310012_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20201030

'V` Division of Water Resources, ��jj t ` "
Facility Number 31 la 0 Division of Soil and, Water °Conservation ° ``" °
-�
0 Other Agency °
Type of Visit: 7Routi'ne
Hance Inspection. Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit. Arrival Time: �a Departure Time: d' Q County:I►'►.�
Farm Name: W VIO-k `i ' S FW H T)Q fLro Owner Email:
Owner Name: A bn k \13 i -A U J Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: LT,fPGr° Title:
Onsite Representative: l Le±:, Rt� w
Certified Operator: " 2j ra� r
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design , Current
Swine, Capacity = Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish yyp 6.0
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Region: w i A O
Certification Number: 19 l0 3l
Certification Number:
Design ` Current• °
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current°
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop, -
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Longitude:
besin Curi ent
° Cattle•.. '•'Capacity. Pop., ,
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes M4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
L.-rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
�-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
M
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: 0-2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): °I "5-
Observed Freeboard (in): �� a o 20
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
EP No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ®, &H p 5 ��� C-
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes M/No
[—]Yes EJ No
❑ Yes [�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E3�Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesFD,,N/o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes To
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes M40
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Insp ctions ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
s dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: to -a'-7
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes rNNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA f6r sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No Cg4NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes E?(No
❑ Yes [gNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes j(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawinus of facilitv to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
(e/elSl°d� �11 Olt C�rre c� �/l;n;Y,nvrvl
vAI")e b1 PON she.e+ o t�_?.Or+ F'(3 Oeyjels /--19, S"
I — S-e 6o h �q bow. "cc�nS �c T �o r►v�. ,
r
nee,&S --fa to Jr"14d.-A57AP.' 5- o� 3, Lagan,x-
.,
u. S�' '�e-fe-I,, ✓yte � �o C.t�.P� t an.�' I eve 1 S w � b� � � �. 4 e�.�,
Ada Gy-aq j ojs
Reviewer/Inspector Name: a 11 /1 FZAW&l Phone: (51o1 (7" q S?7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Ade4f?:��Date: 1 (7)
Page 3 of 3 21412015