310455_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20201027

(O'Division of Water Resources
Tacility Number, y 55 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation'' 0
Other Agency
.g Y °
Type of Visit: W
CHance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: lac �M Departure Time: County: j;v, Region: Wlk
Farm Name: aArIN A PkyIJA �{>;t ZLLL Owner Email:
Owner Name: VJ 114t) &1J.Dj "AULU, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:!(a�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish 1440
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Others
Other
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number: 100S61S4
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry `
Capacity Pop.,
Layer
Non -Layer
Design • Current °
Dry Pnultry
Canaeity Pon..
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
y ° Design Current,,.
Cattle, `. _ ° ° ; -Capacity ; Pop,.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes'
[BL"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
E2"'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑y -40
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Ea/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
l
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: p—a�- atlas
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 4No
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [?(No
Structure 1
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): lq
Observed Freeboard (in): o��F
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4' Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [24o
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? dYes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E2"Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [2To
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
No
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): a-1+
13. Soil Type(s): C
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 2"Ves ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? [Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
E2"N"'o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
�es
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21rWaste
es record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. dyes ❑ No
Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard [jKWaste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking �op Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? s�No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? :Ye
es ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
[>Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: '3 - Ys'5- Date of Inspection: j O-a -Z6a d
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
EZ"Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [lNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [qNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ hTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA DIE
❑ Yes []NO
❑ Yes [2rNo
❑ Yes F—;r&o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
;'oLLo\-4 r tcoN ' S ECT1 e N oloao, VTR -I EVF-_D ants jNG_ moi.os FRom
— L0.s+ Cjx11b r.��avk de,%e 20%
LAST S[UDGL Sv2utj Jerre 4 ®sgph Lanya�;
17�s;c' o- Cn, ► tie o s-��o� `^'?'Cb. cbrr-e 4
�ro�e S?ot� aR Ia5o`nri ,,jems J�/P�S/�����Sln Caves
S weeA5, Ir.gpec2�Cc W;11 C�ejlles� a�. ca�rav ;S� �a
c-,S Se S4�e_ ield i
7 W A F6� �frr^u�°� , LAST W�iot n�ao�9
Zvi'►sS � v� CAP 16AA, �e CO VAS
S s iri� �01`� �v,n►.�;�� , tet�C' We fe c�'wz�m 4co bw Ceco4a Vic-- W- w , f k avit-
��'aci I S o � asSv b °•��W �� ► e-eJLF -to ve tip t*e7d i-F
q,Ite-4�(
Ar•1 I � N wit _ F6LLo--1 AmR CaQsot i ". -
Reviewer/Inspector Name: o 14 r1 ;Flutd Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Q--��- -)9a-d
Page 3 of 3 21412015