NC0020737_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (2)

Water Resources
Environmental Quality
April 26, 2017
Ms. Richelle Meek
WWTP Superintendent/Pretreatment Coordinator
City of Kings Mountain .
Post Office Box 429
Kings Mountain, North Carolina 28086
Dear Ms. Meek:
L L�-=zROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: PAR Review
City of Kings Mountain/Pilot Creek WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO020737
Cleveland County
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
reporting period of January -through December 2016. Based on the review, the POTW completed the
PAR in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H..0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive
Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2018
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at (704)
235-2192 and/or Deborah Gore at [phone] or at [e-mail] and
[e-mail].
cc: Deborah Gore, PERCS Unit
MSC-1617 Central -Basement
ac
Sincerely,
�v- W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality) Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 310 1. Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

'SPAT MCCRORY
b L +'ram 3 Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
Water Resources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Director
May 12, 2016
Ms. Kim Moss
WWTP ORC/Pretreatment Coordinator
City of Kings Mountain
Post Office Box 429
Kings Mountain, North Carolina 28086
Subject: PAR Review
City of Kings Mountain/Piloi Creek WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO020737
Cleveland County
Dear Ms. Moss:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for.the
reporting period of January through December 2015. Based on the review; the POTW completed the
PAR in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelinesset forth in Comprehensive
Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Prog ans. The next PAR will be due March.1, 2017.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Wes Bell at
[phone] and/or Sarah Bass at (919) 807-631.0 or at wes.bell@a cdenr.gov and sarah.bassnncdenr.gov.
Sincerely;
�q- W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor .
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: Sarah Bass, PERCS Unit
MSC=1617 Central -Basement
WB
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality. J-Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations.
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite- -301 1 Mooresville,.North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

f'
A 7-�A
May 24, 2012
Mr. Dennis Wells, Water Resources Director
City of Kings Mountain
Post Office Box 429
Kings Mountain, NC 28086
Subject: PAR Review
Kings Mountain
NPDES Permit No. NCO020737
Cleveland County
Dear Mr. Wells:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
reporting period of January through December 2011. Based on the review, the POTW completed the PAR in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive Guidance for
North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2013.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact Wes Bell or Donna
Hood at [phone] or by email at wes.bell��ncdenr.l?ov. or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Lesley
Mooresville Regional Office Contact
Cc: Sarah Morrison, PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 .East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC; 28115
Phone: [phone]Fax: [phone]
Internet: httpllpor al.ncdenr.o�lweblwQ
One.
NorthCarolina
N11h"1411
An Equal Opportunity, AfGrrnat i r'e Action Employer -- 50". Recycled/10% Post Consumer paper

Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
April 16, 2010
Mr. Dennis Wells
City of Kings Mountain
Post Office Box 429
Kings Mountain, North Carolina 28086
Subject: PAR Review
City of Kings Mountain
NPDES Permit No. NCO020737
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Wells:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
- Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
reporting period of January through December 2009. The POTW submitted the Public Notice on April 15,
2010. PAR has been completed in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set
forth in Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Pro;;rams. The next PAR will be due March
1, 2011.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
or by email at j ohn.lesleynncdenr. gov.
Sincerely,
tohn Lesley
. Mooresville Regional Office Contact
Cc: Sarah Morrison, PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] \ Fax: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: hftp:llportal.ncdenr.orglweb/wq
NoithCarolina
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Conswner paper

NiC®EN R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
Dee Freeman
Secretary
March 9, 2009
Mr. Brian Ramsey
Pretreatment Program Coordinator
City of Kings Mountain
Post Office Box 429
Kings Mountain, North Carolina 28086
Subj ect: Pretreatment Compliance
Inspection
City of Kings Mountain
NPDES Permit No. NCO020737
Cleveland County, NC
Dear. Mr. Ramsey:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection of the City of
Kings Mountain approved Industrial Pretreatment Program on March 6, 2009 by Mr. John Lesley of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
�v
? obert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Sarah Morrison, PERCS Unit
jl
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28'115
Phone: [phone] \ Fax: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
ne
NoithCarolina
Natutvl&
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10°/ Post Consumer paper

A
AMA NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NC®ENR PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)]
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Kings Mountain
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Brian Ramsey
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Program Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 5/28/08 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
o��F WA
rF9QG
� r
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number Mlvl/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
N NCO020737 03/06/09 P S 1
(1)TTA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
7
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
5
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations -During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
L
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Pu
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
® YES ElNO
9/08 Cadmium, 10/08 Cadmium
11/08/Cadmium (See comments)
® YES ❑ NO
(See comments)
Limits: None
Reporting: None
dished: None
NA
❑ YES ® NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations:
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in
their files. complete with suoportin documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
11/15/06
®
Yes
❑ No
2/22/08
®
Yes
❑ No
9/1/10
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
12/10/04
®
Yes
❑ No
12/20/04
®
Yes
❑ No
12/1/09
Sewer Use Ordinance SUO
6/20/07
®
Yes
❑ No
11/6/07
®
Yes
❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
8/24/94
®
Yes
❑ No
8/25/94
®
Yes
❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
7/29/05
®
Yes
❑ No
9/20/05
®
Yes
❑ No
1NDUSTRfAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name
1. Evonic Energy Services
2. Buckeye
3. Eaton
30. IUP Number
032
015
008
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
®
Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
3/1/12
11/17/11
11/17/11
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
415
433
433
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
®Yes ElNo
to Permit Issue Date?
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
®
Yes ❑
No
®Yes ❑
No
®Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
a. ®Yes ❑No
�[b.
a. NYes ONO
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
b. ❑Yes ❑No
❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Yes❑No❑N/A
P
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
a. NYes ❑No
a. NYes ❑No
11
a. NYes ❑No
b. All Issues Resolved?
bzyes❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
I ® Yes ❑ No 11
®
Yes
❑
No
®Yes ❑ No
41a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
es❑No❑N/A
T
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Sampling as Required b IUP, includingflow?
4lb. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
®Yes❑No❑N/A
IF
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
on time?
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
file includeprocess/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
production rates and/or flows as Required b IUP?
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
®Yes❑No❑NA
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑No®N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
azYes❑No❑N/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c.®Yes❑No❑N/A
c.®Yes❑No❑N/A
violations from the POTW sample event?
45. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑
Yes
®
No
❑
Yes ® No
ro
Yes ®
No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
11
®Yes❑No❑N/A
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
47. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A 11
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
RoYesoNoZNIA
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
11
Requested Information For You?
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
34. Applications were received as follows: Evonic 9/28/06; Buckeye 12/29/06; Eaton 4/3/06
35. Inspections were completed as follows: Evonic 12/9/08; Buckeye 12/19/08; Eaton 12/11/08
37. Initial TTO Analyses were conducted by Evonic. No total toxic organics were found, a TOMP was developed and the SIU certifies
there are no toxic organic compounds used. Buckeye certifies there are no total toxic organics used on site. Eaton also certifies there
are no toxic organics used.
40. The POTW uses PAR Labs, all chain of custody forms were on file. Buckeye and Eaton use PAR Labs, Evonic uses K&W Labs.
All SIU chain of custody forms are on file.
41a. Eaton has recently went to a non -discharge recycle system but has elected to keep the IU.P active.
43a. Evonic had one cadimum violation, Buckeye had two total phosphorus violations, and Eaton has one zinc violation.
43b. Buckeye had one minor reporting violation. Eaton had one minor reporting violation. Both SIUs were sent NOVs for the
noncompliance.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments:
Spectrum Dyed Yarns has ceased discharge and was dropped on 12/5/08.
Entertainment Distributors will cease operations in 4/08.
Eaton Corportation has went to a non -discharge recyle system.
WWTP Violations: Cadmium limit violation in 9/08, case No. LV-2009-0023. Cadmium limit violation in 10/08 case No. LV-2009-0040.
Cadmium limit violation 11/08, case under review. The violations have been addressed by increased monitoring. Evonic reported one cadmium
limit violation during second six-month period. The LTMP data shows a negative removal rate for cadmium.
Requirements:
See the Program Elements Review Section
Recommendations:
It is recommended that Barbara Sifford of this office be contacted for technical assistance (non -regulatory) regarding the cadmium
noncompliance.
NOD: ❑ YES ® NO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory_ ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY:`--�,V­- (
John 1� esley, Mooresville Regiona
TE: March 9, 2008
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3

F wATF Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
l&�--
rColeen Sullins. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 29, 2008
Mr. Brian Ramsey
Pretreatment Program Coordinator
City of Kings Mountain
1013 N. Piedmont Avenue
Kings Mountain, North Carolina 28086
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance
Inspection Report
Kings Mountain
NPDES Permit No. NCO020737
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Ramsey:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection
of the Kings Mountain approved Industrial Pretreatment Program. John Lesley of this office
conducted the inspection on May 28, 2008.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley at [phone].
Sincerely,
-j obert B. Krebs
�� ' Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Sarah Morrison, PERCS Unit
Cleveland County Health Department
JL
No `thCarolina
aturally
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 E. Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

..�,_01 NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NCDENR PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)]
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Kings Mountain
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Brian Ramsey
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Program Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 12/12/2006 Inspection Type: ❑ PCI ® Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
N NCO020737 05/28/08 P S 1
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
7
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
4
CIUS
9. Number of SIUS Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC foi
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC foi
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Pu
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
❑ YES ® NO
❑ YES ® NO
Limits: None
Reporting: None
)1ished: None
❑ YES ® NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
23. . Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations: NA
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

rPRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW —Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in
heir files, complete with supporting documents and co of PERCS A roval Letter, and dates consistent with Pro ram Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
11/15/06
® Yes ❑ No
2/22/08
® Yes ❑ No
9/1/10
Industrial Waste Survey IWS)
12/10/04
® Yes ❑ No
12/30/04
® Yes ❑ No
12/1/09
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
6/20/07
® Yes ❑ No
11/6/07
® Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
8/24/94
® Yes ❑ No
8/25/94
® Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
7/29/05
® Yes ❑ No
9/20/05
® Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name
1. Entertain Distribution Co.
2. Mayflower
3. Kings Mtn. International
30. IUP Number
007
0026
0031
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
11 ® Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
11/27/11
11/17/11
7/1/10
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
433
433
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ElNo
® Yes ❑ No
to Permit Issue Date?
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
® Yes
❑
No
® Yes ❑ —N-711
® Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
a. ®Yes [:]No
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. NYes ❑No
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. []Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
a. NYes ❑No
a. NYes ❑No
a. NYes ❑No
b. All Issues Resolved?
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
® Yes ElNo
® Yes El No -11
®Yes El No
its Sam lin as Required b IUP, including flow?
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
® Yes
❑ No
®
Yes ❑ No
11 ® Yes ❑
No
41. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
on time?
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No0N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
file include process/dilution flows as Required b IUP?
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑NoNNA
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoON/A
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
violations from the POTW sample event?
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.®Yes❑No❑N/A
45. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑
Yes ®
No 11
❑
Yes ®
No 11
❑
Yes
®
No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
47. Does the File Contain Penal Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
.Yes❑No®N/A
Fb[3.[1Yes0No0N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
KOYes❑No®N/A
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
❑ Yes Z
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Requested Information For You?
I
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
#34: IUP Applicaton Dates: EDC 3/31/06 Mayflower 3/30/06 KMI 7/20/04
#35: Inspections EDC 11/26/07 Mayflower 11/20/07 KMI 11/21/07
#36 and #37 The SPCC Plans and TOMP for EDC and Mayflower are over 5 years old. KMI is current on both.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments:
A Toxicity Identification Evaluation conducted by Environmental Testing, Inc. determined that zinc was the constituent causing toxicity test
failures in 2005 and 2006. The pretreatment program began looking for sources of zinc and has succeeded in reducing zinc in the system. No
NPDES permit limit violations were reported in 2007.
Requirements:
The Slug and Spill Control Plans and TOMPs for applicable 'SIUs should be evaluated and updated if necessary to provide current information.
The Industrial Waste Survey is due no later than 12/1/2009.
The Headworks Analysis is due no later than 9/1/2010.
Recommendations:
None
NOD: ❑ YES ® NO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: [:]YES ® NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory_ ❑
PCI COMPLETED
C
ley, Mooresville Re io al Office
ATE: May 29, 2008
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3

OF W ATF. Michael F, Easley. Goverr,
bLL6
DWilliam G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Cl)r Alan W, Klimek, P. E. Director
Division ofWater
O 'C
March 3, 2005
Mr. Dennis Wells
City of Kings Mountain
Post Office 429
Kings Mountain, North Carolina 28086
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance
Inspection
City of Kings Mountain
NPDES Permit No. NCO020737
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Wells:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection
of the City of Kings Mountain's approved Industrial Pretreatment Program on March 3, 2005 by
John Lesley of this Office. The City's Industrial Pretreatment Program is well organized and
managed.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
�-- D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
< <� Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Jon Risgaard, Pretreatment Unit
Cleveland County Health Department
JL
No rthCarolina
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Re.-ional Office, 610 E. Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone]
.NCDENR
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

®�IWFAJL NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
f�\CDENR PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
..-Ncrhe...,,imv.Ru nryc•.crn
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Kings Mountain
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Brian Ramsey Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Program Coordinator E-mail: [e-mail]
4. Last Inspection Date: 09 /30 /2003 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD= Inspec.Type Inspector
LN INIC10InI2I0171317I 103101I051 I P I LSJ
(DTTA) (TYPT) (TNRPI
Fac. Type
LEI
(FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
5
SILTS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
4
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any POTW Permit Limits Violations? ® Yes ❑ No
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed? 5/04 - pH 9/05 TSS, Cd
(See Comments Section) 4/04 - pH
8/04 - Cd
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial ® Yes ❑ No
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased Pass -Through - Cd
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC during either of the Last 2 Semi- SNC for Limits: None
Annual Periods? Have any Industries in SNC (During Either of the Last SNC for Reporting: None
2 Semi -Annual Periods) Not Been Published for Public Notice? Not Published: None
(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SILTS on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division? None
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which ❑ Yes ® No
Ones?
Filename: Kings Mtn pci 0405 Page 1
Revised: 6/30/98

VPRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW - Please review POTW files and complete the following:
EProgram Element
Date of Last Approval
Date Next Due, If Applicable
lHeadworks Analysis (HWA)
11/14/01
6/1/05 Revision
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
12/30/04
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
9/27/01
12/31/06
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
8/25/94
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
9/14/01
6/1/05 Revision
LTMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is the LTMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® Yes ❑ No
23. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to the LTMP? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
24. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP Monitoring? ® Yes ❑ No
25. Is the LTMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No Is the Table Adequate? ® Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (TTTP) FILF RFVTF.W(I IT TP FTT.F. RF.VTF.W4 C R 1 FTT F RFVTFW ANM i TT T TNTcnF("rrnu.T)
26. User Name
1. Eaton Corporation
2. Spectrum
3. Buckeye Anodizing
27. IUP Number
008
001
015
28. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ N_o__11
®
Yes
❑
No
29. Permit Expiration Date
11/17/06
11/17/06
11/17/06
30. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
410
433
31. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
22. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
® Yes ❑ No
Z Yes ❑ No
® Yes
❑
No
33. a. Does the File Contain a Slug Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
34. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certifiers, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
35. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. NYes ❑No
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a. ®Yes ❑No
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a. ®Yes [:]No
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
36. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP?
®Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
TO
37. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
® Yes ❑
No 11
®Yes ❑ No
® Yes
❑
No
38. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SILT Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
39. Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
NYes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
40. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
® Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
® Yes ElNo
El NA IFEI
® Yes ❑ No
NA
41. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resam le Within 30 Days?
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b. NYes ❑No
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b. NYes ❑No
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b. NYes ❑No
42. Was the SIU Promptly Notified of Any Violations (Per ERP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
43. During the Most Recent Senu-Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑
Yes ® No
❑
Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
44. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTWs ERP?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
45. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
46. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
47. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
48. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑Yes ® No
Filename: Kings Mtn pci 0405 Page 2
Revised: 6/30/98

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
"14
The POTW ceased discharge to the Gastonia collection system on January 1, 2005. All flow is now being conveyed to the Kings
Mountain Pilot Creek WWTP, including the industrial discharge from Buckeye Anodizing. Be advised that the following program
elements must be updated to reflect the additional flow to the Kings Mountain Pilot Creek WWTP:
I. A revised HWA and Allocation Table to reflect new flow values for POTW flow (uncontrollable plus the SIU flow) and
uncontrollable flow must be done. Also new pollutant data may need to be incorporated into the HWA.
2. The LTMP must be modified to add Buckeye Anodizing to the list of SIUs.
3. The Buckeye Anodizing IUP must also be modified to reflect the change in wastewater treatment plant - Kings Mountain Pilot
Creek WWTP.
PCI SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
PCI Comments: The Industrial Pretreatment Program is well organized and managed.
Requirements: See File Review Comments above. Please submit these changes by no later than June 1 2005 Please contact Jon
Risgaard with the PERCS Unit at 919-733-5083 ext 580 regarding the submission.
Recommendations:
NOD: ❑ Yes ® No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: ❑ Yes ® No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY: , ``' DATE: March 3, 2005
Joh�L)sley, Mooresville Re ' L Office
Filename: Kings Mtn pei 0405 Page 3
Revised: 6/30/98

Michael F. Easlev. Governor
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
6-North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j( f Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins. Depute Director
Division of Water Quality
March 26, 2004
Mr. Brian Ramsey
Industrial Pretreatment Program Coordinator
City of Kings Mountain
1013 N. Piedmont Avenue
Kings Mountain, North Carolina 28086
Subject: PAR Review
City of Kings Mountain
NPDES Permit No. NCO020737
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Ramsey:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
for the reporting period of January through December 2003. Based on the review, it appears that
the POTW completed the PAR in accordance with guidelines set forth in Chapter 9 of the
Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact John
Lesley of this Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
/ Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Cc: Pretreatment Unit - Central Office
Central Files
JL
�TorthCarolina r��t1�
�atl[ra!!r� NCDENR
N. C. Division of water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6749