20081764 Ver 5_CAMA Application_20201012

DESIGN
ENGINEERING
ATMiCONSULTING
June 22, 2020
Heather Coats
Beach & Inlet Management Project Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Re: North Topsail Beach Dune Truck Haul Permit Modification
Dear Ms. Coats:
Please allow this letter and submittal to serve as a formal request for a permit modification to CAMA
Permit #79-10 to continue with the restoration of the primary dune system along North Topsail Beach
(NTB). This proposed dune project will attempt to restore the dune system to pre -Florence conditions.
The Town recently completed a dune restoration for the southern —5 miles of shoreline and would like to
continue this effort by continuing this project-5 miles to the north. Briefly, the proposed dune restoration
would extend from Public Beach Access BA13B (Station 900+00) to just south of the Topsail Reef Villas
(Station 1135+00).
Truck hauled sand is being brought in from an upland borrow source. This project is partially funded by
FEMA and will require competitive bidding and two sand mines (ST Wooten Sand and 421 Sand) have
been included as a sand source in this permit modification request. Both of these mines have been
successfully used for recent Surf City and NTB dune restoration projects.
Additional information, including project drawings and additional project descriptions, are attached.
Please let me know of any comments or questions. Note that the enclosed design drawings and project
description have been updated since our April 30, 2020 submittal.
Sincerely,
Francis J. Way, PE
Enclosed: Permit Modification Package (2 copies)
---��' APPLIED TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, INC.
P.O. BOX 20336 • CHARLESTON, SC 29413-0336 • 843.414.1040

I= MP-1
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable)
Town Of North Topsail Beach, North Carolina
NTB Northern Shoreline Dune Truck Haul
Applicant 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Dave
Gilbride (Town Manager)
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
N/A
N/A
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
2008 Loggerhead Court
N/A
North Topsail Beach
NC
ZIP
Country
Phone No.
FAX No.
28460
Onslow
910 - 328 - 1349 ext. 6
910 - 328 - 4508
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
N/A
-
Email
Dave Gilbride <[e-mail]>
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Applied Technology & Management (Atm)
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Fran
J
Way
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
N/A
N/A
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
941 Houston Northcutt Blvd.
N/A
Mount Pleasant
SC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
29464
843 - 414 - 1040
ext.
843 - 414 - 1050 ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
843 414 0155
NC Engineering Firm License: C-1718
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
N/A
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastaimanagement.net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Onlsow
NTB oceanfront from Public
Beach Access BA13B to south
N/A
side of Topsail Reef Villas
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
N/A
North Topsail Beach
NC
28460 -
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
910 - 328 - 1349 ext. N/A
N/A, I I ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
White Oak River Basin
Atlantic Ocean
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Atlantic Ocean
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
®Yes []No
work falls within.
Town of North Topsail Beach
4.
Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
22,900
1,040,879 sq ft (23.9 acres)
c.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
N/A, I ,
NWL (normal water level)
(if many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
—5 ft to —14 ft ❑NHW or ®NWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
Dune vegetation (sea oats, bitter panicum, etc.) occurs just landward of the proposed project area.
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
SeaView Fishing Pier - recreation. Numerous public and private beach access walkways - recreation
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site.
Beach public recreation seaward of the proposed project. Dunes and dune walkovers landward of the proposed project.
More landward of the dune system, primarily residential and beach access lots.
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
C-1; Conservation District along the Ocean -front
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
R-1; Residential to the landward side of the dune system
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
j.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
k.
Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, by whom?
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastaimanagement.net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ❑Yes ®No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ❑Yes ®No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ❑Yes [:]No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/A
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
N/A
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use?
❑Commercial ®Public/Government
❑ Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
See attached project summary
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
See attached.
d. List all development activities you propose.
See attached.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both?
New Work
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project?
24.1 acres ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
See attached. Sand will be dry when excavated (from a stockpile) and placed (on the beach) therefore no discharges will
occur at North Topsail Beach. The proposed upland sand mines are already permitted
for sand excavation and transport
offsite for various construction projects.
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water?
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastaimanagement.net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (0 are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to property prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
I. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name See Attachment C. Return receipts will be provided at a later date. Phone No.
Address
Name See Attachment C Phone No.
Address
Name - Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
See Attachment A (project narrative). DCM 79-10 (Feb. 2020); SAW 2005-00344 (multiple issue
dates); SAW-2017-02492 (2018)
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
I. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date _6/22/20 Prin ame Fran Way
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed projec .
®DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
®DCM MP-3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Information
252-808-2808 1-888.4RC0AST .. www.nccoastaImanagement.net

Form DCM MP-2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
Access
Other
Channel
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
(NLW or
Breakwater
shoreline
NWL)
stabilization
Length
-
-
-
-
-
-
22,900
Width
-
-
-
-
-
-
45 ft average
Avg. Existing
-
-
-
-
NA
NA
7 ft NAVD88
Depth
Final Project
10.7 ft
Depth
-
-
-
-
NA
NA
NAVD88
(sand)
1.
EXCAVATION
❑This section not applicable
a.
Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
b.
Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
Sand
Material will come from existing permitted upland sand mines (See
attached project summary)
C.
(i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
d.
High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
Material will come from existing permitted upland sand
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
mines (See attached project summary)
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Sand source
2.
DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
❑This section not applicable
a.
Location of disposal area.
b.
Dimensions of disposal area.
Beach (see project narrative)
2 Upland Sand Mines (see project narrative)
C.
(i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
d.
(i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
®Yes [-]No ❑NA
❑Yes [:]No ®NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
(ii) If yes, where?
e.
(i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
f.
(i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net revised: 12/26/06

Form DCM MP-2 (Excavation and Fill, Page 2 of 3)
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ®This section not applicable
(if development is a wood groin, use MP-4 — Structures)
a. 1 ype of shoreline stabilization:
❑Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑BreakwaterlSill ❑Other:
C. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
e. Type of stabilization material:
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater/Sill Other
i. Source of fill material.
b. Length:
Width:
d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
4. OTHER FILL ACTMTIES ❑ This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ®Yes ❑No Cl NA b. (i) Will fill material be Dlaced in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW).
If yes,
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water
(iii) Dimensions of fill area 23.9 acres
(iv) Purpose of fill
See project narrative. To restore dune system.
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑S13
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Sand will be dry during excavation and plaecment. See project Dumptrucks, bull dozers, all -wheel drive dumptrucks, back hoes,
narrative. Sand will be placed high on the beach to minimize and other earhmoving heavy equipment. See project narrative.
erosion.
c. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
6/22/20
Date
North Topsail Beach Northem Shoreline Dune Truck Haul
Project Name
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ❑Yes ®No []NA
(ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
Fran Way
AmUmnt Name
Applicant Signature
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanagement.net revised: 12126i06

Form DCM MP-3
UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
GENERAL UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, units or structures b. Number of lots or parcels.
proposed. N/A
❑0
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the units per
acre).
0
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one acre of land, the
Division of Land Resources must receive an erosion and
sedimentation control plan at least 30 days before land -disturbing
activity begins.
(i) If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion control plan been
submitted to the Division of Land Resources?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, list the date submitted:
g. Give the percentage of the tract within the coastal shoreline AEC to
be covered by impervious and/or built -upon surfaces, such as
pavement, building, rooftops, or to be used for vehicular driveways
or parking.
0
Give the percentage of the entire tract to be covered by impervious
and/or built -upon surfaces, such as pavement, building, rooftops,
or to be used for vehicular driveways or parking.
0
Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
N/A
I. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to waters of the
state (e.g., surface runoff, sanitary wastewater, industrial/
commercial effluent, "wash down" and residential discharges).
No discharges to occur at the project site.
d. Size of area to be graded, filled, or disturbed including roads,
ditches, etc.
24.1 acres (23.9 for dune restoration; 0.2 acres for beach
accesses)
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone, asphalt, or concrete)
to be used for impervious surfaces.
None. Some temporary timber slats may be placed to
minize upland trucks getting stuck in sand.
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development Permit may also
require a Stormwater Certification.
(i) Has a site development plan been submitted to the Division of
Water Quality for review?
❑Yes [:]No ®NA
(ii) If yes, list the date submitted:
k. Have the facilities described in Item (i) received state or local
approval?
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
If yes, attach appropriate documentation.
m. Does the proposed project include an innovative stormwater
design?
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
If yes, attach appropriate documentation.
252-808-28082 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net revised: 12/26/06

Form DCM MP-3 (Upland Development, Page 2 of 2)
m. Describe proposed drinking water supply source (e.g., well,
community, public system, etc.)
NIA
o. When was the lot(s) platted and recorded?
NIA
Date
6/22/2020
Project Name
North Topsail Beach Northem Shoreline Dune Truck Haul
Applicant Name
Fran Way
Akpilcyt Signature
n. (i) Will water be impounded? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, how many acres?
p. If proposed development is a subdivision, will additional utilities be
installed for this upland development?
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net revised: 12126/06

OCEAN HAZARD AEC NOTICE
Project is in an: x Ocean Erodible Area High Hazard Flood Area Inlet Hazard Area
Property Owner: Town of North Topsail Beach
Property Address: Town beach from Public Beach Access BA13B to south side of Topsail Reef Villas
Date Lot Was Platted: N/A
This notice is
intended Yo make
you, the
applicant, aware of the
special risks and
conditions associated with development in this
area, which is
subject to natural
hazards
such as storms, erosion
and currents.
The rules of the
Coastal
Resources Commission
require that
you receive an
AEC
Hazard Notice and
acknowledge
that notice in
writing
before a permit for
development can be issued.
The Commission's rules on building standards, oceanfront
setbacks and dune alterations are designed to minimize, but not
eliminate, property loss from hazards. By granting permits, the
Coastal Resources Commission does not guarantee the safety of
the development and assumes no liability for future damage to
the development. Permits issued in the Ocean Hazard Area of
Environmental Concern include the condition that structures be
relocated or dismantled if they become imminently threatened
by changes in shoreline configuration. The structure(s) must be
relocated or dismantled within two (2) years of becoming
imminently threatened, and in any case upon its collapse or
subsidence.
The best available information, as accepted by the Coastal
Resources Commission, indicates that the annual long-term
average ocean erosion rate for the area where your property is
located is 2-3 feet per year.
The rate was established by
careful
analysis of aerial
photographs
of the coastline taken
over the
past 50 years.
Studies
also
indicate that
the shoreline
could move as much as
iea3ao
feet
landward in
a major storm.
The flood waters in a major storm
are predicted
to be
about
�4-18 feet deep in this area.
Preferred oceanfront protection measures are beach nourishment
and relocation of threatened struch�res. Hard erosion control
structures such as bulkheads, seawalls, revetments, groins, jetties
and breakwaters are prohibited. Temporary sand bags may be
authorized under certain conditions.
The applicant must acknowledge this information and
requirements by signing this notice in the space below. Without
the proper signature, the application will not be complete.
I
Property Owner Aignature Date
TAT -r. %t, ."
SPECIAL NOTE: This hazard notice is required for
development in areas subject to sudden and massive storms and
erosion. Permits issued for development in this area expire on
December 31 of the third year following the year in which the
permit was issued. Shortly before work begins on the project
site, the Local Permit Officer must be contacted to determine the
vegetation line and setback distance at your site. If the property
has seen little change since the time of permit issuance, and the
proposed development can still meet the setback requirement,
the LPO will inform you that you may begin work. Substantial
progress on the project must be made within 60 days of this
setback determination, or the setback must be re -measured. Also,
the occurrence of a major shoreline change as the result of a
storm within the 60-day period will necessitate re -measurement
of the setback. It is important that you check with the CPO
before the permit expires for official approval to continue the
work after the permit has expired. Generally, if foundation
ngs have been placed and substantial progress is continuing,
permit renewal can be authorized. It is unlawful to continue
work after permit expiration.
For more information, contract:
Heather Coats, NCDCM
Local Permit Officer
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington. NC 28409
Address
for North Topsail Beach
Locality
910-796-7302
Phone Number
Revised May 2010

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FOR LAMA PERMIT APPLICATION
Name of Property Owner Requesting Permit: ',ow" or- Alvn>q %PSAaL 6eAty
Mailing Address: ��o Loeaaczars (`�ur�a
/ir'c E'j6 o
Phone Number: `f (v .a 3 2 13 q i
I certify that I have authorized rrrAtj WAV or Appleep %ece-rr.�olr4x � /1
I Aoent / Contractor �—
to act on my behalf, for the purpose of applying for and obtaining all CAMA permits
necessary for the following proposed development: (�Fln,v�, sn�aa:� a'nuc,� +-ra�A.a �.
_'1®a lZeS iOt�'£' RA9b p�7�%r1 d�Ay ee 'D4NPS F-itr�fU a3 Ou ifi ®re Any FaQynsT' F72orr'+ d'c'�3Lt�.
Seracwi Acce55 (3A138 To 5eorrrt stud oF= ?nsiay<,c2ee#=s i,W146.
at my property located at AJT6 0Ceg)&)jVr.0"s
in ®av�lot.c�
County.
1 furthermore certify that 1 am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to
Division of Coastal Management staff, the Local Permit Officer and their agents to enter
on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application.
Property Owner Information:
ignature
Print or Type Name
..� N 7es2 t rra '%v t.v,v
Title
Date
This certification is valid through / /.

ATTACHMENT A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION

North Topsail Beach Permit Modification Project Narrative
June 22, 2020
Overview
The Town of North Topsail Beach (NTB) has an active beach management and maintenance
plan for its -11 miles of oceanfront shoreline and was generally successful in establishing a
healthy dune system. However, Hurricane Florence in 2018 severely impacted the entire
shoreline and decimated the dune system. As a result, NTB has a short-term goal of providing
dune rehabilitation to the entire NTB shoreline. The Town has recently completed a dune
rehabilitation for the southern -5 miles of beach and would like to do continue this dune
rehabilitation by rehabilitating the dune system for the northern -5 miles of beach during the
2020/2021 winter environmental window. The final -1 mile of beach closest to New River Inlet
(NRI) is currently not included in this permit modification request due to the planned USACE
AIWW dredging project as well as the existing sandbag structures. Figure 1 presents an
overview of NTB shoreline truck haul dune restoration projects from 2019/2020 as well as the
proposed 2020/2012 truck haul.
The State and FEMA have contributed funds to NTB for beach/dune recovery efforts from
Hurricane Florence.
Figure 1: Overview of recently completed and currently proposed dune restoration truck haul projects.
North Topsail Beach has 5 reaches of shoreline, beginning at Phase/Reach 1 along the New
River Inlet at the north, down to Phase/Reach 5 with terminates at the Surf City border.

Project Purpose
The goal of the project is to restore the dune system to pre -Florence health. A healthy dune
system is a critical buffer for hurricane protection. The NTB dune system lost an average of
approximately 11 cy/ft as a result of Hurricane Florence. The proposed dune rehabilitation
project proposes to place approximately 3-10 cy/ft of beach compatible material.
Project Description
The currently proposed project mimics the recently completed NTB project. Table 1 presents an
overview of the proposed dune project.
Table 1: Proposed Dune Restoration Information
Dune Characteristics for Restoration Project
Crest Width (ft)
10-45
Crest Height (ft NAVD88)
12-14
Base Width (ft) (varies)
29-65
Seaward Dune Slope
1V:3H
Unit Volume (cy/ft) (varies)
2.7 to 9.9
Overall Length (ft)
22,900
Overall Footprint (acres)
23.9
Project Volume (cy)
144,221
Average erosion prior to construction (cy/ft)
1.6
Requested volume (accounting for future
erosion)
188,000
The restoration of the primary dune system includes placement of sand with a dune crest at
elevation 12.0' to 14.0' NAVD88 and a variable dune crest width (see attached permit
modification drawings and Figures 2-5). The seaward dune slope is designed to be a 3H:1V
slope to reduce the overall dune footprint and avoid impacts closer to the mean high water
(MHW) line.
All fill will be located as landward as possible and immediately adjacent to the existing frontal
dune to avoid creating any troughs or gaps between the fill area and the existing frontal dune.
The design varies in width based on losses during Florence. Note that no fill is proposed for
Station 930+00 as the dune in this reach shows no losses when compared with pre -Florence
data. This area is owned and operated by Onslow County and this -600-ft section of shoreline
was previously repaired (according to survey data).

Other notes on design:
• The proposed project will remain landward of the MHHW line.
• An additional average erosion loss of 1.6 cy/ft is requested in order to account for
ongoing background erosion prior to project construction (and since the September 2019
survey). Therefore 188,000 cy is requested.
• No existing dune vegetation will be impacted. The new sand will be placed immediately
seaward of existing eroded dunes and dune vegetation. No gaps or troughs will occur
between the restored dune and the existing dune.
• The project design goal is to restore and enhance the dune system while also
maintaining adequate beach for walking/recreation.
Proiect Timin
The project is planned to occur during the next winter environmental window (i.e., outside of
turtle nesting season). The project is anticipated to take -3.5 months and will be conducted
within the environmental window (November 16 to April 30), which is approximately 5.5 months
in duration.
Proiect Permit Drawinas
Project permit modification drawings are attached to the end of this document.
The attached set of construction plans includes bathymetric and topographic data immediately
following Hurricane Dorian (September 2019). The mean high water (MHW) and mean low
water (MLW) lines are based on elevations gathered during the September 2019 post -Dorian
survey effort. Several profile figures below show the pre -Florence dune (see Figures 2-5). The
pre -Florence dune is represented by 2016 LiDAR data. Note that no annual monitoring was
conducted for several years for this particular project reach. Reaches 1 and 5 have more
transect monitoring data than Reaches 2-4.
_
20
STATION 1110+0
PRE-FLURENCE
:2019-09 SURVEY
�
15
'�30�� +12
10
PROPO ED DUNE
- --
�r
w
5
TEMPLATE
hiHW: 1.1'
K
0
J
-5
w
-10
3 0
4 0 500
0 700
D ISTAN C E I N FEET
Figure 2: Station 1110+00 dune restoration in comparison to pre -Florence dune (represented by 2016
LiDAR).

20
15
10
w
K 0
� t
w
-10
300
STATION 1050+00
FP1 +14
Al
0 500
DiSTANGE IN FEET
PRE-FLQRENCE
-2019-09 SURVEY
PROPOSED DUNE
TEMPLATE
MHW_ 1. I
Figure 3: Station 1050+00 dune restoration in comparison to pre -Florence dune (represented by 2016
LiDAR).
10
If. N U-bUIVUPRE-FLORENC E
0' +14 201M9 SURVEY
PROPOSED DUNE
TEMPLATE
DISTANCE IN FEET
MH1 : 1.1'
Figure 4: Station 980+00 dune restoration in comparison to pre -Florence dune (represented by 2016
LiDAR).
4

20
TATION 9 0+
PRE-FLORE N-CE
201 M9 SURVEY
� �
�+'I2-
��
PROPOSED DUNE
TEMPLATE
J
o
DISTANCE IN FEET
Figure 5: Station 920+00 dune restoration in comparison to pre -Florence dune (represented by 2016
LiDAR).
Table 2 presents volume data by station (this is also included in the permit drawings).
5

Table 2: Project Volumes by reach. Note that an additional 1.6 cy/ft volume is requested to
account for future erosion (prior to project construction).
STATION
AREA
DISTANCE
VOLUME
VOLUME
Nurt4}er
SF
LF
CY
CY/!FT
900+00
105.4
1,000
5,707
5.7
910+00
202.8
1,000
9,272
9.3
9I0+00
297.9
1,000
5,517
5.5
930+00
D.0
1,ODO
4,370
4.4
940+00
236.0
1,OOO
7,015
7.0
950+00
142-8
000
51652
5.7
950+00
152.4
1,R00
4,622
4.6
970+00
87.2
1,000
3,726
3.7
980+00
114.0
1,000
4,644
4.6
990+OD
136.8
1,000
4,533
4.5
1000+00
108.0
1,000
3,218
3.2
1010+00
65.8
1,DO0
2,703
2.7
1024+00
80.2
000
2,795
2.e
1030+00
70.7
1,Om0
2,939
2.8
iD40W0
82.6
1,000
4M5
4.1
1050+00
13811E
1,DDO
4,379
4.4
1060+00
99.5
1,000
6,966
7.0
1070+00
277.7
1,D00
9.86A
9,9
1080+00
254.E
1,D00
8,852
8.9
1090+00
223.2
S,DOO
8,984
9.0
1100+00
261.7
1,DOO
9,738
9.7
1110+K
264.1
1,000
9,485
9.5
1130+00
248-0
1,DO0
9,927
9.9
1130+00
298.0
1,000
5,334
5.3
1140+00
0.0
TOTAL VOLUME
144,221
AVERAGE VOLUME PER FOOT
6.0
AiD01TIONALEROSION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION (CY/FT) 1.6
TOTAL REQUESTED VOLUME (CY) 1 188,000

Truck Beach Access
Several truck beach accesses are identified on the project drawings. These stockpile and
rehandling areas are required to transfer the truck -hauled material to all -wheel -drive dump
trucks that travel on the beach. The transfer will occur on the beach to ensure material quality.
Dozers and other heavy equipment will load the all -wheel -drive dump trucks. Similar heavy
equipment will shape and construct the dunes.
Several beach accesses and rehandling areas are required to reduce truck transport along the
beach and to expedite dune restoration. Coordination with NTB public works will occur to
ensure minimal disturbance at the beach accesses. Truck beach accesses will be restored to
original conditions following project completion. Note that three (3) existing beach accesses are
currently operational and these will be used for the project. An additional two (2) beach
accesses are also included in the plans where some temporary dune removal would be
required. This impact area is conservatively estimated at 0.2 acres.
Florence FEMA Mitigation
This project will be partially funded with Hurricane Florence "Category B" dune mitigation.
Reaches 1 through 4 qualified for—137,000 cy. As such, the project will be competitively
bid. This project is planned to occur during the 2020/2021 winter environmental window.
Project Permit
The DCM permit modification is for 79-10. This permit was most recently used for the
2019/2020 truck haul project for the southern —5 miles of shoreline. This project was modified
in February 2020 to extend the dune restoration up to Station 900+00. However, because of
timing and funding, the dune restoration stopped at Station 855+00.
The proposed dune restoration project is out of USACE jurisdiction as the proposed dune sand
will be placed well landward of the MHW line. It is noted that the USACE will review this DCM
permit modification request.
Note that following Hurricane Matthew (2016), prior to Hurricane Florence (2018), a
Phase/Reach 5 FEMA Hurricane Matthew mitigation project using upland truck haul material
was proposed mostly for the upper and intertidal beach, as the dune was in relatively good
shape. This of course required a USACE permit and SAW-2017-02492 was issued. However,
due to the significant dune losses from Hurricane Florence, the existing dune required and still
requires significant repair and the recently modified FEMA mitigation project (modified February
2020) focused on the dune area (and not the upper/intertidal beach). .
Upland Sand Source
Two upland sand mines have been identified for the proposed project. Both sand mines have
successfully been used for Surf City and NTB dune hauls projects and these mines are:
1. ST Wooten
2. 421 Sand
Information on both sites is provided in the following sections. Both upland mines provide
processed sand to mix for concrete, asphalt, and mortar. Processed sand is sand that is
7

hydraulically dredged at the mine and run through a classifier. This sand is referred to as
"washed and processed" as a result and is very uniform with very few fines and gravel. The
clean and well sorted sand is essential for successful large-scale construction projects. This
product is also ideal beach sand as a result of the washing and processing.
Sand is dried via stockpiling/air drying at the mine prior to loading and trucking offsite. Similar to
the previous permit modification, material will be screened at the borrow area prior to hauling to
the project site. All material dredged for use on the beach will be screened with a 3/4" screen at
the sand mine site.
Both sites have been contacted about the project and both sites have confirmed that they have
enough material for the proposed project and that this is the same material that was used for
previous Surf City and NTB dune projects.
Sand Compatibility
Table 3 presents summary compatibility for the native beach as well as the two sand mines.
This data was sourced from the NTB 2009 EIS (for native beach characteristics) and the NTB
and Surf City permit modification requests/projects (for the project sand). Additional sediment
data from the recently placed sand haul projects is also available and can be provided upon
request (although this data has been previously submitted to DCM during project construction).
Both sand mines are compatible with native beach sand based on DCM sediment criteria
thresholds. Sediment granularmetric data is provided at the end of this document from both
mines.
Table 3: Sediment compatibility summary
Fine %
Sand %
Granular%
Gravel%
Calcium
Mean
(<0.0625
(0.0625 -
(2.0 to 4.76
(4.76-
Carbonate
Site
(mm)
mm)
2.00 mm)
mm)
76.0 mm)
ST Wooten
Mine
0.27
1.8
97.8
0.3
0.1
<1
421 Sand
0.41
0.0
98.9
1.1
0.0
0
NTB Native
0.23
1.5
97
1.07
0.43
26
NTB+CRC
Threshold
N/A
6.5
N/A
6.07
5.43
41
*N/A=not applicable (not a sediment criterion)
Sand Availability
Both ST Wooten and 421 Sand have significant sand available at their active mines. Greater
than 2 million cubic yards (cy) is available at each mine. ATM staff have contacted both mines
to ensure that existing mines have adequate material for the proposed project.
Sand Mine Information
Sand mine information for 421 Sand and ST Wooten is provided below.
N

421 Sand Mine
The 421 Sand mine is located at 5401 Highway 421 in Wilmington, NC just north of the New
Hanover County landfill. Mr. Dennis Earp is the plant manager and can be reached at:
Email: Den nis@421 sand. com
Office Phone: [phone]
Cell Phone: [phone]
www.421sand.com
Figure 6 presents the location of the 412 Sand Mine.
Figure 6: 421 Sand mine location
A small Ellicott Dredge sits in the sand pit borrow area excavating material via cutter suction.
Sand is initially screened by a 3/8" mesh and any material coarser than 3/8" is kicked out to a
discard pile. Any material passing the initial screening is then classified in a tank where it is
washed for fines and separated based upon grain size. The plant carries two main, screened
sand sizes, 2S (asphalt and concrete sand) and 4S (mortar sand). CM Mitchell provided TI
Coastal with sand samples in September 2019 which were sieved within TI Coastal's
geotechnical lab. The average grain size for the 2S sand was 0.5 mm and the 4S sand was 0.33
mm.
The screening process effectively removed all large pebbles and stones as well as vegetative
debris. Because the material is dredged and then washed in the sieving process, all fines
0

(passing the 230 sieve or less than 0.0625 mm) have been removed from the final product. The
onsite stockpiles consist of a mix of the 2S and 4S graded sands with a combined average grain
size of 0.41 mm and 0.0% calcium carbonates. Munsell colors of the 421 Sand were 10YR 7/3
(wet) and 10YR 8/2 (dry) (source, TI Coastal).
ST WOOTEN
The ST Wooten site is located at 226 Sutton Lake Road near Highway 140. Figure 7 presents
the location of ST Wooten.
Figure 7: ST Wooten location.
ST WOOTEN CONTACT INFO:
Jennifer Kiglics, Project Manager
Eastern Commercial
S. T. Wooten Corporation
226 Sutton Lake Rd
Wilmington, NC 28402
mobile [phone]
office 910.762.0325
fax [phone]
www.stwcorp.com
The ST Wooten sand processing is very similar to that of the 421 Sand site as both of these
mines serve the same clients and industries. Note that extensive geotechnical testing and
gradation analyses were conducted to determine the Fineness Modulus (FM) of the material. Of
course this geotechnical analysis was for the in -situ material and not the final processed sand
used for the dune restoration.
10

421 SAND
SAND SAMPLE
GRANULARMETRIC DATA

K
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oasts
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc.
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr.
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: CM Mitchell Sand Samples 2019
Sample Name: 19-421 Sand-2S-01
Analysis Date: 09-17-19
Analyzed By: PRD
Easting (ft):
Northing (ft):
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/3
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
228.60
Wash Weight (g):
228.60
Pan Retained (g):
0.00
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.74
�
Fines Y.):
#20 - 0.74
#230 - 0.74
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (% ):
0.00
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3/4"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3/8"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.20
0.09
0.20
0.09
5
-2.00
4.00
0.70
0.31
0.90
0.39
7
-1.50
2.83
1.30
0.57
2.20
0.96
10
-1.00
2.00
2.70
1.18
4.90
2.14
14
-0.50
1.41
8.20
3.59
13.10
5.73
18
0.00
1.00
15.10
6.61
28.20
12.34
25
0.50
0.71
32.50
14.22
60.70
26.55
35
1.00
0.50
41.30
18.07
102.00
44.62
45
1.50
0.35
53.20
23.27
155.20
67.89
60
2.00
0.25
41.30
18.07
196.50
85.96
70
2.25
0.21
12.80
5.60
209.30
91.56
80
2.50
0.18
8.70
3.81
218.00
95.36
100
2.75
0.15
6.20
2.71
224.20
98.08
120
3.00
0.13
1.40
0.61
225.60
98.69
170
3.50
0.09
1.20
0.52
226.80
99.21
200
3.75
0.07
0.10
0.04
226.90
99.26
230
4.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
226.90
99.26
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.48
1.95
1.70
1.12
0.45
0.13
-0.60
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.03
0.49
0.91
-0.47
3.42

K
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oasts
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc.
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr.
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: CM Mitchell Sand Samples 2019
Sample Name: 19-421 Sand-2S-02
Analysis Date: 09-17-19
Analyzed By: PRD
Easting (ft):
Northing (ft):
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/3
Dry - 10YR-8/3
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
224.50
Wash Weight (g):
224.50
Pan Retained (g):
0.00
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.40
�
Fines Y.):
#20 - 0.40
#230 - 0.40
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (% ):
0.00
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3/4"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3/8"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
-2.00
4.00
0.30
0.13
0.30
0.13
7
-1.50
2.83
1.60
0.71
1.90
0.85
10
-1.00
2.00
2.90
1.29
4.80
2.14
14
-0.50
1.41
9.00
4.01
13.80
6.15
18
0.00
1.00
16.50
7.35
30.30
13.50
25
0.50
0.71
33.30
14.83
63.60
28.33
35
1.00
0.50
46.20
20.58
109.80
48.91
45
1.50
0.35
47.80
21.29
157.60
70.20
60
2.00
0.25
37.20
16.57
194.80
86.77
70
2.25
0.21
12.40
5.52
207.20
92.29
80
2.50
0.18
9.30
4.14
216.50
96.44
100
2.75
0.15
5.00
2.23
221.50
98.66
120
3.00
0.13
1.50
0.67
223.00
99.33
170
3.50
0.09
0.60
0.27
223.60
99.60
200
3.75
0.07
0.00
0.00
223.60
99.60
230
4.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
223.60
99.60
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.41
1.92
1.64
1.03
0.39
0.08
-0.64
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
0.97
0.51
0.91
-0.36
3.04

K
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oasts
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc.
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr.
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: CM Mitchell Sand Samples 2019
Sample Name: 19-421 Sand-4S-01
Analysis Date: 09-17-19
Analyzed By: PRD
Easting (ft):
Northing (ft):
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
USCS:
SIP
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/3
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
218.40
Wash Weight (g):
218.40
Pan Retained (g):
0.00
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.73
�
Fines Y.):
#20 - 0.73
#230 - 0.73
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (% ):
0.00
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3/4"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3/8"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
-2.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7
-1.50
2.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10
-1.00
2.00
0.50
0.23
0.50
0.23
14
-0.50
1.41
1.60
0.73
2.10
0.96
18
0.00
1.00
3.80
1.74
5.90
2.70
25
0.50
0.71
10.30
4.72
16.20
7.42
35
1.00
0.50
23.10
10.58
39.30
17.99
45
1.50
0.35
44.40
20.33
83.70
38.32
60
2.00
0.25
62.50
28.62
146.20
66.94
70
2.25
0.21
26.80
12.27
173.00
79.21
80
2.50
0.18
24.50
11.22
197.50
90.43
100
2.75
0.15
14.10
6.46
211.60
96.89
120
3.00
0.13
3.00
1.37
214.60
98.26
170
3.50
0.09
2.10
0.96
216.70
99.22
200
3.75
0.07
0.10
0.05
216.80
99.27
230
4.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
216.80
99.27
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.68
2.36
2.16
1.70
1.17
0.91
0.24
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.61
0.33
0.73
-0.65
3.67

K
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oasts
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc.
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr.
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: CM Mitchell Sand Samples 2019
Sample Name: 19-421 Sand-4S-02
Analysis Date: 09-17-19
Analyzed By: PRD
Easting (ft):
Northing (ft):
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
USCS:
SIP
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/3
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
219.40
Wash Weight (g):
219.40
Pan Retained (g):
0.00
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.27
�
Fines Y.):
#20 - 0.32
#230 - 0.27
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (% ):
0.00
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3/4"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3/8"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
-2.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7
-1.50
2.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10
-1.00
2.00
0.10
0.05
0.10
0.05
14
-0.50
1.41
1.30
0.59
1.40
0.64
18
0.00
1.00
4.10
1.87
5.50
2.51
25
0.50
0.71
11.80
5.38
17.30
7.89
35
1.00
0.50
27.00
12.31
44.30
20.19
45
1.50
0.35
48.80
22.24
93.10
42.43
60
2.00
0.25
61.50
28.03
154.60
70.46
70
2.25
0.21
26.60
12.12
181.20
82.59
80
2.50
0.18
22.60
10.30
203.80
92.89
100
2.75
0.15
10.70
4.88
214.50
97.77
120
3.00
0.13
2.80
1.28
217.30
99.04
170
3.50
0.09
1.30
0.59
218.60
99.64
200
3.75
0.07
0.10
0.05
218.70
99.68
230
4.00
0.06
0.10
0.05
218.80
99.73
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.61
2.28
2.09
1.64
1.11
0.83
0.23
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.56
0.34
0.71
-0.5
3.26

K
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oasts
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc.
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr.
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: CM Mitchell Sand Samples 2019
Sample Name: 421 Sand Average
Analysis Date: 11-07-19
Analyzed By: JCP
Easting (ft):
Northing (ft):
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/3
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
100.00
Wash Weight (g):
100.00
Pan Retained (g):
0.00
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.01
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.01
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (% ):
0.00
Shells
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
5
-2.00
4.00
0.11
0.11
0.13
0.13
7
-1.50
2.83
0.32
0.32
0.45
0.45
10
-1.00
2.00
0.69
0.69
1.14
1.14
14
-0.50
1.41
2.24
2.24
3.38
3.38
18
0.00
1.00
4.42
4.42
7.80
7.80
25
0.50
0.71
9.84
9.84
17.64
17.64
35
1.00
0.50
15.46
15.46
33.10
33.10
45
1.50
0.35
21.90
21.90
55.00
55.00
60
2.00
0.25
22.94
22.94
77.94
77.94
70
2.25
0.21
8.93
8.93
86.87
86.87
80
2.50
0.18
7.41
7.41
94.28
94.28
100
2.75
0.15
4.09
4.09
98.37
98.37
120
3.00
0.13
0.99
0.99
99.36
99.36
170
3.50
0.09
0.59
0.59
99.95
99.95
200
3.74
0.07
0.03
0.03
99.98
99.98
230
4.00
0.06
0.01
0.01
99.99
99.99
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.54
2.17
1.94
1.39
0.74
0.42
-0.32
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.29
0.41
0.87
-0.6
3.42

ST WOOTEN
SAND SAMPLE
GRANULARMETRIC DATA

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oasts
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc.
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr.
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2019-NTB-622-DC
Analysis Date: 12-17-19
Analyzed By: PRD
Easting (ft):
Northing (ft):
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
203.90
Wash Weight (g):
203.90
Pan Retained (g):
0.40
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.78
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.98
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (% ):
0.50
Shells
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.60
0.29
0.60
0.29
5
-2.00
4.00
0.40
0.20
1.00
0.49
7
-1.50
2.83
0.80
0.39
1.80
0.88
10
-1.00
2.00
2.30
1.13
4.10
2.01
14
-0.50
1.41
4.70
2.31
8.80
4.32
18
0.00
1.00
9.60
4.71
18.40
9.02
25
0.50
0.71
19.00
9.32
37.40
18.34
35
1.00
0.50
30.20
14.81
67.60
33.15
45
1.50
0.35
39.90
19.57
107.50
52.72
60
2.00
0.25
40.30
19.76
147.80
72.49
70
2.25
0.21
17.10
8.39
164.90
80.87
80
2.50
0.18
16.40
8.04
181.30
88.92
100
2.75
0.15
13.10
6.42
194.40
95.34
120
3.00
0.13
3.60
1.77
198.00
97.11
170
3.50
0.09
3.10
1.52
201.10
98.63
200
3.74
0.07
0.50
0.25
201.60
98.87
230
4.00
0.06
0.30
0.15
201.90
99.02
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.74
2.35
2.07
1.43
0.72
0.37
-0.43
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.33
0.40
0.99
-0.64
3.78

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oasts
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc.
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr.
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2019-NTB-622-DT
Analysis Date: 12-17-19
Analyzed By: PRD
Easting (ft):
Northing (ft):
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
206.80
Wash Weight (g):
206.80
Pan Retained (g):
0.30
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.82
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.97
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (%):
0.70
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.50
0.24
0.50
0.24
5
-2.00
4.00
0.40
0.19
0.90
0.44
7
-1.50
2.83
0.70
0.34
1.60
0.77
10
-1.00
2.00
1.70
0.82
3.30
1.60
14
-0.50
1.41
5.40
2.61
8.70
4.21
18
0.00
1.00
9.20
4.45
17.90
8.66
25
0.50
0.71
20.30
9.82
38.20
18.47
35
1.00
0.50
28.90
13.97
67.10
32.45
45
1.50
0.35
42.50
20.55
109.60
53.00
60
2.00
0.25
45.00
21.76
154.60
74.76
70
2.25
0.21
17.60
8.51
172.20
83.27
80
2.50
0.18
13.90
6.72
186.10
89.99
100
2.75
0.15
11.10
5.37
197.20
95.36
120
3.00
0.13
3.30
1.60
200.50
96.95
170
3.50
0.09
3.40
1.64
203.90
98.60
200
3.74
0.07
0.50
0.24
204.40
98.84
230
4.00
0.06
0.40
0.19
204.80
99.03
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.73
2.28
2.01
1.43
0.73
0.37
-0.41
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.32
0.40
0.96
-0.6
3.82

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oasts
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc.
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr.
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2019-NTB-624-DC
Analysis Date: 12-17-19
Analyzed By: PRD
Easting (ft):
Northing (ft):
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
206.40
Wash Weight (g):
206.40
Pan Retained (g):
0.50
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.73
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.97
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (%):
0.70
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.70
0.34
0.70
0.34
5
-2.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.34
7
-1.50
2.83
0.80
0.39
1.50
0.73
10
-1.00
2.00
1.70
0.82
3.20
1.55
14
-0.50
1.41
4.90
2.37
8.10
3.92
18
0.00
1.00
10.10
4.89
18.20
8.82
25
0.50
0.71
20.40
9.88
38.60
18.70
35
1.00
0.50
32.60
15.79
71.20
34.50
45
1.50
0.35
41.10
19.91
112.30
54.41
60
2.00
0.25
39.30
19.04
151.60
73.45
70
2.25
0.21
16.90
8.19
168.50
81.64
80
2.50
0.18
17.30
8.38
185.80
90.02
100
2.75
0.15
10.60
5.14
196.40
95.16
120
3.00
0.13
4.20
2.03
200.60
97.19
170
3.50
0.09
2.80
1.36
203.40
98.55
200
3.74
0.07
0.60
0.29
204.00
98.84
230
4.00
0.06
0.40
0.19
204.40
99.03
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.74
2.32
2.05
1.39
0.70
0.36
-0.39
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.31
0.40
0.97
-0.54
3.72

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oasts
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc.
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr.
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2019-NTB-624-DT
Analysis Date: 12-17-19
Analyzed By: PRD
Easting (ft):
Northing (ft):
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
203.60
Wash Weight (g):
203.60
Pan Retained (g):
0.50
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.54
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.79
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (% ):
0.60
Shells
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.60
0.29
0.60
0.29
5
-2.00
4.00
0.10
0.05
0.70
0.34
7
-1.50
2.83
0.70
0.34
1.40
0.69
10
-1.00
2.00
2.20
1.08
3.60
1.77
14
-0.50
1.41
5.00
2.46
8.60
4.22
18
0.00
1.00
9.50
4.67
18.10
8.89
25
0.50
0.71
20.20
9.92
38.30
18.81
35
1.00
0.50
31.10
15.28
69.40
34.09
45
1.50
0.35
40.60
19.94
110.00
54.03
60
2.00
0.25
39.80
19.55
149.80
73.58
70
2.25
0.21
17.40
8.55
167.20
82.12
80
2.50
0.18
15.30
7.51
182.50
89.64
100
2.75
0.15
11.30
5.55
193.80
95.19
120
3.00
0.13
4.40
2.16
198.20
97.35
170
3.50
0.09
2.80
1.38
201.00
98.72
200
3.74
0.07
0.60
0.29
201.60
99.02
230
4.00
0.06
0.40
0.20
202.00
99.21
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.74
2.31
2.04
1.40
0.70
0.36
-0.42
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.31
0.40
0.98
-0.55
3.67

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oastal
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-820-DC
Analysis Date: 03-04-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,468,934
Northing (ft):
269,713
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
12.0 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-8/3
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
207.10
Wash Weight (g):
207.10
Pan Retained (g):
0.20
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.82
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.92
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (%:
0.00
Shells
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.10
0.05
0.10
0.05
5
-2.00
4.00
0.20
0.10
0.30
0.14
7
-1.50
2.83
0.70
0.34
1.00
0.48
10
-1.00
2.00
1.70
0.82
2.70
1.30
14
-0.50
1.41
5.60
2.70
8.30
4.01
18
0.00
1.00
9.70
4.68
18.00
8.69
25
0.50
0.71
21.80
10.53
39.80
19.22
35
1.00
0.50
30.90
14.92
70.70
34.14
45
1.50
0.35
47.60
22.98
118.30
57.12
60
2.00
0.25
47.80
23.08
166.10
80.20
70
2.25
0.21
16.00
7.73
182.10
87.93
80
2.50
0.18
11.10
5.36
193.20
93.29
100
2.75
0.15
8.20
3.96
201.40
97.25
120
3.00
0.13
1.90
0.92
203.30
98.17
170
3.50
0.09
1.70
0.82
205.00
98.99
200
3.74
0.07
0.10
0.05
205.10
99.03
230
4.00
0.06
0.10
0.05
205.20
99.08
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.61
2.12
1.89
1.35
0.69
0.35
-0.39
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.24
0.42
0.89
-0.56
3.48

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oastal
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-820-DT
Analysis Date: 03-04-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,468,943
Northing (ft):
269,697
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
6.0 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/3
Dry - 1 OYR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
205.80
Wash Weight (g):
205.80
Pan Retained (g):
0.10
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.05
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.10
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (%:
0.06
Shells
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
5
-2.00
4.00
0.20
0.10
0.40
0.19
7
-1.50
2.83
0.70
0.34
1.10
0.53
10
-1.00
2.00
2.10
1.02
3.20
1.55
14
-0.50
1.41
5.30
2.58
8.50
4.13
18
0.00
1.00
10.10
4.91
18.60
9.04
25
0.50
0.71
20.40
9.91
39.00
18.95
35
1.00
0.50
33.80
16.42
72.80
35.37
45
1.50
0.35
43.90
21.33
116.70
56.71
60
2.00
0.25
45.30
22.01
162.00
78.72
70
2.25
0.21
16.30
7.92
178.30
86.64
80
2.50
0.18
13.60
6.61
191.90
93.25
100
2.75
0.15
9.30
4.52
201.20
97.76
120
3.00
0.13
2.20
1.07
203.40
98.83
170
3.50
0.09
1.80
0.87
205.20
99.71
200
3.74
0.07
0.30
0.15
205.50
99.85
230
4.00
0.06
0.10
0.05
205.60
99.90
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.60
2.17
1.92
1.34
0.68
0.35
-0.41
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.26
0.42
0.91
-0.55
3.5

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oastal
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-822-DC
Analysis Date: 03-04-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,469,108
Northing (ft):
269,812
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
11.9 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-8/3
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
213.80
Wash Weight (g):
213.80
Pan Retained (g):
0.20
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.47
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.56
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (% ):
0.04
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
1.10
0.51
1.10
0.51
5
-2.00
4.00
0.60
0.28
1.70
0.80
7
-1.50
2.83
1.10
0.51
2.80
1.31
10
-1.00
2.00
2.50
1.17
5.30
2.48
14
-0.50
1.41
6.50
3.04
11.80
5.52
18
0.00
1.00
12.10
5.66
23.90
11.18
25
0.50
0.71
23.90
11.18
47.80
22.36
35
1.00
0.50
35.20
16.46
83.00
38.82
45
1.50
0.35
45.00
21.05
128.00
59.87
60
2.00
0.25
42.20
19.74
170.20
79.61
70
2.25
0.21
15.30
7.16
185.50
86.76
80
2.50
0.18
14.70
6.88
200.20
93.64
100
2.75
0.15
8.00
3.74
208.20
97.38
120
3.00
0.13
2.60
1.22
210.80
98.60
170
3.50
0.09
1.50
0.70
212.30
99.30
200
3.74
0.07
0.20
0.09
212.50
99.39
230
4.00
0.06
0.10
0.05
212.60
99.44
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.59
2.15
1.88
1.27
0.58
0.22
-0.59
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.16
0.45
0.98
-0.72
4.02

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oasts
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-822-DT
Analysis Date: 03-04-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,469,116
Northing (ft):
269,791
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
4.7 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/3
Dry - 1 OYR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
211.40
Wash Weight (g):
211.40
Pan Retained (g):
0.10
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.14
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.19
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (%:
0.00
Shells
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.70
0.33
0.70
0.33
5
-2.00
4.00
0.20
0.09
0.90
0.43
7
-1.50
2.83
1.40
0.66
2.30
1.09
10
-1.00
2.00
2.20
1.04
4.50
2.13
14
-0.50
1.41
6.70
3.17
11.20
5.30
18
0.00
1.00
11.50
5.44
22.70
10.74
25
0.50
0.71
23.40
11.07
46.10
21.81
35
1.00
0.50
35.80
16.93
81.90
38.74
45
1.50
0.35
44.50
21.05
126.40
59.79
60
2.00
0.25
42.50
20.10
168.90
79.90
70
2.25
0.21
17.60
8.33
186.50
88.22
80
2.50
0.18
12.90
6.10
199.40
94.32
100
2.75
0.15
7.80
3.69
207.20
98.01
120
3.00
0.13
2.20
1.04
209.40
99.05
170
3.50
0.09
1.30
0.61
210.70
99.67
200
3.74
0.07
0.20
0.09
210.90
99.76
230
4.00
0.06
0.10
0.05
211.00
99.81
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.55
2.12
1.88
1.27
0.59
0.24
-0.55
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.17
0.44
0.95
-0.66
3.79

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oastal
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-824-DC
Analysis Date: 03-04-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,469,279
Northing (ft):
269,913
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
11.8 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/3
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
206.30
Wash Weight (g):
206.30
Pan Retained (g):
0.10
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.00
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.05
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (% ):
0.02
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
-2.00
4.00
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
7
-1.50
2.83
0.60
0.29
0.80
0.39
10
-1.00
2.00
2.10
1.02
2.90
1.41
14
-0.50
1.41
4.90
2.38
7.80
3.78
18
0.00
1.00
10.20
4.94
18.00
8.73
25
0.50
0.71
21.10
10.23
39.10
18.95
35
1.00
0.50
35.40
17.16
74.50
36.11
45
1.50
0.35
44.80
21.72
119.30
57.83
60
2.00
0.25
45.50
22.06
164.80
79.88
70
2.25
0.21
16.20
7.85
181.00
87.74
80
2.50
0.18
13.00
6.30
194.00
94.04
100
2.75
0.15
8.50
4.12
202.50
98.16
120
3.00
0.13
1.90
0.92
204.40
99.08
170
3.50
0.09
1.60
0.78
206.00
99.85
200
3.74
0.07
0.20
0.10
206.20
99.95
230
4.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
206.20
99.95
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.56
2.13
1.89
1.32
0.68
0.36
-0.38
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.24
0.42
0.89
-0.5
3.27

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oastal
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-824-DT
Analysis Date: 03-04-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,469,289
Northing (ft):
269,891
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
4.5 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/3
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
215.50
Wash Weight (g):
215.50
Pan Retained (g):
0.50
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.37
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.60
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (%):
0.44
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.30
0.14
0.30
0.14
5
-2.00
4.00
0.20
0.09
0.50
0.23
7
-1.50
2.83
1.10
0.51
1.60
0.74
10
-1.00
2.00
1.80
0.84
3.40
1.58
14
-0.50
1.41
4.60
2.13
8.00
3.71
18
0.00
1.00
8.60
3.99
16.60
7.70
25
0.50
0.71
20.40
9.47
37.00
17.17
35
1.00
0.50
29.20
13.55
66.20
30.72
45
1.50
0.35
47.20
21.90
113.40
52.62
60
2.00
0.25
50.10
23.25
163.50
75.87
70
2.25
0.21
19.50
9.05
183.00
84.92
80
2.50
0.18
14.50
6.73
197.50
91.65
100
2.75
0.15
10.60
4.92
208.10
96.57
120
3.00
0.13
2.60
1.21
210.70
97.77
170
3.50
0.09
2.80
1.30
213.50
99.07
200
3.74
0.07
0.40
0.19
213.90
99.26
230
4.00
0.06
0.30
0.14
214.20
99.40
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.67
2.22
1.98
1.44
0.79
0.44
-0.34
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.33
0.40
0.92
-0.65
3.92

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oastal
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-826-DC
Analysis Date: 03-04-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,469,458
Northing (ft):
270,014
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
11.9 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/3
Dry - 1 OYR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
205.70
Wash Weight (g):
205.70
Pan Retained (g):
0.40
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.44
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.63
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (%:
0.00
Shells
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.40
0.19
0.40
0.19
5
-2.00
4.00
0.10
0.05
0.50
0.24
7
-1.50
2.83
0.40
0.19
0.90
0.44
10
-1.00
2.00
1.40
0.68
2.30
1.12
14
-0.50
1.41
3.60
1.75
5.90
2.87
18
0.00
1.00
7.00
3.40
12.90
6.27
25
0.50
0.71
15.30
7.44
28.20
13.71
35
1.00
0.50
28.60
13.90
56.80
27.61
45
1.50
0.35
41.80
20.32
98.60
47.93
60
2.00
0.25
48.80
23.72
147.40
71.66
70
2.25
0.21
19.40
9.43
166.80
81.09
80
2.50
0.18
18.10
8.80
184.90
89.89
100
2.75
0.15
12.40
6.03
197.30
95.92
120
3.00
0.13
3.40
1.65
200.70
97.57
170
3.50
0.09
2.90
1.41
203.60
98.98
200
3.74
0.07
0.50
0.24
204.10
99.22
230
4.00
0.06
0.30
0.15
204.40
99.37
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.71
2.33
2.09
1.54
0.91
0.58
-0.19
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.44
0.37
0.9
-0.68
4.09

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oastal
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-826-DT
Analysis Date: 03-04-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,469,467
Northing (ft):
2,700,001
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
6.2 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
204.20
Wash Weight (g):
204.20
Pan Retained (g):
0.50
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.24
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.49
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (% ):
0.21
Shells
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
-2.00
4.00
0.40
0.20
0.40
0.20
7
-1.50
2.83
0.30
0.15
0.70
0.34
10
-1.00
2.00
1.40
0.69
2.10
1.03
14
-0.50
1.41
3.10
1.52
5.20
2.55
18
0.00
1.00
6.40
3.13
11.60
5.68
25
0.50
0.71
15.10
7.39
26.70
13.08
35
1.00
0.50
25.50
12.49
52.20
25.56
45
1.50
0.35
37.20
18.22
89.40
43.78
60
2.00
0.25
46.60
22.82
136.00
66.60
70
2.25
0.21
25.20
12.34
161.20
78.94
80
2.50
0.18
20.70
10.14
181.90
89.08
100
2.75
0.15
13.80
6.76
195.70
95.84
120
3.00
0.13
4.00
1.96
199.70
97.80
170
3.50
0.09
2.70
1.32
202.40
99.12
200
3.74
0.07
0.50
0.24
202.90
99.36
230
4.00
0.06
0.30
0.15
203.20
99.51
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.72
2.37
2.17
1.64
0.98
0.62
-0.11
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.51
0.35
0.89
-0.69
3.69

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oastal
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-828-DC
Analysis Date: 03-04-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,469,633
Northing (ft):
270,118
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
12.1 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
206.00
Wash Weight (g):
206.00
Pan Retained (g):
0.40
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.05
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.24
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (%:
0.06
Shells
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.90
0.44
0.90
0.44
5
-2.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.90
0.44
7
-1.50
2.83
0.70
0.34
1.60
0.78
10
-1.00
2.00
1.10
0.53
2.70
1.31
14
-0.50
1.41
4.40
2.14
7.10
3.45
18
0.00
1.00
8.00
3.88
15.10
7.33
25
0.50
0.71
17.50
8.50
32.60
15.83
35
1.00
0.50
30.00
14.56
62.60
30.39
45
1.50
0.35
42.10
20.44
104.70
50.83
60
2.00
0.25
46.70
22.67
151.40
73.50
70
2.25
0.21
19.10
9.27
170.50
82.77
80
2.50
0.18
19.00
9.22
189.50
91.99
100
2.75
0.15
10.00
4.85
199.50
96.84
120
3.00
0.13
3.30
1.60
202.80
98.45
170
3.50
0.09
2.10
1.02
204.90
99.47
200
3.74
0.07
0.30
0.15
205.20
99.61
230
4.00
0.06
0.30
0.15
205.50
99.76
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.66
2.28
2.04
1.48
0.81
0.51
-0.30
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.37
0.39
0.92
-0.79
4.46

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oastal
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-828-DT
Analysis Date: 03-04-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,469,643
Northing (ft):
270,102
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
5.5 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
211.00
Wash Weight (g):
211.00
Pan Retained (g):
0.50
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.38
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.62
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (%:
0.00
Shells
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
-2.00
4.00
0.70
0.33
0.70
0.33
7
-1.50
2.83
0.70
0.33
1.40
0.66
10
-1.00
2.00
1.60
0.76
3.00
1.42
14
-0.50
1.41
4.50
2.13
7.50
3.55
18
0.00
1.00
8.70
4.12
16.20
7.68
25
0.50
0.71
19.70
9.34
35.90
17.01
35
1.00
0.50
32.50
15.40
68.40
32.42
45
1.50
0.35
43.80
20.76
112.20
53.18
60
2.00
0.25
46.50
22.04
158.70
75.21
70
2.25
0.21
19.00
9.00
177.70
84.22
80
2.50
0.18
16.20
7.68
193.90
91.90
100
2.75
0.15
10.00
4.74
203.90
96.64
120
3.00
0.13
3.00
1.42
206.90
98.06
170
3.50
0.09
2.10
1.00
209.00
99.05
200
3.74
0.07
0.40
0.19
209.40
99.24
230
4.00
0.06
0.30
0.14
209.70
99.38
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.66
2.24
2.00
1.42
0.76
0.45
-0.32
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.33
0.40
0.91
-0.58
3.62

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oastal
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-830-DC
Analysis Date: 03-04-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,469,796
Northing (ft):
270,211
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
12.3 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
207.70
Wash Weight (g):
207.70
Pan Retained (g):
0.30
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.29
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.43
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (%):
0.07
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.80
0.39
0.80
0.39
5
-2.00
4.00
0.20
0.10
1.00
0.48
7
-1.50
2.83
0.90
0.43
1.90
0.91
10
-1.00
2.00
1.80
0.87
3.70
1.78
14
-0.50
1.41
4.70
2.26
8.40
4.04
18
0.00
1.00
8.90
4.29
17.30
8.33
25
0.50
0.71
20.30
9.77
37.60
18.10
35
1.00
0.50
29.10
14.01
66.70
32.11
45
1.50
0.35
45.50
21.91
112.20
54.02
60
2.00
0.25
47.80
23.01
160.00
77.03
70
2.25
0.21
18.10
8.71
178.10
85.75
80
2.50
0.18
13.40
6.45
191.50
92.20
100
2.75
0.15
9.60
4.62
201.10
96.82
120
3.00
0.13
2.50
1.20
203.60
98.03
170
3.50
0.09
2.50
1.20
206.10
99.23
200
3.74
0.07
0.40
0.19
206.50
99.42
230
4.00
0.06
0.30
0.14
206.80
99.57
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.65
2.20
1.96
1.41
0.75
0.39
-0.39
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.3
0.41
0.94
-0.74
4.31

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oastal
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-830-DT
Analysis Date: 03-04-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,469,807
Northing (ft):
270,192
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
4.9 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-8/3
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
209.40
Wash Weight (g):
209.40
Pan Retained (g):
0.80
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.29
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.67
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (%):
0.12
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.30
0.14
0.30
0.14
5
-2.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.14
7
-1.50
2.83
0.30
0.14
0.60
0.29
10
-1.00
2.00
1.20
0.57
1.80
0.86
14
-0.50
1.41
4.30
2.05
6.10
2.91
18
0.00
1.00
9.50
4.54
15.60
7.45
25
0.50
0.71
18.90
9.03
34.50
16.48
35
1.00
0.50
30.20
14.42
64.70
30.90
45
1.50
0.35
42.60
20.34
107.30
51.24
60
2.00
0.25
44.10
21.06
151.40
72.30
70
2.25
0.21
18.70
8.93
170.10
81.23
80
2.50
0.18
19.50
9.31
189.60
90.54
100
2.75
0.15
11.40
5.44
201.00
95.99
120
3.00
0.13
3.60
1.72
204.60
97.71
170
3.50
0.09
2.40
1.15
207.00
98.85
200
3.74
0.07
0.60
0.29
207.60
99.14
230
4.00
0.06
0.40
0.19
208.00
99.33
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.70
2.32
2.08
1.47
0.80
0.47
-0.27
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.38
0.38
0.91
-0.5
3.43

0
N
U)
LU
d
Q
0
Z
ca
Z
Z
0
a
w
U
K
F
w
2
Ir
a
Z
Ir
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
T
I T1 "�� oasta
S E F2 \/ t c E= s, t N c.
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-726-DC
Analysis Date: 02-18-20
Analyzed By: HDM
Easting (ft):
2,460,917
Northing (ft):
264,850
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
11.5 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 1 OYR-7/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
205.30
Wash Weight (g):
205.30
Pan Retained (g):
0.30
Sieve Loss (%):
0.29
Fines (%):
#230 - 0.44
Organics (%):
Carbonates (%):
0.04
Shells (%):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
-2.00
4.00
0.50
0.24
0.50
0.24
7
-1.50
2.83
0.90
0.44
1.40
0.68
10
-1.00
2.00
1.20
0.58
2.60
1.27
14
-0.50
1.41
3.80
1.85
6.40
3.12
18
0.00
1.00
8.00
3.90
14.40
7.01
25
0.50
0.71
17.70
8.62
32.10
15.64
35
1.00
0.50
31.40
15.29
63.50
30.93
45
1.50
0.35
43.40
21.14
106.90
52.07
60
2.00
0.25
47.30
23.04
154.20
75.11
70
2.25
0.21
19.30
9.40
173.50
84.51
80
2.50
0.18
16.00
7.79
189.50
92.30
100
2.75
0.15
9.80
4.77
199.30
97.08
120
3.00
0.13
2.80
1.36
202.10
98.44
170
3.50
0.09
1.80
0.88
203.90
99.32
200
3.74
0.07
0.30
0.15
204.20
99.46
230
4.00
0.06
0.20
0.10
204.40
99.56
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.64
2.24
2.00
1.45
0.81
0.51
-0.26
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.35
0.39
0.89
-0.63
3.75

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oastal
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-726-DT
Analysis Date: 02-18-20
Analyzed By: HDM
Easting (ft):
2,460,932
Northing (ft):
264,824
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
5.6 NAVD88
USCS:
SIP
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/3
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
206.10
Wash Weight (g):
206.10
Pan Retained (g):
0.80
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.68
Fines (%:
#230 - 1.07
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (%:
0.06
Shells
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
-2.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7
-1.50
2.83
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
10
-1.00
2.00
0.80
0.39
1.00
0.49
14
-0.50
1.41
3.10
1.50
4.10
1.99
18
0.00
1.00
6.40
3.11
10.50
5.09
25
0.50
0.71
18.20
8.83
28.70
13.93
35
1.00
0.50
30.90
14.99
59.60
28.92
45
1.50
0.35
43.80
21.25
103.40
50.17
60
2.00
0.25
46.00
22.32
149.40
72.49
70
2.25
0.21
18.80
9.12
168.20
81.61
80
2.50
0.18
17.80
8.64
186.00
90.25
100
2.75
0.15
10.60
5.14
196.60
95.39
120
3.00
0.13
3.60
1.75
200.20
97.14
170
3.50
0.09
2.70
1.31
202.90
98.45
200
3.74
0.07
0.60
0.29
203.50
98.74
230
4.00
0.06
0.40
0.19
203.90
98.93
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.73
2.32
2.07
1.50
0.87
0.57
-0.01
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.43
0.37
0.85
-0.33
3.14

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oastal
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-728-DC
Analysis Date: 02-18-20
Analyzed By: HDM
Easting (ft):
2,461,087
Northing (ft):
264,955
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
12.0 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
203.30
Wash Weight (g):
203.30
Pan Retained (g):
0.10
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.15
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.20
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (% ):
0.65
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
-2.00
4.00
0.10
0.05
0.10
0.05
7
-1.50
2.83
0.40
0.20
0.50
0.25
10
-1.00
2.00
1.30
0.64
1.80
0.89
14
-0.50
1.41
3.70
1.82
5.50
2.71
18
0.00
1.00
7.60
3.74
13.10
6.44
25
0.50
0.71
16.40
8.07
29.50
14.51
35
1.00
0.50
27.60
13.58
57.10
28.09
45
1.50
0.35
38.10
18.74
95.20
46.83
60
2.00
0.25
43.10
21.20
138.30
68.03
70
2.25
0.21
22.70
11.17
161.00
79.19
80
2.50
0.18
23.10
11.36
184.10
90.56
100
2.75
0.15
13.30
6.54
197.40
97.10
120
3.00
0.13
2.60
1.28
200.00
98.38
170
3.50
0.09
2.50
1.23
202.50
99.61
200
3.74
0.07
0.30
0.15
202.80
99.75
230
4.00
0.06
0.10
0.05
202.90
99.80
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.67
2.36
2.16
1.57
0.89
0.55
-0.19
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.46
0.36
0.89
-0.61
3.25

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oasts
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-728-DT
Analysis Date: 02-18-20
Analyzed By: HDM
Easting (ft):
2,461,104
Northing (ft):
264,929
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
5.8 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-7/3
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
207.90
Wash Weight (g):
207.90
Pan Retained (g):
0.60
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.29
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.58
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (% ):
0.04
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.70
0.34
0.70
0.34
5
-2.00
4.00
0.50
0.24
1.20
0.58
7
-1.50
2.83
0.40
0.19
1.60
0.77
10
-1.00
2.00
1.50
0.72
3.10
1.49
14
-0.50
1.41
3.90
1.88
7.00
3.37
18
0.00
1.00
8.00
3.85
15.00
7.22
25
0.50
0.71
19.50
9.38
34.50
16.59
35
1.00
0.50
30.00
14.43
64.50
31.02
45
1.50
0.35
48.60
23.38
113.10
54.40
60
2.00
0.25
49.70
23.91
162.80
78.31
70
2.25
0.21
17.40
8.37
180.20
86.68
80
2.50
0.18
11.90
5.72
192.10
92.40
100
2.75
0.15
9.40
4.52
201.50
96.92
120
3.00
0.13
2.30
1.11
203.80
98.03
170
3.50
0.09
2.30
1.11
206.10
99.13
200
3.74
0.07
0.30
0.14
206.40
99.28
230
4.00
0.06
0.30
0.14
206.70
99.42
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.64
2.17
1.93
1.41
0.79
0.47
-0.29
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.31
0.40
0.9
-0.75
4.62

m
0
N
(n
J
d
Q
0
Z
Co
Z
Z
0
0
a
w
U
K
w
2
Of
Q
J
Z
Z
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
TI _, oastal
S E F2 \/ I C E S, I N (---
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-730-DC
Analysis Date: 02-18-20
Analyzed By: HDM
Easting (ft):
2,461,257
Northing (ft):
265,060
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
11.9 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 10YR-6/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
209.40
Wash Weight (g):
209.40
Pan Retained (g):
0.20
Sieve Loss (% ):
0.38
Fines (%:
#230 - 0.48
Organics (% ):
Carbonates (%):
0.12
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
-2.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7
-1.50
2.83
1.30
0.62
1.30
0.62
10
-1.00
2.00
1.10
0.53
2.40
1.15
14
-0.50
1.41
4.10
1.96
6.50
3.10
18
0.00
1.00
8.00
3.82
14.50
6.92
25
0.50
0.71
18.50
8.83
33.00
15.76
35
1.00
0.50
30.80
14.71
63.80
30.47
45
1.50
0.35
41.80
19.96
105.60
50.43
60
2.00
0.25
44.20
21.11
149.80
71.54
70
2.25
0.21
20.50
9.79
170.30
81.33
80
2.50
0.18
19.90
9.50
190.20
90.83
100
2.75
0.15
12.10
5.78
202.30
96.61
120
3.00
0.13
3.30
1.58
205.60
98.19
170
3.50
0.09
2.30
1.10
207.90
99.28
200
3.74
0.07
0.30
0.14
208.20
99.43
230
4.00
0.06
0.20
0.10
208.40
99.52
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.68
2.32
2.09
1.49
0.81
0.51
-0.25
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.39
0.38
0.91
-0.57
3.38

0
N
U)
LU
d
Q
0
Z
ca
Z
Z
0
a
w
U
K
F
w
2
Ir
a
Z
Ir
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
T
I T1 "�� oasta
S E F2 \/ t c E= s, t N c.
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-730-DT
Analysis Date: 02-18-20
Analyzed By: HDM
Easting (ft):
2,461,271
Northing (ft):
265,033
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
5.8 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 1 OYR-6/2
Dry - 1 OYR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
209.60
Wash Weight (g):
209.60
Pan Retained (g):
0.20
Sieve Loss (%):
0.24
Fines (%):
#230 - 0.33
Organics (%):
Carbonates (% ):
0.11
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
-2.00
4.00
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
7
-1.50
2.83
1.00
0.48
1.20
0.57
10
-1.00
2.00
1.90
0.91
3.10
1.48
14
-0.50
1.41
4.20
2.00
7.30
3.48
18
0.00
1.00
8.70
4.15
16.00
7.63
25
0.50
0.71
19.50
9.30
35.50
16.94
35
1.00
0.50
34.20
16.32
69.70
33.25
45
1.50
0.35
47.10
22.47
116.80
55.73
60
2.00
0.25
47.70
22.76
164.50
78.48
70
2.25
0.21
17.30
8.25
181.80
86.74
80
2.50
0.18
14.90
7.11
196.70
93.85
100
2.75
0.15
8.60
4.10
205.30
97.95
120
3.00
0.13
1.90
0.91
207.20
98.85
170
3.50
0.09
1.40
0.67
208.60
99.52
200
3.74
0.07
0.20
0.10
208.80
99.62
230
4.00
0.06
0.10
0.05
208.90
99.67
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.57
2.17
1.92
1.37
0.75
0.45
-0.32
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.29
0.41
0.88
-0.6
3.59

0
N
U)
LU
d
Q
0
Z
ca
Z
Z
0
a
w
U
K
F
w
2
Ir
a
Z
Ir
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
T
I T1 "�� oasta
S E F2 \/ t c E= s, t N c.
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-732-DC
Analysis Date: 02-18-20
Analyzed By: HDM
Easting (ft):
2,461,422
Northing (ft):
265,171
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
12.1 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 1 OYR-7/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
204.40
Wash Weight (g):
204.40
Pan Retained (g):
0.50
Sieve Loss (%):
0.24
Fines (%):
#230 - 0.49
Organics (%):
Carbonates (% ):
0.17
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.50
0.24
0.50
0.24
5
-2.00
4.00
0.20
0.10
0.70
0.34
7
-1.50
2.83
0.60
0.29
1.30
0.64
10
-1.00
2.00
1.20
0.59
2.50
1.22
14
-0.50
1.41
2.90
1.42
5.40
2.64
18
0.00
1.00
7.40
3.62
12.80
6.26
25
0.50
0.71
16.80
8.22
29.60
14.48
35
1.00
0.50
30.90
15.12
60.50
29.60
45
1.50
0.35
42.40
20.74
102.90
50.34
60
2.00
0.25
45.40
22.21
148.30
72.55
70
2.25
0.21
19.50
9.54
167.80
82.09
80
2.50
0.18
18.80
9.20
186.60
91.29
100
2.75
0.15
10.40
5.09
197.00
96.38
120
3.00
0.13
3.30
1.61
200.30
97.99
170
3.50
0.09
2.20
1.08
202.50
99.07
200
3.74
0.07
0.50
0.24
203.00
99.32
230
4.00
0.06
0.40
0.20
203.40
99.51
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.68
2.30
2.06
1.49
0.85
0.55
-0.17
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.4
0.38
0.9
-0.68
4.26

0
N
U)
LU
d
Q
0
Z
ca
Z
Z
0
a
w
U
K
F
w
2
Ir
a
Z
Ir
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
T
I T1 "�� oasta
S E F2 \/ t c E= s, t N c.
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-732-DT
Analysis Date: 02-18-20
Analyzed By: HDM
Easting (ft):
2,461,438
Northing (ft):
265,146
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
6.0 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 1 OYR-7/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
209.30
Wash Weight (g):
209.30
Pan Retained (g):
0.40
Sieve Loss (%):
0.24
Fines (%):
#230 - 0.43
Organics (%):
Carbonates (% ):
0.04
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.40
0.19
0.40
0.19
5
-2.00
4.00
0.10
0.05
0.50
0.24
7
-1.50
2.83
0.60
0.29
1.10
0.53
10
-1.00
2.00
1.30
0.62
2.40
1.15
14
-0.50
1.41
4.10
1.96
6.50
3.11
18
0.00
1.00
8.50
4.06
15.00
7.17
25
0.50
0.71
19.70
9.41
34.70
16.58
35
1.00
0.50
32.50
15.53
67.20
32.11
45
1.50
0.35
44.60
21.31
111.80
53.42
60
2.00
0.25
45.80
21.88
157.60
75.30
70
2.25
0.21
18.60
8.89
176.20
84.19
80
2.50
0.18
16.10
7.69
192.30
91.88
100
2.75
0.15
10.10
4.83
202.40
96.70
120
3.00
0.13
3.10
1.48
205.50
98.18
170
3.50
0.09
2.20
1.05
207.70
99.24
200
3.74
0.07
0.40
0.19
208.10
99.43
230
4.00
0.06
0.30
0.14
208.40
99.57
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.66
2.24
1.99
1.42
0.77
0.47
-0.27
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.34
0.40
0.9
-0.57
3.84

0
N
U)
LU
d
Q
0
Z
ca
Z
Z
0
a
w
U
K
F
w
2
Ir
a
Z
Ir
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
T
I T1 "�� oasta
S E F2 \/ t c E= s, t N c.
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-734-DC
Analysis Date: 02-19-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,461,588
Northing (ft):
265,279
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
12.1 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 1 OYR-7/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
208.70
Wash Weight (g):
208.70
Pan Retained (g):
0.10
Sieve Loss (%):
0.29
Fines (%):
#230 - 0.34
Organics (%):
Carbonates (% ):
0.13
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.60
0.29
0.60
0.29
5
-2.00
4.00
0.20
0.10
0.80
0.38
7
-1.50
2.83
1.10
0.53
1.90
0.91
10
-1.00
2.00
1.40
0.67
3.30
1.58
14
-0.50
1.41
4.90
2.35
8.20
3.93
18
0.00
1.00
9.00
4.31
17.20
8.24
25
0.50
0.71
19.80
9.49
37.00
17.73
35
1.00
0.50
33.60
16.10
70.60
33.83
45
1.50
0.35
46.20
22.14
116.80
55.97
60
2.00
0.25
47.80
22.90
164.60
78.87
70
2.25
0.21
18.20
8.72
182.80
87.59
80
2.50
0.18
13.70
6.56
196.50
94.15
100
2.75
0.15
7.60
3.64
204.10
97.80
120
3.00
0.13
2.30
1.10
206.40
98.90
170
3.50
0.09
1.30
0.62
207.70
99.52
200
3.74
0.07
0.20
0.10
207.90
99.62
230
4.00
0.06
0.10
0.05
208.00
99.66
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.56
2.15
1.92
1.37
0.73
0.41
-0.38
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.26
0.42
0.9
-0.76
4.26

0
N
U)
LU
d
Q
0
Z
ca
Z
Z
0
a
w
U
K
F
w
2
Ir
a
Z
Ir
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
T
I T1 "�� oasta
S E F2 \/ t c E= s, t N c.
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-734-DT
Analysis Date: 02-19-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,461,604
Northing (ft):
265,254
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
6.1 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 1 OYR-7/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
212.80
Wash Weight (g):
212.80
Pan Retained (g):
0.40
Sieve Loss (%):
0.33
Fines (%):
#230 - 0.52
Organics (%):
Carbonates (% ):
0.15
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5
-2.00
4.00
0.60
0.28
0.60
0.28
7
-1.50
2.83
0.70
0.33
1.30
0.61
10
-1.00
2.00
1.90
0.89
3.20
1.50
14
-0.50
1.41
4.00
1.88
7.20
3.38
18
0.00
1.00
8.60
4.04
15.80
7.42
25
0.50
0.71
19.00
8.93
34.80
16.35
35
1.00
0.50
32.10
15.08
66.90
31.44
45
1.50
0.35
45.80
21.52
112.70
52.96
60
2.00
0.25
49.10
23.07
161.80
76.03
70
2.25
0.21
18.50
8.69
180.30
84.73
80
2.50
0.18
15.90
7.47
196.20
92.20
100
2.75
0.15
10.70
5.03
206.90
97.23
120
3.00
0.13
2.30
1.08
209.20
98.31
170
3.50
0.09
2.10
0.99
211.30
99.30
200
3.74
0.07
0.20
0.09
211.50
99.39
230
4.00
0.06
0.20
0.09
211.70
99.48
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.64
2.23
1.98
1.43
0.79
0.48
-0.30
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.33
0.40
0.9
-0.63
3.71

0
N
U)
LU
d
Q
0
Z
ca
Z
Z
0
a
w
U
K
F
w
2
Ir
a
Z
Ir
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
T
I T1 "�� oasta
S E F2 \/ t c E= s, t N c.
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-736-DC
Analysis Date: 02-19-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,461,759
Northing (ft):
265,383
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
12.1 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 1 OYR-7/3
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
207.80
Wash Weight (g):
207.80
Pan Retained (g):
0.20
Sieve Loss (%):
0.34
Fines (%):
#230 - 0.43
Organics (%):
Carbonates (% ):
0.27
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.40
0.19
0.40
0.19
5
-2.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.40
0.19
7
-1.50
2.83
0.70
0.34
1.10
0.53
10
-1.00
2.00
1.60
0.77
2.70
1.30
14
-0.50
1.41
4.80
2.31
7.50
3.61
18
0.00
1.00
10.10
4.86
17.60
8.47
25
0.50
0.71
20.80
10.01
38.40
18.48
35
1.00
0.50
33.80
16.27
72.20
34.74
45
1.50
0.35
43.90
21.13
116.10
55.87
60
2.00
0.25
45.50
21.90
161.60
77.77
70
2.25
0.21
17.90
8.61
179.50
86.38
80
2.50
0.18
15.10
7.27
194.60
93.65
100
2.75
0.15
7.90
3.80
202.50
97.45
120
3.00
0.13
2.40
1.15
204.90
98.60
170
3.50
0.09
1.50
0.72
206.40
99.33
200
3.74
0.07
0.20
0.10
206.60
99.42
230
4.00
0.06
0.30
0.14
206.90
99.57
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.59
2.18
1.94
1.36
0.70
0.38
-0.36
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.27
0.41
0.9
-0.57
3.69

0
N
U)
LU
d
Q
0
Z
ca
Z
Z
0
a
w
U
K
F
w
2
Ir
a
Z
Ir
Granularmetric Report
Depths and elevations based on measured values
T
I T1 "�� oasta
S E F2 \/ t c E= s, t N c.
TI Coastal Services, Inc
387-B N. Green Meadows Dr
Wilmington, NC 28405
ph 910.821.1358
fax [phone]
Project Name: NTB Phase 5 FEMA Truck Haul
Sample Name: 2020-NTB-736-DT
Analysis Date: 02-19-20
Analyzed By: NGL
Easting (ft):
2,461,775
Northing (ft):
265,358
Coordinate System:
North Carolina State Plane
Elevation (ft):
6.0 NAVD88
USCS:
SW
Munsell:
Wet - 1 OYR-7/2
Dry - 10YR-8/2
Comments:
Dry Weight (g):
210.70
Wash Weight (g):
210.70
Pan Retained (g):
0.40
Sieve Loss (%):
0.38
Fines (%):
#230 - 0.57
Organics (%):
Carbonates (% ):
0.19
Shells (% ):
Sieve Number
Sieve Size
(Phi)
Sieve Size
(Millimeters)
Grams
Retained
% Weight
Retained
Cum. Grams
Retained
C. % Weight
Retained
3"
-6.25
76.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75"
-4.25
19.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.375"
-3.25
9.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
-2.25
4.76
0.40
0.19
0.40
0.19
5
-2.00
4.00
0.10
0.05
0.50
0.24
7
-1.50
2.83
0.50
0.24
1.00
0.47
10
-1.00
2.00
1.30
0.62
2.30
1.09
14
-0.50
1.41
4.40
2.09
6.70
3.18
18
0.00
1.00
8.50
4.03
15.20
7.21
25
0.50
0.71
19.60
9.30
34.80
16.52
35
1.00
0.50
28.90
13.72
63.70
30.23
45
1.50
0.35
45.40
21.55
109.10
51.78
60
2.00
0.25
51.30
24.35
160.40
76.13
70
2.25
0.21
17.70
8.40
178.10
84.53
80
2.50
0.18
14.20
6.74
192.30
91.27
100
2.75
0.15
10.40
4.94
202.70
96.20
120
3.00
0.13
2.90
1.38
205.60
97.58
170
3.50
0.09
3.00
1.42
208.60
99.00
200
3.74
0.07
0.50
0.24
209.10
99.24
230
4.00
0.06
0.40
0.19
209.50
99.43
Phi 5
Phi 16
Phi 25
Phi 50
Phi 75
Phi 84
Phi 95
2.69
2.23
1.98
1.46
0.81
0.47
-0.27
Moment
Mean Phi
Mean mm
Sorting
Skewness
Kurtosis
Statistics
1.36
0.39
0.9
-0.58
3.91

ATTACHMENT B
PERMIT SHEET DRAWINGS

0
0
w
U
O
W
o!
W
0
W
m.
Z
0
Z W
r�
N w
J Q
� Z
J_ Q
Q �
W Y
O O
Q O
J Z
2 V
V W
a�
Y O
aW
Oa
J 4
Q
ZO
O
H J
Q
Z
N O
O: K
M�a
�Za
�YZ
o ttl W
ok
V �
W
laa
Q
d w x
0°3
. z m
o0w
M U Z
Y Q
77 ,
� U �
1po KO
�N.2
�w0
�Qu
Y
Z
�C'!Z
wIIW —
�oi'
°a mza
�Q
=I a Z a
OIQO
mffi°
wQ
m W V
o F
i
77oo
600
U
NORTH CAROLI NA
BEACH
FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH
DUNE REHABILITATION
Edgecombc
o�xo,
:dkstO.'te 'J
_ncatls Fc^y
a
x
iio;?y Ridge Thrmas Nor,^-OI-``-ail N�a
tard«x�
?l�Or
La�di�vj
Sul City
Surf Cary
Wmrlside y%Y.tts landing
C�rEeA
SHEETINDEX
SHEET DESCRIPTION
01 LOCATION MAP & COVER PAGE
02 PROJECT OVERVIEW
03 STATIONS 880+00 TO 900+00
04 STATIONS 910+00 TO 930+00
05 STATIONS 940+00 TO 960+00
06 STATIONS 970+00 TO 990+00
07 STATIONS 1000+00 TO 1020+00
08 STATIONS 1030+00 TO 1050+00
09 STATIONS 1060+00 TO 1080+00
10 STATIONS 1090+00 TO 1110+00
11 STATIONS 1120+00 TO 1130+00
NORTH TOPSAIL
BEACH DUNE
REHABILITATION
PROJECT LOCATION
N
i
0 20000'
Scale in Feet
© 2020 Microsoft Corporation © 2020 HERE V :7h"�;�
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
LOCATION MAP & COVER PAGE
Rehabilitation
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATMiCONSULTINGDESIGN
Re uested b Town of North To sail Beach
q Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
23-June-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 01

ti
ox \00
v \
00 \s
�0
0 v
00
`Sy v v
°
Lo v
P
N
0 3000'
Scale in Feet
FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
"NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
EXISTING DUNE
VARIES DUNE TEMPLATE
+12' NAVD88 (TYP.)
SLOPE 1 V:3H
MHW
EXISTING GRADE 17
(POST HURRICANE DORIAI
TYPICAL DUNE PROFILE
(VERTICAL SCALE EXAGGERATED 5X)
PROJECT SITE TIDAL DATUMS
(NEW RIVER INLET, NORTH CAL DOLPHIN)
Datum
Abbreviation
Elev.
(ft-NAVD88)
Mean Higher -High Water
MHHW
1.4
Mean High Water
MHW
1.1
North American Vertical
Datum of 1988
NAVD88
0
Mean Low Water
MLW
-1.7
Mean Lower -Low Water
MLLW
-1.8
Water Levels at 8658163 , Wrightsville Beach NC
Datum
Abbreviation
Elev.
(ft-NAVD88)
Mean Higher -High Water
MHHW
1.77
Mean High Water
MHW
1.42
North American Vertical
Datum of 1988
NAVD88
0
Mean Low Water
MLW
-2.56
Mean Lower -Low Water
MLLW
-2.71
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Rehabilitation
OVERVIEW
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATMiCONSULTINGDESIGN
Re uested b Town of North To sail Beach
q Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
I
23-June-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 02

FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
C
�
D
D
_j
/L�� O
O
00
c EXISTING PERMITTED o
PROPOSED DUNE
o
R7�C DUNE TEMPLATE +
FT
TEMPLATE
+
CD
'QO
7.66
7.02
s.
7.10
7.14
5
5.88
�.50
axis
8
'78 890+00
10 78
10.67
9.82
13
r�
1t"8 880+00
4. A3
2.oB
1.20
0.26
-0.91
-2.88
-4.18
4.51
Z41
- MHW - 1. 6- - MHW -
0 i
.92 _
- MLW -
-3.10
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER:
EXISTING PERMITTED DUNE TEMPLATE
(PERMIT #79-10)
PARCEL: 049182 PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED
CAPITAL ASSET PROPERTIES LLC BEACH ACCESS &
C/O CHRISTOPHER ANDREW STOCKPILING AREA
PLAFORD
7522 DUNBAR RD
WILMINGTON, NC 28411-9626
1.58
Q18
-1.02 -
-1.8
-2.85
-6.3s PROPOSED
7.701 DUNE CREST
PROPOSED
TOE OF DUNE
MHW
MLW
Al
0 200'
Scale in Feet
20
STATION 880+00
20
STATION 890+00
20
STATION 900+00 PRE-FLORENCE
Co
15
2019-09 SURVEY
CO
15
2019-09 SURVEY
00
15
2019-09 SURVEY
p
-120' I- +12
>
-120' I +12
>
1 ` +12
z 10
3 EXISTING PERMITTED
z 10
;1 EXISTING PERMITTED
z 10
31 PROPOSED DUNE
DUNE TEMPLATE
DUNE TEMPLATE
- TEMPLATE
w 5
w 5
w 5
LL
MHW: 1.1'
MHW: 1.1'
�
MHW: 1.1'
z 0
Z 0
z 0
-5
J -5
� -5
w
w
w
-10
10
-10
400 500 600 700
400 500 600 700
400 500 600 700
360
360
300
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. THE SURVEY DATA IS BASED
ON A POST DORIAN SURVEY BY TI COASTAL DATED SEPTEMBER 7-12, 2019.
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 880+00 TO 900+00
Rehabilitation
DESIGN
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
Arm
Requested b Town of North Topsail Beach
q Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
CONSULTING
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
23-June-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 03

W
0
w
0
w
0
0
s
w
m
rr
OZ
Z W
r�
N W
J Q
� Z
J a
a�
W Y
O O
O
Q O
J Z
rx
xW
�r
�o
Yw
aJ
Oa
J 4
a
z�
0
H J
Q 0
Z 0
N 1'K
M�a
�Za
oaZ
ttl W
Ok
V �
W
W 0' O-a,
laa
�0w
�zx
mar
Q
d w x
0°3
ml z m
o0w
M U Z
I Q
77
� U �
'z0
�w00
�aLL
Y
Z
�'Z
wIIW -
�oi'
°a mza
�Q
=I Za
a
OIQO
0W
wQ
W V
z
77
U Z U
W
D
O
z
o
O
O
0
910+00
3.16
1.99 MHW
-0.01
-1.07 _
------4
-2.80
-4.46
-9.60
FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
"NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
Cn
D
O
z
N
0
O
0
6.42 NEW RIVER INLET RD
6.50
6.41
6.35 920+00
a
3.28
- 1.q4 - - - MHW -
Q 06
-1.27
MLW
-2.96
-4.56
-6.36
-8.92
PROPOSED TOE OF DUNE
PROPOSED
DUNE CREST
G7
D
O
z
0
W
O
O
0
0-74
-0.98
- MLW - -1.83
-2.97
-4.11
-6.28
-7 71
930+00
NO DUNE FILL
PROPOSED THIS
STATION
- MHW - -
NV
0 200'
Scale in Feet
20 STATION 910+00 PRE-FLORENCE 20 STATION 920+00 PRE-FLORENCE 20 STATION 930+00 PRE-FLORENCE
00 15 2019-09 SURVEY Q 15 2019-09 SURVEY 15 2019-09 SURVEY
- 5'-I +12 < 45'-1 +12
z 10 // s PROPOSED DUNE z 10 3 Q NO DUNE FILL PROPOSED
/ „ PROPOSED DUNE z 10THIS STATION*
w 5 w 5 TEMPLATE --� TEMPLATE w 5
V. W ui
LL MHW:1.1' MHW:1.1' K MHW:1.1'
Z 0 Z 0 z 0
J -5 W -5 J -5
W W W
-10 -10 -10
360 400 500 600 700 300 400 560 660 700 300 400 500 600 7C
DISTANCE IN FEET DISTANCE IN FEET DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. THE SURVEY DATA IS BASED
ON A POST DORIAN SURVEY BY TI COASTAL DATED SEPTEMBER 7-12, 2019.
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 910+00 TO 930+00
Rehabilitation
DESIGN
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATM
Requested b Town of North Topsail Beach
q Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
CONSULTING
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
23-June-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 04

0
0
0
a
w
c
0
V
0
w
m
rr
oZ
Z W
r�
N w
J Q
� Z
J Q
Q�
W Y
O O
� O
Q O
J Z
r=
=w
L^r
�o
a
w
Oa
J 4
Q
zo
O
H J
Q;
zo
M�a
�Za
o ttl W
ok
� V �
�w3
&0
laa
�Qr
Q
d w 2
0°3
ml z m
.0w
M U Z
I Q
77
� U �
'Wo
�w0
aLL
Y
Z
�'Z
wIIW -
�oi'
°a mza
�Q
=I Za
a
OIQO
0W
wQ
W V
z
77
U Z U
D
O
z
0
P.
0
0
0
940+00
5.13
4.54
Z 98
-j8 - MHW
-0.41
-1.94
-3.59
-5.41
- 7.98
FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
"NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
R
LN
F.
cfl
a,
0
0
0
950+00
NEW RIVER INLET RD
D
O
z
0
rn
0
0
0
5.
960+00
'4 ' �97
11 44771
5.05
1.97 4.95
3.3.34
-0.80 - - MHW - ea5- - MHW - -0.09 -
-1.04 -0.88
- MLW - 15 - MLW -
-2.38
-3.20 -3.76
-4.-7
-6.30 30 _ 7 43 �
-8.65
PROPOSED TOE OF DUNE %
PROPOSED ,®
DUNE CREST
0 200'
Scale in Feet
20 STATION 940+00 PRE-FLORENCE 20 STATION 950+00 PRE-FLORENCE 20
00 2019-09 SURVEY -1 23' j- [phone] SURVEY 00
15 I-35'-1 p 15 p 15
a-- s +12 a 3 PROPOSED DUNE Q
z 10 „ PROPOSED DUNE z 10 „ z 10
TEMPLATE TEMPLATE
w 5 w 5� w 5
LL MHW: 1.1' w MHW: 1.1' LL
Z 0 z 0 z 0
-5 5 J -5
w w w
-10 -10 -10
300 460 500 600 700 300 400 500 600 700
DISTANCE IN FEET DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. THE SURVEY DATA IS BASED
ON A POST DORIAN SURVEY BY TI COASTAL DATED SEPTEMBER 7-12, 2019.
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND INC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
STATION 960+00 PRE-FLORENCE
2019-09 SURVEY
20' I- +13
PROPOSED DUNE
TEMPLATE
MHW: 1.1'
DISTANCE IN FEET
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 940+00 TO 960+00
Rehabilitation
DESIGN
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATM
Requested b Town of North Topsail Beach
q Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
CONSULTING
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
23-June-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 05

W
0
w
0
rr
w
0
0
V
f/1
s
w
m
rr
OZ
Z W
r�
N W
J Q
�Z
J a
a�
W Y
O O
O
Q O
J Z
r=
=w
�r
�o
Yw
aJ
Oa
J 4
a
z-0
0
H J
Q;
Zo
M�a
�Za
aZ
o ttl W
Ok
V �
�w3
W02
laa
�0w
mar
Q
d w 2
0°3
ml z m
o0w
M U Z
I Q
77
� U �
'z0
�w0
-aLL
Y
Z
�'Z
wIIW -
�oi'
°a mza
�Q
=I Za
a
OIQO
0W
wQ
W V
z
77
U Z U
970+00
4.57
Z 65
M. - MHW
-0.23
-2.85
-4.13
-5.84
-Mae
FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
" OT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
W
O NEW RIVER INLET RD 5.0 Z
4 1 (9
5.61 00
5.8 O
5.g +
6.03 O
6.15
6.56
6.74
77 gggg331
T 8z
7.18
7�2;n 980+00
Cn
-I
O
Z
O
5;3 O
6 O
6.1 O
6.6
6.99
7.34
7.29
7.34
7.35
721 990+00
3.28 4.78 -
t.84 1.68 MHW - -
o.8i - - - MHW
MLW -0.51 MLW
=1.w_ -2.54
-2.60
-3.60 4.57
PROPOSED TOE OF DUNE 4-5.03 PROPOSED -714
BEACH ACCESS &
-7.01 DUNE CREST STOCKPILING AREA FOR
TRANSFER BETWEEN
UPLAND TRUCKS &
ALL -WHEEL DRIVE BEACH 0 200'
DUMP TRUCKS
Scale in Feet
20 STATION 970+00 PRE-FLORENCE 20 STATION 980+00 PRE-FLORENCE 20 STATION 990+00
� �_ 2019-09 SURVEY 20' 2019-09 SURVEY
0 15 rt15 +13 0 15 +14 0 15 15' +13
a 3 PROPOSED DUNE a 3 PROPOSED DUNE a
z 10 �1 z 10 �1 z 10� � 3i
TEMPLATE =___ _� TEMPLATE
w 5 w 5 w 5
LL MHW: 1.1' LL MHW: 1.1' LL
> >Lu >
5 J -Lu
5 J -5
w w w
-10 -10 -10
360 460 500 600 700 300 400 500 600 760 300 400 500
DISTANCE IN FEET DISTANCE IN FEET DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. THE SURVEY DATA IS BASED
ON A POST DORIAN SURVEY BY TI COASTAL DATED SEPTEMBER 7-12, 2019.
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
PRE-FLORENCE
2019-09 SURVEY
PROPOSED DUNE
TEMPLATE
MHW: 1.1'
0
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 970+00 TO 990+00
Rehabilitation
DESIGN
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATM
Requested b Town of North Topsail Beach
q Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
CONSULTING
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
23-June-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 06

r.
1000+00
4.87
4.43
3.78
2.09
- --U23-MHW
- -
-0.83
-
-2.83
-3.65
-4.so
-s.s8
-6.84
FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
D
O
z
0
O
+ NEW RIVER INLET RD
0
0
1010+00
4.84
3.95
Z 66
2.29
Z 79
e 72- - MHW -
-0.68
MLW -1.64- MLW -
-2.76
=4'se PROPOSED
PROPOSED TOE OF DUNE -6.40 DUNE CREST
Cn
D
O
z
0
N
O
+
0
0
3.37
2.99
1.86
-0.24
-1.21
-2.74
-3.11
-3.91
-6.81
1020+00
NV
0 200'
Scale in Feet
20 STATION 1000+00 PRE-FLORENCE 20 STATION 1010+00 PRE-FLORENCE 20.STATION 1020+00 PRE-FLORENCE
00 2019-09 SURVEY � 2019-09 SURVEY � 2019-09 SURVEY
p 15 15'1--j +13 p 15 10'- -1 +13 p 15-115'f- +13
z�T, _1 PROPOSED DUNE Q - s PROPOSED DUNE Q s PROPOSED DUNE
z10 `��1 z10 �� z10 ��
TEMPLATE TEMPLATE
TEMPLATE
W 5 W 5 W 5
LL MHW: 1.1' U_ MHW: 1.1' MHW: 1.1'
J -5 J -5 J -5
w w w
-10 -10 10
300 460 500 660 700 300 400 500 600 700 300 400 500 600 7C
DISTANCE IN FEET DISTANCE IN FEET DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. THE SURVEY DATA IS BASED
ON A POST DORIAN SURVEY BY TI COASTAL DATED SEPTEMBER 7-12, 2019.
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 1000+00 TO 1020+00
Rehabilitation
DESIGN
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATM
Requested b Town of North Topsail Beach
q Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
CONSULTING
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
23-June-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 07

0
0
w
U
O
a
w
0
0
V
f/1
G
w
m
rr
oZ
Z W
r�
N W
J Q
� Z
J Q
Q�
W Y
O O
O
Q O
J Z
r=
=w
�r
�o
Yw
Oa
J 4
Q
ZO
0
H J
Q
z0
M�a
�Za
aZ
o ttl W
ok
V �
W
K W O-a
laa
�zw
�Qr
Q
d w 0
0°3
ml z m
o0w
M U Z
1 Q
� U �
'wo
�N2w
�w0
�aw
}
Z
� 'Z
wIIW -
�oi'
°a mza
�Q
1.2
a
OIQO
mw
wQ
W V
z
boo
U Z U
FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
D
0
�
O
Z
o
�
0
o
CTI
o
0
0
0
0
NEW RIVER IN RD
0
5.95
5.74
22
S 1030+00
4.80
5.19
4.88 1040+00
4.5A
5.08
5.37
dos
1050+00
3.92 4:66 4.�
3.06 4.49 3.86
1_72 3.64
0.44 MHW 1.74 4.o2 -
�38- MHW MHW -
-0.93 - MLW
-2.44 '•}..?3-- -0.77
-3.26 -2.51 - MLW - MLW
-4.00 -3.58 -2.40
-5.32 -4.84 PROPOSED 4:fi7
-5.48 BEACH ACCESS & PROPOSED -6•20 DUNE CREST -5.41
STOCKPILING AREA FOR TOE OF DUNE
TRANSFER BETWEEN
UPLAND TRUCKS &
ALL -WHEEL DRIVE BEACH
DUMP TRUCKS o 200'
Scale in Feet
20 STATION 1030+00 PRE-FLORENCE 20 STATION 1040+00 PRE-FLORENCE 20 STATION 1050+00 PRE-FLORENCE
Co 15 l'r10' [phone] SURVEY 0 15 1 [phone] SURVEY o 15 f'25'1 [phone] SURVEY
> PROPOSED DUNE > r 3 PROPOSED DUNE
10 \ „ TEMPLAT PROPOSED DUNE 10 /1 TEMPLATE 10 / �„ TEMPLATE
W '-��-� W .` W �_J
W 5 W 5 J W 5
W MHW: 1.1' W MHW: 1.1' W MHW: 1.1'
Z 0 Z 0 Z 0
W 5 � 5 -5
W W W
-10 -10 -10
300 460 500 600 700 300 400 500 600 700 300 400 500 600 700
DISTANCE IN FEET DISTANCE IN FEET DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. THE SURVEY DATA IS BASED
ON A POST DORIAN SURVEY BY TI COASTAL DATED SEPTEMBER 7-12, 2019.
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 1030+00 TO 1050+00
Rehabilitation
DESIGN
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATM
Requested b Town of North Topsail Beach
q Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
CONSULTING
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
23-June-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 08

FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
In
Cn
D �
O O D
o z O
rn z
0 0
+ -4 o
0 0 OD
CD+ o
0 0
0 0
1060+00
1070+00 NEW RIVER INLET RD
iN 1080+00
3.34 1.21 - _
_ -I-1.30
B MHW 1.80.23 - MHW 8-
Q45 0.35 9
-0.01 � �- - - -
-0.79 -0.01
_
-1.06 - .99 MLW - -t .92
9 -MLW
MLW -2-2.47
-
-Z07 4.5.3 53
.55 -2.54
-3.2.3041 -5.69 -4.29
-
-3.86 - 7 37 -5.45
BEACH ACCESS &
-4.99 BEACH ACCESS & -6.53 ,y
_6p2 STOCKPILING AREA FOR PROPOSED
TRANSFER BETWEEN PROPOSED STOCKPILING AREA FOR DUNE CREST ,S
UPLAND TRUCKS & TOE OF DUNE TRANSFER BETWEEN
ALL -WHEEL DRIVE BEACH UPLAND TRUCKS & 0 200'
DUMP TRUCKS ALL -WHEEL DRIVE BEACH
DUMP TRUCKS Scale in Feet
20 STATION 1060+00 PRE-FLORENCE 20 STATION 1070+00 PRE-FLORENCE 20 STATION 1080+00 PRE-FLORENCE
00 15' 2019-09 SURVEY 20 2019-09 SURVEY 20 2019-09 SURVEY
p 15 I- +14 p 15 / t I- +14 p 15 I' +14
Q 3 PROPOSED DUNE Q 3 Q a
z10- 10 �� z10 ��
TEMPLATE PROPOSED DUNE PROPOSED DUNE
w 5- w 5 TEMPLATE w 5 TEMPLATE
MHW: 1.1' U- MHW: 1.1' LL MHW: 1.1'
z 0 z 0 z 0
J -5 J -5 J -5
w w w
-10 -10 10
300 460 500 600 700 300 400 500 600 700 300 400 500 600 70
DISTANCE IN FEET DISTANCE IN FEET DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. THE SURVEY DATA IS BASED
ON A POST DORIAN SURVEY BY TI COASTAL DATED SEPTEMBER 7-12, 2019.
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 1060+00 TO 1080+00
Rehabilitation
DESIGN
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATM
Requested b Town of North Topsail Beach
q Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
CONSULTING
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
23-June-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 09

W
0
0
w
U
0
c
0
s
w
m
rr
OZ
Z W
r�
N w
J Q
� Z
J Q
Q�
W Y
O O
O
Q O
J Z
r=
=w
L^r
�o
a
aJ
Oa
J 4
Q
zo
O
H J
Q
Zo
M�a
�Za
Y Z
� m W
0k
� V �
�w3
W02
laa
�0w
�Qr
Q
d w 2
0°3
ml z m
o0w
M U Z
1 Q
� U �
'z0
�w00
aw
Y
Z
�'Z
wIIW -
�oi'
°a mza
�Q
1.2
a
OIQO
0W
wQ
W V
z
boo
U Z U
FOR
PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
NOT
FOR CONSTRUCTION"
Cn
D
R�
o
D
R\VER \N`E�
D
NEW
4Cn
z
-I
O
5N O
o
z
6.6 Z
s�
o
+
04.
3 g
07
7.1
0
0+
y o
o
o
0
ii.
77• o
7.
1090+00
5.72
V
8 02
1
6.99
8.24
7.74
7.95
7.
1100+00
1110+00
8.26
-0.12
-1.71
Imo MLW
-2.15
-3.09
_4
- SVL ---
PROPOSED
TOE OF DUNE
=fig-- --
97
T-2
0
MHW4
8
56
55563
Sg
8
-5.63 PROPOSED
DUNE CREST
S s.o166
13-- -- 7 -- -- SVL �-
- - -
2
0.88 MHW
-0.27
-0.46
-2.23 MLW
�- -2.39
-2.80
-3.73
-4.34
-5.62
20
STATION 1090+00
PRE-FLORENCE
20
STATION 1100+00
PRE-FLORENCE
20
00 00 15
20' I-
2019-09 SURVEY
Q 15
2019-09 SURVEY
0 15
>
+13
,
f-35'-I +12
>
z 10-
PROPOSED DUNE
z 10
s PROPOSED DUNE
z 10
w 5
TEMPLATE
w 5
TEMPLATE
w 5
U_
MHW: 1.1'
LL
MHW: 1.1'
z 0-:r-- I I z o- I I z 0
�
5 J -5 J 5
w w w
-10 10 -10
300 400 500 600 700 300 400 500 600 700
DISTANCE IN FEET DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. THE SURVEY DATA IS BASED
ON A POST DORIAN SURVEY BY TI COASTAL DATED SEPTEMBER 7-12, 2019.
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND INC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
NV
0 200'
Scale in Feet
STATION 1110+00 PRE-FLORENCE
2019-09 SURVEY
)'- { +12
PROPOSED DUNE
TEMPLATE
MHW: 1.1'
DISTANCE IN FEET
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 1090+00 TO 1110+00
Rehabilitation
DESIGN
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATM
Requested b Town of North Topsail Beach
q Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
CONSULTING
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
23-June-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 10

FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
D
� ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER:
0 TOPSAIL BEACH
z HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
-� PO BOX 79032
o+ CHARLOTTE, NC 28271
T O O
O Z
W
O
7j3 O
1120+00 �.� O
1130+00
N�
0 200'
Scale in Feet
�I
C)
z
NEW RIVER INLET RD
O
7.1 O
-
--- -- SVL ---�--
°z
748
0.67
� � �
-
-
8.01
-0.03
-MHW -
2.8s--�-
-�
10�
�.s8
-
-
-60 o.�
_
` s
70.98
11.86 1140+00
-z.52 �
MLW ----
-1.82
-1.05
_�
I�3Iy3Ty
-2.68
-1.37
-2.48
_­�7: 7-
2.24 -
-4• 7
-2.19
MLW
-'3
-4.71
-2.70
-3,17
-2 3O8G
-p
PROPOSED TOE OF DUNE
-4.24 -3.96
PROPOSED
-1.89
-6.06
DUNE CREST
-2.09
-2.22
-2.57
-3.29
-3.92
1
-4.08
20
STATION 1120+00 PRE-FLORENCE
_ 20
STATION 1PRE-FLORENCE
130+00
00
Cl)15
2019-09 SURVEY
/
00
15
2019-09 SURVEY
A..
-30'1 +12;
+12
10
j
10
PROPOSED DUNE
7A3
„ PROPOSED DUNE
W 5
J \TEMPLATE
Lu 5
TEMPLATE
LL
MHW: 1.1'
LL
MHW: 1.1'
LU -5
w -5
LL]
Lu
-10
10
400 500 600 700
400 500 600 700
300
360
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. THE SURVEY DATA IS BASED
ON A POST DORIAN SURVEY BY TI COASTAL DATED SEPTEMBER 7-12, 2019.
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
STATION
AREA
DISTANCE
VOLUME
VOLUME
Number
SF
LF
CY
CY/FT
900+00
105.4
1,000
5,707
5.7
910+00
202.8
1,000
9,272
9.3
920+00
297.9
1,000
5,517
5.5
930+00
0.0
1,000
4,370
4.4
940+00
236.0
1,000
7,015
7.0
950+00
142.8
1,000
5,652
5.7
960+00
162.4
1,000
4,622
4.6
970+00
87.2
1,000
3,726
3.7
980+00
114.0
1,000
4,644
4.6
990+00
136.8
1,000
4,533
4.5
1000+00
108.0
1,000
3,218
3.2
1010+00
65.8
1,000
2,703
2.7
1020+00
80.2
1,000
2,795
2.8
1030+00
70.7
1,000
2,839
2.8
1040+00
82.6
1,000
4,085
4.1
1050+00
138.0
1,000
4,379
4.4
1060+00
98.5
1,000
6,966
7.0
1070+00
277.7
1,000
9,860
9.9
1080+00
254.8
1,000
8,852
8.9
1090+00
223.2
1,000
8,980
9.0
1100+00
261.7
1,000
9,738
9.7
1110+00
264.1
1,000
9,485
9.5
1120+00
248.0
1,000
9,927
9.9
1130+00
288.0
1,000
5,334
5.3
1140+00
0.0
TOTAL VOLUME
144,221
AVERAGE VOLUME PER FOOT
6.0
ADDITIONAL EROSION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION (CY/FT)I 1.6
TOTAL REQUESTED VOLUME (CY) I 188,000
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 1120+00 TO 1130+00
Rehabilitation
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATMICONSULTINGDESIGN
Re uested b Town of North To sail Beach
q Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
23-June-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 11

ATTACHMENT C
Adjacent Property Owner Info

Attachment C
Adjacent Property Owner (APO) Information
Adjacent property owners for the proposed dune restoration are:
South of the project fill template:
Mail Mail Address
Mail Mail
Parcel Owner
Address
Legal1
City
ZIP
Address City
State ZIP
CAPITAL
100
L1
NORTH
7522
ASSET
OCEAN
OCEAN
28411-
TOPSAIL
28460 DUNBAR WILMINGTON
NC
PROPERTIES
VIEW
SOUND
9626
BEACH
RD
LLC
LN
VILLAGE
North of the project fill template:
Mail
Mail Address Mail Mail
Parcel Owner Address Legal1
City ZIP
Address
City State ZIP
NEW
TOPSAIL REEF C/A
RIVER
PO BOX
28271-
HOMEOWNERS TOPSAIL
NTB 28460
CHARLOTTE NC
INLET
79032
7047
ASSO REEF
RD
Complete permit application packages have been sent by Certified Letter to the above adjacent
property owners.
C-1

NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Qualih
October 12, 2020
MEMORANDUM:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director, Division of Coastal
Management
FROM:
Heather Coats
Beach & Inlet Management Project Coordinator
Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7302
[e-mail]
SUBJECT:
CAMA Permit Application Review— Major Modification 79-10
Applicant:
Town of North Topsail Beach
Project Location:
Public Beach Access BA13B to south of Topsail Reef Villas
Proposed Project:
Dune Reconstruction
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Heather Coats at the address above by November 9, 2020. If you have any questions
regarding the proposed project, contact Heather Coats 910-796-7302 when appropriate, in-depth comments
with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
PRINT NAME
AGENCY
SIGNATURE
DATE
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave. Morehead City, NC 28557 [phone]

Roy COOPER
C1+ONYJ1r)r
MICHAELS. REGAN
sP�fer�fy
BRA TOM C. DAV15
air-eemf
Mr. Dave Gilbride
Town of North Topsail Beach
2008 Loggerhead Court
N. Topsail Beach, NC 28460
Dear Mr. Gilbride:
NORT" CAROUNA
tm4ra m&Wa1 Qm&jr
October 12, 2020
The Division of Coastal Management hereby acknowledges receipt of your application for State approval of
the Town's dune rehabilitation project, located from the Public Beach Access BA13B to south of the Topsail
Reef Villas, in N. Topsail Beach, Onslow County, and adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean. It was received as
complete on 9/30/20 and appears to be adequate for processing at this time. The projected deadline for making
a decision is 12/14/20. An additional 75-day review period is provided by law when such time is necessary to
complete the review. If you have not been notified of a final action by the initial deadline stated above, you
should consider the review period extended. Under those circumstances, this letter will serve as your notice of
an extended review. However, an additional letter will be provided on or about the 75th day.
If this agency does not render a permit decision within 70 days from 9/30/20 you may request a meeting with
the Director of the Division of Coastal Management and permit staff to discuss the status of your project. Such
a meeting will be held within five working days from the receipt of your written request and shall include the
applicant and project designer/consultant.
NCGS 113A-119(b) requires that Notice of an application be posted at the location of the proposed
development. Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Permit Filing" postcard which must be posted at the
property of your proposed development. You should post copies of this notice at a conspicuous point along
the project area where it can be observed by the public. Failure to post this notice could result in an incomplete
application.
An onsite inspection will be made, and if additional information is required, you will be contacted by the
appropriate State or Federal agency. Please contact me if you have any questions and notify me in writing if
you wish to receive a copy of my field report and/or comments from reviewing agencies.
Sincerely,
4��avle,t 6k2�1
Heather Coats
Beach & Inlet Management Project Coordinator
cc: MHC Files, DCM Fran Way, ATM
Liz Hair, COE Robb Mairs, DWR
FM
NonkhCanAlmDeparYmentafEnvlronntiemlQuaRry I Division ofCoastal Mmagernen#
Mwngnan Off et I IV Cardinal DrILAe vaenS-lerL 11+Y+IrMhQW. North C"ha 28405
914,7ft?215

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Town of North Topsail Beach —Major Mod.— Permit No. 79-10
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: The project site is located along the oceanfront beach from
the Public Beach Access BA13B to south of the Topsail Reef Villas, adjacent to the Atlantic
Ocean, in North Topsail Beach, Onslow County.
Approximate Coordinates— Lat: 34.491304 N (start)/ 34.522333' N (end)
Long: 77.421431'W (start) / 77.352724' W (end)
INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit — 7/16/20
Was Applicant Present — No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received — Complete 9/30/20
Office — Wilmington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan — Town of North Topsail Beach
Classification from LUP — No Classification / Developed
(B) AEC(s) Involved: OH
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Government
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing — Municipal Sewer
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing — Commercial and Residential structures
Planned — Dune Rehabilitation/Truck Haul
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 2'-3'/year Source — LTAASCR 2020 Update
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands (coastal)
N/A
N/A
N/A
(B) Non -Vegetated Wetlands -
N/A
N/A
N/A
open water/shallow bottom
(C) Other (Highground) -
N/A
23.7 acres
N/A
(fill above MHW)
(D) Total Area Disturbed: Approximately 23.9 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SA/SB Open: YES
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting authorization to construct a starter dune (dune
reconstruction) via truck haul from the ST Wooten and 421 Sand mines.
FM
NonhCanAlmDepartmentafEnvlronntiemlQuaRry I Division ofCoastal Mmagernen#
Mwngan bfflee I ICJ Cardinal DrlueExlenS-lerL I Mr h QW. North C"ha 28405
914,7ft?215

North Topsail Beach — CAMA Major Permit Modification, No. 79-10
Page Two
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project site is located between the Public Beach Access BA13B and the Topsail Beach Villas,
adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean, in North Topsail Beach, Onslow County. The project site begins at the
Public Beach Access BA13B on the right at the southern end of New River Inlet Rd. The project would
originate from this point and span toward the north to south of the Topsail Beach Villas. The project site
encompasses approximately 4.4 miles of oceanfront beach. The project site is adjacent to primarily
residential properties as well as infrastructure for the Town. The project site is bordered by Onslow Beach
to the North, the Atlantic Ocean to the East, and commercial and residential properties to the south and
west. The highground portion of the property is vegetated primarily American Beach Grass (Ammophila
breviligulata) and Sea Oats (Uniola paniculata).
The Annual erosion rate for this portion of the Town of North Topsail Beach is 2'-3'/year based on the
Division of Coastal Management's 2011 Annual Erosion Rate maps.
The Town of North Topsail Beach Land Use Plan does not have the dry sand beach classified. However;
the upland areas of this project are classified as Developed. The adjacent waters of the project site are
classified as SB by the NC Division of Water Resources. The NC Division of Marine Fisheries has NOT
designated the adjacent waters of the Atlantic Ocean as a Primary Nursery Area, and the waters adjacent
to the proposed project are predominantly OPEN to the harvesting of shellfish.
The Town of North Topsail Beach currently has a couple beach -related CAMA Major Development
Permits that are active, including CAMA Major Permit No. 79-10 (Shoreline Stabilization) and No. 191-
05 (Beach Bulldozing). Permit No. 92-14 was also issued to the Town through variance for a sand bag
revetment in 2014.
CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit No. 79-10 was issued to the Town of North Topsail Beach on July 21,
2010. The permit authorized a Town -wide "shoreline stabilization" project which consisted of dredging a
portion of New River Inlet bar channel, as well as an offshore borrow area. Dredge material from these
areas was authorized to be deposited along the entire ocean front shoreline of North Topsail Beach in five
(5) phases. To date, the Town has completed work along the majority of the ocean front with the
exception of Phases 2 and 4. On January 10, 2017 a Major Modification was issued to allow truck haul
for renourishment of Phase 5. Post -Florence, the applicant requested to modify the permit again to allow
for dune restoration of the Phase 5 area in lieu of beach renourishment. A request was also submitted to
extend the repair area north to include a portion of the Phase 4 area. On November 21, 2019, a minor
modification of the permit was issued to allow the work to include the expanded fill area. The truck haul
project was conducted over the winter of 2019/20 and work was completed in early April. The sand was
sourced from the ST Wooten sand mine and 421 Sand.
PROPOSED PROJECT:
Under this permit modification request, the Town proposes to construct a starter dune along the northern
half of the Town's oceanfront shoreline to restore the frontal dune damage from Hurricane Florence. Sand
would be conducted by truck -hauling material from the ST Wooten sand mine and 421 Sand, which were
the same sources used for the recently completed project. ST Wooten Sand Mine is located at 220 Sutton
NonhCanAlmDepartmentafEnvlronmemlQuaRry I Division ofCoastal Mmagernen#
Mwngnan bfflee I ICJ Cardinal DrILAevaeni-len I MrMhQW. North Ceropna 28405
914,7ft?215

North Topsail Beach — CAMA Major Permit Modification, No. 79-10
Page Three
Lake Road, Wilmington, NC and the nearby 421 Sand is located at 5401 Highway 421. The applicant's
engineer indicates that approximately 11 cubic yards/linear foot (on average) of material was eroded from
the frontal dune system as a result of Hurricane Florence. The proposed project consists of constructing a
starter dune that would replace from 3.3-11.7 cubic yards/linear foot.
According to the application package, the currently proposed project would consist of the placement of
approximately 187,000 cubic yards of compatible fill along —22,900 linear feet of shoreline. The
applicant's plans (Sheet 11) show a volume of 149,373 cubic yards of material is needed to construct the
starter dune as designed. A varying crest width of 7'-46' is proposed with a crest height of 12'-15'
NAVD88. The starter dune would be constructed with a 3:1 waterward slope. Sand would be placed
immediately waterward of the eroded frontal dune to avoid the creation of any low-lying troughs or
valleys between the existing frontal dune and the project area while also avoiding impacts to existing
dune vegetation. While the template volume is currently calculated at 149,373 cubic yards, the applicant
is also requesting a maximum placement volume of approximately 187,000 cubic yards be authorized to
account for additional erosion anticipated this season prior to the onset of construction. All fill would be
placed above mean high water (MHW). The design template approximates restoration of the dune
footprint that was lost in Hurricane Florence. The pre -Florence profiles, sourced through 2016 LiDAR
data, have been shown on the plans for reference.
In order to demonstrate the borrow source sand compatibility with native dune material, samples were
collected from both mines prior to and during the recent fill project and have been submitted with the
application package. Sand is also washed and processed at the mines prior to stockpiling, which
significantly reduces any fine-grained material, and then the sand is screened using a 1/4" screen at the
mine prior to hauling to the project site. As proposed, material will also be staged and transferred to
trucks on the beach at the site to further avoid the potential for foreign gravel material to be introduced
through the transfer process. According to the information provided, sand sampled from ST Wooten is
calculated to have a mean grain size of 0.27mm, with less than 2% fines and less than 0.5% granular and
gravel material. Calcium carbonate is also less than 1 %. The sand samples from 421 Sand have a mean
grain size of 0.41mm with 0% fines, approximately 1% of granular material and 0% gravel and calcium
carbonate.
Sand that has been deposited in the fill area by off -road dump trucks would be graded to the design
template by bulldozer. The proposed accessways are shown on the plans. Five in total are proposed to
facilitate sand transport to the beach. Three are existing vehicular accessways and two would require
temporary dune impacts (resulting in less than 0.2 acres of temporary impacts). According to the
applicant, all five accesses would be restored to original conditions post -project. The application also
states that all work would be conducted in the winter work window from November 16- April 30.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS
The proposed project would result in the filling of approximately 23.7 acres of upper beach, with a fill
volume of up to 187,000 cubic yards. As proposed, no fill would occur below mean high water.
Approximately 0.2 acres of area would also be disturbed for truck access onto the beach. Minor
temporary impacts to the frontal dune would occur for equipment access to the beach; however, the
applicant has stated that these areas would be restored to their pre -project condition upon project
NonhCanAlmDeparrmentafEnvlronmemlQuaRry I Division ofCoastal Mmagernen#
Mwngan bfflee I ICJ Cardinal DrILAevaenS-lerL I Mr h,9W, North Ceropna 28405
914,7ft?215

North Topsail Beach — CAMA Major Permit Modification, No. 79-10
Page Four
completion and disturbance to remaining dunes will be kept to a minimum. The applicant is proposing to
limit work between November 16 through April 30, thereby avoiding peak periods of biological activity.
Additionally, the project has been demonstrated via historic profiles to not advance the proposed dune
reconstruction (starter dune) in an oceanward direction of the former frontal dune location, thereby
limiting impacts to the public's use of the beach.
Submitted by: Heather Coats Date: October 5, 2020 Office: Wilmington
NonhCanAlmDepartmentafEnvlronmemlQuaRry I Division ofCoastal Mmagernen#
Mwngnan bfflee I ICJ Cardinal DrlueEx1enS-1erL I Mr h,9W, North Ceropna 28405
914,7ft?215

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of themailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
NC -IN --
�5aa
NC -IN c-
IIIIIIIII I'll IIIIII IIIII IIIIIIIII I ll I ll III I III
9590 9402 4703 8323 9734 34
2. Article Number (Imnsfer from service fabelJ _
7014 2120 0003 3922 1724
PS Form 3811, July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
aga�t►-nna1
II I IIIIII IIII III I II III I I II I IIIIII � II II II III III
9590 9402 4703 8323 9734 58
7014 2120 0003 3922 1717
PS Form 3811, July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053
A. Signature
X W �1a I \`— `� ❑ Addressee
B. Received
by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery
D. Idelivery address differentt fr m item 11 ❑ Yes
V'zjDIf YES, erRE!MV below: ❑ No
30L 1 5 '^"1
3. Se"IC-9 yPe
❑ Priority Mall Express®
1Y%dult Signature
❑ Registered Mall..
❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery
❑ Registered Mail Restricted,
rd'Certified Mall®
Dart/
❑ Certified Mail Restricted Delivery
8-Return Recelpt for
Merchandise
❑ Collect on Delivery
❑ Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery
D Signature Congrmatlon�•
—'nsured Mail
[I Signature Confirmation
nsured Mall Restricted Pitj y:,.
Restricted Delivery
over$500) ,_
Domestic Return Receipt
❑ Agent
7C�
❑ Addre
6. eiv by tted Name) /
C�
e of D II
D. Is delivery m 1
11,063
If YES a
❑ No
Q �O
JUL 15hh2 202
,hs
�
�
!
DCf�I`�y L.MINGTONAN
P Mall Express®
❑,e stared Mail*'"
Ivery ' u'1, islered Mall Restricted
every
fry .®'Return R..IPt for
Merchandise
Delivery m Signature Confirmation*.
❑ Signature Confirmation
y Restricted Delivery
Domestic Return Receipt

ATM ENGINEERING
Z.-
P.O. BOX 20336
CHARLESTON, SC 29413-0336
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
DATE: July 13, 2020
TO: Heather Coats
SUBJECT:
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
FROM: Fran
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
N Attached ❑ Under Separate Cover via:
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
❑ Proposal ❑ Correspondence ❑ Invoice N Other
COPIES DESCRIPTION FORMAT
1 USPS Certified Receipt / Capital Asset Properties
1 USPS Certified Receipt / Topsail Reef HOA
❑ For Your Use
Delivery Via:
❑ Hand Delivery
COMMENTS:
N For Your Records
N US Mail
❑ As Requested
❑ Fed -Ex
❑ For Review/Comment
❑ Other
Re: North Topsail Beach Northern Shoreline Dune Rehabilitation Trj�NED
JUL 15%!'�
DGM WILMINGTON, NC

FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
"NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH
DUNE REHABILITATION
a wRSBaY
SHEET INDEX
o
SHEET
DESCRIPTION
NORTH
CARO
L
I N
A
oixv, y
`
e w
01
LOCATION MAP & COVER PAGE
Y
02
PROJECT OVERVIEW
03
STATIONS 880+00 TO 900+00
f natl F—
04
STATIONS 910+00 TO 930+00
3 Pc u
05
STATIONS 940+00 TO 960+00
ti
06
STATIONS 970+00 TO 990+00
07
STATIONS 1000+00 TO 1020+00
_ r'p
08
STATIONS 1030+00 TO 1050+00
09
STATIONS 1060+00 TO 1080+00
10
STATIONS 1090+00 TO 1110+00
hd YnIdge Th-1 N.1hT.pmilgEa°''
11
STATIONS 1120+00 TO 1130+00
BEACH
W o�ri eitic
r�osa,� aead,
Morn=
fdgemm�c
Su �f Ci.y
5urf City
14 a[t: Landis ig
NORTH TOPSAIL
BEACH DUNE
REHABILITATION
PROJECT LOCATION
N
i
0 20000'
Scale in Feet
© 2020 Microsoft Corporation © 2020 HERE V DEng
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
LOCATION MAP & COVER PAGE
Rehabilitation
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATMICONSULTINGDESIGN
Re uested b Town of North To sail Beach
q Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
I 29-September-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 01

�m
\ ~ 2
�;5zw
N N W
�a
aka
m
0
t Q z
S U
�>w
a
010
J
o0 a
a
Maa
MZo
�o
oaa
zo
owLL
�~LL
Za
>mw
�w3
.Oo
10 a
cz
oa2
�
I J F-
m a 0
F
M z 2
W H
A
oOw
�UZ
_ > a
H �
BULL.
F K O
W K
C O
° a LL
c z <
mOa
oNz
u w >
�za
�aLL
=Nri
z
a
z3o
W a
�wU
�i=z
owe
a0o
O z U
N
0 3000'
Scale in Feet
FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
EXISTING DUNE
VARIES DUNE TEMPLATE
+12'-15' NAVD88 (TYP.)
SLOPE 1 V:3H
MHW
EXISTING GRADE
TYPICAL DUNE PROFILE
(VERTICAL SCALE EXAGGERATED 5X)
PROJECT SITE TIDAL DATUMS
(NEW RIVER INLET, NORTH CAL DOLPHIN)
Datum
Abbreviation
Elev.
(ft-NAVD88)
Mean Higher -High Water
MHHW
1.4
Mean High Water
MHW
1.1
North American Vertical
Datum of 1988
NAVD88
0
Mean Low Water
MLW
-1.7
Mean Lower -Low Water
MLLW
-1.8
Water Levels at 8658163, Wrightsville Beach INC
Datum
Abbreviation
Elev.
(ft-NAVD88)
Mean Higher -High Water
MHHW
1.77
Mean High Water
MHW
1.42
North American Vertical
Datum of 1988
NAVD88
0
Mean Low Water
MLW
-2.56
Mean Lower -Low Water
MLLW
-2.71
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Rehabilitation
OVERVIEW
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATMiCONSULTINGDESIGN
Re uested b Town of North To sail Beach
q Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
I 29-September-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 02

6 •g6
514
-�
5
6 A0
6.29
11��
19.a3
1$ 880+00
8•
3 •y"
4$7
4
9 - MHW -
1 4g MON
,315
�4•9A
,6.49 EXISTING PERMITTED DUNE TEMPLATE
/, 60 (PERMIT #79-10)
,9.2$
,6.2B
FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
U)
C D
iD
i O �O
�S'iV�cR EXISTING PERMITTED o PROPOSED DUNE
C) 7�< DUNE TEMPLATE ) TEMPLATE
i o �`i +
� o 'QO
80
8.a0 890+00 .647900
/ 4.
48B4
4.2a
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER:
MLW —
PARCEL: 049182 PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED
CAPITAL ASSET PROPERTIES LLC BEACH ACCESS &
C/O CHRISTOPHER ANDREW STOCKPILING AREA
PLAFORD
7522 DUNBAR RD
WILMINGTON, NC 28411-9626
—
,3•��
,5�33
PROPOSED
i DUNE CREST
PROPOSED
,6 59 TOE OF DUNE
,6.55
,� •21
MHW -
MLW
20� STATION 880+00 I 20� STATION 890+00 20� STATION 900+00
w — ——2019-09 SURVEY 00 — ——2019-09 SURVEY � ry
15 20 r +12.0 2020-07 SURVEY 15 f-33'-1 [phone] SURVEY 0 15 I +13.0
z 10 — 3� EXISTING PERMITTED z_ 10 — — J 3 EXISTING PERMITTED z 10 3
DUNE TEMPLATE DUNE TEMPLATE
LU
w 5 w UJ 5- w UJ 5
w MHW: 1.1' w MHW: 1.1' w
Z Q_ z Q Z 0-
ui
5 �� J 5 \ J -5
w w w
-10 10 -10
300 400 500 600 700 300 400 500 600 700 360 400 500
DISTANCE IN FEET DISTANCE IN FEET DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. SURVEY DATA BY TI COASTAL
DATED JULY 2020 (ANNUAL MONITORING) AND SEPTEMBER 2019 (POST HURRICANE DORIAN).
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
8. CONSTRUCTED DUNE SLOPE TO MATCH OR BE MILDER THAN EXISTING DUNE SLOPE.
N
0 200'
Scale in Feet
PRE-FLORENCE
— ——2019-09 SURVEY
2020-07 SURVEY
PROPOSED DUNE
TEMPLATE
MHW: 1.1'
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 880+00 TO 900+00
Rehabilitation
T DESIGN
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
MI ENGINEERING
Requested b Town of North Topsail Beach
q Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
1 CONSULTING
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
29-September-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 03

FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
"NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
W
--I
D
Cn
D O
i z 0
O N z
Z o CD
(.0 o 0
0 0 +
+ 0
o NEW RIVER INLET RD
a 5B 413
4 g,33 4,99
8$ 3
a 13 63-4 920+00 4 B9 930+00
B p6910+00 2 r_ �3a�
4
4.
0
410
4.a5
480
5.89
6
— —
526
2 g4
A.
MHW
—1
0 46
— — — — MHW-
—
0
3
- MHW
—a�4
MLW
A.
MLW
_
MLW
'J 91
_
��•��
,55g
,6 81
�6 63
6
'a 33
a
'I
NO DUNE FILL
,8 04
PROPOSED
2
PROPOSED THIS
/ 2$
a'
PROPOSED TOE OF DUNE
,8 $�
DUNE CREST
,g.22
STATION
�N
,8•g8
51
0 200'
,8.24
—3
Scale in Feet
,� •1 g
� 8 50
STATION 910+00
STATION 920+00
STATION 930+00
20
p 15
PRE-FLORENCE
f-30'-1 +14.0 - - - 2019-09 SURVEY
20
Q 15
F--4.6'--+, +14.0
PRE-FLORENCE
- --2019-09 SURVEY
20
co 15
0
PRE-FLORENCE
- --2019-09 SURVEY
2020-07 SURVEY
2020-07 SURVEY
2020-07 SURVEY
Z 10
3 PROPOSED DUNE
Z 10
3
PROPOSED DUNE
Q
z 10
NO DUNE FILL PROPOSED
THIS STATION'
w 5
TEMPLATE
w 5
—
TEMPLATE
w 5
�
MHW: 1.1'
�
_ \
MHW: 1.1'
w
z
MHW: 1.1'
W -5
J -5
J -5
w
w
w
-10
-10
-10
360
400 500 600 700
300
400 500
600 700
360
400 560 600 7C
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. SURVEY DATA BY TI COASTAL
DATED JULY 2020 (ANNUAL MONITORING) AND SEPTEMBER 2019 (POST HURRICANE DORIAN).
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
8. CONSTRUCTED DUNE SLOPE TO MATCH OR BE MILDER THAN EXISTING DUNE SLOPE.
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 910+00 TO 930+00
Rehabilitation
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
AFMIDESIGN
Requested b Town of North Topsail Beach
4 Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
CONSULTING
,..��
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
29-September-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 04

a
0
0
a
W
C'
0
0
U
N
s
w
\ 0 2
ajzw
N N W
�a
o J a
N Q �
0
0
Q z
�2U
K7X
w
°pa
oQa
M z �00
'tea
oa,
'Zo
owa
� a
> m W
KI U
w3
.0 OW
.a�
�i 0 a
czw
a�
❑ J
_
W=
i zm
opw
2 �U
Ya
�U0•
�Fo
�Iw 0
p � LL
a Y
u N z
�za
IL W z
�za
as
= z
a
z3o
ma
oa
MW�
'Wa
m W U
xz
owe
a00
OzU
FOR
PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
"NOT
FOR CONSTRUCTION"
�Cn
C
Cn
�>
I0
z
°
z
°
z
+
0
gg8o
5
o
o
o
5.4
NEW RIVER INLET RD
6��2
(0.-1-7
g6
940+00
30
93 950+00
.0
$� 960+00
6
58
410�
4g4
506
3.3
2g9
MHW
4 8
—
—�L�—
— MHW
•152
0•
0• 13
— MHW -
,1.20
g5
�-
,2.29
MLW —
,0
14
— MLW —
�1.�g
2.5
— MLW — —
,3• 5g
,206
,
,236
, 4.p
, 3.5$
�•
�
—F 5 4
'4.51
,55g
N
,S•
4
PROPOSED TOE OF DUNE
3�
PROPOSED
Al
DUNE CREST
,-7196
_S156
0 200'
1.60
I
,a,43
_B19-7
Scale in Feet
20
STATION 940+00
20
STATION 950+00
20
STATION 960+00
PRE-FLORENCE
PRE-FLORENCE
PRE-FLORENCE
15
—i 21 I— +14.0
— ——2019-09 SURVEY
00
0 15
I'25''� +14.0 — ——2019-09 SURVEY
�
15
12'+— +14.0 — ——2019-09 SURVEY
p
Q
z 10
a
2020-07 SURVEY
PROPOSED DUNE
Q
z 10
2020-07 SURVEY
/ s PROPOSED DUNE
��
a
z 10
2020-07 SURVEY
;, PROPOSED DUNE
,1
TEMPLATE
TEMPLATE
TEMPLATE
w 5
_
w 5
\ _
� 5
MHW: 1.1'
�`
MHW: 1.1'
MHW: 1.1'
Z p\
z p
z 0
-\
>
-5
>
5
>
Uj 5
RECENTLY REBUILT DUNE
w
w
w
WITH NO VEGETATION -
-10
-10
-10
300
460 500
600 700
300
400 500 600 700
300
460 500 600 700
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. SURVEY DATA BY TI COASTAL
DATED JULY 2020 (ANNUAL MONITORING) AND SEPTEMBER 2019 (POST HURRICANE DORIAN).
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
8. CONSTRUCTED DUNE SLOPE TO MATCH OR BE MILDER THAN EXISTING DUNE SLOPE.
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 940+00 TO 960+00
Rehabilitation
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATMICONSULTINGDESIGN
Re uested b Town of North To sail Beach
4 Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
,..��
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
29-September-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 05

FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
" OT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
-�
�'I
p
��
� O NEW RIVER INLET RD
>
D
4
co
O
Co4.
4
0
59 0
52 0
6�6
5 0
� �1
1 .2
6•
1 •�3
6
970+00
6.9 6 980+00
1
A;6
01
11 4� 990+00
4
6
—MHW - 1 •g2
— MHW—
4
,2.61
MLW
MLW _
5g
/ 46
,3,20x
,3.31
33
-5i
PROPOSED TOE OF DUNE ,5,4g PROPOSED
-6196
,6 g2 DUNE CREST
_ 01
,1.54
,8 64
,8.40
,1.41
,8.41
,1 •$4
_B.B2
a 21
,8.26
-B.22
- MHW —
BEACH ACCESS &
STOCKPILING AREA FOR
TRANSFER BETWEEN
UPLAND TRUCKS &
ALL -WHEEL DRIVE BEACH
DUMP TRUCKS
STATION 970+00
STATION 980+00
STATION 990+00
20
PRE-FLORENCE
20
_
PRE-FLORENCE
20
20
00
00 15
11'4-1 +14.0 -- —2019-09SURVEY
CO 15
+15.0---2019-09SURVEY
00
p 15
7'-1 F— +14.0
2020-07 SURVEY
2020-07 SURVEY
a
z 10
s PROPOSED DUNE
— — — �1
Q
z 10
/ 3 PROPOSED DUNE
Q
z 10
-�
TEMPLATE
�1
- TEMPLATE
_ ;1
w 5
—
w 5
w 5
�L
MHW: 1.1'
�L
\ MHW: 1.1'
L`
\
LU _J 5
w 5
_J 5
L
L
L
-10
-10
-10
400 500 600 700
400 500 600 700
400 500
360
300
300
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. SURVEY DATA BY TI COASTAL
DATED JULY 2020 (ANNUAL MONITORING) AND SEPTEMBER 2019 (POST HURRICANE DORIAN).
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
8. CONSTRUCTED DUNE SLOPE TO MATCH OR BE MILDER THAN EXISTING DUNE SLOPE.
MLW
�N
0 200'
Scale in Feet
PRE-FLORENCE
— ——2019-09 SURVEY
2020-07 SURVEY
PROPOSED DUNE
TEMPLATE
1'll
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 970+00 TO 990+00
Rehabilitation
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
AFMIDESIGN
Requested b Town of North Topsail Beach
4 Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
CONSULTING
,..��
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
29-September-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 06

FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
Cn Cn
DD
-� O z
z z
z o 0
C N
0 0
CD NEW RIVER INLET RD CD+o 0 +
+ o
5 0 �.59 5g0
6 �6 -7
33 g3
g 26 56 � .49 1020+00
7 60 1000+00 8' 1010+00 8 ],0
a 6 $�
6.42
ro 2
4.32
MHW - 6 -
0 50
MLW
PROPOSED
—418
PROPOSED TOE OF DUNE —512 DUNE CREST
,6.35
,6.40
,g 13
20
,8�8
,86-7
_q.4-7
a 95
MHW
4
,0.26
- MLW 3 p5
4 09
4 38
,3 g6
,5 03
�6.26
su-50
- MHW -
MLW
�N
0 200'
Scale in Feet
STATION 1000+00 1
STATION 1010+00
STATION 1020+00
20
PRE-FLORENCE
20
PRE-FLORENCE
20
PRE-FLORENCE
00
� 15
0
10'�- +14.0 - --2019-09 SURVEY
00
00 0 15
9' - --2019-09 SURVEY
+13.0
w
0D 15
- --2019-09 SURVEY
10'-H +14.0
2020-07 SURVEY
2020-07 SURVEY
2020-07 SURVEY
Q
10
3 PROPOSED DUNE
¢
10
3 PROPOSED DUNE
Q
10
s PROPOSED DUNE
z
_ ��
TEMPLATE
z
�i
�- TEMPLATE
z
_11
TEMPLATE
w 5
--
w 5
w 5
_
MHW: 1.1'
�' �_ MHW: 1.1'
`� MHW: 1.1'
w
_
w
_5
_5
w _5
W
ti
W
W
-10
-10
-10
400 500 600 700
400 560 600 700
400 500 600 700
360
300
360
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. SURVEY DATA BY TI COASTAL
DATED JULY 2020 (ANNUAL MONITORING) AND SEPTEMBER 2019 (POST HURRICANE DORIAN).
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
8. CONSTRUCTED DUNE SLOPE TO MATCH OR BE MILDER THAN EXISTING DUNE SLOPE.
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 1000+00 TO 1020+00
Rehabilitation
DESIGN
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATM
Requested b Town of North Topsail Beach
4 Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
CONSULTING
,..��
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
29-September-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 07

Cn
O
z
0
w
C
C
C
5•19
5.89
Aq 1030+00
0.50
1
—
64
,g 15
- MHW
,6,63
BEACH ACCESS &
,1 p-7
STOCKPILING AREA FOR
—1 40
TRANSFER BETWEEN
UPLAND TRUCKS &
,813
ALL -WHEEL DRIVE BEACH
DUMP TRUCKS
,861
MLW
PROPOSED
TOE OF DUNE
FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
W CD
D
D �
O O
Iz z
o C
cn
i CD +
C C
C
NEW RIVER INLET RD
1p 30
4 91 6.OB
5.29 1040+00 5 9-7 1050+00
4a3 5.15
5 \I-
5.23
,3 34
�4
PROPOSED
,� 53 DUNE CREST
,8.03
—0-
-0-
811
,8 03
.a 16
4 g1
551
2B-
- MHW — —0 09- — — — — — MHW —
MLW 63
— MLW
rob
—5 00
�N
0 200'
Scale in Feet
20
STATION 1030+00
STATION 1040+00
STATION 1050+00
�
PRE-FLORENCE
$�
20
PRE-FLORENCE
20
PRE-FLORENCE
�20�
p 15
+13.0---2019-09SURVEY
15
21'----i +15.0---2019-09SURVEY
�
15
+15.0--2019-09SURVEY
>
2020-07 SURVEY
p
>
/ ` s 2020-07 SURVEY
>
-` s 2020-07 SURVEY
z 10
s PROPOSED DUNE
_11
Q
10
_11 PROPOSED DUNE
a
10
_11 PROPOSED DUNE
TEMPLATE
z
/ TEMPLATE
z
TEMPLATE
w 5-
w 5
—
w 5
LL
` MHW: 1.1'
\ MHW: 1.1'
\� MHW: 1.1'
z 0\
z 0
\
z 0
UJ -5
-5
�
5
w
w
w
10
-10
-10
400 500 600 700
400 500 600 760
400 500 600 700
300
360
300
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. SURVEY DATA BY TI COASTAL
DATED JULY 2020 (ANNUAL MONITORING) AND SEPTEMBER 2019 (POST HURRICANE DORIAN).
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
8. CONSTRUCTED DUNE SLOPE TO MATCH OR BE MILDER THAN EXISTING DUNE SLOPE.
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 1030+00 TO 1050+00
Rehabilitation
DESIGN
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATM
Requested b Town of North Topsail Beach
4 Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
CONSULTING
,..��
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
29-September-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 08

FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
G7
D
I�
0
i>
10
o
z
rn
0
+
f0
ICD
641060+00
1
6
A. 39
9 0 1070+00
NEW RIVER INLET RD
Cn
D
i
0
z
0
00
0
0
0
1080+00
520
514
4�1
MHW
0.80
Oj67ACCESS&
MHW
9 -
�� 4
,393
MLW
— MLW —
,0.65
,6�43
,4b0
,�•�0
BEACH ACCESS &
-8.23
BEACH
-6.24
STOCKPILING AREA FOR PROPOSED
,8.45
STOCKPILING
PROPOSED
,812
TRANSFER BETWEEN
TOE OF DUNE
TRANSFER BETWEEN
DUNE CREST
,174
UPLAND TRUCKS &
,868
UPLAND TRUCKS &
,8 6g
ALL -WHEEL DRIVE BEACH
62
�8' ALL -WHEEL DRIVE BEACH
_-7 93
,8 51
DUMP TRUCKS
,BCE
DUMP TRUCKS
20
STATION 1060+00
20
STATION 1070+00
20
PRE-FLORENCE
PRE-FLORENCE
°O
p 15
+ 14.0 — 2019-09 SURVEY
00
15
+ 15.0
— ——2019-09 SURVEY
°°
p 15
a
2020-07 SURVEY
PROPOSED DUNE
Q
10
2020-07 SURVEY
a
z 10
TEMPLATE
z
PROPOSED DUNE
z 10
w 5
-`
w
5
\
TEMPLATE
w 5
w
LL
MHW: 1.1'
w
L
MHW: 1.1'
w
LL
Z 0:_
_
Z
0
\?
0-
LU -5
J
5
J -5
w
w
w
-10
-10
-10
400 500 600 700
400 500
600 700
360
300
300
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. SURVEY DATA BY TI COASTAL
DATED JULY 2020 (ANNUAL MONITORING) AND SEPTEMBER 2019 (POST HURRICANE DORIAN).
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
8. CONSTRUCTED DUNE SLOPE TO MATCH OR BE MILDER THAN EXISTING DUNE SLOPE.
- MHW —
MLW
�N
0 200'
Scale in Feet
STATION 1080+00
PRE-FLORENCE
16'F- +15.0— — — 2019-09 SURVEY
2020-07 SURVEY
PROPOSED DUNE
TEMPLATE
MHW: 1.1'
DISTANCE IN FEET
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 1060+00 TO 1080+00
Rehabilitation
DESIGN
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATM
Requested b Town of North Topsail Beach
4 Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
CONSULTING
,..��
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
29-September-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 09

a
O
°
W
U
_
s0
a
W
C'
0
0
U
N
O
w
\ ~ 2
ajzw
i
o N W
= O
�a
o J a
NQi
wwr
O
J
Q z
�2U
K7X
w
°pa
oQa
M z oo 0
b
'tea
oa,
=o
owa
za
>mw
KI U
w3
.oW
.�
�i ao a
czw
a�
❑ J
_
W=
i zm
oow
2 �U
as
�U0
�Fo
�Iw 0
p � LL
a Y
u z z
�za
IL W z
�za
as
=;M
z
a
z3o
ma
oa
MW�
'Wa
m W U
xz
owe
a00
OzU
FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
"NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
Cn
D
i I -i NEW R`vER `N�E1 R
z _-I
IO
o z
o
0
+ o
00 �o
to
0
6 -6 1090+00 i
X9
3 1100+00
-- -- --- SVL
——
g�--
r-- — 2----
C 03 MHW A —MHW —
, 52 -
-=159 MLW
2.29
�2•
24
,3 68
,�•8g
,6'60
,396
,6 0�
PROPOSED
DUNE CREST
PROPOSED
TOE OF DUNE
'�
,8.55
,8.14
5'4 D
• O
(Of
z
0
'1 0
0
8•
J •82
g Al
1110+00 5.06
4•�
_, —
3 9�—
,431
,416
4.45
,-1 10
_9 15
,9•45
20
STATION 1090+00
STATION 1100+00
20
_
PRE-FLORENCE
20
PRE-FLORENCE
00
00 15
12'4-I +14.0 — ——2019-09 SURVEY
00
co 15
j16'f— +14 — ——2019-09 SURVEY
00
00 15
>
2020 -07 SURVEY
2020-07 SURVEY
z 10
�� PROPOSED DUNE
z 10
_ A 3 PROPOSED DUNE
z 10
w 5
TEMPLATE
w 5
TEMPLATE
w 5
L
MHW: 1.V
U
MHW: 1.1'
Uj -5
- -
Uj -5
W -5
W
W
W
-10
-10
-10
460 500 600 700
400 500 600 700
360
300
300
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. SURVEY DATA BY TI COASTAL
DATED JULY 2020 (ANNUAL MONITORING) AND SEPTEMBER 2019 (POST HURRICANE DORIAN).
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
8. CONSTRUCTED DUNE SLOPE TO MATCH OR BE MILDER THAN EXISTING DUNE SLOPE.
SVL ---
— — MHW
MLW
0 200'
Scale in Feet
STATION 1110+00
PRE-FLORENCE
20'— 2019-09 SURVEY
a [phone] SURVEY
3PROPOSED DUNE
TEMPLATE
MHW:1.1'
400 500 600 700
DISTANCE IN FEET
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 1090+00 TO 1110+00
Rehabilitation
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
ENGINEERING
ATMICONSULTINGDESIGN
Re uested b Town of North To sail Beach
4 Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
,..��
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
29-September-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 10

U)
D
O
z
N
O
O
O
1120+00
4 -73
2�
,2.2 -MHW
_2 98
, 3.20 Mk W
4.4-7
,558
-6 63 1 PROPOSED TOE OF DUNE
-1.60
8.49
,9.00
- 3.42
FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER:
TOPSAIL BEACH
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
PO BOX 79032
CHARLOTTE, NC 28271
1130+00
355�6 _
- 5 25
,318
'4.- PROPOSED
-5.36 DUNE CREST
,6.24
�8.86
0 200'
Scale in Feet
al
NEW RIVEREIN LET RD
O
0
Sri , _ 11260 1140+OC
-MHW- ---t 4
do
W
,3.
54
AArB
53
-4 A6
d14
20
STATION 1120+00
20
STATION 1130+00
_
PRE-FLORENCE
PRE-FLORENCE
CO
15
-2019-09 SURVEY
20 r +14
�
15
- --2019-09 SURVEY
20, +14
2020-07 SURVEY
2020-07 SURVEY
z 10
PROPOSED DUNE
z 10
3, PROPOSED DUNE
w 5
- - TEMPLATE
w 5
TEMPLATE
�,
u_
�� MHW:1.1'
u
MHW:1.1'
z 0
-�
-
z 0-
-
J -5
J -5
RECENTLY REBUILT DUN
w-10
w_10
WITH NO VEGETATION
460 500 600 760
400 500 600 7C
300
360
DISTANCE IN FEET
DISTANCE IN FEET
NOTES:
1. POINTS AND PROFILES ARE IN FEET AND REFERENCE THE VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. SURVEY DATA BY TI COASTAL
DATED JULY 2020 (ANNUAL MONITORING) AND SEPTEMBER 2019 (POST HURRICANE DORIAN).
2. PRE-FLORENCE LIDAR WAS DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AND NC ONEMAP
3. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DOWNLOADED FROM NOAA DIGITAL COAST AS WAS TAKEN IN 2019 AFTER HURRICANE
DORIAN.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT STORAGE WILL BE ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER ALONG THE DUNE OR UPLAND OF THE DUNE IN THE
EXISTING PARKING/ROADWAY AREA.
5. NO EXISTING ESTABLISHED DUNE VEGETATION WILL BE COVERED DURING THIS PROJECT.
6. PUSH SAND UP TO AND UNDER EXISTING TIMBER DUNE WALKOVERS AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL WITHOUT DAMAGING
STRUCTURE.
7. SVL-STATIC VEGETATION LINE; MHW-MEAN HIGH WATER; MLW-MEAN LOW WATER.
8. CONSTRUCTED DUNE SLOPE TO MATCH OR BE MILDER THAN EXISTING DUNE SLOPE.
1
STATION
AREA
DISTANCE
VOLUME
VOLUME
Number
SF
LF
CY
CY/FT
900+00
143.9
1,000
7,507
7.5
910+00
261.5
1,000
11,742
11.7
920+00
372.6
1,000
6,900
6.9
930+00
0.0
1,000
3,324
3.3
940+00
179.5
1,000
7,65S
7.7
950+00
233.8
1,000
7,297
7.3
960+00
160.2
1,000
5,157
5.2
970+00
118.3
1,000
4,443
4.4
980+00
121.6
1,000
4,332
4.3
990+00
112.3
1,000
4,445
4.4
1000+00
127.7
1,000
3,852
3.9
1010+00
80.2
1,000
3,392
3.4
1020+00
102.9
1,000
3,996
4.0
1030+00
112.9
1,000
5,526
5.5
1040+00
185.6
1,000
7,0S1
7.1
1050+00
195.2
1,000
5,464
5.5
1060+00
99.9
1,000
5,434
5.4
1070+00
193.6
1,000
7,162
7.2
1080+00
193.1
1,000
7,426
7.4
1090+00
207.9
1,000
8,095
8.1
1100+00
229.3
1,000
9,051
9.1
1110+00
259.5
1,000
8,116
8.1
1120+00
178.8
1,000
7,658
7.7
1130+00
234.8
1,000
4,347
4.3
1140+00
0.0
TOTAL VOLUME ICY)
149,373
AVERAGE VOLUME PER FOOT (CY/FT)
6.2
ADDITIONAL EROSION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION (CY/FT) 1 1.6
TOTAL REQUESTED VOLUME ICY) 1 187.000
PROJECT: North Topsail Beach Dune
STATION 1120+00 TO 1130+00
Rehabilitation
T DESIGN
WATERBODY: Atlantic Ocean
MI ENGINEERING
Requested b Town of North Topsail Beach
q Y� p
COUNTY: Onslow
1 CONSULTING
STATE: North Carolina
Project Address: New River Inlet Rd, NTB
LATITUDE: 34°30'39.86"N
29-September-2020
LONGITUDE: 77°22'39.13"W
SHEET 11