830007_Inspection_20200709

Nov -'V u---J' —? 3 N 9 --- 7 f'�✓�'
8-Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ] - 07 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: altiiiitine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other — 0 Denied Access
7 9 Date of Visit:1 * Arrival Time: / a."Tv Departure Time:I /'r'4 ( County: L.C; ! Region:
Farm Name: /Or./�Y�- ss7'9 Owner Email:
Owner Name: FGc/wt. 7 / L.L C Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:y Title: '1 1/YG. Phone:
Onsite Representative: !'��� Integrator: d/ t/j
Certified Operator: Certification Number: /, 7 .)7
Back-up Operator: (/ 4 Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean 37,„z 7 39.P7 Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Pouf Ca i aci Po . Non-Dairy -_
Farrow to Finish �[ �-- _ Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? J Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [r]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: -297 Date of Inspection: 7 9`
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): (o
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0'i ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes lacio ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. la< ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of ApprovedArea
12.Crop Type(s): ��r� �� A?22 I' / /jl h� s /96/r/,> rz--
/
13. Soil Type(s): 7#1z F/fl/ly/ /711a�//v 4/70
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes I 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [ j' i1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ae ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑r Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

IFatility Number: '3 - 7 Date of Inspection: 7 9—,�
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Eo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check laTes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
ion-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑//No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the [/]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
r1N�
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? es r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ErNlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Er-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
axe__ tU425 Yr v sr (7Ja.%)
r-- < crony--evr---- irio.„127r.,A 3a--6DA7-s,
2 r
%Jr) if/�S�Z- i r f7r-1pl 7`-cui � ''J"•"�" �� /
��3oZ �i�r 5 cJ G/j /.Ua.5 N17` ILIO/WA-et fl m±`ger`t i- K.d v ae/v rSfi
�C. 4 -, A4v t- a1S /Cho ca*-J 6y
B'rY : Wcr j��z •bw __ Me/e4 AJ,45-k- 13 -;GFiivevr- llacc)
i ,i` r-eff.
rao'rote,/l cvi f( -b►(awup ate, 1,-.' ` j--
Reviewer/Inspector Name: _!;c'SC ,- Phone: ,)/P.--3D3—Q/57
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ?90
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015