Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20060138 Ver 3_401 Application_20100510rAdAiN EN GINEERS MIR 1 PLANNERS ECONOMISTS WilburSmith A S S O C I A T E S May 7, 2010 Ms. Laurie Dennison C)6-013g L)3 Division of Water Quality 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250 m? Raleigh, NC 27604 Iu Subject: Modified Section 401 Water Quality Certification Application MAY 1 0 2010 Hornaday Road Improvements Dear Ms. Dennison: DENR • w4zER cpjAUTY WETtMAND5MrWYVAR&W" Please find attached five (5) copies of the modified Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form for the above referenced project. As I briefly discussed with you on the phone, this project was approved as a roadway project under Permit No. DWQ# 06-0138. The bridge for this project over the Greensboro Urban Loop was originally to be constructed under the Urban Loop project which was permitted under a separate permit for the Urban Loop project. Due to timing and contractor commitments, the bridge was not built as part of the Urban Loop project and was put into the Hornaday Road project. Bent 3 of the bridge will impact the buffers for the recently relocated Long Branch. The permanent buffer impacts will be the footprint of the three (3) bridge columns extending out of the ground and will include 4 sf of impacts to Zone 1 and 26 sf of impacts to Zone 3. The temporary impacts to construct this bent are 2,553 sf in Zone 1, 2,635 sf in Zone 2 and 2,370 sf in Zone 3. There was a field meeting held on March 31, 2010 with the City of Greensboro, Dane Construction and Sue Homewood and Amy Euliss with NC DWQ. I have attached a copy of the minutes from that meeting. A preformed scour hole is located near the bent and will be relocated upon completion of the bent construction. I have also included five (5) copies of the revised title sheet and plan sheet showing these additional buffer impacts. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES l' Y Tre Dugal, P.E. Project Manager cc: Tom Cordell, City of Greensboro (with one set of plans) Attachments W:?Homaday Road\Permit\DWQ Dennison Modification Itr.doc 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1303 Raleigh, NC 27601 919.755.0583 f919.832.8798 www.WilburSmith.com YM, K JA NCDENR !North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary City of Greensboro Attn: Thomas L. Cordell Engineering Design & Inspection 300 W. Washington St. Greensboro, NC 27401-2624 Darrell Ferguson NCDOT, Division 7-Resident Engineer PO Box 14996 1584 Yanceyville Street Greensboro, NC 27415 Subject: Hornaday Road DWQ permit no. 20060138 Guilford County Dear Sirs: April 1, 2010 In response to your requests, Amy Euliss and Sue Homewood, NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) meet with Mr. Cordell and other City of Greensboro staff, a NCDOT Division 7 Inspector, and Adam Holcomb of Dane Construction regarding the placement of bent ##3 on March 31, 2010. As a follow up to our meeting, Dane Construction sent us a letter dated March 31, 2010 detailing the construction activities that will occur adjacent to and inside DOT's Long Branch Mitigation Site and the Randleman Lake Buffer. Through issuance of this letter, we approve the commencement of construction activities and placement of sediment and erosion control activities in the Randleman Lake Buffer as detailed in the March 31, 2010 letter from Dane Construction, as long as the following conditions are met: 1. DWQ permit no. 20060138 shall be modified to account for permanent and temporary impacts to Randleman buffer associated with bent placement and sediment and erosion control measures. An modification application shall be received within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. 2. Any disturbed vegetation shall be replanted with like vegetation. 3. If the Long Branch mitigation site is inadvertently harmed, this site shall be repaired. This could result in increased monitoring time of the mitigation site. If any repairs to the mitigation site are necessary, these shall be coordinated with and approved by NCDOT and DWQ. 4. Please reassess the location of the preformed scour hole. Diffuse flow must be achieved at the outlet of the preformed scour hole. If necessary, the placement of the scour hole might need to be shifted away from the bridge bent. Winston Salem Regional Office 585 Waughtown Street. Winston Salem, North Carolina 27107-2241 Phone: 336-771-50001 FAX: 336-771-0631 Internet: http:llportal.ncdenr.orgi%veblvlglhomelrolwsro NorthCarolina N17t1lrl7lly An Equal Opportunity',, Affirmative Action Employer Erosion control measures must installed in a manner that is in compliance with Division of Land Resources requirements. Please contact Amy Euliss at 336-771-4959 or myself at 335-771-4964 if you have any questions. Sue Homewood Winston Salem Regional Office cc: Adam Holcomb, Dane Construction, e-copy Andy Williams, USACE Raleigh Field Office, e-copy Chuck Kirchner, Land Quality, e-copy Jamie Lancaster, NCDOT PDEA- NEU, e-copy Jerry Parker, NCDOT Division 7 DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit File Copy Dto - Dl 3g U3 OF W A O? TF?90G O Y Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: El Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ? No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ? Yes ? No For the record only for Corps Permit: ? Yes ? No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. ? Yes ? No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ? Yes ® No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Hornaday Road Extension 2b. County: Guilford 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Greensboro 2d. Subdivision name: N/A 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: City of Greensboro 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: 300 W. Washington St. 3e. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27401 3f. Telephone no.: 336-373-2308 3g. Fax no.: 336-373-2338 3h. Email address: thomas.cordell@greensboro-nc.gov Page I of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Tre Dugal 5b. Business name (if applicable): Wilbur Smith Associates 5c. Street address: 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1303 5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27601 5e. Telephone no.: 919-573-4190 5f. Fax no.: 919-832-8798 5g. Email address: mdugal@wilbursmith.com Page 2 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Roadway Latitude: 36 03 36.02 Longitude: - 79 55 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 07.88 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: Linear roadway improvements acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Long Branch proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: 2c. River basin: Upper Randleman Watershed 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: This is a modification to DWQ# 06-0138. Additional project information relative to the overall project can be found with that PCN Application Form. The site consists of a roadway in an industrial and commercial business area of western Greensboro. The Greensboro Outer Loop bisects the project area. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: None relative to this modification. 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: None relative to this modification. 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Bridge and Roadway improvements. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: As part of this modification, construction of a bridge pier within the buffer area of Long Branch. See original PCN Form for additional overall project information. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ? Yes ®No ? Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: Not for this modification. Yes for overall project. 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ? Preliminary ? Final of determination was made? 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. Page 3 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version S. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ® Yes ? No ? Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. The Hornaday Road widening project includes a bridge over the Greensboro Urban Loop. The original permit (DWQ# 06- 0138) for this project only included the Hornaday Road roadway portion. The Hornaday Road bridge was proposed to be constructed as part of the Urban Loop project which was permitted under a separate permit as well. This modification is for buffer impacts to construct an interior bridge pier in the buffers of Long Branch. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 4 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ? Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ® Buffers ? Open Waters ? Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres) Temporary T W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps ? No ? DWQ W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps ? No ? DWQ W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps ? No ? DWQ W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps ? No ? DWQ W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps ? No ? DWQ W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps ? No ? DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps ? INT ? DWQ S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps ? INT ? DWQ S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps ? INT ? DWQ S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps ? INT ? DWQ S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps ? INT ? DWQ S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps ? INT ? DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 3i. Comments: Page 5 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number - Permanent (P) or Temporary T 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) 01 ?P?T 02 ?P?T 03 ?P?T 04 ?P?T 4L Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If and or lake construction proposed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID 5b. Proposed use or purpose of 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) number pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5L Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: Page 6of11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ? Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other: Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ® Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number - Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) or Temporary required? T B1 ®P ®T Bridge Pier Long Branch ® Yes 2553 Temp. 2635 Temp. Construction ? No 4 Perm. 26 Perm. B2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? No B3 ?P?T ?Yes ? No 6h. Total buffer impacts 2,553 Temp. 2,635 Temp. 4 Perm. 26 Perm. 6i. Comments: Buffer Zone 3 will have a temporary impact to 2,370 sf. D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Centered bridge pier between Long Branch and the Greensboro Urban Loop. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Sheet piles to creat a crane pad to minimize impacts to the area. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ® Yes ? No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ® DWQ ? Corps ? Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ® Payment to in-lieu fee program ? Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity Page 7 of 11 PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): Z1 - 2,553, Z2 - 2,635, Z3 - 2,370 square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: Original permit was miticated under EEP No. ILF-2005-4148 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ? Yes ? No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 8 of 11 PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ? Yes ? No Comments: 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Inclu ded in the roadway portion of the project. 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, na rrative description of the plan: ? Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program ? DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? ? Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW ? USMP apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed ? Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ? Coastal counties ? HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW (check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246 ? Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ? Yes ? No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No Page 9 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ® Yes ? No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ® Yes ? No letter.) Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a . Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b . If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a . Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. N/A Page 10 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ? No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ? No impacts? ? Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? Completed under the Urban Loop Project and Hornaday Road Project. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ? No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? Completed under the Urban Loop Project and Hornaday Road Project. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ? No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Completed under the Urban Loop Project and Hornaday Road Project. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ? No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Completed under the Urban Loop Project. Theodore PAlfrick, Jr. PE ?? ? Engineering Acting Manager ? i City of Greensboro Appllcant/AgentsSlgnature Date Applicant/Agent's Printed Name (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Page 11 of 11 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version See Sheet F2 For Index of Sheets ~ COl~iRACT SHEET See S et F4 For onventaon~l moll y r r r r r r r a ~ r r o _ E r I r t ~ r ,~.7 ~ . r 0 r -4 ~ r r ~ 7 r d ~ ~ B r \ r r ~ ~ , ~J . L/ s B ~ r ' \ } 9l ~y ~ ~ ~ r ® y 11 r ~ f i ~ ~ ~ !3.~ L d~ ,ems a t~'T alb Ii;-' _ a ' ~ , 6 g 1546 EY I~tO R , 1609 r .A V ,r:~ ' as 213 ~ ~ ® v~ ~ 1~, ' ~i ~ ~ iii 1 > ~ j ' STREAM IMPACT TABLE hl 1552 r ' 16 I-40 LOCATION LENGTH OF IMPACT lFT) r sl o s I 546 s2 0 ° I S3 220 ' ~ \ 4126 ' r ~ s i ~ ' ~ S4a 0 ~ I ~ ~ Sob D ' d 1 ' ,o~. ~,,,,,.-1560 I 4142 _ _ o I o + ~ L POC STA° 15 95032 5+95°32 = s5 0 r i ' 8 xz~ YI POT STA° 10+OOn00 OOnOO TOTAL 220 r ~ 1546 h ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ? .03 4'd78 f 165 ,a o ~s 163 ~ I r N BEGIN CONSTRUCTION ' 1541 1541 I WETLAND 1 MPACT TABLE r 1672 r STAo 10+58°65 154 ti® o , s r ~a 1558 30 168 e LOCATION AREA OF EN1 END CONST RUCT lON IMPACT (AC) STS STA° 13+25°00 wl 0.005 6 ~ r~ ? rte`''' o ~ 1 ' s BUFFER IMPACT TABLE w2 ao26 o EY R _ OCK - . , , RDa w3 0,012 , - , , LOCATION ZONE i BUFFER ZONE 2 BUFFER ZONE 3 BUFFER w4 0 AREA l SF) AREA (SF) AREA l SF) w5 0 ' S4a ~ , ~ ~ ' t ' I PCSta° 1 a w PCSta° II f95°i3 SI 2,422 3,320 14,168 TOTAL Oa043 o x 3 t` ® 1 S2 O 2,127 19,(60 ~_®~®,.®®®®_e.~ POTStae IO+00°00 ' ''h ' n o B o , ~ , S3 14,848 9,551 19,560 OPEN WATER !MPACT TABLE , Sob ` s r L, ' w ' ' PCStao 12+22°9 ~ ~ ' S4a 30 77 4,574 1 , , .a S4b 125 285 2,512 LDCAT ION AREA OF • ~ 0 ~ , IMPACT l AC) ' -M- -----e-- r s ~ ~ - S5 2,553 2,635 2,370 PI O LEGEND: ~ ~ O , ~n r , PI 3833 7,722 25,469 TOTAL 0 fi s FEATURE LOCATION e ~ , TOTAL 23,811 25,717 87,813 IS=STREAM,P=POND, ~ ' w~ - ' PTStao W=WETLANDI ~ - PTStao 20+15°22 ~C o , I ' ~7 ~ , r` r 100` BUFFER ZONE ~ ~ ' f ' ~ r r ~ ~ (ZONE 31 - ' wig ~ ~ ~ olo' U 3 ' ri 0 i o ~ - ~ a END CONSTRUCTION END BRIDGE ~~~~,q~ ~ ~o~o ~ D 50' UFFER ZONE - ' B (ZONE 1- F1RST 30'I o ~ ' CITY OF GREENSBORO lBY OTHERS) vm~~~® ~~z~~e~~ _ e (ZONE 2 NEXT" 20'1 STA° 35f~0°09, STA° 42+75°09 PTStao 59+95°70 ~ - , QUARRY r~`' ' ~x<~~ r.......... a •®®--®m-®®---®----®® - m~yl~y®s--Alme®-®- s®®®u----sl.-- s--0-~e -®®®v~esM~---®-------0-------OAP-s--1~--- - --n1- o POND i ~ - ~~1 0 ~ ,~s„, WETLAND ~ - ~ I + o PCSta° 25 42x13 I ~ ~ ~ ! , ®®a.®® '...T PTSta° 35+41°82 35+41°82 ~ ~ P1' a e PCSta° 43 55°83 ' PCSta° 34 27041 8 .'7041 ! s n,; _ - _ - - ~ _ s~t I 6 I W3 - o - - ----DAY ~ s ~ ~V ~ t ~ - m-= ~ ~ - o W2 3 / ~ t ~ 0 ~ 4 I t 0 B i ~ + FUTUR URBAN ~ ;,OP`~~~~-- PTStao 32 93°4l BEG. ' _ BEG . ;'BRIDGE U x-2524 AC ~ PRCSta° 55 f49e4T ' b ' -(-~Y SENSTTNE INFO TION , ~ o - MOTTO BE COPIED STA° , h STA° ~ 9 ~ BEGIN CONSTRUCTION DISTRIBUTED ' ' CITY OF GREENSBORO NOTTOSCALE 0 c ,1, THE ESS ~ ~:......-®---......a .o PERMISSION OF E STA° 43+00°09 END CONSTRUCTION CITY OF GREE _ STA 51+4004 "m 4 o ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS 0 7 4' 8' 17 I6' a _ SON MJST ENGINEER ENGINEER 421 F/y~y~eiteville Street ° ~ ~ ~ I~' o r J ~ Y- Diu rr a ~8 ~ ~ ~ R o Suite 13D3 g o City of Greensboro Underground ~a0 ~TF~~ 1' =4(}' HORIZOMAL (PLAN AND PROFILl7 1° =4` VERT{C 1° =4` VER(ICAL (PROFILE `o ~ Locafi~s Iniorrnafifon/Requests o`' o~ ` ~ RAlEIGN, N. C. 27601 ~ N Op v v r a ^ COG Wets pesqueces kepi _.373-2033 J W " ~ Z ~A®I ~®~~L1Ce JCs' ~"lle~iV s`7 T A$~BUILT AU lar AUfH.DATE BENCH MARKS JOBNUMBER P~04160 CITY OF GREENSBC)RQ _ _ . T _ REVISIONS m~E cor~cr corrranc oR uuui irarric DO NOT USE FOR jW ACQUISITION Z COG/Guilford Co Telecom _373-2084 ROADWAY °s COG Water Supply ----373-5655 PRELIMINARY PLANS DESIGNED BY. ENGINEERINGG DIVISION r 1 Tanks/Treatment Plants SEWER DO NOT USE FO CONSTRUCTION SHEET NO. DETAILED BY, HORNADROAD e a GOOT Storm Water -373-2569 BEFORE XOUDIG! WATER CHECKED BY. CONTACT ONE-CALL CENTER a 1-80D-632-4949 SIDEWALK sc SCALE, SHEET TME 01 OF 12 c 4 City of Greensboro Underground Locates Information/Requests COG Water Resources Dept _373-2033 GDOT Traffic Signal _._.__ 373-2606 COG/Guilford Co. Telecom _.373-2084 COG Water Supply__ _ _ -- 373-5855 Tanks/Treatment Plants GDOT Storm Water _ _. _ — _ _373-2569 L GREENSBORO -: •• BY OTHERS ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER P IN �.— T it "L7 STRUCTUR'E NO I POINT NO UTILITY STATION OFFSET ELEVATION STRUCTURE NO POINT NO UTILITY STATION OFFSET I ELEVATION 38-391 1906 GASLN 47+32.94 15.37 LT 876.488 1926 FIBER 48+55.78 19.51 LT 882.137 38-391 1907 GND 47+33.13 15.83 LT 879.121 1927 FIBER 48+1851 16.35 LT 883J21 1920 FIBER GO 47+03.89 24.94 LT 877.265 1928 FIBER 48+67.10 15.88 LT 883.827 1921 FIBER 47+03.89 24.90 LT 877.325 -39 1923 FIBER AT T 47+27.98 24.27 LT 873.330 38-39 1924 FIBER 47+44.22 21.98 LT 879.683 38-39 1908 12" WATER MAIN 47+30.15 18.04 LT 874.88 1925 1 FIBER 1 48+07.74 22.64 LT 88/.298 .421 Fayetteville Street Suite 1303 RALEIGH, N. C. 27601 0 20 80 120 160 1'= 40' HORIZONTAL V= = 4' VERTICAL CONTRACT SHEET OF REVISIONS TYPE CONTRACT CONTRACTOR AS -BUILT AUni. DATE BENCH MARKS JOB NUMBER P-04160 CITY OF GREENSBORO ENGINEERING DIVISION ROADWAY DESIGNED BY: SEWER DETAILED BY: AY ® ROADWAY PLAN STA. 38+00.00 TO 50+W.00 SHEET NO. � of WATER CHECKED BY: SIDEWALK SCALE: