470029_Inspection_20200714

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number /7 - 97 9- 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: dtrompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: eoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:I! Arrival Time: 8';3e7 Departure Time:l,I :37) I County: hie7- Region:
Farm Name: Ae� 6Ci9---* Owner Email:
Owner Name: f bf(r 1-:;0t3 - Peyyl. l i L Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 7 ,cm c -Q Title: f/Hi— ' /` -- Phone:
Onsite Representative: S' Integrator:
Certified Operator: j,.� Certification Number: Ver/
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
_Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
//farrow to Wean 4 DD t7,57 Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poul Ca'aci Po+. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MIEMEM-- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes PrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: �- 9- I Date of Inspection:, �LJ—,,7a10
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: __VAOar
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): zj 4. 0
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or envir mental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EP< ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes lagc. ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 121.11io ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. El Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): $i^eltujer_/�`e'd'rrJ //2l9frkL/b(JLyJf4
13. Soil Type(s): k /r 6j---"rSacyt4
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents ,__,�
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes LINO ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑-IQo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists El Design El Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Et< ❑ NA El NE
El Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking El Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes []No El NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: G17 -(2 7 'Date of Inspection: //L
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 12<vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [N ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 121‘ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes la< ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 12 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
/ 8- - Wit do/1 z cry— t� cad-A�`r--_ G do
7 �17�1 uY GvD l�
72t7u
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ,S1-G�_ Phone: '97/; j6--Ofr$
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _041WDate: ?-pf--god
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015