470028_Inspection_20200714

etivision of Water Resources
Facility Number y7 - `iY 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: &Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:1-7. ----1AAD Arrival Time: 7 3 C7 Departure Time:10,, Q& County: 7jk. Region: ff 0
Farm Name: rQe-1,y—d L.LV-r-iridc, )?`f Owner Email:
Owner Name: qa pco( L,;'c/r/ r/,,t, XHG, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ./!! !Z Title: (2, ---e..„ Phone: 7�-33 ,72?
Onsite Representative: ...t„... Integrator: J� /j
Certified Operator: , ti.t./ Certification Number: /CC) 1fj(
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 3132.,3`f Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poul Ca,aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MIEM -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
MEESTI
Other •Turke Poults
Other El Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ErI; ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes la�Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes []N ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: #7 - % (Date of Inspection: _J11t— 0
Waste Collection&Treatment 6
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): J
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ONO ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment)1 threat,notify DWR
.41
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? IEKs Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? es El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes la< ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ji El NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
El PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): P/-,/4648ki
13. Soil Type(s): ft/ "---
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No NA 0 NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? s o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA El NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes lit< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Jio ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes a< ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps El Lease Agteements El Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EI o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes Ersro ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

'Facility Number: 1/7 -`' 'Date of Inspection: 7/q o
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 1:24VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [ 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [J1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes BNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
efr,filu Y u kt -djie �� s - /KT� moo,
A-vwe s
7es dart i 5 u J-r�,.-_- //l.�t��r�.tJl?zii
Reviewer/Inspector Name: •S�Ge-C Phone: 9D—35-DrS7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��- Date: 7--/i
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015