Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout 470027_Inspection_20200908 _ Division of Water Resources Facility Number /�/ ? - , ? 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: O'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: axoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: ?- ? Arrival Time: /0 OP Departure Timer ,,'/r County: /7' rr. Region: T.—WO Farm Name: ;77— Owner Email: Owner Name: (C hvd—f'eXf I�z. U)11 7 Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: —�-- Facility Contact: n/Q,7( Title: , , , Phone: Onsite Representative: � Integrator: ` �rVi /.1 Certified Operator: i (r/ / (�( Certification Number: (: j Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf _ Feeder to Finish ,r Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder D Poul Ca aci Po . Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish • -- Beef Stocker Gilts 37 ) 3j, A" •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow Other •Turke Poults Othcr •Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ‘❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA [1 NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA [i NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued (Facility Number: 'I ' - 7 1 Date of Inspection: g—e- ) Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes o n NA n NE a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA n NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): ,3 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? n Yes No n NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a n Yes 0 N ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta eat, notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? aces o n NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N o n NA n NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑N o ❑ NA n NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 12-1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE n Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) n PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil n Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12.Crop Type(s): &,ml{�/� 42tAec312rraldi 13. Soil Type(s): ' /i9u 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 10 n NA n NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [li'‹o n NA n NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes to n NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? n Yes [O ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes IE No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes I J Ni ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IENo n NA ❑ NE ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code El Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes [o ❑ NA ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? n Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued (Facility Number: 117 - 2, 7 (Date of Inspection: =,r:03/) 24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ N A ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check n Yes rj'No n N• A ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [j1/o ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Rio ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA n N• E ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? n Y• es [l]No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? n Y• es No n N• A n N• E 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? n Y• es 0 N pi N• A n N• C Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). ,M ' dJ- Dior /ro ( eAr`/\kst Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: 7/' 3—G �J Reviewer/Inspector Signature: %`'� Date: cie� .) Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015