470011_Inspection_20200702

ivision of Water Resources 0,
Facility Number II/ - f I 0 Division of Soil and Water Conse ation
0 Other Agency 8-1-A../
Type of Visit: lm ' nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2,5;4,t (104.CArrival Time:I ffJo J Departure Time:I I JJS A County: I-Joke Region:PTO (
Farm Name: C h ct.v`I e 5 LL ki -- r-Q,t v Owner Email:
Owner Name: CIiU,,-I.ck (')n L / , /e4-- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: lAa,,v1,4f LC^c(' v .ai-^ Title: Phone: '
��r�' 1ed
Onsite Representative: '� Integrator: 1't'1 a'S►k.tT(t C�, .
Certified Operator: I,, I �/ Certification Number:
I8'3fk
l Back-up Operator: C f eC 0, l'Ve.:I-f e4L. — Certification Number: cif 7 C Do
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish _Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean I11L tr 150(0 Design Current .Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca'aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish • -- .Beef Stocker
Gilts II Non-La ers -- .Beef Feeder
Boars IN Pullets -- ,Beef Brood Cow
1111MEZ
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes a1lr ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 'NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Q A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I lNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: it l - I Date of Inspection: T t v ZDZ01
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ NoH ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): ('7 0
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [l].PQo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [] to ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes DK ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ENO ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes I:(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
O PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C 1 " S'G 0
13. Soil Type(s): No
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 1=1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Q.A<- ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes EP< ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [°�N ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents �--� l��
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes l.d o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP Checklists El Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes D..< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 1*o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes It No ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Lf`( - j( Date of Inspection: 9,S'ccjy 'Z0
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? (( ❑ Yes In—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes I -lam ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? 0 Yes Er-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes INGo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ['�No 0 NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Cal; Lice oex ZOzr) S4 r
d-, . z 7 1 P-
c. �7
cyAa al0-- 3v6'— 68' s(
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1 Uvil 4 r Phone:C1(0`v3 3 3 3 3 y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: QuAkil
ZT..Date: L a J
Page 3 of 3 2/4/201 4