260072_Inspection_20200818

u % ) I`f Ft()6 z. —'
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number [ - 7 z- 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: erCom lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: (' 1)(e `7 Arrival Time:l 6;1 a A— Departure Time: 6i 5v' County:gu rti Region: AV
Farm Name: ---r to 144 Owner Email:
Owner Name: a (41 � /1)C Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Don.
it)t-C►'11 r Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: tt Integrator:
Certified Operator: LC Certification Number: I ?CO 7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder (000 £j 0 I El Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean GV[ a bii Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca aci Po i. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MEME1111-- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ a ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [ A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [j Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 'u,- `7 Z 'Date of Inspection: I8 4 U G -ze2 Z(1)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ -1❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No laPrir❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes la‹-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 1114Q5 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes In< ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes do ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): G Q `' r 0
13.Soil Type(s): 4 U-
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes !I- ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 126 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? El Yes Pc❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ti'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall El Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No NA El NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Mi 'Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: /Ze - 2 'Date of Inspection: /9 , bir z.„?Zj)
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes JFo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 123,1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes BIENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes n Imp ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 4r❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ZXo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes I . ,o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑r _Ni ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑' ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
, vi/tk 114-4,()Ne --CaoA,k
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 6 t ICJ V'j 1 1 p Phone: (,- cl 3 i- 33 3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: V�/ Date: J 4uG
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015