260070_Inspection_20200331

sj.
e14
ail>ty NI nh r Z .F; O D►vision of Soil and Water Cnservaapn
7iue� w �`y ,. ^ems.'^;
�r ,r�i�� ,..' +.
,,, .:rn . v ,q ,i1 - ' ,,.o,a, ...,, 4 ,.. , ?s
pe of Visit: Q-Ciun fiance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
ason for Visit: O Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
,��j p n e i
to of Visit: iti Arrival Time: ^r/�,(S Departure Time:I7;y0 County: t!�u"'{ 1 ( Region: (-Jr(
rm Name: if k
(1 i y t1F,t) '/ 7<2 / Z 2.70 f—ufv4l Owner Email: S I - I h f r' I u)W =
vner Name: �1 l��'u'�t L.L G Phone:
ailing Address:
ysical Address:
il v t N 7t.t 5 Title: o
dully Contact: lit f VVC _ Phne:f j (�,,/�
'site Representative: I Integrator: ►�' `1-r '�\`C
!I-tilled Operator: I I Certification Number: 9 (2 .6) 713
tck-up Operator: t '`C K, et,Gtd Certification Number: TZ
►cation of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
P
�,. llesrgn Current •• � Deli Current �. Design current
i, Swme Capacity Pop Wet Poultry Capacity Pop Cattle' ,. CapacL y Fop
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
'- Non-LayerDairy Calf
3 Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean I S sO _ O Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder _.DryPnnitry;,, Capaca�ty. :Pop Non-Dairy
• Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers - Beef Feeder
''
Pullets :- Beef Brood Cow
Boars
Turkeys ;F
Oar Turkey Poults
U Other Other 4.� .
lischarges and Stream Impacts
.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No EI A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 31 A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [ tA ❑ NE
?.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Er-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes EiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Pare 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - 7 D Date of Inspection: 8l fl'la ti
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [ kr-❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No D-NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): a'
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes -®'No El NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes (ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Er-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. El Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13.Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes I"o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [:]No El NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents /
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [J'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists El Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 1:::rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Z, - ' 7 o Date of Inspection: 8 l /XK4 Zv
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ J to ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 1To ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? Yes io El
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ['o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes lNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Fr-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [7'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ['1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
itL g t.S Le ot.+- zp`" 4(5 O , S(1.41 � SZC y
19° ''r 2 yet-s
e-at ato- 30g- s(
Reviewer/Inspector Name: c13l "k /N ? Phone 4g 3-333
CEP \ V'AtG
nn , 2-o
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: t '11/
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015