The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20190157 Ver 1_401 Application_20201029VXR, of Vh llt�u� Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1 Initial Review Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?* 0 Yes 0 No Is this project a public transportation project?* 0 Yes M No a,ange only if needed. BIM # Assigned * Version#* 20190157 1 Is a payment required for this project?* 0 No payment required 0 Fee received Reviewing Office* 0 Fee needed - send electronic notification Central Office - (919) 707-9000 Select Project Reviewer* Erin Davis:eads\ebdavis Information for Initial Review 1a. Name of project: Perry Hill Mitigation Site la. Who is the Primary Contact?* Lin X i 1b. Primary Contact Email:* lin.xu@ncdenr.gov Date Submitted 10/30/2020 Nearest Body of Water Eno River Basin Meuse Water Classification WS-II;HQW,NSW,CA Site Coordinates Latitude: 36.108078 Longitude: -79.128361 1c. Primary Contact Phone:* (919)707-8319 A. Processing Information U County (or Counties) where the project is located: Orange Is this a NCDMS Project 0Yes 0No Is this project a public transportation project?* OYes 0No la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ® Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act) ❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act) 1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization? ® Nationwide Permit (NWP) ❑ Regional General Permit (RGP) ❑ Standard (IP) 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified bythe Corps? 6 Yes O No Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS): 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR: ® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ Individual Permit 27 - Restoration le. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?* d Yes d No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? 6 Yes 6 No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? d Yes O No Acceptance Letter Attachment eppproval Letter Perry Hill_SAW-2019-00125.pdf 211.96KB 1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? O Yes O No 1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? 0Yes 0No 0 Yes Q No 0Yes 0No B. Applicant Information C� 1d. Who is applying for the permit? ❑ Owner ® Applicant (other than owner) 1a. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?* d Yes d No 2. Owner Information 2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: Evelyn J. Perry, Judy Kadlac, Gene Kadlac, Mary C.P. Bishop and Hubert Bishop 2b. Deed book and page no.: DB 6513; PG 42 2c. Responsible party: North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) Contact: Lin Xu, Project Coordinator 2d. Address Street Address 217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A Address Une 2 Uty State / Rwince / Rion Raleigh North Carolina Fbstal / Zip Code C—" 27603 United States 2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number: (919)707-8319 2g. Email Address:* lin.wi@ncdenr.gov 3. Applicant Information (if different from owner) ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3a. Name: Lin Xu 3b. Business Name: NCDEQ - DMS 3c.Address Street Address 217 W .ones Street, Suite 3000A Address tine 2 aly Raleigh Fbstal / Zip Code 27603 3d. Telephone Number: (919)707-8319 3f. Email Address:* lin.xu@ncdenr.gov 4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable) 4a. Name: Daniel Johnson 4b. Business Name: Wildlands Engineering 4c.Address Street Address 497 Bramson Court, Suite 104 Address Une 2 Qy Mt. Pleasant Rstal / Zip Q:de 29464 4d. Telephone Number: (843)277-6221 4f. Email Address:* djohnson@vAldiandseng.com Agent Authorization Letter* eApproval Letter_Perry Hill_SAW-2019-00125.pdf C. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Project Information 1b. Subdivision name: (if appropriate) 1c. Nearest municipality/town: Fillsborough 2. Project Identification 2a. Property Identification Number: 9865081397 2c. Project Address Street Address 2623 Frank Perry Road Address tine 2 aly Fillsborough Fbstal / Zip Code 27278 State/ Rovi ne / 113glon North Carolina 0-ft United States 3e. Fax Number: State / RaAnce / Fbgion South Carolina 0"rY United States 4e. Fax Number: 211.961B 2b. Property size: Conservation Easement area —27 ac State / Rovince / legion North Carolina oxr&y United States 3. Surface Waters 3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:* Eno River 3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:* WS-II;HQW,NSW,CA 3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?* Neuse 3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located. 030202010302 4. Project Description and History 4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:* The Perry Hill project is located within a rural watershed in Orange County. Land use within the vicinity of the project is primarily agriculture (pasture) and forest. Stream channels, wetlands, and riparian corridors are degraded as a result of active livestock grazing. 4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?* O Yes A No 4 Unknown 4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR) Perry_Hill_USGS.pdf 283.33KB 4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR) Perry_Hill_SoilsMap.pdf 793.13KB 4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 4.933 4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property: 5,714 4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:* The project proposes to restore and enhance on site streams and riparian buffers to generate stream and buffer mitigation units for the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services. 41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:* The project is a stream and buffer restoration and enhancement project. Impacts to streams and wetlands will occur as a result of the restoration project. However, the restored system is expected to provide long term ecological uplift and the site will be protected in perpetuity by a conservation easement. Excavators wil be utilized for channel and floodplain excavation and bank grading. Articulated and track trucks will be used for hauling soil and other construction materials such as woody debris. Small equipment such as mini excavators and skid steers may also be used during construction. See the mitigation plan for additional design information. 4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project. Perry_Hill_PJD.pdf 8.46MB PerryHill_PCN_Figure.pdf 2.6MB 5. Jurisdictional Determinations 5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the propertyor proposed impact areas?* d Yes 4 No O Unknown Comments: 5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?* d Preliminary O Approved 6 Not Verified 4 Unknown 4 NIA Corps AID Number: SAW-2019-00125 5c. If 5a is ves. who delineated the iurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Win Taylor Agency/Consultant Company: Wildlands Engineering Other: 5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR Samantha Dailey (USACE) and Win Taylor (Wildlands Engineering) conducted a field visit on December 10, 2019 to reviewthe jurisdictional features at the site. Based on field verification, minor revisions were made to the Preliminary JD and were submitted via email to Samantha Dailey on December 11, 2019. Samantha Dailey approved the revisions and provide a JD concurrence email on December 11, 2019 (enclosed below). 5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload Perry_Hil I_PJD_Con cu rrence. pdf 1.38MB 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project?* C Yes O No Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity? D. Proposed Impacts Inventory O 1. Impacts Summary la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply): E7 Wetlands [7 Streams -tributaries ❑ Buffers r Open Waters C Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts 2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type * M 2c. Type of W. 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested* 2f. Type of Jurisdicition*(?) 2g. Impact area* W1 Floodplain grading T Headwater Forest Wetland A Yes Both ]0.072 (acres) W1 Stream channel P Headwater Forest Wetland A Yes Both 0.020 excavation (acres) W2 Stream channel P Headwater Forest Wetland B Yes Both 0.124 excavation (ac es) Floodplain grading T Seep Wetland C Both 0.044 (acres) W3 Stream channel P Seep Wetland C Both 0.004 excavation (acres) W4 Floodplain grading T Headwater Forest _] Wetland F Yes Both 0.003 (acres) W5 Floodplain grading T Headwater Forest Wetland G Yes Both 0.016 (acres) W5 Stream channel P Headwater Forest Wetland G Yes Both 0.001 excavation (acres) W6 Floodplain grading T Seep Wetland H Both 0.024 (acres) W6 Stream channel P Seep Wetland H Both 0.003 excavation (acres) W7 Floodplain fill P Headwater Forest Wetland I Yes Both 0.007 (acres) W8 Stream channel P Headwater Forest Wetland J Yes Both 0.001 excavation (ac es) W9 Floodplain grading T Headwater Forest Wetland K Yes Both 0.030 (acres) W9 Stream channel P Headwater Forest Wetland K Yes Both 0.001 excavation (acres) W10 Stream channel P Headwater Forest Wetland M Yes Both 0.001 excavation (ac es) W11 Floodplain grading T Seep Wetland P NO Both 0.056 (acres) ff:A Floodplain grading T Headwater Forest Wetland O_____J No Both 0.013 (ac es) 2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 0.258 2g. Total Wetland Impact 0.420 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact 0.162 3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name* 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact ❑ (?) Jurisdiction* length* S1 Stream restoration Permanent Relocation Per Branch Reach 1 ry Perennial Both 3 324 Average (feel) (lir�rfeet) S2 Stream bed/bank stabilisation Tem ora P rY Stabilization Per Branch Reach 2 ry Perennial Both 5 17 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S3 Stream channel reali nment g Permanent Relocation Per Branch Reach 2 Perry Perennial Both 5 104 Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) � Stream restoration Permanent Relocation Per Branch Reach 3 Perry Perennial Both 6 733 Average (feet) (lir�earfeet) S5 Stream restoration Permanent —] Relocation Per Branch Reach 4 Perry Perennial Both 9 2,076 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S6 Stream restoration Permanent Relocation LIT1 Intermittent Both 2 601 Average (feet) (liriearfeet) S7 Stream bed/bank stabilisation Tem orar P Y Stabilization UT2 Intermittent Both 8 16 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S8 Stream bed/bank stabiliztion Tem orar P Y Stabilization Ur2 Intermittent Both 8 135 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S9 Stream bed/bank stabilization Tem ora P rY Stabilization Ur2 Intermittent Both 8 60 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S10 Stream bed/bank stabilization Tem ora P ry Stabilization Ur2 Intermittent Both 8 20 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S11 Stream bed/bank stabilization Tem ora P rY Stabilization Ur2 Intermttent Both 8 11 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S �2�StreamP bed/bank stabilization Tem orar Y Stabilization UT2 Intermttent Both 8 37 Average (feet) (lin�rfeet) 13 S Stream bed/bank stabilization Tem ora P rY Stabilization LIT2 Intermttent Both 8 72 Average (feet) (lin�rfeet) S �4�StrearnP bed/bank stabilization Tem ora rY Stabilization t1T2 Intermttent Both 8 31 Average (feet) (lin�rfeet) S 15 Stream bed/bank stabilization Tem ora P rY Stabilisation Ur2 Intermittent Both 8 80 Average (feet) (lin�rfeet) 16 S Stream bed/bank stabilization Tem ora P rY Stabilisation Uri Intermittent Both 6 94 Average (fed) (lin�rfeet) S17 Stream bed/bank stabilization Tem ora P rY Stabilization Uri Intermittent Both 6 69 Average (fed) (linearfeet) �8]�StreamP bed/bank stabilization Tem ora rY Stabilization Uri Intermittent Both 6 88 Average (feet) (linearfeet) 31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet: 31. Total permanent stream impacts: 3,838 31. Total stream and ditch impacts: 2494 3j. Comments: None E. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 31. Total temporary stream impacts: 730 la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project: Stream enhancement and restoration activities include the relocation and stabilization of impaired resources. The proposed activities are based on natural channel design principals and will result in an overall ecological uplift. Proposed stream impacts have been avoided and/or minimized on project reaches that exhibit less instability and incision. Stream enhancement activities primarily include stream bank and bed stabilization, riparian buffer improvement, and cattle exclusion. Stream alignments and grading for restoration activities were designed to avoid existing wetlands to the extent practical. Stream restoration activities will result in improved floodplain connectivity and will likely result in a net increase in wetland area within the project site. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques: Stream restoration will involve construction of offline channel sections which will minimize sedimentation to aquatic systems during construction. Newly constructed channel banks will be stabilized using biodegradable coir fiber matting and seeded and planted with native riparian species. Temporary construction crossings will be minimized. Construction practices will follow guidelines from the NC Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? C Yes C No 2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why: The project proposes to restore and enhance on site streams and buffers to generate stream and buffer mitigation units for the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services. The project is expected to result in an overall net improvement to onsite aquatic resources and the associated riparian corridor. F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? r, Yes C No What type of SCM are you providing? ❑ Level Spreader ❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT) ❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHVVT) ❑ Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen ® Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer Diffuse Flow Documentation 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS0002507* CYes 0No 2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)? 0Yes 0No Comments: None G. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?* r, Yes C No 1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPAISEPA)? * r Yes C No 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized bythe State Clearing House?* C Yes r No NEPAor SEPA Final Approval Letter 2. Violations (DWR Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?* r Yes C No 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement) 3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?* C Yes O No 3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. This is a stream and riparian buffer mitigation project that will not cause an increase in development nor wll it negatively impact downstream water quality. The project area will be protected in perpetuity from future development through a conservation easement. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement) 4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?* rYes rNoC WA 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?* r Yes C No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?* rS Yes C No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh 5d. Is another Federal agency involved?* C Yes t^ No 5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8? C Yes M No 5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.? CYes CNo 5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? C Yes C No 5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?* C Yes C No C Unknown Si. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.? C Yes r No 5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? See the approved Categorical Exclusion (CE) Document in Mitigation Plan for additional information. Consultation Documentation Upload 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat? C Yes C No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?* See the approved Categorical Exclusion (CE) Document in Mitigation Plan for additional information. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?* C Yes O No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?* See the approved Categorical Exclusion (CE) Document in Mitigation Plan for additional information. 7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?* C Yes M No 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?* Perry Branch and the unnamed tributaries are within Zone X an area of minimal flood hazard. The Site location is included on the Orange County Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 9865. The map's effective date is February 2, 2007. Miscellaneous C:a Comments None Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested. PerryHill_100093_MP_2020. pdf Signature * FI By checking the box and signing below, I certify that: 43.26MB I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form; • I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); • I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); • I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND • I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form. Full Name; Lin Yu Signature Full Name (Co -Signor)* Daniel Johnson Co -Signor Signature* Date 10/29/2020 July 30, 2020 Regulatory Division Re: NCIRT Review and USACE Approval of the NCDMS Perry Hill Mitigation Site / Orange Co./ SAW-2019-00125/ NCDMS Project # 100093 Mr. Tim Baumgartner North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 Dear Mr. Baumgartner: The purpose of this letter is to provide the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) with all comments generated by the North Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT) during the 30-day comment period for the Perry Hill Draft Mitigation Plan, which closed on June 10, 2020. These comments are attached for your review. Based on our review of these comments, we have determined that no major concerns have been identified with the Draft Mitigation Plan, which is considered approved with this correspondence. However, several minor issues were identified, as described in the attached comment memo, which must be addressed in the Final Mitigation Plan. The Final Mitigation Plan is to be submitted with the Preconstruction Notification (PCN) Application for Nationwide permit approval of the project along with a copy of this letter. Issues identified above must be addressed in the Final Mitigation Plan. All changes made to the Final Mitigation Plan should be summarized in an errata sheet included at the beginning of the document. If it is determined that the project does not require a Department of the Army permit, you must still provide a copy of the Final Mitigation Plan, along with a copy of this letter, to the appropriate USACE field office at least 30 days in advance of beginning construction of the project. Please note that this approval does not preclude the inclusion of permit conditions in the permit authorization for the project, particularly if issues mentioned above are not satisfactorily addressed. Additionally, this letter provides initial approval for the Mitigation Plan, but this does not guarantee that the project will generate the requested amount of mitigation credit. As you are aware, unforeseen issues may arise during construction or monitoring of the project that may require maintenance or reconstruction that may lead to reduced credit. REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 69 DARLINGTON AVENUE WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343 Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter, and if you have any questions regarding this letter, the mitigation plan review process, or the requirements of the Mitigation Rule, please call me at 919-554-4884, ext 60. Sincerely, Kim Browning Mitigation Project Manager for Tyler Crumbley Enclosures Electronic Copies Furnished: NCIRT Distribution List Jeremiah Dow, Lindsay Crocker—NCDMS Jeff Keaton—WEI July 30, 2020 Regulatory Division Re: NCIRT Review and USACE Approval of the NCDMS Perry Hill Mitigation Site / Orange Co./ SAW-2019-00125/ NCDMS Project # 100093 Mr. Tim Baumgartner North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 Dear Mr. Baumgartner: The purpose of this letter is to provide the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) with all comments generated by the North Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT) during the 30-day comment period for the Perry Hill Draft Mitigation Plan, which closed on June 10, 2020. These comments are attached for your review. Based on our review of these comments, we have determined that no major concerns have been identified with the Draft Mitigation Plan, which is considered approved with this correspondence. However, several minor issues were identified, as described in the attached comment memo, which must be addressed in the Final Mitigation Plan. The Final Mitigation Plan is to be submitted with the Preconstruction Notification (PCN) Application for Nationwide permit approval of the project along with a copy of this letter. Issues identified above must be addressed in the Final Mitigation Plan. All changes made to the Final Mitigation Plan should be summarized in an errata sheet included at the beginning of the document. If it is determined that the project does not require a Department of the Army permit, you must still provide a copy of the Final Mitigation Plan, along with a copy of this letter, to the appropriate USACE field office at least 30 days in advance of beginning construction of the project. Please note that this approval does not preclude the inclusion of permit conditions in the permit authorization for the project, particularly if issues mentioned above are not satisfactorily addressed. Additionally, this letter provides initial approval for the Mitigation Plan, but this does not guarantee that the project will generate the requested amount of mitigation credit. As you are aware, unforeseen issues may arise during construction or monitoring of the project that may require maintenance or reconstruction that may lead to reduced credit. REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 69 DARLINGTON AVENUE WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343 Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter, and if you have any questions regarding this letter, the mitigation plan review process, or the requirements of the Mitigation Rule, please call me at 919-554-4884, ext 60. Sincerely, Kim Browning Mitigation Project Manager for Tyler Crumbley Enclosures Electronic Copies Furnished: NCIRT Distribution List Jeremiah Dow, Lindsay Crocker—NCDMS Jeff Keaton—WEI USGS Topographic Map Perry Hill Mitigation Site Neuse River Basin (03020201) Orange County, NC 0 500 Feet ¹ Efland USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle Assessment Area NRCS 1977 Soils Map Perry Hill Mitigation Site Neuse River Basin (03020201)0 600 1,200300 Feet Orange County, NC ¹ Project Location Conservation Easement Boundary1977 Soil Survey of Orange County !P !P !P !P !P U T2 U T 1 Perry BranchUT3R 2 R 1 R4R4R3R2R1R2R 1 EC3 W1 W11 W6 W5 W4 W3 W2 W9 W7 W12 W10 S7 S8 S10 S12 S1 3 S1 4 S1 5 S1 8S17 S1 6 S1 S2 S4 S3 S5 S6 S9 S11 W6 W3 W1 W1 W5 W1 W8 401/404 Impacts MapPerry Hil l M itigation SiteMitigation PlanNeuse River Basin (0302020 1) 0 350 700175 Fe et Orange County, N C ¹ 201 7 Aerial Photo graphyE1 Pro jec t Lo ca tion Pro posed C on ser vat ion E as em ent Existin g Wetland Perman ent Wetla nd Im pact (W#) Temp orar y Wet land Impact (W#) Stream Im pac ts (S #) Pro jec t Str eam Ephem eral Ch annel No n-Project S tream Topog raph ic Co ntours (4') Existin g U til ity Line !P Reach Break