260003_INSPECTION_20201102

72,0
041vision of Water Resources sifts 36 yAL.1 -EA)
Facility Number 7,6 - C)0 3 0 Division of Soil and Water Cons rvation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: dCom Hance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:KT 0,ri,(,f c Arrival Time: j/%o0 Departure Time:l S County: a 0`e`'`L Region:
Farm Name: K. d' G Fair wL_5 Owner Email: II
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C v 4( 5 'Oa v'k,9(et Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ( ( Integrator: PvNtS ray
Certified Operator: 4.Vy� Cc S CA.CA. CertCertification Number: �S7D
Back-up Operator: ( Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 7 st 1130 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poultr Ca'aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish -- Beef Stocker
Gilts El Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars II Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
MIESMIIM
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Efl-N ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No M-NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 12-1' ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No aic A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes la o El NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Z b - .3 IDate of Inspection:3 Ozi J Z020
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NAB El NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No l.IQA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 1 1
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 31 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ptcro- ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes []'!v ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require D Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Eg'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C IS St,p I I7
13. Soil Type(s): filt-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes lNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ll'1io ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Ilrg—o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [alto ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [04Cro ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP 0 Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes alCio ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall 0 Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections 0 Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Erf•-lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 4 - 3 !Date of Inspection: ?O 7;tiy2070
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 310 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes I2" o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes a1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes EFIC6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes I=Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ergo o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes IB No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [. o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Cct16A,410,-1 6-19 5to-cr £ -l8 -1 c 3, Z P- '1(
141 (CR
P
9 6‘ p ��
Y'1,�.r�,,��e cQ �c"tc;c.��r�C C� �1'lsr
e;r
c( I 3 08-(, 5 I
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1c3 l( �Uy1,1c Phone:110 J(3 - 31
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l Date: ,°j O 1(y 2°2°
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015