040032_INSPECTION_20201102

0i / S I Er ( 2iJ4-0 L7
®Division of Water Resources
Facility Number "I - ;' 1--- 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: &Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: • Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
4 t.��
Farm Name: c
Date of Visit: Er �AJ Arrival Time: /1)!4 girl Departure Time: ffi . County: 4vtcOvl Region:
"c't hq 6 raott .f *Z Owner Email:
Owner Name: L-c,,-t -- CA 4,17 s Li Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: I 'r
Facility Contact: ( mt.-1`S c k a 6 t N Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: C( Integrator: 0413 '--.7 ti!`i'Lifi`-tq
` ZZ 561
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder f g s--r^5a t ) Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr Poultr ' Ca s aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MIEZZE_- Beef Stocker
Gilts El Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Points
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts /
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ( Dle� ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure 0 Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? n Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters 0 Yes Of No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - 3 Z Date of Inspection: 3) 4-h(9-`ZC
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes NA Li NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ElNo I _.NAB❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): -26
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? n Yes ❑.Pdo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a n Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [ I c ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? n Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require n Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C i3 `s67 O P
13.Soil Type(s): G 1 y (3(�'�c i
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes1n NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? n Yes 13./cker ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable n Yes ❑' ❑ NA n NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Go n NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes lalC ❑ NA n NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check n Yes Q'o ❑ NA n NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes J ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ['Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Li - 3 a, Date of Inspection: 3
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Et< ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ELK ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes n NA n NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the n NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 1=1,4, 0 NA 0 NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Ca t6Af
1 (/1 `t'q&c S( te 5c2e7A -2020 0- P 3, 5 c
cc cllc; 3t ?- -t E .S(
( � � IReviewer/Inspector Name: \� ( `1 l?K; Phone
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: a t L Date 4 u6--Z�2r�
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015