040031_INSPECTIONS_20201102

*Division of Water Resources
Facility Number i - .3 ( 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: eCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3((�U6-�,ti Arrival Time:WHIM Departure Time: M. County: ✓�,S'0v1 Region: F.r
Farm Name: LI V f Gt,k r '� f I Owner Email:
Owner Name: L-e-c- It- G-cokei L. (t Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
L "
Facia) Contact: 1 1 Contact: 1 1 Ti,�`5 G 1 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ' Integrator:0k,) S �t,���P Y w
if
Certified Operator: Certification Number: Z Sid
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder :5 5 2., 25 31 Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr Poult Ca m aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults
Other III Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes a 1T ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? n Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) 0 Yes ❑ No Ir-NA ❑ NE
c.,,What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ri NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? [i Yes ON; ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ht - 4 (Date of Inspection: 3 I 16 G- 'Zi9 Zr�
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ® ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No IIKA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): Z&
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Er No n NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DV%R
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0.N o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑,t' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
1 1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E1Z ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): r, S&O 1D
13. Soil Type(s): l
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? r] Yes M''o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Dooes the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? esvic, ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 215 ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 111.2Go ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? n Yes [� ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - , ( Date of Inspection: ' 4 ( Z. Z�
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [� No ri N• A ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [ o n N• A ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey n Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? n Y• es E1/5 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes DNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes n 1�.cr ❑ NA ❑ N E
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 41 ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? n Yes 13 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? n Y• es IlUly ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? n Y• es OrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
c.� l,b °41 7-112-ict
st e, 564 /?-o 3 3 0 -
Ic (A)-6 - te 6 la 661 6. ADOI NrC te��'.
c-& -
Reviewer/Inspector Name: L\I V`f, . ap PhoneFt iv`-`3 3v33LI
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: "J tukkrDate: I .)(S'
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015