040009_INSPECTIONS_20201102

DIM I 5 C V k -2-~- 2.t) Pk.
0 Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - C1 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 110 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access (�
Date of Visit:I 1 L Art z.t 1 Arrival Time:I J` 1(5 id
Departure Time: / J 4.51? County: in 561,t Region: .F.:8'
Farm Name: &C (& c„ipx`e l4L-A1- 'L1 -f 2 Owner Email:
Owner Name: I f k vt 5 1"• L-_Fiv Ile( 61 11 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: I r A.L 15 I It 1--in NA,, i V Title: Phone
Onsite Representative: I.( Integrator: VL a `s ,,,q
: .t..e.
elf)
Certified Operator: l Certification Number: 2-7-g 7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 3.c,.5 7. 33 3( Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr Poultr Ca 1 aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish .11=111M-- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
IIIMEEMEM
Other •Turke Poults
Other El Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [73Tio ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: D Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: -
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No []A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No lI NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes e N ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes rinNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: Li - ot (Date of Inspection: 3 j 40 ZO 2.0
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes 1:1"No ❑ NA NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? El Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 2 I
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes (Nr, ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes a❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or envir nmental t eat,notify DWR
Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes L!7 1V o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑_N El NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Elit.fEj NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. El Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
-
12.Crop Type(s): C �`3 #4 4 P S
13. Soil Type(s): 4 't'E7 Rt GLdt1
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Eft1V ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes lel No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes C3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0,1:413 ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes atc o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA El NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 1 - (Date of Inspection:5/46Cr12 AI
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues /
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [.i'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Et< ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ee1C
❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑/1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [ (o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
C--at,(Ai) Cdi T-It lf 547 2.30.106
p 3 6 6
7. ill co 1 , er-011. lea "- e S(y
_42-YTtout ct
1!<
ctit coo (i)
Reviewer/Inspector Name: L C E2 Li J Phone:Q(/`' 1 3 3 V 33 31(
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: t 'l w ' �7
Page 3 of 3 ttt 2/4/2015