Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20201518 Ver 1_401 Application_20201030 10/30/2020 Monitor I Laserfiche Forms I I DWR r i r Dhislon of Waster Resources Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1 Initial Review Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?* Yes No Is this project a public transportation project?* Yes No Change only if needed. BIMS#Assigned* Version# 20201518 1 Is a payment required for this project?* No payment required Reviewing Office* Fee received Winston-Salem Regional Office - (336) 776-9800 Fee needed - send electronic notification Select Project Reviewer* Dave Wanucha:eads\djwanucha Information for Initial Review la. Name of project: BR-0048: Replace Bridge 103 over Mitchell River on NC 268 la. Who is the Primary Contact?* NCDOT 1 b. Primary Contact Email:* 1c. Primary Contact Phone: ekcheely-@ncdot.gov (919)707-6108 Date Submitted 10/29/2020 wv2dnlsfhap02.eapps.ncads.net/Forms/Home/ProcessMon itoring#/monitoring/instances/a11134579/modal/view-su bmission-dialog?tab=History&filterb... 1/12 10/30/2020 Monitor I Laserfiche Forms Nearest Body of Water Mitchell River Basin Yadkin-PeeDee Water Classification C Site Coordinates Latitude: Longitude: 36.277359 -80.77069 A. Processing Information County (or Counties) where the project is located: Surry Is this a NCDMS Project Yes No Is this project a public transportation project?* Yes No Is this a NCDOT Project? * Yes No (NCDOT only) T.I.P. or state project number: BR-0048 WBS #(?) 67048.1.1 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act) Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act) lb. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization? Nationwide Permit (NWP) Regional General Permit (RGP) Standard (IP) 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No wv2dnlsfhap02.eapps.ncads.net/Forms/Home/ProcessMonitoring#/monitoring/instances/all/34579/modal/view-submission-dialog?tab=History&filterb... 2/12 10/30/2020 Monitor I Laserfiche Forms Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 - Linear transportation Number: NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS): 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR: 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular 401 Water Quality Certification - Express Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit Riparian Buffer Authorization Individual Permit 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written * approval is not required? For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: Yes No For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No 1f. Is this an after-the-fact permit application?* Yes No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? Yes No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? Yes No Acceptance Letter Attachment 1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? Yes No 1 j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? Yes No B. Applicant Information 1d. Who is applying for the permit? Owner Applicant (other than owner) wv2dnlsfhap02.eapps.ncads.net/Forms/Home/ProcessMonitoring#/monitoring/instances/all/34579/modal/view-submission-dialog?tab=History&filterb... 3/12 10/30/2020 Monitor I Laserfiche Forms le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?* Yes No 2. Owner Information 2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: NC Department of Transportation 2b. Deed book and page no.: 2c. Responsible party: 2d. Address Street Address 1598 Mail Service Center Address Line 2 City State/Province/Region Raleigh NC Postal/Zip Code Country 27699 USA 2e. Telephone Number: (919)707-6108 2f. Fax Number: 2g. Email Address:* pharris@ncdot.gov C. Project Information and Prior Project History 1 . Project Information 1 b. Subdivision name: (if appropriate) 1c. Nearest municipality/town: Burch 2. Project Identification 2a. Property Identification Number: 2b. Property size: wv2dnlsfhap02.eapps.ncads.net/Forms/Home/ProcessMon itoring#/monitoring/instances/a11134579/modal/view-su bmission-dialog?tab=History&filterb... 4/12 10/30/2020 Monitor I Laserfiche Forms 2c. Project Address Street Address Address Line 2 City State/Province/Region Postal/Zip Code Country 3. Surface Waters 3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:* Mitchell River 3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:* C 3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?* Yadkin-PeeDee 3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located. 030401010504 4. Project Description and History 4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:* Surrounding land use is residential and forested interspersed with some agriculture. 4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?* Yes No Unknown 4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR) 4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR) 4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property: 690 4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:* Replace a deficient bridge that is approaching the end of its useful life to provide a safe crossing. wv2dnlsfhap02.eapps.ncads.net/Forms/Home/ProcessMonitoring#/monitoring/instances/all/34579/modal/view-submission-dialog?tab=History&filterb... 5/12 10/30/2020 Monitor I Laserfiche Forms 4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:* This project is the replacement of NCDOT Structure Bridge #850103. The existing bridge length is 210 feet (1 @ 70', 1 @ 70', and 1 @ 70' RC Deck on I-beams) while the proposed bridge will be 215 feet (1 @ 55', 1 @ 105', and 1 @ 55' 63" MBT). The new bridge will be placed immediately north of the existing structure and traffic maintained on the existing bridge during construction. Standard road building equipment such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project. BR-0048 Final Permit Drawings.pdf 3.29MB 5. Jurisdictional Determinations 5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?* Yes No Unknown Comments: Only two perennial streams identified (no wetlands), and only one of those (Mitchell River) is impacted by this project. 5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?* Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A Corps AID Number: 5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Erin Cheely, Jeff Hemphill Agency/Consultant NCDOT Company: Other: 5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project?* Yes No wv2dnlsfhap02.eapps.ncads.net/Forms/Home/ProcessMonitoring#/monitoring/instances/all/34579/modal/view-submission-dialog?tab=History&filterb... 6/12 10/30/2020 Monitor I Laserfiche Forms Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? No. D. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1 . Impacts Summary 1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply): Wetlands Streams-tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction 3. Stream Impacts 3a. Reason for 3b.Impact 3c. Type of 3d. S. name* 3e. 3f. Type of 3g. S. 3h. impact(?) type* impact* Stream Jurisdiction width* Impact Type*(?) length* si Causeway Tempor Workpad/C Mitchell River Perenni Both 75 62 ary auseway al Average (linear (feet) feet) S2 Causeway Tempor Workpad/C Mitchell River Perenni Both 75 130 ary auseway al Average (linear (feet) feet) S3 Bank Perman Bank Mitchell River Perenni Both 75 12 Stabilization ent Stabilizatio al Average (linear n (feet) feet) 3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet: 0 3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 3i. Total temporary stream impacts: 12 192 3i. Total stream and ditch impacts: 204 3j. Comments: Total acreage of temporary impacts from causeways is 0.12 acre. E. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1 . Avoidance and Minimization wv2dnlsfhap02.eapps.ncads.net/Forms/Home/ProcessMonitoring#/monitoring/instances/a11134579/modal/view-su bmission-dialog?tab=History&filterb... 7/12 10/30/2020 Monitor I Laserfiche Forms 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project: The existing bridge has 12" HDPE funnel drains on both ends of the bridge. The proposed bridge will have deck drains on the right side that are outside top of banks and not over the water. The roadway runoff will be discharged on to riprap pads located as far away from the river as practicable. A shoulder berm gutter will be placed at the beginning and end of the bridge on the right side to help guide the road runoff to the two GIs. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques: Temporary causeways will be used to remove existing abutments and set proposed interior girders. Only one workpad will be placed at a time to maintain 50% of the river width. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge during construction. NCDOT will adhere to Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? Yes No 2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why: The NCDOT does not propose mitigation for the temporary and bank stabilization impacts associated with this project. These impacts do not require permanent fill in the stream bed, therefore, under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, do not constitute Loss of Waters of the U.S., and are not subject to compensatory mitigation. F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) 1 . Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes No If no, explain why: No buffered resources within project area. 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?* Yes No wv2dnlsfhap02.eapps.ncads.net/Forms/Home/ProcessMonitoring#/monitoring/instances/all/34579/modal/view-submission-dialog?tab=History&filterb... 8/12 10/30/2020 Monitor I Laserfiche Forms Comments: G. Supplementary Information 1 . Environmental Documentation 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?* Yes No lb. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?* Yes No 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House?* Yes No NEPA or SEPA Final Approval Letter BR-0048 MCDC.pdf 2.07MB 2. Violations (DWR Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?* Yes No 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement) 3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?* Yes No 3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. wv2dnlsfhap02.eapps.ncads.net/Forms/Home/ProcessMonitoring#/monitoring/instances/all/34579/modal/view-submission-dialog?tab=History&filterb... 9/12 10/30/2020 Monitor I Laserfiche Forms 4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement) 4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?* Yes No N/A 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?* Yes No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?* Yes No 5d. Is another Federal agency involved?* Yes No Unknown 5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8? Yes No 5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.? Yes No 5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? Yes No 5g(1). If yes, have you inspected the bridge for signs of bat use such as staining, guano, bats, etc.? Yes No If you answered "Yes" to 5g(1), did you discover any signs of bat use? Yes No Unknown 5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?* Yes No 5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or(2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.? Yes No wv2dnlsfhap02.eapps.ncads.net/Forms/Home/ProcessMonitoring#/monitoring/instances/all/34579/modal/view-submission-dialog?tab=History&filter... 10/12 10/30/2020 Monitor I Laserfiche Forms If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this activity on the property. 5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? As of 7/17/20, the USFWS lists five protected species for Surry County. See attached memo for gray bat and NLEB info. Habitat is present for Schweinitz's sunflower. Walking visual surveys of all areas of habitat were conducted by NCDOT biologists and no individuals of this species were identified, therefore this project will have no effect on Schweinitz's sunflower. No habitat is present for the bog turtle, and small whorled pogonia is listed as historical for Surry County, therefore surveys are not required. Consultation Documentation Upload BR-0048 Surry NLEB MYGR SLOPES.pdf 278.59KB 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?* Yes No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? * NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?* Yes No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? * Tribal coordination 7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload BR-0048 Catawba Response 2019-193-36.pdf 597.75KB 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?* Yes No wv2dnlsfhap02.eapps.ncads.net/Forms/Home/ProcessMonitoring#/monitoring/instances/all/34579/modal/view-submission-dialog?tab=History&filter... 11/12 10/30/2020 Monitor I Laserfiche Forms 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?* FEMA Maps Miscellaneous Comments There will be 1.4 acres of tree clearing on this project. Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested. BR-0048 Cover Letter.pdf 248.7KB Signature * By checking the box and signing below, I certify that: • I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form; • I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); • I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); • I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND • I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form. Full Name: Michael Anthony Turchy Signature q Date 10/29/2020 wv2dnlsfhap02.eapps.ncads.net/Forms/Home/ProcessMon itoring#/monitoring/instances/a11134579/modal/view-su bmission-dialog?tab=History&filter... 12/12