Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19970616 Ver 1_More Info Received_19980327JATr ; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JAMES B. HUNT JR_ GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 E. NORRIs ToLSON s-.TAaETARY March 27, 1998 Mr. William L. Cox, Chief Wetlands Section Wetlands, Coastal, and Water Quality Grants Program U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, S. W. Atlanta, GA 30303 Dear Mr. Cox_ Re: U.S. 421, Watauga County Action ID No. 199707161 Rk On March 25, 1998, we were given for the first time a copy of your February 5, 1998 letter to the Asheville Office of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding the above-referenced project by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ). We would have responded to you earlier if we had been copied along with the DWQ and the Raleigh Office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (Please copy us on future correspondence of this nature.) Our response to your two comments is as follows: 1. Median and Right of Way Widths. The NCDOT's proposal to use a 46 ft. median on the subject project is based on "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" developed by the American Association of State Highway and Transpiration Officials (AASHTO), Standing Committee on Highways. The Committee was established in 1937 to formulate and recommend highway engineering policies. The guidance supplied by AASHTO is based on established practices and is supplemented by research and is intended to provide operational efficiency, comfort, safety and convenience for motorists. According to AASHTO, the principal function of a median on an expressway facility such as US 421 is to separate opposing traffic, provide a recovery area for out-of- control vehicles, provide a stopping area in case of emergencies, and minimize headlight glare. Medians should be as wide as feasible, and where possible, should be such that a median barrier is not warranted. A median should be of sufficient width to provide adequate shelter for vehicles crossing at crossovers. Insofar as traffic is concerned, a sense of physical and psychological separation from opposing traffic is obtained when medians are about 12 in. (40 ft.) or wider. With such widths traffic is truly divided. The /.'?A noise and air press ure of opposing traffic is not noticeable and at night headlight glare is greatly reduced. Based on PASHTO, the NCDOT has determined a 60 ft. median is desirable for roadways posted for speeds 55 mph or higher. A 46 ft. median on such facilities is considered the miriimum width acceptable, except under extraordinary circumstances. The right cif way limits for the subject project were established based on topographic constraints. US 421 between Deep Gap and the South Fork New River is located in the mountain region of Northwestern North Carolina. A maximum desirable vertical alignment for the proposed expressway type facility was established at four percent. However the terrain was such that grades of approximately six percent were required in some areas to limit the impacts of the proposed roadway. Cut and fill slopes were established alt. 2:1 or steeper were practicable. Regardless of the efforts to make slopes steeper and to increase grades, the footprint of the roadway extended as much as 500 ft. in areas of eextrerne terrain. In these areas the width of the right of way was established at a width sufficient to contain the slopes. In areas of less extreme terrain, right of way widthLs were reduced to a little as 110 ft. 2. Wetland and Stream Mitigation. The wetland mitigation for all of the highway project's wetland i,,rnpacts is being proposed at the Sparta Bog. This site will also provide some of the 11,272 ft. of stream mitigation required (5,636 ft. at a 2:1 ratio), however the exact amount will not be known until the mitigation plan is complete. To address the (as yet unknown) balaEnce, the NCDOT is entering into a contract with the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) to identify and implement up to 11,272 ft. of stream mitigation in the highway project's area. To better discuss the wetland and stream mitigation issues you raised in your letter, we have enclosed a copy of a document entitled "Wetland and Stream Mitigation Strategy for US 421" dated March 27, 1998, which we prepared at the request of the N.C. Division of Water Quality. This document includes a copy of the proposed DOT/WRC contract. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at 919-733-7844, Ext. 310, or e-mail me at "drobinson@dot.state.nc.us." Sincerely, V_-ra tDavid C. Robinson, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Manager - Environmental Services Enclosure cc: John Dorneyl/ Steve Lund Gail Grimes