20030166 Ver 2_401 Application_20100420

ATLANTIC ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, LLC
P.O. Box 3266, Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
[phone] phone/fax
'D3-OILo 6 U)--,
April 11, 2010
Mr. Anthony Scarbraugh
NC Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
RE: John Geewax Property
NOTICE OF VIOLATION-2010-OP-0001
APR 14 2010
0 ???? V l5 ?1?'
U
/APR 2 ti 2010
DDIR - WATER WAL Y
WETLANDS W STORMATER FMCH
Dear Mr. Scarbraugh,
This letter and PCN application is in reference to the Notice of Violation for the John
Geewax property located in Ocracoke, Hyde County, North Carolina.
Enclosed is a site plan that shows the existing house and walkway along the bulkhead
which was intended to provide access to piers and boat slips at the east end of the
property without having to create a driveway to this end of the property. The "future"
houses shown on the site plan are only a demonstration of what could be constructed
on the existing lots. If future development occurs Mr. Geewax will apply for the state
and local permits needed prior to any construction activities.
In addition we included an authorization letter and a copy Mr. Geewax's letter
describing in detail his reasons and justification for the construction of the wood
walkway in Tar/Pamlico Buffer.
We appreciate your attention to this matter and if you have any questions please do not
hesitate to call 252-261-7707.
Sincerely,
Do g Dorman
Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
John Geewax
129 Hicks Road
West Grove, PA 13394
1, John Geewax authorize Doug Dorman of Atlantic Environmental
Consultants, LLC (AEC) to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of
applications and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in
support of the permit application.
- 2U/v
y -21
DATE
February 9, 2010
Al Hodge, Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Washington Regional Office
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
RE: Response to NOTICE OF VIOLATION NOV-2010-OP-0001
Dear Mr. Hodge,
I am in receipt of your letter dated January 8, 2010, which I received January mid-month. Let me first
say that it would never be my intention to purposefully violate any of the environmental laws intended
to protect a resource that I feel strongly in protecting. I know my property is a sensitive one, and have
done everything to limit my demands on it. As you may be aware from your inspection, I have just
recently planted over sixty trees along my access drive to try and re-establish some cedars along the
marsh for stabilization. I also installed a cistern for toilet and exterior use, even though I had a
municipal supply for my home. I was also able to establish dune cover on the west side (back) of my
house and the large dune, as these areas are protected from storm surges; unlike the eastern part of my
property near the bulkhead. There lies the crux of the problem - any dune grass seeding I had done
along that part of the bulkhead has been washed away - this has been going on for four years now.. I
believe the Division of Coastal Management can verify this.
In following the outline your letter provides, I would like to take this opportunity to respond to your
request to explain: how this violation occurred, and to get input from you and your colleagues as to
what would be a suitable "detailed restoration and monitoring plan".
1) Please explain when construction occurred at the site, and clearly explain why appropriate
regulations were not followed.
The site includes three contiguous lots, with the middle one further subdivided into three
sound-front lots - all plotted before 1975. We were allowed to dredge two areas for water
dependant structures on these contiguous lots. The first, close to the far eastern side of the
middle lot(s), is for a boat dock. The second is for the far eastern lot, which also has been
dredged for a boathouse. Both of these structures are permitted, and will be built this coming
year. According to the Division of Coastal Management's "Fast Facts: Coastal Shoreline Buffer
Rules", in Zone 1 (the first 30 feet landward from the normal high water level), "Only
structures with water dependant uses may be built in the buffer zone. These include docks,
boat ramps, bulkheads on eroding shorelines, and walkways to the water". The Division of
Water Quality in summarizing the "Table of Uses" (15A NCAC 02B.0259(6)) in their brief
pamphlet entitled "Buying Property and the State's Riparian Buffer Rules" have the example
of a single family driveway crossings of stream that impact less than ...or 2,500 square feet of
John J. Geewax
120 Hicks Rood
West Grove, PA 19300
(61o) 86o-d-71,0
riparian buffer. It lists this use as exempt. I assume that crossing a stream/buffer to use the
other part of one's property is very similar to crossing the buffer to use a water dependant
structure. Furthermore, my wooden slotted deck is pervious (by statute definition, although a
permanent impact as per DWQ's clarification), unlike a driveway. When constructed in
September 2009, 1 thought a three foot wide walkway to a permitted water dependant
structure was, by statute, allowable and under your example exempt.
Uses designated as exempt are allowed within the riparian buffer (15A NCAC 026.0259(7)).
Exempt uses shall be designed, constructed, and maintained to minimize soil disturbance, and
to provide the maximum water quality protection practicable (15A NCAC 02B.0259 (7) (a)). I
think I will meet these requirements.
As noted earlier, nothing was growing on that part of the property frorn the day I purchased
it. In its past, the area was used to store dredged sand. My plan was to use the slatted
walkway as a storm/wave surge suppressant, and then create a dune behind it that I would
plant in sea oats/grass (e.g.). I planned on starting on the west side, and to continue in stages
to the east. Stages will be utilized due to irrigation (via drip lines - which have already beer)
purchased) needed to establish the grass. This ultimately will stabilize the area - limiting
future soil disturbance.
As walkways to the water dependant structures are allowed, the current location of the one
walkway not only serves to stabilize the first three feet of buffer to allow grass to be
established behind it, but it also is the least intrusive in total square footage - especially in
light of Buffer interpretation/Clarification #2009-004, which states that only "one access path
is allowable per single family residence". Furthermore, the path to the water dependant
structures is limited in the use of Zone 2 due to septic requirements, normal driveway
requirements, and home placement requirements. The pathway also will allow for normal
maintenance of the water dependant structures without any future disturbance.
2) A Map of the Restoration Site.
I have attached map(s) of the contiguous lots in question with the location of the permitted
water dependant structures. Please not that "Lot 3" in your letter is really lots 3, 4 and 5 of
Trent Woods 2 Subdivision (PC A. SL 178A).
3! Restoration Plan.
As stated before, nothing was growing in Zone 1 where the elevated wooden slatted walkway
was constructed. There was no pre-existing vegetation. The walkway was the start of a plan
to try to establish in this area grass cover. It would serve two purposes: stop storm damage
from not allowing grass to grow in Zone 1, and having the least intrusive allowable water
dependant access from the residence to the structures.
after looking at the attached maps, would it be possible to determine if the current pathway is Exempt,
Ailo,,vabie, Allowable with Mitigation, or Prohibited to see if instead of removal/variance, rather another
notification/process would be appropriate; or if the current location is a very logical solution for a
sensitive site and is by statute allowable.
John J. Geewax
129 flicks Road
West Grove, PA 19390
(61o) 86o-47So
would like to thank you for your attention and time in helping to solve this important matter. I would
welcome the opportunity to speak directly with you to address the open questions and issues so I may
modify my response according to your needs. Please feel free to contact me at any time at (610) 869-
4750. If you do not feel it intrusive, would you mind if I call you to discuss sometime next week?
Respectfully,
r.
john 41 Geewax

John J. Geewax
!29 Hicks Road
West Grove, PA iggo
(61o) 869-4750
D.3 -OILPLe0Dl

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
? Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ? No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes N No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ® Yes ? No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ® Yes ? No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Geewax
2b. County: Hyde
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Ocracoke r. L7
2d. Subdivision name: Trent Woods APR 2 0 Z018
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A
mug - W
ATER QUALITY
3. Owner Information WETLANIX AW STORMATM IMCH
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: John Geewax
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 199/265, 181/419 & 424, 169/210
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
John Geewax
3d. Street address: 129 Hicks Road
3e. City, state, zip: West Grove, PA 19390
3f. Telephone no.: 610-869-4750
3g. Fax no.: none
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page I of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b, Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Doug Dorman
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Atlantic Environmental Consultants, LLC
5c. Street address: PO Box 3266
5d. City, state, zip: Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
5e. Telephone no.: 252-261-7707
5f. Fax no.. 252-261-7707
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 9501-51-8171, 9501-61-0169, 9501-61-1117
9501-61-1197, 9501-61-2170
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.0658 Longitude: - 75.5810
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 1.75, 0.25, 0.30, 0.38, 2.10 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Pamlico Sound
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: SA
2c. River basin: Tar - Pamlico
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Five single family residential lots. One lot has two story residence with a pier and gazebo. All shoreline has been
bulkheaded and armored with riprap. A X x 550' wood walkway is located on the landward side of the bulkhead.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.42 acres, 0.12 acres, 0.14 acres, 0.11 acres, 1.20 ares
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Construction of a 3 foot wide wood slatted walkway parallel to the bulkhead to provide access to the existing and
permitted piers for the five separate sound front lots. The walkway is providing access to the permitted piers which
provides a deep water connection to Cohcran channel. It is also stabelizing the area behind the bulkhead which
continually washes out material and vegatation that has been planted several times.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The 3 foot wide wood walkway has been constructed along the landward side of the existing bulkhead using hand tools.
No heavy equipmant ws needed for the construction.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
®Yes ? No ? Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
f
? Preliminary ®Finai
o
determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Atlantic Environmental
Name (if known): Doug Dorman Other:
4d. If yes, fist the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
We have contacted the Corp for documention but we have not received any information for submittal with this application.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
?Yes No ? Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ® Yes ? No
6b. If yes, explain.
Five separate lots on the Pamlico Sound with one single family residence on one of the lots. Unknown when other lots
may developed.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
6. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5E Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ® Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary (T impact required.
B1 ®P ®T Water
access Pamlico Sound E Nos 1,650 0
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts 1,650 0
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The walkway was constructed directly behind the existing bulkhead where no vegatation would grow because of continued
erosion issues. The walway was constructed only three foot wide which would allow for two people to pass each other safely
on the walkway.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The walkway is constructed of open slatted wood material that will allow for precipitaion to pass through.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ® Yes ? No
'
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ® DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this

pro
project? ? Mitigation bank

®Payment to in-lieu fee program

? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 1,650 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ® Yes ? No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 Water Access 1,650 3 (2 for Catawba) 4,950
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
Payment into the NCEEP in-lieu fee fund.
6h. Comments:
Page 8of11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan

1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes No
Comments: The walkway is an open slatted construction.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 2%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Less than 24% impervious coverage.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NIA
? Phase II
? NSW
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
® Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
? Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ® Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ® Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes ? No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ® Yes ? No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ® Yes ? No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): The property
owner was not aware that a permit was required to construct this walkway. He was simply trying to provide the least obtrusive
access to the piers to be constructed and solve his erosion issues quickly.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ® Yes ? No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The enclosed site plan is an example of the future impacts and is not peritted at this time. At the time of construction of
any of the lots state and local permits will be obtained prior to any construction activities take place.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Onsite waste water treatment. Conventional and Peat Biofilter treatment.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ® Yes ? No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ® Yes ? No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Contacted a Biologist with the USFWS Field office.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no impacts to the adjacant waters.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Contacted State Archeologist office for a determation.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The walkway is not a project that FEMA regulates.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Hyde County GIS FEMA Flood Hazard Maps
Doug Dorman 4/11/10

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name pp Icant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant Date
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
'i
NF
GRANT GODFREY
~ 5,0' 1
RIPARIAN GOHCRAN CtL4NNEL BUFFER 1 I
~ II 40 BREAKWATER ~ 5L'~6A J~~~at~ ~ po -SITE
, ~ , ~ UNDER PIER S 45'12'00" W 1602,93' , I s ~ ~
~~a' ' ~ ~ I 35 \ PROPOSED ~ 30 ~ I,
\ CONVENTIONAL SEPTIC ~
' ~ ~ ~ ,111, t,.ll, ~ ~
t , , S/T ~ u ~ r~ ~I f.~^~.. ~ L._ . ~ 1 \ .III, BOAT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 ,111,
l ,'.,I~~ ;.~I:~~~,~I,~ SLIPS ~ t ~ 1~' 111
all, ~ f?G~AC(~K~:
12 , 1 ~ ~ 1 i 1 ~ ` BOAT HOUSE ~ l ; ~ '1
~ , ~ 404 & coASTAL ~ E~TSrING ~ 1 ` ',l ~ 1 , \ UR 1 , ~ FU T E \ ti 1, , ~ I WETLAND Lm~E ,111
' RIP-R4P ~ ~a i. A, ~ ~ 1, ~ HOUSE ~ ,
~ ~ `v ~ 11 1 y t ~
WALKWAY' ~ ~ ~ . - , . ._..1 r, N.T.S.
' 0 ~ ~ ~ .q ,111, 4~1,
EXISTING BULKHEAD a ~ ~ ~ N F JOHN J, GEEWAX 1 ~ o ~ 1 1
~ a ~ ; _ ~ LoT ~ S~ICTION 1 . ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ I ' ,111, > 1 V
' o ~ ~ ~ ~ DIVISION OF PROPL'RTY RTY 1 ~ ,111,
'~,,ti ~ ~ OF ISSAC W. ~ NEAL HEIRS ~ t~EIRS ~ ~ 1, ,Ilf,
y ~
, ~ JOHN W. 0 NEAL HEIRS HEIRS 1.
, ; ~ ~1II, ~ (PC A, SLIDE 98B) ~ alt,
I ~ ~ DB 1691 PG 210 A ~ ( ~ . i Ilf,
~ i ~ ,111,
awl, ~ .
\ ,
~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 , X50.48' 220.27 "i ,
TO BE CONSTRf1CTED \ N 4512 0 E 1509.78 t5o9.78'
~ HilJOR PER,~1T ~ 7B Ql . , . _ P P ,III, , _ 200' PIER P/T ~ • '
I
~ - ~ \ a - ~ ,111, o.
~ ~ N PERMITTED
12 0•- ~ ~ ® a PIER ~ 1 LO'S' S a ~ FUTUR ~ g, ,111,
~ ~ HOUSE ~ ~ j
, ~ I w ~ LDT 6 LDT 7 ~ ,1il,
' ° I ~ ,11~ a11, I ~ 1 ~.'1 ~
t i IU ~ ,111, ,r ~
. ~ , . ,11~

\ DITCH DITCH
\ ~ Y \
E7fISTING I U 1 \ ,
~ ~ o F TURE \ , . , , , , RIP-RAP - - . ~ . a E~''77NG 1 ASPHAL .X15`TIlJG~ ~ASPFIALtT~S01L: ROAD ' . ~ ~ . . , ~ ~ v a . ~ ~ ~ . , ~ o, , . , , . ~
H USE ~ ' ~ ~ 4 ,1

I ~ , LT4 _ _ _ ~~°o. ~ 11f, N/F JDH J. DEEWAX _ _ _ _
~ . ~ ` ~ a1~,= (TRENT' Y~Dv~" ~
all,

,111, Ilf, ~ (D8 181, PG 415 ~ 424) LDT ~
- E STING \ ~ .
WALKWAY FU TU E ~ ~ ~ - • . ~ all, LDT
~ LDT 3 °o.~~ all, a ~
i d 'ti,.N.• ~ tit{!, ,1l1, o ~ ,11l, ,111,
tiY. ~ ~
t. ti
~ ,
'k •.i \ f ~
~ • . , A ~ d ~ ,111, ~
~ ~ s•. \
~ ~ \ ~ ~ all, ~
Pn , ~ all, 1 ~
a \ I ~ 5 T , A~ all,
PAM~~co Sau~D ~ ' lil,
~
,a ' \ ~ \ EXISTING BULKHEAD -:1 Y~
~ ,111, ,11l, ,111,
\ ' EXISTING _ .'~EXIS'TIN HOUSE` 1 o~\) ~ ~
RIP-RAY ~ \
\ 1 N/F JOHN I GEEWAX
^a \ ~ LOT 2, SECTION I,
Y~ 1~, 40~ & COAS2"At DIVISION OF PROPERTY
EXISTLVG PIER AND GAZEBO ' ~ : ~ ~ \ \
(GENERAL PERa9'IT NO. 49449) \ ~ ` WE1'1~AND ~ OF' ISSAC O'NEAL HEIRS &
.L~ U trL' 1 Y .t.' APRROXIdfATE LOC,AT ON ~ 1 ,111, JOHN ~ O'NEAL HEIRS 111,
_ jam- '"a ~ 1 ~ (PC A, SLIDE 58B)
I \ . _ _ _ ( - " - 30 TAR PAM BUFFER LINE ~ . ~ (DB 159, PG 265)
V i~
STING - 50 TAR PAM BUFFER LINE I,~il II ~ ~ I. 11! ,r, I,I,I I ;I I I , II~II , I,. I ~I r;, Iii I r ; ; ~L ;,~.,,~~I- I~~ ~ I I III I I I I I i I~ I ~ I Iii i i I I (I I III .I , 14 ~ 'III I I I I~ ~ 1~ 'TING ~ all,
~ 3 I - ,;il.l I:I,~ I ~'AY l ~ all, 111, r~~~
~ ;;,ail; .I%;;j!+ _ - 75 AEC LINE li
-
\ ~ ,111, ,Ilf,
- EX, PIPE - ---1 ~ ail,
- EX. REBAR I
REBAR SET - __t_.__-----------------_----___._._.______.._._-_._..._.__._..-._
I
- EX, CONC. MON. i
,R I ~ r h ~ I - - CONC. MON. SET ~xrsrtNC BUr~aa
F r t. OBSERVED WATER LEVEL
- P K N AIL (~/z~ a4) ~ ~ ~ ? ~ t~x~5'!'!NG BtI~9KR'ATE1t (;}J
- P K NAIL SET
- SEWER SERVICE
N/I' DE,Y~ • w41ER~lA1irY
- WATER METER ROBERT DESPO v~r~aDS r~o sr~~~rar~r cw
- PHONE PEDESTAL
nonlul~in nln No. aaT~ a~,~~~~~~
- C. A. T. V. SITE PLAN
D j ~r 1 11/6/04 PERMIT MODIFICATION REQUEST
UTILITY POLE 04-013 l EXISTING CONDTIONS AND FUTURE PLA ~ - GUY WIRE DRAWN BY URE P.L4 x 3/1/05 PERMIT MODIFICATION REQUEST rz.01r/c ZV ON#Z 3 11 /29/06 CAMA MAJOR PERMIT RENEWAL / ( , y l CDZY
FIRE HYDRANT DAD BASE MAP FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PER - ELECT. TRANS. issuE DATE JOHN GEE-WAX
MITTING 3 4/11/10 DWQ PCN APPLICATION FOR WALKWAY PO BOX 3266 KITTY HAWK NORTH CAROLINA L PER Phones [phone] Fax, [phone]
oeawiac vim: c ewgx 11/1/04 OCftACOKE TOWNSHIP HYDE COUNTY NORTH CAI E-Mail, roxdorman@aol,com
PLOT scniE: 50 NORTH CAROLINA