20200140 Ver 2_401 Application_20201027

SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
EST. 2.11
October
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
Attn: Mr. Lyle Phillips
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Ms. Stephanie Goss
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Liberty Station (Formerly Wildcat Branch Subdivision)
SAW-2017-01248 / NCDWR #20-0140
Revised request for NWP 29, GC #4139 and Riparian Buffer Compliance — Permit Modification
Sage Project #2017.34
On behalf of KB Home Raleigh -Durham, LLC (applicant and owner), please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) that the activities associated with the proposed development of the Liberty Station
(formerly Wildcat Branch) Subdivision (Project) may proceed under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29 and the
corresponding GC #4139. A request for riparian buffer compliance is also included in this application. A
Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29 and corresponding General Certification (GC) #4139 were issued for this
project on April 10, 2020 (USACE SAW-2017-01248) and March 18, 2020 (NCDWR #20-0140).
The City of Raleigh is requiring that the energy dissipater located below the proposed road crossing be
extended from 20 feet to 50 feet in length. All other proposed impacts are the same as what was previously
approved.
Project Summary and Purpose
The proposed project includes the construction of a residential subdivision with associated roads and
utilities which will connect to existing adjacent infrastructure in the area. The +/-22-acre project is located
at 3124 Garner Road in Raleigh, Wake County, NC. Wake County lists the parcel PIN as 1702-83-8607.
The approximate center of the property is located at Latitude: 35.737907' N; Longitude: 78.633097' W.
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision to meet the demand for housing
in this part of Wake County, NC.
Project Detail
The overall project consists of a single-family residential townhome subdivision. Proposed road
construction and culverting will result in permanent stream and riparian buffer impacts. Utilities for the
proposed project will connect to those existing on and adjacent to the Site. Heavy equipment typically used
for utility installation projects (e.g. back hoes, bull -dozers, etc.) will be utilized.
No federally threatened or endangered species are listed to occur within 1 mile of the Project according to
the NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) Database (January 2020). See attached letter from NHP.
Liberty Station Subdivision Page 1 of 2

No historic properties are listed on the Project based on a query of the NCSHPO HPOWEB GIS Service
website accessed January 13, 2020. Seven historic properties are listed within 0.25-mile of the Project.
Three properties are designated as "Surveyed Only" (WA2462, WA2458, and WA8142) and one property
is designated "Surveyed Only — Gone" (WA2459). Site WA4566 is a Surveyed Area north of the Project.
Site WA2460 is the Beasley Store & Houses directly across Garner Road from the Project. This site is
designated "Blockface" indicating multiple properties were surveyed as a group. To the south, Site WA2461
(former Governor Morehead School for Colored, Blind, and Deaf) is adjacent to the Project. This property
is designated as "Study List — Determined Eligible" and is currently the INC Highway Patrol Training
Academy.
Protect History
The Site has been forested since prior to the earliest reviewed orthophotography (1993). A PJD was
requested and a field determination site meeting was held on July 11, 2017, with Ms. Tasha Alexander
(Corps) and Mr. Sean Clark of Sage Ecological. A PJD was issued on April 10, 2020. A NWP 29 was also
issued on April 10, 2020. Additionally, a GC 4139 was issued by NCDWR on March 18, 2020. However,
the City of Raleigh has requested for the riprap to be extended downstream of the proposed culvert.
Avoidance and Minimization
Proposed roads were aligned so as to avoid and minimize impacts to streams and wetlands. Lots were
positioned so as to avoid lot fill in streams and adjacent wetlands. Open space was provided around
drainages containing jurisdictional streams. Construction fencing will be used to define the construction
corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Silt fencing will be installed to provide additional
protection from runoff.
Project Impacts
Proposed permanent stream impacts total 129 Linear Feet (LF) as a result of culverting for a road crossing.
Proposed permanent stream impacts due to riprap keyed into the stream channel total 50 LF. Proposed
temporary stream impacts total 40 LF as the result of a proposed perpendicular sewer utility crossing. No
wetland impacts are proposed. Permanent riparian buffer impacts will result from sewer utility construction,
road construction, and a BMP outfall. Total Zone 1 impacts total 11,841 square feet and Zone 2 impacts
total 8,497 square feet.
Mitigation
Permanent stream, no loss impacts have been minimized to less than 150 LF, therefore, no stream
mitigation is proposed. No wetland impacts are proposed so no wetland mitigation is proposed. Riparian
buffer impacts are "Allowable" per the Table of Uses; therefore, no riparian buffer mitigation is proposed.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Liberty Station Subdivision Page 2 of 2

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20200140
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Liberty Station (Formerly Wildcat Branch)
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Sean Clark
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
10/27/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Wildcat Branch
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C; NSW
Version#*
2
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\sagoss
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.7379070 N 78.6330970 W
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
ID# Version
2020-0140 v2
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
10/28/2020
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf 51.48KB
A. Processing Information C^U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake

Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
rJ 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
to. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
KB Home Raleigh -Durham
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB:017927,DP: 02557
2c. Responsible party:
Doug Schwartz
2d.Address
*
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

Street Address
4506 S. Miami Blvd., Suite 100
Address tine 2
city
Durham
Postal / Zip Code
27703
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Sean Clark
4b. Business Name:
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
3707 Swift Drive
Address Line 2
city
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27606
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Liberty Station signed Agent Authorization Form.pdf
State / Rovince / Rion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
Slate / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
59.54KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History C^U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(i appropriate)
Liberty Station (Formerly Wildcat Branch)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
City of Raleigh
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
1702-83-8607
+/- 22 acres
2c. Project Address
Street Address
3124 Garner Road
Address tine 2
City
State / Province / Fegion
Raleigh
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27610
USA
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Wildcat Branch
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C; NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*

Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
03020201
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The Site is mostly forested and undeveloped land. Drainages on the Site remain forested. A sewer easement runs northeast to southwest through the center of the Site. General land -
use in the vicinity consists of residential tracts, commercial, industrial, and governmental properties, and a small number of undeveloped, forested parcels.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
DWR #20-0140
SAW-2017-01248
Project History Upload
401-approval for Wildcat Branch (DWR #20-0140).pdf 199.5KB
404-approval (SAW-2017-01248 - NWP 29 Verification) for Wildcat Branch.pdf 14.41 MB
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Figure2 - Soils.pdf 1.62MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
2,330
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision and associated utilities to meet the demand for housing in this part of Wake County, NC. The revised
request is due to the City of Raleigh requiring that the dissipater downstream of a proposed road crossing be longer than what was previously designed and approved.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of a single-family residential townhome subdivision. Utilities for the proposed project will connect to existing utility lines on the Site. Proposed roads will
connect to existing road stubs to the north and east of the Site. Heavy equipment typically used for utility installation projects (e.g. back hoes, bull -dozers, etc.) will be utilized.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No O Unknown
Comments:
Jurisdictional features were delineated in 2017. A field determination was held on July 11, 2017, with
Ms. Tasha Alexander (Corps) and Mr. Sean Clark of Sage Ecological.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2017-01248
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Sean Clark
Agency/Consultant Company: Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made bythe Corps or DWR
Sd1. Jurisdictional determination upload
404-approval (SAW-2017-01248 - NWP 29 Verification) for Wildcat Branch.pdf 14.41 MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands W Streams -tributaries
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
m Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
Type of
3gSwidth *
3h. Impact
❑
�[3f.
(?)
urisdiction*
length*
S1
Road Crossing
9
Permanent
Culvert J
ream SB
Intermittent
Both
5
129
Average (feet)
(lirxearfeet)
S2
Energy Dissipater
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Stream SB (same impact
Intermittent
Both
15
50
Joeas Si)
Average (feet)
(lirrfeet)
S3
Sewer installation
Tem orar
p y
Excavation
Stream SB
Intermittent
Both
5
40
Average (feet)
(linearfcet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts: 31. Total temporary stream impacts:
179 40
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
219
3j. Comments:
All impacts are the same as previously approved except for the riprap dissipater which has increased in length from 20 feet to 50 feet.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
P Neuse r Tar -Pamlico
r Catawba r Randleman
F Goose Creek r Jordan Lake
r Other
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Site 1, road crossing, Allowable
P
SB
No
9,847
4,447
Site 2, road grading, Allowable
T
SB
No
58
3,044
Site 2, Sidewalk, Allowable
P
SB
No
432
0
Site 3, Sewer line, Exempt
P
SB
No
1,504
603
Site 4, BMP outfall, Exempt
P
SA
No
0
403
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 58.00 3,044.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 11,783.00
5,453.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 11,841.00
8,497.00
61. Comments:
Supporting Documentation
Wildcat Branch Impact Map - Areas 1-4.pdf 4.86MB

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Proposed roads were aligned so as to avoid and minimize impacts to streams Mile connecting to existing stub roads off site and avoiding utilities. Lots
were positioned so as to avoid lot fill in streams. Open space was provided around drainages containing jurisdictional streams. Construction fencing
will be used to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Silt fencing will be installed to provide additional
protection from runoff.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Silt
fencing and temporary basins will also be used to prevent sediment runoff into the stream.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes
r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Impacts were minimized and avoided as much as possible. There are no proposed wetland impacts. The 129 LF of permanent stream impacts resulting from the installation of the
culvert were minimized as much as possible while maintaining street width requirements and safe fill slopes. The additional permanent stream impact resulting from the riprap dissipater
should not be considered a loss to aquatic function because the riprap will be keyed into the bed and bank material so that the post construction elevation is the same as ebsting.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) u I
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes
r NA - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
W Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
W Phase II r NSW r USMP r Water Supply
Please identify which local government Stormwater program you are using.
City of Raleigh
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
r No
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r Yes
r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No

3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project does not provide new utilities to the area and is essentially an infill project. The construction of this project does not increase or decrease
the potential of future development in the area.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR forth is project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Se. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?`°
r Yes r No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Database (2020) was queried and a report (dated January 13, 2020) was received from NCNHP which identified no recorded
federally listed species on the project site or within a 1-mile radius.
Consultation Documentation Upload
6 - NCNHP Report for Wildcat Branch.pdf 1.17MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The proposed project takes place in Wake County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat that would support EFH (i.e. salt marshes, oyster
reefs, etc.).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NCSHPO website was used. No recorded NCSPHO properties are listed on the Site. Seven historic properties are listed within 0.25 mile of the Site
based on a query of the NCSHPO HPOWEB GIS Service website on January 13, 2020.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?*
r Yes r No
Be. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Flood Map Service Center NC Flood Risk Information System DFIRM Panel #1702; Dated May 2, 2006.
Miscellaneous
Comments
The only proposed change from the impacts approved earlier this year is the addition of 30 feet of stream impact to increase the energy dissipater downstream of the proposed road
crossing as per the City of Raleigh's requirements. Al other proposed impacts are the same.

Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
4-Figurel - USGS.pdf 1.03MB
PCN Cover Letter for Liberty Station.pdf 117.8KB
Signature
® By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request Within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Sean Clark
Signature
Date
10/27/2020
v

SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
FST. A
T016
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner or Legal Representative
Name: KB Home Raleigh -Durham, Inc. / Legal Representative - Doug Schwartz
Address: 4506 S. Miami Blvd.
Suite 100
Phone: [phone]
Email: DSchwartz(a),KBHome.com
Project Name/Description: Liberty Station (formerly Wildcat Branch)
Sage Project # 2017.34
Date:
9-28-2020
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. BOX 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: Mr. Lyle Phillips
Field Office: Raleigh
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, the owner or a duly authorized representative of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. I also hereby designate and authorize Sage Ecological Services to act on my behalf as my
agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by Sage staff. Please contact Sage to arrange a meeting
prior to visiting the site.
BY: DOUG SCHWARTZ
Print Name of Landowner or
Legal Representative
BY: VI.." 5J1A_
Signatud of Lando or
Legal Representative

r i
ti
MI5 C c-F
ti•
1
Mdd
Easi Parkland
r'q n
r�
x..r
L � AP
K ��
= m
' �5
eD
• ti� _ 4
APB
CIB3 M1 hh C T
+1L
APC2 N�.
u APB
Ape.
D of
C 01
Project Study Area ti
iviap Location
DURHAM FRANKLIN
WAKE
CHATHAM
JOHNSTON
LEE HARNETT
NRCS Soils Map Figured
3124 Garner Road Property
Sage Project #2017.34 N
USDA Soil Survey
Wake County Sheet 69
May 1, 2017
0 500 1,000
Feet
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

LYV 161b) • %ISLL "J N "AntlJ tlNR01[tlJ NOISIAIQI{RS HS1[ON'HOPS'ItlE[
_� OOZ aY^S "'P1[s"'°Id Aa"'d OOSI
�' esco-�'oN'�n-sxadw�Na �NuansNo� ��a SNOISVJO'I vaav-dvlN
V*,I ,SdI'-l-IIHd �8 'IHdIQ HDNV2Iff LVDQ IIM S�aarnrHn�xflIV�aMT a
I
z
0

LYV 161b) • %ISLL "J N "AntlJ tlNR01[tlJ HS1[ON'HOPS'ItlE[
OOZ aY^S "'P1[ s"'°Id 6amd OOSI �p
ozoziazic aaaav sawn �3NNvna esco-� oN'�n-sxadwoNa oNuansNo� Ja NOISIAIQSIIS LPH`SF-
-,.,a F�'d SdI I IIHd 28 IH�IQ HJNV'dg JVJQ"IIM S ed ➢x NF'ag IvJc
wz
a

LYV 161b) • %ISLL "J N "AntlJ tlNR01[tlJ HS1[ON'HOPS'ItlE[
OOZ aY^S "'P1[s"'°Id Aa"'d OOSI
S9b1ON'J11-sxad 1 ONunnsNo� ��a NOISIAIQgRS iH�ab-dtiiN
„ F� d SdI I IIHd'18 '-IHTIIQ HJNV2IgIVJQ"IIM S Hal rx n>F+xs IV:�MT a
1 0
0
Z_ �1
/f`illllr
l
�<1
---- T / 1
®
rl©ti V ��, i i1� rl1
/
/
J _
Ir�ljrflfl� I f l I/ 1 1 II
I j� ��III\rII I, 1 II(I 1 1
/ 0 1 �,�11\n/lltll l/I 1 I It
1 / n/1
/ U I
iIN Il���i _/.i,i
`'l H ilii I I/ l `
z 1Nial �Y; i i//1 j�l
1 I l o
J, �o l
1
.-3'7PVHe 44/ ' r p / r
'�: u l rr✓ AV ^� . � l `1

-" LOOZ aY^S "'P1[s"�°IdR �d OOSIJ
ae V'w1-SxaHdwodn�a --,q -IH a NOISIAIQSRS Ia 'SaI DNVHHIVDQne£HtlNH-adTtiMlN
h
I " Q
�`� •-.� ` l� i �/ U w U U
I a
r
Nco N�dcp
I I
i1L �l\
r
-_�_---�- `=�i��lyy,,I ��� /� m Ilia l � �'t� t. �"�,\\��.�._zN�/, \'��' ; ;III I\I I i �\• �I,��\1���11\`-)
�� m �o��i� z' mil\ �_ AI�I; ',� I_' i
o Om
,1 �o
I
v
I'
U� - I .I .I
�oA x
I � 3
I
I`
I � JI /� `i, I \ �^.�,-! _ - � �"r� � � p r I III ' _ �L�=% /�i ��.✓

LYV 161b) • %ISLL "J N "AntlJ tlNR01[tlJ HS1[ON'HOPS'ItlE[
_� OOZ aY^S "'P1[s"'°Id Aa"'d OOSI
o m= ssw-�'oN'�n-sxsswoNs oNunnsNo� ��a NOISIAIQSRS tH�ab-dbiN
V*,I ,SdI'-l-IIHd �8 'IHdIQ HDNV'dgIVDQ"IIM S�aa u�n>HxflSV�aMTM

MEN Roy Cooper. Governor
•s ; NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton, Secretary
■■ ■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
013
0 Walter Clark, director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-11087
January 13, 2020
Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606-2543
RE: Wildcat Branch; 2017.34
Dear Sean Clark:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water
Management Trust Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented
near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butlerCo�ncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR7HEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1691 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27609
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

■
\
\ y
»aeo0
sake@
_ _ o
co co a %
.g g /
U
» 2 t j Z
CC3 E U
oz
\
\
/
E
/
CO
/
ƒ
\
ƒ
0
ea
»
CO (
s 2
3
»
\
3
n \
°'
\
o e
©
9
j
=
g2
g
\
j
\
CO %
%
\
9 %
±
\
�\
aU)
«
/s
/
��
\\
c
\
E
\\
g
_
~
^
%{
77
u
>
`2
4
e
/
�\
\
0
-
o
}
/
3: CO
\
ca\G
\/a
z
y/
E\CO
egg
y\
/\
/
- \
\
-
\/
_
>\\
/)
r \ee
©
\0
)\
co\
\ \
co\
U
/
n
\_0
|
�
co
`
\
0\
�\
E
\
\ \
\
§\
6z
co\
s
~\/Z
/j
e
os�e
/
(,
Ea
/
\
4
/
\
u
)\
\\
.\
°/
y =
\
: -
\
mo
\
��
�0
u
o
®
.k\
\t
E
./»
®°
®
u
LE
x
±
a)s
E
/
/
=
2 G
/
E
co
/»
^E
QO
\(\\�
e
2-
/�
CO
/
Z\
2/
`
±
%
e e
s s
\ \
CO22
\
\ co�\
�G
5
s
s «ry
» 6
\ §
»
~
u
/
CC3
LL,
j j
\
\
/
/ e
\ }
\ {
e 0
>
Z
x
x Z,J
9
j/
s
§
/

\
~
3 ~
g/
s
g
y
s
a a
v
r. e
\ /
/
/
\
3 ®
3
3
e
\
>
>
g >
e w
CO
\
O
CO ±
CO
± u
a)\ \ a)\
/
2%
m /y
« e«
2
.y
e«
2y
e e« e
2 /y 2-
z
®
s
s
s
e s
ƒ
\
�
\ \
CO
s CO
2
/ s
\
\ \ \ \
\
\ \ \
§
\
>
x
x
\ x
=
CO
\ o
\
0 \
0 \ \ 0
\ \ \ \
\
\ \ \
>
CO
/
\ a
\
a \
a y \ a
© / / / /
/
/ / /
/
<
}a/cocoa
a
cocoa
/
e
/ \ \ \ \
\
\ \ \
/
%
CU
C-
E\\
x
ƒ
2
2 2
4
° u
®
v
3 u
\U 00
co 2\© v
z
a
e
>
(o3 «/
2
a
±
/
a
/
®%\ >G
e
e
ec
©
CO
\ u w % z
COe®\e%
a) 2
CO c
%
¢
\
COs
CO 2 j \
^
\
/
\
/
e
/
/
/
.g
\\ƒ/Z
u/%
3
g
e
D
\
\
\
eteee
e
eee
=
3
z
x
y
y
/
.s E ./ ./ ./
./
./ ./ ./
O
®
°
%
%
®
c
?—
\
%
s
e %
c
e
/ G / / /
\
OOO
\
_(
\
s
6
\
y
z
0 \ \ \
\
\ \ \
5 \
\
\
/
\
CO °
©
/
a
CO?
e : : :
y
y y y
§
(DE/
7
/
e®
(D»
%
OZOOO
O
OOO
\
z E
\
\
/ &
_
\ /
/
2
/
co?
/
e
\
(
CO
E
/ CO\
y
CO
\
CO/
COz
§
o
2
\
H
§
? e
?
e
2
- -0
/
/
\ ?
\
e
»
\
\
/
/
-%
\
e
e 20
0
2
s
m
u
e
\ %
§
0Q0
e
2 /
\
`
\.\
\
\ \ O
\
\
2
e
\
_
CO
_« c e
z
\
\
0
j
\
/
e
E
s
/ /
\
\
\ \
D
/ / / \ \
\
/ \ /
2
z
E
cn cn cn c_
cn
���
®
e
»
%
D
\©
®
v
o
a
a
®
o e
y
= e = _ _ D
= O
%
a
v
m o
e
/
e— e e e=
z 0 z z Cl
e s
z�
e e e
z z z
/ o
e
e
e
v a
\
©
O\ O O O/
O/
O O O
u
t t
}
0®
u
y 0) 0) 0)\
0
u
O-
G
>>
CO CO
»»
2
4
/\/// o
c e e co 3
e o
a 3
e e<
7 7 a
0
41
\
y
//
_
\
2
2 e 2 2 2 0
2 0
2 2 2
y
e = z
o
$
CO/
m
\ - 0 0 0 /
\ /
\ \ 0
E } 0
D
E 3
_ =
®
_
C
_ > ® > > >.2
>.2
> > >
\
/ /
//\d\
o//
//
/
//\/\\\/\/\\\
ra
s
\
/

O
N
O
N
C
n
z
U
z
U
7
O
O
N
O
N
M
r
G
O

U
ML
W
U
_0
1
00
O
r
r
W
w
� ml7
p}1 W-md" O� pil 4vaa,o -
~ QUr Kv
9
�0+�0
)Hvo2i l'a.W,e6 ' Nd t,14e1�piaj �a� o
I'd
an 3 U
IS' ,alsapT -
�Aa is
m 'U •�5n., � � z '0.� ,- � _ i � µes
s
LL J o
o p¢ -
R
. E
N g _A
W
\ o r
4�1 C,-
4ayR�
! p
5 — Rd
O Im .p SI Ig PoWMaN
n¢n SI lS uap,Le� .
�n
m R `tm
c a �•� a ��a � 6 J
a
rss,00Uxe:s.S Y
•stj'�' -i
x i0 aimwNn am`
J A
LU
"i
m r
La'a o a b
U 5 m Pe
r
J,

kAv
k
r.. •ftme►�-Nip OF-,"9jow