20200972 Ver 1_More Info Received_20201027

Strickland, Bev
From: Bobby Billingsley <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 2:54 PM
To: 'Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)'
Cc: Snider, Holley
Subject: [External] RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Windpointe Subdivision
Attachments: 2020-10-27-Windpointe_PCNRevisionsTransmit.pdf,
WindpointePCNApp_Revised10-26-2020_1.pdf,
Windpointe_PCNPlans_Rev-10-26-2020.pdf, Credit Reservation_ Windpointe
SD -Thompson Engineering.pdf, WindpointeQUAD.pdf, Windpointe_Soil_Map.pdf
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
�Illo'NEI&[e-mail]
Rachel/Holley,
I have attached:
• A response letter offering comments on revisions made
• A revised application based on comments received
• A revised set of plans. Mainly the changes were all on the stream crossing Site 'A' (Sheet 2)
• The credit reservation letter from Land Management Group
• The QUAD Map
• The Soils Map
I didn't know if you both want to look over this electronically first before I mail in paper documents to you? If not,
please advise as to how many copies you would like and I will get them out as soon as possible.
Let me know if you have questions regarding the revisions. We did our best to minimize the crossing width to the extent
possible.
Thanks,
Bobby Billingsley, PE
[e-mail]
ThomasEniai neeri niaPA.com
THOMAS est 1983
WV ENGINEERING, PA
Phs. Address: 1316-B Commerce Drive
New Bern, NC 28562
Mail Address:
PO Box 1309
New Bern, NC 28563
Office :
252.772.8011
Mobile:
252.671.2408
Fax:
252.636.2448
1

From: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2020 5:01 PM
To: Bobby Billingsley<bobbybiIli [e-mail]>
Cc: Snider, Holley <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Windpointe Subdivision
Hi Bobby,
The 15 days are to continue processing this request and it is from the 19th. If you are planning on making changes please
revise the drawings and send them in. I will forward your response to SHPO and see if there is anything else they need.
At this time the Corps cannot issue the permit until we get confirmation from SHPO as well as the required mitigation
associated with proposed impacts.
Thanks,
Rachel
From: Bobby Billingsley<[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2020 4:49 PM
To: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Windpointe Subdivision
Just a follow up on this ... do you mean 15 days from October 19t"?
Thanks,
Bobby Billingsley, PE
[e-mail]
ThomasEngi neeri ngPA.com
THOMAS est 1983
WV ENGINEERING, PA
Phs. Address: 1316-B Commerce Drive
New Bern, NC 28562
Mail Address: PO Box 1309
New Bern, NC 28563
Office : 252.772.8011
Mobile: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
From: Bobby Billingsley<[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 10:00 AM
To: 'Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)'<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Windpointe Subdivision
Rachel,
We apologize for the delay. We have been working on it, just don't have a resolution just yet. Our client is looking at
mitigation for this at around $160,000 based on the credit reservation letter. We didn't recall ever being required to pay
mitigation when we were under 150 linear feet of stream disturbance, so we are trying to find ways to lessen the
impacts here and to reduce this expense. Any suggestions you would have on that would be appreciated.

Regarding the 15 days, do you mean 15 days to respond from when your email came out yesterday?
Regarding the SHPO and the house: I have attached pics on this that the clearing contractor took months back, but the
guys clearing the site demoed that house months back before we were even told there was a potential house on the
site. We didn't know is was there. Clearing guys said that it was dilapidated/caving-in and couldn't safely access. We
can't provide the requested further documentation from the SHPO because we don't know how many floors, rooms,
windows, doors, etc., there were in the house, as no one went in. Also, based on these pics I'm not sure if it would have
been possible to move it.
Thanks,
Bobby Billingsley, PE
[e-mail]
ThomasEnei neeri nePA.com
TH MA S est 1983
4W ENGINEERING, PA
Phs. Address: 1316-B Commerce Drive
New Bern, NC 28562
Mail Address:
PO Box 1309
New Bern, NC 28563
Office :
252.772.8011
Mobile:
252.671.2408
Fax:
252.636.2448
From: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 1:01 PM
To: Bobby Billingsley<bobbybiIli [e-mail]>
Cc:[e-mail]; Leah Quinn <[e-mail]>; Snider, Holley
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Windpointe Subdivision
Hi Bobby,
If no response is received within 15 days the permit request will be withdrawn due to lack of response. Please let me
know if you intend of continuing with this request and provide responses to all questions asked by SHPO and the Corps.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions.
Thanks,
Rachel
From: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 2:21 PM
To: 'Bobby Billingsley'<[e-mail]>
Cc: '[e-mail]'<[e-mail]>;'Leah Quinn'
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Windpointe Subdivision
Hi Bobby,

Attached are the comments from the State Historic Preservation Office, please provide the information in the attached
document. The Corps cannot issue it's permit without satisfying the SHPO requirement. Please let me know if you have
any additional questions.
Thanks,
Rachel
From: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 12:53 PM
To: Bobby Billingsley<[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Windpointe Subdivision
Our regulations state that on a case by case basis the Corps can determine whether mitigation is required for stream
impacts of less than 150' to ensure that the impacts do not result in more than minimal impact and we also can consider
cumulative impacts for the watershed. In many coastal areas mitigation is charged for impacts to coastal stream for
impacts over 25' feet. The ratio can be negotiated based on the quality of the stream and that is why I asked about a NC
Stream Assessment Form.
In the Wilmington District we do not consider the bottom of the stream to be a wetland. Mitigation is done on a linear
footage impact and mitigation banks have stream mitigation credits.
Please refer to the 2008 mitigation rule under which the three mechanisms for providing compensatory mitigation
which in order of preference is mitigation banks, in -lieu fee programs, and then we consider permittee-responsible
mitigation.
If your applicant wants to consider putting in a bridge feature or reducing the crossing impact significantly your proposal
will still likely require mitigation. There are a couple banks located in Onslow County within the watershed of this
proposed development that likely have the required credits available.
Thanks,
Rachel
From: Bobby Billingsley<[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 12:33 PM
To: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Windpointe Subdivision
Rachel I am trying to chase down a mitigation bank site for this and get a quote, and who would be able to offer credits,
etc. I do have a question on this though.
We have done a bunch of stream crossings over the years, most times with the bottoms of the stream being considered
wetlands, and then sometimes Riparian Buffers credits, etc. We have had to do mitigation on a square foot basis when
it exceeded 0.10 ac and have done that via mitigation, in -lieu, conservation easement, or a combination of the
three. However, we can't offhand remember a time when we were required to do mitigation on a linear foot of stream
basis.
So my question then is..... what threshold level are we exceeding that is causing the mitigation to be required on this
site? I ask because I have no idea yet how costly this is going to be for our client, and if there is something we can do
design wise to get under the threshold level or lessen the impacts, I may need to do that.

Thanks,
Bobby Billingsley, PE
[e-mail]
ThomasEngi neeri ngPA.com
I!E!t�THOMAS esa 1983
WF ENGINEERING, PA
Phs. Address: 1316-B Commerce Drive
New Bern, NC 28562
Mail Address: PO Box 1309
New Bern, NC 28563
Office : 252.772.8011
Mobile: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
From: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 9:53 AM
To: Bobby Billingsley<bobbybiIli [e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; Snider, Holley <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Windpointe Subdivision
Hi Bobby,
I spoke with Robb about the attached email. He was looking for the origin of the stream and was not looking at the
location of the crossing that I was discussing. There is a North Carolina Stream Assessment form that uses methodology
developed by the State and consulting groups on how to rate the quality and type of the stream resource. The State also
has their own stream assessment forms, but what you provided is not either of those assessments.
Based on the type of resource impacted (perennial stream) a conservation easement would not be adequate as you do
not have additional streams onsite to preserve. Any other impacts to those streams would require a permit and thus the
threat to the resource is limited. It is also out of line with our mitigation rule which is first to go to an established
mitigation bank, then discuss in -lieu fee, and then conservation easement. The Corps has found that conservation
easements are often violated and do not have the success rate as mitigation banks. Mitigation will be required for that
crossing at a 2:1 ratio.
Also please be aware that this permit is currently on hold as I have still not heard from the State Historic Preservation
Office on the data point located on -site (appears to be a house). Still waiting on their concurrence and I need that
information before I issue this permit.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions.
Thanks,
Rachel
From: Bobby Billingsley<[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 1:48 PM
To: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<[e-mail]>

Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Windpointe Subdivision
Rachel, the attached is all I have from Robb. Do you need more information on it? I have copied Robb on it. Robb do
you have further stream data on the crossing/quality or what need be ... a "Stream Assessment Form"?
Rachel also, we would likely prefer to do conservation easement instead of paid mitigation bank if possible.
Thanks,
Bobby Billingsley, PE
[e-mail]
ThomasEnei neeri nePA.com
?-,SOMAS est 1983
MV ENGINEERING, PA
Phs. Address: 1316-B Commerce Drive
New Bern, NC 28562
Mail Address:
PO Box 1309
New Bern, NC 28563
Office :
252.772.8011
Mobile:
252.671.2408
Fax:
252.636.2448
From: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 1:35 PM
To: Bobby Billingsley<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Windpointe Subdivision
Hi Bobby,
The Corps can require mitigation for any impacts we feel have a negative effect on the aquatic environment. We
typically require mitigation for impacts over 150 linear feet, but in the case of perennial impacts mitigation can be
required at any impact length. Mitigation will be required for this permit even if impacts are reduced to 149 linear feet.
If you can provide an North Carolina Stream Assessment form we can discuss ratios.
Thanks,
Rachel
From: Bobby Billingsley<[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 9:58 AM
To: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Windpointe Subdivision
Rachel regarding the stream issue ... are you saying that greater than or equal to 150 LF requires mitigation? This is new
for us ... never run into the footage being a threshold point before. If so, can we just simply reduce the impact length to
149 LF? We are trying to keep this as simple as possible for everybody...
Thanks,

Bobby Billingsley, PE
[e-mail]
ThomasEngi neeri ngPA.com
THOMAS est 1983
WF ENGINEERING, PA
Phs. Address: 1316-B Commerce Drive
New Bern, NC 28562
Mail Address: PO Box 1309
New Bern, NC 28563
Office : 252.772.8011
Mobile: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
From: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2020 8:46 AM
To: Bobby Billingsley<[e-mail]>
Cc:[e-mail]
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Windpointe Subdivision
The impacts associated with Fullard Creek are 150 linear feet long and therefore would require mitigation. Also please
be reminded I have reached out to SHPO regarding the surveyed house point and cannot issue my permit until I receive
concurrence from their office.
Thanks,
Rachel
From: Bobby Billingsley<[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 7:49 AM
To: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Windpointe Subdivision
Rachel I just noticed this below email that you had sent to John, but the submitted PCN was not over 150 LF of
stream. Therefore mitigation wouldn't be required, right?
Thanks,
Bobby Billingsley, PE
[e-mail]
ThomasEngi neeri ngPA.com
THOMAS est 1983
WF ENGINEERING, PA
Phs. Address: 1316-B Commerce Drive
New Bern, NC 28562
Mail Address: PO Box 1309
New Bern, NC 28563

Office : 252.772.8011
Mobile: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
From: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2020 3:23 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: FW: Windpointe Subdivision
Apologies I sent this to John earlier. Also I must hear back from SHPO before I can issue.
Thanks,
Rachel
From: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 1:11 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Windpointe Subdivision
Hi John,
The Corps requires mitigation for impacts to perennial streams over 150 linear feet. Mitigation in the form of bank
credits will be required at a ratio of 2:1. Once you submit an updated mitigation proposal I can issue the permit.
Thanks,
Rachel
Rachel Capito
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Office: 910.251.4487
Cell: 910.899.6051
Virus -free. Blocked Blocked Blocked Blocked Blockedwww.avg. com
s

THOMAS ENGINEERING, PA est 1983
civil engineering@ land surveying.project management
EMAILED
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Rachel Capito
Onslow County Field Representative
Re: Windpointe Subdivision — Comments Response
Wetland Crossing (Fill) PCN Application — Nationwide 29
Reference Action ID# SAW-2020-00558
Onslow County, Sneads Ferry, North Carolina
TE Project #: 2019-016
Dear Rachel,
October 27, 2020
Please find attached for the above referenced project for your review and approval one
(1) copy of the revised PCN form, one (1) copy of the revised plans, one (1) copy of the
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank Credit Reservation Letter, and one (1) copy of
miscellaneous attachments.
The following revisions have been made to the documents based on comments received.
I have added my comments regarding the revisions made in BLUE text below.
USACE Comments (Rachel Capito):
1) Provide mitigation for the stream crossing site with a 2:1 ratio.
The stream crossing site has been revised to reduce the required impacts to the
extent possible. This was accomplished primarily by lowering the roadway
profile at the crossing approximately three to four feet, and additionally by
steepening the rip -rap protected slopes to that amount acceptable to NCDOT. The
combination of these changes net a reduction of 68 linear feet of impacts to the
stream crossing. Additionally, the impacts to the 50' vegetated buffers have
roughly been cut in half. Please refer to plan sheet 2 for the revised crossing plan
and profile. When reviewing please let me know if you have questions.
2) Project on hold until site reviewed and comments received from SHPO regarding the
Horace Grant house.
Per previous email correspondence, I have forwarded pics of the house that the
clearing contractor took months back. The clearing contractor site demoed that
house months back before we were even told there was a potential house on the
1316-B Commerce Drive.P.0. Box 1309.New Bern, NC 28563
Phone: [phone].Fax: [phone].Website: ThomasEngineeringPA.com

THOMAS ENGINEERING, PA est 1983
civil engineering@ land surveying.project management
site. We didn't know is was there. The clearing contractor said that it was
dilapidated/caving-in and couldn't safely access. We can't provide the requested
further documentation from the SHPO because we don't know how many floors,
rooms, windows, doors, etc., there were in the house, as no one went in. Also,
based on these pics I'm not sure if it would have been possible to move it.
DEMLR Comments (Holley Snider):
1) Letter C La. please clarify that wetlands and streams will be impacted.
Wetlands, Streams, and Buffers proposed to impacted. Application checked as such.
2) Letter C 3.a. please clarify the linear feet and width of the perennial (This has been
revised to Perennial on the application) (not intermittent) stream to be impacted. The
plans indicate 120 linear feet of pipe for the proposed roadway crossing.
Additionally, the DWR general water quality certification 4139 is specifically
conditioned to state:
Culverts shall be designed and installed in such a manner that the original stream
profiles are not altered and allow for aquatic life movement during low flows. The
dimension, pattern, and profile of the stream above and below a pipe or culvert shall
not be modified by widening the stream channel or by reducing the depth of the stream
in connection with the construction activity. The width, height, and gradient of a
proposed culvert shall be such as to pass the average historical low flow and spring
flow without adversely altering flow velocity. [1SA NCAC 02H .0506(b)(2) and
(c)(2)]
AND
If multiple pipes or barrels are required, they shall be designed to mimic the existing
stream cross section as closely as possible including pipes or barrels at flood plain
elevation and/or sills where appropriate. Widening the stream channel shall be
avoided.
The submitted drawings depict a meandering perennial stream 6 feet in width. The
proposal depicts two (2) 42" culverts 120 feet in length. The cross-section drawing
indicates the pipes would be located outside of the stream channel. Please ensure
that your that your project has been designed to meet the conditions above and
provide any justification and clarification necessary.
Proposed crossing pipes revised from double 42" RCP to double 36" reinforced
concrete pipe, buried 8" at both ends for passage. This better fits inside the ditch
channel section as located in the field. We feel this best mimics the natural channel
and profile.
1316-B Commerce Drive.P.0. Box 1309.New Bern, NC 28563
Phone: [phone].Fax: [phone].Website: ThomasEngineeringPA.com

THOMAS ENGINEERING, PA est 1983
civil engineering@ land surveying@project management
3) Placement of culverts and other structures in streams shall be below the elevation of
the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and
20% of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than or equal to 48
inches, to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Double 36" pipes
proposed to be buried 8" on both ends, just slightly greater than 20%.
Thank you,
eWl "�+
Bobby Billingsley, PE
[e-mail]
Attachments
ec. Holley Snider, w/ att
1316-B Commerce Drive.P.O. Box 1309.New Bern, NC 28563
Phone: [phone].Fax: [phone].Website: ThomasEngineeringPA.com

a`'�F wArEgQ�
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Windpointe Subdivision
2b.
County:
Onslow
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Sneads Ferry
2d.
Subdivision name:
Windpointe Subdivision
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
n/a
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
A. Sydes Construction, Inc.
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB 5022, PG 958
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Anthony W. Sydes - President
3d.
Street address:
100 Carolina Plantations Blvd
3e.
City, state, zip:
Jacksonville, NC 28546
3f.
Telephone no.:
225.455.6956
3g.
Fax no.:
n/a
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner) n/a - applicant is the Owner
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
John G. Thomas, PE
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Thomas Engineering, PA
5c.
Street address:
1316-B Commerce Drive
5d.
City, state, zip:
New Bern, NC 28562
5e.
Telephone no.:
252.637.2727
5f.
Fax no.:
252.636.2448
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Parcel ID: 007057, PIN = 428801196422
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 34.539167 Longitude:-77.399722
1 c.
Property size:
98.93 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Fullard Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
SA; HQW (19-39-4-1)
2c.
River basin:
White Oak River Basin
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Project site is undeveloped forested land with wetlands areas primarily towards the rear portions of the property. The vicinity of the site generally has
some low density residential development around the perimeter, with some undeveloped areas.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 15.36
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 6,400
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to provide a roadway crossing to access the rear portion of the subdivision, known as "The Cliffs", w/ one addt. small fill.
subdivision.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Excavators/backhoes, and similar construction equipment will be used to install pipe and bring up roadway fill.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Haywood Pittman - Pittman Soil
Agency/Consultant Company: USAGE
Other:
4d.
Action
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
ID# SAW-2020-00558 - Rachel Capito Corps Representative. 4/28/2020
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑X Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
"Yes" checked above as the project will be constructed in phases. However, there are no known needed future wetlands disturbance. The proposed
impacts as shown herein should accommodate all necessary facilities installations for the entire planned subdivision.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Unknown
Yes
Corps
0.014
W2
Choose one
Unknown
Yes/No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.014
2h. Comments:
One small fill (606 sf) required for fill and roadway drainage in the project rear between Lots 147 & 148 (Site 'B').
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Piping & Outlet Prot.
Fullard Creek
PER
DWQ
6
82
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
82
3i. Comments:
Existing ditch to be piped with double 72 LF - 36" reinforced concrete pipe as shown in the plans, buried 8" (20% +/-) on both ends for aquatic life
passage. 5' of rip rap outlet protection added to both inlet and outlet ends.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1 P
Fill/slopes for road crossing
Fullard Creek
No
7,557
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
7,557
6i. Comments: Buffer clearing and fill required to make roadway crossing and support roadway, shoulders, and slopes. Slopes to be fully rip -rap
stabilized. Note that these are not 'Riparian' Buffers ... just required 'Vegetated Setbacks'.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
This is the only planned crossing of the stream for the Windpointe Subdivision project. The blue -line stream extended fully across the project, so it
was necessary to cross for project continuation. Fill impacts are those necessary to make the crossing mainly, and additionally for a very small fill for
roadway construction bypass point to support lot construction geometry. Note that the stream crossing site impacts have roughly been cut in half since
the original application/proposal.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Silt fence and construction fencing will be utilized to isolate the area. A check dam will be installed downstream of the proposed storm drain.
Stabilization will be completed as soon as the fill is brought up and slopes/shoulders graded out to plan elevations. Slopes at crossing site will be
stabilized with full rip -rap placed on filter fabric. Silt fencing will be maintained daily.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑X Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Stream
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity: 164
Quantity:
Quantity:
164 stream credits of impacts @ 2:T_r_a—fio_T_co_nfi`rmed and reserved to be purchased as approved.
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
23.22 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Erosion control permit has been obtained: Onslo-2020-054. State stormwater permit has been applied for
and is currently in the process of being
reviewed.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
State
stormwater permit has been applied for and is currently in the process of being reviewed. This is a hybrid
high density/low density master plan
of development.
The high -density portion is "The Shores at Windpointe". The pipes and ditches here will transport all impervious, built upon areas to
one
of the two wet detention basins. The wet basins will store and provide treatment for the difference in the pre- and post- developed 1-yr, 24-hr due
to SA requirements. The low -density portion of is "The Cliffs at Windpointe". Impervious area for this portion will be capped at 12% as per the low -
density
requirements. Stormwater for this portion of the project will be treated primarily through sheet flow
across lots to roadway open ditch sections.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
NCDEQ - Wilmington Regional Office
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
N/a
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
OCoastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No In proces
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
Proposed
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
lot be treated by through NCDEQ to be by the Pluris Holdings, LLC.
wastewater will public sewer, permitted and owned and operated
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes © No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes [9 No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No fish in the ditch. Somtimes wet, sometimes dry
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes [0 No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Dept of Natural & Cultural Resources site
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Portions of the overall project boundaries are within the 100-yr floodplain, but these portions are not impacted as part of this work. The site where the
wetlands fill/stream crossing is proposed is not within the 100-yr floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
b
Flood Insurance Rate Map
3-72-04Z,Qsvo r
Anthony W. Sides
05/29/2020
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Appli nt/Agent' Signature
Date
(Agents signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

GENERAL NOTES
1. BOUNDARY AND WETLANDS INFORMATION IS AS PROVIDED ON THE
"BOUNDARY & WETLANDS SURVEY- 192 ENNETT LANE, SNEADS FERRY,
NC 28460" AS PREPARED BY HERBERT J. NOBLES, JR., PLS (L-2703).
2. THE 404 WETLANDS LINE AS SHOWN HEREIN IS AS PER ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION ACTION ID:
SAW-2020-00558.
3. THE BLUE LINE STREAMS AND ASSOCIATED VEGETAGED SETBACKS ARE
SHOWN HEREIN ARE AS PER THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STREAM DETERMINATION # ONSLOW 2020-001.
4. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND MEASUREMENTS, NO
GRID FACTORS APPLIED.
5. PROPERTY ADDRESS = 192 ENNETT LANE, SNEADS FERRY, NC 28460,
6. DEED REFERENCE = DEED BOOK 502Z PAGE 958.
7. PARCEL ID = 007057.
8. PIN = 428801196422.
9. TOTAL SITE AREA = 4,309,391 SF (98.93 AC).
10. TOTAL SITE WETLANDS AREA = 15.36 t AC
11. THE EXISTING SITE IS GENERALLY WOODED PROPERTY.
12. ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD 1988.
13. EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN ARE AT ONE FOOT.
14. PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT SCALE WITHIN ZONE "X" AND ZONE "AE" AS
PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS 3720428800J AND 3720428900J, DATE
NOVEMBER 3, 2005 AS ESTABLISHED BY FEMA. ADDITIONALLY, PORTIONS
OF THIS PROJECT SCALE WITHIN ZONE "X" AND ZONE 'AE" AS PER
PRELIMINARY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS 3720428800K AND
3720428900K, PRELIMINARILY DATED JUNE 30, 2016 AND PROPOSED TO BE
EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 19, 2020, AS ESTABLISHED BY FEMA.THIS REPORT IN
NO WAY SUPERCEDES THE ABOVE MENTIONED FIRM.
15. BUILT -UPON AREA SUMMARY:
PROJECT IS A COMBINATION OF HIGH -DENSITY ("THE SHORES) AND
LOW -DENSITY ("THE CLIFFS') SUBAREAS (MASTER PLAN OF
DEVELOPMENT).
"THE SHORES SUB -AREA (130 LOTS) _
a. TOTAL AREA = 46.30 t AC
b. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 16.66 t AC.
C. TOTAL PERCENT OF IMPERVIOUS COVER = 36.0 % t.
d. TOTAL PROJECT GREEN SPACE = 70.2 % t.
"THE CLIFFS" SUB -AREA (43 LOTS) _
a. TOTAL AREA = 52.63 t AC
b. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 6.29 t AC).
C. TOTAL PERCENT OF IMPERVIOUS COVER = 12.0 % t.
d. TOTAL PROJECT GREEN SPACE = 88.0 % t.
COPYRIGHT © 2020 BY THOMAS ENGINEERING P.A.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THESE DRAWINGS ARE
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH REMAIN
THE PROPERTY OF THOMAS ENGINEERING P.A.
NEITHER THIS DOCUMENT NOR ANY PART OF THIS
DOCUMENT MAY BE REUSED, REPRODUCED OR
TRANSMITTED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS,
ELECTRONIC OR MECHANICAL INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO PHOTOCOPYING, MICROFILMING AND
RECORDING, OR BYANY INFORMATION STORAGE
AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, WITHOUT PERMISSION IN
WRITING FROM THOMAS ENGINEERING P.A.
nw_1
- - -_�, - _ _------f___ -_'-J-Ennett Lane-L
1� --- (SR 75191 Public)- [
9 10 11 12 13 14 � 15 �_
^^ I WINDMILL LIGHT WAY I 1 T� nW I
126 - -
\ 125 r0 I 105
240,
23
122 rD 1
121 M
20 \
19
\ 18
17
O� 1
Q-
c7�
'O
6
C
54155156157
88 187
58159160161
40 39 tilt 1
33 ' '< y
' 32
31 ��
\ „v11 7­0� 93 7 75. 74
73 77
112 96 �- 6 u
113 95���'
115 114
h Str 171
RaJ Rra,� PUpii�i 170
169��S(��' 163 1
164
Qr �V 165
\ 166
SITE IMPACTS DATA TABLE
Site ID
Impact LF/SF
Im act AC
Descri tion
A
82 LF
Jurisdiction Ditch Pi in /Fillip
A
7557 SF
0. 173 AC
50' Vegetated Setback Fill SA Waters
B
606 SF
0.014 AC
4041401 Fill For Proposed Sv�rale
FINAL DRAWINGS GRAPHIC SCALE
Released for permits only,
not released for construction. 400 200 0 400
� (11"X17)
LEGEND
- - - -
IMPACT AREAS
ROADWAY 4
Lin
ASPHALT AREAS
PROPOSED LOT LINES
- PROPOSED LOTS
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
PROPOSED DITCH LINES
PROP. RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
-
404 WETLAND LINE
- - - -
BLUE -LINE STREAM 4 LD -
- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
- ---
- STREAM TOP OF BANK t o o
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
F50'
VEGETATED SETBACKS
®
_ TEMP. WATTLE / CHECK DAM
##'
##'
PROPOSED CONTOURS
PROPOSED WATER MAINS
PROPOSED SEWER MAINS
- -##' - -
EXISTING CONTOURS
167
168
131 1132 133
DRAWING INDEX
SHEET
NAME
1
VICINITY & INDEX PLAN
2
PLAN & PROFILE SITE A"
3
PLAN & PROFILE SITE'B'
4
ROADWAY & DRAINAGE DETAILS
5-6
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
CURRENT PROJECT
BOUNDARY
F
J
1)
159 � 136
160
157 \ 137 139 140 1
138 \
156 141
/ O CT \
/ \ 155 \�1 /�, CpP BLANC( 142 404 WETLANDS
�I I 144 `143 \
154 (ij ' I
y / 145
146 T
"
I 152151
147
ml
/ 150 co 148
149
`,VLSI I IT I7�ITI IIIrI j
0R`�T`r�
H ` SEAL
C-438`
•,,�rjllCAzill gO,,,
rf jt rjj 198,34
ww /
es Road /�� �,/� •
n w
�, cy ! `3 P�plicl'
ad q5 Know what's below.
/ awGh/ aISR Call before you dig.
Revised 10.26.2020 (Site 'A')
1ttllllii� ljll.
�`ti •�� 0 ffrr
4
147
N y
1
r�rfMO ��g,•~
ffj�i G:il><TaO��t`
VICINITY & INDEX PLAN
NWP #29
WETLAND FILL &
VEGETATED IMPACTS FOR
WINDPOINTE SUBDIVISION
SNEADS FERRY ONSLOW COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
OWNER & DEVELOPER
A. SYDES CONSTRUCTION, INC.
100 CAROLINA PLANTATION 8L VD.
JACKSONVILLE, NC 28546
SCALE: AS SHOWN
DATE: 0710912020
PROJECT#: 2019 016
SHEET: Iof6

1. BOUNDARYAND WETLANDSGENERAL TNOTESPROVIDED ONTHE
"BOUNDARY & WETLANDS SURVEY - 192 ENNETT LANE, SNEADS FERRY,
NC 28460"AS PREPARED BY HERBERT J. NOBLES, JR., PLS (L-2703).
2. THE 404 WETLANDS LINE AS SHOWN HEREIN IS AS PER ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION ACTION ID:
SAW-2020-00558.
3. THE BLUE LINE STREAMS AND ASSOCIATED VEGETAGED SETBACKS ARE
SHOWN HEREIN ARE AS PER THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STREAM DETERMINATION # ONSLOW 2020-001.
4. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND MEASUREMENTS, NO
GRID FACTORS APPLIED.
5. PROPERTYADDRESS = 192 ENNETT LANE, SNEADS FERRY, NC 28460.
6. DEED REFERENCE = DEED BOOK 5022, PAGE 958.
7. PARCEL ID = 007057.
8. PIN = 428801196422.
9. TOTAL SITE AREA = 4,309,391 SF (98.93 AC).
10. TOTAL SITE WETLANDS AREA = 15.36 t AC
11. THE EXISTING SITE IS GENERALLY WOODED PROPERTY.
12. ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NA VD 1988.
13. EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN ARE AT ONE FOOT.
14. PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT SCALE WITHIN ZONE X"AND ZONE "AE"AS
PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS 3720428800J AND 3720428900J, DATED
NOVEMBER 3, 2005 AS ESTABLISHED BY FEMA. ADDITIONALLY, PORTIONS
OF THIS PROJECT SCALE WITHIN ZONE X" AND ZONE AE"AS PER
PRELIMINARY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS 3720428800K AND
3720428900K, PRELIMINARILY DATED JUNE 30, 2016 AND PROPOSED TO BE
EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 19, 2020, AS ESTABLISHED BY FEMA. THIS REPORT IN
NO WAY SUPERCEDES THE ABOVE MENTIONED FIRM.
15. BUILT-UPONAREASUMMARY.,
PROJECT IS A COMBINATION OF HIGH -DENSITY ("THE SHORES) AND
LOW -DENSITY ("THE CLIFFS') SUBAREAS (MASTER PLAN OF
DEVELOPMENT).
'THE SHORES SUB -AREA (130 LOTS) _
a. TOTAL AREA = 46.30 t AC
b. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 16.66 t AC.
C. TOTAL PERCENT OF IMPERVIOUS COVER = 36.0 % t.
d. TOTAL PROJECT GREEN SPACE = 70.2 % t.
'THE CLIFFS" SUB -AREA (43 LOTS) _
a. TOTAL AREA = 52.63 t AC
b. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 6.29 t AC).
C. TOTAL PERCENT OF IMPERVIOUS COVER = 12.0 % t.
d. TOTAL PROJECT GREEN SPACE = 88.0 % t.
WETLANDS LINE DATA
LINE #
BEARING
DISTANCE
W198
S55'32'36E
44.93'
W199
S77°29'33"E
31.33'
W200
S50' 10' 29 E
47.32'
W201
S84' Of' 13 E
43.65'
W202
I S65" 19' 16 E
49.55'
FINAL DRA WINGS
Released for permits only,
not released for construction.
DRAWING INDEX
SHEET
NAME
1
VICINITY & INDEX PLAN
2
PLAN & PROFILE SITE A"
3
PLAN & PROFILE SITED'
4
ROADWAY & DRAINAGE DETAILS
5-6
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
SITE IMPACTS DATA TABLE
Site ID
Impact (LF/SF)
Impact (AC)
Description
A
82 LF
--
Jurisdiction Ditch Pi in /Fillip
A
7557 SF
0. 173 AC
50' Vegetated Setback Fill SA Waters
B
606 SF
0.014 AC
4041401 Fill For Proposed Sv�rale
1MWW.:1ffiW0
WA W�
GRAPHIC SCA
20 X
/
SETBAC
I l
j I / W198
J�,�,,, I \I III
a�
jAOh wlss I /
I
ss y, o
xz
���/ / // `�,s ✓®� ,� ��' ,1 jl • ,IABILIL� ,I. j..�-�/ 5 / SnOa�GCL�EC1pRl 25' 2k Zk 25 6
_SLOP
o
s4H2a
3ANCE % '
e�
i 6
,lP-RAP
STABILIZED SIDE L
SLOPES /
( j
LOW PT STA: 14+02.43
LOW PT ELEV: 23.38
PVI STA:14+09.42
PVI ELEV.23.00
K.45.00
LVC:118.16
B VCS: 13+50.34
28.0'
BVCE. 23.68'
EVCS: 14+68.49
EVCE: 23.87'
�
24.0'
00
0
(D
20.0'
Z
Q
16.0'
W
12.0'
GRAPHIC SCALE (VER) W
10 5 0 10
(11"X IT)
GRAPHIC SCALE (HOR)
40 20 0 40
(11"X IT)
8.0'
4.0'
13+00
LEGEND
- - - -
IMPACT AREAS
ROADWAY 4
L
ASPHALT AREAS
PROPOSED LOT LINES
- PROPOSED LOTS
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
PROPOSED DITCH LINES
PROP. RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
- w
404 WETLAND LINE
- - - -
BLUE -LINE STREAM LD
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
- --
- STREAM TOP OF BANK ± o o
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
F50'
VEGETATED SETBACKS
®
_ TEMP. WATTLE/CHECKDAM
##'
##'
PROPOSED CONTOURS
PROPOSED WATER MAINS
_
PROPOSED SEWER MAINS
- -##' - -
EXISTING CONTOURS
GPS GA)
'3971 SF VEG. SETBACK DISTURBANCE
-
82 LF STREAM DISTURBANCE
LOT 173 NI
I / 26593 sf
/ 0.61 ac
WHITE SHOAL WAY Natural Grade Line (EG)
Proposed 4 Grade Line (FG)
14+00
STATION
SMH24
28.0'
TYPE: 4' Std.
STA: 14+56 (White Shoal Way), OFF. 0.00'
RIM: 23.80'
24.0'
63,
SUMP:6.76'
0
INV IN (SS25): 6.86'
INV OUT (SS24): 6.76'
20.0'
Z
16.0'
Q
120'
W
W
8.0'
4.0'
15+00
,`'1111IIIIIllffljf �11IlIIlI ll
'bti� ;tttttOt.rtt. •lA, jrfjf ti1,� .......tt� O�c. ffl
ti'~ogp R`1 T•,�':°''o��' S refry
,r �rr -� ♦ i O f�i r
V � r r
F : SEAL AL �D :.
- C-438 1 14
rr ffl ♦yy r ��
r f. CAR• � . � �;• C2.
rrrr 'ff,ttttttt tip~~ rrr ffG1j�N�.,� Q'�,
ffrj'f j! 918 3l*�ti�ti
�!lllIlllt
15
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
Revised 10.26.2020 (Site 'A')
b
L�
00
N M N
u ° e
00 zN utMo
y U y Ln
Opp z N
3 W W x
Z m zS
C) "Q1
iM oM
ot�-s b
k ~ N
000 3 N
U p 3
on y u
b
M �
PLAN & PROFILE SITE 'A'
NWP #29
WETLAND FILL &
VEGETATED IMPACTS FOR
WINDPOINTE SUBDIVISION
SNEADS FERRY ONSLOW COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
OWNER & DEVELOPER
A. SYDES CONSTRUCTION, INC.
100 CAROLINA PLANTATION BLVD.
JACKSONVILLE, NC 28546
SCALE: AS SHOWN
DATE: 0710912020
PROJECT#: 2019 016
SHEET: 2of6

GENERAL NOTES
1. BOUNDARY AND WETLANDS INFORMATION IS AS PROVIDED ON THE
"BOUNDARY & WETLANDS SURVEY - 192 ENNETT LANE, SNEADS FERRY,
NC 28460" AS PREPARED BY HERBERT J. NOBLES, JR., PLS (L-2703).
2. THE 404 WETLANDS LINE AS SHOWN HEREIN /S AS PER ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION ACTION ID:
SAW-2020-00558.
3. THE BLUE LINE STREAMS AND ASSOCIATED VEGETAGED SETBACKS ARE
SHOWN HEREIN ARE AS PER THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STREAM DETERMINATION # ONSLOW 2020-001.
4. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND MEASUREMENTS, NO
GRID FACTORS APPLIED.
5. PROPERTY ADDRESS = 192 ENNETT LANE, SNEADS FERRY, NC 28460,
6. DEED REFERENCE = DEED BOOK 502Z PAGE 958.
7. PARCEL /D = 007057.
8. PIN = 428801196422.
9. TOTAL SITE AREA = 4,309,391 SF (98.93 AC).
10. TOTAL SITE WETLANDS AREA = 15.36 t AC
11. THE EXISTING SITE /S GENERALLY WOODED PROPERTY.
12. ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD 1988.
13. EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN ARE AT ONE FOOT.
14. PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT SCALE WITHIN ZONE 'X" AND ZONE 'AE" AS
PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS 3720428800J AND 3720428900J, DATED
NOVEMBER 3, 2005 AS ESTABLISHED BY FEMA. ADDITIONALLY, PORTIONS
OF THIS PROJECT SCALE WITHIN ZONE 'X" AND ZONE 'AE" AS PER
PRELIMINARY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS 3720428800K AND
3720428900K, PRELIMINARILY DATED JUNE 30, 2016 AND PROPOSED TO BE
EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 19, 2020, AS ESTABLISHED BY FEMA.THIS REPORT IN
NO WAY SUPERCEDES THE ABOVE MENTIONED FIRM.
15. BUILT -UPON AREA SUMMARY.
PROJECT IS A COMBINATION OF HIGH -DENSITY ("THE SHORES) AND
LOW -DENSITY ("THE CLIFFS') SUBAREAS (MASTER PLAN OF
DEVELOPMENT).
"THE SHORES SUB -AREA (130 LOTS) _
a. TOTAL AREA = 46.30 t AC
b. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 16.66 t AC.
C. TOTAL PERCENT OF IMPERVIOUS COVER = 36.0 % t.
d. TOTAL PROJECT GREEN SPACE = 70.2 % t.
"THE CLIFFS" SUB -AREA (43 LOTS) _
a. TOTAL AREA = 52.63 t AC
b. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 6.29 t AC).
C. TOTAL PERCENT OF IMPERVIOUS COVER = 12.0 % t.
d. TOTAL PROJECT GREEN SPACE = 88.0 % t.
FINAL DRA WINGS
Released for permits only,
not released for construction.
DRAWING INDEX
SHEET
NAME
1
VICINITY&INDEX PLAN
2
PLAN & PROFILE SITE A"
3
PLAN & PROFILE SITE 'B'
4
ROADWAY & DRAINAGE DETAILS
5-6
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
SITE IMPACTS DATA TABLE
Site ID
Impact (LF/SF)
Impact (AC)
Description
A
82 LF
--
Jurisdiction Ditch Pi in /Fillip
A
'557 SF
0.173 AC
50' V etated Setback Fill SA Waters
B
606 SF
0.014 AC
404/401 Fill For Pro osed Sv�rale
606 SF WETLAND FILL o
SITE 'B' =Q /
17'
I ` SB-BA
I �\\ S8-6A --
W691
ss \ \ 16�LJ
SS31 -�
I \ \ 27 SMH30 ss ss - ss - ss -White Shoal Way_'
ss
«��--20'EP-EP)
60'R/W PUBLIC( \
\` GRAPHIC SCALE-
/ G \
20 1 10-
(1 7")
GRAPHIC SCALE (VER)
10 5 0 10
(11"X IT)
GRAPHIC SCALE (HOR)
140 20 0 40
01"X 17")
Proposed 4 Grade Line (FG)�
24.0'
00
20.0'
Z
z 16.0'
O
j 12.0'
W ssS
W
8.0'
26+25 27+00
SMH30
TYPE. 4' Std.
STA: 27+02 (White Shoal Way), OFF: 0.00'
RIM: 17.52'
SUMP: 12.60'
INV IN (SS31): 12.70'
INV OUT (SS30): 12.60'
WHITE SHOAL WAY
. 0. �� _
STATION
LEGEND
- - - -
IMPACT AREAS
ROADWAY 4
ASPHALT AREAS
PROPOSED LOT LINES
- PROPOSED LOTS
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
PROPOSED DITCH LINES
PROP. RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
-
404 WETLAND LINE
- - - -
BLUE -LINE STREAM 4 LD -
- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
- ---
- STREAM TOP OF BANK t o o
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
F50'
VEGETATED SETBACKS
®
_ TEMP. WATTLE / CHECK DAM
##'
PROPOSED CONTOURS
PROPOSED WATER MAINS
##'
PROPOSED SEWER MAINS
- -##' - -
EXISTING CONTOURS
28+00
24.0'
W
20.0'
Q)
Z
16.0' Z
O
120, j
W
W
a 0'
28+25
15
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
Revised 10.26.2020 (Site 'A')
N
h �.
� M �
N ry
u°Ek6
z N Ij O LO
2 m �
d � t\
LU
C) ^ rA
Q
yen pM
N S �
t1 0 Ln
om 3N
u p 3
m � u
M �
PLAN & PROFILE SITE V
NWP #29
WETLAND FILL &
VEGETATED IMPACTS FOR
WINDPOINTE SUBDIVISION
SNEADS FERRY ONSLOW COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
OWNER & DEVELOPER
A. SYDES CONSTRUCTION, INC.
100 CAROLINA PLANTATION 8L VD.
JACKSONVILLE, NC 28546
SCALE: AS SHOWN
DATE: 0710912020
PROJECT#: 2019 016
SHEET: 3of6

MATERIALS
LABEL DESCRIPTION DEPTH WIDTH
0 1 SF 9.58 ASPHALT SURFACE COARSE 1.5" 20'
O CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE COARSE 6" 21'
DIMENSIONS
1 ARFI r)F.Srp1PTinN win TH
A
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
20'
B
STABILIZED EARTHEN SHOULDER
6'
C
DITCH FRONT SLOPE
7'
D
DITCH BACK SLOPE
7'
F
RIGHT OF WAY (TOTAL)
60'
NOTES:
1. PAVEMENT WIDTHS, RIGHT OF WAYS, ROADWAY DIMENSIONS, AND PAVEMENT DESIGNS SHALL BE AS
SHOWN HEREIN UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. WHERE DISCREPANCIES OCCUR, IF ANY, CONTACT
THE ENGINEER FOR DIRECTION.
2. ALL SUBGRADE SHALL BE FIELD COMPACTED, PROOFROLLED, AND/OR TESTED FOR DENSITY AS
PROVIDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY PAVEMENT SECTION MATERIALS OR
CURB AND GUTTER.
TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION
"THE CLIFFS AT WINDPOINTE"
DRAWING INDEX
SHEET
NAME
1
VICINITY&INDEX PLAN
2
PLAN & PROFILE SITE A"
3
PLAN & PROFILE SITE 'B'
4
ROADWAY & DRAINAGE DETAILS
5-6
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
SITE IMPACTS DATA TABLE
Site ID
Impact (LF/SF)
Impact (AC)
Description
A
82 LF
--
Jurisdiction Ditch Pi in /Fillip
A
7557 SF
0. 173 AC
50' Vegetated Setback Fill SA Waters
B
606 SF
0.014 AC
4041401 Fill For Proposed Sm/e
'6. 4� -,(r � 4-
�T
dr ee�T
m
NATURAL AREAS
COMPACTED BACKFILL IN 8
INCH LIFTS AND 95% MIN.
DENSITY OR AS SPECIFIED
BY THE ENGINEER
COMPACTED SELECT
BACKFILL WHERE
SPECIFIED TO BE
INSTALLED IN 6" LIFTS AND
QFo/ MIN nFAIRITY
ASPHALT (TYP.)
COMPACTED ABC STONE
AS SPECIFIED
COMPACTED BACKFILL IN 8
INCH LIFTS AND 95% MIN.
DENSITY OR AS SPECIFIED
BY THE ENGINEER
TYPICAL STORM DRAIN TRENCHING DETAILS
LEGEND
— — — —
IMPACT AREAS
ROADWAY 4
ASPHALT AREAS
PROPOSED LOT LINES
- PROPOSED LOTS
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
PROPOSED DITCH LINES
PROP. RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
—
404 WETLAND LINE
— - - —
BLUE -LINE STREAM 4 LD
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
- ---
- STREAM TOP OF BANK t o o
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
F50'
VEGETATED SETBACKS
®
_ TEMP. WATTLE / CHECK DAM
##'
##'
PROPOSED CONTOURS
PROPOSED WATER MAINS
PROPOSED SEWER MAINS
— -##' - —
EXISTING CONTOURS
FULLY GRASS STABILIZED
N
U 00
h �.
� M �
kj
N ry
z N O LO
00 Z �O1N
2 m �
Q iz "Ia
y OM p M
N — S
£ x t- Li
om 3N
V p 3
m � u
M �
PAVED AREAS
Revised 10-26.2020 (Site 'A)
ROADWAY & DRAINAGE DETAILS
NWP #29
WETLAND FILL &
VEGETATED IMPACTS FOR
WINDPOINTE SUBDIVISION
SNEADS FERRY ONSLOW COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
OWNER & DEVELOPER
A. SYDES CONSTRUCTION, INC.
100 CAROLINA PLANTATION 8L VD.
JACKSONVILLE, NC 28546
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
DATE: 07/09/2020
PROJECT#: 2019 016
SHEET: 4of6

1/APIF.0 A.Q hIPFCTFr) RV FN(:IAIFFP
W
ti
TOP STRAND 10
GAUGE MIN.
LINE WIRES 12-1/2
GAUGE MIN.
BOTTOM STRAND 10
GAUGE MIN.
SILT FENCE NOTES
1. WIRE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 32" IN WIDTH AND SHALL HAVE A
MINIMUM OF 6 LINE WIRES WITH 12" STAY SPACING.
2. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 36" IN WIDTH AND SHALL BE
FASTENED ADEQUATELY TO THE WIRE AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER.
3. STEEL POSTS SHALL BE 5' IN HEIGHT AND SHALL BE OF THE
SELF -FASTENER ANGLE STEEL TYPE.
4. WIRE FABRIC SHALL BE FASTENED TO WOOD POSTS WITH NOT LESS
THAN #9 WIRE STAPLES 1-1/2"LONG.
1.5' MIN
9"MIN
Me
12" OF NCDOT #5
OR #57 WASHED STC
FILTER CLOTH
CLASS B RIP -RAP \
P/ AN
FILTER
NOTES
1. PLACE STONE TO THE LINE AND DIMENSION SHOWN IN THE PLAN ON A
FILTER FABRIC FOUNDATION.
2. KEEP THE CENTER STONE SECTION AT LEAST 9 INCHES BELOW
NATURAL GROUND LEVEL WHERE THE DAM ABUTS THE CHANNEL
BANKS.
3. EXTEND STONE AT LEAST 1.5 FEET BEYOND THE DITCH BANK TO KEEP
WATER FROM CUTTING AROUND THE ENDS OF THE CHECK DAM.
4. SET SPACING BETWEEN DAMS TO ASSURE THAT THE ELEVATION AT
THE TOP OF THE LOWER DAM IS THE SAME AS THE TOE ELEVATION OF
THE UPPER DAM.
5. PROTECT THE CHANNEL AFTER THE LOWEST CHECK DAM FROM HEAVY
FLOW THAT COULD CAUSE EROSION.
6. MAKE SURE THAT THE CHANNEL REACH ABOVE THE MOST UPSTREAM
IS STABLE.
7. ENSURE THAT OTHER AREAS OF THE CHANNEL, SUCH AS CULVERT
ENTRANCES BELOW THE CHECK DAMS, ARE NOT SUBJECT TO DAMAGE
OR BLOCKAGE FROM DISPLACED STONES.
B. PURPOSE: TO REDUCE EROSION IN A CHANNEL BY REDUCING THE
VELOCITY OF FLOW.
9. DO NOT USE CHECK DAM IN INTERMITTENT OR PERENNIAL STREAMS.
10. SEE DENR STANDARDS & SPECS. FOR COMPLETE DESIGN CRITERIA &
MAINTENANCE.
2' MAX AT
CENTER
CROSS -SECTIONAL VIEW
DESIGN CRITERIA
1. KEEP A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 2 FEETAT THE CENTER OF
THE DAM.
2. KEEP THE CENTER OF THE CHECK DAM AT LEAST 9 INCHES
LOWER THAN THE OUTER EDGES AT NATURAL GROUND
ELEVATION.
3. KEEP THE SIDE SLOPES OF THE DAM AT 2:1 OR FLATTER
4. ENSURE THAT THE MAXIMUM SPACING BETWEEN DAMS
PLACES THE TOE OF THE UPSTREAM DAM AT THE SAME
ELEVATION AS THE TOP OF THE DOWNSTREAM DAM.
5. STABILIZE OUTFLOW AREAS ALONG THE CHANNEL TO
RESIST EROSION.
6. USE NCDOT CLASS B STONE AND LINE THE UPSTREAM SIDE
OF THE DAM WITH NCDOT #5 OR #57 STONE.
7. KEY THE STONE INTO THE DITCH BANKS AND EXTEND IT
BEYOND THE ABUTMENTS A MINIMUM OF 1.5 FEET TO
AVOID WASHOUT FROM OVERFLOW AROUND THE DAM.
TEMPORARY GRAVEL & RIP -RAP CHECK DAM
DRAWING INDEX
SHEET
NAME
1
VICINITY & INDEX PLAN
2
PLAN & PROFILE SITE A"
3
PLAN & PROFILE SITED'
4
ROADWAY & DRAINAGE DETAILS
5-6
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
SITE IMPACTS DATA TABLE
Site ID
Impact (LF/SF)
Impact (AC)
Description
A
82 LF
--
Jurisdiction Ditch Pi in /Fillip
A
7557 SF
0. 173 AC
50' Vegetated Setback Fill SA Waters
B
606 SF
0.014 AC
4041401 Fill For Proposed Sv�rale
STORM PIPE OUTLET
PROTECTION AND END TREATMENT
NOTES:
1. FLARED END SECTIONS MAYOR MAY NOT BE USED. REFER TO
PLAN DRAWINGS AND/OR CONTACT THE ENGINEER FOR
FLARED END LOCATIONS.
2. PIPE END TREATMENT WITHOUT FLARED END SECTION TO BE
INSTALLED IN A SIMILAR FASHION TO THIS DETAIL.
RIP RAP TO EXTEND ONE FT
ABOVE TOP OF BANK
y y y
CONCRETE FLARED
END SECTION
(DIMENSIONS MAY VARY)
SEE STORM DRAIN TRENCHING
DETAIL FOR BEDDING
RIP RAP APRON
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
TEMPORARY COIR FIBER WATTLE
)UND
CROSS SECTIONDOWNSL
OPE
STAKE
TRAPEZOIDAL DITCH STAKE
1QnAA==f1111=IA/ 1 _-0. I /PAVEMENT
INSET
COIR FIBER ` -,q
WATTLE
SLOPE
LEGEND
- - - IMPACT AREAS
ROADWAY 4 ASPHALT AREAS
• • PROPOSED LOT LINES
- PROPOSED LOTS PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
PROPOSED DITCH LINES PROP. RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
- W 404 WETLAND LINE
- - - - BLUE -LINE STREAM LD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
-- - STREAM TOP OF BANK ± o o TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
F50' VEGETATED SETBACKS ® _ TEMP. WATTLE I CHECK DAM
##' PROPOSED CONTOURS PROPOSED WATER MAINS
##' _ PROPOSED SEWER MAINS
- -##' - - EXISTING CONTOURS
OFPAVEMENT
`111111lIlljjj",
� .<t1Gr 11��•j� jfrfjj
% yy1,111t11111r1/1' Jd j'rJjr
.' x .+(30 ?''CONbr�
r
F : SEAL y
- C-438lip
Z`
/11111111t yt 'y~~
jjjf T 1 9 8 3 T 11't�1
rjjrrllllI1111111,
C
NAL DRAWINGS
easedfor permits only,
eleased for construction.
NOTES:
1. USE MINIMUM 12 IN. DIAMETER COIR FIBER (COCONUT FIBER) WATTLE.
2. USE 2 FT. WOODEN STAKES WITH A 2 IN. BY 21N. NOMINAL CROSS SECTION.
3. ONLY INSTALL WATTLE(S) TO A HEIGHT IN DITCH SO FLOW WILL NOT WASH AROUND
WATTLE AND SCOUR DITCH SLOPES AND AS DIRECTED.
4. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 2 UPSLOPE STAKES AND 4 DOWNSLOPE STAKES AT AN ANGLE
TO WEDGE WATTLE TO BOTTOM OF DITCH.
5. PROVIDE STAPLES MADE OF 0. 1251N. DIAMETER STEEL WIRE FORMED INTO A
U-SHAPE NOT LESS THAN 12" IN LENGTH.
6. INSTALL STAPLES APPROXIMATELY EVERY 1 LINEAR FOOT ON BOTH SIDES OF
WATTLE AND AT EACH END TO SECURE IT TO THE SOIL.
7. INSTALL MATTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1631 OF THE NC DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
8. WATTLES TO BE USED WHERE LONGITUDANAL DITCWSWALE SLOPES DO NOT
EXCEED 3% AND/OR AS SHOWN IN THE PLANS.
1
STAKES STD S
\
INSET A INSET B
2'(MAX.)
2'UPSLOPE
STAKE NATURAL GROUND
MATTING \__2' DOWNSLOPE
STAKE
CROSS SECTION VEE DITCH
.e.l.1111tirM
what's below.
all before you dig.
Revised 10.26.2020 (Site 'A')
h
00
N M N
UL Ia
zNrn
ukoo
y U y Ln
Opp z N
3 i i x
2 m
C) � ry
Q
Ln
m 3 N
a(j 3
m y u
b
M �
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
NWP #29
WETLAND FILL &
VEGETATED IMPACTS FOR
WINDPOINTE SUBDIVISION
SNEADS FERRY ONSLOW COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
OWNER & DEVELOPER
A. SYDES CONSTRUCTION, INC.
100 CAROLINA PLANTATION BLVD.
JACKSONVILLE, NC 28546
SCALE: AS SHOWN
DATE: 0710912020
PROJECT #: 2019 016
SHEET: 5 of 6

TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN DETAIL
VFREEBOARD
WFLOWSTRUCTURE BAFFLES CROSS-SECTION VIEW
DEWATERING ZONE H
SEDIMENT
/
STORAGE ZONE
J
(CLEAWUT DEPTH)
PVC ELBOW
HVC LNL7 CAP
PVC END CAP
PVC ILL
FLEXIBLE
HOSE'
cn,n ,ncini
NOTES:
1. SKIMMER SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SOON AS BASIN,
OUTLET POINT GRADING, AND OUTLET STRUCTURE
IS INSTALLED AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL
SUCH TIME THAT THE PROJECT GRADING IS
COMPLETEAND GROUND COVER ESTABLISHED.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SKIMMER
DEVICE AFTER EVERY RAIN EVENT TO ENSURE
THAT IT IS FUNCTIONING PROPERLY AND
WITHDRAWING WATER FROM THE WATER
SURFACE. IN THE EVENT THAT THE SKIMMER IS
NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY, THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL REPAIR PRIOR TO CONTINUANCE OF
PROJECT GRADING OPERATIONS.
PVC VENT
PIPE
WATER SURFACE
SCHEDULE40
PVC PIPE
�P-
WENT
RGENCY
LWAY
EMBANKMENT
EMERGENCY
SPILLWAY
SCHEDULE40
PVC PIPE
ORIFICE
PLATE
ARMASSEMBLY
'C"ENCLOSURE
PERSPECTIVE VIEW WATERENTRYUNIT
BASIN SKIMMER DEVICE
DRAWING INDEX
SHEET
NAME
1
VICINITY&INDEX PLAN
2
PLAN & PROFILE SITE A"
3
PLAN & PROFILE SITE 'B'
4
ROADWAY & DRAINAGE DETAILS
5-6
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
SITE IMPACTS DATA TABLE
Site lD
Impact(LFISF)
Impact(AC)
Description
A
82 LF
--
Jurisdiction Ditch Pi in /Fillip
A
7557 SF
0. 173 AC
50' Vegetated Setback Fill SA Waters
B
606 SF
0.014 AC
4041401 Fill For Proposed Sv�rale
INSTALL TROST 70ANCHOR
DR4PEBAFFLEMA7ERIAL OVERW/RES7RAND BAFFLE TO SIDEOFSAS/NAND
AND SECUREWITHPLAS77C 77ESATPOS7S SECURE TO VER77C4L POST
ANDONW/REEVERYII" /
9GAUGEM/NHIGH
7ENSIONW/RES7RAND
SHALL BESECURED -
70 POS770 SUPPORT
SAFFLEMATERIAL
SAFFLEMATER/AL
NOTES:
1. INSTALL THREE (3) COIR FIBER BAFFLES
IN SILT BASINS AND SEDIMENT DAMS AT
DRAINAGE OUTLETS WITH A SPACING OF
'OF THE BASIN LENGTH.
2. TWO (2) COIR FIBER BAFFLES CAN BE
INSTALLED IN SILT BASINS AND DAMS
LESS THAN 20 FT. IN LENGTH WITH A
SPACING OF 113 THE BASIN LENGTH.
3. TOP HEIGHT OF COIR FIBER BAFFLES
SHALL NOT BE BELOW BASE OF
EMERGENCY SPILLWAY ELEVATION.
SECUREBOTTOMOFSAFFLE
70 GROUND W/7H 12" STAPLES
AT 12'WX/MUMSPAC/NG
ff GAUGE
LANDSCAF
STAPLE
SAFFLEMATER/AL SHALL BESECURED
TO THEBOT70MAlVD SIDES OFBASIN
USING f7LANDSCAPES54PLES
COIR FIBER BAFFLE DETAIL
BAffLEMA7ER/AL
SEDIMENT BASIN SIZING & TABULATIONS
N
h �.
� M �
N ry
V h E k6
z N Ij O LO
CL m Z �N
2 m z
d L
C) ^ rj
a
yen Z,M
N — S LO
t1 kl'N
Co
3N
V p 3
m u
M �
Basin ID
Drainage Area
Disturbed Area
Q ssrr
RegV Surface Area
Prov. Surface Area
RegV Storage Volume
Prov. Storage Volume
Sediment Basin Dimensions Faircloth
#
cfs
sf = Q 15 x 325 sf
sf
cft = Dist. ac x 1800 cft
cft
Length (ft)
Width (ft)
Height (ft)
CO Depth (ft)
Skim. Size (in.)
SB-6A
0.37
0.37
1.5
500
512
666
1024
32
16
2
1 1
1 1.5"
SB-6B
0.37
0.37
1.5
500
512
666
1024
32
16
1 2
1 1
1 1.5"
LEGEND
— — IMPACT AREAS
ROADWAY 4 ASPHALT AREAS
PROPOSED LOT LINES
- PROPOSED LOTS PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
PROPOSED DITCH LINES PROP. RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
— 404 WETLAND LINE
— — — — BLUE -LINE STREAM 4 LD — - LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
--- - STREAM TOP OF BANK t o o TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
F50' VEGETATED SETBACKS ® _ TEMP. WATTLE / CHECK DAM
##' PROPOSED CONTOURS PROPOSED WATER MAINS
##' PROPOSED SEWER MAINS
— —##' — — EXISTING CONTOURS
0
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
FINAL DRA WINGS
Released for' permits only,
not released for construction.
Revised 10.26.2020 (Site 'A)
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
NWP #29
WETLAND FILL &
VEGETATED IMPACTS FOR
WINDPOINTE SUBDIVISION
SNEADS FERRY ONSLOW COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
OWNER & DEVELOPER
A. SYDES CONSTRUCTION, INC.
100 CAROLINA PLANTATION BL VD.
JACKSONVILLE, NC 28546
SCALE: AS SHOWN
DATE: 0710912020
PROJECT#: 2019 016
SHEET: 6of6

BACHELORS DELIGHT MITIGATION BANK
CREDIT RESERVATION LETTER
October 27, 2020
TO: Bobby Billingsley FROM: Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Thomas Engineering c/o Land Management Group
1316-B Commerce Drive 3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15
New Bern, NC 28562 Wilmington, NC 28403
Project: Windpointe SD
Dear Mr. Billingsley:
Pursuant to your recent credit request, Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank (BDMB) is providing confirmation
of acceptance to supply stream compensatory mitigation credits for impacts associated with the
Windpointe Subdivison in Onslow County, North Carolina. This acceptance is conditional upon receipt of
payment as outlined below. Please refer to the table below depicting the type and quantity of credits
requested and reserved for your project.
I Mitigation Type Credits Reserved Fee Per Unit I Fee
Stream 164 F_ $530.00 F_ $86,920.00
[Non -Riparian Wetland 0.0 $52,273.99 [ $0.00
Riparian Wetland 0.0 $52,273.99 F $0.00
F__
Total Fee $86,920.00
Based upon receipt of the project credit request transmitted on October 26, 2020, BDMB will reserve 164
stream credits for a period of up to 90 days from the date of this letter. Note that requests to reserve
credits beyond 90 days will require a deposit. Please contact us if you need a reservation to extend beyond
the 90-day period.
Upon request for receipt of credit transfer, BDMB will issue an invoice in the amount of $86,920.00.
Upon receipt of payment, BDMB will provide an executed Transfer of Credit Certificate. Note that all
payments must be made with certified funds. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the credit
types and amounts requested are consistent with the compensatory mitigation requirements of the
permit(s) issued. BDMB and/or its agents are not responsible for determining the applicant's mitigation
requirements. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me by phone at
[phone] or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
Christian Preziosi
Land Management Group (Agent)

Soil Map—Onslow County, North Carolina
(Windpointe Soils Map)
v
278900 279100 279300 279500 279700 279900
34° 32' 40" N
g
g
8
8
g
34' 31' 31" N
278900 279100 279300 279500 279700 279900
3
zo
a Map Scale: 1:10,400 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
N Meters
0 110 310 611 100
Feet
0 500 1000 2000 ----
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84
U}DA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
280100
280100
3
M
`a
34' 32' 40" N
8
K
g
US
8
34o 31' 31" N
280300
3
1 /6/2020
Page 1 of 3

0
CD
0
Z
LU
a
LU
J
a
a
E
O
U
L
a
(n y @
3
U O w a
O
U ? Ea)
0 cc
C
y m 0
m.Q3 y
m m 0 O C
O A m L 0
y Q
> w c >
.0 C'0 OL
a
c n a
T QLO.m O
m y E
E o0a)�
m w
m E c w
a .O
N w
(n aC) nE�
cEa)Up
m a m
(0 N cC U
W O E _ U y
O a)
w
m
m
a)
3
a)
m
m r m m
m
a
I
3 C o
Q
U
Z
U O
0
_m
m
O
co O C
m
E
O
Q 3 E
a)a y �a
w
A
O_
N
C
_� N
O
M
.�
O
L
N ` VOi a'
(n
E
a)Y
Q O
m coN
y N
U
N O
0
.: C
O Z L N
-
Z
U o
+LO„
E� 2
Q
0 (n
a N p m
o
L N
>i
a
O
E
�j w
m@ o 2
o`°
@
3 L m m
L
y
m
Z O_
a)
N
0 m Q L
co
V
@ O
O�
co
N a
C
aymj
3
aa)i
a)
T C U
:E 0
O
3
CL
y
O
0
Q
E 2' co
O
a)
Z a O m
p Q
U
Q
N E E a?
m
_m
v�ayi02
0_ =o
wa
a m
3o
O 'L
.ym..
a
m
moa)
a
>m
N
3
.8
O a) Q C O
O C
f0
C;
a)
a) a `� O
O
Z
L U
a>) O- al m
m y
a)
(0
a)
N
O
`a C
0a
0
3
CL
0 C
m 3< j
.Lm. 3 a f0 U
y O
Q co
w N
fa
O a Q m
>'
�2
U) a?
o—m
E N F U
7 .L
2
7 0
0
mr-
a m a E
�a o
0) 3
(n
U
ooa,mo
U N
U
om
>
�Q
3 T
a0
m O
O
O
a)
m m
td
3 L O
C L
a w0 a) U
Q
yLm
O
:: N
a) C
a) E (06
a)
a E
o>
(n > U
2 Q 'a Q m
H O
(n (n
(n
C) N
H U y
i y
acc
6 C
LL U
N
-
L
D
rn
(n
a) O
m
N
N
0
Na
C
J N
N
O
070
@
L
o O
Z
L_
y L
u
a)
ly
o
o
U
m
U) U)
O
_
U) CO
O
c
O
J
Q
O
O*
N }
d l
a[
j
cm
�
�
m
M
C
o
y
w
a
m�
o
9
o
0
Q
ca
U)
y
a w
a
N
E
m
a
3
a)
N
o'
a
°
a
°>
Q1a
>.O >•O
l
>•�
3
C
c
cc
CO
2
o
w°
�O
O
N
O
U.
3
U
>>'
a
N
O
N
0)
J
N
>`
>N
O
a)
ao
Nd
Q
n n
(n
C
•0 m
Z5
m U
U
(i
(D
2
(J
N>
JJ
N
a
a'
(n
m
(n
m
"O
m
O
m
m
a
c
�
CL
3p(
pq
Q
fn
O ("M
N w
O O
N N
5Q (D
0)
m
a
(o
Z

Soil Map—Onslow County, North Carolina
Windpointe Soils Map
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
BaB
FoA
Baymeade fine sand, 0 to 6
percent slopes
44.3
74.9
8.5%
14.4%
Foreston loamy fine sand, 0 to
2 percent slopes
Ln
Leon fine sand
1.5
0.3%
MaC
Marvyn loamy fine sand, 6 to
15 percent slopes
76.2
14.6%
Mk
Muckalee loam
25.0
4.8%
On
Onslow loamy fine sand
5.5
1.0%
Pa
Pactolus fine sand
0.8
0.1 %
St
Stallings loamy fine sand
132.1
25.4%
To
Torhunta fine sandy loam
4.1
0.8%
W
Water
1.3
0.3%
WaB
Wando fine sand, 1 to 6
percent slopes
63.7
12.3%
Wo
Woodington loamy fine sand
90.9
17.5%
Totals for Area of Interest
520.2
100.0%
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/6/2020
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3