20160979 Ver 2_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20201029

ID#* 20160979 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 10/29/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/29/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jamey McEachran
Project Information
...................................................................................
ID#:* 20160979
Existing IDr
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*2
Existing Version
r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Poplar Creek Buffer and Nutrient Mitigation
Project
Johnston
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Poplar Creek Bank Parcel MY1 Report.pdf 6.16MB
Rease upload only one RDFof the corrplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jamey McEachran
Signature:*

Bank Parcel Development Plan Year 1 Report
Poplar Creek Mitigation Site
DWR Project # 20160979 V2
Johnston County, North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Prepared By:
pros
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-829-9909
Bank Sponsor: EBX-Neuse I, LLC
October 2020

Table of Contents
1.
Project Summary.............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1
Project Location and Description.............................................................................................. 1
1.2
Project Success Criteria............................................................................................................. 1
1.3
Project Components.................................................................................................................. 2
1.4
Riparian Mitigation Approach................................................................................................... 3
Riparian Restoration Activities........................................................................................................ 3
Riparian Enhancement Activities.................................................................................................... 3
Riparian Preservation Activities...................................................................................................... 3
1.5
Construction and As -Built Conditions...................................................................................... 4
1.6
Year 1 Monitoring Performance................................................................................................ 4
2.
Methods........................................................................................................................................... 5
3.
References........................................................................................................................................5
Appendix A: Site Maps
Figure 1 - Site Location
Figure 2 - Current Conditions Plan View
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2: Plant Species Summary
Table 3: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 4: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Table 5: Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data
Appendix C: Vegetation MonitorinE Plot Photos
Appendix D: Vegetation MonitorinE Plot Data Sheets
n

1. Project Summary
L I Project Location and Description
EBX—Neuse I, LLC (EBX), an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide
this Monitoring Report for the Poplar Creek Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank (Parcel).
This Parcel is designed to provide riparian buffer credits for unavoidable impacts due to development within
the Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey (`USGS') 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC —
03020201). In addition, it also provides nutrient offset credits in the 03020201 HUC, excluding the Falls
Lake Watershed, for existing and proposed development requiring such mitigation. This Parcel is in
accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, 15A NCAC 0213.0240
and the RES Poplar Creek Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument for Riparian Buffer Mitigation and
Nutrient Offset Credits (UMBI), made and entered into by EBX-Neuse I, LLC acting as the Bank Sponsor
(Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality -Division of Water Resources
(DWR). Supporting figures can be found in Appendix A. The Parcel has also been designed in concurrence
with the Poplar Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site in the Neu -Con Stream and Wetland Umbrella
Mitigation Bank (SAW# 2016-01985). The mitigation plan for the Poplar Creek Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Bank has been approved by the Interagency Review Team (IRT).
The Parcel is located in Johnston County approximately three miles north of Smithfield, NC (Figure 1).
The Parcel is located within Neuse River Basin USGS 14-digit HUC 03020201100050 and North Carolina
Division of Water Resources (DWR) Subbasin Number 03-04-02. To access the Parcel head East on NC
70 from the Town of Wilson Mills and turn right onto Wilson Mills Road and head south for approximately
a quarter of a mile, then turn left onto Lee Youngblood Loop. The coordinates of the site are 35.5521 - N, -
78.3568- W.
When combining the Poplar Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank with the Poplar Creek Buffer
Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Bank, the conservation easement totals 23.59 acres and includes three
unnamed tributaries that drain to Poplar Creek. The drainage area of the Parcel is 0.3 mi2. The Parcel is
located in an area dominated by agricultural fields, cattle pastures and wooded areas. The majority of the
Parcel was actively grazed pasture and disturbed riparian forest. Additional land use practices included the
maintenance and removal of riparian vegetation, maintained vegetation, grazed pasture, and agricultural
ponds. The Parcel also contained one agricultural pond that had been in place for at least 20 years.
The Poplar Creek Mitigation Site was built to provide stream restoration, enhancement, and preservation
on approximately 4,273 linear feet. Riparian restoration, enhancement, and preservation of the Neuse
riparian buffer (as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0233) and other riparian areas onsite result in immediate
water quality benefits within the vicinity of the Parcel and include the removal of livestock access to Parcel
streams and reduction in nutrient loads from agricultural land -uses. The riparian restoration activities within
the Parcel also result in improved water quality within the downstream watershed.
1.2 Project Success Criteria
Annual vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a minimum of five (5) years and will be conducted
during the fall season with the first year occurring at least 5 months from initial planting. Four vegetation
monitoring plots were installed a minimum of 100 m2 in size and cover at least two percent of the riparian
restoration area. Plots were randomly placed throughout the planted Neuse buffer zones and nutrient offset
mitigation area and are representative of the crediting areas. The following data will be recorded for all
trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. Photos are to be taken from
all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports. The measures of vegetative
Poplar Creek 1 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2020

success for the Parcel will be the survival of at least 4 native hardwood tree species, where no one species
is greater than 50 percent of the established stems, established at a density of at least 260 planted trees per
acre at the end of Year 5. Native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance standards.
Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none become dominant or alter the
desired community structure of the site.
RES must monitor the stream mitigation bank for a minimum of seven years, or until IRT approval.
Therefore, plots placed within riparian restoration areas that are outside of the mitigation area for buffer
and nutrient offset credits will be monitored in accordance with the monitoring protocol in the Poplar Creek
Stream Mitigation Plan.
1.3 Project Components
This Bank generates approximately 93,766 ft2 of riparian buffer restoration credits (84, 875 ft2 from
backfilling and planting the pond), 76,454.5 ft2 of riparian buffer enhancement credits via cattle exclusion,
8,220.5 W of riparian buffer preservation credits, and 1,454.73 lbs of nutrient offset credits. These numbers
reflect some small changes in total credit amounts due to the use of the actual as -built survey top of bank
and tree line. The total restoration credit increased by 4,526 W, total enhancement credit decreased by 1,158
W, total preservation credit increased by 72 ftz, and total nutrient offset credit increased by 32 lbs.
The riparian buffer mitigation credits generated, service Neuse buffer impacts within the USGS 8-digit
HUC 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin excluding the Falls Lake Watershed. The Nitrogen nutrient
offsets generated services nutrient load reduction requirements where payments are authorized in 15A
NCAC 02B .0240 within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed. The
Sponsor maintains 3 credit ledgers. One ledger accounts for buffer restoration credits, one ledger accounts
for buffer preservation and enhancement credits, and one accounts for nitrogen nutrient offset credits. All
mitigation credit assets shall be shown on these credit ledgers. The total potential riparian buffer and
nutrient offset mitigation credits that the Poplar Creek Bank generates are summarized below.
Table 1. Poplar Creek Mitigation Credits
Riparian Buffer Credit
Riparian
Credit
Mitigation
Existing
Used
Credit
%Full
Mitigation
Zone
Type
Type
Acreage
Acreage
Per Acre
Ratio
Credit
Assets
Pond
Riparian
Restoration
1.95
1.95
43,560
1:1
100%
84,875 ft2
Footprints
Buffer
Riparian
Restoration
0.20
0.20
43,560
1:1
100%
8,891 ft2
Buffer
RipariaEnhancement
0-50'
Buffer
Buffer
(via cattle
3.51
3.51
43,560
2:1
100%
76,454.5 ft2
exclusion
Preservation:
Buffer
Subject
3.94
1.89
43,560
10:1
100%
8,220.5 ft2
Streams
Total Restoration
2.15
2.15
93,766 ft2 (2.15 ac)
Total Enhancement
3.51
3.51
76,454.5 ft2 (1.76 ac)
8,220.5 ft2 (0.19 ac)
Total Preservation
3.94
1.89
includes ratios & reductions
Poplar Creek 2 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2020

Nutrient Offset Credit
Credit
Mitigation
Credit
Mitigation
Zone
Type
Type
Acreage
per Acre
Ratio
Assets
bs
0-50'
Nitrogen
Restoration
0.64
2273.02
N/A
1,454.73
Total
0.64
1,454.73
*According to 15A NCAC 02B. 0295 (o) (4) and (5), "the area ofpreservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall
comprise of no more than 25% of the total area of buffer mitigation ".
All riparian restoration in the table above is generated on land determined by DWR as being agricultural.
Therefore, the 93,766 ft2 of Neuse riparian buffer restoration credits shown in the table above, can be used
for either Neuse riparian buffer credits or Nitrogen nutrient offset credits, but not both. Neither riparian
buffer preservation nor enhancement credits can be converted into nutrient offset credits. The Sponsor
must submit a written request and receive written approval from DWR prior to any credit conversions and
transfers to the buffer and nutrient offset credit ledgers. With each conversion and transfer request
submitted to the DWR, the Sponsor will provide all updated credit ledgers showing all transactions that
have occurred up to the date of the request.
1.4 Riparian Mitigation Approach
Riparian Restoration Activities
Buffer restoration occurred along YB2-A and a small area on YB2-B, including the former agricultural
pond, in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n) (Figure 2).
This pond was removed, and stream restoration was performed in the pond bottom. Stream Restoration
addressed impairments, which included the former pond, floodplain dislocation, bank erosion, nutrient
input, livestock access, and buffer degradation. The stream design approach included breaching the existing
dam and meandering the channel within the natural valley. Riparian restoration areas were planted from
top of bank back at least 50 feet from the stream with bare root tree seedlings on an 8 by 8-foot spacing to
achieve an initial density of 680 trees per acre. Furthermore, livestock exclusion fence was installed, to
remove access to riparian areas and their associated streams. All fencing was installed to NRCS
specifications. Some areas adjacent to the forested areas may require maintenance due to the rapid
regeneration of some species, such as red maple (Acer rubrum) and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua).
Furthermore, the lower portion of YB2-A, that was not within the pond footprint, used for nutrient offset
credit, and is viable for buffer restoration crediting in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0240. This area
included the same activities as described above.
Riparian Enhancement Activities
Buffer enhancement along YB2-B also occurs in areas of grazing adjacent to the stream in accordance with
the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6) (Figure 2). Where livestock were
present, livestock exclusion fence was installed, to remove access to riparian areas and their associated
streams. All fencing was installed to NRCS specifications. Some areas adjacent to the forested areas may
require maintenance due to the rapid regeneration of some species, such as red maple and sweetgum.
Minimal maintenance is anticipated due to the past land use history. Buffer enhancement can only generate
buffer mitigation credit and is not transferrable into nutrient offset credits.
Riparian Preservation Activities
Buffer preservation occurred along YB 1-C and YB3 in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5) (Figure 2). Preservation activities consisted of permanently protecting
the buffer from cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and similar activities that would affect the functioning of
the buffer. No more than 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation was used for preservation credit
pursuant to 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4) and the rest of the area is protected in the
Poplar Creek 3 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2020

conservation easement and not applied for credit. Furthermore, Buffer preservation can only generate buffer
mitigation credit and is not transferrable into nutrient offset credits.
1.5 Construction and As Built Conditions
Revegetation of the site included treating invasive species and planting native hardwood bare root trees.
Prior to planting, RES prepped the site by spraying and ripping the easement. Coastal Plain Small Stream
Swamp is the target community type and was used for all areas within the project. The community is defined
by Schafale (2012). The planting of bare root trees occurred in May and December 2019. Deviations from
the initial planting plan were due to bare root availability. A list of the planted species can be found in
Table 2.
Stream construction activities were originally completed in May 2019. Based on a site visit conducted by
NCDWR on July 9", construction was determined to be incomplete until the IRT recommended updates
were made. Reaches YB1-C and Y132-13 underwent significant stream repairs in the fall of 2019. Trees in
these two areas were replanted in December 2019. After all site work was complete, it was determined that
the original four vegetation plots, Vegetation Plot 1, 2, 3, and 4, for the Poplar Creek Riparian Buffer and
Nutrient Offset sections of the project were not impacted during site work and therefore were not
remeasured in December. RES acquired 404 (SAW-2016-01985), 401 (DWR # 16-0979), and NPDES
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (JC# 19-003-P) Permits. There were no easement changes between
BPDP approval and construction. The conservation easement is marked every 150-200 feet with North
Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation signs attached to either fences or t-posts. Fences were installed in
areas where livestock is present, and t-posts are used as physical barriers where livestock is not present.
1.6 Year 1 Monitoring Performance
The Poplar Creek Year 1 Monitoring (MY1) activities were completed in September 2020. All MY1 data
is present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meeting vegetation and stream interim
success criteria. In MY1, RES measured four random vegetation plots in the area of Y132-A per DWR
request.
Monitoring of the four permanent vegetation plots and four random vegetation plots was completed in
September 2020. Vegetation tables are located in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C.
Monitoring Year 1 (MY1) monitoring data indicates that seven out of eight plots are exceeding the interim
success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Vegetation Plot 4 (VP4) did not meet the interim success
criteria and only documented 243 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 243 to 850
planted stems per acre with a mean of 622 planted stems per acre across all plots. A total of 13 species were
documented within the plots. Volunteer species were recorded in one plot. The average tree height observed
was 4.4 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project. Areas with vegetation plots less than 600 stems per acre
in MY1 were replanted in April 2020. However, the area in and around VP4 (0.77 acres) needs to be
replanted again this dormant season. All of the fencing was in good condition and there was no evidence of
cattle in the easement. There was no encroachment observed or similar activities that would negatively
affect the functioning of the buffer. Diffuse flow was also maintained throughout the conservation easement
area. Small areas of re -sprouted Chinese privet that were noted in MY1 were treated in 2020 and will
continue to be addressed as needed throughout the monitoring period. There are a number of stream
structure repairs that will be performed in 2021, however, RES expects the impact to the buffer to be
minimal and the affected areas will be properly replanted.
Poplar Creek 4 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2020

2. Methods
Vegetation success is being monitored at four permanent vegetation plots. Vegetation plot monitoring
follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes
analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry
tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal
conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year. In
MY1, RES also measured four random vegetation plots in the area of Y132-A per DWR request. The random
vegetation plots were measured in 25 by 4 in (100 m2) transects.
3. References
Environmental Banc & Exchange — Neuse I, LLC (2018). Poplar Creek Buffer Mitigation Site — Bank
Parcel Development Plan
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
NCDENR. 2009. "Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." Division of Water Quality. http://
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (October 2013).
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 0213.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh,
NC.
Poplar Creek 5 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2020

Appendix A - Site Maps

Ia
�w
Li J
Ory
tau r
�r
- - DansSa Dr.
'4 dale gl
I ke Of
q
� a
en °¢
[ ee p
I'Yea�(q
V �jQe
3� Be
dd �ry
n
n
'�ordesind La
L
e
a ` s a4 a Psa c £ Marlin Ln `gcOc
ye rdne� � 'Qy 70r � i yb
3p el
u
Mitchner Dr
in k
'4a
M�
f
v
A
;wrnage Fd
m �d
bo ✓-a�rer
1.
wd�
�t
n S 4aM�°
' s[ephen son Dr
yv�
c`
Li ooker Dairy Rd Or
Oc Qc
a4
Shady Lana Or
p - o P wNar[IeY Dr H a SU+Errseq�r A Oda Or --- $aoker Dairy Rd Ear oWNI Sl a O - - - .. _ .. -
Se F !+e SranEa13,
4% i 9
a°y Pace SE u a SmeMpld
ReC r@a�Un
LerihilieY ❑r �Lererftn Area
gend
AF�
Strickland Dr 3 West Castle Dr Parkway Dr
Proposed Easement 9n1,3r Swithtioid
Fiollanrl Ur
N
Date: 6/14/2019
Figure 1 - Site Location
w e Drawn by: MDE res
Poplar Creek Mitigation Site
s Checked by: RTM
0 1,000 2,000
Johnston County, North Carolina 1 inch = 2,000 feet
Feet

v N
v� �A 00
ww o w
'� o p uJ m m R m o o c m
v o U c A c .4 jL E E E 4 E� o d m Eg
°
Z U Ry p oa i L ° z
A V z a n zIfwa Z a-
in
U m 1 sal—<ftan—Ul

Appendix B - Vegetation Assessment Data

Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Total Stems Planted
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
2,000
River Birch
Betula nigra
1,500
Persimmon
Diospyros vir iniana
1,500
Water Tupelo
N ssa a uatica
1,200
Overcup Oak
Quercus l rata
1,200
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
1,200
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
1,200
Bald Cypress
Taxodium distichum
1,200
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1,000
Tulitree
Liriodendron tuli i era
1,000
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
1,000
Buttonbush
Ce halanthus occidentalis
600
Silky Dogwood
Corpus amomum
500
White Dogwood
Corpus orida
400
Black um
N ssa s lvatica
400
American Hazelnut
Corylus americana
200
Total
16,100
Table 3. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Planted Stem
Height (ft)
1
850
121
971
Yes
3.7
2
809
0
809
Yes
4.2
3
728
0
728
Yes
5.2
4
243
0
243
No
4.1
R1
526
0
526
Yes
5.7
R2
647
0
647
Yes
3
R3
526
0
526
Yes
5.6
R4
647
0
647
Yes
3.5
Project Avg
622
15
637
Yes
4.4

i
M
ci
-zt
lD
O
Ln
M
N
c l
N
I,
O
M
M
cl
cl
M
O
cl
CO
ci
O
m
r
ei
O
M
c-I
'zt
l0
O
Ln
M
N
c l
N
I,
O
M
N.
M
cl
cl
M
O
O
cl
CO
a
o
0
C
2
V1
M
ci
lD
O
Ln
M
N
cl
N
I"
O
M
m
O
M
c-I
ci
M
O
c l
co
�
a
�
(p
M
M
N
cl
Ln
N
Ln
M
O
M
O
co
3
ci
ci
N
lD
cl
co
C
�
C
a
o
r
N
M
M
N
c l
Ln
N
Ln
O
Ln
a)
co
N
ci
ci
N
lD
O
Ln
tD
a
o
V1
M
M
N
c-I
Ln
N
Ln
O
Ln
0)
co
J
O
ci
ci
N
ID
Ln
tD
C
1
I
a
N
I
ci
ci
ci
lD
Ln
Mn
a
O
N
o
F
N
cl
cl
cl
ci
lD
N
Ln
M
ci
O
N
O
d
O
N
�p
J
N
c-I
ci
ci
ci
lD
Ln
M
�
O
N
O
C
a
N
Ln
N
c-I
M
Ln
CO
lD
CO
cn
c
N
O
O
F
O
O
N
Ln
N
l
M
Ln
00
N
llDD
N
O
O
F4
O
O
d
J
Ln
l
Ln
C
lD
C00%0
O
nO
°
O
a
m
Ln
ci
ci
co
ci
'tO
lDm
N
N
0
00
a
OLn
F
cl
cl
00
cl
�
OIN
O
i
01
IN
ci
O
CO
3
m
d
O
u
N
�p
J
Ln
ci
ci
00
zt
O
lD
O
rq
0
O
00
O
a
N
cl
cl
cl
N
M
O
c0
O
N
n
O
F
O
N
cl
cl
cl
N
O
c-I
I�
O
cl
N
ci
N
O
Ln
00
o
a
CA
N
cl
cl
cl
N
O
cl
I,
O
O
J
ci
N
Ln
�p
O
co
O
a
ar
c N LU c
a
iLU 0 U
$ ° u u
a
'V
•N a
�
�
d al
ar
v
i
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
i
v
N
N
'�
a
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
a. E
CAW
4r
i
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
N
U
L
C
Y
L
E
()
E
a
o
m
�
CL
O
m
m
a
Z
>.
Y
VI
7
O
E
L
Q
L
c
Q
t
Y
m
aJ
u
c
c
n
ai
v
m
Q
U
Cl.
o
o
m
Q
O
o
o
c
U
u
3
v
u
ai
E
E
a)
a
ai
Y
v
°
o
u
u
nD
'y
Q
o
o
3
3
•m
al
v
m
U
m
E
Z
u
o>
m
fl
m
c
x
t
V
O
Y
O
U
++
m
c
c
m
u
L
c
3
tlD
•E
L
E
>
-
,
O
-8
u
O
.V
m
O
7
v
�
7
7
7
7
7
O
7
Q
�
c
u
u
u
u
u
u
a
o
Y
O
ai
o
X
m
u
o
u
J
o
Cl)
VV
may
may
V
may
V
may
V=

+�
�
Fj
x
0
n
c-I
0
o
N
0
r,
c-I
0
Ln
m
0
o
M
0
ti
N
0
o
0
n
rn
r,
m m
o
o
o
o
�
a
=
c
=uuu
=uu
=u
£
o
a
aLm
v
a
a
a
v
a
o
0
o
v
a
o
o
v
a
a
o
a
m
ix
c
k
m
c
k
a
a
a
a
a
a
c
.k
a
a
a
s
co:13
.k
C
a
a
ol
Cf
a?°0
v
3k
c-I
N
M
�
VI
lD
I,
W
Q1
v
N
m
O
H
�
d
GJ
>
a>Q
e
�
2
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
o
O
x
E
o
E
E
a
�'
o
E
E
E
a
o
o
v
o
o
a
v
a
a
z
a
a
a
o
-a
=
o
=
o
oc
cu
L
£
Q
.00
y
v
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
H
n
cu
O�q
cu
1r0
O
1O
y
a
>
Q
>
a
£
0
a
0
m
0
a
0
o
0
ko
O
r,
O
o
O
r,
o
N
n
m
o
o
n
a
Z
'a
'a
'a
Z
'a
c
c
c
c4,�cu
a
a
a
u
u
o
v
v
m
0
0
0
0
0
0>>
o
o
oc
u
Q
eq
y
v
=
2
�
N
O
a
y
>
Q
>
a
£
a
M
o
o=
a
a
a
a
o
o°
r
N
"c
"c
-°'o
"c
"c
"c
a
�
�
•g
c
•�
c
'_
�
'c
a
O.
Co
Co
Co
a��
Co
Co
Co
Co
m
a
s
e
Le
a
oc
u
Q
eq
y
v
N
O
�
1O
a
>
Q
a

Appendix C - Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Photos

Poplar Creek WI Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegatation Plot 1 (9/30/2020)
Vegatation Plot 3 (9/30/2020)
Vegatation Plot 2 (9/30/2020)
Vegatation Plot 4 (9/30/2020)

Poplar Creek MY Random Vegetation Plot Photos
Random Vegatation Plot 1 (9/30/2020)
Random Vegatation Plot 3 (9/30/2020)
Random Vegatation Plot 2 (9/30/2020)
Random Vegatation Plot 4 (9/30/2020)

Appendix D - Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Data Sheets

Plot (continued): 06062019-01-0001 Sep 2020 Data N THIS YEARS DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06062019-01-0001 Pa Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): Date: / / 7 New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.554801 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.35008 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 ',X-Axis bearing (deg): 180
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of
ID
Species Name
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2020 Data N
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
1
Betula nigra
®
R
0.4
0.4
Missin g
❑
2
Betula nigra
R
1.5
0.4
Missin g
❑
3
Betula nigra
O
R
2.8
0.4
Missin g
❑
4
Betula nigra
O
R
3.7
0.5
Missin g
❑
5
Diospyros virginiana
O
R
4.9
0.7
88.0
❑
6
Diospyros virginiana
@
R
6.0
0.9
35.0
❑
7
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
7.2
1.2
66.0
❑
8
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
8.2
1.3
92.0
❑
9
Quercus phellos
O
R
9.4
1.4
42.0
❑
10
Taxodium distichum
O
R
9.7
3.8
66.0
❑
I I
Taxodium distichum
O
R
8.2
4.0
83.0
❑
12
Taxodium distichum
O
R
6.1
3.6
95.0
❑
13
Betula nigra
O
R
4.7
3.1
135.0
DBH? ❑
14
Betula nigra
O
R
2.9
2.9
145.0
0.1 ❑
15
Betula nigra
O
R
1.1
2.6
Missing❑
16
Quercus phellos
®
R
1.1
5.4
160.0
0.3 ❑
17
Betula nigra
R
2.5
5.8
260.0
1.2 ❑
18
Quercus lyrata
O
R
4.5
6.2
165.0
0.2 ❑
19
Betula nigra
(�)
R
6.4
6.5
Missin g
❑
20
Betula nigra
O
R
8.3
7.1
180.0
0.3 ❑
21
Taxodium distichum
R
9.9
7.7
82.0
❑
22
Taxodium distichum
®
R
9.7
9.1
100.0
❑
23
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
8.6
9.7
Missin g
❑
24
Taxodium distichum
O
R
7.4
9.7
93.0
❑
25
Betula nigra
R
5.7
9.4
Missin g
❑
26
Taxodium distichum
R
4.5
8.9
125.0
DBH? ❑
27
Taxodium distichum
R
2.9
8.6
125.0
DBH? ❑
28
Taxodium distichum
O
R
1.5
8.7
122.0
DBH? ❑
THIS YEARS DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, BVSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
06062019-01-0001
Sep 2020 Data
N
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
29 Taxodium distichum O R 0.2 8.4 80.0
# stems: 29 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamoling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
sapi
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBII)
"Required ifcrioff>lOcmorsubsample?100%. 101
•2
0'3
•*4
NS
:6
::7
8
TZ
}T
::10 Form WS2,ver9.1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M—missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Mai of stems on plot 06062019-01-0001 __
X-axis: 180 ° # stems: 29
:CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems map size:
,marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a"). N 0 small
Y:5m
0
O
a
C
0
0
0
O
1
c
O
O
0
°O
(0,0)
X:5m
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M—missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VNID) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06062019-01-0002 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): � Date: / / 71 New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard:
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.554062 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.350322 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 ',X-Axis bearing (deg): 25
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: F7710 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of
ID
Species Name
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2020 Data
Height DBH
Icm* 1 cm
31
Quercus phellos
R
0.6
0.5
Missin g
❑
32
Taxodium distichum
O
R
1.3
3.1
135.0
DBH? ❑
33
Quercus lyrata
O
R
2.7
2.5
85.0
❑
34
Betula nigra
O
R
4.3
2.0
60.0
❑
35
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
5.7
1.2
Missin g
❑
36
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
7.4
0.9
55.0
❑
37
Quercus sp.
O
R
9.5
3.2
Missin g
❑
38
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
8.3
3.4
20.0
❑
39
Betula nigra
O
R
7.3
3.5
Missin g
❑
40
Betula nigra
O
R
6.4
3.7
190.0
1.5 ❑
41
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.5
4.2
220.0
2.0 ❑
42
Quercus sp.
O
R
4.4
4.5
Missin S
❑
43
Quercus sp.
O
R
3.4
4.8
Missin g
❑
44
Platanus occidentalis
R
2.2
5.3
140.0
0.2 ❑
45
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
1.1
5.9
160.0
0.3 ❑
46
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
0.4
6.2
180.0
0.5 ❑
47
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
0.4
9.4
Missin g
❑
48
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
1.6
8.7
129.0
DBH? ❑
49
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
2.9
8.0
155.0
0.2 ❑
50
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.3
7.4
125.0
DBH? ❑
51
Platanus occidentalis
R
5.5
7.1
180.0
0.5 ❑
52
Quercus sp.
R
6.7
6.7
Missin g
❑
53
Taxodium distichum
R
8.3
6.1
100.0
❑
54
Taxodium distichum
®
R
9.5
6.0
140.0
0.4 ❑
55
Taxodium distichum
R
9.8
8.7
100.0
❑
56
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
9.0
9.0
Missin g
❑
57
Quercus sp.
O
R
7.5
9.3
Missin g
❑
58
Betula nigra
O
R
6.1
9.5
110.0
DBH? ❑
59
Betula nigra
R
4.3
9.8
160.0
0.4 ❑
633
Betula nigra
©
R
9.9
6.0
110.0
DBH? ❑
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
06062019-01-0002
Sep 2020 Data
N
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
#sterns: 30 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplina**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right): LL 10cm LL 50cm Li 100cm Li 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub.-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBII)
**Re quiredifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
03
064
N5
�6 ::7
::8
} J
::10 Form WS2,ver9.1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M—missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map_ of stems on plot_ 06062019-01-0002
:CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems
:marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a").
Y:5m
m
®
� O
0
0
O
O ®C
O
O0
O O O A
O
0
0
(0,0)
X:5m
X-axis: 25 ° #stems: 30
N map size:
� small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M—missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VNID) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06062019-01-0003 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): � Date: / / 71 New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard:
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.553576 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.350731 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 ',X-Axis bearing (deg): 180
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: F7710 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of
ID
Species Name
Map
char
Source*
X Y
0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2020 Data
Height DBH
Icm* 1 cm
61
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
0.1
0.3
Missin g
❑
62
Quercus lyrata
®
R
0.2
5.2
160.0
0.2 ❑
63
Quercus phellos
®
R
0.1
6.1
125.0
DBH? ❑
64
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
0.1
9.8
Missin g
❑
65
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
2.1
8.3
280.0
2.0 ❑
66
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
2.2
6.9
Missin g
❑
67
Betula nigra
O
R
2.3
5.3
Missin g
❑
68
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
2.3
3.8
320.0
2.8 ❑
69
Platanus occidentalis
R
2.2
2.7
320.0
2.9 ❑
70
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
2.3
1.2
280.0
2.5 ❑
71
Quercus sp.
O
R
5.1
0.5
Missing❑
72
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.0
1.8
180.0
1.0 ❑
73
Quercus lyrata
(p)
R
5.1
2.9
43.0
❑
74
Taxodium distichum
O
R
4.9
4.1
140.0
0.2 ❑
75
Quercus sp.
R
5.0
5.5
Missin g
❑
76
Betula nigra
O
R
5.1
6.9
170.0
0.2 ❑
77
Taxodium distichum
O
R
4.9
8.2
160.0
0.4 ❑
78
Betula nigra
R
4.9
9.4
150.0
0.3 ❑
79
Quercus sp.
O
R
7.6
9.8
Missing❑
80
Taxodium distichum
O
R
7.6
8.8
135.0
DBH? ❑
81
Betula nigra
O
R
7.9
7.5
Missin g
❑
82
Quercus sp.
R
7.8
6.2
Missin g
❑
83
Quercus phellos
O
R
7.6
4.7
90.0
❑
84
Quercus sp.
O
R
7.3
3.0
Missin g
❑
85
Quercus michauxii
O
R
7.3
1.6
75.0
❑
86
Quercus phellos
O
R
7.2
0.4
25.0
❑
87
Taxodium distichum
O
R
9.7
0.7
90.0
❑
88
Quercus sp.
®
R
9.7
2.0
Missin g
❑
89
Taxodium distichum
©
R
9.8
3.1
100.0
❑
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm sprout
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
06062019-01-0003
Sep 2020 Data
N
THIS YEARS DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
#steins: 29 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplina**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right): LL 10cm LL 50cm Li 100cm Li 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub.-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBII)
**Re quiredifcut-off >10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
03
064
N5
�6 ::7
::8
} J
::10 Form WS2,ver9.1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M—missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Mai of stems on plot 06062019-01-0003 __
X-axis: 180 ° # stems: 29
:CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems map size:
,marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a"). N 0 small
Y:5m
X
O
O
O
O
O
O
CID
d 0
0
uO
C
0
s
(0,0)
X:5m
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M—missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VNID) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06062019-01-0004 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): � Date: / / 71 New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard:
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.552844 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:-78.351369 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 ',X-Axis bearing (deg): 60
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: F7710 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of
Sep 2020 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m Icm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
90
Quercus sp.
®
R
0.8
9.4
Missin g
❑
91
Diospyros virginiana
®
R
0.1
7.7
Missin g
❑
92
Betula nigra
O
R
0.1
0.5
200.0
1.0 ❑
93
Quercus lyrata
O
R
0.9
2.3
160.0
0.4 ❑
94
Betula nigra
R
1.2
3.9
Missin g
❑
95
Quercus sp.
(g)
R
1.4
5.9
Missin g
❑
96
Betula nigra
®
R
3.0
5.0
142.0
0.3 ❑
97
Taxodium distichum
O
R
3.1
7.0
160.0
0.5 ❑
98
Liriodendron tulipifera
(p)
R
6.8
9.3
Missin g
❑
99
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
6.5
8.5
Missin g
❑
100
Quercus phellos
O
R
6.3
7.1
Missin g
❑
101
Quercus sp.
(6)
R
6.0
5.9
Missin g
❑
102
Betula nigra
O
R
5.3
4.3
Missin g
❑
103
Cephalanthus occidentalis
O
R
4.5
2.8
Missin g
❑
104
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
4.0
1.3
Missin g
❑
105
Quercus michauxii
R
7.4
1.0
Missin g
❑
106
Quercus michauxii
O
R
8.1
2.4
30.0
❑
107
Quercus sp.
O
R
8.7
4.0
Missin g
❑
108
Quercus sp.
R
9.4
5.4
Missin g
❑
109
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
9.7
0.8
Missin g
❑
636
Diospyros virginiana
O
R
1.3
8.5
60.0
❑
# stems: 21 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (in) (in) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
06062019-01-0004
Sep 2020 Data
N
THIS YEARS DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m)
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub.-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Suer
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Requiredifciioff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01
•2
•3
♦64
1 NS
:46 ::7
S
1
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 06062019-01-0004
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 60° N #stems: 21
0 map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M—missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1