20191032 Ver 2_More Info Received_20201013 (2)

Strickland, Bev
From: Neal, Robert <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 1:45 PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg
Cc: Huggett, Douglas; Gregory Rudolph; Styron, Heather M.; Finegan, Katie
Subject: [External] Old Ferry Channel - Deer Creek - Additional Information Submittal
Attachments: Table of Contents - OFC-DC RE100920.pdf, 10153-OFC_DC-Form_MP_1-
RE100920.pdf, 10153-OFC_DC-Form_MP_2-RE100920.pdf, 10153-OFC-
DC_Project_Narrative-RE101220.pdf, 10153-OFC_DC-Drawings-RE101220.pdf, 10153-
OFC_DC-ShellfishSurvey-093020.pdf, 10153-OFC-DC-Adjacent_Property_Notification-
Hunt-100920.pdf
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
�[e-mail]
G regg,
Please find attached, the revised CAMA Major permit submittal containing the additional information requested for the
shellfish and SAV habitat in the project area.
Also included is the property owner notification for the small extension of the dredge footprint at the Deer Creek
terminus near Yaupon Drive.
The additional information clarifies the dredge activities will maintain a 10-ft buffer from any identified SAV habitat and
Carteret County will relocate shellfish located in the dredge footprint in accordance with DMF guidance.
For reference, the following files are attached:
■ Revised MP-1 Form
■ Revised MP-2 Form
■ Revised Permit Narrative
■ Revised Permit Drawings
■ Additional Riparian Property Notice for the Deer Creek Extension
■ The Shellfish Survey results
■ Revised Table of Contents
Please let me know if I may provide any additional information!
Best Regards,
Robert Neal, P.E.
■
{
238 Princess Street I Wilmington, NC 28401
D 910.218.7082 10 910.218.7100 1 C 910.524.3285
Creative People, Practical Solutions. @
Connect with us: Website I Facebook I Linkedln Twitter

Per Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, Moffatt & Nichol will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in the selection and retention of subconsultonts,
including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. Moffatt & Nichol will ensure that minorities will be afforded full opportunity to present proposals and will
not be discriminated against in consideration for an award. For additional information go to: http://www.moffattnichol.com/content/small-business-outreach

Carteret County Shallow Draft Navigation Waterways
Old Ferry Channel & Deer Creek Maintenance Dredging
CAMA Major Permit Application
Table of Contents
Tab Description
A. Form MP-1
B. Form MP-2
C. Agent Authorization
D. Project Narrative
E. Permit Drawings
F. Consent of Use Agreements
G. August 2018 Hydrographic Survey
H. Previous Permits
I. Sediment Analysis
J. Riparian Property Owners Notification List
K. Shellfish Survey Results

ON MP-1
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable)
Carteret County
Old Ferry Channel & Deer Creek
Maintenance Dredging
Applicant 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Tommy
Burns
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Greg
Rudolph
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
302 Courthouse Square
Beaufort
NC
ZIP
Country
Phone No.
FAX No.
28516
us
252 - 222 - 5835 ext.
252 - 222 - 5826
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Moffatt & Nichol
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Robert
Neal
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
272 N. Front Street, Suite 204
Wilmington
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
28401
910 - 218 -
7100 ext.
ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
919 781 4869
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back>
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastaimanagement.net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Carteret
307 Bayshore Drive
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
N/A
Cape Carteret
NC
28584 -
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
- - ext.
, , , ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
White Oak River Basin
Bogue Sound
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Bogue Sound
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
®Yes ❑No
work falls within.
Carteret County
4.
Site Description
a.
Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
18,300 ft
30.7 Ac - Maintenance channels
2.2 Ac - Material Placement sites
c.
Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
0.6 Ac (916 WB McLean Drive); 1.0 Ac (312, 314,
NWL (normal water level)
& 324 Live Oak Drive); 0.6 Ac (307 Bayshore Drive).
N/A ❑NHW or ❑NWL
e.
Vegetation on tract
SAV habiat has been identified near the dredge footprint. The maintenance operations shall maintain a minumum 10-ft
buffer from any identified SAV habitat. In addition, the dredging will maintain a 10-ft buffer from any marsh vegetation or
coastal grasses.
f.
Man-made features and uses now on tract
Fixed and floating docks, along with bulkheads and other shoreline control structures.
g.
Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site.
Residential and undeveloped land located adajcent to the navigation channel.
h.
How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
n/a
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
j.
Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
k.
Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, by whom?
I.
Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastaimanagement.net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ❑Yes ®No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
N/A
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
N/A
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
N/A
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ®Public/Government
❑ Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
Deer Creek and Old Ferry Channel provide recreational navigation access to the AIWW and Bogue Sound from Cape
Carteret and Emerald Isle.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Mechanical dredging equipment entailing a bucket to barge operation. Dredge spoil will be excavated and placed in a
hopper barge and transported to the offloading site. The material will then be transferred to a dump truck for hauling to a
placement area.
d. List all development activities you propose.
Maintenance dredging in Old Ferry Channel and Deer Creek in Carteret County, NC.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? Both
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 31.9 ❑Sq.Ft or ®Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
Small quantities of dredge effluent can be expected to run-off from the work barge during material transport, otherwise the
effluent will be contained within the hauling equipment. Berms and silt fencing will contain the sediment in the end use
placement facilities.
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal. The applicant will relocate shellfish from the dredge footprint in accordance with DMF guidance, prior to
construction.
<Form continues on back>
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastalmanagement.net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name See Attached Tab J - Riparian Property Owners Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
See Attached Tab H - Pervious Permits
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date October 9, 2020 Print Name Greg 'Rudi' Rudolph
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
®DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP-4 Structures Information
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastaimanagement.net

Form DCM MP-2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
Old Ferry
Deer Creek
Deer Creek
Other
Channel
(Access
(Residential
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
(Access
Channel)
Canal)
Breakwater
shoreline
Channel)
stabilization
Length
6,750 ft
6,200 ft
6,000 ft
Width
50'- (6,150 ft)
50' - (4,000 ft)
30' - (500 ft)
30'- 600 ft)
Varying'- (2,200 ft
20' - (5,500 ft)
Avg. Existing
- 4 MLW
-3 MLW
-2 MLW
NA
NA
Depth
Final Project
- 6 MLW +1
-5 MLW+1
-5 MLW+1
NA
NA
Depth
-4 MLW + 0.5
The Deer Creek Access channel includes the Deer Creek Connector channel.
1.
EXCAVATION
El This section not applicable
a.
Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
Silty sand, fines, mud.
38,733 CY
C.
(i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
0 CY
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Carteret County will relocate shellfish from the dredge footprint
in accordance with DMF guidance and will also maintain a min. 10-ft .
buffer from any identified SAV habitat.
2.
DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
El This section not applicable
a.
Location of disposal area.
b. Dimensions of disposal area.
0.6 Ac - 916 WB McLean Drive (Hwy 24)
916 WB McLean Drive (Hwy 24), 307 Bayshore Drive, and
1.0 Ac - 312, 314, & 324 Live Oak Drive
312,314A 324 Live Oak Drive Cape Carteret (28584)
0.6 Ac - 307 Bayshore Drive
c.
(i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
[-]Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
(ii) If yes, where?
See Tab F - Consent of Use Agreements
(i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SIB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?

Form DCM MP-2 (Excavation and Fill, Page 2 of 2)
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION x This section not applicable
(If development is a wood groin, use MP-4 — Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization:
❑Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ❑Other:
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
e. Type of stabilization material:
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater/Sill Other
i. Source of fill material.
b. Length:
Width:
d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ®This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes,
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water
(iii) Dimensions of fill area
(iv) Purpose of fill
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
controlled?
Silt fencing and erosion control berms
C. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
October 09, 2020
Date
Old Ferry Channel & Deer Creek Maintenance Dredging
Project Name
b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ❑None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Excavator (backhoe) or bucket dredge, bobcat, dump trucks and
floating barges.
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
Greg ' Rudi' Rudolph
Applicant Name
. Jr'
Applicant Signature
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanagement.net

Carteret County Shallow Draft Navigation Waterways
Old Ferry Channel & Deer Creek Maintenance Dredging
Project Narrative (Revised October 2020)
Carteret County intends to maintenance dredge the navigation systems referenced as Old Ferry Channel
and Deer Creek adjoining Bogue Sound in Cape Carteret. The dredging operations will help enhance
traditional and existing recreational navigation access for residents and visitors in Cape Carteret and
Emerald Isle to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW).
The Old Ferry Channel spans approximately 6,750 linear feet (If) (1.3 miles) across the AIWW to connect
the townships of Cape Carteret and Emerald Isle. The channel supported a ferry operation from 1961 to
1971, until the B. Cameron Langston Bridge, otherwise known as the Emerald Isle Bridge, was constructed.
Since 1971, the Old Ferry Channel has served as a primary recreational navigation access for the Cape
Carteret boating community. The proposed work represents the first known maintenance event for the Old
Ferry Channel since the original construction by W.B. McLean as a developmental action for Cape Carteret.
Deer Creek includes a system of navigation channels facilitating access to multiple residential areas in Cape
Carteret. The Deer Creek system covers approximately 12,200 if (2.3 miles) inclusive of a connection to
the Old Ferry Channel. Deer Creek provides recreational navigation access to five (5) separate residential
areas containing an estimated 18,3001f (3.5 miles) of shoreline. Maintenance dredging occurred in sections
of Deer Creek in 2001 and 2007, although the records do not indicate maintenance ever occurred throughout
the entire system. Figure 1 below shows the proposed Old Ferry Channel and Deer Creek maintenance
areas.
Figure 1. Old Ferry Channel and Deer Creek Maintenance Dredge Areas
Construction Methodology
The proposed maintenance dredging project will restore the Old Ferry Channel to a 50-ft width at -7-ft (-6-
ft + a 1-ft overdredge allowance) MLW with 3H:1V side slopes. Although the main alignment of the Old
Ferry Channel maintains the 50-ft width, both the Cape Carteret and Emerald Isle inaugural sections begin

Carteret County Shallow Draft Navigation Waterways
Old Ferry Channel and Deer Creek Maintenance Dredging
Project Narrative (Revised October 2020) Page 2 of 8
with a 30-ft width to help minimize potential shoreline impacts. The dredging project will remove
approximately 9,675 cubic yards (CY) of fine-grained sand and silt from the shoaled areas of the Old Ferry
Channel. A clamshell or excavator type dredge will remove the spoil material for placement in an upland
site. The dredge spoil will be placed on a floating barge or bin for transport from the dredge area to a
material transfer site on Cape Carteret. At the transfer site, material will be `transferred' from the floating
barge to dump trucks (or other hauling equipment) for hauling to one of three (3) placement sites. Tab E
(Permit Drawings) shows the proposed Old Ferry Channel dredge area, the material transfer site, and the
upland material placement sites in Cape Carteret. The material transfer site is located at 314 Live Oak Drive
and the material placement sites are located at 312, 314, & 324 Live Oak Drive (I site), 307 Bayshore
Drive, and 916 WB McLean Drive (Hwy 24). Tab F (Consent of Use Agreements) provides the consent of
use agreements for the transfer site and placement of the dredge material at each of the three (3) respective
placement sites.
Tab E (Permit Drawings) also shows the proposed dredge footprints for the Deer Creek channel segments.
Deer Creek consists of four (4) branches and a connecting channel extending from the Old Ferry Channel.
The project will remove a maximum of 29,058 CY from the Deer Creek system. The connecting channel
originates from a 150-ft widener positioned along the northern segment of the Old Ferry Channel. The
widener begins with an approximate 300-ft width and narrows to a 50-ft width over a 150-ft length. The
connecting channel then extends approximately 2,000 if at -6-ft (-5-ft + a 1-ft overdredge allowance) MLW
to the main branch of Deer Creek. The main branch extends in both a north and south direction at -6-ft (-5-
ft + 1-ft overdredge allowance) MLW. The northern extension maintains a 30-ft width and covers
approximately 500-ft before diverting to the northwest and branching again to School House Creek (also
referenced as Rocky Run). Both the Deer Creek (North) and School House Creek continue with a 20-ft
width at-4.5-ft (4-ft + 0.5-ft overdredge allowance) MLW. These channels have a decreased navigation
space available within the residential areas of Deer Creek due to lower anticipated vessel density. The Deer
Creek (North) channel continues in a northwest direction for approximately 2,200 If to reach the terminus
near Yaupon Drive and Highway 24 in Cape Carteret. School House Creek also extends approximately
2,200 If and terminates at Highway 24.
The southern extension of the main Deer Creek channel, referenced as Deer Creek (South), increases from
the 30-ft width identified at the confluence with the connecting channel to the Old Ferry Channel, to a 50-
ft width approximately 2,200 if from the confluence area. Throughout the referenced 2,200 if transition
area from the Old Ferry Channel connector, Deer Creek (South) varies between a 20-ft and roughly 50-ft
channel width to avoid potential SAV impacts. The maintenance operations maintain a minimum 10-ft
buffer from any SAV habitat from the 2012-2014 SAV mapping limits identified by APNEP (Albermarle-
Pamlico National Estuary Partnership) and DMF (North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries) with
support from NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). The limits of the referenced
SAV habitats were also ground-truthed in August 2020 by Carteret County. Tab E (Permit Drawings) shows
the referenced 2012-2014 SAV limits in reference to the dredging template.
A west branch originates from Deer Creek (South) approximately 300 if from the referenced connecting
channel confluence. This branch, referenced as Deer Creek (West), extends approximately 1,1001f with a
20-ft width at -4.5-ft (4-ft +a 0.5-ft overdredge allowance) MLW to the terminus at Yaupon Road. Deer
Creek (South) continues from the branch point with a maximum 50-ft width at -6-ft (-5-ft +a I -ft overdredge
allowance) MLW for approximately 3,7501f to a deep -water path in Bogue Sound that accesses the AIWW.
Deer Creek (South) follows the Cape Carteret shoreline near Hunting Island and makes a western
directional turn towards the Emerald Isle Bridge. Deer Creek (South) then merges with the deep -water path
which adjoins the AIWW. The increased width for Deer Creek (South) provides additional maneuverability
for vessel traffic anticipated from the AIWW. As the multiple Deer Creek channels access predominately
residential canals, the channel widths decrease in expectations of slower navigation speeds and vessel

Carteret County Shallow Draft Navigation Waterways
Old Ferry Channel and Deer Creek Maintenance Dredging
Project Narrative (Revised October 2020) Page 3 of 8
density. Table 1 provides the design standards for both the Deer Creek and Old Ferry Channel navigational
systems.
Both the Deer Creek and Old Ferry Channel maintenance operations will utilize the three (3) material
placement sites and one (1) transfer site located at the Cape Carteret terminus of the Old Ferry Channel.
Sedimentation and erosion control structures, such as silt fencing, biodegradable wattles, and earthen berms,
will be implemented and maintained until vegetation cover establishes enough to stabilize the placed
material. Material may be placed in the designated facilities up to six (6-ft) feet above the pre -construction
grade for either site. However, the final grading for each site will provide a steepest slope of 3H:1V for
slope stabilization. In addition, the sites will be smooth graded to discourage water ponding. Figure 2 shows
the referenced material transfer site and the three (3) placement areas for the Old Ferry Channel and Deer
Creek maintenance operations.
Table 1. Old Ferry Channel and Deer Creek Design Elements
Channel
Depth
Width (ft)
Length (ft)
Side Slopes
Volume
(MLW-ft)
H:V
(CY)
Old Ferry Channel
-7 (-6+1)
30-ft
600-ft
3:1
9,675
50-ft
6,150-ft
Deer Creek
-6 (-5+1)
50-ft
2,150-ft
3:1
10,372
Connecting Channel
Deer Creek (North)
-6 (-5+1)
30-ft
500-ft
3:1
4,984
Main Channel
-4.5 4 +0.5
20-ft
2,200-ft
Deer Creek (South)
-6 (-5+1)
varying
2 200-ft
3:1
10,882
Main Channel
50-ft
1,850-ft
School House Creek
-4.5 (-4 +0.5)
20-ft
2,200-ft
3:1
689
Deer Creek
-4.5 (-4 +0.5)
20-ft
1,100-ft
3:1
2,131
West Branch
The volumetric calculations stem from a hydrographic survey Carteret County conducted in August 2018.
Tab G (Hydrographic Survey) shows a color -coded depiction of the reference survey. The survey shows
several `hotspots' or shoaled areas in the Old Ferry Channel and Deer Creek system. The shoaled areas
reflect a red or yellow color and indicate elevations approaching 0 MLLW (-0.15 MLW)'. The shoaled
areas will be prioritized during the first maintenance event to minimize dredging costs and potential
impacts. Carteret County most likely will not dredge the complete navigational system as described during
the first maintenance event due to budget limitations. However, Carteret County requests authorization to
dredge the full footprint, as described for the Old Ferry Channel and Deer Creek, in the event additional
funds become available in out -year budgets. Obtaining and preserving the appropriate state and federal
authorizations through one permitting process, for the complete Old Ferry Channel and Deer Creek system,
provides a future potential cost savings by avoiding multiple permit submittals.
1 Datum's reference benchmark sheets established for NOAA station 8656483, Beaufort, Duke Marine Lab

Carteret County Shallow Draft Navigation Waterways
Old Ferry Channel and Deer Creek Maintenance Dredging
Project Narrative (Revised October 2020)
Page 4 of 8
Figure 2. Old Ferry Channel & Deer Creek Material Transfer Site and Placement Facilities
Carteret County will also limit the construction activities to daytime hours between November 16t' and
March 315t. Limiting the construction timeframe to the cooler winter months will reduce the injury risk to
potential migrating species such as West Indian manatee, and juvenile and larval fish species. Scheduling
the work in the winter months will also reduce the potential risk of injuring or harassing sea turtles, which
generally show a greater presence density in the summer months. The dredging will also maintain a 10-ft
buffer from aquatic vegetation such as marsh grass or vegetated wetlands. Implementing the buffer will
help minimize the potential for the channel side slopes to erode the vegetation through tidal scour or boat
wake impacts.
Carteret County also acknowledges the existence of oyster habitat within School House Creek. In order to
minimize the potential impacts to oyster in this area, Carteret County will conduct an oyster relocation prior
to dredging. Carteret County will coordinate with the N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF) during the
development and implementation of the oyster relocation plan. Carteret County will also provide the N.C.
Division of Coastal Management (DCM) with notice of satisfactory completion of the relocation efforts
from DMF, prior to initiating dredging activities in School House Creek.
Carteret County conducted a shellfish survey within the confluence area of School House Creek and Deer
Creek in September 2020. The survey consisted of presents / absence sampling on pre -established transects
spaced at approximately 100-ft intervals. Tab (K) provides the survey results and shows approximately 2
bushels of shellfish exist per acre within the dredge footprint at the School House Creek and Deer Creek
confluence.

Carteret County Shallow Draft Navigation Waterways
Old Ferry Channel and Deer Creek Maintenance Dredging
Project Narrative (Revised October 2020)
Previous Permits
Page 5 of 8
As referenced above, the proposed work will be the first known maintenance dredging event for the Old
Ferry Channel since the original construction in 1961. W. B. McLean conducted the original dredging to
promote ferry travel between Cape Carteret and Emerald Isle'. Subsequently, North Carolina operated a
ferry service through the navigation channel until 1971, when the B. Cameron Langston Bridge replaced
the ferry service as the primary access between Emerald Isle and Cape Carteret. The Old Ferry Channel has
maintained navigation depth, presumably due to the boating traffic and tidal currents helping to flush
shoaled sediment from the waterway. The original construction also did not fall under permit review. The
original dredging occurred prior to the enactment of the North Carolina Dredge and Fill Law and the federal
Coastal Zone Management Act.
Portions of the Deer Creek system have been previously maintained. Tab H (Previous Permits) contains
records of maintenance events proposed during 2001 and 2007. The previous permits concentrate on
localized shoaling within the residential neighborhoods of Deer Creek and do not encompass the complete
recreational navigable system. However, the current proposal stems from the previous maintenance
attempts and concentrates on minimizing potential dredging impacts. The previous dredging projects
allowed excavation to -4-ft Normal Water Level (NWL) and the current plan limits dredging to -4.5-ft (-4-
ft + a 0.5-ft overdredge allowance) MLW. Accounting for the elevation difference between NWL and MLW
(0.17-ft), the current plan extends the dredging depth approximately 0.67-ft below the previously authorized
dimensions to provide a minimal (0.5-ft) overdredge allowance and a 0.17-ft conversion to the MLW
datum. The overdredge allowance provides additional workspace for the contractor to help prevent
excavation below the authorized limits.
Sediment Composition
Sediment analysis results indicate silty and fine grain sands comprise a large percentage of Old Ferry
Channel and Deer Creek. As a result, the material most likely does not meet state standards for beach
placement as beneficial reuse. Tab I (Sediment Analysis) shows the complete sediment composition for the
samples collected for Old Ferry Channel and the Deer Creek system. For reference, Table 2 and Table 3
provide a summary of each dredge area and Figure 3 shows the sediment sample locations in planview.
Table 2 and Table 3 indicate approximately 25% of the dredge material consists of silty sands. Although
the project did not evaluate a native beach for comparison, generally any site with greater than 10% fines
will not meet North Carolina state criteria for beach placement. Carteret County also understands the
financial burden and economic cost of transferring the dredge material via truck haul to a nearby beach,
assuming the material could satisfy the NC requirements for beneficial reuse placement. Therefore, Carteret
County refrained from exploring if the material would be appropriate as beneficial reuse based on the
sediment results and general knowledge of sand quality at the nearby beaches and overall cost implications.
2 Cape Carteret (2019). History of the Town of Cape Carteret, NC. URL www.townofeaecarteret.ora/town-histoLy.htmI (visited
2019, September 25).

Carteret County Shallow Draft Navigation Waterways
Old Ferry Channel and Deer Creek Maintenance Dredging
Project Narrative (Revised October 2020)
Table 2. Sediment Analysis for Old Ferry Channel
Sediment
Classification (% b weight)
Sample
o
/o Gravel
/o Granular
/o Sand
/o Fines
OFC-01
-
-
-
-
OFC-02
0.44
0.38
83.79
15.39
OFC-03
0.00
0.03
94.21
5.77
OFC-04
0.13
0.31
78.95
20.61
OFC-05
0.22
0.01
96.00
3.77
OFC-06
0.63
0.63
83.54
15.19
OFC-07
1.20
0.20
94.30
4.31
OFC-08
21.07
2.13
52.87
23.94
OFC-09
-
-
-
-
OFC-10
0.00
0.03
29.23
70.75
OFC-11
-
-
-
-
OFC-12
0.12
0.58
58.48
40.83
OFC-13
0.00
0.07
82.79
17.14
Composite
1 2.38
1 0.44
1 75.42
21.77
Notes: Sediment Classification determined in accordance with 15A NCAC 07H.0312(1)(e).
(-) indicates the sample depth was below the max. (deepest) dredge elevation.
Composite characteristics determined by simply arithmetic mean.
Table 3. Sediment Analysis for Deer Creek
Sediment
Classification (% b weight)
Sample
o
/o Gravel
/o Granular
/o Sand
/o Fines
DC-01
0.31
0.41
70.19
29.09
DC-02
0.96
0.56
64.67
33.81
DC-03
0.00
0.18
19.28
80.54
DC-04
-
-
-
-
DC-05
0.36
1.16
83.67
14.81
DC-06
0.90
1.58
72.51
25.01
DC-07
0.00
0.01
96.92
3.07
DC-08
2.52
0.25
95.28
1.95
DC-09
17.33
2.18
61.59
18.91
Composite
2.80
0.79
70.51
25.90
Notes: Sediment Classification determined in accordance with 15A NCAC 07H.0312(1)(e).
(-) indicates the sample depth was below the max. (deepest) dredge elevation.
Composite characteristics determined by simply arithmetic mean.
Summary
Page 6 of 8
Carteret County requests authorization to maintenance dredge the Old Ferry Channel and the Deer Creek
waterways in efforts to maintain and enhance recreational navigation access for residents and visitors of
Cape Carteret and Emerald Isle. The proposed project will improve navigation access through the Old Ferry
Channel to the AIWW from both Cape Carteret and Emerald Isle. The Old Ferry Channel has served as a
recreational navigation throughway for both communities since the 1971 construction of the B. Cameron
Langston Bridge. The bridge construction reduced the need for a state operated ferry system to provide the
primary travel option between Emerald Isle and Cape Carteret. As the ferry system became less used, Old
Ferry Channel became a recreational asset for providing navigational access for local boaters in Cape
Carteret and Emerald Isle to the AIWW.
Old Ferry Channel extends approximately 6,7501f (1.3 miles) to connect Emerald Isle with Cape Carteret.
The waterway also crosses the AIWW in Bogue Sound to provide navigable access to deep -water. The
maintenance project will remove a maximum of approximately 9,675 CY from the Old Ferry Channel

Carteret County Shallow Draft Navigation Waterways
Old Ferry Channel and Deer Creek Maintenance Dredging
Project Narrative (Revised October 2020)
Figure 3. Old Ferry Channel & Deer Creek Sediment Sample Locations (Not To Scale)
Page 7 of 8
alignment. The excavation will occur down to a maximum (deepest) elevation of -7-ft (-6-ft + a 1-ft
overdredge allowance) MLW over an approximate 50-ft channel width. The Old Ferry Channel alignment

Carteret County Shallow Draft Navigation Waterways
Old Ferry Channel and Deer Creek Maintenance Dredging
Project Narrative (Revised October 2020) Page 8 of 8
narrows from the 50-ft width to 30-ft at both the Emerald Isle and Cape Carteret terminus. The change in
width occurs in response to slower vessel speeds anticipated within the mooring areas and to help limit
potential dredging impacts.
The proposed maintenance will help improve navigation depths through the residential community
adjoining the Deer Creek system. Deer Creek consist of four (4) branches extending from a connecting
channel that originates at the Old Ferry Channel. The complete Deer Creek system extends approximately
12,2001f (2.3 miles) and contains approximately 29,058 CY of shoaled material. Maintenance operations
will dredge to a maximum (deepest) elevation of -6-ft (-5-ft + a 1-ft overdredge allowance) MLW in the
main channels and -4.5-ft (4-ft + a 0.5-ft overdredge allowance) MLW in the residential canal areas. The
channel widths vary from a maximum of 50-ft width in the main channel segments to 20-ft widths in the
residential portions. The varying design dimensions stem from the vessel traffic density anticipated within
each navigable waterway, as well as an effort to avoid SAV impacts during construction.
Records indicate this will be the first documented maintenance event for Old Ferry Channel since the
original construction in 1961. However, portions of the Deer Creek system have incurred at least two (2)
prior maintenance events. The proposed action will be the first to encapsulate the full extents of the Deer
Creek system and will help provide a documented channel alignment for future maintenance events. Due
to available funding, actions remain unlikely to remove the complete dredge volume proposed for the
maintenance event. However, obtaining the necessary permits and authorizations under the current efforts
will assist the County in future maintenance operations by defining a channel alignment and operational
plan.
The sediment placement plan provides three (3) dredge material placement facilities. The dredge material
composition most likely falls below the necessary standards for beneficial reuse; and therefore, will be
placed in upland facilities. The proposed placement facilities cover approximately 2.2 acres and material
will not be placed higher than six (6) feet above pre -construction conditions in either site. Expectations
suggest the project will not remove a significantly greater volume than the available capacity can maintain.
However, if additional financial resources become available a greater volume may be removed. In this
event, material will be stockpiled for dewatering in the placement facilities and removed prior to raising
either site more than 6-ft above the existing elevations. Dewatered material will be truck hauled to a landfill
facility to create or restore capacity for the additional material. Material remaining in the placement
facilities will be smooth graded to discourage water ponding and will also be graded at a maximum slope
of 3H-IV for slope stability. Sedimentation and erosion control structures, such as silt fencing,
biodegradable wattles, and earthen berms, will be implemented and maintained until vegetation cover
establishes enough to stabilize the placed material.
The maintenance project will occur during the winter months of November 16' through March 315i
Constricting the construction to this period will help reduce the potential for environmental impacts. The
dredging operations will also maintain a 10-ft buffer from wetland vegetation and identified SAV habitat.
Implementing this buffer will help minimize the potential for the channel side slopes to erode the vegetation
through tidal scour or boat wake impacts. The County will also relocate shellfish from the construction
footprint prior to dredging activities occurring. These considerations coupled with the channel design
should provide a reasonable and environmentally acceptable enhancement to the navigation systems within
the Old Ferry Channel and Deer Creek systems.

I
SHEET 23
SHEET 16
y�z
UN
CHANNEL INDEX
CHANNEL NAME SHEET NO.
OLD FERRY CHANNEL 2-9
DEER CREEK CONNECTOR 8 & 10- 12
DEER CREEK MAIN CHANNEL (NORTH) 12-16
DEER CREEK MAIN CHANNEL (SOUTH) 12 & 17-21
SCHOOL HOUSE/ROCKY RUN CREEK 13, 14, 22, & 23
DEER CREEK SPLIT (WEST) 17 & 24
SHEET 15 -/
CAPE CARTERET
SHEET 12
SECONDARY DREDGE
DISPOSAL SITE
SHEET 19 SHEET 6
c�
BOGUE SOUND SHEET 4
i�
L =
SHEET 24 --/
SHEET 17
SHEET 18
SHEET 20 -
SHEET 21
} SHEET 5
HUNTING
O ISLAND
LIMITS OF
SEAGRASS, TYP
SHEET 3
T SHEET 2
EMERALD ISLE

MATCHLINE A
MATCHLINE SHEET 3
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH= -6 MLW +1
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
- - - - - - -
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
-
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
SEAGRASS AREA
BOGUE SOUND
APPROX LIMITS OF
DREDGING, TYP
q OLD FERRY CHANNEL
340278.574-
2587750.13
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
4. SAV 2012-2014 MAPPING LIMITS AS DEFINED BY THE N
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP
(APNEP) WITH SUPPORT FROM THE NC DIVISION OF MARINE
FISHERIES (NC-DMF) AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) BEAUFORT LABORATORY.
MATCHLINE A

MATCHLINE A
MATCHLINE SHEET 4
LEGEND
-- LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
------- APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
---- CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
SEAGRASS AREA
MATCHLINE SHEET 2
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
4. SAV 2012-2014 MAPPING LIMITS AS DEFINED BY THE N
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP
(APNEP) WITH SUPPORT FROM THE NC DIVISION OF MARINE
FISHERIES (NC-DMF) AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) BEAUFORT LABORATORY.
MATCHLINE A

MATCHLINE A
MATCHLINE SHEET 5
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
-------
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
SEAGRASS AREA
MATCHLINE SHEET 3
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
4. SAV 2012-2014 MAPPING LIMITS AS DEFINED BY THE N
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP
(APNEP) WITH SUPPORT FROM THE NC DIVISION OF MARINE
FISHERIES (NC-DMF) AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) BEAUFORT LABORATORY.
LIMITS OF
SEAGRASS,TYP,
SEE NOTE 4
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH= -6 MLW +1
MATCHLINE A
BOGUE SOUND
APPROX LIMITS OF
DREDGING, TYP
_10
� -11
\ -12
� -13
\ _ -14
\ OLD FERRY CHANNEL

MATCHLINE A
MATCHLINE SHEET 6
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
-------
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
SEAGRASS AREA
MATCHLINE SHEET 4
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
4. SAV 2012-2014 MAPPING LIMITS AS DEFINED BY THE N
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP
(APNEP) WITH SUPPORT FROM THE NC DIVISION OF MARINE
FISHERIES (NC-DMF) AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) BEAUFORT LABORATORY.
MATCHLINE A

0
oo
MATCHLINE A
\ LIMITS
%co, \ \ SEAGRASS,TYP,
� \ \ SEE NOTE 4 —
co
� I
NOTE:
DREDGE D�TH= —6 MLW +1
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
— — — — — — —
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
SEAGRASS AREA
NNEL
BOGUE SOUND
o \ \
cr
k \
o \
rn
MATCHLINE SHEET 5
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
4. SAV 2012-2014 MAPPING LIMITS AS DEFINED BY THE N
ALBEMARLE—PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP
(APNEP) WITH SUPPORT FROM THE NC DIVISION OF MARINE
FISHERIES (NC—DMF) AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) BEAUFORT LABORATORY.
c
�'
MATCHLINE SHEET 7
co
O \
k �
LIMITS OF
SEAGRASS,TYP,
SEE NOTE 4 —
GUE SOUND
\ \ \ OLD FERRY CHANNEL
ON
NOTE: \ \
DREDGE DEPTH= —6 MLW +1 r,
AL \ \.
MATCHLINE A

MATCHLINE A
MATCHLINE SHEET 8
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
-------
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
SEAGRASS AREA
MATCHLINE SHEET 6
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
4. SAV 2012-2014 MAPPING LIMITS AS DEFINED BY THE N
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP
(APNEP) WITH SUPPORT FROM THE NC DIVISION OF MARINE
FISHERIES (NC-DMF) AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) BEAUFORT LABORATORY.
MATCHLINE A
BOGUE SOUND
LIMITS OF
SEAGRASS,TYP,
SEE NOTE 4 -
OLD FERRY CHANNEL

MATCHLINE SHEET 10 MATCHLINE SHEET 9
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
-------
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
SEAGRASS AREA
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
4. SAV 2012-2014 MAPPING LIMITS AS DEFINED BY THE N
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP
(APNEP) WITH SUPPORT FROM THE NC DIVISION OF MARINE
FISHERIES (NC-DMF) AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) BEAUFORT LABORATORY.
MATCHLINE SHEET 7

NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH= -6 MLW +1
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
- - - - - - -
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
-----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
0
SEAGRASS AREA
N 346775.54
E 2586202.32
I
I
BOGUE SOUND
I
I
MATCHLINE SHEET 8
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
4. SAV 2012-2014 MAPPING LIMITS AS DEFINED BY THE N
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP
(APNEP) WITH SUPPORT FROM THE NC DIVISION OF MARINE
FISHERIES (NC-DMF) AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) BEAUFORT LABORATORY.

LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
--
------- APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
----- CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
\Q
Ld
:5 APPROX LIMITS OF
` DREDGING, TYP`\
\ �J
70x `
� \X r.
gO
\ �O
9x00 J x P
v �
DEER CREEK CONNECTOR
(69,x
BOGUE SOUND 00 ` \
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH= —5 MLW +1 ` \
MATCHLINE SHEET 9
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS. PURPOSE: DEER CREEK CARTERET COUNTY
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES. DREDGE PLAN
OLD FERRY CHANNEL o 6o i2o NAVIGATION PROJECT
N MAINTENANCE DREDGING
DATUM: MLW 1"=60' APPLICATION BY: MOFFATT & NICHOL
® REVISED: OCTOBER 2020
SHEET 10 OF 26 DATE: 2020
\Q
Ld
:5 APPROX LIMITS OF
` DREDGING, TYP`\
\ �J
70x `
� \X r.
gO
\ �O
9x00 J x P
v �
DEER CREEK CONNECTOR
(69,x
BOGUE SOUND 00 ` \
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH= —5 MLW +1 ` \
MATCHLINE SHEET 9
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS. PURPOSE: DEER CREEK CARTERET COUNTY
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES. DREDGE PLAN
OLD FERRY CHANNEL o 6o i2o NAVIGATION PROJECT
N MAINTENANCE DREDGING
DATUM: MLW 1"=60' APPLICATION BY: MOFFATT & NICHOL
® REVISED: OCTOBER 2020
SHEET 10 OF 26 DATE: 2020

LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
--
------- APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
----- CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
N 346900.18
E 2585064.20
�3
DEER CREEK CONNECTOR
W -
Z - �\
J CP _
O �
U 1 _ 13+00
_ x
:2 _ — 14+00 �O
0
w
_ — APPROX LIMITS OF `
_ 16+00 DREDGING, TYP
w
17+00 Q ��x z
�O J
1 B+00 u
Q
19+00 � :EN 346778.93 BOGUE SOUND
E 2584425.61
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH= —5 MLW +1
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS. PURPOSE: DEER CREEK CARTERET COUNTY
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES. DREDGE PLAN
OLD FERRY CHANNEL o so i2o NAVIGATION PROJECT
N MAINTENANCE DREDGING
DATUM: MLW 1"=60' APPLICATION BY: MOFFATT & NICHOL
® REVISED: OCTOBER 2020
SHEET 11 OF 26 DATE: 2020
N 346900.18
E 2585064.20
�3
DEER CREEK CONNECTOR
W -
Z - �\
J CP _
O �
U 1 _ 13+00
_ x
:2 _ — 14+00 �O
0
w
_ — APPROX LIMITS OF `
_ 16+00 DREDGING, TYP
w
17+00 Q ��x z
�O J
1 B+00 u
Q
19+00 � :EN 346778.93 BOGUE SOUND
E 2584425.61
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH= —5 MLW +1
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS. PURPOSE: DEER CREEK CARTERET COUNTY
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES. DREDGE PLAN
OLD FERRY CHANNEL o so i2o NAVIGATION PROJECT
N MAINTENANCE DREDGING
DATUM: MLW 1"=60' APPLICATION BY: MOFFATT & NICHOL
® REVISED: OCTOBER 2020
SHEET 11 OF 26 DATE: 2020

MATCHLINE SHEET 13
0
0
N
30' 0„
C
A,
0
0
APPROX LIMITS OF '
DREDGING, TYP
fq384
I
N .
E 2584176.88
EER CREEK MAIN
�NNEL (NORTH)
DEER CREEK
CONNECTOR
w
w
U)
Q
J
_
U
o
Q
�
=1
0
q DEER CREEK MAIN 121+00�����
CHANNEL(SOUTH)
v J 20+00 -
klie7QVAPip-cz
Q
� LIMITS OF
15'-0" !,W\ SEAGRASS,TYP,
SEE NOTE 4
i
N
NOTE:\_%OGUE SOUND \
DREDGE DEPTH= -5 MLW +1
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
-------
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
-----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
0
SEAGRASS AREA
MATCHLINE SHEET 17
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
4. SAV 2012-2014 MAPPING LIMITS AS DEFINED BY THE N
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP
(APNEP) WITH SUPPORT FROM THE NC DIVISION OF MARINE
FISHERIES (NC-DMF) AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) BEAUFORT LABORATORY.

r
klir
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH MAIN CHANNEL (NORTH) STA 3+00-5+00 = -5 MLW +1
DREDGE DEPTH MAIN CHANNEL (NORTH) STA 6+00-END= -4 MLW + 0.5
DREDGE DEPTH SCHOOL HOUSE/ROCKY RUN CREEK= -4 MLW + 0.5
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
-------
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
-----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
MATCHLINE SHEET 14
� DEER CREEK MAIN 11
4
CHANNEL (NORTH)
N 347487.71 p /
E 2584000.67
N
SCHOOL
HOUSE/ROCKY
RUN CREEK
1
N 347411.83 1
E 2583855.70 1
1
0
1
0 v
xN
00
-IO
APPROX LIMITS OF
DREDGING, TYP
m
N 347315.36
E 2583970.48
N 347283.22
E 2584008.87
k0 �
O
� DEER CREEK MAIN
CHANNEL (NORTH)
�G
N 347122.90
E 2584128.44
00 1
MATCHLINE SHEET 12

r
w
w
cn
w
z
J
U
Q
14+00
N 347927.50
E 2583503.06
V
I
13+00
APPRO MI S OF
DREDGING, TYP
I N 347888.33
a' E 2583699.19
+
I
w
r DEER CREEK MAIN
CHANNEL (NORTH)
o�0
D V--A-J p
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH MAIN CHANNEL (NORTH)
STA 3+00-5+00 = -5 MLW +1 1O
00
DREDGE DEPTH MAIN CHANNEL (NORTH)
STA 6+00-END= -4 MLW + 0.5
DREDGE DEPTH SCHOOL HOUSE/ROCKY RUN CREEK= -4
MLW + 0.5
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
- - - - - - -
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
N 347663.44
E 2583692.32
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
O
O
O
4 w
XHOUSE/ROCKY
RUN CREEK —
N 347689.75
4099.70
n
O �
� o
MATCHLINE SHEET 13
MATCHLINE SHEET 22
II
1
I II I
I I I
o I
of I+I
� II
1
I i
N 347887.31
E 2584143.81
`• •
JD
APPROX LIMITS OF
DREDGING, TYP _

vt
N 347872.03
E 2582809.77
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH= -4 MLW + 0.5
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
- — — — — — -
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
L
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
E 2582879.92
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
V. \ppp
Av�L� �•_ ADDOnV I IAAITQ nC'
N 348122.47
E 2583309.12

N 348106.95
E 2582591.66
0
DEER CREEK MAIN
27+00
CHANNEL (NORTH)
26+50
-I
Ln
N 348099.54 —
�` w
_
E 2582485.18
o w
APPROX LIMITS OF
w
DREDGING, TYP
z
o
�
U
Q
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH- -4 MLW + 0.5
LEGEND
NOTES:
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS. PURPOSE: DEER CREEK CARTERET COUNTY
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES. DREDGE PLAN
OLD FERRY CHANNEL o 60 �2o NAVIGATION PROJECT
N MAINTENANCE DREDGING
DATUM: MLW 1"=60' APPLICATION BY: MOFFATT & NICHOL
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
® REVISED: OCTOBER 2020
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
SHEET 16 OF 26 DATE: 2020
--
------- APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
----- CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP

APPROX LIMITS OF
DREDGING, TYP
q DEER CREEK
SPLIT (WEST)
N
IMP
-0 ■
- '
:2 1 dft \- N 346353.54
I &�,E 2583854.96
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH SPLIT (WEST)= -4 MLW + 0.5
DREDGE DEPTH MAIN CHANNEL (SOUTH)= -5 MLW+ 1
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
- - - - - - -
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
-----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
0
SEAGRASS AREA
MATCHLINE SHEET 12
i 1
�4 I ,4
1
IN346527.39
E 2584158.74
I
rY
x BOGUE SOUND
00
/.
XOt�• � � LIMITS OF
SEAGRASS,TYP,
SEE NOTE 4
q DEER CREEK MAIN
CHANNEL (SOUTH)
APPROX LIMITS OF \ 00
DREDGING, TYP _
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
4. SAV 2012-2014 MAPPING LIMITS AS DEFINED BY THE N
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP
(APNEP) WITH SUPPORT FROM THE NC DIVISION OF MARINE
FISHERIES (NC-DMF) AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) BEAUFORT LABORATORY.
ME

LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
-------
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
-----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
0
SEAGRASS AREA
MATCHLINE SHEET 17
MATCHLINE A
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
4. SAV 2012-2014 MAPPING LIMITS AS DEFINED BY THE N
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP
(APNEP) WITH SUPPORT FROM THE NC DIVISION OF MARINE
FISHERIES (NC-DMF) AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) BEAUFORT LABORATORY.
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH= -5 MLW+ 1
MATCHLINE A
APPROX LIMITS OF
DREDGING, TYP
F
MATCHLINE SHEET 19
LIMITS OF
SEAGRASS,TYP,
SEE NOTE 4
BOGUE SOUND
� DEER CREEK MAIN
CHANNEL (SOUTH)

MATCHLINE SHEET 18
MATCHLINE A
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
-------
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
-
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
SEAGRASS AREA
LIMITS OF
SEAGRASS,TYP,
"I �.. - A
MATCHLINE A
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
4. SAV 2012-2014 MAPPING LIMITS AS DEFINED BY THE
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP
(APNEP) WITH SUPPORT FROM THE INC DIVISION OF MARINE
FISHERIES (NC-DMF) AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) BEAUFORT LABORATORY.
lei
BOGUE SOUND
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH= -5 MLW+ 1

■
IN
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
- - - - - - -
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
-----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
0
SEAGRASS AREA
%IN
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
4. SAV 2012-2014 MAPPING LIMITS AS DEFINED BY THE N
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP
(APNEP) WITH SUPPORT FROM THE NC DIVISION OF MARINE
FISHERIES (NC-DMF) AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) BEAUFORT LABORATORY.
32}pp
31 +p0
BOGUE SOUND
APPROX LIMITS OF
DREDGING, TYP ---\
v
LIMITS OF
SEAGRASS,TYP
SEE NOTE 4
W"

40�0
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH= -5 MLW+ 1
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
-------
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
-----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
0
SEAGRASS AREA
3
R,
J(
BOGUE SOUND
CD
N
w
w
Cn
w
z
J
C)
Q
7
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
4. SAV 2012-2014 MAPPING LIMITS AS DEFINED BY THE N
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO NATIONAL ESTUARY PARTNERSHIP
(APNEP) WITH SUPPORT FROM THE NC DIVISION OF MARINE
FISHERIES (NC-DMF) AND THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND
ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) BEAUFORT LABORATORY.

MATCHLINE A
� SCHOOL
HOUSE/ROCKY
RUN CREEK
o/
r
I 1
1 I
I N 348265.13
I I1 E 2584198.22
1
I I
1 I I
I
0I I 1
+ i
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
-------
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
-----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
MATCHLINE SHEET 14
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
CQx O. � \
7\ .
X001,
\
.
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH= -4 MLW+ 0.
348837.27
E 2584321.04
7 \
6 I
x00
I
I —
I
-5
I
0 20'-0"
0
+ I
I I�I
I I
I
i
I
I I I
01 I N 348537.29
+ I E 2584324.43
MATCHLINE A

ot N 349076.15
pw* E 2584000.20
CL SCHOOL
HOUSE/ROCKY
RUN CREEK
N 348994.17
E 2583817.78
APPROX LIMITS OF
DREDGING, TYP
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH= -4 MLW+ 0.5
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
-------
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
-----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
\\
9 �\
7
X 0
O

N 346243.38
E 2583127.35
NOTE:
DREDGE DEPTH= -4 MLW+ 0.5
LEGEND
LIMITS OF CHANNEL BASE
--
-------
APPROXIMATE DREDGING LIMITS
----
CHANNEL CENTERLINE, TYP
L
DREDGE AREA (BASE)
DREDGE AREA (SIDE SLOPE)
APPROX LIMITS OF
DREDGING, TYP
N 346291.93
E 2583214.78
' 1N-k
NOTES:
1. 1' CONTOURS REFERENCE MLW.
2. SEE SHEET 25 FOR SECTION VIEWS.
3. SEES SHEET 26 FOR VOLUME TABLES.
t
N 346337.04
E 2583409.62
8+00
a
DEER CREEK
%4�S
SPLIT (WEST) N 346377.57
E 2583681.62
o -
6+pp
_ _ I +oo
0
5+00
f
1m:

VARIES
CHANNEL
25'-0" I 25-0"
TYP I
EDGE OF
APPROX EXIST. 10, CHANNEL, TYP
GRADE, EL VARIES
DESIGN DREDGE EL -6.0 MLW 7
(1.0' ALLOWABLE OVERDREDGE)
SECTION A -A
VARIES
APPROX EXIST. TYP
GRADE, EL
VARIES
N TS
� CHANNEL
15'- 0" t 15'- 0"
DESIGN DREDGE EL -6.0 MLW _/
(1.0' ALLOWABLE OVERDREDGE)
SECTION B-B
N TS
q CHANNEL
VARIES 15'-0" 1 15'-0"
APPROX EXIST. i Tr
GRADE, EL
VARIES
I
EDGE OF CHANNEL,
TYP
EDGE OF CHANNEL,
TYP
3\\ //3'•1
DESIGN DREDGE EL -5.0 MLW
(1.0' ALLOWABLE OVERDREDGE)
SECTION C-C
N TS
VARIES 10'-0"
TYP
APPROX EXIST.
GRADE, EL VARIES � - -
DESIGN DREDGE EL -4.0 MLW
(0.5' ALLOWABLE OVERDREDGE)
VARIES
TYP
CHANNEL
10'-0" EDGE OF
CHANNEL, TYP
SECTION D-D
N TS
CHANNEL
15-0" VARIES
APPROX EXIST.
GRADE, EL VARIES
DESIGN DREDGE EL -5.0 MLW
(1.0' ALLOWABLE OVERDREDGE)
VARIES
TYP
EDGE OF
CHANNEL, TYP
SECTION E-E
N TS
25'-0"
APPROX EXIST.
GRADE, EL VARIES
I
\
DESIGN DREDGE:E7.0 MLW
(1.0' ALLOWABLDREDGE)
SECTION F-F
N TS
CHANNEL
VARIES EDGE OF
CHANNEL, TYP

OLD FERRY CHANNEL
CHANNEL WIDTHS= 30' (0+00-1+85 &
65+00-END) AND 50' (3+85-63+00)
DESIGN DREDGE= -6 MLW +1
STATION
DREDGE
DENSITY
(CY/FT)
CUMULATIVE DREDGE
VOLUME (CY)
0+00.00
6.2
0
1+00.00
4.8
550
2+00.00
3.7
973
3+00.00
3.5
1330
16+00.00
1.1
1559
17+00.00
3.6
1792
18+00.00
4.8
2213
19+00.00
4.0
2656
20+00.00
3.4
3031
21+00.00
6.0
3502
22+00.00
8.3
4214
27+00.00
4.1
4834
33+00.00
4.4
5259
34+00.00
11.2
6040
35+00.00
12.9
7246
36+00.00
7.0
8240
37+00.00
0.5
8615
38+00.00
0.3
8654
46+00.00
0.0
8670
47+00.00
0.1
8674
48+00.00
0.0
8678
49+00.00
0.3
8695
50+00.00
0.8
8748
51+00.00
0.8
8826
65+00.00
0.5
8889
66+00.00
3.5
9085
67+00.00
5.3
9523
67+27.78
5.6
9675
DEER CREEK SPLIT (WEST)
CHANNEL WIDTH= 20'
DESIGN DEPTH= -4 MLW +0.5
STATION
DREDGE
DENSITY
(C Y/FT)
CUMULATIVE DREDGE
VOLUME (CY)
1+00.00
1.4
315
2+00.00
2.0
487
3+00.00
1.6
669
4+00.00
1.9
845
5+00.00
1.3
1004
6+00.00
1.7
1153
7+00.00
1.7
1323
8+00.00
1.3
1475
9+00.00
2.1
1646
10+00.00
2.0
1854
11+00.00
3.6
2131
DEER CREEK CONNECTOR
CHANNEL WIDTH= 50'
DESIGN DEPTH= -5 MLW +-1
STATION
DREDGE
DENSITY
(CY/FT)
CUMULATIVE
DREDGE VOLUME
(CY)
1+00.00
0.01
0.2
2+00.00
1.4
68
3+00.00
1.6
214
4+00.00
4.3
509
5+00.00
3.2
904
6+00.00
4.6
1296
7+00.00
5.0
1776
8+00.00
5.7
2313
9+00.00
6.3
2914
10+00.00
7.2
3587
11+00.00
7.2
4304
12+00.00
5.8
4953
13+00.00
5.4
5505
14+00.00
5.6
6057
15+00.00
5.1
6593
16+00.00
5.7
7131
17+00.00
5.8
7705
18+00.00
6.4
8313
19+00.00
8.1
9039
20+00.00
7.5
9832
21+00.00
3.3
10372
SCHOOL HOUSE/ROCKY RUN CREEK
CHANNEL WIDTH= 20'
DESIGN DEPTH= -4 MLW +0.5
STATION
DREDGE
DENSITY
(CY/FT)
CUMULATIVE DREDGE
VOLUME (CY)
0+00.00
2.5
0
1+00.00
0.9
167
2+00.00
1.2
267
3+00.00
1.0
373
4+00.00
0.7
455
5+00.00
0.1
495
6+00.00
0.2
509
21 +00.00
1.3
581
22+00.00
1.3
689
NOTE:
THE VOLUME AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN MAY
REDUCE BASED ON POTENTIAL SAV HABITAT. NO
DREDGING SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10-FT OF ANY
IDENTIFIED SAV HABITAT.
DEER CREEK MAIN CHANNEL (NORTH)
CHANNEL WIDTHS= 30' (0+00-5+00) AND
20' (6+00-END)
DESIGN DEPTHS= -5 MLW +1 (0+00-5+00) AND
-4 MLW +0.5 (6+00-END)
STATION
DREDGE
DENSITY
(CY/FT)
CUMULATIVE DREDGE
VOLUME (CY)
0+00.00
0.5
0
1+00.00
2.7
162
2+00.00
2.9
443
3+00.00
3.3
753
4+00.00
3.2
1082
5+00.00
2.4
1362
6+00.00
0.7
1512
7+00.00
0.6
1573
8+00.00
0.7
1637
9+00.00
0.6
1702
10+00.00
0.6
1760
11+00.00
0.4
1806
12+00.00
0.5
1847
13+00.00
1.0
1917
14+00.00
1.3
2030
15+00.00
1.4
2165
16+00.00
2.2
2344
17+00.00
1.6
2535
18+00.00
1.4
2680
19+00.00
2.1
2860
20+00.00
2.4
3077
21+00.00
2.3
3316
22+00.00
1.6
3513
23+00.00
2.6
3719
24+00.00
3.6
4022
25+00.00
3.5
4375
26+00.00
4.4
4769
26+50.00
4.2
4984
DEER CREEK MAIN CHANNEL (SOUTH)
CHANNEL WIDTHS= 30' (0+00-3+00) AND
50' (3+00-END)
DESIGN DEPTH= -5 MLW +1
STATION
DREDGE
DENSITY
(CY/FT)
CUMULATIVE DREDGE
VOLUME (CY)
0+00.00
0.9
0
1+00.00
1.8
133
2+00.00
1.6
301
3+00.00
3.7
567
4+00.00
3.9
931
5+00.00
5.7
1413
6+00.00
5.9
1996
7+00.00
6.7
2628
8+00.00
6.2
3270
9+00.00
2.5
3695
10+00.00
2.6
3947
11+00.00
3.5
4253
12+00.00
3.2
4590
16+00.00
0.05
4752
17+00.00
1.3
4817
18+00.00
1.6
4961
19+00.00
0.3
5058
20+00.00
1.6
5155
21+00.00
5.9
5529
22+00.00
6.8
6163
23+00.00
5.7
6787
24+00.00
5.5
7348
25+00.00
3.1
7786
26+00.00
2.2
8051
27+00.00
5.1
8417
28+00.00
4.9
8917
29+00.00
5.0
9413
30+00.00
4.3
9881
31+00.00
3.2
10,257
32+00.00
2.7
10,553
33+00.00
1.4
10,759
34+00.00
0.5
10,851
35+00.00
0.2
10,882

hdhIq Deer Creek and Schoolhouse Creek Shellfish Survey
Figure
Dredge Area Overview
moffatt & nichol

1
C�-O' co:h
A.
5h��h� y �C•.�.
Oy . • �• 5b
Psv :8
p6O 66,E
O 6• �' • Off. --
Q••
s'o f• ,NN
5500�°� ••;6QA,9
Elk. • OQAjo
ps; G • Ou'7
6 _•�n_rJ,
4
t
200
i
ow
400
� Feet

IN
• Ali
I vi�v 4�,s
••. Flo'V
,r
Dredge Limits
Oyster Counts ' • ,
• 0 Oysters ,4
• 1Oyster -
• 2-5 Oysters
• 6-13 Oysters
• 14-20 Oysters
20+ Oysters
00
high, Deer Creek and Schoolhouse Creek Shellfish Survey
Figure
Oyster Count
moffatt & nichol
3

10153
School House Creek Deer Creek
Shellfish Survey Results
Overall Site
# of Oyster
433
Area Sampled (m)
289
Oyster Density (Oyster perm2)
1.5
Oyster Density (Oyster per Acre)
6063
Oyster Density (Bushel per Acre)
20
Oyster per Bushell
300
Dredge Footprint
# of Oyster
10
Area Sampled (m)
68
Oyster Density (Oyster per m2)
0•1
Oyster Density (Oyster per Acre)
595
Oyster Density (Bushel per Acre)
2
Oyster per Bushel
300

10153
School House Creek Deer Creek
Shellfish Survey
Data Sheet
Date
Time
Transect
Depth
Oyster
No. Oyster
Clam
No. Clams
Sediment
9/3/2020
SO-1
2'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
SO-2
24""
3 oysters @ 4""
3
0
Muck
9/3/2020
SO-3
48""
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
SO-4
4.5'
0
0
Muck, Shell
9/3/2020
SO-5
5'
0
2 clams @ 2", shell
2
Shell
9/3/2020
4:54
SO-6
5.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
SO-7
5.5'
0
0
9/3/2020
SO-8
5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
SO-9
5.5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
SO-10
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
SO-11
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
SO-12
6'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
SO-13
6'
1 oyster @ 3""
1
0
Muck
9/3/2020
SO-14
5.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
SO-15
4.5'
0
0
9/3/2020
SO-16
3'
1 oyster @ 2""
1
0
9/3/2020
SO-17
3'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
SO-18
3.5'
0
0
9/3/2020
SO-19
2.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
5:08
SO-20
4'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
SO-21
4.5'
0
0
9/3/2020
SO-22
4'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
SO-23
3'
0
1 clam @ 1"
1
9/3/2020
SO-24
2.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
SO-25
18""
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
SO-26
18""
2 oysters @ 1.5""
2
0
Muck
9/3/2020
SO-27
18""
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
SO-28
18""
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
1:25
51-1
4'
2 oysters @ 2""
2
0
9/3/2020
S1-2
4.5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
S1-3
5.5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
S1-4
6'
0
0
9/3/2020
4:38
51-5
6'
0
0
9/3/2020
4:37
51-6
6'
0
0
9/3/2020
4:35
51-7
5.5'
0
0
9/3/2020
4:34
S1-8
4011"
0
0
9/3/2020
4:33
S1-9
3'
2 oysters @ 3""
2
0
9/3/2020
4:32
S1-10
30""
3 oysters @ 3""
3
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
4:31
51-11
30""
2 oysters @ 4""
2
0
muck
9/3/2020
4:29
51-12
30""
4 oysters @ 2""
4
0
9/3/2020
4:28
51-13
30""
1 oyster @ 3""
1
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
4:27
51-14
32""
1 oyster @ 3""
1
0
Muck
9/3/2020
4:26
S1-15
2411"
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
4:24
S1-16
2411"
0
0
shell
9/3/2020
4:22
S1-17
30""
5 oysters @ 3""
5
1 clam @ 3"
1
shell
9/3/2020
4:21
S1-18
3011"
0
0
Dead Shell
Notes: Transects labled by Transect - Sample.
S - references samples in School House Creek
D - References samples in Deer Creek.

10153
School House Creek Deer Creek
Shellfish Survey
Data Sheet
Date
Time
Transect
Depth
Oyster
No. Oyster
Clam
No. Clams
Sediment
9/3/2020
4:19
51-19
3011"
0
0
Muck, Shell
9/3/2020
4:18
S1-20
2'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
1:20
52-1
3'
8 oysters @ 2""
8
0
O point taken, middle of do(
9/3/2020
1:23
52-2
4'
2 oysters @ 3.5""
2
0
9/3/2020
52-3
5.5'
3 oysters @ 4""
3
1 clam @ 2"
1
9/3/2020
52-4
6'
0
0
9/3/2020
52-5
4'
0
0
9/3/2020
52-6
4'
0
0
9/3/2020
52-7
3'
0
0
Dead Shell, no point taken
9/3/2020
4:12
52-8
3'
0
0
9/3/2020
4:12
52-9
3'
1 oyster @ 1.5""
1
0
Muck
9/3/2020
4:13
52-10
3'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
4:13
S2-11
3011"
1 oyster @ 2.5""
1
0
Muck
9/3/2020
4:14
S2-12
3011"
1 oyster @ 2.5""
1
0
Muck
9/3/2020
4:14
52-13
3011"
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
4:15
52-14
24""
0
0
9/3/2020
4:15
52-15
361-"
0
1 clam @ 2"
1
9/3/2020
4:16
52-16
3011"
0
0
9/3/2020
4:17
S2-17
1811"
1 oyster @ 3""
1
0
9/3/2020
1:14
S3-1
3011"
9 oysters @ 2""
9
0
Dead shell
9/3/2020
1:17
53-2
3011"
3 oysters @ 2.5""
3
0
9/3/2020
1:18
53-3
5411"
4 oysters @ 2""
4
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
53-4
0
0
9/3/2020
53-5
6'
0
0
9/3/2020
3:48
53-6
5.5'
0
0
9/3/2020
S3-7
4'
0
0
9/3/2020
S3-8
3011"
3 oysters @ 3""
3
0
9/3/2020
53-9
3011"
1 oyster @ 3""
1
0
Muck
9/3/2020
53-10
3'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
53-11
4'
4 oysters @ 3""
4
0
9/3/2020
3:35
53-12
3'
0
0
9/3/2020
1:10
54-1
4'
1 oyster @ 3.5""
1
0
sandy bottom
9/3/2020
1:12
S4-2
4'
0
0
Dead shell
9/3/2020
2:59
54-3
5'
1 oyster @ 3""
1
0
Muck
9/3/2020
3:02
54-4
5.5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
3:05
54-5
5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
3:08
54-6
5'
6 oysters @ 2"" to 5""
6
0
Muck
9/3/2020
3:11
54-7
5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
3:28
S4-8
4'
1 oyster @ 4""
1
0
Muck
9/3/2020
3:29
S4-9
3'
2 oysters @ 3""
2
0
Muck
9/3/2020
3:30
54-10
3'
3 oysters @ 3""
3
0
Muck
9/3/2020
3:31
54-11
4'
0
0
9/3/2020
3:32
54-12
4'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
3:33
54-13
4'
2 oysters @ 3""
2
0
Notes: Transects labled by Transect - Sample.
S - references samples in School House Creek
D - References samples in Deer Creek.

10153
School House Creek Deer Creek
Shellfish Survey
Data Sheet
Date
Time
Transect
Depth
Oyster
No. Oyster
Clam
No. Clams
Sediment
9/3/2020
1:00
S5-1
18""
3 oysters @ 1.5""
3
0
NO DATA, expected muck
9/3/2020
1:02
S5-2
30""
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
1:04
S5-3
4'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
2:56
S5-4
5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
2:53
S5-5
0
0
9/3/2020
2:47
S5-6
7'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
2:45
S5-7
6'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
2:43
S5-8
5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
2:41
S5-9
5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
2:39
S5-10
4.5'
1 oyster @ 3""
1
0
Muck
9/3/2020
12:53
S6-1
3011II
6 oysters @ 2"
6
0
9/3/2020
12:54
S6-2
3'
0
0
Dead shell
9/3/2020
12:56
S6-3
40""
0
0
Dead shell
9/3/2020
12:58
S6-4
5'
0
0
Dead shell
9/3/2020
2:21
S6-5
65""
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
2:23
S6-6
6'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
2:25
S6-7
6.5'
0
0
9/3/2020
2:27
S6-8
7'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
2:29
S6-9
5.5'
0
0
9/3/2020
2:33
S6-10
5.5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
2:35
S6-11
5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
2:37
S6-12
5.5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
12:21
S7-1
2'
7 oysters @ 2.5"
7
0
9/3/2020
12:23
S7-2
2'
5 oysters @ 2.5"
5
0
9/3/2020
12:25
S7-3
5'
4 oysters @ 3.5""
4
0
9/3/2020
2:19
S7-4
7'
5 oysters @ 4.5""
5
1 clam @ 2"
1
9/3/2020
2:17
S7-5
0
1 clam @ 2"
1
9/3/2020
2:12
S7-6
6'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
2:10
S7-7
1 oyster @ 2"
1
0
Muck
9/3/2020
2:08
S7-8
301111
0
0
9/3/2020
12:29
S8-1
30""
4 oysters @ 3""
4
0
9/3/2020
12:30
S8-2
4'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
12:31
S8-3
5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
1:45
S8-4
6.5'
2 oysters @ 3""
2
0
point taken, too deep for G
9/3/2020
2:00
S8-5
6.5'
0
0
muck and dead shell
9/3/2020
2:02
S8-6
5'
2 oysters @ 3""
2
0
Muck
9/3/2020
2:04
S8-7
3'
1 oyster @ 1""
1
0
Muck
9/3/2020
2:06
S8-8
30""
6 oysters @ 2""
6
0
Muck
9/3/2020
12:34
S9-1
40""
1 oyster @ 3""
1
0
9/3/2020
12:36
S9-2
5'
0
0
Dead Shells
9/4/2020
12:50
S9-3
8'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
1:44
S9-4
8'
0
0
Notes: Transects labled by Transect - Sample.
S - references samples in School House Creek
D - References samples in Deer Creek.

10153
School House Creek Deer Creek
Shellfish Survey
Data Sheet
Date
Time
Transect
Depth
Oyster
No. Oyster
Clam
No. Clams
Sediment
9/3/2020
1:40
59-5
7'
0
0
9/3/2020
1:38
59-6
6'
0
0
9/3/2020
1:35
59-7
5'
2 oysters @ 3.5""
2
0
9/3/2020
12:39
S10-1
4'
1 oyster @ 1.5""
1
0
9/3/2020
12:41
S10-2
4'
1 oyster @ 5""
1
1 clam @ 3.5"
1
9/4/2020
12:53
510-3
8'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
12:53
510-4
8'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
12:54
510-5
8.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
12:56
510-6
9'
0
1 clam @ 1"
1
9/4/2020
12:58
S10-7
6.5'
0
0
sand
9/4/2020
1:32
S10-8
5'
6 oysters @ 3""
6
0
Muck
9/4/2020
1:36
510-9
12""
5 oysters @ 2""
5
0
Muck
9/4/2020
12:48
DI-1
12""
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
12:47
D 1-2
3'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
12:46
D1-3
4.5'
0
0
Dead shell and Muck
9/4/2020
12:45
D1-4
5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
12:44
D1-5
6.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
12:43
D 1-6
7'
0
0
9/4/2020
12:42
D1-7
6.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
12:40
D 1-8
6.5'
0
0
9/4/2020
12:35
D1-9
6'
0
0
sand
9/4/2020
12:33
D1-10
3.5'
0
0
Dead shell and sand
9/4/2020
12:29
D 1-11
3'
0
0
9/4/2020
12:28
D1-12
3'
S oysters @ 3""
5
0
9/4/2020
12:27
D1-13
2.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
12:25
D1-14
2'
7 oysters @ 2""
7
0
9/4/2020
12:24
D 1-15
1811"
0
0
9/4/2020
12:21
D 1-16
121111
0
0
9/4/2020
11:50
D2-1
18""
0
0
9/4/2020
11:56
D2-2
3'
1 oyster @ 1""
1
2 clams @ 1"
2
9/4/2020
11:59
D2-3
4.5'
0
0
9/4/2020
12:00
D2-4
6'
0
0
9/4/2020
12:01
D2-5
6.5'
0
0
9/4/2020
12:02
D2-6
7'
0
0
9/4/2020
12:09
D2-7
6.5'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
12:10
D2-8
5'
2 oysters @ 2""
2
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
12:12
D2-9
4.5'
1 oyster @ 2""
1
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
12:13
D2-10
3'
1 oyster @ 2""
1
0
Muck
9/4/2020
12:14
D2-11
3'
2 oysters @ 2""
2
0
Muck
9/4/2020
12:15
D2-12
3'
4 oysters @ 2""
4
0
Muck
9/4/2020
12:16
D2-13
3'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
12:18
D2-14
3'
1 oyster @ 2""
1
0
9/4/2020
12:20
D2-15
12""
35 oysters @ 2""
35
0
Notes: Transects labled by Transect - Sample.
S - references samples in School House Creek
D - References samples in Deer Creek.

10153
School House Creek Deer Creek
Shellfish Survey
Data Sheet
Date
Time
Transect
Depth
Oyster
No. Oyster
Clam
No. Clams
Sediment
9/3/2020
5:48
D3-1
2'
1 oyster @ 2""
1
0
Muck
9/3/2020
5:47
D3-2
2'
1 oyster @ 2""
1
0
Muck
9/3/2020
5:47
D3-3
3'
1 oyster @ 2.5""
1
0
Muck
9/3/2020
5:46
D3-4
3'
4 oysters @ 3""
4
0
Muck
9/3/2020
5:45
D3-5
5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
5:44
D3-6
5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
5:43
D3-7
5'
0
0
9/3/2020
5:41
D3-8
5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
5:40
D3-9
4'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
5:39
D3-10
3.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
5:34
D3-11
3.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
5:33
D3-12
3'
1 oyster @ 1""
1
0
9/3/2020
5:31
D3-13
30""
0
0
9/3/2020
5:20
D3-14
18""
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
D3-15
5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
D3-16
2'
0
0
9/3/2020
D3-17
2'
1 oyster @ 1.5""
1
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
D3-18
2'
1 oyster @ 1""
1
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
5:48
D4-1
2'
6 oysters @ 2""
6
0
Muck
9/3/2020
5:49
D4-2
2.5'
1 oyster @ 3""
1
0
9/3/2020
5:52
D4-3
3'
0
0
9/3/2020
5:53
D4-4
4'
0
0
9/3/2020
5:55
D4-5
5'
0
0
9/3/2020
6:02
D4-6
5'
0
0
9/3/2020
6:03
D4-7
5'
0
0
9/3/2020
6:04
D4-8
5'
1 oyster @ 1""
1
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
6:05
D4-9
4'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
6:07
D4-10
3.5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
6:08
D4-11
3.5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
6:08
D4-12
3.5'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
6:09
D4-13
3.5'
0
0
9/3/2020
6:10
D4-14
3'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
6:11
D4-15
3'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
6:12
D4-16
3'
1 oyster @ 2""
1
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
6:13
D4-17
3'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/3/2020
6:14
D4-18
3'
2 oysters @ 2""
2
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
11:48
D5-1
18""
2 oysters @ 2""
2
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:47
D5-2
3'
S oysters @ 2""
5
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:46
D5-3
3'
2 oysters @ 2""
2
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:45
D5-4
3.5'
2 oysters @ 2""
2
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:45
D5-5
4'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:44
D5-6
5'
1 oyster @ 2""
1
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:41
D5-7
5.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
11:39
D5-8
6'
0
0
9/4/2020
11:36
D5-9
6.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
Notes: Transects labled by Transect - Sample.
S - references samples in School House Creek
D - References samples in Deer Creek.

10153
School House Creek Deer Creek
Shellfish Survey
Data Sheet
Date
Time
Transect
Depth
Oyster
No. Oyster
Clam
No. Clams
Sediment
9/4/2020
11:34
D5-10
6.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
11:33
D5-11
6.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
11:26
D5-12
6'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:25
D5-13
5'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:23
D5-14
4.5'
1 oyster @ 1""
1
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:23
D5-15
4.5'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:21
D5-16
4'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:20
D5-17
3.5'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:00
D6-1
2'
3 oysters @ 1""
3
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
11:00
D6-2
3.5'
1 oyster @ 2""
1
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:03
D6-3
4'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:04
D6-4
5'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:06
D6-5
5.5'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:08
D6-6
5.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
11:10
D6-7
5.5'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
11:15
D6-8
5.5'
0
0
9/4/2020
11:16
D6-9
6'
0
0
shell
9/4/2020
11:17
D6-10
6'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
11:19
D6-11
5.5'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
10:56
D7-1
3'
0
0
9/4/2020
10:54
D7-2
4.5'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
10:53
D7-3
5'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
10:52
D7-4
6'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
10:51
D7-5
6'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
10:51
D7-6
6'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
10:50
D7-7
4'
0
0
Muck
9/3/2020
1:27
D7-8
4.5'
S oysters @ 2' to 3""
5
0
9/4/2020
10:30
D8-1
30""
1 oyster @ 3""
1
0
Muck
9/4/2020
10:34
D8-2
2.5'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
10:36
D8-3
4'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
10:39
D8-4
4.5'
0
0
9/4/2020
10:40
D8-5
5'
0
0
9/4/2020
10:42
D8-6
5'
0
0
9/4/2020
10:43
D8-7
6'
0
0
9/4/2020
10:46
D8-8
6'
0
0
Dead Shell
9/4/2020
10:48
D8-9
6'
0
0
Muck
9/4/2020
10:49
D8-10
4'
1 oyster @ 2""
1
0
Muck
9/4/2020
10:50
D8-11
811"
20 oysters @ 2""
20
0
Muck
9/3/2020
1:29
D8-12
30""
1 oyster @ 3""
1
0
9/4/2020
10:29
D9-1
12""
8 oysters @ 2""
8
0
Muck
9/4/2020
10:29
D9-2
4'
13 oysters @ 2""
13
0
Muck
9/4/2020
10:28
D9-3
4.5'
1 oyster @ 2""
1
0
muck, shells
9/4/2020
10:27
D9-4
5'
12 oysters @ 2""
12
0
Notes: Transects labled by Transect - Sample.
S - references samples in School House Creek
D - References samples in Deer Creek.

10153
School House Creek Deer Creek
Shellfish Survey
Data Sheet
Date
Time
Transect
Depth
Oyster
No. Oyster
Clam
No. Clams
Sediment
9/4/2020
9:45
D9-5
5.5'
0
0
9/4/2020
9:45
D9-6
6'
0
0
dark sand
9/4/2020
9:44
D9-7
5'
0
0
organic debris
9/4/2020
9:42
D9-8
5'
0
0
muck
9/4/2020
9:41
D9-9
5'
0
0
muck
9/4/2020
9:40
D9-10
5.5'
1 oyster
1
0
sandy mud
9/4/2020
9:39
D9-11
3011II
2 oysters @ 2""
2
0
shell
9/3/2020
1:32
D9-12
3011II
2 oysters @ 2""
2
0
Notes: Transects labled by Transect - Sample.
S - references samples in School House Creek
D - References samples in Deer Creek.

CERTIFIED MAIL •RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ADJACENT RIPARIAN PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION/WAIVER FORM
Name of Property Owner: ¢ � _ WOPWtA7uN�
Address of Property: 6e� '#
(Lot or Street Street or Road, City & County) pO©mom Q�f�
Applicant phone#: o�.Sr.2--IG������� Mailing Address�,
Cape Carteret, NC 28584
I hereby certify that I own property adjacent to the above referenced property. The individual
applying for this permit has described to me as shown on the attached drawing the development
they are proposing. A description or drawing, with dimensions must be provided with this letter.
I have no objections to this proposal. I have objections to this proposal.
if you have objections to what is being proposed, you must notify the Division of Coastal Management
(DCMj in writing within 10 days of receipt of this notice. Contact information for DCM offices is
available at www.nccoastalmangement.net/contact dcm.htm or by calling 1-888-4RCOAST. No
response is considered the same as no objection if you have been notified by Certified Mail.
WAIVER SECTION
I understand that a pier, dock, mooring pilings, breakwater, boathouse, or lift must be set back a
minimum distance of 15' from my area of riparian access unless waived by me. (If you wish to
waive the setback, you must initial the appropriate blank below.)
V I do wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
I do not wish to waive the 15' setback requirement.
(Applicant Information)
Carteret County
c/o Gene Foxworth
Print or Type Name
302 Courthouse Sauare
Mailing Address
Beaufort. NC 28516
City/StatelZip
252-728-8485
Telephone Number
October 2.2020
(Riparian Property Owner Information)
�' ng
�i a e� L , /-�d.✓ �
Print or Type Name
Mailing Address
Cape Carteret NC 28584
City/State/Zip
Telephone Number
Date
fwavr d a� G,.t! c.
Date