NC0082899_Complete File - Historical_20171231

�y-
A. C. DEPT. OF -NATURAL
RESOURCES AND .
COMMU1tiITY AEVE1, ' "T
APR 1 9 1993
UIVISIIIIl OF ERVIR61t',i:,t ..VT
State of North Carolina dflHRESVIttE ALOMPltl ufrill
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Edvironmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Steven G. Billings, President
S2 Concepts, LTD. .
14647 Eastfield Road
Huntersville, NC 28078
Dear Mr. Billings:.
April 8, 1993
Subject: NPDES Permit No. NCO082899
First Division Sports Club
Cabarrus County
1. Reference is made to your NPDES permit application received on October 10, 1992. The
Division of Environmental Management (DEM) has previously requested additional information
by letter dated January 4, 1993 (copy attached). This additional information was needed in
order for the Water Quality Section to complete its permit review.
Because a response to our request has not been received, the Division of Environmental
Management is returning your application. A copy of your application has been submitted to our
Central Files for future reference.
Should you desire to reactivate your permit request, please .advise the Division of
Environmental Management in writing and resubmit a new complete application with the
appropriate application fees. Construction of wastewater discharge facilities without a permit
may be considered a violation of DEM Regulation 15 NCAC 2H .0101 and the North Carolina
General Statutes (GS 143-215.1).
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Randy Kepler at 919/733-5083.
Sincerely,
Coleen H. Sullins, Supervisor
Permits and Engineering, NPDES Unit
cc: MIZ097SITM9- un"Il Offtce
Technical Support Branch
Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA
David A Roberts, P.E.; 309 North Zion Street, Landis, NC 28088
Central Files
Regional Offices
Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/571-4700 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O.- Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Iu a n-TP7-. OF
.:s
VE
Dz-
JAIN 0 7 1993
�1G€3tGl; laiE�'4'IR"iaa7ErliRl �rnll:iGE�iEyj
t+°�'rRLSIr'SLLF REGIONAL OFFICE
State , of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
January 4, 1993
Steven G. Billings, President
S2 Concepts, LTD.
14647 Eastfield Road
Huntersville, NC 28078
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Acting Director
Subject: NPDES Permit Additional Info.
Permit number NCO082899
First Division Sports Club
Cabarrus County
Dear Mr. Billings:
On October 15, 1992, the Division of Environmental Management(DEM) received an
application from S2 Concepts requesting a NPDES permit numbered NC0082899. Due to concerns
with the impact of the discharge to Clarke Creek which is a wetlands area, DEM requests that S2
Concepts submit a more detailed analysis of the spray irrigation option for the groundwater for
our review. This analysis should include the amount of land needed for treatment, application
rates onto the required amount of land and a cost comparison with the discharge alternative. DEM
feels there are several possibilities for spray irrigation. They would be construction of spray
facilities of property that will not be used in the next 5 to 10 years. There is a possibility 2
municipal sewer collection system will be, available in 5 to 10 years and a connoctfon could be
made then. Second , additional property could be purchased for the spray irrigation system and in.
the 5 to 10 years when the sewer connection can be made the additional land could be sold or used
for expansion. Also consideration should be given to using the effluent for irrigation of the soccer
fields. For discussion of this possibility Kim Colson of the Mooresville Regional Office should be
contacted.
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

FFV
Mr. Billings
Page 2
Please have this information submitted within 45 days of receipt of this letter. If the
requested information is not submitted the package will be returned to you and may be
resubmitted when complete. If you have any questions about what is requested please feel free to
call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Randy L. Kepler
Environmental Engineer/NPDES Unit
cc. on IMOM It e
Permits and Engineering Unit
David A. Roberts, P.E.
309 North Zion Street
Landis, NC 28088

i\-
David A. Roberts Engineering
SPECMUZNG N WATER AND WASTEWATER ENGNEERM PROJECTS = �``~ Six �}
Mailing Address Office Location :a'; 6271 �=
Ow PHONE [phone]
309 N. ZION ST 141i~ 2 01 od %� 49TNUa 0.�0,r
LAW1S. N.C. 28M CAU9fR-y HnAD ....
December fftz c;.992
0 '' A
DEC yr
Mr. Randy L . Kepler j 6 199l)
Division of Environmental Manageaft t
Post Office Box 29535 ®f EPrYIP,p;yJ���,
Raleigh, N.C. 2 7 6 2 6-0 5 3 5 fd�01t£S4�fE R�U^�� off -let
Subject: Local Government Review for
No.nmunicipal.Domestic Wastewater Discharge Permit
NPDES Permit NCO082899
Indoor/Outdoor Sports Facility
CParrus County, N.C.
S Concepts, Ltd. — Owner/Applicant
Dear Mr. Kepler:
1 t d of the local
Enclosed you will.find one comp e e copy
government review for this proposed indoor/outdoor sports
facility in Cabarrus County. This form has been completed by
the Cabarrus County Manager.
A similar form for this project was given to the City of
Concord Manager on November 25, 1992, the same date the
enclosed 'form was given to the Cabarrus County Manager. The
City of Concord is the closest municipality to this property,
but this site is not within the planning jurisdiction of.the
City of Concord, and they have no control over the use of
this land. We have not yet received a completed form from
the City of.Concord Manager, and it does not appear at this
time, as if they will be sending the completed form to me.
We request treat the enclosed form of "Local Government
Review for this project be added to the remaining'item.s of
the application package for this project, and that the
Division of Environmental Management continue with the review
and approval process for this application.
Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can
be of additional service to you.
With kind',regards.,..
David A. Roberts
copy: Steven G. Billings
Rob Prince
Ken Colson

Local Government Review..
Requirements for the Issuance o ew 199
Nonmunicipal Domestic Wastewater DiscO11 ,°l,rmits
General Statute Overview YA
On October 1, 1989, an amendment to North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, denoted as 143-215.1
(c)16), became effective. The amendment allows input from local governments in the issuance of NPDES
Permits for nonmunicipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. The new language requires that the
Commission (Environmental Management Commission) shall not act on an application for a new
nonmunicipal domestic wastewater discharge facility until it has received a written statement from each
city and county government having jurisdiction over any part of the lands on which the proposed facility
and its appurtenances are to be located. The written statement shall state whether the city or county has
In effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance and, if such an ordinance is in effect. whether the proposed
facility is consistent with the ordinance. The Commision shall not approve a permit application for any
facility which a city or county has determined to be inconsistent with its zoning or subdivision ordinance
unless it determines that the approval of such application has statewide significance and is in the best
interest of the State.
Instructions to the Anolican
Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit fors proposed project, the applicant shall request
that both the nearby city and county government complete this form. The applicant must submit a copy
of the draft permit application and shall make a written request for this form to be completed to the clerk
of the city and county by certified mail, return receipt requested. If a (or both) local government(s) fail(s)
to mail the completed form, as evidenced by the postmark on the certified mail card(s), within 115 days
after receiving and signing for the certified mail, the applicant may submit the application for a discharge
permit. As evidence to the Commission that the local government(s) failed to respond within 15 days, the
pplicant shall submit a copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local
oovernment(s) failed to respond within the 15 day period.
Instructions to the Local Governmen
The nearby city or county government which may have or has jurisdiction over any part of the lands on
which the proposed facility or its appurtenances are to be located is required to complete and return this
form to the applicant within 15 days of receipt. The form must be signed and notarized.
Name of local government C niintV of Caharrus. N.C. _
Project: Sports Facility (City/County) S _ Concepts, Ltd.
Does the city/county have jurisdiction over an art of the lands on which the proposed facility and its
appurtenances are to be located? Yes ® No [ if no, please sign this form, have it notarized, and
return it to the applicant:
Does the city/county have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance?_ Yes ® No ❑
If there is a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect, is the plan for the p Lconsistent with
the ordinance? Yes] No ❑
Date 3-1__R Z
(City Nanager,&KntyManager)
State of , County of rr
On this 1 s-1- day of , 19 A personnauy appeared before me,
the said name -S VuO V . to me known and known to me to be
the person described in and who ezecuted the foregoing umen and he (or, she) acknowledged that he
(or she) executed the same and being duly sworn by me, made oath that the statements in the foregoing
aocument are true. 0-7
MyCommisionexpires �- �� , 19 (Signature of Notary Publlc)�0,(��n(�
Notary Public (official Seal)

Dovid A. Roberts Engineering
SPOCM2M N VY4TER MD WASTEWATER ENf7dEE" PROJECTS
f oft Address an wactro 657-U00 office Location
309 N. ZION U KamIMF 2**0 d
l AMDM. N.C. 2soee cA"`af"r" a""a
November 25, 1992
Mr. Leonard Sossamon .
City of Concord
Post Office Box 308
Concord, North Carolina 28026
Subject: Proposed Sports Facility
Poplar Tent Road (S.R. #1394)
near Harris Road (S.R. #1449)
T2wnship #3, Cabarrus County, N.C.
S Concepts, Ltd. - Owner
Dear Mr. Sossamon:
CARD
1991,
�CEpyA� ®�✓¢,CfFpl
'i
Enclosed you will find the following items: (a) a copy
of "Application For Permit To Discharge - Short Form D" dated
September 29, 1992; (b) a copy of a portion of the composite
of the "Kannapolis Quadrangle Map and Cornelius Quadrangle
Map", showing the location of this 75 acre tract, Poplar Tent
Road, Harris Road, and Clarke Creek; (c) one copy of "Local
Government Review Requirements For The Issuance Of New
Nonmunicipal Domestic Wastewater Discharge Permit".
We request that the "Local Government Review" be
completed by the Manager of the City of Concord, be
notarized, and returned"to me as soon as possible, for my
submittal to the Division of, Environmental Management.
This sports facility will consist of indoor and outdoor
recreational facilities,'with projected wasteflows of 30,000
gallons per day maximum when fully developed and fully
utilized.. Wastewater from this facility is proposed to be
treated and discharged into Clarke Creek which crosses this
property.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. Please
let me know if you have any questions or if .I. can be of
additional service.
With kind regards,
Z.:J a. PaQ�p
David A. Roberts

SOC Priority Project: Yes No X
If Yes, SOC No.:
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: (Randy, Kepler)
Date: November '12, 1992
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County: Cabarrus
Permit No. NCO082899
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: First Division Sports Club
S2 Concepts, LTD
14647 Eastfield Road
Huntersville, North Carolina 28078
2. Date of Investigation: November 12, 1992
3. Report Prepared by: Kim H. Colson, Environmental Engineer I
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: David Roberts, P. E.,
[phone].
,5. Directions, to Site: From the intersection of ;NC Hwy 73 and SR
1394 (Poplar Tent Road), travel southeast on SR 1394
approximately 0.1 mile past the intersection of .SR 1394 and SR
1449 (Harris Road). •
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35' 24' 41" Longitude: 800 44' 55"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site
and discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No.: F16NW USGS Quad Name: Kannapolis, NC
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application?
Yes.
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Flat to
moderate slopes on the northeast side of Clarke Creek,
moderate slopes on the southwest side of Clarke Creek.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: None within 500 feet of ,the
disposal site.

Page Two
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Clarke Creek
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin - Pee Dee 030711
c. Describe.. receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: General "C" classification uses.
Receiving stream is a small, slow moving stream. Several
large areas of wetlands are located adjacent to the
stream both upstream and downstream of the discharge
location. -
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT -WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: 0.030 MGD
(Ultimate Design Capacity)
b. Current permitted capacity of the Wastewater Treatment
facility: N/A '
C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility
(current design capacity): N/A
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two
years: N/A
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially
constructed wastewater treatment facilities: N/A
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities: Treatment facilities have not been
proposed at this time, however, it is expected that some
type of package treatment plant will be.installed.
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: N/A
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Residuals
will probably be disposed of at a local municipal WWTP.
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
permit no.: N/A
Residuals Contractor: N/A
Telephone No.: N/A
b. Residuals stabilization: N/A PSRP PFRP Other
C. Landfill:' N/A
d: Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify): N/A
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating
sheet): Class II (Estimated)

Page Three
4. SIC Code(s): 7997
Wastewater Code(s):
Primary: 02 Secondary: 10
Main Treatment Unit Code: N/A
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT. INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds or are any public monies involved (municipals only)?
N/A
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity)
requests: N/A
3_. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please
indicate) N/A
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation:
Spray Irrigation:
Spray irrigation may be an alternative to discharging.
Several possibilities exists for spray irrigation.
The first is to construct spray facilities on property
that will not be used in the near future. There is a
possibility that within 5 - 10 years that municipal sewer
service will be available.
Additional property could also be purchased for spray
irrigation. Once municipal sewer service is available, the
property could be sold or used for expansion.
Consideration should also be given -to the possibility -of
using the soccer fields for spray irrigation. This option
would increase operational expenses since a higher level of
treatment would be required, however, the facility would
benefit since a separate irrigation system would not be
needed. The use of cut and fill areas for spray irrigation
would need to be addressed before this option is selected.
The native soil is mapped as Coronaca, which has a subsoil
that typically extends to a depth of 96 inches.
Connection to Regional Sewer System: Connection to a regional
sewer system does appear to be reasonable within the next 5 -
10 years.
Subsurface: Subsurface disposal.is not a'viable alternative.
Other disposal options: N/A

1
Page Four
5. Air Quality and/or Groundwater concerns or hazardous materials
utilized at this facility that may impact water quality, air
quality, or groundwater: Groundwater comments should be
obtained if the spray irrigation option is utilized. There
are no known Air Quality or.hazardous materials concerns.
6. Other Special Items: N/A
_PART IV EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The applicant, S2 Concepts, has applied for an NPDES permit -to
serve a proposed sports complex facility. The wastewater will
include both domestic and restaurant.
The applicant may have an economical alternative to
discharging by utilizing spray irrigation. This alternative was
not completely addressed in the application.
It is recommended that the applicant be required to further_
investigate spray irrigation as an alternative. An NPDES permit
should only be issued provided the spray irrigation option is not
feasible.
Signature of report preparer
DryA:2�s�_
Water Quality Vgional Supervisor
��hZ
Date
0

13 6 �;f 1 F n �� Bin i�; __�•—
p nCP
y h
700 I
i
Lai
aU ll 650.
Lake\
650 -� % of 1442i
AQ
1
\ 1 ; : 4 , - �� • ! �,.,) .' ` , _ �C `. ' -ice , r � �x \ `�', <\.�� � ` r_'
700
- -�LA
\•• / \/ ''o' ��^\ '`ram \ "� � - I C�6 `�` ^ •� '/i�: v� �`I ��� �!\'� I \\�\\\w� J Li _�).
Cox Mui . 750
39
%,, IIIII 0 \ iIVM 1
650
<
1... \ �l�\-� �• i�-\�1 .� • ;�� Cyr � � ;
r '
3917 50
600
3916
����;�,)/ `I �;� � J '✓,off 1;5���(�\1l/� � - ;�
600 000
FEET'
50
`

v`"'srntFa 1� C.
REs jr OF NA
.� COI�gMII pUReZS V _ � � ll NdTg DL�LOp
�P`Kxti ,° ? , l ® 0 1992
,I r/ State of North Carolina DIVISION Of E1dVIRONg1�l
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resourl EsVfllf
�[ fiAr g
Division of Environmental Management REN Offl 6
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Steven Billings, President,Partner
S Squared Concepts, LTD
14647 Eastfield Road
Huntersville, NC 28078
Dear Mr. Billings :
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Acting Director
October 28, 1992
Subject: NPDES Permit Application
NPDES Permit No.NC0082899
First Division Sports Club
County
This is to acknowledge receipt of the following documents on October 15, 1992:
Application Form
Engineering Proposal (for proposed control facilities),
Request for permit renewal,
Application Processing Fee of $400.00,
Engineering Economics Alternatives Analysis,
Local Government Signoff,
Source Reduction and Recycling,
Interbasin Transfer,
Other Map,
The items checked below are needed before review can begin:
Application Form ,
Engineering proposal (see attachment),
Application Processing Fee of
Delegation of Authority (see attached)
Biocide Sheet (see attached)
Engineering Economics Alternatives Analysis,
Local Government Signoff,
Source Reduction and Recycling,
Interbasin Transfer,
Other
Pollution Prevention Pays .
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Tf the application is not made complete within thirty (30) days, it will be
returned to you and may be resubmitted when complete.
This application has been assigned to Randy Kepler
(919/733-5083) of our Permits Unit for review. You wiii be advised of any
comments recommendations, questions or other information necessary for the
review of the application.
I am, by copy of this letter, requesting that our Regional Office
Supervisor prepare a staff report and recommendations regarding this
discharge. If you have any questions regarding this applications,
please contact the review person listed above.
Sincerely,
�p( P.E.
CC: Mooresville Regional Office a?'W.Jsu�ln�s,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE - SHORT FORM G
To be filed only by services, wholesale and retail trade,
and other commercial establishments including vessels
DEVELOPMENT
FOR
AGENCY
USE
Do not attempt to complete this form without reading the accompanying instructions
Please print or type
APPLICATION NUMBER
G
O
O
rj
DATE RECEIVED
y
-'a
r 4s
YEAR MO. DAY
�f '& o zs3
QP
1. Name, address, and telephone number of facility prod YT19Ptner ff.. (Contact) —Gen. Partnershi
A. Name S2 Concepts, LTD teven illings, President, North
B. Street address 14647 Eastfield Road 14leck. Ail
C. city Huntersville D. State Dl.
E. County Mecklenburg:' F. ZIP 28078
G. Telephone No. 704 :87�-949
Area
Code
This sports complex will be located on 75 acre tract
2.SIC off Poplar Tent Road in Township #3, Cabarrus County,
(Leave blank) N. C . This indoor and outdoor sports facility includes
5 outdoor soccer fields, 1 outdoor baseball softball fiel
3. Number of employees an outdoor pool 77,640 s.f. building - generating 30,000
masteftow
4. Nature of business indoor and outdoor sports facility
5. (a) Check here if discharge occurs all year$I. or
(b) Check the month(s) discharge occurs:
1. 0 January 2.13 February 3. 0 March 4.13 April 5. 0 May
6, o June 7. a July 8. 0 August 9.o September 10, o October
11.0 November 12.0 December
(c) How many days per week:
1 .01 2.0 2-3 3.0 4-5 4.19 6-7
6. Types of waste water discharged to surface waters only (check as applicable)
Volume treated before
Flow, gallons per operating day
discharging (percent)
Discharge per
operating day
0.1-999
1000-4999
5000-3999
10,000-
50,000
None
0.1-
30-
65-
95-
49,999
or more
29.9
64.9
94.9
100
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
A. Sanitary, daily
average
30,000
101
B. Cooling water,._etc.,
daily average
C. Other,discharge(s),
daily average;
Specify
D. Maximum per operat-
ing day for combined
discharge (all types)
30, 000

1. If any of the types of waste identified in item 6, either treated or un-
treated, are discharged to places other than surface waters, check below
as applicable.
Waste water is discharged to:
0.1-999
�1)
1000-4999
(2)
5000-9999
(3)
10,000-49,999
(4)
50,000 or more
(5)
A.a Munl,c.ipal sewer• system
II, IIIIIII. 1'II ►'11111111 wl•I
C. Septic tank
D. Evaporation lagoon or pond
E. Other, specify:
8. Number of separate discharge points:
A. ill ' B. a 2-3 C, 0 4-5 D. i 6 or more
9. Nan* of receiving water or waters Clarke Creek. Tributary to Roekv River in
the Yadkin PeeDee River Basin
10. Does your discharge contain or is it possible for your discharge to contain
one or more of the following substances addtA as a result of your operations,
activities, or processes: ammonia, cyanide, aluminum, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium, copper, lead, mercur , nickel, selenium, zinc, phenols, oil and
grease, and chlorine (residual.
A.:&yes B.o no Chlorine added as part of the wastewater treatment
process.
I certify that 1 am familiar with the information contained in the application and
that to the best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and
accurate.
J'C_ yeIJ lG' �� 1 i 1 A-)(,
Printed Name of Person Signing tly,T-N ME-c_13Li19.(4, 4- Q Q 4Ti C-S P1KT-NL-N_
President, OF S� Cc -,tic. Li ccrrEb AL /,jev_, f+
Title
, oZo
Date Applicdtion Signer'
Signs ure of Applicant
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6(b)(2) provides that: Any person who knowingly makes
any false statement representation, or certification in any application,'record, report, plan,
or other document files or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the
Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with,
or knowly renders inaccurate any recording or monitorigg device or method required to be
operated or maintained under Art;Lale 21;W,. regulations•of the Environmental Management Commissir
implementing that`Article, s.hal3''be.'tui + of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed
$10,000, or by imprisonment riot to excee�; six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provi:
a punishment by a fine of"not more than S10 ,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both,
for a similar offense.)

i
ENGINEERING REPORT
EVALUATION OF OPTIONS
FOR
WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL
SERVING
PROPOSED INDOOR AND OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITY
POPLAR TENT ROAD (SR #1394) NEAR HARRIS ROAD (SR #1449)
TOWNSHIP #3, CABARRUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
S2 CONCEPTS, LTD.
STEVEN G. BILLINGS, PRESIDENT
14647 EASTFIELD ROAD
HUNTERSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28078
[phone]
PREPARED BY
DAVID A. ROBERTS, P.E.
309 NORTH ZION STREET
LANDIS, NORTH CAROLINA 28088
[phone]
OCT 0 1992
i SFAS
o ; 6271
HUR•�,,,�-

OPTIONS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL
S CONCEPTS, LTD.
POPLAR TENT ROAD, CABARRUS COUNTY, N.C.
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
-------------------
S2 Concepts, Ltd. has access to a 75 acre tract located
along the southwestern margin of Poplar Tent Road (S.R.
#1394) situated approximately 450 feet southeast of its
intersection with Harris Road (S.R. #1449). This tract
consists of approximately 1,040 feet of road frontage along
Poplar Tent Road and extends in a southwesterly direction,
crossing Clarke Creek, and includes approximately 2/3 of the
tract or approximately 50 acres located in open fields
between Poplar Tent Road and Clarke Creek, while
approximately 25 acres in established woodland are located on
the southwestern margin of Clarke Creek.
PROPOSED FACILITIES:
-------- -----------
The proposed indoor and outdoor sports facility proposed
for this site include 5 outdoor soccer fields, an outdoor
baseball/softball field, 4 outdoor tennis courts, outdoor.
pool, and a 77,640 square feet building which will include an
indoor soccer field, an indoor pool, 5 indoor raquetball
courts, pro shop, classrooms, restaurant, fitness center,
gymnasium, locker rooms with showers, office space, and
related facilities. Projected wasteflows from this building
are estimated to be 30,000 gallons per day, when fully
developed. Except for potentially grease -bearing flows from
the restaurant portion of the building, all other wasteflows
should be consistent with domestic sewage characteristics.
This facility will be supplied water from an on -site
well to be drilled on this site as needed to meet water
demands at this complex.
LISTING OF OPTIONS FOR WASTEWATER DISPOSAL_
------- --------- --- ---------- --------
The following options are identified:
OPTION #1: Extension of gravity sewer line from this property
downslope to the nearest available community sewerage system,
requiring the willingness of the system owner to accept the
proposed wasteflow, the acquiring of right -of way easements
across all intermediate properties between this tract and the
location of the community sewerage system, and the issuance
of a permit and authorization to construct from the Division
of Environmental Management after review of detailed
engineering plans and specifications of the proposed gravity
sewer extension. Ongoing costs will include the system
owner's regular monthly charges for accepting and treating
PAGE 1

the wasteflows generated at this site, along with any costs
associated with the pretreatment of the wasteflows when
required by the system owner.
OP_T_ION #2: Construction of a pumping station and extension of
force main piping system across varying terrain to the
location of an existing community sewerage system, requiring
the willingness of the system owner to accept the proposed
wasteflow, the acquiring of right -of way easements across all
intermediate properties between this tract and the location
of the community sewerage system, and the issuance of a
permit and authorization to construct from the Division of
Environmental Management after review of detailed engineering
plans and specifications of the proposed pump station and
force main sewer extension. Ongoing costs will include the
power costs for running the pump station, chemical costs
associated with the pumping process when required by the
system owner, maintenance costs as may be associated with the
long-term operation of the pump station and force main piping
system, costs associated with the employment of a certified
operator when required by the conditions of the permit, the
system owner's regular monthly charges for accepting and
treating the wasteflows generated at this site, and costs
associated with the renewal of the permit when required by
the Division of Environmental Management.
OPTION #3: Construction of a ground absorption wastewater
disposal system, disposing of wasteflows by injection it into
the ground after adequate treatment, requiring suitably
permeable soil on the site as described by a detailed soil
evaluation, and requiring a permit from the local health
department after review of detailed engineering plans and
specifications by the Raleigh Office of the Division of
Health Services, and requiring the employment of an approved
management entity to visit the plant and perform system
monitoring and maintenance as required by the permit. Ongoing
costs will include the power costs for running the plant,
chemical costs associated with the treatment process, costs
for laboratory analysis of effluent when required by the
permit, maintenance costs as may be associated with the long-
term operation of the wastewater treatment plant, costs
associated with the employment of an approved management
entity for plant operation and maintenance as required by the
permit, and costs associated with the renewal of the permit
every five years and the costs associated with making
improvements to the plant as may be required from time to
time in order to comply with changing permit requirements
when the permit is renewed.
OPTION #4: Construction of a spray irrigation, land
application wastewater disposal system, disposing of the
wasteflows by applying it onto the surface of the ground
PAGE 2

after adequate treatment, requiring suitably permeable soil
surface and subsurface on the site as described by a detailed
soil evaluation, while meeting all buffer requirements, and
requiring a permit and authorization to construct from the
Division of Environmental Management. Ongoing costs will
include the power costs for running the plant, chemical costs
associated with the treatment process, costs for laboratory
analysis of effluent when required by the permit, maintenance
costs as may be associated with the long—term operation of
the wastewater treatment plant, costs associated with the
employment of a certified wastewater treatment plant
operator, and costs associated with the renewal of the permit
every five years and the costs associated with making
improvements to the plant as may be required from time to
time in order to comply with changing permit requirements
when the permit is renewed.
OPTION #5: Construction of a wastewater disposal system with
discharge to an adequately sized flowing stream, requiring a
permit to discharge and an authorization to construct from
the Division of Environmental Management, and requiring a
certified wastewater treatment plant operator to visit the
plant on a timetable defined by the permit, as well as the
performance of laboratory analysis of the effluent on a
timetable defined by the permit. Ongoing costs will include
the power costs for running the plant, chemical costs
associated with the treatment process, costs for laboratory
analysis of effluent, maintenance costs as may be associated
with the long—term operation of the wastewater treatment
plant, costs associated with the employment of a certified
wastewater treatment plant operator, and costs associated
with the renewal of the permit every five years and the costs
associated with making improvements to the plant as may be
required from time to time in order to comply with changing
permit requirements when the permit is renewed.
ENGINEERING EVALUATION OF EACH OPTION
FOR
WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL:
O_P_T_ION #1: The nearest available community sewerage system,
located downstream from this property, is currently under
construction and should be completed, ready to accept
wasteflows, about July 1, 1993. This is a gravity sewer
extension, belonging to the Cabarrus County Utility
Authority, and will be located along Rocky River at an
unnamed tributary located west of Interstate 85 an east of
Derita Road (S.R. #1445). The distance from the S Concepts,
Ltd. property at Poplar Tent Road, following Clarke Creek and
Rocky River to the location of the nearest available gravity
sewerage system, is approximately 3.5 miles. The following
cost estimates project likely expenses associated with Option
#1:
PAGE 3

Costs for Acquiring Easements $40,000 min. to $185,000+
Costs for Engineering Services $40,000 min. to $ 60,000
Costs for Construction $700,000 min. to $800,000
Total Costs for Option #1 $780,000 min. to $1,045,000+
OPTION #2: The nearest community sewerage system available
by means of pump station and force main piping system from
the property of "First Division Sports Club" is the same
community sewerage system described in Option #1-, but would
include a gravity sewer outfall extending up the unnamed
tributary at Rocky River in the direction of Poplar Tent
Road. Required for this option is a pump station,
approximately 2 miles of force main along Poplar Tent Road to
the intersection with Harris Road, and approximately 1 mile
of gravity sewer from the intersection to the point of
nearest available sewerage system. The following cost
estimates project likely expenses associated with Option #2:
Costs for Acquiring Easements $40,000 min. to $160,000+
Costs for Engineering Services $60,000 min. to $100,000
Costs for Construction $450,000 min. to $600,000
Total Costs for Option #2 $550,000 min. to $860,000+
OPTION #3: Installation of a ground absorption wastewater
disposal system, at the site of the "First Division Sports
Club" property, will require the availability of suitable or
provisionally suitable soil in an area large enough to
accommodate the initial ground absorption wastewater disposal
system, as well as sufficient area to accommodate a 100%
future repair area. The soil surfaces at the location of the
proposed ground absorption wastewater disposal system, should
not be graded or otherwise disturbed prior to placement of
the disposal system.
"Soil Survey of Cabarrus County" reveals soils mapped as
"Coronaca" soils located in the area between Clarke Creek and
Poplar Tent Road. This soil series is identified as being
"moderate" for use with septic tank absorption fields, and
appears useable for ground absorption wastewater disposal
trenches. However, the Owner's site development plans show
construction of 5 soccer fields in this area, and the
required grading for these soccer fields will destroy the
useable character of the soil in this area, thereby making it
not suitable for use with ground absorption wastewater
disposal systems.
"Soil Survey of Cabarrus County" reveals soils mapped as
"Enon" and "Poindexter" series, located southwest of Clarke
Creek at this property, both of which are rated as having
"severe" limitations for use with septic tank absorption
fields.
Based upon these soil mapping evaluations and based upon
PAGE 4

the need for grading the area between Clarke Creek and Poplar
Tent Road to accommodate the soccer fields and building
complex, it appears that the disposal of wastewater by means
of an on site, ground absorption wastewater disposal system
on this property is not an option available to the Owner.
Adjoining property along Poplar Tent Road, as well as
property across the road from this location are shown to be
"Coronaca" series and "Cecil" series soils by the "Soils
Survey of Cabarrus County", both of which are identified as
being "moderate" for use with septic tank absorption fields.
The Owner may acquire additional property at these locations
for the purpose of accommodating the "initial" and "future
repair wastewater disposal system at this location. It
appears that approximately 22 acres are needed to accommodate
the "initial" disposal system, and that another 22 acres
would be required for the "future repair" wastewater system.
Should adjoining property be available for use by "First
Division Sports Club" for ground absorption wastewater
disposal systems, the following cost estimates are projected
for Option #3:
Costs for Purchasing Land $ 50,000 to $180,000
Costs for Engineering Services 35,000 to 55,000
Costs for Construction 325,000 to 450,000
Total Costs for Option #3 $410,000 to $685,000
OP_T_ION #4: The property located to the southwestern margin
of Clarke Creek could be utilized for spray irrigation - land
application of wastewater generated from the "First Division
Sports Club". Soils at this location are shown to be of the
Enon and Mecklenberg series by "Soil Survey of Cabarrus
County". All required buffer zones must be met, such as
distances from property lines, existing streams, and existing
structures used as residences or for public assembly. A
pretreatment system must be utilized, followed by a treatment
lagoon and holding pond, with effluent spray irrigated onto
the surface of the ground currently containing a healthy crop
of mixed hardwoods. The lagoon should provide a minimum of
7-days storage and would require a suitable liner. The
holding pond should provide up to 30-days storage for
enduring periods of inclement weather, and would require a
suitable liner. Effluent should be disinfected prior to its
spray irrigation onto the surface of the ground in the
designated area.
Preliminary computations show the need for a 210,000
gallon capacity lagoon, approximately 81' x 81' at its base,
96' x 96' at its top, designed for approximately 3.75' liquid
depth. The holding pond needed should have capacity for
900,000 gallons, approximately 140' x 140' at its base, 160'
x 160' at its top, designed for approximately 5.50' maximum
liquid depth.
PAGE 5

If effluent is spray irrigated upon the surface of the
ground at the rate of 1/2" depth per week, the wetted area
required for spray irrigation is approximately 18 acres. It
appears that the rear portion of this tract may provide 18
useable acres after meeting all required buffers. This does
not allow room for expansion unless adjoining land owners are
willing to offer the use of their land for spray irrigation
purposes. Also, the Owner intends to use this area for
additional sports facilities as this site develops, and there
may not therefore be available property on this site for
spray irrigation system of wastewater disposal. The Owner
would therefore need to acquire additional land for the spray
irrigation system.
Costs
associated with this option
are as follows:
Costs for
Engineering Services
$18,000
to
$36,000
Costs for
Construction
$300,000
to
$440,000
Total
Costs for Option #4 On Site
$318,000
to
$476,000
Costs to
Acquire Land for Irrigation
$ 75,000
to
$400,000
Total
if Land is Acquired
$393,000
to
$876,000
OPTION #5: The extent of wastewater treatment that will be
required, in order to discharge effluent from the "First
Division Sports Club" into Clarke Creek at a location
approximately 1/2 mile south of the intersection of Poplar
Tent Road and Harris Road, is not known at this time and will
not be known until after an application for a permit to
discharge has been filed with the Division of Environmental
Management and they have performed a stream analysis relative
to the proposed discharge location. Therefore, it is
extremely difficult to fully evaluate the costs associated
with this treatment and disposal option. However, the
following "ball park" estimates are provided in an attempt to
provide the Owner with some awareness of costs likely to be
associated with this option:
tkCosts associated with this option are as follows:
Costs for Engineering Services $25,000 to $35,000
Costs for Construction $225,000 to $440,000
Total Costs for Option #5 $250,000 to $475,000
PAGE 6

rri
f ' ° IN
to
CD
p '� ,'T ��, y,rr. r�.�'`i L, O• ] / 1, � t1 f .d .m O
,• 'Y 1l,, > � .•*1: � '`` o a.r. .�
•' . ` ' Q: f m npi �• ' �' m, ••l 1.\ 1 ��•••"`44r .� f - `, .. ' `���r ,
\ e V40
co
tj
uo
co
i6 c0 � •�` � `'fG?, *, . pq�,•" _" ..� � E ',ym. •'j. :f jf" N m
' ,V �f .• 1 � N'
•�• ,u, f o n' a. v � � .. n f o ,
`• O ` m •1, N .V p N `�� . • ,.
m m n• v
CD
CD
3 Paz
•.gym •' '�• Dp ,+4' ��'% �� T �. • o �„' ~�: ,.
m
CABARRUS COUNTY SOIL MAP
SHOWING LOCATION OF
"FIRST DIVISION SPORTS CLUB"
POPLAR TENT ROAD, CABARRUS COUNTYj. N.C.

PIEDMONT AND COASTAL PLAIN AREA OF NORTH CAROLINA s `.
. .,.,, .•nr,n�i corm GTrGTims
JU1LJ
vai a e:Recoi ended Maximum:
:Average:Mositure :�A 1p icati_on Rate
Group : : Soil : Holding Bare : Cover Crops Locally Grown
Soil Type
Index . and Depth :Capaciti/: (In/Hr): (In/Hr)
No. Description Ft.
6 7
:Irri ation:A Iica-
:Moisture to: 9 pp
Depth of :be Replaced;"Design":Frequency tion T
Moisture by Each :Moisture: for Peak :Amount3
:Replacement: Irrigation:Use Rate:UseDaesiod:(In.) J
Ft. In.In Da 12
8 9 10 11
_T1 2
3
4
5
25
2.20
.2
11
2.95
'
to moderately well drained :
1.3
.30 .35 :Cotton
:Corn, field
.
2.5
2.20
222
10
2.95
:Well
:soils of the Piedmont uplands
2.4
3 6
:Ladino Clover & Grass, .
Perennials or
5
: 1.60
:with loamy surface layers and
clayey subsoils.
4 6
:Summer
Mixed Hay :
1 5
1 5
1 20
1.26
24
.18
7
1.70
:firm plastic
11
3.0
5.3
:Peas, field
Grain or Soybeans:
2 0
1.80
18
18
10
2.40
1.70
:Creedmoor
:Small
:Tobacco
1 5
1 26
5
5
. 95
:Helena
:Vegetables, Group 1
1.0
1 5
•70
1.12
•14
14
8
1.50
:Sedgefield
:Vance •
:Vegetables, Group 2
:Vegetables, Group 3
1.5
1 26
18
7
10
1.70
2.40
'
:Vegetables, Group 4
2-0--------1
80--------------------------------
•18
• •----------------------
•---------------'
--------20'---Cotton----------------------1.0
1.00
.20
.22
4
1.35
------- -------------------- 11 drained
to moderately we
1.9
.20
�_,,. :Corn, field
1.0
.88
:Well
:soils of the Piedmont uplands
:Ladino Clover & Grass,
Perennials or
1.30
:with loamy surface layers and
:
:Summer
1.0 :
96,
l._90% '
24
.4
5
1.20
:plastic. sticky clayey subsoils.
Mixed Hay
field
1.0
18
5
1.20
•
1.0
:Peas,
:Small Grain or Soybeans:
1.0
•90
18
.18
5
1.20
:Enon
:Iredell
:Tobacco
1.0
.90
12 :.Lignum
\ :Orange
:White Store
=
----------------
•
•
------------•'-"
-------i-5
--
------30--.-----35---------------------------------------------
:Alfalfa
2.5
2.16
2.20
.24
.20
'g
11
2.9
2'
:Well to moderately well drained
•
2.4
:Cotton
2.5
2.5
2.20
.22
10
5
2.95
95
:Coastal Plain soils, with silty
3 4
:Corn, field
1.0
70
.14
:surface layers and friable loamy
: 4 4
:Gladioli
:Ladino Clover & Grass,
:subsoils.
•
5 2
:Summer Perennials or
1 5
1 20
24
5
1.60
:Aycock
3'0+
Mixed Hay :
:Nursery Crops, 1st yr.
1.0
64
1.80
.16
18
4
10
.85
2.40
:Engelhard
:Exum
:Nursery Crops, 2nd yr.
2.0
2.0
2.5
1.80
•18
10 -
2.40
1.70
13 :Nixonton
:Peanuts :
:Peas, field
1.26
1.80
•18
.18
7
10
2.40
:Tetotum
•
:Small Grain or Soybeans:-
2.0
1 26
.18
7
1.70
•
'
:Tobacco
:Vegetables, Group 1
1 0
.26
1 12
.14
14
5
8
.95
1:50
:Vegetables, Group 2
1.5
1.5
1.26
.18
7
1.70
L.40
'
:Vegetables, Group 3
•18
10
'
.. :Vegetables, Group 4
___2-0------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------.------------
---------------------------------
-----------------
(Continued)
Sheet
6•of '