Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
NCS000483_Phase II MS4 Audit Report_20201023
MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4) PROGRAM AUDIT REPORT NPDES PERMIT NO. NCS000483 Town of Kernersville, NORTH CAROLINA 509 S. Michael Street Audit Date: September 23, 2020 Report Date: October 23, 2020 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Energy, Mineral & Land Resources Stormwater Program 512 N. Salisbury Street, 9th floor 1612 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1612 (This page intentionally left blank) NCS000483 Kernersville MS4 Audit 20200923 TABLE OF CONTENTS AuditDetails..................................................................................................................................................1 PermitteeInformation..................................................................................................................................2 List of Supporting Documents.......................................................................................................................3 Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment...........................................................................4 PublicEducation and Outreach.....................................................................................................................7 Public Involvement and Participation...........................................................................................................8 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE)........................................................................................9 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations..................................................11 Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 1.............................................................................................13 Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 1......................................................................................................15 Site Visit Evaluation: Post -Construction Stormwater Control Measure No. 1............................................16 Appendix A: Photograph Log DISCLAIMER This audit consists of an evaluation of program compliance with the issued permit and implementation of the approved Stormwater Management Plan. This audit report does not include a review of all program components, and program deficiencies in addition to those noted may be present. The permittee is required to assess program progress and permit compliance, and to implement the approved Stormwater Management Plan in accordance with the issued permit. NCS000483 Kernersville MS4 Audit 20200923 ii This page intentionally left blank NCS000483 Kernersville MS4 Audit 20200923 Audit Details Audit ID Number: Audit Date(s). NCS000483_Kernersvllle MS4 Audit_20200923 I September 23, 2020 Minimum Control Measures Evaluated: ® Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment ® Public Education & Outreach ® Public Involvement & Participation ® Illicit Discharge Detection & Eiimination ❑ Construction Site Runoff Controls — No delegated Sediment and Erosion Control Program ❑ Construction Site Runoff Controls — Delegated Sediment and Erosion Control Program ❑ Post -Construction Site Runoff Controls ® Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations © Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) Field Site Visits: ® Municipal Facilities. Number visited: 1 ® M54Outfa11s. Numbervlsited: 1 ❑ Construction Sites. Number visited: Choose an item. ® Post -Construction Stormwater Runoff Controls. Number visited: 1 ❑ Other: Nurnber visited: Choose an item, ❑ Other: Number visited: Choose an itern. 1 lnsoector(s) Conducting Audit Name, I Qr mlza Ion Zachary Lentz, Assistant Regional Engineer NCDEQ Isaiah Reed, Environmental Specialist NCDEQ Slane Houck, Environmental Specialist NCDEQ Audit Report Author: Zach ry Lentz /L Signature Date: lo(q l2. a Audit Report Aut r; Isaiah ed -. Signature i_ � Date (} I i��(�� U NCS000483 Kernersville MS4 Audit 20200923 Page 1 of 19 Permittee Information MS4 Permittee Name: Town of Kernersville Permit Effective Date: February 20, 2017 Permit Expiration Date: February 19, 2022 Mailing Address: 509 Michael Street Date of Last MS4 Inspection/Audit: June 4, 2015 Permit Owner of Record: Wendi Hartup, Stormwater Manager Primary MS4 Representatives Participating in Audit Name, Title Organization Wendi Hartup, Stormwater Manager Town of Kernersville Doran Maltba, Public Services Director Town of Kernersville Edgar Colop, Engineering Project Coordinator Town of Kernersville Donald Schlesselman, Stormwater Technician Town of Kernersville Danica Heflin, Environmental Programs Coordinator Piedmont Triad Regional Council MS4 Receiving Waters Waterbody Classification Impairments Belews Creek WS-IV ; CA None East Belews Creek C None Reedy Fork Creek WS-III ; NSW Benthos (Nar, AL, FW) Fish Community (Nar, AL, FW) West Fork Deep River WS-IV:* Benthos (Nar, AL, FW) Fish Community (Nar, AL, FW) Abbotts Creek WS-III None Kerners Mill Creek WS-III None Smith Creek WS-III None Fishers Branch WS-III None NCS000483 Kernersville MS4 Audit 20200923 Page 2 of 19 List of Supporting Documents Item Number Document Title When Provided (Prior to/During/After) 1 Stormwater Management Plan (2016) Prior 2 MS4 Program Chart and Associated Program Responsibilities Prior 3 IDDE SOP Prior 4 SCM SOP Prior 5 Solid Waste SOP Prior 6 Manual for ordinance Prior 7 UDO Chapter C During 8 Map Book Prior 9 Outfall Map Prior 10 PTWQP 2017-2018 Town of Kernersville Annual Report Form After 11 2019 Kernersville Creek Week Flyer After 12 Stormwater SMART 2019-2020 Annual Report After 13 Mobile 311 IDDE Work Order After 14 IDDE Staff Training After 15 IDDE Email to Staff After 16 IDDE Email Training Numbers After 17 RV Waste Flyer After 18 Yard Waste Flyer After 19 Streets Division SOP Prior 20 SCM Inspections Sheet After 21 Pesticide Class Roster After 22 Fire Station Evaluation for Improvements After NCS000483 Kernersville MS4 Audit 20200923 Page 3 of 19 Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment staff Interviewed: Wendi Hartup, Stormwater Manager (Name, Title, Role) Doran Maltba, Public Services Director Edgar Colop, Engineering Project Coordinator Donald Schlesselman, Stormwater Technician Danica Heflin, Environmental Programs Coordinator Permit Citation Program Requirement Status Supporting poi No. II.A.1 The permittee maintained adequate funding and staffing to implement and manage Yes 1, 2 Staffing and the provisions of the Stormwater Plan and meet all requirements of the permit. Funding The Stormwater Plan identifies a specific position(s) responsible for the overall Yes I coordination, implementation, and revision to the Plan. Responsibilities for all components of the Stormwater Plan are documented and 1 Yes position(s) assignments provided. The permittee is current on payment of invoiced administering and compliance Not monitoring fees (see stormwater e-payments on DEMLR M54 web page). Reviewed The Stormwater Management Plan has been updated and maintained in accordance with the MS4 permit. II.A.2 Stormwater The permittee evaluated the performance and effectiveness of the program see Plan components at least annually. Yes Comments Implementation and Evaluation If yes, the permittee used the results of the evaluation to modify the program Yes I components as necessary to accomplish the intent of the Stormwater Program. Did the permitted M54 discharges cause or contribute to non -attainment of an Not applicable water quality standard? Reviewed If yes, did the permittee expand or better tailor its BM Ps accordingly to address Not the non -attainment? Applicable SWMPA's have been submitted for each year of the current permit cycle. ILA-3 Keeping the The permittee kept the Stormwater Plan up to date. Yes 1 Stormwater Plan Up to Date The permittee notified DEMLR of any updates to the Stormwater Plan. I No --- I The plan has been updated on an ongoing basis as positions have changed and programs have developed. II.A.4 Availability The permittee kept an up-to-date version of its Stormwater Plan available to the of the Stormwater Division and the public online. N° Plan The online materials included ordinances, or other regulatory mechanisms, or a list identifying the ordinances, or other regulatory mechanisms, providing the legal Partial See comments authority necessary to implement and enforce the requirements of the permit. The SWMP was not available online. The entire UDQ con be accessed here.- hffos.11toknc.com/Cc)mmunity-deve/o,pmenVu da NCS000483 Kernersville MS4 Audit 20200923 Page 4 of 19 Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment II.A.3 & ILA-5 Stormwater Plan Did DEMLR require a modification to the Stormwater Plan? No Modifications If yes, did the permittee complete the modifications in accordance with the Not established deadline? Applicable No modifications were required by ❑FMLR. II.A.fi Sharing Responsibility Are any control measures implemented by an entity other than the permittee? Yes 10,12 If yes, is there a written agreement in place? No -" Piedmont Triad Regional Council (PTRC) assists with implementation of Public outreach and Public Involvement in Kernersville, but an agreement does not exist between PTRC and the Town of Kernersville. II.A.7 The permittee maintained written procedures for implementing the six minimum Partial 3 Written control measures. Procedures Written procedures identified specific action steps, schedules, resources and Partial 3,4,5,19 responsibilities for implementing the six minimum measures. Written procedures for implementing the 1DDF program have been developed and maintained. Several SDP's have been generated for components of the control measures, but written procedures have not been created for all minimum control measures. III. A The permittee maintained documentation of all program components including, but Program not limited to, inspections, maintenance activities, educational programs, No --- Documentation implementation of BMPs, enforcement actions etc., on file for a period of five years. Documentation has not been maintained far all components. 1111.13 The permittee submitted annual reports to the Department within twelve months Annual Report from the effective date of the permit (See Section 111.8. far the annual reporting Yes See Comments Submittal period specific to this MS4). The permittee submitted subsequent annual reports every twelve months from the See scheduled date of the first annual report submittal. Yes comments The Annual Reports included appropriate information to accurately describe the progress, status, and results of the permittee's Stormwater Plan, including, but not limited the following: 1. A detailed description of the status of implementation of the Stormwater Plan as a whole. This will include information on development and implementation Not of each major component of the Stormwater Plan for the {past year and Reviewed schedules and plans for the year fallowing each report. 2. An adequate description and justification of any proposed changes to the Stormwater Plan. This will include descriptions and supporting information for Not the proposed changes and how these changes will impact the Stormwater Reviewed Plan (results, effectiveness, implementation schedule, etc.). 3. Documentation of any necessary changes to programs or practices for assessment of management measures implemented through the Stormwater Not Reviewed --- Man. NCS000483 Kernersville MS4 Audit_20200923 Page 5 of 19 Program Implementation, documentation & Assessment 4. A summary of data accumulated as part of the Stormwater Plan throughout year along with an assessment of what the data indicates in light of the Notthe Reviewed Stormwater Plan. 5. An assessment of compliance with the permit, information on the establishment of appropriate legal authorities, inspections, and enforcement Not Reviewed actions. SWMPA's have been submitted for each year of the current permit cycle. IV.B Annual Reporting The Annual Reports document the following: 1. A summary of past year activities, including where applicable, specific Not quantities achieved and summaries of enforcement actions. Reviewed 2. A description of the effectiveness of each program component. Not Reviewed 3. Planned activities and changes for the next reporting period, for each Not program component or activity. Reviewed 4. Fiscal analysis. Not Reviewed SW MPA's have been submitted for each year of the current permit cycle. NC5000483 Kernersville MS4 Audit 20200923 Page 6 of 19 Public Education and Outreach Staff Interviewed: Wend! Hartup, Stormwater Manager (Name, Title, Role) Edgar Colop, Engineering Project Coordinator Donald Schlesselman, Stormwater Technician Danica Heflin, Environmental Programs Coordinator 2016-Permit Program Requirement Status Supporting Doc No. Citation II.B.2.a The permittee defined goals and objectives of the Local Public Education and Yes 10,12 Goals and Outreach Program based on community wide issues. Objectives II.B.2.b The permittee maintained a description of the target pollutants and/or stressors and yes F10, 12 Target Pollutants likely sources. II.B.2.c The permittee identified, assessed annually and updated the description of the target Yes 10,12 Target Audiences audiences likely to have significant storm water impacts and why they were selected. II.B.2.d Residential The permittee described issues, such as pollutants, the likely sources of those and Industrial/ pollutants, potential impacts, and the physical attributes of stormwater runoff In Yes 10,12 Commercial Issues their education/outreach program. 11.B.2.e The permittee promoted and maintained an internet web site designed to convey the yes Website Informational program's message. Web Site II.B.2.f The permittee distributed stormwater educational material to appropriate target Yes 14, 12 Public Education Materials groups. ll� B.2.g The permittee promoted and maintained a stormwater hotline/helpline for the Website Hotline/Help Line purpose of public education and outreach. Yes /various 11.8.2.h The permittee's autreach program, including those elements implemented locally or Public Education through a cooperative agreement, included a combination of approaches designed to Yes 10,12 and Outreach reach the target audiences. Program For each media, event or activity, including those elements implemented locally or through a cooperative agreement the permittee estimated and recorded the extent Yes 10,12 of exposure. Annual report from WQP and PTRC documented metrics and exposure, but no formal agreement exists. NC5000483 Kernersvilie M54 Audit 20200923 Page 7 of 19 Public Involvement and Participation Staff Interviewed: Wendi Hartup, Stormwater Manager (Name, Title, Role) Edgar Colop, Engineering Project Coordinator Donald Schlesselman, Stormwater Technician Danica Heflin, Environmental Programs Coordinator Permit Citation Program Requirement Status Supporting Doc No. II.C.2.a Volunteer Community The permittee included and promoted volunteer opportunities designed to promote Yes 10, 11, Involvement ongoing citizen participation. 12 Progra m I I.C.2.b Mechanism for The permittee provided and promoted a mechanism for public involvement that YeS 10, 11, Public provides for input on stormwater issues and the stormwater program. 12 Involvement II.C.2.c The permittee promoted and maintained a hotline/helpline for the purpose of public 10, 11, Hotline/Help Line involvement and participation. Yes 12 The permittee promotes ongoing volunteer opportunities. NCS000483 Kernersville MS4 Audit_20200923 Page 8 of 19 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Staff Interviewed: Wendi Hartup, Stormwater Manager (Name, Title, Role) Edgar Colop, Engineering Project Coordinator Donald Schlesselman, Stormwater Technician Danica Heflin, Environmental Programs Coordinator Permit Citation Program Requirement Status supporting Dot No. I I. D.2.a IDDE Program The permittee maintained a written IDDE Program. Yes 3 If yes, the written program includes provisions for program assessment and Yes 3 evaluation and integrating program. The SWMP has been maintained and includes an IDDE program SOP last revised September 2020. The permittee maintained an IDDE ordinance or other regulatory mechanism(s) that Yes 7 II.D.2.b provides the legal authority to prohibit illicit connections and discharges to the M54. Legal Authorities If yes, the ordinance applies throughout the corporate limits of the permittee. 7 Yes (Permit Part I.D] Ii.D.2,c The permittee maintained a current map showing major outfalis* and receiving Yes 8,9 Storm Sewer System Map streams. II.D.2.d The permittee maintained a program for conducting dry weather flow field Dry Weather Flow observations in accordance with written procedures. Yes Program The permittee's program includes inspection of at least 20% of outfalis each year. II.D.2.e The permittee maintained written procedures for conducting investigations of Yes 3 Investigation identified illicit discharges. Procedures The permittee has maintained a written SOP program for conducting investigations of identified illicit discharges. II.D.2.f For each case of an illicit discharge or potential illicit discharge, the permittee documented and tracked the Track and following: Document Investigations 1. The date(s) the illicit discharge was observed Yes 13 2. The results of the investigation yes 13 3. Any follow-up of the investigation Yes 13 4. The date the investigation was closed No --- The program tracks illicit discharges through Mobile 311 and utilized their regulatory mechanism js] to pursue enforcement for an illicit discharge. NCS000483 Kernersville MS4 Audit_20200923 Page 9 of 19 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Ii.D.2. Employee The permittee implemented and documented a training program for appropriate Training municipal staff who, as part of their normal job responsibilities, may come into Yes 14,15,16 contact with or otherwise observe an illicit discharge or 01icit connection. Staff are trained annually to identify and address illicit discharges. II.D.2.h The permittee informed public employees of hazards associated with illegal Yes 14 Public Education discharges and improper disposal of waste. The permittee informed businesses of hazards associated with illegal discharges and Yes 17 improper disposal of waste. The permittee informed the general public of hazards associated with illegal Ycs 1Fi discharges and improper disposal of waste. Public employees were trained annually. Businesses and the general public were informed through public messaging campaigns and targeted audiences as needed. II.D.2.1 The permittee promoted, publicized, and facilitated a reporting mechanism for the Yes see Public Reporting public to report illicit discharges. Comments Mechanism The permittee promoted, publicized, and facilitated a reporting mechanism for staff Yes 14 to report illicit discharges. The permittee established and implemented response procedures for citizen Yes 3 requests/reports. The lnfoline is an the Town's website and states that it should be used to report a spill: https://toknc.com/public- services/storm wa ter/fa q1 II&I-J The permittee implemented a mechanism to track the issuance of notices of violation Yes 3,13 Enforcement and enforcement actions administered by the permittee. If yes, the mechanism includes the ability to identify chronic violators for No initiation of actions to reduce noncompliance. There was no mechanism to identify chronic violators. Violators were tracked by property and would have to be identified as chronic violators manually. NC50004$3 Kernersvilie M54 Audit_20200923 Page 10 of 19 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations Staff Interviewed: Wendi Hartup, Stormwater Manager (Name, Title, Role) Edgar Colop, Engineering Project Coordinator Donald 5chIesselman, Stormwater Technician Danica Heflin, Environmental Programs Coordinator Permit Citation Program Requirement Status Supporting Doc No. II.G.2.a The permittee maintained a current inventory of facilities and operations owned Facility Inventory and operated by the permittee with the potential for generating polluted Yes 8,9 stormwater runoff. ]I.G.2-b The permittee maintained and implemented an O&M program for municipally Operation and owned and operated facilities with the potential for generating polluted Partial 5,19 Maintenance (OW) stormwater runoff. for Facilities Not If yes, the O&M program specifies the frequency of inspections. Applicable If yes, the O&M program specifies the frequency of routine maintenance Not requirements. Applicable If yes, the permittee evaluated the Q&M program annually and updated it as Not necessary. Applicable Several SOP's have been generated far components of this control measure, but written procedures have not been created. I I.G.2.c Spill Response The permittee had written spill response procedures for municipal operations. No Procedures No written spill response procedures were provided at the time of inspection. II.G.2.d Streets, The permittee evaluated existing and new BM Ps that reduce polluted stormwater Roads, and Public runoff from municipally -owned streets, roads, and public parking lots within its No --- Parking Lots corporate limits annually. If yes, the permittee evaluated the effectiveness of existing and new BMPs Not Maintenance based on cost and the estimated quantity of pollutants removed. Applicable No documentation for annual evaluation of these BMP's was provided. II.G.2.f The permittee maintained and implemented an O&M program for the stormwater ❑&M for Catch sewer system including catch basins and Conveyance systems that it owns and Partial 19 Basins and maintains. Conveyance Systems An SOP exists for the stormwater sewer system catch basin, but an overarching O&M has not been developed. The earliest SOP made available was dated July 8, 2020. II.G.2.d The permittee maintained a current inventory of municipally -owned or operated Structural structural stormwater- controls installed for compliance with the permittee's post- Partial 8,9,20 Stormwater Controls construction ordinance. NC5000483 Kernersvilie M54 Audit_20200923 Page 11 of 19 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations II.G.2.e The permittee maintained and implemented an O&M program for municipally - O&M for Structural owned or maintained structural stormwater controls installed for cam pliance with No --- stormwater Controls the permittee's post -construction ordinance. If yes, then: The O&M program specified the frequency of inspections and routine Not maintenance requirements. Applicable The permittee documented inspections of all municipally -owned or maintained Not structural stormwater controls. Applicable The permittee inspected all municipally -owned or maintained structural Not stormwater controls in accordance with the schedule developed by permittee. Applicable The permittee maintained all municipally -owned or maintained structural Not stormwater controls in accordance with the schedule developed by permittee. Applicable The permittee documented maintenance of all municipally -owned or Not maintained structural stormwater controls. Applicable No 0&M program was available at the time of the audit. II.G.2.f The permittee ensured municipal employees are properly trained in pesticide, 21 Pesticide, Herbicide herbicide and fertilizer application management. Yes and Fertilizer Application The permittee ensured contractors are properly trained in pesticide, herbicide and Not Management fertilizer application management. Applicable The permittee ensured all permits, certifications, and other measures for 21 applicators are followed. yes Pesticide course given to relevant employees annually. II.G.2.g The permittee implemented an employee training program for employees involved Staff Training in implementing pollution prevention and good housekeeping practices. N° - - The training program introduced during the audit did not include any training specific to pollution prevention and good housekeeping. II.G.2.h The permittee described and implemented measures that prevent or minimize Vehicle and contamination of stormwater runoff from all areas used for vehicle and equipment yez 22 Equipment Cleaning cleaning. NC5000483 Kernersville M54 Audit 20200923 Page 12 of 19 Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 1 Facility Name: Date and Time of Site Visit: Kernersville Public Works September 23, 2020, 2:45 PM Facility Address: Facility Type (Vehicle Maintenance, Landscaping, etc.): 720 McKaughan Street Public Works Name of M54 inspector(s) evaluated: Most Recent MS4 Inspection (List date and name of inspector): Not specified Not Reviewed Name(s) and Title(s) of Facility Representative(i) Present During the Site Visit: Name Title Dale Metzinger Streets Superintendent Bill Metzinger Central Maintenance Superintendent Jimmie Moore Fleet Maintenance Supervisor Observations Facility Documentation/Training Does the facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) or similar document? Is it facility -specific? No. The only facility documentation observed was inspection reports. What type of stormwater training do facility employees receive? How often? Annual IDDE training Inspector Training/Knowledge What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? Annual IDDE training Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about Permit requirements for pollution prevention and good housekeeping? No Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about stormwater pollution prevention and good housekeeping? Yes Inspection Procedures Does the MS4 inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? No Does the MS4 inspector's process include taking photos? No Does the MS4 inspector's process include reviewing the facility's SWPPP (or similar document)? No NCS000483 Kernersville MS4 Audit_20200923 Page 13 of 19 Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 1 Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire facility and inspecting all points of discharge? Yes Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious areas of concern? If so, explain: Yes; secondary containment was missing for water tanks. Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the facility contact? No Inspection Results Did the facility inspection result in any corrective actions to be implemented? If so, for what issue(s)? Yes. Secondary containment for the water tanks was discussed. Additionally, potential remedies were discussed for a leaf/compost area that may require corrective actions to maintain the No Exposure Certification for the site. If compliance corrective actions were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided? The facility personnel and MS4 inspector discussed taking immediate action to build a structure for secondary containment. Notes/Comments/Recommendations The inspection was conducted by on -site staff, and not the MS4 inspector. The MS4 inspector must inspect municipal facilities in addition to facility staff including stormwater components in their regular site inspections. NCS000483 KernersviIle MS4 Audit_20200923 Page 14 of 19 Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 1 Outfall ID Number: Date and Time of Site Visit: Not Numbered September 23, 2020, 3:55 PM Outfall Location: Outfall Description (Pipe Material/Diameter, Culvert, etc.): 502 Michael Street Corrugated Metal Pipe Receiving Water: Is Flow Present? If So, Describe (Color, Approximate Flow Rate, Abbotts Creek Sheen, Odor, Floatables/Debris, etc.): Trickle Most Recent Outfall Inspection/Screening (Date): Not Reviewed Days Since Last Rainfall: Inches: Not Reviewed N/A Name of MS4 Inspector(s) evaluated: Donald Schlesselman Observations Inspector Training/Knowledge What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? Annual IDDE training Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about illicit discharge indicators and investigations? Yes Inspection Procedures Does the inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? Yes Does the inspector's process include taking photos? Yes Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious potential illicit discharge indicators or maintenance issues? If so, what were they? No Inspection Results Did the outfall inspection result in any work orders or maintenance requests? If so, for what issue(s)? No Will a follow-up outfall inspection be conducted? If so, for what reason? Yes. Routine. NCS000483 Kernersville MS4 Audit 20200923 Page 15 of 19 Site Visit Evaluation: Post -Construction Stormwater Control Measure No. 1 Site Name: Date and Time of site Visit: Briarcliffe Apartments September 23, 2020, 3:55 PM Site Address: SCM Type: 502 Michael Street Wet Pond Most Recent MS4 Inspection (Include Date and Entity): July 29, 2020—Town of Kernersville Name of MS4 Inspector(s) evaluated: Most Recent MS4 Enforcement Activity (Include Date): Edgar Colop N/A Name(s) and Title(s) of Site Representative(s) Present During the Site Visit: Name Title None Observations Site Documentation Does the site have an operation and maintenance plan? Yes Does the site have records of annual inspections? Are they performed by a qualified individual? Yes Inspector Training/Knowledge What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often? Annual IDDE training Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about MS4 requirements for post -construction site runoff controls? Yes Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about post -construction BMPs (general purpose/function, components, 0&M requirements, etc.)? Yes Inspection Procedures Does the MS4 inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? What format? Yes Does the MS4 inspector's process include taking photos? Yes Does the MS4 inspector's process include reviewing the site's operation and maintenance plan and records of annual inspections? No Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire site and inspecting all points of discharge? Yes Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious operation and maintenance deficiencies? If so, explain: No Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the site contact in writing? Yes Compliance/Enforcement What, if any, enforcement actions (verbal warnings, NOV, etc.) did the inspection result in? None If compliance issues were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided? N/A NCS000483 Kernersville MS4 Audit 20200923 Page 16 of 19 APPENDIX A: PHOTOGRAPH LOG Tanks at the Public Works facility requiring secondary containment. NC5000483 Kernersville M54 Audit 20200923 Page 17 of 19 Post Construction Site on Michael Street. NCS000483 Kernersville M54 Audit_20200923 Page 18 of 19 Outfall located on Michael Street. NC5000483_Kernersville MS4 Audit_20200923 Page 19 of 19