NCG500323_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (63)

W q
!;OQ 9QG ;,,`• Michael F. Easley, Govern
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p ^� Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
`. Division of Water Quality
March 6, 2007
Mr. Mark Hawes, Director of Environment & Safety
Shurtape Technologies, LLC.
Post Office Box 1530
Hickory, North Carolina 28603-1530
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Shurtape Technologies -Stony Point WWTP
NPDES General Permit No. NCG050036
Alexander County, N.C.
Dear Mr. Hawes:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on February 28, 2007, by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office. This Office
commends the efforts of the facility staff responsible for the implementation of the NPDES
(Stormwater) General Permit.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
i�n,'JJohn Lesley
Acting Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Alexander County Health Department
W.
UA
NCDENR
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone]
Internet: www.ncvvaterquality.org 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
Nor` hCarolina
'atura!!il
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG050036 Effective: 05/01/03 Expiration: 04/30/08 Owner: Shurtape Technologies, LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Shurtape Tech Inc -Stony Point
County: Alexander NC Hwy 90
Region: Mooresville
Stony Point NC 28678
Contact Person: Mark E Hawes Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative Mark E Hawes Phone: [phone] ext 5428
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 02/28/2007 Entry Time: 12:28 PM Exit Time: 03:00 PM
I
Primary Inspector: Wesley N Bell r�•'� ., ;� �'. yJr /�(r; t Phone: Ext.23 3-1699
Ext.231
Secondary Inspector(s): �(
Marcia Allocco Vi Cv� Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Apparel/Printing/Paper/Leather/Rubber Stormwater
Discharge COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NC6056036 '; Owner - Facility: Shurtape Technologies, LLC
Inspection Date: 02/28/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ■ n n n
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? ■ 11 n n
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? ■ n n 171
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? ■ n n n
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ■ n n n
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ■ n n n
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ■ n n n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ■ ❑ n n
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? ■ n n n
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ■ f=1 n n
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ■ n n n
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ■ n n n
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ■ n n n
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ■ ❑ n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? ■ 1­1 n n
Comment: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan was organized and well
maintained.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
n
n
n
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
n
n
n
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
n
n
n
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
D
❑
■
Cl
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■
n
n
n
Comment: The facility has five designated stormwater outfalls (001-005). Only Outfall
002 was observed discharging at the time of the inspection. The water appeared clear
with no foam.
Page: 2