Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0026271_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (49)OtO� W AT �RQ G 6 ,,tu 4 Michael F. Easley, Gove or IV William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources January 23, 2007 Mr. David M. Robinette, Public Works Director Town of Taylorsville 67 Main Avenue Drive Taylorsville, -North Carolina 28681 Dear Mr. Robinette: Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality Subject: Notice of Deficiency Compliance Evaluation Inspection Town of Taylorsville WWTP NPDES Permit No. NCO026271 Alexander County, NC Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted at the subject facility on January 19, 2007, by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office. Please inform the facility's Operator -in -Responsible Charge, of our findings by forwarding a copy of the enclosed report. It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by February 13, 2007 addressing the deficiencies noted in the Operation & Maintenance, Bar Screens, Influent Sampling, and Effluent Sampling Sections of the report. In addition, the response should include the Town's efforts to'ensure the two lower digesters are equipped with operable backup blower/motor units. In responding, please address your comments to the attention of Ms. Marcia Allocco. The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning the report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell or me at (704) 663-1699. Sincerely, Michael L. Parker Acting Regional Supervisor Surface Water Protection Enclosure cc: Alexander County Health Department 1'.T/:3 NCDENR Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone 704-663-1699 Internet: www.ncwaterguality.org 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax 704-663-6040 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper NNo ehCarolina aturally Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved. EPA Washington, D.C. 20460 OMB No. 2040-0057 Water Compliance inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type 1 I N 1 2 15I 31 NCO026271 111 121 07/01/19 1 17 181 rlJ 191 sI 20I L! Remarks 211111 1111 11111111 1111 11111111 1111 1111 1 1 1 1 1 - I I I I I16 Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA --------------------------- Reserved ---- ---------------- 67I 1.5 169 7014 I_ 71 I N I 72 LI 73 I I 174 751 I I I I I 1-1 80 1_ I_L_I Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES permit Number)' Taylorsville WWTP 09:15 AM 07/01/19 05/07/01 Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date Minnigan Ln Taylorsville NC 28681 12:15 PM 07/01/19 10/03/31 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data Steve Brian Eades/ORC/828-632-5280/ Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number David Matthew Robinette,67 Main Ave Dr Taylorsville NC 28681/Publicontacted Works Director/828-632-2218/ No Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Wesley N Bell J MRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.231/ Signature of Management Q A Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date ���� Mar ci~locc�MRO WQ//704-235-2204/ EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. Page # 1 Permit: NCO026271 Owner - Facility: Taylorsville WWTP Inspection Date: 01/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? Is the facility as described in the permit? # Are there any special conditions for the permit? Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? Comment: Record Keeping Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? Is all requiredinformation readily available, complete and current? Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? Is the chain -of -custody complete? Dates, times and location of sampling Name of individual performing the sampling Results of analysis and calibration Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses Transported COCs Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? (if the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? Comment: DMRs were reviewed for the period December 05 through November 06. No limit violations were reported. No influent BOD and TSS values were reported on 8/8/06. The inspection verified the discrepancies were transcription errors; therefore, an amended DMR will be submitted. The records were organized and well maintained. Laboratory Page # 3 �11 Permit: NCO026271 Inspection Date: 01/19/2007 Owner - Facility: Taylorsville WWTP Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Laboratory Yes No NA NE Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? ■ ❑ Q Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? ■ n n n # Is the facility using a contract lab? ■ n l] n Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)? ■ Q Cl 0 Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees? 0 ❑ ■ 0 Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees? Q ❑ ■ 0 Comment: On -site field analyses are performed under the Town of Taylorsville's field laboratory certification (#5062). Influent and effluent analyses are also performed by Water Tech Labs, Inc. (Certification #50). Please refer to Mr. Chet Whiting's (Division's Laboratory Certification Unit) inspection report regarding the Town's on -site laboratory practices. Influent Sampling Yes No NA NE # Is composite sampling flow proportional? ■ ❑ ❑ Q Is sample collected above side streams? ■ ❑ ❑ I] Is proper volume collected? ■ n n 0 Is the tubing clean? ■ ❑ Cl n Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)? ■ 0 ❑ 0 Is sampling performed according to the permit? ■ n n n Comment: The sampling program could not be accessed during the inspection due to a malfunction in the internal programming system. The ORC has had continued programs accessing the sampler's program. The sampler should be repaired/replaced to ensure the ORC can adequately program the sampler according to permit- . requirements. Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE Is. composite sampling flow proportional? ■ ❑ 0 0 Is sample collected below all treatment units? ' ■ ❑ ❑ Q Is proper volume collected? ■ Q Q 0 Is the tubing clean? ■ Q ❑ Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)? ■ o ❑ Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ Q O Q Comment: The sampling program for the sampler was not accessible due to problems associated with internal programming system. The ORC has had continued problems accessing the sampler's program system. The sampler should be repaired/replaced to ensure the ORC can adequately program the sampler according to permit requirements. Page # 4 Permit: NCO026271 Owner - Facility: Taylorsville WVVTP Inspection Date: 01/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ❑ ■ ❑ Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS; MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Judge, and other that are applicable? Comment: Approximately 500 gallons had spilled onto the ground adjacent to the two upper digesters. All affected areas should be properly remediated including the proper removal and disposal of the solids. Note: See "Bar Screens" Section also. Bar Screens Yes No NA NE Type of bar screen a.Manual ■ b.Mechanical ■ Are the bars adequately screening debris? ■ Is the screen free of excessive debris? ■ 0 El 0 Is disposal of screening in compliance? ■ Q 0 Is the unit in good condition? ■ 'fl Q 0 Comment: Overall, the screenings are properly disposed; however, the facility staff failed to clean up the screenings on the ground (adjacent/underneath the conveyor system) following recent maintenance activities. Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE Mode of operation Ext. Air Type of aeration system Diffused Is the basin free of dead spots? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Are surface aerators and mixers operational? ❑ Cl ■ ❑ Are the diffusers operational? ■ Cl Q Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? ■ 0 Q Cl Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface? ■ Q ❑ ❑ Is the DO level acceptable? ■ Q 0 Cl Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1) ■ D 0 0 Comment: The facility utilizes two aeration basins (circular). One of the three blower/motor units was not operational due to a control panel malfunction. Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? ■ ❑ 0 Cl Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? ■ 0 0 El Page # 5 Permit: NCO026271 Owner - Facility: Taylorsville WWTP Inspection Date: 01/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE Are weirs level?, ■ n n 0 Is the site free of weir blockage? ■ Cl n Cl Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? ■ n n n Is scum removal adequate? ■ n ❑ n Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? ■ n n n Is the drive unit operational? ■ n n n Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)? ■ n n n Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? ■ n n n Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/4 of the sidewall depth) ■ n C1 n Comment: The facility utilizes two secondary clarifiers. One of the secondary clarifiers was turbid due to a high solids inventory and recent sludge wasting efforts. Disinfection -Gas Yes No NA NE Are cylinders secured adequately? ■ ❑ n Are cylindersprotected from direct sunlight? ■ n n n Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant? ■ n n n Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable? Cl n n ■ Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup? ■ n n n Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination? Cl n n ■ Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)? 0 n ■ If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site? ❑ p ■ 0 If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- - ) If yes, then when was the RMP last updated? . Comment: The facility utilizes two chlorine contact chambers. The water clarity in one of the chlorine contact chamber trains was turbid (See also Secondary Clarifier Section). De -chlorination Yes No NA NE Type of system ? Gas Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is storage appropriate for cylinders? ■ n ❑ 0 # Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers? ■ n n n Comment: Page # 6 AA Permit: NC002.6271 Owner - Facility: Taylorsville WWTP Inspection Date: 01/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation De -chlorination Yes No NA NE Are the tablets the proper size and type? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Are tablet de -chlorinators operational? ❑ Cl ■ ❑ Number of tubes in use? Comment: Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE # Is flow meter used for reporting? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is flow meter calibrated annually? ■ ❑ ❑' ❑ Is the flow meter operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ (If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Comment: The flow meter was last calibrated by Johnston, Inc. on 7/18/06. The flow meter is calibrated annually. Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ Comment: The effluent appeared turbid with no foam. The receiving stream was not evaluated. Standby Power Yes No NA NE Is automatically activated standby power available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source? ■ Cl ❑ ❑ Is the generator tested under load? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Was generator tested & operational during the inspection? ■ Q ❑ ❑ Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power? ■ Cl ❑ ❑ Is the generator fuel level monitored? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE Is the capacity adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the mixing adequate? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the odor acceptable? ■ ❑ ❑ Cl Page # 7 Permit: NCO026271 Owner - Facility: Taylorsville WWTP Inspection Date: 01/19/2607 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE # Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? ■ n 0 0 Comment: The facility lime stabilizes in four digestors prior to land application (WQ0006906)*. Two of four blower/motor units were not operational for the two lower digesters. The permittee must ensure that the lower digesters have operable backup blower/motor units for adequate sludge mixing and treatment. 0 I Page # 8 MAYOR Guy E. Barriger COMMISSIONERS Glenn P. Deal Bob Phillips George B. Holleman TOWN MANAGER David Odom TOWN CLERK Yolanda T. Prince Town of Tayforsviffe""k: _= : ` 67 Main Avenue Drive • Taylorsville, NC 28681 1 Phone (828) 632-2218 • FAX (828) 632-7964 j� JAN 2 92007 January 25, 2007 ATTN: Ms. Marcia Allocco Division of Water Quality Mooresville Regional Office Dear Ms. Alloco, NAIL . 1b ;L,. 1. Compliance Evaluation Inspection Taylorville WWTP-NPDES #NC0026271 Alexander County, NC This letter addresses the deficientcies noted during our January 19th, 2007 inspection by Mr. Wes Bell. The August 2006 DMR has been ammended to reflect the proper Influent test results -(RECORD KEEPING). I also have placed an order for two new refrigerated compositers for Influent and Effluent programing. The old ones will be discarded upon arrival of the new units-(INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLING). PLA (sludge haulers) have set up today to remove excess solids to rectify our turbidity problems on side #2, which in turn will clear up our #2 CL2 train and the Final Effluent - (SECONDARY CLARIFIERS/EFFLUENT). (OPERATION & MAINTENANCE) -We have removed all sludge via vacuum truck to be placed back in the digester. The grass has been "limed" where 500 gallon spill occured. (BAR SCREENS) -Conveyor unit had slid out of position and had since been moved back into place to capture all debris from screener. Scum spillage has been shoveled into dumpster. (AERATION BASINS/AEROBIC DIGESTERS)-Land's Electric Company has been contracted to repair blower panels at all three locations. The one digester pump that is locked -up will be repaired. If there are any other items that need to be addressed, please contact me at (828)-632-5280. Thank you. Sincerely, f � Mr. Brian Eades Taylorsville WWTP ORC The Town of Taylorsville does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability in employment or the provision of services