HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0026271_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (49)OtO� W AT �RQ G
6
,,tu 4
Michael F. Easley, Gove or IV
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
January 23, 2007
Mr. David M. Robinette, Public Works Director
Town of Taylorsville
67 Main Avenue Drive
Taylorsville, -North Carolina 28681
Dear Mr. Robinette:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Town of Taylorsville WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO026271
Alexander County, NC
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on January 19, 2007, by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office. Please inform the
facility's Operator -in -Responsible Charge, of our findings by forwarding a copy of the enclosed report.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this Office by February 13, 2007 addressing
the deficiencies noted in the Operation & Maintenance, Bar Screens, Influent Sampling, and Effluent
Sampling Sections of the report. In addition, the response should include the Town's efforts to'ensure the
two lower digesters are equipped with operable backup blower/motor units. In responding, please address
your comments to the attention of Ms. Marcia Allocco.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning the
report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell or me at (704) 663-1699.
Sincerely,
Michael L. Parker
Acting Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Alexander County Health Department
1'.T/:3
NCDENR
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone 704-663-1699
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.org 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax 704-663-6040
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
NNo ehCarolina
aturally
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 I N 1 2 15I 31 NCO026271 111 121 07/01/19 1 17 181 rlJ 191 sI 20I
L!
Remarks
211111 1111 11111111 1111 11111111 1111 1111 1 1 1 1 1 - I I I I I16
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA --------------------------- Reserved ---- ----------------
67I 1.5 169 7014 I_ 71 I N I 72 LI 73 I I 174 751 I I I I I 1-1 80
1_ I_L_I
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)'
Taylorsville WWTP
09:15 AM 07/01/19
05/07/01
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
Minnigan Ln
Taylorsville NC 28681
12:15 PM 07/01/19
10/03/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Steve Brian Eades/ORC/828-632-5280/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
David Matthew Robinette,67 Main Ave Dr Taylorsville NC 28681/Publicontacted
Works Director/828-632-2218/ No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Wesley N Bell J MRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.231/
Signature of Management Q A Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
����
Mar ci~locc�MRO WQ//704-235-2204/
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1
Permit: NCO026271 Owner - Facility: Taylorsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
Comment:
Record Keeping
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
Is all requiredinformation readily available, complete and current?
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
(if the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Comment: DMRs were reviewed for the period December 05 through November 06.
No limit violations were reported. No influent BOD and TSS values were reported on
8/8/06. The inspection verified the discrepancies were transcription errors; therefore, an
amended DMR will be submitted. The records were organized and well maintained.
Laboratory
Page # 3
�11
Permit: NCO026271
Inspection Date: 01/19/2007
Owner - Facility: Taylorsville WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory
Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■ ❑ Q
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
■ n n n
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
■ n l] n
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
■ Q Cl 0
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
0 ❑ ■ 0
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
Q ❑ ■ 0
Comment: On -site field analyses are performed under the Town of Taylorsville's field
laboratory certification (#5062). Influent and effluent analyses are also performed by
Water Tech Labs, Inc. (Certification #50). Please refer to Mr. Chet Whiting's (Division's
Laboratory Certification Unit) inspection report regarding the Town's on -site laboratory
practices.
Influent Sampling
Yes
No
NA NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■
❑
❑ Q
Is sample collected above side streams?
■
❑
❑ I]
Is proper volume collected?
■
n
n 0
Is the tubing clean?
■
❑
Cl n
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
■
0
❑ 0
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
■
n
n n
Comment: The sampling program could not be accessed during the inspection due to
a malfunction in the internal programming system. The ORC has had continued
programs accessing the sampler's program. The sampler should be repaired/replaced
to ensure the ORC can adequately program the sampler according to permit- .
requirements.
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is. composite sampling flow proportional? ■ ❑ 0 0
Is sample collected below all treatment units? ' ■ ❑ ❑ Q
Is proper volume collected? ■ Q Q 0
Is the tubing clean? ■ Q ❑
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)? ■ o ❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ Q O Q
Comment: The sampling program for the sampler was not accessible due to problems
associated with internal programming system. The ORC has had continued problems
accessing the sampler's program system. The sampler should be repaired/replaced to
ensure the ORC can adequately program the sampler according to permit requirements.
Page # 4
Permit: NCO026271 Owner - Facility: Taylorsville WVVTP
Inspection Date: 01/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ❑ ■ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS; MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: Approximately 500 gallons had spilled onto the ground adjacent to the two
upper digesters. All affected areas should be properly remediated including the proper
removal and disposal of the solids. Note: See "Bar Screens" Section also.
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual ■
b.Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■ 0
El
0
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■ Q
0
Is the unit in good condition?
■ 'fl
Q
0
Comment: Overall, the screenings are properly disposed; however, the facility staff
failed to clean up the screenings on the ground (adjacent/underneath the conveyor
system) following recent maintenance activities.
Aeration Basins
Yes
No
NA
NE
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Diffused
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
❑
Cl
■
❑
Are the diffusers operational?
■
Cl
Q
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
0
Q
Cl
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■
Q
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
■
Q
0
Cl
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
■
D
0
0
Comment: The facility utilizes two aeration basins (circular). One of the three
blower/motor units was not operational due to a control panel malfunction.
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? ■ ❑ 0 Cl
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? ■ 0 0 El
Page # 5
Permit: NCO026271 Owner - Facility: Taylorsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Are weirs level?, ■ n n 0
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■
Cl
n
Cl
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■
n
n
n
Is scum removal adequate?
■
n
❑
n
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
■
n
n
n
Is the drive unit operational?
■
n
n
n
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
■
n
n
n
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
■
n
n
n
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/4 of the sidewall depth)
■
n
C1
n
Comment: The facility utilizes two secondary clarifiers. One of the secondary clarifiers
was turbid due to a high solids inventory and recent sludge wasting efforts.
Disinfection -Gas
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
■
❑
n
Are cylindersprotected from direct sunlight?
■
n
n
n
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■
n
n
n
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
Cl
n
n
■
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■
n
n
n
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
Cl
n
n
■
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
0
n
■
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
❑
p
■
0
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- - )
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated? .
Comment: The facility utilizes two chlorine contact chambers. The water clarity in one
of the chlorine contact chamber trains was turbid (See also Secondary Clarifier
Section).
De -chlorination
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of system ?
Gas
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
■
n
❑
0
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
■
n
n
n
Comment:
Page # 6
AA
Permit: NC002.6271 Owner - Facility: Taylorsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
De -chlorination
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
❑
❑
■
❑
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
❑
Cl
■
❑
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■
❑
❑'
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: The flow meter was last calibrated by Johnston, Inc. on 7/18/06. The flow
meter is calibrated annually.
Effluent Pipe
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
❑
❑
❑
■
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
❑
❑
❑
■
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: The effluent appeared turbid with no foam. The receiving stream was not
evaluated.
Standby Power
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
■
Cl
❑
❑
Is the generator tested under load?
■
❑
❑
❑
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
■
Q
❑
❑
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
■
Cl
❑
❑
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Aerobic Digester
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the capacity adequate?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the mixing adequate?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the odor acceptable?
■
❑
❑
Cl
Page # 7
Permit: NCO026271 Owner - Facility: Taylorsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 01/19/2607 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? ■ n 0 0
Comment: The facility lime stabilizes in four digestors prior to land application
(WQ0006906)*. Two of four blower/motor units were not operational for the two lower
digesters. The permittee must ensure that the lower digesters have operable backup
blower/motor units for adequate sludge mixing and treatment.
0
I
Page # 8
MAYOR
Guy E. Barriger
COMMISSIONERS
Glenn P. Deal
Bob Phillips
George B. Holleman
TOWN MANAGER
David Odom
TOWN CLERK
Yolanda T. Prince
Town of Tayforsviffe""k: _= : `
67 Main Avenue Drive • Taylorsville, NC 28681 1
Phone (828) 632-2218 • FAX (828) 632-7964
j� JAN 2 92007
January 25, 2007
ATTN: Ms. Marcia Allocco
Division of Water Quality
Mooresville Regional Office
Dear Ms. Alloco,
NAIL . 1b ;L,. 1.
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Taylorville WWTP-NPDES #NC0026271
Alexander County, NC
This letter addresses the deficientcies noted during our January 19th, 2007
inspection by Mr. Wes Bell.
The August 2006 DMR has been ammended to reflect the proper Influent test
results -(RECORD KEEPING). I also have placed an order for two new refrigerated
compositers for Influent and Effluent programing. The old ones will be discarded
upon arrival of the new units-(INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLING). PLA (sludge
haulers) have set up today to remove excess solids to rectify our turbidity problems
on side #2, which in turn will clear up our #2 CL2 train and the Final Effluent -
(SECONDARY CLARIFIERS/EFFLUENT).
(OPERATION & MAINTENANCE) -We have removed all sludge via vacuum truck
to be placed back in the digester. The grass has been "limed" where 500 gallon spill
occured. (BAR SCREENS) -Conveyor unit had slid out of position and had since
been moved back into place to capture all debris from screener. Scum spillage has
been shoveled into dumpster. (AERATION BASINS/AEROBIC DIGESTERS)-Land's
Electric Company has been contracted to repair blower panels at all three locations.
The one digester pump that is locked -up will be repaired.
If there are any other items that need to be addressed, please contact me at
(828)-632-5280. Thank you.
Sincerely,
f �
Mr. Brian Eades
Taylorsville WWTP ORC
The Town of Taylorsville does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin,
sex, religion, age or disability in employment or the provision of services