Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0034860_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (23)NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION PERMIT NO.: _NC0034860 PERMITTEE NAME: FACILITY NAME: Schneider Mills, Inc. Schneider Mills, Inc. Facility Status: Existing Permit Status: Renewal Major Minor Sol ®�§ Ago Pipe No.: QQ1 0.!�5 t �o Design Capacity: 0.780 MGD Domestic (% of Flow): 1 % Industrial (% of Flow): 99 % Comments: See effluent guideline limitations attached RECEIVING STREAM: Muddy Fork Creek Class: C Sub -Basin: 03-08-32 Reference USGS Quad: D 14 NW (please attach) County: Alexander Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office Previous Exp. Date: 8/31/93 Treatment Plant Class: II Classification changes within three miles: None Requested by: Greg Nizich Prepared by:e / U Reviewed b Y /38.2-s Date: 12/22/92 Date: 41 Z z 93 Date: Modeler Date Rec. # 5M►J l7i v % Drainage Area (mil) Avg. Streamflow (cfs) 7Q10 (cfs) A y Winter 7Q10 (cfs) ; 2 30Q2 (cfs) 3. 0 Toxicity Limits: IWC 9� % Acut Chronic Instream Monitoring: Parameters �, 7 Upstream Y Loca on Downstream s7 y Location e 3 Effluent Characteristics yyyy,, BODS d-) '?e1 g3.2 593 a_tz13.5,M /L NH3-N (mg/1) 1,9 T S S (,*/J-) /53 33s pH (SU) iv — C/ 0 Comments: Schneider, Mills, Inc. NCO034860 FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGERS, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW Effluent Characteristics Monthly Average lbs/day Daily Maximum lbs/day Comments BOD5 281 543 COD 836 1299 TSS 153 335 H6to9 } f Type of Product Produced . Lbs/Day Produced Effluent Guideline Reference Weaved Cloth 61,000 CFR Part 410 Subpart C - Water Jet Weaving MW Facility Naive: NPDES No.: Type of Waste: Facility. S tatus: Permit Status: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification Subbasin: County: Regional Office: Requestor: Date of Request: Topo Quad: FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Request # Schneider. Mills, Inc. NCO034860 Domestic - 107o, W6:T*\"WA Existing Renewal Muddy Fork Creek C 7289 "VIS tfEa - ,-j'rip - 030832 3ai ut YSiL�+t ILSf? T P nu Alexander Stream Characten tic. Mooresville %#C USGS # Nizich Date: " 12/29/92 Drainage Area (mi2): 8 D14NW Summer 7010 (cfs)- 1 4 Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 2.2 Average Flow (cfs): 8.8 30Q2 (cfs): 3.0 IWC M: 46 Wasteload Allocation Summary (approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) Facility requesting renewal of existing NPDES permit. Increase in production requires higher effluent guidelines -for BOD5, COD and TSS. Technical Support recommends renewal of permit with effluent guidelines -and additional monitoring requirements for metals. Recommended b Reviewed by Instream Assessment: Regional Supervisor: Pen -nits & Engineerin j.¢�r ;RETi7RN TO,IIlVICAL SERVICES BY: Date:_4/2/93_ YIAY 0 1993 WN! 2 Type of Toxicity Test: Existing Limit: Recommended Limit: Monitoring Schedule: Existing Limits BOD5 (#/d): NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TS S (#/d): pH (SU): COD (#/d): TP (mg/1): TN (mg/1): Zinc (µg/1): Recommended Limits F BOD5 (#/d): NH3N (mg/1): TOXICS/Iv1ETALS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS Chronic Pass/Fail Qrtrly 45% 46% MAR JUN SEP DEC DO (mg/1): TSS (#/d): pH (SU): COD (#/d): Cadmium Nickel (µg/1): Lead (µg/1): Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (ug/1) Zinc (µg/1): Mercury (4g/1): Silver (µg/1): Monthly Avg. 230 monitor 5 125 6-9 685 monitor monitor monitor c . 9 1d J Monthly Avg. 281 and 43.2 mg/1 1.9 (Summer) 4.7 (winter) 5 153 h96 cP `1 ,6=9- S3CD Limits. Changes Due To: Change in 7Q 10 data Change in stream classification Relocation of -discharge Change in wasteflow New pretreatment information Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.), Daily Max. WQ or EL 291 WQ monitor 5 WQ 275 EL 6-9 WQ 1065 . EL monitor monitor monitor Daily Max. WQ or EL 543#/d and 83.5 EL mg/1 5 WQ 335 EL V-9 � DC9 EL Qrtrly monitoring Qrtrly monitoring Qrtrly monitoring Qrtrly monitoringo, — ►6(0w AD Mon. monitoring wiyl t rtrly monitoring Qrtrly monitoring Parameter s) Affected Cd, Ni, Pb,Bis-2e phthalate,. Hg,Ag Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers- within this portion of the watershed. OR No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. owl 3 INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Upstream Location: 50 ft. upstream of outfall Downstream Location: At SR1313 Parameters: BOD5, DO, Conductivity, Temperature Special instream monitoring.locations or monitoring frequencies: MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Adequacy of Existing Treatment ti Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment facilities? Yes _ No If no, which parameters cannot be met? Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office recommendations: If no, why not? Special Instructions or Condition Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _ _ (Y or N) (If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if .not modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan) Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments. MW Facility Name YAO/WW Permit # ,t/C<m 3y26 ° Pipe # . 66 / CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY) The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using.test procedures outlined in: 1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions. The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality is `/L % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform quarerly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be -performed after thirty days from the effective dateof this.permit, unng the months of NIg2 Y ZW SEP pEG . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the N_ PDES permitted final effluent discharge below alltreatmeni processes. All toxicity testing results required as part of this .permit condition will -be entered on the Effluent. Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch North Carolina Division of Environmental Management 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, N.C. 27607 Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data: Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate afailure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will begin immediately until. such time that a single test is passed.. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified"above. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements. 7Q10 cfs Permitted Flow o- Y D MGD IWC ill Basin & Sub -basin Cie 3 z- Receiving Stream Mv, d F—t(- Ci; Ll C County /4 w" R mmended by:. �at, �/5-19-3 QCL PIF Version 9191