NC0034967_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018 (11)

PERMIT NO.: NCO034967
PERMITTEE NAME:, Carolina Glove Company, Inc.
FACILITY NAME: Carolina Glove Company
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.015 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
100 %
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
RECEIVING STREAM: the Lower Little River
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03=08732
Reference USGS Quad: D14NW (please attach)
County: Alexander
Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 5/31/92 Treatment Plant Class: class I
Classification changes within three miles:
No change within three miles
Requested by: Randy Kepler
Prepared b.
Reviewed p�Y)
�a D w /3S
Date: 3/6/92
Date:
Date:
//1�
Modeler
. Date REL
�M ti1
3
9
-1
Drainage Area (miz) 63,1 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 71, �c
7Q10 (cfs) /Z. ,? Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 217 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
30
NH3-N (mg/1)
nr
D.O. (mom)
TSS (mg/1)
3�
F. Col. (/100 ml)
pH (SU)
t!p
�T'rY �2CZS AND ,
01992
DIVISION
f y,
11
f E(ihrl�°JJ rr. rP.,1 F1,
Comments:

FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
RequA f. DEPT. �IATURAIi
Facility Name:
Carolina Glove Co.
RESOUR AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT,
NPDES No.:
NCO034967
Type of Waste:
Domestic - 100%
APR 2 2 1992;
Facility Status:
Existing
Permit Status:
Renewal
Receiving Stream:
Lower Little River
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL. mun uff
Stream Classification:
C
MOORESVILLE REOMML WIN/
Subbasin:
030832
County:
Alexander
Stream Characteristic:
Regional Office:
Mooresville WAA
USGS #
Requestor:
Kepler
Date:
Date of Request:
3/9/92
Drainage Area (mi2): 63.8
Topo Quad:
D14NW
Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 12.8
Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 21.7
Average Flow (cfs): 71.4
30Q2 (cfs): 30.6
IWC (%):
Wasteload Allocation Summary
I'
r�
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)�r�
=�
Facility requesting renewal of NPDES permit. Tech Support recommends renewal of existing
effluent limits.
Q
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
E5
�-
�
cif.
Recommended
Reviewed by L/
Instream Assessment:
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineerin
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
Date:_4/13/92
MAY I -q
y,sya
-51
g2
1774

2
Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (4GD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 Fil):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil. & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/l):
TN (mg/1):
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
0.015
.30
monitor
nr
30
.nr
nr
Monthly Average
_,Summer Winter
0.015
30
nr
nr
30
nr
nr
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge .
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
WQ or EL
Parameter(s) Affected
Parameters) are water quality limited. For some parameters; the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
•M
X_ No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment _
facilities? Yes - No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new, limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations: r
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _N_ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.