WI0300085_Sampling and Analysis_20030924

ADDENDUM #3 TO THE
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN FOR THE
FEASIBILITY STUDY/REMEDIAL DESIGN
AT THE
FORMER NAVAL AMMUNITION DEPOT (NAD),
MECKLENBURG COUNTY,
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
CONTRACT NUMBER DACA21-95-D-0022
DELIVERY ORDER NUMBER 0066
September 2003
FINAL
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703

FINAL
ADDENDUM #3 TO THE
SAMPLING AND. ANALYSIS PLAN FOR THE
FEASIBILITY STUDY/REMEDIAL DESIGN
AT THE
FORMER NAVAL AMMUNITION DEPOT (NAD)
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Savannah District
Under Contract DACA21-95-D-0022
Delivery Order Number 0066
Prepared by:
SAIC Engineering of North Carolina, Inc.
151 Lafayette Drive
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
September 2003
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703

SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
contributed to the preparation of this document and should not
be considered an eligible contractor for its review.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703

CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................... v
PART I - FIELD SAMPLING PLAN
TitlePage.......................................................................................................................................vii
Tableof Contents............................................................................................................................ ix
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION....................................................................................................1-1
2.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES....................................................2-1
3.0 PROJECT SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES................................................................................3-1
4.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES.............................................................................................................4-1
5.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE.........................................................................................................5-1
APPENDICES
AREFERENCES............................................................................................................................ A-1
B RIGHT -OF -ENTRY AGREEMENT............................................................................................ B-1
C WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAMS AND BORING LOGS .................................................. C-1
DRESUMES...................................................................................................................................D-1
E PRODUCT INFORMATION....................................................................................................... E-1
PART 11- QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN
TitlePage...........................................................................................................................................i
Tableof Contents........................................................................................................................... iii
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION....................................................................................................1-1
2.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES.....................................................2-1
3.0 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES..........................................................................................3-1
4.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND PROCEDURES.................................................................4-1
APPENDICES
AREFERENCES............................................................................................................................ A-1
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 iii

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 1V

INTRODUCTION
This Addendum #3 supplements the Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for the Feasibility
Study/Remedial Design at the Former Naval Ammunition Depot (NAD), Mecklenburg County, Charlotte,
North Carolina (SAIC 2000). It presents changes to the SAP and the specific requirements for the
performance of the Pilot Study at the Former NAD Site. The investigation activities will be conducted by
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIL) Engineering of North Carolina, Inc., hereafter
referred to as SAIC Engineering.
Addendum #3 to the SAP for the Former NAD Site consists of two parts: the Field Sampling Plan (FSP)
and the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP). An addendum to the Site Safety and Health Plan for the
project will be prepared as a separate, stand-alone document. The FSP provides guidance and rationale for
the Pilot Study by defining the project's purpose, scope, and objectives; environmental setting; data
quality objectives (DQOs); description of proposed field activities and chemical testing; and project
schedule and milestones. The QAPP describes the policy, organization, functional activities, and quality
assurance/quality control protocols necessary to achieve the project's DQOs.
Addendum #3 has been prepared in accordance with requirements as defined in the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) guidance EM-200-1-3 (February 1, 2001). The contents of this Addendum have been
prepared by SAIC Engineering in accordance with the project scope of work, as modified by subsequent
technical direction developed by USACE, Savannah District for Delivery Order No. 0066, under contract
DACA21-95-D-0022.
Although the FSP and QAPP are included in this Addendum, each plan has been prepared' as a
stand-alone document. In cases in which similar information is required in one or more plans, the
information is presented in detail within only one plan and is subsequently referenced, as required, in the
other plan.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 v

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 V i

ADDENDUM #3 TO THE
FIELD SAMPLING PLAN FOR THE
FORMER NAVAL AMMUNITION DEPOT (NAD)
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
September 2003
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 V 11

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 Vlll

CONTENTS
FIGURES............................................................................................................................................... xi
TABLES................................................................................................................................................ xi
ACRONYMS......................................................................................................................................... xi
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...........................................................................................................1-1
1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION..........................................................................................................1-4
1.2 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND TOPOGRAPHY..........................................................................1-4
1.3 CLIMATIC CONDITIONS.................................................................................................1-4
1.4 GEOLOGY.........................................................................................................................1-5
1.4.1 Soils..........................................................................................................................1-5
1.4.2 Bedrock.....................................................................................................................1-9
1.5 HYDROGEOLOGY............................................................................................................1-9
2.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES............................................................2-1
2.1 PROJECT ORGANIZATION.............................................................................................2-1
3.0 PROJECT SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES..........................:.............................................................3-1
3.1 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES...............................................................................................3-1
3.2 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES........................................................................................3-3
3.3.1 QO Step 1: Identify Decision Types...........................................................................3-3
3.3.2 QO Step 2: Identify Data Needs.................................................................................3-4
3.3.3 QO Step 3: Specify Data Collection...........................................................................3-4
4.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES......................................................................................................................4-1
4.1
INJECTION AND MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS...................................................4-1
4.2
DRILLING METHODS......................................................................................................4-1
4.2.1 Transition Zone and Injection Wells..........................................................................4-1
4.2.2 Bedrock Zone Wells..................................................................................................4-2
4.3
MONITORING WELL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION.........................................4-2
4.3.1 Monitoring Well Material..........................................................................................4-2
4.3.2 Monitoring Well Construction...................................................................................4-5
4.3.3 Monitoring Well Development..................................................................................4-6
4.4
SODIUM LACTATE AND BROMIDE INJECTION..........................................................4-6
4.4.1- Baseline Sampling.....................................................................................................4-6
4.4.2 Injection System Materials and Operation..................................................................4-9
4.4.3 Monitoring..............................................................................................................4-12
5.0 SAMPLE CHAIN OF CUSTODY/DOCUMENTATION............................................................5-16
5.1
SAMPLE NUMBERING SYSTEM....................................................................................5-1
6.0 INVESTIGATION -DERIVED WASTE.
7.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE ..................
APPENDICES
A REFERENCES .........................................
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703
............................................ .....................6-1
......................................................................
ix
7-1
A-1

B RIGHT -OF -ENTRY AGREEMENT....................................................................................... B-1
C WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAMS AND BORING LOGS C-1
DRESUMES..............................................................................................................................D-1
EPRODUCT INFORMATION.................................................................................................. E-1
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 R

FIGURES
1-1
Site Map of the Former NAD Site, Charlotte, North Carolina......................................................1-3
1-2
Cross-section A -A' Within the Former NAD Site Pilot Study Focus Area....................................1-7
1-3
Cross-section B-B' Within the Former NAD Site Pilot Study Focus Area.....................................1-8
1-4
Shallow Zone Potentiometric Surface, 1999/2003......................................................................1-11
1-5
Transition Zone Potentiometric Surface, 1999/2003...................................................................1-12
1-6
Bedrock Zone Potentiometric Surface, April 2003.....................................................................1-13
2-1
Organizational Chart for the Pilot Study at the Former NAD Site, Charlotte, North Carolina .......2-2
3-1
Pilot Study Focus Area at the Former NAD Site..........................................................................3-2
4-1
Transition Zone Monitoring Well Construction Diagram.............................................................4-3
4-2
Bedrock Zone Monitoring Well Construction Diagram................................................................4-4
4-3
Batch Tank and Injection System Pump..................:..................................................................4-10
4-4
Injection System Control Panel...................................................................................................4-11
4-5
Typical Injection Well Head Configuration...............................................................................4-13
TABLES
2-1 Key Field Personnel Assignments and Qualifications for the Pilot Study at the Former
NAD Site .............. :.........................................................................:...........................................
2-3
4-1 Sampling and Analytical Requirements for the Baseline Sampling Event and FLUTeTm
Wells
4-2 Sampling and Analytical Requirements for the Monitoring Events............................................4-14
5-1 Sample'Numbering Scheme for the Pilot Study at the Former NAD Site......................................5-2
ACRONYMS
bgs
below ground surface
COD
chemical oxygen demand
DNAPL
dense nonaqueous-phase liquid
DO
dissolved oxygen
DQO
data quality objective
FS
Feasibility Study
FSP
Field Sampling Plan
gpm
gallons per minute
ID
inside diameter
IDW
investigation -derived waste
M&E
Metcalf and Eddy
MSDS
Materials Safety Data Sheet
NAD
Naval Ammunition Depot
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
NTU
nephelometric turbidity unit
ORP
oxidation-reduction potential
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 xi

ppm parts per million -
PMP Project Management Plan
psi pounds per square inch
PVC polyvinyl chloride
RD Remedial Design
RI Remedial Investigation
QA quality assurance
QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan
QC quality control
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
RD Remedial Design
SAIC Science Applications International- Corporation
SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan
TCE trichloroethene
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
VOC volatile organic compound
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 Xii

1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This document represents Addendum #3 to the Field Sampling Plan (FSP) for the Pilot Study to be
performed at the Former Naval Ammunition Depot (NAD) Site by Science Applications International
Corporation (SAIC) Engineering of North Carolina, Inc., hereafter referred to as SAIC Engineering,
which is a wholly owned subsidiary of SAIC. It presents changes to the FSP and the specific requirements
for the performance of the Pilot Study at the Former NAD Site (Figure 1-1). Investigations at the Former NAD
Site have been conducted since 1990 when site assessments were conducted as part of property real estate
transactions. During these early investigations, trichloroethene (TCE) was identified as a primary groundwater
contaminant. Beginning in 1994, Metcalf and Eddy, Inc. (M&E) conducted a Phase I Remedial Investigation
(RI) [M&E 1995] followed by a Phase II RI in 1999 (M&E 2000). These investigations focused on the areas
referred to as Former NAD Areas 1 and 2. The RIs concluded that TCE was the most widespread constituent
with the highest concentrations and that the majority of the TCE was detected in the transition zone. While the
RI defined the vertical extent of the TCE, the horizontal extent of the TCE plume was not completely
identified. The Phase II RI recommended that the TCE plume be further defined prior to implementing the
Feasibility Study/Remedial Design (FS/RD).
In November 2000, SAIC implemented the RI recommendations as part of the FS/RD effort. Evaluation
of the data collected during this investigation indicated that site conditions had changed significantly
since the Phase II RI was conducted in July 1999. Results indicated that the water table had dropped more
than 20 ft in some bedrock wells and that the groundwater flow direction shifted from west to southwest.
In addition, contaminant concentrations were shown to have changed over time with the extent of the
TCE contamination in the northern portion of the TCE plume decreasing. An investigation to determine
the cause for these changes revealed that a well field, located less than 150 ft southwest of the Former
NAD Site (NAD Area 2) on Nevada Boulevard, consisting of three, 8-in.-diameter water supply wells had
been installed for water production purposes in June 1999 (Figure 1-1). These wells (WF-1, WF-2, and
WF-3) were brought on-line in July 2000 and were reported to have a combined flow rate of approximately
0.5 million gallons per day.. The use of these wells ceased on May 6, 2001.
From April 2001 through April 2003, additional delineation efforts, triggered by the off -site pumping of
the three water supply wells, were conducted by SAIC to gain a better understanding of the current site
conditions. These activities included collecting groundwater samples for volatile organic compound
(VOC) analysis from selected existing site monitoring wells and from the three water supply wells,
conducting geophysical surveys, installing three deep bedrock multizone FLUT6rm monitoring wells, and
collecting multiple rounds of water level measurements. Based on the results, it was determined that with
the current site conditions, complete delineation of the dissolved -phase VOCs in the fractured bedrock
underlying the site is not achievable. Recommendations were made to focus on the areas where the TCE
concentrations exceed 500 µg/L.
Prior to writing an FS to address the VOC impacts at the Former NAD Site, a pilot study will be
conducted. The purpose of the study will be to evaluate the potential of biostimulation as a remedial
approach for the site and to better understand the hydraulics near NAD MW-21, which has historically
contained the highest concentrations of TCE.
This Addendum #3 provides an overview of the Pilot Study, including the proposed field activities,
chemical testing, and procedures to be used in executing the field activities. The Project Management
Plan (PMP), including the primary project organization and responsibilities, is presented in Chapter 2.0,
while the project scope and objectives are found in Chapter 3.0. Sampling design, procedures, methods,
and rationales are discussed in detail in Chapter 4.0. Sample matrix types, analytical parameters, and
analytical methods can be found in Chapter 5.0. The project schedule is provided in Chapter 6.0.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 1-1

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 1-2

�*
\\ CNCO•--' HP11 rr N 505,200 + LEGEND:
........................PRIMARY BUILDING
W10\\ \ o ............................ASPHALT ROAD
* �1101 �* DYKE \NNADMW64�� owGpO c _ _ _ _ _ ....................... GRAVEL ROAD
\ INDUST*'j��% R J2 pRR \ ---�........................RAILROAD TRACKS
... FENCE LINE
....................DITCH
...................
VERSAR9 ✓ ``' ....TREE OR TREELINE
4b RSAR26 C.............................SHALLOW ZONE WELL
- 0 DMW62 W / 0.......................... TRANSITION ZONE WELL
ONADMW38 AR
/* \ \�AR MILE RADIUS 0....................................BEDROCK WELL
OUND INFECTION 0...............MULTIPORT DEEP BEDROCK WELL
0 VERSAR22 \ WELL 0.....••••••••••••••••••PLANT PRODUCTION WELL
0...........................ABANDONED BOREHOLE
� 0/FJADMW65 NADMW57 * NADMW � �*/* \
....................... LINEAMENT TRACE
\ D..............PILOT STUDY FOCUS AREA
° NADMW360
'C 09 MW60
�0 NADMW61 1C U� _ C 10 NADMW59 PRROWOGG \\\
/ 0 NADMW37 NADMW40
MW3 VERSAR 0 �?
VERSAR18 1
9o9e oo \� SAIC 11 1 NOTE:
RRO`NO SAIL 131 m
o P 12 LINEAMENT TRACE TAKEN FROM REVISED FINAL
ARROWOOD SOUTHERN NADMW42 8 BOX USA PHASE II RI REPORT, FIGURE 2.9 (METCALF &
PROPERTY NADMW41 4_,D MNr1 NgDMW30 (FOMERLY ST. JOE EDDY, INC., 2000).
NADMW43 OW270 CONTAINER CO.)
SAIC 15 0 SAIC.17- INJECTION --WELL)
° MW11 i
��0 0 NADMW31
NADM
�* SAIC20 \ NAD0hlw4 �.
0 NADMW32 \ NADMW5
<*� NAD 6 S IC21 NADMW51 *� \
MW52 0 NADMw50 *UW
®
WREN I C.
C 02� / SAIC1
NORFOLK
'0 SOUTHERN NAD 5 SA1C16 ABDN)
\\G / ROCKSPROPERTY.....RAILWAY �MNP� \\NADMW55
BERM i 00
ao
\\ p p pp LINEAMENT / �i / ?
\ W \ TRACE a
z
EL
`\ FRITO-LAY \ FRITO-LAY Y z �� */* \ / /
PLANT WAREHOUSE N
\ \ OFFICE 0 200 400 800
a CM ; \ SCALE: 1" = 400'
\off / U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT
` \ Oo \� TEXTRON
WF-1 CORPS OF ENGINEERS
US
- y"� of Engneersrps SAVANNAH, GEORGIA
Savannah District
/ ^ n FORMER NAVAL
AMMUNITION DEPOT
WF-2\ /' �� CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
+ N 501,850 • + DRAWN Br: REV. NO CAD FILE:
/ R. BEELER A 09-18-03 /00015/DWGS/043MW004D
Figure 1-1. Site Map of the Former NAD Site, Charlotte, North Carolina
1-3

1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION
The entire Former NAD complex occupied approximately 2,266 acres of land southwest of Charlotte,
North Carolina. Former NAD Areas 1 and 2 are located partially within the city limits of Charlotte, with
the remaining portion, approximately 60 acres, located in unincorporated Mecklenburg County. The
Former NAD Site is currently occupied by light industrial and commercial businesses with the property
zoned industrial (I-1). Several buildings, including Arrowood Southern Industrial Park Buildings II, III,
and IV, are located within the site (Figure 1-1). These large buildings, located adjacent to Cordage Street,
were constructed in 1980 and are used primarily for distribution and warehousing operations. Other
businesses are located within the area, with some of the structures situated directly over Former NAD
Areas 1 and 2. The Former NAD Site also has several areas that remain undeveloped and are covered
with trees and brush.
The area surrounding the Former NAD complex is comprised primarily of commercial, light industrial,
and residential tracts. The predominance of residential areas increases toward the north and surrounds
Former NAD Areas 1 and 2 beyond a 1-mile radius, but residences are not located within 1/2 mile of the
site. The Carowinds Theme Park is located approximately 1/2 mile southwest of the work area. Figure 1-1
indicates the businesses and property owners located within a 1/a mile radius of the Pilot Study focus area.
The property where the injection and monitoring wells will be installed is owned by Norfolk Southern
Railway Company and Arrowood-Southern Company. A Right -of -Entry Agreement covering the entry of
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and its representatives onto the property for the purpose of
investigation and remediation is provided as Appendix B.
Within the 1/a-mile radius are a total of 59 existing monitoring wells that were installed during previous
investigations conducted at the Former NAD Site. A description of each well type, including depth and
date of completion, is provided on Table C-1 of Appendix C. Well construction diagrams and boring logs
for the 14 monitoring wells within the Pilot Study Focus area are provided in Appendix C.
1.2 PHYSIOGRAPHY AND TOPOGRAPHY
Historical and current building activities have impacted the Former NAD topography. Graded building
pads, foundation structures, drainage features, rail lines, and roads are evident across the site. The
buildings and associated structures, both historical and current, are generally oriented northeast to
southwest. The Norfolk Southern rail lines' average grade is 6 ft below the building pads to facilitate
loading docks. Drainage around structures in the area has been diverted to the southwest.
Relief at the site is approximately 25 ft, with maximum elevations along a northwest -trending ridge in the
center of the work area (Figure 1-1). A major portion of the NAD area slopes away from this ridge to the
southwest. Vegetation in the area is largely secondary scrub pine. Hardwoods and junipers are notable in
Former NAD building areas from past landscaping.
1.3 CLIMATIC CONDITIONS
Mecklenburg County occupies a moderate plateau ranging in elevation from 520 ft to more than 830 ft.
Rainfall is fairly uniformly distributed from December through July. The heaviest rainfall normally occurs
in February, March, and July, with March being the wettest month (4.58 in. on the average). The driest
months are October and November, with October having a monthly average of 2.51 in. of precipitation.
The average annual daily maximum temperature is 71°F, with an average minimum temperature of 50°F.
From 1999 through 2002, the Charlotte area experienced drought conditions. A precipitation deficit of more
than 8 in. was reported during 1999 and 2000 with a 16.5-in. deficit reported in 2001. In 2002, conditions
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 1-4

A
A
NORTH
W
rN N) 3 b
�o�o 00 O
O r7
N I
r7
I N
SOUTH
650
APPROXIMATE GROUND
SURFACE PRIOR TO 1997
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
��
i I
0 0 �� v RAILROAD BALLAST
a RAILROAD BALLAST a ¢ ¢ z a
zcn�cn
z—
v v
Q Q a
N Z z
v
z a
N
UNCONSOLIDATED
650
636.11
--------634.73 —N--�-- ------ —
634.48
63
SOIL OVERBURDEN
TRANSmON ZONE
8.5
95 0
994) _
55 -
(2002) TRANSITION ZONE
BEDROCK = (1994) (1994)
1300
600
14100 =_
(2000)
(2002)
I
BEDROCK
I
600
= 7.6 7160 a
(2002)�(2000)
3590 =
(2000)
550
1
i
550
5600
(2001)
500
6500
(2001)�
3900
500
(2001)
450
4100
450
- (2002)
400
400
5100
(2002)
350
(200 )
24000 —
350
(2002)-
300
F
300
Figure 1-2. Cross-section A -A' Within the Former NAD Site Pilot Study Focus Area
LEGEND:
.............................TOP
OF WELL
POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE SHOWING
MEASURED WATER TABLE ELEVATION.
.. WATER LEVEL MEASURED 4/9/03.
..........................
BENTONITE SEAL
TOP OF SCREENED INTERVAL
SCREENED INTERVAL WITH
ANALYTICAL DATA IN BOX
BOTTOM OF SCREENED INTERVAL
i
........... BOTTOM OF WELL
i ..........................
PROPOSED WELL
-. ^.-..............
LTTHOLOGIC CONTACT
. - ................TOP
OF BEDROCK
II
..UNCONSOLIDATED
SOIL OVERBURDEN
.................
TRANSITION ZONE
®
.................
BEDROCK ZONE
NADHP06..................
DEMOLISHED WELL
SAIC-17....................
PROPOSED WELL
8.5.... TRICHLOROETHENE CONCENTRATION IN ug/L
(1994)..............
SAMPLE COLLECTION DATE
1V U-1-hb:
1.) SURFACE FEATURE (i.e. BUILDINGS) LOCATIONS
AND DIMENTIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
2.) TCE CONCENTRATIONS IN SAIC-14 OBTAINED
FROM DISCRETE INTERVALS WHILE CORING.
0 25 50 100
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 50'
0 25 50 100
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 50'
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
US army corperss
of EngineSAVANNAH, GEORGIA
Savannah District
FORMER NAVAL
AMMUNITION DEPOT
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWN 8Y: REV. NO./DATE I CAD FILE:
WAM/RWB A / 09-18-03 00015\OWGs\s53SECTJA-A
1-7

z
B'
U
w
B
SOUTH WEST
oN °°
�'°°
I I I
z
�
" C14
'� NORTH WEST
6 5 0
APPROXIMATE GROUND
SURFACE PRIOR TO 1997
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVMES
�_
z a
o 0
ASPHALT PAVEMENT ¢ ¢ ¢
z z z
636.52
-�
�¢�
�
BALLASTD
w
U
z UNCONSOLIDATED
_______________ SOIL OVERBURDEN
650
_Q5�
_____________636_18_
____�
RAIL0 6a� ___
1000 -
(1994)
TRANSffION ZONE 330
(1999)
198 5 634.73
(19 4) =
TRANSITION ZONE 61-
1229
600
-
40
=14100
(2000)
7160
BEDROCK ZONE
600
(2002)
BEDROCK ZONE =190
(2002)
(2000)
12001)
3590
(2000)
550
550
5600
�(2001)
500
(001)
3900
�(2001)
500
450
410 =
�(2002) -
450
400
400
Z 5100
(2002) -
350
- (2002)
24000 _
350
(2002)
300
1
1
300
Figure 1-3. Cross-section B-B' Within the Former NAD Site Pilot Study Focus Area
LEGEND:
............................TOP
OF WELL
POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE SHOWING
MEASURED WATER TABLE ELEVATION.
_ .....
WATER LEVEL MEASURED 4/9/03.
..........
... BENTONITE SEAL
TOP OF SCREENED INTERVAL
SCREENED INTERVAL WITH
ANALYTICAL DATA IN BOX
BOTTOM OF SCREENED INTERVAL
.........................
f
BOTTOM OF WELL
I
i ..........................
PROPOSED WELL
--------------------
LITHOLOGIC CONTACT
.. ................TOP
OF BEDROCK
I I ..UNCONSOLIDATED SOIL OVERBURDEN
.................
TRANSITION ZONE
®...................
BEDROCK ZONE
NADILP06 .................
DEMOLISHED WELL
SAIC-17....................
PROPOSED WELL
40 .... TRICHLOROETHENE CONCENTRATION IN ug/L
(2000).............. SAMPLE COLLECTION DATE
I NOTES:
1.) SURFACE FEATURE (i.e. BUILDINGS) LOCATIONS
AND DIMENTIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
2.) TCE CONCENTRATIONS IN SAIC-14 OBTAINED
FROM DISCRETE INTERVALS WHILE CORING.
0 25 50 100
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 50'
0 25 50 100
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 50'
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
US Army Corps
of Engineers SAVANNAH, GEORGIA
Savannah District
FORMER NAVAL
AMMUNITION DEPOT
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWN BY: REV. NO./DATE CAD FILE
WAM/RWB A / 09-18-03 0oo15\DWGS\S53SECf_B—B
1-8

began improving with only a 3.13-in. deficit being reported. In 2003, the area received an excessive amount
of rainfall, thereby reversing the drought conditions. From January through June 19, 2003, the Charlotte
area has received 36.38 in. of precipitation, which is 15.67 in. above the average precipitation value.
1.4 GEOLOGY
The Former NAD Site is located within the central Piedmont of North Carolina, which extends from the
northwestern edge of the Kings Mountain and Loundsville belts eastward and southward to the Raleigh
and Kiokee metamorphic belts. Regional geologic features occurring in this region include the Carolina
Slate, Charlotte, Kings Mountain, and Milton belts. The western boundary of this region is formed by the
Kings Mountain and Loundsville shear zones. The eastern edge of the region is defined by a sequence of
faults (Jonesboro and Nutbush Creek) and linear features that include the Raleigh and Eastern Slate belts.
The focus area is located within the Charlotte belt, which is typically characterized as dominantly plutonic
with mineralogical compositions ranging from granite to gabbro (King 1955). A detailed description of
the local geology is provided in the following sections.
1.4.1 Soils
The soil at the Former NAD is a moderately well -drained to well -drained clayey soil that formed from
diorite, gabbro, and other rocks having high percentages of ferromagnesium minerals and is classified as
Iredell-Mecklenburg. Former NAD Areas 1 and 2 are typically underlain by Iredell fine, sandy loam. The
average slope ranges from 0 to 8% over the site. Soils of the Iredell series are formed as residuum of
crystalline rock. The Mecklenburg series is also a fine, sandy loam that is generally formed in residuum
from igneous and metamorphic rock and is about 1 to 2 ft thick at the Former NAD Site. Slopes range
from 2 to 15% for this series. The landscape is characterized by broad flats and gentle side slopes.
The hydraulic conductivity of these soils ranges from 2.0 to 6.0 in. per hour in the 0- to 0.5-ft depth range
and 0.06 to 0.6 in. per hour below 0.5 ft (M&E 2000).
Soils encountered during site investigation activities were characterized as brown, moist, plastic, sandy
clays. The clay contained traces of organic construction materials in areas of fill or disturbance. In
undisturbed residual soils, the clay was generally lighter in color, with an increase in mica content. The
soil ranges in thickness from 4 to 25 ft deep across the site. This unconsolidated soil zone is referred to as
the shallow zone. Figures 1-2 and 1-3 are cross -sections constructed within the Pilot Study focus area and
depict the -thickness of the soil in the area.
Geotechnical analysis of NADMW-041, conducted during the Phase H RI, determined that the soil
consisted of 0.9% gravel, 46.0% sand (mostly medium to fine), and 53.1% fines. Based on a liquid limit
of 40, plasticity index of 20, and natural moisture content of 13.6%, the material was classified as a
low -plasticity clay (M&E 2000).
Below the unconsolidated soil zone lies a varying thickness of saprolite (completely weathered rock) with
fine- to medium -grained interbedded reddish to brown silty sand, clay -rich silts, and silty clays. In this
zone, the material has weathered to the sands, silts, and clays and contains the structure and composition
of the parent material with the sands being derived from quartz -rich layers in the bedrock and the silts and
clays from biotite, feldspars, hornblende, and plagioclase. The saprolite ranges in thickness from 0 to 15 ft
deep across the site and occurs directly over the bedrock and within fractures in the bedrock. Near the top
of the bedrock, the saprolite may become coarser grained with the grains becoming subangular. Larger
fragments of rock may also be encountered. This zone, along with the upper zone of the fractured
bedrock, is referred to as the transition zone (see Section 1.4.2 for discussion of bedrock). Figures 1-2
and 1-3 depict this zone within the Pilot Study focus area.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 1-5

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEVI' BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)1091703 1-6

1.4.2 Bedrock
Regionally, the rocks of the Charlotte Belt consist of massive to weakly foliated granite to granodirorite
and earlier formed gneiss. The gneiss unit consists of amphibolites or homblende gneisses, quartz-biotite,
and quartz-microcline gneisses and various types of migmatite marginal to the major plutons. Both the
granite and the gneisses are intruded by very late orogenic gabbros consisting of fibrous amphiboles,
biotite, and plagioclase. Pegmatites crosscut these gabbros. In addition to the folding and magmatic
activity within the belt, a pronounced N 20 W fracture direction is prominent. Geophysical data suggest
the complex forms a body extending for more than 15 miles east —west and ranging in thickness from 2.2
to 2.8 miles.
Based on the environmental investigations conducted at the site, the bedrock directly underlying the
saprolite consists of a highly fractured, partially weathered rock that ranges in thickness from 1 to 5 ft.
This zone of partially weathered bedrock, along with the overlying saprolite, is referred to as the
transition zone.
Depth to competent bedrock within the Former NAD Site ranges from 4.5 ft to 31.0 ft below land surface.
In the vicinity of the Pilot Study focus area, approximately 6 to 8 ft of soil were removed during site
grading and construction activities performed by Norfolk Southern in 1996-1997 causing the depth to
bedrock to be much shallower than the rest of the site. The average depth to bedrock in this area is
approximately 6 ft (Figures 1-2 and 1-3). ,
At the site, the mafic bedrock is typically medium -grained, light -to -dark gray or green gabbro/basalt and
amphibolite. According to the borehole logs, the felsic rocks range from a hornblende-biotite granite to a
biotite, quartz -rich granodiorite. Feldspar -rich rocks, such as syenite and diorite, are also present. During
the Phase H RI, granodirorite outcrops near the site were investigated and numerous fractures were
observed. The predominant orientation of the fractures observed at the site trends to the northeast (M&E
2000). The outcrops identified in the Former NAD area formed a linear feature trending approximately
north —south.
Many topographical features observed within the Former NAD Site and surrounding areas are the result
of structural and mechanical processes within the bedrock. During the Phase H RI, M&E identified trace
lineaments within the NAD area (Figure 1-1). These lineament traces correlate to the fractures
encountered during bedrock coring activities conducted by SAIC, specifically SAIC 16A.
1.5 HYDROGEOLOGY
The soil survey of Mecklenburg County indicates soils are primarily underlain by moderately pervious
saprolite, which is typically 48 in. or greater below the ground surface (USCS 1980). Depth to the
groundwater throughout the county is usually greater than 6.0 ft. The hydraulic conductivity of the
saprolite varies greatly based on the percentage of clay, minerals, and the presence of relic secondary
features (veins, fractures, and joints): Higher quartz content and more developed fracture patterns enhance
hydraulic conductivity. Groundwater in the transition zone is primarily transmitted through the partially
weathered rock, whereas groundwater in the crystalline bedrock is transmitted via fractures contained in
the bedrock. As reported in the Phase II RI, the average hydraulic conductivity of the bedrock zone is
2.06 E-3 centimeters per day.
Since the Phase II RI, the site hydrogeologic conditions have changed due to the use of the plant
production wells. Although their use ceased in May 2001, water level conditions have not completely
recovered to baseline (1999) conditions. Water level measurements collected on April 9, 2003, indicate
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 1-9

that the majority of the wells have recovered; however, the conditions are still altered from those reported
in the RI. Table C-1 in Appendix C provides a summary of water level data collected at the site from
1999 through 2003. The current potentiometric surface indicates that the current flow direction has shifted
from a westerly direction to more of a south—southwest direction. Potentiometric surface maps for each of
the three zones are provided on Figures 1-4 through 1-6. Figures 1-4 and 1-5 provide a comparison of the
1999 potentiometric surface to the 2003 potentiometric surface for the shallow and. transition zones,
respectively.
Note when reviewing the potentiometric surface figures that NAD MW-45 has an anomalously high
water level that is evident by the elongated contour interval as shown on the shallow potentiometric
surface map (Figure 1-4). This may be due to a potential leak in the storm drain system in this area. In
addition, monitoring wells NAD MW-21 and MW-20 were typically not used in the preparation of the
potentiometric surface as each is screened across larger intervals than the surrounding wells. The resultant
water level elevations in these wells do not correspond well with either the transition zone or bedrock
zone potentiometric surface.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 1-10

r+
�s2fi.i4DYKE
62881 INDUST
m
90 \
ARROWOOD
SOUTHERN
PROPERTY
O
/x
2
\\j
r-I
M
632 181 LJ
x/*/x 634.33
�NORFOLK
SOUTHERN
��G \ RAI LWAY ✓
w ROCKS;PROPERTY
N 503,000 \ .o /✓
0
Ln
r)
NNADMW55
635.76
631.88
Figure 1-4. Shallow Zone Potentiometric Surface, 1999/2003
FA
618
WREN INC.
N 505,100 + LEGEND:
0 0....................... PRIMARY BUILDING
0 ... ASPHALT ROAD
C'--___...................... GRAVEL ROAD
N ..... .. RAILROAD TRACKS
—.—.— .............................. FENCE LINE
---...................................... DITCH
Li
OR TREELINE
C............................ SHALLOW ZONE WELL
616.73.... SHALLOW ZONE GROUNDWATER ELEV 1999
618.20.... SHALLOW ZONE GROUNDWATER ELEV 2003
1999 POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE CONTOUR
o--1PRESENTED IN PHASE II RI (M & E 2000)
o--12003 POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE CONTOUR
L,A
O
GJi
M
Z
J
Z
Q
W
U
Z
Z
Q
0
200
400
800
SCALE: 1 " = 400'
11111"191 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Army corps of Engineers SAVANNAH, GEORGIA
of
Savannah District
FORMER NAVAL
AMMUNITION DEPOT
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWN BY: I REV. NO./DATE: I CAD FRE:
R. BEELER 0 / 07-16-03 1 /00015/DWGS/S44_SHAL01

Figure 1-5. Transition Zone Potentiometric Surface, 1999/2003
1-12

Wt I \DYKE\
\\ 4 INDUST y:%\rtj PF
\ SRO 6 \ \ \ 6, V RSAR09
rt -�VERSAR26 640.95
\ \ x 636.40
\ �x
VERSAR
* \ ` 633.90
11` �
* NAD 6
�SAIL 09
620.7
1 I I 635.95
* 11 C 10
' 35 911
r
N 505,000 LEGEND:
CD
0.......................PRIMARY BUILDING
N ...... ASPHALT ROAD
- - - - GRAVEL ROAD
- - - - ... RAILROAD TRACKS
z- .............................. FENCE LINE
.......................................... DITCH
.... TREE OR TREELINE
....................... SHALLOW BEDROCK WELL
0 ................ SHALLOW/DEEP BEDROCK WELL
®...................DEEP BEDROCK WELL
630.3737........ BEDROCK ZONE GROUNDWATER ELEV
r-......POTENTIOMEFRIC SURFACE CONTOUR
F
so
J7
�! O.1
w()o 6351�\J)
sA�C 2
\ ARRO OOD/ 6: BOX USA
SOUT ERN �sAlc 15 = _X 63 1 �/ (FOMERLY ST. JOE
PRO ERTY� / NADMw43 x NADM 2 1.4 CONTAINER CO.) `
;\ 629.01 -0 63 8
o
x 8
0
5.62�
* MW29
/x x 631NADM
x
634.220
i
Q \/x W9N INC.
/ SAIC [2
6 7(5 NORFOLK ./
(\G RA THERN
/ I RO KS 6� RMNPL PROPERTY \6 /
*o c 94 i
W \ 630
CL
Ln 1y FRI I U�b4Y� x/` g
FRIPTO�NLAY Q� WAREHOUSE �\-- \\ /
OFFS 1 Sac 07
N 50 450
e
Figure 1-6. Bedrock Zone Potentiometric Surface, April 2003
NOTES:
1.) WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS COLLECTED
APRIL 2003.
00
ao
Z 0
J <
U Uj
Z
a
z a
Cn
0 100 200 300 600
SCALE: 1 " = 300'
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
US ArmCo
of En neersrps SAVANNAH, GEORGIA
Savannah District
FORMER CHARLOTTE
NAVAL AMMUNITION DEPOT
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWN BY., I REV. NO./DATE: I 0AD nLE:
R. BM -ER 0 / 08-19-03 1 /00015/DWGS/S44P01N-BEm B

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 1-14

2.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
This portion of the addendum represents the PMP for project activities to be performed by SAIC
Engineering for the work at the Former NAD Site. This plan designates the key SAIC Engineering and
subcontractor personnel who will participate in the project and provides a summary of their
responsibilities.
2.1 PROJECT ORGANIZATION
The organizational chart illustrated in Figure 2-1 outlines the management structure that will be used to
implement the project. The functional responsibilities of key personnel are described in the following
parts of this plan. Resumes of the key project personnel are provided in Appendix D. The assignment of
personnel to each project position is based on a combination of (1) experience in the type of work to be
performed, (2) experience working with government personnel and procedures, (3) a demonstrated
commitment to high quality and timely job performance, and (4) staff availability. The key project
personnel have been assigned based upon the minimum education and qualification requirements for each
assigned position, as shown in Table 2-1. In the event that personnel identified in Figure 2-1 and
Table 2-1 must be replaced after issuance of these documents, SAIC Engineering will provide the names
and resumes for the replacement individuals to the USAGE, Savannah District Project Manager prior to
mobilization for fieldwork.
Identification of additional key personnel associated with the subcontracted laboratory activities for the
project and a summary of their responsibilities are presented in Chapter 2.0 of the Quality Assurance
Project Plan (QAPP). The subcontractors selected by SAIC Engineering to support the project and the
services to be performed by these companies are presented below.
Parratt-Wolff, Inc.
Monitoring well installation
Prism Laboratories, Inc.
Chemical analytical testing for groundwater
Clean Management Environmental Group
Transport and disposal of IDW
IDW = Investigation -derived waste.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 2-1

USACE—Savannah District
Technical Manager/Geologist
Franz Froelicher
SAIC Engineering Site
Health & Safety Officer
Chuck
SAIC Engineering
Health & Safety Officer
SAIC Engineering
Technical Manager
SAIC Engineering
Field Manager
Allison Bailey/
Chuck McNulty
SAIC Engineering
Field Personnel
Chuck McNulty
Allison Bailey
Mark Kidder
Jackson Spain
USACE—Savannah District
Project Manager
SAIC Engineering
Program Manager
SAIC Engineering
Project Manager
SAIC Engineering
Data Manager
Patrick Ryan
Parratt-Wolff, Inc.
Butch Stevens
Lee Penrod
USACE—Savannah District
Industrial Hygienist
John an amer
SAIC Engineering
QA/QC Officer
r--------------------------------
SAIC Engineering
-- Site Chemical QC
Allison Bailey/
Chuck McNulty
SAIC Engineering
Laboratory Coordinator
Nile Luedtke
Environmental Testing
and Consulting, Inc.
Nathan A. Pera
USACE—Savannah District
Chemist
Franz Froeficher
SAIC Engineering
CIA Technical Reviewer
Alauddin Khan
Figure 2-1.Organizational Chart for the Pilot Study at the Former NAD Site, Charlotte, North Carolina

Table 2-1. Key Field Personnel Assignments and Qualifications for the
Pilot Study at the Former NAD Site
Minimum Degree
Project Assignment
Requirements
Minimum Qualifications
Project Manager
B.S., Civil Engineering,
10+ years of experience in HTRW projects
Geology, or related field
including site investigations and related
Jim Romer
environmental evaluations/studies
Site Safety and Health Officer
B.S., Safety, Engineering, or
5+ years of experience in HTRW projects
related field
including providing health and safety
Allison Bailey/Chuck McNulty
oversight for site investigations, RIs, and
related environmental evaluations/studies
Chemical QC
A.S., Science or Engineering
3+ years of experience in HTRW projects
Site Representative
Technology or related field or
including site investigations, RIs, and
equivalent fieldwork
related environmental evaluations/studies
Allison Bailey/Chuck McNulty
experience
Technical Manager
B.S., Civil Engineering,
5+ years of experience in HTRW projects
Geology, or related field
including management of field projects for
Allison Bailey
site investigations, RIs, and related
environmental evaluations/studies
Laboratory Coordinator
B.S., Chemistry
5+ years of experience in HTRW projects
including laboratory interface for site
Nile Luedtke
investigations, RIs, and related
environmental evaluations/studies
Field Manager
B.S., Civil Engineering,
3+ years of experience in HTRW projects
Geology, or related field
including soil and rock logging and
Allison Bailey/Chuck McNulty
monitoring well installation
Sampling Technicians
A.S., Science or Engineering
2+ years of experience in HTRW projects
Technology or related field or
including soil and groundwater sampling
Chuck McNulty
equivalent fieldwork
and monitoring well installation
Mark Kidder
experience
Jackson Spain
HTRW = Hazardous, toxic, and radioactive waste.
QC = Quality control.
RI = Remedial Investigation.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 2-3

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 2-4

3.0 PROJECT SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES
3.1 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES
The groundwater hydraulics at the Former NAD Site are complex and have been altered during
performance of the RI by both on -site alteration of drainage patterns and off -site pumping. An effort to
understand hydraulic connectivity in the area close to NAD MW-21 was conducted during the Phase H
RI. Three short-term pumping tests were conducted followed by a 72-hr test in NAD MW-21. These data
demonstrate the anisotropic nature of the formation. In addition, field data collected during and after
pumping of an off -site well field indicate a fracture system may transport contaminants in a southerly
flow component in addition to the previous predominant westerly direction. Although efforts to locate an
actual dense nonaqueous-phase liquid (DNAPL) source have failed, the highest concentrations to date
[61 parts per million (ppm)] have been associated with NAD MW-21 (following the 72-hr pumping test).
As a result, this area has been targeted for the pilot test.
The Pilot Study will be conducted to evaluate the use of an electron donor for promoting reductive
dechlorination as a remedial approach at the site and to better understand the hydraulics near NAD MW-21.
The Pilot Study will consist of an initial injection of a Bromide tracer followed by up to 5 days of continuous
injection of sodium lactate solution. The information for both of these products is included in Appendix E.
The scope and objectives of the Pilot Study include the following:
The transition zone was identified during the RI as containing the bulk of the TCE mass. This zone is
comprised of the lower portion of the unconsolidated overburden (saprolite) and extends into the
upper fractured bedrock. The construction log of NAD MW-21 indicates that the transition zone is
sealed off in this well, although vertical fractures may exist in the adjacent formation between the
transition and deeper bedrock zones (Appendix Q. Since there is not a transition zone well next to
MW-21, one will need to be installed for injection (SAIL 17). In addition, two additional transition
zone wells will need to be installed for monitoring purposes (SAIC 18 and SAIC 19). Figure 3-1
depicts the locations of these proposed wells.
Sodium lactate (electron donor) has been successfully deployed at a number of sites and is both
water-soluble and acceptable to the regulatory community based on its lack of impurities . and
biodegradability. Since sodium lactate is organic, a portion of it will adsorb to the formation matrix,
reducing its rate of flow compared to natural groundwater. A non -adsorbing tracer (bromide) will be
co -injected. To differentiate between the transition zone and bedrock zone, sodium bromide will be
injected into the transition zone and potassium bromide will be injected into the bedrock zone. The
bromide tracer will travel at the same velocity as the groundwater and should provide additional
downgradient flow data over the course of the 6-month pilot study. The injection will take place over
a 5- day period. The details of the injection are discussed in Chapter 4.0.
Monitoring for both the tracer and the sodium lactate will be conducted in several wells within the
focus area for up to a 6-month period. After a baseline sampling event, it is anticipated that the
groundwater will be monitored biweekly for the first 2 months, with monthly sampling to occur
during months 3 through 6 for a total of eight monitoring events. The detailed monitoring program is
discussed in Chapter 4.0.
2. Injection and monitoring of the bedrock will be conducted simultaneously with the transition zone
activities described above. Injection in the bedrock wells will take place in NAD MW-21. Monitoring
will include select existing bedrock wells and two new bedrock wells to be installed: SAIC 20 and
SAIC 21 (Figure 3-1). All wells involved with the pilot test will be gauged for water elevations,
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 3-1

ARROWOOD N 504,150+
SOUTHERN N
PROPERTY
ARROWOOD IV ��� ,�'`, ARROWOOD III
w
` VE,` SAR 18
SAIC 11 ��� �\\-'�VVERSAR17
SAIC 13 ;
SAIC 12 \ -
_,_,_.—•—•-� NADMW23 p i
VERSAR27 j� NAD H i / (BOX USA
I FOMERLY ST. JOE
<` I CONTAINER CO.)�'T AD CONTAINER I\
��--NAO PO SAIC , DM 05 0NADMW30
ADMW340
AIC,j N ECTION WELtk
oNADMW33 8 NADM'W19 DMW06
ADH O ADMW20
D M
NAD 22 Al SAC19
I B� c�
oNADMW31 z
I `( NA6HP10:' I g
NADMW240 ` /' w o
NADMW32 N Z
i
U
z
CD
NORFOLK SOUTHERN �\
0 40 80
% RAILWAY
SAIC21
PROPERTY
SCALE: 1" = 80'
A-
w-
+ N. 03,570
� ----- -----------�
\ +
LEGEND:
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT
fm
CZONE WELL
.............................SHALLOW
0..........................
TRANSITION ZONE WELL WELL & RMEROSHALLPUNCH BORING
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
p........."...BEDROCK WELL
' ...FORMER TRANSITION ZONE WELL
0........ MULTIPORT DEEP BEDROCK BOREHOLE
US Army Corps
of Engineers SAVANNAH, GEORGIA
........................PLANT PRODUCTION WELL �. FORMER SHALLOW BEDROCK WELL
Savannah District
.......................................
POLY TANK
FORMER NAVAL
�..........................INJECTION
LINES
AMMUNITION DEPOT
C _ — D..............PILOT
STUDY FOCUS AREA
CHARLOTTE, NORTH MOLINA
DRAWN BY:
REV. NO./DATE:
CPO FILE:
R. BEELER
0 / 08-21-03
/00015/DWGS/0431NJf01
Figure. 3-1. Pilot Study Focus Area at the Former NAD Site
3-2

screened for the tracer with a field probe, and analyzed for sodium lactate distribution utilizing
chemical oxygen demand (COD) as an indicator parameter. The detailed monitoring program is
discussed in Chapter 4.0.
3. The multizone FLUTeTm system installed in SAIC 14 will be monitored for water levels and screened
for the tracer in all seven zones (Appendix C). If the tracer is present, a follow-up COD analysis will
be performed to determine if sodium lactate is also present (see Chapter 4.0):
4. A baseline sampling effort will be conducted to establish current electron acceptor concentrations
in both the transition and bedrock injection and monitoring points. Baseline sampling will include
collecting samples from 21 observation points (5 new wells, 7 ports in SAIC 14, and 13 existing
wells). The following field parameters will be measured during the baseline sampling effort:
ferrous iron, dissolved oxygen (DO), conductivity, carbon dioxide, oxidation-reduction potential
(ORP), temperature, pH, turbidity, and bromide. Laboratory analytical samples will also be
collected from the 21 observation points and analyzed for pH, nitrate/nitrite, sulfate, phosphate,
ammonia, COD, alkalinity, and methane. During the course of the pilot study, wells with elevated
COD values and reduced ORP conditions will be analyzed for electron donor levels (sodium
lactate). During the later stages of the pilot test, wells exhibiting significant reducing conditions
will also be analyzed for lactate breakdown products. The detailed monitoring program is discussed
in Chapter 4.0.
5. A baseline sampling for VOCs will be conducted prior to injection in all 21 observation points.
Degradation of TCE will be monitored in those wells that indicate the presence of the tracer and
reduced conditions from the electron donor. Changes in concentration during early detection of the
tracer will assist in determining impacts on concentrations resulting from dilution. Once reductive
conditions are established, sampling will identify breakdown products. The monitoring program is
discussed in detail in Chapter 4.0.
To achieve the objectives, the data to be collected are to be of sufficient quality and quantity to be legally
defensible under regulatory requirements.
3.2 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES
Data quality objectives (DQOs) are used to identify the data to be collected so that the data are suitable to
fulfill the objectives of the project and are obtained in an efficient and cost-effective manner. The DQO
process culminates in the reduction of uncertainty associated with decisions related to FS and RD actions.
There are three steps to the DQO process:
• identify decision types,
• identify data needs, and
• specify data collection.
The following sections contain the DQO rationale for the focused field investigation at the Former NAD
Site.
3.3.1 DQO Step 1: Identify Decision Types
This fieldwork is recommended to gain a better understanding of the hydraulics near NAD MW-21 and to
evaluate the potential of biostimulation as a remedial approach. This will allow an accurate site model to
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 3-3

be developed for future FS/RD work. The questions to be answered using the data obtained during the
Pilot Study are as follows:
• What type of travel times and distribution can be anticipated in the transition zone near NAD
MW-21?
• What type of travel times and distribution can be anticipated in the bedrock zone near NAD MW-21?
• Will material injected in the upper portion of the bedrock (screened interval of NAD MW-21) travel
vertically to deeper fractures monitored in SAIC 14?
• Will reductive dechlorination proceed beyond cis-1,2-dichloroethene without bioaugmentation?
• What are the loading rates for the electron donors?
3.3.2 DQO Step 2: Identify Data Needs
Data to be collected for the field investigation are to satisfy the following two general data needs:
• the data are to be sufficient to determine the concentrations of the required field and analytical
parameters; and
• the data are to be of sufficient quality to be legally defensible under regulatory requirements.
The QAPP contains details of the number and types of proposed quality. assurance/quality control
-
(QA/QC) samples. Duplicate samples will be collected at a rate of 10% of the total number of samples
and equipment rinsate samples will be collected at a rate of 5% of the total number of samples. Trip
blanks will be included in each cooler. containing water samples designated for volatile organic analysis.
Temperature blanks will also be placed in each cooler prior to shipment.
3.3.3 DQO Step 3: Specify. Data Collection
Types and sample locations are based on DQOs; USAGE, Savannah District recommendations; and
identified data needs. The following sampling strategy is based on the results of the Phase Il RI
(M&E 2000), the sampling activities conducted in November and December 2000 by SAIC as part of the
FS/RD, and the results from the supplemental well field sampling event conducted from October 2001
through April 2003. The types of samples to be collected and sample collection methodologies are
discussed in detail in Chapter 4.0 of this addendum.
03-209(FSP)(doc)1091703 3-4

- 4.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES
A Pilot Study will be conducted to evaluate the use of an electron donor for promoting reductive
dechlorination as a remedial approach at the Former NAD Site and to better understand the hydraulics
near NAD MW-21. The Pilot Study will focus on a limited area where the highest concentrations of TCE
to date have been detected (NAD MW-21) [Figure 1-1]. The Pilot Study will consist of an injection of a
Bromide tracer followed by continuous injection of Sodium Lactate solution in the transition and bedrock
zone. Field activities will include the installation of four new monitoring wells, one injection well,
baseline groundwater sampling, and injection of a bromide tracer and sodium lactate followed by a
6-month monitoring period. A detail discussion , of the field activities is provided in the following
sections.
4.1 INJECTION AND MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS
As shown on Figure 3-1, an injection well (SAIL 17) will be installed adjacent to NAD MW-21 and
SAIC 14. This well will be installed as a transition zone well to allow the sodium lactate to be injected
into the transition zone, which the RI identified as containing the bulk of the TCE mass. This well will
also be used as a monitoring point.
The nearest transition zone well currently located downgradient from the injection well is NAD MW-32.
Two new transition zone wells, SAIC 18 and SAIC 19, will be installed to assist in the evaluation of.: the
sodium lactate and bromide distribution (Figure 3-1). Additionally, sodium lactate and bromide will be
injected into existing monitoring well NAD MW-21. Currently no bedrock wells are located
downgradient of the projected .flow path within the focus area; therefore, two new bedrock wells
(SAIC 20 and SAIC 21) will be installed (Figure 3-1).
The location of the two transition wells was determined using the current groundwater flow direction
(Figure 1-5) and by predicting the range of distances the bromide would travel using a calculated are of
influence based on the assumed transition zone injection rates of 1 to 2 gallons per minute (gpm)_and
aquifer properties reported in the Phase II RI (M&E 2000). The model predicted that in the transition
zone, the bromide tracer would travel a minimum of 54 ft and a maximum of 73 ft. The location of the
two bedrock wells was determined the same way. The model predicted that in the bedrock the tracer
would travel a minimum of 177 ft and a maximum of 354 ft. These predicted travel lengths are based on a
combination of injection and 6 months of advective transport: The large variation in travel distance in the
bedrock is due to the variation in the effective porosity, which is based on the estimated fractures in the
associated bedrock.
The transition zone wells will be advanced into the upper fractured bedrock. The total depth of SAIL 17
and SAIC 18 is anticipated to be less than 20 ft below ground surface (bgs). The total depth of SAIC 19 is
expected to be approximately 25 ft bgs. Bedrock zone wells (SAIL 20 and SAIC 21) will be installed into
the bedrock with a total depth expected to be 80 ft bgs.
4.2 DRILLING METHODS
4.2.1 Transition Zone and Injection Wells
Initially, a 4.25-in., hollow -stem auger will be used to drill through the unconsolidated overburden to the
top of competent bedrock. If the augers encounter refusal while drilling through the fractured bedrock, a
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 4-1

4-in. air hammer will be used to advance the boring until the top of the competent bedrock is encountered.
The well will be constructed after drilling activities have been completed. Figure 4-1 provides j
a construction diagram for the transition zone and injection wells. Each borehole will be logged according
to the guideline outlined in Section 4.3.2.4 of the original Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP)
[SAIC 2000]. All information will be recorded on Engineer Forms 5056-R and 5056A-R. All equipment
will be decontaminated according to the requirements specified in the original SAP (SAIC 2000).
4.2.2 Bedrock Zone Wells
A 6.25-in.-diameter hollow -stem auger, and 6-in.-diameter air hammer will first be used to advance the
two borings to a depth of 5 ft below the top of competent bedrock. Steel surface casing, measuring
4.25 in., will then be inserted into the boring and grouted in place. The grout will consist of a Type I
Portland cement; 3 lbs of dry, powdered bentonite per 94-lb sack of dry cement; and a maximum of 7 gal
of water per sack of cement, for an approximate grout weight of 12.0 to 15.0 lbs per gallon. No sooner
than 48 hrs after grouting, a core rig will be used to HQ (3.77 in.) wireline core the borehole into the
bedrock to a total depth of approximately 80 ft. The diameter of the borehole created by the coring will be
a nominal 3.7-in., which is smaller than the standard borehole size (6 in.) for a 2-in.-diameter well.
However, by coring the borehole this will allow the lithology of the bedrock to be accurately described,
will assist in determining the exact depth of each bedrock borehole, and will be the least
disruptiveldestructive drilling method used to drill into the bedrock. The drilling rig will be equipped with
sufficient systems to allow for the collection and containment of all drill cuttings, drilling fluids, and
formation water. The monitoring well will be constructed after all drilling activities are completed.
Because of the smaller borehole size, the annular space between the borehole wall and the.well casing
will be reduced-, thereby reducing the amount of filter pack and bentonite used. The placement of the filter
pack and seal is discussed in Section 4.3.2. Figure 4-2 provides a construction diagram for the bedrock
zone monitoring wells. Each borehole will be logged according to the guideline . outlined in
Section 4.3.2.4 of the original SAP (SAIC 2000). All information will be recorded on Engineer Forms
5056-R and 5056A-R. All equipment will be decontaminated according to the requirements specified in
the original SAP (SAIC 2000). S
4.3 MONITORING WELL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION
4.3.1 Monitoring Well Material
A total of four wells (two transition zone wells and two bedrock wells) will be constructed of polyvinyl
chloride (PVC). The well screen, casing, and well cap material used for construction of these new wells
will be composed of new, precleaned, 2.0-in.-diameter, Schedule 40 PVC. The transition zone well used
for injection purposes (SAIC 17) will be constructed of new, precleaned, 2. 0-in. -diameter stainless steel.
Screen sections for the four monitoring wells will be commercially fabricated and slotted with openings
equal to 0.010 in. For the injection well (SAIC 17), the screen openings will be equal to 0.020 in. Screen
and casing sections will be flush -threaded. Thermal or solvent coupling will not be used. All material
used for monitoring well construction will be as chemically inert as technically practical with respect to
the site environment. All well casing, screen, and fittings will conform to the National Sanitation
Foundation Standard 14 for potable water usage or the Annual Book of American Society for Testing and
Materials Standards: Volume 08.04, F 480 and will bear the appropriate rating logo. The tops of all
monitoring well casings will be covered with locking, expanding well caps. The caps will be fitted to the
casings and will be designed to preclude binding to the casing as a result of tightness of fit, unclean
surfaces, or frost and to allow for equilibration between hydrostatic and atmospheric pressures (vented).
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 4-2

-1111I1111 •a : . .:
UNCONSOLIDATED
SOIL OVERBURDE
COMPETENT BEDROCK
I LEGEND:
r.
MANHOLE COVER
CONCRETE PAD
LOCKING WELL CAP
GROUT
BENTONITE SEAL
(2.0' MINIMUM)
2" 0 PVC RISER
SILICA SAND FILTER PACK
(2.0' MINIMUM ABOVE TOP OF
SCREEN WIITH A 6" BASE)
2"0 SLOTTED PVC SCREEN
(SCREEN LENGTH MAY VARY
FROM 5.0' TO 10.0' DEPENDING
ON BOREHOLE LITHOLOGY)
(TOP OF COMPETENT BEDROCK
ESTIMATED TO BE 18.0' TO 25.7)
WiMill U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
US Army Corps
of Engineers SAVANNAH, GEORGIA
Sovannah District
FORMER NAVAL
AMMUNITION DEPOT
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWN W.- REV. NO CAD ELLS:
R. DEELER A / 09-10-03 /00015/DYKS/544WELL01
Figure 4-1. Transition Zone Monitoring Well Construction Diagram
4-3

c
a
COMPETENT BEDROCK
LEGEND:
• d
Al e
MANHOLE COVER
CONCRETE PAD
LOCKING WELL CAP
SURFACE CASING
GROUT
TOP OF COMPETENT_ BEDROCK
APPROXIMATELY 25.0')
(BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASING
APPROXIMATELY 30.0')
GROUT
BENTONITE SEAL
(2.0' MINIMUM)
2" 0 PVC RISER
SILICA SAND FILTER PACK
(2.0' MIN. ABOVE TOP OF
SCREEN WITH A 6" BASE)
2"0 SLOTTED PVC SCREEN
(SCREEN LENGTH MAY VARY
FROM 10.0' TO 30.0' DEPENDING
ON BOREHOLE LITHOLOGY)
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
US of Engineers�s SAVANNAH, GEORGIA
Savannah District
FORMER NAVAL
AMMUNITION DEPOT
CHARLOTTE, NORTH MOLINA
DRAWN BY: REV. NO'
/DATE CAD FILE:
R. BEELER A / 09-18-03 /00015/DWGS/S44WELL02
Figure 4-2. Bedrock Zone Monitoring Well Construction Diagram
4-4

4.3.2 Monitoring Well Construction
='J All screens used for well construction will be installed such that the bottom of each well screen is
placed no more than 2.0 ft above the bottom of the drilled borehole. The screen bottom will be securely
fitted with a threaded cap or plug. The cap/plug will be within 6.0 in. of the open portion of the screen.
The length of each screen section to be used for monitoring well construction will be determined
based on borehole lithology. The screen length may vary from 5 ft in the transition zone to as much as
30 ft in the bedrock wells. The well/riser casing will be of sufficient length to extend to the
ground surface. For the injection well (SAIC 17), the riser casing will temporarily extend
approximately 5 ft above the ground surface to allow the injection system to be attached. Once the
injection has been completed, the riser casing will be adjusted so that the well can be completed as a
flush mount well.
Granular filter pack consisting of silica filter sand will be placed within the annular space around the
monitoring well. For the bedrock wells, the filter pack will be washed into the reduced annular space
using a tremie. For the transition zone wells, the sand will be poured directly into the annular space, as
these will be shallow boreholes. The grain size of the filter pack will be appropriate for the screen slot
size (i.e., Type 30/45 for 0.010-in. slotted screen). The filter pack will extend from the bottom of the
borehole to a minimum of 2.0 ft and a maximum of 4.0 ft above the top of the well screen. In addition,
6:0 in. of sand will be placed under the bottom of the well screen to provide a firm fitting. The final
depth to the top of the filter pack will be measured directly with a weighted tape and recorded on the
associated well construction diagram.
A 2.0-ft bentonite seal will be placed on top of the filter pack. For the bedrock wells, a bentonite slurry
will be tremmied into the reduced annular space. For the transition zone wells, bentonite pellets will be
used. After the bentonite has been placed into the annular space, a small volume of water will be
poured into the annulus to hydrate the bentonite pellets. The pellets will be allowed to hydrate for a
minimum of 1 hr after which time the final depth will be measured directly with a weighted tape and
recorded on the associated well construction diagram
After the bentonite has been allowed to hydrate, grout will be placed into the annulus. The grout
mixture will be composed of Type I Portland cement; 3 lbs of dry, powdered bentonite per 94-1b sack
of dry cement; and a maximum of 7 gal of water per sack of cement, for an approximate grout weight
of 12.0 to 15.0 lbs per gallon. For the bedrock wells, the grout will be placed using a rigid tremie pipe
with side discharges, initially located just over the top of the bentonite seal. For the transition zone
wells, the grout will be poured into the annulus. The grout will be brought to'a level that allows the
construction of the flush -mount casing assembly.
The flush -mount casing assembly will be installed around each monitoring well so that the distance
between the top of the casing cover and the top of the well casing is no more than 3 in. The
flush -mount assembly will be constructed with a minimum 8-in.-diameter, commercially manufactured,
metal skirt and bolt -down steel/iron cover capable of supporting the vehicle loading at the site. Grout
will then be added to the borehole to bring the level to a point midway between the top of the well
casing and the bottom of the flush -mount casing assembly. A sloping concrete pad measuring
approximately 3.0 by 3.0 ft2 will be poured around the exterior of each flush -mount casing assembly.
The thickness of each concrete pad will be at least 4.0 in.
Each monitoring well installed during the project will be depicted in an as -built well
construction diagram. Each diagram will be attached to the original borehole log for that installation.
Details of the information to be recorded are provided in Section 4.3.2.4 of the original SAP (SAIC
2000).
03-209(FSP)(doc)1091703 4-5

Coordinates and elevations shall be established for each new monitoring and injection well. The
coordinates shall be to the closest 1.0 ft and referenced to the State Plane Coordinate System. If the
State Plane Coordinate System is not readily available, an existing local grid system shall be -
established. Ground elevations to the closest 0.1 ft and an elevation on the top of each well riser casing
to the closest 0.01 ft shall be determined. Elevations shall be referenced to the National Geodetic
Vertical Datum of 1983.
4.3.3 Monitoring Well Development
The development of each monitoring well will be initiated no sooner than 48 hrs after the grouting of
the wells. Water level, total well depths, specific conductance, temperature, and pH will be
measured and recorded at the beginning and end of development activities. Detailed information
regarding monitoring well development is provided in Section 4.3.2.12 of the original SAP (SAIC
2000).
4.4 SODIUM LACTATE AND BROMIDE INJECTION
As discussed previously, sodium lactate and bromide will be injected into the transition zone and the
bedrock zone in a focused area (Figure 3-1). An injection system consisting of two injection wells
(NAD MW-21 and SAIC 17), 21 monitoring points (14 wells and the 7 ports in FLUTeTM well
SAIC 14), and piping will be utilized to conduct the Pilot Study. The details of the injection program
are discussed in the following sections.
4.4.1 Baseline Sampling
The system will be monitored through the network of existing monitoring wells, the newly installed
monitoring wells, and the injection wells. Prior to injection, all 14 monitoring wells and the FLUTeTM
monitoring well will be gauged for water elevations and sampled within the defined focus area to
establish baseline conditions. In addition FLUTeTM monitoring wells SAIC 15 and SAIC 16A will be
sampled as these wells have not been sampled to date (Figure 1-1). Groundwater samples will be
collected and sent to an off -site laboratory for the following analytes: VOCs, COD, natural attenuation
parameters, methane, potassium, sodium, and bromide. In addition, test kits will be used in the field to
perform analysis for ferrous iron and carbon dioxide. Field measurements for conductivity, ORP, DO,
temperature, pH, turbidity, and bromide will also be collected. Water level measurements will be
collected from each well prior to collecting. A summary of the number of groundwater samples and
analytical parameters to be collected is presented on Table 4-1.
Purging and sampling for all groundwater monitoring wells, except for the FLUTeTM wells SAIC 14,
15, and 16A, will be preformed using the low -flow method to minimize the volume of liquid
investigation -derived waste (IDW). Prior to installation of the sampling pump, the organic vapor
concentration at the well head will be measured using a photoionization detector immediately following
the removal of the well cap, and the static water level and the static water level relative to the top of
casing will be recorded. Additionally, a field measurement for bromide will be recorded by lowering a
bromide probe into the well. The inlet of the sampling pump will be placed at the mid -point of the
screened interval as determined from well construction diagrams. Well purging will not begin
until either the static water level returns to within 10% of the initial static water level.
For the multiport FLUTeTM wells, the sampling will be conducted by connecting a gas source (nitrogen)
to the surface tubing of the well head assembly. The gas forces groundwater to the surface through the
03-209(FSP)(doc)1091703 4-6

v
Table 4-1. Sampling and Analytical Requirements for the Baseline Sampling Event and FLUTeTM Wells
Samples
QC Samples
QA Samples'
ample Total
Parameter
Analytical Method
No. Primary
Samples
No.
Duplicates
No.
Rinsates
No. Trip
Blanks
QA
Du lien
QA Trip
No. of
Samples
per Event
Total No.
Events
Total No.
Sam les
FLUTeTm Sampling (SAIC 15 and SAIC 16A)
VOC SW-846 826013/5030 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 1 16
Baseline Sa
'ng Event"
VOC
SW-846 8260B/5030
21
2
1
3
2
1
30
1
30
COD
EPA 410.4
21
2
1
0
2
0
26
1
26
Alkalinity
EPA 310.1
21
2
1
0
0
0
24
1
24
Ammonia
EPA 350.2
21
2
1
0
2
0
26
1
26
Phosphate
EPA 365.1
21
2
1
0
2
0
26
1
26
Potassium
SW-846, 6010B
21
2
1
0
0
0
24
1
24
Nitrate
EPA 300.0
21
2
1
0
2
0
26
1
26
Nitrite
EPA 300.0
21
2
1
0
2
0
26
1
26
Sodium
SW-846, 6010B
21
2
1
0
2
0
26
1
26
Sulfate
EPA 300.0
21
2
1
0
2
0
26
1
26
Methane
SW-8000
6
1
0
0
0
0
7
1
7
Bromide
EPA 300.0
5
1
1
0
0
0
7
1
7
Ferrous Iron
Field Test Kit
21
2
0
0
0
0
23
1
23
Carbon dioxide
Field Test Kit
21
2
0
0
0
0
23
1
23
Conductivity
Field Measurement
21
0
0
0
0
0
21
1
21
ORP/DO
Field Measurement
21
0
0
0
0
0
21
1
21
Temperature
Field Measurement
21
0
0
0
0
0
21
1
21
H
Field Measurement
21
0
0
0
0
0
21
1
21
Turbidity
Field Measurement
21
0
0
0
0
0
21
1
21
Bromide
Field Measurement
21
0
0
0
0
0
21
1
21
"Quality Assurance samples are to be sent to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers -contracted laboratory, Accura Analytical Laboratories.
'Baseline groundwater samples will be collected from the following:
• 7 multiport zones of Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) 14;
• Injection well - SAIC 17;
• 4 new wells, SAIC 18 through SAIC 21; and
• 9 existing wells - NAD MW-21, NAD MW-30, NAD MW-18, NAD MW-19, NAD MW-20; NAD MW-31, NAD MW-32, NAD MW -2, and NAD MW-23.
COD = Chemical Oxygen Demand. ORP = Oxygen Reduction Potential.
DO = Dissolved Oxygen. QA = Quality Assurance.
EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. QC = Quality Control.
NAD = Naval Ammunition Depot. VOC = Volatile Organic Compound.

downhole tubing and series of check valves. In sequence, the following steps are required to sample one
or multiple zones:
1. The pressure of the source is adjusted first to that needed to force the gas through the bottom of the
U tube and, hence, driving nearly all of the water out of the tube.
2. The gas pressure is then reduced, so as to not drive gas through the bottom of the U tube. The gas
pressure is applied again to the large left tube, forcing the water up the right-hand slender tube to
the surface, through the second check valve. The first slender tube volume is discarded to avoid the
aerated droplets left in the first purge stroke.
3. The water flowing from the sampling tube is now of good quality. However, 'it contains some of the
water from the spacer and the port to check valve tubing. This second stroke can be discarded.
4. The gas pressure is dropped, and the system refills from the ports again.
5. The gas pressure is applied to the large tube for the third time. Following stabilization of pH,
temperature, conductivity, and turbidity, the sample(s) can be collected from this flow at any time.
The first flow is that drawn directly from the formation.
Since the pump stroke is the volume of the 'h-in. inside diameter (ID) tube below the water table, the
pumped water volume is often 1 to 2 gal per stroke per port. This pumping system can be used for large
depths limited only by the pressure capacity of the tubing. Even in that case, the pump can be operated
with a series of short strokes to avoid the need for a pressure much larger than that to lift the water from
the water table. For shallow water table situations (less than 1000 ft), the maximum depth of the sampling
liner is not limited by the pumping capacity.
The calculation of the volumes required to purge the sample tubing for each port will be determined by
the SAIC Field Operations Manager using a worksheet provided by FLUT9m, Inc. The information
required consists of the hole depth, depth of each port, and the tubing. ID. These, . volumes-- will be
measured at the surface prior to collection of the groundwater sample to ensure a valid sample.
The purge rate will be adjusted, as necessary, to minimize drawdown and to equal the recharge of the
aquifer. Field measurements of DO, pH, conductivity, temperature, and turbidity will be recorded during
low -flow purging. Well purging will be considered complete when the pH, temperature, and conductivity
are stable for a minimum of three readings at 5-min intervals, and purge water is less than 10 nephelometric
turbidity units (NTUs). Parameters will be considered stable when pH varies less than 0.2 units, temperature
varies less than 0.5°C, and conductivity varies less than 10%. If parameter stabilization of turbidity cannot
be achieved in 1 _hr, well purging will be terminated and sampling initiated. In the event that the recharge
rate of a well is insufficient to sustain the lowest possible pumping rate, the well will be pumped dry.
Groundwater sample collection will begin immediately after completion of well purging, or as soon as a
sufficient amount of water is available, if the well is purged dry. The groundwater sample aliquot obtained
immediately after well purging will be used for laboratory chemical testing.
Groundwater purging and sampling equipment will be decontaminated prior to use at each well. The
decontamination procedures are outlined in the original SAP (SAIC 2000).
Immediately following the baseline sampling activities, a bromide data logger will be placed in
monitoring well SAIC 18 to allow real-time measurements of the bromide tracer to be collected.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 4-8

raj
4.4.2 Injection System Materials and Operation
Materials
A required mass of approximately 240 gal of 60% sodium lactate solution will be used along with
approximately 5 kg of a reagent -grade sodium bromide tracer and 12 kg of potassium bromide tracer.
Appendix E contains the product information and the product materials safety data sheets (MSDS).
Approximately 28,800 gal of water will be used to mix with the sodium lactate in batches of 6900 gal
(poly tank limitation) and injected continuously, at a rate of approximately 1 gpm in the transition zone
and 3 gpm in the bedrock zone, for up to 5 days (Figure 4-3). The sodium bromide tracer will be mixed
with approximately 150 gal of water and injected into the transition zone. The potassium bromide tracer
will be mixed with approximately 300 gal of water and injected into the bedrock zone. Injection of the
sodium lactate will begin after the bromide tracers have been injected. Neither the sodium nor potassium
bromide concentrations will exceed 10,000 mg/L. During the injection phase, the injected solution will
create a mounding effect, which will extend the delivery of the solution in a radial pattern around the
injection points. The injection will be conducted as a one-time event with monitoring to occur over a
6-month period.
The area of influence caused by the injection was calculated in order to more closely estimate the distance
the solution would travel. In the transition zone, calculations indicated that the area of influence would be
40 ft with an injection rate of 1 gpm. In the bedrock, the area of influence was calculated to be 64 ft with
an injection rate of 3 gpm.
Water will be supplied by the Charlotte Mecklenburg Utility District via a fire hydrant and delivered to
the site by a tanker truck, as required. Sodium lactate will be delivered to the site in 55-gal poly drums
and pumped, as required, into the poly tank using a drum pump. Mixing of the sodium lactate and water
will be achieved by pumping the lactate (100% water soluble) into the poly tank during filling operations.
Energy will be supplied to the injection system by a '/2-horsepower, 60-Hertz, 115-volt, single-phase
Gould's Model 5GB 7-stage Centrifugal Booster Pump capable of the flow and head requirement of
6, gpm at 50 pounds per square inch (psi). A generator will be used to power the pump, lights, tools, and
any other miscellaneous equipment needed for the construction, operation, and breakdown of the
system.
Piping from the poly tank to the pump will be 1-in., residential -grade suction hose fitted with worm -gear
clamps and quick -disconnect couplers. Piping from the pump to the injection wellheads will be 1-in.,
200 psi working pressure, residential and commercial air and water hose fitted with worm -gear clamps
and quick -disconnect couplers. Injection piping at the wellheads and 68 ft down the well (NAD MW-21
only) will be rigid -threaded PVC Schedule 40.
Operation and Controls
Inlet and outlet control at the poly tank is achieved with two 3-in. butterfly valves (Figure 4-3). The inlet
valve will be used during filling operations, and the outlet valve will be used to control the flow of
solution to the suction side of the pump. Prior to pump start, the outlet valve will be fully open. This will
allow proper priming of the pump and maintain solution supply during operation.
The system control panel (Figure 4-4) will be located shortly after the discharge side of the pump. A
1-in. isolation valve will be used to isolate the pump, should it need to be replaced. This isolation valve
will be half open at system start to prevent any damage to the flow meters that may be caused by
sudden surge. The isolation valve will be slowly opened as the system stabilizes. As shown in
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 4-9

24" MANWAY
PLATFORM
i
24" LADDER 6,900 GAL.
POLY TANK
i TO CONTROL PANEL
(SEE FIG. 4-4)
i
PUMP
ELEVATION REDUCER 1 1/2" 1"
REDUCER 3" TO 1 1/22""
SCALE: 1/4" = l'-0" 3" OUTLET VALVE
i —3" FILL VALVE
3" OUTLET VALVE
24" MANWAY REDUCER 3" TO 1- 1/2"
REDUCER 1 1/2" TO 1
TO CONTROL PANEL
�2 (SEE FIG. 4-4)
WORK
PLATFORM
1" FLEXIBLE
PRESSURE HOSE (TYP)
PLAN
SCALE: 1/41' = 1'-0"
NOTES:
Science Applications
International Corporation
FORMER NAVAL
0 1 2 3 4 AMMUNITION DEPOT
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWN BY: REV. NO./DATE. DAD FlE
SCALE: 1 /4" = 1
R. BEELER 0 / 08-15-03 /00015/DWGS/S531ANK01
Figure 4-3. Batch Tank and Injection System Pump
4-10

0
I
J
DE PLYWOOD
90' ELBOW
FLOW MER
VALVE
90' ELBOW
TEE
VALVE
90' ELBOW
FRONT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"
I I\LJJUI\L II\IJ'11LU L AT
2'-7 3/4"
SIDE ELEVATION
SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"
0 3" 6" 9" 12" 1'-6" 2'-0"
SCALE: 1 " = 1'-0"
Science Applications
International Corporation
FORMER NAVAL
AMMUNITION DEPOT
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
VN BY: I REV. NO./DATE- CAD FILE:
R. BEELER 0 / 08-15-03 /DD015/DWGS/S53VALV01
Figure 4-4. Injection System Control Panel
4-11

Figure 4-4, two vertical in -line flow meters will be used to monitor flow to each individual well. Before
each flow meter, there will be a 1-in. butterfly valve used to control the total flow and flow to each
individual well. The butterfly valves at the individual lines will be half open at system start, and
after the system stabilizes the valves will be adjusted, as necessary, to maintain consistent flow to the
wells.
System components at the wellhead (Figure 4-5) will include a 1-in. isolation valve, pressure gauge, and
well seal (except SAIC 17). The isolation valve will remain fully open and only closed should any part of
the system need to be taken out of service. The pressure gauge will be -used to monitor system pressure.
NAD MW-21 is an existing 4-in. well that will require the installation of a well seal to facilitate the 1-in.
drop pipe needed for the injection system A bleed -off valve will be located on the well seal to expel air,
as required. SAIC 17 will be a new 2-in. well, in which case the riser casing will be extended above
grade. The 1-in. injection line will be fitted with a reducer to meet the 2-in. riser casing. All other
components will be as shown in Figure 4-5.
Monitoring well SAIC 14, which is equipped with a multizone monitoring system (FLUTeTM), is
located approximately 6 ft from injection well NAD MW-21. The FLUTeTm system contains seven
discrete monitoring intervals that correspond to fractured zones in the bedrock. The FLUTCm liners are
held in place by differential head, where the total head inside of the liner must always be greater than
the total head in the aquifer to ,prevent the collapse of the FLUTeTM. This differential head requirement
must be considered during the injection period, due to the close proximity of SAIC 14 to NAD MW-21.
To keep the FLUTeTM system from potential collapse, SAIC 14 will be monitored to ensure that the
total head inside the liner- remains greater than the total head in the aquifer for the duration of the
injection. -
4.4.3 Monitoring
Monitoring for both the tracer and the sodium lactate will be conducted within the focus area for up to a
6-month period. After the injection, the groundwater will be monitored biweekly for the. first 2 months,
with monthly sampling to occur during months 3 though 6 for a total of eight monitoring events. The
same purging and sampling procedures discussed in Section 4.4.1 will be utilized to collect- samples
during the monitoring events. The monitoring schedule is presented in Chapter 7.0 while the required
sampling parameters are summarized in Table 4-2.
Water level measurements will be collected from each well in the Pilot Study focus area at the beginning
of each event. Field parameter measurements will include conductivity, ORP, DO, temperature, pH, and
turbidity, and bromide. Information from the data logger will also be downloaded at the beginning of each
event.
During the monitoring period, all wells will be screened for the bromide tracer with the field probe and
will be analyzed for COD as an indicator parameter for the sodium lactate distribution. In addition, field
test kits will be used to analyze the samples for ferrous iron and carbon dioxide. Wells where bromide is
detected and elevated COD values and reduced ORP conditions are present will be sampled for VOCs,
potassium, sodium, and natural attenuation parameters. Once reducing conditions are exhibited, wells will
be sampled for lactate breakdown products (organic acids) that include acetic acid, lactic acid, butanoic
acid, and propanoic acid. The number of samples to be collected, as indicated on Table 4-2, is only an
estimate. The actual total will be determined based- on the results of the bromide tracer.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 4-12

C`nI ATI/%AI % I A I %ir
PRESSURE GAUGE
4" WELL CAP
INTERNAL GASKET
1 " THREADED PVC
SCREENED 63'- 68'- 69'
BGS
INJECTION WELL HEADER @ EXISTING NADMW21
SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"
NOTES:
0 1" 2" 3" 4" 5" 6" 9"
SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"
Science Applications
International Corporation
FORMER NAVAL
AMMUNITION DEPOT
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWN BY: I REV. NO./DATE I
CAD FILE
R. BEELER 0 / 08-15-03 /00015/DWGS/S530ETL01
Figure 4-5. Typical Injection Well Head Configuration
4-13

Table 4-2. Sampling and Analytical Requirements for the Monitoring Events
Samples
QC Samples
QA Sam lesa
Sam le Total
Parameter
Analytical
Method
No.
Primary
Sam les
No.
Du licates
No.
Rinsates
No. Trip
Blanks
Du QA
licates
QA Trip
Blanks
No. Samples
er Event
Total
No.
Events
Total No.
Sam le
Month I (Bi-MonthlyEvent
COD
EPA 410.4
21
2
1
0
2
0
26
2
52
Field
Parameters`
Field
Measurement
21
0
0
0
0
0
21
2
42
Month 2 (Bi- onthly Event)
COD
EPA 410.4
15
2
1
0
1
0
19
2
38
VOCS
SW-846
826013/5030
10
1
1
1
1
1
15
2
30
Alkalinity
EPA 310.1
10
1
1
0
0
0
12
2
24
Ammonia
EPA 350.2
10
1
1
0
1
0
13
2
26
Phosphate
EPA 365.1
10
1
1
0
1
0
13
2
26
Potassium
SW-846, 6010B
10
1
1
0
0
0
12
2
24
Nitrate
EPA 300.0
10
1
1
0
1
0
13
2
26
Nitrite
EPA 300.0
10
1
1
0
1
0
13
2
26
Sodium
SW-846, 6010B
10
1
1
0
1
0
13
2
26
Sulfate
EPA 300.0
10
1
1
0
1
0
13
2
26
Methane
SW-8000
5
1
0
0
0
0
6
2
14
Organic Acids
BPLC
5
1
1
0
0
0
7
2
14
Ferrous Iron
Field Test Kit
21
2
0
0
0
0
23
2
46
Carbon dioxide
Field Test Kit
21
2
0
0
0
0
' 23
2
46
Field
Parameters`
Field
Measurement
21
0
0
0
0
0
21
2
42
Months 3 throu h 6 (MonthlyEvent)
COD
EPA 410.4
21
2
1
0
1
0
25
4
100
VOCs
SW-846
826013/5030
16
2
1
1
1
1
22
4
88
Alkalinity
EPA 310.1
16
2
1
0
0
0
19
4
76
Ammonia
EPA 350.2
16
2
1
0
1
0
20 _
4
80
Phosphate
EPA 365.1
16
2
1
0
1
0
20
4
80
Potassium
SW-846, 6010B
16
2
1
0
1
0
20
4
80
Nitrate
EPA 300.0
16
2
1
0
1
0
20
4
80

Table 4-2. Sampling and Analytical Requirements for the Monitoring Events (continued)
Samples
QC Samples
QA Sam lesa
Sam le Total
Parameter
Analytical
Method
No.
Primary
Samples
No.
Duplicates
No.
Rinsates
No. Trip
Blanks
QA
Duplicates
QA Trip
Blanks
No. Samples
per Event
Total
No.
Events
Total No.
Sample
Nitrite
EPA 300.0.
16
2
1
0
1
0
20
4
80
Sodium
SW-846, 6010B
16
2
1
0
1
0
20
4
80
Sulfate
EPA 300.0
16
2
1
0
1
0
20
4
80
Methane
SW-8000
9
1
0
0
0
0
10
4
40
Organic Acids
HPLC
9
1
1
0
0
0
11
4
44
Ferrous Iron
Field Test Kit
21
2
0
0
0
0
23
4
92
Carbon dioxide
Field Test Kit
21
2
0
0
0
0
23
4
92
Field
Parameters`
Field
Measurement
21
0
0
0
0
0
21
4
84
'Quality Assurance samples are to be sent to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers -contracted laboratory, Accura Analytical Laboratories.
GAIT wells will be screened for the bromide tracer with the field probe and will be analyzed for COD as an indicator parameter for the sodium lactate distribution. Wells where
bromide is detected and elevated COD values and reduced ORP conditions are present will be sampled for VOCs. Once reducing conditions are exhibited, wells will be sampled for
lactate breakdown products (organic acids).
,! `Field Parameters include measurements for conductivity, ORP, DO, temperature, pH, turbidity, and bromide.
dOrganib acids include acetic acid, lactic acid, butanoic acid, and propanoic acid.
COD = Chemical Oxygen Demand.
DO = Dissolved Oxygen.
EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
HPLC = High -Performance Liquid Chromatography.
NAD = Naval Ammunition Depot.
ORP = Oxygen Reduction Potential.
QA = Quality Assurance.
QC = Quality Control.
VOC = Volatile Organic Compound.

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT' BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 4-16

5.0 SAMPLE CHAIN OF CUSTODY/DOCUMENTATION
i
5.1 SAMPLE NUMBERING SYSTEM
A unique sample numbering scheme will be used to identify each sample designated for laboratory
analysis. The purpose of this numbering scheme is to provide a tracking system for the retrieval of
analytical and field data on each sample. Sample identification numbers will be used on all sample labels
or tags, field data sheets and/or logbooks, chain -of -custody records, and all other applicable
documentation used during the project.
The sample numbering scheme used for field samples will also be used for duplicate samples so that these
types of samples will not be discernible by the laboratory. However, other types of field QC samples will
be numbered so that they can be readily identified from different sample types. A summary of the sample
numbering scheme to.be used for the project is presented in Table 5-1.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 5-1

Table 5-1. Sample Numbering Scheme for the Pilot Study at the Former NAD Site
Sample Identification: NMSSTE#
N = Project Designator
N will be used in the first place of the sample number to designate the
sample as belonging to the Former NAD FS/RD field effort.
M = Sample Medium
Examples
1 = Groundwater Sample
2 = Subsurface Soil Sample
3 = Waste Water
4 = Waste Solids
SS = Sample Station
Examples V
SAI17 = Monitoring well SAIC 17
T = Tank
D = Drum
T = Sample Type
Examples
1 = Environmental Sample
2 = Duplicate
3 = QA Split
4 = Rinsate Blank
5 = Investigative -derived Waste
# = Sample Depth
Sample number will be a sequential number
0 = Composite
1 = First Sample Interval
2 = Second Sample Interval
3 = Third Sample Interval
4 = Fourth Sample Interval
5 = Fifth Sample Interval
6 = Sixth Sample Interval
7 = Seventh Sample Interval
E = Sample Event
Sample round will be represented by a number for each laboratory sample.
Examples
B = Baseline Event
P1 = Pilot Study Monitoring, First Event
P2= Pilot Study, Second Event
P3 = Pilot Study, Third Event
P4 = Pilot Study, Fourth Event
P5 = Pilot Study, Fifth Event
P6 = Pilot Study, Sixth Event
P7 = Pilot Study, Seventh Event
P8 = Pilot Study, Eighth Event
All trip blank samples used during the project will be consecutively identified as follows: TB001, TB002, TB003, etc.
FS = Feasibility study.
NAD = Naval Ammunition Depot.
QA = Quality assurance.
RD = Remedial design,
SAIC = Science Applications International Corporation.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 5-2

6.0 INVESTIGATION -DERIVED WASTE
During the performance of field investigation activities, IDW will be managed in accordance with
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 requirements and the EPA's IDW policy. IDW
includes all materials generated during performance of an investigation that cannot be effectively reused,
recycled, or decontaminated in the field. IDW consists of materials that could potentially pose a risk to
human health and the environment (e.g., sampling and decontamination wastes) and materials that pose a
risk to human health and the environment (e.g., sanitary solid wastes). The types of IDW expected to be
generated during the field activities are: (1) drill cuttings and decontamination sludges; (2) wastewaters,
including monitoring well development and purge waters, and decontamination fluids; and
(3) noncontaminated compactable and miscellaneous trash.
All soil and drill cuttings generated during the drilling of monitoring wells will be collected and drummed
or otherwise contained and segregated by borehole location. A composite sample will be collected from
each set of drums (i.e., one from SAIC 17 drums, etc.) to determine the appropriate disposal method.
Based on the analytical results, the solids will either be disposed of as nonhazardous, non -regulated, or as
hazardous listed waste bearing waste codes D040 and F001.
A detailed discussion of the procedures and equipment used for handling the IDW is discussed in
Chapter 7.0 of the SAP (SAIC 2000).
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 f-1

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_2

7.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE
The anticipated schedule for this project is provided below 'and is based on receiving approval of the
Work Plan by the USACE and North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR) within 30 days of receipt of the Draft Plan:
• August 19, 2003 — Submit Draft Work Plan.
• September 19, 2003 — Receive USACE and NCDENR comments on Draft Work Plan.
• September 26, 2003 — Submit Final Work Plan.
• September 30, 2003 — Begin well installation.,
• October 9, 2003 — Complete well installation and development.
• October 16, 2003 — Begin baseline sampling activities.
• October 19, 2003 — Complete baseline sampling activities.
• October 20, 2003 — Begin injection of bromide tracer and sodium lactate.
• November 14, 2003 — First monitoring event.
• November 28, 2003 — Second monitoring event.
• December 5, 2003 — Third monitoring event.
• December 19, 2003 — Fourth monitoring event.
• January 18, 2004 — Fifth monitoring event.
• February 17, 2004 — Sixth monitoring event.
• March 18, 2004 — Seventh monitoring event
• April 17, 2004 — Eighth (final) monitoring event.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 7-1

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 7.2

APPENDIX A
REFERENCES
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 A-1

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT' BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 A-2

REFERENCES
Metcalf and Eddy, Inc. 2000. Final Phase II Remedial Investigation Report for the Former Naval
Ammunition Depot Area 1 and 2, Mecklenburg County, Charlotte, North Carolina, October.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Conservation (NCDENR) 2002a. NCDENR Superfund
Comments from Marti Morgan on the Former Charlotte Naval Ammunition Depot April 9, 2002
Presentation.
NCDENR 2002b. NCDENR Superfund Approval Letter from Marti Morgan for the IDW Water
Management Strategy for the Former Charlotte Naval Ammunition Depot, October.
SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation) 2000. Sampling and Analysis Plan for the
Feasibility Study/Remedial Design (FS/RD) at the Former Naval Ammunition Depot (NAD),
Mecklenburg County, Charlotte, North Carolina.
SAIC 2001. Addendum #1 To The Sampling and Analysis Plan for the Feasibility Study/Remedial Design
(FS/RD) at the Former Naval Ammunition Depot (NAD), Mecklenburg County, Charlotte, North
Carolina
SAIC 2002. Regulatory Meeting Presentation, Feasibility Study/Remedial Design At Former Naval
Ammunition Depot (NAD) Site, Mecklenburg County, Charlotte, North Carolina, April.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps. of Engineers) 1998. Monitor Well Installation at Hazardous and Toxic Waste
Sites, Engineer Manual EM 1110-14000.
USACE 2002. IDW Water Management Strategy, Feasibility Study/Remedial Design Field Investigations
at the Former Charlotte Naval Ammunition Depot (NAD), Mecklenburg County, Charlotte,
North Carolina, Letter to NCDENR, September.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 A-3

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 A_4

APPENDIX B
RIGHT -OF -ENTRY AGREEMENT
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 B_ 1

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)l091703 B_2

�A��4ZJ• 9-03- �329
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO RIGHT OF ENTRY
WHEREAS, Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Arrowood-Southern
Company (collectively referred to as "Company") and United States of America
("Licensee") have entered into an Environmental Right of Entry Agreement
("Agreement"), made as of July 12, 1991, covering the entry of Licensee onto
Company's property (known as the "Pineville" property) for the purpose of investigation
and remediation of the former Naval Ammunition Depot located in Charlotte, North
Carolina; and
Whereas the Agreement has been amended on three previous occasions on
October 24, 1994, November 7, 1997 and May 8, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the parties to the Agreement agree to extend the term of the
Agreement for an additional two-year period until November 6, 2004; and
The parties, acknowledging mutual consideration and intending to be legally
bound, agree as follows:
1. The term of this extension is up to and includes November 6, 2004.
2. In the event of any inconsistency or ambiguity between the provisions of the
Agreement and as subsequently amended, and those of the Extension, the
provisions of this Extension shall prevail. However, except as expressly
modified by this Extension, the terms and conditions of the Agreement and
the subsequent amendments thereto shall continue in full force and effect.
Each of the parties therefore has caused the Extension to be executed by its duly
authorized representative.
NORFOLK SOUTHER RAILWAY
COMPANY and ARROWOOD-
SOUTHERN COMPANY
By:
Title: Vice President
Date: j
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ifl
T
Date: Ccntractislg v==
Im

AMENDMENT _
This Amendment is entered into as of otjz , 2000,
between ARROWOOD-SOUTHERN COMPANY ('''ASC"), a North Carolina
corporation, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ("NSRC"), a Virginia
corporation (ASC and NSRC hereafter together called "Company") and THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA ("Licensee").
WHEREAS, NSRC and Licensee entered intov R__ight-ef Entry License
agreement, made as of July 12, 1991 (" 1991 Agreement"), covering the entry of Licensee
onto Company's property for the purpose of performing environmental testing on the
property of Company: including the installation of monitoring wells on Company
property; and
WHEREAS, by agreement dated October 24, 1994 (" 1994 Agreement"), NSRC
and ASC both agreed to entry for two (2) additional years by Licensee on the same
property for the purpose of performing additional environmental testing on the property
of Company, including installation of monitoring wells; and
WHEREAS, by agreement -dated November 7, 1997 (" 1997 Agreement"),
Company agreed to Licensee's entry onto Company property at Pineville,. at or near
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. for the purpose of performing additional
environmental tests defined as including collecting and testing surface and subsurface
soil samples, collecting and testing surface water and surface sediment, performing a
potable well survey (if applicable), determining the surface geophysical model of the
property of Company, performing a passive soil vapor survey (to determine -if volatile
hydrocarbons are present), installing deep (70') rock test wells for bore hold geophysics
and acquifier testing (to understand bedrock fracture orientation and permeability),
installing new monitoring wells (to continue monitoring for possible contamination of
groundwater) and continuing to maintain and use, under the terms of the 1997
Agreement, those monitoring wells originally installed under the then -expired 1991
Agreement and the then -expired 1994 Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Licensee finds that it needs additional time in which to complete the
aforementioned work; and
WHEREAS, Licensee finds that it needs to install and maintain two (2)
additional monitoring wells on the property of Company, and other work may be needed
in the future; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement.
The parties, acknowledging mutual consideration and intending to be legally
bound, agree as follows:

1. The term of the 1997 Agreement is extended to November 6, 2002.
2. Company and Licensee agree to Licensee's installation and maintenance of
two (2) additional monitoring wells on Company's property, subject to the requirement of
the 1997 Agreement. Licensee will use its best efforts not to install either of the two (2)
additional monitoring wells at any location except the grassy area of Company's property,
but Company understands that it may not be possible to do so. In any event, the wells
shall not be placed at any location that will interfere with or create a hazard for the
operations of Company on the property of Company. Company and Licensee agree that
the location of each well shall be one that has been mutually agreed to by Company's
Division Engineer E. G. Cody (864-25 5-425 1) or his authorized representative and by
Licensee's Project Manger John E. Keiser, P.E. (912-652-5687). Within one (1) month
of the installation of such wells, Licensee shall furnish Company with a drawing that
depicts the location of the two wells.
3. If Licensee shall require installation of any additional wells on the
property of Company, again Licensee shall use its best efforts to place the same on grassy
areas of Company's property, avoid locations that interfere with or create a hazard for
Company's operations on Company's property and in any event shall be ones that are
agreed to by the said representatives of Company and Licensee, as described in the
previous paragraph of this Amendment. Within one (1) month of the installation of such
wells, Licensee shall furnish Company with a drawing that depicts the location of any
such wells.
4. Licensee agrees to remove drums and waste generated from the wells
covered by the Agreement as amended hereby in a short and timely manner. If the waste
contained in a particular drum includes hazardous waste, Licensee will remove that drum
within the time period allowed after generation of the waste, as specified by federal or
state law, before a hazardous waste storage permit is required. If the waste contained in a
particular drum is not hazardous, Licensee will, if requested to do so by Company and
within five (5) workdays of such request by Company, provide Company with written
certification of such status. .
5. In the event of any inconsistency or ambiguity between the provisions of
the Agreement, as previously amended, and those of this Amendment, the provisions of
this Amendment shall prevail. However,, except as expressly modified by this
Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Agreement, as previously amended, shall
continue in full force and effect.
Executed in duplicate, each part being an original, as of the date first above

written.
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY
COMPANY and ARROWOOD-
SOUTHERN COMPANY
Title: ✓(/'
Date: 51 (f ) 0
is\ops\rightofe\amndmnts\amendment.army
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ronald L. Ogden
Title. Chief, Real Estate Division
ntra ting Officer
Date: : d

5L= -'-,-Jl I -, U.
PA
VGVA2N
YU VA 3N
14
14
an
Cl
'A7 r SeTr
t. tb
�b
14
ros.-e
-7 7.7-7-L
71107cY VA 3
tb
rt
-
?a '-7r.F.F6/ D"
ly
17 dlYSAIM Oi
ry
PZZ437 u
SLIM
4. /p,
966'Z*/
Vt
Lb
ZZ
tot
L7A 79
-?9ncLy9N1.L-r,314
;ate
57F'9
2'957
so�nbdj &ndv -7, 15CP cc�
P51" m
D
It
d`6C ;p ,ay P y
ci
11 GI 91
.7 AVE= . c9r
SO'Cl v J.IqiHxa
01 L66T-TZ-�

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(doc)/091703 B_g

APPENDIX C
WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAMS AND BORING LOGS
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_ 1

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_2

Table C-1. Summary of the Current Site Monitoring Well Construction Information for the Former NAD Site
Well ID
Original
Well
I T e°
Proposed
Well
Typeb
Depth to
Bedrock
I (ft BGS)
Screen
Interval/
Sample
Interval
(ft BGS)
Total
Depth
(ft BGS)
Date
Water Level
(ft BTOC)
TOC
Elevations
Ground -
water
Elevation
(AMSL)
CC MW10
S
S
N/A
?-20
20.0
09-Apr-03
3.45
632.26
628.81
17-Oct-02
4.87
632.26
627.39
06-Feb-02
7.47
632.26
624.79
06-Nov-01
9.56
632.26
622.70
13-Dec-00
10.29
632.26
621.97
07-Jun-99
6.12
632.26
626.14
CC MW10I
T
DB
N/A
?-62.2
62.2
09-Apr-03
4.48
632.52
628.04
17-Oct-02
5.78
632.52
626.74
06-Feb-02
8.00
632.52
624.52
06-Nov-01
10.23
632.52
622.29
13-Dec-00
10.66
632.52
621.86
07-Jun-99
6.37
632.52
626.15
NADHPI 1
S
S
9.5
3.9 - 8.9
8.9
09-Apr-03
1.45
643.49
642.04
17-Oct-02
4.11
643.49
639.38
06-Feb-02
5.22
643.49
638.27
06-Nov-01
7.10
643.49
636.39
25-Apr-01
3.30
643.49
640.19
06-Dec-00
No Access
643.49
No Access
07-Jun-99
No Access
643.49
No Access
05-Dec-94
3.30
643.49
640.19
NADMWI8
S
S
7.0
1.5-6.5
6.5
09-Apr-03
3.51
640.03
636.52
17-Oct-02
5.09
640.03
634.94
06-Feb-02
Dry
640.03
Dry
06-Nov-01
Dry
640.03
Dry
25-Apr-01
Dry
640.03
Dry
07-Dec-00
6.24
640.03
633.79
07-Jun-99
4.92
640.03
635.11
NADMW 19
T
SB
6.0
31.8-41.8
41.8
09-Apr-03
3.82
640.00
636.18
17-Oct-02
5.83
640.00
634.17
-
06-Feb-02
10.16
640.00
629.84
06-Nov-01
14.37
640.00
625.63
25-Apr-01
14.01
640.00
625.99
06-Dec-00
13.50
640.00
626.50
-
07-Jun-99
4.88
640.00
635.12
NADMW20
D
DB
7.0
51.2 - 61.2
61.2
09-Apr-03
6.81
640.22
633.41
22-Oct-02
11.33
640.22
628.89
06-Feb-02
15.69
640.22
624.53
08-Nov-01
18.03
640.22
622.19
25-Apr-01
30.70
640.22
609.52
07-Dec-00
23.79
640.22
616.43
07-Jun-99
7.90
640.22
632.32
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-3

Table C-1. Summary of the Current Site Monitoring Well Construction Information for the Former NAD Site
(continued)
Well ID
Original
Well
T e°
Proposed
Well
Type
Depth to
Bedrock
(ft BGS)
Screen
Interval/
Sample
Interval
(ft BGS)
Total
Depth
(ft BGS)
Date
Water Level
(ft BTOC)
TOC
Elevations
Ground -
water
Elevation
(AMSL)
NADMW21
T
SB/DB
10.1
19.5-69.5
69.5
09-Apr-03
3.73
638.46
634.73
17-Oct-02
11.03
638.46
627.43
06-Feb-02
13.61
638.46
624.85
06-Nov-01
13.78
638.46
624.68
25-Apr-01
28.50
638.46
609.96
15-Dec-00
22.09
638.46
616.37
07-Jun-99
4.37
638.46
634.09
NADMW22
T
SB/DB
22.0
24.5 - 74.5
74.5
09-Apr-03
3.87
639.49
635.62
22-Oct-02
7.14
639.49
632.35
06-Feb-02
10.20
639.49
629.29
06-Nov-01
12.01
639.49
627.48
25-Apr-01
11.00
639.49
628.49
08-Dec-00
10.69
639.49
628.80
07-Jun-99
5.85
639.49
633.64
NADMW23
T
SB/DB
12.3
20.5 - 70.5
70.5
09-Apr-03
2.14
638.25
636.11
22-Oct-02
4.03
638.25
634.22
06-Feb-02
8.10
638.25
630.15
06-Nov-01
11.28
638.25
626.97
25-Apr-01
12.63
638.25
625.62
08-Dec-00
1J.39
638.25
626.86
07-Jun-99
3.37
638.25
634.88
NADMW24
T
T
9.5
6.5-16.5
16.5
09-Apr-03
2.73
638.34
635.61
22-Oct-02
5.28
638.34
633.06
06-Feb-02
9.59
638.34
628.75
06-Nov-01
13.73
638.34
624.61
J
25-Apr-01
14.48
638.34
623.86
06-Dec-00
13.48
638.34
624.86
07-Jun-99
3.55
638.34
634.79
NADMW251
S
T
12.0
9.0-19.0
19.0
09-Apr-03
5.45
639.78
634.33
22-Oct-02
9.46
639.78
630.32
06-Feb-02
12.50
639.78
627.28
06-Nov-01
13.31
639.78
626.47
25-Apr-01
12.95
639.78
626.83
06-Dec-00
11.86
639.78
627.92 .
07-Jun-99
6.97
639.78
632.81
NADMW26
T
SB
16.0
30.0-40.0
40.0
09-Apr-03
5.52
639.72
634.20
21-Oct-02
9.35
639.72
630.37
06-Feb-02
12.36
639.72
627.36
08-Nov-01
13.18
639.72
626.54
25-Apr-01
12.76
639.72
626.96
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-4

Table C-1. Summary of the Current Site Monitoring Well Construction Information for the Former NAD Site
(continued)
Well ID
Original
Well
T e°
Proposed
Well
Typeb
Depth to
Bedrock
(ft BGS)
Screen
Interval/
Sample
Interval
(ft BGS)
Total
Depth
(ft BGS)
Date
Water Level
(ft BTOC)
TOC
Elevations
Ground -
water
Elevation
(AMSL)
06-Dec-00
11.75
639.72
627.97
07-Jun-99
7.23
639.72
632.49
NADMW27
T
T
19.5
15.5-25.5
25.5
09-Apr-03
4.92
640.03
635.11
21-Oct-02
8.16
640.03
631.87
06-Feb-02
10.53
640.03
629.50
01-Nov-01
12.00
640.03
628.03
25-Apr-01
10.80
640.03
629.23
06-Dec-00
10.84
640.03
629.19
07-Jun-99
7.44
640.03
632.59
NADMW28
T
SB
13.0
30.0-40.0
40.0
09-Apr-03
3.56
636.79
633.23
21-Oct-02
5.66
636.79
631.13
06-Feb-02
8.23
636.79
628.56
01-Nov-01
9.41
636.79
627.38
25-Apr-01
8.61
636.79
628.18
06-Dec-00
8.07
636.79
628.72
07-Jun-99
4.85
636.79
631.94
NADMW29
T
SB
16.0
30.0-40.0
40.0
09-Apr-03
7.54
639.25
631.71
21-Oct-02
8.66
639.25
630.59
06-Feb-02
11.35
639.25
627.90
07-Nov-01
13.29
639.25
625.96
25-Apr-01
16.48
639.25
622.77
06-Dec-00
14.69
639.25
624.56
07-Jun-99
9.10
639.25
630.15
NADMW30
T
T
26.0
20.4-30.4
30.4
09-Apr-03
12.78
648.59
635.81
23-Oct-02
17.15
648.59
631.44
06-Feb-02
20.61
648.59
627.98
01-Nov-01
No Access
648.59
No Access
25-Apr-01
No Access
648.59
No Access
06-Dec-00
22.51
648.59
626.08
07-Jun-99
12.75
648.59
635.84
NADMW31
T
T
26.0
20.0-30.0
30.0
09-Apr-03
11.23
645.71
634.48
23-Oct-02
17.03
645.71
628.68
06-Feb-02
19.95
645.71
625.76
07-Nov-01
22.57
645.71
623.14
25-Apr-01
24.92
645.71
620.79
06-Dec-00
23.31
645.71
622.40
07-Jun-99
10.08
645.71
635.63
NADMW32
T
T
10.0
9.0-29.0
29.0
09-Apr-03
10.98
645.56
634.58
23-Oct-02
17.00
645.56
628.56
06-Feb-02
20.60
645.56
624.96
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-5

Table C-1. Summary of the Current Site Monitoring Well Construction Information for the Former NAD Site
(continued)
Well ID
Original
Well
Type
Proposed
Well
T eb
Depth to
Bedrock
(ft BGS)
Screen
Interval/
Sample
Interval
(ft BGS)
Total
Depth
(ft BGS)
Date
Water Level
(ft BTOC)
TOC
Elevations
Ground -
water
Elevation
(AMSL)
07-Nov-01
23.18
645.56
622.38
25-Apr-01
26.08
645.56
619.48
06-Dec-00
24.74
645.56
620.82
07-Jun-99
9.99
645.56
635.57
NADMW33
FT
T
5.0
4.0-24.0
24.0
09-Apr-03
4.01
639.59
635.58
18-Oct-02
7.35
639.59
632.24
06-Feb-02
10.01
639.59
629.58
O1-Nov-01
11.65
639.59
627.94
25-Apr-01
10.37
639.59
629.22
14-Dec-00
10.35
639.59
629.24
07-Jun-99
6.27
639.59
633.32
NADMW34
T
T
4.5
4.0-14.0
14.0
09-Apr-03
4.09
639.98
635.89
18-Oct-02
7.33
639.98
632.65
06-Feb-02
10.36
639.98
629.62
O1-Nov-01
12.31
639.98
627.67
25-Apr-01"
11.17
639.98
628.81
14-Dec-00
11.01
639.98
628.97
07-Jun-99
6.31
639.98
633.67
NADMW35
T
T
25.5
21.6-36.6
36.6
09-Apr-03
5.59
634.45
628.86
18-Oct-02
8.48
634.45
625.97
06-Feb-02
9.59.
634.45
624.86
O1-Nov-01
11.22
634.45
623.23
25-Apr-01
No Access
634.45
No Access
14-Dec-00
14.64
634.45
619.81
07-Jun-99
7.54
634.45
626.91
NADMW36
T
SB
5.0
12.0-22.0
22.0
09-Apr-03
1.89
622.66
620.77
18-Oct-02
4.89
622.66
617.77
06-Feb-02
5.80
622.66
616.86
01-Nov-01
8.07
622.66
614.59
25-Apr-01
21.34
622.66
601.32
12-Dec-00
18.52
622.66
604.14
07-Jun-99
9.70
622.66
612.96
NADMW37
T
T
12.0
9.2-19.2
19.2
09-Apr-03
0.33
626.12
625.79
18-Oct-02
2.29
626.12
623.83
06-Feb-02
2.85
626.12
623.27
01-Nov-01
5.24
626.12
620.88
25-Apr-01
7.65
626.12
618.47
14-Dec-00
7.86
626.12 1
618.26
07-Jun-99
2.94
626.12
L623.18
NADMW38
T
T
16.3
14.5-24.5
24.5
09-Apr-03
1.83 1
634.59 1
632.76
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-6

Table C-1. Summary of the Current Site Monitoring Well Construction Information for the Former NAD Site
(continued)
Well ID
Original
Well
T e°Type'
Proposed
Well
Depth to
Bedrock
(ft BGS)
Screen
Interval/
Sample
Interval
(ft BGS)
Total
Depth
(ft BGS)
Date
Water Level
(ft BTOC)
TOC
Elevations
Ground -
water
Elevation
(AMSL)
18-Oct-02
3.99
634.59
630.60
06-Feb-02
6.10
634.59
628.49
01-Nov-01
8.55
634.59
626.04
25-Apr-01
7.63
634.59
626.96
13-Dec-00
8.55
634.59
626.04
07-Jun-99
5.14
634.59
629.45
NADMW39
S
S
>21.0
10.0-20.0
20.0
09-Apr-03
4.73
637.47
632.74
17-Oct-02
7.05
637.47
630.42
06-Feb-02
8.16
637.47
629.31
06-Nov-01
9.89
637.47
627.58
25-Apr-01
8.89
637.47
628.58
13-Dec-00
9.41
637.47
628.06
07-Jun-99
6.16
637.47
631.31
NADMW40
T
T
25.0
23.0-33.0
33.0
09-Apr-03
3.92
638.20
634.28
18-Oct-02
N/A
638.20
N/A
06-Feb-02
8.59
638.20
629.61
01-Nov-01
10.33
638.20
627.87
25-Apr-01
10.15
638.20
628.05
11-Dec-00
10.65
638.20
627.55
07-Jun-99
7.84
638.20
630.36
NADMW41
S
S
>19
8.0-18.0
18.0
09-Apr-03
8.25
641.93
633.68
18-Oct-02
13.42
641.93
628.51
06-Feb-02
14.30
641.93
627.63
08-Nov-01
14.70
641.93
627.23
25-Apr-01
12.48
641.93
629.45
11-Dec-00
14.09
641.93
627.84
07-Jun-99
11.89
641.93
630.04
NADMW421
T
T
22.5
20.5-30.5
30.5
09-Apr-03
12.19
641.02
628.83
18-Oct-02
13.17
641.02
627.85
06-Feb-02
14.53
641.02
626.49
08-Nov-01
16.55
641.02
624.47
25-Apr-01
21.18
641.02
619.84
11-Dec-00
20.32
641.02
620.70
07-Jun-99
13.69
641.02
627.33
NADMW431
D
DB
23.0
70.5-80.5
80.5
09-Apr-03
12.75
641.76
629.01
21-Oct-02
16.77
641.76
624.99
06-Feb-02
18.50
641.76
623.26
08-Nov-01
20.14
641.76
621.62
25-Apr-01 1
35.57 1
641.76
606.19
11-Dec-00 1
31.68 1
641.76
610.08
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-7

Table C-1. Summary of the Current Site Monitoring Well Construction Information for the Former NAD Site
(continued)
Well ID
Original
Well
T e°
Proposed
Well
Typek
Depth to
Bedrock
(ft BGS)
Screen
Interval/
Sample
Interval
(ft BGS)
Total
Depth
(ft BGS)
Date
Water Level
(ft BTOC)
TOC
Elevations
Ground -
water
Elevation
(AMSL)
07-Jun-99
15.18
641.76
626.58
NADMW44
T
T
12.0
10.0-20.0
20.0
09-Apr-03
6.89
640.13
633.24
21-Oct-02
7.46
640.13
632.67
06-Feb-02
10.43
640.13
629.70
01-Nov-01
12.47
640.13
627.66
25-Apr-01
11.82
640.13
628.31
11-Dec-00
11.43
640.13
628.70
07-Jun-99
8.12
640.13
632.01
NADMW45
S
S
9.3
4.0-9.0
9.0
09-Apr-03
2.52
640.03
637.51
21-Oct-02
3.60
640.03
636.43
06-Feb-02
3.72
640.03
636.31
01-Nov-01
4.66
640.03
635.37
25-Apr-01
4.72
640.03
635.31
07-Dec-00
5.66
640.03
634.37
07-Jun-99
5.20
640.03
634.83
NADMW46
T
T
9.0
7.0-17.0
17.0
09-Apr-03
8.75
640.10
631.35
21-Oct-02
5.21
640.10
634.89
06-Feb-02
12.83
646.10
627.27
01-Nov-01
13.79
640.10
626.31
25-Apr-01
13.52
640.10
626.58
17-Dec-00
12.46
640.10
627.64
07-Jun-99
6.73
640.10
633.37
NADMW47
S
T
5.0
3.0-13.0
13.0.
09-Apr-03
1.97
639.36
637.39
21-Oct-02
5.94
639.36
633.42
06-Feb-02
9.59
639.36
629.77
01-Nov-01
12.27
639.36
627.09
25-Apr-01
11.92
639.36
627.44
17-Dec-00
10.72
639.36
628.64
07-Jun-99
3.36
639.36
636.00
NADMW48
T
S
23.5
12.0-22.0
22.0
09-Apr-03
15.61
647.49
631.88
21-Oct-02
Dry
647.49
Dry
06-Feb-02
Dry
647.49
Dry
01-Nov-01
Dry
647.49
Dry
25-Apr-01
Dry
647.49
Dry
17-Dec-00
Dry
647.49
Dry
07-Jun-99
11.34
647.49
636.15
NADMW49
T
T
22.0
19.0-29.0
29.0
09-Apr-03
14.90
647.49
632.59
23-Oct-02
19.82
647.49
627.67
06-Feb-02
22.44
647.49
625.05
01-Nov-01
No Access
647.49
No Access
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-g

_ Table C-1. Summary of the Current Site Monitoring Well Construction Information for the Former NAD Site
(continued)
Well ID
Original
Well
Type
Proposed
Well
Type
Depth to
Bedrock
(ft BGS)
Screen
Interval/
Sample
Interval
(ft BGS)
Total
Depth
(ft BGS)
Date
Water Level
(ft BTOC)
TOC
Elevations
Ground -
water
Elevation
(AMSL)
25-Apr-01
No Access
647.49
No Access
17-Dec-00
22.26
647.49
625.23
07-Jun-99
11.20
647.49
636.29
NADMW50
S
S
>20.0
9.8-19.8
19.8
09-Apr-03
16.73
648.43
631.70
23-Oct-02
Dry
648.43
Dry
06-Feb-02
Dry
648.43
Dry
01-Nov-01
No Access
648.43
No Access
25-Apr-01
N/A
648.43
N/A
17-Dec-00
19.74
648.43
628.69
07-Jun-99
12.12
648.43
636.31
NADMW51
T
T
23.0
20.0-30.0
30.0
09-Apr-03
16.75
648.57
631.82
23-Oct-02
22.50
648.57
626.07
06-Feb-02
25.58
648.57
622.99
01-Nov-01
No Access
648.57
No Access
25-Apr-01
N/A
648.57
N/A
17-Dec-00
25.82
648.57
622.75
07-Jun-99
13.22
648.57
635.35
NADMW521
T
T
22.3
19.5-29.5
29.5
09-Apr-03
10.27
644.29
634.02
21-Oct-02
18.45
644.29
625.84
06-Feb-02
22.11
644.29
622.18
07-Nov-01
23.87
644.29
620.42
25-Apr-01
29.30
644.29
614.99
08-Dec-00
26.56
644.29
617.73
07-Jun-99
8.66
644.29
635.63
NADMW53
S
S
19.0
10.0-20.0
20.0
09-Apr-03
10.26
643.35
633.09
21-Oct-02
14.38
643.35
628.97
06-Feb-02
17.13
643.35
626.22
01-Nov-01
No Access
643.35
No Access
25-Apr-01
No Access
643.35
No Access
08-Dec-00
15.58
643.35
627.77
07-Jun-99
6.95
643.35
636.40
NADMW54
T
T
20.0
18.0-28.0
28.0
09-Apr-03
10.58
643.37
632.79
21-Oct-02
14.44
643.37
628.93
06-Feb-02
17.12
643.37
626.25
01-Nov-01
No Access
643.37
No Access
25-Apr-01
No Access
643.37
No Access
08-Dec-00
15.66
643.37
627.71
07-Jun-99 1
6.20 1
643.37
637.17
NADMW55
S
S
>18.0
7.0-17.0
17.0
09-Apr-03
7.08
638.97
631.89
21-Oct-02
Dry
638.97
Dry
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-9

Table C-1. Summary of the Current Site Monitoring Well Construction Information for the Former NAD Site
(continued)
Well ID
Original
Well
T e°
Proposed
Well
T eb
Depth to
Bedrock
(ft BGS)
Screen
Interval
Sample
Interval
(ft BGS)
Total
Depth
(ft BGS)
Date
Water Level
(ft BTOC)
TOC
Elevations
Ground -
water
Elevation
(AMSL)
06-Feb-02
Dry
638.97
Dry
01-Nov-01
Dry
638.97
Dry
25-Apr-01
Dry
638.97
Dry
08-Dec-00
Dry
638.97
Dry
07-Jun-99
3.21
638.97
635.76
NADMW561
T
T
20.5
1 17.0-27.0
27.0
09-Apr-03
6.95
638.52
631.57
17-Oct-02
17.56
638.52
620.96
06-Feb-02
20.57
638.52
617.95
08-Nov-01
22.33
638.52
616.19
25-Apr-01
27.51
638.52
611.01
08-Dec-00
27.64
638.52
610.88
07-Jun-99
2.78
638.52
635.74
NADMW571
S
S
>19.5
9.0-19.0
19.0
09-Apr-03
9.20
644.03
634.83
17-Oct-02
12.25
644.03
631.78
06-Feb-02
13.97
644.03
630.06
01-Nov-01
15.68
644.03
628.35
25-Apr-01
13.91
644.03
630.12
12-Dec-00
14.52
644.03
629.51
07-Jun-99
11.73
644.03
632.30
NADMW58
T
T
18.0
16.0-26.0
26.0
09-Apr-03
9.61
644.47
634.86
21-Oct-02
12.74
644.47
631.73
-06-Feb-02
14.62
644.47
629.85
01-Nov-01
15.87
644.47
628.60
25-Apr-01
14.36
644.47
630.11
12-Dec-00
14.92
644.47
629.55
07-Jun-99
14.90
644.47
629.57
NADMW591
S
S
14.0
4.0-14.0
14.0
09-Apr-03
0.00
640.71
640.71
21-Oct-02
2.47
640.71
638.24
06-Feb-02
4.30
640.71
636.41
01-Nov-01
7.84
640.71
632.87
25-Apr-01
5.19
640.71
635.52
12-Dec-00
4.66
640.71
636.05
07-Jun-99
1 3.67
640.71
637.04
NADMW60
T
T
14.0
11.8-21.8
21.8
09-Apr-03
0.20
641.11
640.91
21-Oct-02
3.06
641.11
638.05
06-Feb-02
4.81
641.11
636.30
01-Nov-01
8.34
641.11
632.77
25-Apr-01
5.66
641.11
635.45
12-Dec-00
5.16
641.11
635.95
07-Jun-99
4.07
641.11
637.04
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_ 1 0

Table C-1. Summary of the Current Site Monitoring Well Construction Information for the Former NAD Site
i
(continued)
Well ID
Original
Well
Type
Proposed
Well
Type
Depth to
Bedrock
(ft BGS)
Screen
Interval
Sample
Interval
(ft BGS)
Total
Depth
(ft BGS)
Date
Water Level
(ft BTOC)
TOC
Elevations
Ground -
water
Elevation
(AMSL)
NADMW61
T
T
17.0
14.0-24.0
24.0
09-Apr-03
4.96
623.16
618.20
21-Oct-02
6.17
623.16
616.99
06-Feb-02
6.91
623.16
616.25
01-Nov-01
7.96
623.16
615.20
25-Apr-01
15.05
623.16
608.11
12-Dec-00
14.53
623.16
608.63
07-Jun-99
6.43
623.16
616.73
NADMW62
T
T
20.0
17.0-27.0
27.0
09-Apr-03
5.29
628.75
623.46
21-Oct-02
6.33
628.75
622.42
06-Feb-02
8.18
628.75
620.57
01-Nov-01
10.28
628.75
618.47
25-Apr-01
12.27
628.75
616.48
12-Dec-00
11.57
628.75
617.18
07-Jun-99
7.12
628.75
621.63
NADMW63
T
T
15.0
12.5-22.5
22.5
09-Apr-03
7.13
646.59
639.46
~
21-Oct-02
11.50
646.59
635.09
06-Feb-02
13.14
646.59
633.45
01-Nov-01
13.93
646.59
632.66
25-Apr-01
13.27
646.59
633.32
12-Dec-00
13.22
646.59
633.37
07-Jun-99
9.51
646.59
637.08
NADMW641
T
T
21.0
18.0-28.0
28.0
09-Apr-03
7.82
645.70
637.88
21-Oct-02
12.15
645.70
633.55
06-Feb-02
No Access
645.70
No Access
01-Nov-01
14.97
645.70
630.73
25-Apr-01
No Access
645.70
No Access
13-Dec-00
14.18
645.70
631.52
07-Jun-99
12.40
645.70
633.30
NADMW651
T
T
31.0
27.0-37.0
37.0
09-Apr-03
0.34
625.30
624.96
21-Oct-02
3.66
625.30
621.64
06-Feb-02
3.87
625.30
621.43
01-Nov-01
5.45
625.30
619.85
25-Apr-01
9.95
625.30
615.35
12-Dec-00
9.09
625.30
616.21
07-Jun-99
3.58
625.30
621.72
SAIC 1
S
S
28.5
19.7-29.1
29.1
09-Apr-03
13.15
640.37
627.22
21-Oct-02
15.43
640.37
624.94
06-Feb-02
17.44
640.37
622.93
01-Nov-01
18.76
640.37 1
621.61
25-Apr-01
1 18.62
640.37 1
621.75
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-11

Table C-1. Summary of the Current Site Monitoring Well Construction Information for the Former NAD Site
(continued)
Well ID
Original
Well
T e°
Proposed
Well
TYPeb
Depth to
Bedrock
(ft BGS)
Screen
Interval/
Sample
Interval
(ft BGS)
Total
Depth
(ft BGS)
Date
Water Level
(ft BTOC)
TOC
Elevations
Ground -
water
Elevation
(AMSL)
15-Dec-00
18.50
640.37
621.87
SAIC 2
SB
SB
28.0
41.8-51.3
51.3
09-Apr-03
12.61
640.46
627.85
17-Oct-02
15.81
640.46
624.65
06-Feb-02
17.72
640.46
622.74
08-Nov-01
19.14
640.46
621.32
25-Apr-01
27.13
640.46
613.33
15-Dec-00
25.76
640.46
614.70
SAIC 3
S
S
26.0
17.7-27.6
27.6
09-Apr-03
11.31
641.36
630.05
17-Oct-02
18.82
641.36
622.54
06-Feb-02
22.54
641.36
618.82
06-Nov-01
24.66
641.36
616.70
25-Apr-01
Dry
641.36
Dry
06-Dec-00
Dry
641.36
Dry
SAIC 4
SB
SB
25.5
50.0-59.5
59.5
09-Apr-03
11.66
641.58
629.92
17-Oct-02
20.03
641.58
621.55
06-Feb-02
23.01
641.58
618.57
01-Nov-01
24.78
641.58
616.80
17-May-01
32.22
641.58
609.36
08-May-01
34.61
641.58
606.97
25-Apr-01
35.45
641.58
606.13
19-Dec-00
32.57
1 641.58
609.01
SAIC 5
DB
DB
24.5
64.3-73.7
73.7
09-4pr-03
11.36
641.39
630.03
20-Oct-02
18.31
641.39
623.08
06-Feb-02
22.34
641.39
619.05
07-Nov-01
24.16
641.39
617.23
17-May-01
32.37
641.39
609.02
08-May-01
34.49
641.39
606.90
25-Apr-01
35.95
641.39
605.44
19-Dec-00
32.54
641.39
608.85
SAIC 6
S
S
27.8
19.0-28.5
28.5
09-Apr-03
9.51
639.80
630.29
20-Oct-02
13.88
639.80
1 625.92
06-Feb-02
20.51
639.80
619.29
01-Nov-01
21.83
639.80
617.97
25-Apr-01
21.92
639.80
617.88
18-Dec-00
18.13
639.80
621.67
SAIC 7
SB
SB
24.0
40.0-59.5
59.5
09-Apr-03
14.15
639.80
625.65
17-Oct-02
21.10
639.80
618.70
06-Feb-02
1 23.46
639.80
616.34
01-Nov-01
1 25.03 1
639.80
614.77
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-12

Table C-1. Summary of the Current Site Monitoring Well Construction Information for the Former NAD Site
(continued)
Well ID
Original
Well
T e°
Proposed
Well
TypO
Depth to
Bedrock
(ft BGS)
Screen
Interval/
Sample
Interval
(ft BGS)
Total
Depth
(ft BGS)
Date
Water Level
(ft BTOC)
TOC
Elevations
Ground -
water
Elevation
(AMSL)
25-Apr-01
37.55
639.80
602.25
19-Dec-00
59.42
639.80
580.38
SAIC 8
S
S
>15.3
5.1-14.5
14.5
09-Apr-03
1.41
637.40
635.99
17-Oct-02
4.68
637.40
632.72
06-Feb-02
6.91
637.40
630.49
01-Nov-01
8.79
637.40
628.61
25-Apr-01
7.11
637.40
630.29
14-Dec-00
7.54
637.40
629.86
SAIC 9
SB
SB
14.7
25.1-40.2
40.2
09-Apr-03
1.52
637.47
635.95
"17-Oct-02
4.89
637.47
632.58
06-Feb-02
7.09
637.47
630.38
01-Nov-01
8.93
637.47
628.54
25-Apr-01
7.61
637.47
629.86
20-Dec-00
7.91
637.47
629.56
SAIC 10
DB
DB
16.0
53.8-68.6
68.6
09-Apr-03
1.51
637.42
635.91
17-Oct-02
5.29
637.42
632.13
06-Feb-02
7.31
637.42
630.11
01-Nov-01
8.82
637.42
628.60
25-Apr-01
8.37
637.42
629.05
20-Dec-00
8.37
637.42
629.05
SAIC 11
S
S
>14.9
4.4-14.4
14.4
09-Apr-03
5.65
642.06
636.41
17-Oct-02
9.36
642.06
632.70
06-Feb-02
11.77
642.06
630.29
01-Nov-01
13.48
642.06
628.58
25-Apr-01
12.21
642.06
629.85
19-Dec-00
12.33
642.06
629.73
SAIC 12
SB
SB
14.5
25.5-35.0
35.0
09-Apr-03
5.98'
641.99
636.01
17-Oct-02
9.59
641.99
632.40
06-Feb-02
11.91
641.99
630.08
01-Nov-01
13.68
641.99
628.31
25-Apr-01
12.45
641.99
629.54
19-Dec-00
12.56
641.99
629.43
SAIC 13
DB
DB
14.3
44.5-54.5
54.5
09-Apr-03
6.71
641.81
635.10
17-Oct-02
10.11
641.81
631.70
06-Feb-02
12.15
641.81
629.66
01-Nov-01
13.82
641.81
627.99
25-Apr-01
15. 71
641. 81
626.10
19-Dec-00
14.75
641.81
627.06
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-13

Table C-1. Summary of the Current Site Monitoring Well Construction Information for the Former NAD Site
(continued)
Well ID
Original
Well
T e°
Proposed
Well
Type
Depth to
Bedrock
(ft BGS)
Screen
Interval/
Sample
Interval
(ft BGS)
Total
Depth
(ft BGS)
Date
Water Level
(ft BTOC)
TOC
Elevations
Ground -
water
Elevation
(AMSL)
SAIC 14`
DB
DB
6.0
350.7
N/A
638.20
N/A
Port 1
62.0-72.0
Port 2
109.0-114.0
Port 3
126.0-135.0
Port 4
139.0-144.0
Port 5
199.0-210.0
Port 6
250.0-264.0
Port 7
297.0-307.0
SAIC 15`
DB
DB
31.0
204.8
N/A
640.55
N/A
Port 1
31.0-39.0
Port 2
60.0-67.0
Port 3
112.0-120.0
Port 4
149.0-155.0
Port 5
188.0-204.8
SAIC 16d
DB
DB
17.0
200.0
637.55
SAIC 16A`
DB
DB
37.5
331.6
Port 1.
58.0-65.0
Port 2 .
83.0-103.0
Port 3
122.0-129.0
Port 4
160.0-165.0
Port 5
191.0-199.0
Port 6
295.0-305.0
VERSAR09
D
SB
N/A
?-38
38.0
09-Apr-03
3.95
644.90
640.95
21-Oct-02
8.04
644.90
636.86
06-Feb-02
9.50 ,
644.90
635.40
01-Nov-01
10.66
644.90
634.24 .
25-Apr-01
8.58
644.90
636.32
12-Dec-00
No Access
644.90
No Access
07-Jun-99
No Access
644.90
No Access
05-Dec-94
5.65
644.90
639.25
VERSAR12
S
S
N/A
?-20
20.0
09-Apr-03
4.27
644.90
640.63
21-Oct-02
8.33
644.90
636.57
06-Feb-02
9.80
644.90
635.10
01-Nov-01
11.94
644.90
632.96
25-Apr-01
8.89
644.90
636.01
12-Dec-00
9.41
644.90
635.49
07-Jun-99
7.55
644.90
637.35
05-Dec-94
5.95
644.90
638.95
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-14

Table C-1. Summary of the Current Site Monitoring Well Construction Information for the Former NAD Site
(continued)
Well ID
Original
Well
T e°
Proposed
Well
Typeb
Depth to
Bedrock
(ft BGS)
Screen
Interval/
Sample
Interval
(ft BGS)
Total
Depth
(ft BGS)
Date
Water Level
(ft BTOC)
TOC
Elevations
Ground -
water
Elevation
(AMSL)
VERSAR 17
S
S
N/A
?-15
15.0
09-Apr-03
4.75
642.70
637.95
21-Oct-02
8.72
642.70
633.98
06-Feb-02
11.54
642.70
631.16
01-Nov-01
Dry
642.70
Dry
25-Apr-01
13.15
642.70
629.55
15-Dec-00
12.67
642.70
630.03
07-Jun-99
7.05
642.70
635.65
05-Dec-94
N/A
642.70
N/A
VERSAR18
T
T
N/A
?-33
33.0
09-Apr-03
5.45
643.40
637.95
21-Oct-02
9.35
643.40
634.05
06-Feb-02
12.22
643.40
631.18
01-Nov-01
15.22
643.40
628.18
25-Apr-01
13.89
643.40
629.51
15-Dec-00
13.36
643.40
630.04
07-Jun-99
7.60
643.40
635.80
05-Dec-94
N/A
643.40
N/A
VERSAR20
D
SB
N/A
23.8-33.8
33.8
09-Apr-03
1.97
640.52
638.55
21-Oct-02
2.77
640.52
637.75
06-Feb-02
4.79
640.52
635.73
01-Nov-01
5.34
640.52
635.18
25-Apr-01
5.14
640.52
635.38
08-Dec-00
4.52
640.52
636.00
07-Jun-99
2.28
640.52
638.24
05-Dec-94
2.06
640.52
638.46
VERSAR22
D
DB
?
40.0-50.0
50.0
09-Apr-03
14.66
648.56'
633.90
21-Oct-02
17.90
648.56
630.66
06-Feb-02
18.69
648.56
629.87
01-Nov-01
19.60
648.56
628.96
25-Apr-01
18.67
648.56
629.89
15-Dec-00
19.11
648.56
629.45
07-Jun-99
16.80
648.56
631.76
05-Dec-94
15.30
648.56
633.26
VERSAR26
N/A
T
N/A
6.3 - 21.3
09-Apr-03
5.47
641.87
636.40
17-Oct-02
9.66
641.87 1
632.21
06-Feb-02
11.04
641.87
630.83
25-Apr-01
Dry
641.87
Dry
25-Apr-01 1
10.92
641.87
630.95
06-Dec-00 I
N/A
641.87
N/A
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091103 C-15

Table C-1. Summary of the Current Site Monitoring Well Construction Information for the Former NAD Site
(continued)
Screen
Interval/
Ground -
Original
Proposed
Depth to
Sample
Total
water
Well
Well
Bedrock
Interval
Depth
Water Level
TOC
Elevation
Well ID
T e°Type'
(ft BGS)
(ft BGS)
(ft BGS)
Date
(ft BTOC)
Elevations
(AMSL)
07-Jun-99
N/A
641.87
N/A
05-Dec-94
6.54
641.87
635.33
Notes:
AMSL = Above Mean Sea Level. S = Shallow Zone Well.
ft BGS = Feet Below Ground Surface. SB = Shallow Bedrock Well.
ft BTOC = Feet Below Top of Casing. T = Transition Zone Well.
? = Value unknown. D = Deep Well.
DB = Deep Bedrock Well.
'The original well type as classified by Metcalf and Eddy (M&E) in the Phase I and II Remedial Investigations (RIs).
6Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) reclassified the well types to provide better definition of the site
hydrogeologic framework. In addition, new well types (shallow and deep bedrock) were added for clarification. These new
proposed well types were used to prepare the current (April 2003) potentiometric maps.
`Multiport wells (FLUTeTM Systems). Water level measurements have not been collected as of August 2003.
dBorehole abandoned due to formation collapse in October 2002.
Data collected in December 1994 and June 1999 were collected by M&E and taken from the Phase I and Phase II RI Reports. All
other data were collected by SAIC.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_ 1C

WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAMS
AND
BORING LOGS
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_ 17

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_ 18

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT' BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_20

Hole No. VA-% Lr,_,/O
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
Garw1®r N�
SHEET
OF I SHEETS
1. PROJECT
At>
10. SIZE AND TrPE OF BIT /77 /%SA 4 C,-,Rl;-��a,.�ygr�
11. u Q AXFQ
2. LOCATION (Coordinates or St dlonl
1 L� I
12. MANUFACTURE S O�SIGNATION OF DRILL
� •s4- 1 M
J�00
S. DRILLING AGENCY T1 t / 11 vl
rr 6- '/
1S. TOTAL NO. OF OVER- a6TURB[D ; uND16TURB[O
BURDEN SAMPLES TAKEN /
4. HOLE NO. (As ahown an dra Ime
and file nmabod
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
S. NAME OF DRILLER /
I �NT71 llGCl
19. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
6. DIRECTION OF HOLE
VERTICAL OINCLINED D[ti. FROM V[R T.
I START[D IcaMfa [T O
16. DATE HOLE
�Z
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 7.0
16. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING 'Y
/
S. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK O
19. SIGNATUJIE OF INSPECTOR
1>,
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 7,0/
ELEVATION
a
DEPTH
b
6LEGEND
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(Denerfptian)
d
% COR
RECOV-
ERY
BOX OR
SAMPLE
NO.
REMARKS
(Drilling time, water Iona, depth of
wth
arrift, eta., (1 aignificand
s I Ad
—
r
0VA; oo ei
'L
'0
5 4?04i 2-'-✓k GyA- 2.> y 41L 6747-
PI^9 �, �,�/s, u, s. z✓� /ry,//✓cs�
i
4,,aW
TvP or 12vck 7. p
10
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
%--G 1

GROUNDWATER INSTALLATION PRaec JOB NO. wELLA4
ri«ar N1'D� ai795� ,v+D�w/8
DRILLING CONTRACTOR r, COORDINATES:
7 Drf//in v So3elt.0¢ E/q?o5o9 80
BEGUN: 1 SUPERVISOR: P. « r%r WELL SITE: WATER LEVEL: EPTH/ELEV.
FINISHED: $1is /9if DRILLER: r (A oN j�j�u r�i 9 • 9 2 7 635• //
DEPTH IN I ELEV. IN
REFERENCE POINT & ELEVATION:
GROUND SURFACE
GENERALIZED x x DIA.:
GEOLOGIC LOG SURFACE CASING: TYPE: �A
TOP OF PROTECTIVE CASING
PROTECTIVE CASING: TYPEL_�5� ��✓
TOP OF RISER CASING 610 •03
1 s s V_BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASING.
s
s x
s :
z z BACKFILL: TYPE:
I i
= x
x s ry
s RISER CASING: TYPE Z
TYPE
s :
x x
x x TOP OF SEAL 5
ANNULAR SEAL:
BOTTOM OF SEAL
S
TOP OF SCREEN
L•
�l
FILTER MATERIAL �� PE: 31)/¢3�
r• SCREEN: DIA. • Z TYPE: PVG S�Qv
OPENING WIDTH:E:
U s /0 77
BOTTOM OF SCREEN
METHOD DRILLED:
6 r/4n BOTTOM OF SUMP
G,ww' er 6. y
BOTTOM OF HOLE
METHOD DEVELOPED: HOLE DIAMETER
TIME DEVELOPED:
6 � � COMMENTS:
MllraC i Eddy
C-22 —�

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
Lmu'l
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_24

Hole No.
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
"w
SHEET /
OF 2 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT Iy" 6°(•Si^
41, A•rl^,.•,a+le✓
of
-c. LOCATION (Coold/not•a or Statlon)
12. MAN tFACTURER'Sp ESIGNATION OF DRILL
5crrR-h +, kvp7r//
S. DRILLINGA��CY
'r/`"n
13. TOTAL NO. OF OVER- DISTUROED
BURDEN SAMPLES TAKEN !
I UNDISTUNGED
of
4. HOLE NO. (As ahown arl draldwg Hole
and file numbed
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
S. NAME OF DRILLER
s* 7�arC�
15. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
S. DIRECTION OF HOLE
I](I VERTICAL OINCLINED
DEG. FROM VENT.
! ST ART99f
16. DATE HOLE 8/� Q
ICOMPLETEO
8 i4 y
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN (0,0/
16. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING
i
3. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 36 .3
1!. SIGNAT RE OF INSPECTOR
�. Z7
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE l�2, 3
ELEVATION
a
DEPTH
b
LEGEND
C
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(DesertPt/artd
s C RE
R ECOV-
•
DOX OR
SAMPLE
/
REMARKS
(DrUIQy tine, ester lose, depth of
weathsrind, ate, If sl/nl/leant)
5ca
SnPRRirt
N,HjrtaJ lES L.�S
11 trtAj"IAK
6Z - v
•
J`"lLt Gw , b,ofvk, Sr
g i�Po'5, fv $f2, �r ('j..fc ✓-cva.se
/0
/2
14
I
`� ' V l�P(✓r�j Sof'� zw�a
1
r
by
l
ZO r IJF�te I�/�i j
ZZ I
Pic. CT• s�
J3r)3� 8�/f�9 ft OJ73o Y W r_ 4>1
F fI' 7.5'c—k
r15r,,��`` �4-
A1A'4AA"I-e#• tveI (;aW.
' SIT �/14/,r,,Y zs'
�\ ("7�- &/5I4B 13ov
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
PROJECT I HOLE NO.

DRIWNG LOG (Cont Sheet)
ELEVATION TO/ OF MOLE
Nona
/l% A'D i
MSTALLATION
Fo r rH Pr- NA P
ELEVATION
DEPTH
LEGiM
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
f Dwr.yrir.)
% CORE
RECOV•
ROX OR
SAMPLE
a
b
C
d
Ely
e
NO.
f
`
— InrQ� cv wiSt q!-. �rJlrl�i
29
�
V
�
30
J
l
40
42
��.
E.v. AS. @ 4Z•3
Ell
Hole No. NAB r) W
IsMEn Z
Op L SHEETS
REMARKS
(DriffI Oroar. roar k8j. depik of
wr��L"ring. rfs., if iippO"W)
eve
No rro fi�..Gle. ate- O
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
ENG FORM 18 36 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.
MAR 71 PROJECT HOLE NO.
C-26

GROUNDWATER INSTALLATION PROJECT: ��, NAD�� IoeNo. vi7458 WELL M.�
kge
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: M� �rl /^ COORDINATES:
/T� ! 3� NSo3ao5.o4 E142-ofio.6
BEGUN: y / 3 q8 SUPERVISOR: Nil WELL SITE: WATER LEVEL: DEPTH/ELEV.
FINISHEQ:B /S'qg DRILLER: Gpy�/ucG/ 4. 63 s./2
F1DE1.PTH IN ELEV. IN
REFERENCE POINT & ELEVATION:
GROUNOSURFACE
GENERALIZED x x OIA.: & ��
GEOLOGIC LOG SURFACE CASING: TYPE : p✓C.,4+ -
TOP OF PROTECTIVE CASING
PROTECTIVE CASING: DIA. :
TYPE :
TOP OF RISER CASING
OF SURFACE CASING
:
X
x
i
X
x
BACKFILL: TYPE:
Gre.-)oe—
X
X
i
Zr7 6
i x
i
DIA.:
RISER CASING: TYPE: i�✓C S�
x
x
x
:
x
i
TOP OF SEAL
ANNULAR SEAT: �TYPE�,A
BOTTOM OF SEAL
•
TOP OF SCREEN
_
-6
FILTER MATERIAL: TYPE:
_
30/6 5
DIA.: 2 " TYPE: P ✓C 40
---.—,—SCREEN:
'•' '
OPENING WIDTH: E:
BOTTOM OF SCREEN
—
METHOD DRILLED:
11��A - I oy. rner
BOTTOM OF SUMP
61' Ar �m cr
•�:
METHOD DEVELOPED:
BOTTOM OF HOLE
HOLE
DIAMETER
COMMENTS:
TIME DEVELOPED:
8.d
26,v
IA
I 6fo.00
C-27

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-28

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-30

Mole No. AJ&bW Z o
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
Shv.
INSTALLATION
f >ru,alr
SN[ET
of 3- SHEETS
1. PROJECT
NA1> 0-,,.
10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT �p �' /� r Mff-
4
2. LOCATION (Coordinates or StaglorO
12. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL
Sr
S. DRILLING AGENCY
�rr/��
13. TOTAL NO. OF OVER- DISTURBED I UNDIaT R11E0
BURDEN SAMPLES TAKEN,
Rr
6. MOLE NO. (As shown an drawing title ��
N ltJ- p
and file numbed d<(
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
.off
S. NAME OF� RILLER /
Juw,tie
15. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
6. DIRECTION OF HOLE
VERTICAL OINCLINED DEC. PROM VERT.
x98
I STA T D I COUPLET D
16. DATE HOLE p eT
8 / �
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 7, o 1
16. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING -� %
S. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK ,j,s, O r
19. SIGNAT RE INSPECTOR
�, '4f
!. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE (9 2 . G '
ELEVATION
a
DEPTH
,7 b
LEGEND
C
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(DeecrfptlorJ
d
Y CORE
R ECOV-
ERY
e
BOX OR
SAMPLE
NO.
f
REMARKS
(DrUI/y time, wtor lose, depth o/
w91=1q/, ago, if aloeltlCand
!
2
PNvrt-
s wRo��,I
Sam HO/S Log
II ovA,�
l� N.�hwwmP►^
1+19' d2-z)
_
5
..
I
,AJ
V%7Qi 6fW—•. , We�
/
1305
/4
r,
Zv
/ '
ZZ
r
4
It�
Split -spoon samples for lithologI6 definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
�.... �...... _ - _ C-31 1PROJECT I MOLE NO.

DRILLING LOG (Cont Sheet)
[IEVATION TOP, or MOu
f10JER
INSTALL ATX)N
EtEVAT10N
DEITM
LEGEND
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(Destriptin.)
a
Zbb
c
d
_I
28
r
in cup,^Js
38
�
40
-
i
42-
r�
46
. \
t�
SV
T 4-
,
51
r
�
_
.
tt
wt N- Nh-b
% CORE ROX OR
RECOV. SAMPLE
ERr NO.
e I f
Hole No. N9-oM w LO
p � S►1lETS
REMARKS
(DrWiwR time. sra/tr less, 4pb of
We/lberiwS, qe., i/ si(wi/&rr!)
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
ENG FORM 18 36 -PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. C-32 PROJECT MOLE NO.
I

DRILLING LOG ShNt EIEVAnOM TW oW MOLE
(Cont � Hole No. JANIn-fl wZo
r�o,Ea W45TAuwnON SMEV 3
AV j I r e,..e %V OF V*M
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS % CORE box OR REMARKS
ELEVATION DEPTH LEGEND (De b RECOV- SAMPLE (Drv;fl= time. meter Ais. /eptb of
eft ERY NO. wed erilps, etc.. if uRwi/i—')
s C d e f 6
6 ( 4f,- o-
62 ' `
�- o. B. fir✓ 6� v
I
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
ENG FORM i Q z A M5 ARE OBSOLETE.
C-33 PROJECT MOLE MO.

GROUNDWATER INSTALLATION
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:
r7 E �r r �lir
BEGUN: V iqI SUPERVISOR: }'7• rS
FINISHED: S.ft qg I DRILLER: f�. G�i7ri�ara
REFERENCE POINT & ELEVATION:
GENERALIZED
GEOLOGIC LOG
METHOD DTLLED.
1-2, 4;, vmmai�q . 0
METHOD DEVELOPED:
TIME DEVELOPED:
PROJECT: JOB NO. WELL NO.
)CO r km &r- AIA-I> X- v /'J 4'58 M W Z O
COORDINATES:
N 5-037 �•ol r- /42o9y6. si
WELL SITE: WATER LEVEL. DEPTH/ELEV.
7.90 63Z•3z
DEPTH IN I ELEV. IN
GROUND SURFACE
x x DIA.: 6 r•
SURFACE CASING: • YPE ; %'VC
TOP OF PROTECTIVE CASING
PROTECTIVE CASING: DIA. .
TYPE
_ TOP OF RISER CASING
jx
x
Lsorrom OF SURFACE CASING
y. o
x
x
x
00.0
x
X
X
■
x
BACKFILL: TYPE: r4,r y/�� Ty",1
y /or�
x
x
x
DIA.:
RISER CASING: TYPE : PVC S�+
x
x
x
=
x
TOP OF SEAL
ANNULAR SEAL: [ /TYPE:
Q . C%
BOTTOM OF SEAL
TOP OF SCREEN
FILTER MATERIAL: TYPE-
_
Z.
f
1
,''•
SCREEN: DIA.. Z it TYPE: s`4 4(2
OPENING WIDTH: TYPE:
—
—
BOTTOM OF SCREEN
BOTTOM OF SUMP
BOTTOM OF HOLE
690.22
HOLE DIAMETER
6 ^ COMMENTS:
Ml1C>stl i Eddy
C-34

NAD MW21
03-209(FSP)(doe)/091703 C-35

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_36

"*I* No. Al,
h DRILLING LOG I
I.PROJECT
L LOCATION (Coofdiry ten or
/;rw or, ,yAD
10. S12E AND TYPE OF BIT /Zt
11, u
M5L
OF b SHEETS
S. DRILLING AGENCY / wN�CY �,,bIa C44 S3D "vrc
,4 ✓ri LINIr. -
13. TOTAL NO. OF OVER- la•TYw.`O ; Y Dls UwitD
4. MOLE NO. (As slwnrl drsoby t/tle BURDEN SAMPLES TAKEN l
and file e•a,;,
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
S. NAME OF DRILLER
µttn.t� GG� 15. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
6. DIRECTION OF HOLE !STAR tD COMPLETED
IS. DATE HOLE o
VERTICAL a1NCLINED DEG. FROM VERT. lr?/3 �o
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN
/ tee TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING i
B. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 1!. SIGNAT E 9F INSPECTOR
!. TOTAL DEPTH OF MOLE O-o lD1. 4,01wr
ELEVATION
DEPTH
LEGEND
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(Deecr*tlarJ
i IVORE
RECO
BOX OR
SAMPLE
REMARKS
(DrIll41/ fine, water lose, depth of
ERYV-
wsthertR/, sta, It slgInit/cand
s
b
C
d
•
1
V o J o
? C
b rr R r.-v
2
-
GH Pl!j br Jw r /X �/✓�
r/vdlrr�y •Ir�lr4sr••r� lX•l/�
4
1
/3z -v
; - v c 4-
/0
(wile
�••O✓G r».T��'
seed P/rd` 9s
s e4_49 /i 6 "k _5
//l•/9Ir 0130
/
r
n
� l �
ZO
Z
I �
r
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
C-37 -

N.I. YW A14 n /N/. ) 7 )
DIVISION
INSTALLATION -
SHEET
DRILLING LOG
1OF y SHEETS
1. PROJECT
n
/
TYPE OF BIT
10. 112E AND 2 �/✓,y„vnL ��,�„ /�!i
LOCATION (Coordinates or Station)
12. MANUFACTURER-S DESIGNATION OF DRILL
S. DRILLING AGENCY
,/�- � _7)Rq Ll/v
13. TOTAL NO. OF OVER-
BURDEN SAMPLES TAKEN
008TUR1190 I UNDISTUR Mo
�'✓ /n /V 7
4. HOLE NO. (Aa ahooN an draoINg title
and file nuinbod
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
S. NAME�F DRILLER
lS. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
i. DIRECTION OF HOLE
14. DATE MOLE t� I STARTED l COMPLKT{D
i //C A 7-%d'
� QRTICAL QINCLINED 090. FROM VKRT.
p �!� R i
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN ,/%. 1
18. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING ;
B. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK S� s
19. SIGNATURE OF IN PEC OR
77
'
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 7v
( /
ELEVATION
DEPTH
LEGEND
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(DesCrtptlan)
;CORE
R ERYV
BOX OR
SAMPLE
REMARKS
(Dr01/n/ time, "ter lose. depth Of
watherirl/, ata. It al/nlflCond
a
b
C
J
•
(
'�^�--
Qu4afZ-l3�rJnTC PC`G/`�AT/Tt: �•/
Velz T/a/C/C �� 3'�ISA,voj 0'
V
0UA27-Z k%/ .S/ J,OCL GRAN/✓y
UU ��
. t
/3/0 r/nc if- M�'SCu✓, re s' r e A,
I� }�6-
,
r/-cvtoA.Zs C✓2� s,+iGlac y i SAC -
/J
/IPz qy /20,v STl�/N/NCr MJt T
`
/'ACrv,,cr V(Jr wi?%E/L-1.rEAJ2,/✓(,
�� r
n!/EA/OC,tV TS
? <C
��Ems'/aa-
T/rE
v
1 y
G/ZQ,NI 09
(2 - 3
u�
`�'�
i
4J, 7/.• 0, 11117 / / Sa,he 1-1/nc /0,11101v
j i C)U = /,
v }
A/2 K/2 M/elF-R/pLt CO3VC 61,1, Z,77 k
r
n
-/111- EIZ1 /C w/—
( V
G Qil/NS OF f/0/3NnLE/VOJ
7
L ,a(i /✓CLt�i-,= / Q- (0/ O/Z7 2 ,
n
'1 = �(�U
/.�EPr'//,(� F�/oCi//RF_ 1 , F/•ACi 1//ZFj
/K <✓
4,
7 `
-C 7 -
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
u-.75 ......_.___

DRILLING LOG Cont ShNt
ILIVAM14 TOP OF HIM
PpJECT
_X
MSTAWITION
SHEET
R 17-
OF L SHEETS
ELEVATION
DERV
LEGEND
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
fDnr ts�1
% CORE
RECOV-
box OR
SAMPLE
REMARKS
water
(Driding rise, ter lots, depth of
NO.
weathering, etc., if lipsfiivat)
a
b
C
d
e
IF
S
/+
ETf+Gfa/3ti/zo/ PH/a,�' :.=/T/C '.✓�6/�Fi•✓S
L
OF Vo CN/JL
n
Tv/,ED — I MJO—/J.vGc/ FIERCTL'•LC/
O Si fJ/�//NG, NJ lJi7i�lC �F,G/�/N C•
/L� U
C
i�
'� ~ -+
f=/r�cT�•acs-! F��cT����r GE/vf,�>vLL;,
F/CACT // � r .!' DcC/I/F)S'quG L✓�Ofo: f/
� �
< r
J/
7
r
-
/2A/niS Or //�?/N/?L!_ /✓[Jt' ! /Z/�)T/ -F!
'/ZPCT�',:G f�JJS/.�L' L.//�i/__/= L7'_N/•
I /• S
i,
V �
c
i
r/C
L,�-��CL�75./.,
x' /NCi°F_A(!ti!� f-1M��il•1,(" ✓'=
(;•%2/7/AdS' '�✓� �Lti. F/,'pCTd!_ -
� �
L% ��7
c
rc %S"min /n% 'j,DTIV
n
� h
n
/�%fTN I"cP�: i-/`v/%!N'9 Ni2/i/C AI/C'2N/.�,, �•
n
CL/arF_ a- Ga-rz T — CJ2._ D/fvL/g s
<
FV/Oc.vC._ or /�/�iJ'-✓ r`N/� J/aL fGd; o
\
'J
�,
�+rr/v,r� c.%trconlo�leY D�per/-•�•v c:=
/?Q D 51-7 _4;
�L'A/'i 2 4 //Ld:✓.^:'F1/Ti iN f�.WCTL'/_
c
c
f7L L f
�
F!_'ioCTG'R.` f � F/?/aCTG•,?i,S' Gr"/✓iFI_//-7LL r
n
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
j
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
- ­. - __
ENG FORM 18 36 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. C_39

DRILLING LOG (Cant ShNt)
ELEVATION TO/ o/ NOL!
Hol• No. 1,4qn /'-V,.
FADJECT � �
4AME/l, A4
�ISTALLATION
SHEET
L A1,111 (l_ dr'07"
O/ 1p SHEETS r
CLASSIFICATION OF 1 ATERLUS
% CORE
RoX OR
REMARKS
ELEVATION
DERV
LEGEND
(Dntryaew)
RECOV.
SAMPLE
(Drilling tine, rater lots. Arptb of
ERY
NO.
weitberisg, ett., i% tignific"t)
a
b
C
d
e
IF
S
n
l'7* r'96 a�'2J/ PH�NEi2 /7/C w�L2/trNS
v
OF Nol'N!-316^1.0r, ;3;. T/re , P4ACla -
�/
i /I
F�NC7L.2f_.t D/i<'Cfl f/=Cr /✓tiJv/��
c,
41�. _ /L o
V </!Y02J
i /✓E2/'9/�C 1�tpi l /% /6V t7F
0U/a1tTZ ' e- V. LFL✓ C17,11S7-1�L. S
/}F_For!/a/p F/_"4C ry �F_ c' / C?,0C7L', L S
Tu —70 inrn (!C!'G'i?rCTZ
S
Gdsr/n/ S OF r`/U/C/✓`c, r'/.n,r �,�T/rr-r
� n fLr7ii/✓C.Lialr ° /=c'c✓ C:L'i?ri'? (,/_N�'✓//
Pi.?d/1!Y �/�f'C'TL �'r_D /✓,� �Ja Tt=i'/;_�/'
v
t // C, i=K/aCrd,2t y, r�fl: ru.Lr� G,_/✓_
U
4 v
C/_'A/Ni OF f'G'�_/.' j,; r�NU•� / :'•i /Tr:l
/ PcA1/0C4.i49',eE
V ` i /%t!•1 G/1r7//•rS GF /R.:N
(jSr" ory C-:;,✓S
NJ 1a A'PA r'_ 1LA1 T -
` n frC'UI✓iJr?rd+ t:rL%i?�'T� 7LPUi.—iOt/
r
� J,�TFGAri3rZJ/ I'hIF1Ar/_=/=/:TYC :v�C i'ra•::';
`/ ,S OF
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
ENG FORM g 36 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. PROJECT HOLE N,
., , f , . C-40

DRILLING LOG (Cant Sho*t) ELEVATION TOP OF MOUI
RoJecr MSTALLAnom
ELEVATION Of"" LEGEND CLASSIFICATION Of MATERIALS % colt ROX OR
(DNss7peeM) RECOV. SAM►lE
b ERY NO.
d e f
Hole No. jVAD M1,, 2 /
SMEET
OF L/ SHEETS L/
REMARKS
(Dry/ling time. career less, lepeb of
Wedueberi-s, eec., i/ /ipelii-1)
e
•''` ::Gc /_'�US/HvEfpR"Cs<7/-
� Z
-
^
7JAL
i
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic.change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
ENG FORM 18 1A ogev�fl��e enlTlnue •ee rye C-41 I PROJECT I MOLE NO.

GROUNDWATER INSTALLATION PRaECT: i JOB No. WELL NC.
NiYD� on w .21
DRILLING CONTRACTOR. COORDINATES: L
So3854. tL F/A2o97�.Zy
BEGUN: br /; SUPERVISOR: WELL SITE: WATER LEVEL. D PTH/ELEV.
FINISHED: Slz1,1 DRILLER: -p, (�.,,�i/r[ 1 1 4.37 631.OS_ .
REFERENCE POINT & ELEVATION: I
DEPTH IN I ELEI
GROUNOSURFACE
GENERALIZED = x OtA.: 5 p
GEOLOGIC LOG SURFACE CASING: TYPE:
TOP OF PROTECTIVE CASING
PROTECTIVE CASING: TYPE:
TOP OF RISER CASING
OF SURFACE CASING
11
x
x
:
x
x
:
x
BACKFILL: 4ru�� TYPE: rpr flel 7
x
x
x
x
RISER CASING: DIA.
TYPE: S�•'�sy
x
x
:
x
x
x
x
TOP OF SEAL
ANNULAR SEAL: TYPE:
BOTTOM OF SEAL
TOP OF SCREEN
s•
FILTER MATERIA} TYPE:
/��.� 3o/gs
_
.ti
'•' '
SCREEN: DIA.. Q ri TYPE: S. 5
OPENING WIDTH: TYPE:
BOTTOM OF SCREEN
METHOD DRILLED:
Z" �rrlu, ,,,sy //
BOTTOM OF SUMP
METHOD DEVELOPED:
HOLE
BOTTOM OF HOLE
DIAMETER
TIME DEVELOPED:
COMMENTS:
63Y.46
9.S
7o 0
Me1r3f1 i ESOy'
C-42

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-44

DRILLING LOG
I. PROJECT
Z. LOCATION Coatlpolee or:
C fv�la 'V
ro
RILLING AGENCY
/jv, n
10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT IQ" Alp
11. DATUM FOR ELEVATIONIMI
ySL
Hole No. ruJ- Z L
SHlET (
OF 3 SHEETS
,rxr rr•,s� 6n�r ,«r..r
run
or
�r 13. TOTAL NO. OF OVER. 0IIITUR0E0 I UNDISTURBED
eL HOLE/i O��ehown an dsawine titre BURDEN SAMPLES TAKEN E
and MOM� ZZ (,Hoe I V
S. NAME OF DRILLER 14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
t Ha++G 6r1'hll4cc 15. ELEVATION GROUND WATER J
S. DIRECTION OF HOLE 1f. DATE HOLE ISTARTEpD (COMPLETED
VERTICAL QINCLINED DEG. FROM VENT. T. (
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN ZZ 17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
18. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING
�. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 19. SIGN URE F INSPECTOR
1. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS x CORE BOX OR REMARKS
ELEVATION DEPTH LEGEND (DeaeripeiarJ R EROYV- SAMPLE (Drilling tle+e, weer roam, depth of
a /l b c i e 1 wathering, etc.• ll elgtlilleand
S
2 met — ronvtc' jrt,.•f N - r 6t ,v6fj 15
I,)r4.r-(,rock I�IN
r2� _
0VA1,4 c
54e16r rk4�
12/cM�e..1«vr 1�0
tiS = U
Note: Geologic logging by direct physical
/ 8 observation of cuttings ceased at the top of rock.
_ Please see Appendix J and K of this report for data
collected during geophysical logging activities.
Zp , l,Je.��.�t'Tin�y S
2 %o of7 01c 22 . o
AJA -/f9b,o%/W, y«
24 _ Pam, 4-r. atz, fr r1r,k, wel— Gaada- aoa4.v�
r7UY )
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
C-45

i
GROUND WATER INSTALLATION I PROJECT: x/n
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES.
A ,� N So3 7 J.6 E
BEGUN. S? 14 6 SUPERVISOR: r ^A � WELL SITE:
FINISHED: Ilt5 /4 DRILLER: _ w��l�/u t c
REFERENCE POINT & ELEVATION:
cos No./ gS� WELL NO.
!• 5
WATER LEVEL: DEPTH/ELEV.
S. es 635.64
DEPTH IN I ELEV. ll'`
GROUND SURFACE
GENERALIZED = x DIA.: 61
GEOLOGIC LOG SURFACE CASING: TypE : PvC 5.4 40
TOP OF PROTECTIVE CASING
OIA.: ��
PROTECTIVE CASING: TYPE : �/N f
TOP OF RISER CASING
I
OF SURFACE CASING
_
_
_
=
BACKFILL: TYPE:
""',,.f/,
=
0/1
x
=
:
x
�
DIA.. 2
x
RISER CASING: TYPE
=
x
_
_
:
x
TOP OF SEAL
I
I-e—sorrom
ANNULAR SEAL: TYPE:2��.
t`e_
OF SEAL
TOP OF SCREEN
s
_
FILTER MATERIAL: TYPE:
_
511C - -S a �( 3 0 fs
�•
SCREEN: DIA.. 2- TYPE:
OPENING WIDTH: TYPE:
—
wv�
BOTTOM OF SCREEN
METHOD DRILL D:
)v 2-4
SUMP
f2 " �}i rG�'^" Pf
BOTTOMOF
'
..
BOTTOM OF HOLE
METHOD DEVELOPED:
HOLE DIAMETER
COMMENTS:
TIME DEVELOPED:
Z4• D
Z2, O
24 s
63y.4
C-46

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-48

Nol• No. 3 M W Z 3
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
INSTALLATION SHEET t
.e, AD OF 3 SHEETS
I. PROJECT
1'
10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT ,f
6 A.r tH a,r/
r
Y
u o. AIUJ
+ LOCATION (Caerd et•e or Stet/on)
IZ. MANIUFACTURER' DESIGNATION OF DRILL
Rp �At�t1
r . t"
DRILLING AG� Y_
DrI(/)M
(
.5C I'AWI ti
1S. TOTAL NO. OF OVER- I DItTUR\ED I UNDISTURBED
BURDEN SAMPLES TAKEN I
f BOLE NO. (Ae .howl an drenfty Ntl•
and a,. tll,ne.d MA O Z3 K ue /
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
S. NAME OF DRILLER /
If. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
,}I(�
f. DIRECTION OF HOLE
1 STA TED COMPLETEDS
VERTICAL QINCLINED DEG. FROM VERT.
If. DATE BOLE
! 1T
f
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN
f. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK
16. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING 01 %
19. SIGN TU OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE
'P. Kf
ELEVATION
DEPTH
LEGEND
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(DeecrfptloJ
; CORE
R ECOV-
BOX OR
SAMPLE
REMARKS
(Drilling fine, motor lose. depth of
G
Q b
C
d
O.
weQnrflo, eta, 1f sf/n1flCerlt)
•
f
fl
wu ier��al`.o .
Se = &
1(]
139 =o
1
o cfi & C /? • 3
S•f 6"PvC
16
ZZ
Note: Geologic logging by direct physical
observation of cuttings ceased at the top of rock.
24 Please see Appendix J and K of this report for data
collected during geophysical logging activities.
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
C-49

GROUNDWATER INSTALLATION PROJECT; N�� cos o/
ORILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES:
7 / 4Yv43z .7S
BEGUN: /i 9 SUPERVISOR: AhII A)r ^^- WELL SITE:
FINISHED: ef,yrjjgj DRILLER: 7), /k r%
REFERENCE POINT & ELEVATION:
WELL NO.
�uePl�
WATER LEVEL: DEPTH/ELEV.
3.3 7 63f..Yy
DEPTH IN I ELEV.
GROUND SURFACE
GENERALIZED s z
GEOLOGIC LOG
DIA.:
SURFACE CASING: TYPE: RUC S off, l�v
TOP OF PROTECTIVE CASING
DIA.PROTECTIVE CASING: TYPE
T
TOP OF RISER CASING
BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASING
z z
i
z z
s z
x x
BACKFILL:�j, o. TYPE����/��
z x
z :
x
ola : Z
RISER CASING: TYPE:
z :
-
z :
z x
_ =
TOP OF SEAL
ANNULAR SEAL: TYPE:
BOTTOM OF SEAL
TOP OF SCREEN
_
FILTER MATERIAL: TYPE:
-30145
•'
SCREEN: OIA.: 2 �r TYPES/��� -SS
OPENING IAnoTH:o, 0 0 TYPE:
`i
G✓ r I,�p
11
—
BOTTOM OF SCREEN
METHOD TRILLED:
d r i� �r
jw
.f .3
BOTTOM OF SUMP
r
BOTTOM OF HOLE
METHOD DEVELOPED:
HOLE DIAMETER
COMMENTS:
TIME DEVELOPED:
�p
C-50
38.1S
14.3
z V, 5
7o:5
i
%/, c7
Imp
Melmtt t Eddy

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT' BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-52

Not• Me. 'S
OIVIf10N
INSTALLATION SHEET
DRILLING LOG
Sqv.
/t:z; of SHEETS
I. PROJECT
10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT
N
1' DATUM FOR ELEVATION gffaWWM,
L
LOCATION (Coed1/f�g'ot" r St lorJ
r77 O NL
12. MAN FACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL
DRILLING �AGENCY
:z>1',
13. TOTAL NO. OF OVER- DISTUR• I UNDO sr Sao
BURDEN SAMPLES TAKEN
�G
i. HOLE NO. (As of en drowin SIN• \
and file mambed
(,✓Z ¢ ,✓a//>
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
S. NAME OF DRILLER
15. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
• Jaw
i. DIRECTION OF HOLE
li. DATE HOLE ISTARTED 1COMP CTE
VERTICAL QINCLINED D[G. FROM VENT.
/L7 Z 9P 0 2 S
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN L1.
Is. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING t
f. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK f0-V
1!. SIGNAT E OF NSPE OR
�.
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 1 q • S
ELEVATION
DEPTH
LEGEND
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(DooerJINIwO
% CORE
REECOV-
BOX OR
SAMPLE
REMARKS
(Dralla/ Clone, enter lose, depth of
weawNq, ai—, 11 of/allleand
a
b
C l
♦
e
1
o OJVV
� - s�
tiA-
Z•S'y41z,
•
_�Sh-off
6
-
c✓h ��. g�ry
/Z
r
! I L
-
w e-14 s
1430,
r
E.v. 0. (-0 If's .
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
�,..• awn,. _ _ _ C-53 1PROJECT I HOLE NO.

GROUNDWATER INSTALLATION PROJECT: `I JOB NO. ' �a WELL NOif,. s
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: I COORDINATES: D
Alr1 r I I� I� .5a3b79. /Z fA2Wa7. 38
BEGUN: 10 Z¢ qQ SUPERVISOR: `wQ WELL SITE: WATER LEVEL: DEPTH/ELEV.
FINISHED: �® yq $ DRILLER: �o�a 3•SS 3 .71
DEPTH IN I ELEV. IN
REFERENCE POINT & ELEVATION:
GROUND SURFACE
GENERALIZED x x
DIAGEOLOGIC LOG SURFACE CASING: TYPYP • Pr
N
TYPE:
TOP OF PROTECTIVE CASING U ��45
PROTECTIVE CASING: TYPE : o I� 0
TOP OF RISER CASING 638.3¢
OF SURFACE CASING
x
x
x
x
BACKFILL: TYPE:
'b..�y
x
x
x
x
n
2
x
RISER CASING: DIA..
TYPE :
x
x
FUC, 5 cl
x
x
x
x
210
x
TOP OF SEAL
[—BOTTOM
ANNULAR SEAL: TYPE:" �.
OF SEAL
I
6.5
TOP OF SCREEN
.f•
FILTER MATERIAL: TYPE: 301gS
_
n
SCREEN: DIA.: 27 TYPE: f1I( 5�►^ 4�
OPENING WIDTH: 1) TYPE A
�5
—
BOTTOM OF SCREEN
METHOD DRILLED:
BOTTOM OF SUMP
METHOD DEVELOPED:
HOLE DIAMETER
BOTTOM OF HOLE
bj1
�
COMMENTS:
TIME DEVELOPEO:
MlICBC
i Eddy
C-54

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT' BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_56

u_e_ U_ MI., 2n K
4
4
DRILLING LOG
OIVIiION
INSTALLATION
SHEET
rlMe,� /Vi4ij
of Z SHEETS
1. PROJECT /��
10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT
/ v I T •l.�
It. DATUM FOR ELEVATION SHOWN Irma arkaQ-
n 5 L
LOCAION (Coad*latom or SlatlorJ
L
l/l r N
12. MANUFACTURER'S DESI NATION OF DRILL
SG�I y04-1 M Ro�aL41
3. RILLING AGENCY J
T-3L
L'� 17rIf11N�
HOLE.TPHO.
13. TOTAL NO. OF OVER-
NURDEN SAMPLES TAKEN
amruw8to ; uwolmruwBto
(Ara ohowrl arl dramrbl/ tlftm
3o Y
and Hm numbed ,`
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
S. NAME OF DRILLER /
18. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
I • �aCOtl
i. DIRECTION OF HOLE
[STARTED COYrL[TtD
ti. DATE HOLE
VERTICAL OIMCLIN[D DEG. FROM V[w T.
p
%O Z_IlZ 9p i z�
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN Z(o.p�
i. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK �.p
18. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING S
19. SIG AT RE OF INSPECTOR
x -
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 32. p
ELEVATION
DEPTH
LEGEND
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(Dmmertptt�l
s CORE
R
BOX OR
SAMPLE
REMARKS
(Drujing ttmm, wtmr lama, dmpth mt
o
IsO.
ERYV
wmNrrtn/, etc.. it mt/nitice"d
s
m
(
Clk ��/�r. L -5 yf�Z- Sf"2/
&// �llY6n..µ1P1- O�'2 0
61v71�/ Mf�+cs-0�/r0'kV'�G�Y70Yn�laa„/L
2
„-,IX%
4-
/®
/2
p,cced roc,
l8
20
vv,4 : o
�'/
ruc�Ct(r , ucr� veor�sr-/y�c.(c
��
r
_ 2 r,d go,/
26 7�o
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).

DRILLING LOG (Cont
Iona NRD :15
ELEVATION
DEPTH
LEGEND
a
b
c
f� 1
28
► ,
1,
30
/
3Z
34
36
3�
ELWAnON TOP O► HW
No.
Hole 30 )r
NSTAUATKaN
SHEET Z
O� N9 Etr PAT)
or SHEETS
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
% CORE
ROX OR
REMARKS
(DescrOl�)
RECOV-
SAMPLE
(Dri"S line, awfer leis. depth o/
ERY
NO.
weathering, Ht.. i/ tigwificant)
d
e
f
S
C. 0• Q• IV 32.0
OV4 i h 8a-o
0 qi_)_
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
ENG FORM 18 36 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. PROJECT MOLE NO.
- C-58

GROUNDWATER INSTALLATION
DRILLING CONTRALTO
'D.II Ins
BEGUN: to (z 2 ( qg I SUPERVISOR:
FINISHED: 101 Gf f6 DRILLER:
- -' REFERENCE POINT & ELEVATION:
PROJECNOD
COORDINATES:
03749.b3 /4
WELL SITE:
Jos NO. 19 WELL NO. L
WATER LEVEL. DEPTH/ELEV.
/2 • �5 �6•�• 8 f�
DEPTH IN I ELEV. IN
GROUND SURFACE
GENERALIZED x x DIA.:
GEOLOGIC LOG SURFACE CASING: TYPE:
TOP OF PROTECTIVE CASING
PROTECTIVE CASING: DIA. :
TYPE:
TOP OF RISER CASING
s
METHOD DRILLED:
METHOD DEVELOPED:
TIME DEVELOPED:
BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASING
x
x
x
x
P
I
x
BACKFILL: Gia TYPE:
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
RISER CASING. DIA. 2
TYPE: P✓( sd4 q0
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
TOP OF SEAL
ANNULAR SEAL: TYPE:
BOTTOM OF SEAL
TOP OF SCREEN
.f
FILTER MATERIAy TYPE: 30
_
S, CIL.SO.—�
f .
SCREEN: DIA.. 2 TYPE: PAL S'� 90
—
OPENING WIDTH: 0, O D ' TYPE*
BOTTOM OF SCREEN
—
BOTTOM OF SUMP
"
BOTTOM OF HOLE
f4,0
20.4-
0. Q-
G 48.
HOLE DIAMETER
f— b --i
COMMENTS:
MllCap i Eddy
C-59

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_60

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_62

Hole No. M k,7 3 /
DIVISION INSTALLATION :NEST
DRILLING LOG sa �. %zrw.� il/A4D 10F Z $MEET$
1. PROJECT 10- SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT (&'/
r'til vi IVAID _Tr- 11. DATUM FOR ELEVATION SHOWN (jarim or
•L LOCATION (Coeld►t j�� of station) SL
!` C N�t,rlp v C, 12. MANUFACTURER-5 DESIGNATION OF DRILL
3. DRILLING AGENCY ,40,
r6%'„ 13. TOTAL NO. OF OVER. DISTURBED I UNDISTURBED
4. HOLE NO. (As shown an drawtne fNle I BURDEN SAMPLES TAKEN O v
and file numbed
S. NAME OF DRILLER 14. TOTAL -NUMBER CORE BOXES
tiLo 15. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
i. DIRECTION OF MOLE ISTA TE jCOMPLET D
19. DATE MOLE
ERTICAL OINCLINEO DEG. FROM VERT. /0 Z/ J? 2/ nj $
17. ELEVATION TOP OF MOLE
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN
IS. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING ;
E. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK S 5^ 19. SIG AT RE O INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF MOLE 3 5 --I>, -,
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS % CORE BOX OR REMARKS
ELEVATION DEPTH LEGEND (Desor/pt/o) R ERYV- SAMPLE (DrUlhy thme- ester loss, depth of
wsdoring, ste.- II s14n1l1esltt)
s b c d e 1 $
sarco�,rz ,/Kayo, z.srq/2 �Z, .✓4 AIA 611A,-L_. ee isro
Z 4y Bt =o
. r
)2
/4
ZC)
Ov,+ BZ-o
ZZ e Z` vocl 1/o3
a4
� IwG(� gPI I•rD
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
- C-63

DRILLING LOG (Cont Shnot)
euVAnON To► of NOLe �
Hole No. /'�w3 i well
►ROJEQ
MSTAU,ATION
SHEET
OF Z- SKITS
ELEVATION
DEPTH
LEGEND
CLASSIFICATION Of MATERIALS
(Dowroti .)
% CORE
RECOV-
sox OR
SAMPLE
REMARKS
(DrXiws river, water less, /epsb of
ERY
NO.
—beri-g, ur., i% risw0-1)
a
b
C
d
f
9 -
GL.,� . o. slr.alr c4.;•s.
U✓.4 — r39 = c�
200
Cv .311,s ICI -
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted),
ENG FORM 18 36 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. PROJECT MOLE NO.

GROUND WATER INSTALLATION PaaecT: N JOB NOD1 *-Sp MLL 3f t"ll
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:: COORDINATES:
/�'G i y'lll/ lo-5 503706.77 14L/OOi?.79'
BEGUN:10 Zi fq9 1SUPERVISOR: WELLSITE: WATER LEVEL. DEPTH/ELEV.
FINISHED: 10 !z cjgj DRILLER: R • �cpb� /O.U$ 3s• 63
REFERENCE POINT & ELEVATION: DEPTH IN I ELEV. IN
GROUND SURFACE
GENERALIZED x x
DIA.
GEOLOGIC LOG SURFACE CASING: TYPE:
TOP OF PROTECTIVE CASING
PROTECTIVE CASING: DIA. .
TYPE
TOP OF RISER CASING 7/
METHOD DRILLED:
6" 4,'r � al(Amer
METHOD DEVELOPED:
j
TIME DEVELOPED:
1
IL -BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASING
xlx
xlx
x
x
x
x
x
x
BACKFILL: TYPE:
x
x
x
x
x X
x
x
RISER CASING: OM: Z
TYPE: PUC S.(, 40
x
z
x
z
x
x
x
TOP OF SEAL
ANNULAR SEAL: TYPE:
b e+ ��o, { c pu rye
BOTTOM OF SEAL
TOP OF SCREEN
FILTER MATERIAL: TYPE: 30 /ASS
_
=� •
;;
SCREEN: DIA.: 2TYPE: PAC s'490
OPENING WIDTH: TYPE:
5l0 �eci?
_
BOTTOM OF SCREEN
—
BOTTOM OF SUMP
L;.
BOTTOM OF HOLE
DIAMETER
HOLE
6 �e
COMMENTS:
v
16.5
20,v
30 .o
3/•S i
impi
Me1caM i Eddy
C-65

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-66

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(docN091703 C-( 8

Mole He. MW 32r'=
DIVISION INSTALLATION �) SHEET /
DRILLING LOG -54y Forµ er /vim / OF Z SHEETS
I.PROJECT 10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT YO' IrN /`
^ 1 v
1'2. LOCATION (Coordinates or Stetlmo S L
C URA /v 12. MANUFAC URER'S DESIGNATIONF DRILL
S. DRILLING AGENCY ,�
13. TOTAL NO. OF OVER. DItiTUR6 I UNDISTURNRD
4. HHOdLE NO. (As home on drowW tltls BURDEN SAMPLES TAKEN
Ilia number)/G1W32 2
S. NAME OF DRILLER_
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
R.JGIC 15. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
S. DIRECTION OF HOLE I
tm. DATE MOLE I STARTED I COMPL T[
V CRTICAL OINCLINED DEG. FROM VERT. 1. /0 ZS 7� /0 25 ,98
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN j�, (]
18. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING
S. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 2/, �� 1S. SIGNAT E OF�IN,$PECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 1.0 1' /
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS % CO E BOX OR REMARKS
ELEVATION DEPTH LEGEND (DeecrtptlotJ R ERYV- SAMPLE (DrBIhV t/ne, meta lose, depth of
wathering, eta. If elgnttleentl
s b c Y/ d e ( S
SAP�'/72= : d'ky 1, �)/ ¢/y ill A MA /0"12/-4014I«*r OBoo
Pyr./o,* �. 0V4 r $z?-7r
l� _ Ir�e�rfQK
I �
i
/6 -
r ,
i
Oof-;H
13�=0
•' r J
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).

DRILLING LOG (Cant Sheet)i1UVWAnON ro/ OF HOW
"0JW a+STA"n ON
N>
ELEVATION DEPTH LEGEND
a b C
3®
32
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
% CORE
BOX OR
(p,yteMl
RECOV.
SAMPLE
ERr
No.
d
e
f
Ggbb�o :
M�gcs -pyr/fit, P/oj,
Sn++ 11�Zt
Lio�i��.
Hole No. GJ32 z
3MIET z
p Z 3"WETS
REMARKS
(L rF pv R time, water lest, Ieptb of
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
ENG FORM 18 36 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. PROJECT MOLE NO.
(�
C-70
i

GROUNDWATER INSTALLATION
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:
-prl � I"
BEGUN: (012.410 SUPERVISOR:
FINISHED: Ipl15l q% DRILLER:
1I REFERENCE POINT & ELEVATION:
PROJECT: / JOB NO. O'�4,y WEL NOZ \
COORDINATES. ' 0 1
503b5-f. y2 / 20950. Zo
WELL SITE: WATER LEVEL. DEPTH/ELEV.
y,�� 0 s7
DEPTH IN I ELEV.IN (`
GROUND SURFACE
GENERALIZED x =
OIA.: �.
GEOLOGIC LOG SURFACE CASING: TYPE: N
TOP OF PROTECTIVE CASING
PROTECTIVE CASING: TYPE:
6 ¢S• 5b
TOP OF RISER CASING
OF SURFACE CASING
x x
x x
x x
=
BACKFILL. TYPE:
G I.,t•
x X
X x
x
9
RISER CASING: TYPE YPE 0
T: (PVC S� g
X x
x x
'
x x
TOP OF SEAL
DOC
ANNULARSEAL:TYPE:
_/p
BOTTOM OF SEAL
TOP OF SCREEN
t•
_
FILTER MATERIrl.. TYPE: 3b IQsi
—
SCREEN: DIA.: TYPE: PVC S� 40
_'.
YPP
OPENING WIDTH: i� T/
O
,
a' S
-
21.0
—
BOTTOM OF SCREEN
METHOD DRILLED:
BOTTOM OF SUMP
1V 1
I D �ir V�o�rn►n�►r
3 I. �
METHOD DEVELOPED:
BOTTOM OF HOLE
HOLE DIAMETER
n �
10
00MMENTS:
TIME DEVELOPED:
N eN L Eddy
C-71

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEF"I' BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703' C_72

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_74

33
Malta M._ IV I.J Xv Ada`
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
SHEET /
DRILLING LOG
Si4'�
/=+�✓' k+Pr Ni%D
of / SHEETS
1. PROJECT
10. SI2E AND TYPE OF BIT /p11 �r •�.Irq/1^
N*j -1-
It. DATUMor MNJ
/ / 5 L-
L LOCATION (C Inot s or St•ll-vt
de v (—
12. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL
5c; A-Ar, /-/d
a,14
DRILLING AGENCY
!.
16;1.m 11
13. TOTAL NO. OF OVER-
BURDEN SAMPLES TAKEN
asTU: I UND18'r7pt EO
!
4. NOLE NO. (As shown an dreerfetl title
I M � 3 3
and file numbet) , /
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
S. NAME OF DRILLER //
�• T Ob
15. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
i. DIRECTION OF HOLE
I /TART D I COMPLETED
10. DATE HOLE �2¢/k 8
VERTICAL QINCLINED DEG. FROM VERT.
�¢
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN S - 0
/
1S. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING ><
E. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK Z o • V
19. SIGNA URE F INS CTOR
f. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 2 S•O
ELEVATION
DEPTH
LEGEND
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(Deecrtpf/eR)
% ORE
R ERYV-
BOX OR
SAMPLE
REMARKS
(DrIll/n/ dale, wrier lose, depth of
wetlrrta& eta. If e1tNf/cent)
o
b
c
J
•
IF
3 ro 1 4-- ° C/k &,Y-e, . S y4lz k �2,
�i2.
4
_
P 67 5.flr
J
11
g
� r
`� (
O�; B>�=v
J
IZ
l r
i
C
L
'�pv,1Z
i
e�1r11111,
r
V. bNe Wr r PrJ4�.•ce�
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
------- I unl C un
V- 1 J

O.
GROUND WATER INSTALLATION PROJECT: N �� Joe No. O� � 1.WELL N) 33
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES:
Af -9r/ film j o 3Y o6.4 7 1470774 .27
BEGUN. 0(�4 q SUPERVISOR: fWELL SITE: WATER LEVEL. DEPTH/ELEV.
FINISHED: �p A DRILLER: �q � 6.27 Gas 3Z
OEPTHIN ELEV.
REFERENCE POINT & ELEVATION:
GROUND SURFACE
GENERALIZED z X DIA, :
GEOLOGIC LOG SURFACE CASING: TYPE
TOP OF PROTECTIVE CASING
PROTECTIVE CASING: TYPE : S %Ius
TOP OF RISER CASING
METHOD DRILLED:
METHOD DEVELOPED:
TIME DEVELOPED:
X X LOTTOM OF SURFACE CASING /
X X
X X
X X
z = BACKFILL: E:
z z ki� 2
X :
X X ri
X RISER CASING: TYPE : � L s
X X
X X
X X
t
X
TOP OF SEAL
ANNULAR SEAL: TYPE:
6ct(m rk
BOTTOM OF SEAL
TOP OF SCREEN
FILTER MATERIAL: TYPE: 3D/45
f �}
SCREEN: DIA. TYPE: I v SGn �v
OPENING WIDTH:b, p /0 '1 TYPE:
BOTTOM OF SCREEN
BOTTOM OF SUMP
BOTTOM OF HOLE
-i- 1 G 31.
a
1, 0
2.o
w
HOLE DIAMETER
�II COMMENTS:
Mekatl t EOQy
C-76

NAD MW34
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_77

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT' BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_78

NCI• Mo. M w 3 B�
DIVISION INSTALLATION SHEET /
DRILLING LOG S �r�,ei NA-D OF $MEET$
1. PROJEChT',/� 10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 6^
or AKW
LOCATION�Coordtnafaa or Staffer 4-
PC— 12. MANUFACTURE 'S OESIGNAT(Q N QF DRILL
7. DRILLING AGENCY SpG�Pvr,^ ti J�i7/A►cOri
17. TOTAL NO. OF OVER. D1faTUw�[O I UNOI8T R\[O
4 MOLE NO. (As shown an dra f!f!a BURDEN SAMPLES TAKEN
and file nunbe /�f ld3l� (3(3
S. NAME OF DRILLER 14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
)Ipde [19. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
t. DIRECTION OF HOLE 13TA�T[ 1 COrrL[T[O
16. DATE HOLE /
V 1iw TICAL QIMCLIN [D O[G. FROM V[RT. /v 2i 98 io 2/ yb'
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN q, 5
16. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING
S. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 20
19. SIGNATURE O INSP TOR
!. TOTAL DEPTH OF MOLE
ELEVATION DEPTH LEGEND CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS LRECOV- SAMPE REMARKS
(Doaerwfan) ERY NO. (DrUIW t1na, "tar ludo. dooh of
wat)rring, afr:, 1f afgnlfIcand
o b e A d a I
6„
sago/,fe : a?E yyd r. z.s""`/ 4/2
2 fit: , ��i�K >��J PY�"x"`� • O L/41 , d-z=v
I�OCI�/ 6w`<,�'O IJt�-T'��+'•cE� �^sy
� � r.c�ev wcic
g � \
t
2 WPfrI [� trt 2 v+, e
I4-
�6
i-
1
r, r/
124 4 1 �U.4ye Z4.s I I I
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
C-79

GROUNDWATER INSTALLATION PROJECT: -NAB JOBNo0 4S� WELL NO.
q w 3 a
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: COORDINATES:
23 3 4 • S /I��o�93.4�
BEGUN: io 1# t4 IF SUPERVISOR: 7 . ! l.1s WELL TE: WATER LEVEL. DEPTH/ELEV.
FINISHED: 1012 j DRILLER: 6.3/ 633•(7
REFERENCE POINT & ELEVATION: DEPTH IN ELEV. IN
GENERALIZED
GEOLOGIC LOG
METHOD DRILLED:
6 " 14,-r � pmw,Pr
METHOD DEVELOPED:
TIME DEVELOPED:
GROUND SURFACE
DIA. :
SURFACE CASING: TYPE:
-TOP OF PROTECTIVE CASING
-PROTECTIVE CASING: DIA. :
TYPE
-TOP OF RISER CASING
1
1x
4BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASING
xlx
Ix
x
:
x
x
x
SACKFILL: k7ry TYPE: S we k r (+C,
x
x
x
:
x
x
x
x
DIA.: 2 /'
RISER CASING: TYPE: P UC 5 � 40
:
x
x
x
x
x
x
TOP OF SEAL
/
/ d
ANNULAR SEAL: TYPE:
2 D
BOTTOM OF SEAL
TOP OF SCREEN
�' a
FILTER MATERIAL: TYPE:
/f
_
f ti
~.
SCREEN: OIA.. 2 TYPE: PVC S,44o
OPENING WIDTH: Q , 0/0 /1 TYPE'
.b
BOTTOM OF SCREEN
BOTTOM OF SUMP
,
124,
BOTTOM OF HOLE
31. 98
HOLE DIAMETER
COMMENTS:
Metatf i Eddy
C-80

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C_82

Hole Me. 11 w -4 7
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
P/srFic r—
INSTALLATION
1'�;i2,-f
SWEET
1. PROJECT
N�
OF f SWEETS
10. SIZE AND TYPE OF SIT !/f" IZ IIS-19
1 r
tram0
<L LOCATION (Coalp �tso or StwtfarJ
AlSL
Chtt,- �D N L
p� DRILLING AGENCY
1Z. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL•
C/HE %S
A- HOLE on drewhy NUo
13. TOTAL NO. OF OVER- DISTURB D 1 UNDISTURBED
BURDEN SAMPLES TAKEN
lNO. �ohown
nW4
S. NAME OF DRILJLfR
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES --
A,w
15. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
6. DIRECTION OF HOLE
ISTw1I,TEq 1COM LETED
IS. DATE HOLE�
i
VERTICAL OINCLINED DEG. FROM VERT.
I 3 / /3
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN ��. v
1111
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE
S. DEPTH GRILLED INTO ROCK
16. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING X
-
19. SIGNATURE OF PE TOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 1J.5
D D.
ELEVATION
DEPTH
LEGEND
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(Don
s C RE
R
BOX OR
SAMPLE
REMARKS
(DrUl4l/ tfmo, wtor l000, dopfh of
ERYV
IwwMrrlyd, oto., If aldelfle and
2-3-45-47
ovA =o
-
Ge- rtt dK-ifyK•--pf�y,L,ohk
• \
•I V441 L V•I `�i
/O
A4
/Sao
S
Split -spoon samples for lithologic definition and/or chemical analysis were collected from 3 to 5 feet
below ground surface (BGS) and every 5 feet or lithologic change thereafter (unless otherwise noted).
_ - -- C-83 - -

GROUNDWATER INSTALLATION
DRILLING CONTRACTOR:
/�' ei
BEGUN: I I+}r5 h SUPERVISOR:.
FINISHER: / /} DRILLER:
REFERENCE POINT & ELEVATION:
PROJECT. JOB NO. WELL NO.
N*D 0, o/ MaJ 47 (si
COORDINATES:
.S o3 2.46 14 2/ 112. 4.7
WELL SITE: WATER LEVEL: DEPTH/ELEV.
3.36 / 636.o0
DEPTH IN I ELEV. IN
GROUND SURFACE
GENERALIZED z x
GEOLOGIC LOG SURFACE CASING. TYPE:
N�
T
TOP OF PROTECTIVE CASING
PROTECTIVE CASING: TYPE : 8 / /' Gas
TOP OF RISER CASING
BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASING
x1
x1
x
x
x
x
x
x
BACKFILL: TYPE:
x
x
x
X
i
x
x
x
DIA.:
RISER CASING: Z "
TYPE: PLJ(. 'e j, '40
x
x
x
x
x
X
x
TOP OF SEAL
ANNULAR SEAL: TYPE:
BOTTOM OF SEAL
,1
TOP OF SCREEN
'::
FILTER MATERIAL: TYPE: /
s,l�«. s�..•� 3or 4s
_
.:}
SCREEN: DIA.. 2 � TYPE: 'PV C 4V
OPENING WIDTH: TYPE:
/0 slr' slit
BOTTOM OF SCREEN
METHOD DRILLED: 1E
6/k' A/Qli r hMt'/
BOTTOM OF SUMP
!
METHOD DEVELOPED:
HOLE
!'
BOTTOM OF HOLE
DIAMETER
TIME DEVELOPED:
) O', �
. COMMENTS:
16.�ry. v.
i•v
2�o I
3.0 I I
C-84

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT' BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-86

[HTRW DRILLINGDISTRICT:
Savannah
HOLE NUMBER
2.DRILLSUBC."NTAACTOR:
SHEET OF .-
5. NAME .DRILLER:
DESIGNATION .DRILL:
7. SIZES AND TYPES OF DRILLING
AND SAMPLING EOUIPMENr
..
.. .
0. DATE STARTED.
11. DATE COMPLETE
15. DEPTH GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED:
13. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK
14. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE
17. OTHER WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS (SPECIFY):
18. GEOTECHNICAL. SAMPLES
DISTURBED
UNDISTURBED
19. TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE BOXES
23. SIGNATURE OF INSPECTO
LOCATION SKETCH/COMMENTS SCALE: fts+
■■■■■�■■■■■c�
I�N_
m_■
■
a_
■_
■■■■■■■■
MENEM
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
I
C_87

88-D
_...
'S inK.w ' ,l+v
�11A 1 S y� M 1 41 S r0
�1•�'�
's,,,,� �� , f,. v�l+S !f-ram
��•t,t..:(�!L ZIP 5
�S �'', �— S l
d
L•1 y <, ti `-�"'a.1S.++o�-�-F Yip„�n ,�a.il
5�..'(/ �,�.r-•M �..,�,� �f34�-�,-t•ya'
orb �r ^•e. � N
a -
(,,,,• .
>> y,.y,-,-7 ..),f•.�sp �-rib-^ I
>1 0 1
7 "�
s
o�
171
571MVW3M
Of dO Z 133HS
hl-JIVS ")13etNnN 3"lOH
t,
r
z _
1"W15 r►r7 —J11'S 7ritil ,
,f h _vAol
Idl ON Sl'1f1s3M
ON3'IAWVS \O33MOJNo ONIN33SJS
'1VJI.AIVNV 3'IdWVs O131i 5lvldulVWd0 N01141MJS30 If.ld"el(1 AI'1'rl
AIInN3W `I'n4.) / Puo(I rined :NO.LJJdtiNi (IVN 31101MI.)

68-0
W
M1I
r4
MI
wL
-C
91
V"vJ
L —b6
it
j; V-W- 7-W^ 114
Y %0-5
z
Y'l A v' I L. VA
^2 lAaV
fl
loq
nk
101
t3i m
ON il'idlAWS
ON
XOII ISOO HO
ONIN33113S
(III
IV)
VP43N
IV)IIAIVNV
I
31dwvs
CIM
RVIVILVAO
MIN NOIJAIM.W30
lild.10
AtITI
Of :10 c 133HS
AiltiNDW
jantjD; puoEj vInrcl :*dOJ.J*id7—F-
NI OVN 21101.1c1i.) J.Ailro)ld
rlMrs :d39L-jnN 91011
001 5-KY111W] WHIH

HTRW DRILLING LOG
HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-14
11ROJI CT- Charlotte NAD
INSPECTOR: Pa1112 Oond / Chuck McNulty
SHEET 4 OF 30
I:I.IiV
(A)
DEPTH
(n)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
IC)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BOX
ANALYTICAL
SAMPLE NO ,
REMARKS
' (G)
RESULTS
NO
jF1
r :
Ao tvk v e /'y x cL-reK�
00Y
Dri4j s/•f� r /titer+-1��
S,glc-
'
S
21
S� il�r c�� t�csa-p
22
23
24
2s
nQ
3i01
301
�G i 3
26
I
Rat)-
27
2B
20
�u
C-90

HTRW DRILLING LOG
HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-14
PROWCT: Charlotte NAD
INSPEC-roR: 112ulu Bond/Chuck McNulty
SHEET 5 OF 30
IiI.IEV
(A)
DEPTH
ID)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
(C)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BOX
ANAI.YnCAL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
(G)
RESULTS
NO
F
Y
6 e y
1
y'ru.,�1lz _ /u..f1 cry��,t•C�s:
SAt4-
�i' JrIIler
do -till A
//i.r/
33
%OLM u.
33
s-- y n ` -4/ f
q-
at /OY1G/ p6 /t yti/1 /J(lc.wl y ftlt
rail
S I c -
r f "p
G ./� t �...... K77H �J : d.. f �� r {
34
r�
/' Kk f/ nrd ro ��+taf..
35
�r1.o,
/d Dr���Ji.�k �if'� I$k
36
ee �/ .tl�c.. m h S' / .
tc"zw�+vtV,
'rto ^I
37
N 7 it,rf,
3A
ncA.ui•v.r...
s 6� afi. Fc 7:,n• nt 5..
tvw IL-r co [Dr
rA
6r'1
7
1% zwt` !3 ir•e
�n
C-91

Z6-0
9/ C L =e�
lDl
s�tavw3a
01 d0 9 133HS
rl-JIVS :-s3awf1N 310H
G
nr
or
tr
J�'O.��ph#I�,t�sI�AIZ�rTcQ[ sr
I b$ sr
It
8 0
1:11 ON SllnS3b
ONl1dWVS x0931103110 DNIN3313S 1JI (a) 1V1
'IV,IIlA"IVNV 31dWVS 0131d S'1VIa31VWdONO1JAI113S3O llldltl Aii'lil
AIInN.IW 4an9J / puop elned :'dO.LJ3dSNi QVN a11oIJa4.) ;I.JilfO)Id
-3/

HTRW DRILLING LOG HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-I4
I'It()JECT- C 11ar1otic NAD INSPECTOR: Paula Bond / Chuck McNulty SPIFFY 7 OF 30
1iLIiV orpm DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS FIELD SAMPLE' ANALY'rICAL REMARKS
1A) (01 (C) SCREENING OR CORE IIOX SAMPLE NO (G)
•f RESULTS NO (F)
I" i,044
Vu7 > Ffvr.gl 1iLa/-'C 1 SIh; v1 /t
5! �j a Lb iV I C
52
s.w( o.—� ,w,,...d " -r.u.C..
37
55
i
56
57
�t uz f
UK
Stl L V� (T 1. , 1 I ✓�M .? i (.a I it
yl, + r�, r.t•�4., .� f os 3
59
Y
S4-4
I 'f
S
37ma.t%�
C-93

1
HTRW DRILLING LOG
HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-14
PROJECT: Charlotte NAD
INSPECTOR: Paula Bond / Chuck McNulty
SHEET 8 OF 30
lil.liv
IAI
n13P'rll
Ilil
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
IC)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE nO%
ANALAMCAL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
(G)
RESULTS
NO
F)
+rat ^_itil vl r-�l CAA
61
'
62
N s :�,.-•I.�.r,� � cat':, M.o.�
67
rabd t,.k 4^e ira6lJrocit
1
�h CKt,a,•? J
x�
3-
64
re
6s
d
�
r
67
26za
a
dk
64
.�
a
711
to
�� C-94

HTRW DRILLING LOG
HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-14
Charlotte NAD
INSPECTOR: Paula lioad / Chuck McNulty
SHEET 25 OF 30
Iil.liv
IA)
D FI'rll
111)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
(C)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BOX
ANALYTICAL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
(G)
RESULTS
NO
IF1
q ,A
c +1
-"4k-rj, oy"' d
Rcc= S��'�
Sir 1 r•�� -�, � 5 ra,t.>�
y
, . �
Yet �., jf �
SM
� ��> Y k
grla(LG-1 4v o&Arwy.�I�IN"i
c�.,
LL 7� y C4..r-
,
µc ctr, t I ►
Aar
4tt.7 U IJ1l v�
i'
1 S
+Z
i w�c d, S C-, . �►. h ;W,
�
4v
Tr� / 1 o?. (✓S
17
lo-$-�-Iz-1�1 �Ift�IV
6, 1•
ram.
).
dZ 111-V l.
r

C -ab-p 1,. na( — lid'
HTRW DRILLING L G
110LE NUMBER: SAIC-14
PROJECT. Charlotte NAI) INSPI:(:TUR: Paula Bond /Chuck McNulty
SHEET 9 OF 30
Ii1.I:V
IAI
DIiPTII
(p)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
II') _
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE.
OR CORE DOX
ANALY'rICAI.
SAMPLE NU
REMARKS
(G)
RESULTS
NO
II
trap 1,
III
iZQp=7'/
e:
e3
cfriw.�a ^ r"�4C u,t�✓1 �3.�
t v���a� ►'l-l-
= .�...
+•�h��--rc�+.-,�-f�«.r-N i•� uA� 1 !ry /
�,�
WKa,C tHrC, L, l ��
�r+.a�e/
7-
dc1 u��l "j
It
`� k
P
94
}oS co��••vfC ^'�4•
as
PAY
4.5
87
v-cr� � ti.-r �•^e
Wes'
8R
�.
Yr
t"
84
.
%--Yu CA"

HTRW DRILLING LOG
HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-Id
PRt)Jli("I': Charlotte NAD INSPECTOR: Paula Bond f Chuck McNulty
SHEET 10 OF JO
I:I.Ev
IA)
DI:P'rii
IB)
DESCRIPTION OF MATF:RIAt.S
(C)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BOX
ANALYTICAL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
(G)
RESULTS
NO
F)
Nyoa C(6
rb Uk
91
1-M'NK� � T - o
V,
�r •wyJ i V' Z� w-W CiZva�l
-
9- c i 5
V<1-7 S• °1^fr vex d
to
92
to o rev.-�7
s. ID L.
97
i
94
t-
S0 1
95ct
S.r.r—t lN�S C t •p TT 'Ti
/
_ /
��
96
V.
Ll
1r wA s,
97
be ti rc k; 143 4
,,405.1--
jil
98
i
i
M
v
ton
C-97

ae
HTRW DRILLING LOG
HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-14
PROJEVT Charlotte NAD
INSPECTOR: Paula Bond / Chuck McNulty
SHEET I I OF 30
li1.1:v
(Al
IIIiPTii
(III
DESCRIPTION OF MA'rERIAI.S
(C)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BOX
ANALYTICAL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
tG)
RESULTS
NO
F1
N 2 9 i-at,y es G I -el K,
Sqq c.
�., (pro
-
101
1.�►-t
&t
to:
1A�f b�u� �cfLt.•K �-�f-C
V� 21►�t
103
104
105
10e
.
ROD
/' ll
107
1nx
y
L r2eA
fill

HTRW DRILLING LOG
BOLE NUMBER: SAIC-14
PlUffl-VT: Charlotte NAD
INSPECTOR: Paula I;nnll / Chuck McNulty
SHEET 12 OF 30
Ii1.I6V
(A)
IIIipm
(III
DESCRIPTION OFMA•rERIA1S
(C•)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BOX
ANALYTICAL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
(G)
RESULTS
NO
(F)
3 Q r~ la_ Nit- red
kcc = S. V
l.a>
ulta�/It.Lrc �'� r r✓{�7 h �
�.
wa.G�I_a rz4.v-.,, 6,q
AVA- relde ' t, fr„y��'1 � i(tQl.Q�
AA, (ky � [. re- Mvl e-got �.
112
r/ �kQK•� `1��,�7
.ki'siC 6,atowr-s-4
/[-ar✓1 /� S/
3~-
11J
A, r�
rq
114
j
1"
I15
1
(t ♦�
Z.
a1o1dL3�, 1
- L'7
y�_I^�li t �R
116
� Q6 i 7`�/
117
\
118
119
1 '
1 211
J'+'i
C-99

001-D
-y*-k 1 CL— J
_q- -,4
sr
101
S)IIIVH3'd
Of Jo El 13311S
tl-:)Ivs :-d30wnN310H
I
SZ1
A.
cil
zzl
01
��Si.
H
I ON Slills3d
ON --Jldwv%, Xog 3VO.) No ONIN3311-)S 13) (U) (VI
'IVJ I.LA*JVNV R. IdW"' cliall VIVINUMNA0 NOI"I)J.)s3a 111dil(I AATI
UVN 31101MI.)
MInNavY llzn4.),- ptioll rillcd:VOJ..)7]clrNl

101-0
FIF
'27 e)4QT4
�/��n4
_rT -5r-j •z - I-i
1�)1
s�lavl,aa
of AO r l
rl-.)1�'S �?1:IfI1Nf1K �I"I()II
Of
�X•w Mo y��',2® ���
���5 a o!� M S� +►�S
;M,ra►b yp v .sue a►�7�
,-,.yr cav,►,
?�2/wc "W16" � s
.snM„V S✓ff�a�d'v�W
,� ��u>n �1r s -y►� � �J
y
`F r ssr� °pr
►rrS _ rr+o.v7a cvTwos
..I I
Ni'1
LCI
vn •
Sri
t'CI
rrl
:n
Ill
IIw Ihllvv� X09 'JXU.)MU OM11,3:II01, I.)1 IOI iVl
I� III '.'I\•N\ I'Id IV Vt U IJ13 ' IVIM•IJ \'IV :Ill NIII I.IIN.Iti:IU II.I .1.111 .t 1 1 1
All"WIN PIIII(l1:111'.I Nrl.l..)IdtiNIT (1\'n�IluLlr.Il,l 1.111I)TI�I
Dol DN11-1"1121a .Mll.l ll

HTRW DRILLING LOG
HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-14
I'ItOJI's("I': (.112rlotto NAD I INSPL'C'TOR: Paula Bond / Chuck McNulty
SHEET 15 OF 30
1'.I.liv
IAI
I)'I;PTII
411)
DESCRIPTION OI: MATERIALS
I('1
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BOX
ANALYTICAL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
(G)
RESULTS
NO
F)
S. �.5.
it / �i
pla,SS c G iK t:4.orL�.r
142
143
144
145
-.
116
2 33- > If"
f%%
147
lift
149
1�n
C-102

di4r--
1': Charlotte NAD
INSPECTOR: ['auto Bond / Chuck McNulty
FLEV
(A)
DFPTII
111)
DESCRIPTioN OF MA'rIi1RIAIS
(C) _
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BO\
ANALYTICAL
SAMPLE NO
RESULTS
NO
F)
5,1}1 C
f.j 4ta r r-` C--j 1
��
151
Is:
133
154
HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-14
SHEET 16 OF 30
REMARKS
(G)
is'r /5
9,C .I. (ka.s.r..",,X(
-..3�--> "
i 0
f &S ir L"C„&r z(WJ�
i 53. v-
C-103

HTRW DRILLING LOG
HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-14
I'ROJE("I'• Charlotte NAD
4wspECTOR: Paula Bond / Chuck McNulty
SHEET 17 OF 30
ia.liv
IAI
nEP'rll
In$
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL %
(C)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BO%
ANA071C'AL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
(G)
RESULTS
NO
IF)
161
Ifil
163
i
1
164
i\
�l
L
iq
165
13
l//►tt(��
, ( q t<
1
167
ra (n t A-+C.f
e - 11721*L..1-'JCCr4C
168
1�
169
LY
1711
,�
a
1-1-1 V`+

HTRW DRILLING LOG
HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-14
111(OJI-.*("1*: Charlotte NAD
INSPECTOR: Paula Bond Chuck McNulty
SHEET 18 OF 30
ELEV
(A)
I)F.PTI I
(11)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BOX
ANALYTICAL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
(G)
RESULTS
NO
(F)
13
171
t -F4
17Z
173
174
z
175
err
176
177
178
Z
179
Imil
C- 105

HTRW DRILLING LOG
HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-14
Charlotte NAD
INtiPIi(.?OR: Paula Ilond / Chuck McNulty
SHEET 19 OF 30
FLEV
IA)
1)IiPTII
In)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
(C)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE.
OR CORE BOX
ANALYTICAL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
(G)
RESULTS
NO
F
I81
182
183
184
18s
LZ
186
to
187
188
`
1)1Y
I'NI
C-106

HTRW DRILLING LOG
HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-11
11ROJECT: ('Itarlotte NAD
INSPECTOR: Paula Bond / Chuck McNulty
SHEET 20 OF 30
)il.l?v
(A)
OIiPr1I
[it)
DESCRIPTION OF MAmRIALti
IC)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BOX
ANAt.\-rICAL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
(G)
RESULT,}S'
'40
IF)
191
-a•y�
193
15.7 N!� Akd I) r" 7 w 14t%
141
�� wt t .�•<.ra�r �,�,��^
lti Y, � - I `I Y: � �.r�rj
ct-,rf
y01�
I"
196
IcQ� = �l•
k•
197
� •
� i" 9
"��,
Ail
C I �j � • ? •- v�� S 1-r-c►y c oil:
Y•
ej
7I
yrL„�
s"
/A-Z-4
zoo
r-
1 n-f
2q--o'

80I-D
soZ
14I%, Z/�_ j� _ZIf _ e, -:AZ
7'h : Qi921
'?I 5 ` T
.►are, f,,,,,4 r 4n
1•�
rNSf>�d� ►SJ c�
rl+rkisd �.��}+ I-e.; 31
-J?J--o
-SV661
101
sx,vW31f
OE JO Iz 133HS
hl-mv% :v3etNnN 3-I0H
ls,
i
I'll
ON
Oh 31dwVS
X08 3110.3110
'1VJIIA"IVNV
31dwv5
>,%ST
>-04� w s„ t u�y rN Li
2-JI-rI r-Ipr•n-Lj- U0
7 J 1} 7 Vlt
W CP%t
jAj a.
r - rIL-t %41
not
Nor
tor
90:
soz
roz
coz
zoz
lot
I ONIN3311JS I U) I (111 I IVI
0131d %IVOI31VWd0NOI1d111JS30 11"ll(1 AiIT
411nNDW `I.,)n4.)i Pnue Lined :21O.LJ3dSNI OVN 2110IJeti.) J..)Af())I,I

HTRW DRILLING LOG T
I ,OLLE NUMBER: SAIC-14
..
PROJECT: Charlotte NAD
INSPECTOR: Paula Bond Chuck McNulty
SHEET 22 OF 30
Ii1.ry
IAl
I)I:PTII
1111
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAI %
(C)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BOX
ANALYTICAL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
(G)
RESULTS
NO
IFS
(s , 4,�,rJ,
3 %Z - Li - 3 Y2 -3'/27
L.-- -C—rpt c F 94 ri f., S
Z12
Z.
Z.
213
21-1
zIs
216
+ �/
L4-3.t -'i-y.
217
Ran-3,,2=�0olb
w
it ►tits—
zis
•� t war r� r«� •� r�
219
uo
/ vj
k1-1 UY

HTRW DRILLING LOG
HOLE'NUMBER: SAIL -Id
PROKC f: Charluttc NAD
INSPECTOR: Paula Band ; Chuck McNulty
SHEET 23 OF 30
FLEV
IWPTII
DESCRIPTION OF MATF.RIAI S
FIELD
SAMPLE
ANALYTICAL
REMARKS
IAI
U9
(C)
SCREENING
OR CORE BOX
SAMP�r. NO
(G)
RESULTS
NO
F
l Gf1
Sal" eCzYcr�ef;"Vt
2 ZO — LZS
==I
3YZ —3 yz
__3
54(0
224
225
r
230-7
226
,-u . �
Z27
228
__9
Z.m
C-iiu

HTRW DRILLING LOG
11OLE NUMBER: SAIC-14
11140JR 1': Charluttc NAD
INSPECTOR: Paula Bond / Chuck McNulty
SHEET 24 OF 30
1i1.1iv
IA)
mirm
(it)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
(C) •
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BO\
ANALYTICAL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
(G)
RESULTS
NO
IF
)
----
AllKA=s1 3.5_
:31
Sfw.v�L c�.8c,r..'n'►'*.y,•l
.- �,
ItiQ �- 1 �'/s
It 3 � � N 10.01' 4U'%.4
232
233
234
235
lgavA^ i JLL S etTn4m-m •
1
R�Y1 Z.3>. T •- Zyo,.:?L
236
(M
1 �
WA PU%" 60 ps.J,
239
DcuM pn ' S o D f6p
239
2J11
C-111

J
HTRW DRILLING LOG
HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-I.+
PROJECT: Charluttc NAD
INSPECTOR: Paula Bond / Chuck McNulty
SHEET 26 OF 30
I IXV
IAI
OEPTII
fill
DESCRIPTION 01: MArERIAIS
In
FIELD
SCREENING
RESULTS
SAMPLE
OR CORE BOX
ANAI.\'TICAL
SAMPLE NO
FI
REMARKS
IGI
Jz,t-� r c 60-c-c 1 wj+4
►i
rs
Z#Z
�cc4?cc�►' �
Zy
Mlho� OCGu; .�....� r
ar
Fu►a= S�
f',, _ 57.0.
Z
QQ,>- y.95'- 97%
Oct N
Z4`1
�.-�o
„
„�

HTRW DRILLING LOG
HOLENUMBER: SAIC-14
11RO11:CT: Charlotte NAD
INSPECTOR: Paula Bond / Chuck McNulty
SHEET 27 OF 30
Ii1.EV
JAI
I)IiPrII
IBI
miSCR)PTION OF MATERIALS
(C)
FIELD
SCREENING
RESULTS
SAMPLE
OR CORE BOX
NO
ANALMCAL
SAMPLE NO
IF)
REMARKS
(G)
Z�I
2�
Zs�+
zs7
7M
2 S�
a
Z 50- -
a �w -L.,-� +, �F v«4,,-e
GG
I�'� °� ��r-�•Ij +4XAc� a.�.a,+ -lac{
S'OL,
rr�..1t
�ra1�
-
iZ"A 2 5-0.7 - z5-+6 �
iYvgYA- ;Y2-';yi-clyL
tij = �• 1� _`12`l
"'.r., C. zse- s
(AA,tCcQ , c P vSSa'��� ��
(�Ccrcw
Xpo= ji.�
5a1ct
J �
C-113

HTRW Drilling Log
HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-14
I'ROJI:(' I' , Charluuc NAb
INSPECTOR: Paula Bond / Chuck McNulty
SHEET 28 OF 30
FIXV
IA)
D EP1,11
IIII
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
(C)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BOX
ANALYTICAL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
(G)
RESULTS
NO
(F)
-
i�
-zao,�
C
3-3 3
C'
ZO
% 1�.
3
Z �► 3. S f'�'SS w.�C,r
�
� row......,[--P Sw•—P
�r
r
FP
2 US • G5 �. z 70.
e3 c... ..J.% 3v
YL-3-3- 3- 3'Vz
d c o n"4c,
LGb'
!�
1 1 A

HTRW DRILLING LOG
IIOLE NUMBER: SAIL-14
PROJECT. ('ltrrloltc NAD
INSPECTOR: Paula 131md / Chuck McNulty
SHEET 29 OF 30
I.1.1?V
(A)
DEPTH
(11)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
IC)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BOX
ANALN'TICAL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
(G)
RESULTS
NO
IF)
Q. Z �c 3�+•c�c o . V.r. .�.. �...
vl,ot arJC rfM�3 cra�1M ire'+
S•,�tC
1 �( -
Saw-4 /�r2Ycrlp�l.sv.1
y •
i
-ate 7
2� 1
y-4'- r- j kh,c f
• J:
1
A
. +r
+=cA
4
zti pPR
me artae, rg f ce.
+
LeRy 60.
Z.
Z
4i
,t
s.gtc-
Z��
Sw ti c . KYu-ti- btw.,k
14
��� 7 _ Z- 7
L 4 f %
21
Z �i
Tv-r k n tA
,
44< j•.n.,c cj r r1 w-- D 3 M(
{� S
=
r
-
D'
1 r
✓ r

HTRW Drilling Log
HOLE NUMBER: SAIC-IJ
11I10JE("I': Charlotte NAD
INSPECTOR: Paula Bunt / Chuck McNulty
SHEET 30 OF 30
1il.li�'
IA)
OliPill
Int
DESCRIPTION OF MA"rERIALS
(C)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
OR CORE BOX
ANALYTICAL
SAMPLE NO
REMARKS
(G)
RESULTS
NO
(F)
Y •
i
��r 5rat.rnt1 ruck
k
IZt{.y'= 9$14
! h �-Gf S �teX • ,
29
�
Z vlet t."% y ``
Z�3
Zyv
yl-
Ic
�4
so.r•� sc r,,p,Z.,..
7 M . 7 1
�
st5l-4 kj, -Aw:.� CD4Lii.f
Mt. Ad f d 1 it��+ .�o �r.:c�+•.�
zo
S•
S,
V
C-116

HOLE NUMBERS
PROJECT: CHARLOTTE FORMER NAD INSPECTOR:
SHEET OF
ELEV.
(A)
DEPTH
(B)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
(C)
FIELD .
SCREENING
SAMPLE
INTERVAL
ANALYTIC
AL
REMARKS (Recovery & RQD)
RESULTS
(E)
SAMPLE
(G)
�+< Acne rip+c
Z9 5,7
•.
�nn�
21
3,�� _ 3.3 -3 --3
-F►..t �n„wa 3�
QUN _ 5•
Coo
s-
r
RQC) - 10VC7C
4
)q-zz
2ti3
< 511544 ,.t,41, :7
.
,
rid
II
zk4
�
S a.r f "n p —"- 4c,
Z. 9 5.-1 7
1 p1A
/2 - 3/z - 3/Z Iw
�lv are a • rv,„ 21 h. c. - � a�. l
%V�r% f 6fJ� w vZG P r cr v ass Sit
(? e CIS = s •
7
L1iWt, N ws! -4 •3 �qhL r c'� cc� , 6,1s�
o
Q J = . 2 = CJ `%O
cz"� Y z Lti t4,,, a--
'TT6L C•iWC
DOSS W.-k-
i 7
�av
3g i.,>t A rarKW
C-117

PROJECT: CHARLOTTE FORMER NAD I INSPECTOR:
rIA
V'DEPTH DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
) (B) (C) f, , 1 01 vt IV% W' Ira- COle'la be.. 4r7
H Cl - A , (d -A; T, of
3vl Sw,� 4,o gruA%4 -9tat,4
Frr�Z lrv'-Tvl� 6lcick,
T w.t y ra t w•� S ow•c .�.�,,,,
Ire-'1' r cuQ �-n �"cr` 3,r.,,�,,(•r
3v L
o
03
304
CNN
Luc f � %r Li 1
raj �' S (•r i,/ 1 � r�....yt�
-17tjk,4 Kam' -,c c- 30>.3
S,t4L,e vt-tf2:r,f-H--ce%
f-ut,k r r4 W 1 gu►v j.
OL t l r-y- lrkc cA
T
HOLE NUMBER: 5
SHEET OF
FIELD SAMPLE
SSCREENING INTERVAL
ANALYTIC
AL REMARKS (Recovery & RQD)
RESULTS (E))
SAMPLE (G)
..4 8
�sfilC'
•
Qua. 5 �
PezO
3:S .3 3
Lcai'
,
!1
� csS' w•u+� r 3u�k
5A IL-
3 c5.7 - 310. 7
3-s-3-3-3
*Ire
f Qc)
.r
s �
to

■
PROJECT: CHARLOTTE FORMER NAD INSPECTOR:
ELEV. DEPTH DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
(A) (B) (C)
i
i
So-o.-. C�C - c t .I+•,,,,,
Vt Urc ,
T� S�
JL L�esu 1�-,,t,•n
Lp
317
%L VLIv.
`Y
311
V" ih
OLE NUMBS
SHEET OF
REMARKS (Rxovey & RQD)
(G)
FIELD
SCREENING
RESULTS
SAMPLE
INTERVAL
(E)
ANALYTIC
AI
SAMPLE
1 q-23 Pull 5
-i•s-3
faun
CAD S cr.. ...A..
s�
1`
C-119

.... _ _._...� _.. _.. _..�_.�..--..... -..�-.---...- ....... ........ ... •.•..r.• .iw•.........n wv. •..6 w6 ...•.. V•aw � pb. .Yw ■ V
PRILLING LOG
HOLE NUMBER:
PROJECT: CHARLOTTE FORMER NAD
I INSPECTOR:
SHEET OF
ELEV.
(A)
DEPTH
(8)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
(C)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
INTERVAL
ANALYTIC
AL
REMARKS (RecoveryRQD)
RESULTS
(E)
SAMPLE
(G)
czar
vl,h
AIC-
14-Z`
oe
32C.Q•- 3Z5.8
gee, 512-
6 iL_,.,s
RQD = 106%
�ZZ
L3
F
L
C
• .
1 y
1 •
• •1
f
z,
�-&4U I{. oc{
3 z 5 . - 33o. a
o .
rdT_►•-,t*�/)
t"
r�fk C
��7c,o
-52Y
a. 4
31
-
C-120

T LOG
HOLE NUMBERS -
PROJECT: CHARLOTTE FORMER NAD
INSPECTOR:
SHEET OF
ELEV.
(A)
DEPTH
(B)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
(C)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
INTERVAL
ANALYTIC
AL
REMARKS (R—VY & RQD)
RESULTS
(E)
SAMPLE
(G)
'
1445
3'30.8 — 3
'
�n =5•sd
+
,
KZc -"S L
r
`
.1-J-J.5-Z.i-2• #Am;;L,
��y�'�1►F'
i
puj[joQs,.
Ott
.,to,"
i
1
1
Vt
µ�
+ +
a �
} f
♦
33�•�— 3`/o•S
^31Az
-5jOaZ
5
+
+ t
t
C-121

—
C•\Documents and Settin \rncnul OR-EEMG\M Documents\Forms & Misc Documents\Borin Template - 5 pgs.doc
DRILLING L0
T
HOLE NUMBER:
PROJECT: CHARLOTTE FORMER NAD
INSPECTOR:
SHEET OF
ELEV.
(A)
DEPTH
(g)
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS
(C)
FIELD
SCREENING
SAMPLE
INTERVAL
ANALYTIC
AL
REMARKS (fie 4 RQD)
(G)
RESULTS
(E)
SAMPLE
(j
,
'
♦
27
r .►
CC"
3Li is .1-34
saK-
I�
2
Roo- lo090
Hz
�
+
H3
+
p090
1 y
Xl
N4
+
+
+
+
+
l_
3`I S
4
+
� a
y L
+
q4, - 3 .i o• y
5...c d44 c r &Z.,,
guo = -5, .e-
,rC.,� `j
2100 = 9 9
1
olth, G-
4.
F +_
Z Z-
34
4
L
-
h
+�
C-122 ' TI

t
MULTIPORT MONITORING SYSTEM
PROJECT: FORMER NAVAL AMMUNITION DEPOT, CHARLOTTE, NC DELIVERY ORDER NO. 0066
WELL NUMBER: JR1L I4--
BEGIN 2 2-,7 Pul END yli 003
COORDINATES: N: 103; 84g, I{ 9
REFERENCE POINT
E: O zm q77. 5 15
ELEVATION
2'x2'x2' WELL VAULT W/LOAD
BEARING BOLT DOWN STEEL PLATE
TETHER SUPPORTING
TUBING INSIDE LINER
DEPTH
(FT BGS)
ELEV
(FT AMSQ
GROUND SAMPLE TUBING
CONCRETE PAD
SURFACE
\\\
GROUND SURFACE
---0---
_!�38_�_
GROUT
-
_ �s 3S, Z
OVERBURDEN
SURFA E CASING
�:•
DM (IN)
;..., TYPE:
�-
BOTTOM OF SURFACE CASING
- ----
--
COMPETENT BEDROCK
(FT. BGS)
I
I
I SAMPLE PORT No.--
�
G 2.0-71.0
-------
-3blo-�So_
INTERVAL: !Z,r- 7Z- 0
WATER LEVEL INSIDE LINER
SAMPLE PORT NO.-?-.,.-
10Q•0-114.v
Z _
INTERVAL:
5'IZ.4;—
SAMPLE PORT
I SAMPLE PORT NO.
124.I - l37•
-------
3. c,
--- -
INTERVAL: 1 7-4.0-13 6. a
49q•G-
SAMPLE PORT NO.3-
139.E-14y 0.
y W, b
1
1 INTERVAL: 11L.9L7 ig4.9
SAMPLE TUBING
NO. 5'
SAMPLE PLqq.4r_2uto.
19Q•d-zco.0
1
1 INTERVAL:
FLUTe. LINER
3$8.i.—
SAMPLE PORT N0.!
_250_9�-_u_�4
_ 3_7_4- G_
1
1 INTERVAL:
BOREHOLE WALL
3yi•!s-
SAMPLE PORT
Z97.0_3v7.
331.6
1
I INTERVAL: Z` ll-307.0
BOTTOM OF HOLE
-35�-�
--Z87_9
HOLE
DIA:
y
(IN)
C-123

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 C-124

APPENDIX D
RESUMES
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-1

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEKI' BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-2

SAIC ENGINEERING PROJECT MANAGER
DAMES ROMER
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-3

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-4

SAIC ENGINEERING PROJECT MANAGER
Mr. Romer has over 15 years of experience in site restoration activities, including characterization,
feasibility studies, remediation design, construction, and operations and maintenance (O&M). He has
managed hydrogeologic studies and remediation projects at both private and government installations,
including petroleum bulk storage facilities, pipeline terminals, airports, electrical utilities, wood products
facilities, electronic, and other manufacturing sites impacted by chlorinated solvents and petroleum
products. Mr. Romer has a wide variety of treatment approaches for addressing both nonaqueous-phase
liquids (NAPLs) and dissolved -phase compounds, including NAPL recovery, pump and treat using
activated carbon and air stripping systems and in situmethods, including air sparging, soil vapor
extraction (SVE), bioventing, and passive flow through barriers.
Mr. Romer's experience has also included identification and mitigation of non -point source pollution to
surface water bodies. These activities have included watershed analysis as well as design and construction
of Best Management Practices (BMPs).
Mr. Romer's experience has included emergency response for petroleum releases, design/build/O&M of
many full-scale soil and groundwater systems, and soil excavation at active facilities. He has worked with
construction management firms during both new and facility expansion activities to conduct remediation
activities in a coordinated streamlined approach. Recently he has been providing remedial strategy and
cost support for the remediation cap cost insurance market and cost recovery litigation efforts. He is
currently supporting costing efforts at two major airports.
This diverse background enables Mr. Romer to assist clients in developing and implementing optimal
turnkey solutions. Having served as in-house site restoration specialist for a major utility, he understands
the business requirements of managing multiple facilities and can assist in working through budgeting
and prioritization issues.
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY:
8/99 — Present, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) — Oak Ridge, Tennessee
Senior Remediation Engineer — Currently performing as both a project manager and technical lead on a
variety of projects including:
• Currently managing two Feasibility Study/Pilot Study/Remedial Designs for a former Naval
Ammunition Depot and a former Army Missile Plant facility under the Formerly Utilized Defense
Sites (FUDS) program Both of these sites are managed by the Corps of Engineers and are impacted
with chlorinated solvents in fractured rock. Pilot study will look at methods to address dense
nonaqueous-phase liquid (DNAPL).
• Provided independent review and remediation cost analysis in support' of a 1.3-billion-dollar
concourse expansion at JFK International Airport. Activities have included support to attorneys for
cost cap and cost recovery activities. Designed an extraction well system to control an existing
groundwater plume during several months of tunnel dewatering. Provided senior review of grout
curtain and plug testing.
• Provided independent review and remediation cost analysis for all future site restoration activities at
Miami International Airport. Currently working with airport environmental manager and attorneys
providing technical support for cost recovery activities.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-5

• Provided independent review and cost analysis for a 60-site, 250-million-dollar chemical company
insurance portfolio. Future remediation cost projections were developed using a Monte Carlo -based
statistical program.
• Engineer of record for a 90-gpm sodium lactate injection system at the Tennessee National Guard
base in Memphis, Tennessee. Mr. Romer led the modeling, design, construction, and O&M efforts.
The injection system includes 9 wells to 60 ft capable of injecting 10 gpm each. They are connected
to a treatment building [via over a mile of subsurface high -density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe] where
a 60% sodium lactate solution is injected as an electron donor. Following four injections at 2-month
intervals, VOC concentrations have declined over 75%.
• Engineer of Record for two permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) at Kelly AFB. The PRBs have a
combined length in excess of 2000 ft and are keyed into an underlying clay unit approximately 25 ft
below grade. They use zero valence iron to degrade PCE impacted groundwater. Extensive
consideration for both underground and overhead piping had to be incorporated into the design
package.
6/94 — 7/99,'EMCON — Portland, Oregon; Medford, Oregon; and Knoxville, Tennessee
Initially hired as a Remediation Engineer in Portland, later promoted to Branch Manager of the Medford,
Oregon, office. Co-founder of a. national Remediation Resource Group. Moved to Knoxville in 1998 for
family reasons and continued as a Senior Technical Consultant supporting multiple offices. Projects
included:
• Project Manager for design/build of a soil and groundwater treatment system at a former airport
facility. All field activities were conducted concurrent with facility construction and.capped with a
40-mil liner prior to pouring building slabs. Activities included excavation of over 10,000. yd3 of soil,
installation of 38 SVE wells, 24 sparge points, and over 20,000 ft of HDPE piping. Project required
partnering with the construction management firm to coordinate remediation activities with other site
construction activities.
• Provided independent review of remediation cost estimates for 56 solid waste management.units at a
former rocket propellant factory.
• Designed an under -building vapor collection system for over 2 acres of building footprint at the new
NAVSEA headquarters located in the Washington Navel Yard. Worked with the construction
management team to implement a design/build approach to maintain project schedule.
• Provided environmental support for excavation of ethylene glycol and Jet fuel impacted soils as part
of an airport expansion program.
• Project Manager and technical lead for the design and construction of a funnel and gate treatment
system utilizing zero valence iron fillings for PCE at a helicopter maintenance facility. Tasks included
development of remedial measures evaluation report, working with Envirometals on design and
patent issues, and developing construction QA/QC protocol. Installation techniques included
continuous pass trenching using 100% iron fillings and placement of iron/sand mixtures with both
track -hoe and hollow -stem auger methods.
• Project manager and technical lead for the design and construction of a 500-gpm groundwater
extraction system and an 800 cfm SVE system at a Midwest grain elevator site impacted by carbon
tetrachloride. Project was fast -track design build on a lump -sum -fee basis. System is telemetry
monitored, programmable logic controller (PLC) controlled using pressure transducers and variable
frequency drives (VFDs). Following treatment, the water is re -injected into the regional aquifer.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-6

- • Member of the remediation cost review panel for decommissioning of the chemical processing plant
(OU3) at Idaho National Energy Lab (INEL).
• Developed an interim corrective measures plan and managed design and installation of a multi -well,
multi -aquifer recovery and treatment system for a manufacturing facility, where groundwater is
impacted by TCE. System is PLC controlled and has been "on-line" over 95% during the first year of
operation with no discharge violations.
• Managed design and installation of multi -well recovery and treatment system for TCE at an
electronics manufacturer. System includes PLC regulated variable speed pumping to maintain
drawdown at the desired set point.
• Managed design and installation of an activated carbon treatment system for pentachlorophenol
(PCP) at a municipal well field in Oregon. Total system flow rate is 750 gpm.
• Negotiated closure for a caustic soda release for the Trans -Alaska pipeline terminal in Valdez,
Alaska.
• Designed and managed installation of an ion . exchange treatment system for removal of dissolved
metals from parts wash water at a helicopter maintenance facility.
• Project manager and technical lead for the design and construction of a 9-well groundwater recovery
system to control VOC-impacted groundwater at an Arizona landfill. Activities included groundwater
modeling to predict capture zones as well as optimal placement of re -injection wells. The modeling
resulted in modifying the project approach, eliminating a lower aquifer from the treatment program.
This resulted in significant cost savings to the client. The final design included chlorination for
bacteria control, air stripping followed by electronic hardness control, filtration, and re -injection: The
system is operated by a PLC and pumps are controlled by VFDs. Project was awarded Groundwater
Remediation Project of the Year by the National Groundwater Association.
1/92 — 6 /94, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) — Portland, Oregon
Hydrogeologist — Managed lower Columbia Area surface and groundwater programs at DOE facilities in
western Oregon and Washington. Directed drilling and construction during remedial action at
high -security, energized electrical substations (up to 500 kV).
• Managed a million -dollar cleanup of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and insulating oil at a 13-acre
substation.
• Conducted research and development work with EPRI on the properties of transformer oil and
negotiations with the Washington Department of Ecology for risk -based cleanup levels.
• Obtained variance from EPA Region 10 to allow disposal of listed PCB waste less than 50 ppm at a
Subtitle D Landfill. This resulted in enormous savings during the life of BPA's capacitor replacement
program.
• Worked with both engineering and construction branches to delineate and remediate soils prior to
installation of secondary containment systems.
• Provided support for UST, SPCC, and herbicide programs.
• Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) for overseeing subcontractors. Helped
develop new consultant/environmental contractor pool for multi -year master service agreements.
• _ BPA's representative for DOE's Technical Information Exchange (TIE) workshops.
-03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-7

1/90 —1/92, Riedel Environmental Services — Portland, Oregon
Engineer/Geologist — Provided a range of environmental services to commercial and government clients,
including emergency response, RI/FS, and site cleanup. Select projects included:
• Managed PCB, insulating oil, and UST investigations and cleanup at several electrical substations for
BPA.
• Managed several Emergency Response Actions for petroleum hydrocarbon spills and PCB releases in
the Northwest.
• Worked at several active petroleum bulk storage facilities and pipeline terminals to remediate
free -phase petroleum product, including Jet Fuel, diesel, gasoline, and bunker C. Techniques included
light nonaqueous-phase liquid (LNAPL) recovery, SVE, and bioventing. Sites included the
following Chevron Pipeline facilities: Wilbridge Terminal Facility — Portland, Oregon; Boise
Terminal Facility — Boise, Idaho; and Burley Terminal Facility — Burley, Idaho.
• Conducted soil vapor study and developed model of an SVE system at a Petroleum bulk storage
facility with a 1-million-gallon release of diesel in Taiwan, ROC. Supervised foreign nationals in
addition to duties as geologist and civil engineer. Operated free -product recovery system.
5/88 —1/90, Intergovernmental Resource Center — Vancouver, Washington
Water Quality Specialist — Supported a Lake Restoration Project. Activities included:
• Developed a water quality sampling program for a 43,000-acre watershed including installation and
sampling of gauging stations.
• Queried existing database to determine suspected areas of phosphorus inputs.
• Worked with USDA Soil Conservation Service to design and construct BMPs for riparian
enhancement.
• Coordinated volunteer groups to revegetate stream banks.
• Conducted public meetings to brief concerned citizens.
• Briefed Advisory Board, including County Commissioners and State Senator.
• Attended North American Lake Managers (NALMS) conference
8/87 — 5/88, Northwest Geotechnical Consultants — Portland, Oregon
Staff Engineer — Duties included:
• Provided field inspections for excavation, backfilling, and concrete construction activities.
• Conducted geotechnical testing in laboratory.
• Installed and sampled groundwater monitoring wells in support of a landfill closure project.
9/86 - 6/87, Tennessee Tech University
• Completed 28 hrs toward M.S. in Environmental Engineering.
• Research Assistant — TTU Water Center.
• Analyzed infrared aerial photographs and conducted field investigations in support of a Tennessee
Valley Authority (TVA) -funded watershed study of Boone Reservoir — North Carolina.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-8

6/81— 5/86, Memphis State University
0 B.S., Geology — 1986.
• B.S., Civil Engineering — 1986.
• Part-time work history.
• 1981-1982, Plain Clothes Security — Central Hardware Inc.
• 1982-1985, Phlebotomist — Baptist Memorial Hospital.
• 1985-1986, Research Assistant — Memphis State University Engineering Research Center.
Constructed flume and sampling building, collected soil and water samples, and analyzed data for
monitoring non -point source herbicide runoff from farm lands.
4/78 — 4 /81, United States Army
Assignments:
Rifleman - 2/75 h Airborne Ranger Battalion — Fort Lewis, WA
Instructor — Huckleberry Creek Mountain Training Camp (HCMTC) — TDY —Mt. Rainier, WA
Senior Instructor (Acting Sergeant) — HCMTC
Discharge — Honorable E-4
Security Clearance - Secret
Schools attended: Basic, Infantry, Airborne, Jungle Operations, Arctic Survival, Survival Evasion and
Resistance, and Mountaineering Instructors Qualification course.
EDUCATION:
Completed 28 hrs toward M.S. in Environmental Engineering, Tennessee Technical University
B.S., Civil Engineering, Memphis State University
B.S., Geology, Memphis State University
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS:
Professional Engineer, Oregon, Washington, Florida, North Carolina, Tennessee
Registered Geologist, Oregon
Certified Water Rights Examiner, Oregon
SPECIAL TRAINING:
In situ Thermal Remediation Workshop - International Containment and Remediation Technology
Conference, 2001.
Use of Programmable Logic Controllers, PLC Direct, 1996.
Use of MODFLOW for Simulation of Ground Water Flow and Advection Transport, National Ground
Water Association, 1994.
Chemical Dispersion Dynamics, Oregon Graduate Center, 1994.
Risk Assessment for the Environmental Professional, National Ground Water Association, 1993.
Capture Zone Analysis for Remediation and Wellhead Protection, National Ground Water Association,
1992.
Groundwater, The Princeton Course, 1992.
Bioremediation Engineering, General Physics Corporation, 1991.
Permit Writers Workshop, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1987.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-9

PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS:
"Large -Scale Lactate Injection in a Mildly Reducing Aquifer for PCE Dechlorination." Seventh
International In Situ and On -Site Bioremediation Symposium, Orlando Florida. J. Romer et al. June
2003 (accepted November 2002).
"Hydraulic containment of landfill gas driven VOCs in groundwater using a state-of-the-art computerized
control system at the Los Reales landfill." Fourth annual SWANA\ASCE Landfill Symposium,
Denver, Colorado. J. Romer et al. June 1999.
"Use of continuous trenching technique to install iron permeable barriers." First International Conference
on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Monterey, California. With Stephanie
O'Hannesin. May 1998.
"Installation of groundwater treatment at a municipal wellfield." TAPPI Conference, Orlando, Florida.
With L. Durkin and R. E. Cornish. May 1996.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-10

SAIC TECHNICAL MANAGER
ALLISON BAILEY
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-11

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-12

SAIC ENGINEERING TECHNICAL MANAGER
i
CATHERINE ALLISON BAILEY, P.G.
EDUCATION:
Tennessee Technological University: B.S., Geology, 1987
EXPERIENCE SUMMARY:
Ms. Bailey is a Registered Professional Geologist with more than 15 years of experience in environmental
project management, investigation, monitoring, and assessment. She has been involved with a variety of
multi -disciplinary environmental Resource Conservation - and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA),
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), and
Underground Storage Tank (UST) projects for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), U.S. Department
of Defense (DOD), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and National Guard Bureau (NGB), as well
as with private industry in Tennessee, Georgia, Florida, and South Carolina.
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY:
For 11 years, Ms. Bailey has provided project management and technical support services to Science
Applications International Corporation (SAIL). As project manager, her responsibilities include
communicating directly with clients, preparing fee proposals, preparing and maintaining project budgets
and schedules, assembling and supervising project personnel, and developing work plans, initial site
characterization reports, closure reports, Corrective Action Plan (CAP) - Part A and Part B Reports for
UST and RCRA projects, and Remedial Investigation (RI) Reports.
Ms. Bailey is currently functioning as technical manager on a Feasibility Study/Remedial Design project
for a Former Naval Ammunition Depot under the Formerly Utilized Defense Site (FUDS) program for the
USACE. For this project, a Pilot Study will be implemented to address areas where chlorinated solvents
impact fractured bedrock. In her technical support role, Ms. Bailey is responsible for preparing and
reviewing technical procedures, assisting in data evaluation, serving as geologist and field team leader for
the installation of groundwater monitoring wells in both soil and bedrock, soil sampling, water sampling,
and conducting health and safety monitoring and quality control/quality assurance (QA/QC)-
surveillances.
Before joining SAIL, Ms. Bailey worked for other consulting firms that provided environmental services
to both commercial and,DOE clients. During this time, Ms. Bailey served primarily as a field team leader
and geologist involved with UST and hazardous waste site investigations and remediation projects in
which she was responsible for supervision of field activities; groundwater monitoring well installation in
unconsolidated and bedrock using auger and air rotary drilling; groundwater monitoring well
development; groundwater, soil, surface water, and sediment sampling; groundwater monitoring well plug
and abandonment; health and safety (H&S) monitoring; and performing aquifer hydraulic conductivity
tests (slug and pump tests). She also served as project manager for Phase I and Phase II environmental
site assessment projects and due diligence property audits for commercial and corporate clients.
A description of selected projects follows:
• Delivery Order Manager for the USACE—Savannah District for a variety of projects in Georgia and
_ North Carolina. These projects included conducting CAP -Part A and CAP -Part B UST, RCRA, and
RUFS/RD Investigations, Soil Gas Surveys and Pilot Studies. As Delivery Order Manager,
Ms. Bailey's responsibilities include preparing fee proposals; interacting and conununicating with the
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-13

USACF and Facility Project Managers, QA/QC, H&S, and data management personnel; preparing
and co:;ntrolling project budgets and schedules; assembling and supervising the project team; preparing
sampi5.;; and analysis plans; managing the project field personnel and subcontractors; evaluating the
data; rucking technical decisions associated with the project scope; and preparing monthly progress and
financial reports, as well as the associated project reports.
Project Manager for Energy Systems Y-12 UST Technical Support contract for the DOE Y-12 Plant
in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. As Project Manager, Ms. Bailey was responsible for managing
investigation, monitoring, and closure activities for former USTs as well as the budget and schedule,
and interacting and communicating with site Environmental Program Managers and Tennessee
Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Underground Storage Tank (TDEC-
DUST) regulatory personnel. Ms. Bailey prepared Initial Site Investigation reports and provided site
evaluations using the TDEC-DUST Regulations to determine eligibility for the monitoring only
program and site closure. She was also responsible for informing and updating the client on a regular
basis with current State UST Regulations, preparing Site Status .Monitoring and Closure Reports,
assisting with site monitoring activities, and preparing and maintaining UST Management Plans.
Project Manager for the Lower East Fork Poplar Creek (LEFPC) Confirmatory Project, which
consisted of providing confirmation data to DOE and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), proving that the remedial efforts to remove mercury contamination from the LEFPC
floodplain sediments, were successful. Ms. Bailey's responsibilities included preparing for,
conducting, and participating in SAIC, Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. (LMES), and DOE
Readiness Reviews; managing the project field crew and subcontractors; assembling and maintaining
a fully functional on -site laboratory and performing field screening analyses for mercury in sediment
samples; evaluating data; making technical decisions associated with the project scope; producing and
controlling the project budget and, schedule; and interacting and communicating with the LMES and
DOE Project Manager, Remediation Contractor, QA/QC, H&S, and.data management personnel, as
well as responding to and participating in LMES and DOE field surveillances. Ms. Bailey was also
responsible for preparing weekly progress reports, monthly progress and financial reports, the final
data reports associated the completion of the confirmatory sampling effort, and assisting with the
preparation of the Remedial Action Report.
Project Manager for the LMES ETS Contract for the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Bear Creek Valley (BCV)
FPSS RI Field Activities. This RI incorporated a unique and innovative approach to the environmental
investigation, which allowed the sampling locations to be selected and the number of samples to be
limited by using radiation screening and surveying technologies. The project consisted of conducting an
environmental investigation of the entire BCV FP by implementing the Sampling and Analysis Plan
(SAP) and involved procuring multiple subcontractors; preparing for, conducting, and participating in
SAIC and Y-12 Readiness Reviews; managing and supervising project personnel; and interacting and
communicating with LMES project managers, technical support personnel, and QA/QC officers. As
project manager, Ms. Bailey's responsibilities included managing field personnel and subcontractors;
producing and controlling the project budget; interacting and communicating with the Energy Systems
Project Manager, technical personnel, and QA/QC personnel; and responding to and participating in
Y-12 and DOE field surveillances.
Field Operations Manager (FOM) for the ES ETS Contract for the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant BCV
Operable Unit (OU) 1 RI Field Activities. This RI utilized innovative waste minimization technologies
by utilizing the Geoprobe® direct -push and water sampling methodologies. This technology allowed a
smaller -diameter soil core sample to be collected and permitted water samples to be collected directly
from the borehole. This project consisted of conducting an environmental investigation of the S-3
Ponds, the Boneyard/Burn Yard, Sanitary Landfill I, Oil Landfill, and the Burial Grounds by
implementing the RI Work Plan, which Ms. Bailey assisted in writing. Ms. Bailey's responsibilities
included managing field personnel and subcontractors; interacting and communicating with the Energy
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-14

Systems Project Manager, technical personnel, and QA/QC personnel; and responding to and
participating in Y-12 and DOE field surveillances.
Project Manager for the ES ETS Contract for the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant BCV OU 2 RI, which
included conducting the field investigation and writing and completing the RI Report. The field
activities portion of the project consisted of conducting an environmental investigation of the Rust
Spoil Area, SY-200 Yard, and SA-1 by implementing the RI Work Plan, which Ms. Bailey assisted in
writing. Ms. Bailey was responsible for procuring the subcontractor; preparing for, conducting, and
participating in SAIC and Y-12 Readiness Reviews; training personnel; mobilizing to the field;
working with technical procedures; and making technical decisions associated with the project tasks.
Ms. Bailey's responsibilities during the field effort also included managing field. personnel and
subcontractors; producing and controlling the project budget; interacting and communicating with the
Energy Systems Project Manager, technical personnel, and QA/QC personnel; and responding to and
participating in Y-12 and DOE field surveillances. After the field activities were completed, Ms.
Bailey was responsible for the preparation and completion of the RI Report, which included
coordinating all document preparation and data validation, evaluation, and interpretation efforts
between Y-12, SAIL, and FS personnel; developing, tracking, maintaining, and reporting the project
budget; and responding to Y-12, DOE, EPA, and TDEC document reviews through the Record of
Decision (ROD). This was the first RI to be completed and receive a ROD at the Y-12 Plant.
• Development of CERCLA RI Work Plans for DOE's Y-12 Plant and K-25 Site, in Oak Ridge,
Tennessee. The RIs included developing work plans to investigate groundwater, surface water,
sediment, and soil contaminated with radiological, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and metals
[including mercury, asbestos, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) wastes] for the Y-12 Plant's
BCV OUs 1, 2, and 4 and Upper East Fork Poplar Creek (UEFPC) OU3, and the K-25 Site K-770
OU. Two of the project tasks included developing schedules for the RI/FS through the Interim Record
of Decision (IROD), work plan implementation schedules, and cost estimates.
• Geologist supervising and participating in field activities to support DOE's Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant
East Fork Poplar Creek/Sewer Line Beltway RCRA/CERCLA/National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Assessment Phase 1B Project. Responsibilities for this project included functioning as field
team leader and activity oversight; collecting soil,surface water, and stream sediment samples;
sediment mapping; and data log entry. During this project, Ms. Bailey participated in a community
relations project by teaching in the 1992 Oak Ridge Summer Science Environmental Education Pilot
Program. She also assisted in the preparation of the RI/FS report for the project.
January 1990 to August 1991, Tenera, L.P., Geologist. As a geologist with the Environmental Services
Division in Knoxville, Tennessee, Ms. Bailey was involved with hazardous waste site investigations and
Remediation projects in which she was responsible for supervision of field activities and groundwater
monitoring well installation, and groundwater and soil sampling. She served as project manager for Phase
I and Phase II environmental site assessment projects and due diligence property audits for commercial
and corporate clients. Responsibilities included performing site walkovers, data searches, and tracking
project costs. Her duties also included aiding clients in environmental regulatory compliance.
January 1989 to January 1990, Engineering, Design, and Geosciences Group, Inc. (EDGe),
'Geologist. While with EDGe in Knoxville, Tennessee, Ms. Bailey functioned as a project hydrologist
where she supervised and participated in field activities to support RCRA Closure Activities for the
Burial Grounds and Oil Landfarm at the DOE's Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Activities on this project included supervision of QA/QC groundwater monitoring well plug and
abandonment activities, H&S monitoring for VOCs, maintaining field logs, and preparing abandonment
reports. She supervised activities to support the Chestnut Ridge Landfill Extension H project at the
Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant. These activities included installation of unconsolidated and bedrock groundwater
monitoring wells using air rotary drilling, preparing and maintaining field logs and monitoring well
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-15

development records, and preparing detailed lithologic and monitoring well construction logs. Ms. Bailey
also supervised and participated in field activities to support RCRA groundwater investigation activities
at Oak Ridge National.Laboratory. During this project, activities included installation of unconsolidated -
and bedrock groundwater monitoring wells using auger and air rotary drilling methods in conjunction
with drill cutting containment boxes, logging and collecting split -spoon samples, preparing and
maintaining field logs and monitoring well development records, and preparing detailed lithologic and
monitoring well construction logs.
August 1987 to December 198% Soil & Material Engineering (S&ME)/Westinghouse
Environmental Services (WES), Hydrogeologist. During her employment with WES in Columbia,
South Carolina, Ms. Bailey served as staff hydrologist/technician where she conducted and participated in
field activities to support investigations at hazardous waste and UST sites following South Carolina
Department of Health and Environmental Conservation (SCDHEC) regulations. Her responsibilities
included monthly and quarterly surface and groundwater sampling, groundwater monitoring well
development, aquifer hydraulic conductivity tests (slug and pump tests) and calculations, site health and
safety officer, field equipment manager, and maintaining computer data bases.
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS:
Professional Geologist — State of Tennessee, TN0586, 1992
State of Georgia, 001530, 1999
State of Florida, 2132, 2000
State of North Carolina, Pending Approval August 2003
SPECIAL TRAINING:
DOE Security L Clearance.
East Tennessee Technology Park Worker Access Training, Module No. 21221, December 21, 1999.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Technical and Professional Training Course,
Risk -Based Corrective Action for Underground Storage Tanks, February 1997.
40-hour Hazardous Waste Site Health and Safety Training Course, S&ME, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia;
September 21-25, 1987. Updated Annually.
Hazardous Communications, Respiratory Protection, and Hearing Protection Training, SAIC, March
1995.
Project Planning and Management System Training, January 1995.
Radiation Worker H Training; MK-Ferguson, Y-12 Plant, November 9, 1994.
Hazardous Waste Site. Supervisors and Managers Training, Roane State Community College,
September 24, 1993.
RCRA Hazardous and Mixed Waste Generators Training, Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.,
Y-12 Environmental Restoration, July 22, 1993.
PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS:
Hodges, Catherine. Allison, and Solt, E. M. 1987. Tidal Inlet Facies within the Hartselle Formation at
Cardwell Mountain, Warren County, Tennessee. Abstract and Presentation , Tennessee Academy of
Science, 1987.
03-209(FSP)(doc)1091703 D-16

SAIC ENGINEERING FIELD OPERATIONS MANAGER
CHUCK McNULTY
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-17

SAIC ENGINEERING FIELD OPERATIONS MANAGER
CHARLES M. MCNULTY, GEOLOGIST
EDUCATION:
B.S., Geology, 2001
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
WORK SUMMARY:
Mr. McNulty has over two years work experience as a geologist with a heavy emphasis on drilling
oversight for numerous environmental site investigations. The work has involved characterization of sites
impacted with various chemical constituents located mainly in the Southeast United States. He has
developed knowledge and experience in field investigative procedures for site characterization through a
variety of drilling and sample collecting techniques. He has extensive drilling management experience
with the following systems: RotoSonic, wireline coring, air rotary, reverse air, hollow -stem auger, and
Geoprobe®. His sample collection protocols and subsurface data acquisition experience includes discreet
groundwater sampling with inflatable packer systems and micropurge bladder sampling techniques, and
subsurface soil collection using split spoon and augering. Mr. McNulty has work experience at both
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) sites and has authored several deliverable
documents such as Data Summary Reports, Work Plans, and Quality Control Plans (QCPs).
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
May 2001 - Current, Geologist, Science Applications International Corporation
Mr. McNulty began employment with SAIC in May 2001 as a Geologist in the Engineering and
Environmental Management Group. He has supported field investigations for remedial investigations and
contaminant removal for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which included oversight of drilling and
monitoring well installation, soil and groundwater sampling, and underground storage tank (UST)
remediation and removal. Additionally, he has assisted in the preparation of remedial investigation (RI)
reports, Field Sampling and Analysis Plans (FSPs), Health and Safety Plans, Statements of Work, and
QCPs. Mr. McNulty also has been actively involved in planning and effecting mobilization efforts.
Recent projects include Field Operations Manager (FOM) and oversight of drilling and deep well
installation with RotoSonic drilling in Charlotte and Fort Bragg, North Carolina; FOM for RotoSonic
drilling, deep wireline coring, and discreet interval packer sampling in Charlotte, North Carolina; sight
geologist conducting reverse air drilling and well installation in the Everglades National Park, Florida;
oversight geologist conducting Geoprobe® soil and water collection, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, and
Dyersburg, Tennessee; oversight of installation of Flexible Liner Underground Technologies (FLUTem)
systems in Charlotte, North Carolina; and site safety and health officer for various other projects.
Mr. McNulty's current emphasis is on three separate work sites where he is the FOM'as well as the Site
Safety and Health Officer. He oversees the project from pre -planning stages to the completion of FSP
activities. He has also trained new employees in various field methods and operations, including drilling
oversight, allowing them to integrate into a successful team unit within SAIL.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-19

October 1999 - March 2000, Technician, Oak Ridge National Laboratories
Mr. McNulty worked independently to conduct field measurements of metals contaminants and data
collection from groundwater monitoring wells. He became proficient in the use of many environmental
types of equipment such as YSI multi -parameter probes, spectrometers, data loggers, and groundwater
pumping devices.
He prepared graphs, spreadsheets, and presentation slides for senior research efforts and coordinated the
ongoing maintenance of sensitive hydrologic equipment and supplies.
August 1975 — June 1995 Supervisor, U.S. Army
Mr. McNulty performed activities as supervisor and primary trainer in field medical and infantry units
throughout a 20-year military career. Mr. McNulty managed and directed up to 120 personnel in varying
capacities. His final assignment was as supervisor for an elite airborne Forward Surgical Team consisting
of 26 personnel, which included Medical Doctors, Nurses, and Medical Technicians.
PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND CERTIFICATIONS:
Registered Geologist, Sate of Tennessee .
40-hour HAZWOPER Certification, updated annually
8 hours Hazardous Waste Supervisor Training
CPR and First Aid Certified
COMPUTER PROFICIENCY:
Microsoft applications, including Word, Excel, Access, PowerPoint, and Project
Environmental Software such as AQTESOLV
Basic HTML writing
Various other software; including Harvard Graphics, PageMaker, and Lotus 123
MISCELLANEOUS:
Graduate of three U.S. Army Leadership Academies
Languages: Spanish and German
Member, National Groundwater Association
U.S. Department of Defense Hazardous Materials Transportation Training
Licensed Practical Nurse, State of Tennessee
Meritorious Service and other awards for service and performance
REFERENCES:
Matthew Vest, P.G., Section Supervisor: [phone]
Ken Swain, P.G., Project Manager: [phone]
Allison Bailey, P.G.: [phone]
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-20

SAIC ENGINEERING HEALTH AND SAFETY OFFICER
STEPHEN L. DAVIS
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-21

SAIC ENGINEERING HEALTH AND SAFETY OFFICER
STEPHEN LAMAR DAVIS, CIH, CSP
ASSISTANT VICE-PRESIDENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY SERVICES
EDUCATION:
University of South Carolina: M.S.P.H., Industrial Hygiene, 1983
Valdosta State College: B.S.; Zoology, 1975
SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE:
Mr. Davis has 20 years of experience in industrial hygiene and environmental health. This experience
includes research, program management, project management and line management. He has written or
reviewed hundreds of health and safety plans for remedial investigations and remedial actions involving
contaminants such as acidic sludge, dioxins, carbon disulfide, polychlorinated biphenyls, vinyl chloride,
benzene, partially buried unexploded ordnance, chemical warfare agents, uranium, etc. Tasks addressed in
these plans include excavation, incineration, monitoring well installation, slung wall installation, subsurface
soil sampling, surface soil sampling, groundwater sampling, surface water sampling, lake water sampling
from boats, macroinvertebrate sampling from boats, electrofishing, air sampling, waste lagoon sampling,
waste treatability studies, underground storage tank removal, etc. He has served as site health and safety
officer for remedial projects involving PCBs, dioxins, gasoline, acid wastes, and miscellaneous solvents. He
has delivered dozens of hazardous waste safety and emergency response training courses for clients such as
the U.S. Navy, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, state of California,
state of Nevada, Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Boeing, Hughes Aircraft, etc. He, has also spoken at
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)-sponsored meetings on protective clothing
performance, at American Board of Industrial Hygiene sponsored meetings on hazardous waste and at
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) -sponsored meetings on design and construction issues at
hazardous waste sites.
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY:
Mr. Davis manages the health and safety program for the Engineering and Environmental Management
Group. Activities include interpreting regulations, setting health and safety policy, performing training,
tracking performance of the program, writing or reviewing procedures and health and safety plans,
conducting accident investigations, auditing field projects, and providing services to clients. Previous
experience includes managing a consulting program delivering health and safety program audits, health and
safety training, field project health and safety oversight, job hazard analyses, and occupational exposure
monitoring. Examples of experience include:
• Developed SAIC/EEMG-specific HAZWOPER Refresher and Supervisor courses for presentation to
SAIC staff. These courses incorporate the tasks and hazards associated with work for the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USAGE). These courses also incorporate lessons learned from USACE fieldwork
as a basic course module.
• Developed baseline Site Safety and Health Plans (SSHPs) to be used in preparing SSHPs for multiple
USACE districts. These baseline documents were prepared with the intent of incorporating relevant
portions of EM 385-1-1, "U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Safety and Health Requirements Manual,"
into SAIC's standard field practices. These baseline documents have been used to prepare dozens of
SSHPs for USACE projects in locations over much of the continental United States.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-23

• Managed a project to deliver health and safety support to the USACE, Omaha District. This included
project managemw�s� and on -site participation in a project that delivered a range of health and safety
services to USACJ: , at the Bruin Lagoon Superfund Site. The acid sludge disposal site was being
remediated by excavating the sludge, mixing it with lime and soil, and burying the mix on -site. Services
consisted of health and safety oversight of the remedial contractor, general health and safety technical
advice, on -site monitoring with four real-time instruments mounted on an all -terrain vehicle, and
installation and maintenance of a real-time data logging system to collect and store results from multiple
hydrogen sulfide and hydrogen chloride sensors installed at the site perimeter. The data logging system
was equipped with alarms that notified the USACE Contract Officer Representative when pre-set
emission levels were exceeded. Following .project completion the general results of the air monitoring
program were published and presented, with USACE and EPA input and approval, at the EPA Design
and Construction Conference.
Fort Bliss Army Post. Managed and participated in a project to perform hundreds of job hazard analyses
at the Fort Bliss Army Post for AIR -HAS (HAZWRAP). On -site work consisted of interviewing, army
personnel, observing operations, inventorying chemicals, assessing the nature and severity of potential
exposures, and identifying issues that needed immediate attention. The project also included reducing
the data to Army codes and entering the accumulated data into the Army's Health Hazard Information
Module database.
• On -site health and safety support for slurry wall construction. Served as the site health and safety officer
for a remedial action conducted for a commercial client in Detroit, Michigan. The remedial action
consisted of construction of a slurry wall and clay cap at a site contaminated with various industrial
solvents.
• On -site health and safety support for PCB remediation. Served as SHSO on a project involving removal
of PCBs from a bank building following a transformer fire. On -site activities began during fire -fighting
and extended through site cleanup. Activities included training, specifying protective clothing,
collecting air samples, collecting surface wipe samples, and monitoring remediation activities. The
results of the air and wipe sampling were used to determine when building occupants could return.
• On -site health and safety support for dioxin remediation. Served as SHSO on a project involving
remediation of dioxin contamination at a former herbicide plant. Project activities included excavation,
building demolition, and transportation of dioxin contaminated materials. Project hazards included
working at heights, temperature stress, power tool use, heavy equipment use, and unsafe walking
surfaces.
• Industrial hygiene support for remedial investigation on the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Feed
Materials Production Center, Fernald, Ohio. The primary objective of this activity was to attain
compliance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.120, the Hazardous Waste Operations and
Emergency Response standard. Site contaminants included uranium, technetium, thorium, kerosene, and
trichloroethylene. Activities included detailed on -site hazard assessment, coordination with DOE
representatives, air monitoring, and production of over 20 task -specific health and safety plans.
• Remedial investigation health and safety plan for K-25 Site. Prepared the Health and Safety Plan for the
K-901 Operable Unit Remedial Investigation at the K-25 Site. The Health and Safety Plan was written
to address the hazards and controls for tasks including surface and subsurface soil sampling, surface and
subsurface water sampling, monitoring well installation, pond sediment sampling from boats, biota
sampling, electrofishing, and excavation. Site contaminants included uranium, lead, and various organic
solvents. It is organized in the format specified in the "Annotated Outlines for Documents Required by
FFA and CERCLA for Oak Ridge Reservation Sites" (DOE 1993).
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-24

• Hazardous waste training. Presented over fifteen 24-hour SARA/OSHA hazardous waste safety courses
at DOE's K-25 Site. These courses consisted of modules developed by the K-25 Site training staff and
included site -specific hazards, alarms, and programs.
• Developed and delivered asbestos abatement worker training to meet the New Jersey asbestos
abatement regulations. The course was specifically created to satisfy the stringent state requirements. A
total of 11 presentations were made.
Managed and participated in the development and delivery (over 20 sessions) of the 3-day "Hazard
Appraisal and Recognition Planning" course for the California Department of Health Services. This
course is the basic health and safety training for the hazardous waste compliance officers. It was
developed to meet the specific needs of the sponsor and included training in preparation of program -
specific hazard assessment forms, use of program -specific monitoring instruments, and compliance with
program specific policies.
• Participated in the development and delivery of "Air Surveillance for Hazardous Materials," a 4-day
course conducted for the California Specialized Training Institute. The course was designed to enable
students to calibrate and operate commonly used real-time instruments. The program included detailed
interpretation of instrument readings in a variety of realistic field exercises.
• Participated in the development and presentation of the "Hazardous Substance Incident Response
Management Course" in 1983 for the Naval Energy and Environmental Support Activity, Port
Hueneme, California. The course was modeled on the EPA 36-hour, hazardous wastelemergency
response training program and was specifically tailored to meet the needs of the U.S. Navy. The first
phase consisted of coordination and development of the 400-page student manual. The second phase
included 25 presentations of the 1-week course at sites, including Kaneohe Bay, Pearl Harbor, Norfolk,
Charleston, Washington, D.C., Guam, Treasure Island, Oakland, Philadelphia, San Diego, and Port
Hueneme. Mr. Davis continued to participate in this program in various roles, including program
manager and lecturer, over the next several years. During these years the course was altered to meet
changing Navy needs and to include additional Navy -specific information. The total number of
presentations delivered by Mr. Davis for the U.S. Navy exceeds 50.
SECURITY CLEARANCE:
Department of Energy Q clearance (inactive)
REGISTRATION AND CERTIFICATIONS:
Certified in the Comprehensive Practice of Industrial Hygiene by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene
(#4213)
Certified Safety Professional by the Board of Certified Safety Professionals (#10044)
PROFESSIONAL
American Academy of Industrial Hygiene
American Industrial Hygiene Association - Current member of Local Sections Council and current president
of Tennessee Valley Section
American Society of Safety Engineers
American Society for Testing and Materials - Former member, Committee F-23 on Protective Clothing
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-25

American Society for Testing and Materials - Former member, Task Force on Environmental Suit -
Standardization ( �}
Hazardous Waste Action Coalition - Current member, Health and Safety Subcommittee -
PUBLICATIONS:
Davis, Stephen L., 1985, "Permeation Testing of Protective Gloves Exposed to Selected High Hazard
Pesticides," report prepared under EPA contract number 68-03-3069, IT Corporation, Edison,
New Jersey.
Davis, S. L., C. E. Feigley, and G. A. Dwiggins, 1984, "A Comparison of Two Methods Used to Measure
Permeation of Glove Materials by a Complex Organic Mixture," American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) Special Technical Publication, First International ASTM Symposium on the
Performance of Protective Clothing.
Davis, S. L., and B. Khona, 1991, "Airborne Exposure Control at an Acid Sludge Remedial Site," published
in the proceedings of U.S.EPA conference, Design and Construction Issues at Hazardous Waste Sites.
TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS:
Davis, Stephen L., 1983, "Permeation of Glove Materials by Liquefied Coal," Carolina's Section, American
Industrial Hygiene Association, Asheville, North Carolina.
Davis, Stephen L., 1985, "Industrial Hygiene Assessment for Initial Entry into Hazardous Waste Sites,"
Joint Conference of Occupational Health (JCOH), Orlando, Florida, 1985.
Davis, Stephen L., 1983, "A Comparison of Two Methods Used to Measure Permeation of -Glove Materials
by a Complex Organic Mixture," Carolina's Section, American Industrial Hygiene Association,
Asheville, North Carolina.
Davis, Stephen L., 1991, "Airborne Exposure Control at an Acid Sludge Remedial Site," U.S. EPA
Conference, Design and Construction Issues at Hazardous Waste Sites.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 D-26

APPENDIX E
PRODUCT INFORMATION
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 E_ 1

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)/091703 E_2

M
w
Reductive PCE
Dechlorination
Pathway TCE
H
1,1 - DCE Cis - 1,2 - DCE
H
H H V H
�vl,
Vinyl Chloride
�N
' H � H
Ethene
H H
7
H V H
Chlorine Atom
®
Cwbon Atom
OHydrooen
Atom
Single Chemical
sand
_
_
Double Chemical
Bona
40%
trans - 1,2 - DCE
H
H
Cf
Complete Mineralization
H H m
Ethane
H H
H H Modified from
Medemeler at at., 1996
H H
Figure 1. Reductive Dechlorination Pathway

WI LCLEARTM
Sodium Lactate
For Bioremediation Applications
Description JRW Technologies' WILCLEARTM Sodium Lactate for bioremediation is a clear, slightly
viscous liquid that is 60% solids by weight in USP purified water. WILCLEARTM
Sodium Lactate provides the
lowest\ metals content, as measured by a nationally
recognized analytical laboratory, of any sodium lactate available and exceeds US
Pharmacopoeia standards. It is
the only sodium lactate that meets all primary MCL's
(maximum contaminant levels)
for drinking water in a 60% form, thus minimizing
concern for underground injection.
Specification Typical
Specifications Sodium Lactate, % by wt.
60 + 1.2 60 + 0.5
HZO
40+1.2 40+0.5
pH
7.0+0.5 6.8-7.2
Color,'APHA
25 max. 10
Iron, ppm
2 max <5
Specific Gravity
1.3100-1.3400
Citrate, Oxalate,
Phosphate, Tartrate
none detected
Sulfate
none detected
Sugars
none detected
Sodium, %
12.3 + 0.2
Odor
Practically odorless
Applications WILCLEARTm Sodium Lactate is used to enhance the microbial activity in situ for
biodegradation and reduction of chlorinated solvents. Technical support for
bioremediation applications is provided through an exclusive agreement with SRP
Technologies, developers of Bioavailability Enhancement Technology (B.E.T.TM), patent
pending).
Packaging 55 gallon (600 lbs. Net) Polyethylene Drums; 2.850 lb IBC's\'
Storage Store unopened under dry conditions at ambient temperatures.
5101 r
E-4

WILCLEAR
REPORT (1)
MSDS#: 955 Status: Current
status Date: 08/03/2001
Product Name: SODIUM LACTATE 60% SOLUTION, U.S.P.
Current Company Information:
FERRO PFANSTIEHL LABORATORIES, INC.
1219 Glen Rock Avenue
Waukegan, IL 60085
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Emergency: 847-623-0370
Current Company Short Name:
Manufacturer:
PFANSTIEHL LABORATORIES, INC.
1219 Glen Rock Avenue
Waukegan, IL 600850439
Phone: [phone] Emergency: 847-623-0370
supplier:
7RW Technologies, INC.
14321 W. 96TH TERRACE
LENEXA, KS 66215.
Fax: [phone] Emergency: 913-438-5544
MSDS Prepared: 12/07/1994
MSDS Revised: 08/03/2001.
Formula: CH3-CHOH-COONa
Keyword: ORGANIC ACID SALT
stock Item(s):
S-110-2
�•'tri:#kki'.c�k'i it it �•ir sir itk ki:•� �i:irk#'Xt�'ar�is�Y: *it Y: '.: �•:t': '.r�:t ;c irtt. �:t::•'.:::i:'.:iei:ie*�ierii it it it ?.:M 7e y: is': ie is it k'k'.t :r
Physical/Chemical Characteristics
Boiling Point: EQ 105 'C
Specific Gravity: EQ 1.323 H2o=1 @ 20 deg. C
Vapor Density: Air=1 NA
Evaporation Rate: NA
Melt/Freeze Point: NA
PH: ST 6.5 7.5
%.volatile: NA
Vapor.Pressure: NA
Pour Point: NA
Viscosity:.Cst NA
Molecular weight: EQ 112.07
Solubility In water: SOLUBLE
Appearance/Odor: CLEAR AND COLORLESS LIQUID, ODORLESS
Physical state: Liquid
.:..:: it i......:.....: k ,` f; :• ,: i.• ..............., .... t• k � .........................: i:.... :•r tr i. ,..........: ,•: i; is is is ........................., ..............
FIRE AND EXPLOSION DATA:
Closed CUP Flash Pt.: NA
open Cup Flash Point: NA
Auto Ignition: NA
Fire Point: NA
LEL/LFL: NA
UEL/UFL: NA
DOT INFORMATION:
DOT hazard Class: NA
Label: NA
Page 1
E-5

REPORT (1)
Proper Shipping Name: SODIUM LACTATE 60%
Preparers Info.: GREGORY A. KOLAR TITLE: DIRECTOR
SAFETY/ENVIRONMENTAL
�. ✓; J. J; J; h A J; J. J; J; J. .�. J. �; ..; J. �; J; J; J; J; .I; �. J; n �• t". �• t J: �: JC �: 5�. .. n n .. n .. .. .. .. .. .. J..!: '!: ':: �: ':: %':: ':: �: ':....: �: �: �. .... .. n .... ...... .... .. ............
COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Component Name: SODIUM LACTATE
Product: Yes Percent: EQ 60
CAS No.: 72-17-3
Exposure Limits
Limit Note: OSHA PPM: NA \ ACGIH PPM: NA \ OSHA STEL PPM: NA
Component Name: WATER
Percent: EQ 40
CAS NO.: 7732-18-5
Exposure Limits
Limit Note: OSHA PPM: NA \ ACGIH PPM: NA \ OSHA STEL PPM: NA
HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS/IDENTITY INFORMATION
Hazardous Components I OSHA PEL ACGIH TLV I Other Limits j °o
(optional) [specific Chemical I I Recommended
Identity: Common Name(s)] I I I
-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------
None I I I
I
I I I
J; J; �; J. �; �; .,.; �; ,; �: d: �: �: J; �: ;r:..,rc J: d: {: '.: '.: ':: Y: •;: ;:; :; '; '.: ': '::: J.: Y: J.: '.: s; J.: Y:': �..................... J.: �. �. � .;: i:'. J.: J.: is i::':..........:� J.: J.: J..................
FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA
Flash Point: NA Flammable Limits: NA I LEL:. NA UEL: NA
Extinguishing Media: water, Carbon Dioxide or Dry Chemical.
special Fire Fighting Procedures: wear self-contained breathing apparatus.
unusual Fire and Explosion Hazards: Fire may produce irritating or toxic
fumes.
REACTIVITY DATA
Stability: Stable. conditions to Avoid: NA
Incompatibility (Materials to Avoid): NA
Hazardous Decomposition or Byproducts: NA
Hazardous Polymerization: will not occur.
�. � J. J. J.J. �: �.- �: x :: �; J. J. e: �: �: �: t �: x �. � �. J.J. J. J; �; �. ;,; �:::.. �• �: d....: �- �- � :..., n ...::: �... �• � �: n .................... .... .................., n ., n
HEALTH HAZARD DATA
/;
Routes) of Entry: Inhalation? Yes Skin? NA Ingestion? Yes
Page 2
E-6

REPORT (1)
Health Hazards (Acute and chronic): No specific data. Low order of
toxicity The chemical, physical, and toxicological properties have not been
thoroughly investigated.
carcinogenicity: NTP? NA IARC Monographs? NA
TSCA Registered? Yes
Signs and symptoms of Exposure: NA
Medical Conditions Generally Aggravated by Exposure: NA
Emergency and First Aid Procedures:
SKIN:
In case of contact with skin, immediately wash with soap
removing contaminated clothing.
EYE:.
In case of contact with eyes, immediately flush eyes with
15 minutes, lifting eyelids during flushing to facilitate
medical attention if necessary.
INHALATION:
If inhaled, remove person from contaminated atmosphere to
INGESTION:
If swallowed, get medical attention.
PRECAUTIONS FOR SAFE HANDLING AND USE
OSHA Regulated? NA
and water while
water for at least
irrigation. Get
fresh air
Steps to Be Taken in Case Material is Released or spilled: Contain spill
and place material in drum for disposal. Dispose of according to all local,
state and federal regulations at an approved waste treatment facility.
Precautions to Be Taken in Handling and Storing: Store in cool, dry area to
preserve product quality.
Other Precautions: NA
{, ... �� �. �, �. �. �; s. ;,,. �; � ;.'..- ;; '.: '.: Y:'.::::: �-'.: t � � � '; '; ;•: '.:.;: '..'.: '.: is d: !: ': '.: i...., s +: d... .......... 'r �: ': '::k'.: is '::: is ': ': is � .... _ ......................
CONTROL MEASURES/PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Respiratory Protection (Specify Type): None.
ventilation: General ventilation: Is recommended.
Local Exhaust: Is recommended.
other: NA
Protective Gloves: Are recommended.
Eye Protection: Is recommended.
other Protective Clothing or Equipment: NA
work/Hygienic Practices: NA
END OF REPORT.
Page 3
E-7

Potassium Bromide, Crystal, Reagent, ACS
KBr F.W. 119.00 7758-02-3
Assay (KBr)
Min. 99.0%
pH of a 5% Solution @ 25°C
5.0-8.8
MAXIMUM LIMITS
Insoluble Matter
0.005%
Bromate (BrO3)
0.001%
Iodate (103)
0.001%
Chloride (CI)
0.2%
Iodide (1)
0.001%
Nitrogen Compounds (as N)
0.005%
Sulfate (SO4)
0.005%
Barium (Ba)
0.002%
Heavy Metals (as Pb)
5 ppm
Iron (Fe)
5 ppm
Calcium (Ca)
0.002%
Magnesium (Mg)
0.001%
Sodium (Na)
0.02%
Shipping Information
150 lb
Storage Information
HYGROSCOPIC: Keep tightly closed.
•
•
E-8

%PECTRUMg
Material Safety Data Sheet
Personal Protective Equipment
ISee Section 15.
1. Chemical Product and Company Identification Page Number: 1
me/ Potassium bromide
e
Catalog P1220, P1230
Number(s).
CAS# 7758-02-3
er SPECTRUM LABORATORY PRODUCTS INC.
14422 S. SAN PEDRO STREET
GARDENA, CA 90248
[hemical
RTECS TS7650000
TSCA TSCA 8(b) inventory:
Potassium bromide
Name(s) Not available.
CI# Not applicable.
Bromide salt of Potassium; Tripotassium tribromide
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
CHEMTREC (24hr) 800424-9300
CALL [phone]
ame Potasium Bromide
heroical Family Salt.
Chemical Formula KBr
Supplier SPECTRUM LABORATORY PRODUCTS INC.
14422 S. SAN PEDRO STREET
GARDENA, CA 90248
Section 2.Composition and Information on Ingredients
Exposure Limits
Name
CAS #
TWA (mg/m')
STEL (mg/m')
CEIL (mg/m')
% by Weight
1) Potassium bromide
7758-02-3
100
Toxicological Data Potassium bromide:
on Ingredients ORAL (LD50): Acute: 3070 mg/kg [Rat]. 3120 mg/kg [Mouse].
Section 3. Hazards Identification
Potential Acute Health Effects Slightly hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of eye contact (irritant), of ingestion, of inhalation
Potential Chronic Health CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available.
Effects MUTAGENIC EFFECTS: Not available.
TERATOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available.
DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY: Not available.
The substance is toxic to the nervous system.
The substance may be toxic to central nervous system (CNS).
Repeated or prolonged exposure to the substance can produce target organs damage.
Continued on Next Page E-9 I

Potassium bromide Page Number. 2
Section 4. First Aid Measures
Eye Contact
Check for and remove any contact lenses. In case of contact, immediately flush eyes with plenty of water for at.
least 15 minutes. Cold water may be used. Get medical attention if irritation occurs.
Skin Contact
Wash with soap and water. Cover the irritated skin with an emollient. Get medical attention if irritation develops.
Cold water may be used.
Serious Skin Contact
Not available.
Inhalation
If inhaled, remove to fresh air. If not breathing, give artificial respiration. If breathing is difficult, give oxygen. Get
medical attention.
Serious inhalation
Not available.
Ingestion
Do NOT induce vomiting unless directed to do so by medical personnel. Never give anything by mouth to an
unconscious person. Loosen tight clothing such as a collar, tie, belt or waistband. Get medical attention if
symptoms appear.
Serious Ingestion
Not available.
Section 5. Fire and Explosion Data
Flammability of the Product
Non-flammable.
Auto -Ignition Temperature
Not applicable.
Flash Points
Not applicable.'
Flammable Limits
Not applicable.
I .
Products of Combustion
Not available.
Fire Hazards in Presence of
Not applicable.
Various Substances
Explosion Hazards in Presence Non -explosive in presence of open flames and sparks, of shocks, of heat.
of Various Substances
Fire Fighting Media
Not applicable.
and Instructions
Special Remarks on
Not available.
Fire Hazards
Special Remarks on Explosion
Not available.
Hazards
Section 6. Accidental Release Measures
Small Spill
Use appropriate tools to put the spilled solid in a convenient waste disposal container. Finish cleaning by
spreading water on the contaminated surface and dispose of according to local and regional authority
requirements.
Large Spill
Use a shovel to put the material into a convenient waste disposal container. Finish cleaning by spreading water
on the contaminated surface and allow to evacuate through the sanitary system.
Continued on Next Page E-10

' Potassium bromide Page Number. 3
Section 7. Handling and Storage
;Precautions
Do not ingest. Do not breathe dust. If ingested, seek medical advice immediately and show the container or the
label. Keep away from incompatibles such as oxidizing agents, acids.
Storage
Keep container tightly closed. Keep container in a cool, well -ventilated area.
Section 8. Exposure Controls/Personal Protection
Engineering Controls
Use process enclosures, local exhaust ventilation, or other engineering controls to keep airborne levels below
recommended exposure limits. If user operations generate dust, fume or mist, use ventilation to keep exposure to
airborne contaminants below the exposure limit.
Personal Protection Safety glasses. Lab coat. Dust respirator. Be sure to use an approved/certified respirator or equivalent. Gloves.
Personal Protection in Case of Splash goggles. Full suit. Dust respirator. Boots. Gloves. A self contained breathing apparatus should be used
a Large Spill to avoid inhalation of the product. Suggested protective clothing might not be sufficient; consult a specialist
BEFORE handling this product.
Exposure Limits
Not available.
tion 9. Physical and Chemical Properties
l state and appearance
Solid. (Crystalline solid. Crystals solid.)
Odor Odorless.
Taste Saline. Bitter. Pungent. (Strong.)
lar Weight
[Bng
119 g/mole
Color White.
soln/water)
7 [Neutral.]
Point
1435°C (2615°F)
felting Point
730°C (1346°F)
Critical Temperature
Not available.
Specific Gravity
2.75 (Water = 1)
Vapor Pressure
Not applicable.
Vapor Density
Not available.
Volatility
Not available.
Odor Threshold
Not available.
Water/Oil Dist. Coeff.
Not available.
Tonicity (in Water)
Not available.
Dispersion Properties
See solubility in water.
Solubility
Easily soluble in cold water, hot water.
Slightly soluble in diethyl ether.
Insoluble in acetate.
Solubility in water: 1 g/1.5 ml
Solubiltiy in boiling water: 1 g/1 ml
Solubility in alcohol: 1 g/250 ml
Solubility in boiling alcohol: 1g 21 ml
Continued on Next Page E-11 I

Potassium bromide
Page Number., 4
Section 10. Stability and Reactivity Data
Stability
The product is stable.
Instability Temperature
Not available.
Conditions of instability
Incompatible materials, moisture
Incompatibility with various
Reactive with oxidizing agents, acids.
substances
Corrosivity
Non -corrosive in presence of glass.
Special Remarks on
Hygroscopic; keep container tightly closed.
Reactivity
Incompatible with heavy metal salts. Reacts violently with bromine trifluoride
Special Remarks on
Not available.
Corrosivity
Polymerization
Will not occur.
Section 11. Toxicological Information
Routes of Entry
Inhalation. Ingestion.
Toxicity to Animals
Acute oral toxicity (LD50): 3070 mg/kg [Rat].
Chronic Effects on Humans
Causes damage to the following organs: the nervous system.
May cause damage to the following organs: central nervous system (CNS).
Other Toxic Effects on
Slightly hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of ingestion, of inhalation.
Humans
Special Remarks on
Not available.
Toxicity to Animals
Special Remarks on
May affect genetic material (mutagenic)
Chronic Effects on Humans
Special Remarks on other
Acute Potential Health Effects:
Toxic Effects on Humans
Skin: May cause skin irritation.
Eyes: May cause eye irritation.
Inhalation: May cause respiratory tract irritation.
Ingestion: Causes gastrointestinal tract irritation (gastritis) with vomiting, diarrhea. It may also affect the urinary
system/kidneys (anuria, acute nephroisis, uremia, kidney hemolysis, fatty degeneratioin of the kidney, kidney
damage), liver (fatty liver degeneration. It may affect the brain/central nervous system (central nervous
depression, halllucinations, psychosis, drowsiness, irritability, confusion, mania, ataxia, vertigo, mental
deterioration, somnolence), eyes (enlarge pupils with subnormal reaction to light, miosis, diplopia).
Section 12. Ecological Information
Ecotoxicity
Not available.
BOD5 and COD
Not available.
Products of Biodegradation
Possibly hazardous short term degradation products are not likely. However, long term degradation products may
arise.
Toxicity of the Products
The product itself and its products of degradation are not toxic.
of Biodegradation
Special Remarks on the
Not available.
Products of Biodegradation
Continued on Next Page E-12 I

Potassium bromide
Page Number., 5 I
Section 13. Disposal Considerations
1!Section
aste Disposal Waste must be disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local environmental
control regulations.
14. Transport Information
DOT Classification Not a DOT controlled material (United States).
Identification Not applicable.
Special Provisions for Not applicable.
Transport
DOT (Pictograms)
Section 15. Other Regulatory Information and Pictograms
Federal and State
Regulations
tr
TSCA 8(b) inventory: Potassium bromide
lliornia
oposition 65
arnings
ther Regulations
EINECS: This product is on the European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substances.
Other Classifications
WHMIS (Canada) CLASS D-2A: Material causing other toxic effects (VERY TOXIC).
DSCL (EEC) This product is not classified according S24/25- Avoid contact with skin and eyes.
to the EU regulations. S26- In case of contact with eyes, rinse
immediately with plenty of water and seek
medical advice.
S28- After contact with skin, wash immediately
with plenty of water.
HNUS (U.S.A.)
�� 1
Fire Hazard .;
Reactivity
National Fire Protection
Association (U.S.A.)
Flammability
Health Reactivity
Specific hazard
Personal Protection E
WHNUS (Canada)
(Pictograms)
T
DSCL (Europe)
(Pictograms)
Continued on Next Page E-13

Potassium bromide
TDG (Canada)
(Pictograms) 0
ADR (Europe)
(Pictograms)
Page Number: 6
Protective Equipment Gloves.
I, Lab coat.
T
Dust respirator. Be sure to use an
W
approved/certified respirator or
equivalent. Wear appropriate respirator
when ventilation is inadequate.
Safety glasses.
Section 16. Other Information
MSDS Code P4190
References Not available.
Other Special Not available.
Considerations
Validated by Sonia Owen on 6/2/2003.
Verified by Sonia Owen.
Printed 6/27/2003.
CALL [phone]
Notice to Reader
All chemicals may pose unknown hazards and should be used with caution. This Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) applies only to the material as packaged If this product is
combined with other materials, deteriorates, or becomes contaminated, it may pose hazards not mentioned in this MSDS It shall be the user's responsibility to develop proper methods
of handling and personal protection based on the actual conditions of use. While this MSDS is based on technical data judged to be reliable, Spectrum Quality Products, Inc. assumes
no responsibilityfor the completeness or accuracy of the information contained herein.
E-14

SPECTRUM`R'
Material Safety Data Sheet
NFPA
HMIS
Personal Protective Equipment
fiY
Health t•Isrard 2
U .
Reactivity O
See Section 15.
Section 1. Chemical Product and Company Identification
Page Number. 1
Common Name/
Trade Name
Sodium bromide
Catalog,
Number(s).
S1195, S1197
CAS#
7647-15-6
Manufacturer
SPECTRUM LABORATORY PRODUCTS INC.
14422 S. SAN PEDRO STREET
GARDENA, CA 90248
R1TCS
VZ3150000
TSCA
TSCA 8(b) inventory: Sodium
bromide
Commercial Name(s)
Not available.
Cl#
Not available.
Synonym
Bromide salt of sodium
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
CIIEMTREC (24hr) 800424-9300
CALL [phone]
Chemical Name Sodium Bromide
Chemical Family Not available.
Chemical Formula NaBr
Supplier
SPECTRUM LABORATORY PRODUCTS INC.
14422 S. SAN PEDRO STREET
GARDENA, CA 90248
Section 2.Composition and Information on Ingredients
Exposure Lindis
Name
GAS #
TNVA (mg/m')
STEI. (mg/m')
CF.II, (mg/m)
% by Weight
1) Sodium bromide
7647-15-6
100
Toxicological Data Sodium bromide:
on Ingredients ORAL (LD50): Acute: 3500 mg/kg [Rat]. 7000 mg/kg [Mouse].
1 Section 3. Hazards Identification I
Potential Acute Health Effects Hazardous in case of eye contact (irritant), of ingestion, of inhalation. Slightly hazardous in case of skin contact
(irritant).
Potential Chronic Health CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available.
Effects MUTAGENIC EFFECTS: Not available.
TERATOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available.
DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY: Not available.
Repeated or prolonged exposure is not known to aggravate medical condition.
Continued on Next Page E-15

Sodium bromide
Page Number. 2
Section 4. First Aid Measures
Eye Contact
Check for and remove any contact lenses. In case of contact, immediately flush eyes with plenty of water for at
least 15 minutes. Cold water may be used. Get medical attention.
Skin Contact
Wash with soap and water. Cover the irritated skin with an emollient. Get medical attention if irritation develops.
Cold water may be used.
Serious Skin Contact
Not available.
Inhalation
If inhaled, remove to fresh air. If not breathing, give artificial respiration. If breathing is difficult, give oxygen. Get
medical attention.
Serious Inhalation
Not available.
Ingestion
Do NOT induce vomiting unless directed to do so by medical personnel. Never give anything by mouth to an
unconscious person. Loosen tight clothing such as a collar, tie, belt or waistband. Get medical attention if
symptoms appear.
Serious Ingestion
Not available.
Section 5. Fire and Explosion Data
Flammability of the Product
Non-flammable.
Auto -Ignition Temperature
Not applicable.
Flash Points
Not applicable.
Flammable Limits
Not applicable.
i
Products of Combustion
Not available.
Fire Hazards in Presence of
Not applicable.
Various Substances
Explosion Hazards in Presence
Risks of explosion of the product in presence of mechanical impact: Not available.
of Various Substances
Risks of explosion of the product in presence of static discharge: Not available.
Fire Fighting Media
Not applicable.
and Instructions
Special Remarks on
Not available.
Fire Hazards
Special Remarks on Explosion
Not available.
Hazards
Section 6. Accidental Release Measures
Small Spill
Use appropriate tools to put the spilled solid in a convenient waste disposal container. Finish cleaning by
spreading water on the contaminated surface and dispose of according to local and regional authority
requirements.
Large Spill
Use a shovel to put the material into a convenient waste disposal container. Finish cleaning by spreading water
on the contaminated surface and allow to evacuate through the sanitary system.
Continued on Next Page E-16

Sodium bromide
Page Number: 3
Section 7. Handling and Storage
Precautions
Do not ingest. Do not breathe dust. Avoid contact with eyes. Wear suitable protective clothing. In case of
insufficient ventilation, wear suitable respiratory equipment. If ingested, seek medical advice immediately and
show the container or the label. Keep away from incompatibles such as oxidizing agents, acids.
Storage
Keep container tightly closed. Keep container in a cool, well -ventilated area. Do not store above 25°C (77°F).
Section & Exposure Controls/Personal Protection
Engineering Controls
Use process enclosures, local exhaust ventilation, or other engineering controls to keep airborne levels below
recommended exposure limits. If user operations generate dust, fume or mist, use ventilation to keep exposure to
airborne contaminants below the exposure limit.
Personal Protection
Personal Protection in Case of
a Large Spill
Splash goggles. Lab coat. Dust respirator. Be sure to use an approved/certified respirator or equivalent.
Gloves.
Splash goggles. Full suit. Dust respirator. Boots. Gloves. A self contained breathing apparatus should be used
to avoid inhalation of the product. Suggested protective clothing might not be sufficient; consult a specialist
BEFORE handling this product.
Exposure Limits
Not available.
Section 9. Physical and Chemical Properties
Physical state and appearance
Solid.
Odor Not available.
Taste Not available.
Molecular Weight
102.91 g/mole
Color Not available.
pH (l % soln/water)
6.5-8.0
Boiling Point
1390°C (2534°F)
Melting Point
755°C (1391°F)
Critical Temperature
Not available.
Specific Gravity
3.21 (Water = 1)
Vapor Pressure
Not applicable.
Vapor Density
Not available.
Volatility
Not available.
Odor Threshold
Not available.
Water/Oil Dist. Coeff.
Not available.
tonicity (in Water)
Not available.
Dispersion Properties
See solubility in water, methanol.
Solubility
Easily soluble in cold water, hot water.
Soluble in methanol.
1 g dissolves in 1.1 ml of water.
1 g dissolves in about 16 ml of alcohol.
1 g dissolves in 6 ml of methanol
Continued on Next Page E-17

Sodium bromide
Page Number: 4
Section 10. Stability and Reactivity Data
Stability
The product is stable.
Instability Temperature
Not available.
Conditions of Instability
Incompatible materials, moisture
Incompatibility Frith various
Reactive with oxidizing agents, acids.
substances
Corrosivity,
Non -corrosive in presence of glass.
Special Remarks on
Absorbs moisture from the air but is not deliquescent. Hygroscopic.
Reactivity
Also incompatible with alkaloidal and heavy metal salts, and Bromine Trifluoride.
Special Remarks on
Not available.
Corrosivity
Polvmeiization
Will not occur.
Section 11. Toxicological Information
Routes of Entry
Inhalation. Ingestion.
Toxicity to Animals
Acute oral toxicity (LD50): 3500 mg/kg [Rat].
Chronic Effects on Humans
Not available.
Other Toxic Effects on "
Hazardous in case of ingestion, of inhalation.
Humans
Slightly hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant).
Special Remarks on
Not available.
Toxicity to Animals
Special Remarks on
May cause adverse reproductive effects (male and female effects on fertility and effects on newborns and
Chronic Effects on Humans
fetotoxicity) based on animal data
Human: passes the placental barrier, detected in maternal milk.
Special Remarks on other
Acute Potential Health Effects:
Toxic Effects on Humans
Skin: May cause mild skin irritation.
Eyes: Causes eye irritation.
Inhalation: May cause respiratory tract irritation.
Ingestion: May cause gastrointestinal tract irritation with nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, constipation.
Bromide poisoning following acute ingestion is more rare and may affect the central nervous system (CNS
depression - somnolence, confusion, ataxia, coma and other symptoms similar to chronic ingestion),
cardiovascular system (hypotension, tachycardia), and respiration (respiratory distress). It may also cause eye
disturbances such as mydriasis, disturbances of apparent color of objects, blurring or indistinctness of vision,
apparent movement or wiggling and change in apparent size of objects, large pupils, subnormal reaction to light,
diplopia, and photophobia.
Chronic Potential Health Effects:
Skin: Prolonged or repeated skin contact may cause skin rashes.
Eyes: Prolonged or repeated eye contact may cause blepharitis, and conjunctivitis.
Prolonged or repeated ingestion may cause skin rashes (bromoderma, acne, pyoderma gangrenosum, erythema
multiforme), affect the liver, endocrine system (thyroid), metabolism(anorexia), blood and may produce a toxic
syndrome,, "Bromism" which may be characterized by behavior/central nervous symptoms such CNS depression,
irritability, headache, confusion, slurred speech, memory loss, lethargy, ataxia, tremor, agitation, delusion,
disoriented, paranoia, aggressiveness, hallucinations, mania, fatigue, seizure, neuropathy, muscle weakness,
coma).
Continued on Next Page E-18

Sodium bromide Page Number: 5
` Section 12. Ecological Information
Ecotoxicity Not available.
BOD5 and COD Not available.
Products of Biodegradation Possibly hazardous short term degradation products are not likely. However, long term degradation products may
arise.
Toxicity, of the Products The product Itself and its products of degradation are not toxic.
of Biodegradation
'Special Remarks on the Not available. I
Products of Biodegradation
Section 13. Disposal Considerations
ante Disposal Waste must be disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local environmental
control regulations.
' Section 14. Transport Information -
DOT Classification Not a DOT controlled material (United States).
Identification Not applicable.
Special ProAsions for Not applicable.
Transport
DOT (Pictograms)
\J
Section 15. Other Regulatory Information and Pictograms
Federal and State TSCA 8(b) inventory: Sodium bromide
Regulations /
65
Other Regulations EINECS: This product is on the European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substances.
Other Classifications WHMIS (Canada) Not controlled under WHMIS (Canada).
IDSCL(EEC) R36- Irritating to eyes. S2- Keep out of the reach of children.
HMIS (U.S.A.)
�4
Reactivity
Personal Protection
E
National Fire Protection
Association (U.S.A.)
S24/25- Avoid contact with skin and eyes.
S46- If swallowed, seek medical advice
immediately and show this container or label.
Flammability
Health` Reactivity
Specific hazard
Continued on Next Page E-19 I

Sodium bromide
Page Number: 6
VVHMIS (Canada)
(Pictograms)
DSCL (Europe)
(Pictograms)
TUG (Canada)
(Pictograms)
ADR (Europe)
(Pictograms)
Protective Equipment
Gloves.
0
0
Lab coat.
Dust respirator. Be sure to use an
approved/certified respirator or
equivalent.
Splash goggles.
Section 16. Other Information
MSDS Code S3750
References Not available.
Other Special Not available.
Considerations
Validated by Sonia Owen on 1/20/2003.
Verified by Sonia Owen.
Printed 1/22/2003.
CALL [phone]
Notice to Reader
Continued on Next Page
E-20

I Sodium bromide Page Number: 7 1
AR chemicals may pose unknown hazards and should be used with caution. This Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) applies only to the material as packaged If this product is
combined with other materials, deteriorates, or becomes contaminated, it may pose hazards not mentioned in this MSDS It shall be the user's responsibility to develop proper methods
of handling and personal protection based on the actual conditions of use While this MSDS is based on technical data judged to be reliable, Spectrum Quality Products, Inc. assumes
no responsibility for the completeness or accuracy of the information contained herein.
E-21

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209(FSP)(doc)l091703 E-22

FINAL
ADDENDUM #3 TO THE
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR THE
FEASIBILITY STUDY/REMEDIAL DESIGN
AT THE
FORMER NAVAL AMMUNITION DEPOT (NAD),
MECKLENBURG COUNTY,
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
r,
September 2003
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703

CONTENTS
TABLES................................................................................................................................................ iv
ACRONYMS......................................................................................................................................... iv
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...........................................................................................................1-1
2.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES...........................................................2-1
2.1 LABORATORY PROJECT MANAGER..............................................................................2-1
2.2 LABORATORY MANAGER...............................................................................................2-2
2.3 LABORATORY SECTION HEADS, DEPARTMENT MANAGERS, AND
TECHNICALLEADS..........................................................................................................2-2
3.0 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES.................................................................................................3-1
3.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES.....................................................................................................3-1
3.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE OBJECTIVES FOR MEASUREMENT DATA ...........................3-1
APPENDIX A REFERENCES............................................................................................................A-1
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703 iii

TABLES
1-1 Sampling and Analytical Requirements for the Focused Sampling Activities at the Former
NADSite....................................................................................................................................1-2
3-1 Groundwater Investigative DQO Summary for the Focused Sampling Activities at the
Former NAD Site, Charlotte, North Carolina............................................................................... 3-2
3-2 Project Quantitation and Action Levels for Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil and Water Using
SW-846 Methods 8260B/5030 and 8260B/5035(GC/MS)...........................................................3-4
3-3 Project Reporting Levels for Natural Attenuation Parameters in Soil and Water Using EPA Water
and Wastewater Methods or SW-846 Methods.............................................................................3-5
ACRONYMS
COC
chain of custody
DQO
data quality objective
EPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FSP
Field Sampling Plan
NAD
Naval Ammunition Depot
QA
quality assurance
QAPP
Quality Assurance Project Plan
QC
quality control
SAIC
Science Applications International Corporation
USACE
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703 iv

1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This portion of the addendum presents the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for the activities to be
performed at the Former Naval Ammunition Depot (NAD) Site, Charlotte, North Carolina. This QAPP
addendum supplements the QAPP presented in the Sampling and Analysis Plan for the Feasibility
Stud/Remedial Design at the Former Naval Ammunition Depot, Mecklenburg County, Charlotte, North
Carolina (SAIC 2000). It only presents changes to the QAPP as they relate to the Pilot Study at the
Former NAD Site. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and .the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) require that all environmental monitoring and measurement efforts mandated or supported
by these organizations participate in a centrally managed quality assurance (QA) program. Any party
generating data for this project has the responsibility of implementing minimum procedures to ensure that
the precision, accuracy, completeness, and representativeness of its data are known and documented. To
ensure that these responsibilities are uniformly met, each party must adhere to the QAPP.
This QAPP presents the organization, objectives, functional activities, and specific QA and quality control
(QC) activities associated with the Pilot Study at the Former NAD Site. Also presented are details
regarding data quality objectives (DQOs) for the activities. The specific protocols that will be followed for
sampling, sample handling and storage, preservation procedures for samples collected in the field, chain of
custody (COC), field and sample documentation, sample packaging and shipping, and laboratory analytical
procedures for all media sampled and laboratory analysis are presented in the QAPP (SAIC 2000).
Analytical activities and methodologies associated with chemical testing of QA split samples to be
performed by the government laboratory assigned to this project by the USACE—Savannah District are not
addressed within this QAPP.
The Field Sampling Plan (FSP) portion of the Work Plan contains the project description, background
information, sampling design, procedures, methods, and rationales. Table 1-1 of this QAAP presents a
summary of the sample matrix types, analytical parameters, and analytical methods to be used during the
field investigation. Appendix A of the QAAP presents the references used.
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703 1-1

N
Table 1-1. Summary of Sampling and Analytical Requirements for the Plot Study
Samples
QC Sam les
QA Samples'
Parameter
Analytical
Method
No. Primary
Samples
No.
Du licates
No.
Rinsates
No. Trip
Blanks
Total A-E
Samples
QA
Duplicates
QA Trip
Blanks
Total QA
Samples
VOC
SW-846
8260B/5030
116
12
6
10
144
12
10
22
COD
EPA 410.4
177
18
9
0
204
18
0
18
Alkalinity
EPA 310.1
105
11
5
0
121
0
0
0
Ammonia
EPA 350.2
105
11
5
0
121
11
0
11
Phosphate
EPA 365.1
105
11
5
0
121
11
0
11
Potassium
SW-846, 6010B
105
11
5
0
121
11
0
11
Nitrate
EPA 300.0
105
11
5
0
121
11
0
11
Nitrite
EPA 300.0
105
11
5
'0
121
11 .
0
11
Sodium
S W-846, 6010B
105
11
5
0
121
11
0
11
Sulfate
EPA 300.0
105
11
5
0
121
11
0
11
Methane
SW-8000
52
5
0
0
57
0
0
0
Bromide
EPA 300.0
5
1
1
0
7
0
0
0
Organic Acids G
HPLC
46
5
3
0
54
0
0
0
Ferrous Iron
Field Test Kit
147
15
0
0
162
0
0
0
Carbon dioxide
Field Test Kit
147
15
0
0
162
0
0
0
'Quality assurance samples are to be sent to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers -contracted laboratory, Accura Analytical Laboratories.
°Organic acids include acetic acid, lactic acid, butanoic acid, and propanoic acid.
COD = chemical oxygen demand.
DO = dissolved oxygen.
EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
HPLC = high-performance liquid chromatography.
NAD = Naval Ammunition Depot.
ORP = oxidation-reduction potential.
QA = quality assurance.
QC = quality control.
VOC = volatile organic compound.

2.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The primary project organizational structure and responsibilities for the Pilot Study are discussed in
Chapter 2.0 of the Field Sampling Plan (FSP). This portion of the QAPP focuses on the analytical
subcontract organization's structure and responsibilities. Fixed -based chemical laboratory support for this
investigation has been designated to a single subcontractor, Environmental Testing and Consulting, Inc.,
based on a competitive bidding process. The selected subcontract laboratory is validated by the USACE
Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Center of Expertise, Omaha, Nebraska. The relevant QA
manual, laboratory qualification statements, certifications, and license documentation are available.
Prism Laboratories, Inc., personnel and organizational management structures will be used for
implementation of these studies and will perform analysis of all primary and QC duplicates and field blank
samples. The responsibilities of key personnel are described in the following paragraphs. The assignment of
personnel to each position will be based on a combination of (1) experience in the type of work being
performed, (2) experience working with USACE personnel and procedures, and (3) a demonstrated
commitment to high quality and timely job performance.
Prior to commencement of field activities for the project, Science Applications International Corporation
(SAIC) Engineering will send a complete copy of the Work Plan, including this QAPP, to the subcontracted
laboratory. The address and telephone number for Prism are provided below.
Prism Laboratories, Inc.
449 Springbrook Road
Charlotte, NC 28217
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Point of contact: Angie Overcash
QA split samples will be collected by the sampling team and sent to the USACE QA Laboratory for
analysis to provide independent assessment of SAIC Engineering and contractor laboratory performance.
The address and telephone number for the USACE QA Laboratory are provided below.
Analytical Management Laboratories, Inc.
15130 South Keeler, Suite B
Olathe, KS 66062-2716
Telephone: [phone], ext. 26
Fax: [phone]
Point of contact: Vis Viswanathan
2.1 LABORATORY PROJECT MANAGER
The responsibilities of each Laboratory Project Manager include those listed below:
• Initiate and maintain contact with SAIC Engineering on individual job tasks.
• Prepare all laboratory -associated Work Plans, schedules, and manpower allocations.
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703 2-1

• Initiate all laboratory -associated procurement for the project.
• Provide day-to-day direction of the laboratory project team, including analytical department managers,
supervisors, QA personnel, and data management personnel.
• Coordinate all laboratory -related financial and contractual aspects of the project.
• Provide formatting and technical review of all laboratory reports.
• Provide day-to-day communication with the client.
• Exercise final review and approval on all laboratory analytical reports to the client.
• Respond to all post -project inquires.
2.2 LABORATORY MANAGER
The responsibilities of each laboratory's Laboratory Manager include those listed below:
• Coordinate all analytical production activities conducted within the analytical departments.
• Work with the Laboratory Project Manager to ensure that all project objectives are met.
• Provide guidance to analytical department managers.
• Facilitate transfer of data produced by the analytical departments to the report preparation and review
staff for final delivery to the client.
2.3 LABORATORY SECTION HEADS, DEPARTMENT MANAGERS, AND TECHNICAL
LEADS
The responsibilities of each laboratory section or department include those listed below:
• Coordinate all analytical functions related to specific analytical areas.
• Provide technical information to and oversight of all analyses being performed.
• Review and approve all analytical results produced by their specific analytical area of expertise.
• Maintain all analytical records and information pertaining to the analyses being performed.
Technical personnel will be responsible for preparation, extraction, and analysis of environmental and field
QC project samples in accordance with the requirements of the QAPP and this addendum
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703 2-2

- 3.0 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES
i
The overall project objective is to develop and implement procedures for field sampling, COC, laboratory
analysis, and reporting that will provide results to be used in site evaluation and assessment and that are
technically sound and defensible. Specific procedures for sampling, COC, laboratory instrument
calibration, laboratory analysis, reporting of data, internal QC, audits, preventive maintenance of field
equipment, and corrective action are described in the QAPP (SAIC 2000). The purpose of this section is to
address the specific objectives for the Pilot Study sampling activities for data accuracy, precision,
completeness, representativeness, and comparability.
DQOs are qualitative and quantitative statements that specify the quality of data required to support
decisions made during investigation activities and are based on the end uses of the data being collected.
3.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The Pilot Study will be conducted to evaluate the use of an electron donor for promoting reductive
dechlorination as a remedial approach at the site and to better understand the hydraulics near NAD
MW-2LThe Pilot Study will consist of an initial injection of a bromide tracer followed by 5 days of
continuous injection of sodium lactate solution.
The objectives of the Pilot Study include the following:
1. Install a transition zone well (SAIC 17) next to NAD MW-21 to serve as both an injection well for the
injection of bromide and sodium lactate and as a monitoring well.
2. Install two additional transition zone wells (SAIL 18 and SAIC 19) to assist in the evaluation of the
sodium lactate and bromide distribution in the focus area.
3. Install two additional bedrock wells (SAIC 20 and SAIC 21) downgradient of the projected flow path
to assist in the evaluation of the sodium lactate and bromide distribution.
4. Collect groundwater samples in the new and existing monitoring wells within the Pilot Study focus
area prior to injection to establish baseline conditions.
5. Inject potassium bromide in existing bedrock monitoring well NAD MW-21 and sodium bromide in
the newly installed transition zone well, SAIC 17.
6. Inject sodium lactate in NAD MW-21 and SAIC 17 over a 5-day period.
7. Perform monitoring activities over a 6-month period to evaluate the distribution of the bromide and
sodium lactate. Groundwater samples will be collected from monitoring wells within the Pilot Study
focus area bi-weekly for the first 2 months, with monthly sampling to occur during months 3
through 6 for a total of eight monitoring events.
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703 3-1

3.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE OBJECTIVES FOR MEASUREMENT DATA
An analytical DQO summary for this supplemental investigation is presented in Table 3-1. All QC -
parameters stated in the specific EPA SW-846 methods (EPA 1997) [i.e., % recoveries] will be adhered to
for each chemical listed. Laboratories are required to comply with all methods as written; recommendations
are considered to be requirements.
Table 3-1. DQO Summary for the Pilot Study at the Former NAD Site, Charlotte, North Carolina
Precision (RPD)'
Accuracy
Field
Lab
I
Sample
Analytical
Laboratory
Data Use
Type
Method
Du s
Du s
(MS)
Completeness
Determination
Discrete
EPA-120.1
<10 RPD
NA
± 0.1 µmhos/cm
95%
of basic water
conductivity
characteristics
EPA-170.1
<10 RPD
NA
±0.1°C
95%
Temperature
Turbidity meter
<10 RPD
NA
NA
95%
SW-8260B/5030
<30 RPD
<20 RPD
70 to 130%
90%
Confirmation of
Discrete
contamination
Volatile organics
recover
<30 RPD
<20 RPD
70 to 130%
90%
extent
recover
IDW
Composite
SW-5035/8260B
<30 RPD
<20 RPD
50 to 150%
90%
Volatile orgar
recover
°Relative% differences at values within five times the quantitation level comparison are acceptable if values are plus or minus
two times the quantitation level.
DQO = Data quality objective.
EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
FID = Flame ionization detector.
FS = Feasibility Study.
IDW = Investigation -derived waste.
MS = Matrix spike.
NA = Not applicable.
NAD = Naval Ammunition Depot.
PID = Photoionization detector.
ppm = parts per million.
RD = Remedial Design.
RPD = Relative% difference.
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703 3-2

In accordance with the new EPA guidance (1993), which now supersedes all other documents in this
discipline, the previously used analytical Levels I through V have been changed. These levels are now
divided into two categories: (1) screening data with definitive confirmation (replaces Levels I and II), and
(2) definitive data (replaces Levels III, IV, and V). Definitive data represent data generated under
laboratory conditions using EPA -approved procedures. Data of this type, both qualitative and quantitative,
are used for determination of source, extent, or characterization and to support evaluation of remedial
technologies.
General analytical objectives for this work are as listed below:
• To analyze samples using well-defined methods that will provide confident detection limits
that are accurate enough to determine the presence or absence of target analytes.
• To define precision and accuracy goals for data to provide defensible data.
• To specify QA/QC procedures for both field and laboratory methodology to meet the USACE
guidance document requirements.
It is anticipated that the Pilot Study activities will produce groundwater and investigation -derived waste
samples for analyses. Additional samples will be collected to complete field QC duplicate, field blank, and
QA split sample analyses. Specific numbers of samples are shown on Table 1-1. Tables 3-2 and 3-3
provide the project quantitation and action levels for the target analytes. Sampling procedures are discussed
in detail in Chapter 4 of the FSP addendum The Pilot Study activities have not affected the remaining
sections of the QAPP that include analytical procedures, sample custody and holding times, calibration
procedures and frequency, QC checks, calculation of data quality indicators, corrective actions, data
reduction, validation, and reporting, preventive maintenance procedures, performance and system audits,
and QA reports. These sections are discussed in detail in the QAPP (SAIC 2000).
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703 3-3

Table 3-2. Project Quantitation and Action Levels for Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil and Water
Using SW-846 Methods 826013/5030 and 8260B/5035 (GC/MS)
Compound
CAS
Registration
Number
PQL
Water
( )
Federal
SDWA
MCL°
( )
NC GW
StandardLO
( )
PQL Soil`
( )
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
71-55-6
1
200
5
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
1
0.17 i
5
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-00-5
1
5
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
75-35-3
1
--
700
5
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-34-4
1
7
7
5
1,2-Dibromoethane
106-93-4
1
0.0004
5
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
1
5
0.38
5
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
540-59-0
1
70.0
5
1,2-13ichloro ro ane
78-87-5
1
0.56
5
2-Butanone
78-93-3
10
170
20
2-Hexanone
591-78-6
10
280i
20
4-Meth 1-2- entanone
108-10-1
10
20
Acdtone
67-64-17
10
700
20
Benzene
71-43-2
1
5
1
5
Bromochloromethane
74-97-5
1
5
Bromodichloromethane
75-27-4
1
0.56
5
Bromoform
75-25-2
1
0.19
5
Bromomethane
74-83-9
1
5
Carbon disulfide
75-15-0
1
700
5
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
1
0.3
5
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
1
50
5
Chloroethane
75-00-3
1
2800
5
Chloroform
67-66-3
1
0.19
5
Chloromethane
74-87-3
1
2.6
5
Cis- 1,3-Dichloro ro ene
10061-01-5
1
0.19 (total)
5
Dibromochloromethane
124-48-1
1
0.41 i
5
Eth lbenzene
100-41-4
1
700
29
5
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
1
5
5
5
Styrene
100-42-5
1
100.0
5
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
1
5
0.7
5
Toluene
108-88-3
1
1000
1000
5
Trans- 1,3-Dichloro ro ene
10061-02-6
1
0.19 (total)
5
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
1
2.8
5
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4 1
1 1
2
0.015
5
X lenes (total)
1330-2-7 1
2 1
10,000
530
10
'U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) maximum contaminant level (MCL).
'North Carolina (NC) Groundwater (GW) Standards, Subchapter 2L (Title 15A, Section: 0202).
`Action levels for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detected in soil and sediment samples will be determined during the preparation of the
Feasibility Study report.
Note: Specific quantitation limits are highly matrix dependent; project reporting levels listed here are goals and may not always be
achievable. Due to the high inaccuracy and imprecision of values observed between the laboratory method detection levels and these
project reporting levels, values estimated below these reporting levels will not be reported.
CAS = Chemical Abstracts Service.
GC = Gas chromatograph.
i = Interim standard established by the NC Director of the Division of Water Quality. Effective May 24, 1999.
MS = Mass spectrometry.
PQL = Practical Quantitation Level.
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703 3-4

Table 3-3. Project Reporting Levels for Natural Attenuation Parameters in Soil and Water
Using EPA Water and Wastewater Methods or SW-846 Methods
Compound
CAS Registration
Number
Project Rep tin Levels
Water
(m )
Soil/Sediment
(mg/kg)
Ammonia-N (350.2)
0.1
--
Bromide (EPA 300.0)
0.1
Potassium (SW-846, 6010)
7440-09-7
0.2
--
Sodium (SW-846, 6010)
7440-22-4
0.2
--
Nitrate-N (EPA 300.0)
0.1
--
Nitrite-N (EPA 300.0)
0.1
--
Sulfate (EPA 300.0)
1.0
Phosphate (EPA 365.1)
0.2
Alkalinity (310.1)
NA
--
Chemical Oxygen Demand
(SM5220D)
1
--
Methane, Ethane, Ethene (SW-8000)
1.0
--
n-Butyric Acid
2.0
--
Lactic Acid
2.0
--
Acetic Acid
2.0
--
Pro ionic Acid
2.0
--
CAS = Chemical Abstracts Service.
EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703 3-5

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT' BLANK.
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703 3.6

APPENDIX A
REFERENCES
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)J091703 A-1

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703 A-2

REFERENCES
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) 1993. Data Quality Objectives Process, EPA-540-R-93-
071, September.
EPA 1997. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846, 3rd edition,
Revision 1, Update 2.
SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation) 2000. Sampling and Analysis Plan for the
Feasibility Study/Remedial Design at the Former Naval Ammunition Depot (NAD), Mecklenburg
County, Charlotte, North Carolina, August.
v
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703 A-3

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
03-209P(QAPP)(doc)/091703 A-4