Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20201232 Ver 1_401 Application_20201021DWR mrlslon of Water Resources Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1 Initial Review Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?* r Yes r No Is this project a public transportation project?* C Yes r No Change only if needed. BIMS # Assigned * Version#* 20201232 1 Is a payment required for this project?* r No payment required What amout is owed?* r Fee received r $240.00 r Fee needed - send electronic notification r $570.00 Reviewing Office * Select Project Reviewer* Raleigh Regional Office - (919) 791-4200 Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss Information for Initial Review 1a. Name of project: Aspire at Cary Pointe 1a. Who is the Primary Contact?* Deborah Shirley 1b. Primary Contact Email:* dshirley@sandec.com Date Submitted 10/21/2020 Nearest Body of Water Panther Creek Basin Cape Fear Water Classification WS-N;NSW Site Coordinates Latitude: 35.813026 A. Processing Information County (or Counties) where the project is located: Wake Is this a NCDMS Project r Yes r No Longitude: -78.875390 Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes r No 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act) r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act) 1c. Primary Contact Phone:* (919)846-5900 V 1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization? W Nationwide Permit (NWP) r Regional General Permit (RGP) r Standard (IP) 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? r Yes r No Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS): 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR: W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular F- 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit r Riparian Buffer Authorization r Individual Permit le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: r Yes r No For the record onlyfor Corps Permit: r Yes r No 1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?* r Yes r No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? r Yes r No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? r Yes r No Acceptance Letter Attachment 1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? r Yes r No 1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? r Yes r No B. Applicant Information 1d. Who is applying for the permit? r Owner W Applicant (other than owner) le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?* r Yes r No 2. Owner Information 2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: Balaji Commercial, LLC 2b. Deed book and page no.: Book: 017061 Page: 01502, Book: 016683 Page: 01360 2c. Responsible party: Ashok Biyyala 2d.Address Street Address 1058 Kennicott Ave Address Line 2 City Cary Postal / Zip Code 27513 2e. Telephone Number: (919)454-4961 2g. Email Address:* abiyyala@gmail.com State / Rwince / Ifgion NC Country United States 2f. Fax Number: 3. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 3a. Name: Ryan Klaff 3b. Business Name: BRG Route 55, LLC 3c.Address Street Address 104 Hume Avenue Address Line 2 City Alexandria Postal / Zip Code 22301 3d. Telephone Number: (703)244-1161 3f. Email Address:* ryan.klaff@bonaventure.com 4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable) 4a. Name: Deborah Shirley 4b. Business Name: Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA 4c.Address Street Address 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104 Address tine 2 city Raleigh Postal / Zip Code 27615 4d. Telephone Number: (919)846-5900 4f. Email Address:* dshirley@sandec.com State / Province / Fegion VA Country United States 3e. Fax Number: State / Province / Region NC Country United States 4e. Fax Number: (919)846-9467 Agent Authorization Letter* SEC Agent Authorization Form Applicant - EXECUTED 2020.09.14.pdf 101.62KB C. Project Information and Prior Project History u 1. Project Information 1b. Subdivision name: (d appropriate) 1c. Nearest municipality / town: Cary 2. Project Identification 2a. Property Identification Number: 0735701815 & 0735605736 2c. Project Address Street Address 2525 Morrisville Parkway Address Line 2 City Cary Postal / Zip Code 27519 3. Surface Waters 2b. Property size: +/- 8.22 State / Province / Region NC Country United States 3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:* Panther Creek 3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:* WS-IV;NSW 3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?* Cape Fear 3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located. 030300020605 4. Project Description and History 4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinityof the project at the time of this application:* Existing conditions onsite consist of forested land. There is one (1) perennial stream feature (SA), one (1) intermittent stream feature (SB), one linear wetland (LW1), and two (2) vetland features (W2 & W3). SA runs along the southern property boundary with adjacent wetlands W2 and LW1. SB runs along the western side of the property with W3 at its headwaters. General land use in the vicinity of of the project consists primarily of residential developments with some commercial development just to the south. Morrisville Parkway bounds the property to the North and Highway 55 bounds the property to the East. 4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?* r Yes r No r Unknown 4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR) Cary Point USGS 2019.pdf 2.57MB 4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR) Cary Point SS 2019.pdf 831.8KB 4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: Approximately 0.44 acres 4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property: Approximately 915.54 LF 4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:* The purpose of this project is to construct a residential development and its necessary infrastructure. 4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:* The overall project consists of the construction of an age restriced Residential Development, including but not limited to roads, parking, residential building, amenities and utilities. Specifically, there is one (1) road crossing that impacts a wetland and a stream, one area of lot fill that impacts a wetland, and one (1) utility crossing that impacts a stream. Equipment typically used for construction and earthwork such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, graders, pavers etc. vdll be utilized for this project. 4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project. C-1.0_W&S.pdf 1.14MB SITE IMPACT TOTALS_WETAND & STREAM.pdf 1.58MB 490-19_AREA 1.pdf 546.24KB 490-19_AREA 1_Profiles.pdf 312.08KB 5. Jurisdictional Determinations 5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?* r Yes r No r Unknown Comments: 5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?* r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A Corps AID Number: SAW-2019-02253 5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Steven Ball Agency/Consultant Company: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA Other: 5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR USAGE: Field determination was completed by James Lastinger on December 12, 2019 and PJD was issued on April 1, 2020. Riparian buffer determination and site visit was completed by Eric Kulz of the Town of Cary on March 30, 2017 (TCRB 17-005). Sd1. Jurisdictional determination upload SAW-2019-02253 signed PJD.pdf TCRB 17_005_Morrisville Pkwyat NC- 55.pdf 5.19MB 3.51 MB 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project?* r Yes r No Are anyother NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity? it is my understanding that there are no intended future phases beyond the property boundaries shown. Therefore, no additional NWP, Regional General Permits, or IP are anticipated. D. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply): W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries ❑ Buffers r Open Waters F Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts 2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type*(?) 2c. Type of W.* 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested* 2C Type of 2g. Impact Jurisdicition*(?) area Im act 1A P Road Crossing 9 P Headwater Forest W3 Yes Both 0.061 (acres) Im act 1C P Lot Fill J Headwater Forest �W3 Yes Both 0.008 (acres) 2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 0.000 2g. Total Wetland Impact 0.069 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact 0.069 3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * Type of 3gSwidth * 3h. Impact(?) ❑ �[3f. urisdiction* length* S1 Impact 1A-Road Crossing P 9 Permanent Culvert Stream B Intermittent Both 4 69 (Culvert & Headwalls) Average (feet) (lir�rfeet) g2 Impact 1A-Dissipator Pad Permanent Other Stream B Intermittent Both 4 27 (Permanent -No permanent Average (fee) (li �rfcet) loss) S3 Impact 1 B-Utility Crossing Temporary Other Stream B Intermittent Both 4 32 Average (feet) (linearfeet) S4 Impact 1A-Temporary Temporary Other Stream B Intermittent Both 4 10 Construction Average (feet) (lin�rfeet) 31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet: 31. Total permanent stream impacts: 96 31. Total stream and ditch impacts: 138 31. Total temporary stream impacts: 42 3j. Comments: Total permanent loss stream = 69 LF, Total permanent -no permanent loss stream = 27 LF. Total temporary stream = 42 LF. Temporary stream impacts will be brought back to pre -construction stream bed elevations and the stream banks will be stabilized. Riprap dissipator pad to be constructed such that post -construction elevation not to exceed pre -construction elevation of the stream (i.e. no permanent loss). E. Impact Justification and Mitigation u 1. Avoidance and Minimization la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project: S&EC completed a detailed wetland and stream delineation for the entire property in order to identify natural resources so that impacts could be avoided and minimized to the maAmum extent practicable. Impact area 1A is proposed permanent and temporary stream and permanent wetland impacts for a road crossing. This crossing is necessary to serve as a single, full access drive from Morrisville Parkway. The Town of Cary required that the full access drive line up with the eAsting driveway on the north side of Morrisville Parkway, in addition there is an eAsting median from the eAsting drive going east to Highway 55. There are two other access drives off Morrisville Parkway however they are right in, right out only. The full access drive was designed to serve this property and any future development to the west of this property. Headwalls have been utilized to minimize impacts. The "permanent -no permanent loss" impacts for the dissipator pad Will be constructed such that post construction the top elevation of the riprap pad shall not exceed the pre -construction elevation of the stream bed, additionally it will assist with velocities and stream erosion. Impact area 1 B is proposed temporary stream impact for a utility crossing. The utility crossing has been designed at a perpendicular angle to minimize stream impacts. Temporary stream impacts will be brought back to pre -construction stream bed elevations and the stream banks Will be stabilized. Impact 1 C is proposed permanent loss wetland impacts for lot fill. This impact is necessary per the Town of Cary Planned Development District (PDD) rezoning case which required a parking ration to be 1.25 spaces per dwelling unit. This calculates out as; 1.25 x 138 units = 172.5 = 173 required parking spots. Given the building footprint that was delivered from the architects, the site restrictions such as riparian buffers and street yard buffers with their associated setbacks, and the parking requirements that have to be met, this site layout has been redesigned many times to meet all requirements. Per the above requirements above and the retaining walls that have been utilized, the proposed wetland impacts have been minimized to the maximum extent practicable. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques: This development proposes two (2) temporary sediment basins, multiple associated temporary diversion ditches with rock check dams, silt fence with silt fence outlets, tree protection fencing, two (2) temporary construction entrances, a concrete washout station, and gravel bag inlet protection for relevant eAsting storm structures and for proposed storm devices during construction. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? r Yes r No 2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why: Total permanent wetland impacts are less than 0.10 acre and total permanent stream impacts are less than 150 LF, therefore compensatory mitigation in the form of mitigation payment has not been proposed. However the proposed project has avoided and minimized stream and wetland impact to meet the mitigation requirements. F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the INC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? r Yes r No What type of SCM are you providing? i— Level Spreader r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT) r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT) W Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen r Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer Diffuse Flow Documentation 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?* r Yes r No 2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)? r Yes r No 2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program? r Yes r No F WA - project disturbs < 1 acre 2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply: 17 Local Government r State Local Government Stormwater Programs W Phase II r NSW r USMP W Water Supply Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using. Town of Cary Comments: G. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?* r' Yes C No 2. Violations (DWR Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? * r Yes r No 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement) 3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?* r Yes r No 3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and silvicultural operations. The Aspire at Cary Pointe project is a residential development. Additionally, the project is located within the town of Cary ETJ, therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will have the following regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the Jordan Watershed Riparian Buffer Protection regulations, these regulations require limited development within the riparian buffer area in addition to "diffuse flow" requirements and could require Best Management Practices that control nitrogen if diffuse flow cannot be achieved; 2) the Phase II NPDES Stornmeter Permit Program, this program includes permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post -construction stormwater management requirements; and 3) the Water Supply, Watershed Protection Program which limits development densities as well as requires protective riparian buffers. We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement) 4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?* r Yes r Nor NIA 4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant. Non -discharge wastevoter will be generated and treated at the Western Wake WRF, which holds a capacity of 18 million gallons per day. 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?* r Yes r No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?* r Yes r No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh 5d. Is another Federal agency involved?* r Yes r No r Unknown 5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8? r Yes r No 5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.? r Yes r No 5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? r Yes r No 5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?* r Yes r No 5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.? r Yes r No 5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? S&EC completed a Threatened & Endangered Species Report, to include a Self -Certification letter through the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), a query through the NC Natural Heritage Program database, and an official Species List through the iPac. A formal request was sent to the USFWS on August 28, 2020. Responses from the USFWS must be within 30 days of the sent request date. S&EC received no response meaning that they concurred with the determinations made by S&EC that the proposed actions is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Please see attached S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species report. Consultation Documentation Upload S&EC Cary Pointe T&E Report signed.pdf 11.35MB 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?* r Yes r No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?* The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced. No Essential Fish Habitat was identified near the project. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?* r Yes r No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?* The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service interactive map was referenced on August 24, 2020, no historic listings or study list entries or determined eligible listings were identified within the property boundaries. Additionally, no structures epst within the property boundaries. 7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?* r Yes r No 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?* NC Flood Risk Information System Floodplain Mapping Program and confirmation from the project engineer Miscellaneous 61 Comments Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested. Signature W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that: I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form; I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act'); I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act'); I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form. Full Name: Deborah E. Shirley Signature Date 10/21 /2020 V AGENT AUTHORIZATION Project Name/Description: Cary Pointe S&EC Project # 13134 Date: _________________ The Department of the Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 Attn: James Lastinger Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office I, the undersigned, authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project. PARCEL INFORMATION: Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0735701815 & 0735605736 Site Address: Morrisville Parkway/Highway 55 City, County, State: Cary, Wake County, NC, 27519 APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: Mailing Address: Telephone Number: Email: _________________________________________ ________________________ Applicant (please print) Date Applicant Signature We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge. BRG Route 55, LLC 104 Hume Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22301 703-244-1161 ryan.klaff@bonaventure.com BRG Route 55, LLC Attn: Ryan Klaff September 14, 2020 September 14, 2020   Project Number: SBProject Manager: 1" = 1000'Scale: 10/31/2019Date: Map Title: Source: Figure 1 - USGS Map Morrisville Parkway/NC 55 Property Wake County, NC 2019 NC Cary & Green Level Quads ¯0 1,000 2,000 Feet 13134.W7   NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis Project Number: SBProject Manager: 1" = 500'Scale: 10/31/2019Date: Map Title: Source: Figure 2 - Soil Survey Morrisville Parkway/NC 55 Property Wake County, NC Wake County Soil Survey Sheet 45 ¯0 500 1,000 Feet 13134.W7 42"L2L3L4L5L6EIPEIPWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW18"PINE20'SDSDSDSD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDWETLWETLXXXXXXXXXOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWETL WETLWETLWETLWETLWETLWETLWETLWE T L W E T L WETLWETLWETL330'335'3 3 5 '340' 3 4 0 '345'345'350'350'350'355'355'355'360'360'360'365'365'365'370'375'315'320'325'335'340'345'339'345'337'341'345'350'340'345'346'347'348'349'350'351'345'NC HIGHWAY 55VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC R/WWVWVFHAGV100'50'LOT 1EXTRA SPACE PROPERTIESNINETY EIGHT, LLCDB 15863, PG 895BM 1980, PG 364PIN: 0735-70-2552TRACT TWOPIN: 0735-70-4901188,828 S.F.4.33 AC.3727 N.C. 55 HWY.ZONING: PDDEX. PROPERTYLINE TO BEREMOVED WITHRECOMBINATIONEX. WETLAND15,895 SF(0.365 AC)EX. STREAM(TYP.)EX. STREAM TOPOF BANK (TYP.)EX. RIPARIANBUFFER - ZONE 1(TYP.)EX. RIPARIANBUFFER - ZONE 2(TYP.)EX. RIPARIAN BUFFER -TOWN OF CARY URBANTRANSITION BUFFER(TYP.)EX. RIPARIANBUFFER - ZONE 1(TYP.)EX. RIPARIANBUFFER - ZONE 2(TYP.)EX. STREAM(TYP.)EX. RIPARIANBUFFER -ZONE 1 (TYP.)21"PINE18"PINE20"PINE20"PINE27"OAK36"POPLAR18"POPLAR18"POPLAR22"BEACH21"PINE21"PINEPINE18"PINE18"PINE19"PINE20"PINE19"18"PINE18"PINE18"PINE18"PINE18"PINE12"PINE25"PINEPINE19"18"PINEPINE19"PINE24"PINE22"PINE21"PINE22"10"POP10"POP23"PINE16"PINE14"PINE20"PINE14"PINE21"POP23"OAK23"OAK15"GUM14"OAK14"OAK11"OAK13"MAPLE17"OAK19"OAK19"GUM18"19"OAKOAK19"OAK20"OAK21"OAK18"PINEGUM18"POPPOPPOPPOPPOPPOP24"19"GUMOAK19"21"OAK26"MAPLE20"MAPLE20"24"26"18"20"SYCAMORE22"POP26"21"MAPLE19"ASH20"ASHPOP28"PINE24"19"POPPINE21"PINE19"PINE19"PINE21"GUM20"GUM21"23"OAKOAKOAK20"24"OAK27"OAK20"OAK20"OAK19"OAK29"19"POP18"OAK20"PINE17"PINE18"PINEGUM11"24"OAK22'OAK18"PINE20"PINE20"PINE23"PINE21"PINE13"PINE13"PINE13"PINE19"PINE15"PINE14"PINE18"PINE12'PINE11"PINE14"PINE17'PINE19"OAK19"OAK19"PINE10"PINE10"PINE13"PINE12"PINE16"PINE14"PINE14"PINE16"PINE11"PINE15"PINE21"PINE12"PINE11"PINE11"PINE10"PINE22"PINE13'MAPLE19"PINE12"PINEMAPLE10"11"GUM11"GUM21"PINE21"PINE20"PINE18"PINE18"OAK21"PINEMAPLE10"POP19'GUM12"GUM12"13"PINEPOP11"12"GUMPOPLAR21"POPLAR19"18"PINE10"GUM21"GUM14"MAPLE23"OAK19"OAK18"OAK16"ASHPOP10"MAPLEPINE16"21'PINEOAK30"OAK24"OAK20"BEACHBEACHBEACH23"25"21"PINE18"EX. PROPERTYLINE TO BEREMOVED WITHRECOMBINATIONDROP INLETTOP(GRATE): 343.82'INV.OUT: 340.15'(18"RCP), INLET TOBE REMOVED, SEESHEET C-4.0TOP: 362.43'OUT: 356.33'TOP: 357.10'IN: 348.10'OUT: 348.00'TOP: 350.50'IN: 345.72'OUT: 345.69'42" FES330.6'24" RCP340.3'18" RCP343.1'12" CMP342.3'42"338.3'42" FES325.8'8"337.0'DITOP: 377.86'8"336.3'TRACT ONEPIN: 0735-60-8872205,519 S.F.4.72 AC.3741 N.C. 55 HWY.ZONING: PDDVAULT±388 LF EX. GUARDRAIL, TO BE REMOVED,SEE SHEET C-2.0 FOR PROPOSEDLOCATION OF NEW GUARDRAILEX. GUARDRAILTO REMAIN5' ACCESSORY USE/VUASETBACK FROM UTB10' PRINCIPAL USESETBACK FROM UTBPIN: 0735-60-2672261,679 S.F.6.00 AC.3301 MORRISVILLE PKWY.ZONING: PDDTOP: 343.30'IN: 339.34'OUT: 339.26'± 64 LF C&G TOBE REMOVED± 443 SF SIDEWALKTO BE REMOVED± 62 LF C&G TOBE REMOVED± 2,291 SF ASPHALTTO BE REMOVEDTOP: 338.92'IN: 334.38'OUT: 334.30'EX. 12" DIP WATER LINEEX. 4" PVC RECLAIMEDWATER LINEEX. GUARDRAIL, TO BEREMOVED, SEE SHEETC-2.0 FOR PROPOSEDLOCATION OF NEWGUARDRAIL100' TOWN OF CARYURBAN TRANSITIONBUFFER (TYP.)100' TOWN OF CARYURBAN TRANSITIONBUFFER (TYP.)EX. CENTERLINEASPHALTGREENWAYPINCHED IRONPIPE FLUSHPERMANENTDRAINAGE EASEMENT(DB 10176, PG 50450' RIPARIAN BUFFERZONE 1ZONE 2ZONE 1ZONE 2ZONE 1CONCRETE S/W VARIABLE WIDTHSLOPE EASEMENTGVTOP/BANKTOP/BANKTOP/BANKWETLANDFLAGSTOWN LIMIT/ZONING LINE(B.M. 2013 PG. 515)ZONE 3ZONE 33' TOC UTILITYEASEMENT3' TOC UTILITYEASEMENT(BM 2012, PG 303)SLOPEEASEMENTB.M. 2012 PG. 2093' TOWN OF CARY UTILITYEASEMENTB.M. 2012 PG. 301PERMANENTDRAINAGE EASEMENT(DB 10176, PG 50450'50' RIPARIANBUFFEREX. WETLAND3,437 SF(0.079 AC)ALL EX. PAVEMENT MARKINGSBETWEEN THIS POINT ANDTHE HWY 55 INTERSECTIONWITHIN EASTBOUND TRAVELTO BE REMOVED BY MILLING,REFER TO SHEET RW-1.0 FORNEW PAVEMENT MARKINGSWV(TYP.OF 3)42"EX. RIPARIANBUFFER - ZONE 2(TYP.)ZONE 2EX. 6" PVC RECLAIMEDWATER LINEEX. FHA, TO BERELOCATEDS 06°11'12" E 289.27'S 89°17'10" W 393.22'S 61 °41 '09" W 204 .00 ' N 00°09'27" E 362.53'N 89°48'24" W 520.92'S 01°07'38" W 200.14'N 74°32'21" W 191.78'S 84°47'41" W 294.67'5/8" IRONPIPE 0.1'AG1/2" IRONPIPE SET1/2" IRONPIPE SETPINCHED IRONPIPE FLUSH5/8" IRONPIPE 0.1'AG5/8" IRONPIPE FLUSH5/8" IRONPIPE 0.2'BGC3C4C1C2C 5L7 L8 S 89°15'54" E 227.22'CONTROL CORNERN: 750,628.15E: 2,036,590.571/2" IRONPIPE SETTIE TO THEINTERSECTION5/8" IRONPIPE 0.2'BG1/2" IRONPIPE SET1/2" IRONPIPE SETL5A1/2" IRONPIPE SET1/2" IRONPIPE SETS 89°28'13" E 289.48'N 01°09'21" E 185.08' S 3 9 ° 5 1 ' 2 1 " W 1 3 5 . 9 3 '± 451 SF SIDEWALKTO BE REMOVED1/2" IRONPIPE SETSLOPEEASEMENTB.M. 2012 PG. 301,TO BE ABANDONED3' TOC UTILITYEASEMENT(BM 2012, PG 301)50' RIPARIAN BUFFEREX. STREAMTOP OFBANK (TYP.)TOWN LIMIT/ZONING LINE (B.M. 2013 PG. 515)VARIABLE WIDTHSLOPE EASEMENT(BM 2012, PG 303),TO BE ABANDONEDSLOPEEASEMENTB.M. 2012 PG. 301,TO BE ABANDONEDMORRISVILLE PARKWAYVARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC R/W100'50'DRAINAGEEASEMENTB.M. 2012 PG. 209WETLANDFLAGSSTREAM AWETLAND W2STREAM BWETLAND W3C-1.0490-19SITE WETLAND & STREAM IMPACTS EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN1 inch = 50 ft.( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE0505010020025FOR EXHIBIT ONLYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNAD83 LEGEND STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVEDFCESTXOUWSSSDSURVEY LEGEND AND NOMENCLATUREEX. IRON PIPE/ROD OR NAILEX. CONCRETE MONUMENTNEW IRON PIPECALCULATED POINTCABLE PEDESTALTELEPHONE PEDESTALELECTRIC PEDESTALFIBER-OPTIC MARKERTRAFFIC SIGNAL BOXWATER METERFIRE HYDRANTVALVE (WATER OR GAS)SANITARY SEWER MANHOLESANITARY SEWER CLEANOUTSTORM CURB INLETDRAINAGE INLET (W/ GRATE)STORM DRAIN MANHOLEUTILITY POLELAMP POSTSIGNAL POLEGUY WIRESIGN POSTFENCEOVERHEAD UTILITYWATERSANITARY SEWERSTORM DRAINDBDEED BOOKPB or BMPLAT BOOK / BOOK OF MAPSN/FNOW OR FORMERLYPg.PAGESFSQUARE FEETAc.ACRESR/WRIGHT-OF-WAYNCSRNORTH CAROLINA STATE ROUTENCDOTNORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OFTRANSPORTATIONEx.EXISTINGRCPREINFORCED CONCRETE PIPEPVCPOLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE(M)MEASUREDAGABOVE GROUNDBGBELOW GROUNDSYMBOLSLINETYPESABBREVIATIONSPROPERTY LINETTCCGGEXISTING TELECOMMUNICATIONSEXISTING COMMUNICATIONSEXISTING GASCURVE TABLECURVELENGTHRADIUSBEARINGCHORDC120.161423.35N 55°21'31" E20.16C2409.621423.35N 64°00'34" E408.21C338.901423.35N 73°02'13" E38.90C4168.671861.47N 76°24'54" E168.62C558.0040.00S 47°43'33" E53.05LINE TABLELINELENGTHBEARINGL1124.81S 87°23'12" WL261.50N 53°19'53" EL367.08N 89°35'23" EL438.90N 89°35'23" EL5104.45N 89°02'48" EL6128.24N 53°32'40" EL7124.03 N 04°57'00" EL842.89N 04°57'00" EL5A28.26S 83°40'07" ETREE LEGEND EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVEDPOP - - - - - - -POPLARGUM - - - - - - SWEETGUMWETLLIMITS OF WETLANDSRIPARIAN BUFFEREXISTING WETLANDSSURVEY NOTES1.ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN U.S. SURVEY FEET UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.2.THIS SURVEY DOES NOT INCLUDE NOR DEPICT ANY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATIONS BYTHIS OFFICE. WETLAND FLAGS AND DELINEATED WATERS SHOWN HEREON FROMSURVEYED FLAGS PLACED BY OTHERS PRIOR TO FIELD SURVEY. ALL RIPARIAN BUFFERSSHOWN HEREON MEASURED FROM EXISTING TOP OF BANK OF FEATURE.3.FIELD SURVEY(S) PERFORMED MARCH 3 THRU 5, 2020.4.SURVEYOR HAS MADE NO INVESTIGATION OR INDEPENDENT SEARCH FOR EASEMENTSOF RECORD, ENCUMBRANCES, RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, OWNERSHIP TITLE EVIDENCEOR ANY OTHER FACTS THAT AN ACCURATE AND CURRENT TITLE SEARCH MAY DISCLOSE.5.PER TABLE A ITEM #11 THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN HEREON(IF ANY) ARE BASED ON ABOVEGROUND STRUCTURES, ABOVEGROUND VISUALEVIDENCE, AND EXISTING MARKINGS AT TIME OF SURVEY. LOCATIONS OFUNDERGROUND UTILITIES/STRUCTURES MAY VARY FROM LOCATION SHOWN HEREON.ADDITIONAL BURIED UTILITIES/STRUCTURES MAY BE ENCOUNTERED. NO EXCAVATIONSWERE MADE DURING THE PROGRESS OF THIS SURVEY TO LOCATE BURIEDUTILITIES/STRUCTURES.6.SUBJECT PROPOERTIES ARE NOT LOCATED WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE PERFEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) #3720073500J, EFF3ECTIVE DATE MAY 2, 2006.7.THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES FOR THIS PROJECT WERE PRODUCED WITH RTK GPSOBSERVATIONS AND PROCESSED USING THE NORTH CAROLINA VRS NETWORK. THENETWORK POSITIONAL ACCURACY OF THE DERIVED POSITIONAL INFORMATION IS ±0.07'.HORIZONTAL DATUM = NAD 83/2011VERTICAL DATUM = NAVD 888.THERE ARE NO VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE SURVEYED PROPERTY BYIMPROVEMENTS ON ADJACENT PROPERTY OR ON ADJACENT PROPERTY, STREETS ORALLEY BY ANY IMPROVEMENTS ON THE SURVEYED PROPERTY, PARTY, WALLS,CONFLICTS OR PROTRUSIONS.9.THE SURVEYED PROPERTIES ARE THE SAME PROPERTIES AS DESCRIBED IN FIDELITYNATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT #091059510, WITH AN EFFECTIVEDATE OF MAY 14, 2020 @ 8:00 AM AND THAT ALL EASEMENTS, COVENANTS ANDRESTRICTIONS REFERENCED IN SAID TITLE COMMITMENT OR VISIBLE FROM A PHYSICALINSPECTION OF THE SURVEYED PROPERTY OR OTHERWISE KNOWN HAVE BEEN PLOTTEDHEREON OR OTHERWISE NOTED AS TO THEIR EFFECT ON THE SURVEYED PROPERTY.10.NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT EARTH MOVING WORK, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, ORBUILDING ADDITIONS OBSERVED IN THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING THE FIELDWORK.11.NO PROPOSED CHANGES IN STREET RIGHT OF WAYS LINES, IF SUCH INFORMATION ISMADE AVAILABLE TO THE SURVEYOR BY THE CONTROLLING JURISDICTION. NO EVIDENCEOF RECENT STREET OR SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION OR REPAIRS OBSERVED IN THEPROCESS OF CONDUCTING THE FIELDWORK.1.ALL UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES NOT DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL OR MODIFICATION ARE TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE.2.ALL DEMOLITION WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED WITH "DUE CARE AND DILIGENCE" SO AS TO PREVENT THE ARBITRARY DESTRUCTION ORINTERRUPTION OF CONCEALED UTILITIES WHICH ARE INTENDED TO REMAIN IN USE AND THE ROUTING OF WHICH COULD NOT BE PREDETERMINEDUNTIL DEMOLITION WAS STARTED. ALL SUCH DISCOVERIES OF UTILITIES DURING THE DEMOLITION PROCESS WHICH ARE IN A LOCATION DIFFERENTFROM THAT INDICATED OR ARE UNIDENTIFIED SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER, ENGINEER AND ARCHITECT BEFORE REMOVAL FOR FINALDISPOSITION.3.ALL WASTE MATERIAL GENERATED FROM DEMOLITION WORK, TO INCLUDE BUILDING ASBESTOS ABATEMENT, SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF SITE INACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF DURHAM AND STATE REGULATIONS.4.SALVAGEABLE FILL MATERIALS FROM SITE DEMOLITION DETERMINED TO BE ACCEPTABLE BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS TESTING LABORATORY SHALLBE UTILIZED FOR FILL MATERIAL WHERE APPROPRIATE.5.ANY NOTE, OR REFERENCE TO ANY ELEMENT, WHICH DOES NOT SPECIFY ACTION BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS INFORMATIONONLY.6.CLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVEMENT/STRUCTURES AS REQUIRED BY SPECIFICATIONS.7.ALL STRUCTURES/UTILITIES DESIGNATED FOR MODIFICATION SHALL BE PROTECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR DURING CONSTRUCTION.8.STRIP TOPSOIL, CLEAR AND GRUB AS REQUIRED WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. STOCKPILE TOPSOIL WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS FORREDISTRIBUTION AFTER FINAL GRADING OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETED.9.BOUNDARY SURVEY INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM A MAP SURVEYED BY NEWCOMB LAND SURVEYORS, PLLC ON MARCH 3-5, 2020.10.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COORDINATION OF AND DISCONNECTION OF ALL EXISTING SITE UTILITIES, IF NECESSARY.11.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CARE AND CAUTION DURING THE CLEARING , GRUBBING, REMOVAL OF TREES, ETC. SUCH THAT THEADJACENT PROPERTY IS NOT DISTURBED, REMOVED OR DAMAGED. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SAFETY ANDSECURITY FENCING, AT ALL ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES, IN ORDER TO PROPERLY SECURE AND PROTECT THE SITE.12.ALL WORK IN THE EASEMENT AREAS ARE TO BE CONFINED TO THE EASEMENT WIDTHS. ALL PIPE REPLACEMENT WORK, WHEN REQUIRED BY PIPEDEPTHS AND EXCAVATION, SHALL BE PERFORMED WITH THE USE OF TRENCH BOXES. ALL EXCAVATIONS, UTILITY AND GRADING WORK, SHALL BE INACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS.13.ALL EXISTING CONCRETE, PAVEMENT, LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING OR EXISTING SITE FEATURES ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES SHALL BE REPLACED ASDEMOLITION, GRADING AND UTILITY WORK DICTATES .14.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL SAFETY AND SECURITY FENCING, BARRIERS, PROTECTION MATERIAL AND METHODS AS REQUIREDTO COMPLETE THE OFF SITE WORK IN A SAFE AND TIMELY MANNER.15.COORDINATE UTILITY REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SCHEDULES AND REQUIRED WORK DURATIONS WITH THE OWNER'S CONSTRUCTIONREPRESENTATIVE.DEMOLITION NOTESWETLAND NOTES1.PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION PROVIDED BY SOIL & ENVIRONMENTALCONSULTANTS (S&EC) ON OCTOBER 24, 2019. (S&EC PROJECT # 13134.W7). WETLANDS ARE LOCATEDON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.2.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS IS IN PROGRESS OF ISSUING A WETLAND DETERMINATION WITHUNKNOWN DATE.3.CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HAS BEEN INITIATED REGARDING THEREQUEST FOR A 404 (CLEAN WATER ACT, 33 USC 1344) TO BE ISSUED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT.4.CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY HAS BEEN INITIATED REGARDINGREQUEST FOR A 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION TO BE ISSUED, PERMITTING FILL MATERIAL TOBE PLACED IN THE DESIGNATED WETLAND.5.WETLAND AREAS SHOWN ON C-1.0 ARE EXISTING LIMITS OF WETLANDS. WETLAND AREAS SHOWN ONALL OTHER SHEETS ARE DELINEATED AFTER IMPACTS, IF ANY.19,332 SF (0.444 AC.) EXISTING TOTAL ONSITE WETLANDS- 3,011 SF (0.069 AC.) WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED= 16,321 SF (0.375 AC.) TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTEDCARY, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SDSDSDSD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDWETLWETLXXXXXXXXXOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWETL WETLWETLWETLWETLWETLWETLWETLWE T L W E T L WETL330'335'3 3 5 '340' 3 4 0 '345'345'350'350'350'355'355'355'360'360'360'365'365'365'370'375'315'320'325'335'340'345'339'345'337'341'345'350'340'345'346'347'348'349'350'351'345'WFWFWFWFWFWFWFWFWFWFWF WF WF WFWFWFWFWFWFWFWFWWUFOWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWFWFSS SSWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSD SD SD SDSD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD3503433443453463363373393393 4 8 3493 4 9 3 4 9 347346345344343342341339336337340 34134234334434534634734834934734834935235335435935835735635536536036236 7 36 5365 360355350364363361362348349349348349348365368373371375378370367368366365368 3493493503513523533543553563603533523353403453353 3 7 3 3 8332330331326330326329327320319322320318 3493 4 9 3503423673 6 6 360337 338339SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD GRZRZRZRZ 360363362358353349350337336335334333332331330329328327338337338334337335334332331330325322326336337339341343345347348339341340339340338SDSD336335338338319319320339 WETLWETLS 06°11'12" E 289.27'C4S 61 °41 '09" W 204 .00 'C6C7N 0°42'50" W 329.61'C8C9N 88°52'22" W116.35'84.29'L14L15S 1°07'38" W L11L10L22 L13L16L17L18 L20 L21 L24 L25L12S 89°17'10" W 283.32'S 89°17'10" W 109.94'PROPOSED 4-STORY BUILDING±194,564 GSFAFFE = 350.0NC HIGHWAY 55VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC R/W50'ZONE 2ZONE 1TOP/BANKZONE 2ZONE 1TOP/BANK ZONE 350' RIPARIAN BUFFER100' TOWN OF CARYURBAN TRANSITION BUFFERS 06°11'12" E 289.27'S 89°28'13" E 289.48'N 89°48'24" W 520.92'S 61 °41 '09" W 204 .00 'S 89°17'10" W 283.32'S 89°17'10" W 109.94'N 0°42'50" W 329.61' 83.80'S 1°07'38" WN 88°52'22" W116.35'84.29'S 1°07'38" W CONTROL CORNERN: 750,628.15E: 2,036,590.57LOT 1EXTRA SPACE PROPERTIESNINETY EIGHT, LLCDB 15863, PG 895BM 1980, PG 364PIN: 0735-70-2552PIN: 0735-60-2672261,679 S.F.6.00 AC.3301 MORRISVILLE PKWY.ZONING: PDDWETLAND FLAGSINSET 1 : IMPACT AREA 1,SEE SHEET IMP-1EX. STREAM(TYP.)EX. STREAM TOP OF BANK (TYP.)EXISTING WETLAND,426 SF TO REMAINPRESERVED50' RIPARIAN BUFFERZONE 2ZONE 1 STREAM IMPACT(69 LF, 276 SF)50'ZONE 1ZONE 2STREAM IMPACT(32 LF, 128 SF)LODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLOD LOD LODL O D LODLODLODLO D LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODMORRISVILLE PARKWAYSTANDARD 4-LANE THOROUGHFARE - 18' MEDIANVARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC R/WSTREAM AWETLAND W2STREAM BWETLAND W3PERMANENT-NO PERMANENT LOSS:RIPRAP DISSIPATOR PAD TO BEKEYED IN, POST- CONSTRUCTIONELEVATION NOT TO EXCEEDPRE-CONSTRUCTION STREAMWATER ELEVATION.(STREAM IMPACT: 27 LF, 108 SF)L19LODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODEXISTING WETLAND,3,011 SF IMPACTED1 inch = 50 ft.( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE0505010020025FOR EXHIBIT ONLYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONIMP-T490-19SITE WETLAND & STREAM IMPACTS CONTEXT MAPS FOR INSETS NAD83 SURVEY LEGENDIPF - - - IRON PIPE FOUNDCMF - - - CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUNDCP - - - COMPUTED POINTDIST - - - DISTURBEDR/W - - - RIGHT-OF-WAYSN - - - SIGNELP - - - ELECTRICAL PEDESTALFOV - - - FIBEROPTICS VAULTSIG - - - SIGNAL BOXFOM - - - FIBEROPTICS MARKERTEV - - - TELECOMMUNICATION VAULTRCP - - - REINFORCED CONC. PIPEPVC - - - POLYVINYL CHLORIDA PIPEC+G - - - CURB & GUTTEREP - - - EDGE OF PAVEMENTHC - - - HANDICAPLP - - - LIGHT POLEGV - - - GAS VALVESIGDSFWEX SEWER MANHOLEEX STORM MANHOLEEX STORM INLETEX WATER MANHOLEEX WATER VALVEEX FIRE HYDRANTLEGENDLODSDEXISTING PUBLIC EASEMENTEXISTING STORM DRAINLIMITS OF DISTURBANCESSEXISTING SANITARY SEWERWEXISTING WATER LINESDPROPOSED STORM DRAINWPROPOSED WATER LINESSPROPOSED SANITARY SEWERPROPOSED PUBLIC EASEMENTWETLANDWETLLIMITS OF WETLANDSPROPOSED SEWER CLEANOUTPROPOSED THRUST BLOCKPROPOSED WATER VALVEPROPOSED BFPPROPOSED WATER METERPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTWFPROPOSED FIRE LINEPROPOSED CATCH BASINPROPOSED FDCPROPOSED DOUBLE CATCHBASINLINE TABLELINEL10L11L12L14L15L16L17L18L19L20L21L22L23L24L25LENGTH59.87'100.08'10.22'25.98'108.23'50.21'56.16'17.55'13.69'14.10'32.04'51.85'51.14'35.72'127.52'DIRECTIONN53°24'08"ES83°48'01"ES89°15'54"ES84°22'13"ES89°26'23"ES47°43'33"EN39°15'11"WN5°09'45"EN53°41'36"WN17°05'26"EN17°28'34"EN11°50'51"EN5°15'06"WN14°03'01"EN29°39'22"WL1385.02'S89°15'54"EL5A28.26N 89°02'48" EC3C438.90168.671423.35'1861.47N 73°02'13" EN 76°24'54" E38.90168.62CURVE TABLECURVEC6C7C8C9LENGTH231.83'71.91'126.04'111.47'RADIUS1423.35'1423.35'1423.35'13699.50'BEARINGN59°37'10"EN65°43'58"EN69°43'01"EN89°19'59"ECHORD231.5771.91126.00111.47CARY, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA TPFTREE PROTECTION FENCEIMPACTED WETLAND AREAPROPERTY BOUNDARY LINEIMPACTED STREAM AREA WF WF WF W F WFWFWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSD SD S D SDSDS DSDSD3363373393393423413393 3 6 33 7 340341342343344345346347348327320319322337 338339SDSDSDSDSDSD SD 33733633533433333233133032932832733833733833433733533433233133032532232633934134033934033833633533 8 338TPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPF TPF TPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFT P F TPF319320339WETLWETLTPF TPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFEX. STREAM(TYP.)EX. STREAM TOPOF BANK (TYP.)50'50' RIP A R I A N B U F F E R ZONE 2 ZONE 1 STREAM CROSSING A:STREAM IMPACT (69 LF, 276 SF)50'ZONE 1 ZONE 2 PROPOSEDSANITARYSEWER MAIN20' PUBLIC SANITARYSEWER ESMT. (TYP.)LODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODSTREAM CROSSING B:STREAM IMPACT (32 LF, 128 SF)WETLAND W3(426 SF TO REMAIN)STREAM BROAD CROSSING B:2,666 SF IMPACTED26'12'PERMANENT-NO PERMANENT LOSS:RIPRAP DISSIPATOR PAD TO BE KEYEDIN, POST- CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONNOT TO EXCEED PRE-CONSTRUCTIONSTREAM WATER ELEVATION.(STREAM IMPACT: 27 LF, 108 SF)LODLODLODLOD LOD LODLODLOT FILL C:345 SF IMPACTED TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT:10 LF, 40 SFIMP-1406-18SITE WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS IMPACT AREA 1 MAP FOR EXHIBIT ONLYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION1 inch = 40 ft.( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE040408016020NAD83 INSET 1 : WETLAND & STREAM IMPACTS AREA 1PROJECT NUMBERDRAWINGSHEETF:\Public\10-Projects\400-499\490-19 Cary Pointe Senior Living Facility (Bonaventure)\20-Tech Docs\WETLAND & BUFFER IMPACT MAPS\490-19_AREA 1.dwg Oct 21, 2020 - 1:31pm BY:jleab TOWN OF CARY, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA LEGENDWETLLIMITS OF WETLANDWETLAND AREALIMITS OF DISTURBANCELODTREE PROTECTION FENCETPFPROPERTY BOUNDARY LINEIMPACTED WETLAND AREAIMPACTED STREAM AREA SCALEHORIZONTAL: 1" = 40'VERTICAL: 1" = 4'STREAM CROSSING B30831031231431631830831031231431631810+0010+50317.9 316.6 317.3 318.0 EXISTINGGRADE2.5'90 LF 8" @ 0.75%EXISTING STREAMELEVATIONSCALEHORIZONTAL: 1" = 40'VERTICAL: 1" = 4'STREAM CROSSING A31832032232432632833033233433633834031832032232432632833033233433633834010+0011+0011+56325.0 324.7 331.5 324.0 337.8 324.2 337.8 323.8 336.5 322.0 330.0 320.4 323.5 319.3 319.5 EXISTINGGRADEPROPOSEDGRADE7.3'48" RCP STORM PIPEPROPOSEDHEADWALLPERMANENT-NO PERMANENT LOSS:RIPRAP DISSIPATOR PAD TO BE KEYED IN, POST- CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONNOT TO EXCEED PRE-CONSTRUCTION STREAM WATER ELEVATIONPROPOSEDHEADWALL1.5'26'AQUATIC LIFE PASSAGEMATERIAL FROM STORM PIPEBEING BURIED 20% DEEP336337SD 337335334332331330329328327334332331325322326338338TPFTPFT P F TPFEX. STR E A M T O P 10+0011+0011+56STREAM IMPACT:69 LF, 276 SF48" RCP STORM PIPE124'26'L O D LOD LODLODPNPL STREAM IMPACT:27 LF, 108 SF12'SSSS320TPFTPFTPFTPF10+0010+50STREAM IMPACT(32 LF, 128 SF)90 LF @ 0.75%LODLODIMP-1406-18SITE WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS IMPACT AREA 1 MAP FOR EXHIBIT ONLYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION1 inch = 40 ft.( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE040408016020NAD83 PROJECT NUMBERDRAWINGSHEETF:\Public\10-Projects\400-499\490-19 Cary Pointe Senior Living Facility (Bonaventure)\20-Tech Docs\WETLAND & BUFFER IMPACT MAPS\490-19_AREA 1_Profiles.dwg Oct 21, 2020 - 1:30pm BY:jleab TOWN OF CARY, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA LEGENDWETLLIMITS OF WETLANDWETLAND AREASTREAM CROSSING ASCALE1" = 40'STREAM CROSSING BSCALE1" = 40'IMPACTED STREAM AREALIMITS OF DISTURBANCELODTREE PROTECTION FENCETPFPROPERTY BOUNDARY LINETEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT:10 LF, 40 SFPERMANENT-NO PERMANENT LOSSPNPL U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT Action Id. SAW-2019-02253 County: Wake U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Green Level NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Requestor: Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA Steven Ball Address: 8412 Falls of Neuse Rd., suite 104 Raleigh, NC 27615 Telephone Number: 919-691-2114 E-mail: sball@sandec.com Size (acres) 10 Nearest Town Cary Nearest Waterway Panther Creek River Basin Cape Fear USGS HUC 03030002 Coordinates Latitude: 35.8130 Longitude: -78.8753 Location description: The project site is approximately 10 acres bordered to the north by Morrisville Parkway and to the east by NC Hwy 55, and is identified by PINs 0735704901, 0735608872, and a portion of 0735602672, near the town of Cary, Wake County, North Carolina. Indicate Which of the Following Apply: A. Preliminary Determination ☒ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 10/24/2019. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. ☐ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps. B. Approved Determination ☐ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. ☐ There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. ☐We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps. ☐The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly SAW-2019-02253 suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years. ☐The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. ☐ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. ☐ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808-2808 to determine their requirements. Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact James Lastinger at 919-554-4884 ext 32 or James.C.Lastinger@usace.army.mil. C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination form dated 04/01/2020. D. Remarks: None. E. Attention USDA Program Participants This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps’ Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work. F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B. above) This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address: US Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer 60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801 In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable. **It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.** Corps Regulatory Official: ______________________________________________________ Date of JD: 04/01/2020 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable SAW-2019-02253 The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0 Copy furnished: Property Owner: Ashok Biyyala Address: 1058 Kennicott Ave. Cary, NC 27513 Telephone Number: 919-454-4961 NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND REQUEST FOR APPEAL Applicant: Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA, Steven Ball File Number: SAW-2019-02253 Date: 04/01/2020 Attached is: See Section below ☐INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A ☐PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B ☐PERMIT DENIAL C ☐APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D ☒PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision. Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.  ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.  OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below. B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit  ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.  APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information.  ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.  APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD. SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record. POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION: If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the appeal process you may contact: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division Attn: James Lastinger Raleigh Regulatory Office U.S Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may also contact: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer CESAD-PDO U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801 Phone: (404) 562-5137 RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations. ________________________________________ Signature of appellant or agent. Date: Telephone number: For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: James Lastinger , 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to: Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801 Phone: (404) 562-5137 PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 04/01/2020 B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA, Steven Ball, 8412 Falls of Neuse Rd., suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Cary Pointe/Balaji Commercial site, SAW-2019-02253 D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project site is approximately 10 acres bordered to the north by Morrisville Parkway and to the east by NC Hwy 55, and is identified by PINs 0735704901, 0735608872, and a portion of 0735602672, near the town of Cary, Wake County, North Carolina. (USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County: Wake City: Cary Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.8130 Longitude: -78.8753 Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: Panther Creek E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ☐Office (Desk) Determination. Date: ☒Field Determination. Date(s): 10/24/2019 TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION Site Number Latitude  (decimal  degrees)  Longitude  (decimal  degrees)  Estimated  amount of  aquatic  resources in  review area  (acreage and  linear feet, if  applicable  Type of aquatic  resources (i.e.,  wetland vs.  non‐wetland  waters)  Geographic authority to  which the aquatic  resource “may be”  subject (i.e., Section 404  or Section 10/404)  A 35.8124 ‐78.8748 1000 linear feet Non‐wetland Section 404  B 35.8126 ‐78.8769 175 linear feet Non‐wetland Section 404  W1 35.8124 ‐78.8755 0.2 acre Wetland  Section 404  W2 35.8129 ‐78.8768 0.09 acre wetland Section 404  1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative record and are appropriately cited: ☒Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor: Map: see attached dated 10/24/19 ☒Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets: ☒Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. ☐Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: ☐Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ☐ Corps navigable waters' study: ☒U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ☒USGS NHD data: ☐USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps: ☒U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 2019 Cary and Greenlevel Quad ☒Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake County, 1970, sheet45 ☒National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI ☐State/local wetland inventory map(s): ☒FEMA/FIRM maps: ☐100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929) ☒ Photographs: ☒ Aerial (Name & Date): NC One Map undated or ☐ Other (Name & Date): ☐Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: ☐ Other information (please specify): IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations. Signature and date of Regulatory staff member completing PJD 04/01/2020 Signature and date of person requesting PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) 1 1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action. 106 TT Pipe105 TT Pipe100 TT S01114 TT S01!?S0101 TT PLChannel becomes braided in this area22 TT CHChannel becomes braided in this areaB (± 175 ft)A (± 1000 ft)W1 (± 0.20 ac)W2 (± 0.09 ac)!?!?DP1DP2N C 5 5 H W Y BELMONT VIEW LOOPS E D G E F IE L D P A R K L NMORRISVILLE PKWYNC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board106 TT Pipe105 TT Pipe100 TT S01114 TT S01!?S0101 TT PLChannel becomes braided in this area22 TT CHChannel becomes braided in this areaB (± 175 ft)A (± 1000 ft)W1 (± 0.20 ac)W2 (± 0.09 ac)!?!?DP1DP2N C 5 5 H W Y BELMONT VIEW LOOPS E D G E F IE L D P A R K L NMORRISVILLE PKWYNC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 BoardμWetland Sketch MapMorrisville Parkway/NC 55Wake Co., NCProject No.13134.W7Project Mgr.:SBScale:1" = 100'10/24/190 200 400100FeetLegendEvaluation AreaPotentially Jurisdictional Perennial StreamPotentially Jurisdictional Intermittent StreamPotentially Jurisdictional Wetland 50' Town of Cary Buffer2' Wake County ContoursSource:Aerials from NC One Map Detailed Delineation of Waters of the US Suitable for Preliminary Planning Only S&EC reserves the right to modify this map based on more fieldwork, and any other additional information. Approximations were mapped using topographic maps, air photos and ground truthing. If the site is going to be disturbed, S&EC’s detailed delineation should be approved and permitted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as required. If the user of this work desires an accurate map of the regulated features flagged by S&EC, they should retain a NC Registered Professional Land Surveyor to locate S&EC’s flagging. WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT March 31. 2017 Steven Ball Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 102 Raleigh, NC 27615 Subject: Jordan Lake Watershed — Riparian Buffer and Urban Transition Buffer Rules Wake County Real ID # 0120947/PIN10: 0735608872 Wake County Real ID # W20639/PIN10: 0735704901 Wake County Real ID # 0418077/PIN10: 0735602672 3737 & 3741 NC Highway 55 and 3301 Morrisville Parkway TCRB 17-005 Dear Mr. Ball: The site location and maps that were provided allowed a determination to be made as to whether or not the referenced site would require compliance with The Town of Cary Riparian Buffer and Urban Transition Buffer (UTB) Rules. This project, as referenced by the Town of Cary as TCRB 17-005, includes features as depicted on the attached maps. The table below summarizes the stream determination made in a site visit on March 30. 2017. This determination is valid until March 30, 2022. Reference I E�--U SGS Ma 900 Ft. Buffer Soil Surve Ma 50 Ft. Buffer Not Subject SA Origin at Flag 12 CL T TT CH SB I Origin at Flag S01 Landowners or affected parties that dispute a stream origin determination made by the Town of Cary may appeal the determination to the NC Division of Water Resources. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the Director of DWR shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service: c/o Karen Higgins; DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 1617 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.): Karen Higgins; DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 512 N. Salisbury Street; Raleigh, NC 27604. Any appeal submitted shall be related to the origin of the stream channel and/or applicability of the Jordan Lake Buffer Rules to a stream feature. TOWN Of CARY 318 North Academy Street •Cary, NC 27513•PO Box 8005•Cary, NC 27512-8005 tel 919-469-4030 • fax 919-460-4935• vvww.townofcary.org Mr. Ball Stream Determination Letter March 30, 2017 Page 2 of 2 This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, an appeal is requested within sixty (60) days. 1 Town of Cary Water L.� y \' LZ a 5ti �r"� (BSI ''..:'_`'• C, `+N710 13134 Project Manager: SB Scale: 1" = 1000' Date: 3/8/17 Lrn r � �' `yt - 1 �fj r r r I �! Figure 1 - USGS Map Morrisville Parkway/NC 55 Property Wake County, NC Source: NC USGS Cary & Green Level Quads 0 1,000 2,000 N cm ray on'.e. v..w.amm �a. xnaan. a v>cu To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Raleigh Field Office P.O. Box 33726 Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 Re: Online Project Review Request, Morrisville Parkway/HWY 55 (Aspire at Cary Pointe), Cary – Wake County, North Carolina We have reviewed the referenced project using the USFWS North Carolina Field Office’s online project review process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We completed our review August 14, 2020 and are submitting our project review package in accordance with the instructions for further review. Our proposed action consists of: A senior living residential development that is proposing impacts to wetlands and streams. The location of the project and the action area are identified on the enclosed maps. Morrisville Parkway/HWY 55 (35.812947, -78.875740). The site is located at 2525 Morrisville Parkway, Cary, Wake County, North Carolina. Construction will commence following the anticipated Section 404 & 401 Approvals and should be completed by the Nationwide Permit Expiration date of March 18, 2022. This project review is needed under provisions of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and per General Condition 18 of Nationwide Permit 29. The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species and critical habitat considered in our review. The species conclusions table included in the package identifies our determinations for the resources that may be affected by the project. For additional information, please contact Mason Montgomery at mmontgomery@sandec.com Sincerely, SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA Mason Montgomery Environmental Specialist, Wetlands Department Enclosures: August 14, 2020 S&EC Project No: 13134.W10 1. Project Request Review Package 2. S&EC T&E Species Report 3. Vicinity Maps 4. S&EC Photo Report 5. Overall Site Plan 6. FWS Official Species List 7. NHP Report 8. FWS Species Conclusion Table 9. FWS Self-Certification Letter Morrisville Parkway/HWY 55 – S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report Page 1 of 4 August 14, 2020 S&EC Project No.: 13134.W10 To: Bonaventure Realty Group Attn: Ryan Klaff 104 Hume Avenue Alexandria, VA, 22301 Re: THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT Morrisville Parkway/HWY 55 (Aspire at Cary Pointe) (+/- 10 acres) 2525 Morrisville Parkway, Cary, Wake County, NC Dear Ryan Klaff: On August 14, 2020, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) evaluated the Morrisville Parkway/HWY 55 property shown on the attached maps for potential endangered species. The property is located at 2525 Morrisville Parkway in Wake County, NC. Surface waters onsite flow into Panther Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin, which has been classified in the “Classification and NC DWQ Standards Applicable to Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina” as WS-IV;NSW. We obtained the attached automatically generated official species list from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) and N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) report identifying the protected species on or within one mile of the project area that could potentially be affected by the project. These FWS & NHP reports were updated as of the date of this report. The official species list is valid for 90 days. We conducted site assessments to identify potential suitable habitat and preliminary surveys for the individual species listed on the official species list. This included assessing the physical characteristics of the streams, identifying forest types and looking for evidence of the listed species onsite. This survey did not include any detailed sampling or netting. The results of the search are discussed below. August 14, 2020 S&EC Project #13134.W10 Morrisville Parkway/HWY 55 – S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report Page 2 of 4 RESULTS: The FWS official species list identified the following species for the Evaluation limits:  Red-cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Endangered  Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), Proposed Threatened  Michaux’s Sumac (Rhus michauxii), Endangered Of the species identified on the official species list, the NHP report did not identify any Federally threatened or endangered species within the project area or within 1 mile of the project area. Other State listed species were found within the project area as listed in the attached NHP report. The NHP Report Identified no natural land areas and 11 managed land areas within the project area or within 1 mile of the project area. These are listed out in the attached NHP Report. RED-COCKADED WOODPECKER (Picoides borealis): S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat (foraging and cavity trees) and individual Red-cockaded Woodpeckers (RCWs) within the project area. We found no individual RCWs within the project area. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area or within 1 mile of it. We found no ideal suitable habitat (e.g., Long Leaf pine forests) within the project area. Given the lack of species present, and no presence of suitable habitat we concluded that the project would have “No effect” on RCWs. ATLANTIC PIGTOE (Fusconaia masoni): S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams onsite for potential suitable habitat for the Atlantic Pigtoe. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area or within 1 mile of it. The suitable habitat for this species consists of medium sized creeks to large rivers with excellent water quality. This species typically lives in streams with coarse sand and gravel with moderate to high flowing water. While we did not specifically sample for the species, we also did not find any evidence of the species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams for potential suitable habitat Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does not exist onsite. Panther Creek was +/-2 feet wide with low to no base flow and had a sandy gravel substrate. Additionally, the other August 14, 2020 S&EC Project #13134.W10 Morrisville Parkway/HWY 55 – S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report Page 3 of 4 stream onsite did not have suitable habitat. Due to these observations we have concluded that the project would have “No effect” on the Atlantic Pigtoe. MICHAUX’S SUMAC (Rhus michauxii): S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat within the project area. We visited a known population of Michaux’s sumac within Wake County prior to conducting our preliminary surveys. We found no individual Michaux’s Sumac species within the project area. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area. We found suitable habitat within the project areas to include primarily disturb open areas along the road. These areas were surveyed in detail. Given the lack of species present within the suitable habitat, we concluded that the project would have “No effect” on the Michaux’s sumac. BALD EAGLE (Haliaeetus leucocephalus): S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat, nesting sites, and individual Bald Eagles within the project area. During our survey, we found no evidence of Bald Eagles or any nesting sites within the project area. The NHP report did not identify any known nests onsite or within 1 mile of the site. Given the lack of species present, we have concluded that the project is “Unlikely to disturb nesting bald eagles”. We believe no Eagle Act Permit is required. NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT (Myotis septentrionalis): S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys for suitable habitat and individual Northern Long- eared Bats (NLEB’s) within the project area. During our survey, we found no induvial species. Due to the nature of the project being residential development, we concluded that the project would “May affect, but not likely to adversely affect” NLEB’s. CONCLUSION: After completing the habitat assessments and preliminary surveys, S&EC completed the attached “Species Conclusion Table” and “Self-Certification Letter”. Using language typically used by the FWS in their conclusion letters, we have concluded that it appears the proposed project is not likely to adversely affect any federally-listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated August 14, 2020 S&EC Project #13134.W10 Morrisville Parkway/HWY 55 – S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report Page 4 of 4 critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). We strongly recommend requesting a concurrence letter from the FWS. Sincerely, SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA Mason Montgomery Environmental Specialist, Wetlands Department Attachments: 1. USGS Vicinity Map 2. Soil Survey Vicinity Map 3. Aerial Map 4. Photo Report 5. FWS List of threatened and endangered species that occur in your proposed location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project. Official Species List. August 4, 2020 6. NHP report re: Morrisville Parkway/HWY 55. August 4, 2020. 7. S&EC – FWS Species Conclusion Table. 08/14/2020. 8. S&EC – FWS Self-Certification Letter. 08/14/2020. References: -North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2017. Biotics Database. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina. -US Fish and Wildlife Service. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) & Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office Online Project Reviews website. -U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Species status assessment report for the Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni). Version 1.2. March, 2017. Atlanta, GA. -U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993. Michaux’s Sumac Recovery Plan. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 30pp. -U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Recovery Plan for the Red-cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) Second Revision. Atlanta GA 316 pp. Project Number: DSProject Manager: Scale:1" = 1000' 08/04/2020Date: Map Title: Source: USGS Map Morrisville Parkway/NC 55 Property Wake County, NC 2019 NC Cary & Green Level Quads ¯0 1,000 2,000 Feet 13134.W10 NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis Project Number: DSProject Manager: Scale:1" = 500' 08/04/2020Date: Map Title: Source: Soil Survey Morrisville Parkway/NC 55 Property Wake County, NC Wake County Soil Survey Sheet 45 ¯0 500 1,000 Feet 13134.W10 !?N C 5 5 H W Y BELMONT VIEW LOOPS E D G E F IE L D P A R K L NMORRISVILLE PKWYNC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board!?N C 5 5 H W Y BELMONT VIEW LOOPS E D G E F IE L D P A R K L NMORRISVILLE PKWYNC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 BoardμAerial Photo MapMorrisville Parkway/NC 55Wake Co., NCProject No.13134.W10Project Mgr.:SBScale:1" = 100'08/04/20200 200 400100FeetLegendEvaluation AreaPotentially Jurisdictional Perennial StreamPotentially Jurisdictional Intermittent StreamPotentially Jurisdictional Wetland 50' Town of Cary BufferSource:Aerials from NC One Map Job #: 13134.W10 August 14, 2020 1 Threatened and Endangered Species Photo Report for the Aspire at Cary Pointe Project Photo 1: Pine saplings along Morrisville Parkway Photo 2: Panther Creek Job #: 13134.W10 August 14, 2020 2 Photo 3: Panther Creek Photo 4: Intermittent Stream 9'18'24'24'24'24'24'24'9'18'18'9'18'9'18'9'9'18'18'18'9'9'15.5'18'5'8'NC HIGHWAY 55VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC R/WS 89°28'13" E 289.48'50'50'28'28'24'20' TOWN OF CARY UTILITY ESMTVAULTUCUCUCUCUCUCUCUCUCUBT2R1-1R1-1R1-1UBTIT2TIUCTITEUAUETQT2PIN: 0735-60-2672261,679 S.F.6.00 AC.3301 MORRISVILLE PKWY.ZONING: PDDUFOUFO HCHCHCHCHCHCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOC6C7N 0°42'50" W 329.61'C8C983.80'S 1°07'38" WN 88°52'22" W116.35'84.29'L14L15S 1°07'38" W L11L10L22 L13L17L19L18 L23L20 L21 L24 L25L12MORRISVILLE PARKWAY641114109910899(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)(TYP.)S5D-1.0S3D-1.0S1D-1.013S2D-1.0S7D-1.0PROPOSED 4-STORY BUILDING±194,564 GSFAFFE = 350.0S6D-1.014(T Y P . O F 4 )101012S4D-1.0S9D-1.114S3D-1.0S10D-1.1( T Y P . O F 3 )STANDARD 4-LANE THOROUGHFARE - 18' MEDIANVARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC R/WR6RW-2.0R7RW-2.010'8'5'20'100'11'13'24'13'11'WETLWETLXXXXXXXXXOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWETL WETLWETLWETLWETLWETLWETLWETLWE T L W E T L WETLWETLS11D-1.1S1D-1.0S10D-1.1S10D-1.1±312 LF OF PROPOSED SEGMENTAL BLOCKRETAINING WALL OF VARIABLE HEIGHT w/ 4'HIGH MINIMUM BLACK POWDER CHAINLINKFENCE. DESIGNED BY OTHERS.±242 LF OF PROPOSED SEGMENTAL BLOCKRETAINING WALL OF VARIABLE HEIGHT w/4' HIGH MINIMUM BLACK POWDERCHAINLINK FENCE. DESIGNED BY OTHERS.±251 LF OF PROPOSED SEGMENTAL BLOCKRETAINING WALL OF VARIABLE HEIGHT w/ 4'HIGH MINIMUM BLACK POWDER CHAINLINKFENCE. DESIGNED BY OTHERS.ADA PARKING WITHSIGNS, WHEELSTOPS, & ADA RAMPS(TYP. OF 6)PROPOSED 4" WHITEPAINT STRIPING (TYP.)5' WIDE, 4" THICKCONC. SIDEWALK(TYP.)24" CURB ANDGUTTER (TYP.)BIKE RACK(TYP. OF 2)CONCRETEPAVEMENTSECTIONFIRE LANEMARKINGS (TYP.),FIRE LANES SHALLBE MARKED PERTOWN OF CARYSTANDARD 3050-CNEW PROPERTY LINEBY RECOMBINATIONNEW PROPERTY BYRECOMBINATIONNEW PROPERTYLINE BYRECOMBINATIONASPHALTPAVEMENTSECTIONMAIN BUILDINGENTRANCE±3,615 SF OFDESIGNATED PUBLICGATHERING SPACEBOLLARD(TYP. OF 9)DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE,MATERIALS TO MATCHBUILDINGEX. STREAM(TYP.)STANDARDCROSSWALK15' X 220' SITEDISTANCETRIANGLE15' X 220' SITEDISTANCETRIANGLECURB RAMP(TYP. OF 10)NCDOT CURBRAMP (TYP. OF 4)± 3,831.70 SFNEW OFFSITEASPHALT± 11,764.80 SFNEW OFFSITEASPHALT±566 LF OF PROPOSEDSEGMENTAL BLOCKRETAINING WALL OFVARIABLE HEIGHT w/ 4'HIGH MINIMUM BLACKPOWDER CHAINLINKFENCE. DESIGNED BYOTHERS.NEW R/W LINE TO BERECORDED AFTERDEDICATIONR/W TO BE DEDICATEDTO TOWN OF CARYEX. R/WEX. R/W5' WIDE CONC.SIDEWALK (TYP.)30" NCDOTC&G (TYP)NEW R/W LINE TOBE RECORDEDAFTER DEDICATIONCENTERLINEOF EX. R/W15' X 220' SITEDISTANCETRIANGLE15,895 SF (0.365 AC) EX. WETLAND. ALL TOREMAIN. PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONALDETERMINATION PROVIDED BY SOIL &ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS ONMARCH 21, 2017.1,695 SF (0.039 AC) EX. WETLAND TOREMAIN AND BE PROTECTED.PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONALDETERMINATION PROVIDED BY SOIL& ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTSON OCTOBER 24, 2019.NCDOT CURBRAMP (TYP. OF 2)EDGE OF EXISTINGASPHALT PAVEMENTNEW PROPOSEDRAMP, SEEARCHITECTURALSHEETSNEW FHATRANSITION30" C&G TO 24"C&G (TYP. OF 2)TRANSITION30" C&G TO 24"C&G (TYP. OF 2)TRANSITION30" C&G TO 24"C&G (TYP. OF 2)CONC. WHEELSTOP (TYP. OF 9)TIE TO EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTER24" CURB ANDGUTTER (TYP.)NEW FHANEW FHA30" NCDOTC&G (TYP)30" NCDOTC&G (TYP)TIE TO EXISTINGCURB AND GUTTERS1D-1.024" CURBAND GUTTER(TYP.)LOADING ZONE8' x 8'GENERATOR PADNO PARKING ZONE10' x 8' TRANSFORMER PADTO BE INSTALLED BY DUKEENERGY PROGRESS40' AVG.STREETSCAPEBUFFER, 30' MIN.40' AVG.STREETSCAPEBUFFER, 30' MIN.5' ACCESSORY USE/VUASETBACK FROMSTREETSCAPE BUFFER20' PUBLICSANITARYSEWER ESMT10' BUILDINGSETBACKFROM UTBR15'R15'R2'R15'R45'R14.5 'R14.5R 7 ' R10'R40'R50'R20'R20'R225'R20'R231'R30'R3 0 ' R 1 4 . 5 ' R15'R15'R50'R50'R10' R 2 1 'R21'R113'R27'R33'R31'R30'R50'R112'R102'R15'R13'R14'R9'R20'R109'R108'R84'R84'R9'R39'R39'ASPHALTGREENWAY3' TOC UTILITYEASEMENT(BM 2012, PG 303)VARIABLE WIDTHSLOPE EASEMENT(BM 2012, PG 303)TO BE ABANDONEDPERMANENTDRAINAGE EASEMENT(DB 10176, PG 504PERMANENTDRAINAGE EASEMENT(DB 10176, PG 504ZONE 2ZONE 1VARIABLE WIDTHSLOPE EASEMENTTOP/BANKWETLAND FLAGS(BY OTHERS)50' RIPARIAN BUFFERZONE 2ZONE 1TOP/BANK ZONE 3SLOPEEASEMENTB.M. 2012 PG. 3013' TOWN OFCARY UTILITYEASEMENTB.M. 2012 PG. 3013' TOC UTILITYEASEMENT(BM 2012, PG 301)50' RIPARIAN BUFFER100' TOWN OF CARYURBAN TRANSITION BUFFERSLOPE EASEMENT(BM 2012, PG 303)TO BE ABANDONEDDRAINAGEEASEMENTB.M. 2012 PG. 209VARIABLE WIDTHSLOPE EASEMENT(BM 2012, PG 303)TO BE ABANDONEDS3D-1.05' WIDE CONC.SIDEWALK (TYP.)1L16S3D-1.05' WIDE, 4" THICKCONC. SIDEWALK(TYP.)S3D-1.05' WIDE, 4" THICKCONC. SIDEWALK(TYP.)S3D-1.06' WIDE, 4" THICKCONC. SIDEWALK(TYP.)S12D-1.1S11D-1.1CONC. WHEELSTOP (TYP. OF 6)S3D-1.05' WIDE CONC.ADA SIDEWALK(5% MAX SLOPE)14'11'11'36'4:1 TAPER5' WIDE, 4" THICKCONCRETE SIDEWALKS3D-1.05' WIDE CONC.SIDEWALK (TYP.)5' ACCESSORYUSE/VUASETBACKFROM UTB5'S3D-1.06' WIDE, 4" THICKCONC. SIDEWALK(TYP.)S12D-1.1S3D-1.05' WIDE, 4"THICK CONC.SIDEWALK (TYP.)S3D-1.06' WIDE, 4" THICK CONC.SIDEWALK (TYP.)S12D-1.1R3-2R3-224'(TYP.)S3D-1.04'-6" WIDE, 4" THICKCONC. SIDEWALK (TYP.)S12D-1.1S8D-1.0REFER TO SHEETRW-1.0 FOR ALLMORRISVILLEPKWY PAVEMENTMARKINGSR6-1R6-1TIE TO EX.GUARDRAIL± 388 LF NEW GUARDRAILS 06°11'12" E 289.27'N 89°48'24" W 520.92'S 61°41 '09" W 204 .00 'C3C4S 89°17'10" W 283.32'S 89°17'10" W 109.94'CONTROL CORNERN: 750,628.15E: 2,036,590.57S4D-1.0S3D-1.0S3D-1.06' WIDE, 4"THICK CONC.SIDEWALK(TYP.)S12D-1.1C-2.0490-19MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE LAYOUT PLAN SIGNSLAYOUT NOTES1.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN OF CARYAND NCDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.2.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT, EDGE OF SIDEWALK, FACE OFCURB, CENTERLINE OF COLUMN AND FACE OF BUILDING WALL, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED. ALL RADII DIMENSIONS TO BACK OF CURB.3.ALL PAINT STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM TOTHE "MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES" OR AS REQUIRED INSPECIFICATIONS.4.ALL STRIPING SHALL BE 4" WIDE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.5.ALL RADII TO BE 3'-0" BOC UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.6.VERIFY ALL SETBACKS WITH LOCAL CODES.7.A SEPARATE PERMIT AND APPROVAL IS REQUIRED FOR SIGNS.8.ALL RETAINING WALLS REQUIRE A BUILDING PERMIT. WALLS GREATER THAN 4' INHEIGHT WILL REQUIRE ENGINEERING DESIGN APPROVAL AT CONSTRUCTIONDRAWING REVIEW AS WELL AS A BUILDING PERMIT. ENSURE THAT NO UTILITIESWILL BE IN CONFLICT WITH STRUCTURAL REINFORCEMENT OF THE WALL.9.ALL CURB RAMPS SHALL HAVE A DETECTABLE WARNING COMPLYING WITHSECTIONS 4.7.7 AND 4.29.2 OF THE ADA ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES (ADAAG).10.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS FOR THEINSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS AS SHOWN ONTHE CONSTRUCTION PLANS.11.ALL NON-LANDSCAPED PARKING ISLANDS SHALL BE PAINTED WITH WHITE STRIPES 4" WIDE, AT 45° ADN 2 FEET ON CENTER.12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO OTHER PLANS WITHIN THIS CONSTRUCTION SETFOR OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION.13.DETECTABLE WARNINGS ARE REQUIRED AT ANY CROSSWALK, OR ISLAND CUTTHRU, WHERE THERE IS NO CHANGE IN ELEVATION (I.E. RAMP NOT PROVIDED).NOTE(s):ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN OFCARY, NCDOT, AND MUTCD STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS.WETLAND NOTESLEGENDPROPOSED PUBLIC EASEMENTWETLEXISTING LIMITS OF WETLANDSSURVEY LEGENDIPF - - - IRON PIPE FOUNDCMF - - - CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUNDCP - - - COMPUTED POINTDIST - - - DISTURBEDR/W - - - RIGHT-OF-WAYSN - - - SIGNELP - - - ELECTRICAL PEDESTALFOV - - - FIBEROPTICS VAULTSIG - - - SIGNAL BOXFOM - - - FIBEROPTICS MARKERTEV - - - TELECOMMUNICATION VAULTRCP - - - REINFORCED CONC. PIPEPVC - - - POLYVINYL CHLORIDA PIPEC+G - - - CURB & GUTTEREP - - - EDGE OF PAVEMENTHC - - - HANDICAPLP - - - LIGHT POLEGV - - - GAS VALVESIGDSFWEX SEWER MANHOLEEX STORM MANHOLEEX STORM INLETEX WATER MANHOLEEX WATER VALVEEX FIRE HYDRANTRIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATIONMUTCD "STOP" R1-1R1-1CONVENTIONAL ROAD:SINGLE LANE: 30" X 30"MULTI-LANE: 36" X 36"FIRE NOTES:1.FIRE LANES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC STREETREQUIREMENTS AND THE FIRE CODE. THE REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTALLATION OF A FIRE LANE SHALL BESUBJECT TO THE FIRE CODE.2.ALL FIRE LANES SHALL BE MARKED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:2.1.CONTINUOUSLY MARKED WITH YELLOW PAINT STRIPING ALONG THE FIRE LANE WITH "NO PARKINGFIRE LANE" PRINTED WITH MINIMUM 8" HIGH LETTERS AT 40' INTERVALS OR AS DIRECTED BY THEFIRE MARSHAL.2.2.CONTINUOUSLY MARKED WITH YELLOW PAINTED CURB WITH "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" ALONG THEFIRE LANE WITHNO PARKING - FIRE LANE" PRINTED WITH MINIMUM 8" HIGH LETTERS AT 40' INTERVALS OR ASDIRECTED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL.2.3.THE INSTALLATION OF THE MUTCD STANDARD SIGN SHOWING "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" PLACEDAT EACH END OF THE FIRE LAND AND AT 50' INTERVALS WITH ARROWS ON THE SIGNS OR ACONTINUOUSLY PAINTED YELLOW STRIP ALONG THE DESIGNATED FIRE LANE.1.PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION PROVIDED BY SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS(S&EC) ON OCTOBER 24, 2019. (S&EC PROJECT # 13134.W7). WETLANDS ARE LOCATED ON THE SUBJECTPROPERTY.2.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS IS IN PROGRESS OF ISSUING A WETLAND DETERMINATION WITH UNKNOWNDATE.3.CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HAS BEEN INITIATED REGARDING THEREQUEST FOR A 404 (CLEAN WATER ACT, 33 USC 1344) TO BE ISSUED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT.4.CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY HAS BEEN INITIATED REGARDINGREQUEST FOR A 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION TO BE ISSUED, PERMITTING FILL MATERIAL TO BEPLACED IN THE DESIGNATED WETLAND.5.WETLAND AREAS SHOWN ON C-1.0 ARE EXISTING LIMITS OF WETLANDS. WETLAND AREAS SHOWN ON ALLOTHER SHEETS LIMITS OF WETLANDS POST FILLING.19,332 SF (0.444 AC.) ± EXISTING TOTAL ONSITE WETLANDS- 1,742 SF (0.040 AC.) ± WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED= 17,590 SF (0.404 AC.) TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTEDCARY, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAFOR REVIEW ONLYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSETBACK & EASEMENT NOTES:1.NEW PLAT APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH ANY NECESSARY ACCESS AND UTILITYEASEMENTS. REQUIRED PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED AFTER APPROVAL OF SITE PLANS FROM TOWN OFCARY.2.EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE EXISTING PER BM 2012, PG 301, BM 2012, PG 303, BM 2012, PG209. SEE THIS SHEET (C-2.0) FOR EASEMENTS.1 inch = 50 ft.( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALE0505010020025NAD83 SITE DISTANCE CALCULATIONS:1.MORRISVILLE PKWY IS A THORUGHFARE 2-LANE, WITH MEDIAN WITH DESIGNSPEED OF 45 MPH.2.SITE INGRESS DOES NOT REQUIRE SITE TRIANGLE. SITE EGRESS REQUIRESSIGHT TRIANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNING TRAFFIC.3.PER TOWN OF CARY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS MANUAL, SITETRIANGLE IS CALCULATED AS THE FOLLOWING:D1 = 15'D2 = 220' (PER AASHTO'S POLICY ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYSAND STREETS)EXISTING WETLANDRIPARIAN BUFFERDESCRIPTIONWIDTHKEY ITEMQCPAINTSTRAIGHT ARROWP2PAINTSTOP BAR24"P3PAINTWHITE CROSSWALK LINE8"QAPAINTLEFT TURN ARROWPIPAINTYELLOW DOUBLE CENTER LINE4"PEPAINTYELLOW SOLID LANE LINE4"QBPAINTRIGHT TURN ARROWQEPAINTCOMBO. RIGHT/STRAIGHT ARROWLINE TABLELINEL10L11L12L14L15L16L17L18L19L20L21L22L23L24L25LENGTH59.87'100.08'10.22'25.98'108.23'50.21'56.16'17.55'13.69'14.10'32.04'51.85'51.14'35.72'127.52'DIRECTIONN53°24'08"ES83°48'01"ES89°15'54"ES84°22'13"ES89°26'23"ES47°43'33"EN39°15'11"WN5°09'45"EN53°41'36"WN17°05'26"EN17°28'34"EN11°50'51"EN5°15'06"WN14°03'01"EN29°39'22"WL1385.02'S89°15'54"EL5A28.26N 89°02'48" EC3C438.90168.671423.35'1861.47N 73°02'13" EN 76°24'54" E38.90168.62CURVE TABLECURVEC6C7C8C9LENGTH231.83'71.91'126.04'111.47'RADIUS1423.35'1423.35'1423.35'13699.50'BEARINGN59°37'10"EN65°43'58"EN69°43'01"EN89°19'59"ECHORD231.5771.91126.00111.47MUTCD "NO LEFT TURN" R3-2R3-2CONVENTIONAL ROAD:SINGLE LANE: 24" X 24"MULTI-LANE: 36" X 36"MUTCD "ONE WAY" R6-2RR6-2R August 04, 2020 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 Phone: (919) 856-4520 Fax: (919) 856-4556 In Reply Refer To: Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-1612 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03665 Project Name: Morrisville Parkway/Highway 55 (Aspire at Cary Pointe) Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized, funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or 08/04/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03665   2    evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the web site often for updated information or changes If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys. If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects, before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles. Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/ eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and bats. Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http:// www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http:// www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/ comtow.html. Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7 consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at john_ellis@fws.gov. 08/04/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03665   3    ▪ Attachment(s): Official Species List 08/04/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03665   1    Official Species List This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 (919) 856-4520 08/04/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03665   2    Project Summary Consultation Code:04EN2000-2020-SLI-1612 Event Code:04EN2000-2020-E-03665 Project Name:Morrisville Parkway/Highway 55 (Aspire at Cary Pointe) Project Type:DEVELOPMENT Project Description:Project is located within the Southwest quadrant of Morrisville Parkway and Highway 55, Wake County, NC Project Location: Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/place/35.812998487080975N78.8752080951093W Counties:Wake, NC 08/04/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03665   3    1. Endangered Species Act Species There is a total of 3 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. Birds NAME STATUS Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614 Endangered Clams NAME STATUS Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164 Proposed Threatened Flowering Plants NAME STATUS Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217 Endangered 1 08/04/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03665   4    Critical habitats THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION. NCNHDE-12598 August 4, 2020 Robert Zarzecki Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104 Raleigh, NC 27615 RE: Aspire at Cary Pointe; 13134.W10 Dear Robert Zarzecki: The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above. Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our records. The attached ‘Potential Occurrences’ table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report. If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here: https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37. Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission. The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund easement, or Federally-listed species are documented near the project area. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler@ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603. Sincerely, NC Natural Heritage Program Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area Aspire at Cary Pointe Project No. 13134.W10 August 4, 2020 NCNHDE-12598 Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area Taxonomic Group EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Observation Date Element Occurrence Rank Accuracy Federal Status State Status Global Rank State Rank Dragonfly or Damselfly 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004-Pre H?5-Very Low ---Significantly Rare G5 S2? No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type Town of Cary Open Space - Mills School Park Town of Cary Local Government Town of Cary Open Space - Future Park Town of Cary Local Government Town of Cary Open Space - Future Park Town of Cary Local Government Town of Cary Open Space - Cary Tennis Park Town of Cary Local Government Town of Cary Open Space - Future Park Town of Cary Local Government Town of Cary Open Space - Green Hope Elementary School Park Town of Cary Local Government Town of Cary Open Space - Sears Farm Rd Park Town of Cary Local Government Wake County Greenway - OS-034 Wake County Local Government Town of Cary Open Space - Future Park Town of Cary Local Government Town of Cary Open Space Town of Cary Local Government Town of Cary Open Space Town of Cary Local Government Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on August 4, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q3 July 2020. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database. Page 2 of 3 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Page 3 of 3 Species Conclusions Table Project Name: Aspire at Cary Pointe Date: August 14, 2020 Species / Resource Name Conclusion ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination Notes / Documentation Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis No suitable habitat present No effect Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC staff on August 12, 2020. Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni No suitable habitat present No effect Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC staff on August 12, 2020. Michaux’s Sumac Rhus michauxii Suitable habitat present, species not present No effect Survey completed by S&EC staff on August 12, 2020. Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Unlikely to disturb nesting bald eagles No Eagle Act Permit required Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC staff on August 12, 2020. Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Suitable habitat present, species not present May affect, not likely to adversely effect Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC staff on August 12, 2020. Critical Habitat No critical habitat present No effect Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas. Mason Montgomery / Environmental Specialist, Wetlands Department at S&EC, PA August 14, 2020 Signature /Title Date Raleigh Field Office P.O. Box 33726 Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 Date:__________________________ Self-Certification Letter Project Name______________________________ Dear Applicant: Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter, and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat. 884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained in our records. The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the determinations that apply: “no effect” determinations for proposed/listed species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or “may affect, not likely to adversely affect” determinations for proposed/listed species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or “may affect, likely to adversely affect” determination for the Northern long- eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5, 2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the Northern long-eared bat; “no Eagle Act permit required” determinations for eagles. Applicant Page 2 We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the “no effect” or “not likely to adversely affect” determinations for proposed and listed species and proposed and designated critical habitat; the “may affect” determination for Northern long-eared bat; and/or the “no Eagle Act permit required” determinations for eagles. Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species. Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html. If you have any questions, you can write to us at Raleigh@fws.gov or please contact Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10. Sincerely, /s/Pete Benjamin Pete Benjamin Field Supervisor Raleigh Ecological Services Enclosures - project review package