HomeMy WebLinkAbout20181274 Ver 1_USACE Correspondence_20200909Strickland, Bev
From:
Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<Kimberly.D.Browning@usace.army.mil>
Sent:
Wednesday, September 9, 2020 12:00 PM
To:
Jeff Keaton; Davis, Erin B
Cc:
Haywood, Casey M CIV (USA)
Subject:
RE: [External] Lyon Hills Culvert
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as
an attachment to report.spam@nc.gov<mailto:report.spam@nc.gov>
Correct, as long as the failed culvert replacement occurs "in place" and you're not extending the footprint of
the culvert or installing additional dissipater pads, no permit mod is required.
Kim Browning
Mitigation Project Manager, Regulatory Division I U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
-----Original Message -----
From: Jeff Keaton <jkeaton@wildlandseng.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2020 11:44 AM
To: Davis, Erin B <erin.davis@ncdenr.gov>
Cc: Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Kimberly.D.Browning@usace.army.mil>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] Lyon Hills Culvert
OK, great. Kim - Same for you?
From: Davis, Erin B <erin.davis@ncdenr.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 11:42 AM
To: Jeff Keaton <jkeaton@wildlandseng.com>
Cc: Kim Browning <Kimberly.D.Browning@usace.army.mil>
Subject: RE: [External] Lyon Hills Culvert
Correct. If there will be no change to impacts, then a permit modification is not required. We just need a
record of the crossing type change for the mitigation plan. Thanks.
1
From: Jeff Keaton [mailto:jkeaton@wildlandseng.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 10:38 AM
To: Kim Browning <Kimberly.D.Browning@usace.army.mil <mailto:Kimberly.D.Browning@usace.army.mil> >;
Davis, Erin B <erin.davis@ncdenr.gov <mailto:erin.davis@ncdenr.gov> >
Subject: [External] Lyon Hills Culvert
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as
an attachment to report.spam@nc.gov <mailto:report.spam@nc.gov>
Kim & Erin - I asked Charlie to determine if there would be a change in stream impacts due to the switch from
bridge to culvert. There are no wetlands in that location. This is what he said: The crossing will serve an
established, ongoing agricultural operation so we expected it to be exempt from 401/404 permitting. No
impact length associated with this crossing was submitted in the PCN. Therefore there is no change in impacts.
Does that make sense? If this is correct, then we don't need to change the permits, right? It may also help to
know that an agricultural crossing that was previously established at this location failed in September of 2018
(Hurricane Florence), so we will just be replacing the culverts. Thanks.
Jeff Keaton, PE I Senior Water Resources Engineer
0:919.851.9986 x103 M:919.302.6919
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
<Blockedhttps://urldefense.com/v3/_http:/www.wiIdlandseng.com/_;!!HYmSToo!OdBO6N25hdM9g2Ee5E
wQuTDoxoj3fTUyazEdjugmTwdyaoLrTNXRG_J3tlmv3GYx6Fk$>
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609