Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20150416 Ver 1_Notice of Initial Credit Release_20201006Strickland, Bev From: Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Kimberly.D.Browning@usace.army.mil> Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 8:54 AM To: Reid, Matthew; Wiesner, Paul; Allen, Melonie; Baumgartner, Tim; King, Scott (Scott.King@mbakerintl.com); katie mckeithan Cc: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Byron Hamstead; Bowers, Todd; Davis, Erin B; Haywood, Casey M CIV (USA); Leslie, Andrea J; Wilson, Travis W.; McLendon, C S CIV USARMY CESAW (USA); Smith, Ronnie D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA); Jones, M Scott (Scott) CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) Subject: [External] Notice of Initial Credit Release/ NCDMS Russell Gap Mitigation Site/ SAW-2015-00826 / Alexander County Attachments: Russell Gap_100003_STR_RW_CT 01_Initial Release.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed • External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Wort.spam@nc.gov Good morning The 15-Day Record Drawing and MY-0 review for the Russell Gap Mitigation Site (SAW-2015-00826) ended October 2, 2020. Per Section 332.8(o)(9) of the 2008 Mitigation Rule, this review followed the streamlined review process. There were no objections to issuing the initial credit release and the revised assets have been approved at 9,166.949 warm SMUs and 7.053 WMUs. Please find attached the current signed ledger, and IRT comments below. The IRT would like to visit this site in spring 2021. DWR Comments. Erin Davis: 1. Regarding the change from rock step structures to boulder step structures, are there any concerns with aquatic passage? 2. DWR is ok with the additional plant species installed. 3. In future MYO baseline reports, please note whether there are changes in monitoring locations from the approved mitigation plan (e.g. groundwater well MW12); not including minor shifts in field placements. EPA Comments, Todd Bowers: • The vegetation plot data in Appendix D has some serious deficiencies. o The species planted is not provided in the list. I find this troubling for several reasons. Since the data was gathered immediately after planting the species should still be tagged and known. Even in the absence of tags, a botanist with basic skills should be able to determine species based on stem, bundle scar and bud characteristics. I trust this will be rectified in the growing season monitoring report for Year 1. o I found that several plots (permanent plots 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10; random plots 1, 2, 3, 7 and 9) are well below the desired planted density of 680 stems per acre. One plot, random 2, is nearing the threshold for year 3 success of 320 stems per acre. Granted this plot/exact location is likely not to be sampled again but it is indicative of potential trouble of tree survival in this location. o Planted species percentages cannot be determined or verified by plot data to confirm if planted percentages follows the desired species ratios in the mitigation plan. o I have no issues with substituting Shumard oak on -site but the percentages are unknown. • The color scheme used for the site assets is a bit odd and unlike others I have seen by both Baker and other providers. This is a topic that the IRT can discuss internally but providers should agree to some sort of color scheme for legends in forthcoming plans and reports. Tthe green for stream restoration is difficult to see and it is mainly used for preservation on other projects. • I appreciate Baker's use of 50-foot riparian buffers on this site especially as livestock operations and other agricultural purposes are continuing as an adjacent land use. I did not submit comments on the original mitigation plan but this would have been included as a recommendation. • Deviations from the mitigation plan as far as rock step pool features substituted with boulder steps on Reaches 11, 13, 15, 18, 19 and 27 are noted and I have no concerns. Gate locations and fence adjustments are noted and approved of as well. • Excellent spread of photos highlighting stream structures, veg plots and gauges. Please contact the mitigation office if you have questions. Thanks, Kim Browning Mitigation Project Manager, Regulatory Division I U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mitigation Project Name Russell Gap DMS ID 100003 River Basin Catawba Cataloging Unit 03050101 USACE Action ID 2015-00826 DWR Permit 2015-0416 Date Project Instituted 9/15/2016 Stream/Wet. Service Area Catawba 03050101 County Alexander Date Printed 9/14/2020 BROWN ING.KIMBERLY.DANIELLE.1527683510 Digitally signed by BROWN ING.KIMBERLY.DANIELLE.1527683510 Date: 2020.10.06 08:35:35-04'00' Signature of Official Approving Credit Release Credit Release Milestone Warm Stream Credits Project Credits Scheduled Releases % Estimated Scheduled Release # Proposed Released # Not Approved Releases Approved Credits Anticipated Release Year Actual Release Date 1 - Site Establishment N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 - Year 0 / As -Built 30.00% 2,750.085 2,750.085 0.000 2,750.085 2020 9/14/2020 3 - Year 1 Monitoring 10.00% 916.695 2021 4 - Year 2 Monitoring 10.00% 916.695 2022 5 - Year 3 Monitoring 10.00% 916.695 2023 6 - Year 4 Monitoring 5.00% 458.347 2024 7 - Year 5 Monitoring 10.00% 916.695 2025 8 - Year 6 Monitoring 5.00% 458.347 2026 9 - Year 7 Monitoring 10.00% 916.695 2027 Stream Bankfull Standard 10.00% 916.695 2022 Totals 2,750.085 Total Gross Credits 9,166.949 Total Unrealized Credits to Date 0.000 Total Released Credits to Date 2,750.085 Total Percentage Released 30.00% Remaining Unreleased Credits 6,416.864 Credit Release Milestone Riparian Credits Project Credits Scheduled Releases % Estimated Scheduled Release # Proposed Released # Not Approved #Releases Approved Credits Anticipated Release Year Actual Release Date 1 - Site Establishment N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 - Year 0 / As -Built 30.00% 2.116 2.116 0.000 2.116 2020 9/14/2020 3 - Year 1 Monitoring 10.00% 0.705 2021 4 - Year 2 Monitoring 10.00% 0.705 2022 5 - Year 3 Monitoring 15.00% 1.058 2023 6 - Year 4 Monitoring 5.00% 0.353 2024 7 - Year 5 Monitoring 15.00% 1.058 2025 8 - Year 6 Monitoring 5.00% 0.353 2026 9 - Year 7 Monitoring 10.00% 0.705 2027 Stream Bankfull Standard N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Totals 2.116 Total Gross Credits 7.053 Total Unrealized Credits to Date 0.000 Total Released Credits to Date 2.116 Total Percentage Released 30.00% Remaining Unreleased Credits 4.937 Page 1 of 2 Mitigation Project Name Russell Gap USACE Action ID DMS ID 100003 DWR Permit River Basin Catawba Date Project Instituted Cataloging Unit 03050101 Stream/Wet. Service Area County Alexander Date Printed Notes Contingencies (if any) Project Quantities Mitigation Type Restoration Type Physical Quantity Warm Stream Restoration 4,693.740 Warm Stream Enhancement I 4,895.060 Warm Stream Enhancement II 2,930.560 Riparian Restoration 6.773 Riparian Enhancement 0.559 2015-00826 2015-0416 9/15/2016 Catawba 03050101 9/14/2020 Debits Warm Stream Restoration Credits Riparian Restoration Riparian Restoration Equivalent Credits Beginning Balance (mitigation credits) 9,166.949 6.773 0.280 Released Credits 2,750.085 2.032 0.084 Unrealized Credits 0.000 0.000 0.000 Converted Credits 0.000 0.000 0.000 Owning Program Req. Id TIP # Project Name USACE Permit # DWR Permit # DCM Permit # Remaining Balance (Released credits) 2,750.085 2.032 0.084 Remaining Balance (Unreleased credits) 6,416.864 4.741 0.196 Total Remaining Balance (Released and Unreleased credits) 9,166.949 6.773 0.280 Page 2 of 2