The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWI0100353_Monitoring (Report)_20180206ENR USE ONLY ❑Pa er Report []Electronic Data - Email CD (data loaded: Yes / No ] Doc/Event #: :NC DENR P IEnvironmental Monitoring Division of Waste Management - Solid Waste Reporting Form Notice: This form and any information attached to it are "Public Records" as defined in NC General Statute 132-1. As such, these documents are available for inspection and examination by any person upon request (NC General Statute 132-6). Instructions: Prepare one form for each individually monitored unit. Please type or print legibly. Attach a notification table with values that attain or exceed NC 2L groundwater standards or NC 2B surface water standards. The notification must include a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of each value (e g naturally occurring, off -site source, pre-existing condition, etc.). Attach a notification table of any groundwater or surface water values that equal or exceed the reporting limits. Attach a notification table of any methane gas values that attain or exceed explosive gas levels. This includes any structures on or nearby the facility (NCAC 13B .1629 (4)(a)(i). Send the original signed and sealed form, any tables, and Electronic Data Deliverable to: Compliance Unit, NCDENR-DWM, Solid Waste Section, 1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1646. Solid Waste Monitoring Data Submittal information Name of entity submitting data (laboratory, consultant, facility owner): SCS Engineers, PC -Consultant; Pace Labs- Laboratory Contact for questions about data formatting. Include data preparer's name, telephone number and E-mail address: Name: C. Ed Hilton, Jr., P.E. Phone: 813-804-6791 E-mail: ehilton@scsengineers.com NC Landfill Rule: Actual sampling dates (e.g., Facility name: Facility Address Facility Permit # ( 0500 or .1600) October 20-24, 2006) i Buncombe County Old Landfill 2726 Riverview Road (Closed) (Highway 251) 11-01 1600 October 10-16. 2017 Environmental Status: (Check all that apply) Initial/Background Monitoring ❑X Detection Monitoring OX Assessment Monitoring U Corrective Action Type of data submitted: (Check all that apply) X Groundwater monitoring data from monitoring wells ❑ Methane gas monitoring data Groundwater monitoring data from private water supply wells ❑ Corrective action data (specify) Leachate monitoring data HX Surface water monitoring dataOther(specify) Notification attached? No No groundwater or surface water standards were exceeded. RX Yes, a notification of values exceeding a groundwater or surface water standard is attached. It includes a list of groundwater and surface water monitoring points, dates, analytical values, NC 2L groundwater standard, NC 2B surface water standard or NC Solid Waste GWPS and preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of any concentration Yes, a notification of values exceeding an explosive methane gas limit is attached. It includes the methane monitoring points, dates, sample values and explosive methane gas limits Certification To the best of my knowledge, the information reported and statements made on this data submittal and attachments are true and correct. Furthermore, I have attached complete notification of any sampling values meeting or exceeding groundwater standards or explosive gas levels, and a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of concentrations exceeding groundwater standards. I am aware that there are significant penalties for making any false statement, representation, or certification including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment. C. Ed Hilton, Jr, P.E Vice President (813)804-6791 Facility Represent Live Name (Pr' t) Title a +at�X 0 7�-� � 2%cjt- Signature 5850 S Semoran Blvd, Orlando, FL 32822 Facility Representative Address PE - 7909 NC PE Firm License Number (if applicable effective May 1, 2009) Qo„��o,� ai�nna Date (Area Code) Telephone Number Affix NC Licensedl Pfofe"i®ijal Geologist Seal 8 S E A f_ " 7909 u a e `IvL IKE��;bd' : 09.0 t+ Old Buncombe County Landfill Permit No. 1 101 Fall 2017 Semi -Annual Monitoring and Monitored Natural Attenuation Sampling Report Presented to: Buncombe County Solid Waste Department 81 Panther Branch Road Alexander, North Carolina 28701 (828)250-5460 Presented by: SCS ENGINEERS, PC 5850 S Semoran Blvd Orlando, FL 32822 (81 3) 804-6791 February 6, 2018 File No. 09204072.15 Offices Nationwide www.scsengineers.co Table of Contents Section Page 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................1 2 BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................................................................1 3 SAMPLING METHODOLOGY..........................................................................................................................3 4 SEMI-ANNUAL SAMPLING RESULTS.............................................................................................................3 SURFACEWATER.................................................................................................................................................3 GROUNDWATER DETECTIONS......................................................................................................................3 GROUNDWATER EXCEEDANCES..................................................................................................................4 5 MNA SAMPLING RESULTS................................................................................................................................4 BIOCHLORMODEL..............................................................................................................................................5 b CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................5 7 REFERENCES...........................................................................................................................................................6 Figures Figure 1. Groundwater Contours Tables Tablel. Sample Parameters Table 2. EPA Screening Table Table 3. EPA Screening Interpretations Appendices Appendix A — Sampling Forms Appendix B — Well Condition Summary Appendix C — Chain of Custody Appendix D — Surface Water Detections Appendix E — Surface Water Exceedances Appendix F — Groundwater Detections Appendix G — Groundwater Exceedances Old Buncombe County Landfill i Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report Solid Waste Services INTRODUCTION On behalf of the Buncombe County Solid Waste Division, SCS Engineers, PC (SCS) respectfully submits this report summarizing the findings of the fall 2017 semi-annual sampling event to the Solid Waste Section and the Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program (permit #W10100353) of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). SCS conducted semi-annual sampling at the Buncombe County Solid Waste Management Facility Old Landfill (permit no. 1101) on October IOth through October 26', 2017. Sampling for Monitored Natural Attenuation was also performed in accordance with the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) approved by DEQ on September 24, 2014.This report summarizes the sampling methodology, results, conclusions and recommendations from this semi-annual sampling event. 2 BACKGROUND The Old Buncombe County Landfill (OBCL), located at 2726 Riverview Road is closed and currently monitored under post -closure care. The OBCL was an unlined landfill and approved to receive municipal, industrial, and construction solid wastes, along with household waste and yard debris. Leachate from the waste areas have mixed with the groundwater as evidenced from chlorinated solvents detected in down -gradient monitoring wells in excess of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) standards beginning in 1985 to the present. Waste Areas A, B, and C stopped receiving waste prior to October 9, 1991. Area D stopped receiving waste on September 27, 1997 in accordance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Rule T15A: 13B .1627(c)(10)(A). Institutional controls are in place which restricts access to and use of the OBCL, and eliminates or minimizes exposure to site contaminants. All disposal areas have been closed and capped in accordance with permit modifications for closure under 15A North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) Chapter 13B. The OBCL has controlled access and perimeter fencing to limit site access. An active gas collection system was constructed and is operated by Enerdyne. This system generates power from a small facility located on the property. The County has constructed a Safety Training Facility on property outside of the waste fill area but within the original landfill property limits. This area has controlled access and perimeter fencing that separates its facilities from the waste - containing areas of the landfill property. The habitable buildings in this area are equipped with sub -floor vapor extraction systems and gas detectors that are monitored continuously by on -site personnel. While these vapor intrusion controls have been installed specifically to address potential methane gas issues, it is expected that the vapor systems in permanently occupied spaces will also help to mitigate any potential issues arising from a vapor intrusion pathway. The groundwater plume has been monitored over the years by a series of monitoring wells around the perimeter of the landfill (Figure 1). Currently 24 monitoring wells are sampled semi - Old Buncombe County Landfill 1 Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report Solid Waste Services annually (DPLr2 was converted to an Injection Well prior for the fall 2015 injection event). Groundwater samples collected from these wells have been analyzed for the typical landfill parameters (metals, semi -volatile organic compounds, volatile organic compounds, etc.). Concentrations in excess of the Title 15A NCAC Subchapter 2L (NC2L) groundwater standards have been reported primarily for metals and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The extent of the groundwater plume has been delineated and concentrations of contaminants have generally been declining. Additional remedial measures, enhanced in -situ bioremediation (EIB) were performed in September 2015 in accordance with the March 2015 CAP Addendum and the Injection Permit W10100353. Five main groundwater flow paths, referred to as transects, have been identified down -gradient from the OBCL waste piles presented below. Transect 1 M W-4A MW-12-25 MW-13-35 MW-13-132 M W-24-45 Transect 2 MW-B MW-17-60 MW-17-137 MW-24-160 Italicized -FIB Injection Well Bold-MNA Performance Well Bold& Italicized-MNA Sentinel Well Transect 3 MW-3 M W-21-21 MW-21-94 Transect 4 MW-DPL-2 M W-4 MW-19-75 MW-19-110 Transect 5 M W-6 MW-6-192 MW-5 DPL-1 MW-18-78 Transects 1 and 5 appear to be long enough to naturally attenuate VOCs observed immediately down -gradient from the waste piles prior to reaching the French Broad River. MNA is the only remedial activity for Transects 1 and 5. Transect 2 appears to have been successfully remediated following the pilot testing of EIB using hydrogen release compound injection. Transect 3 and 4 show contaminants reach the French Broad River before natural attenuation processes may completely de -chlorinate site VOCs. Therefore more aggressive clean-up actions consisting of enhancing natural attenuation through substrate addition were implemented along the short flow path system. DPL-2 and the newly installed IW-1 were used as the fractured bedrock injection points for substrate addition based on their close proximity to the source plume. Direct injection to the base of the regolith was also used to treat the high flow zone which may be used to remediate both short and long fracture controlled flow paths along Transects 3 and 4. Substrate addition was conducted in September, 2015 prior to the fall 2015 semi-annual sampling event. Old Buncombe County Landfill 2 Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report Solid Waste Services 3 SAMPLING METHODOLOGY Twenty one monitoring wells were sampled during the fall 2017 event. Three monitoring wells were dry and no samples were collected (DPLr1, MW-24-45, and MW-7). Groundwater samples were collected from October IOth through 16th, 2017. The four surface water samples were collected on October 10", 2017. All samples were collected and analyzed by Pace Laboratories (Pace) in Asheville, NC for analysis of Appendix I and H constituents list as well as MNA parameters as specified in Table 1. All groundwater sampling and analyses were performed in accordance with 15A NCAC 13B .1632 and the approved CAP. Pace analytical laboratories collected groundwater samples, to be tested for MNA parameters, from 10 monitoring wells (MW-2, MW-4, MW-6, MW-13-132, MW-18-78, MW-19-75, MW- 19-110, MW-21-21, MW-21-94, and MW-24-160). Field parameters including pH, temperature, specific conductivity, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, oxidative/reductive potential (ORP) and water level were measured and recorded at each groundwater, surface water and leachate sampling site. Field logs with recorded parameters are included in Attachment A and well condition summary forms are included in Attachment B. After samples were collected, they were placed on ice, logged on a chain of custody and sent to Pace Laboratories in Asheville, NC, a laboratory certified by the State of North Carolina for all applicable analyses. A copy of the chain of custody is provided as Attachment C. 4 SEMI-ANNUAL SAMPLING RESULTS A groundwater contour maps was created from the water level field data and is included as Figure 1. SURFACE WATER A summary of detections is provided in Appendix D. Metals detected in the surface water samples were barium, copper, vanadium, and zinc. No VOCs were detected in surface water samples. Two samples exceeded turbidity maximum contaminate levels (MCL) of 25 NTUs at SW-1 (91.78 NTUs) and SW-2 (79.49 NTUs). A summary of surface water exceedances is included in Appendix E. GROUNDWATER DETECTIONS Metals and VOCs were detected in ground water samples. A summary of groundwater detections is included in Appendix F. VOC constituents detected include 1, 1 -dichloroethane, 1,2- dichlorobenzene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, benzene, chlorobenzene, chloroethane, cis-1,2- dichloroethene, ethylbenzene, toluene, trichloroethene, vinyl chloride, 6-xylene, and xylene. Metal constituents detected include barium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, nickel, vanadium, and zinc. Old Buncombe County Landfill 3 Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report Solid Waste Services GROUNDWATER EXCEEDANCES Ten of the 21 monitoring wells sampled had concentrations in excess of the NC2L Groundwater Standards. A summary of groundwater exceedances is provided in Appendix G. The exceedances were consistent with historic concentrations at their respective wells. VOCs exceedances were as follows: 1, 1 -dichloroethane was above the MCL of 6 ug/L in MW-3 (7.5 ug/L), MW-4 (15.6 ug/L), and MW-21-21(7.5 ug/L); benzene was above the MCL of 1 ug/L in MW-13-132 (1.2 ug/L), MW-13-35 (2.4 ug/L), MW-4 (1.1 ug/L), and MW-6 (1.2 ug/L); vinyl chloride was above the MCL of 0.03 ug/L in MW-B (1.6 ug/L), MW-21-21 (2.3 ug/L), MW-3 (2.9 ug/L), and MW-4 (4.6 ug/L). These exceedances are all break -down products of Trichloroethene (TCE) and are indicators of biodegradation as a result of the 2014 injection. Metals exceedances were as follows: barium was above the maximum contaminant level of 700 ug/L in MW-4 (720 ug/L), MW-4A (779 ug/L), and MW-6 (1340 ug/L); cadmium was above the MCL of 2 ug/L in MW-4 (71.6 ug/L); chromium was above the MCL of 10 ug/L in MW-15 (19.2 ug/L); cobalt was above the MCL of 1 ug/L in MW-21-21 (7 ug/L), MW-3 (18.3 ug/L), MW-4 (90.8 ug/L), MW-4A (37.9 ug/L), and MW-5 (9.3 ug/L); nickel was above the MCL of 100 ug/L in MW-4 (136 ug/L); vanadium was above the MCL of 0.3 ug/L in MW-4 (8.4 ug/L). 5 MNA SAMPLING RESULTS A summary of the MNA parameters exceeding their respective NC2L limit is included in Appendix G. The fall 2017 results were evaluated using the analytical parameters and weighting for preliminary screening for anaerobic biodegradation processes presented in the EPA Technical Protocol for Evaluating Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents (EPA 1998). Each well's "Sum of Screening Values" indicates whether there exists sufficient evidence to support the assumption of ongoing natural attenuation. The scores are based on predictable indicators of biodegradation found within changes in the groundwater chemistry and ascertain the presence of bio-dechlorination but not the rate or level at which it is occurring. The screening table is presented as Table 2 and the score interpretations are presented in Table 3 Results from the screening indicate that there is strong evidence for anaerobic biodegradation at MW-4, which is immediately downgradient of the injection location. There is inadequate evidence to support anaerobic biodegradation at MW-24-160, which is close to the river and the furthest well from the injection location. There is adequate to limited evidence of anaerobic biodegradation for the rest of the performance wells screened (MW-6, MW-13-132, MW-18-78, MW-19-75, MW-19-110, MW-21-21, MW-21-94, MW-24-160). Tetrachloroethene (PCE) in MW-4 has remained not detected (ND) since fall 2016 and is ND in all other MNA wells. Trichloroethene (TCE) has steadily dropped in MW-4 since the injection, but had a slight rebound to 1.2 ug/L in this last sampling round, but does not exceed the associated MCL. TCE is ND in the other MNA wells. Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene (DCE) has increased from 23 ug/L to 26.1 ug/L in MW-4, which indicates biodegradation of TCE. DCE increased in MW-18-78 from ND to 1.4 ug/L and increased in MW-21-21 from 9.8 ug/L to 12.6 ug/L. DCE decreased in MW-13-132 from 22.6 ug/L to 20.9 ug/L and in MW-21-94 from 3.7 Old Buncombe County Landfill 4 Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report Solid Waste Services ug/L. DCE decreased in MW-13-132 from 22.6 ug/L to 20.9 ug/L and in MW-21-94 from 3.7 ug/L to 2.8 ug/L. DCE remained ND in MW-2, MW-6, MW-19-75, MW-19-110, and MW-24- 160. Vinyl Chloride (VC) increased in MW-4 from 3.6 ug/L to 4.6 ug/L and had a slight increase in MW-21-21 from 2.2 ug/L to 2.3 ug/L. VC decreased in MW-18-78 from 1.8 ug/L to ND (less than 1.0 ug/L). VC remained ND in MW-2, MW-6, MW-13-132, MW-19-75, MW-19-110, MW-21-94, and MW-21-160. These decreases in parent product (PCE and TCE) and increases in daughter products (DCE and VC) indicate that the injection is still catalyzing the biodegradation of TCE. BIOCHLOR MODEL The data from this sampling event were compared to the BIOCHLOR model output generated with 2016 data. The BIOCHLOR model simulates the sequential reductive dechlorination of chlorinated ethanes and ethenes. The model assumes anaerobic conditions and sequential first - order kinetics as the mechanisim of degradation. In this case, ethenes were the constituents modeled. The fall 2017 sampling results are generally in line with the model. The model predicted that with sequential first order decay (biotransformation) tetrachloroethene (TCE) would be just over 0.001 mg/L in 25 years at 500 ft from the source. Current sample data from MW-4, which currently has the highest concentration of TCE at the Site and was modeled at 450 ft from the source, is at 0.0012 mg/L. Dichloroethene (DCE), specifically cis-1,2,-dichloroethne in this case, was predicted by the model to be at 0.0027 mg/L at 300 ft and 600 ft from the source in 25 years. The model predicted vinyl chloride (VC) to be at 0.006 mg/L at 300 feet from the source and at 0.004 600 feet from the source under biotransformation. Sample results from MW- 4 were 0.0046 mg/L. 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The OBCL data presented in this report provides multiple lines of evidence to demonstrate natural attenuation is occurring on site in accordance with EPA Technical Protocol for Evaluating Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents (EPA 1998). Overall contaminant concentrations of highly chlorinated VOCs have been decreasing. Based on the data presented in this report, SCS reaches the following conclusions: • Groundwater VOC exceedances are mostly break -down products of TCE, indicating that biodegradation of TCE is still occurring; • There is strong evidence to support anaerobic biodegradation at MW-4; • There is inadequate evidence to support anaerobic biodegradation at MW-12-160; • There is adequate to limited evidence to support biodegradation at performance wells MW-6, MW-13-132, MW-18-78, MW-19-75, MW-19-110, MW-21-21, MW-21-94, MW-24-160; • Levels of PCE and TCE in MNA wells are decreasing, while break -down products DCE and VC are increasing, indicating biodegradation is still occurring; • MNA constituent levels are following the predictions of the BIOCHLOR model. Old Buncombe County Landfill 5 Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report Solid Waste Services SCS recommends continued semi-annual and MNA sampling in accordance with the current sampling plan. The next sampling event is scheduled for spring of 2018. 7 REFERENCES EPA. 1998. Technical Protocol for Evaluating Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents in Ground Water. EPA/600/R-98/128, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington D.C. Old Buncombe County Landfill 6 Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report Solid Waste Services 6 FIGURES Old Buncombe County Landfill Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report ACTIVE MONITORING WELLS INACTIVE MONITORING WELLS ABANDONED MONITORING WELLS ACTIVE SURFACE WATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS INACTIVE SURFACE WATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS ABANDONED TEMPORARY INJECTION WELLS INJECTION WELL MW-2 MW-8 MW-9 SW-1 SW-5 TW-1 I-W1 MW-3 MW-12-10 MW-10 SW-2 SW-6 TW-2 DPL-2 MW-4 MW-13-10 MW-16 SW-2A SW-7 TW-3 MW-4A MW-14 MW-17 SW-3 SW-8 MW-5 MW-18-3 SW-4 SW-9 MW-6 MW-19-4 MW-6-192 MW-20-3 MW-7 MW-20-32 MW-12-25 MW-21-4 MW-13-35 MW-22-78 MW-13-132 MW-22-143 MW-15 MW-23-119 MW-17-60 MW-23-186 MW-17-137 MW-A MW-17-310 DPL-2 MW-18-78 MW-19-75 MW-19-110 MW-21-21 MW-21-94 M W-24-45 M W-24-160 DPL-1 M W-B NOTE: ACTIVE SAMPLING MONITORING WELLS AND SURFACE LOCATIONS ARE TO BE NOTE: ONE INJECTION SAMPLED AND TESTED TWICE ANNUALLY. INACTIVE MONITORING WELLS ARE TO BE EVENT 0912015. CHECKED FOR DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER ONLY. SW-1 s `V O V / .O.Q) O 0 -i o0Q)Q)Q) g� SW-2 \ \ �r Z' \ 200 100 0 200 198 SCALE IN FEET (1965.90) (2002.6 ® �� I lI ! I r ban oned Y \_ I T- T 3 !! 0 \\ 3 i �\ (19 220 T-W2 i� 9 (1891i 6) (1 91. 8) ed) QQ o I (N M No 5 W 1- MW-21-4 ( 93 5) (189�- -21 ii �� O •. (1 a. 3 Pe I o p(2093.74 l Q � (2040.21)/' i a �� [ MW-23-119 DIR (203375). #2020.82) • C • /-- +yuy to MW-A ®s� - �5) A' LEGEND MW-20 ACTIVE GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL . MW-8 @ INACTIVE GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL SW-1® ACTIVE SURFACE WATER MONITORING LOCATION SW-5® INACTIVE SURFACE WATER MONITORING LOCATION PROPERTY BOUNDARY o - `•� Q ABANDONED TEMPORARY INJECTION WELLS fkr INJECTION WELL C(`C P-mr-, IFFRC Figure 1. Old Landfill October 2017 Groundwater Contour Map, Old Buncombe County Landfill, Buncombe County, North Carolina Solid Waste Services 6 TABLES Old Buncombe County Landfill Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report TABLE I MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SUMMARY Site ID Total Depth Type Semi -Annual MNA Semi -Annual Appendix I Metals & Volatiles Annual Appendix lI Field Parameters MW-B 15.4 Compliance Yes Yes MW-2 175 Background Yes Yes Yes Yes MW-3 90 Compliance Yes Yes MW-4 75 Performance Yes Yes Yes MW-4A 77 Compliance Yes Yes MW-5 80 Compliance Yes Yes Yes MW-6 40 Performance Yes Yes Yes Yes MW-6-192 192 Compliance Yes Yes MW-7 29 Compliance Yes Yes MW-12-25 26 Compliance Yes Yes MW-13-35 35 Compliance Yes Yes MW-13-132 132 Performance Yes Yes Yes MW-15 72 Compliance Yes Yes MW-17-60 60 Compliance Yes Yes MW-17-137 137 Compliance Yes Yes MW-17-310 310 Compliance Yes Yes MW-18-78 78 Sentinel Yes Yes Yes MW-19-75 75 Compliance Yes Yes Yes MW-19-110 110 Sentinel Yes Yes Yes MW-21-21 21 Performance Yes Yes Yes MW-21-94 94 Sentinel Yes Yes Yes MW-24-45 45 Compliance Yes Yes MW-24-160 160 Sentinel Yes Yes Yes DPL-1 65 Compliance I Yes I Yes Yes DPL-2 97 EIB Well I Yes* I Yes* Yes* EIB Well -This well was used as injection wells for Enhanced In -Situ Bioremediation (EIB). *This well has been removed from the sampling schedule following enhancement application. TABLE 2. Fall 2017 EPA MNA SCREENING VALUES OLD LANDFILL, BUNCUMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA EPA Biodegradation Parameters Units Analytical Result/ Screening Value Date MW-2 MW-4 MW-6 MW-13-132 MW-18-78 MW-19-75 MW-19-110 MW-21-21 MW-21-94 MW-24-160 Field pH Std. Units Analytical Result Fall 2014 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.7 6.4 7.3 6.3 6.4 7.2 Spring 2015 6.1 6.0 6.0 6.8 6.4 --- 7.3 6.2 6.5 7.2 Fall 2015 6.3 6.1 6.1 7 6.5 6.2 7.2 6.2 6.7 7.1 Spring 2016 6.0 5.9 5.8 6.9 6.2 5.9 7.2 6.1 6.3 7.0 Fall 2016 6.3 6.1 6 6.8 6.2 6.4 7.2 6.2 6.6 7.2 Spring 2017 6.2 6 6.1 6.9 6.4 6.2 7.3 6.2 6.5 7.1 Fall 2017 5.9 6 6 6.9 6.2 6.1 7.2 6 6.6 11.9 Screening Value Fall 2017 --- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -2 Field Temperature deg C Analytical Result Fall 2014 21.7 14.3 24.5 15.7 16.3 --- 16.5 16.3 19.5 14.5 Spring 2015 20.8 15.0 16.4 17.3 17.3 --- 18.1 13.6 14.1 12.7 Fall 2015 12.9 16.5 18.9 13.9 16.1 17.1 16.9 17.8 18.5 18.4 Spring 2016 14.9 19.5 15.2 14.4 14.2 16.5 18.0 17.4 17.4 18.4 Fall 2016 18.5 18.3 16.9 18.3 50.6 19.4 18.2 22.3 20 26.6 Spring 2017 20.4 16.6 12.2 15.7 17.4 18.2 18.5 15.9 16.6 16.6 Fall 2017 10 18.4 21.1 16.3 19.8 19.6 23.2 23.3 23.3 6.6 Screening Value Fall 2017 --- 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 Field Specific Conductance umhos/cm Analytical Result Fall 2014 120 987 1292 249 701 --- 607 1337 909 147 Spring 2015 122 973 1241 302 651 --- 560 1228 964 149 Fall 2015 118 970 1263 305 678 1089 550 1157 960 151 Spring 2016 122 990 1232 314 709 1112 527 1419 878 174 Fall 2016 121.2 982 1256 324 735 1105 511 1409 976 160 Spring 2017 130 965 1333 323 722 1148 505 1218 892 160 Fall 2017 128 962 1306 322 834 1146 495 1195 885 180 Screening Value Fall 2017 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Dissolved Oxygen mg/L Analytical Result Fall2014 2.88 2.58 0.82 1.14 0.12 --- 1.1 2.42 1.21 4.6 Spring 2015 3.91 2.9 1.03 1.09 0.81 --- 0.76 1.57 1.62 3.71 Fall 2015 4.66 1.6 0.6 0.38 0.16 0.57 0.63 0.29 0.38 3.01 Spring 2016 3.25 2.87 0.97 1.04 0.66 0.6 1.43 0.67 0.7 1.96 Fall 2016 5.3 0.89 0.4 0.95 1.9 1.69 2.34 1.14 1.31 2.84 Spring 2017 3.75 1.79 1.86 1.4 1.49 1.62 1.49 1.87 3.67 3.37 Fall 2017 4.62 0.81 1.55 0.83 0.6 1.41 0.63 0.71 1.75 2.91 Screening Value Fall 2017 --- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turbidity NTU Analytical Result Fall 2014 277 1.91 2.05 1.59 2.15 --- 2.2 2.04 1.93 4.8 Spring 2015 3.2 3.14 4.09 4.22 29 --- 3.13 16.7 4.01 5.7 Fall 2015 1.74 6.93 24.78 0.42 0.35 1.78 3.05 2.51 6.68 3.79 Spring 2016 2.78 2.15 1.17 1.15 3.9 25.48 9.37 5.66 30.9 7.2 Fall 2016 2.1 1.73 10.75 3.11 1 2.62 3.6 7.09 3.14 8.36 Spring 2017 9.24 5.17 6.92 1.11 8.09 8.03 7.95 25.65 12.63 4.66 Fall 2017 6.23 7.58 7.62 2.4 0.71 5.88 0.44 3.31 0.65 6.48 Screening Value Fall 2017 --- --- --- --- --- --- -- Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP) m/V Analytical Result Fall 2014 165.8 31.2 -39 -46.9 -56.9 --- -114.6 -331 -58.4 147.3 Spring 2015 203.1 86.4 -2.1 -50.8 -29.8 --- -92.7 -16.5 -40.5 49.6 Fall 2015 163.6 24.8 -33.2 -82.4 -84.4 -26.4 -49.7 -33 -109.9 138.3 Spring 2016 121.2 45.9 -10 -56.4 -39.9 17.1 65 -24 -75.2 134.8 Fall 2016 187.2 -19.3 12.4 -37.5 -4.8 -23.1 -50.4 -25.9 -43.7 90.7 Spring 2017 100.5 34.8 -16.6 1.4 -36.6 2.3 -64.7 6 -3.7 157 Screening Value Spring 2017 --- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 Alkalinity, as CaCO3 mg/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 50.1 390 529 111 241 --- 227 580 299 41.6 Spring 2015 45.6 346 464 101 195 --- 179 475 308 39.5 Fall 2015 50.1 380 477 115 207 321 173 430 299 45.2 Spring 2016 57.6 437 490 130 223 361 193 672 306 51 Fall 2016 53.8 416 512 133 217 M1 335 178 602 309 47.3 Spring 2017 56.3 418 NS 138 NS 346 177 489 294 47.4 Screening Value Spring 2017 --- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chloride mg/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 2 85.6 113 5 78.4 --- 54.7 105 107 7.1 Spring 2015 1.96 74.2 113 4.19 76.2 --- 49.8 101 119 6.5 Fall 2015 2.16 84.8 110 4.9 87.3 153 46.5 108 119 8.05 Spring 2016 2.16 74.8 140 4.99 102 160 59.3 91.4 21.8 7.72 Fall 2016 2 69.6 127 4.8 87.2 M1 156 50.7 114 122 7.44 Spring 2017 2.17 77.7 146 4.68 101 179 49.8 123 139 7.66 Screening Value Spring 2017 --- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Iron ug/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 4,850 3,010 37,200 3,000 25,400 --- 2,600 21,400 16,800 209 Spring 2015 720 3,380 34,400 5,010 22,600 --- 1,880 19,800 19,800 276 Fall 2015 95 3,970 40,700 14,800 21,800 8,580 1,660 13,800 17,400 92 Spring 2016 252 5,730 26,800 11,400 21,500 11,700 946 15,000 16,800 136 Fall 2016 50 U 7,480 33,800 11,100 23,600 15,400 2,320 27,100 16,200 335 Spring 2017 800 12,600 33,400 11,600 24,900 13,000 1,840 19,100 16,400 172 Screening Value Spring 2017 --- 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 0 Nitrogen, Nitrate mg/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U --- 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.066 Spring 2015 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U --- 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.066 Fall 2015 51.5 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 74.7 Spring 2016 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.02 U 62.4 Fall 2016 35.4 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 37.8 Spring2017 20 U 20 U, M1 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U Screening Value Spring 2017 --- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sulfate mg/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 4.4 32.1 3.5 8.6 2 U --- 13.2 34.3 8.1 9.8 Spring 2015 4.56 32.9 4.87 11.4 2 U --- 15.8 37.6 4.76 10.4 Fall 2015 3.99 31.1 4.26 10.5 2 U 21 16.4 36.5 3.26 10.3 Spring 2016 3.87 31.2 7.46 11 2 U 20.4 16 46.9 4.22 14.4 Fall 2016 3.82 27.6 4.37 11.2 2 U 16.7 14.7 15.7 3.21 11.4 Spring 2017 3.35 28.8 NS 11 NS 16 16.6 29.2 3.18 12.7 Screening Value Spring 2017 --- 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Sulfide mg/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U --- 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.12 0.1 U Spring 2015 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U --- 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U Fall 2015 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U Spring 2016 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U Fall 2016 0.1 U 0.1 U, M1 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U Spring 2017 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U 0.1 U Screening Value Spring 2017 --- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Organic Carbon (TOC) mg/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 8.7 30.5 38 26 44.7 --- 27.4 75.7 15 5.3 Spring 2015 1 U 7.54 11.2 1 U 3.87 --- 4 13.6 10.7 1 U Fall 2015 1 U 5.12 7.12 1 U 3.12 8.62 3.31 10.7 7.94 1 U Spring 2016 1 U 6.92 6.77 1 U 3.88 9.84 2.82 17 8 1 U Fall 2016 1 U 5.41 7.69 1 U 4.32 10.8 2.47 14.6 9.1 1 U Spring 2017 1 U 5.91 NS 1 U NS 10.2 M1 3.17 10.5 7.74 1 U Screening Value Spring 2017 --- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Carbon Dioxide ug/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 36,000 470,000 550,000 35,000 160,000 --- 24,000 510,000 170,000 6,000 Spring 2015 54,000 110,000 450,000 20,000 100,000 --- 12,000 370,000 79,000 5,300 Fall 2015 38,000 300,000 410,000 13,000 100,000 320,000 11,000 250,000 83,000 5,800 Spring 2016 52,000 420,000 490,000 13,000 200,000 130,000 11,000 460,000 110,000 6,500 Fall 2016 35,000 400,000 230,000 17,000 130,000 270,000 6,800 380,000 91,000 8,600 Spring 2017 58,000 380,000 NS 16,000 NS 280,000 7,800 230,000 56,000 5,500 Screening Value Spring 2017 --- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ethene ug/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 0.0099 J 0.065 0.23 0.051 0.51 --- 0.094 0.36 1.2 0.0099 J Spring 2015 0.009 J 0.0087 J 0.26 0.037 0.24 --- 0.048 0.16 0.94 0.008 U Fall 2015 0.0063J 0.023 0.18 0.019 0.18 0.029 0.027 0.078 0.27 0.0056J Spring 2016 0.0076J 0.045 0.3 0.1 0.47 0.05 0.05 0.27 2.5 0.012 Fall 2016 0.008 0.044 0.13 0.15 0.52 0.21 0.016 0.41 0.28 0.011 Spring 2017 0.012 0.024 0.2 0.16 0.34 0.048 0.046 0.087 0.071 0.006 Screening Value Spring 2017 --- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fall 2014 0.0022 J 0.23 0.52 0.099 1.6 --- 0.2 0.18 0.46 0.0078 J Spring 2015 0.0012 J 0.02 0.62 0.04 1.3 --- 0.13 0.13 0.75 0.0015 J Ethane ug/L Analytical Result Fall 2015 0.00111 0.061 0.23 0.023 0.42 0.03 0.017 0.025 0.057 0.00111 Spring 2016 0.0011 0.084 0.63 0.05 2 0.093 0.021 0.089 0.4 0.0034 Fall 2016 0.002 0.19 0.18 0.098 1.5 0.2 0.022 0.15 0.58 0.0025 Spring 2017 0.002 0.071 0.17 0.061 2.1 0.11 0.069 0.064 0.18 0.002 Screening Value Spring 2017 --- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hydrogen nM Analytical Result Fall 2014 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.2 1.3 --- 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.5 Spring 2015 1.3 1.4 1.9 54 1.3 --- 1.4 1.1 10 1.2 Fall 2015 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.5 1.3 1.9 1.2 4.5 1.2 Spring 2016 2 1.4 8.4 1.4 2.4 2 1.8 1.4 1.5 9 Fall 2016 2.5 2.4 3.4 2.1 3.3 2.6 2.3 4.1 8.3 2.5 Spring 2017 2 1.8 2.5 2 2.9 1.8 1.9 1.8 6.6 2.1 Screening Value Spring 2017 --- 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Methane ug/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 0.18 1900 3200 840 3300 --- 630 1400 2000 0.71 Spring 2015 0.074 140 3000 320 2100 --- 310 370 1700 0.3 Fall 2015 0.066 440 900 160 760 47 37 170 240 0.057 Spring 2016 0.091 470 1900 330 5000 130 30 1400 1500 0.32 Fall 2016 0.073 1500 700 690 3100 370 79 1200 2200 0.32 Spring 2017 0.21 560 710 390 4700 150 330 350 810 0.19 Screening Value Spring 2017 --- 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 3 0 Acetic Acid (Volatile Fatty Acid) ug/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 810U 810U 810U 810U 810U --- 810U 810U 810U 810U Spring 2015 890 U 980 J 890 U 890 U 11001 --- 890 U 890 U 1300 J 890 U Fall 2015 240 J 230 J 1501 180 J 200 J 210 J 1501 1901 210 J 180 J Spring 2016 2600 J 19001 200 J 2200 J 890 U 10001 18001 1700 J 18001 2100 J Fall 2016 330 U 330 U 330 U 330 U 330 U 330 U 330 U 330 U 330 U 330 U Spring 2017 330 U 330 U 330 U 330 U 330 U 330 U 330 U 330 U 330 U 330 U Screening Value Spring 2017 --- 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Butyric Acid (Volatile Fatty Acid) ug/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 700 U 700 U 700 U 700 U 700 U --- 700 U 700 U 700 U 700 U Spring 2015 1400 U 1400 U 1400 U 1400 U 1400 U --- 1400 U 1400 U 1400 U 1400 U Fall 2015 160 J 66 J 811 130 J 120 J 120 J 50 U 130 J 1101 1101 Spring 2016 1400 U 1400 U 1400 U 1400 U 1400 U 1400 U 1400 U 1400 U 1400 U 1400 U Fall 2016 55 U 55 U 1801 55 U 55 U 360 J 55 U 10001 55 U 55 U Spring 2017 55 U 55 U NS 55 U NS 55 U 55 U 55 U 55 U 55 U Screening Value Spring 2017 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -- Propionic Acid (Volatile Fatty Acid) ug/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 660 U 660 U 660 U 660 U 660 U --- 660 U 660 U 660 U 660 U Spring 2015 730 U 730 U 730 U 730 U 730 U --- 730 U 730 U 730 U 730 U Fall 2015 34 J 27 J 191 32 J 30 J 28 J 14 J 27 J 29 J 33 J Spring 2016 730 U 730 U 730 U 730 U 730 U 730 U 730 U 730 U 730 U 730 U Fall 2016 52 U 52 U 240 J,B 52 U 52 U,B 490 J,B 52 U,B 52 U 52 U 52 U Spring 2017 52 U 52 U 52 U 52 U 52 U 52 U 52 U 52 U 52 U 52 U Screening Value Spring 2017 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Tetrachloroethene (PCE) ug/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 1U 1.8 1U 1U 1U 1U 1U 1U 1U 1U Spring 2015 1U 1.4 1U 1U 1U I 1U 1U 1U 1U Fall 2015 1U 1.2 1U 1U 1U I 1U 1U 1U 1U Spring 2016 1 U 1.5 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U Fall 2016 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U Spring 2017 1U 1U 1U 1U 1U I 1U 1U 1U 1U Fall 2017 1U 1U 1U 1U 1U I 1U 1U 1U 1U Screening Value Fall 2017 --- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trichloroethene (TCE) ug/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 1U 1.8 1U 1U 1U I 1U I 1U 1U Spring 2015 1U 1.7 1U 1U 1U I 1U 1U 1U 1U Fall 2015 1U 1.3 1U 1U 1U 1U 1U 1U 1U 1U Spring 2016 1 U 1.3 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U Fall 2016 1 U 1.2 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U Spring 2017 1U 1U 1U 1U 1U I 1U 1U 1U 1U Fall 2017 1U 1.2 1U I 1U I 1U 1U 1U 1U Screening Value Fall 2017 --- 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene (DCE) ug/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 1U 19.5 1U 23.1 1U 1U 1 19.7 4.9 1U Spring 2015 1 U 22 1.1 23.1 1 U 1 U l U 18.2 4.1 1 U Fall 2015 1U 18.7 1U 26.6 1U I 1U 11.8 3.4 1U Spring 2016 1 U 20.3 1.1 19.4 1 U 1 U 1 U 13 3.5 1 U Fall 2016 1 U 20.4 1 U 21.3 1 U 1 U 1 U 13.2 3.3 1 U Spring 2017 1 U 23 1 U 22.6 1 U 3 U 1 U 9.8 3.7 1 U Fall 2017 1U 26.1 1U 20.9 1.4 1U 1U 12.6 2.8 1U Screening Value Spring 2017 --- 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 1,1-Dichloroethene (DCE) ug/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U Spring 2015 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U Fall 2015 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U Spring 2016 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U Fall 2016 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U Spring 2017 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U Fall 2017 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U 0.56 U Screening Value Fall 2017 --- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vinyl chloride (VC) ug/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 1U 2.7 1U I 2.2 1U 1U 3.4 1U 1U Spring 2015 1U 2.6 1U I 1.6 1U 1U 2.5 1U 1U Fall 2015 1U 3.1 1U I 1.6 1U 1U 2.4 1U 1U Spring 2016 1 U 2.7 1 U 1 U 1.7 1 U 1 U 2.6 1 U 1 U Fall 2016 1 U 2.8 1 U 1 U 1.8 1 U 1 U 2.6 1 U 1 U Spring 2017 1U 3.6 1U 1U 1.8 1U 1U 2.2 1U 1U Fall 2017 1U 4.6 1U 1U 1U I 1U 2.3 1U 1U Screening Value Fall 2017 --- 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 1U 1U 1U I 1U I 1U 1U I 1U Spring 2015 1U 1U 1U 1U 1U I 1U 1U 1U 1U Fall 2015 1U 1U 1U 1U 1U I 1U 1U I 1U Spring 2016 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 3 U 1 U 1 U l U 1 U 2016 1U 1U 1U 1U 1U I 1U I I 1U -Fall Spring 2017 1U 1U 1U 1U 1U I 1U 1U I 1U Fall 2017 1U 1U 1U I 1U I 1U 1U 1U 1U Screening Value Fall 2017 --- - -- --- --- --- --- -- -- --- Chloroethane ug/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 1U 1U 4.5 1U 1U 1U 1U 3.8 6 1U Spring 2015 1U 2.8 5.2 1U 1U 1U 1U 3.6 5.8 1U Fall 2015 1U 1U 4.2 1U 1U 1U 2.7 1U 4.1 1U Spring 2016 1 U 3.4 4.1 1 U 1.3 1 U 1.4 3.6 5 1 U Fall 2016 1 U 2.8 4 1 U 1.2 1 U 1.7 4.1 3.8 1 U Spring 2017 1 U 3.1 3.9 1 U 1.1 1 U 1.3 2.3 4 1 U Fall 2017 1U 3.6 3.6 1U 1U 1U 1.2 2.1 4.1 1U Screening Value Fall 2017 --- 2 2 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 Biological Oxygen Demand, S day (BOD) mg/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 2U 2U 15 2U 5.1 --- 2U 4.6 12.6 2U Spring 2015 14.2 5.2 11.1 4.75 3.3 --- 2 2.53 5.85 4.9 Fall 2015 2 U 2 U 7.3 2 U 6.1 2 U 2 U 2 U 11.3 2 U Spring 2016 2 U 2 U 5.32 2 U 4.79 2.51 2 U 4.59 4.89 2 U Fall 2016 2 U,B2 2 U,B2 4.71 2 U,B2 4.41 3.81 2 U,B2 5.13 D6 3 B2 2 U Spring 2017 2 U 2 U NS 2 U NS 5.2 2 U 2 U,B2 2 U,B2 2 U Screening Value Spring 2017 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) mg/L Analytical Result Fall 2014 25 U 36 29 25 U 25 U --- 25 U 48 25 U 25 U Spring 2015 25 U 30 44 25 U 25 U --- 25 U 44 32 25 Fall 2015 25 U 25 U 25 U 25 U 25 U 25 U 25 U 1 25 U 25 U 25 U Spring 2016 25 U 37 34 25 U 25 U 45 25 U 78 29 25 U Fall 2016 25 U 36 31 250 25 U 38 25 U 63 43 25 U Spring 2017 25 U 35 NS 25 U NS 51 25 U 52 35 25 U Screening Value Spring 2017 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Sum of Screening Values 22 14 14 9 9 NOTES: 1. mg/L: milligrams per liter. 2. ug/L: micrograms per liter. 3. NTU: nephelometric turbidity units. 4. umhos/cm: micromhos per centimeter. 5. deg C: degrees Celsius. 6. --- = Parameter not analyzed. 7. U = Analyte concentration was below the laboratory detection limit (value shown). 8. 1= Analyte concentration was between the laboratory detection limit and laboratory practical quantitation limit. 9. J = Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit 10. M1 = Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery. Table 3. Interpretation of Points Awarded During Screening Score Interpretation 0 to 5 Inadequate evidence for anaerobic biodegradation* of chlorinated organics 6 to 14 Limited evidence for anaerobic biodegradation* of chlorinated organics 15 to 20 Adequate evidence for anaerobic biodegradation* of chlorinated organics >20 Strong evidence for anaerobic biodegradation* of chlorinated organics *reductive dechlorination Solid Waste Services 6 APPENDIX A SAMPLING FORMS Old Buncombe County Landfill Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report � J h a to 3 3 V � 1 � n 0 N C a w c F a b 0 e ,y a n 0 n 1 h �} V v v % S o .i ri J ° N � A r i A , n h r CJ 1 r r n b � �J » � w � ; � } ��2 • � t g f E ; )f e« R9 e §.w < / Jac |}i } �}" �§ a» r . } 7 ®� {\» $\ ,I I D \f | } / \ * ell & I»f \�{ � \ «% ®\e LL- o v�U U d a m C` P 01 I \ d � � c h O N (^ U v n v G n z C� D N N U R c � u o� 0 r v y �I � r � ------------- � � 3 3 3 ym I a F 3 � v _ U Q 9 m. _r < J ---------------- � 9 � Y = Q �l ri _ _ o c m IN N ( n •� f n 3 a a a N 1V`j V V Ca G � N 'I IU 4 v m w � w � - r Y u• -F .� - � _\ r d 3 a m r U � N � w f � 3 v n, n .. � c o C n 3 3 IN 21,u"'t3,4'gdil„yll�.c7f' Field Data Sheet Docum tNumbe C Field Data Sheet lient: / Location: d3 v',✓ C O L 1J eF Project Name/#: ame and Affiliation (Sampler(s):_, mac(.J Al c ame fell information 'ell ID: I" W 17 • > / J 'ell Diameter: )tal Well Depth: atic Water Level: 67-cr- VI ft eight of Water Column: 3 f ° ft Well Locked: NO Construction: C1 Steel Stainless Steel Multi Factor's': r(Radivs/12)2 x 3.14 x 7.481 Casing Volume: gallons Cal. 3 Volumes: gallons irge Information ite Purged: I t) ! I 13 / J2 0 p g Start Time: 5— Fixush: �3 Purge Rate: urging Method: Vma_ r Total Volume Purged: gallons Mpling Information ite Collected:_"(6 / Time Collected: /`f S ° am pm mpling Equipment Used: /% �,9Ma /l cry Bottle Type Ad MeasurementgQbservations Preservation mple Temp (°C): /if, I Time: F10 mple pH (s.u.): Time: /�5 ecific Cond. (uS): Time: Dox (mV): f k �i ' o Time: lox: G �4-,A' Time: I / S -neral/Weather Observations mpler Signature/Date: bill2ation Test Analysis Required Turbidity (ntu): 0, . i z Time: % LI-S Diss Oxy (mg/L): /,1, Time: 7�� , Res. CI (mg/L): Time: Other: A-1J Time: Appearance: C Time 'urged pH (s.u.) Spec. Cond. (us) ReDox (mV) Turbidity (ntu) Diss Oxy. (mg/L) Temp , (IC) Volume Removed Other /4-�r A 5j (, i L ' r n A31j—.dxr 13 eo h,37 wpm ) G i 1-.a/, go is,i 4-e'-0.> s a $, fti ( _ Ift,i 36 i ?S' tr, t 0.6 . s c iF I ,0 if` t i,13 / tI9/>0 Document Name: vu u • ..--__._ , Field Data. Sheet Page of_ Documeni plumber: ssueingAuthorlty: - - F-CAR-FLD-001.rev.01 Pace Huntersvilie Quality Office Client: _ =— L — Location: C5 i ✓ Project: .Well ID: h I $ zstua Stabiliz_ ati_ _®n Tes� Volume Diss Spec. Turbidity Removed Water level. Other Time Temp, Oxy. Cond. pH (s.u.) ReDox (mV) (ntu) (gallons/m.is) (ft) Purged (°C) . (mg/L) (US) circle one, i (fib (1.2 3j.. s— r ' Document Nance: Document Issued: July 28, 2016 Field Data, Sheet Page. of _ s Document Number: Issueireg Authority: i' F-CAR-FLD-001.rev.01 pace Huntersville Quality Office Client: Location: !) u ✓ i Project: n0_r n l Well ID: G-! i✓_ rY. 3 (�C Stabilization Test Time purged Temp. (°C) Diss Oxy. (mg/L) Spec. Cond, (US) pH (s.u.) ReDox (mv) Turbidity (ntu) Volume Removed (gallons/m.ls) circleune Water level, Other (ft) 11 � If? l 5u- Field Data Sheet Page 1 of Documem Number: Issuing Authority: Field Data Sheet lient: SC 5 Location: Qu, t project Name/#: ame and Afiliation (Sampler(s): 1'- ,4 /ice e E ame and Afiation Fell Information 'ell ID: /'71✓- t � 0 ' Well Locked: (:YE NO ell Diameter: rF Construction:t°V Steel Stainless Steel )tal Well Depth: - L b -�ft Multi Factor*: [*(Rad us/12)2 x 3.14 x 7.481 atic Water Level: o P: z S ft Casing Volume: gallons eight of Water Column:Tft . Cal. 3 Volumes: gallons Frye Information ate Purged: I / ! / ! 7 Start Time: Finish: ) J Purge Rate: 10) r' �/ l /! 41 irging Method: A' n,94t- l v^.e Total Volume Purged: gallons anaslim, Information tte Collected: %0 Time Collected: ✓ am pm mpling Equipment Used: Aao . rsn Bottle Type Preservation Analysis Required Ch All Ape � VJl d �l> Ad Measurements/O''b/I seervations Swmple Temp (°C): Time: Ca ° : Turbidity (ntu): Time: 1 mplepH(s.u.): Time: /o Time: yg jp ecific Cond. (uS): _, f 2 Time: ! / e Res. Cl (mg/L): Time: Dox (mV): !' o Time: %I °' Other: ° ° 1Dh Time: [or.. C c l d1 Time: / z Appearance: C n p a a 2 mi:ral/Weather Observations (,?G'� 0ye,zclS4 /hli� otpler Signature/Date: a& -1 !' — bilization Test Time (s.u.) Spec. Cond: ReDox (mV) Turbidity Diss Oxy: Temp. (°C) Volume Other ?urged g PH (us) (ntuj (mg/L) Removed `/I rs.'s `J, 0). J)..e/LF 1 ia.l 0, j � C Cqn AN% OU" G.GIt 10 �,51 Q.?s �3,? g,qql I X16A. -IL") 1 /.4a , ryry2Ea.'� 7`F-7 1 6 I I{% i . I f f.5 l .2 . 1, 152 1 A 3 1 1, s Name: /or crs�itaa�rilcaf" f Pane i of® Issuing Authority: Field Data Sheet lient: t Location: tl z.. C 04-12 -r Project Name/#: ame and Afiliation (Sampler(s): r` P ame and Afiliation (Inspector): 'ell Information 'ell ID: tv ^ Z Well Locked: riES) NO 'ell Diameter: % a Construction: Steel Stainless Steel rtal Well Depth: Multi. Factor*: [*(Radius/12)2 x 3.14 x 7,481 atic Water Level: / f / • S`p ft Casing Volume: gallons eight of Water Column: ft . Cal. 3 Volumes: goons irge Information _ to 0 1 / rte Purged: 7 Start Time: 'Finish: Purge Rate: r �� / / irging Method: Total Volume Purged: gallons :molinz Information tte Collected: Time Collected: am pm tripling Equipment Used: Bottle Type Preservation Analysis Required ald Measurements/Observations mple Temp (uC): Time: mple pH (s.u.): Time: ecific Cond. (uS): Time: Dox (mV): Time: [or: Time: mer /Weather Observations miller Signature/Date .UM-61— T.e* Turbidity (ntu): Time: Diss Oxy (mg/L): Time: Res. C1(mg/L): Time: Other: Time: Appearance: Time pH (s.u.) Spec. Cond. p ReDox (mV) Turbidity (ntu) Diss Oxy: (mg/t) Temp. (C) uRL urged us ( ) .i b,�� f �. t fSi, I6.9� q b^, l � � ww ie Name: Documued;. July 28, 2016 Document ent Iss Field Data Sheet page _of _ Documem'Number: Issueing Authority: F-CAR-FLD-001.rev.01 Pace Huntersville Quality Office Client: SC j Location. r✓� f Q� % `�� Project: i� L✓ — .Well ID: _ (L I/� % Stabilization Test Volume Diss Spec. Waterievel, Time Temp. Turbidity Removed Other Oxy. Cond. pH (s.u.) ReDox (mV) (ntu) (gallons/mis) A Purged (°C) (mg/L) (uS) circle ane Y Mesa Issuing AuthontF lient: S 6 y ame and Afiliation /)PjlPnI Field Data Sheet `✓ (- Project Name/#: �L__....p-L f r7 Tell Information ,� ID: �.] ld . y- Well Locked: YES NO Construch4n.. PVC Steel $tainlessSteel 'ell Diameter: rtal Well Depth:--) 7 )ft Multi Factor*: V(Radius l2)2x3.14x7.48] Volume: gallons atic Water Level: / 0 � � � — ft Casin S ;fight of Water Column: f Ca1.3 Volumes: gallons urge Information 0 7 Finish. Purge Rate: T, , ite Purged: 1 / / Stan Time: urging Method: '� < �� ' ' . "'" Total Volume Purged: gallons jn lines Info dotmation [� fife Collected: M . 1 7 Time Collected: pm mphng Equipment Used: N S" Bottle Type preservation Analysis Required Ad Measxrenients/observations r Tema• mple Temp CC): Time: mple pH (s.u.): Time: ecific Cond. (IS): Time: Dox (mV): Time: for: Time: avattSAleather Observations mpler Signature/Date: ibifizatlon Test Time pH (s.u.j Spec.Co ReDox (mV) purged (u5) lbr1,o b ZJ 1p.0 J 1•!, lj 0 Turbidity (ntu): Diss Oxy (mg/4Time: Res. C1(mg/L): Time: Other: Time: Appearance: Diss Ox TM= Turbidity V Temp. ( (ntu) (mg/lj It D Documentissvecl dY 28, "l-' DocumentNaWe: Field Data Sheet Page o1 _ E:A f Dcrcunent`Number: - IssueingAuthorlty:- Quality office F-CAR-FLD-001.rev.01 Pace Huntersvil(e C i'�eINT;AiameEx' Iw,InlSipHka�i Client: —1.2— c 1 tm Location: s uiv� Project: OLGJ L� e °. Well ID: Stab68uz_Ption Test Diss Spec. volume Water. level, Turbidity Removed Other Time Temp. Oxy.` Cond. pN (Su') ReDox (MV) (ntu) (gallons/mts) (ft1 Purged ("C) (mg/L) (US) circle ane Do �.5 6 � l �.rc �A-6,( 5 92 g t,9 �6,i2 r .moo .-207 lC .� U, 0 rbbsz— Field Data Sheet. Pa e1oF_ Document-N=bei: Issuing Authority: Hn�romeville rMalitV Office Field Data Sheet lient: 5 Location: 9✓�C Project Name/ ame and Afiliation (Sampler(s): M w ame and Afilation (Inspector). rell Information 'ell ID: Well Locked: NO 'ell Diameter: t r Construction: Steel Stainless Steel ntal Well Depth: Jft Multi Factor*: ('(Radius/12)2 x 3.14 x 7.481 atic Water Level: l7 (- -5 ft Casing Volume: gallons eight of Water Column: ft . Cal. 3. Volumes: gallons urge Information AePurged://'/ �3 / 7 Start Time: _l rJ Finish: ✓ Purge Rate: irging Method: W ,11 w, z 2a * Total Volume Purged: % ' gallons milling Information ite Collected: Time Collected: am pm mpling Equipment Used: W-tl G✓,zan�a Bottle Type Preservation Analysis Required Ad Measurements/Observations mple Temp CC): Time: / mple pH (s.u.): '7 Time: ecific Cond. (uS): t o Y f' Time: Dox (mV): / 9, 6 Time: for: C Time: meral/Vdeather Observations wqze'? cnpler ibilization Test Turbidity (ntu): 3' Time: -0 Diss Oxy (mg/L): Tine: Res. Ci (mg/L): Time: Other: 9.2 a o>> > Time: P Appearance: D Time )urged pH (s.u.) Spec. Cond. (us) ReDox (mV) Turbidity (ntu) Diss Oxy: (mg/L) o Temp. (C) Volume Removed Other S U t 15,a 0,zr- Document Name: Document Issued; July 28, 2016 —[:— Field Data Sheet Page _of _ Document Nu rber: 7/,�_557450 AM IssueingAuthority: . F-CAR-FLD-001.rev.01 Pace Huntersville Quality Office Client: j C S �'4� rwt��v��nFaEr� Location 1j L/,v l Project: 0tiV L Well ID: �/ 5 Stabilization Test Time Purged Temp. (°C) Diss Oxy. (mg/C) Spec, Cord. (US) volume Turbidity Removed Water level, Other pH (s.u.) ReDox (mv) ft (ntu) (gallons/mts) ( } CiCC�e 6R2 1.3klowt,7— �2C're,�4t4a:ufC21x Field Data Sheet 11agre i ui Docvmnt:NvmherIssuin Aut_os�' F CAR FLD 001 rev 00 Pace Hntersville ai e Field Data Sheet lient: S C Location: C Project Name/#: ° C ame and Afiliation (Sampler(s): MP 1 ame and Afiliation (Inspector);--_-__-_. 'ell Information `ell ID: Well Locked:�S NO ell Diameter: ! ConsirucNou: PV J Steel ' Stainless Steel ntal Well Depth; it Multi Factor*: i*(Rad1usil2)2 x 3.14 x 7.481 - %tic Water Level:—?L. � ft Casing Volume: gallons eight of Water Column: ------It . Cal. 3 Volumes: 8allons irge Information ate PurgedStart Time. G f Fmnsh: Purge Rate: . irging Method: / c- 4 ok— L,.^ i Total Volume Purged: gallons mpling Information ite Collected: Time Collected: am pm mpling Equipment Used: Bottle Type Preservation analysis Required eld Measurements/Observations mple Temp (°C): Time: Turbidity (ntu): Time: mple pH (s.u.): Time: Dies Oxy (mg/L): Time: ecific Cond. (uS): Time: Res.: Cl (mg/L): Time: Dox (mV): Time: Other: Time: [or: Time: Appearance: meralffeather Observations mpler Signature/Date: ibilization Test Time ,urged pH (s.u.) Spec, Cond. ReDox (mV) Turbidity Diss Oxy. (mg/L) o Temp. (C) Volume Removed Other (us) (ntu) 1�`ro 0 9.i! dT,� 2'),'�� 2,7 O,a f;r7 ITao ,-;c�I !�j f Z �a./S i.0 ti,1 Ne 0 Q. h I' �' ,9> DocnmentNaMe: Do,,-WntIssued*Ay - 2016 Field Data Sheet Page Of Document dumber: ssueing Authority: - - f F-CAR-FLD ool.rev.01 Pace Huntersville Quality Office Client: 5 C_S Location: Project: .Well ID: Stadillzation Test i Field Data Sheet lient: S C S Location: Project Name/ #: 0 CL 0 ame and Afiliation (Sampler(s): ame,and Afiliation (Inspector) rell Information 'ell ID: lIq w - Well Locked; YES NO i 'ell Diameter: Construction: PVC Steel Stainless Steel rtal Well Depth: ft Multi Factor*: (*(Radius/12)2 x 3.14 x 7.481 atic Water Level: 71. 0 7 ft Casing Volume: gallons eight of Water Column: ft Cal. 3. Volumes: gallons erge Information O n. ate Purged:-j 0 // �� Start Time: Finish: Purge Rate: (} M" aging Method: L l eya -, otal Volume Purged: gallons mplin¢ Information ite Collected: Time Collected: am pm mpling Equipment Used: Bottle Type Preservation Analysis Required Ad Measurements/Observations mple Temp (°C): Time: mple pH (s.u.): Time: ecific Cond, (uS): Time: Dox (mV): Time: [or: Time: meral/Weather Observations r. �— An n As n mpler Signature/Date: C/� `"4 ibilization Test Turbidity (ntu): Time: Diss Oxy (mg/L): Time: Res. CI (mg/L): Time: Other: Time: Appearance: C Lj a Time 'urged pH (s.u.); Spec. Cond. (us) ReDox (mv) Turbidity (ntu) Diss Oxy. (mg(L) Temp. (uC) volume Removed other !`f Ry.Lc o s.� sr, /. 0-) 0 1 AD Z 7, x. ® P, rd !✓', Document Natae: Document Issuea. Jury Field Data Sheet page —of — '" � ` Drcumerit Number: Issu2ing Authorlty: [ F-CAR-FLD-001.rev.01 Pace Huntersville Quality Office Client: J 6 S r a'71$V Location: Project: wo L Well ID: t-, Stabilization Test Time Temp. Diss Oxy. Spec: Cond. pH (s.u.) ReDox (mVi Tumidity (ntuj Purged (°C) (mg/L) (u5) 0, 9b r,g !tl 7 b Volume Removed Water level. Other (gallons/m.is) (ft) circle one I,S? i 7s . rau i.aU aneec • u . " DocumetttNumberi Issuing Authority: F-CAR-FLD-001-rev.00 - Pace Huntusvitle Quality Office Field Data Sheet lient. S L j Location: y✓ c Project Name/#: ame and Afiliation (Sampler(s): ame and Afiliation (Iwpector):-_—________ rell Information 'ell ID: M Well Locked: 9 NO 'ell Diameter: b ( Construction: teef Stlirdess Steel )tal Well Depth: r�� ft Multi Factor*: r(Radius/12)2 x 3,14 x 7.481 atic Water Level: '' z j ft Casing Volume: gallons eight of Water Column-.ft. Cal, 3 Volumes: gallons irge Information 3 00 ate Purged:/ l i / 1 7 Start Time: f �S Finish: Purge Rate,'~`/ 'r irging Method: k✓ i,l e Total Volume Purged: gallons mplina Information ite Colfected:_ Time Collected: am pm mpling Equipment Used: Bottle Type Preservation ?analysis Required 4d Measurements/Observations mple Temp (°C): Time: mple pH (s.u.): - Time: ecific Cond. (uS): Time: Dox (mV): [or: mpler Signature/Date: bilization Test Time: Time: Turbidity (ntu): Time: Diss Oxy (mg/L): Time: Res. Cl (mg/L): _ Time: Other: Time: Appearance: y Goa✓ 70 `� a Time rurged pH (s,u.) Spec. Cond. (US) ReDox (mV) Turbidity (ntu) Diss Oxy. (mg/L) Temp. (°C) Volume Removed Other Tao Id j�o f/23 Svc SI_ %a.f O's- jL d.Eb i .3 Loa Ins" G.IIS�Z r. /� r' (".t �, 1.� oaf 1 aRe t ox Issuing Authority: :nntersviue Q2hl z Office f �/ Field Data Sheet JC lient: S Location: 9&1ii c (0 de-01F Project Name/#: ame and Afiliation (Samplen.(s): ame and Afiliation (Inspector) ---- 'ell Information 'ell ID: Well Locked: NO ell Diameter: + Construction: Steel Stainless Steel )tal Well Depth: � ft Multi Factor*: r(Radius/12)2 x 3,14 x 7,481 atic Water Level: ft Casing Volume: gallons eight of Water Column: ft Cal, 3 Volumes: goons irge Information j J J � Start Time: 100O Finish: PureRate: uj J ate Purged: 1 /�_/g trging Method: Iy E '- a Total Volume Purged: gallons tmpline Information Ite Collected: Time Collected: am pm mpling Equipment Used: Bottle Type Preservation analysis Required Ad Measurements/Observations mple Temp (°C): Time: mple pH (s.u.): Time: ecific Cond. (iB): Time: Dox (mV): Time: for: Time: 'neral/Weathe'.Obseryations mpler Signature/Date: ibilization Test Turbidity (ntu): Time: Diss Oxy (mg/L): Time: Res. CI (mg/L): Time: Other: Time: Appearance: Time 'urged pH(S.U.) SEReDoxTurbidity (ntu) Diss Oxy. (tp8/�)Temp. u (Q Volume Removed Other Ar 1p j = 5,5� 3 6,0o e7. i 1 %,cj C/.v'� csxe Lc< 0JI 3; 31 C 2 9 o S, 0,13 9. /, Document Name: Document Issued. July 28, 2016 Field Data Sheet Page of _ ' Document Number: Issueing Authority: F-CAR-FLD-001.rev.01 Pace Huntersville Quality office Client: Location: 0 L-'3 "- Project: — Well ID: t'k7 � 5tabilaaation `test Time Purged Temp. (°C) Diss oxy. (mg/L) Spec. Cond. (US) Volume Turbidity Removed Water level, Other pH (s.u.) ReDox (mV) (ft) (ntu) (gailydeons) circle one �e;'o Cd`'f'f3 $ Field Data Sheet Document.Number: E-CP [2-PLD-001 xev.00 " -- Isstiing Authority: Pace Huntersville Q1181ity Office Field Data Sheet $ent; 5 L Location: Qy-r L;J U� Project Name/#: ame and Affiliation (Sampler(s): ameand Affiliation (Insvector) Tell Information `ell ID: ('h W - l' 13 Well Locked: YES NO 'ell Diameter: Construction: PVC Steel Stainless Steel )tal Well Depth: / 3 h ft Multi Factor*: r(Radivs/12)2 x 3.14 x 7.481 atic Water Level: ft Casing Volume: gallons eight of Water Column: ft Cal. 3 Volumes: gallons urge Information 5 r ite Purged: 1 % / j / % Start Time, Finish: Purge Rate: 5 S trgmg Method: 01- 0 a e)"t P v r Total Volume Purged: gallons f S 7 Wiling Information ite Collected: r D t - i 7 Time Collected: am pm mpling Equipment Used: Bottle Type Preservation Analysis Required Ad Measurements/Observations mple Temp (C): Time: Turbidity (ntu): Time: mple pH (s.u.): Time: Diss Oxy (mg/L): Time: ecific Cond. (uS): Time: Res. Cl (mg/L): Time: Dox (mV): Time: Other: Time: lot: Time: Appearance: meral/Weather Observations rapier Signature/Date; A111 ..61— T.ca Time pH (s.u.) Spec. Cond. ReDox (mV) Turbidity (ntu). Diss Oxy. (mg/�) e Temp. (C) Sur ed g (US) %sue! 779„ 32 5,? 177— Rother ;Removed 3ce,� 90 o x,00 0,73 �•°' 0 '`b,, a.iGo o.P> 16, 1 �,••�r�lrraprdreat, i' Field Data Sheet lient: G % Location: Project Name/#: ame and Afiliation (Sampler(s): l 1) ame and Afiliation (Inspector); Fell Information `ell ID: ,& w - / 7.6 0 Well Locked: GY0 NO 'ell Diameter: �� Construction: Steel Stainless Steel �T t§ al Well Depth: D ft Multi Factor*: r(RacU s112)2 x 3.14 x 7.481 ,gatic Water Level: 3 a b ft Casing Volume: gallons eight of Water Column: ft Cal. 3 Volumes: gallons rrge Information ate Purged, _/ (� / 7 Start Time: / 6 Finish; �� 31 Purge Rate: I t l `A I irging Method: I ✓� I/ I Total Volume Purged: C gallons Mpling Information ate Collected:/ il P I - / i Time Collected: �.3 .o am pm mpling Equipment Used: Bottle Type Preservation Analysis Required Ad Measurements/Observations mple Temp (C): (0i. - Time: ('63 J mple pH (s.u.): Iv) Time: ecific Cond. (uS): �S 5 1, Time: Dox (mV): _ G 0. / Time: [or: CLlrri_ Time: eneral/Weather Observations yob mpler Signature/Date: /&X/ /,L - / 41 • //' ibilization Test 1•se.� Turbidity (ntu): 1116 Time: j Diss Oxy (mg/L): D, `� �/ Time: Res. Cl (mg/L): Time: Other: 0 -d ti o 21 c - Time: Appearance: G e -4, 7- Time purged pH (s.u.) Spec, Cond. (US) ReDox (mV) Turbidity (ntu) DissOxy: (mglt) u Temp, (C) Volume Removed Other T 1 i e) o J'q6 -61,I ,S"s 0,7 = /ate 72z� 7 S'5L mob(.; / ca.4rzrcar r" ( Field Data Sheet lient: S C ) Location: vrC— !✓J L Project Name/#: ame and Affiliation (Sampler(s): ame: and Affiliation Telllnformation (a !1 1 'ell ID: f' u ' / i 3 7 Well Locked: NO i 'ell Diameter: Construction: 1&2Steel Staudess Steel )talWell Depth: /37 ft Multi Factor*: r(Radtus/12)2x3.14x7.481 ,vatic Water Level: i a.ti I ft Casing Volume: gallons eight of Water Column: £t . Cal. 3. Volumes: gallons urge Information f j 6 i J (7 po purge A-, ate Purged:_/ / r i Start Time: Finish: ge Rate: /S trging Method: W - / l /N, z Total Volume Purged: (--) gallons mpling Information ite Collected: 1 0 ' / / 1 Time Collected: 0/0 am pm mpling Equipment Used: Wm l / '^/ a 2J Bottle Type Preservation Analysis Required T Ad Measurements/Observations mple Temp (°C): ICJ!(' J!(' Time: % 5 x mple pH (s.u.): -i, 7 Time: ecific Cond. (uS): FZ _2 Time: Dox (mV): — Z /. 3 Time: Lot: L L-4 4rn Time: meral/Weather Observations Turbidity (ntu): 127 Time: Diss Oxy (mg/L): 6 'V,' Time: Ices. Cl (mg/L): Time: Other: D Ac a i)ga Time: Appearance: C 114- mpler Signaftue/Date: =-..-G G//-----. hilization Test Time pH (s.u.) Spec. Cond. ReDox(mV) Turbidity Diss Oxy. (mg/L) Temp, )urged (us) (ntu) o. Issuing Authoxity: Field Data Sheet lient: Location: ti/✓ ppojectName/#: ame and Afiliation (Sampler(s): ame and Affiliation (Inspector}: _ 'ell fi formation `ell ID: ✓i-t w - a- , Z Well Locked: NO 'ell Diameter: i Construction: VAC Steele SiainlessSfeel )tal Well Depth: ft Multi Factor*: r(Radius/12)2x3.14x7.491 atic Water Level: %, do `I ft Casing Volume gallons eight of Water Column.—ft. Cal. 3 Volumes: gallons irge Information rte Purged: Start Time; j / 5 Finish: Purge Rate: aging Method: JAL 2,1 // • Total Volume Purged: l�3 �-` gallons snpling Information ite Collected: % 7 - (f i Time Collected: d n A' am pm mpling Equipment Used: r Bottle Type Preservation Analysis Required RWW 5alj �4 Vow dYl n�� 1d Measurements/Observations mple Temp (IC): 14 ? Time: ^ '— mple pH (s.u.): 6 ' 1- Time: ecific Cond. (uS): 63 N Time: Dox (mV): r) s • 1 Time: (or: C x A-0.,_- Time: merd/Weather Observations mplex Signature/Date: 0�5" / d - //-/'` ) iblilzation Test Turbidity (ntu): (9, 7 / Time: /a z.r- Diss Oxy (mg/L): ©, a / Time: Res. C1(mg/L): Time: Other: 0, c. o aU Time: Appearance: Time 'urged pH (s.u.) Spec. Cond. (US) ReDox (mV) Turbidity (ntu) Diss Oxy. (mg/L) Temp. (nC) Volume Removed Other I%,0 O..L /xo 6,5>, fir -a.�°.d 33s.>a ©.g9 i9,� °• �' ,i) 17r o G.,� -7 9w 1 0.73 19,5 Gos- Document Name: Document issued: July 28, 2016 Field Data Sheet Page _of _ O scumeni Number: Issueing Authority: i F-CAR-FLD-O01.rev.01 Pace Huntersville Quality Office Client: 4U,/c f(- Location: &t"* &C-d Project: Stabilization Test Time Purged Temp. (6C) piss Oxy. (mg/L) Spec. Cond. (uS) pH (s.u.) ReOox (mV) Volume 7water level, Turbidity RemovedOther (ntu) (gallons/m.Is)ft) circle one /Aar 15.7 1 J,6k NI 1 6,41. -ru., ®„� I.ac -„-Y'k14C,.^FtlYl,;yGttiUt - Document Number: Is§wing Authority: F-CAR-FLD-001 rev 00 Pace Huntersville Quality Office Field Data Sheet lient: S L S Location: Project Name/#: ame and Afiliation (Sampler(s): ame and Afiliation (Inspector) __- _-_-_ _ rell Information (D II t IAll ID: t 19 •• Well Locked: C & NO 4e11 Diameter: i Construction: Steel Stainless Steel -otal Well Depth: �'�'� '' ft Multi Factor*: [*(Radius/12)2 x 3,14 x 7.481 raiic Water Level: T G ft Casing Volume: gallons Right of Water Column: ft Cal. 3 Volumes: gallons Tree information tte Purged: I Start Time: Finish: I`o a Purge Rate: irging Method: z iJ A /f - Total Volume Purged: gallons Mpling Information (�4te Collected: / / Time Collected: +J-o ' am pm mpling Equipment Used: Bottle Type ' 4-2 A& - Preservation 1d Measurements/Observations mple Temp (0Q: Time: I •S o 0 mple pH (s.u.): 6 • P . Time: ecific Cond, (uS): ! t Time: Dox (mV): 7 Time: tor: C �e,4 - Time: .neral/Weather Observations mplerSignature/Date: z /X- //0-J/-/ ibilization Test Analysis Required 1 Turbidity (ntu): -S . 2 Time: Diss Oxy (mg/L): Time: I Res: Other: Time: Appe ante: Time 'urged pH (s.u.) Spec. Cond. (US) ReDox (mV) Turbidity (ntu) Diss Oxy. (mg/L) e Temp. (C) Volume Removed Other /97 O.s 0.G Ur L -ri 1f79 it �,�t. ©.moo 19,E 1 0 - S 11f b- I ') 0 V -3 l jr— 1 16I 10.1 f,q f ,t I I, Document Name: Document Issued: July 28, 2016 o "'"" i Field Data Sheet Page _of _ Document Number: F-CAR-FLD-001.rev.01 IssueingAiathorityi Pace Huntersville Quality Office Client: 5 Location: 6 UV ( b L4 L F Project: _ Well ID: 41ti • of (9� Stabilization Test v�etinF�� ;�i�u�>�ac�aMa+a° � s awns i q,g�r i�3iP94 Time Purged Temp. (°C) Diss Oxy. (mg/L) Spec. Cond. (uS) pH (s.u.) ReDox (mV) Turbidity (ntu) Volume Removed (gallons/mis) circle one Water level. Other lft) (`t'1f0 7 1,41 pLo (0,0 as.c `F F t y .— Document Number: Issuing Authority: - F-CAR-FLD-001-re nn - Pace Huntersville Quality Office Field Data Sheet lient:`! y— C Location: v c t'� D`!) dH Project Name/#: ame and Afiliation (Sampler(s): ame and Affiliation (Inspector):;___ 'ell Information _ 'ell ID: M w • (I - t/ Well Locked: NO `ell Diameter: ( Construction: F�p SteelStainless Steel )tal Well Depth: // o - ft Multi Factor*: [•(Radius/12)2 x 3.14 x 7.481 , fatic Water Level: 0 , a ft Casing Volume: gallons eight of Water Column: ft . Cal. 3 Volumes: gallons rrge Information ate Purged j tJ g aging Method: / ( /�StartTime: H,, _ ! S F Finish: ) F x6 �'-�7 r�-sa Puige Rate: f c + , o gallons' 4 y6O� Total Volume Purged: J<,L, milling Information ite Collected: % o ! / ' < 2 Time Collected: j E' ° am pm mplingEquipment Used: Al —I Bottle Type 4� e.--.- � 1,4 7, �. Ad Measurements/Observations Preservation I Analysis Required mple Temp (°C): a 3 _ Time: 0 �A mple pH (s.u.): 7 Time: ecific Cond. (uS): " s Time: 4— Dox (mV): ` 103,1 Time: for: G �4�4n Time: meral/Weather Observations S�✓tiy `'�2 Turbidity (ntu): d • " Time: l Y� a• � Diss Oxy (mg/L): 0. 4 Time: Res. CI (mg/L): Time: Other: r 0q�,-L Time: Appearance: C npler Signature/Date: 'J7�. ,/1-- ✓� i ibilization Test Time 'urged pH (s.u.) Spec. Cond. ReDox (mV) Turbidity (ntu) Diss Oxy: (mg/L) Temp. (IQ(uS) Volume Removed Other 9T7 �,i �,. +� .91 fto to9A. —to > j 30 fl 6/ 07 47 —';4 0">-A 1 qQo ff 0,L'> 1 2 1,A 1 0,9 I! .eo.4tsalyzrcal Field Data Sheet lient: Sc 5 Location: J6�,� t oL o `s project Name/#: - ame and Afiliatlon (Sampler(s): ILI e' j ame and Afiliation 'ell Information Vell ID: / - * I Well Locked: YES NO Ul Diameter: L Construction: PVC Steel Staudess Steel )talWell Depth: / ft Multi Factor*: r(Radtus/12)2x3.14x7.481 atic Water Level: ft Casing Volume: gallons eight of Water Column: £t . Cal. 3 Volumes: gallons g n'ge Information itepurged;_Start Time: Finish: Purge Rate: IAS " irging Method: ti, .S / / Total Volume Purged: gallons mnling information } ite Collected: _.9 ' ! 7 ' Time Collected: am pm mpling Equipment Used: Bottle Type Preservation Analysis Required Ad Measurements/Observations mple Temp (°C): Time: Turbidity (ntu); Time: mple pH (s.u.): Time: Diss Oxy (mg/L): Time: ecific Cond. (uS): Time: Res. Cl (mg/L): Time; Dox (mV): Time: Other: Time: tor: Time: Appearance: ,neral/Weather Observations mpler Signature/Date: 1' << — /0/C I ibilization Test Time ,urged pH (s.u.} Spec. Cond. (us) ReDox (mV) Turbidity (ntu) Diss Oxy: (mg/t) u Temp, (C) Volume Removed Other 'F3s (5a .7w s l o 'f- os I -�9 'f.6s a3 /.: Document Name: Document issued:. July 28, zula Field Data Sheet Page _of _ _ Issuesng Authority: Dacumeni Number: i F-CAR-FLD-001.rev.01 Pace Huntersville Quality Office 'MtLTPn Y°+au'2r� iW�iiLb?]b'HkPVID Client: SC S Came s i z aarsas Location: ®c-0 �f s3u -1& 0.1 1 0.1630 Project: — i — Mwo Well ID: I? w n r Z610s stabilization Teak Diss Spec. Turbidity Volume Removed Water level, Other Time Temp. Oxy. Cord. pH (s.u.) ReDax (mV} (ntu) (gallons/mis) (ft) Purged (°C) (mg/L) (us) cirde one Issuing ` Meld Data Sheet Bent: C S Location: C ©L O F project Name/#: ame and Afiliation (Sampler(s): /4,' 1 amp, and Affiliation (inspector)._,_ __ --------- 'ell Information 'ell ID: /k v • N t -'9 Well Locked: YES NO r 'ell Diameter: fi Construction: PVC SteelStainless Steel rtal Well Depth: !' ft Multi Factor*: [*(Rad us/12)2 x 3.14 x 7.481 atic Water Level: ft Casing Volume; gallons eight of Water Column: ft Cal. 3 Volumes: _ gallons nrge Information ate Purged: l Start Time: 3 Finish: r Purge Rate: / `fir aging Method: Total Volume Purged: gallons :mvlina Information ite Collected: � 0 " I b - t O Time Collected: I �2 am pm tripling Equipment Used: i6c_2. s %f Bottle Type Preservation Analysis Required Ad Measurements/Observations mple Temp (°C): Time: Turbidity (ntu): Time: mple pH (s.u.): _ Time: Diss Oxy (mg/L): Time: ecific Cond. (uS): Time: Res. CI (mg/L): Time: Dox (mV): Time: Other: Time: for: Time: Appearance: meral/Weather Observations mplerSignature/Date: bilization Test Time 'urged pH (s.u.) Spec. Cond. (US) ReDox (mV) Turbidity (ntu) Diss Oxy. (mg/L) Temp. (°C) Volume Removed Other A f,0� �.t -65r-, 0•� m C i E (11 s U S � � n V V [ J 2 O U ` U T T 0 t v' U C `J � 7 3 3 a C E ti I:. i 1 ZFG�IiFFdciVkTGc17 � FieldData Sheet - Document Nissuing umber; Pa e 1 of Authority: � F CAR FLD 001 rev 00 Pace Hvntexsville Quali Office Field Data Sheek C lient: / Location: 641?✓C flt 4-r Project Name/#: ame and Afiliation (Sampler(s): ,ram ' i u i ame and Affiliation (hispector): __ cell Information 'ell ID: /"t / 7, /' Well Locked: (IE5) NO 'ell Diameter: Construction: 71r�) Steel Stair&ss Steel tal Well Depth: / 0 ft Multi Factor*: ("(Radius/12)2x3.14x7.481 atic Water Level>' U ,J ft Casing Volume gallons eight of Water Column: 3 / ° ft . Cal, 3 Volumes: gallons rrM Information 1te Purged: / V / (� /�� Start Time: /.3 /S5 Finish; ��3 J2 U,1 l Purge Rate: �R .ti it Method: `�9C1� D,�r, Bing , Total Volume Purged: ' ° gallons i myling Information ite Collected: "r6 / 7 Time Collected: a am pm tripling Equipment Used: 6 I-400 R /l 4 Bottle Type Preservation Analysis Required Ad Measurements/Observations mple Temp (°C): * r Time: {O mple pH (s.u.): 4 /, Time: /�' ° ecific Cond. (US): ' Time: Dox (mV):'* /^' Time: /IFS tor: —� Ulf r Time: !ner /Weather Observations mpler Signature/Date: G:IN. 41nn Tee+ Turbidity (ntu): �' Time: / '�_S' xy ( g/L) l }i 3 Diss O m : Tim (I e: Res. Cl (mg/L): Time: Other: AIJ J 3°'i- Time: I Appearance: pH (s.u.) Spec, Cond. ReDox (mV) Turbidity Diss Oxy. (mg/L) ° Temp. (C) Volume Removed Other Time 'ur ed g (us) (ntu) Document Name: Field Data Sheet t Document Number: i I F-CAR-FLD-001.rev.01 Document Issued: July 28,2016 Page of _ ssueing Authority: . Pace Huntersville Quality Office Client: ! 1 _-- —o Location: 1.625 inns nwo a.-i -100 Project: L ir z i a � 0,3670 �.viaso _WelliD: 5tabllizatlon'1est Volume Diss Spec. Turbidity Removed Water I Time Temp. ox . y Cond. pH (s.u.) ReDox (mU) (ntu} (ft) (gallons Purged (°C) (mgfL} (uS) circle onet I p l is ! /`P'? ICI �, + ... .`? 4 D I rI 6 /4-).9 Aq- Other Nield i Field data Sheet lient: SC 5 Location: gv^`C Project Name/#: ame and Afiliation (Sampler(s): /�� % n� ' ame and Afiliation (Inspector): rell Information 'ell ID: 1'7w-Pt /4 s Well Locked: NO ell Diameter: Construction: 'V Steel Stainless Steel ltalWell Depth: O ft Multi Factor*: r(Radivsh2)zx3.14xMal atic Water Level: Casing Volume: gallons eight of Water Column: tt . Cal. 3 Volumes: gallons a is a ire Information 11` I IJ ite Purged:/ d G / / Start Tune: Finish: .1 0 0 Purge Rate: M „� //' irging Method: h "0 4 L ^,n Total Volume Purged: gallons mares Information ite Collected: / / b .. / Time Collected: J am pm mpling Equipment Used: L Aoo (rA> Bottle Type 57 VOLd:A,ltl% Preservation )analysis Required Ad Measurements Observatiorts S,-mple Temp (IC): Time: r a O. o io mple pH (s.u.): _ ` ( Time: �� o is ecific Cond. (uS): Time: (d °' Dox(mV): l' ' j Time: 9' [or: C c ! 1 1. Time: / © ve .x. c C0O/ q- -Sa mpler Signature/Date: bilization Test Turbidity (ntu): e, E Time: /d v o Diss Oxy (mg/L): u 20 Time: /F 0 Res. CI (mg/L): Time: Other: A% ° e Jmn Time: (A v o Appearance: Ct d4.rt N.q D4 )2 ,tee, 2 Time urged pH [s.u.) Spec. Cond. (us) ReDox (mV) Turbidity (ntu) Diss Oxy: (mg/L) e Temp. (C} Volume Removed Other llr0 J'r-5A a..`tq- 3a I Ia"1 Deyjo 1"4A A� t i /Ga2//� l9 . b /5.Da.b /% 19 3. �' e S l %�..'� 0. / J ''�" di. 3 i, s Document Name: Field Data Sheet Document Number: F-CAR-F LD-001. rev.01 Client: Location: L" L Project: 0 Well ID: c✓ t v.�b—� Stabilization Test Document Issued:. July 28, 2016 Page of_ Ime. ingAuthority' -- Pace Huntersvill�lity office Volume Diss Spec. Water level.L Time Temp. Turbidityfe!tme oved Oxy. Cond. pH (s.u.)ReDox (mV) (ntu) s/mis) (ft) Purged (°C) (mg/L) (uS) one �'f ---�1---1-pl i N 1 a > 1 ? 1 N 3 �+ all `C ri ri q N 3. c v< o O � P N Q 4 u I V3 S r � jP G r 4 r I' � 4 I, I I •/ IJ. i �I f1 �3to N � a ro a N s p Ila N y, N ` El m 4 O o a G � 3 a �a r Q B V `� O N N � d t� � � c 4' h (? (�v n G n � \ R ii Ci o a c � �I �• J u � i 3 d m � 1 3 I i Cl r Zz N z 3 � a n r' T O 'O T T � n 4. 3 fD Us C (D ci O (D 1 U l✓ n i � V •6 � N I . .. .. � . \.\ . �w =a \ N \®{\\ \. a � y� ^ . n v ro- s 7 Solid Waste Services APPENDIX B WELL CONDITION SUMMARY Old Buncombe County Landfill Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report 0 N o_ 3 ❑4❑�❑�❑q�❑y❑4❑o❑Q❑4❑cp i, O Q v 3 Q O 3 Q n o 3 O o 3 Q , 3 Q n 3 Q , e 3 Q Q 3 O n o 3 00, 00 .03 5, ❑ N N 0 N 0 N 0 0 a 0 ❑- 10 N a a a a a a a a g o o o 0 o g 3 o g 3 o 0 3 o g 3 o 0 3 o g 3 o g fl o N 3 a 3 a 3 ❑. a a a a a a ❑ ❑ Q❑ 4❑ 4❑ m❑ 4❑ q❑ 40 4❑ Q °a o =- a o s o ❑a .5 a o a o =- a o =- a o =- a o 0 a 0 0 or `❑ o 0 0 0 0 0 .o `o c ❑ m N N N N N N N 0 N ❑ 4❑ ❑ ❑ 40 Q❑ n❑ Q❑ Q❑ �❑ Q O Z 0 { 0 Z 0 { 0 Z 0 { 0 Z 0c { 'Z O { ,0� Z 0 { 0 Z 0 { 0 Z 0 { Z 0 [ A Z 0 { 0 n R rr\0 y\0 zs n 0 3 N tr d• A Q 0 i r- w � f ❑❑❑4❑0❑004❑4❑4❑Q0000 d O o O o O o O a O� o O� 0 00 O 3 7Q Olt a o 0 0 0 o 3 p 3 ❑ 3 ❑ a o. n. a a a a a a ❑- p Q O p Q � Q p� ❑ � 0 Q ❑ � � 0 ❑ O n p p p O ❑ ❑ � l0 Ip � 7 a a a a a a a a a ❑ ❑❑ [�❑ ❑❑ El 40 Q❑ �❑ q❑ ❑❑ ❑ 0 .o 0 c c p O 0 ❑ ❑ 0 � ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ Z -C �❑ Z Z -< Z -G 'Z < Z O < 0 ZG 0 Z 0 0 0 O N 0 N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 m N Q P N Q 0 N 9 Z N Z N -� v c. v 0 00 o 00 a 3 0 o 3 00 3 0,0 ° 3 00 ° 3 00, ° 0 O° o 3 3 a a p a T o 0 o 0 o 0 o 7C o o 3 3 H 0 m a o m a a m a o ry a 0 ry a 0 m a m a p m a p a o. m ❑ @ ❑ m ❑ ❑ f] ❑ Q ❑ �1 ❑ b, C�7 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 O , s a O s n. O a p a p a a a o a 0 0 a °- P n a o 0 ❑ Cal❑ ❑ [p❑ ❑ ❑ 4❑ ❑ O Z o < 0 Z 0 < Z 0 -G m Z o -G 'Z o -G m Z o < m Z 0 -G Z m 0 < Z m 0 < Z 0 < r0 }m- ss� � J n 0 3 m O N N p 0 i O � N 0 � T P n z z 0 N 3 0 a c TV O `a a a O C £ 0 u `.� � *�,>M-l o Zd Z Y Z Y Z Y Z Y Z ❑C7 ❑� ❑�1 ❑f� ❑Na0 .O Y 0 Y o X o Y O X 6 X o Y 0 Y 0 X o Y O ❑b ❑� ❑� ❑b ❑b ❑� ❑d ❑b ❑� El m E rn rn rn rn a rn c rn a rn a rn 9 U Y o E So Y E oq X E o Y E O o� Y E D o Y E O ao Y E p o Y E o c, 0 E O 0 0 E D 0 EI E E O D aE Eo "a EE YI E E E Y1 Y E oOE \Y 0 0 OOD ❑ El \O0 ❑ 00 ❑ ,Ut, 13 ❑ ❑ L Solid Waste Services 6 APPENDIX C CHAIN OF CUSTODY Old Buncombe County Landfill Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report Document Name: Document Revised: July 25, 2017 e aceAnalytlbal Sample Condition Upon Receipt(SC JR) Page 1 of 2 Document No.: Issuing Authority: ( F-CAR-CS-033-Rev.03 Pace Quality Office Laboratory receiving samples: Asheville den❑ Greenwood ❑ Huntersville ❑ Raleigh❑ Mechanicsville[] Client Name: W®# : 92355571 Courier: Project k: Ex ❑- UPS ❑USPS ❑Client I I I I II I II II I I II III ❑ Commercial �Fed 1>"` ❑Other._ 92358571 Custody Seal Present? ,--, ❑Yes Seals Intact? ❑ '/Yes Ism iV1qr 115U Date/Initials i✓si`ningrCont nts: Packing Material: ❑Bubble Wrap ubble Bags ❑None Other Biological Tissue Fro ❑Yes ❑No N/A Thermometer: et ❑Blue []None ❑IR Gun ID: Type of Ice: Correction Factor: Cooler Temp Corrected (°C): . ) Temp should be above freezing to 6°C []Samples out oftemp criteria. Samples on ice, cooling process has begun USDA Regulated Sol A, water sample) Did samples originate in a quarantine zone within the United States: CA, NY, or SC (check maps)? r IV... ilni., Did samples originate from a foreign source (internationally, including Hawaii and Puerto Rico)?[]Yes []No Comments/Discrepancy: Chain of Custody Present? []NO ❑N/A 1. Samples Arrived within Hold Time? Yes [IN. ❑N/A 2. Short Hold Time Analysis (42 hr.)? []Yes -B%'o— ❑N/A 3. Rush Turn Around Time Requested? []Yes ❑N/A 4. Sufficient Volume? []NO ❑N/A 5. Correct Containers Used? -Pace Containers Used? eS []NO Ohio ❑N/A ❑N/A 6. Containers Intact? s []No N/A 7. Dissolved analysis: Samples Field Filtered? ❑Yes -21tro' ❑N/A B. Sample Labels Match COC? -Includes Date/Time/ID/Analysis Matrix: Yes []NO []N/A 9. Headspace in VOA Vials (>5-6mm)? Dyes o ❑N/A 10. Trip Blank Present? Trip Blank Custody Seals Present? []Yes2<6— [:]Yes❑No ,❑INN/AA -PIN/A 11. CLIENT NOTIFICATION/RESOLUTION Person Contacted: Comments/Sample Discrepancy: Project Manager SCURF Review: Date: Project Manager SRF Review: Date: rteiauataregwrear LJTes UNU laf13 Vb Note: Whenever there is a discrepancy affecting North Carolina compliance samples, a copy of this form will be sent to the North Carolina DEHNR Certification Office (i.e. Out of hold, incorrect preservative, out of temp, Incorrect containers) Document Name: I Document Document No.: F-CAR-CS-033-Rev.03 *Check mark top half of box if pH and/or dechlorination is verified and within the acceptance range for preservation samples. **Bottom half of box is to list number of bottles Issuing Authority: Project # WO# : 92358571 PM: PTE Due Date: 10/24/17 CLIENT: 93-SCS E Z N W m a E 7 O m z Z W d j a E ] 1�1 m a Z V W 7 a E N m `t n 7 m a `m 7 .4 m U N V v n a E til d m N V .n- m0 Z V m n .� E = IVI m O Z m Z N n a E m M A _6 S Z m a E V M m m C U" d E a u 3 Q : V i• w 7 E E ¢ :; M a y V V a E ¢ °: S e1 a "O v d n J E a of M a N d e O_ ry a E a r 'I a ry V O 2 E a E m a �..1 sf Z a E a o r�i � m Q IH a Z _ U a O > E 01 0 00 o>> 2 m0 N N ¢ p > E OI > Z 0 > E P ti Z a0 M O > E N 0 o>> \ Z y m N Y N 6 Q Q ? y � O j N ry t9 1 Z « n H' E N n r a 1 a ? N '° n W E N n m AZ P ry - V of M d m y a u> \ 2 — > V A E yl 2 W 1 3 z 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 it 12 pH Adjustment Log for Preserved Samples Sample ID Type of Preservative pH upon receipt Date preservation adjusted Time preservation adjusted Amount of Preservative added Lot # N p ,O J OI N A W N ITEM # A -e 3 D n m ry s o H 3 E' O a w y 3 m a n D o \ o —D 3 03 m -, m y 1.+ T 0 z p v r re m re z 1 m N ONP^_Owv��o n 65. s 3 n—ry `e _ ]7 m o , Z Oymp vOr 09�� zl— ti B'p D zoz o n� f— m 3 t 0 v W r MATRIX CODE (see valid codes to left) cr m A 0 O ° y SAMPLE TYPE (G=GRAB C=COMP) 1 o W m r st �o m y3 P 3 = r D m 0 O r- W y A 0 D22 I O_ m z -Di z m c x d y 4 m o °s O re a °p ✓ _ 1 a a i V y "� f m v v y m SAMPLE TEMP AT COLLECTION z z p b �13 o Ci c- # OF CONTAINERS 8 m m m a 3 f\ Fm a' m S ° ° Unpreserved - s z o O H,SOa 3 HNOa ° ° HCI m NaOH w p Na2S203 y Methanol Other T c JAnalysis Test Y(NI o re a �c D D 0.t ! N ma z D X Im m N co co T C l m T L d y m m O m m A Cy m < 2 0 0 m m m m C AO 00 Z 2 C1 C Temp in'C O Residual Chlorine (Y/N) j I N Received on 1 p 131 Ice (YIN) j W 9 ,-.1" V m o Custody O 9 0 OCO Sealed Cooler O G ti A O Z O z z z Samples Intact Q v m (WN) — m O Document Name: Document Revised: July 25, 2017 _ ceAnalytkal Sample Condition Upon Receipt(SCL Page 2 of 2 Document No.: Issuing Authority: ! F-CAR-CS-033-Rev.03 Pace Quality Office *Check mark top half of box if pH and/or dechlorination is verified and within the acceptance range for preservation samples. **Bottom half of box is to list number of bottles Project # Wp## : 92358571 PM: PTE Due Date: 10/24/17 CLIENT: 93—SCS ae W z J a E .Ni m L L J a E N J m v W J a E 1!1 J m W W J m a y vl J m N V 2 y ON x a E 0 N m N V S T = n E z m Z W d a N n E m M A 2 2 O Z a E m C J N v E v 3 ? V W N 6 E a `m a N ¢ E a `w a 9 d W 6 J a E a N i V O E a> `a a N V 0 I ¢ E a V V 2 d Q E n m a a _Z x O E o>> \ M ON z O > E a p O E Q 0 E a>> a 2 « n 10 z ? y N > y " � a q a - in E a m I a z .2 H E a m C1 0 n E `v \_ N E Z 1 ZJ 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 I 3 7 8 9 IN10 11 12 I INN pH Adjustment Log for Preserved Samples Sample ID Type of Preservative pH upon receipt Date preservation adjusted Time preservation adjusted Amount of Preservative added Lot x �y IO m V q V1 p W N ITEM# A V m N D 0 A 0 O R R N�qD d`o a v 'a a= o n o o fn c W ti \ 1 D li p C o a m v O V zas 3 as p c C T z m i y ^ i g�P�oo A��o incmmx 3 G M I R N O�9� O O It A c D y�NA � z z ? O } a y 0 3 3 d p m m m MATRIX CODE (sae valid wcesmieal o N TYPE (G=GRAB C=COMP) CSAMPLE W o a 01 D to i$ �g W 3 C m 00 m t m r '^ M z z r m P 4 2 2 y D Q _ G _ — C 4 _ r V V _ O n n,o 'i in 1' _ co \ z 3 D Ln D D 9 y \ m b r .t\ ) C C m 9 SAMPLE TEMP AT COLLECTION z z A J r m n ' as _ �# OF CONTAINERS m °;' m m= m m a N 3 Unpreserved rl as 909m0 ? H2SO4 z O HNO3 3 - - „- HCl m NaOH m Na3S303 as Methanol in Other < iAnalysis YI Test 1 N nT - e h —// A a m r 4 � L a, o W (" i 7A .i. T x442 ll m D o N F i u m v rC 5 m M L m z r ° _ , D W s an O m � v Qi A 0 D O z K m Temp in °C Residual Chlorine (YIN) j m v Recei,md on Ice (YIN) y 9 _ 1 9 W W CID Custody Sealed Cooler Op 9 ,./\ A (YIN) a ^ m x W O N Samples Intact n P (YIN) 0 < _ ceAnalytical Document Name: Sample Condition Upon ReceiptlSCUR) Document Revised: July 25, 2017 Page 2 of 2 Document No.: F-CAR-CS-033-Rev.03 Issuing Authority: Pace Quality Office *Check mark top half of box if pH and/or dechlorination is verified and within the acceptance range for preservation samples. **Bottom half of box is to list number of bottles Project WOE : 92353571 PM: PT a Date: 10/24/17 CLIENT: 93-SCS L = v u c a E .Ni 7 6 m v a a E N 6 m a w c a E N 7 6 m Z v Z of ."-.'V' m a y 7 6 m ry v -x¢, O a E N 6 m n v .x a. O m n E -L 6 m _ ! w ¢ G d E N 6 m .� xn O a E V 6 m e j q• 5 E 3 LL M 3 y w a E M l7 a ry v a E rl V a i' v E ¢ E O M l7 a v. a E m '1 V a x = E ¢ E O M Lf a x Z E E o n m M O a Z x ¢ Oj E 01 �' a>> ¢ ? 0 a zid O> E N > Z a E 01 > ¢ a O a Oj E T « Y o N a G >> a UN� x a n V m E N N 0. 2 u = E O C _ O ry o 0' m u u> m ii E O Z 1 � 3 2 3 3 1 4 I 3 5 3 6 7 8 9 SO 11 12 pH Adjustment Log for Preserved Samples Sample ID Type of Preservative pH upon receipt Date preservation adjusted Time preservation adjusted Amount of Preservative added Lot R O O J 0 N A W N ITEM # m to 3 a O a m N O 3 3" n p_ D rrJl t 9 a a o p O t' O, (T N 3 Cso a in m r 0 Y �, �• C C O C l a m m y N gH o 2 m'� o 08�—_ 3 %n O m 'om m T o 17 n m a so N �NA `L�� Z Z -i a '0 0 z ~ 6 y 3 3 p y m MATRIXCODE (ses valid codes to left) f— z m r z SAMPLE TYPE (G=GRAB C=COMP) p C C ftf\ o (� m p y on mo (J D io Q so r m O M C o r m a N_ A z y z m Z. to o f CM, T A e Z 2m 3 v D T u V f\ U U m on SAMPLE TEMP AT COLLECTION z A V # OF CONTAINERS g d a. d " g q — g . a a n m n g to a ^ d 't, � o ? o o Unpreserved m m = 3 '+� U HzSOa Z to p a HNO, P,o — �^ w U- HCI 2 — NaOH tl • 0 Na2S203 y m Methanol �— y m Other p M lAnalysis Test 1 n N I r p $� +G LO A n S�frcH.p cm ip D m p u G) r m v i ✓Oq ) Ait '�^ T. �'' p y to O n 9 m 5 ti w �1 A T m m g rn O = rt � A D m Z p In 2 to p r D r Z 0 j e Temp in°C :y --t a A �V h Residual Chlorine (YIN) Received on Ice (YIN) D (� 1 on on iSealetl O O Custody Cooler (YIN) p o zi x Samples Intact - C m (YIN)N — — 'p A M% cb i= I � I � 1►0 N O m m m m a w n+ ITEM # c 3 n 3 i w o $' J 3 y o v o m b �; a m O c N F W m a m r NO 3 3 O c m " V r N go. mm m n8m'A� 3 \N % ]_] c m N m m O L OyD $ONm� O H y y Z y NA'drr �`i; Z Z 0 J 6 D 3 3 O O a� MATRIXCOOE (see valid c°das to left) r a m- m m m r G z SAMPLE TYPE (G=GRAB C=COMP) b 3 o m O h x s O III m m r m O 3 m m m 9 D r A 6 O m u c _ D v ,`� n m o9 m 0 y z m CA D v n y0 m Z V m M ti m 3 3 0 U D n V U m 9 v D m c \ V m m A A m SAMPLE TEMP AT COLLECTION D g m N OF CONTAINERS d g 3 m m v - S e D A 3 R M m a - m v g o p° o$ c P Unpreserved HsS,Oe 3 o O 3 \ HNOe m - ,\ /( HCI NaOH .\ NazS203 m vMethanol m Other o lAnalysls Test Y/Nl C m _w-f� A o m X X S14, 171, a C r m O-� '1'� L ✓a,j l H w i m In a W n D z ti O 5y m y T .m. m -I 'm � > D � n IIp A 0 ra (_ Z d m C 1 Z a z P w Temp in °c c n m Nu Residual Chlorine (YIN) Received on A f Ice (YIN) D ' 1 })COo Custody m O �. O O I A Sealetl Cooler O R an Z (YIN) Z CYO y O Z C J O N � Samples Intactm� b (YIN) U1 G Document Name: Document Revised: July 25, 2017 _ Analytical' Sample Condition Upon Receipt(SCUR) Page 2 of 2 Document No.: Issuing Authority: F-CAR-CS-033-Rev.03 Pace Quality Office *Check mark top half of box if pH and/or dechlorination Project # is verified and within the acceptance range for preservation samples. **Bottom half of box is to list number of bottles E E u 2 a Z >c '_ m a E e a m a Z >c _ m a J E m a m a Z >c _ m a E �J H Q. m z W c m n y : .r G. m ry 2 O urvt x ^�. a J E N e a m n v m Sz _ m —a E 2 m u m m Z ca W u S J E N m Q. m . zi A O Z _ a J E y� U m n m a > V y t c E a LL 3 4!E z N m O y a E a « _ Vr a n xn x i E E Q _ I •+ Vr a 2 y a Z c a E a E 7 m V' a r`i v O x n E Q `w VI w l7 a ry v x O ^' E a E y� m 0 a �- z _ U 2 z a ¢ E ry r m m a u x O > E e1 m o>> Q z m z O > '.' E m z c 0 > E m � d m O > E m o>> Q Z �«'e n yr m i a -' « '° « n N m O n m z n E m u n I ? w irr J E ry H O1 m g z a E m m a U> o v J E O z m 1 z ) 3 3 7 J 4 Z. 5 z- 6 7 8 9 SO 11 12 pH Adjustment Log for Preserved Samples Sample ID Type of Preservative pH upon receipt Date preservation adjusted Time preservation adjusted Amount of Preservative added Lot # 0 5 10 '7 1 POT 5 0 -(11 1117050 'w e I- m r Iss m A w u ITEM # A a e o m 3 n o n mm 3 a � c F? 3 m y o m o i s - 1 3 0 `� y!m r y ml z rin m 0 C Z_ Q 3 O 3 O to to on gyP�g o'0dd� mmc ° 3 ow. O o m An, ny NA�rN"V�rL ^ m -1 '� C O Z 3 Z 3 m 0 m ~ 6 E m m (._ m l m m o MATRIX CODE (see valid codes blefl) r O z Z = SAMPLE TYPE (G=GRAB C=COMP) ------------ y on n \ ° m m o v$ K L 3e vv W r m () /' 9 ` D M O m C o m A Z m a i D m n m z m m m N N y •`. 5 O u 3 3 Z a� y `t V" to a z v z D A V m SAMPLE TEMP AT COLLECTION m- D a 3 a nA # OF CONTAINERS 2 S 3^ m 's � n o 3 = 0. m c 0 Unpreserved u m _o H,SO,t N O 3 m o HNO3 HCl y 2 NaOH m NazS303 y 'a m Methanol m Other Analysis Test j YIN � as Qa A / ✓M1 R.[ / ✓2� no om. o Qa an r z A k ♦ALA,'/L n o. O an m^ O R C Z In C [- _ n M n re _n - m o m N O n � A a m Z pDA O Z O 9 (Z z 0 < m Temp In °C y on �7 Residual Chlorine (Y/N) Received on Ice (� A (YIN) 3 m0 m y 9 0 UJ D ( ) o Custody Sealed Cooler O co' In Z (YIN) o ~ .O. O Z Samples Intact n C A (YIN) C — G n S1n 'D m e Z o -M w C 0 1O 00 0� rn 3D z a 3 D C1 ace Analytical Document Name: Sample Condition Upon Receipt(SCUR) Document Revised:luly 25, 2017 Page 1 of 2 Document No.: Issuing Authority: F•CAR-CS-033-Rev.03 Pace Quality Office Laboratory receiving sa es: Asheville Eden❑ Greenwood❑ Huntersville❑ Raleigh❑ Mechanicsville❑ Client Name: WD# : 92359565 Project #: Courier: ❑Fe x ❑UPS ❑USPS [Client ❑ Commercial ace - ❑Other:_ Custody Seal Present? []Yes o Seals Intact? ❑Yes ❑No Packing Material: ❑Bubble Wrap ble Bags ❑None Thermometer: / [-]Wet ❑ l un ID: Type off Ice: Correction Factor: 0 Cooler Temp Corrected (°C): 11 t11 ❑ Other IIIIII I I IIIIIII II II III 92358565 Date/Initials Person Examining Contents:µ ft0 If1 []Blue []None USDA Regulated Soil (❑ N�water sample) Did samples originate in a quarantine zone within the United States: CA, NY, or SC (check maps)7 Biological Tissue Fro ❑Yes [:]No /A Temp should be above freezing to VC 05amples out of temp criteria. Samples on ice, cooling process has begun Did samples originate from aforelgn source (inferno ry, f N.'T o Urea Urvv - - Comments/Discree pancy: Chain of Custody Present? es No ❑N/A 1. Samples Arrived within Hold Time? ❑Yes No ❑N/A 2. Short Hold Time Analysis (<72 hr.)? ❑Yes o ❑N/A 3. Rush Turn Around Time Requested? ❑Yes o ❑N/A 4. Sufficient Volume? mesZ [I No ❑N/A 5. Correct Containers Used? -Pace Containers Used? a []NO []NO ❑N/A []N/A 6. Containers Intact? Yes [IN- ❑ 7. Dissolved analysis: Samples Field Filtered? ❑Ye ❑No N/A 8. Sample Labels Match COC7 -Includes Date/Time/ID/Analysis Matrix: es It Ii []NO []N/A 9. Headspace in VOA Vials (>5-6mm)? []Yes N/A 10. Trip Blank Present? Trip Blank Custody Seals Present? ❑Yes ❑Yes No No ❑N/A ❑N/A 11. CLIENT NOTIFICATION/RESOLUTION Person Contacted: Comments/Sample Discrepancy: Date/Time: Project Manager SCURF Review: Date: bl Project Manager SRF Review: Date: jC'r Z Note: Whenever there is a discrepancy affecting North Carolina compliance samples, a copy of this form will be sent to the North Carolina DEHNR Certification Office (i.e. Out of hold, incorrect preservative, out of temp, Incorrect containers) Document Name: Document Revised: July 25, 2017 < ceAnaYMC8l Sample Condition Upon Receipt(SCUR) Page 2 of 2 Document No.: Issuing Authority: F-CAR-CS-033-Rev.03 Pace Quality Office *Check mark top half of box if pH and/or dechlorination is verified and within the acceptance range for preservation samples. **Bottom half of box is to list number of bottles Project# WO# : 92358565 PM: PTE Due Date: 10/24/27 CLIENT: 93—SCS E a' a W �di 6 E V m a' 2 9 U N m 1 E N M m a 2 V W vvi t m 1 E N N m Q -Z-. C a y N M m u N V y0 n 6 E 1 Q m N = M Z J E N I=VI m i 0 m [a O V Z N m 6 E N M m S S O Z m 4 E M m z o, J N V' W o E v LL 3 ? b D.I _G a Q :; .-I a N �y U_ a ¢ ,<; e1 a = \ 2 W U 6 E ¢ E M a N V V O_ a ¢ .mod, .-I a V V Q 2 E J E M a o Z V � ¢ J E h lV m M a ¢ Z U ¢ > E E M o>> \ 2 M O N < O E OI \ Z ¢ > E aO N O M ¢ > E E Ot c>> _ ¢ Z ~ Y Yt 6 •'- a O> a' \ ? y N V' > ate. N m i l7 \ ¢ z N a N E vl N d y Z as 1 VI E O N d v o; O V1 N Z V 1 E N M d m C L O u> Z O_ E O Z m 1 t 2 r \NN 3 3 ° 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 pH Adjustment Log for Preserved Samples Sample ID Type of Preservative pH upon receipt Date preservation adjusted Time preservation adjusted Amount of Preservative added Lot # ;38 q J g q A W N ITEM# z U In 3 na O A m 3 t�`o ly.•, to A y y c 9 � � a � rr }��n c i n v O D Is t m N y p D pic mv> 0 m- y m = 0 `z t7 do O n dom z -1 y QN£�oyv��a Is mom'° ygm0 $a a, ry �p OtiD O S}$ y y'A 0 Is C Z 3 a O R W In MATRIXCODE (seeyaodcadestolen) = g m M R 11, D Q P �. S SAMPLE TYPE (G=GRAB C=COMP) rn m p In vy a m D m I In z =-m01 r0 r D r c y z on G 4 4 G _. D 09 0 i c' 1 y'1 Inm z p V SAMPLE TEMP AT COLLECTION m # OF CONTAINERS $ d m m$ n 3 P r y m ='2..� 0 1 _ P o 8 ° = ? Unpresertned HSO s a z F In + HNOa 3 P HCI m ° NaOH m n NazS,Oa y In Methanol C m Other lAnalysisTest I YINi < T 3 y 4 �\ ~ 2=52�y m 4MID 7fIs '.S ,✓ ,0:7 6 O — y N, 1 ;MU C p y to o y a C m V m L y J m 0 m O A _ N n K m A = Z v O C Z � j C Temp in °C Residual Chlorine (YIN) y In A _ Received[ on Ice (YIN) jIs 9 v In Is q ,o Custody Sealed[ Cooler O G Oy D (YIN) zo �J m 0 y 2 p _• A Z Samples Intact u D (YIN) LTv (\ r p c V EZZ 3 � Solid Waste Services 6 APPENDIX D STORMWATER DETECTIONS Old Buncombe County Landfill Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report Surface Water Detection Summary Report Buncombe County Old Facility From: 09/01/2017 To: 12/01/2017 Well ID Parameter Sample Date Result Flags Units SW-1 Barium, Total 10/10/2017 43.3 ug/L Copper, Total 10/10/2017 5.3 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/10/2017 8.24 mg/L trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene 10/10/2017 1 U,M1 ug/L Turbidity - Field 10/10/2017 91.78 NTU Vanadium, Total 10/10/2017 7.2 ug/L Zinc, Total 10/10/2017 24.5 ug/L SW-2 Barium, Total 10/10/2017 44 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/10/2017 7.88 mg/L Turbidity - Field 10/10/2017 79.49 NTU Vanadium, Total 10/10/2017 7.4 ug/L Zinc, Total 10/10/2017 24 ug/L SW-2A Barium, Total 10/10/2017 31.4 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/10/2017 8.13 mg/L Turbidity - Field 10/10/2017 5.11 NTU U = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit. V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Friday, February 2, 2018 Page 1 of 2 Well ID Parameter SW-3 Barium, Total Dissolved Oxygen Turbidity - Field Sample Date Result Flags Units 10/10/2017 92.2 ug/L 10/10/2017 7.95 mg/L 10/10/2017 7.18 NTU U = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Friday, February 2, 2018 Page 2 of 2 Solid Waste Services 6 AP P E NDIX E S TORMWATER EXCEEDANCES Old Buncombe County Landfill Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report Surface Water MCL Exceedance Summary Report Buncombe County Old Facility From: 09/01/2017 To: 12/01/2017 Well ID Parameter MCL Sample Date Result Flags Units SW-1 Turbidity - Field 25 SW-2 Turbidity - Field 25 10/10/2017 91.78 NTU 10/10/2017 79.49 NTU U = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Friday, February 2, 2018 Page 1 of 1 Solid Waste Services 6 AP P E NDIX F GROUNDWATER DETECTIONS Old Buncombe County Landfill Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report Groundwater Detection Summary Report Buncombe County Old Facility From: 09/01/2017 To: 12/01/2017 Well ID Parameter Sample Date Result Flags Units MW 13-132 1,1-Dichloroethane 10/12/2017 2 ug/L Barium, Total 10/12/2017 28 ug/L Benzene 10/12/2017 1.2 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 10/12/2017 20.9 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/12/2017 0.83 mg/L Turbidity - Field 10/12/2017 2.4 NTU MW 21-21 1,1-Dichloroethane 10/12/2017 7.5 ug/L 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10/12/2017 2 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10/12/2017 8.1 ug/L Barium, Total 10/12/2017 116 ug/L Chlorobenzene 10/12/2017 7.8 ug/L Chloroethane 10/12/2017 2.1 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 10/12/2017 12.6 ug/L Cobalt, Total 10/12/2017 7 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/12/2017 0.71 mg/L trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene U = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit. V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Friday, February 2, 2018 Page 1 of 10 Well ID Parameter Sample Date Result Flags Units MW 21-21 trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene 10/12/2017 1 U,M1 ug/L Turbidity - Field 10/12/2017 3.31 NTU Vinyl chloride 10/12/2017 2.3 ug/L MW 21-94 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10/12/2017 1.6 ug/L Barium, Total 10/12/2017 49.2 ug/L Chlorobenzene 10/12/2017 1.1 ug/L Chloroethane 10/12/2017 4.1 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 10/12/2017 2.8 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/12/2017 1.75 mg/L Nickel, Total 10/12/2017 8.3 ug/L Turbidity - Field 10/12/2017 0.65 NTU MW 6-192 1,1-Dichloroethane 10/12/2017 1 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10/12/2017 1.5 ug/L Barium, Total 10/12/2017 67.3 ug/L Chlorobenzene 10/12/2017 2.4 ug/L Chloroethane 10/12/2017 1 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/12/2017 2.69 mg/L U = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit. V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Friday, February 2, 2018 Page 2 of 10 Well ID Parameter Sample Date Result Flags Units MW 6-192 Turbidity - Field MW-12-25 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10/12/2017 7.62 NTU 10/11/2017 1.4 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10/11/2017 3.3 ug/L Barium, Total 10/11/2017 121 ug/L Chlorobenzene 10/11/2017 5.1 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/11/2017 8.46 mg/L Nickel, Total 10/11/2017 17.7 ug/L Turbidity - Field 10/11/2017 0.46 NTU Zinc, Total 10/11/2017 14.2 ug/L MW-13-35 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10/11/2017 8 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10/11/2017 39.5 ug/L Barium, Total 10/11/2017 191 ug/L Benzene 10/11/2017 2.4 ug/L Chlorobenzene 10/11/2017 9.8 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 10/11/2017 6.3 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/11/2017 6.2 mg/L Nickel, Total 10/11/2017 5.9 ug/L U = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit. V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Friday, February 2, 2018 Page 3 of 10 Well ID Parameter Sample Date Result Flags Units MW-13-35 Turbidity - Field MW-15 10/11/2017 2.23 NTU Barium, Total 10/16/2017 202 ug/L Cadmium, Total 10/16/2017 2 U,D3 ug/L Chromium, Total 10/16/2017 19.2 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/16/2017 5.79 mg/L Lead, Total 10/16/2017 9.1 ug/L Turbidity - Field 10/16/2017 9.57 NTU MW-17-137 Barium, Total 10/11/2017 26.1 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/11/2017 0.34 mg/L Turbidity - Field 10/11/2017 2.87 NTU M W-17-310 Dissolved Oxygen 10/16/2017 1.27 mg/L Turbidity - Field 10/16/2017 12.32 NTU MW-17-60 1,1-Dichloroethane 10/11/2017 1.3 ug/L Barium, Total 10/11/2017 24.2 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/11/2017 0.79 mg/L Turbidity - Field 10/11/2017 1.5 NTU U = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit. V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Friday, February 2, 2018 Page 4 of 10 Well ID Parameter Sample Date Result Flags Units M W-18-78 1,1-Dichloroethane 10/11/2017 1.3 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10/11/2017 2.1 ug/L Barium, Total 10/11/2017 61.4 ug/L Chlorobenzene 10/11/2017 3.2 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 10/11/2017 1.4 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/11/2017 0.6 mg/L Turbidity - Field 10/11/2017 0.71 NTU MW-19-110 Barium, Total 10/11/2017 11.6 ug/L Chloroethane 10/11/2017 1.2 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/11/2017 0.63 mg/L Turbidity - Field 10/11/2017 0.44 NTU MW-19-75 1,1-Dichloroethane 10/11/2017 1.2 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10/11/2017 4.9 ug/L Barium, Total 10/11/2017 115 ug/L Chlorobenzene 10/11/2017 4.4 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/11/2017 1.41 mg/L Nickel, Total 10/11/2017 19.2 ug/L U = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit. V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Friday, February 2, 2018 Page 5 of 10 Well ID Parameter Sample Date Result Flags Units MW-19-75 Turbidity - Field 10/11/2017 5.88 NTU � 14tba Barium, Total 10/13/2017 25.1 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/13/2017 4.62 mg/L Methapyrilene 10/13/2017 50 U,L2 ug/L Methyl methanesulfonate 10/13/2017 5 U,L1 ug/L Turbidity - Field 10/13/2017 6.23 NTU M W-24-160 Barium, Total 10/16/2017 14 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/16/2017 2.91 mg/L Turbidity - Field 10/16/2017 6.48 NTU ►MITM 1,1-Dichloroethane 10/13/2017 7.5 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10/13/2017 7.8 ug/L Barium, Total 10/13/2017 164 ug/L Chlorobenzene 10/13/2017 2 ug/L Chloroethane 10/13/2017 4.1 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 10/13/2017 9.1 ug/L Cobalt, Total 10/13/2017 18.3 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen U = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit. V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Friday, February 2, 2018 Page 6 of 10 Well ID Parameter Sample Date Result Flags Units MW-3 Dissolved Oxygen 10/13/2017 1.32 mg/L Nickel, Total 10/13/2017 15.6 ug/L Turbidity - Field 10/13/2017 3.44 NTU Vinyl chloride 10/13/2017 2.9 ug/L M W-4 1,1-Dichloroethane 10/13/2017 15.6 ug/L 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10/13/2017 1.1 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10/13/2017 9.9 ug/L Barium, Total 10/13/2017 720 ug/L Benzene 10/13/2017 1.1 ug/L Cadmium, Total 10/13/2017 71.6 ug/L Chlorobenzene 10/13/2017 3.2 ug/L Chloroethane 10/13/2017 3.6 ug/L Chromium, Total 10/13/2017 8.3 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 10/13/2017 26.1 ug/L Cobalt, Total 10/13/2017 90.8 ug/L Copper, Total 10/13/2017 61.9 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/13/2017 0.81 mg/L Lead, Total U = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit. V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Friday, February 2, 2018 Page 7 of 10 Well ID Parameter Sample Date Result Flags Units MW-4 Lead, Total 10/13/2017 6.8 ug/L Nickel, Total 10/13/2017 136 ug/L Trichloroethene 10/13/2017 1.2 ug/L Turbidity - Field 10/13/2017 7.58 NTU Vanadium, Total 10/13/2017 8.4 ug/L Vinyl chloride 10/13/2017 4.6 ug/L Zinc, Total 10/13/2017 138 ug/L MW-4A 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10/10/2017 6.1 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10/10/2017 52.5 ug/L Barium, Total 10/10/2017 779 ug/L Chlorobenzene 10/10/2017 9.9 ug/L Cobalt, Total 10/10/2017 37.9 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/10/2017 1.61 mg/L Ethylbenzene 10/10/2017 2 ug/L Lead, Total 10/10/2017 6.2 ug/L Nickel, Total 10/10/2017 10.6 ug/L o-Xylene 10/10/2017 2.2 ug/L Toluene U = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit. V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Friday, February 2, 2018 Page 8 of 10 Well ID Parameter Sample Date Result Flags Units MW-4A Toluene 10/10/2017 2 ug/L Turbidity - Field 10/10/2017 8.98 NTU Xylene (total) 10/10/2017 2.2 ug/L MW-5 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10/13/2017 5.4 ug/L Barium, Total 10/13/2017 149 ug/L Chlorobenzene 10/13/2017 9.5 ug/L Chloroethane 10/13/2017 1.4 ug/L Cobalt, Total 10/13/2017 9.3 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/13/2017 0.56 mg/L Methapyrilene 10/13/2017 50 U,L2 ug/L Methyl methanesulfonate 10/13/2017 5 U,L1 ug/L Nickel, Total 10/13/2017 17.4 ug/L Turbidity - Field 10/13/2017 1.41 NTU Zinc, Total 10/13/2017 22.3 ug/L MW-6 1,1-Dichloroethane 10/12/2017 4.3 ug/L 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10/12/2017 4.2 ug/L Barium, Total 10/12/2017 1340 ug/L U = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit. V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Friday, February 2, 2018 Page 9 of 10 Well ID Parameter Sample Date Result Flags Units MW-6 Benzene 10/12/2017 1.2 ug/L Chlorobenzene 10/12/2017 11.2 ug/L Chloroethane 10/12/2017 3.6 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/12/2017 1.55 mg/L Methapyrilene 10/12/2017 50 U,L2 ug/L Methyl methanesulfonate 10/12/2017 5 U,L1 ug/L Nickel, Total 10/12/2017 5.5 ug/L Turbidity- Field 10/12/2017 7.62 NTU MW-B Barium, Total 10/11/2017 198 ug/L cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 10/11/2017 5 ug/L Dissolved Oxygen 10/11/2017 2.3 mg/L Turbidity - Field 10/11/2017 64.35 NTU Vinyl chloride 10/11/2017 1.6 ug/L U = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Friday, February 2, 2018 Page 10 of 10 Solid Waste Services 6 APPENDIX G GROUNDWATER EXCEEDANCES Old Buncombe County Landfill Semi -Annual & MNA Sampling Report Groundwater MCL Exceedance Summary Report Buncombe County Old Facility From: 10/01/2017 To: 12/01/2017 Well ID Parameter MCL Sample Date Result Flags Units MW 13-132 Benzene 1 10/12/2017 1.2 ug/L MW 21-21 1,1-Dichloroethane 6 10/12/2017 7.5 ug/L Cobalt, Total 1 10/12/2017 7 ug/L Vinyl chloride 0.03 10/12/2017 2.3 ug/L MW-13-35 Benzene 1 10/11/2017 2.4 ug/L MW-15 Chromium, Total 10 10/16/2017 19.2 ug/L MW-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 6 10/13/2017 7.5 ug/L Cobalt, Total 1 10/13/2017 18.3 ug/L Vinyl chloride 0.03 10/13/2017 2.9 ug/L MW-4 1,1-Dichloroethane 6 10/13/2017 15.6 ug/L Barium, Total 700 10/13/2017 720 ug/L Benzene 1 10/13/2017 1.1 ug/L Cadmium, Total 2 10/13/2017 71.6 ug/L Cobalt, Total 1 U = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit. V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. Friday, February 16, 2018 Page 1 of 2 Well ID Parameter MCL Sample Date Result MWA Cobalt, Total 1 10/13/2017 90.8 Nickel, Total 100 10/13/2017 136 Vanadium, Total 0.3 10/13/2017 8.4 Vinyl chloride 0.03 10/13/2017 4.6 MWAA Barium, Total 700 10/10/2017 779 Cobalt, Total 1 10/10/2017 37.9 M W-5 Cobalt, Total 1 10/13/2017 9.3 M W-6 Barium, Total 700 10/12/2017 1340 Benzene 1 10/12/2017 1.2 MW-B Vinyl chloride 0.03 10/11/2017 1.6 Flags Units U = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. BDL = Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected. I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit. V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank. ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Friday, February 16, 2018 Page 2 of 2