WI0100353_Report_20160419

oo
SCS Engineers, P.C.
Environmental Consultants 4041 Park Oaks Blvd. 813-621-0080
and Contractors Suite 100 FAX [phone]
Tampa, Florida 33610 www.scsengineers.com
April 19, 2016
File No. 09204072.14
Michael Rogers, P.G.
UIC Program
NC Division of Water Resources
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Subject: Buncombe County Monitor Natural Attenuation Fall 2015 Report
Dear Michael:
SCS Engineers, P.C. (SCS) is submitting the attached report for the latest round of groundwater
sampling at the Old Buncombe County Landfill in hard copy as requested. Three rounds of semi-
annual sampling for MNA parameters have been completed and are shown on Table 4. As we
discussed in the June 8, 2015 Response to Comments of the UIC Permit Application, there is no
major impact from the injectants observed in the sampling performed immediately after the
injection event. The Spring Sampling event is being conducted this month and we expect to see
the beginning effects of the extended release product at that time, but consistent with the
previous HRC injection and sampling, it may be a year before effects are observed in the
groundwater quality data.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely,
4rookFait, MPH
eH
Project Manager
SCS ENGINEERS
CAL.
Enclosures
r, -e� �±I' 1ArJ'- '�r
C. Ed Hilton, Jr. P.E.
Vice President
SCS ENGINEERS
RECEIVEMCDEOIDWR
APR 2 5 2016
Water Qualitv Regional
Operations Section

wL 01003�3
41
a
Old Buncombe County Landfill
Permit No. 1 101
Fall 2015 Semi -Annual Monitoring and Monitored
Natural Attenuation Sampling Report
Presented to:
Buncombe County Solid Waste Department
81 Panther Branch Road
Alexander, North Carolina 28701
[phone]
Presented by:
SCS ENGINEERS, PC
4767 New Broad Street, Suite 222
Orlando, FL 32814
[phone] RECEIVEDINCDEWWR
February 1 1, 2016
File No. 09204072.14
Offices Nationwide
www.scsengineers.co
APR 2 5 2016
Water Quality Regional
Operations Section
Im

L pENR I1SE0IL ❑Paper Report El Electronic Data -Email CD (data loaded Yes / No) DoGEvent #
NC DENR I I
Environmental Monitoring
Division of Waste Management - Solid Waste
Reportin Form
Notice: This form and any information attached to it are "Public Records" as defined in N Std 21 .these documents are
available for inspection and examination by any person upon request (NC General Statute 132-6).
Instructions: APR 2 5 2016
• Prepare one form for each individually monitored unit
• Please type or print legibly. Water Quality Regional
• Attach a notification table with values that attain or exceed NC 2L groundwater Stan 01390128 S$ ter standards. The notification
must include a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of each value. (e.g. naturally occurring, off -site source, pre-existing
condition, etc.).
Attach a notification table of any groundwater or surface water values that equal or exceed the reporting limits.
• Attach a notification table of any methane gas values that attain or exceed explosive gas levels. This includes any structures on or nearby the
facility (NCAC 13B .1629 (4)(a)(i).
• Send the original signed and sealed form, any tables, and Electronic Data Deliverable to: Compliance Unit, NCDENR-DWM, Solid Waste
Section, 1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1646.
soma waste monitoring Data Submittal Information -
Name of entity submitting data (laboratory, consultant, facility owner):
SCS Engineers, PC- Consultant; Pace Labs - Laboratory
Contact for questions about data formatting. Include data preparer's name, telephone number and E-mail address:
Name: C. Edward Hilton, Jr., P.E. Phone: [phone]
E-mail: ehilton(cDscsengineers.com
NC Landfill Rule: Actual sampling dates (e.g.,
Facility name: Facility Address: Facility Permit # (.0500 or .1600) October 20-24, 2006)
Buncombe County Old Landfill
(Closed) 2726 Riverview Road (Highway 251) 11-01 .1600 October 12-19, 2015
Environmental Status: (Check all that apply)
❑ Initial/Background Monitoring 0 Detection Monitoring >( Assessment monitoring
❑ Corrective Action
(limited) ❑
i
T e of data submitted: (Check all that apply)
X Groundwater monitoring data from monitoring wells ❑ Methane gas monitoring data
Groundwater monitoring data from private water supply wells 0 Corrective action data (specify) MNA
Leachate monitoring data
X Surface water monitoring data ❑ Other(specify)
Notification attached?
No. No groundwater or surface water standards were exceeded.
BX Yes, a notification of values exceeding a groundwater or surface water standard is attached. It includes a list of groundwater and surface water
monitoring points, dates, analytical values, NC 2L groundwater standard, NC 2B surface water standard or NC Solid Waste GWPS and
preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of any concentration.
❑ Yes, a notification of values exceeding an explosive methane gas limit is attached. It includes the methane monitoring points, dates, sample
I values and explosive methane gas limits.
I
Certification
To the best of my knowledge, the information reported and statements made on this data submittal and attachments are true and correct
Furthermore, 1 have attached complete notification of any sampling values meeting or exceeding groundwater standards or explosive gas
levels, and a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of concentrations exceeding groundwater standards. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for making any false statement, representation, or certification including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment
C. Ed Hilton, Jr., P.E. Vice President 407-514-2766
Facility Represen ative Name (Print) Title (Area Code) Telephone Number
C �' 24
�� ` Affix NC Licensed/TTpNpsional Geologist Seal
- Signature Date
°aoeo
°00 ��ESS/G°al�
4767 New Broad Street, Suite 222, Orlando, FL 32814
-- Facility Representative Address S E A I ! i
e
79('9
PE 007909 p° , 0

Solid Waste Services
Table of Contents
Section page
1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 1-2
2 Semi-AnnualSampling......................................................................................................................2-3
3 BIOCHLOR...........................................................................................................................................3-5
4 Conclusion............................................................................................................................................4-5
5 References...........................................................................................................................................5-6
Appendices
Appendix A
Figures
Appendix B
Tables
Appendix C
Well Condition Summary
Appendix D
Sampling Forms
Appendix E
Summary of Detections
Appendix F
Summary of Exceedances
Appendix G
BIOCHLOR
Old Buncombe County Landfill i MNA Sampling Report

I Solid Waste Services
1 INTRODUCTION
The Buncombe County unlined municipal solid waste landfill located at 2726 Riverview Road
near Asheville NC, has commenced Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) monitoring in
accordance with the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) approved September 24, 2014. The Fall
sampling event was performed between October 12 and October 19, 2015 along with traditional
semi-annual sampling.
The Old Buncombe County Landfill (OBCL) is closed and currently monitored under post -
closure care. The OBCL collected waste streams in unlined waste areas approved to receive
municipal, industrial, and construction solid wastes, along with household waste and yard debris.
Leachate from the waste areas have contaminated the groundwater as evidenced from the
presence of chlorinated solvents detected in groundwater from down -gradient monitoring wells
in excess of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR)
standards beginning in 1985 to the present.
Waste Areas A, B, and C stopped receiving waste prior to October 9, 1991. Area D stopped
accepting waste on September 27, 1997 in accordance with the North Carolina Solid Waste
Management Rule T15A: 13B .1 627(c)(1 0)(A). Institutional controls are in place which restricts
the use of, access to the site, and eliminates or minimizes exposure to site contaminants. All
disposal areas have been closed and capped in accordance with permit modifications for closure
under 15A North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) Chapter 13B.
The landfill site has controlled access and perimeter fencing to limit site access. An active gas
collection system was constructed and is operated by Enerdyne. This system generates power
from a small facility located on the property. The County has constructed a Safety Training
Facility on property outside of the waste fill area but within the original landfill property limits.
Multiple buildings have already been constructed and others are in the planning stages. This area
has controlled access and perimeter fencing that isolates its development from the balance of the
landfill property. The habitable buildings in this area are equipped with sub floor vapor
extraction systems and gas detectors that are monitored continuously by on -site personnel. While
these vapor intrusion controls have been installed specifically to address potential methane gas
issues, it is expected that the vapor systems in permanently occupied spaces will also help to
mitigate any potential issues arising from a vapor intrusion pathway.
The groundwater plume has been monitored over the years by a series of monitoring wells
- around the perimeter of the landfill (see Figure 1, Appendix A). Currently 24 monitoring wells
are sampled semi-annually (DPL-2 was converted to an Injection Well prior to the October 2015
sampling event). Groundwater samples collected from these wells have been analyzed for the
typical landfill parameters (metals, semi -volatile organic compounds, volatile organic
compounds, etc.. Concentrations in p ) excess of the Title 15A NCAC Subchapter 2L (NC2L)
r Old Buncombe County Landfill 1 -2 MNA Sampling Report

groundwater standards have been reported primarily for metals and volatile organic compounds
(VOCs). The extent of the groundwater plume has been delineated and concentrations of
contaminants have generally been declining. Additional remedial measures, enhanced in -situ
bioremediation (EIB) were performed in September 2015 in accordance with the March 2015
CAP Addendum and the Injection Permit WI0100353.
Five main groundwater flow paths, referred to as transects, have been identified down -gradient
from the OBCL waste piles presented below.
Transect 1
MW-4A
MW-12-25
MW-13-35
M W-13-132
MW-24-45
MW-24-160
Transect 2
MW-B
M W-17-60
MW-17-137
Italicized- EIB Injection Well
Bold-MNA Performance Well
Bold & Italicized-MNA Sentinel Well
Transect 3
MW-3
MW-21-21
MW-21-94
Transect 4
MW-DPL-2
MW-4
MW-19-75
MW-19-110
Transect 5
MW-6
MW-6-192
MW-5
DPL-1
MW-18-78
Transects 1 and 5 appear to be long enough to naturally attenuate VOCs observed immediately
down -gradient from the waste piles prior to reaching the French Broad River. MNA is the only
remedial activity for Transects 1 and 5. Transect 2 appears to have been successfully remediated
following the pilot testing of EIB using hydrogen release compound injection. Transect 3 and 4
show contaminants reach the French Broad River before natural attenuation processes may
completely de -chlorinate site VOCs. Therefore more aggressive clean-up actions consisting of
enhancing natural attenuation through substrate addition were implemented along the short flow
path system.
DPL-2 and the newly installed IW-1 were used as the fractured bedrock injection points for
substrate addition based on their close proximity to the source plume. Direct injection to the base
of the regolith was also used to treat the high flow zone which may be used to remediate both
short and long fracture controlled flow paths along Transects 3 and 4. Substrate addition was
conducted in September, 2015 prior to the Fall 2015 semi-annual sampling event.
2 SEMI-ANNUAL SAMPLING
Metals and VOCs were detected in ground water samples which exceeded NC2L Groundwater
Standards in concentrations which are consistent with previous sampling results. Surface water
sampling demonstrated no constituents were above their SWS reporting limits.
Twenty one monitoring wells are sampled during the Fall 2015 event, three monitoring wells
were dry and no samples were collected (DPL-1, MW-24-45, and MW-7). Groundwater samples

were collected from October 13th through 19"', 2015. The four surface water samples were
collected on October 12th, 2015. All samples were collected and analyzed by Pace Laboratories
( in Asheville, NC for analysis of Appendix I and II constituents list as well as MNA parameters
as specified in Appendix B, Table 1.
Groundwater elevations were also measured and a groundwater contour map for both the shallow
-- and deep flow regimes as presented in Appendix A. Field parameters and the well condition
were evaluated as presented in Appendix C Well Condition Summary and Append
ix D
Sampling Forms. Field parameters included: pH, specific conductivity, temperature, dissolved
' oxygen, and oxidation/reduction potential, temperature, and turbidity. Field parameters were also
measured at the surface water sampling locations.
Eleven of the 21 monitoring wells had concentrations in excess of the NC2L Groundwater
Standards. No surface water samples had concentrations in excess of the SWS reporting limits. A
summary of detections is provided in Appendix E; a summary of exceedances is provided as
Appendix F. The exceedances were consistent with historic concentrations at their respective
wells. A summary of the contaminants exceeding the NC2Ls is presented as Appendix B, Table
2.
VOC constituents detected include 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,2-dichloropropane, 1,4-
dichlorobenzene, 2-butanone, 2-hexanone, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, acetone, benzene,
chlorobenzene, chloroethane, cis-1,2-dichloroethene, ethylbenzene, tetrachloroethene, toluene,
trichloroethene, vinyl chloride, and xylene. 1, 1 -dichloroethane was detected above the maximum
contaminant level of 6 ug/L in MW-21-21 (8.6 ug/L), MW-3 (12 ug/L), and MW-4 (16.7 ug/L).
1,2-dichloropropane was detected above the maximum contaminant level of 700 ug/L in MW-
13-132 (1.4 ug/L). 1,4-dichlorobenzene was detected above the maximum contaminant level of 6
ug/L in MW-13-35 (45 ug/L),.MW-21-21 (10.3 ug/L), MW-3 (9.1 ug/L), MW-4 (11.3 ug/L),
MW-4A (86.5 ug/L), and MW-5 (7.4 ug/L). Benzene was detected above the maximum
contaminant level of 1 ug/L in MW-13-132 (1.1 ug/L), MW-13-35 (2.3 ug/L), MW-3 (1.1 ug/L),
MW-4A (5.3 ug/L), and MW-6 (1.3 ug/L). Tetrachloroethene was detected above the maximum
contaminant level of 0.7 ug/L in MW-4 (1.2 ug/L). Vinyl chloride was detected above the
maximum contaminant level of 0.03 ug/L in MW-18-78 (1.6 ug/L), MW-21-21 (2.4 ug/L), MW-
3 (3.4 ug/L), MW-4 (3.1 ug/L), and MW-B (2.1 ug/L).
Metal constituents detected include antimony, barium chromium, cobalt, iron, lead, manganese,
nickel, selenium, vanadium, and zinc. Antimony was detected above the maximum contaminant
level of 1 ug/L in MW-15 (12.4 ug/L), and MW-4 (5.3 ug/L). Barium was detected above the
maximum contaminant level of 700 ug/L in MW-6 (1410 ug/L). Chromium was detected above
the maximum contaminant level of 10 ug/L in MW-15 (12.6 ug/L). Cobalt was detected above
the maximum contaminant level of 1 ug/L in MW-21-21 (6.1 ug/L), MW-3 (22 ug/L), MW-4
(64.4 ug/L), MW-4A (32 ug/L), and MW-5 (25.5 ug/L). Nickel was detected above the
maximum contaminant level of 100 ug/L in MW-4 (109 ug/L).
Metals were detected in the surface water samples including: barium, chromium, cobalt, copper,
nickel, vanadium, and zinc. Concentrations were below their SWS reporting limits.

Pace analytical laboratories collected groundwater samples, to be tested for MNA parameters,
from 10 monitoring wells (MW-2, MW-4, MW-6, MW-13-132, MW-18-78, MW-19-75, MW-
19-110, MW-21-21, MW-21-94, and MW-24-160). Sampling was conducted per the
methodology listed in the approved CAP Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling and
Analysis Plan for the constituents listed in Appendix B, Table 3. These results were evaluated
using the EPA Technical Protocol for Evaluating Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents
(EPA 1998). A summary table of 2014 and 2015 baseline MNA sampling results is presented as
Appendix B, Table 4. Screening results indicate that there is adequate information to suggest
natural attenuation is occurring at the performance well locations. Further, screening results
indicate that there is strong information to suggest natural attenuation is occurring at the
transect3 and 5 sentinel well locations.
The range of hydrogen concentrations for a given terminal electron -accepting process show
sulfate reduction as the likely MNA process for all three rounds of MNA parameter sampling
with some evidence of methanogenesis in the very deep flow regimes based on elevated
hydrogen concentrations during the Spring 2015 sampling event.
3 BIOCHLOR
The analytical model solution BIOCHLOR (Aziz et al. 1999) provides an integrated platform for
analyzing site data and to confirm or quantify attenuation. BIOCHLOR simulates solute
transport assuming 1-D advection, 3-D dispersion, linear adsorption, and biotransformation via
reductive dechlorination (the dominant biotransformation process at most chlorinated solvent
sites). Reductive dechlorination is assumed to follow a first -order decay process. BIOCHLOR
Modeling Input rationale and model runs are presented as Appendix E. Model results must be
considered qualitative because of the limitations of the BIOCHLOR model and site
heterogeneity. Transect 4 were selected for modeling chlorinated ethenes.
A model of Transect 4 using historical contaminant data was developed and calibrated to current
site data for chlorinated ethenes. The Transect 4 model was then used to help predict future
behavior with current conditions (same biotransformation coefficients and inputs) and also with
future conditions expected following addition of EIB substrate (reduced half-life of calibrated
model). Both PCE and VC showed no impact to the boundary point of compliance with
biotransformation occurring which correlates well with historical data. Plume contraction was
modeled to occur by 2028 at the current rate of dechlorination. A 50% decrease in degradation
half-life correlates to a six year reduction in estimated plume contraction. A 50% decrease in
degradation half-life used for the predictive model is anticipated to be conservative given the
microcosm half-life measurements. The BIOCHLOR inputs and models for PCE and VC are
presented as Appendix G.
4 CONCLUSION
The OBCL data presented in this report provides multiple lines of evidence to demonstrate
natural attenuation is occurring on site in accordance with EPA Technical Protocol for
Evaluating Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents (EPA 1998). Overall contaminant
concentrations of highly chlorinated VOCs have been decreasing. Fall 2014 MNA sampling data
were evaluated using EPA's NINA screening tool, screening values indicate that there is strong

information to suggest natural attenuation is occurring in all four MNA performance wells.
BIOCHLOR modeling has been presented showing natural attenuation through sequential 1 St
order decay.
MNA Sampling will continue for one more round of baseline sampling conducted in conjunction
with site -wide semi-annual compliance monitoring. BIOCHLOR models will be further
calibrated with future analytical results.
5 REFERENCES
EPA. 1998. Technical Protocol for Evaluating Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents in
Ground Water. EPA/600/R-98/128, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research
and Development, Washington D.C.

Solid Waste Services
APPENDIX A
FIGURES
Old Buncombe County Landfill MNA Sampling Report

ACTIVE
MONITORING
WELLS
INACTIVE
MONITORING
WELLS
ABANDONED
MONITORING
WELLS
ACTIVE
SURFACE
WATER
SAMPLING
LOCATIONS
INACTIVE
SURFACE
WATER
SAMPLING
LOCATIONS
ABANDONED
TEMPORARY
INJECTION
WELLS
INJECTION
WELL
MW-2
MW-8
MW-9
SW-1
SW-5
TW-1
I-W1
MW-3
MW-12-10
MW-10
SW-2
SW-6
TW-2
DPL-2
MW4
MW-13-10
MW-16
SW-2A
SW-7
TW-3
MW-4A
1014-14
MW-17
SW-3
SW-8
MW-5
MW-18-3
SW-4
SW-9
MW-6
MW-194
MW-6-192
MW-20-3
MW-7
MW-20-32
MW-12-25
MW-214
MW-13-35
MW-22-78
MW-13-132
MW-22-143
MW-15
MW-23-119
MW-17-60
MW-23-186
MW-17-137
MW-A
MW-17-310
DPL-2
M W-18-78
MW-19-75
MW-19-110
MW-21-21
MW-21-94
MW-2445
MW-24-160
DPL-1
MW-B
NOTE: ACTIVE SAMPLING MONITORING WELLS AND SURFACE LOCATIONS ARE TO BE
NOTE: ONE INJECTION
SAMPLED AND TESTED TWICE ANNUALLY. INACTIVE MONITORING WELLS ARE TO BE
EVENT 092015.
CHECKED FOR DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER ONLY.
SW- r 31 — _ — — — IN,
MW-1
S 200 i� 0
(1984.30) 0
MW-6-192 tt ; lGIE N !Si
' 1966 -6
> DPL-11�'.`
% MW 9
W-5 Dom_ .
O \�
�MW4 �� \
MW-194. p
(DRY) (1943.23) -
MW-19-7 �MW-19-11 r,, -W2
(183 ) (1890.98 s f
o w.
OVMW-16
♦ m�
Mw-
1 f
S ao
I v/
h
MW-214
wow io All),
J
e ; 7(2087.06) M (2 .81J® / ?
�r
/ MW-17-137 (NR
MVI(�(7J1, MW-17-O0 NR
jr
t-..MW-8 (2039i11) ' 3 r'?
-A-"2.21) - _78
` db
d* $ MW-B,. E MW-7 MW-23-„9 MW-22-1
,71) MW-23-18fi�
(2034.66) (2022
� .
i r I #2022,54) - ...'
i r
3 SW_ W-8
-45 (DRY) ,_ - s�. - • i `'Ba
MW-24
�MWi-z4-16oLTe_3i:eoJ' - � � �-A��
MW-13-35MW4A
2011.54) 1.02)
MW-13-132
1985.86)�� LEGEND
1 " ♦ i i '"_.J I �r _-"---"!` ei ` ...�� ( MW-i 3-10:t .r,. - J„f .ram
(2009.74(20MW-Z4, 5j,- ' 0 ,r' MW-2® ACTIVE GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
-2-10`'
INACTIVE GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
SW"1® ACTIVE SURFACE WATER MONITORING LOCATION
_-
f� SW-5® INACTIVE SURFACE WATER MONITORING LOCATION
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
O ABANDONED TEMPORARY INJECTION WELLS
�` � ) fJ ;✓ � INJECTION WELL
SCS ENGINEERS
Figure 1. Facility Figure, Old Buncombe County Landfill, Buncombe County, North Carolina

ACTIVE
MONITORING
WELLS
INACTIVE
MONITORING
WELLS
ABANDONED
MONITORING
WELLS
ACTIVE
SURFACE
WATER
SAMPLING
LOCATIONS
INACTIVE
SURFACE
WATER
SAMPLING
LOCATIONS
MW-2
MW-8 SW-1
SW-5
MW-3
MW-12-10 - SW-2
SW-6
MW-4
MW-13.10 - SW-2A
SW-7
MW-4A
MW-14 SW-3
SW-8
MW-5
MW-183 SW-4
SW-9
MW-6
MW-19-4
MW-6-192
MW-20.3
MW-7
MW-20-32
MW-12-25
MW-21-4
MW-13-35
MW-22-78
MW-13.132
MW-22-143
MW-15
MW-23-119
MW-17.60
MW-23-186
MW-17-137
MW-A
M W-17310
MW-18-78
MWA 9-75
MW-19-110
MW-21-21
MW-21-94
MW-24-45
MW-24-160
DPL-1
DPL-2
MW-B
NOTE: ACTIVE SAMPLING
MONITORING WELLS AND SURFACE LOCATIONS
ARE TO BE
SAMPLED AND TESTED
TWICE ANNUALLY. INACTIVE MONITORING WELLS
ARE TO BE
CHECKED FOR DEPTH
TO GROUNDWATER ONLY.
P"'
SW-8 .aa� Z �-
I _
�+ 200 100 0 200
+ . (1983.45) - SCALE IN FEET
.MW ( tl g!
(19 .50) .
0
� t ,
r `
1 (1 2.5) La i
N
' n
}
F
2(}6MW
Q ¢
S �
lob 21
MW-21/-4
(NR)!
s
�a
O NR
/ r ,
a / 0"' %
o .� 22094 30 ..- 2021.
1
_
J O '
-
�.. a
RY) , Gp o\BMW-A - t
LEGEND
MW-2a ACTIVE GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
I.--�.,
I`'1W-8® INACTIVE GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
N /
Ab -' `.l SW-1® ACTIVE SURFACE WATER MONITORING LOCATION
o A _ } i,�-'-'-"�\\ �.• d°`f, - _ \. SW-5® INACTIVE SURFACE WATER MONITORING LOCATION
c
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
2010-- OCTOBER 2015 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
SCS ENGINEERS —
Figure 2. Groundwater Contour Map, Old Buncombe County Landfill, Buncombe County, North Carolina

APPENDIX B
TABLES
Old Buncombe County Landfill MNA Sampling Report

TABLE I
MONITORING WELL SAMPLING SUMMARY
Site ID
Total
Depth
Type
Semi -Annual
MNA
Semi -Annual
Appendix I Metals
& Volatiles
Annual
Appendix II
Field
Parameters
MW-B
15.4
Compliance
Yes
Yes
MW-2
175
Background
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
MW-3
90
Compliance
Yes*
Yes*
MW-4
75
Performance
Yes
Yes
Yes
MW-4A
77
Compliance
Yes
Yes
MW-5
80
Compliance
Yes
Yes
Yes
MW-6
40
Performance
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
MW-6-192
192
Compliance
Yes
Yes
MW-7
29
Compliance
Yes
Yes
MW-12-25
26
Compliance
Yes
Yes
MW-13-35
35
Compliance
Yes
Yes
MW-13-132
132
Performance
Yes
Yes
Yes
MW-15
72
Compliance
Yes
Yes
MW-17-60
60
Compliance
Yes
Yes
MW-17-137
137
Compliance
Yes
Yes
MW-17-310
310
Compliance
Yes
Yes
MW-18-78
78
Sentinel
Yes
Yes
Yes
MW-19-75
75
Compliance
Yes
Yes
MW-19-110
110
Sentinel
Yes
Yes
Yes
MW-21-21
21
Performance
Yes
Yes
Yes
MW-21-94
94
Sentinel
Yes
Yes
Yes
MW-24-45
45
Compliance
Yes
Yes
MW-24-160
160
Sentinel
Yes
Yes
Yes
DPL-1
65
Compliance
Yes
Yes
Yes
DPL-2
97
EIB Well
Yes*
Yes*
I Yes*
EIB Well -This well was used as injection well for Enhanced In -Situ Bioremediation (EIB). *This
well was removed from the sampling schedule after enhancements were applied.

00
00
in
A
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
n
Q
eq
H
��
wmoaoama�
m='comma
M
Vl
M
M
�
A
'"
'"•
A�
A�
A
N�
N
U
m
m
m
m
m
N
m
N
m
m
m
CD
`D
�
v
�"•
A
A
Q
oo
Q
A
A
U
N
W
90
w
a>
w
z
OC
U
y
r
O.
O
N
�
aFi
O
O
O
U
to
O
O
O
O
O
O
T
=
U
Q
C]
A
N
R
E
o
X
a
U
w

Table 3
Analvtical Methods to Monitor Natural Attenuation
Analysis
Method
Data Use
Dissolved
Field meter
The most thermodynamically favored electron
Oxygen
SM 4500 O G
acceptor used by microbes.
Nitrate
EPA 353.2
Used as an electron acceptor by denitrifying
bacteria if oxygen is depleted.
Iron (II)
EPA 6010
Indicator of iron reducing bacteria.
Sulfate
EPA 300.0
Used as electron acceptor. Provide evidence of
sulfate reducing bacteria.
Sulfide
Field meter
Daughter product of sulfate reduction. May not be
SM 4500 S D
detected even if sulfate -reducing bacteria are
active because it can react with various
oxygenated chemical species and metals.
Methane, ethane,
Bubble Strip Sampler
Provide evidence of complete dechlorination of
ethene
AM 20 GAX
chlorinated ethenes, and ethanes. Methane also
indicates activity of methanogenic bacteria.
Oxidation
Field meter
Influences and is influenced by the nature of
Reduction
A2580B
biologically mediated degradation of
Potential
contaminants.
pH/
Field meter
Biological processes are optimal at pH range of 5
Temperature/
to 9/ Temp>20°C/ measure of ion concentrations.
Conductivity
Turbidity
EPA 180.1
Possible interference.
Total Organic
SM 5310 B
Used to classify plume and to determine if
Carbon TOC
reductive dechlorination is possible.
Biological
SM,5210 B
Measure of the total concentration of dissolved
Oxygen Demand
oxygen that would eventually be demanded as
(BOD)
plume degrades.
Chemical
SM 5220 D
Measure of the total quantity of oxygen required to
Oxygen Demand
oxidize all organic material into carbon dioxide
(COD)
and water.
CO2
AM 20 GAX
Ultimate oxidative daughter product.
Alkalinity
SM 2320 B
Increased levels indicative of carbon dioxide
production (mineralization of organic compounds).
Chloride
SM 4500 Cl E
Provides evidence of dechlorination, possible use
in mass balancing, may serve as conservative
tracer.
Dissolved
Bubble Strip Sampler
Determine type of anaerobic activity (i.e.,
Hydrogen
AM 20 GAX
methanogenesis, sulfate and iron reduction
Volatile Fatty
AM 21 G
May provide insight into the types of microbial
Acids
I
activity and serve as electron donors.

TABLE 4 EPA MNA BASLINE & SCREENING VALUES
EPA Biodegradation Parameters
Units
Analytical Result/
Screening Value
Date
MW-2
MW-4
MW-6
MW-13-132
MW-18-78
MW-19-75
MW-19-110
MW-21-21
MW-21-94
MW-24-160
Field pH
Std. Units
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.7
6.4
---
7.3
6.3
6.4
7.2
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
6.1
6.0
6.0
6.8
6.4
---
7.3
6.2
6.5
7.2
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
6.3
6.1
6.1
7
6.5
6.2
7.2
6.2
6.7
7.1
Field Temperature
deg C
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
21.7
14.3
24.5
15.7
16.3
---
16.5
16.3
19.5
14.5
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
20.8
15
16.4
17.3
17.3
---
18.1
13.6
14.1
12.7
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
12.9
16.5
18.9
13.9
16.1
17.1
16.9
17.8
18.5
18.4
Field Specific Conductance
umhos/cm
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
120
987
1292
249
701
---
607
1337
909
147
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
122
973
1241
302
651
---
560
1228
964
149
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
118
970
1263
305
678
1089
550
1157
960
151
Dissolved Oxygen
mg/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
2.88
2.58
0.82
1.14
0.12
---
1.1
2.42
1.21
4.6
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
3.91
2.9
1.03
1.09
0.81
---
0.76
1.57
1.62
3.71
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
4.66 1
1.6
0.6
0.38 1
0.16
0.57
0.63
0.29
0.38
3.01
Screening Value
Fall 2015
---
0
0
3
3
0
0
3
3
0
Turbidity
NTU
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
277
1.91
2.05
1.59
2.15
---
2.2
2.04
1.93
4.8
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
3.2
3.14
4.09
4.22
29
---
3.13
16.7
4.01
5.7
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
1.74
6.93
24.78
0.42
0.35
1.78
3.05
2.51
6.68
3.79
Oxidation Reduction Potential
m/V
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
165.8
31.2
-39
-46.9
-56.9
---
-114.6
-331
-58.4
147.3
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
203.1
86.4
-2.1
-50.8
-29.8
---
-92.7
-16.5
-40.5
49.6
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
163.6
24.8
-33.2
-82.4
-84.4
-26.4
-49.7
-33
-109.9
138.3
Screening Value
Fall 2015
---
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
Alkalinity, as CaCO3
mg/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
50.1
390
529
111
241
---
227
580
299
41.6
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
45.6
346
464
101
195
---
179
475
308
39.5
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
50.1
380
477
115
207
321
173
430
299
45.2
Screening Value
Fall 2015
---
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
Chloride
mg/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
2
85.6
113
5
78.4
---
54.7
105
107
7.1
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
1.96
74.2
113
4.19
76.2
---
49.8
101
119
6.5
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
2.16
84.8
110
4.9
87.3
153
46.5
108
119
8.05
Screening Value
Fall 2015
---
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Iron
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
4850
3010
37200
3000
25400
---
2600
21400
16800
209
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
720
3380
34400
5010
22600 1
---
1880
19800
19800
276
Analytical Result
Fall 2015 1
94.8
3970
40700
14800
21800
8580
1660
1 13800
17400
92.2
Screening Value
Fall 2015
--- 1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
0
Nitrogen, Nitrate
mg/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
---
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.066
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
---
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.066
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
51.5
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
0.02 U
74.7
Screening Value
Fall 2015
---
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
Sulfate
mg/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
4.4
32.1
3.5
8.6
2 U
---
13.2
34.3
8.1
9.8
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
4.56
32.9
4.87
11.4
2 U
---
15.8
37.6
4.76
10.4
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
3.99
31.1
4.26
10.5
2 U
21
16.4
36.5
3.26
10.3
Screening Value
Fall 2015
---
0
2
2
2
0
2
0
2
2
Sulfide
mg/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
---
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.12
0.1 U
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
---
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
0.1 U
Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
8.7
30.5
38
26
44.7
---
27.4
75.7
15
5.3
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
1 U
7.54
11.2
1 U
3.87
---
4
13.6
10.7
1 U
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
1 U
5.12
7.12
1 U
3.12
8.62
3.31
10.7
7.94
1 U
Carbon Dioxide
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
36000
470000
550000
35000
160000
---
24000
510000
170000
6000
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
54000
1 110000
450000
20000
100000
---
12000
370000
79000
5300
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
38000
300000
410000
13000
100000
320000
11000
250000
83000
5800
Screening Value
Fall 2015
---
1
1
0
1
1
0
1 1
1
0
Ethene
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
0.00991
0.065
0.23
0.051
0.51
---
0.094
0.36
1.2
0.00991
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
0.0091
0.00871
0.26
0.037
0.24
---
0.048
0.16
0.94
0.008 U
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
0.00631
0.023
0.18
0.019
0.18
0.029
0.027
0.078
0.27
0.0056J
Ethane
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
0.00221
0.23
0.52
0.099
1.6
--
0.2
0.18
0.46
0.00781
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
0.0012 J
0.02
0.62
0.04
1.3
---
0.13
0.13
0.75
0.00151
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
0.00111
0.061
0.23
0.023
0.42
0.03
0.017
0.025
1 0.057
0.00111
Hydrogen
nM
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
1.3
1.4
1.7
1.2
1.3
---
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.5
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
1.3
1.4
1.9
54
1.3
---
1.4
1.1
10
1.2
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
1.1
1.3
1.4
1.2
1.5
1.3
1.9
1.2
4.5
1.2
Screening Value
Fall 2015
---
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Methane
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
0.18
1900
3200
840
3300
---
630
1400
2000
0.71
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
0.074
140
3000
320
2100
---
310
370
1700
0.3
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
0.066
440
900
160
760
47
37
1 170
240
0.057
Screening Value
Fall 2015
---
0
3
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
Acetic Acid
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
810 U
810 U
810 U
810 U
810 U
---
810 U
810 U
810 U
810 U
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
890 U
9801
890 U
890 U
11001
---
890 U
890 U
1300 J
890 U
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
240 J
230 J
1501
1801
200 J
210 J
150 J
1901
210 J
180 J
Butyric Acid
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
700 U
700 U
700 U
700 U
700 U
---
700 U
700 U
700 U
700 U
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
1400 U
1400 U
1400 U
1400 U
1400 U
---
1400 U
1400 U
1400 U
1400 U
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
160 J
66 J
81 J
130 J
120 J
120 J
50 U
130 J
1101
1101
Lactic Acid
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
2500 U
2500 U
4100 J
2500 J
2500 U
---
2500 U
2500 U
2500 U
2500 U
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
2400 U
2400 U
2400 U
2400 U
2400 U
---
2400 U
2400 U
2400 U
2400 U
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
88 J
511
170 J
93 J
1101
70 J
130 J
440 J
1101
95 J
Propionic Acid
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
660 U
660 U
660 U
660 U
660 U
---
660 U
660 U
660 U
660 U
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
730 U
730 U
730 U
730 U
730 U
---
730 U
730 U
730 U
730 U
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
34 J
27 J
191
32 J
30 J
28 J
14 J
27 J
291
33 J
Pyruvic Acid
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
770 U
770 U
770 U
770 U
770 U
---
770 U
770 U
770 U
770 U
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
640 J
410 U
410 U
410 U
810 J
---
870 J
710 J
1200 J
950 J
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
120 U
120 U
120 U
120 U
120 U
120 U
120 U
120 U
120 U
120 U
Tetrachloroethene
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
1 U
1.8
1 U
1 U
S U
S U
l U
l U
1 U
1 U
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
1 U
1.4
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
S U
1 U
1 U
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
1 U
1.2
1 U
1 U
1 U
S U
1 U
1 U
S U
I U
Trichloroethene
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
1 U
1.8
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
l U
S U
1 U
1 U
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
1 U
1.7
1 U
1 U
S U
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
1 U
1.3
1 U
1 U
1 U
S U
S U
l U
1 U
1 U
Screenin Value
Fall 2015
---
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
1 U
19.5
1 U
23.1
1 U
1 U
1
19.7
4.9
1 U
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
1 U
22
1.1
23.1
1 U
1 U
1 U
18.2
1 4.1
1 U
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
1 U
18.7
1 U
26.6
1 U
1 U
1 U
11.8
3.4
1 U
Screening Value
Fall 2015
---
2
0
2
0
0
0
2
2
0
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
1 U
2.7
1 U
3 U
2.2
1 U
3 U
3.4
1 U
1 U
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
1 U
2.6
1 U
1 U
1 1.6
1 U
1 U
2.5
1 U
1 U
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
1 U
3.1
l U
1 U
1.6
1 U
1 U
2.4
1 U
1 U
Screening Value
Fall 2015
---
2
1 0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
S U
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
l U
1 U
1 U
1 U
l U
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
l U
S U
S U
1 U
1 U
l U
Screening Value
Fall 2015
---
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Chloroethane
ug/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
1 U
1 U
4.5
1 U
1 1 U
1 U
S U
3.8
6
1 U
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
1 U
2.8
5.2
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
3.6
5.8
1 U
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
1 U
1 U
1 4.2
1 U
1 U
1 U
2.7
S U
4.1
1 U
Screening Value
Fall 2015
---
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
BOD, 5 day
mg/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
2 U
2 U
15
2 U
5.1
---
2 U
4.6
12.6
2 U
Analytical Result
Spring 2015
14.2
5.2
11.1
4.75
3.3
---
2
2.53
5.85
4.9
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
2 U
2 U
7.3
2 U
6.1
2 U
2 U
2 U
11.3
2 U
Chemical Oxygen Demand
mg/L
Analytical Result
Fall 2014
25 U
36
29
25 U
25 U
---
25 U
48
25 U
25 U
Analytical Result
Spring 20151
25 U
30
44
25 U
25 U
25 U
44
1 32
25
Analytical Result
Fall 2015
25 U
25 U
I 25 U
25 U
25 U
25 U
25 U
25 U
1 25 U
25 U
Sum of Screening Values
23
13
23
8
Notes: Assumes all contamination comes from tetrachloroethene and rest of chlorinated organics are daughter products.
- Screening results of 5 or below indicate that there is inadequate information to suggest natural attenuation is occurring at well location
- Screening results above 5 indicate that there is limited information to suggest natural attenuation is occurring at well location
�- Screening results above 15 indicate that there is adequate information to suggest natural attenuation is occurring at well location
- Screening results above 20 indicate that there is strong information to suggest natural attenuation is occurring at well location

APPENDIX C
WELL CONDITION SUMMARY
I
Old Buncombe County Landfill
MNA Sampling Report

aceAnatyficai
K'M/W,PBCB/9A�C'O/!l
Document.Name: Well Condition Summary
Document No.:
F-ASV-F=008-rev.00
Document Revised: May 27, 2014 Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Drive
. Issuing Authorities:
Pace Asheville Quality office
Phone: [phone]
Fax [phone]
Site,
WELL CONDITION SuMMARy
2 QLa L 1/- 1-76,' `J Personnel:
®tea �, J,1� /
—Page / of L.
Well gD
Protective
Casing
Well
Casing
Label
Lock
OK
OK
OK
Yes
❑
❑
❑
—Damaged
Dama ed
made irate
No.
1;;1--
OK
ir`
13—
EJ—
OK
OK
Yes
Dama ed
_Damaged
Inade uate
No
OK
OK
OK
Yes
❑
❑
❑
.Dama ed
D�ma ed.
Inadequate
Lf-A
7-�
(�
OK
OK
OK
Ye-s
Damaged
m
Daa ed
Inadequate
No
OK
OK
OK
Yes
Dama ed
Dama ed
In! uate
No.
EllOK
OK
OK
Yes
Damaged
—Damaged,
Tnade irate.
No.
Dama ed
Da! ed
Inade t
N
Sample
Equipment Cam ments/Observations*
-- Ype
I -If
cat. (t
ua e o
*Note ponding water, weep holes, or any other information pertaining to well condition. Provide additional details on
listed items. Return this form. to SCS Engineers

aceAnal fta!
Document Name: Well Condition Summary
ry
Docdment Revised: May 27, 2014
Pace Analytical Services, inc.
w.n8o@rgos moo"'
2225 Riverside Drive
Asheville, NC 28804
Document No.:
F-ASV-E-008-rev.00.
Issuing, Authorities:
Pace Asheville Quality Office
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Site: ��c �� l F
WELL CONDITION SUMMARY
i� DG-� '.S
c F ,�-r
Personnel.
A_? 41114..3
Date: x
Page
®g s
—
Aq
Well gD Protective
Casing
Well
Casing
Label
Lock
Sample
Equipment Cole ments/Observations*
17 OK
OK
OK
Type
Yes
Dama ed
Damaged
made uate
No
OK
OK
OK
Yes
Gslc (( Ct�iz
p
❑
144...0
Damaged
Dama ed
Inadequate
No
OK
Q--__'"
OK
'OK
1'es
Q CZ
Dam. a ed
ama ed
Damaged-
made oats
No.
!" / - 2__ OK
OK
OK
Yes
o
❑
Dama ed
Damaged
Inade uate..
No
OK
OK
OK
Yes
Dama ed
Dama ed
-.Damaged
Inade oats
No
(3 - J- OK
per-_
❑�
❑
'
OK
OK
Yes
T r
❑
Damaged
❑
Damaged
❑
Inadequate
❑
Noil�
c 12
--0
Damaged
Dama ed
Inade uate
No
*Note ponding water, weep holes, or any other information peAaining to well condition. Provide additional details on
listed items: Return this form to SCS
Engineers

aceArralytiea!
Document Name: well Condition Summary
Document Revised: May'27, 2014
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
'+ww.pocalabs.com
2225 Riverside Orive
Asheville, NC 28804
Document No.:
F-ASV F-008-rev.00
Issuing Authorities:
Pace Asheville Quality Office
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
r� WELL CONDITioN sUAEVURY
Site,rJN
PO sonnet"
,!
r
Date: 1 o
Z
Page
�ei9 g® Protective
Casing
well
Casing
Label
Lock
Sample
EqUlp' ent Comments/Obsefrvations*
TV0 .
`
OK
OK
OK
Yes
❑
❑
❑
❑
-r`f
Darn: ed
Dama ed
Inadequate
No
i� f
0—
'OK
OK
OK
Yesc
❑
❑
❑
❑
Gv� �2 .r,?
Damaged,
_...Damaged —Inadequate—
No
OK
OK
OK
Yes
( /
❑
❑
❑✓r..���?
Damaged
Damaged —Inadequate—
No
OK
OK
OK
Yesr2vrs>/Jl
❑
p .
❑
❑
i r�`3�cc�..
Dama ed
Damaged—
Inadequate
No
OK
OK
El —
4/l.
OK
Yes
.Da ma ed
Dama ed
Inadequate
No
OK
OK
OK
Yes
Damaged
Damaged
Inade uate
No
❑
❑
❑
❑
v1
Dama e
e
a e ua
*Note ponding water; weep holes, or any other information peAaining to
listed items. Return this form to SCS Engineers
well condition. Provide additional details on

Document Name: well CondiYaon.Summary Document Revised; May 27, 2014
aceAnalytical
www,pa6elaCs.com
Document No.: Issuing Authorities;
F-ASV-F-008-rev.00 Pace Asheville Quality Office
WELL CONDITION SUMMARY
Site:
POIfs®nnello
Date- i / J Page
9
Pace.Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Drive
Asheville, NC 28804
Phone: [phone]
Fax. [phone]
�✓G�''r''C jj C� Cr
Well ED
Protective
Casing
Well
Casing
Label
Lock
Sample I
Equipment
Cogs meats/Observations*
Type
OK
OK
OK
Yes
Dama ed
Damaged
Inadequate
No
OK
El
OK
OK
Yes
?� 2
,� F �
` `l
p
❑c~r�
Damaged
Dama ed
Inadequate
No
OK
OK
OK
Yes
��
'Damaged:
'Damaged
Inadequate
No
ND AL
r j--
OK
OK
OK
Yes:
i'`(~✓` '. tcr�
/
N
- -
Dama ed
Dama ed
Inade uate
No
a--.
OK
OK
OK
Yes,
Damacied,
Damaged
Inadequate
No
OK
OK
OK
Yes
Damaged
_-Damacled
Inadequate
Now
re f
Dama ed
Damaged
Inadequate
No
*Note ponding water, weep holes, or any -other information pe►{taining to well condition. Provide additional details on
listed items. Return this form to SCS Engineers

�, Document Name: well Condition Summaiy
aceAnaljftal
�. www:pi�celabs,gom:
Document No.:
F-ASV-F-008-rev.00
Document Revised: May 27, 2014
Issuing Authorities:
Pace Asheville Quality Office
WELL CONDITION S ARC'.
Site: t'3 c/ / L 1�g r (� r c <� G <=" Pe.rsonnelo
Dated �. Page of
Pace Analytical.Seryices, Inc.
2225 Riverside Drive
Asheville, NC 28804
Phone: [phone]
Fax: 828.252A618
C_
Weill ID
Protective
Casing
Well
Casing
Label
hock
sample
Equipment
pe
Comments/Observations*
OK
Dama ed
OK
Damaged
OK
Inadequate,
Yes
No
p
OK
Damaged
p
OK
Damaged
❑
OK
.Inade irate
❑
Yes
No
OK
❑
Damaged
OK
❑
Dama ed
OK
p
_Inadequate
Yes
p
No
O
OK
o
Dama edi
❑
OK
a
Damaged __Inadequate
p
OK
p
Yes
No
❑
OK
o
Damaged
❑
OK
❑
Dama ed
OK
❑
inadequate—
Yes
❑
No
❑
OK
Damaged
p
OK
_Damaged
p
OK
Inadequate,
Yes
❑
Damaged
❑
Dama ed
—No
❑
Inade uate
p
No
�Ivote ponding water, weep holes, or any other information. per6inlr g to well condition. Provide additional details on
listed items. Return this form to SCS Engineers

aceAnalydCal -
Document Name: well Condition Summary
Documegi Revised: May 27;2014
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225
wwH'neaaa°s'`°"'
Riverside Drive
Asheville, NC 28804
Document No.:
F-ASV-17-008-rev.00
Issuing Authorities:
Pace Asheville Quality Office
Phone: [phone]
Fa)c 828.252.4618
Site.
/Loyd
WELL CO ITI®N SUMMARY
c�
606/,/ 6l
'�'o y/=� Personneh
Date.
CD 0
t
I
Page
of
well ED
Protective
using
Well
Casing
Label )Lock
Sample
Equipment Comments/Orbservations*
[�
Type
OK
OK
OK' Yes
Dama Red
Damaged
No.
C7`
p-'_—Inadequate�.-,.
J
OK
OK
OK Yes
Damaged
Dama ed
Inadequate No
❑
❑
OK
OK
OK Yes
(fie l
❑
❑
C.
Damaged
. Damaged
Inadequate No
❑
❑
o
j
OK
OK
OK Yes
�✓� I'
Damaged
—Damacied
Inadequate No
�'
0--
OK
Er C —
OK
OK Yes
(iJ L
Dama ed
Damaged
Inade uate No
�J
'
❑
OK
❑
❑ ❑
t
OK
OK Yes
'/0
.Damaged
Damaged
Inade uate No
❑
a
o 171
e
de uate No
*Note ponding water, weep holes; or any other information peAaming to well condition
listed items. Return this form to SCS Engineers Provide additional details on
1.
;

Document Name: Well Condition summary Document Revised: May 27, 2014 Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
aceAnalyfical� 2225 Riverside Drive
Asheville, NC 28804
Document No.: Issuing Authorities: Phone: [phone]
F-ASV-F-008-rev.00 Pace Asheville Quality Office Fa)c 828.252.4618
WELL CONDITION SUMMARY
bite:y v� per/ C�, c?� Personnel° l' t
Dated 1 d G ! ; Page
Well ID
Protective
Casing
Well
Casing
Label
Lock
Sample
Equipment
Type
Comments/Dtxservations*
OK
❑
__Damaged
OK
❑
Dama ed
OK
❑
Inade uate
Yes
(,LfAr
❑
No
(
❑
OK
❑
Dama ed
❑
OK
❑
Damacied
❑
OK
❑
Inade uate
❑
Yes
/
❑rV'�
No
-OK
OK
OK
Yes
=-
Dama ed
❑
Dama ed
oEl
Inadequate
No
C g
12--
OK
p--
OK
2--`
OK
Yes
(,IA_L
❑
Damaged
p
Damaged
❑
Inade "irate.
p
...No .
OK
❑
Dama ed
OK
❑
Damaged
OK
Inade uate
Yes
No
3
OK
Damaged
OK
—Damaged
OK
_Inadequate
Yes
No
Dama ed
Damaged
--Inadequate
No
*Note ponding water, weep holes, or any other information 0et4taining to well condition. Provide additional details on
listed items. Return this form to SCS Engineers

Document Name: well Condition Summary Document Revised: May 27, 2014
aceAnalj fieal
' wwv.ptcetees_com
Document No.: Issuing Authorities:
F-ASV-F-008-rev.00 Pace Asheville Quality Office
WELL CONDITION SUMMARY
Site, t!'! c' o /4 4 G. C D L- r Personnel:
Dated / p , Page Of
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Drive
Asheville, NC 28804
Phone: [phone]
Fax [phone]
Well. ED
Protective
Casing
Well
Casing
Label
lock
Sample
Equipment
Type
Comments/Observations*
15-
.�
OK
-Damaged
OK
Damaged
OK
Inade uate .
Yes
No;
--
�� L
"
OK
Damaged
OK
Dama ed
OK
made uate
Yes
No
2- • �a
OK
OK
El-- .
OK
�-�
Yes
❑
Dama ed
p
Damaged
❑.
Inade uate
❑
No
OK
OK
OK
'Yes
❑
Damaged
❑
Damaged
p
Inadecivate .
❑
No _
fl--
p—
❑_ _ .
p�_
OK
OK
OK
Yes
❑
Damaged
❑
Damaged
❑
Inadecivate.
F
No
OK
Damaged
OK
_...Damaged
OK
_Inadequate
Yes
No
D ma ed
--Damaged
Inade uate
No
*Note ponding water, weep holes, or any other information pertaining to well condition. Provide additional details on
listed items. Return this'form to SCS Engineers

APPENDIX D
SAMPLING FORMS
Old Buncombe County Landfill MNA Sampling Report

LO
N
0
O
LO
Rage.. of.cc
m
a
� r
°
I4# (> ,
4.
S
s
{
I
t
,
t
-------------------
°

..,:,.,':. ...: i;:.:. �..Lu..,:; .'. .. .•...;:.. : ,'
:� ,�.. . ,' ,., �.;.• ..„--„„:
F
0
•
..
��
co
m t
..
..
m
a
-
;.
us
DocumentRevised;:Aug t 4, 20T1'
D'ocumgnf;Name
Page 1 of 1
�� A ca 4nah�Fi�al `
Report Form for,i �2Cd (ViOT[ItOf Iris
cciune u on s
i a th tie ;:
ate
Time
Sampfe�
sample:ID
Water
Level (FY)
PN (units)
7e[tiP i°GJ ;
Sped cific
Conductivity
Turbidity�
{NTUJ
bR
n ments
Q?r
ufiraios
C
,
n
:
-
Ix
I'3
,
L-1
'
W
,
t
k
-7
AAW-��
7
i
•.
Al t
E
,
i

ao
o
,It
00
a)
rn
M
Document Name: Document Revised: "August 4,,2011
Page 1 of I
f ! Report Form for"Field MoniEoring
Ye?C�'AC7e?lVtfGe?j
Document No:.: issuing Authorities::
F-AVL F=004 rey,00 Pace Asheville Quality Office ..
Face Analytical Services, Inc
Report Form for Field Monitoring
Location
Cale
Time
sample
Sample iD
Water
Level (Ft)
pH.(units):
"Temp ("C)
Specific,
ConductivityORP
(uhmos)
Turbidity'
(NTU)
comrn.ents
l t� =
i l✓
r..�?7
..., j.
/.•I /
�/i
(`.l !.
:�t���
:7/��1
,C4ii.lCiC f.✓�
t
s n I_:!i.-��%
!rt t'...+-
�� ��, i r / �s.:l ��i: `�� .:.
��, h✓.`
7.:r ��
f } .' �j
V �
.���V„/.
�r �{-"�
: �I
, .

APPENDIX E
SUMMARY OF DETECTIONS
Old Buncombe County Landfill MNA Sampling Report

Detections By Date Range
Buncombe County Old Facility
From: 10/13/2015 To: 10/19/2015
Site ID Analyte
Date
Result
MW-12-25
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10/13/2015
1.5
ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10/13/2015
3.7
ug/L
Barium
10/13/2015
113
ug/L
Chlorobenzene
10/13/2015
4.9
ug/L
Nickel
10/13/2015
19.6
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/13/2015
7450
ug/I
Zinc _
10/13/2015
14.1
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 1 of 17

Site ID Analyte Date Result
MW-13-132
M-Dichloroethane
10/16/2015
2.6
ug/L
1,2-Dichloropropane
10/16/2015
1.4
ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10/16/2015
1.4
ug/L
Acetic Acid
10/16/2015
180 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
10/16/2015
115000
ug/L
Barium
10/16/2015
28.6
ug/L
Benzene
10/16/2015
1.1
ug/L
Butyric Acid
10/16/2015
130 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Carbon Dioxide
10/16/2015
13000
ug/L
Chloride
10/16/2015
4900
ug/L
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
10/16/2015
26.6
ug/L
Ethane
10/16/2015
0.023
ug/L
Ethene
10/16/2015
0.019
ug/L
Iron
10/16/2015
14800
ug/L
Lactic Acid
10/16/2015
93 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Methane
10/16/2015
160
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/16/2015
380
ug/I
Propionic Acid
10/16/2015
32 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Sulfate
10/16/2015
10500
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 2 of 17

Site ID Analyte
Date
Result
MW-13-35
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10%13/2015
8.9
ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10/13/2015
45
ug/L
Barium
10/13/2015
196
ug/L
Benzene
10/13/2015
2.3
ug/L
Chlorobenzene
10/13/2015
10.1
ug/L
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
10/13/2015
7.9
ug/L
Nickel
10/13/2015
5.2
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/13/2015
6000
ug/I
Zinc
10/13/2015
31.1
ug/L
MW-15
Antimony
10/13/2015
12.4
ug/L
Barium
10/13/2015
202
ug/L
Chromium
10/13/2015
12.6
ug/L
Lead
10/13/2015
5.8
ug/L
Nickel
10/13/2015
8.8
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved,, Dissolved
-
10/13/2015
4560
ug/I
Selenium
10/13/2015
11.4
ug/L
MW-17-137
1,1-Dichloroethane
10/13/2015 1.2 ug/L
Barium
10/13/2015 23.2 ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/13/2015 80 ug/I
MW-17-310
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/14/2015 2980 ug/I
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 3 of 17

Site ID Analyte Date Result
MW-17-60
1,1-Dichloroethane
10/13/2015 1.6 ug/L
Barium
10/13/2015 20.8 ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/13/2015 80 ug/I
MW--18-78
1,1-Dichloroethane
10/14/2015
1.8
ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobe nzene
10/14/2015
1.1
ug/L
Acetic Acid
10/14/2015
200 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
10/14/2015
207000
ug/L
Barium
10/14/2015
39
ug/L
BOD, 5 day
-
10/14/2015
6060
ug%L
Butyric Acid
10/14/2015
120 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Carbon Dioxide
10/14/2015
100000
ug/L
Chloride
10/14/2015
87300
ug/L
Chlorobenzene
10/14/2015
2.7
ug/L
Ethane
10/14/2015
0.42
ug/L
Ethene
10/14/2015
0.18
ug/L
Iron
10/14/2015
21800
ug/L
Lactic Acid
10/14/2015
110 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Methane
10/14/2015
760
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/14/2015
160
ug/L
Propionic Acid
10/14/2015
30 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Total Organic Carbon
10/14/2015
3120
ug/L
Vinyl chloride
10/14/2015
1.6
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical
quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 - Page 4 of 17

Site ID Analyte Date Result
AlW-19-I10
Acetic Acid
10/14/2015
150 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
10/14/2015
173000
ug/L
Barium
10/14/2015
12.8
ug/L
Carbon Dioxide
10/14/2015
11000
ug/L
Chloride
10/14/2015
46500
ug/L
Chloroethane
10/14/2015
2.7
ug/L
Ethane
10/14/2015
0.017
ug/L
Ethene
10/14/2015
0.027
ug/L
Iron
10/14/2015
1660
ug/L
Lactic Acid
10/14/2015
130 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Methane
-
10/14/2015
37
ug/L
Nickel
10/14/2015
5
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/14/2015
630
ug/L
Propionic Acid
10/14/2015
14 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Sulfate
10/14/2015
16400
ug/L
Total Organic Carbon
10/14/2015
3310
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 5 of 17

Site ID Analyte Date Result
MW-19-75
1,1-Dichloroethane
10/14/2015
1.4
ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10/14/2015
3.5
ug/L
Acetic Acid
10/14/2015
210 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
10/14/2015
321000
ug/L
Barium
10/14/2015
100
ug/L
Butyric Acid
10/14/2015
120 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Carbon Dioxide
10/14/2015
320000
ug/L
Chloride
10/14/2015
153000
ug/L
Chlorobenzene
10/14/2015
3.5
ug/L
Ethane_
10/14/2015
0.03
ug/L
Ethene
10/14/2015
0.029
ug/L
Iron
10/14/2015
8580
ug/L
Lactic Acid
10/14/2015
70 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Methane
10/14/2015
47
ug/L
Nickel
10/14/2015
16.7
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/14/2015
570
ug/L
Propionic Acid
10/14/2015
28 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Sulfate
10/14/2015
21000
ug/L
Total Organic Carbon
10/14/2015
8620
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 6 of 17

Site ID Analyte Date. Result
MW-2
Acetic Acid
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
Barium
Butyric Acid
Carbon Dioxide
Chloride
Ethane
Ethene
Iron
Lactic Acid
Methane
Nitrogen, Nitrate
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
Propionic Acid
Sulfate
10/19/2015
240 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
10/19/2015
50100
ug/L
10/19/2015
19
ug/L
10/19/2015
160 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
10/19/2015
38000
ug/L
10/19/2015
2160
ug/L
10/19/2015
0.0011 J
ug/L
10/19/2015
0.0063 J
ug/L
10/19/2015
94.8
ug/L
10/19/2015
88 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
10/19/2015
0.066
ug/L
10/19/2015
51.5
ug/L
10/19/2015
4660
ug/L
10/19/2015
34 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
10/19/2015
3990
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 7 of 17

Site ID Analyte Date Result
MW--21-21
M-Dichloroethane
10/15/2015
8.6
ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10/15/2015
2.9
ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10/15/2015
10.3
ug/L
Acetic Acid
10/15/2015
190 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
10/15/2015
430000
ug/L
Barium
10/15/2015
106
ug/L
Butyric Acid
10/15/2015
130 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Carbon Dioxide
10/15/2015
250000
ug/L
Chloride
10/15/2015
108000
ug/L
Chlorobenzene
10/15/2015
17.2
ug/L
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
10/15/2015
11.8
ug/L
Cobalt
10/15/2015
6.1
ug/L
Ethane
10/15/2015
0.025
ug/L
Ethene
10/15/2015
0.078
ug/L
Iron
10/15/2015
13800
ug/L
Lactic Acid
10/15/2015
440 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Methane
10/15/2015
170
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/15/2015
290
ug/L
Propionic Acid
10/15/2015
27 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Sulfate
10/15/2015
36500
ug/L
Total Organic Carbon
10/15/2015
10700
ug/L
Vinyl chloride
10/15/2015
2.4
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, Februmy 08, 2016 Page 8 of 17

Site ID Analyte Date Result
MW--21-94
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10/15/2015
1.7
ug/L
Acetic Acid
10/15/2015
210 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
10/15/2015
299000
ug/L
Barium
10/15/2015
50.7
ug/L
BOD, 5 day
10/15/2015
11300
ug/L
Butyric Acid
10/15/2015
110 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Carbon Dioxide
10/15/2015
83000
ug/L
Chloride
10/15/2015
119000
ug/L
Chlorobenzene
10/15/2015
1.4
ug/L
Chloroethane
10/15/2015
4.1
ug/L
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
10/15/2015
3.4
ug/L
Ethane
10/15/2015
0.057
ug/L
Ethene
10/15/2015
0.27
ug/L
Iron
10/15/2015
17400
ug/L
Lactic Acid
10/15/2015
110 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Methane
10/15/2015
240
ug/L
Nickel
10/15/2015
9.6
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/15/2015
380
ug/I
Propionic Acid
10/15/2015
29 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Sulfate
,
10/15/2015
3260
ug/L
Total Organic Carbon
10/15/2015
7940
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 9 of 17

Site ID Analyte Date Result
M Y-24-160
Acetic Acid
10/19/2015
180 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
10/19/2015
45200
ug/L
Barium
10/19/2015
7.6
ug/L
Butyric Acid
10/19/2015
110 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Carbon Dioxide
10/19/2015
5800
ug/L
Chloride
10/19/2015
8050
ug/L
Ethane
10/19/2015
0.0011 J
ug/L
Ethene
10/19/2015
0.0056 J
ug/L
Iron
10/19/2015
92.2
ug/L
Lactic Acid
10/19/2015
95 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Methane
10/19/2015
0.057
ug/L
Nitrogen, Nitrate
10/19/2015
74.7
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/19/2015
3010
ug/I
Propionic Acid
10/19/2015
33 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Sulfate
10/19/2015
10300
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 10 of 17

Site ID Analyte Date Result
MW-3
M-Dichloroethane
10/15/2015
12
ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10/15/2015
9.1
ug/L
Barium
10/15/2015
182
ug/L
Benzene
10/15/2015
1.1
ug/L
Chlorobenzene
10/15/2015
2.5
ug/L
Chloroethane
10/15/2015
7
ug/L
cis- 1,2-Dich loroethena
10/15/2015
10.9
ug/L
Cobalt
10/15/2015
22
ug/L
Nickel
10/15/2015
16.3
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/15/2015
130
ug/I
Vinyl chloride
10/15/2015
3.4
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 11 of 17

Site ID Aualyte Date Result
MW-4
1,1-Dichloroethane
10/15/2015
16.7
ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10/15/2015
1.1
ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10/15/2015
11.3
ug/L
Acetic Acid
10/15/2015
230 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
10/15/2015
380000
ug/L
Antimony
10/15/2015
5.3
ug/L
Barium
10/15/2015
599
ug/L
Butyric Acid
10/15/2015
66 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Cadmium
10/15/2015
1.1
ug/L
Carbon Dioxide
10/15/2015
300000
ug/L
Chloride
10/15/2015
84800
ug/L
Chlorobenzene
10/15/2015
3
ug/L
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
10/15/2015
18.7
ug/L
Cobalt
10/15/2015
64.4
ug/L
Ethane
10/15/2015
0.061
ug/L
Ethene
10/15/2015
0.023
ug/L
Iron
10/15/2015
3970
ug/L
Lactic Acid
10/15/2015
51 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Methane
10/15/2015
440
ug/L
Nickel
10/15/2015
109
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/15/2015
1600
ug/I
Propionic Acid
10/15/2015
27 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected -in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 12 of 17

Site ID Analyte Date Result
MW-4
Sulfate
Tetrachloroethene
Total Organic Carbon
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Zinc
10/15/2015
31100
ug/L
10/15/2015
1.2
ug/L
10/15/2015
5120
ug/L
10/15/2015
1.3
ug/L
10/15/2015
3.1
ug/L
10/15/2015
16.6
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 13 of 17

Site ID Analyte Date Result
MW-4A
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10/16/2015
9
ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10/16/2015
86.5
ug/L
2-Butanone
10/16/2015
19.2
ug/L
2-Hexanone
10/16/2015
7.7
ug/L
4-Methyl-2- p e n to n o n e
10/16/2015
8
ug/L
Acetone
10/16/2015
39.2
ug/L
Barium
10/16/2015
673
ug/L
Benzene
10/16/2015
5.3
ug/L
Chlorobenzene
10/16/2015
12
ug/L
Cobalt
10/16/2015
32
ug/L
Ethylbenzene
10/16/2015
9
ug/L
Nickel
10/16/2015
9.4
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/16/2015 _
1250
ug/I
o-Xylene
10/16/2015
7.3
ug/L
Toluene
10/16/2015
5.2 -
ug/L
Xylene, m,p-
10/16/2015
11.1
ug/L
Xylenes- Total
10/16/2015
18.4
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 14 of 17

Site ID Analyte Date Result
MW-5
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Barium
Chlorobenzene
Cobalt
Nickel
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/13/2015
10/13/2015
10/13/2015
10/13/2015
10/13/2015
10/13/2015
7.4 ug/L
151 ug/L
11.8 ug/L
25.5 ug/L
16 ug/L
1700 ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 15 of 17

Site ID Analyte Date Result
MW-6
1,1-Dichloroethane
10/14/2015
5.9
ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobe nzene
10/14/2015
4.7
ug/L
Acetic Acid
10/14/2015
150 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Alkalinity, Total as CaCO3
10/14/2015
477000
ug/L
Barium
10/14/2015
1410
ug/L
Benzene
10/14/2015
1.3
ug/L
BOD, 5 day
10/14/2015
7260
ug/L
Butyric Acid
10/14/2015
81 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Carbon Dioxide
10/14/2015
410000
ug/L
Chloride
10/14/2015
110000
ug/L
Chlorobenzene
10/14/2015
12.6
ug/L
Chloroethane
10/14/2015
4.2
ug/L
Ethane
10/14/2015
0.23
ug/L
Ethene
10/14/2015
0.18
ug/L
Iron
10/14/2015
40700
ug/L
Lactic Acid
10/14/2015
170 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Methane
10/14/2015
900
ug/L
Nickel
10/14/2015
5.6
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/14/2015
600
ug/L
Propionic Acid
10/14/2015
19 J,H1,B,d
ug/L
Sulfate
10/14/2015
4260
ug/L
Total Organic Carbon
10/14/2015
7120
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 16 of l7

Site ID Aualyte Date Result
MW-6-192
UI :6
e
1,1-Dichloroethane
10/14/2015
1.2
ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10/14/2015
1.4
ug/L
Barium
10/14/2015
62.4
ug/L
Chlorobenzene
10/14/2015
2
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/14/2015
2880
ug/I
Barium
10/13/2015
201
ug/L
cis-1,2-Dich loroethene
10/13/2015
3.8
ug/L
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/13/2015
3880
ug/I
Vinyl chloride
10/13/2015
2.1
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 17 of 17

Detections By Date Range
Buncombe County New Facility
. From: 10/1/2015 To: 10/1/2015
Site ID Analyte Date Result
SW-1
SW-2
Barium
10/1/2015
191
ug/L
Field pH
10/1/2015
6.2
Std.
Field Specific Conductance
10/1/2015
99
umh
Field Temperature
10/1/2015
18.5
deg
ORP
10/1/2015
35.8
mV
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/1/2015
990
ug/L
Turbidity
10/1/2015
5.58
NTU
Zinc
10/1/2015
17.9
ug/L
Barium
10/1/2015
62.3
ug/L
Field pH
10/1/2015
6.5 .
Std.
Field Specific Conductance
10/1/2015
149
umh
Field Temperature
10/1/2015
18.5
deg
ORP
10/1/2015
156.5
mV
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/1/2015
8020
ug/L
Turbidity
10/1/2015
7.79
NTU
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page I of 4

Site ID Analyte Date Result
SW-3
Barium
10/1/2015
42.1
ug/L
Field pH
10/1/2015
7.5
Std.
Field Specific Conductance
10/1/2015
188
umh
Field Temperature
10/1/2015
20.8
deg
ORP
10/1/2015
176.7
mV
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/1/2015
5530
ug/L
Turbidity
10/1/2015
3.46
NTU
SW-4
Barium
10/1/2015
134
ug/L
Chromium
10/1/2015
7.1
ug/L
Cobalt
10/1/2015
5.2
ug/L
Copper
10/1/2015
11.8
ug/L
Field pH
10/1/2015
6.4
Std.
Field Specific Conductance
10/1/2015
269
umh
Field Temperature
10/1/2015
19.2
deg
Nickel
10/1/2015
11.2
ug/L
ORP
10/1/2015
152.6
mV
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/1/2015
8150
ug/L
Turbidity
10/1/2015
53
NTU
Vanadium
10/1/2015
13.7
ug/L
Zinc
10/1/2015
28.4
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 2 of 4

Site ID Analyte Date Result
SW-5
Barium
10/1/2015
83.5
ug/L
Field pH
10/1/2015
6.9
Std.
Field Specific Conductance
10/1/2015
336
umh
Field Temperature
10/1/2015
19.5
deg
Nickel
10/1/2015
5.2
ug/L
ORP
10/1/2015
192.7
mV
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/1/2015
7510
ug/L
Turbidity
10/1/2015
7.03
NTU
SW-6
Barium
10/1/2015
88.3
ug/L
Field pH
10/1/2015
6.7
Std.
Field Specific Conductance
10/1/2015
210
umh
Field Temperature
10/1/2015
17.9
deg
ORP
10/1/2015
184.2
mV
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/1/2015
5800
ug/L
Turbidity
10/1/2015
6.33
NTU
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 - Page 3 of 4

Site ID Aualyte Date Result
SW-7
Barium
10/1/2015
195
ug/L
Field pH
10/1/2015
6.3
Std.
Field Specific Conductance
10/1/2015
307
umh
Field Temperature
10/1/2015
20.5
deg
Nickel
10/1/2015
22.3
ug/L
ORP
10/1/2015
174.4
mV
Oxygen, Dissolved, Dissolved
10/1/2015
2580
ug/L
Turbidity
10/1/2015
3.04
NTU
Zinc
10/1/2015
15.8
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Monday, February 08, 2016 Page 4 of 4

APPENDIX F
SUMMARY OF EXCEEDANCES
Old Buncombe County Landfill MNA Sampling Report

Exceedances by Date Range.
Buncombe County Old Facility
From: 10/13/2015 To: 10/16/2015
Site ID Analyte Date Result
MW-13-132
1,2-Dichloropropane
MCL: 0.6 ug/L
10/16/2015 1.4 ug/L
Benzene
MCL: 1 ug/L
10/16/2015 1.1 ug/L
MW--13-35
MW-15
MW-18-78
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
MCL: 6 ug/L
Benzene
MCL: 1 ug/L
Antimony
MCL:
Chromium
MCL:
1 ug/L
10 ug/L
Vinyl chloride
MCL: 0.03 ug/L
10/13/2015
10/13/2015
10/13/2015
10/13/2015
10/14/2015
45 ug/L
2.3 ug/L
12.4 ug/L
12.6 ug/L
1.6 ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
T/iursday, February 04, 2016 Page 1 of 4

Site ID Analyte Date Result
MW-21-21
1,1-Dichloroethane
MCL: 6 ug/L
10/15/2015 8.6 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
MCL: 6 ug/L
10/15/2015 10.3 ug/L
Cobalt
MCL: 1 ug/L
10/15/2015 6.1 ug/L
Vinyl chloride
MCL: 0.03 ug/L
UTIf r IM
10/15/2015 2.4 ug/L
1,1-Dichloroethane
MCL: 6
ug/L
10/15/2015
12
ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
MCL: 6
ug/L
10/15/2015
9.1
ug/L
Benzene
MCL: 1
ug/L
10/15/2015
1.1
ug/L
Cobalt
MCL: 1
ug/L
10/15/2015
22
ug/L
Vinyl chloride
MCL: 0.03
ug/L
10/15/2015
3.4
ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Thursday, February 04, 2016 Page 2 of 4

Site ID Aualyte
Date
Result
MW-4
1,1-Dichloroethane
MCL: 6
ug/L
10/15/2015
16.7
ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
MCL: 6
ug/L
10/15/2015
11.3
ug/L
Antimony
MCL: 1
ug/L
10/15/2015
5.3
ug/L
Cobalt
MCL: 1
ug/L
10/15/2015
64.4
ug/L
Nickel
MCL: 100
ug/L
10/15/2015
109
ug/L
Tetrachloroethene
MCL: 0.7
ug/L
10/15/2015
1.2
ug/L
Vinyl chloride
MCL: 0.03
ug/L
10/15/2015
3.1
ug/L
ulfT T2M15
MW--S
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
MCL:
6 ug/L
10/16/2015
86.5 ug/L
Benzene
MCL:
1 ug/L
10/16/2015
5.3 ug/L
Cobalt
MCL:
1 ug/L
10/16/2015
32 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
MCL: 6 ug/L
10/13/2015 7.4 ug/L
Cobalt
MCL: 1 ug/L
10/13/2015 25.5 ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Thursday, February 04, 2016 Page 3 of 4

Site ID Analyte Date Result
MW-6
Barium
MCL: 700 ug/L
10/14/2015 1410 ug/L
Benzene
MCL: 1 ug/L
MW--B
Vinyl chloride
MCL: 0.03 ug/L
10/14/2015
10/13/2015
1.3 ug/L
2.1 ug/L
I = The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quatitation limit.
V = Indicates the anlyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
Thursday, February 04, 2016 Page 4 of 4

APPENDIX G
BIOCHLOR
Old Buncombe County Landfill MNA Sampling Report

I i t -. ,� � � � � � � �
--
__
•.�f'•' .. ,.

BIOCHLOR Natural Attenuation Decision Support System
Version 2.2
Excel 2000
TYPE OF CHLORINATED SOLVENT:
Ethenes
0
5. GENERAL
Ethanes
O
Simulation Time*
1. ADVECTION
Modeled Area Width*
Seepage Velocity* Vs
206.9
(ft/yr)
Modeled Area Length*
or
Zone 1 Length*
Hydraulic Conductivity K
1.0E-03
(cm/sec)
Zone 2 Length*
Hydraulic Gradient i 0.04 (ft/ft)
Effective Porosity n 0.2 ( )
2. DISPERSION
Alpha x* 300 (ft) Calc.
(Alpha y) / (Alpha x)* 0.1
(Alpha z) / (Alpha x)* 1.E-99 (-)
3. ADSORPTION
Retardation Factor* - -- - R
or
Soil Bulk Density, rho 2.67 (kg/L)
FractionOrganicCarbon, foc 1.0E-3 (-)
Partition Coefficient Koc y
PCE 426 (L/kg) 6.54 H
TCE 130 (L/kg) 2.69 N
DCE 125 (L/kg) 2.63 (-)
VC 30 (L/kg) 1,38 (-)
ETH 302 (L/kg) 4.93 H
Common R (used in model)* = 1.25
4. BIOTRANSFORMATION -1st Order Decay Coefficient*
Zone 1 r 1/ r half-life (rs) Yield
PCE TCE 1.777 0,39 0.79
TCE DCE 1.873 0.37 0.74
DCE VC 2.166 0.32 0.64
VC ETH 1.980 0:35 0.45
Zone 2 1/ r half-life ( rs)
PCE -- TCE 0.000 E- i
TCE DCE 0.000 HELP
DCE VC 0.000 <-
VC ETH 0.000 <
6. SOURCE DATA
Source Options
Old Buncombe
County Landfill
Run Name
20
(yr) f L -'
1000
(ft) W
3000
(ft) 1
3000
(ft)
0 (ft) Zone 2=
L -Zone 1
TYPE: Decaying
Single Planar /
Source Thickness in Sat. Zone* = (ft)
Y1
Width* (ft) 1000
ks*
Conc. (mg/L)* C1 (1/yr)
PCE .008 0.022
TCE .008 0.022
DCE .002 :0.022VC .002 .02ETH .0 2/
7. FIELD DATA FOR COMPARISON
PCE Conc. (mg/L)
TCE Conc. (mg/L)
DCE Conc. (mg/L)
VC Conc. (mg/L)
ETH Conc. (mg/L)
Distance from Source (ft)
Data Input Instructions:
115 1. Enter value directly.... or
T or 2. Calculate by filling in gray
0.02 cells. Press Enter, then C
(To restore formulas, hit "Restore Formulas' button )
Variable* Data used directly in model.
Test if
BiotransformatioL. Natural Attenuation
is Occurring __-
Vertical Plane Source: Determine Source Well
Location and Input Solvent Concentrations
View of Plume Looking Down
Observed Centerline Conc. at Monitoring Wells
Date Data Collected 2014 j
8. CHOOSE TYPE OF OUTPUT TO SEE:
RUNHelp Restore RESET
RUN ARRAY ti. ,,, .... .,, . a a ,..
CENTERLINE SEE Paste

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg(L) at Z=O
Distance from Source Ift1
PCE
No De_qradation
�Biotransformation
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
0.007
0.007
0.005
0.004
0.002
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0073
0.002
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
100 1 450 1 925
Field Data from Site 0.002 1 0.001
—No Degradation/Production
1.000
J
0.100
Monitorina Well Locations
-Sequential 1st Order Decay :: Field Data from Site
c
0
4-1
L
= 0.010
m
0
o .. 00
U 0.001
0 500 1000 1500
2000 2500 3000 3500
Distance From Source (ft.)
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH
Time:
4.0 Years Return to
Replay ; — Input To All To Array
Log <=*Linear

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
Distance from Source (ftl
PCE
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
` No Degradation
0.007
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.007_
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
Biotransformation
0.0070
0.002
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Monitoring Well Locations (ft)
100
450
925
Field Data from Site
0.002
0.001
—No Degradation/Production
Sequential 1st Order Decay .: Field Data from Site
1.000
See PCE
See TCE
0.100
c
0
See DCE
ca
L
=
0.010
..A,
See VC
U
p
_
0
:7
��
See ETH
U
0.001 -
L
_, __
0
500
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Distance From Source (ft.)
Time: -
6.0 Years Return to
Replay
'
To All
To Array
Log C=Linear Input

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
Distance from Source (ft)
PCE
No Degradation
Biotransformation
0
1 300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
0.007
0.007
0.006
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.0067
1 0.002
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
100 450 925
Field Data from Site 0.002 0.001
—No Degradation/Production
1.000
J
0.100
U 0.001
0
Monitorinq Well Locations
-Sequential 1st Order Decay
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Distance From Source (ft.)
H Field Data from Site
3000
3500
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH
Time:
8.0 Years Return to
Replay Input To All To Array
Log Linear

r-

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
PCE
No Degradation
Biotransformation
Distance from Source Ift►
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
0.006
0.007
0.006
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0064
0.002
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
100 450 1 925
Field Data from Sitel 0.002 1 0.001
—No Degradation/Production
1.000 1
J
Monitorinq Well Locations
—Sequential 1st Order Decay .: Field Data from Site
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
Distance from Source (ft)
vc
No Degradation
Biotransformation
a11
.11
•11
„
11
:11
II
•,,
11
,,,
, 11 1
1 11
111
1 / 11
1 / 11
1 111
111
1 111
1 111
1 111
III I
100 450 925
Field Data from Site 0.004 1 0.003
No Degradation/Production
1.000
J
0.100
c
0
L
= 0.010
m
Cp ��...
U 0.001 --
0 500
Monitoring Well Locations
—Sequential 1st Order Decay H Field Data from Site
1000 1500 2000
Distance From Source (ft.)
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
Time:
.0 Years Return to
Replay 2
I Input To All To Array
Loy C=,Linear

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
Distance from Source (ft)
VC
- -
No Degrradation
Biotransformation
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0019
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
100
450
925
r-
Field Data from Site
0.004
0.003
-No Degradation/Production
1.000
J
0.100
c
0
ce
0.010
m
c
0
0.001
0
500 1000
Monitoring Well Locations
-Sequential 1 st Order Decay
1500 2000
Distance From Source (ft.)
Time:
4.0 Years
Replay
Log C--Linear
2500
N Field Data from Site
Return to
Input
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH
3500
To All To Array
3i

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
Distance from Source Iftl
VC
No Degradation
Biotransformation
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0018
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
100 450 L_ 925
Field Data from Site 0.004 0.003
No Degradation/Production
1.000
J_
0.100
U 0.001
0
500 1000
Monitoring Well Locations
-Sequential 1st Order Decay
1500 2000
Distance From Source (ft.)
:� Field Data from Site
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH
2500 3000 3500
Time:
6.0 Years Return to
Replay I To All To Array
Input
Log �=Linear

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) of Z=O
vc
No Degradation
Biotransformation
Distance from Source (ft)
a11
•11
•11
11
11
:11
„
•11
11
111
1 11 :
1 11
1 11
1 11
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 1 1
1 111
100 1 450 925
Field Data from Site 1 0.004 1 0.003
-No Degradation/Production
1.000
J
0.100
C
0
Monitoring Well Locations
-Sequential 1st Order Decay :: Field Data from Site
cc
0.010
d
L)
0
U 0.001
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Distance From Source (ft.)
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH
To Array

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=O
Distance from Source (ft)
vc
No Degradation
Biotransformation
1 100 1 450 1 925
Field Data from 0.004 1 0.003 1 1
-No Degradation/Production
1.000
&100
0
ca
0.010
0
0.001
0 500 1000
Monitorinq Well Locations
-Sequential 1st Order Decay :: Field Data from Site
1500 2000 2500 3000
Distance From Source (ft.)
Time:
I
Replay 10 Return to
Log <,,:�Linear Input
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH
3500
To All To Array

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
Distance from Source Iftl
vc
No Degradation
Biotransformation
1 11
1 11
/ 11
1 1/1
1111
1 1/1
/ 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 111
100
450_
925
Field Data from Site
0.004
0.003
No Degradation/Production
1.000
J
0.100
c
0
.Y
0.010
m
�
o
0
U
n nn
Monitoring Well Locations (ft)
-Sequential 1st Order Decay 11 Field Data from Site
Input To All
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See ETH

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
Distance from Source Iftl
vc
No Degradation
Biotransformation
a„
„
•,,
11
„
:11
11
•,,
„
1 „
Monitoring Well Locations (ft)
100 450 925
Field Data from Site i 0.004 0.003
No Degradation/Production -Sequential 1st Order Decay U Field Data from Site
1.000
J
0.100
c
0
cu
a010
c) G:
c IN
0
U 0.001 _ - -- —
0 500 1000 1500 _ 2000 2500 3000 3500
Distance From Source (ft.)
Time:
Replay y 20.0 Years _ Return to To All
I Log C==:>Linear Input
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH
To Array

'0I i�

BIOCHLOR Natural Attenuation Decision Support System Old Buncombe
Version 2.2 County Landfill
Excel 2000 Run Name
TYPE OF CHLORINATED SOLVENT: Ethenes 5. GENERAL
Ethanes O
Simulation Time*
11
(yr)
1. ADVECTION
Modeled Area Width*
1000
(ft)
Seepage Velocity*
Vs 206.9 (ft/yr)
Modeled Area Length*
3000
(ft)
or
41
Zone 1 Length*
3000
(ft)
Hydraulic Conductivity
K
1.0E-03
(cm/sec)
Zone 2 Length*
0
(ft)
Hydraulic Gradient i 0.04 (ft/ft)
Effective Porosity n 0.2 (-)
2. DISPERSION
Alpha x* 300 (ft) Calc.
(Alpha y) / (Alpha x)* 0.1 (-)
(Alpha z) / (Alpha x)* 1.E-99 (-)
3. ADSORPTION
Retardation Factor* -- - - R
or
Soil Bulk Density, rho 2.6 (kg/L)
FractionOrganicCarbon, foc 1.0E-3 H
Partition Coefficient Koc y
PCE 426 (L/kg) 6.54 H
TCE 130 (L/kg) 2.69 H
DCE 125 (Ukg) 2.63 H
VC 30 (L/kg) 1,38 H
ETH 302 (L/kg) 4.93 H
Common R (used in model)* = 1.25
4. BIOTRANSFORMATION -1st Order Decay Coefficient*
Zone 1 1/ r half-life (rs) Yield
PCE --. TCE 0.877 0.79 0.79
TCE - DCE 0.936 0.74 0.74
DCE > VC 1.083 0.64 0.64
VC ETH 1.540 0,45 0.45
Zone 2 <::�� ?. 1/ r half-life (rs)
PCE - TCE F ti
TCE DCE HELP
DCE VC <
VC - -> ETH 0.0400<-
6. SOURCE DATA
Source Options
Zone 2=
L - Zone 1
TYPE: Decaying
Single Planar
Source Thickness in Sat. Zone*
Y1
Width* (ft) 1 1000
Conc. (mg/L)*
C1
PCE
.008
TCE
08
r3002
DCE
02
VC
ETH
7. FIELD DATA FOR COMPARISON
PCE Conc. (mg/L)
TCE Conc. (mg/L)
DCE Conc. (mg/L)
VC Conc. (mg/L)
ETH Conc. (mg/L)
Distance from Source (ft)
75 (ft)
Data Input Instructions:
115 1. Enter value directly .... or
fh or 2. Calculate by filling in gray
0.02 cells. Press Enter, then C ,
(To restore formulas, hit "Restore Formulas" button )
Variable* ® Data used directly in model.
Test if
Biotransformatiof-, Natural Attenuation
is Occurring
Vertical Plane Source: Determine Source Well
Location and Input Solvent Concentrations
ks*
(1 /yr) -
0.01 -
0.01 View of Plume Looking Down
0.01
0.01 Observed Centerline Conc. at Monitoring Wells
0.0
i
Date Data Collected 2015
8. CHOOSE TYPE OF OUTPUT TO SEE:

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
Distance from Source (ft)
PCE
No Degradation
Biotransformation
a/1
•11
•11
11
11
:1/
11
•11
11
111
1 11
1 11
1 11
1 1/1
1 /11
1 1/1
1 111
1 111
1 111
1 1/1
1 111
100 450 925
Field Data from Site 0.008 0.001 0.000
-No Degradation/Production
1.000
Replay
J
0.100
c
0
L
= 0.010
00
c
0
U 0.001 600
0 500 1000
Monitorina Well Locations
-Sequential 1 st Order Decay :: Field Data from Site
1500 2000
Distance From Source (ft.)
Time:
1.1 Years
Log < =Linear
2500 3000
Return to
Input
3500
To All
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH
To Array

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
Distance from Source (ft)
PCE
No Degradation
Biotransformation
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0078
0.004
0.002
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH
To Array

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
PCE
No Degradation
Biotransformation
Field Data from Site
Distance from Source (ft)
0
1 300
600
1 900
1200
1500
1800
2100
1 2400
2700
3000
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.006
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0075
0.004
0.002
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
11 ��
1 11 1 1//
Monitorina Well Locations
—No Degradation/Production —Sequential 1st Order Decay
: Field Data from Site
1.000
See PCE
J
See TCE
0.100
c
See DCE
L
=
0.010
See VC
cs
c
0
00
See ETH
U
0.001 c� _ _ 2100
_
0 500 1000 1500 2000
2500 3000 3500
Distance From Source (ft.)
� a
Time:
6.6 Years
Returnt '
Replay
Log < Linear
o To All
Input
To Array

� .. J' 'r;,�.� � .. ..
� j1�. �

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
PCE
No Degradation
Biotransformation
Distance from Source (ft)
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.0072
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
100 1 450 1 925
Field Data from Site 1 0.008 1 0.001 1 0.000
-No Degradation/Production
1.000 r
J_
0.100
c
O
ca
0.010
(D
L)
o
U 0.001 I
0
Replay
Monitoring Well Locations
Sequential 1st Order Decay :7 Field Data from Site
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
See PCE
See TCE
To All To Array

BIOCHLOR Natural Attenuation Decision Support System
Version 2.2
Excel 2000
TYPE OF CHLORINATED SOLVENT:
Ethenes
5. GENERAL
Ethanes O
Simulation Time*
1. ADVECTION
Modeled Area Width`
Seepage Velocity' Vs
206.9 (ft/yr)
Modeled Area Length*
or
T
Zone 1 Length`
Hydraulic Conductivity K
1.0E-03
(cm/sec)
Zone 2 Length'
Hydraulic Gradient i 0.04 (ft/ft)
Effective Porosity n 0.2 (-)
2. DISPERSION
Alpha x' 300 (ft) Calc.
(Alpha y) / (Alpha x)' 0.1 (-)
(Alpha z) / (Alpha x)* 1.E-99 (-)
3. ADSORPTION
Retardation Factor' R
or
Soil Bulk Density, rho 2.6 (kg/L)
FractionOrganicCarbon, foc 1.0E-3 (-)
Partition Coefficient Koc y
PCE 426 (L/kg) "6.54 ' H
TCE 130 (L/kg) 2.69 H
DCE 125 (L/kg) 2.63 H
VC 30 (L/kg) 1.38 H
ETH 302 (L/kg) 4.93 H
Common R (used in model)` = 1.25
4. BIOTRANSFORMATION -1st Order Decay Coefficient'
Zone 1 h 1I r half-life (rs) Yield
PCE TCE 0.877 F EO.45
0.79
TCE DCE 0.936 E- 0.74
DCE VC 1.083 F 0.64
VC ETH 1.540
Zone 2 /_ 1/ r half-life ( rs)
PCE) TCE 0.000 E-
TCE - DCE 0.000 HELP
DCE - VC 0.000 <-
VC ETH 0. 000 <'
Old Buncombe
Data Input Instructions:
County Landfill
115 1. Enter value directly .... or
Run Name
4` or 2. Calculate by filling in gray
0.02 cells. Press Enter, then C ,
30
1000
(yr)
(ft)
L -'
W
(To restore formulas, hit 'Restore Formulas" button )
Variable` Data used direct) in model.
3000
(ft)
1
Test if
3000
0
(ft)
(ft)
Zone 2=
Biotransformatio� Natural Attenuation
is Occurring
L - Zone 1
- Vertical Plane Source: Determine Source Well
6. SOURCE DATA TYPE: Decaying
Single Planar Location and Input Solvent Concentrations
Source Options g j
d
Source Thickness in Sat. Zone` 75 (ft) - -----
Y 1-
Width` (ft) 1000
ks'
Conc. (mg/L)` C1 (1/yr)
PCE .008 0.01
TCE .008 0,01 View of Plume Looking Down
DCE .002 0.01
VC .002 0.01 Observed Centerline Conc. at Monitoring Wells
ETH 0.01
7. FIELD DATA FOR COMPARISON /
PCE Conc. (mg/L)
TCE Conc. (mg/L)
DCE Conc. (mg/L)
VC Conc. (mg/L)
ETH Conc. (mg/L)
Distance from Source (ft)
Date Data Collected
8. CHOOSE TYPE OF OU
RUN
CENTERLINE
.008
TPUT
.001
.0
.008
.01
.0
.002
.017
.0
0.0
.003
.0
100
450
925
2015
TO SEE:
RUN ARRAY
Restore RESET
Help
SEE `, Paste

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
Distance from Source (ft)
VC
No Degradation
Biotransformation
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0020
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Monitoring Well Locations (ft)
100 450 925
Field Data from Site 1 0.002 1 0.003 0.000
—No Degradation/Production —Sequential 1st Order Decay :: Field Data from Site
1.000
J
0.100
c
0
cv
L
= 0.010
m
U
_ �y
0
U 0.001
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Distance From Source (ft.)
Time:
Replay 3.0 Years
Log C�Linear
Return to
Input
To All
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH
To Array

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0x
Distance from Source (ft)
VC
No Degradation
Biotransformation
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,0020
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
-----------
100 450 925
Field D-ata from Site 0.002 0.003 0.000
No Degradation/Production
1.000 ,
Replay
J
Monitorina Well Locations
—Sequential 1 st Order Decay H Field Data from Site
c
O n nnn
U 0.001 - --
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Distance From Source (ft.)
Time: _
6.0 Years Return to To All
i
Log <^��Linear Input
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH
To Array

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
Distance from Source (ft)
VC
No Degradation
Biotransformation
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0019
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Monitoring Well Locations
100 450 925
Field Data from Site 1 0.002 0.003 0.000
—No Degradation/Production Sequential 1 st Order Decay
1.000 T
O
C
O
w
ca
L
= 0.010
0 o
-C
C) 0.001---
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Distance From Source (ft.)
:2 Field Data from Site
3000 3500
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH
Time:
I 9.0 Years
Replay ! Return to To All To Array
Log CLinear Input

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
Distance from Source (ft)
VC
No Degradation
Biotransformation
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.0019
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Monitoring Well Locations
100 450 925
Field Data from Site 0.002 0.003 0.000
—No Degradation/Production Sequential 1st Order Decay
1.000
J
0.100
c
O
ca
L
= 0.010
m
U
o
U 0.001 - -- - ---.
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Distance From Source (ft.)
.: Field Data from Site
3000 3500
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH
Time:
12.0 Years Return to
Replayi To All To Array
Log <=*Linear Input

DISSOLVED CHLORINATED SOLVENT CONCENTRATIONS ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L) at Z=0
uC
_ No Degradation
Biotransformation
Distance from Source (ft)
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.0016
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
100 450 925
Field Data from Site 0.002 0.003 0.000
—No Degradation/Production
1.000 r
J
0.100
w
L
= 0.010
m
v
Monitoring Well Locations
Sequential 1st Order Decay .: Field Data from Site
_I N
Q nnn nnn nnn nnn
n. nn
o 0+489-00—..40�..
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Distance From Source (ft.)
_ Time:
30.0 Years Return to
Replay Input ' To All
Log <��Linear
See PCE
See TCE
See DCE
See VC
See ETH
To Array