US 13/US 158 (6)

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
March 15, 2010
MEMORANDUM
Dee Freeman
Secretary
To: Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator, Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental
Affairs nA f
From: David Wainwright, Division of Water Quality, Central Office V^"
Subject: Comments on the Environmental Assessment related to the proposed widening of US
13/US 158 from existing US 158/NC 45 near Winton to existing US 158 at Tarheel,
Hertford and Gates County, State Project No. 35488.1.1, TIP 2507A.
State Clearinghouse Project No. 10-294.
This office has reviewed the referenced document dated January, 2010. The NC Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ) is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for activities that
impact Waters of the U.S., including wetlands. It is our understanding that the project as presented will
result in impacts to jurisdictional wetlands, streams, and other surface waters. The NCDWQ offers the
following comments based on review of the aforementioned document:
Project Specific Comments:
1. This project is being planned as part of the 404/NEPA Merger Process. As a participating team
member, the NCDWQ will continue to work with the team.
2. Buckhom Creek, the UT to Folley Branch, and the UT to Jady Branch are class C; NSW; the Chowan
River is class B; NSW waters of the State. The NCDWQ is very concemed with sediment and erosion
impacts that could result from this project. The NCDWQ recommends that highly protective sediment
and erosion control BMPs be implemented to reduce the risk of nutrient runoff to these waterbodies.
The NCDWQ requests that road design plans provide treatment of the storm water runoff through best
management practices as detailed in the most recent version of the NCDWQ's Stormwater Best
Management Practices.
3. The DWQ prefers on-site mitigation when practical and feasible. The DWQ encourages the NCDOT
to fully investigate all potential on-site mitigation possibilities.
4. The document does not discuss Indirect and Cumulative Effects in much detail. The DWQ would like
to review the ICE screening tool results for this project.
Transportation Pemtitting Unit
1650 Arlan Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Location. 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone]
Internet. http.lih2o.enr-state .nc usncwetlands
NorthCarolina
Naturally
An PLuai D vorlun.tr 1 Affai e Aerion Effmuyer
General Comments:
5. Environmental assessment alternatives shall consider design criteria that reduce the impacts to streams
and wetlands from storm water runoff. These alternatives shall include road designs that allow for
treatment of the storm water runoff through best management practices as detailed in the most recent
version of NCDWQ's Stormwater Best Management Practices, such as grassed swales, buffer areas,
preformed scour holes, retention basins, etc.
6. After the selection of the preferred alternative and prior to an issuance of the 401 Water Quality
Certification, the NCDOT is respectfully reminded that they will need to demonstrate the avoidance
and minimization of impacts to wetlands (and streams) to the maximum extent practical. In
accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0506[h]),
mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 1 acre to wetlands. In the event that mitigation
is required, the, mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and values.
The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program may be available for use as wetland mitigation.
7. In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0506[h]),
mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single stream. In the
event that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan shall be designed to replace appropriate lost
functions and values. The NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program may be available for use as stream
mitigation.
8. Future documentation, including the 401 Water Quality Certification Application, should continue to
include an itemized listing of the proposed wetland and stream impacts with corresponding mapping.
9. The NCDWQ is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project.
The NCDOT should address these concerns by describing the potential impacts that may occur to the
aquatic environments and any mitigating factors that would reduce the impacts.
10. The NCDOT is respectfully reminded that all impacts, including but not limited to, bridging, fill,
excavation and clearing, and rip rap to jurisdictional wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers need to be
included in the final impact calculations. These impacts, in addition to any construction impacts,
temporary or otherwise, also need to be included as part of the 401 Water Quality Certification.
Application.
11. Bridge deck drains shall not discharge directly into the stream. Stormwater shall be directed across the
bridge and pre-treated through site-appropriate means (grassed swales, pre-formed scour holes,
vegetated buffers, etc.) before entering the stream. Please refer to the most current version of
NCDWQ's Stormwater Best Management Practices.
12. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or streams.
13. Borrow/waste areas shall avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practical. Impacts to wetlands in
borrow/waste areas will need to be presented in the 401 Water Quality Certification and could
precipitate compensatory mitigation.
14. The 401 Water Quality Certification application will need to specifically address the proposed
methods for stormwater management. More specifically, stormwater shall not be permitted to
discharge directly into streams or surface waters.
15. Based on the information presented in the document, the magnitude of impacts to wetlands and
streams may require an Individual Permit (IP) application to the Corps of Engineers and corresponding
401 Water Quality Certification. Please be advised that a 401 Water Quality Certification requires
satisfactory protection of water quality to ensure that water quality standards are met and no wetland
or stream uses are lost. Final permit authorization will require the submittal of a formal application by
the NCDOT and written concurrence from the NCDWQ. Please be aware that any approval will be .
contingent on appropriate avoidance and minimization of wetland. and stream impacts to the maximum
extent practical, the development of an acceptable stormwater management plan, and the inclusion of
appropriate mitigation plans where appropriate.
16. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, the site shall be graded to its preconstruction
contours and elevations. Disturbed areas shall be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and
appropriate native woody species shall be planted. When using temporary structures the area shall be
cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized
equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat intact allows the area to re-vegetate naturally and
minimizes soil disturbance.
17. Placement of culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands shall be placed below the
elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20
percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low flow
passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures including
temporary erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-
equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and downstream of the above
structures. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being maintained if
requested in writing by the NCDWQ. If this condition is unable to be met due to bedrock or other
limiting features encountered during construction, please contact the NCDWQ for guidance on how to
proceed and to determine whether or not a permit modification will be required.
18. If multiple pipes or barrels are required, they shall be designed to mimic natural stream cross section
as closely as possible including pipes or barrels at flood plain elevation, floodplain benches, and/or
sills may be required where appropriate. Widening the stream channel shall be avoided. Stream
channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases water velocity causing
sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage.
19. If foundation test borings are necessary; it shall be noted in the document. Geotechnical work is .
approved under General 401 Certification Number 3687/Nationwide Permit No. 6 for Survey
Activities.
20. Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient to protect water resources must be implemented and
maintained in accordance with the most.recent version of North Carolina Sediment and Erosion
Control Planning and Design Manual and the most recent version of NCS000250.
21. All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved BMP
measures from the most current version of the NCDOT Construction and Maintenance Activities
manual such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and other diversion structures shall be used to
prevent excavation in flowing water.
22. Riparian vegetation (native trees and shrubs) shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible:
Riparian vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the
growing season following completion of construction.
The NCDWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on your project. Shall you have any
questions or require any additional information, please contact David Wainwright at [phone].
cc: Bill Biddlecome, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington Field Office
Chris Militscher, Environmental Protection Agency (electronic copy only)
Travis Wilson, NC Wildlife Resources Commission (electronic copy only)
Cathy Brittingham, Division of Coastal Management
Garcy Ward, NCDWQ Washington Regional Office
File Copy
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Project Review Form
Project Number: 10-0294 County: Hertford and Gates Date Received: 02/12/2010
Due Date: 3/22/2010
Project Description: Environmental Assessment - Widening of US 13 from US 158 near Winton to
US 158 in Tarheel; TIP No. R-2507A
is Project is Ring reviewe d as m ica e tie low:
Regional Office Regional Office Area In-House Review
Asheville ? Air Soil & Water ? Marine Fisheries -
- _
_ Fayetteville ? Water Coastal Management - Water Resources
Mooresville ? Aquifer Protection - Wildlife ? Environmental Health
_
Raleigh ?
- Land Quality Engineer ? Wildlife -DOT-\C??S -
W :\6Dr Solid Waste Mgmt
? Washington ? Forest Resources -•\? - Radiation Protection
ti?'?tE.c a
Wilmington Land Resources Other
? Parks & Recreation
Winston-Salem
- Water Quality

aterQguality-DOiT Z; 'cam l `7l?
en 9^s 3u. a?wo?rzxs»+:;emv
- Air Quality
Sign-Off/Region:
Reviewer/Agency:
Response (check all applicable)
_ No objection to project as proposed.
- Insufficient information to complete review
No Comment I/
?ther (specify or attach comments) 5ee- u *a .J"d
C,o ou,mr..4If you have any questions, please contact:
Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator at Melba.McGee(d,)ncdenr.eov
FF9 5 G ' ?l\S n
4N?Sq?STgtl7Y
US 13-158
From US 15"C 45 Near Winton to US 158 at Tarheel
Hertford and Gates Counties
State Project 35488.1.1
TIP Project R-2507A
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
In Compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
The following person may be contacted for additional information concerning this proposal
and statement:
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph. D., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
NC Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
[phone]
APPROVED:
2- 110
atD e jdt2Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. F t%?
Manager, 5 1010
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NC 111W.gq
US 13-158
From US 158/NC 45 Near Winton to US 158 at Tarheel
Hertford and Gates Counties
State Project 35488. 1.1
TIP Project R-2507A
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Documentation prepared in the Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch by:
Olivia J. Farr
Project Planning Engineer,
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
i
Ja es A. McInnis, Jr., PFD CARQj/ti?•s
Project Engineer,
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
S
A.
lI2Z/16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT COMMITMENTS .......................................................................................................................... i
SUMMARY... ..................................... ................................................. ..................... ................................... iii
A. Type of Action ................................................................................................... ...................................iii
B. Description of Action ......................................................................................... ...................................iii
C. Summary of Purpose and Need .......................................................................... ...................................iii
D. Alternatives Considered ..................................................................................... ...................................iii
E. Permits Required ............................................................................................... ................................... iv
F. Coordination ...................................................................................................... ...................................iv
G. Contact Information ........................................................................................... .................................... v
1. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION ...................................................... ....................................1
A. General Description ........................................................................................... .................................... I
B. Historical Resume and Project Status ................................................................ .................................... 1
C. Cost Estimates .................................................................................................... ....................................1
II. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR PROPOSED PROJECT ..................................... ....................................2
A. Purpose for Project ............................................................................................ ....................................2
B. Need for Project ................................................................................................. ....................................2
1. Description of Existing Conditions ............................................................... ....................................2
a. Functional Classification .......................................................................... ....................................2
b. Physical Description of Existing Facility ................................................. ....................................2
1) Roadway Cross-Section ....................................................................... ....................................2
2) Right of Way and Access Control ....................................................... ....................................2
3) Speed Limit .......................................................................................... ...................................3
4) Intersections .......................................................................................... ...................................3
5) Structures .............................................................................................. ..:................................3
6) Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities .......................................................... ...................................3
7) Utilities ................................................................................................. ...................................3
C. School Bus Usage ...................................................................................... ...................................3
d. Traffic Carrying Capacity .......................................................................... ...................................4
1) Traffic Volumes .................................................................................... ...................................4
2) Levels of Service ............................................ `.................................... ...................................4
e. Accident Data ............................................................................................ ...................................4
f. Airports ..................................................................................................... ...................................5
g. Projects in the Area ................................................................................... ...................................5
2. Transportation and Land Use Plans ............................................................... ................................... 5
a. Strategic Highway Corridors .........................................:........................... ...................................5
b. Local Thoroughfare Plans ......................................................................... ...................................5
C. Land Use Plan ........................................................................................... ...................................6
C. Benefits of Proposed Project .............................................................................. ...................................6
1. Traffic Volumes with Project ......................................................................... ...................................6
2. Levels of Service with Project ....................................................................... ...................................6
3. Safety ............................................................................................................. ...................................6
III. ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................................... ...................................7
A. Preliminary Study Alternatives ........................................................................... ...................................7
1. Alternative Modes of Transportation ............................................................. ...................................7
a. Travel Demand Management (TDM) ........................................................ ................................... 7
b. Mass Transit .............................................................................................. ...................................7
2. Transportation System Management ITSM) .................................................... .................................7
3. "No-Build" Alternative .................................................................................... .................................8
4. Widen Existing US 13-158 .............................................................................. .................................8
B. Detailed Study Alternative .................................................................................... ...............................10
IV. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................................... ...............................10
A. Roadway Cross-Section and Alignment ................................................................ ...............................10
B. Right of Way and Access Control ......................................................................... ............................... 10
C. Speed Limit ........................................................................................................... ............................... 11
D. Design Speed ........................................................................................................ ...............................I1
E. Anticipated Design Exceptions ............................................................................. ............................... I1
F. Intersections/Interchanges ..................................................................................... ............................... 11
G. Service Roads ....................................................................................................... ...............................11
H. Railroad Crossings ................................................................................................ ............................... 11
1. Structures .............................................................................:................................ ...............................11
J. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities .......................................................................... ...............................12
K. Utilities ................................................................................................................. ...............................12
L. Landscaping .......................................................................................................... ...............................12
M. Noise Barriers ....................................................................................................... ...............................12
V. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF PROPOSED ACTION ............................... ...............................13
A. Natural Resources ................................................................................................ ................................13
I. Biotic Resources ............................................................................................. ................................13
a. Terrestrial Communities ............................................................................. ................................ 13
b. Aquatic Communities ................................................................................. ................................ 15
C. Summary of Anticipated Effects ................................................................. ................................ 15
2. Waters of the United States ............................................................................. ................................16
a. Streams, Rivers, Impoundments ................................................................. ................................ 16
b. Wetlands ..................................................................................................... ................................17
C. Summary of Anticipated Effects ................................................................. ................................ 18
d. Avoidance, Minimization, Mitigation ........................................................ ................................ 18
e. Anticipated Permit Requirements ............................................................... ................................ 18
3. Rare and Protected Species ............................................................................. ................................ 19
a. Federally-Protected Species ....................................................................... ................................ 19
b. Federal Species of Concern/State Protected Species .................................. ................................20
4. Soils ................................................................................................................ ................................20
B. Cultural Resources ............................................................................................... .................................21
1. Historic Architectural Resources .................................................................... ................................22
2. Archaeological Resources ............................................................................... ...............................`.22
C. Farmland .............................................................................................................. ................................23
D. Social Effects ....................................................................................................... ................................23
1. Neighborhoods/Communities .......................................................................... ................................23
2. Relocation of Residences and Businesses ....................................................... ................................23
3. Title VI ............................................................................................................ ................................23
4. Recreational Facilities ..................................................................................... ................................24
5. Other Public Facilities and Services ................................................................ ................................24
E. Economic Effects ................................................................................................. ................................25
F. Land Use .............................................................................................................. ................................25
1. Existing Land Use and Zoning ........................................................................ ................................25
2. Future Land Use .............................................................................................. ................................25
3. Project Compatibility with Local Plans ........................................................... ................................26
G. Indirect and Cumulative Effects ........................................................................... .............. ...............26
H. Flood Hazard Evaluation ..................................................................................... ................................27
1. Traffic Noise Analysis ......................................................................................... ................................28
1. Traffic Noise Impacts and Noise Contours ..................................................... ................................28
2. Noise Abatement Alternatives .............................................................. ........................................... 29
a. Traffic System Management Measures ........................................... ...........................................29
b. Highway Alignment Changes .......................................................... ...........................................29
C. Buffer Acquisition ........................................................................... ...........................................29
d. Noise Barriers ................................................................................. ...........................................29
3. Summary .............................................................................................. ...........................................30
J. Air Quality Analysis ................................................................................. ...........................................30
1. Project Air Quality Effects ................................................................... ...........................................30
2. Mobile Source Air Toxics .................................................................... ...........................................30
3. Construction Air Quality Effects .......................................................... ...........................................31
4. Summary .............................................................................................. ...........................................31
K. Hazardous Materials ................................................................................. ...........................................31
vi. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION .............................................. ...........................................32

APPENDICES
Appendix A - Agency Comments
Appendix B - NCDOT Relocation Assistance Program/Relocation Reports
Appendix C - NEPA/404 Merger Team Concurrence Forms
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table S 1 - Summary of Project Environmental Effects ................................................ .......... iv
Table 1 - Project Cost Estimates ................................................................................. ........... 2
Table 2 - Existing Structures ....................................................................................... ........... 3
Table 3 - Accident Study ............................................................................................. ........... 4
Table 4 - Preliminary Widening Alternative Comparisons ......................................... ........... 9
Table 5 - Detailed Study Alternative .......................................................................... ......... 10
Table 6 - Proposed Structures ..................................................................................... ......... 12
Table 7 - Project Effects on Terrestrial Communities ................................................ ......... 16
Table 8 - Streams Within the Project Study Area ....................................................... ......... 16
Table 9 - Jurisdictional Wetlands in Project Area ...................................................... ......... 17
Table 10 - Wetland/Stream Impacts of Project Alternatives ........................................ ......... 18
Table 11 - Federally-Protected Species Listed for Gates and Hertford Counties ........ ...... 19
Table 12 - Federal Species of Concern in Gates and Hertford Counties ..................... ........ 20
Table 13 - Soils in the Project Area .............................................................................. ......... 21
Table 14 - Homes and Businesses to be Relocated ....................................................... ......... 23
Table 15 - Environmental Effects of Adjacent Projects ................................................ ......... 27
Table 16 - Predicted Traffic Noise Impact by Alternative ............................................ ......... 28
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 - Project Location Map
Figure 2 - Aerial Photograph of Project
Figure 3A - Proposed Roadway Typical Sections
Figure 3B - Proposed Bridge Typical Sections (Over Chowan River and Run Swamp)
Figure 4A - 2006 Existing Traffic Volumes
Figure 4B - 2030 Projected Traffic Volumes
Figure 5A - Estimated 2006 Level of Service without Project
Figure 5B - Estimated 2030 Level of Service without Project
Figure 6 - Estimated 2030 Level of Service with Project
Figure 7 - Environmental Features in Project Area
Figure 8 - Floodplains in Project Area

PROJECT COMMITMENTS
US 13-158
From US 15SINC 45 Near Winton to US 158 at Tarheel
Hertford and Gates Counties
State Project 35488.1.1
TIP Project R-2507A
Project Development Unit, Human Environment Unit
Two previously recorded archaeological sites exist in the vicinity of the project. Prior
to completion of the final environmental document for this project, an intensive
archaeological survey will be conducted to identify and evaluate all archaeological sites
within the project limits, in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800. NCDOT will consult with the
Office of State Archaeology to develop appropriate archaeological survey methodology prior
to conducting this survey.
The State Historic Preservation Office and NCDOT have determined the project will
have an adverse effect on the Story Crossroads Historic District. A memorandum of
agreement to document the resolution of adverse effects will be completed prior to
completion of the final environmental document for this project.
Hydraulics Unit
The Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the NC Floodplain Mapping Program
(FMP), to determine whether the Memorandum of Agreement between NCDOT and the FMP
is applicable or if approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and
subsequent final Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) will be required for this project.
Division One Construction
No in-water work will be performed in the Chowan River between February 15`h and
June 15`h, due to the presence of anadromous fish.
NCDOT's Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage will apply to
the Chowan River crossing.
This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to FEMA-regulated
stream(s). Therefore, the Division shall submit sealed as-built construction plans to the
Hydraulics Unit upon completion of project construction, certifying that the drainage
structure(s) and roadway embankment that are located within the 100-year floodplain were
built as shown in the construction plans, both horizontally and vertically.
Environmental Assessment - R-2507A Page 1 of 2
January 2010
Roadway Design Unit/Structure Design Unit
Fifty-four inch rails will be provided on the outside of proposed bridges in order to
accommodate bicycles. The rails on the east side of the existing bridge over the Chowan
River will be retrofitted to accommodate bicycles. An eight-foot outside shoulder will be
provided on the proposed new bridges in order to accommodate bicycles. A six-foot paved
outside shoulder is proposed for the portion of US 13-158 signed as NC Bike Routes 3A and
4 (US 158 near Winton to NC 137).
Environmental Assessment - R-2507A
January 2010
Page 2 of 2
11
SUMMARY
State Environmental Assessment
Prepared by the
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
of the
North Carolina Department of Transportation
A. Type of Action
This is a State Environmental Assessment.
B. Description of Action
The proposed project involves widening a section of US 13-158 between
US 158/NC 45 near Winton in Hertford County and US 158 in Tarheel in Gates County from
two to four lanes. An expressway type facility is recommended for this project. The
proposed project is approximately 7.1 miles long (Figure 1).
It is anticipated approximately 200 feet of right of way will be required for the
project. Partial control of access (one access per parcel for properties with no other access)
will be obtained. All intersecting roadways will cross US 13-158 at-grade, no grade
separations or interchanges are proposed, with one exception. The exception is construction
of an interchange at the intersection of US 13 and US 158/NC 45 north of Winton.
C. Summary of Purpose and Need
The purpose of the proposed project is to reduce traffic congestion and improve travel
time and safety along US 13-158 in the project area.
The proposed project will address the following needs:
• By the year 2030, portions of US 13-158 within the project area will operate at
capacity.
• US 13-158 in the project area is a regionally important route, carrying a large number
of trucks.
• The fatal accident rate along US 13-158 in the project area exceeds the statewide
average for similar facilities.
D. Alternatives Considered
Widening the existing roadway and the "no-build" alternative were considered for the
project. (Section III)
Table S 1 below presents a summary of the environmental "effects of the project.
iii
TABLE S1
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
Residential Relocatees 7
>y?
Effect on Historic
Yes
r.. Properties?
Receptors Impacted By
Business Relocatees 5
Traffic Noise 14
Wetlands Affected (Ac.) 30.97 Forested Areas Affected 170.23
(Delineated) (Ac.)
Stream Impacts (Ft.) 598 Farmland Affected (Ac.) * 37.65

Protected Species Habitat? Yes ?4, Total Length (Miles) 7.1
Effect on Protected Species? No Effect Total Cost (Millions) $56.8096
Property actually being farmed, not necessarily prime and important farmland, which will
be taken by the current design of the project.
E. Permits Required
It will be necessary to obtain an Individual Section 404 Permit from the US Army
Corps of Engineers for this project. This project will also require a Section 401 Water Quality
Certification from the NC Division of Water Quality. A state stormwater permit may also be
required.
This project may require a CAMA permit from the NC Division of Coastal
Management. If a CAMA permit is required, a CAMA Major Development permit will be
required.
A bridge permit will be required from the Coast Guard and a Section 10 permit will
be required from the US Army Corps of Engineers for the proposed new structure over the
Chowan River. The Coast Guard permit cannot be issued until the Section 401 Water
Quality Certification and the Certification of Consistency with the Coastal Zone Management
Act is received.
F. Coordination
This project was coordinated with the following federal, state and local agencies during this
study:
U.S. Department of the Army - Corps of Engineers
U.S. Coast Guard (Fifth District)
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Raleigh
U.S. Geological Survey - Raleigh
N.C. Department of Administration - State Clearinghouse
N.C. Department of Cultural Resources
rv
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
N.C. Department of Human Resources
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
Gates County
Hertford County
Peanut Belt Rural Planning Organization
Town of Winton
G. Contact Information
The following person may be contacted for additional information concerning this proposal
and statement:
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph. D., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
NC Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
[phone]
v
US 13-158
From US 158/NC 45 Near Winton to US 158 at Tarheel
Hertford and Gates Counties
State Project 35488.1.1
TIP Project R-2507A
1. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
A. General Description
The proposed project involves widening a section of US 13-158 between
US 158/NC 45 near Winton in Hertford County and US 158 in Tarheel in Gates County from
two to four lanes. An expressway type facility is recommended for this project. The
proposed project is approximately 7.1 miles long (Figure 1).
It is anticipated approximately 200 feet of right of way will be required for the
project. Partial control of access (one access per parcel with no other access) will be
obtained. All intersecting roadways will cross US 13-158 at-grade, no grade separations or
interchanges are proposed, with one exception. The exception is construction of an
interchange at the intersection of US 13 and US 158/NC 45 north of Winton.
B. Historical Resume and Project Status
TIP Project R-2507A is programmed as widening US 13-158 to a multi-lane facility
from US 158/NC 45 near Winton to US 158 in Tarheel in Hertford/Gates Counties. This is a
state-funded project. A state environmental assessment was prepared in 1993 for all of
R-2507, from SR 1457 to the Virginia State Line, but the project lost funding and no further
work was performed. R-2507A is the only portion of R-2507 currently funded.
Project studies were restarted in December 2005. TIP Project R-2507A is included in
the 2009-2015 North Carolina State Transportation Improvement Program, with right of way
acquisition scheduled for state fiscal year 2011 and construction scheduled for state fiscal
year 2014. This schedule is subject to change based on the availability of funding.
C. Cost Estimates
The cost estimate for the project included in the 2009-2015 State Transportation
Improvement Program is as follows:
Right of Way Acquisition $ 6,000,000
Mitigation $ 2,030,000
Construction $48,600,000
Total Estimated Cost $56,630,000
Current cost estimates for the project are shown in Table 1 below.
TABLE 1
PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Construction $50,400,000
Right of Way Acquisition $3,078,000
Utility Relocation $1,159,600
Wetland/Stream Mitigation $2,172,000
Total $56,809,600
11. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR PROPOSED PROJECT
A. Purpose for Proiect
The purpose of the proposed project is to reduce traffic congestion and improve travel
time and safety along US 13-158 in the project area.
B. Need for Project
1. Description of Existing Conditions
a. Functional Classification
Both US 13 and US 158 are classified as rural principal arterials in the North Carolina
Functional Classification System. This section of US 13-158 is part of two Strategic
Highway Corridors. Corridor Number 37 follows US 158 from Winston-Salem to Kitty
Hawk/Nags Head and Corridor Number 53 follows US 13 and other routes from Wilmington
to Norfolk, Virginia. The vision for this section of US 13-158 is that it would be a freeway.
b. Physical Description of Existing Facility
1) Roadway Cross-Section
Existing US 13-158 is a two-lane roadway within the project area. Travel lanes are
approximately 12 feet wide. Shoulder widths vary from 6 feet to 8 feet.
2) Right of Way and Access Control
Right of way widths along existing US 13-158 in the project area vary. Existing right
of way on US 13 from south of US 158/NC 45 near Winton to the Chowan River is
approximately 320 feet. Control of access and right of way for an interchange exists at the
US 13 intersection with US 158/NC 45 near Winton. Existing right of way on US 13-158 is
60 feet wide from the Chowan River to US 158 in Tarheel. No control of access exists along
this portion of US 13-158.
3) Speed Limit
The speed limit along existing US 13-158 in the project area is 55 MPH.
4) Intersections
All intersections along existing US 13-158 in the project area are at-grade. No
interchanges are located along the roadway.
5) Structures
Two major structures exist along US 13-158 in the project area. These structures are
described in Table 2 below.
TABLE 2
EXISTING STRUCTURES
Clear Rdwy. Suff.
Bridge No. Carries/Crosses Length
Width Rating.*
32 Chowan River 40 feet 1,121 feet 71.8
Buckhom Creek/
9
Run Swamp 28 feet 84 feet 50.3
* - Sufficiency Rating (out of 100 possible points).
6) Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
NC Bike Routes 3 Alternate and 4 are signed along US 13-158 from US 158/NC 45
near Winton to NC 137 in Gates County (Figure 1).
7) Utilities
The following utilities are located within the project limits:
• Fiber-optic cable is on both sides of US 13-158
• Gas line is on the west side of US 13-158
• Telephone line is on the east side of US 13-158
• Water and sewer lines are on US 158 in vicinity of US 13 near Winton
• Power lines are in various locations throughout project
c. School Bus Usage
Five school buses use existing US 13-158 in the project area in Gates County daily.
Six school buses cross US 13 at the US 158/NC 45 intersection in Hertford County.
3
d. Traffic Carrying Capacity
1) Traffic Volumes
Traffic volumes for existing US 13-158 within the project area were estimated for the
years 2006 and 2030. In the year 2006, traffic volumes along existing US 13-158 ranged
between 6,800 and 8,600 vehicles per day. In 2030, traffic along this route is expected to
range between 12,500 and 15,400 vehicles per day. Figures 4A and 4B depict the estimated
average daily traffic volumes for the years 2006 and 2030 along roadways in the project area.
Trucks make up between 20 to 21 percent of the total traffic.
2) Levels of Service
The effectiveness of a roadway to service traffic demand is measured in terms of level
of service. Level of service is a qualitative measure describing the ability of a facility to carry
traffic and how individual users perceive traffic conditions. It is based on factors of speed,
travel time, comfort, maneuverability, interruptions, convenience and safety. Levels of
Service range from "A" to "F", with "A" representing free flow (ideal conditions), and "F"
representing forced or breakdown flow (undesirable conditions).
A transportation facility is considered to be operating at capacity when it is just able
to accommodate the traffic demand. Once the traffic demand exceeds the facility's capacity
(LOS E), excessive delays occur.
- Traffic capacity analyses were conducted for the existing roadway along US 13-158
for the years 2006 and 2030. As Figure 5B shows, portions of existing US 13-158 in the
project area will operate at capacity (level of service E) in the year 2030.
e. Accident Data
A crash study was conducted for existing US 13-158 within the project area. Between
October 1, 2002 and September 30, 2005, 134 crashes occurred along these routes within the
project area. Of these accidents, four were fatal with a total of seven fatalities. Injuries
occurred in 76 of the crashes. Table 3 below presents the results of this crash study.
TABLE 3
ACCIDENT STUDY
2001-2003

Statewide Crash Rates For 10/2002-9/2005
2002-2005
US 13-158
Rural Two-lane US Critical Rate*
Crashes per 100 MVM
Routes
Total Fatal Total Fatal Total Fatal
171.66 2.24 129.54 3.87 193.37 5.17
*Based on statewide crash rate (95% level of confidence).
4
f. Airports
No airports or other aviation facilities are located within the project area.
g. Projects in the Area
Other STIP projects in the area are (Figure 1):
R-2507B - Widening of US 13, Gates County, from US 158 in Tarheel to SR 1202 (4.2
miles). Both right of way acquisition and construction of this project are unfunded in the
2009-2015 State Transportation Improvement Program.
R-2507C - Widening of US 13, Gates County, from SR 1202 to the Virginia State Line (4.7
miles). Both right of way acquisition and construction of this project are unfunded in the
2009-2015 State Transportation Improvement Program.
R-2583 - Widening of US 158, Hertford County, Murfreesboro Bypass to US 13 West of
Winton (8.3 miles). Right of way acquisition for this project is scheduled for state fiscal year
2011 and construction is scheduled for state fiscal year 2013 in the 2009-2015 State
Transportation Improvement Program.
R-2205 - US 13 Ahoskie Bypass, Hertford County, from NC 42 to US 158 near Winton (14.1
miles). Project development studies for this project are currently underway. Right of way
acquisition for this project is scheduled for state fiscal year 2013 and construction is
unfunded in the 2009-2015 State Transportation Improvement Program.
R-2578 - Widening of US 158, Gates County, US 13 to NC 32 in Sunbury (15 miles). Right
of way acquisition and construction for this project is unfunded in the 2009-2015 State
Transportation Improvement Program.
2. Transportation and Land Use Plans
a. Strategic Highway Corridors
This section of US 13-158 is part of two Strategic Highway Corridors. Corridor
Number 37 follows US 158 from Winston-Salem to Kitty Hawk/Nags Head and Corridor
Number 53 follows US 13 and other routes from Wilmington to Norfolk, Virginia. The
Strategic Highway Corridors Vision Plan designates this section of US 13-158 as a freeway.
b. Local Thoroughfare Plans
The 1992 Hertford County Thoroughfare Plan shows widening of US 13-158 to
multi-lanes. Gates County does not have a thoroughfare plan. The widening of US 13-158 is
part of Gates County's growth strategy. Therefore, the subject project is consistent with local
thoroughfare plans.
c. Land Use Plan
Hertford County and Gates County are both North Carolina Coastal Area
Management Act (LAMA) Counties. Hertford County is in the process of updating their
1996-1997 CAMA Land Use Plan, but the update was not available at the time of this
assessment. Gates County has a Future Land Use Plan map (dated January 6, 2005), which is
part of the CAMA Land Use Plan. Gates County's Future Land Use Plan was updated in
November 2007.
C. Benefits of Proposed Project
The proposed project is expected to reduce congestion and improve safety on
US 13-158.
1. Traffic Volumes with Project
Traffic volumes for existing US 13-158 within the project area were estimated for the
year 2030. In the year 2030, it is estimated that traffic volumes along existing US 13-158
will range between 12,500 and 15,400 vehicles per day. Figure 4B depicts the estimated
average daily traffic volumes for the year 2030 along roadways in the project area.
2. Levels of Service with Project
A traffic capacity analysis was conducted for the project for the year 2030. The
project will operate at level of service A in the year 2030. Figure 6 depicts the estimated
level of service for 2030 along US 13-158 in the project area with construction of the
proposed project.
3. Safety
By increasing the number of lanes on US 13-158, the proposed project will have a
positive impact on vehicular safety. The proposed project will likely make it safer for large
trucks and local traffic. The proposed dual lanes in each direction will allow faster traffic to
pass slower moving vehicles without using the opposing traffic lane.
Emergency response time should improve with construction of the project. By
reducing the congestion on US 13-158, emergency vehicles traveling within or through this
area would likely have a reduction in emergency response time.
III. ALTERNATIVES
A. Preliminarv Studv Alternatives
1. Alternative Modes of Transportation
a. Travel Demand Management (TDM)
Travel Demand Management (TDM) strategies include staggered work hours and
ridesharing. Given the predominately rural nature of the project area, it is not expected that
adjustments to work schedules or ridesharing would substantially reduce the peak hour traffic
volumes within the study area.
b. Mass Transit
Choanoke Public Transit Authority (CPTA) provides public transportation to
Hertford County. CPTA operates a dial-a-ride service throughout Hertford County from
8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. Riders are required to make reservations the
day before their trip. CPTA also provides transportation for out of county medical trips.
Gates County Inter-Regional Transportation System (GITS) provides public
transportation to Gates County. GITS will provide transportation for any county resident to
various appointments. The hours of operation are 5:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. Monday through
Friday and Saturday upon request. GITS utilizes fixed routes and makes on-demand trips.
There are regularly scheduled trips daily to Ahoskie, Edenton and a limited number of cities in
Virginia.
Inter-city bus service is not available to Gates County. The nearest bus station is in
Ahoskie.
Given the predominantly rural nature of the project area, improvements to public
transportation or implementation of inter-city bus service are unlikely to result in substantial
reductions in the amount of traffic along US 13-158 in the project area.
2. Transportation System Management (TSM)
Transportation system management activities, such as intersection improvements,
signing or traffic signalization improvements would potentially improve safety along existing
US 13-158. However, such improvements would not sufficiently meet the project purpose of
reducing congestion on US 13-158.
3. "No-Build" Alternative
The No-Build Alternative would not provide any substantial improvements to
US 13-158 within the study area; only typical maintenance activities would occur. The
No-Build Alternative would not meet the purpose and need of the project.
4. Widen Existing US 13-158
Widening existing US 13-158 would reduce traffic congestion and improve travel
time and safety along US 13-158 in the project area. The proposed project was divided into
eight sections and both east side and west side widening were considered. The eight sections
are described below:
Section 1 - US 158/NC 45 to Powell Lane
Section 2 - Powell Lane to just north of SR 1128 (Barfield Road)
Section 3 - Just north of SR 1128 to approximately 0.4 mile north of SR 1128
Section 4 - Approximately 0.4 mile north of SR 1128 to NC 137/SR 1200
Section 5 - NC 137/SR 1200 to approximately 0.5 mile north of NC 137/SR 1200
Section 6 - Approximately 0.5 mile north of NC 137/SR 1200 to north of SR 1228
(Barfield Road)
Section 7 - North of SR 1228 to north of SR 1122 (Hill Lane Road)
Section 8 - North of SR 1122 to US 158
Table 4 below compares the impacts of east and west side widening for each section.
TABLE 4
PRELIMINARY WIDENING ALTERNATIVE COMPARISONS
Wetlands Streams Homes Businesses
Section Alternative (Acres) (Feet) Relocated Relocated
i, East Side
'
fi
r, ab ,t i4'
i "
W
deni 20 99 : 428
, . _ = 0 p
1 i
r
West Side
16.73 428 0 0
Widening
East Side
5.75 0 0 1 church
Widening
2
West Side
gK J
l??
2
{y

Widen
n 63
, Q,
i
g ,

East Side jj;
'
W
d
ni 1 41,
1
'
' t al
,
3 r
e
ng,' i,v
,.,;t.•
. ,k l
West Side
2.46 0 0 0
Widening
4
tEast Side',J
t 4 i? Y
N
0
5
Afi--`
,a " t H
a,r a ! k
I
W
d
nin
I
,S
97 tO,

4 r
e
g
West Side
4
84 0 0 0
Widening .
East Side
0 0 1 1
Widening
5
J
4 WestSidek v1h, y J.
?, t? ?a , t tI
J
,, ' { S i ,

? {,•f?
lMUM ,,, 4t{

?`????
tai
W
denin O 0
r
g
v
East Side
0.35 0 0 0
Widening
6
West Side ? ' ?e
' r

W
d
ni ?0 28 0
'' ? 0
i
e
n
East Side
0 0 4 2
7 Widenin
West 'Side,
' 7
l,
.Wldemll " ia.l.,
East Side
0
3 0 2 1
Widening .
8
s ,West Sides r{', W
?
3
?r??
ss st t
a
,,
d (ate '
'""-l"
4e:
=
?; ,i5
Wrdemn t
t
6
0 p
l't! 3 1
J
'
?
W - ? Y . , x ,!
"
?dShaded rows indicate alternatives which were dropped from further
consideration by the NEPA/404 merger team. (Section VI-C)
The NEPA/404 merger team agreed to a widening alternative for each of the project
sections, based on anticipated impacts to wetlands, streams, homes and businesses. The
selected widening alternative for each section is presented below:
Section 1 - West side widening
Section 2 - East side widening
Section 3 - West side widening
Section 4 - West side widening
B. Detailed Studv Alternative
Section 5 - East Side widening
Section 6 - East side widening
Section 7 - East side widening
Section 8 - East side widening
As stated previously, a widening alternative was selected for each of the eight project
sections. Based on anticipated impacts to wetlands, streams, homes, businesses and historic
properties, one project alternative was chosen. The impacts of the detailed study alternative
are shown in Table 5 below.
TABLE 5
DETAILED STUDY ALTERNATIVE
Residential Relocatees 7 Effect on Historic Properties? Yes
Business Relocatees 5 Receptors Impacted By Traffic 14
Noise
Wetlands Affected (Ac.) 30.97 Forested Areas Affected (Ac.) 170.23
(Delineated) i?
Stream Impacts (Ft.) 598 Farmland Affected (Ac.) 37.65
Protected Species Habitat? Yes j Total Length (Miles) 7.1
Effect on Protected Species? No Effect Total Cost (Millions) $56.8096
* Property actually being farmed; not necessarily prime and important farmland, which will
be taken by the current design of the alternate.
IV. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
A. Roadway Cross-Section and Alignment
The proposed cross-section is four 12-foot lanes with a median and 10-foot grassed
shoulders. A 46-foot median is proposed for the project except at the Chowan River, where a
30-foot median is proposed. Six-foot paved outside shoulders are proposed to accommodate
bicycles between US 158/NC 45 near Winton to NC 137. Four-foot paved outside shoulders
are proposed from NC 137 to US 158 in Tarheel. An expressway type of design is proposed
for this project. The proposed typical sections are shown on Figures 3A and 3B.
B. Right of Wav and Access Control
A right of way width of 200-feet is proposed for the project. This right of way width
is sufficient to accommodate a four-lane roadway with a 46-foot median, although temporary
easements may be required outside the proposed right of way in some areas. Partial control
of access will be obtained along the proposed roadway. Access will be limited to one per
10
parcel with no other access, although additional access points may be provided for larger
properties. The location of access points will be determined during the design phase of the
project.
The strategic highway corridor vision for this section of US 13-158 is a freeway (full
control of access). A freeway facility was considered for this project. Due to the impacts to
adjacent properties and the resulting increase in cost, partial control of access will be
implemented instead of full control of access. This project is considered a step towards the
ultimate implementation of the freeway vision for this strategic highway corridor.
C. Speed Limit
A posted speed limit of 55 MPH is anticipated.
D. Design Speed
A 60 MPH design speed is proposed for the project. This design speed is consistent
with the expected 55 MPH speed limit.
E. Anticipated Design Exceptions
It is anticipated no design exceptions will be required for this project.
F. Intersections/Interchanges
Except for the southern terminus, all intersections will be at-grade, with the side
streets being stop-sign controlled. Traffic signals are not proposed at any intersections within
the project area. Directional crossovers with median u-turns will be provided at intersections.
An interchange is proposed at the intersection of US 13 and US 158/NC 45 near
Winton. Ramps are proposed in the northwest and southwest quadrants of the interchange
and a loop and ramp is proposed in the southeast quadrant. US 158 will be carried over
US 13 on a bridge. SR 1218 (Industrial Park Road) and entrance roads to subdivisions in the
northeast and northwest quadrants of the interchange will be relocated and tied in to either
US 158 or NC 45. to provide access to these properties.
G. Service Roads
There are no service roads planned for this project.
H. Railroad Crossings
There are no railroad crossings on the project.
1. Structures
,Table 6 below presents the structures proposed for the project.
11
TABLE 6
PROPOSEDSTRUCTURES
Stream Location Existing
Structure Recommendation
Retain existing bridge.
Chowan River 0.7 mile north or Bridge No. 32 Construct new 1,121-foot
junction w/ US 158 1,121 feet in length long bridge with a 36-foot
clear roadway width.
Buckhom Creek/ 0.05 mile south of Bridge No. 9 Replace with dual bridges,
Run Swamp junction of SR 84 feet in length 110-foot long with a 36-
1128 foot clear roadway width.
The Chowan River in the project area is classified as navigable water under Section
10 of the Rivers and Harbor Act. The proposed new structure will maintain the same vertical
and horizontal clearances over the river as the existing structure. A bridge permit will be
required from the Coast Guard and a Section 10 permit will be required from the US Army
Corps of Engineers for the proposed new structure over the Chowan River.
Fifty-four inch rails will be provided on the outside of proposed bridges in order to
accommodate bicycles. The rails on the east side of the existing bridge over the Chowan
River will be retrofitted to accommodate bicycles. An eight-foot outside shoulder will be
provided on the proposed new bridges in order to accommodate bicycles, as well.
J. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
A six-foot paved outside shoulder is proposed for the portion of US 13-158 signed as
NC Bike Routes 3A and 4 (US 158 near Winton to NC 137). This wider shoulder is
proposed due to the high speed traffic and large number of trucks on US 13-158 in the project
area. On the outside 54-inch rails and eight-foot shoulders will be provided on proposed
bridges in order to accommodate bicycles.
K. Utilities
Utilities along the project will be relocated prior to construction. Care will be taken
to prevent damage to water and sewer lines and fiber-optic cables in the area.
L. Landscaping
No special landscaping is proposed for this project. Shoulder areas will be seeded
with grass.
M. Noise Barriers
No noise barriers are proposed along this project (Section V-I).
12
V. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF PROPOSED ACTION
A. Natural Resources
1. Biotic Resources
a. Terrestrial Communities
Eight terrestrial communities were identified within the project area: Coastal Plain
Bottomland Hardwood Forest (blackwater subtype), Cypress-Gum Swamp (blackwater
subtype), Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp (blackwater subtype), Mixed Hardwood-Pine
Forest, Pine Plantation - Successional Pine Forest, Pine/Scrub Oak Sandhill, Cropland and
Maintained-Disturbed.
The Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood forest community makes up most of the
Chowan River floodplain within the project area. In the past, the majority of the floodplain
was probably a gum-cypress swamp but much of it is now dominated by red maple, likely the
result of timbering. Other tree and shrub species present in the bottomland hardwood forest
community include American elm, overcup oak, swamp tupelo, loblolly pine, sweet
pepperbush, sweet bay and highbush blueberry. Vines present include laurel greenbriar and
poison ivy. The herbaceous layer is sparse and includes species such as netted chainfern,
cinnamon fern and green arrow arum. Much of the community within the project area is
jurisdictional wetland.
The Cypress-Gum Swamp community is associated with parts of the Chowan River
floodplain and with flats between the river and the NC 137 intersection. The swamp forest is
diverse, consisting of shrub and tree species that include bald and pond cypress, water tupelo,
black willow, red maple, Carolina ash, sweet pepperbush and the occasional Atlantic white
cedar. Vines and herbaceous species present include greenbriar, woolgrass and cinnamon
fern. The entire community within the project area is jurisdictional wetland.
The Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp community is found along the floodplain
for Buckhorn Creek, a small blackwater stream. Trees and shrubs that characterize this
community include bald cypress, red maple, American holly and sweet pepperbush. The vine
and herb layer.consists of netted chain fern, coastal dogbobble, giant cane, poison ivy and
soft rush. The entire community within the project area is jurisdictional wetland.
The Mixed Hardwood-Pine forest community type encompasses both dry and wet
sites and is scattered throughout the project area. Dominant tree and shrub species include
loblolly pine, sweet gum, tulip poplar, red maple, white oak, water oak, black gum, sourwood
and witch hazel. On wetter sites, other species such as redbay, sweet bay, wax myrtle and
coastal doghobble are more common. Vines and herbs typical of this community include
muscadine grape, greenbriar, cross-vine, bracken fern and giant cane. Portions of this
community are within jurisdictional wetlands.
13
The Pine Plantation - Successional Pine forest community is moderately open to
dense loblolly pine stands that range in age from 10 to 50 years. Trees may either be planted
or regenerating naturally. The canopy is dominated by loblolly pine, with scattered red maple
and sweet gum individuals in older stands.
The Pine/Scrub Oak Sandhill community is found at the NC 137 intersection and is
a remnant of an unusual geomorphic feature known as the Chowan Sand Banks, which runs
from Gates County northward into Virginia. The Natural Heritage Program recognizes the
sand banks as a significant natural heritage area because it is the northernmost area with
sandhills type vegetation and contains an extensive stand of old growth loblolly pine.
Longleaf pine also occurs in this habitat, although few still remain in the project area. In
addition to the pines, hardwoods such as southern red oak, turkey oak, American beech,
southern magnolia and sassafras are found in this community.
The Cropland community represents agricultural fields within the project area that
are currently under cultivation.
The Maintained - Disturbed community encompasses various types of habitats that
have recently been or are currently impacted by human disturbance. This community consists
primarily of roadside shoulders, cut-over areas, maintained lawns and utility easements.
These are habitats that are either regularly maintained or are currently in a low-growing, early
successional state. Herbaceous species expected in these communities include fescue,
ryegrass, horseweed, dogfennel, dandelion, poison ivy, Japanese honeysuckle and greenbrier.
In wetter areas, species such as woolgrass, cattail and beakrush are also expected. Shrubs,
saplings and trees from surrounding habitats may also be present in these communities.
Portions of this community are within jurisdictional wetlands.
Faunal Component - Many animal species are highly adaptive and may utilize all
biotic communities previously discussed. Maintained roadsides and residential communities
adjacent to forested tracts provide foraging and cover areas. Forested areas provide forage
and cover for wildlife dependent on mature forests with mast producing hardwoods. Many
opportunistic species use both habitats to find food and shelter. White-tailed deer and marsh
rabbit were seen in the project study area. Other mammals expected include the gray fox,
black bear, southeastern shrew and Virginia opossum. Reptiles and amphibians observed or
heard in the project area include the copperhead, black racer; eastern fence lizard, southern
cricket frog, southern leopard frog and carpenter frog. Other reptiles and amphibians
expected in this area are the cottonmouth, ground skink, marbled salamander and the
southern toad.
Many bird species were observed or heard within and around the project area,
examples include: pileated woodpecker, downy woodpecker, yellow-throated warbler,
Swainson's warbler, prothonotary warbler, red-eyed vireo, osprey and the northern bobwhite.
14
b. Aquatic Communities
Numerous anadromous fish species use the Chowan River. The primary anadromous
species expected to occur in these waters are blueback herring, alewife, American shad,
hickory shad and striped bass. Other species found in the Chowan River include largemouth
bass, bluegill, channel catfish, lake chubsucker and tessalated darter. These fish feed on a
variety of living and organic matter including other fish, algae, insects, wonns, crustaceans,
snails and detritus.
No in-water work will be performed in the Chowan River between February 15`h and
June 15th, due to the presence of anadromous fish. In addition, NCDOT's Stream Crossing
Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage will apply to the Chowan River crossing.
In addition to the Chowan River, there is a crossing of Buckhorn Creek in the project
area. Buckhorn Creek is an example of a small, coastal swamp stream, which can support a
wide variety of fish species due to the complex habitat structure provided by underwater tree
roots and leaf and branch litter. Fish species likely to occur in these waters include mud
sunfish, eastern mudminnow, swamp darter, golden shiner and the bluespotted sunfish. Other
animals likely present include several of the previously mentioned amphibian species and
some of the mammalian species that inhabit both aquatic and terrestrial communities.
c. Summary of Anticipated Effects
Project construction will have various impacts to the previously described terrestrial
and aquatic communities. Table 7 presents the expected effects of the project on terrestrial
communities.
15
TABLE 7
PROJECT EFFECTS ON TERRESTRIAL COMMUNITIES
Community Area (acres)
Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwoods 16.93
Cypress-Gum Swam 7.38
Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp 1.22
Mixed Hardwood-Pine Forest 23.49
Pine Plantation-Successional Pine Forest 16.32
Pine/Scrub Oak Sandhill 2.17
Agriculture 12.55
Maintained-Disturbed 29.49
Total Area: 109.55
* Figures presented are one-third the amount of each community within the
study area.
2. Waters of the United States
Wetlands and surface waters fall under the broad category of "Waters of the United
States" as defined in 33 CFR§328.3 and in accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). These waters are regulated by the US Army Corps of
Engineers. Any action that proposes to dredge or place fill material into surface waters or
wetlands falls under these provisions.
a. Streams, Rivers, Impoundments
The project is located in the Chowan River basin (sub basin 03-01-01, HUC
03010203). Besides the Chowan River, three jurisdictional streams occur in the project area,
Buckhorn Creek, an unnamed tributary to Folly Branch (S 1), and an unnamed tributary to
Jady Branch (S2). (Table 8) %
No water resources classified as High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-1
or WS-1I), or Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) are located within one mile of the project
study area.
TABLE 8
STREAMS WITHIN THE PROJECT STUDY AREA
Stream Intermittent/Perennial Status
S-1 Perennial
Chowan River Perennial
Buckhom Creek Perennial
S-2 Perennial
16
b. Wetlands
Jurisdictional wetlands are also present in the study corridor. Wetland sites in the
project area are presented below. (Table 9)
TABLE 9
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS IN PROJECT AREA
Wetland Riverine/Non-
Riverine NWI* Class Wetland
Rating Impact
(Acres)
WNEla Non-Riverine PF02B 18 1.92
WNElb Non-Riverine PEMIA 18 0.02
WNEI Riverine PF01C 69 6.89
WSEI Riverine PFO1C 69 0.34
WSEld Non-Riverine PFOIA/PEM1F 22 0.06
WNE2a Non-Riverine PFOIA 18 0.16
WNE2 Riverine PF06F 30 5.05
WSE2 Riverine PF06F 30 2.63
WSE3a Non-Riverine PFOIAA 18 0.02
WSE3c Non-Riverine PF0I/4A 18 1.01
WSE3d Non-Riverine PFOIA 18 0.21
WSE3e Non-Riverine PF01A 18 1.87
WSE3f Non-Riverine PFO1/4A 18 0.68
WNE3a Non-Riverine PFO1/4A 18 0.52
WNE3b Non-Riverine PF06F 24 0.02
WNE3c Non-Riverine PF06F 24 0.51
WNE3d Non-Riverine PF01F 24 0.22
WB Riverine PF06C 55 1.19
WBb Non-Riverine PEM2B 18 0.15
WNE4 Riverine PF0I/4C 22 0.59
WSE4 Riverine PFOIC 22 0.17
WNE5 Riverine PF06C 22 1.61
WSE5a Non-Riverine PF0I/4A 18 0.10
WNE6 Riverine PSS1C 20 2.71
WSE6 Non-Riverine PF0I/4C 16 0.61
WSE6b Non-Riverine PSS1C 20 1.15
WSE7 Non-Riverine PF01A 18 0.30
WNE8 Riverine PF01A 46 0.26
TOTAL Non-Riverine = 9.53 ac Riverine = 21.44 ac
17
c. Summary of Anticipated Effects
Project construction cannot be accomplished without infringing on wetlands and
surface waters. Table 10 below presents anticipated project effects on wetlands and streams
(Figure 7).
TABLE 10
WETLAND/STREAM IMPACTS OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVES
Wetlands Affected (Delineated) 30.97 ac.
Stream Impacts 598 ft.
d. Avoidance, Minimization, Mitigation
Given the number of streams and wetlands in the project area, total avoidance of
surface waters and wetlands by this project is not feasible.
The alternative for the project has been retained because it has lower impacts on
wetlands and streams. The project alignment has been developed to minimize impacts to
wetlands and streams within the corridor. Additional minimization measures will be
considered as the project progresses.
It is expected that wetland and stream mitigation will be required for the project.
Final decisions regarding wetland and stream mitigation requirements will be made by the
US Army Corps of Engineers and the NC Division of Water Quality. On-site mitigation will
be used as much as possible. The Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) will be used for
remaining mitigation requirements beyond what can be satisfied by on-site mitigation.
e. Anticipated Permit Requirements
The proposed project will likely require an Individual Section 404 Permit from the
US Army Corps of Engineers. Final permit decisions rest with the US Army Corps of
Engineers.
This project will also require a 401 Water Quality Certification from the NC Division
of Water Quality prior to issuance of the Individual 404 Permit. A state stormwater permit
may also be required.
This project may require a CAMA permit from the NC Division of Coastal
Management. If a CAMA permit is required, a CAMA Major Development permit will be
required.
A bridge permit will be required from the Coast Guard and a Section 10 permit will
be required from the US Army Corps of Engineers for the proposed new structure over the
Chowan River. The Coast Guard permit cannot be issued until the Section 401 Water
Quality Certification and the Certification of Consistency with the Coastal Zone Management
Act is received.
18
3. Rare and Protected Species
a. Federally-Protected Species
Plants and animals with a federal classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of
Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.
As of January 2008, the US Fish and Wildlife Service lists two species under federal
protection for Gates and Hertford Counties. These species are listed in Table 11.
TABLE 11
FEDERALLY-PROTECTED SPECIES LISTED
FOR GATES AND HERTFORD COUNTIES
Federal Biological
Common Name Scientific Name County Habitat
Status Conclusion
Alligator Threatened
American alligator Gates Yes N/A
misstssi iensis (S/A)
Red-cockaded Gates &
Picoides borealis Endangered Yes No Effect
woodpecker Hertford
The US Fish and Wildlife Service lists the American alligator as Threatened to
protect those endangered animals whose skin has a similar appearance. The American
alligator is not biologically endangered or threatened and is not subject to Section 7
consultation. Suitable habitat for the American alligator occurs within the project area.
Aerial surveys conducted in 2000 identified three red-cockaded woodpecker clusters
(two active, one inactive) within one-half mile of the study area. All were near the
US 13-158 and NC 137 intersection. According to the Natural Heritage Program database, a
red-cockaded woodpecker was observed in the southeast quadrant of this intersection in 1995
and in the northwest quadrant in 2000.
Surveys of potential red-cockaded woodpecker nesting and foraging habitat within
one-half mile of the project area were performed in May and August of 2007. No
red-cockaded woodpeckers were observed or heard. During the surveys, it was discovered
that much of the nesting habitat where the three clusters were found in the earlier survey,had
been either clear cut or thinned and allowed to regenerate a thick understory. A.stand of old
growth loblolly pine still remains in the southeast quadrant of the US 13-158 and NC 137
intersection; however, the understory is thick with invading hardwoods and its suitability as
red-cockaded woodpecker nesting habitat has decreased. One relic nesting cavity was found
in this stand. There is also a strip of older loblolly pines between SR 1200 and an
agricultural field in the northeast quadrant of the intersection. One inactive nest cavity was
found in this area, also.
Since no red-cockaded woodpeckers or active cavities were observed within one-half
mile of the project area and nesting habitat within the project area has decreased or been
19
appreciably degraded, it can be concluded that the project will not affect this endangered
species.
b. Federal Species of Concern/State Protected Species
Federal Species of Concern (FSC) are not legally protected under the Endangered
Species Act and are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are
formally proposed or listed as Threatened or Endangered. Table 12 includes FSC species
listed for Gates and Hertford Counties and their state classifications. Organisms that are
listed as State Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Special Concern (SC) on the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant and Animal Species are afforded state
protection under the State Endangered Species Act and the North Carolina Plant Protection
and Conservation Act of 1979. However, the level of protection given to state-listed species
does not apply to NCDOT activities.
TABLE 12
FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN IN GATES AND HERTFORD COUNTIES

Common Name
Scientific Name Habitat NC Counties of
Present Rank Occurrence
American eel Anguilla rostrata Yes None Gates, Hertford
Ammodramus henslowii
Eastern Henslow's sparrow No SR Gates
susurrans
Black-throated green warbler

Coastal Plain population) Dendroica virens waynei Yes SR Gates
Rafinesque's big-eared bat Corynorhinus rafinesquii

(Coastal Plain subspecies)
macrotis Yes T Gates
Southeastern m otis Myotis austrori arius Yes SC Gates
Chowanoke crayfish Orconectes virginiensis Yes SC Hertford
Grassleaf arrowhead Sagittaria weatherbiana Yes SR-T Gates
Ponds ice Litsea aestivalis No SR-T Gates
Raven's boxseed* Ludwigia ravenii Yes SR-T Gates
Virginia least trillium Trillium pusillum var. Yes E Gates
virginianum
Sources: Franklin and Finnegan, eds., 2006; LeGrand et. al., eds., 2006
Key: T = Threatened, E = Endangered, SC = Special Concern, SR = Significantly Rare
* indicates Historic Record
No FSC species were observed during any of the site visits. The Natural Heritage
Program has a recorded occurrence of grassleaf arrowhead within the project area, near the
Chowan River bridge in Gates County; however, as it was recorded more than 50 years ago,
this observation is considered historic.
4. Soils
Information about soils in the project area is based on soils mapping for Hertford
County (USDA 1984) and Gates County (USDA 1996).
20
TABLE 13
SOILS IN THE PROJECT AREA
Soil Map
Symbol Map Unit Name Hydric Slope % Drainage Class
AaB Alaga sand Yes 0-5 Well drained
BaA Ballahack loam Yes 0-2 Very poorly drained
BnA Bladen loam Yes 0-2 Poorly drained
CrA Craven fine sandy loam No 0-1 Moderately well drained
CrB Craven fine sandy loam Yes 1-4 Moderately well drained
CrD2 Craven fine sandy loam,
eroded No 8-12 Moderately well drained
DoA Dorovan mucky peat Yes 0-2 Very poorly drained
ExA Exum very fine sandy loam Yes 0-2 Moderately well drained
GoA Goldsboro fine sandy loam Yes 0-2 Moderately well drained
LeA Lenoir loam Yes 0-2 Somewhat poorly drained
LF Leaf loam Yes 0-2 Poorly drained
Ln Lenoir loam Yes 0-2 Somewhat poorly drained
LoA Leon sand Yes 0-2 Poorly drained
LyA Lynchburg fine sandy loam Yes 0-2 Somewhat poorly drained
PaA Pactolus sand Yes 0-3 Moderately well drained
RaA Rains fine sandy loam Yes 0-2 Poorly drained
RoA Roanoke loam Yes 0-2 Poorly drained
Ud Udorthents, sandy No 0-6 Well drained
WT Winton Yes 12 - 60 Moderately well drained
B. Cultural Resources
The proposed project is subject to North Carolina General Statute 121-12(a) and
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. Although no federal funds
will be used for the construction of the proposed project, the project will require a permit
from the US Army Corps of Engineers. Section 106 applies to federal permit areas along the
project and requires federal agencies to take into account the effect of their undertakings
(federally-funded, licensed, or permitted) on properties included in or eligible for inclusion in
the National Register of Historic Places and to afford the Advisory Council a reasonable
opportunity to comment on such undertakings.
21
1. Historic Architectural Resources
No properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places are located within the
project area of potential effect (APE). One property, the Story Crossroads Historic District
has been placed on the state study list and determined eligible for the National Register.
The State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) requested a historic structures survey
for the project area in a letter dated February 15, 2006 (see Appendix A). Since the lead
Federal Agency is the US Army Corps of Engineers, NCDOT asked for input from the Corps
of Engineers on the permit areas subject to cultural resources review. The Corps of
Engineers recommended the entire project area for Section 106 survey in a letter dated July
26, 2007 (see Appendix A).
NCDOT architectural historians surveyed the APE of the proposed project in 2006.
As a result, two historic properties were identified as eligible for the National Register. They
are the Story Family Farm and Cemetery. The properties are proposed to be included in the
Story's Crossroads Historic District.
The State Historic Preservation Office (HPO) concurred with these eligibility
determinations by their letters dated January 16, 2009 and June 16, 2006 (see Appendix A).
Figures 2 and 7 depict the historic district in the project area.
At a meeting held on May 26, 2009, HPO and NCDOT agreed the project would have
an adverse effect on the historic district. Construction of the project requires acquisition of
right of way and easements and construction activities within the district's boundaries and
impact the historic setting and contributing structures. The Corps of Engineers was informed
about the adverse effect and did not disagree with the effects assessment. A memorandum of
agreement to document the resolution of adverse effects will be completed prior to
completion of the final environmental document for this project.
2. Archaeological Resources
A preliminary archaeological background investigation of the project's area of
potential effect was performed in order to assess the potential impacts of the project on
archaeological resources.
Two previously recorded archaeological sites exist in the vicinity of the project. Prior
to completion of the final environmental document for this project, an intensive
archaeological survey will be conducted to identify and evaluate all archaeological sites
within the project limits, in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800. NCDOT will consult with the
Office of State Archaeology to develop appropriate archaeological survey methodology prior
to conducting this survey.
22
C. Farmland
North Carolina Executive Order Number 96 requires all state agencies to consider the
impact of land acquisition and construction projects on prime farmland soils, as designated
by the US Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS). Land planned or zoned for
urban development is not afforded the same level of preservation as rural, agricultural areas.
A Farmland Conversion Rating Form (Form NRCS-CPA-106) has been completed
for this project (see Appendix). Since this project received a total point value of less than
160 points on the form, this project falls below the NRCS minimum criteria and will not be
evaluated further for farmland impacts.
D. Social Effects
1. Neighborhoods/Communities
The project area is composed of scattered residences, commercial properties and
farms.
2. Relocation of Residences and Businesses
All of the alternatives studied in detail for the proposed project will require the
relocation of homes and businesses. Table 14 below presents relocations required for the
project.
TABLE 14
HOMES AND BUSINESSES TO BE RELOCATED
Minority Owned or
Total
Occupied
Homes 7 3
Businesses 5 1
Appendix B discusses the NCDOT Relocation Assistance Program and presents the
relocation reports for the project alternatives.
3. Title VI
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, prohibits discrimination in
federally assisted programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex or disability.
The project area, Hertford County and Gates County all had a higher percentage of
minorities than North Carolina in 2000. The percentage of minorities within the project area
(52.9 %) was somewhat lower than that of Hertford County (63.9 %), while it was somewhat
higher than that of Gates County (41.5 %).
23
The project area had a lower percentage of people living below the poverty level
(14.2%) than Hertford or Gates Counties (18.3% and 17.0% respectively) in 1999. The
project area and the two counties all had a higher percentage of people living below the
poverty level than North Carolina.
Despite the fact that the percentage of minorities in the project area was substantially
higher than in North Carolina as a whole, it was not out of line with the percentages in
Hertford or Gates Counties, indicating that the project area does not have a disproportionately
high minority population relative to the region. The percentage of people living below
poverty is lower than in Hertford County and Gates County. It does not appear that there are
specific low-income populations or communities in the project area.
Although over 50% of the project area is minority, only 43% of the homes and 25%
of the businesses to be relocated by the project are minority-owned or occupied.
A citizens informational workshop was held for the project on September 11, 2006
(see Section VI-A). This workshop was advertised in local newspapers and newsletters
announcing the workshop were mailed to area property owners.
A public hearing will be held for this project following distribution of this document.
This hearing will be advertised in local newspapers and newsletters announcing the hearing
will be mailed to area residents. Citizen comments will be taken into consideration in the
selection of the preferred alternative.
Through the public involvement program, citizens have been kept informed of the
proposed project. Citizen comments have been considered in the development of the project,
without regard to the race, color, national origin, age, sex or disability of the commenter.
This project is being implemented in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964.
4. Recreational Facilities
The Chowan Swamp Game Lands are located along the Chowan River, adjacent to
US 13-158. These game lands are owned by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission, and are open for hunting, fishing, paddling and other recreational uses. Public
boat access and parking are located south of US 13-158 on the east side of the Chowan River
at the end of SR 1211 (Shoups Landing Road).
5. Other Public Facilities and Services
No schools, fire stations, post offices or other public facilities are located along
US 13-158 in the project area.
24
E. Economic Effects
A widened roadway may make it more likely that new businesses could appear at key
intersections along US 13-158; however, large-scale growth is not anticipated. Relatively
long distances to major urban centers, lack of public sewer service, and sluggish population
growth limits the opportunity for large-scale growth as a result of the project. Most economic
effects will be related to the construction of the new road, which could help the economy
temporarily by creating local jobs.
Businesses along the corridor may be temporarily affected by reduced visibility or
access due to construction activities. Access to all properties along the project will be
maintained during construction. Additionally, four businesses and/or community facilities
may need to be relocated due to the widening of the roadway.
F. Land Use
1. Existing Land Use and Zoning
Much of the land surrounding US 13-158 in the project area is wooded, with scattered
homes and agricultural fields. A few businesses are located along the roadway, as well.
Several active and vacant commercial buildings are located at Tarheel. The Chowan Swamp
Game Land is located along both sides of US 13-158 on the east side of the Chowan River.
2. Future Land Use
The Hertford County CAMA Land Use Plan was adopted in 1997. The plan includes
recommendations to maintain existing land use patterns. The plan established several goals
relating to natural resource protection, management of resources, economic and community
development, and continuing public involvement. This plan also lists several potential
constraints and issues for potential future development within Hertford County, including
soils (due to wetland issues and poor suitability for septic systems) and water quality issues
related to storm water runoff.
According to the plan, the majority of the project area in Hertford County is classified as
"rural with services", while Winton fell into the "municipal jurisdiction" classification. The
plan identified environmentally sensitive areas designated Areas of Environmental Concern
(AEC). Lands that are within public trust AECs (including the Chowan River) are subject to
the issuance of minor CAMA permits for construction activities. Development is limited in
the undeveloped forestlands within 75 feet of the Chowan River. Developments in these
areas are also required to obtain CAMA permits from the County.
The Gates County CAMA Core Land Use Plan Update (2003-2004) was adopted in 2005
by Gates County and the Coastal Resources Commission. The policies, objectives and future
land use map included in the document help to guide the County's decisions about land use
and development. The vision statement included in the document indicates that Gates
County desires to remain a "slow paced, rural area" by balancing residential and commercial
25
uses, protecting the natural environment and discouraging strip development along
state-maintained roads.
According to the land use plan, land uses are divided into six different categories:
Developed and hr-fill Development Areas, Growth and Town-Like Transition Areas, Limited
Growth and Transition Areas, Community Areas, Rural Areas, and Conservation, Open
Space, and Recreation Areas. A majority of the project area falls within the Rural and
Conservation, Open Space, and Recreation area designations. Two Community Areas, or
crossroads communities designated for low density development with some sort of
commercial, public or semi-public use as a focal point, exist along the project. These areas
are Storys (near the intersection of NC 137 and Sandbank Road), and Tarheel near the
northern US 158 intersection. Limited Growth and Transition Areas are shown along
US 13-158 between SR 1201 (Tinkham Road) and Tarheel. Limited Growth and Transition
Areas are defined in the Gates County Future Land Use Map as areas on the fringes of
Growth and Town-like Transition Areas, or on the fringes of Developed and In-fill
Development Areas or Community Areas. Low density residential and/or commercial
developments are likely to occur in these areas.
3. Project Compatibility with Local Plans
This project is generally consistent with existing local land use plans.
G. Indirect and Cumulative Effects
This project is one of several highway projects planned for US 13 and US 158 in the
area (see Section II-B-1-g). A cumulative effect of these projects is that traffic flow and
travel time through the region will be improved. Table 15 below presents the estimated
environmental effects of these other projects in the area.
26
TABLE 15
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF ADJACENT PROJECTS
TIP Project TIP Project TIP Projects TIP Project
R-2583 R-2205 R-2507 B and C R-2578
(US 158 from (US 13 Ahoskie (US 13 from US (US 158 from
Murfreesboro Bypass from NC 158 at Tarheel to 'US 13 at Tarheel
Bypass to 42 to US 158 the Virginia to NC 32)**
US 13) near Winton) State Line)
Detailed
Environmental

Surveys Yes No No No
Complete?
Homes

Relocated 19 31-44* 54 N/A
Businesses

Relocated 2 4-8* 3 N/A
Wetlands

Affected
4.8 24-44*
74.5
N/A
(Acres) (NWI) .
Streams

Affected (Feet) 1,890 2,765-5,002* N/A N/A
No. of Historic
Properties 0 0 3 N/A
Affected
Forested Land
Affected 26 N/A N/A N/A
(Acres)
Project Length 8.1 miles 13.5-18.7* 8.9 miles 15 miles
N/A - Not available.
*Range of impacts of alternatives selected for detailed study. Detailed environmental
surveys have not been completed for R-2205.
**Project is currently unfunded.
It is expected that the cumulative environmental effect of these projects will be
limited to the sum of each project's individual effects. It is not expected that the projects will
have a synergistic effect which would increase the overall cumulative effect beyond each
project's direct effects.
H. Flood Hazard Evaluation
Hertford and Gates Counties are both participants in the National Flood Insurance
Regular Program. The Chowan River and Buckhorn Creek/Run Swamp crossings are both
located within a special 100-year flood hazard zone which is within a limited detailed flood
27
study reach, having a regulated 100-year non-encroachment width regulated as a floodway.
The proposed bridges will provide equivalent or greater conveyance than that of the existing
bridges. Figure 8 shows the approximate limits of the 100-year floodplain for streams in the
project area.
NCDOT will coordinate with the Floodplain Mapping Program (FMP), the delegated
state agency for administering FEMA's National Flood Insurance Program, to determine
whether the Memorandum of Agreement between NCDOT and the FMP is applicable or if
approval of a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and subsequent final Letter of
Map Revision (LOMR) will be required.
This project involves construction activities on or adjacent to a FEMA-regulated
stream. Therefore, NCDOT Division One shall submit sealed as-built construction plans to
the Hydraulics Unit upon completion of project construction, certifying that the drainage
structures and roadway embankment that are located within the 100-year floodplain were
built as shown in the construction plans, both horizontally and vertically.
I. Traffic Noise Analvsis
Traffic noise impacts were determined from the current procedures for the abatement
of highway traffic noise and construction noise found in Title 23 CFR 772, which also
includes provisions for traffic noise abatement measures. When traffic noise impacts are
predicted, examination and evaluation of alternative noise abatement measures must be
considered for reducing or eliminating these impacts. A copy of the unabridged version of
the full technical report entitled Highway Traffic Noise/Construction Noise Analysis can be
viewed in the Transportation Building, I South Wilmington Street, Raleigh.
1. Traffic Noise Impacts and Noise Contours
The maximum number of receptors predicted to become impacted by future traffic
noise is shown in Table 16 below. The table includes those receptors expected to experience
traffic noise impacts by either approaching or exceeding the FHWA Noise Abatement
Criteria or by a substantial increase in exterior noise levels.
TABLE 16
PREDICTED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS BY ALTERNATIVE*
Alternative Homes Impacted Business Impacted
No Build 14 0
Widening 9 0
*Per TNM''2.1 and in accordance with 23 CFR Part 772
The maximum extent of the 72 and 67 dBA noise level contours measured from the
center of the proposed roadway are 78.5 feet and 141.3 feet, respectively.
28
2. Noise Abatement Alternatives
Measures for reducing or eliminating traffic noise impacts were considered for all
impacted receptors in each alternative. Noise abatement measures evaluated include highway
alignment changes, traffic system management measures, buffer acquisition and noise
barriers.
For each of these measures, benefits versus costs, engineering feasibility,
effectiveness and practicability, land use issues and other factors were considered. Benefits
versus costs are evaluated based on cost per benefitted receptor. The cost of noise abatement
is considered reasonable if it does not exceed $35,000 per benefited receptor plus an
incremental increase of $500 per dBA average increase in the predicted exterior noise levels
of the impacted receptors in the area.
a. Traffic System Management Measures
Traffic system management measures are not considered viable for noise abatement
due to the negative impact they would have on the capacity and level of service of the
proposed roadway.
b. Highway Alignment Changes
Substantially changing the highway alignment to minimize noise impacts is not
considered to be.a viable option for this project due to engineering and environmental factors.
c. Buffer Acquisition
Costs to acquire buffer zones for impacted receptors will exceed the NCDOT
abatement cost threshold. Therefore, this abatement measure is unreasonable.
d. Noise Barriers
Noise barriers include three basic types: vegetative barriers, earthen berms and noise
walls. These structures act to diffract, absorb and reflect highway traffic noise. For this
project, the cost of acquiring additional right of way and planting sufficient vegetation is
estimated to exceed the NCDOT abatement threshold. Also, for this project, earthen berms
are not viable abatement measures because the additional right of way, materials and
construction costs are estimated to exceed the NCDOT abatement cost threshold.
This project will maintain partial control of access, meaning that most commercial
establishments and residences will have direct access connections to the proposed project,
and all intersections will be at-grade. Businesses, churches and other related establishments
require accessibility and high visibility. Noise barriers do not allow uncontrolled access, easy
accessibility or high visibility, and would therefore not be acceptable abatement measures for
this project.
29
3. Summary
Based on this preliminary study, traffic noise abatement is not recommended and no
noise abatement measures are proposed. This evaluation completes the highway traffic noise
requirements of Title 23 CFR Part 772. No additional noise analysis will be performed for
this project unless warranted by a substantial change in the project scope, vehicle capacity or
alignment.
In accordance with NCDOT Traffic Noise Abatement Policy, the Federal/State
governments are not responsible for providing noise abatement measures for new
development for which building permits are issued after the Date of Public Knowledge. The
Date of Public Knowledge of the proposed highway project will be the approval date of the
State Finding of No Significant Impact (SFONSI). For development occurring after this date,
local governing bodies are responsible for insuring noise compatible designs are utilized
along the proposed facility.
J. Air Quality Analysis
1. Project Air Quality Effects
This project is located in Hertford and Gates Counties, both of which have been
determined to comply with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The proposed
project is located in attainment areas; therefore, 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93 are not applicable.
This project is not anticipated to create any adverse effects on the air quality of this
attainment area.
2. Mobile Source Air Tonics
Mobile source air toxics (MSATs) are a subset of the 188 air toxics defined by the
Clean Air Act. MSATs are compounds emitted by highway vehicles and non-road
equipment.
This document includes a basic analysis of the likely MSAT emission impacts of this
project. However, project specific health effects of the emission changes associated with the
project alternatives cannot be predicted with available technical tools.
Evaluating the environmental and health impacts from MSATs on a proposed
highway project would involve several key elements, including emissions modeling,
dispersion modeling in order to estimate ambient concentrations resulting from the estimated
emissions, exposure modeling in order to estimate human exposure to the estimated
concentrations, and then final determination of health impacts based on the estimated
exposure. Each of these steps is encumbered by technical shortcomings or uncertain science
that prevent a more complete detenmination of the MSAT health impacts of the proposed
project. Research into the health impacts of MSATs is ongoing.
30
For each alternative, the amount of MSATs emitted is proportional to the vehicle
miles traveled (VMT), assuming other variables such as fleet mix are the same for each
alternative. The VMT estimated for each of the detailed study alternatives will likely be
higher than that for the no-build alternative, because the additional capacity provided by the
project increases the efficiency of the roadway and attracts rerouted trips from elsewhere in
the transportation network. The increased VMT would lead to higher MSAT emissions for
the action alternative along the highway corridor, along with a corresponding decrease in
MSAT emissions along other routes. The emissions increase is offset somewhat by lower
MSAT emission rates due to increased speeds. According to EPA's MOBILE6 emissions
model, emissions of all of the priority MSATs except for diesel particulate matter decrease as
speed increases. The extent to which these speed-related emissions decreases will offset
VMT-related emissions increases cannot be reliably predicted due to the inherent deficiencies
of technical models.
Because the estimated VMT for each of the alternatives is nearly the same, it is
expected there would be no appreciable difference in overall MSAT emissions among the
various alternatives. Also, regardless of the alternative chosen, emissions in the design year
will likely be lower than present levels as a result of EPA's national control programs that are
projected to reduce MSAT emissions by 57 to 87 percent between 2000 and 2020. Local
conditions may differ from these national projections in terms of fleet mix and turnover,
VMT growth rates and local control measures. However, the magnitude of the EPA-
projected reductions is so great (even after accounting for VMT growth) that MSAT
emissions in the.study area are likely to be lower in the future in nearly all cases.
3. Construction Air Quality Effects
During construction of the proposed project, all materials resulting from clearing and
grubbing, demolition or other operations will be removed from the project, burned or
otherwise disposed of by the Contractor. Also during construction, measures will be taken to
reduce the dust generated by construction when the control of dust is necessary for the
protection and comfort of motorists or area residents.
4. Summary
This evaluation completes the assessment requirements for air quality of the 1990
Clean Air Act Amendments, and no additional reports are necessary. The complete project
Air Quality Analysis is available for review in the Transportation Building, I South
Wilmington Street, Raleigh.
K. Hazardous Materials
Six sites potentially containing underground storage tanks (UST) were found to exist
in the project limits. There is the possibility unregulated USTs may exist within the proposed
right of way limits. No landfills were identified within the project limits. There is one
unregulated junkyard and one automotive repair facility within the project limits.
A preliminary site assessment will be performed on sites containing USTs or other
potentially contaminated sites prior to right of way acquisition.
31
VI. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION
A. Citizens Informational Workshop
A citizens informational workshop for the subject project was held on September 11,
2006, in the Hertford County Cooperative Extension Office in Winton. Approximately 45
citizens attended. Maps showing the project were displayed and NCDOT staff were available
to answer questions and receive comments regarding the project. Comment sheets were
provided for citizens to write down their questions or remarks.
Few people attending the workshop were opposed to the project. Most of the
comments made were concerning the project's effect on individual properties. Several
attendees were concerned about the project being presented to the public and not being built.
A previous workshop was held in February 1992.
Comments and concerns of citizens have been taken into consideration during the
development of alternatives for the proposed widening.
B. Public Hearing
A public hearing for this project will be held following distribution of this document.
Comments received at the public hearing will be taken into consideration as project
development continues.
C. NEPA/404 Merger Process
This project has followed the NEPA/404 merger process. The merger process is an
interagency procedure integrating the regulatory requirements of Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act into the National Environmental Policy Act or State Environmental Policy Act
decision-making processes.
32
Representatives of the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDOT served as co-chairs
for the merger team. The following agencies also participated on the NEPA/404 merger team
for this project:
US Fish and Wildlife Service
US. Environmental Protection Agency
National Marine Fisheries Service
NC Department of Cultural Resources
NC Division of Marine Fisheries
NC Division of Water Quality
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
NC Division of Coastal Management
The merger team has concurred on the purpose and need, alternatives to be studied in
detail and wetlands/streams to be bridged.
The merger team will select the least environmentally damaging preferred alternative
for the project following the public hearing. The team will also concur on further avoidance
and minimization measures for the project.
D. Agency Coordination
NCDOT has coordinated with appropriate federal, state, and local agencies
throughout the project planning study. Comments on the project have been requested from
the agencies listed below. Asterisks indicate a response was received. Copies of the
comments received are included in Appendix A.
U.S. Department of the Army - Corps of Engineers
(Wilmington District)
U.S. Coast Guard (Fifth District)
* U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Raleigh
U.S. Geological Survey - Raleigh
* N.C. Department of Administration - State Clearinghouse
N.C. Department of Crime Control and Public Safety
* N.C. Department of Cultural Resources
* N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
N.C. Department of Human Resources
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
Hertford County
* Gates County
Peanut Belt Rural Planning Organization
Town of Winton
33

FES ' ?'2ttGB
Ady,26, 2007
Kpgttlatory, Div isiott
SUB) EC:T :lcilcm In?HOOP.)JX11.2dot2h{:aroiinaDepartnlc•ntofTrapsportationPrnject.R-
?507:v. Hertford and Gate's Counties; %Videni g ail ImproveinentS to L.TS 1 3 Pi' in' :7S 105 liear
Winton to CIS 155 niTa hcel;.State Project - i5455
Renee G!ediiill-
six C obrdinntor
North Carolinaff..istoric-Preservation Ofiice
4617-MaiI Senicc Center
R2 Icigh NC; 27699-46:17
f)Lar?\ns. Cledhill=Larlea;
By IU:er.daMi.Jamta 291 2007; we received -a request from the%!N6Flh Carolina Depampent
of Transportation to define the undctta6in'J and t.stablirh the Are.t(sj oftPotential Effcets (APE)
.ni' permit area for both lttslo is striictures'tlnd .rcL•iieofo_>y fora proposed milli-lane
improvement of 11S I i from`US 158 near Winton to US 15s in Tancccl. Heliford and,Gates
Sides, the plojot does net utilize-fedcrel fulids the Coius of Lngirnu; will Sere as;ilie.
leach,( ecletal agency wt }i rt4pc?Liii comphttj:ce witit Seaton 106 of the Ttiauotl tl HistJaic
1'rc^SBI WtlJn`.1e1 ;i ECCtioil 4 '01
:herntii will be tequircd for ceilscntction:af 21? hi-DJ BCt 'Ia iiC;
utid' ti l} ina will Consist of the discharge cfFtll that trial into nuiii tons tJ,3 cs oFtile `Unitezl
S#ntes Ltlron<?hcart [t e:corridor-: Based on our rec t te,of the available it'f6rtnationwe llav.-
detcmltne t 14t11 the Petailn Arca Ors dclined in Appendix C ofoiit tec«Ia(ioits v .-ill he the eiitir_'
coritr elto.l ccrtFdor'fruiit the heiiming todLe end of the R-lid? \ ptojtct.antl extend to tile,
limits otthc right of iya; a1Jn?, U is disc trace. A mao-is attachcil for.pourre r6:iexv,, Plea
that as fiaaLdeign has t of been coin Itcteci,for this pr jest o}irdetcnintiation.ofl:uilen kinv imii
Perm t 1t ea are based solely on 'the in fot rntinn .ve received From t\CbCa'C
!''rchinin+r?^'coiisitltation bet 3e?•n Ci.)OT i1nd the State Historic Preservation C)lfcc
(STIPC?) lias?occurred [or this prt?ject. Based on your 1-cbruary 15, 20M nlemdri if3dum to
\CD0`f,;pqu dcterniined that 6p olect area historic struetures.Sut,ev is put of dale and
theretorc recofnmcucleii-a new,arch'Iectural sun^cv'bc conducted For the I'rojecrarca. AtIilc,youirr
memorandum identifedseveral arch cR
.. toaF,czl utcs-bas?d on the 1994 t'epotl bZ' IZoEiinion
entit led "Artllae6ltrgictl Study; Widening of US 1' Conn SR 14 1 in Hertford =COLHI ..ut the
?titginia State line in Gaston ("ounw.'L1P ' RZ)S07; by copy ofthk letter. ,?e are requesting,
dint \TCi )n`I pr6cldc tuc results 01 *2 ne,v itrchiieciui tl s.trvcy pursuata io VOur febnt tr}° ! i',
2006 utentorandunt so that we,tnay make t pr.lintin u. dcterntinati n if any prop rhz, lined, or
eligible for listing btt, [lie NTRER niav be iiiipacLed y-thc'propos6d'pr6joct Yrc eitit{t, un?tiiowii arch uloeical s6ienti6c prcliistoric, or hisu heal mtat t map be located within the project area
an(Vor COUM he affected LW Llle.prppo;ed ago k. hia-]ditidn. iii an e reyit 'sting dial uit gru Tile
tts tvttlt any, addirional tutor atibn you m by regarding the pfczcnce of ar'chacoloeical
resources. as defined in CFP? Part SK located in or nt he ?vicinity of. (h pemtitarea. as-.dzf lied
above so that we may'fully ."0 1 bU o6lir.ttiolts Pur;itanI to Section 106 of the His'M ic_
l'rtcecrvatinn acct.. It-is requested,bat Yitiu respond by let:ar.vithin45?d ys.
Ii ,idditibnal'stu-icti- studies are warrnrucda a re in 01' Illeititoitiiauun tCreived f_roiit V66
and iVCl ar, it ts: our intention to Pi:rther.:cpordiitaea with your otlfice in order to Iitlnll our
-ohliQ:ti'ons in the Section 10.6 proc-Ss. If you have turthcr;qu?sttons,-please contact me'ai (2:52 1
j
975 61,6::_"c?Ecutirii 26.
Sinccrc4v.
1t%illiai»'1t t?iddlccontc:
12eRulatory Project Mmager
FnclOsurei
C'copicS furnisher! (it.rbut ekI6suic)
Nlr: Carl B. Geode Jr.,.PE:
North Carulint I cpal-Lmeat ofTransjbonation
FlUman Environment Unit
I58 1l-lailScrvici Center
RAeigh. Norib Carotin t 37699 1533.
<7
United States,gD'e partment of the Interior j_
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
January 18, 2006
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
This letter is in response to your request for comments from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service) on the potential environmental effects of the proposed widening of US 13 from US 158
near Winton to US 158 in Tarheel, Hertford and Gates Counties, North Carolina (TIP No. R-
2507A). These comments provide scoping information in accordance with provisions of the Fish
and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
Extensive forested wetlands exist along the existing US 13. Based on a January 4, 2006 field
inspection by Service biologist Gary Jordan, it appears that some of the road widening could be
accommodated by previously cleared right-of-way. However, substantial linear wetland impacts
are still likely. Because of the value of the swamp forest to wildlife species, the Service is very
concerned with the potential impacts. It appears that some of these impacts would occur within
the Chowan Swamp Game Land. If these impacts are unavoidable, the Service recommends that
compensatory mitigation options adjacent to the Chowan Swamp Game Land be explored.
Strong consideration should be given to obtaining mitigation sites that could be transferred to the
Game Land for protection and management in perpetuity.
Another consideration regarding the Chowan Swamp is the significant number of black bears
(Ursus anericanus) in the area. Widening US 13, to four lanes and potentially increasing the
posted speed could lead to greater black bear mortality via road kill and increased direct, indirect
and cumulative effects to bear habitat. Increased black bear road kill also translates to increased
danger to the traveling public. The environmental analysis of the project must address the issue
of black bears and means of avoiding and minimizing impacts to the species. If the
environmental analysis determines (through animal collision data or through observation of
black bear crossing points) that black bears are crossing the existing US 13 in significant
numbers, consideration should be given to constructing large wildlife crossings. However, the
flatness of the terrain and other considerations may limit the opportunity for such crossings.
In addition to impacting habitat for black bears, many other forest species will likely be affected
through the direct loss of forest habitat and through increased forest fragmentation. The effects
of forest habitat fragmentation usually extend well beyond the project footprint and can lead to,
local extirpation of forest interior species and wildlife species which require large home ranges
or that travel extensive distances for all or part of their life. Roads often act as physical barriers
to wildlife movement and/or cause significant wildlife mortality in the form of road killed
animals. Forest fragmentation can lead to increased predation of some species and increased
brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater) parasitism of the nests of neotropical migrant birds.
Habitat fragmentation also often facilitates invasive and/or nonnative species colonization of
fragmented lands.
For road improvement projects such as widening, realignment, bridge replacement and culvert
replacement, the Service recommends the following general conservation measures to avoid or
minimize environmental impacts to fish and wildlife resources:
Wetland and forest impacts should be avoided and minimized to the maximal extent
practical. Areas exhibiting high biodiversity or ecological value important to the
watershed or region should be avoided. Proposed highway projects should be aligned
along or adjacent to existing roadways,. utility corridors or other previously disturbed
areas in order to minimize habitat loss and fragmentation. Highway shoulder and median
widths should be reduced through wetland areas;
2. Crossings of streams and associated wetland systems should use existing crossings and/or
occur on a bridge structure wherever feasible. Bridges should be long enough to allow
for sufficient wildlife passage along stream corridors. Where bridging is not feasible,
culvert structures that maintain natural water flow and hydraulic regimes without
scouring or impeding fish and wildlife passage should be employed;
Bridges and approaches should be designed to avoid any fill that will result in damming
or constriction of the channel or flood plain. To the extent possible, piers and bents
should be placed outside the bank-full width of the stream. If spanning the flood plain is
not feasible, culverts should be installed in the flood plain portion of the approach to
restore some of the hydrological functions of the flood plain and reduce high velocities of
flood waters within the affected area;
4. Bridge designs should include provisions for roadbed and deck drainage to flow through
a vegetated buffer prior to reaching the affected stream. This buffer should be large
enough to alleviate any potential effects from run-off of storm water and pollutants;'
5. Off-site detours should be used rather than construction of temporary, on-site bridges.
For projects requiring an on-site detour in wetlands or open water, such detours should be
aligned along the side of the existing structure which has the least and/or least quality of
fish and wildlife habitat. At the completion of construction, the detour area should be
entirely removed and the impacted areas be planted with appropriate vegetation,
including trees if necessary;
6. If unavoidable wetland or stream impacts are proposed, a plan for compensatory
mitigation to offset unavoidable impacts should be provided early in the planning
process. Opportunities to protect mitigation areas in perpetuity via conservation
easements, land trusts or by other means should be explored at the outset;
7. Wherever appropriate, construction in sensitive areas should occur outside fish spawning
and migratory bird nesting seasons. In waterways that may serve as travel corridors for
fish, in-water work should be avoided during moratorium periods associated with
migration, spawning and sensitive pre-adult life stages. The general moratorium period
for anadromous fish is February 15 - June 30; and
8. Best Management Practices (BMP) for Construction and Maintenance Activities should
be implemented.
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act requires that all federal action agencies (or their
designated non-federal representatives), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action
federally authorized, funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of any federally-listed threatened or endangered species. A biological
assessment/evaluation may be prepared to fulfill the section 7(a)(2) requirement and will
expedite the consultation process. To assist you, a county-by-county list of federally protected
species known to occur in North Carolina and information on their life histories and habitats can
be found on our web page at http://nc-es.fws.2ov/es/countyfr.htmi .
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program database indicates two relatively recent
occurrences of the federally endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) near the
project area. If suitable habitat occurs within the project vicinity for this or any or federally
listed species, surveys should be conducted to determine presence or absence of the species. For
the red-cockaded woodpecker, the survey for cavity trees should extend out 0.5 mile from the
project limits.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a listed species, you should notify this office with your determination, the
results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects of the action on
listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects, before
conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed action
will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on listed species, then
you are not required to contact our office for concurrence.
We reserve the right to review any federal permits that may be required for this project, at the
public notice stage. Therefore, it is important that resource agency coordination occur early in
the planning process in order to resolve any conflicts that may arise and minimize delays in
project implementation. In addition to the above guidance, we recommend that the
environmental documentation for this project include the following in sufficient detail to
facilitate a thorough review of the action:
1. A clearly defined and detailed purpose acid need for the proposed project, supported by
tabular data, if available, and including a discussion of the project's independent utility;
A description of the proposed action with an analysis of all alternatives being considered,
including the upgrading of existing roads and a "no action" alternative;
A description of the fish and wildlife resources, and their habitats, within the project
impact area that maybe directly or indirectly affected;
The extent and acreage of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, that are to be impacted
by filling, dredging, clearing, ditching, or draining. Acres of wetland impact should be
differentiated by habitat type based on the wetland classification scheme of the National
Wetlands Inventory (NWI). Wetland boundaries should be determined by using the 1987
Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and verified by the U.S. Army Corps .
of Engineers;
The anticipated environmental impacts, both temporary and permanent, that would bt
likely to occur as a direct result of the proposed project. The assessment should also
include the extent to which the proposed project would result in secondary impacts to
natural resources, and how this and similar projects contribute to cumulative adverse
effects;
Design features and construction techniques which would be employed to avoid or
minimize impacts to fish and wildlife resources, both direct and indirect, and including
fragmentation and direct loss of habitat;
7. Design features, construction techniques, or any other mitigation measures which would
be employed at wetland crossings and stream channel relocations to avoid or minimize
impacts to waters of the US; and,
8. If unavoidable wetland or stream impacts are proposed, project planning should include a
compensatory mitigation plan for offsetting the unavoidable impacts.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. Please continue to advise us
during the progression of the planning process, including your official determination of the
impacts of this project. If you have any questions regarding our response, please contact Mr.
Gary Jordan at [phone], ext. 32.
ices Supervisor
cc: Bill Biddlecome, USAGE, Washington, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmoor, NC
Chris Militscher, USEPA, Raleigh, NC
Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC
e s Fn1F o
?7
North Carolina
Department of Administration
Michael F. Easley, Governor
January 3, 2006
Mr. Jay McInnis
NCDOT
Transportation Building
1548 Mail Service Center
Interoffice
Dear Mr. McInnis:
Gwynn T. Swinson, Secretary
Subject: Scoring - Widening of US 13 from US 158 near Winton to US 158 in Tarheel; TIP No.
R-2507A
The N. C. State Clearinghouse has received the above project for intergovernmental review. This
project has been assigned State Application Number 06-E-4220-0209. Please use this number with
all inquiries or correspondence with this office.
Review of this project should be completed on or before 02/03/2006 . Should you have any
questions, please call [phone].
Sincerely,

Ms. Cluys Baggett
Environmental Policy Act Coordinator
Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location Address:
1301 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1301 State Courier 95 1-01 -00 Raleigh, North Carolina
e-mail: Chrys.Baggett©ncmail.net
An Equal Opportune ylAffirmative Action Employer
5?tuc)"roj cr-; 6.079002T 7rf;r R-2507A C-c:o,_v: Hertford/Gates
CONCURR::SVC P FORa7 FOR ASSFSS\ EN I' Oi? IT, I C-1'S
Prn;.:cr t?csc,-iprio?r. Vviden US 13/158 to.a multi-lane facility with median from
US 158 near Winton (Hertford County) to US 158 in Tarneel.(Gates County) -
state funded, USACOE Permits'
On flay 26, 2009 represent iiyrs of the
x North 6a1-01imi Dep t-tr::cnt oi`I7ans>onmion (\CCD(Yl')
? redemlHighvayAdniii*.istratiaa(E'II1'??7
X_ Nortlt1-.:m Iina State Hisloric Mcscrvati0n Office (11110)
? other
1{<r:;c ercf Jte subject projc..t vu's agreed
? There;ir:; w ctft icts cin the Mo:6n,d ltcgistcr-listcd piopcnyipfopcnics located within
the project's ::ea of po1cn:iA effccCiind listed on the rcversc.
? - f lie Z arena cltcrts nn the Nation it Kc,;isle n iblc Xopie p!properncs luc tied with:a
the projcct'c s r:t OFpr Ic it:ii d'efC Lt ind listed OIL the reverse. - -
? There is an effect i:n thcVation2l 1{e3istcr-Id:<tcd prnpc t.'rritpeities located withill the
pcolc i s area of patentf j cflect. The pr0pc „'pmncrttc s ah d the cffc<:I(s)ag listed On
ihz rep ersc.
Thcre is an eftect on the-Na:ional Ruf;is!er-clir;it±fe proltnrµ!prop::rties Iccited withic. the
srojecl's ii-ca of{rotentril affect. The propc t} propcrtics t ;d cjTc(;t(,,) ;i c listed on the
seacrse.
Si<-,red:
4 h A ?_ l n t-? -D 9
Rcpra:scntntirc, n°C'DO'I' Da;e
N IWA, flor the Division i Athni i .tratnr, or ollicr hcdcc.l Agency llirc
fem.
Rei?rescntnfi?r.; [?pO
'Stale HisionC-hrC?C^?'aeiOn Olltccr
Datc
Date
i
I
S7a1ePr•q,cci 6.079002T 7YP=: R-2507A Coronly: Hertford/Gates i
f rCi lErf e,5 kvithin Ill arc8 of pritcntia7l cl?cci for which -Lime is no efteCt- InCh.;ILe';i 11 'Q(e5!v is
Natiotml Register-t_'sCCd (NR) or deice nmed eligible'(DR).
Properics:within the atca of potential c.' ccE Cdr which ihcre is an eflext. tni c.rcprope ,? $Lulls
1:K,.gf Dh) and describe life. ef'icct. //
37 v a /5 J r,
?z.?/ve rse efr/e c?`?' / / ?
Co'% .-Me?•'?9? {' a S 'ran STS l GfiLt? ICO XU E,YtGYAaG.GL /7w 016?1-f"1
Cyr?/?r?+Lile5 h ;17,'f c- >r,40#1'.4I/ 4c-Jlfri6ur/?q
Rca,tion(s) wity iitc cficct is not nd%Fcrse (i`•npplicanlc),
Initialcc NCDO V -,1 0 FilWA 1IP0

o n
C?',?t 1 JJ Yx
:3ch d F 's;ie?, 6,gv=,nd
100h '. T[

NI EN. 10 B9NDUM
Norila Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
SIAte Historic Preser%'ad011 Office
csi B. 5^rdacc'; al:uur..;r_?n:
.eccu 1 •u:rs:a?a ?
I'C); C?rc:gtan' I-itorrr,. I'lta.; llirencs
! Proicr.t Dcvelop:oclit_anc r.1 1 virn1rtuo1 Ica] At,td. s:<',''ranch
N(:I:)( 15ivi ion.oE 14EL:! wars
FRONT: Peter Sandkck, ?Yi(ClJ tF ?"
1slt'( Ii:; r>t;e,8ichttcr'utal MEMO Find Idc:ir It : i?'ard F; al a6 n. E iS 1
Fro ra I. 5 i a$ ne WAn:on to US 158 1:7 K=_']h A, i:iaLwid? and
I Hmv c.,t W is above. rcltelxnced u?urr. pr<<,>[cd b.,.- .-: na P:: % and lo'l'l-dLfivcial tutor office:
n \tq>•,.nUcc 24, 2000. P: e ar Aof ze or we delay up r ffe.r: Or
;t ll„ t i 4; c;. stnien[s.
%Vc c nkur'ccirh The report c ti:i: ngs that:
The Store''' Crossroads HAtolir Ilistriet rs cl ble• is Ilse tg V the Abdunal-Reps= of Maude lWas,
undukCAMc is C. The chgGI.. dim'icc SAM PrCpe;tt ''i S!01?? I .rrn :,'(-,A g ) ind C anti,;`
31 v vch are on the Mate RA I iq, as 'fell a< Prr I e ar i a h ,t . c ass- c:a.rd wi?l --he
-'- ,,6t,i am- gyn. "1 l.ct `t ntnd ihe= of A Whir appca Tprapr.tte,
We concur dt ai cit crlk;it inq tnnhc ui:v: arc rut eltt_I:ble fur l: u t : uor the rr iti )ns ,t rli irci in ttrerbpurt.
Prop::. td ? -.1 f once
I> njnny '- Flury 1:: P?roe IICUSe A( :\ 352)
1Cr Wo 1,ree.dm dwmd:crp Tc..,iics -it oohed in .he repel (< not ; ,pc : t.:.rtblc fur iisdnse nora::"rcm
liriclnel 2,-1?'. lia ing uea: a tc rn? A, o Me c n ata'.
hi Ih: font-e., plt asc. p t: i:ic c.iit+niW I+nungrap -,t roc c alnn,ed h_ e per'des, is ?t ,mgle Tl 3? r?y?;'sti z i ai?:'
u,es not p ey jit ark. jimir in,r:nnanon for t .al. ng e .duhmis We woul i Ad at that you •, .r d n 2n.1 t., :tier
-NUmby. 1u.':hc propi rdes a 1d,.e.aed I le ri'pe'r' : :is In h ng, tsi_at for „L•i.•t an further scud:
WIRS rcconinicndcd. hmc vivid W Prcpurnc , :i, and ! n i c T WA c 9by rat Or Rj a e:.e lir c ded,?
Plc rc nr7 icie ofd c repo[ ti.. is for,: ur

The three cOmIrwnt_ ara,rt ec pc.:t.anr Sec o 106 or the \ar mm! l ieuvic Yr c ¢i ±n.\u ^znc he
\r;isoR'. Council on 1 liStonc Pr"Cn31ic n S R< ggi:t* ,t.n AW c r t thMWC WIL11 Sccs.Cm P.M) codified rzt 36 CFR
Tan 8(ii"j. .
_Uv d. rut Or eoui.cmpcmhon cud Lew uh:: bu I u hn t amt t 'c-i ni the aboaL Lnitllt:ut?,
ue.:;:: Rcn : G1.cdhll L: lec. nt cn?n^t7 .al ce';ie ct,rrt:di'la, t, .,t 91° `7-65-9. ]n all furlui-
c t tinroicndon concur n j this p'oiecc, pheas cis the sho :. c uenud Hacking nornbcoz.
_? 'Parr ??-irrllii , a\I 1)(i)

Michael F. Easley, Governor
Gsbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ptter B. Sandbeck, Untnistrator
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
November 17, 2006
MEMORANDUM
TO: Matthew T. Wilkerson
NCDOT - Human Environment Unit
FROM: Peter Sandbeck vs? i-?{/'as'dLO&
SUBJECT: US 13 from US 158 near Winton to US 158 in Tarheel, R-2507A, Hertford and Gates Counties,
ER 06-0004
Thank you for your letter of October 30, 2006.. We have reviewed this project and offer the following
comments.
Based on our recent discussions with Paul Moler of your staff, we have reevaluated this project and our
recommendations outlined in a letter of February 15, 2006. Given our present understanding of the project,
sites 31 GA92**, a family cemetery associated with 31 GA92**, and 31 GA104** will not be adversely affected
by the associated work.. We concur with these findings.
Based on the current design plans, the NCDOT Archaeology Group reconunends no further work be
conducted in regards to this project. We concur with this recommendation.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-733-4763, ext. 246. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking number.
cc: Paul J. Mohler, NCDOT
Lncatioo Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADNENISTRATION 507 N. Blount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mad Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/733-8653
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount Sweet, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/715-4801
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Blom Street, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/715-4801
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
MS RENEE GLEDHILL-EARLEY
CLEARINGHOUSE COORD
DEPT OF CUL RESOURCES
ARCHIVES-HISTORY BLDG - MSC 5617
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
ALBEMARLE REG PLANNING COMM
CC&PS - DEM, NFIP
DEHNR - COASTAL MGT
DENR LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF CUL RESOURCES
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
MID EAST COMMISSION
STATE NUMBER: 06-E-4220-0209 F02
DATE RECEIVED: 01/03/2006
AGENCY RESPONSE: 01/30/2006
REVIEW CLOSED: 02/03/2006
ame1y)
noo
_
O? W
A /?/L?G (j CLA
S
wr,.
FES 2006 /
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: NCDOT
TYPE: State Environmental Policy Act
ERD: Scoping
DESC: Widening of US 13 from US 158 near Winton to US 15B in Tarheel; TIP No. R-2507A
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NO 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED:
? NO COMMENT
COM S ATTACHED
SIGNED BY:
DATE:
JAN 13 2000
JAN 0 ' ;_006
laenx H GHIRMIE
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administeator
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
February 15, 2006
MEMORANDUM
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
TO: Gregory J. Thorpe
NCDOT - Project Development and Analysis
FROM: Peter Sandbeck
SUBJECT: US 13 from US 158 near Winton to US 158 in Tarheel, Hertford and Gates Counties, State
Project 6.079002T, TIP Project R-2507A, ER 06-0004
Thank you for your Memorandum of December 22, 2005. We have reviewed this project and offer the
following comments.
We have reviewed the submitted material and find that the project area historic structures survey is out of
date. The initial survey was conducted in 1994. Therefore, we are requesting a new architectural survey for
the project area.
Ken Robinson surveyed the US 13 corridor for archaeological resources at 1994. This survey was in
association with proposed widening of this corridor. Several archaeological sites were recorded within the
boundaries of the proposed project area. These sites include: 31GA42, 31GA61, 31GA92, 31GA93,
31GA95, 31GA101, 31GA102, 31GA103, and 31GA104. Information regarding these sites appears in a 1994
report by Robinson entitled: Archaeological Suudy: Widening of US13 From SR1451 in Hertford County to The Virginia
State line in Gaston County, TIP #R-2507. This document is on file at the OSA as Bib. #3457. Of these, two
sites (31 GA 104 and 31GA92) bear attention in regards to the presently proposed undertaking.
Site 31GA104 is associated with the Henry Fletcher Parker House. Robinson recommended that an
archaeological assessment would be needed in additional areas of the site in the event that NCDOT plans
changed. We recommend that this site be evaluated once again for archaeological significance in light of the
presently existing design plans. In the event that the present design plans depart from the 1994 originals we
recommend that additional archaeological work be conducted within the updated APE.
Site 31GA92 is the Story Family Cemetery and Farmstead. We recommend that this site be evaluated once
again in terms of archaeological significance and in light of the presently existing design plans. In the event
that the present design plans depart from the 1994 originals we recommend that additional archaeological
work be conducted within the updated APE. We also recommend that any potential impacts to the
associated family cemetery be evaluated by this study.
ADMINISTRATION - 507 N, Blount Steeet, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Seevice Cente,, Raleigh NC 27699-4617
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount Saecq Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Blount Street, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617
5-4801
5-4801
n
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisorv Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-733-4763. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking number.
cc: Chrys Baggett, State Clearinghouse
Mary Pope Furr, NCDOT
Matthew T. Wilkerson, NCDOT
Jay McInnis, NCDOT
it
A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
MEMORANDUM
January 25, 2006
TO: Melba McGee
(-PL
FROM: Harry LeGrand, Natural Heritage Program
??? 2QQca
SUBJECT: Widening of US 13 from US 158 near Winton to US 158 in Tarheel; Gates and
Hertford counties
State Project 6.079002T, WBS Element 35488.1.1, TIP Project R-2507A
REFERENCE: Project No. 06-0209
This project has the potential to slightly impact several natural areas, managed areas, and rare
species. Our Program has records of one or two clusters of the Federally Endangered red-
cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) in the vicinity of the community of Storys, where US
13/158 intersects NC 137. Consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Raleigh Field
Office - will be needed, if not already done; a field survey likely will be required for the
woodpecker and its habitat.
The N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission's Chowan Swamp Game Land abuts US 13/158 on
both sides for approximately 1.0 mile in the floodplain of the Chowan River in Gates County.
Thus, it is important that NCDOT coordinate the project with NCWRC to minimize impacts to
these State lands. These lands are part of the State-significant Chowan Swamp Natural Area,
which extends for over a dozen miles along this river and includes lands owned by NCWRC and
the N.C. Division of Parks and Recreation (Chowan Swamp State Natural Area).
A number of rare mussels - all of which are State Threatened, have been found in the Chowan
River at the US 13/158 bridge. These are:
tidewater mucket (Leptodea ochracea)
eastern pondmussel (Ligumia nasuto)
triangle floater (Alasmidonta undulata)
eastern lampmussel (Lampsilis radiata radiata)
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601 One
Phone: [phone] • FAX: [phone] • Internet: www.enr stale.nc us NOIrthiC la+r7olina
An Equal Opportunity - Affirmative Action Employer-50%Recycled •10% Post Consumer Paper _ Aah Kl[y
Because of the populations of these species, our Program considers the Chowan River Aquatic
Habitat to be a State-significant site. Thus, if there is a widening of the bridge over the river, it is
essential that coordination with the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission be done to avoid
impacts to these rare mussels. Our Program also has an historic record (from 1958) of the
grassleaf arrowhead (Sagittaria weatherbiana) from the Chowan River swamp at US 158.
You may wish to check the Natural Heritage Program database website at
<w,?vw.ncsparks.net/nhp/search.html> for a listing of rare plants and animals and significant
natural communities in the county and on the topographic quad map. Please do not hesitate to
contact me at 919-715-8697 if you have questions or need further information.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Inter-Agency Project Review Res-OD-4 7 ZOOS
Project Name:
Project #
06-0209
courity
Hertford/Gates
Type of Project: Proposed proiect is
Comments provided by:

Regional Program Person
Regional Supervisor for Public Water Supply Section
Central Office program person
Name: Fred Hill/ Harry Bailey Telephone #: [phone]
Program within Division of Environmental Health:
Date Rec'd: 1/25/06
Date Rev'd: 2/03/06
Public Water Supply
El Other, Name of Progra
Response (check all applicable):
E No objection to project as proposed
El No comment
Insufficient information to complete review
Comments attached
See comments below
The project has the potential to impact several public water systems distribution lines. The Public Water
Systems that may be impacted are the Gates County Water System (PWS ID # 04-37-020) on the
northern portion of the project area and the Town of Winton Water System (PWS ID# 04-46-020) on the
southern portion.
Plans and specifications must be submitted to the Public Water Supply Plan Review Section prior to
construction if any modifications occur to the distribution systems.
Return to :
Public Water Supply Section
Environmental Review Coordinator for the Division of Environmental Health
Cl--
raw State of North Carolina Reviewing Office:
NCDENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources ??jj..__//yy2???
Project Number: Due Date: L 13 U
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS
After review of this project it has been determined that the DENR permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in orderfor this project
to comply with North Carolina Law. Questions regarding these permitsshould be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of this form.
All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Regional Office.

PERMITS
I Normal Process Time
SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURE or REQUIREMENTS
(StatutoryTime Limit)
? Permitto construct&operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award ofconstnrction
rence usual
f
i
l
h 30 days
facilities, sewer system extensions & sewer systems .
con
n
ca
e
contracts. On-site inspection. Pon-application tec (90 days)
not discharging into state surface waters.
? NPDES-permit to discharge into surface water and/or Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection preapplication
it to conswa wastewater treatment
i
ll
b
i -
90-120 days
permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities n perm
ona
y, o
ta
conference usual. Addit
l
i (N/A)
discharging into state surface waters. ans or
ssue
facility-granted after NPDE5. Reply time,30 days after receipt of p
of NPDES permit-whichever is later,
? Water Use Permit - Preapplication technical conference usually necessary - 30 days
IN/A)
i Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the 7days
? t
Well Construction Perm installation of a well. (15 days)
? Dredge and Fill Permit Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property owner.
On-site inspection. Preapplicatian conference usual- Filling may require Easement 55 days
(90 days)
_ to Fill from N,C. Department of Administration and Federal Dredg^ and Fill Permit
? Permit to construct & operate Air Pollution Abatement
N/A
60 days
facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15 A NCAC
600
)
(2Q.0100,20.0300,21-1.0

Any open burning associated with suolect propoeai 'x °.-
must be in compliance with 15 A NCAC 2D.1900 ry0 P? 700?y f
N d
Demolition or renovations ofstruaurescontaining
liance with
i
b 60 days
N/A
n comp
e
asbestos material must
15 A NCAC 2D.1110 (a) (1) which requires notification I90 days)
and removal prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos
919
.
Control Group
? Complex Source Permit required under 15 A NCAC
ZS7
b?
??2?`

-
.
ZD.O800

y. An erasion &sedimentation
tation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing aaiv
i
20 days
?I men
The Sed
d
control plan will be requited if one or more acres to be disturbe. Plan filed with proper Regional Off¢e !land Quality SeRicn; at leis; 30 (30 days)
days before beginning activity. A fee of S50 for the first acre or any part of an acre.
The Sedimentarion Pollu(ion Control ACt of 1973 must he addressed with respect to the referenced Local Ordinance. - 30days
n and erosion control must be addressed in accordance with NCDOTs approved program. Particular attention should be
i
? o
Sedimggmat
iven 15 design and installation of appropriate perimeter sediment trapping devices as well as stable starmvater conveyancas and outlets.
g
? Permit On-site inspection usual. Surety bond fled with DENR Bondamoum varies with
Minin
th
n
i
d
s
30 da
g
cr=ater
a
ne
type mine and number of acres of affected land. Any are m y
one acre must be permitted. The appropriate bond must be received before (60 days)
the permit can be issued
North Carolina Burning permit I On-site inspection by N.C. Division of Forest Resources if perch exceeds S days I Iday
(N/A)
Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit-22 counties I On-site inspection by N.CDivision of Forest Resource; requires `"r.--more tan five I 1day
in coastal N.Cwith organic. soils. acres of ground clearing activities are involved Irup^:rions should be requested (N/A)
at least ten days before actual burn is planned.'
N/A I 90.120 days
n n,i oafi ninn Facilities (N/A)
? Dam Safety P?ermit

13
?

Permit to dill I exploratory oil or gas well
Geophysical Exploration Permit
State Lakes Construction Permit
401 Water Quality Certification
CAMA Permit for MAJOR development
CAMA Permit for MINOR development
Abandonment of any wells, if required must be in accordance with Title 15A. Subchapter X.0100,
SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS
1by mit required, application 60 days before begin con=cd
hire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare la °n. Applicant
ruction is according to DENR a p ??? CD???On ce?fY
rmh txtder
uito control program, and a 404 per m¢ Go 2M May also Corps of Engineers.
pection of site is necessary to verify Hazard Classification A min imum
$200.00 must accompany the application, An additional processing fee
on a percentage or the total proiect cost will be required upon completion.
rety bond of $5,000 with DENR running to State of NC conditional that any
pened by drill operator shall, upen abandonment. be plugged according
NR rules and regulations.
ation filed with DENR at least l0 days prior to issue orpennit Application
er. No standard application form
Several geodetic monuments are located in or near the project area. If any monument needs to be moved or destroyed, please notify:
N.C.Geodetic Survey, Box 27687 Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Normal Process Tim
Statuto= Lm,
30 days
(50 days)
10 days
(N/A)
10 days
(N/A)
15 - 20 days
(N/A)
55 days
(130 days)
60 days
(130 days)
2222 d
(25 days)
Notification of the proper regional office is requested if "Orphan' under
Compliance with 1 ground storage tanks (LISTS) are discovered during any excavation cparation.
5A NCgC ZH 1000 (Coastal Stormwater Rules) is required.
Othermmments (attach additional pages as necessarybeing certain to cite comment authority)
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, N.C.28801
[phone]
45 days
(N/A)
REGIONAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional office marked below.
? Asheville Regional Office ? Mooresville R
? Fayetteville Reg'io'nal Off ce
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, N.C.28301
[phone]

Application fees based on structure size is charged. Must include descriptions
& drawings of structure & proof of ownership of riparian property.
N/A
$250.00 fee must accompany application
$50.00 fee must accompany application
eglonaloffice
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, N.C.28115
[phone]
? Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Exterl;ion
Wilmington, N.C.28405
[phone]
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 El Winston-Salem Regional Office
Barrett Drive, P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C.27611 585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, N.C.27107
(919) 57 i -4700
[phone]
? Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, N1C.27889
r'o- Department of Em'ironmznt and I.- North Carolina
?? Natural Resources FOREDivision of Forest Resources
SERVICE
NCDENR Michael F. Easley, Governor N (? Stanford M. Adams, Director
1, v
\Gilhim G. Ross Jr., Secretary
2411 Old US 70 West
Clayton, NC 27520
January 13, 2006
1
FEB 2006
lr tt'e?°? .;i
MEMORA !)EM
TO: Melba McGee, Office of Legislative Affairs
FROM: Bill Pickens, NC Division Forest Resources! Gxr?
SUBJECT: DOT Scoping for Widening US 13 from US 158 near Winton to US 158 in Tarhell in
Gates and Hertford Counties
PROJECT #: 06-0209 and TIP # R-207A
The North Carolina Division of Forest Resources has reviewed the referenced Scoping document and
submits the following con nients conceming impacts to woodlands to address in the EA.
1. List, by timber type, the total forest land acreage that is removed or taken out of forest production as a
result of the project so that we can evaluate construction impact. If no impacts will occur, please state
so in the document. The widening of an existing roadway usually has fewer impacts to forest
resources than a new location project.
Additionally, efforts should be made to align corridors to minimize impacts to woodlands in the
following order of priority:
• Managed, high site index woodland
• Productive forested woodlands
• Managed, lower site index woodlands
• Unique forest ecosystems
• Unmanaged, fully stocked woodlands
• Unmanaged, cutover woodlands
• Urban woodlands
3. The EA should include a summary of the potential productivity of the forest stands affected by the
proposed project. Potential productivity is quantified by the soil series, and is found in the USDA Soil
Survey for the county involved.
4. The provisions the contractor will take to utilize the merchantable timber removed during .
construction. Emphasis should be on selling all wood products. However, if the wood products
cannot be sold then efforts should be made to haul off the material or turn it into mulch with a tub
grinder. This practice will minimize the need for debris burning, and the risk of escaped fires and
smoke management problems to residences, highways, schools, and towns.
1616 Mail Service Center, Ralei,h, North Carolinn 27699-1601
Phone: 919 - 733-2162 \ FAX: 919 - 733-0135 \ Internet: tcti\a}..drr,sl;llc.nc.us
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY \ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50V RECYCLED / 10% POST
5_ If woodland burning is needed, the contractor must comply with the laws and regulations of open
burning as covered under G.S. 113-60.21 through G.S. 113-60.31. Gates and Pasquotank Counties
are classified as high hazard counties, and G.S. 113-60.23 requiring a special burning pernvt would
apply. This permit is issued by the local Forest Service Ranger
6. The provisions that the contractor will take to prevent erosion and damage to forestland outside the
right-of-way. Trees, particularly the root system, can be permanently damaged by heavy equipment.
Efforts should be to avoid skinning of the tree trunk, compacting the soil, adding layers of 511,
exposing the root system, or spilling petroleum or other substances.
7. The impact upon any existing greenways in the proposed project area should be addressed.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the proposed project, and encourage the impact on our
forestland be considered during the planning process. Contact me at 919-553-6178 x 233 or by email
at [e-mail].
cc: Barry New
NC©ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Marine Fisheries Preston P. Pate Jr., Director
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
MEMORANDUM:
• TO: Jay McInnis, NCDOT Project Engineer
FROM: Sara E. Winslow, Northern District Managerx4/)
SUBJECT: US 13/US158 - Winton/Tarheel, Hertford and Gates Counties, TIP Project
R-2507A
DATE: January 6, 2006
The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries provides the following comments
relative to the proposed widening of US 13/158 in Hertford and Gates Counties.
Chowan River is a documented spawning and nursery area for alewife, blueback
herring, American shad, hickory shad and striped bass. Resident species, such as white
perch, yellow perch, and catfishes also utilize the area as a spawning and nursery area.
This agency would request an in-water construction moratorium from February 15
through September 30. However, depending on proposed construction methods the
time period may be modified. The moratorium will ensure the environmental integrity
of the area is protected during critical times of usage by the above mentioned species.
A large portion of the project area is wetlands. The Division would be concerned
with loss and/or impacts to these wetlands. Mitigation should be proposed for
associated wetland impacts.
There are currently several bridges over small creeks/tributaries in the project
area. The Division would recommend that these areas remain bridges.
This agency would like to participate in the scoping meeting for this project. If
you have any questions you can contact me (252-264-3911).
1367 U.S. 17 South, Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909 one
North Qarolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet ?r?ww.ncdmf.net NatiaallIy
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Manly S. Wilder, Director
lk
11
1, Irf B 2006
MEMORANDUM: t e a;;/rte 'r

TO: Melba McGee
FROM: David Harrison
A ?
A
NCDENR
January 25, 2006
SUBJECT: US 13 from US 158 near Winton to US 158 in Tar Heel, Gates And Hertford
Counties. Project # 06-0209.
The NC Department of Transportation is proposing improvements to US 13 in Gates and
Hertford Counties.
If construction is restricted to existing right-of-ways, there should be no impact to Prime
or Statewide Important Farmland.
Any acquisition of additional right-of-ways for increase size, capacity or changes in
approach could affect Prime or Statewide Important Farmland. In that case, the environmental
assessment should include information on adverse impacts.
The definition of Prime or Statewide Important Farmland is based on the soil series and
not on its current land use. Areas that are developed or are within municipal boundaries are
exempt from consideration as Prime or Important Farmland.
For additional information, contact the soils specialists with the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA, Raleigh, NC at [phone]. ,
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: 919 - 733-4984 \ FAX: 919 - 715-3060 \ Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us/ENR/
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY \ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50 % RECYCLED / 10% POST CONSUMER PAPER
v ry
O? QG

r
>
_ y
O Y
MEMORANDUM
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 20, 2006
To: Melba McGee, Environmental Coordinator, Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental
Affairs
From: Brian L. Wrenn, Transportation Permitting Unit, NCDWQ ?
Subject: Request for Scoping Comments for the Proposed Widening of US 13 from US 158 in
Hertford County to US 158 in Gates County, State Project No. 6.079002T, WBS Element
35488.1.1, TIP Project No. R-2507A, State Clearinghouse Project No. 06-0209.
This office has reviewed the referenced document. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is responsible
for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for activities that impact Waters of the
U.S., including wetlands. Based on a preliminary review of the project study area, tributaries, wetlands
and riparian buffers associated with the following named streams could be impacted by the proposed .
project:
Stream Name River Basin Stream Classification Stream Index Number
Folley Branch Chowan C; NSW 2545
Chowan River Chowan B; NSW 25
Buckhorn Creek Chowan C; NSW 25-2
DWQ has the following comments:
Project Specific Comments:
A large amount of riverine wetlands are located northeast of the Chowan River in the project study
area. DOT should avoid and minimize impacts to these wetland areas. This may include narrower
travel lanes, steeper fill slopes, retaining walls, bridging, reduced median widths, etc. It is unclear
from the Scoping notice if the existing road would be widened to a multi-lane facility. Currently, the
US 13 is a major bike route in the area. DWQ assumes that US 13 would'continue to function in this
capacity. DWQ supports the construction of bike lanes and access when balanced properly with
potential impacts to streams and wetlands.
2. Because this project will be constructed in coastal counties and will disturb more than one acre of
land, it will require a state storm water permit. All storm water plans should be designed to meet the
requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .1005. All storm water BMPs in the project area should meet the
requirements for Nutrient Sensitive Waters of the State.
General Comments:
1. DWQ prefers spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require work within the stream
and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal and vertical clearances provided by
bridges allows for human and wildlife passage beneath the strucf-ure, does not block fish passage, and
does not block navigation by canoeists and boaters.
,,
NoonhCarolina
Transportation Permitting Unit Natumllly
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: htto://h2o.enr. state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Page 3
pc: Bill Biddlecome, USACE Washington Field Office
Garcy Ward, NCDWQ, Washington Regional Office
Chris Militscher, USEPA
Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Gary Jordan, USFWS
File Copy

i
FEB 2006

6 Fa
9 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0 _
MEMORANDUM Pvchard 11, llamilton, Executive Dircccor
TO: Melba McGee
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, DENR
FROM: Travis Wilson, Highway Project Coordinator -
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: January 30, 2006
SUBJECT: Response to the start of study notification fiom the N. C. Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) regarding fish and wildlife concerns for the
proposed widening of US 13 from US 158 near Winton to US 158 in
Tarheel, Hertford and Gates Counties, North Carolina. TIP No. R-2507A,
SCH Project No. 06-00209.
This memorandum responds to a request from Gregory J, Thorpe of the NCDOT
for our concerns regarding impacts on fish and wildlife resources resulting from the
subject project. Biologists on the staff of the N. C. Wildlife Resources Cotnntission
(NCWRC) have reviewed the proposed improvements. Our comments are provided in
accordance with certain provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d). \
The Chowan Swamp Game Land is located within the Vicinity of this,project;
NCDOT should obtain accurate boundary line data for this resource to avoid and
mitrimize impacts to this area. Shoups Landing Road is the only access to Shoups
landing, a WRC boating access to the Chowan River. DOT should insure access to this
facility remains open during any construction activities. To help facilitate document
preparation and the review process, our general informational needs are outlined below:

1. Description of fishery and wildlife resources within the project area,
including a listing of federally or state designated threatened, endangered,
or special concern species. Potential borrow. areas to be used for project
construction should be included in the inventories. A listing of designated
plant species can be developed through consultation with:
The Natural 14-ritage Program
N. C. Division of Parks and Recreation
1615 Mail Service Center
E9 39dd 6E868Z56i6 Ez:zl 999Z/9E/t9
Memo
January 30,
Raleigh, N. C. 27699-1615
[phone]
WWW.ncsparks.net/nhi)
and,
4?,_
to 2006
lik-A
NCDA Plant Conservation Program
P. 0. Box 27647
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
[phone]
2. Description of any streams or wetlands affected by the project. The need for
channelizing or relocating portions of streams crossed and the extent of
such activities.
Cover type maps showing wetland acreages impacted by the project.
Wetland acreages should include all project-related areas that may
undergo hydrologic change as a result of ditching, other drainage, or
filling for project construction. Wetland identification may be
accomplished through coordination with the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers (COE). If the COE is not consulted, the person delineating
wetlands should be identified and criteria listed.
4. Cover type maps showing acreages of upland wildlife habitat impacted by
the proposed project. Potential borrow sites should be included.
5. The extent to which the project will result in loss, degradation, or
fragmentation of wildlife habitat (wetlands or uplands).
6. Mitigation for avoiding, minimizing or compensating for direct and indirect
degradation in habitat quality as well as quantitative losses.
7. A cumulative impact assessment section which analyzes the environmental
effects of highway construction and quantifies the contribution of this
individual project to environmental degradation.
8. A discussion of the probable impacts on natural resources which will result
from secondary development facilitated by the improved road access.
9. If construction of this facility is to be coordinated with other state, municipal,
or private development projects, a description of these projects should be
included in the environmental document, and all project sponsors should
be identified.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the early planning stages for
this project. If we can further assist your office, please contact me at [phone].

t

b9 30Vd 6E868Z56T6 EZ:ZT 9992/0E/T9

GATES COUNTY
RANDALL K. CAHOON, PLAN PR N.II X006
INSPECTIONS & PLANNING DEPARTMF?Z?1T"? nn n7rdoF
P.O. Box 411 Gatesville, NC 279 o <? r;,ct;rvovs
Ph: [phone] Fax(252)357
4577 ?F4 %Il gra???tcv
[e-mail]
January 4, 2006
NC Department of Transportation
` Project Development and Environmental Analysis
1548 Mail Service Center
t Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
a
Re: US 13 from US 158 near Winton to US 158 in Tarheel, Hertford & Gates Counties, State
Project 6.079002T, WBS No. 35488.1.1, TIP Project No. R-2507A
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
This letter is in response to your request for information regarding the widening of US 13
from US 158 near Winton to US 158 in Tarheel. In assessing the environmental impacts
of this proposed project, you need to take the Chowan River into consideration (in terms
of additional runoff being introduced once the pavement is widened), but you also need
to bear in mind that most of the roadside from the bridge over the Chowan River to the
area identified as "Corner High" is marshland, wetlands, and what laypersons refer to as
"swamp." Looking at the map you enclosed in your proposal package,, the streams and
other lines on the drawing that denote tributaries of the river represent habitat for
numerous aquatic species and waterfowl. Care should be taken to impose' minimal
environmental impact on those areas.
Some portions of US 13/158 (especially the portion of the road between the Chowan
River bridge and the smaller bridge near SR 1128) have oversized, cleared shoulder
areas and are uniquely suitable for widening to four lanes or more without creating an
environmental impact of any sort. From SR 1128 (the southernmost entry) to the area
identified as "Tarheel," the shoulder narrows markedly, the marshy wetlands begin a few
feet from the shoulder of the road and disappear into wooded portions of adjacent
parcels of land. Any construction taking place in this segment will entail displacement of
wildlife, will introduce increased stormwater runoff, and could potentially negatively
impact the surrounding area. On the other hand, like many Gates County roadways, this
corridor is narrow, suffers from reduced visibility (particularly at night) due to the heavy
canopy of low growing trees and marsh-type vegetation, and could become a safer road
if widened dramatically and some portion of the native vegetation were to be eliminated.
The US Army Corps of Engineers should be contacted by NC DOT to delineate the
wetlands located in this corridor, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service should be
consulted to identify the exact types of wildlife that will be impacted by this proposed
project. Among the threatened, endangered, and Federal Species of Concern found in
Gates County there are the following:
American alligator Alligator mississippiensis T(S/A)
Henslow's sparrow Ammodramus henslowii FSC
Rafinesque's big-eared bat
Red-cockaded woodpecker
Invertebrates
Tidewater interstitial amphipod
Vascular Plants
Conferva pondweed
Long beach seedbox
Pondspice.
Virginia least trillium
Corynorhinus (=Plecotus) rafinesquii FSC
Picoides borealis Endangered
Stygobromus araeus FSC
Potamogeton confervoides FSC
Ludwigia brevipes FSC`
Litsea aestivalis FSC
Trillium pusillum var. virginianum FSC
The American Alligator is threatened due to similarity of appearance with other rare
species and is listed for its protection. These species are not biologically endangered or
threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. However, the Red-cockaded
Woodpecker, a type of bird that makes its home in fallen pine trees, is on the
Endangered Species list. The balance of .the species noted on the table above,
including vascular plants, are federally protected species of concern. All are native to
Gates County but they are not all necessarily native to the corridor in question. It is for
this reason I urge you to contact the US Fish & Wildlife Service for specific information
regarding the actual habitats of these creatures and regulations regarding construction
of roadways within those habitats.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sin ly,
Randall K. Cahoon, County Planner
?i
Y

APPENDIX B
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS RELOCATION PROGRAM/
RELOCATION REPORTS

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS RELOCATION PROGRAMS
It is the policy of NCDOT to ensure comparable replacement housing will be available
prior to construction of state and federally-assisted projects. Furthermore, the North Carolina
Board of Transportation has the following three programs to minimize the inconvenience of
relocation:
• Relocation Assistance
• Relocation Moving Payments
• Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or Rent Supplement
As part of the Relocation Assistance Program, experienced NCDOT staff will be
available to assist displacees with information such as availability and prices of homes,
apartments, or businesses for sale or rent and financing or other housing programs. The
Relocation Moving Payments Program provides for payment of actual moving expenses
encountered in relocation. Where displacement will force an owner or tenant to purchase or rent
property of higher cost or to lose a favorable financing arrangement (in case of ownership), the
Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or Rent Supplement Program will compensate up to
$22,500 to owners who are eligible and qualify and up to $5,250 to tenants who are eligible and
qualify.
The relocation program for the proposed action will be conducted in accordance with the
Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970
(Public Law 91-646), and/or the North Carolina Relocation Assistance Act (GS-133-5 through
133-18). The program is designed to provide assistance to displaced persons in relocating to a
replacement site in which to live or do business. At least one relocation officer is assigned to
each highway project for this purpose.
The relocation officer will determine the needs of displaced families, individuals,
businesses, non-profit organizations and farm operations for relocation assistance advisory
services without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The NCDOT will
schedule its work to allow ample time, prior to displacement, for negotiations and possession of
replacement housing which meets decent, safe and sanitary standards. The displacees are given
at least a 90-day written notice after NCDOT purchases the property. Relocation of displaced
persons will be offered in areas not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and
commercial facilities. Rent and sale prices of replacement property will be within the financial
means of the families and individuals displaced and will be reasonably accessible to their places
of employment. The relocation officer will also assist owners of displaced businesses, non-profit
organizations and farm operations in searching for and moving to replacement property.
All tenant and owner residential occupants who may be displaced will receive an
explanation regarding all available options, such as (1) purchase of replacement housing, (2)
rental of replacement housing, either private or public, or (3) moving existing owner-occupant
housing to another site (if possible). The relocation officer will also supply information
concerning other state and federal programs offering assistance to displaced persons and will
provide other advisory services as needed in order to minimize hardships to displaced persons in
adjusting to a new location.
The Moving Expense Payments Program is designed to compensate the displacee for the
costs of moving personal property from homes, businesses, non-profit organizations and farm
operations acquired for a highway project. Under the Replacement Program for Owners,
NCDOT will participate in reasonable incidental purchase payments for replacement dwellings
such as attorney's fees, surveys, appraisals, and other closing costs and, if applicable, make a
payment for any increased interest expenses for replacement dwellings. Reimbursement to
owner-occupants for replacement housing payments, increased interest payments and incidental
purchase expenses may not exceed $22,500 (combined total), except under the Last Resort
}
Housing provision.
A displaced tenant may be eligible to receive a payment, not to exceed $5,250, to rent a
replacement dwelling or to make a down payment, including incidental expenses, on the
purchase of a replacement dwelling. The down payment is based upon what the state determines
is required when the rent supplement exceeds $5,250.
It is a policy of the State that no person will be displaced by NCDOT's state or federally-
assisted construction projects unless and until comparable replacement housing has been offered
or provided for each displacee within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement. No
relocation payment received will be considered as income for the purposes of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1954 or for the purposes of determining eligibility or the extent of eligibility of
any person for assistance under the Social Security Act or any other federal law.
Last Resort Housing is a program used when comparable replacement housing is not
available, or when it is unavailable within the displacee's financial means, and the replacement
payment exceeds the federal/state legal limitation. The purpose of the program is to allow broad
latitude in methods of implementation by the state so that decent, safe and sanitary replacement
housing can be provided. It is not believed this program will be necessary on the project, since
there appear to be adequate opportunities for relocation within the area.

EIS RELOCATION REPORT
X E.I.S.Q CORRIDOR ? DESIGN
20.40M 1$0-250
40--
70m 1 zso-aoo
100M 3 40G-600
r
0
UP 2 60o UP
T
AL 6
WBS: 35488.1 .1 couNTY Gates/Hertford Alternate 1 of 1 Alternate
I. D. NO.: R-2507A F.A. PROJECT N/A
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: US13 From US158 Near Winton to US158 At Tarheel
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES ' INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants
Residential 6 1
Businesses 4 0
Farms 0 0
Non-Profit 1 0
Yes
X
IX
LX
Total Minorities 0-15M 15-25M
7 3 1
4 1 VALUE OF DWELLING
0 0 Owners Tenants
1 0 0-20M S o-150
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS
No Explain all "YES" answers.
X 1. Will special relocation services be necessary?
2. Will schools or churches be affected by
displacement?
X 3. Will business services still be available
after project?
4. Will any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
employees, minorities, etc.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be needed?
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be considered?
X 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
X to. Will public housing be needed for project?
N/A 11. Is public housing available?
12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
X 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12-24 MONTHS _,..-
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
REMARKS
2 - God's Healing Cathredral
25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
4 2
DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
For Sale For Rent
0-20m $0-150
20-40M 4 150-250
1 40.70M 3 zso-aoo 3
70.1 00M 7 40D-600 3
100 up 22 600 up 2
I 36 8
4 - Powell Lane Birdcages - 750 sf - 2 employees
- G and L Variety - 5,000 sf - 2 employees
- ABC Store - 4,000 sf - 4 employees
- Triangle Drive In - 7,000 sf - 2 employees
6 - Newspapers, MLs and Realtors
8 - It will be provided where necessary.
14 -Newspapers, MLS and Realtors
11/25/08 12-1-08
t 1
Date` Relocation Coordinator
Right of Way Agent FRM 15-E Revised 09-02 Orioinal 8 1 Coov: Relncatinn Cor

2 Copy Division Relocation File

NEPA/404 MERGER TEAM MEETING AGREEMENT
Concurrence Point No. 1: Purpose and Need 8 Study Area Defined
PROJECT NO.rrIP NOJ NAMEIDESCRIP71ON
Federal Aid Project Number NA
State.ProjectNumber. WBS Element 35488, 1,1
TIP Project Number. R-2507A .. --
TIP Description Widening. US13 from US 158. near Winton to US 158 in Tarheei,'
Hertford and Gates Counties l
The Project Team concurred on this date of July 19, 2007 with the purpose of and need for the
proposed project as stated below and the project study area ea described below and shown in the
attached ezhlbtG
?uippyUnd Nq-9d of PDno^ed Ptolec?
The purpose. of the pro/act is to reduce traffic congestion and improve travel time and safety along
US 13-158 in tfin project area. -
P.roiect 9tudV Area
The project study area boundaries are shown in the attached exhibit.
e
US Army Corps of Engineers
US Environmental Protection Agency"
US Fish and Wildlife Service
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
NC Deoartmentof Guttural Resources
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
NC Division of Coastal Management
NC Department of Transportation
I??7n i/?Y?2/n1e F.rXe11e-r SerYece
NC Owicmn of MnM, Rshones

NEPA/404 MERGER TEAM MEETING AGREEMENT
Concurrence Point No. 2: Alternatives for Detailed Study
PROJECT NO./TIP NOa NAME/DESCRIPTION: -
Federal Aid Project Number NA
State Project Number: WBS Element 35488.1.1
TIP Project Number: R-2507A
TIP Description: Widening US 13 from US 158 near Winton to US 158 in Tarheel, Hertford
and Gates Counties
Purpose and Need of Proposed Project
The purpose of the project is to reduce traffic congestion and improve travel time and safety along
US 13-158 in the project area.
Alternatives to Studv in Detail
Section 1 *5 t Section 5 fat t
Section 2 A" ! Section 6 Ayr
Section 3 t Section 7 EQSf
Section 4 ]*St Section 8 fsst
The Project Team concurred on this date of February 21, 2008 with the alternatives to be carried
forward for the proposed project as indicated above.
Agency
US Army Corps of Engineers
US Environmental Protection Agency l
US Fish and Wildlife Service
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
NC Department of Cultural Resources
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
NC Division of Coastal Management
NC Department of Transportation
Name Date
2

&7?r4/, AT t t7 I -/? 01/I/V. 12 - R ` 0 5
d SONH-11319-Clio:3WUN £6e9M6T6:_)31 9T:P.T i_IHl 6002-LT-J30
Section 4041NEPA IntQrugcncy Agreement
Concurrence Point 2A - Bridgtng (Decisions
Project Title; US 13.158, From US 158 near Winton to US 158 in Tarhooi, Hertford &
Gates Counties, TIP Project R-2507A, WBS Element 35488.1.1
Proicct Description: The proposed project is widening existing two-lane US 13-158 to a
multilane facility from US 158 near Winton to US 158 in Tarhecl.
Typical Section: 4-lane divided w/46' median except a.tChowan River Crossing where
median will be 30'. Ci6j o c°?``^= lrv g ?lL aLr<)
Bridging Decisions: The merger tenln concurred on the following minimum bridge
lengths for the project:
Chowan River - Length of the proposed bridge should be the scone as the existing
(1,121 feet).
Buckhom Creek - Dual 11.0 foot bridges
The project team has unconditionally concurred on this date of August 20, 2009.

I
b6L6?8LET6 10CJtJ :'»?-?? 22: TT COOP_-LI-_3C
NAMB AGENCY

Y
LINE SHEET 4
? ++ .yam .
Fow
? IW
K y,
ifto

. :AlikJlti?•wAs. ^wt_?S ?( "t?'y`? "? `?'
oev
ctl
41
?. wp??oM .ll ?, Y, .-r• , 1.CoS?K?t . ri
- '=?• ?? .?? ?^.? it -?-y.
tiT, .. ?. F III n
a. _ U
-51
-. v
J. l A. 'fy' ' y? J y>y ? 1 - ar Cn •.,y??w. ,; ski-??,•c"
!: " ?vWt-r M i l * ';•-ef,,`r L.rh .ti?:n r1
14 ? ?` "510?'1`R?i7wS?7'.t1?15.?•Sf
low
4 s y =
i„?? t -?'':k2.>a, ?'? fir, y? R•?.,?R.. :-x? +'y'? *?3? r ' "?'•? c.; .
,? 7.. `l ,.p• ,r"??4'?„?44 ?°r? ? W r?rl=?ti - 7^'X . ? Rr-ri. F,
.I r r• i,x,p ' ;aft" x°`y? 7 ?' +7r7 •-
.. !?, - x? ?, p ... a„??y ate' j?+e : .;y'vJprF... ? .?•? t+: r:
. R .y Sr i I.. •'?• ? ? (d "xt?` y„ , - .? _.-r+F"" `7e°'wr.•,?SY^? ?
7 AL t 4;4u t J «` J
q;r 211.
RT,
yx; - ?? *j'L' y'x.. t E?•? ''} f`, St' .t;, N x
:- ti ti • ? a_r ?e
Y? h? r 7n.;
r
V??V.- •• ;?."? A Wa -'+' . ?wt^.Ar?R 't"l(•,V?Pl i_ y..-/^? J,?
`?' s X+?s. Sj.f 'N'. ? pr.(r +? ? -x ?i 'L.?C i'n '.4rt. ?i'?'.
J A• 1 ?..??'' x r "x'?- .? °,.F i ?" ??,F „? L? lt1+ r5 .c l,y,? 1
?, r}•..??, .+K=.'`?:.. ; s??=uCj-,Y ??:?''3 w -v ?. r J wr ty •?y --?ti' nom:.
y? .? t 'r`??P ? r 9?'' ':: t ?` ? .? r?..??,h. a'S4a?? ??fr?4a:7T- ?•?i•'
w,,,lw F. }> ?:`'?' :,`•a ?°rtit ?µl `•?•w¦' ?•?:s.a°'s?x -? t?:.i Jeri. ? ??'f"
T : J w' • ?' `.;„ C `KR.? ..? O Ar ?"'?.-w+?W '; ,• ,.I i`• . ?'1.. V W ?. ti?.i,?1i
't ? ? ..N h*' ? . } `s7/!.•? "'?'4•?''r 1 f} y yi ^j
w. yj?.`1',ytt ?..y'ti'i ? '.- ? - r .:? ° 'a ?('_b ?i` ` ?.. 5:.??r`.?b?f y?rh •K ? ? 1„) a. ?l. ? i-.- y? ? ^+?
^??w.rL.n`.r?r?.a?. ,r -?a _ .- _r.w.. .. .. ?' ?:..Y`l..•'•. -tic• ? r. ?Y'.93?^.r i7 ±+.- r...`_y y .t..' ?` ._. .?,.^'a ?~.: A'
Af

r.
y<
?e

qr
`. r
h -
? A f 7st
r?
+`p„'? . -tom
c

r Z
? ???777

,A ?jk

.1

? J
w Y Y
?? ? .,,4. MATCH
{
w

f.
1'

.` .:---- -- -------- ------------------- -
-- :SA• f4'" `! ?l .!?^?S.i?IZ?•??r?lV??d`. {'...?y??
_... n?f >r?.?\•?a?'.r _".3?.!Kti _?r?1? „\!'i??. __ J•-JIM
77,
44
q.- f
133HS 3NI1 HOiVIN ti d ' a r ? p , k +
Y ;? .: ?-? K$.. i'. ',y ..N .yj r_, r+?„"-ir' t n `ie rf ?Ir -T t K,• ?a y??r:'f..??? ,. .
.Ar ? .t-3?? -: - ' ? ? - _. ? ? i•??,' ttyy???..yy ? •',.,?r ?=2Y?..,+t?, fr+,¢d••?s.?- ^- t!?
.. eft ...? - ,t,ity'?.'_•_ , :•,yu?,p-+l tK'ya'?•`K^
k? ?, _` ? - ?k 1 r p?. ;? 2..: j?ifi A ? ° :s -M M .•`F sTt`?`?',r,yt`. } '..? ?'9I
f'b 1_..?r?L ?-?,?.•. ?+?,t 2??wr ? `, x^?'.7ti ? ^?,t,+?'''t ?'??F.T -.at„„ w ??."?x t?+x? -^a.' •.?"
' r?. ?.. . :? .!?'?+-_"??._. .-?`f -?.?". '-.'?'`'L?:+'1•. -?,^?'ip m :C?'. fir, ,yS ,}•?., .,?; i,?S' lw'?,i-y??a?{. +'???>alp?-}}?;
v +c. ., k' ?: R'te' ply"sy?? r?.?''• A• _ :2C :??? ?- ':''??'_t r?`?° '?i- a r ?`?"'t'` 3r
__ r.•? ?r ? IPf .ty,.?? ?a?? ?1 Y? •t? .l "'C, i?".? 3 '? riyt?i / _ ??f? .?7• a y?'?tib???"??' `
?, •?A w r ?L¢ :. k ?i % ti5.!' t 3" 'lo
C t Ry d ca jrS4' Y? ik n x
,?!,? ? •'x"`", t?. "? ?,?.. R-• s. ?.,i .'f:.•' ,n,, ? '? '? ?` "' .• ??1: ° '^.i Cmfl f ? ?:r a. ? . < ?s'i
y?.???q ? Y : e ,•' ah ? ?M, rv t t t? dJ ate; Y?`??
Z -?k?"? ' ?y" r ?1 rr; ? ??:!.^ ? ' ,t? ?•ti7 .LL,xk1 ••?? F? ???.yZ. ,'a,c., mc.
- f fh _ r ?i??e ?? X?i a?YT'r ? 'r y,??? : t? f` ?', ?'I '?:..ru ?.?•§,
.'V.FS Y*. 1?„1 ?. 1r l'•Y' 1°- ` .M - 9 ?1
:QS ?. , r3 vet.. Y - W ?,
j .
1jJ MY
'?' ?,-e.? r . J` ? - `? . Nit' ' ?.' tK ?? ..?• ???, rn ? ."? ? 7?Z ? 7}may-+`'h ?pc ;f'?,ll' ??' ?9 ).}7?• "tt ' ?•?i
{ w:11r??Ytl?y??A
_ - r11 4 ... w.. r '+ •>v C7t /! , r'AC -'1O,"?' ?"4 ? -•` 1?
ii??J ? G ,rat •t ' ? - ° "? -k+ V 4. y !?
?? ? x ? ' _ m?.'?'?"X'!r':T ?'; tr Yt?. ±?? le,? +:5+ y • _ - ? J a- •? / K t i.• +'e?" ??+ ?,-.?. ??'` `•'"...
x,y?- ` ? ... 1. ? .r. -.: ?•a.. : s F r+` ? ?;?? ?'w. ? a ? 'n
.^^y s
,fir 4, ` "•L H?r. e ? ?J?r _ lam, ?"'? .x? 7^?`y , ?y -? ? ..? .?`'d'•+
..ca, ?+r''.J 4"r -.? .^k .a ?C?'r1M.-' 'r R _ ? ", ys.!S? ar ti?•? ??? ?. f'•a?-,-yl t ?R{-;
' ? n - '?? 'k dC `rW ? ?: r ,t' ?tl?e, '! r 'r ?,f??P ,r,.' ?R+?,... --i.,,. i ? ,S, .tT. •
,?y ? ?_j:??!". ? ,ti? .y ? c ?-?, ?-' '?. ••?1??? "? i. ?qt ! '.. ° ? r „?? ?':r 1?T?.,7? `r?.?r
aAli?' - 1:.?'•?'?- b - Y" ;.?'r +.°-'rj ?(1' ?, l ??r .. - "-? ?_ ~. Z ;
:f ?.'wJX•" ?.r('. .3.••G.i?, :,JW. '.wl' ?',? "rt Y('? p ,1, ti. _ •?11.
p r, .
"..ice"
• ??? ..!'? +. t y . ? ? ? -•y`??(`'•eY ?? Js J 4' ` ?"/•S:L:.. _ . ?. ?' .4. ?,ay,? a +?i
^? "''e?. - Nt7-'r_ ... .rr,,•?,,.r.7,'? r.-.S?- s - ? ?7' t.,. .?•y+ ?} r J??
a41 WY y ? J'
~?Y`y7? k°? s,?_'S??'y ??• :may.- ?. '!, ?"w.?' ??'??'?`??+',?7j `lY. _
\ _ ?.• .?'•`.' {. ? ?y .1. _J: .* gym .•? ?' t.??
r T h w5 4L +s VP.?? r' f 47 S; y??`` (y j'
rn O y ?? 1.. y1 Y 7 (? r 4 t tt Z ?.. SPA .? rlKgs- r¢ .
•76 O Jam. 1?\ S trTO 7 -?.kd'. '3" .?f .w.i•+? i r71?....
CAI
'w
cr)
y,j ' 4 u Q
? O ??, r1NM .? ... ? "'.,`.-.'`"t,Nepat?-"ra.:w.i-?Ri ::;"?.??;?? i'Mr.-?" ?:i9.Rai'??-?... ^'._?1t`'.'x.•
AOR,
j y +C
Vq
3

Ate' ?, 'Y'. ??• Y _

ac •Y ? •

F

co

c: 7
a

yr ;4•

eft "? }..???•
? i.s'
i :. c
t?h ^-tµ
4F'? a t 1 .

ya?«

I I
i\ M T
BEGIN PROJECT
l
' R-2
R-2507B
END PROJECT
13
\.. \
R•2578 ?
tford 1,?f Gates
inty County 5 s Tarheel 158
`1 t Chowan Swamp Corner High sR
Game Lends 1 1122
Story's Crossroads SR 1126
Historic District tiro
137 h
I ` ?o
13 B` SR??2B s ` _.

13
Miles Legend
0 0.5 1 2 0 Historic_District
I i i l Gameland
y
r? 4OR IN CCROL?VA OCPARTMENT Of 'RANSPORTATION
1 P OIV-';rON 04 H
GNWA :
PROTECT )EVE CORNETT A4D E'IV110NMCNTAL
ANAIYSIi 1RAYCM
US 13
US 13-158 WIDENING
GATES AND HERTFORD COUNTIES
TIP PROJECT R-2507A
FIGURE I
MIN. 200' R/W
GGl ld W1
GROUND
46'

2
4'
6' 30'**
6'
24'
10'
30'
2' 2' ?k
I t t
PROPOSED US 13 WIDENING
* 6' PAVED SHOULDER FROM US 158 /NC 45 TO NC 137
4' PAVED SHOULDER FROM NC 137 TO US 158 IN TARHEEL
* * USE 30' MEDIAN APPROACHING CHOWAN RIVER CROSSING
FIGURE 3A

1
1
8' 12'
36'
30' 24' 8'
4' 2'1 - 14' 2' 8'
MIN.
t t
---------------.--------
- - - - - - - - - - -Exist. Bnd ------1J
-1----?-e -
CHOWAN RIVER STRUCTURES
W/30' WIDTH MEDIAN
t t
12' 4' 4' 12' 12' 8'
36'
TYPICAL BRIDGE SECTION
OVER BUCKHORN CREEK /RUN SWAMP
FIGURE 313

r ?
M

, f'^+

fo T
N U)
N D
O
ti

?
?
N

?j
W-)

nr 1- e? ?sv N N

N C
T J
4
f T
r?^

v. y)
T
1
Q

E
? SSAL 70
? NTT N Of9 N =
CB

U
oo
?
j
it fv,,?ss
N N

N
U) m

00
CO

C) C
O tt I'.lf 11 55?
-11 t-
(
? ?? r
W-j co COZ
U) c6 N T
co
00
c- W-)
01 ?09 m 'O
N N
?) M r L

C:) - rmr
ss?--ff
co
N ..1?
T
) N
U) IL
?i CY)
CD
00

? r C
80? 15
7 r
oY
l ?? N Q
_ r Cl) C
O
i )U V ? Cn
>a co
W 55.4 Fhf (". 13If 60-4 IM 10
Ti 12)
CY)
00 4 _ 4
? Y
old r
Cn C f2)
L
U
Z

0
a ?
N
C
O

? " CG ? OJ
K
V L lJ ` ?1

Ij? 00 w
a?

? y
C•r r

O N C a

a
W
Q
U)
w
O
C
N
w+
N
X
w

sl
O ?
:>> wF JO Y
0
Z
?^?. W ?F•, ?""s W
?IL
a y o
OUP
"?? ?,C a:tLO ?C
:a]
co

r?

,tC4 Ss? PSf 4
(J, r.) 00
LO
s
c+7
(D

u N
? T

r
?s9
M
?
04
rvd J
_
N
co

00
N t

?-

C
4r"-'
35 ro

CI) T

it'cl
or -?09 p7

N 2
D
C?
Df l• LN LOco "
? co
o
U
Lo
N
r T

'C?
ir'sl
rr
e
?ss 00

01
N
r
f _
[?
T L
° C') Q' co
CO
U)

Q0

U
?
M
vsAf 11
?'?` T
r
35 f Jl
?'1
C
N (1'1) tl ? T
? ? N Z
w cy') N
N
L()
T

T N

I r r r 0`r
?
-
CO -p

N O
T
? Yd
J
N (n CO
N
co sS ?Ptit
Jt LO
T

a c
co N LO
T
C

ne
0?-15 C
C'7 m
1 J, t 1 T J
T
Cl)
a
M

L N Q
O
d

C) LO

T

?L/?
Cq

? L1J ? C°
rnr
00) c 10 Ln
00
N
N
00
? P
°o
00 z
U

co
r Y a

N_ ? ?

?o
c

•- c
N
? L

R ? I
m ? r? ? o r
t} x ? ? 7

cc w ?. v
? rn oo y Q
'

? s

FC-I ? U ? $ ?a r ?

Q
Q
W
H
LU
O
M
0
N

y ?
o
? o a
7 p > ?
..l 7 i > T j a 0.
> AL
a c?wzr :.
o p
O-- 7_r-?G
u w V n w") z 0
CC=
d =?o o?.a ?c
a
>
x o as a
US 13
Tarheel
SR 1201 US 158
TIrRAam Rd.
SR 1122
Hills La F
SR 1200
Srrd B nkb Rd. SR 1128
Carry Hbn Rd.
SR 1128
Bwftld Rd.
SR 1230 NC 137
Para1 Rd.
HERTFORDi: COUNTY
COUNTY
n US 13/158
p.
p ?.
US 15,8 Rhmra SR 1131
Edge SD SBap L¦rwft Rd.
SR 1218
lnOUMl Park Rd. NC 45
US 13
SR 11
9arlrld
0 MILES
I i
SR 1200
band Bwft Rd.
HERTFORD O
COUNTY Cf
n
p.
US 158 Rhrere
Edge SD
SR 1218 /
IMUL1al Pek Rd.
SR 1230
Powell Rd
US
NC 45
13
0 MILES 1
I I I
NORM CAJtO1JNA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATIpN
I PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
.. EAMIRONMEMAL ANALYSES SW CH
TIP PROJECT R-2507A
2008 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE
FIGURE 5A
,,,ttt NORTH LAROU14A DEPARTMENT OF
y1 TRANSPORTATION
T PROJECT DEVElOPENT AND
ENVBIONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
TIP PROJECT R-2507A
2030 LEVEL OF SERVICE
WITHOUT PROJECT
FIGURE 5B
LOS-A
LOS- B
®
LOS-c
LOS-0
LOS-E
i l LO6-F
I LEVEL OF SERVICE
US 13
Taftel
SR 1201
Tlrddr Rd. US 158
`SR 1122
SR 1128
Caron HVh Rd.
NC
LOS - A
-LOS-B
0 LOS - C
? LOS - D
LOS-E
LOS-F
LEVEL OF SERVICE
US 13
Tarheel
SR 1201
Tlnkham Rd. ` US 158
SR 1230
Powell Rd.
HERTFORD r GATES `
COUNTY COUNTY
r
US 13/158
, 0,
Rivera SR 1131
%
US 158 Edge SD Snap. Land
SR 1218
InduehJal Park Rd. N(r' 45
yus 13
0 MILES 1
I I I
_SR 1122
SR 1200 Hills Lane Rd.
Sand Banks Rd. SR 1128
Comer High Rd.
SR 1128
Barfield Rd.
NC 137
SR 1128
Barfield Rd.
0 LOS•A
® LOS -B
0 LOS - C
0 LOS - D
0 LOS - E
0 LOS - F
LEVEL OF SERVICE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND
t?-.. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
TIP PROJECT R-2507A
2030 LEVEL OF SERVICE
WITH PROJECT
FIGURE 6
1 . r r •ly,• 1
........ rte. -r•.'f•/r•},r?-,t-. .??•?.-j.-.
v.. ? ?'.- 11 C 4• Y '
r _ ti,.•ti } MATCH LINE SHEET 2
, ?..r.F 1: -,?`_ ;.,t F.ti.,., ? ?Jry,•,.ti ,r`' ti'•. ?tiT •r: r: ?'..,. :i
.,r} . ?. "?:}-??• •,r''''- r/_ r. •: 11 ti -ti. .. f'•. ? .'S.? -5. r•..1 ? ?:• •..'. •'
-_• - E
I? WAN Riv ;_.
S 1151 ,? •, •1•' ••1. 7 •= 1R•r .•?•' _L. -I
.1 •-L•?: 1L / ,1 .I.r _ .' _ •Y: .''_ •''-`. l-• '' I 't 1 ?., - .1.'-ti, ti.
?
0 1?
M co
?LO
I T
VJ
vJ
2
11?
1..L
O
H
I..L
I..L
r O Q
Zr'-
() O
00 C-4
N
?U
Uw
w
)O
O?
?a
Mz
03
zw
z
0
LO
co
co
W
C7
W
w
r
•

AW
¦ T
r
:L
M
1,k r
4f

woo-
' LL
ff r JJ.?r?I'LL w?•fIW J.+X
MATCH LINE SHEET 3
oil'
i +++ _SrL y 00
r?T M w
V ? I P1
Y3J
• ? /fir"
r 1
' ? ? et•
F IN Ire
1
fig(
° r e
16
•i
r r ? ?S ? 3
! { r?' ? fff ?
r rr •1
xr
r r
rr r
r
r
• r{r ?• ? !ff ? y 1
r! ? ? r f ? NSF
1
? r
? r Or { ff
00
T
rr ?
r ?
l
a
Qo
65g h
Q?
U r
f .?
---------------+'-----
1? 1 MATCH LINE SHEET
LM
r
r
.r. *!
\41 X,"?
1 r' ' f!
14*1
{
I ? Y,?
L - r f f
L
f Y
f
??.
00
L
J
l
t
drr a T. r y ? .. f
•, y ? 12{1`1
1 t 3 ?- r
is
? I g

Y
E Y ?,
L N
-
r
r
L
r
t
k MATCH LINE SHEET 4
C:r y
17

00
r
f?
v r+h,n M/?iM
«•v . - - - - - - - -
ailO131j8 e 8Z
r
??32iC N8CN?C 4f +
ne/ dw b
Ms Nna
?r • ?• /mot
% r-w% i!
s??
e 00
f
.-r+ +r-.ti r1
.+T f ? ? v, ?a• ti
r
46? 91
of"
•'r r +4 qu
++ •ti r • "-* i ti Pr i T 4R
X230 •--' a ?' f• ? . ;ti:
f ?r
?+f?v ? ? .? r?• •• ?1?4tr?v-.1
f. rr
r • 4•.•1 1

?r
-
------------ ------------------------- -
£ 133HS 3NII HOIVIN
? r?r?f • •r
M
r
z
D
C
L
C?
O
m - in -r-06%
Z i ? 5

ti
f

r J
.?•?•oo..
Mn nor
. - I ?".,
O
m ?A
m O
? o
t
t
IV
S
f • 1

i .r.1•w.
: rr
• s
M?
} too
r
ran
n a.a.. er+r'
C l)
O
V
f??+i

1 - _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ L _ . .
9133HS 3NI-1 HOiVn
,r
7 N
I
1 ? ? I•
r ?
. e
r? r A r , 5
z _
?T 0cri
0 W
l / ?F ` r+
Y .J• _'t
z
m
f 1JJJ
s r ?f T
4
}
z
?; n
d ?
c =
A ?
`- O
??ti'?r
._
?°"
,.
??,.__ .
? ? ran
?? ?'
?. , ?.?
??
. ,,, ?:
"??v
?? ? ? ??;
_ ? .,, _. _
?,,;" ?K t
?f
"i.
d,.
?? .
a; _a-sJ
1? !
--------- --- --------
MATCH LINE SHEET 6
? ?.Qa WbH
6021. aSN1.1)

2
CD
2
W
w
O
U
S ?
M QO
r- LO
T-

l'++? ? ,.? .
r ..?
??tX. .Tye
r
a
re -
M
7F

1
d
74 W,
?el ?V
F
{

r
?O
8
I i
r?
V
-i Q l o
cn
M'
r-
cn
rn?
m r
.? • N
?+I O
? '•? 1. -`\\ . --? r. n
??l } T l
O a` = f `
m `' x
n
T /
f
n
\.` X41 _ - x .. .. ?`
m , "..

/\
h1A,TCHLSNE SEE SHEET 2
mom- "m
p
N fTi ?
FA
4
- l ... ,-
S,Q , ?q.
77
z
O?c
OJ