WI0100106_Complete File - Historical_20100630

State of North Carolina RECEIVED DENR DVVQ
Department of Environment and Natural ResourcesAqUifer Protec6on SeCfion
Division of Water Quality JUN 3 0 2010
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
• Do not use this form for remediation systems that extract contaminated groundwater, treat it, and reinject the treated groundwater.
• Submit TWO copies of the completed application and all attachments to the address on the last page of this form.
Any changes made to this form will result in the application package being returned.
C 'C" t D LO
Application Number (to be completed by DWQ): \NfT_01'_'Q
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's Name (gener-ally the r-espeftsible pafty): Milkeo, hie (non-rMonsible party)
2. Signing Official's Name*: Mr. Charles L. Gaither Title: President
* Signing Official must be in accordance with instructions in part VI on page 7.
3. Mailing address of applicant: Milkco, Inc.
City: Asheville State: NC Zip: 28 816
Telephone number: 828-254-9560 Fax number: 828-252-8949
4. Property Owner's Name (if different from Applicant):
5. Property Owner's mailing address:
City:
State:
6. Name and address of contact person who can answer questions about the proposed injection project:
Name: Andrew W. Alexander, PG, RSM Title: Senior Hydrogeologist
Company: Bunnell-Lammons En2ineerina, Inc. (BLE)
Address:_ 6004 Ponders Court
City: Greenville State: SC Zip: 29615
Telephone number: 864-288-1265 -Fax number: 864-288-4430
Email Address: andy@—blecorp.com
H. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1 . Project - is: CD (Modification of existing permit (Renewal of existing permit without modification
( Renewal of existing permit with modification
2. If this application is being submitted for renewal or modification to an existing permit, provide:
existing permit number and the issuance date
For renewal without modifications, fill out sections I & H only, sign the certification on the last page of this
form, and obtain the property owner's signature to indicate consent (if the applicant is not the owner).
For all renewals, submit a status report including monitoring results of all injection activities to date.
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Pagel of8

"PLICATION FOR PERNUT TO CONSTRUCT ANDIOR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
M. INCIDENT & FACILITY DATA
A� FACILITY INFORMATION
1. Facility name: Former Andrex Industries CM.
2. Complete physical address of the facility: 180 Deaverview Road
City: Asheville County: Buncombe State: NC Zip: 28806
B. INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
1. Describe the source of the contamination: Textile dyeing and finishing. Use of PCE for industrial textile
cleanina
2. List all contaminants present in soils or groundwater at the site (contaminants may be listed in groups, e.g.,
gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, fuel oil, chlorinated ethenes, chlorinated ethanes, metals, pesticides/herbicides, etc):
Chlorinated ethenes. Chlorinated ethanes (trace level). fuel oil hvdrocarbons (trace level)
3. Has LNAPL or DNAPL ever been observed at the site (even if outside the injection zone)?
(Yes If yes, list maximum measured separate phase thickness —feet
(0 If no, list maximum concentration of total VOCs observed at site:— (MW-5) 49,830 ppb
4. Agency managing the contamination incident:
(UST Section ( Superfund Section (including REC Program and DSCA sites)
( DWQ Aquifer Protection Section ( Solid Waste Section
(Hazardous Waste Section ( Other: Brownfields Program
5. Incident managers name Ms. Tragy Wahl and phone number 828 251-7465
6. Incident number or other site number assigned by the agency managing the contamination incident:
Brownfields Prpject Number 07022-03-11 & Groundwater Incident No. 6586
C. PERMITS
List all permits or construction approvals that have been issued for the facility or incident, including those not
directly related to the proposed injection operation:
1. Hazardous Waste Management program permits under RCRA: FonnerRCRAIDNo.NCDO74498387
2. DWQ Non -Discharge or NPDES permits:
3. County or DEH subsurface wastewater disposal permits:
4. Other environmental permits required by state or federal law: See attached Summaa offermits Issued revised
from the CSA (Appendix D)
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 2 of 8

APPLICATION FOR PERIVHT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 WeUs —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T WeRs — Tracer Injection
IV. INJECTION DATA
A- INJECTION FLUID DATA
1 . List all proposed injectants.
NOTE: Any substance to be injected as a tracer or to promote in situ remediation must be reviewed by the
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section (OEES) of the Division ofPublic Health, Department of
Health and Human Services. Review the list of approved injectants or contact the UIC Program to determine if
the injectants you are proposing have been reviewed by OEES.
Injectant: 1% milk solution
Concentration at point of injection: 1 % milk and 99% water
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
Injectant:
Concentration at point of injection:
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
Injectant:
Concentration at point of injection:
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
Ini ectant:
Concentration at point of injection:
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants:
2. So e of fluids used to dilute or chase the injectants listed above:
None
cipal water supply
Groundwater from private well or any well within 1/4 mile of injection site
Air
Other:
3. If any well within '/4 mile of injection site, a private well, or surface water is to be used as the fluid source, supply
the following information: NOT APPLICABLE
a. Location/ID number of
b. Depth of
c. Formatio:
d. Rock/Sediment
e. In Attachment C, provide a current, complete chemical analysis of the water from the source well, including
analyses for all contaminants suspected or historically recognized in soil or groundwater on the site.
NOTE: lfcontaminated groundwater is to be used as the dilution or chasefluid, this is not theproperpermit
applicationform. You must applyfor a closed -loop groundwater remediation permit using gpl2lication form
GWRS.
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 3 of 8

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 WeRs —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
B. PROPOSED OPERATING PARAMETERS
I . Duration of Injection: (Please Reference Tables in Section V Attachments)
a. Maximum number of separate injection events:
b. Expected duration of each injection event:
c. Expected duration between events (if more than one event):
2. Injection rate per well: gallons per minute (gpm)
3. Total Injection volume: gallons per day (gpd); — gallons per event (if separate events)
4. Injection pressure: pounds/square inch (psi)
5. Temperature at point of injection: - OF
6. Briefly describe how the above parameters will be measured and controlled: Flow will be controlled b
manually 9perated valve on graduated tank.
7. Estimated hydraulic capacity of the well: gpm
C. INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA
1. Injection will be vi --
isting well(s) proposed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through (6) below to the best
Proposed well(s) to be constructed tor use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) throu ow as
proposed construction specifications. See Weff Logs in Section V Attachments
'Jose,
2. Well Drilling Contractor's Name: —
NC Well Contractor Certification number:
3. Date to be constructed: Number of borings:
Approximate depth of each boring (feet):
4. Screened interval/Injection interval of injection wells:
Depth: — to feet below ground surface (if multiple intervals, indicate shallowest and deepest depth).
5. Well casing (N/A if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: ( PVC ( Stainless steel( Other:
Casing depth: to ft.
6. Grout (N/A if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: ( Cement Bentonite Other:
Grout depth: _ to ft.
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 4 of 8

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells —In Situ Groundwater Reniediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
V. ATTACHMIENTS
Provide the following items as separate attachments with the given headings:
A- SITE HISTORY
Provide a brief description of the site history including:
(1) site usage historically and present,
(2) origin of the contamination,
(3) previous remedial action(s).
NOTE.- G.S. 89E-18 requires that any geologic plans, reports, or documents in which the performance is related to the
public we0are or safeguarding of the environment be prepared by a licensed geologist or subordinate under their
direction. G.S. 89E-13 requires that all drawings, reports, or documents involving geologic workprepared or approved
by a licensed geologist, or a subordinate under their direction, be signed and sealed by the licensed geologist.
B. HYDROGEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
Provide a hydrogeologic description, soils description, and cross section of the subsurface to a depth that includes the
known or projected depth of contamination. The hydrogeologic description shall include:
(1) the regional geologic setting;
(2) significant changes in lithology;
(3) the hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity, and specific yield of the aquifer to be used for injection, including a
description of the test(s) used to determine these parameters; and
(4) the depth to the mean seasonal high water table.
C. INJECTION FLUID COMPOSITION
Describe the chemical, physical, biological and radiological characteristics of each injectant. Attach the Material Safety
Data Sheet (N4SDS) for each injectant. If a private well or a well within Y4mile of the injection site is used as the source
well, include chemical analysis of source fluid here.
D. INJECTION RATIONALE
Attach a brief description of the rationale for selecting the injectants and concentrations proposed for injection, including:
(1) goals of the injection project;
(2) explanation and/or calculations of how the proposed injectant volume and concentration were determined;
(3) a description of the reactions between the injectants and the contaminants present including specific breakdown
products or intermediate compounds that may be formed by the injection; and
(4) summary results of modeling or testing performed to investigate the injectant's potential or susceptibility to change
(biological, chemical or physical) in the subsurface.
E. INJECTION PROCEDURE AND EQUIPMENT
Provide a detailed description of all planned activities related to the proposed injection including but not limited to:
(1) construction plans and materials;
(2) operation procedures;
(3) a detailed diagram of the surface and subsurface portions of the system; and
(4) a planned injection schedule.
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 5 of 8

APPLICATION FOR PERNUT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
F. MONITORING PLAN
Provide a plan for monitoring the results of the injection, including:
(1) a list of existing and proposed monitoring wells to be used;
(2) a list of monitoring parameters and analytical methods to be used; and
(3) a schedule for sampling to monitor the proposed injection.
NOTE.- The selected monitoring wells must be located so as to detect any movement of injection fluids, process by-
products, or formation fluids outside the injection area or zone. The monitoring parameters should include the target
contaminants as well as secondary or intermediate contaminants which may result Jrom the injection and other
parameters which may serve to indicate the progress of the intended reactions, such as pH, ORP, dissolved oxygen, and
other electron acceptors and donors. The monitoring schedule should be consistent with the pace of the anticipated
reactions and rate oftransport of the injectants and contaminants.
G. WELL DATA
Provide a tabulation of data on all existing or abandoned wells within 1/4 mile of the injection well(s) which penetrate the
proposed injection zone, including, but not limited to, monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection wells.
Such data shall include a description of each well's use (water supply, monitoring, etc), total depth, screened or open
borehole depth interval, and well construction or abandomnent record, if available.
MEMBI'Mr,11110
Attach the following scaled, site -specific maps:
(1) Area map based on the most recent USGS 7.5' topographic map of the area, at a scale of 1:24,000 and
showing the location of the proposed injection site.
(2) Site map including:
a. all property boundaries;
b. all buildings within the property boundary-,
c. existing and proposed injection wells or well field(s)
d. any existing sources of potential or known groundwater contamination, including waste storage,
treatment or disposal systems within V4 mile of the injection well or well system;
e. all surface water bodies within V4 mile of the injection well or well system; and
f. all existing or abandoned wells within '/4 mile of the injection well(s) which penetrate the proposed
injection zone, including, but not limited to, monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection
wells.
(3) Potentiometric surface map(s) including:
a. direction of groundwater movement
b. existing and proposed monitoring wells
c. existing and proposed injection wells
(4) Contaminant plume map(s) including:
a. the horizontal extent of the contaminant plume, including isoconcentration lines
b. existing and proposed monitoring wells
c. existing and proposed injection wells
(5) Cross-section(s) to the known or projected depth of contamination, including:
a. horizontal and vertical extent of the contaminant plume, including isoconcentration. lines
b. major changes in lithology
c. existing and proposed monitoring wells
d. existing and proposed injection wells
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 6 of 8

APPLICATION FOR PERART TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 51 Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 7 of 8

gEGSIVED I IDENF, I
Qatton
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJAMOBNO ZBAU
Type 51 Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type ST Wells — Tracer Injection
V1. CERTIFICATION (to be signed as required below or by that person's authorized agent)._
NCAC 15A 2C .0211 (b) requires that all permit applications shall be signed as follows:
I . for a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer
2. for a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively
3. for a municipality or a state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or
ranking publicly elected official
4. for all others: by the well owner.
If an authorized agent is signing on behalf of the applicant, then supply a letter signed by the applicant that
names and authorizes their agent.
I hereby certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information
submitted in this document and all attachments therein, and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals
immediately responsible for obtaining said information, I believe that the information is true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are penalties, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment, for submitting
false information. I agree to construct, operate, maintah repair, and if applicable, abandon the injection well(s)
and all related appurtenances in accordance with the approved specifications and conditions of the Permit
Printed Name and Title: Mr. Charles L. Gaither, President
Signature: & (104X_4 zae� Date:
V11. CONSENT OF PROPERTY OWNER (if the property is not owned by the applicant) 1 �
("Owner " means any person who holds the fee or other property rights in the well being constructed. A well is
realproperty and its construction on land shall be deemed to vest ownership in the land owner, in the absence of
conhvq agreement in writing)
As owner of the property on which the injection well(s) are to be constructed and operated, I hereby consent to
allow the applicant to construct each injection well as outlined in this application and agree that it shall be the
responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the injection well(s) conform to the Well Construction Standards
(Title 15A NCAC 2C.0200).
Printed Name and
Signature: Date:
Submit TWO copies of the completed application package, including all attachments, to:
UIC Program
Aquifer Protection Section
North Carolina DENR-DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Telephone [phone]
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 8 of 8

Appendix D
Summary of Permits Issued
Andrex Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
DWQ Ground -Water Incident Number 6586
BLE Project No. J96-1022-01
PermitNumber
Date
Permit Type
Includes
10-0226-WM-0188
4/22/1991
Monitor Well
MW-1 & MW-2
10-0226-WM-0201
7/11/1991
Monitor Well
MW-3 through MW-8 4 MW-8A
NA*
May-95
Monitor Well
MW-9 through MW-12
WM0100103
4/3/1997
Monitor Well
MW-19
WM0100104
4/3/1997
Monitor Well
MW-20
WM0100105
4/3/1997
Monitor Well
MW-13 & MW-14
WM0100106
4/3/1997
Monitor Well
MW-15, MW-16, & MW-18
WM0100107
4/3/1997
Monitor Well
MW-17
WM0100108
4/3/1997
Monitor Well
MW-21 & MW-22
WM0100109
4/3/1997
Monitor Well
MW-23
WM0100110
4/3/1997
Monitor Well
MW-24 & MW-25
10-0226-WR-0265
12/18/1992
Recovery Well
RW-1 & RW-2
WRO100043
October/1999
Recovery Well
RW-3, RW-4, RW-5, RW-6 & RW-7
AC-778
5/14/1993
MSD Allocation
Ground -Water Treatment System
G-015-93
9/24/1993
MSD Discharge
Ground -Water Treatment System
GWR-13
3/29/1993
Air Permit**
Ground -Water Treatment System
Notes:
* = At the time of installation (May 1995) permits for on -site monitoring wells were no longer required.
MSD = Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County.
** = Air permit issued by the Western North Carolina Regional Air Pollution Agency.
Appendix D of Andrex Permits Summary for UIC Permit.xls

ISLE
BUNNELL-LAMMONS ENGINEERING, INC.
GEOTECHNICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS CONSULTANTS
June 8, 20 10
Underground Injection Control Program
DWQ - Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Attention: Mr. Thomas Slusser, L.G.
Program Manager
Subject: UIC Permit Application (UIC-51/5T)
Section V Attachments
Former Andrex Industries Facility
180 Deaverview Road
Asheville, North Carolina
BLE Project Number J09-1022-28
Groundwater Incident Number 6586
Brownfields Project Number 07022-03-11
Dear Mr. Slusser:
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc. (BLE) is pleased to submit the subject documents for
implementation of an in situ groundwater remediation plan at the subject site.
SITE HISTORY
The following information was obtained from our previous work at the Andrex site (1991 through
present) and from our conversations and emails with Mr. Buddy Gaither and Mr. Jack Levins of
Milkco, Inc., Mr. Drew Stahlman, Mr. Stephen Gilman, and 1W. Mark Davies of Stahhnan
Consulting, and Mr. Daniel Stiles of EAS Professionals, Inc.
Andrex fori-nerly owned and operated an industrial textile production facility located at 180
Deaverview Road within the city limits of Asheville, North Carolina (Figures 1, 2, and 3). The
company operated a knitted fabric weaving and cutting business for women's and children's clothing
at this location. In prior years, the facility was operated as a textile finishing business that
conducted cutting, dry cleaning, shrinking and packaging of fabrics. The subject facility was in
operation since the mid 1960s, although under various ownership. A two-story light manufacturing
facility with approximately 77,000 square feet of office, manufacturing, warehouse, storage and
utility space occupied the approximately nine -acre site. Two buildings were present at the site; a
split level brick building and slab -on -grade metal building.
No dry cleaning has been conducted on site since 1995. However, prior to 1995, dry cleaning
operations were prevalent on site and the use of tetrachloroethylene (a.k.a. Perchloroethylene, PCE)
was common.' Virgin PCE was stored on site in a 6,000-gallon underground storage tank (UST).
6004 PONDERS COURT PHONE [phone]
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29615 FAx [phone]

MIL13
Milk Solution Injection Plan Section VAttachments June 8, 2010
Former Andrex Industries, Asheville, North Carolina BLE Project Number J09-1022-28
Prior to 1989, the use of the PCE UST was discontinued and the tank was filled with sand. The UST
was replaced with a 6,000-gallon AST which was used until 1995. In 1995, dry cleaning processes
and the use of PCE were discontinued.
In 1991 concentrations of PCE were detected in the groundwater above the applicable North
Carolina Title 15A Subchapter 2L (NC2L) groundwater standards' maximum level of 0.7 gg/l and
the NCDENR issued Groundwater Incident Number 6586 for the site. Concentrations of PCE were
also documented in the soil near the PCE UST and at other subsurface facility locations. The
NCDENR approved a comprehensive site assessment (CSA) and corrective action plan (CAP) for
the site and remedial efforts were conducted from 1993 through 2005. Remedial efforts consisted of
the installation and operation of two groundwater pump and treat (P&T) systems and one soil vapor
extraction (SVE) system.
The SVE and both groundwater P&T systems were operated and maintained by BLE for Andrex
from May 2003 through August 2005. Treated groundwater effluent was discharged to the sanitary
sewer under a MSD permit. BLE also performed annual site -wide groundwater and surface water
sampling and analysis for Andrex to monitor the fate of the groundwater plume. BLE submitted
quarterly reports remedial progress through August 2005 and annual groundwater monitoring
reports through 2005 to the NCDENR to document site activities.
The remediation system operations were suspended in August 2005 at the discretion of the property
owner. Annual groundwater monitoring was also suspended at the discretion of the property owner,
with the last sampling event conducted in November 2005.
In early 2005, Andrex requested that BLE evaluate feasible remedial alternatives for the site. A
preliminary review of alternate remedial technologies identified a unique opportunity to evaluate
bioremediation at the site. Food -grade lactate containing byproducts (milk solution) from the
neighboring Milkco, Inc. (Milkco) facility were being considered for use as a bio-enhancing remedial
product for the former Andrex facility.
In 2005, Andrex retained BLE to perform a pilot study of the milk byproducts. The study was to
include two parts. The first part was a bench test which was to be followed by a field trial. BLE
completed the bench study in early 2006. The results showed a net decrease in PCE concentration of
30% after 40 days in those microcosms containing the highest concentrations of milk solution.
Significant concentrations of PCE daughter products were also produced in the bench study
indicating successful de -chlorination of the parent product, as anticipated. The field trial portion of
the pilot test was suspended by Andrex after the bench test results were obtained.
In 2006, Milkco entered into a Brownfield's Agreement (Agreement) with the State of North
Carolina as part of a potential purchase of the Andrex property (Appendix A — Brownfields Plat).
The property was sold in 2007 and as part of the plan (see below) for retrofit of the subject site;
Milkco removed and/or demolished selected equipment and facility infrastructure.
2

IBLE
Milk Solution Injection Plan Section V Attachments June 8, 2010
Former Andrex Industries, Asheville, North Carolina BLE Project Number J09-1022-28
In August 2007, three underground storage tanks (one PCE and two heating oil) were removed and
disposed by a contractor retained by Milkco on behalf of Andrex. The results of the activities were
documented in a report titled Report of Limited Assessment for UST Closure dated November 26,
2007 (BLE Project No. J07-1022-20).
In February 2008, Andrex resumed annual groundwater monitoring at the site. BLE performed the
sampling services and prepared and submitted a report titled Report of Annual Groundwater and
Surface Water Sampling and Analysis for 2008 dated November 18, 2008 (BLE Project No. J08-
1022-22) to document the event
As part or Milkco's redevelopment plans for the site, BLE issued a plan titled Work Plan for
Redevelopment of the Andrex Bro-wqfiields Site (Mi1kco Cooler Expansion) dated June 13, 2008
(BLE Project No. J08-1022-23). The plan addressed the Program's requirements including
excavation and disposal of contaminated soil (source area) and continued groundwater monitoring.
The Program reviewed and approved (with modification) the plan in a letter to BLE dated July 7,
2008. The schedule for implementation of the redevelopment plan was changed on December 11,
2008 with concurrence of the Program.
In July 2008, BLE abandoned selected groundwater monitoring and recovery wells in accordance
with the approved redevelopment plan. The results of the well abandom-nent activities were
documented in a report titled Report of Well Abandonment Services for the Milkco, Cooler
Expansion dated January 19, 2009 (BLE Project No. J08-1022-26).
From July through September 2008, contaminated soils were removed and disposed by a contractor
retained by Milkco in accordance with the approved redevelopment plan. The results of the remedial
activities were documented in a report titled Report of Hotspot Soil Removal and Disposal for the
Milkco Cooler Expansion dated June 3, 2009 (BLE Project No. J08-1022-25).
By December 2008, the former Andrex brick building(s) and metal building had been demolished
with only the building slabs remaining. Additionally, all groundwater and soil remediation systems
had been dismantled, removed, and stored by Milkco. All work performed by Milkco (non -
responsible party) is in compliance with the requirements of the NCDENR Brownfields Program
(Program) and the Agreement.
In November 2009, BLE performed the annual sampling services for 2009 and prepared and
submitted a report titled Report ofAnnual Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling andAnalysis
for 2009 dated April 20, 2010 (BLE Project No. J09-1022-29).
In January 20 10, earthwork started for the conversion of the site to a truck transfer and parking facility for
the Milkco plant per the approved redevelopment plan. The earthwork is currently in process.

NILE
Milk Solution Injection Plan Section VAttachments June 8, 2010
Former Andrex Industries, Asheville, North Carolina BLE Project Number J09-1022-28
Previous Remedial Actions
A groundwater pump and treat system (upper system) and a soil vapor extraction (SVE) system
were installed at the site in the mid 1990's. Groundwater was recovered from two recovery wells
RW-1 and RW-2 attached to the upper system. Upgrades to the groundwater recovery systems were
completed in 2002. The upgrades included the addition of one recovery well (RW-3) to the upper
system and construction of a new lower system and the installation of four new lower system
recovery wells (RW-4 through RW-7). After 2002, contaminated groundwater was recovered by
seven recovery wells RW-1 through RW-7. Groundwater recovery from RW-1 through RW-3
(upper system) was restarted on March 25, 2002. Groundwater recovery from RW-4 through RW-7
(lower system) began on May 23, 2002. The system upgrades were documented in a report titled
As -Built Engineering Plans and Specification Groundwater Pump and Treat Systems (2002
Upgrade) dated February 5, 2003.
Operation of both groundwater systems was discontinued on August 23, 2005 and the flinds for
operation of the systems were diverted to a laboratory -scale (bench) pilot test of an alternate
remedial technology. The bench test was completed in 2006, however reporting of the results was
suspended by Andrex while the Brownfields Agreement was in progress. As part of the site
redevelopment plan, the results of the bench test and plans for future groundwater remediation are
submitted herein.
The soil vapor extraction (SVE) system has not been operational in since November 2004 when a
power surge (presumed lightning strike) damaged the system. Repairs were not made as Andrex had
proposed a discontinuance of SVE remedial operations to the NCDENR at that time. Repairs were
contingent on the initiation of the pilot test described above. Andrex. opted to conduct the pilot test
and therefore the SVE system was not repaired.
In the summer of 2008, as part of the approved redevelopment plan, both groundwater systems and
the SVE system we disassembled and the equipment was placed in storage by Milkco. Additionally,
also as part of the redevelopment plan, "hotspot" soils (contaminated soils with concentrations above
a specified limit) were removed and disposed by Milkco on behalf of Andrex. A report of soil
removal and disposal was submitted under separate cover.
HYDROGEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
The subject site is located within the Blue Ridge Belt of North Carolina. The Blue Ridge Belt is
bounded on the southeast by the Brevard fault zone and on the northwest by the Blue Ridge fault
system. The Blue Ridge Belt contains well -exposed Middle Proterozoic basement gneisses, Late
Proterozoic plutons, Late Proterozoic metavolcanic and metasedimentary rift sequences, and thick
early Paleozoic rifted continental margin and platform deposits.
The typical residual soil profile consists of clayey soils near the surface, where soil weathering is
more advanced, underlain by sandy silts and silty sands. Residual soil zones develop by the in situ
chemical weathering of bedrock, and are commonly referred to as "saprohte." Saprolite usually
consists of silt with lesser amounts of sand, clay, and large rock fragments. The thickness of the
4

MILE
Milk Solution Injection Plan Section VAttachments June 8, 2010
Former Andrex Industries, Asheville, North Carolina BLE Project Nianber J09-1022-28
saprolite in the Blue Ridge ranges from a few feet to more than 100 feet. The boundary between soil
and rock is not sharply defined.
A transitional zone of partially weathered rock is normally found overlying the parent bedrock.
Partially weathered rock is defined, for engineering purposes, as residual material with standard
penetration resistance in excess of 100 blows per foot (bpf). Weathering is facilitated by fractures,
joints, and the presence of less resistant rock types. Consequently, the profile of the partially
weathered rock and hard rock is quite irregular and erratic, even over short horizontal distances.
Also, it is not unusual to find lenses and boulders of hard rock and zones of partially weathered rock
within the soil mantle, well above the general bedrock level.
Groundwater in the Blue Ridge usually occurs under unconfined to semi -confined conditions in three
primary zones: 1) residual soil (saprolite); 2) partially weathered rock; and 3) fractured bedrock.
These zones are typically interconnected via bedrock fractures, and secondary permeability features
of the saprolite. The configuration of the potentiometric surface in these water table aquifers
generally resembles the local topography.
In the residual soil and partially weathered rock zones, groundwater is stored within the pore spaces
and is released to the underlying bedrock through gravity drainage. The groundwater flow in these
zones is influenced by the latent rock texture of the residual soil and partially weathered rock.
Typically, groundwater will flow more easily through relict fractures within the saprolite or the
highly porous partially weathered rock zone.
Groundwater within the bedrock zone occurs primarily in fracture voids. Generally, fractures within
the bedrock are very small but may extend to several hundred feet. The groundwater flow in this
zone is controlled by the extent of bedrock fracturing and the degree of fracture interconnection.
Groundwater flows primarily through the fractures and not through the rock matrix.
Seasonal high-water tables are typically observed during the winter and spring months of the year
and seasonal low-water tables are typically observed during the summer and fall months. Natural
discharge of groundwater occurs to creeks, streams, rivers, and lakes. Artificial discharge of
groundwater occurs through withdrawals from water supply wells used for industrial, public,
private, and agricultural purposes.
Soil test borings, auger borings, and downhole percussion air -hammer borings were performed at
both on -site and off -site locations. Soil test borings were performed, using a hollow -stein auger, for
penetration testing and to collect soil samples at regularly spaced intervals. Auger borings were
performed to collect groundwater samples for groundwater contamination screening.
Soil borings at both on -site and off -site locations encountered residual soil (saprolite). The saprolite
generally consists of fine -sandy silt and silty fine sand with varying mica content and weathered rock
fragments. The boundary between the saprolite and bedrock was not sharply defined. Partially
weathered rock (PWR), was encountered overlying the parent bedrock at several locations. The
lithology of the PWR was generally consistent with the overlying saprolite, with an increase in rock
fragments usually observed. Most of the Type 11 monitoring wells were installed in the
5

IRL13
Milk Solution Injection Plan Section VAttachments June 8, 2010
Former Andrex Industries, Asheville, North Carolina BLE Project Number J09-1022-28
saprolite/PWR zone where contaminant concentrations from a DNAPL source would be highest, if
present.
INJECTION FLUID COMPOSITION
The injection fluid is a 1 %-milk solution which is a by-product of the dairy manufacturing processes
at Milkco. The solution is manufactured by the following process. Raw cow's milk is delivered to
the Milkco site in tanker trucks. The raw milk is transferred into stainless -steel holding tanks within
the Milkco facility. The raw milk is allowed to separate and the various milk products are skimmed
and/or drained from the holding tanks. The holding tanks are rinsed with tap water from the City of
Asheville which is filtered in the Milkco plant. This process results in a 1 %-milk solution. There is
no published MSDS for cow's milk. An MSDS for water is included in Appendix B.
INJECTION RATIONALE
The milk -solution provides an organic carbon source to indigenous subsurface microbes which
consume the milk constituents and begin a co -metabolic reaction which dechlorinate the dissolved
groundwater contaminants (chlorinated ethenes). These processes result in a breakdown of parent
solvent to daughter products and ultimately to harmless constituents.
Degradation (dechlorination) of chlorinated compounds is typically reflected in the historical trends
where the concentrations of parent compounds decrease while the concentrations of daughter
products increase. The two major transformation pathways are shown below:
1. PCE 4 TCE 4 (isomers) DCE —> Vinyl Chloride 4 Ethene 4 Ethane
2. 1,1,1-TCA 4 1,1-DCA 4 Chloroethane 4 Ethane
In early 2005, Andrex requested that BLE evaluate feasible bioremediation alternatives for the site.
Food -grade sugar/lactose and lactic acid containing byproducts (milk solution) from the Milkco
facility were being considered for use as a bio-enhancing remedial product for the site's
groundwater. This type of remedial action is dependent upon the results of a feasibility study which
includes bench and field (pilot) testing studies of the milk solution. In 2005, Andrex retained BLE to
perform a pilot study of the milk byproducts.
BLE completed the bench study in early 2006. The bench study was conducted in general
accordance with procedures outlined by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in "Technical
Protocol for Evaluating Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents in Groundwater" (EPA/600/R-
98/128 September 1998) and utilized microcosms of subsurface soil and groundwater from the RW-
I location with variable amendments of milk solution (1% milk — 99% water) from Milkco. The
study was performed in the analytical laboratories of Research Environinental & Industrial
Consultants, Inc. (REIC) of Beaver, West Virginia.
6

ELM
Milk Solution Injection Plan Section V Attachments June 8, 2010
Former Andrex Industries, Asheville, North Carolina BLE Project Number J09-1022-28
In the bench -scale study, microcosms were prepared in 60 mL amber glass vials utilizing 25 g of site
soils in each vial. Three different milk solution volumes were utilized in amounts of 100 gL, 1000
[tL, and 2000 gL to amend three of four sets of microcosm vials; the unamended set was utilized as
the control. The balance of the vials were filled with site groundwater such that a zero headspace
condition existe(L This resulted in a 40 nil groundwater volume and 20 ml soil volume in each
microcosm. The microcosms were stored in a light -proof environment with an ambient air
temperature of 65 degrees F. The groundwater portions from each of the four sets were analyzed for
chlorinated hydrocarbons on Day 1, Day 15, Day 30, Day 45, and Day 59 by EPA Method 8260.
Additionally, the soil in the Day 59 vials was also analyzed by EPA Method 8260 to determine if
any groundwater VOCs were adsorbed onto the soil matrix. Pre -experiment bulk samples of the
RW-1 groundwater and soil used to prepare the microcosms were also analyzed. Summary tables
and graphical plots of the analytical results are included in Appendix C.
The results (Appendix C) showed a net decrease in PCE concentration of 30% after 45 days in those
microcosms containing the highest concentrations (amendments) of milk solution. The net reduction
was calculated by subtracting the control set concentrations. Significant concentrations of PCE
daughter products were also produced in the bench study indicating successful de -chlorination of the
parent product, as anticipated. It is our opinion that the microbial action induced by the lactose and
lactic acid concentrations in the milk solution should reduce the groundwater contaminant
concentrations over time. Please note that field -scale pilot testing has not been conducted and
therefore the actual response of contaminants to the proposed methodology has not been established
outside of a laboratory setting.
Based on the bench scale test results of the 2000 pL (or 2ml) amendment, a post- injection milk
solution concentration of 5% by volume (2 ml/40ml) of 1% milk solution is optimal to induce
dechlorination. We propose to inject milk solution in four of the former recovery wells at the site.
Those wells include RW-I, RW-3, RW-5, and RW-7. Recovery well production rates during
pumping from 2002 through 2004 are included on Tables 1, 2, and 3 for reference. Volumes of milk
solution required to archive a post- injection milk solution concentration ratio of 5% at each
proposed injection point have been calculated on Table 4. Minimum estimated injection rates have
been calculated on Table 5 using selected average production rates from Tables I through 3.
INJECTION PROCEDURE AND EQUIPMENT
The milk -solution will be collected from the subsurface weir present on the Milkco property and
transferred to a truck- or trailer -mounted graduated plastic holding tank via electric purnp. The
solution will be mobilized to the well heads via truck/trailer and injected into the wells by hose via
gravity feed or under pressure via pump as required.
No injection infrastructure will be constructed or installed. Existing recovery wells will be used as
injection points. Please reference the well logs in Appendix D.
The planned injection schedule is shown on Table 6. A 10 hour working day is assumed on Table 6.
This includes 6 hours of injection and 4 hours of milk -solution loading and transfer per day. We

Milk Solution Injection Plan Section VAttachments June 8, 2010
Former Andrex Industries, Asheville, North Carolina BLE Project Number J09-1022-28
anticipate that actual injection rates will be much faster than the minimum rates used the calculations
on Table 5.
Injections are proposed serni-annually for the first two years and annually for the third year (Table
6). The actual injection schedule will be dependent upon the results of the monitoring specified in
subsequent sections of this document.
MONITORING PLAN
Groundwater monitoring will be performed in all four injection areas as specified on Table 7. In
general, monitoring will be performed at 30, 60, and 90-day milestones (depending on distance from
the injection point) and annually for all wells as required. Monitoring frequencies will be adjusted
based on results obtained once the injection program is underway. It may not be possible to obtain
samples at exact milestones (30, 60, and 90 days, etc) due to weekends, holidays, inclement weather,
or other delays beyond our control. Samples will be collected as near the milestone dates as the
schedule allows.
Groundwater samples will be analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260 MSV Low Level and for
total organic carbon (TOC) by Standard Method SM 5310B (for select wells only, see Table 7).
The results of the November 2009 sampling event will be used as a baseline for the injection
program. Please note that TOC sampling was also performed in November 2009 on select wells
which are to be included in the injection monitoring program. The TOC results will be used as a
baseline for the injection program (Appendix E).
WELL DATA
A tabulation of Andrex. well data is included on Table 8. Well construction diagrams are included in
Appendix D. Well abandonment logs are included in Appendix F.
Two water supply wells are/were present in the area, however, neither well is reported to be in use.
The water supply well on the Cryderman property (Figures 2 and 3) appeared to be abandoned prior
to October 2005. Neither a well construction diagram nor an abandom-nent log is available for the
former well. Additionally, we understand that the water supply well at the Skylanes Bowling Center
is no longer connected to their water system and that the DWQ has required that the well owner
properly abandon the well. Well construction information for the Skylanes well is not available.
NWS
Site maps which include the required UIC Permit Application information can be found herein and in
the enclosed report titled Report ofAnnual Groundwater and Suiface Water Sampling and Analysis
for 2009 dated April 20, 2010 (BLE Project No. J09-1022-29). We have also prepared a revised
hydrogeologic profile (originally published in the CSA report) to include wells not present at that
time and to include VOC data from November 2009 as Figure 4. A survey map of the former

Milk Solution Injection Plan Section V Attachments
Former Andrex Industries, Asheville, North Carolina
June 8, 2010
BLE Project Number J09-1022-28
Andrex property which was prepared as part of the Brownfields Agreement is also included in
Appendix A for reference.
CLOSING
We appreciate the opportunity to work with you at the subject site. We look forward to receiving
NCDENR approval of the application and work plan. If you have any questions, please do not
hesitate contacting us at [phone].
Sincerely,
BUNNELL-LAMMONs ENGINEERING, INC.
Andrew W. Ale2d P �G, RSM Trevor J. Benton( LPG,:�)
Senior Hydrogeologist Project Hydrogeologist
Registered, NC No. 1475 Registered, NC No. 2025
Enclosed: Form UIC-51/5T (Permit Application) with Attachments
c:kawa�active projects landrex milkcolphase28 andrex injection planWic permit application and section v attachmentslattachments
section v injection plan andpermit app andrex 1022-28.doc
-kk CARO,-,
N
M75
OL
9

Milk Solution Injection Plan Section VAttachments June 8, 2010
Former Andrex Industries, Asheville, North Carolina BLE Project Number J09-1022-28
property which was prepared as part of the Brownfields Agreement is also included in
x A for reference.
We appreciatet�ie opportunity to work with you at the subject site. We look forward.34 receiving
NCDENR appro��I of the application and work plan. If you have any questions/ease do not
hesitate contacting 1LX at [phone].
Sincerely,
BUNNELL-LAMMONs EN INEERING, INC.
A4.1 I
� P
Andrew W. Alex nder, P.G., RSM
Senior Hydrogeologist
Enclosed: Form IAC-5I/5T (Pennit Applicatic
c:WwaWctive projectsWndrex milkcolphase28 andrex inie
section v injection plan andpennit app andrax 1022-28.doc
TrevorJ.
Project 11
application and section v attachmenWattachments

. .
. .
.
9
9i
R2
In In
'i
I? I
In
1p
11
't
k
'-'-'-k�
I a
.4
11�
oq q
q
�i
�i n
'i n
n In
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
.
. .
. .
. .
oq
G
2� F,
9
8 %9288
8 A
8 8
8
8
88
.5 .5
.5 d
'66
6
d 5
�5
ci 6
c;
6
r
-i
IR n
v-
n
N n
k
.1
A Q
-I
Ell
cl;
Im
.9
w-1. A..
v-
k
k Q.
D!
;g
4
a
g
g
g
g
g
+m
7
PIN-.
C2
2­2
.66
.2N6
T
cwR
q
oq
q
"R
N
"R
'R
'I
q
q
oR
n 'R
ci
Fi q
X Ro
OR
m
'1
vi
'i 1�
w
o 'i
�P
Cn
In li�
5
66d.
.6d
.5
6
c;
6 d
ta
'I;
w
5k
1. 11
n n
n
=RpnEg
-vi
R
If �r
oe
'e
z
,z r
4 -e
'qA
49
9
9
9
N
HMOs
119191
1
Ell
g -e
-.z g
A
e
A A
e e
;; A
e e
11
9 9
A I
g
- -
A,
S9
11
A
N N
N
N
11
7N!
"R
r� oR
1z
!�
-�
n oR
q
Iq
q
I"!
"6
U _,
A
" -:
N N
.6
N
. .
.
n
q
oq m
�
N
m
- -
- -
- -
Cq �r
IT �r
�r 6F
11
5
"lon.415
.:.4
c5
d c;
c;
46—
NN
ma NIP
m,
N
T—
-i
.
. .
. .
. .
z
16 rz
1;
X
ol
e
g e
P A
g
P
-�
.
�- g
. .
� g
. .
P z
. I
-
o1i
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
.
C4
eT
9
lei
9 i
i
mi-
1,[,
m

Table 2
Summary of Ground -Water Discharge
Andrex Industries
Ground-Wate'r'' Remediation System
RW4 and RW-5
May 23, 2002 through April 30, 2004
MSD Permit Number S-067-00
BLF Job Number J03-1022-11
RW4
RW-5
Date
Days Per
Period
System
Totalizer
(gallons)
Gallons per
Period
Flow Rate
(gal/min)
Run -Time
Meter (hours)
Hours/Period
Percent
Uptime
Date
Days Per
Period
System
Totalizer
(gallons)
Gallons per
Period
Flow Rate
(gal/min)
Run -Time
Meter
(hours)
Hours/Period
Percent
Uptime
5/23/2002
0
0
0
5/23/2002
0
0
0
5/31/2002
8
42,310
42,310
3.67
61.8
61.8
32%
5/31/2002
8
2,523
2,523
0.22
8.8
8.8
5%
6/6/2002
6
45,620
3,310
0.38
66.5
4.7
3%
6/6/2002
6
37,633
35,110
4.06
53.6
44.8
31%
6/11/2002
5
47,560
1,940
0.27
69.1
2.6
2%
6/11/2002
5
41,360
3,727
0.52
58.6
5.0
4%
6/18/2002
7
60,650
13,090
1.30
87.5
18.4
11%
6/18/2002
7
74,700
33,340
3.31
158.7
100.1
60%
6/21/2002
3
60,691
41
0.01
87.5
0.0
0.0%
6/21/2002
3
144,814
70,114
16.23
194.3
35.6
49%
6/28/2002
7
60,730
39
0.00
87.6
0.1
0.1%
6/28/2002
7
147,790
2,976
0.30
198.2
3.9
2%
7/9/2002
11
61,381
651
0.04
88.5
0.9
0.3%
7/9/2002
11
160,881
13,091
0.83
215.5
17.3
7%
7/16/2002
7
173,652
112,271
11.14
253.6
165.1 1
98%
7/16/2002
7 1
204,562
43,681
4.33
271.6
56.1
33%
7/24/2002
8
304,577
130,925
11.37
452.0
198.4
103%
7/24/2002
8
228,535
23,973
2.08
302.8
31.2
16%
8/2/2002
9
439,089
134,512
10.38
661.4
209.4
97%
8/2/2002
9
234,206
5,671
0.44
310.4
7.6
4%
8/9/2002
7
546,077
106,988
10.61
831.2
169.8
101%
8/9/2002
7
234,206
0
0.00
310.4
0.0
0.0%
8/16/2002
7
606,837
60,760
6.03
928.7
97.5
58%
8/16/2002
7
234,298
92
0.01
310.5
0.1
0.1%
8/23/2002
7
712,674
105,837
10.50
1,099.4
170.7
102%
8/23/2002
7
234,507
209
0.02
310.8
0.3
0.2%
9/4/2002
12
857,047
144,373
8.35
1,337.8
238.4
83%
9/4/2002
12
234,507
0
0.00
310.8
0.0
0.0%
9/19/2002
15
1,065,542
208,495
9.65
1,700.5
362.7
101%
9/19/2002
is
234,507
0
0.00
310.8
0.0
0.0%
9/27/2002
8
1,163,430
97,888
8.50
1,884.7
184.2
96%
9/27/2002
8
234,743
236
0.02
311.1
0.3
0.2%
10/1/2002
4
1,218,349
54,919
9.53
1,977.1
92.4
96%
10/1/2002
4
238,095
3,352
0.58
315.6
4.5
5%
10/10/2002
9
1,333,310
114,961
8.87
2,195.2
218.1
101%
10/10/2002
9
238,095
0
0.00
315.6
0.0
0.0%
10/17/2002
7
1,413,693
80,383
7.97
2,358.4
163.2
97%
10/17/2002
7
239,413
1,318
0.13 -
317.4
1.8
1 %
10/24/2002
7
1,497,099
83,406
8.27
2,530.9
172.5
103%
10/24/2002
7
243,938
4,525
0.45
323.6
6.2
4%
10/3U2002
7
1,573,380
76,281
7.57
2,697.1
166.2
99%
10/31/2002
7
252,485
8,547
0.85 -
335.3
11.7
1 7%
i lnI2002
7
1,623,790
50,410
5.00
2,813.3
116.2
69%
11/7/2002
7
259,026
6,541
0.65
344.2
8.9
5%
11/14/2002
7
1,623,790
0
0.00
2,813.3
0.0
0%
11/14/2002
7
284,599
25,573
2.54
379.1
34.9
21%
11/22/2002
8
1,634,382
10,592
0.92
2,829.8
16.5
9%
11/22/2002
8
324,743
40,144
3.48
434.0
54.9
29%
11/27/2002
5
1,653,823
19,441
2.70
2,859.7
29.9
25%
11/27/2002
5
344,263
19,520
2.71
460.9
26.9
22%
12/6/2002
9
1,687,820
33,997
2.62
2,912.2
52.5
24%
12/6/2002
9
378,260
33,997
2.62
507.9
47.0
22%
12/14/2002
8
1,722,017
34,197
2.97
2,964.9
52.7
27%
12/14/2002
8
413,986
35,726
3.10
557.4
49.5
26%
12/19/2002
5
1,745,115
23,098
3.21
3,000.5
35.6
30%
12/19/2002
5
441,009
27,023
3.75
594.8
37.4
31%
112/31/2002
12
1,799,730
54,615
3.16
3,085.1
84.6
29%
12/31/2002
12
504,610
63,601
3.68
683.6
88.8
31%
' 1/9/2003
9
1,826,863
27,133
2.09
3,127.4
42.3
20%
1/9/2003
9
537,986
33,376
2.58
730.4
46.8
22%
3/18/2003
68
1,826,874
11
0.00
3,128.0
0.6
0%
3/18/2003
68
538,166
180
0.00
731.3
0.9
0%
3/22/2003
4
1,827,631
757
0.13
3,128.6
0.6
1 %
3/22/2003
4
539,050
884
0.15
731.8
0.5
1 %
3/29/2003
7
1,828,139
508
0.05
3,129.3
0.7
0%
3/29/2003
7
539,623
573
0.06
732.6
0.8
0%
4/5/2003
7
1,830,912
2,773
0.288
3,133.5
4.2
2%
4/5/2003
7
543,064
3,441
0.34
737.1
4.5
3%
4/12/2003
7
1,843,510
12,S98
1.25
3,152.2
18.7
11%
4/12/2003
7
560,564
17,500
1.74
760.4
23.3
14%
4/21/2003
9
1,941,650
98,140
7.57
3,297.2
145.0
67%
4/21/2003
9
582,859
22,295
1.72
790.2
29.8
14%
5/l/2003
10
1,951,835
10,185
0.71
3,312.3
15.1
6%
5/l/2003
10
583,033
174
0.01
790.4
0.2
0%
5/9/2003
8
1,951,835
0
0.00
3,312.3
0.0
0%
5/9/2003
8
583,033
0
0.00
790.4
0.0
0%
5/19/2003
10
1,9519835
0
0.00
3,312.3
0.0
0%
5/19/2003
10
583,033
0
0.00
790.4
0.0
0%
5/27/2003
8
1 2,019,956
68,121
5.91
3,412.8
100.5
52%
5/27/2003
8
668,828
85,795
7.45
906.0
115.6
60%
6/2/2003
6
2,060,869
40,913
4.74
3,473.2
60.4
42%
6/2/2003
6
714,373
45,545
5.27
967.1
61.1
42%
6/17/2003
15
2,110,377
49,508
2.29
3,546.3
73.1
20%
6/17/2003
15
770,106
55,733
2.58
1,042.9
75.8
21%
6/30/2003
13
2,1199904
9,427
0.50
3,560.3
14.0
4%
6/3Ot2003
13
781,486
11,380
0.61
1,058.7
15.8
5%
7/l/2003
1
2,130,524
10,720
7.44
3,576.7
16.4
68%
7/l/2003
1
795,620
14,134
9.82
1,078.4
19.7
82%
7/11/2003
10
2,145,069
14,545
1.01
3,597.7
21.0
9%
7/11/2003
10
812,908
17,288
1.20
1,102.7
24.3
10%
7/18/2003
7
2,205,807
60,738
6.03
3,687.7
90.0
54%
7/18/2003
7
886,618
73,710
7.31
1,206.8
104.1
62%
7/24/2003
6
29260,013
54,206
6.27
39768.2
80.5
56%
7/24/2003
6
944,727
58,109
6.73
1,288.4
81.6
57%
8/l/2003
8
2,321,164
61,151
5.31
3,859.2
91.0
47%
8/l/2003
8
1,006,117
61,390
5.33
1,375.2
86.8
45%
gnI2603
6
2,343,916
22,752
2.63
3,893.1
33.9
24%
8n12003
6
1,028,202
22,085
2.56
1,406.3
31.1
22%
8/19/2003
12
2,376,646
32,730
1.89
3,941.9
48.8
17%
8/19/2003
12
1,065,458
37,256
2.16
1,459.1
52.8
18%
8/26/2003
7
2,427,083
50,437
5.00
4,017.2
75.3
45%
8/26/2003
7
1,118,346
52,888
5.25
19543.3
84.2
50%
9/3/2003
8
2,437,974
10,891
0.95
4,033.4
16.2
8%
9/3/2003
8
1,130,066
11,720
1.02
1,551.0
7.7
4%
9/9/2003
6
2,483,956
45,982
5.32
4,102.4
69.0
48%
9/9/2003
6
1,178,021
47,955
5.55
1,619.7
68.7
48%
9/17/2003
8
2,538,304
54,348
4.72
4,184.0
81.6
43%
9/1712003
8
1,228,646
50,625
4.39
1,692.0
72.3
38%
9/25/2003
8
2,588,499
50,195
4.36
4,259.5
75.5
39%
9/25/2003
8
1,272,512
43,866
3.81
1,754.7
62.7
33%
10/2/2003
7
2,602,946
149447
1.43
4,281.S
22.0
13%
10/2/2003
7
1,285,540
13,028
1.29
1,773.4
18.7
11%
10/10/2003
8
2,651,824
48,878
4.24
4,354.5
73.0
38%
10/10/2003
8
1,331,416
45,876
3.98
1,839.4
66.0
34%
10/17/20031
7
2,674,654
1 22,830
2.26
4,390.2
35.7
21%
10/17/2003
7
1,353,488
22,072
2.19
1,871.2
31.8
19%
10/23/2003
6
2,711,877
37,223
4.31
4,444.3
54.1
38%
10/23/2003
6
1,386,714
33,226
3.85
1,919.0
47.8
33%
10/30/2003
7
2,744,140
32,263
3.20
4,492.6
48.3
29%
1013012003
7
1,415,089
28,375
2.81
1,959.8
40.8
24%
11/13/2003
14
29806,545
62,405
3.10
4,586.0
93.4
28%
11/13/2003
14
1,4679647
52,558
2.61
2,035.4
75.6
23%
11/20/2003
7
2,832,266
25,721
2.55
4,624.4
38.4
23%
11/20/2003
7
1,489,803
22,156
2.20
2,067.3
31.9
19%
11/25/2003
5
2,865,032
32,766
4.55
4,673.4
49.0
41%
11/25/2003
5
1,525,483
35,680
4.96
2,118.5
51.2
43%
12/3/2003
8
2,906,014
40,982
3.56
4,734.8
61.4
32%
12/3/2003
8
1,570,624
45,141
3.92
2,183.3
64.8
34%
12/9/2003
6
2,935,790
29,776
3.45
4,779.3
44.5
31%
12/9/2003
6
1,600,315
29,691
3.44
2,225.8
42.5
30%
12/17/2003
8
2,977,867
42,077
3.65
4,842.8
63.5
33%
12/17/2003
8
1,640,466
40,151
3.49
2,283.2
57.4
30%
12/24/2003
7
3,012,367
34,500
3.42
4,894.8
52.0
31%
12/24/2003
7
1,674,264
33,798
3.35
2,331.5
48.3
29%
12/31/2003
7
3,046,543
34,176
3.39
4,946.4
51.6
31%
12/31/2003
7
1,707,188
32,924
3.27
2,378.5
47.0
28%
1/6/2004
6
3,083,711
37,168
4.30
4,987.5
41.1
29%
1/6/2004
6
1,732,548
25,360
2.94
2,414.7
36.2
25%
1/14/2004
8
3,096,917
13,206
1.15
5,022.7
35.2
18%
1/14/2004
8
1,755,228
22,680
1.97
2,447.2
32.5
17%
1/29/2004
15
3,134,983
38,066
1.76
5,081.8
59.1
16%
1/29/2004
is
1,800,876
45,648
2.11
2,511.5
64.3
18%
2/11/2004
13
3,200,348
65,365
3.49
5,183.7
101.9
33%
2/11/2004
13
1,880,898
80,022
4.27
2,618.7
107.2
34%
2/28/2004
17
3,284,077
83,729
3.42
5,314.8
131.1
32%
2/28/2004
17
1,970,571
89,673
3.66
2,739.0
120.3
29%
3/18/2004
19
3,353,204
.53
5,423.2
108.4
24%
3/18/2004
19
2,039,471
68,900
2.52
2,831.7
92.7
20%
3/31/2004
13
3,410,761
57,557
3._07
'3,513.7
90.5,
29%
3/31/2004
13
2,096,336
56,865
3.04
2,908.4
76.7
25%
4/30/2004
30
3,554,670
143,909
3.33
5,741.0
227.3
32%
4/30/2004
30
2,243,944
147,608
3.42
3,107.4
199.0
28%
Total Days
Total Gallons
Avg. Flow Rate
Total Days
Tot
Avg. Flow
TOTALS
708
3,554,670
3.49
TOTALS1
708
L 2,243,944
2.20

Table 3
Summary of Ground -Water Discharge
Andrex Industries
Ground -Water Remediation System
RW-6 and RW-7
May 23, 2002 through April 30, 2004
MSD Permit Number S-067-00
BLE Job Number J03-1022-11
RW-6
RW-7
Date
Days Per
System
Totalizer
Gallons per
Flow Rate
Run -Time
Hours/Period
Percent
Date
Days Per
System
T I otalizer
Gallons per
Flow Rate
Run -Time
Meter
Hours/Period
Percent
Period
(gallons)
Period
(gal/min)
Meter (hours)
Uptime
Period
(gallons)
Period
(gal/min)
(hours)
Uptime
5/23/2002
0
0
0
5/23/2002
0
0
1 0
5/31/2002
8
18,554
18,554
1.61
24.9
24.9
13%
5/31/2002
8
14,335
14,335
1.24
22.9
22.9
12%
6/6/2002
6
18,666
112
0.01
25.1
0.2
0%
6/6/2002
6
18,?71
943
1 9.�6
28 * 2
5 * 3
�0_0
4111 1,)nn)
1;
10 14A
.11
n n7
r
n 1;
1 no/
1;
19
"5
7
0 1;
6/18/2002
7
19,880
720
0.07
26.5
0.9
1%
6/18/2002
7
28,470
9,310
0.92
41.8
13.1
.8%
6/21/2002
3
19,880
0
0.00
26.5
0.0
0.0%
6/21/2002
3
32,180
3,710
0.86
46.8
5.0
7%
6/28/2002
7
19,880
0
0.00
26.5
0.0
0.0%
6/28/2002
7
32,590
410
0.04
47.3
0.5
0%
7/9/2002
11
19,880
0
0.00
26.5
0.0
0.0%
7/9/2002
11
34,105
1,515
0.10
49.4
2.1
1%
7/16/2002
7
19,927
47
0.00
26.6
0.1
0%
7/16/2002
7
41,478
7,373
0.73
59.3
9.9
6%
7/24/2002
8
19,927
0
0.00
26.6
0.0
0%
7/24/2002
8
47,780
6,302
0.55
67.7
8.4
4%
8/2/2002
9
37,275
17,348
1.34
47.6
21.0
10%
8/2/2002
9
50,927
3,147
0.24
71.9
4.2
2%
8/9/2002
7
47,038
9,763
0.97.
59.5
11.9
7%
8/9/2002
7
50,974
47
0.00
72.0
0.1
0.1%
8/16/2002
7
50,933
3,895
0.39,
64.2
4.7
3%
8/16/2002
7
51,019
45
0.00
72.0
0.0
0.0%
8/23/2002
7
56,160
5,227
0.52
70.6
6.4
4%
8/23/2002
7
51,026
7
0.00
310.8
238.8
142.1%
9/4/2002
12
57,363
1,203
0.07
72.1
1.5
1%
9/4/2002
12
51,026
0
0.00
468.4
157.6
54.7%
9/19/2002
15
57,477
114
0.01
72.2
0.1
0%
9/19/2002
15
51,026
0
0.00
828.5
360.1
100.0%
9/27/2002
8
57,678
1 201
0.02
72.5
0.3
0%
9/27/2002
8
51,026
0
0.00
828.5
0.0
0.0%
10/1/2002
4
65,002
7,324
1.27
81.5
9.0
9%
10/1/2002
4
51,026
0
0.00
828.5
0.0
0%
10/10/2002
9
74,812
9,810
0.76
93.5
12.0
6%
10/10/2002
9
51,026
0
0.00
828.5
0.0
0.0%
10/17/2002
7
79,681
4,869
0.48
99.5
6.0
4%
10/17/2002
7
51t639
613
0.06
1,013.0
184.5
110%
10/24/2002
7
86,596
6,915
0.69
108.1
8.6
5%
10/24/2002
7
57,627
5,988
0.59
1,021.3
8.3
5%
10/3 V2002
7
99,918
13,322
1.32
124.7
16.6
10%
10/31/2002
7
70,555
12t928
1.28
1,039.8
18.5
11%
11/7/2002
7
109,374
9,456
0.94
136.7
12.0
7%
11/7/2002
7
80,740
10,185
1.01
1,054.5
14.7
9%
11/14/2002
7
121,468
12,094
1.20
152.0
15.3
9%
11/14/2001
7
93,500
12,760
1.27
1,072.7
18.2
11%
11/22/2002
8
138,413
16,945
1.47
173.6
21.6
11%
11/22/2002
8
103,502
10,002
0.87
1,087.9
15.2
8%
11/27/2002
5
150,805
12,392
1.72
190.0
16.4
14%
11/27/2002
5
103,502
0
0.00
1,087.9
0.0
0%
12/6/2002
9
173,343
22,538
1.74
219.8
29.8
14%
12/6/2002
9
103,502
0
0.00
1,087.9
0.0
0%
12/14/2002
8
193,373
20,030
1.74
246.3
26.5
14%
12/14/2002
8
103,502
0
0.00
1,087.9
0.0
0%
12/19/2002
5
207,342
13,969
1.94
264.8
18.5
15%
12/19/2002
5
103,645
143
0.02
1,088.2
0.3
0%
12/31/2002
12
239,680
32,338
1.87
307.9
43.1
15%
12/31/2002
12
103,645
0
0.00
1,088.2
0.0
0%
1/9/2003
9
257,676
17,996
1.39
331.8
23.9
11%
1/9/2003
9
103,645
0
0.00
1,088.2
0.0
0%
3/18/2003
68
257,678
2
0.00
332.3
0.5
0%
3/18/2003
68
103,775
130
0.00
1,088.3
0.1
0%
3/22/2003
4
258,297
619
0.11
332.6
0.3
0%
3/22/2003
4
103,775
0
0.00
1,088.4
0.1
0%
3/31/2003
9
259,873
1,576
0.12
333.9
1.3
1%
3/31/2003
9
105,441
lt666
0.13
1,088.7
0.3
0%
4/5/2003
5
260,657
784
0.11
335.5
1.6
1%
4/5/2003
5
106,321
880
0.12
1,089.5
0.8
1%
4/12/2003
7
268,777
8,120
0.81
345.6
10.1
6%
4/12/2003
7
108,500
2,179
0.22
1,094.9
5.4
3%
4/21/2003
9
328,652
59,875
4.62
420.4
74.8
35%
4/21/2003
9
137,749
29,249
2.26
1,135.9
41.0
19%
5/l/2003
10
335,266
6,614
0.46
428.7
8.3
3%
5/l/2003
10
141,090
3,341
0.23
ltl40.6
4.7
2%
5/9/2003
8
335,266
0
0.00
428.7
0.0
0%
5/9/2003
8
141,090
0
0.00
1,140.6
0.0
0%
5/19/2003
10
335,266
0
0.00
428.7
0.0
0%
5/19/2003
10
141,090
0
0.00
1,140.6
0.0
0%
5/27/2003
8
373,608
38,342
3.33
477.1
48.4
25%
5/27/2003
8
161,420
20,330
1.76
1,169.5
28.9
15%
6/2/2003
6
395,008
21,400
2.48
504.1
27.0
19%
6/2/2003
6
174,243
12,823
1.48
1,187.7
18.2
13%
6/17/2003
15
421,293
26,285
1.22
537.5
33.4
9%
6/17/2003
15
189,787
15,544
0.72
1,209.9
22.2
6%
6/30/2003
13
426,966
5,673
0.30
544.7
7.2
2%
6/30/2003
13
192,381
2,594
0.14
1,213.7
3.8
1%
7/l/2003
1
433,054
6,088
4.23
552.5
7.8
32%
7/l/2003
1
195,291
2,910
2.02
1,217.8
4.1
17%
7/11/2003
10
440,233
7,179
0.50
561.6
9.1
4%
7/11/2003
10
199,125
3,834
0.27
1,223.4
5.6
2%
7/18/2003
7
473,631
33,398
3.31
604.4
42.8
25%
7/18/2003
7
217,096
17,971
1.78
1,249.3
25.9
15%
7/24/2003
6
500,880
27,249
3.15
639.4
35.0
24%
7/24/2063
6
233,124
16,028
1.86
1,272.5
23.2
16%
8/l/2003
8
530,966
30,086
2.61
678.0
38.6
20%
8/l/2003
8
252,068
18,944
1.64
1,300.0
27.5
14%
8/7/2003
6
541,853
109887
1.26
692.0
14.0
10%
8/7/2003
6
259,041
6,973
0.81
1,310.2
10.2
7%
8/19/2003
12
559,488
17,635
1.02
714.7
22.7
8%_
8/19/2003
12
268,719
9,678
0.56
1,324.3
14.1
5%
8/26/2003
7
5859458
25,970
2.58
748.
33.5
20%
8/26/2003
7
283,725
15,006
1.49
1,346.3
22.0
13%
9/3/2003
8
5919'038
5,580
0.48
755.3
7.1
4%
9/3/2003
8
286,791
3,066
0.27
1,350.8
4.5
2%
9/9/2003
6
614,524
23,486
2.72
785.6
30.3
21%
9/9/2003
6
300,084
13,293
1.54
1,370.2
19.4
13%
9/17/2003
8
641,208
26,684
2.32
820.0
34.4
18%
9/17/2003
8
316,791
16,707
1.45
1,394.7
24.5
13%
9/25/2003
8
664,859
23,651
2.05
850.5
30.5
16%
9/25/2003
8
331,973
15,182
1.32
1,417.0
22.3
12%
10/2/2003
7
671,731
6,872
0.68
859.4
8.9
5%
10/2/2003
7
336,299
4,326
0.43
1,423.4
6.4
4%
10/10/2003
8
696,298
24,567
2.13
891.1
31.7
17%
10/10/2003
8
350,911
14,612
1.27
1,444.9
21.5
11%
10/17/2003
7
708,221
11,923
1.18
906.6
15.5
9%
10/17/2003
7
358,216
7,305
0.72
1,455.7
10.8
6%
10/23/2003
6
1 726,674
18,453
2.14
930.5
23.9
17%
10/23/2003
6
369,378
11,162
1.29
1,472.1
16.4
11%
10/30/2003
7
743,561
16,893
1.68
952.0
21.5
13%
10/30/2003.
7
380,868
11,490
1.14
1,489.2
17.1
10%
11/13/2003
14
776,188
32,621
1.62
994.7
42.7
13%
11/13/2003
14
406,436
25,568
1.27
1,527.4
38.2
11%
11/20/2003
7
783,889
7,701
0.76
19004.7
10.0
6%
11/20/2003
7
417,120
10,684
1.06
1,543.3
15.9
9%
11/25/2003
5.
783,889
0
0.00
1,004.7
0.0
0%
11/25/2003
5
428,961
11,941
1.64
1,561.0
17.7
is%
12/3/2003
8
783,890
1
0.00
1,004.7
0.0
0%
12/3/2003
8
446,154
17,193
1.49
1,586.6
25.6
13%
12/9/2003
6
802,120
18,230
2.11
1,028.4
23.7
16%
12/9/2003
6
459,092
12,938
1.50
1,605.9
19.3
13%
12/1,7/2003
8
824,183
22,063
1.92
1,057.1
28.7
15%
12/17/2003
8
475,614
16,522
1.43
1,630.5
24.6
13%
112/24/2003
7
842,964
18,781
1.86
1,081.5
24.4
15%
12/24/2003
7
489,888
14,274
1.42
1,651.3
20.8
12%
FL2/31/2003
7
861,959
18,995
1.88
1,106.2
24.7
15%
12/31/2003
7
504,579
14,691
1.46
1,673.1
21.8
13%
I/b/ZUU4
6
877932
15,273
1 1.77
1,126.1
19.9
14% 1
1/6/2004
6
516,572
11,993
1.39
1,690.7
17.6
12%
1/14/2004
8
890,733
13,501
1.17
1,143.7
17.6
9%
1/14/2004
8
526,815
10,243
0.89
1,705.7
15.0
8%
1/29/2004
15
892,102
1,369
0.06
1,145.5
1.8
0%
1/29/2004
15
543,899
17,084
0.79
1,731.0
25.3
7%
2/11/2004
13
908,084
15,982
0.85
1,167.3
21.8
7%
2/11/2004
13
575,015
31,116
1.66
1,774.2
43.2
14%
2/28/2004
17
953,579
45,495
1.86
1,229.3
62.0
15%
2/28/2004
17
612,902
37,887
1.55
1,826.3
52.1
13%
3/18/2004
19
991,684
38,105
1.39
1,281.2
51.9
11%
3/18/2004
19
644,612
31,710
1.16
1,869.9
43.6
10%
3131/2004
13
1,024,092
32,408
173
1,325.4
44.2
14%
3/31/2004
1-3
672,583
27,971
1.49
1,908.5
38.6
12%
4/30/2004
30
1,098,830
74,738
1.73
1,427.7
102.3
14%
4/30/2004
30
736,454
63,871
1.48
1,996.7
88.2
12%
Total Days
Total Gallons
Avg. Flow Rate
Total Days
Total Gallons
Avg. Flow Rate
TOTALS
708
1,098,830
1.08
TOTALS
708
736,454
0.72

Table 4
Injectant Volume Calculations
Andrex Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
NCDENR Groundwater Incident Number 6586
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
November 2, 2009
Well
Meas. Pt.
Elevation
Gnd. Surface
Elevation
Depth to
Water
Elevation
*Total Borehole
Depth ( gs)
*Screen
Depth (bgs)
*Screen
Elevation
Water
Column (ft)
Area
Volume (ft'3)**
Required Injectant
Volume (ft^3)***
Required Injectant
Volume (gallons)***
RW-1
2209.87
2211.22
43.74
2166.13
77.0
35.0 75.0
2176.2 2136.2
29.9
42,284
2,114
15,816
RW-3
2217.58
2218.06
46.78
2170.80
76.0
54.0 64.0
2164.1 2154.1
16.7
23,666
1,183
8,852
RW-5
2159.48
2160.60
14.14
2145.34
66.0
20.2 60.2
2140.4 2100.4
44.9
63,532
3,177
23,764
JRW-7
1 2164.57
1 2165.60
1 23.11
2141.46
67.0
13.0 53.0
2152.6 2112.6
1 28.9
1 40,800
2,040
15,261
NQ=
*Values rounded to the nearest 0. 1 -ft.
Within 50 radius of well at 18% porosity at each wells satruated thickness (water column).
*** Required injectant volume to achieve a 5% milk solution injection concentration (by volume) within 50 radial feet**** of the injection well.
""Actual radius of influence is dependant on advection and dispersion, calculations assume a pore volume replacement of 5%.
bgs = below ground surface.
bmp = below measuring point.
Prepared by: AWA
Table 4 Injection Volumes of 1022-28 Andrex Injection Permit Tables.xis Checked by: TJB

Table 5
Injectant Rate Calculations
Andrex Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
NCDENR Groundwater Incident Number 6586
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
Well
Required Injectant
Volume (gallons)***
Well Flow Rate"
(gpm)
Time Required for
IV (minutes)*
Time Required for
IV (hours)*
Time Required for
IV (24-hour days)*
Time Required for
IV (6-hour days)****
RW-1
15,816
2.30
6,877
115
5
19
RW-3
8,852
1.08
8,196
137
6
23
RW-5
23,764
3.50
1 6,790
113
5
19
RW-7
15,261
1.50
1 10,174
170
7
28
Notes:
Minimum time required to inject the specifed injection volume at the specified flow rate, actual times may be less.
Flow rate at specifed uptime from Tables 1, 2, and 3 as follows: (RW-1 at 57%, RW-3 at 9%, RW-5 at 30%, and RW-7 at 30%)
Required injectant volume to achieve a 5% milk solution injection concentration (by volume) within 50 radial feet of the injection well (see Table 4).
**** Assumes a 10 hour working day with 6 hours of injection and 4 hours of injectant loading and transfer per day.
IV = Injectant Volume
Prepared by:AWA
Table 5 Injection Rates of 1022-28 Andrex Injection Permit Tables.xls Checked by: TJB

Table 6
Injection Schedule
Andrex Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
NCDENR Groundwater Incident Number 6586
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
Well
Year One
Year Two
Year Three
Year Four
Year Five (plus)
RW-1
Semi -Annual
Semi -Annual
Annual
TBD
TBD
RW-3
Semi -Annual
Semi -Annual
Annual
TBD
TBD
RW-5
Semi -Annual
Semi -Annual
Annual
TBD
TBD
JRW-7 I
Semi -Annual
Semi -Annual
Annual
TBD
TBD
Notes:
Actual injection schedule will be adjusted based on monitoring results.
TBD = To Be Detennined
Prepared by: AWA
Table 6 Injection Schedule of 1022-28 Andrex Injection Permit Tables.xls Checked by: TJB

Table 7
Injection Monitoring Plan Matrix
Andrex Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
NCDENR Groundwater Incident Number 6586
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
0
0
01
0
r.
0
0
U
0
U
0
0
0
.0
0
0
U
U
0
0
>
0
>
0
0
:�f
I
CD
M
CD
10
C.
C71
1 1
RW-I
RW-1
X
x
x
x
AM-6
X
x
x
X
MW-7
x
x
MW-9
x
x
RW-3
RW-3
X
x
x
x
MW-5
x
x
x
x
MW-12
x
x
x
x
RW-5
RW-5
X
x
X
x
MW-10
x
x
x
x
MW-13
x
X
MW-14
x
x
RW-6
X
x
rx
RW-7
RW-7
x
x
x
x
MW-11
x
x
x
None
MW-15
x
MW-16
x
MW-17
x
MW-18
X
MW-20
x
MW-21
X
MW-22
x
MW-23
x
MW-24
x
MW-26
x
Notes:
VOC analyses performed by EPA Method 8260 MSV Low Level.
TOC analyses performed by SM Method 53 1 OB.
It may not be possible to obtain samples at exact milestones (30, 60, and 90 days, etc)
due to weekends, holidays, inclement weather, or other delays beyond our control.
Samples will be collected as near the milestone dates as the schedule allows.
Prepared by: AWA
Table 7 Monitoring Plan of 1022-28 Andrex Injection Permit Tables.xls Checked by: TJB

�?", C"- V4 -?-
Table 8
Well Construction and Groundwater Elevation Data
Andrex Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
NCDENR Groundwater Incident Number 6586
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
Novembe 2, 2009
Well
Well
Location
Mess. Pt.
Elevation
Grid. Surface
Elevation
Depth to
Water (bmp)
Water
Elevation
*Total Borehole
Depth (bgs)
*Screen
Depth (bgs)
*Screen
Elevation
Well
Type
wen
Monitors
*Top of Rock
Depth (bgs)
*Top of
Rock Elev.
MW-1
On -Site
2222.34
2222.58
NP-A
NP-A
46.2
31.2 - 46.2
2191.4 - 2176.4
Ills
BR
35.0
2187.6
MW-2
On -Site
2222.28
2222.62
NP-A
NP-A
45.0
28.0 - 43.0
2194.6 - 2179.6
Ills
BR
29.0
2193.6
MW-3
On -Site
2210.40
2207.76
NP-A
NP-A
55.0
40.0 - 55.0
2167.8 - 2152.8
11
BR
36.5
2171.3
MW-4
On -Site
2206.87
2207.04
NP-A
NP-A
86.7
51.7 - 86.7
2155.3 - 2120.3
Ills
BR
26.0
2181.0
MW-5
On -Site
2216.75
2216.92
45.99
2170.76
53.0
43.0 - 53.0
2173.9 - 2163.9
HIS
BR
37.0
2179.9
MW-6
On -Site
2211.01
2211.25
44.87
2166.14
64.5
43.0 - 63.0
2168.3 - 2148.3
il
PWR
49.0
2162.3
MW-7
On -Site
2218.35
2218.60
26.15
2192.20
35.0
24.5 - 34.5
2194.1 - 2184.1
11
BR
12.0
2206.6
MW-8
On -Site
2182.33
2182.63
NP-A
NP-A
24.5
13.0 - 23.0
2169.6 - 2159.6
11
PWR
22.0
2160.6
MW-8A
On -Site
2182.52
2182.70
NP-A
NP-A
35.0
30.0 - 35.0
2152.7 - 2147.7
HIS
BR
15.5
2167.2
MW-9
On -Site
2175.57
2175.95
24.04
2151.53
60.0
44.0 - 54.0
2132.0 - 2122.0
11
BR
34.0
2142.0
MW-10
On -Site
2159.92
2159.45
14.75
2145.17
39.0
29.0 - 39.0
2130.5 - 2120.5
11
PWR
35.0
2124.5
MW-1 I
On -Site
2166.00
2166.39
24.75
2141.25
58.5
48.0 - 58.0
2118.4 - 2108.4
H
SAP
>80.0
<2086.4
MW-12
On -Site
2219.17
2219.49
48.42
2170.75
81.0
60.0 - 70.0
2159.5 - 2149.5
11
PWR
71.0
2148.5
MW-13
Off -Site
2138.80
2138.96
1.35
2137.45
58.5
48.0 - 58.0
2091.0 - 2081.0
11
SAP
58.5
2080.5
MW-14
Off -Site
2138.94
2139.20
Artesian
>2138.94
75.0
65.0 - 75.0
2074.2 - 2064.2
Ills
BR
59.0
2080.2
MW-15
Off -Site
2124.89
2125.18
10.85
2114.04
40.0
33.3 - 40.0
2091.9 - 2085.2
1110
BR
32.5
2092.7
MW-16
Off -Site
2124.59
2124.85
10.75
2113.84
33.5
23.5 - 33.5
2101.4 - 2091.4
It
PWR
33.5
2091.4
MW-17
Off -Site
2094.64
2094.74
3.40
2091.24
14.2
4.0 - 14.0
2090.7 - 2080.7
H
SAP
14.2
2080.5
MW-18
Off -Site
2101.81
2101.92
8.68
2093.13
59.0
49.0 - 59.0
2052.9 - 2042.9
11
SAP
59.0
2042.9
MW-19
Off -Site
2127.61
2127.82
NP-D
NP-D
58.0
48.0 - 58.0
2079.8 - 2069.8
11
SAP
58.0
2069.8
MW-20
Off -Site
2180.55
2180.54
38.44
2142.11
77.0
67.0 - 77.0
2113.5 - 2103.5
11
SAP
77.0
2103.5
MW-21
Off -Site
2091.17
2091.31
1.38
2089.79
36.5
26.5 - 36.5
2064.8 - 2054.8
11
SAP
36.5
2054.8
MW-22
Off -Site
2090.71
2090.84
0.43
2090.28
57.0
47.0 - 57.0
2043.8 - 2033.8
IRS
BR
46.0
2044.8
MW-23
Off -Site
2145.05
2145.20
24.64
2120.41
41.5
31.0 - 41.5
2114.2 - 2103.7
1110
BR
30.0
2115.2
MW-24
Off -Site
2225.37
2225.49
65.67
2159.70
110.0
70.0 - 80.0
2155.5 - 2145.5
H
PWR
42.0
2183.5
MW-25
Off -Site
2207.91
2208.04
NP-I)
NP-I)
106.0
%.0 - 106.0
2112.0 - 2102.0
It
PWR
104.0
2104.0
MW-26
Off -Site
2207.46
2207.62
32.27
2175.19
51.5
41.0 - 51.0
2166.6 - 2156.6
H
PWR/BR
42.0
2165.6
RW-I
On -Site
2209.87
2211.22
43.74
2166.13
77.0
35.0 - 75.0
2176.2 - 2136.2
It
BR/PWR
65.0
2146.2
RW-2
On -Site
2182.46
2183.62
NP-A
NP-A
78.0
35.0 - 75.0
2148.6 - 2108.6
H
BR
31.0
2152.6
RW-3
On -Site
2217.58
2218.06
46.78
2170.80
76.0
54.0 - 64.0
2164.1 - 2154.1
It
BR
36.0
2182.1
RW-4
On -Site
2160.78
2161.74
NP-A
NP-A
60.0
19.6 - 59.6
2142.1 - 2102.1
11
BR
20.0
2141.7
RW-5
On -Site
2159.48
2160.60
14.14
2145.34
66.0
20.2 - 60.2
2140.4 - 2100.4
H
BR
16.0
2144.6
RW-6
On -Site
2160.44
2161.57
16.26
2144.18
67.0
20.0 - 60.0
2141.6 - 2101.6
H
SAP/BR
36.0
2125.6
"_
On -Site
2164.57
2165.60
23.11
2141.46
67.0
13.0 - 53.0
2152.6 - 2112.6
H
SAP/PWR
55.0
2110.6
-0
AS-1
On -Site
2210.73
2211.23
43.27
2167.46
64.0
54.0 - 64.0
2157.2 - 2147.2
H
BR
49.0
2162.2
SVE4
On -Site
2210.57
2211.07
43.28
2167.29
50.5
40.0 - 50.0
2171.1 - 2161.1
H
SAP/PWR
50.5
2160.6
SVE-5
On -Site
2210.96
2211.46
43.39
2167.57
50.5
40.0 - 50.0
2171.5 - 2161.5
H
SAP/PWR
50.5
2161.0
Notes:
*Values rounded to the nearest 0. 1 -ft.
NM = Not measured
NP-A = Not Present - Abandoned
NP-I) = Not Present - Destroyed by Grading
bgs = below ground surface.
bmp = below measuring point.
Table 8 Well Const of 1022-28 Andrex Injection Permit Tables.xls
Water levels measured on 11/2/09. Illo = Type III open bedrock well
Measuring Point Elevation is top of casing. BR & PWR = Bedrock & Partially Weathered Rock
MW-14 returned to artesian conditions as of 10,27/03. SAP = Saprolite
H = Type 11 well MW-24 was abandoned, redrilled and replaced in 2007 after the well head
Ills = Type III screened well was damaged by Milkco contractors in 2003.
RW-1, RW-2, RW-3, RW-4, RW-5, RW-6 & RW-7 were not pumping at time of measurement.
Prepared by: AWA
Checked by: TJB

Given:
Table 8
Hydraulic Conductivity and Groundwater Flow Velocity Data
Andrex Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
DWQ Groundwater Incident Number 6586
BLE Project No. J96-1022-01
2
T= 5.79E-02 ft /min
b= 30 ft (assumed)
K= 1.93E-03 ft/min equal to 9.80E-04 cm/sec
n= 18% (assumed)
i= 1.33E-01 (highest gradient from 4/25/97 water table map -- northeast from Andrex)
i= 4.83E-02 (lowest gradient from 4/25/97 water table map -- southeast from Andrex)
Calulate:
V= ground -water flow velocities (highest and lowest)
V= 1.43E-03 ft/min (highest velocity)
750 ft/year (highest velocity)
V= 5. 1 9E-04 ft/min (highest velocity)
. 272 ft/year (lowest velocity)
Notes:
T = transmissivity
b = aquifer thickness
K hydraulic conductivity
n porosity
i— hydraulic gradient
V = flow velocity
Table 8 of Andrex Table 8 for Risk MsessmentAs

APPENDIX D
WELL LOGS (BORING LOGS AND WELL CONSTRUCTION LOGS)

CL
MONTORING V--T�.L NO. MWA
MILMINC. I
I
PROJECT: —Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
-CUEIWF-- Andrex Induttfles- -STAIM. - -4;li6;9t- -END,---4;1-8--gt---
BLNNELL-LAMMCM
EMINEEMOVINQ LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2222.58
CvEoTEcHmrALANDEwimtowmm DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
CONSULMUffs DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger, rock coring
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFTER 24 HOURS: T 34.79 CAVING>3M
ELEVATION/
DEPTH(FT)
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
-\Asphalt
SURFACE COMPLETION Cover
assembly with removable steel cover -
Very loose red to brown micaceous silty fine to medium
-2
SAND - (fill)
2220-
4
-6
2215-
8
Very firm brown micaceous sitly fine to medium SAND - (fill)
-10
-12
2210-
Neat Cement, 0 to 26.5 feet
Partially weathered rock which sampled as an orange to
14
gray micaceous; silty fine to medium SAND - (residuum)
-16
2205-
Soil boring diameter, 8-inches
18
-
Dense orange to gray micaceous silty fine to medium SAND
-20
-22
2200-
-24
Partially weathered rock which sampled as a gray to black
micaceous silty fine to medium SAND with rock fragments
-26
2195-
Bentonite Seal, 26.5 to 28 feet
28
-30
A
-32
2190-
34
Filter Pack, sand 28 to 46.2 feet
Power auger refusal and boring terminated at 35.0 feet
-36
Four inch PVC pipe set and grouted to 34.0 feet. Began
-
boring bedrock with a 3-7/8" Tri-core rotary bit to 35.5 feet.
2185-
Began NQ rock coring at 35.5 feet. Hard to very hard quartz
38
blotitegneiss. Weathering very slight to fresh. Closeto
moderately closely spaced low angle to moderately dipping
Z
MONTORING WELL NO. MWA
Sheet I of 21

IBLIBINC.
MONTORING' NO. MW-1
,w,'OJECT: Andrex Industries
PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BMNELL-LAMMONS
-CLIENT- -Aridnwindustriew - - -
---START�- 44Sat --END- - 4;1"1-
ENGINEEmr.� INC.
LOCATION:
ELEVATION: 2222.58
GEOTECOaCALANDENVIROMM3M
DRILLER:
LOGGED BY:
CONSULTAKS
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger, rock coring
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFrER 24 HOURS: T 34.79 CAVING>3W_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
joints.
2-inch diameter, Sch. 40 0.010-inch
slotted PVC Screen, 31.2 to 46.2 feet
-42
2180-
44
Very hard quartz biotite gneiss. Weathering fresh
-46
2175- Coring terminated at 46.2 feet.
48
-50
- 52
2170-
54
56
2165
58
-62
2160-_
-64
-66
2155- 68
-70
21504 72
- 74
-76
2145--
-78
Corehole diameter, 3-inches
MONTORING WELL NO. MW-1 I
I Sheet 2 of 21

IBLEINC. MONITORING NO. MW-2
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
--CLIENT�------Andrexlndustdw---------- -- ---- START.--7--27--91---END--7�27-gt---
BUNNELUAMMONS
LOCATION: ELEVATION: =.62
ENGINEERINC% INC.
DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
GE0WX*IWCAUkWEWVR0MWffiWWL
CONBULVRM DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger, rock coring
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: �Z 42.15 AFTER 24 HOURS: -T 38.70 CAVING>=
ELEVATION/
DEPTH(Fn
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
-.,Asphalt and crushed stone
SURFACE COMPLETION
Very stiff gray to red fine to medium sandy very micaceous
Removable steel cover vAth lockable
-2
SILT - (fill)
PVC cap
2220-
-4
-6
Very stiff gray to black fine to medium sandy very
-
micaceous SILT - (residuum)
2215 -
8
-10
Neat Cement, 0 to 22 feet
Dense gray to white micaceous silty fine to coarse SAND
-12
2210-
14
Soil boring diameter, 6-inches
-16
2205-
-13
Very hard gray to orange fine sandy SILT with rock
fragments
-20
-22
2200-
........................................................................ ..............
orange to black fine to medium sandy very micaceous
Bentonite Seal, 22 to 25 feet
-24
SILT
-26
2195-
28
Partially weathered rock gray to brown micaceous fine to
-\coarse sandy SILT with rock fragments
-30
6" roller cone to 30.2 feet. Grouted 4" PVC casing to 30.0
Aidet
NQ cored to 42.6 feet. Hard to very hard, fresh, black to
-32
gray, fine to coarse grained, feldspar, quartz, biotite
2191D-_
GNEISS, variable foliation (migmatite), garnetiferous, minor
-34
pyrite.
Filter Pack, sand 25 to 45 feet
36
GNEISS with high angle, closed, iron stained joint
S2185-
C
38 1
........................................................... ........................
with high angle, closed, iron stained joint.
2-inch diameter, 0.010-inch slotted
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-2
Sheet I of 2

MONITORING NO. MW-2
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
-WENT.-.- - ---Andrex Industhds-- -START--.- 7--27--M--T=ND.----1-ZT-n-
BUNNELL41AMMONS
ENGINEERINrk INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: ZM.62
DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
QWTMMKICAL4mEwir4MKWM
CONSULMWTS DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger, rock coring
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: �7 42.15 AFrER 24 HOURS: -T 38.70 CAVING>3m
ELEVATION/ DESCRIPTION SOIL MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH (FT) TYPE DETAILS
Very hard, fresh, light gray, aphonitic, feldspar, quartz Sch. 40 PVC Screen, 28 to 43 feet
2180-
42.�
L
4" roller cone to 45 feet
Boring terminated at 43.0 feet
46
Auger refusal at 29.0 feet
Corehole diameter, 3-inches
Ground water encountered at 42.15 feet at time of boring.
2175-
Ground water encountered at 38.35 feet after 12 hours.
48
-50
- 52
2170-
-54
-56
2165-
58
-60
- 62
2160-
-64
66
2155-
68
70
- 72
2150-
-74
[L
176
Z
2145
78
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-21
Sheet 2 of 21

[L
"K
LLJ
z
MONITORING NO. MW-3
MOUSING.
� "
-PkOJECT: —Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
AndrexindustffCs---------------- -START'­W24-�
BUNNELL-LAMMONS
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2207.76
ENGINEERINrm% INC.
DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
C*0TECWaCALAwEwirto#aWn%L
CONSULMWT3 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger and air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 40.5 AFTER 24 HOURS: CAVING>3W_
ELEVATION/
DEPTH(Fo
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
Topsoil - brown silty fine to medium SAND - (fill)
SURFACE COMPLETION
-2
Removable steel cover vAth lockable
2205-
PVC cap
Soft orange to brown micaceous fine coarse sandy silty
-4
CLAY with rock fragments - (fill)
-6
Very dense red to brown micaceous silty fine to medium
SAND - (fill)
2200-
-8
-10
-12
2195-
.....
—7
.............................................
... Ve'r"y" de"Irs"e' ... gia''y"f6ye"I lio"w' m i c a c e o u s s i I t y fi n e t o m ediu"IM'­
-14
SAND - (fill)
-16
Neat Cement 0 to 33.8 feet
Firm gray to yellow micaceous silty fine to medium SAND
2190--18
-20
Very stiff brown fine to medium sandy very micaceous SILT
- 22
with rock fragments - (residuum)
2185-
-24
-26
2180--28
Dense silty very micaceous fine to medium SAND
-30
X.
-32
2175-
Partially weathered rock sampled as gray micaceous fine to
medium SAND with rock fragments
-34
Bentonite Seal, 33.8 to 36.1 feet
-36
-
Auger refusal at 36.5 feet. 6" air hammer to 55 feet.
2170--38
GNEISS
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-3
Sheet I of 2

�2
MONITORING "-ILL NO. MW-3
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
-QU_ENT-__'_ -Andrex Industries START: 9-24-91__5ND- -9-24-91
BUNNELL-LAMMCM
EMMMEEMG, INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2207.76
GEOTECHNICALANDENVIROINIE"ki. DRILLER: LOGGED BY-
CONSUUMTO DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger and air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 40.5 AFTER 24 HOURS: CAVING>3W_
ELEVATION/ SOIL MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT) DESCRIPTION TYPE � DETAILS
-42
2165-
46
2160- r 48
-52
2155-
-54
56 Boring terminated at 55.0 feet.
- Ground water encountered at 40.5 feet at time of boring.
2150--58
-60
62
2145
64
-66
2140- 68
-70
-72
2135-
74
76
2130 78
Filter Pack, sand 36.1 to 55 feet
2-inch diameter, 0.010-inch slotted
Sch. 40 PVC Screen, 40 to 55 feet
Borehole diameter, 6-inches
�_l MONITORING WELL NO. MW-31
0
W
.1 Sheet 2 of 2

�X
Z
MONITORING -ILL NO. MW-4
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELL-LAMONS CLIENT: Andrex Inclu-stffe—s ---- -- START-__144:9`1__ENIJ._
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2207.04
ENGINEERINrot INC.
GWMCHNCAL4mEwqRoWfiEPM DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
CONSUMNI'S DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger and air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AIFTER 24 HOURS: -T 77.52 _ CAVING>=
ELEVATION/
DEPTH(FT)
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
-\Gravel
-
Hard orange minor fine sandy clayey micaceous SILT - (fill)
SURFACE COMPLETION
2205-2
Removable steel cover with lockable
PVC cap
4
-6
2200--
8
...... i; .....................................................................................
ry s Iff red micaceous clayey SILT - (fill)
. . .
. .
-10
2195
Soil boring diameter, 6-inches
14
Very stiff orange micaceous fine to medium sandy SILT -
(residuum)
2190--
Neat Cement, 0 to 38.3 feet
-18
Hard gray to light brown fine to medium sandy micaceous
SILT
-20
2185--22
-
Very dense gray silty fine to medium SAND
-24
-26
2180--
Auger refusal at 26.0 feet.
6" air hammer to 31.0 feet.
-28
V' PVC casing set to 31.0 feet.
-30
NQ core from 31.8 feet to 44.5 feet.
2175-32
Moderately hard severe weathering reddish brown (iron
-
staining) high angle to low angle fractures, closely to very
.closely spaced open fractures with soil seams.
-34
. kiid io­ v*'e*'r* y' Kaid ... fie"s"li "f61 I igh t* ... w'e"a"t'Ihe­r'i n*'g'*,' 'a"pfi6n­it'l c* ............
-
including foliation - horizontal to vertical, feldspar, quartz
-36
biotite
GNEISS (migmatite) high angle fracture, open, moderately
2170--
close, deformed layering.
38
Large open fracture - bit fell approximately 6" - iron
staining.
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-4
Sheet I of 3

MONITORING �If- �1-1- NO. MW-4
MILMINC.
PkOJECT: —Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
-CLI1aTr-- -fincTnew-1ficlu-s-tin—es
BLINNELL-LAMMONS
ENGINEEMrp, INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2207.04
Ck-manwALANDEwintowEinxi. DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
CONSULTANTS DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger and air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAl - AFTER 24 HOURS: 77.52 CAVING>3W
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
Very hard to hard fresh bluish gray phorphorlitic feldspar
blotite quartz GNEISS foliation horizontal to vertical; one
2165-42
high angle closed fracture at 43' deformed layering
Bentonite Seal, 38.3 to 45.6 feet
(migmatite)
44
3-7/8" air hammer to 82.0 feet. GNEISS
-46
2160--
48
-50
2155-52
-54
-56
2150--
- 58
-60
Rock boring diameter, 3 7/8-inches
2145-62
-64
Filter Pack, 45.6 to 86.7 feet
66
2140--
-68
-70
2135--72
2-inch diameter, 0.010-inch Slotted
74
Sch. 40 PVC Screen, 51.7 to 86.7 feet
-76
2130-
-
-78
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-4
Sheet 2 of 3

MONITORING `-LL NO. MW-4
MUSING.
���OJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
I3t1NNELL4JUY1M0NS---- - 1--E-ND--144--9t- -
ENGINEmmrp, INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2207.04
DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
GE0TECHmnALANDEWaR0NU0M DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger and air hammer
CONSULUNTS
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL . AFrER24HOURS:-Y 77.52 CAVING>3W_
ELEVATION/ DESCRIPTION MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH (FT) I I TSYOPI 7LE DETAILS
2125-82
2120
-84
86
Boring terminated at 86.7 feet.
88
Auger refusal at 26.0 feet.
-
Ground water encountered at 77.52 feet after 36 hours.
-90
2115-92
-94
-96
2110--
98
-100
2105
102
-104
-106
2100--
108
-110
2095-112
114
(L
-116
j
2090--
-118
co
z
0
I
W
.
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-4
Sheet 3 of 3

0-
�x
LU
z
IBLIGINC. MONITORING �LL NO. MW-5
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
-Culml------)Vid-re—xFn-d-us-Une—s
BUNNELL4-AMMONS
ENGINEEmrx, INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2216.92 7
GEOTEMOWALANDEwrtommomL DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
comwtMorm DRILLING METHOD: 6 and 3-7/8 inch air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: -7 48 — AFTER 24 HOURS: CAVING>3m—
ELEVATION/
DEPTH (FT)
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
Grass and topsoil
Very stiff orange minor fine sandy micaceous clayey SILT -
URFACE COMPLETION
2215-2
(fill)
Re movable steel cover with lockable
PVC cap
4
-6
2210--
-8
-10
Partially weathered rock sampled as gray to orange
micaceous fine to medium sandy SILT - (residuum)
2205--
12
-14
-16
2200--
'18
Neat Cement, 0 to 38.1 feet
-20
Partially weathered rock
2195-22
GNEISS
-24
-26
2190--
28
Soil and partially weathered rock
-30
2185--32
-34
GNEISS
-36
Partially weathered rock
2180--
6" air hammer to 46.5 feet
-38
4" PVC casing grouted to 46.5 feet.
-
GNEISS
Bentonite Seal, 38.1 to 40.5 feet
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-5
Sheet I of 2

�X
Lu
z
MILISINC. MONITORING'�" NO. MW-5
,,,LL
PROJECT: —Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELUAMMONS
-CrI ENT-.- ---WW —rex 1nd -usVe—s START: 9;30-91 F-NL):-9404T—
ENGINEERING, IPJQ
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2216.92
GEOTECHNFCALANDENVRONLENIAL
DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
CONSULTAWS
DRILLING METHOD: 6 and 3-7/8 inch air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 48 AFTER 24 HOURS: T CAVING>3W
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
GNEISS
2175-42
44
-46
2170--
3-7/8" air hammer to 53.0 feet.
GNEISS
Filter Pack, sand 40.5 to 53.0 feet
4,57
-50
2-inch diameter, 0.010-inch slotted
Sch. 40 PVC Screen, 43 to 53 feet
2165-52
Boring terminated at 53.0 feet.
-54
-
Ground water encountered at 48.0 feet at time of boring.
- 56
2160--
- 58
-60
2155-62
-64
66
2150
68
-70
2145
72
-74
-76
2140--
78
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-5
Sheet 2 of 21

CL
MONITORING ".LL NO. MW-6
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELL-LAMMONS -CLIENT'.----- Andrexindusffe—s-----
ENGUNEEmro, INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2211.25
GE0TECHwcALANDEwir&muonAL DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
CONSUL11mrs DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger, air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 48.8 AFTER 24 HOURS: CAVING>3M
ELEVATION/
DEPTH(Fn
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
-\Gravel
2210--
SURFACE COMPLETION
Firm gray to brown micaceous clayey SILT - (fill)
-2
Removable steel cover with lockable
PVC cap
4
2205--6
-8
Firm black to red clayey SILT with black granular material -
-
(fill)
10
2200-
12
Very stiff yellow to brown micaceous SILT - (residuum)
-14
Neat Cement, 0 to 31.4 feet
2195
16
-18
Ha r'd' ... y6lhiow' ... to ... o' r*a'*n' g*'e' ... mi'c-a'c-e-o-u-s' ... S' I L T' ............. ............ .......
----
-20
2190-
22
v6 .............................................................................................
ry hard dark to medium brown fine to medium sandy
micaceous SILT with layering and relic structure
-24
2185-
-26
-28
......
Wr-y* 'hard ... ied ... lo 'bio-w-n .... In i'c* a** c- e-o"u-s"'fl-n-e ... t'o* " m*"e'd'* 1u' ... m ... s"a-ndy'
A.,
SILT with layering and relic structure
-30
2180-
32
Bentonite Seal, 31.4 to 35 feet
-34
Partially weathered rock red to brown silty micaceous fine
-
to medium SAND with layering and relic structure
2175
-36
38
ry stiff pale yellow to white clayey SILT
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-6
Sheet I of 2

C3
MONITORING NO. MW-6
MILIGINC.
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELL-ILMMONS Andrex Industries
ENGINEERINCI, INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: . 2211.25
DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
CONSULTAWS DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger, air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 48.8 AFTER 24 HOURS: CAVING>3M_
ELEVATION/ SOIL MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT) DESCRIPTION TYPE I DETAILS
42
Partially weathered rock sampled as light to dark brown, fine
-44
to medium sandy micaceous SILT with layering and relic
-
structures
2165--46
-48
�7
GNEISS
—50
2160-
-52
-
Partially weathered rock
-54
2155--56
Soil
58
Partially weathered rock
—60
2150-
-62
64
Boring terminated at 64.5 feet.
2145—
66
Ground water encountered at 48.8 feet at time of boring.
70
2140-
72
-74
'7r
2135
-78
Filter Pack, sand 35 to 64.5 feet
2-inch diameter, 0.01 0-inch slotted
Sch. 40 PVC Screen, 43 to 63 feet
Borehole diameter, 6-inches
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-61
I Sheet 2 of 21

MONITORING ���LL NO. MW-7
IBLEINC.
r�--Ij_-�OJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELL-LAMMONS -CLIEN I: M d nem I n—d us ffi e —s -------START----T-3M1 I=ND--9;30*1r
ENGINEERWrol, INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2218.60
DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
GEOTECHnIzALANDENVEMNUBM
CONSMmurm DRILLING METHOD: 6' Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 28.9 AFTER 24 HOURS: CAVING>30_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH (M
TYPE
DETAILS
Grass and topsoil
_N'
7.
Hard tan to orange micaceous fine to medium sandy SILT -
SURFACE COMPLETION
-2
(residuum)
Removable steel cover with lockable
PVC cap
2215-
4
-6
-8
2210-
Partially weathered rock white with black particles fine to
-10
medium sandy SILT with minor gravel and mica
Neat Cement, 0 to 20.2 feet
-12
GNEISS. 6" air hammer to 35 feet
2205-
14
-16
Soil
—/U
Bentonite Seal, 20.2 to 22.3 feet
-22
2195-
24
Partially weathered rock
-26
GNEISS
-28
2190-
N
7
Filter Pack, sand 22.3 to 35 feet
-30
2-inch diameter, 0.010-inch slotted
-32
Sch. 40 PVC Screen, 24.5 to 34.5 feet
2185-
34
Boring terminated at 35.0 feet.
36
-inches
Borehole diameter, r.
Ground water encountered at 28.9 feet at time of boring.
38
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-71
I Sheet I of I

MONITORING,` '�LL NO. MW-8
VKOJECT: —Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELLAIAMMONS
CLIEN I: -An-dr-emInd-u-st—nes SIARI: 5-26;91 END.��6-91
ENGINEERIN% INC.
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2182.63
GE0TWHNCAL"I91VR0WAWM
DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
COHBLRMWM
DRILLING METHOD: 6"Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 19.o AFTER 24
HOURS: CAVING>=
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH (Fr)
TYPE
DETAILS
Topsoil
4A
1171
K,"a
KNI
SURFACE COMPLETION
Hard dull red micaceous fine to medium sandy SILT -
-2
(residuum)
Removable steel cover With lockable
2180-
PVC cap
4
Neat Cement, 0 to 7.8 feet
-6
2175 -
8
artially weathered rock reddish brown clayey fine to
medium micaceous SILT
Bentonite Seal, 7.8 to 10 feet
10
-12
2170-
-14
-16
2165-_
Filter Pack, sand 10 to 24.5 feet
18
N7
-20
2-inch diameter, 0.010-inch slotted
22
Sch. 40 PVC Screen, 13 to 23 feet
6" air hammer to 24.5 feet. GNEISS
2160-
-24
Boring terminated at 24.5 feet.
26
Ground water encountered at 19.0 feet at time of boring.
Borehole diameter, 6-inches
2155-
28
-30
-32
2150-_
-34
-36
2145-
38
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-8
Sheet I of I

A,
--A
Z
MONITORINGV" LNO. MW-8A
11LEINC.
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELL-UUAMONS
CLIENT: Andrex Industries START: 9-27-91 END: 9-27-91
ENGINEERINCvg INC.
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2182.70
GWWCHWCALAmEwimowumx
DRILLER: LOGGED BY.
CoNsuUnm
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger and air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 28.3 AFTER
24 HOURS: CAVING>3M_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
Topsoil
SURFACE COMPLETION
Hard dull red micaceous fine to medium sandy SILT -
J.
-2
(residuum)
Removable steel cover with lockable
2180—
PVC cap
4
Soil boring diameter, 6-inches
-6
2175-
8
...............................................................................................
.. ...
artially weathered rock reddish brown clayey fine to
medium sandy micaceous SILT
-10
Neat Cement, 0 to 22.6 feet
-12
2170—
... ... ... ... .............
....
kirfially' weathered" ii:��k`g­r­a'y'­6'br­o win-flin"e"'tio' m e'd' if 6m'
14
Sandy SILT with minor gravel.
16
Rock
2165—
18
—20
-
Soil
-22
2160—
Rock
-24
Bentonite Sea[, 22.6 to 25.2 feet
Soil
-26
L 1'
V"."
Rock. GroutedV'PVC casing to 28.6 feet
2155—_
28N7
-
Filter Pack, sand 25.2 to 35 feet
Hard to moderately hard moderately weathered medium to
—30
coarse grained feldspar, quartz, biotite GNEISS, horizontal
open fractures closely spaced vertical layering.
Very hard fresh to slightly weathered gray medium to
-32
rai,
coarse grained (granitic) quartz, feldspar, blotite GNEISS
2150 —
f,
Vgry hard fresh dark gray fine to medium grained quartzite
2-inch diameter, 0.010-inch slofted
SS I
GNEISS, high angle closed fracture
Sch. 40 PVC Screen, 30 to 35 feet
-34
3-7/8" air hammer to 35.0 feet
Boring terminated at 35.0 feet
-36
-
Ground water encountered at 28.3 feet at time of boring.
2145 —
38
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-8A
Sheet I of I

I
a-
u
--A
MONITORING;' -UNO. MW-9
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
13WINELL-ILMMOM
-CUENT�'— Andrex Indus-Fn—es--'-- START: 5-1&�END.-34345—
EMINEEMGY INIQ
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2175.49
GE0TECNN=ALANDEuvwwNwWM
DRILLER: LOGGED BY. A Alexander
CONSULmuffs
DRILLING METHOD: 6" Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: �7- 38 AFTER
24
HOURS: 25.3 CAVING>3W
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTI-I (Fn
TYPE
DETAILS
2175-
Brown, slightly micaceous, fine sandy SILT with rock
fragments and roots
SURFACE COMPLETION Steel well
-2
cover with lockable cap
4
2170-
-6
8
2165-
-10
Alternating soils and partially weathered rock
-12
14
2160-
-16
-18
Neat Cement, 0 to 39 feet
Partially weathered rock
-20
2155-
-22
-24
2150-
-
-26
.28
30
2145-
-32
34
GNEISS rock
2140 -
36
-38
oil
IS
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-9
Sheet I of

IBLIGINC. MONITORING -"LL NO. MW-9
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELUJUAMOM
CLIEXT.� Mor-em-M—dustnes SIARI: "8a5—END--54"5—
ENGINEEM43� PC.
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2175.49
GEOTECHNICALANDENVEWWONM
DRILLER: LOGGED BY: A- Alexander
CONSULTANTS
DRILLING METHOD: 6" Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 38 AFTER 24 HOURS: 25.3 _ CAVING>3W
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
2135-
Soil water -bearing zone 7 gpm
Bentonite Seal, 39 to 42 feet
GNEISS rock
-42
44
2130-
46
-48
Filter Pack, 42 to 60 feet
-50
2125-
2-inch diameter,0.010-inch slotted
52
Sch. 80 PVC Screen, 44 to 54 feet
54
Fractured zone - high yield
2120-
GNEISS rock
-56
58
60
Boring terminated at 60.0 feet. Ground water encountered
2115-
-
at 38.0 feet at time of boring and at 25.3 feet after 18 hours.
Borehole diameter, 6-inches
-62
-64
2110-
-66
68
-70
2105-
-72
-74
2100-
76
78
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-9
Sheet 2 of 21

MONITORING NO. MWA 0
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96t-10242-01
BUNNELLAIAMMCM
GLIEN I: Andre_x1nd_us_ffFe_s START: 54945—E
EN03I1NEEI%IN% INC.
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2159.45
QMTECHMCALANDEmvrAwLwnAL
DRILLER: LOGGED BY. A. Alexander
CoNsumum
DRILLING METHOD: 6" Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 29 AFTER 24 HOURS: -T 13.83 CAVING>3W_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH (M
TYPE
DETAILS
Gravel
SURFACE COMPLETION Steel well
Reddish -brown, clayey, fine sandy SILT
-2
cover m(ith lockable cap
Brown, micaceous, fine sandy SILT
4
2155
-6
-8
2150-
-10
-12
Neat Cement, (3% Bentonite) 0 to 24
feet
IF
2145-
-16
2140-
Partially weathered rock
-20
22
24
2135-
-26
Bentonite Seal, 24 to 27 feet
-28
2130-
Soil seam - water bearing
-30
Partially weathered rock
32
Filter Pack, 27 to 40 feet
2125-
-34
Water -bearing fracture at 35.0 feet
2-inch diameter, 0.010 inch slotted
GNEISS rock
-36
Sch. 40 PVC Screen, 29 to 39 feet 4
Borehole diameter, 6-inches
31
2120
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-10
Sheet I of 2

MONITORING V�' NO. MW-1 0
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELULAMMONS
-CLIEN I: Mdrex Indugtffe—s START: 5--i "5 ND--5;1"5--
ENG1NEERNCvt1NC.
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2159.45
DRILLER: LOGGED BY: A. Alexander
GE0TECHNCALANDENV1WNNMN1hL
DRILLING METHOD: 6"Air hammer
COMWUAKS
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 29 AFTER 24 HOURS: -T 13.83 CAVING>M
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
DEPTH (M
Boring terminated at 39.0 feet. Ground water encountered
at 29.0 feet at time of boring and at 16.05 feet after 2.5
-42
hours.
44
2115-
46
-48
2110-
-50
52
-54
2105-_
- 56
58
2100-
-60
62
64
2095-
66
-68
2090-
-70
72
74
2085-
-76
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-10
Sheet 2 of 2

MONITOR
IBLIHINC. ING%, '�-L NO. MW-1 1
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELL-LAMMONS
L;LIILZN : ---Ar- Orex nclustries S 5-13-95 END: 5-18-95
ENGINEERIN06 INC.
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2166.39
GE0TWI*8CAL"BWR0WM3M
DRILLER: LOGGED BY: A. Alexander
CONSULVXTS
DRILLING METHOD: 6"Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 30 AFrER
24
HOURS: -T 23.08 CAVING>3M
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
Gravel
2165-
SURFACE COMPLETION Steel
Brown, fine to medium, sandy SILT with quartz fragments
-2
well cover mdth lockable cap
4
2160-
-6
-8
-10
2155-
-12
-14
Neat Cement, (3% Bentonite) 0 to
-16
31.5 feet
2150-
18
-20
2145-
J..
-22
IF
.
24
-26
2140-
-28
-305'
2135-
-32
-34
-36
2130-
38
Bentonite Seal, 31.5 to 45 feet
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-11
Sheet I of 3

MONITORING NO. MW-1 I
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
eu Andex Industries---------- START—.54"5—END---SwM5---
BUNNELL-LAMMONS
EMINEEmrm, INQ LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2166.39
DRILLER: LOGGED BY. A. Alexander
GEOTErNMICALANDENvRoNmomw
CONSULVXF3 DRILLING METHOD: 6" Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 30 AFTER 24 HOURS: -T 23.08 _ CAVING>3W
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
2125-
-42
-44
J:
2120-
46
-48
-50
Filter Pack, sand 45 to 58.5 feet
2115-
-52
2-inch diameter, 0.010 inch slotted
-64
Sch. 40 PVC Screen, 48 to 58 feet
2110-
56
-58
Borehole diameter, 6-Inches
-60
2105-
The boring for well MW-1 1 was offset
-62
about 5 feet from boring B-1 I
-64
66
2100-
68
-70
2095-
-72
-74
2090-
-76
-78
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-11
Sheet 2 of 3.

IBLENC. : "I __' MONITORING Vf-_).L NO. MW-11
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELL-LAMWOMNS -WENT-- ---fiAdrex-lhMusTn-es
ENGNEEM%lNQ LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2166.39
GEOTEr.HmnALANDENVROMMNM DRILLER: LOGGED BY: A. Alexander
CONSULTAIFFS DRILLING METHOD: 6" Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 30 AFTER 24 HOURS: -T 23.08 CAVING>3w
ELEVATION/ SOIL MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH (FT) DESCRIP71ON TYPE I DETAILS
Boring terminated at 80.0 feet. Ground water encountered
82 at 30.0 feet at time of boring and at 25.7 feet after 18 hours.
84
86
88
-92
-94
96
2070
98
-100
2065-
102
-104
2060-- 106
108
�-110
2055-
112
-114
a. -116
2050
-118
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-11
Sheet 3 of 3

MONITORING V__!_L NO. MW-12
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
GEOTEMIXICALANDEWWWN1111EICAL DRILLER: LOGGED BY: A. Alexander
CousuLvirra DRILLING METHOD: 6"Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 57 AFTER 24 HOURS: T- 45.26 CAVING>3M
ELEVATION/
DEPTH(FT)
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
Reddish -brown, micaceous, clayey, fine sandy SILT
SURFACE COMPLETION Steel well
-2
cover vAth lockable cap
Brown, micaceous, fine to medium, sandy SILT
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
2195-
feet
26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-12
Sheet I of 3

MONITORINGY� ',,LNO. MW-12
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
-CUENT-.---.- Andrex Industffe—S --START-.— 54 EP95 E D���
BUNNELL-LAMMONS
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2219.49
ENGINEEIUNG� INC.
DRILLER: LOGGED BY: A Alexander
GE0TECHKnmANDENvmoN1BM
DRILLING METHOD: 6"Air hammer
CONSIJUANTS
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 57 AFTER 24 HOURS: T 45.26 _ CAVING>3W_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
-42
44
2175-
-46
48
Partially weathered rock
2170-
-50
-52
-
Bentonite Seal, 51 to 55 feet
54
2165--
56
N7
Fracture at 57.0 feet
58
2160-
60
Fracture at 60.0 feet
62
-64
2155-
Filter Pack, sand 55 to 81 feet
66
-68
2-inch diameter, 0.010 inch slotted
Sch. 40 PVC Screen, 60 to 70 feet
2150-
Fracture at 69.0 feet
-70
GNEISS bedrock (very hard)
-72
74
2145-
-76
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-12
Sheet 2 of 3

MILMINC. MONITORINGV,-- -,.LNO. MW-12
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BtSINELL-LAMMONS
--LT-NT: START: 5-18J95--END­-5;T8M
C E drex Industries
ENGINEERING9 INC.
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2219.49
GEOTECHmeALANDENVIROW113M
DRILLER: LOGGED BY: A. Alexander
CONSULTAWS
DRILLING METHOD: 6"Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 57 AFrER
24
HOURS: -T 45.26 _ CAVING>=_
ELEVATION/
DEPTH(FT)
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
-82
Boring terminated at 81.0 feet Ground water encountered
57.0 feet at time of boring and at 47.62 feet after 18 hours.
Borehole diameter, 6-inches
84
2135
-86
-88
2130-
90
-92
94
2125-
96
-98
2120-
-100
102
104
2115-
106
-108
2110-
-110
112
114
�2
2105-
-116
(a.
'X
2100
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-121
I Sheet 3 of 3

J--- MONITORING LL NO. MW-1 3
P'kOJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELL4-AMONS ---SIARI: 3*7;9t-END-�-X�
ENGINIEFimr.., INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2138.96
DRILLER. Lee and Sims LOGGED BY: A Alexander
GEOTEwowALANDENVIRONKUNIX
CONSULM%NF3 DRILLING METHOD: 8 inch Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 5 AFTER 24 HOURS: .5 CAVING>3W
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH (FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
..�Asphalt
SURFACE COMPLETION Steel well
Brown micaceous fine to medium sandy SILT - wet
-2
cover vidth lockable cap
2135—
4
N
7
-6
8
2130--
j.
10
-12
2125-14
-16
J..
18
2120--
-20
-22
Neat Cement, (3% Bentonite) 0 to
43.5 feet
2115-24
-26
-28
2110--
-30
32
2105-34
-36
2100--
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-13
Sheet I of 2

5
MILIGINC.
MONITORING WL NO. MW-1 3
PH OJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
I3MNELL-LAM0NS----.L
LIENT--.-- Andrex Industin—es ---STAFZT*---3;27-97---ENU.----Ir-�-9T-
ENGINEMM% INC.
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2138.96
GWMCHmnALANDENVWdWME"kL
DRILLER: Lee and Sims LOGGED BY: A. Alexander
CONSIJUNiTS
DRILLING METHOD: 8 inch Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 5 AFTER
24 HOURS: .5 _ CAVING>3M
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
-42
2095-44
Bentonite Seal, 43.5 to 46 feet 7
-46
-48
2090--
-50
Filter Pack, 46 to 58.5 feet
-52
2-inch diameter, 0.010 inch slotted
2085-54
Sch. 40 PVC screen, 48 to 58 feet
-56
-58
2080--
Borehole diameter, 8-inches
Bedrock at 58.5 feet
-60
62
2075--64
-66
68
2070
70
-72
2065
74
-76
-78
2060--
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-13
Sheet 2 of 2

PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
=EERINC-% INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2139.20
QWTMWCALAmBwRomGWn DRILLER. Lee and Sims LOGGED BY: A. Alexander
CONSIJUAlfre DRILLING METHOD: 6" and 10" air hammer
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH (M
TYPE
DETAILS
7 Brown micaceous fine to medium sandy SILT - wet
SURFACE COMPLETION Steel
-2
well cover with lockable cap
2135--4
10
-12
2125--14
-16
—20
-22
2115--24
-28
—30
-32
2105--34
-36
-38
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-14
r
Sheet 1 of 2

MONITORING L NO. MW-14
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
-WENT.----Andrex industries bIAKI: j-21-VI "Df-3411--97—
BUNNELULAMMCM
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2139.20
ENGINEERWG� INC.
DRILLER: Lee and Sims LOGGED BY: A. Alexander
GwmcwacAIAwEwvvAwU8n%L
CONSULVATS DRILLING METHOD: 6" and 10" air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 1.5 AFTER 24 HOURS: -T -6.23 _ CAVING>=
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH (FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
-42
2095--44
-46
-48
2090--
-50
-52
2085--54
Borehole diameter, 10-inches down.
-56
to 60 feet
-58
2080--
Weathered bedrock water bearing
-60
Bentonite Seal, 59.5 to 63 feet
62
Hard rock
2075--64
-66
Water bearing fracture at 67 feet
-68
2070--
-70
Filter Pack, sand 63 to 75 feet
-72
2-inch diameter, 0.010 inch slotted
Sch. 40 PVC Screen, 65 to 75 feet
2065-
-74
-76
Borehole diameter, 6-inches
-78
2060
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-14
Sheet 2 of 2

J- k
13LEINC. MONITORING, , NO. MW-1 5
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
CLIENT: Andrex Industries
BUNNELL-LAMMONS
ENGINEERING, INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: - 2125.18
GeoTECHwcmAwEwvRomwffiwu. DRILLER: Lee and Sims LOGGED BY: A. Alexander
CONSLUMM DRILLING METHOD: 10 inch Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 10.4 AFTER 24 HOURS: -T 10.26 CAVING>3W_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
jopsoil and grass
Tan to brown micaceous; fine to medium sandy SILT - moist
SURFACE COMPLETION Steel
-2
(residuum)
well cover woth lockable cap
4
2120--
-6
-8
j
2115--101E
-12,
-14
2110--
Neat Cement, (3% Bentonite) 0 to
-16
33.3 feet
-18
2105--20
22
-24
2100--
K NZI
Borehole diameter, 10-inches down
-26
to 33.3 feet
-28
Partially weathered rock Water bearing greater than 30
2095--30
gpM est.
6-inch diamter PVC casing grouted
-
in place down to 33.3 feet
32
-
Rock at 32.5 feet
-34
Fracture at 37 to 38 feet about 30 gpm
2090--
36
Open bedrock hole, 33.3 to 40 feet
-38
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-15
Sheet I of I

MONITORING 11" ",-L NO. MW-1 6
Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
'�"i,'�OJECT:
BtMNELL-LAMMOM -WENT.--- - --Aridrex-Industries—
IOCATION: ELEVATION: 2124.85
EMINEEmrr, iNc. DRILLER: Lee and Sims LOGGED BY: A Alexander
GEDTECHWCALAmENVFAMW3M DRILLING METHOD: 8" Air hammer
CONSUIUMMIM DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFTER24HOURS:-T 10.10 CAVING>3W
ELEVATION/ SOIL MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH (FT) I DESCRIPTION TYPE I DETAILS
ne to medium sandy SILT
-2
-4
2120--
6
-8
2115--101F
-12
-14
2110--
-16
18
2105--20
-22
- 24
2100--
-26
Partially weathered rock
-28
2095-
30
-32
-34
Terminated boring at 33.5 feet - Bedrock
2090--
36
2;
0
W
0
SURFACE COMPLETION Cover
11, assembly with removable steel cover
R
0 210
5.0 5101
ma . Neat Cement, (3% Bentonite) 0 to 19
feet
Bentonite Seal, 19 to 21.5 feet
Filter Pack, sand 21.5 to 33.5 feet
2-inch diameter, 0.010 inch slotted
Sch. 40 PVC Screen, 23.5 to 33.5 feet
Borehole diameter = 8 inches
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-16
Sheet I of I

-Al
MONITORING 1, ��]_L NO. MW-17
r�kOJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELL-IL4MMONS
C' ENT ------- Andrexindustries7----ND--3e27-97—
ENGNEEM% INC.
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2094.74
GEOTECHNICALAmEwnomem
DRILLER: METRO, R. FRYE LOGGED BY: TOM MCCANLESS
CONBUURM
DRILLING METHOD: HOLLOW STEM AUGER
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 2.95 AFTER
24
HOURS: 2.95_ CAVING>3M_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(Fn
TYPE
DETAILS
TOPSOIL and grass (moist)
SURFACE COMPLETIONSteel well
Brownish gray clayey SILT (wet)
-2
cover with lockable cap
Neat Cement, (3% Bentonite) 0 to 2
feet
4
Bentonite Seal, 2 to 3 feet
2090-
6
-8
Filter Pack, 3 to 14.2 feet
2085--lo
2-Inch diameter, 0.010-inch slotted
Sch. 40 PVC screen, 4 to 14 feet
-12
14
Auger Refusal at 14.2 feet
2080-
Borehole Diameter, 6 inches
-16
18
2075--20
-22
-24
2070 -
-26
-28
2065-
30
-32
-34
2060-
36
2055-
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-17
Sheet I of I

(L
P
MONITORING "'LL NO. MW-1 8
'PkOJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELL-LAMONS ----GLtENT.------- Andrex Industrie-s— --S-rAJTr'.— 4-1-97 --END1'-44--9-V—
ENGINEEMC16 INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: — 2101.92
GE0TECHKrALAmENvrAwmecaL DRILLER: Metro LOGGED BY: JAC
CONSULTANT3 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFTER 24 HOURS: 7.44 CAVING>3M_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH
TYPE
DETAILS
Slightly fine sandy, very micaceous brown trace of clay SILT
SURFACE COMPLETION Cover
2100-2
assembly vAth removable steel cover -
4
-6
2095--
IF
-8
—10
2090--
12
-14
-16
2085--
-20
Neat Cement, 0 to 43.9 feet
2080-22
-24
-26
2075--
-28
—30
2070-32
-34-
-36
2065--
-38
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-18
Sheet I of 2

iL
13
MONITORING IWL NO. MWA 8
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: .196ti-1022-01
t
BUNNELUAMMOM
Andrex industries- START: 4-1-97 E
EM94EEM% INCQ
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2101.92
GBOTECHNICALANDIEWIRONMOM
DRILLER: Metro LOGGED BY: JAC
CONSULVXM
DRILUNG METHOD: Hollow stem auger
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFTER 24 HOURS: 7.44 CAVING>3W_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
2060-42
KM
K'A
-44
Bentonite Seal, 43.9 to 46 feet
-46
2055--
-48
-50
Filter Pack, 46 to 59 feet
2050-52
-54
2-inch diameter, 0.010 inch slotted
-56
Sch. 40 PVC Screen, 49 to 59 feet
2045--
58
Boring terminated at 59 feet
-60
Borehole diameter, 9 114-inches
2040-62
-64
-66
2035--
- 68
70
2030-72
-74
-76
2025--
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-18
Sheet 2 of 21

MONITORING IWL NO. MW-19
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
CLIENT: Andrex Industries START: 4-1-97 END: 4-1-917
CL -1-97
BUNNELL-LAMIVICOMM
EMINEEMG� INC.
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2127.82
GEOTECHNICALANDENVRDNI1119ML
DRILLER: Metro, C. Gordon LOGGED BY: A Alexander
ComuLmorm
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: �Z 15 AFrER
24
HOURS: 3.38 - CAVING>3W_
A
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH (FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
-jopsoil and grass
Brown micaceous slightly clayey sandy SILT
SURFACE COMPLETION Cover
-2
assembly with removable steel cover -
2125--
IF
4
6
Gray silty fine sandy CLAY
2120--8
10
Brown micaceous fine to medium sandy SILT
-12
2115--
14
N7
-16
Neat Cement, 0 to 38 feet
2110-
18
-20
-22
2105--
24
-26
2100--28
-30
-32
2095--
-34
-36
j.
2090--38
ONITORING WELL NO. MW-19
Sheet I of 2

MONITORINGV '!-LNO. MW-19
MILISINC.
,,,,,DJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELL-LANIMONS -CLJENT—.-- Aridrex Industfies --STPRT---4PI--97---IEND��-1--97--
IEMINEIEIMG� INQ LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2127.82
C4E0TECHMCALAwENVN0NM8ML DRILLER: Metro, C. Gordon LOGGED BY: A. Alexander
CONSULvarrs DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 15 AFTER 24 HOURS: 3.38 _ CAVING>30
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPMON
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
Bentonite Sea[, 38 to 44 feet
-42
2085--
-44
-46
2080--48
—50
-52
Filter Pack, 44 to 58 feet
2075--
-64
2-inch diameter, 0.010-inch sloffecL,
56
Sch. 40 PVC screen, 48 to 58 feet
Borehole diameter, 7.5 inch es;
20701
58
Boring terminated at 58 feet, Auger refusal
-62
2065--
-64
-66
2060--68
—70
72
2055
74
-76
2050--78
2i
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-19
Sheet 2 of 2

MONITORING',"- -,-L NO. MW-20
PROJECT: —Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELL-LAMMONS CLIEW'T-: -Midr-ex-Fndu­str1es- --START--- - -4mT-97-- -EW- - 2P2-9F
ENGINEERING� INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2127.82
C1E0TECHfflCALA=E4vRoWufflx DRILLER: Metro LOGGED BY: JAC
CONS110W13 DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AIFTER 24 HOURS: -T 32.50 CAVING>3M
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(Fn
TYPE
DETAILS
Slightly sandy fine very micaceous brown SILT
SURFACE COMPLETION Cover
-2
assembly with removable steel cover -
2125--
4
-6
2120--
8
-10
-12
2115--
-14
Neat Cement, 0 to 33 feet
-16
2110--18
-20
-22
2105--
-24
-26
2100--28
-30
321F
2095--
-34
Bentonite Seal, 33 to 36 feet
-36
2090--38
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-20
Sheet I of 21

MONITORING t NO. MW-20
PROJECT: —Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
CLIENT: Andrex Industries START: --4:2--97
BUNNELUAMMOM
EWINEEMIGIONC.
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2127.82
QWTECHfflCALANDENVfft0W9NIXL
DRILLER: Metro LOGGED BY: JAC
CONSUL11mrs
DRILLING METHOD: Hollow stem auger
ai S7
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITI. AFTER 24 HOURS: -T 32.50 CAVING>3W
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
-42
2085--
44
-46
2080--48
-50
-52
Filter Pack, sand 36 to 77 feet
2075--
54
-56
2070--
58
-60
-62
2065--
-64
-66
2060--
68
-70
2-inch diameter, 0.010-inch slotted
Sch. 40 PVC screen, 67 to 77 feet
-72
2055--
74
-76
�-4
C9
�k
�Lu
a:
-
I
. Y.
Borehole diameter, 7.5 inches
a
z
2050-�
78
Boring terminated at 77 feet
<
1
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-201
I Sheet 2 of 2

f
LLI
MONITORING VWL NO. MW-21
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
CL
CLIENT�---AndreMdustd—es -START--.-4--1w;97--END. 4- ;97'--
BUNNELL-LAMMOM
ENGENEEMC% INQ
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2091.31
GE0TECmmcmAmENVRDNffnkL
DRILLER: Lee and Sims, John LOGGED BY: JAC
comsuuwm
DRILLING METHOD: 10" Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: -7 AFTER24HOURS:-Y 2.41_ CAVING>3M_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
Alluvial soils
2090-
SURFACE COMPLETION Cover
-2
assembly vAth removable steel cover -
4
Rock, inter layers of rock and alluvial sediments, some
-
wood
2085--
6
-8
-10
2080-
Neat Cement', 0 to 22 feet
-12
-14
2075--
16
-18
20
2070-
22
Bentonite Seal, 22 to 24 feet
-24
2065--
26
-28
Filter Pack, sand 24 to 36.5 feet
-30
2060-
2-inch diameter,0.010-inch slotted
-32
Sch. 40 PVC screen, 26.5 to 36.5 feet
-34
2055--
36
Total well depth, 36.5 feet
-38
Borehole diameter, 10-inches
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-21
Sheet I of I

�
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2090.84
ENGINEEMG, INC.
GEOTEMODCALANDENVRDMENIRL DRILLER: Lee and Sims, John LOGGED BY. JAC
CONSULMkIfrs DRILLING METHOD: 10" Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFTER 24 HOURS: 1.24 CAVING>=_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(Fr)
TYPE
DETAKS
Alluvial soils
SURFACE COMPLETION Cover
-2
assembly Wth removable steel cover -
Rock, inter layers of rock and alluvial sediments
10
Residual soils
20801
-12
-14
-20
Neat Cement, 0 to 43
-22
-24
2065--26
-28
30
-32
-34
2055--36
-38
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-22
Sheet I of 2

IRLIHINC. MONITORING NO. MW-22
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELL-ILMMONS CLEN -1M-d-re-x-I-nUu--sFn-es- S I -AR I:
ENGINEEJM% INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2090.84
ENVIRONMWIAL DRILLER: Lee and Sims, John LOGGED BY: JAC
COUSULUM DRILLING METHOD: 10" Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFTER 24 HOURS: 1.24_ CAVING>3W_
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
ELEVATION/ DESCRIPTION TSYOPI 7LE DETAILS
DEPTH(FT)
-42
-44
2045- 46
Bedrock
-48
-50
2040--
-52 Water bearing fracture
54
2035-- 56
-62
-64
2025- 66
-68
-70
2020--
72
-74
2015176
78
Bentonite Seal, 43 to 45 feet
Filter Pack, 45 to 57 feet
2-inch diameter, 0.010-inch slotted
Sch. 40 PVC Screen, 47 to 57 feet
Total well depth, 57 feet
Borehole diameter, 10-Inches
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-'�2
21 Sheet 2 of 2

I
IL
0
MONITORING 1; NO. MW-23
VF%OJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELL-LAMMONS -CLIENT-- --START; 4*697--END­4--�
ENGINEERiNr., INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2145.20 -
GEOTECHNICALANDIENVRONMEN1RI. DRILLER: Lee and Si ms, J. Sims LOGGED BY., A. Alexander
'
CONSULZWF3 DRILLING METHOD: 6" and 10" air hammer
DEPTH TO -WATER> INITI A L. AFrER 24 HOURS: -T 23.78 CAVING>3W
ELEVATION/
DEM (F0
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
,Topsoil and grass
SURFACE COMPLETION Cover
Reddish brown silty clayey micaceous fine sandy SILT
-2
assembly with removable steel cover -
4
2140--
-6
Inter layered partially weathered rock and micaceous fine to
8
medium sandy SILT - (residuum)
Borehole diameter, 1 0-inches down
-
to 31 feet
2135--10
-12
6-inch diameter PVC casing grouted
-
in place down to 31 feet
-14
2130--
-16
Neat Cement 0 to 31 feet
-18
2125--20
-22
IF
-24
2120--
-26
-28
2115--30
Bedrock
32
-34
2110--
Water bearing fracture at 35 feet, approximately 18 gpm
-36
Open bedrock, 31 to 41.5 feet
Water bearing fracture at 37 feet, approximately 18 gpm
38
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-23
Sheet I of 21

MONITORING NO. MW-23
rROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
EMNELUAMMOM
NT: Andrex Industries
ENGINEEIUW.vt INQ
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2145.20
CWVrE0wachLANDENVFA*IK3MkL
DRILLER: Lee and Sims, J. Sims LOGGED BY. A. Alexander
CONSUUXNTS
DRILLING METHOD: 6" and 10" air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFTER 24 HOURS: -T 23.78 CAVING>3M
ELEVATION/
DEPTH(FO
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
-42
EMU
Boring terminated at 41.5 feet
Borehole diameter, 6-inches
44
2100--
-46
-43
2095--50
-52
54
2090-
-56
-58
2085
60
62
-64
2080--
66
-68
2075--70
72
-74
2070--
-76
-78
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-23
Sheet 2 of 21

MONITORING NO. MW-24
IBLEINC.
PROJECT: —Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
-START� -- ;Vf3;8T--END- --iP4X97-
BUNNELL-LAMMONS
LOCATION: ELEVATION: ZM5.49
ENGINEERING% INC.
DRILLER: Lee and Simms LOGGED BY: JAC
GEOTECINCALANDIEwItowfiNmL DRILLING METHOD: Air hammer
CONSWANTS DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AIFTER 24 HOURS: -T 56.q.5 CAVING>=_
ELEVATIONI
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
DEPTH(FI)
2225-
Residual soils
SURFACE COMPLETION Cover
assembly with removable steel cover
-2
-4
2220-
-6
-8
-10
2215-
U
-14
2210-
16
-20
2205-
-22
-24
2200-
-26
-28
-30
Neat Cement, 0 to 61.5 feet
2195-
-32
-34
2190-
EL
36
LLJ
Cr
z
-38
d
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-24
Sheet I of 3

MONITORING 1: NO. MW-24
/'-L
ECT: —Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
-CLIENT.- ---- Andrex Indust es --ZTART----4--�-ENIJ.-4��--
BUNNELUJI01MONS
ENGINEEI%Nr.� INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2225.49 -7
GEOTECH111CALANDENVRONUMMI. DRILLER: Lee and Simms LOGGED BY: JAC
CONSULTAKM DRILLING METHOD: Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFTER 24 HOURS: -T 56.05 _ CAVING>=_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
2185-
-42
Bedrock
44
2180-
-46
-48
50
2175-
-52
54
2170-
IF
56
-
-58
60
2165-
-62
-64
Bentonite Seal, 61.5 to 68 feet
2160-
66
68
-70
2155-
72
Water producing fracture at 7'21-*..;�',
Filter Pack, 68 to 80 feet
-74
2150-
2-inch diameter, 0.010-inch slotted
-76
Sch. 40 PVC screen, 70 to 80 feet
-78
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-24
Sheet 2 of 3,

MONITORING IWL NO. MW-24
tPROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
IENTF--- Andrex Industries ---START-.- 4.1 7 END: 4-1,1,-97
-
BUNNELIAMMONS
ENGINEERN03, INC.
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2225.49
GMTECHNICALANDIEwRON1111311AL
DRILLER: Lee and Simms LOGGED BY: JAC
CONSULvorm
DRILLING METHOD: Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL. AFrER
24 HOURS: -T 56.05 CAVING>3W
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
2145-
Borehole diameter, 6-Inches
-82
84
2140-
86
-88
-90
2135-
-92
94
2130-
-96
-98
100
2125-
-102
104
2120-
106
-108
2115
110
Boring terminated at I 10 feet
-112
-114
2110—
116
118
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-24
Sheet 3 of 3

Li
z
BLEW-MONITORING1, ',LLNO. MW-25
-PkOJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
CLIENT: -----A&Fdr—ex Industries ---STMW ------ IP43;9T---END 'P[3;9T—
BILINNELUAMMOM
EWINEmmr.�INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2208.04
GEOTECHUCALANDIEwipommom DRILLER: Lee and Simms LOGGED BY: JAC
CommmX13 DRILLING METHOD: Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFTER 24 HOURS: 1 49.93 CAVING>=
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(Fn
TYPE
DETAILS
Brown micaceous silty SAND
SURFACE COMPLETION Cover
-2
assem bly Wth removable steel cover -
2205--
4
-6
2200-8
—10
-12
2195--
14
-16
2190-18
—20
-22
2185--
-24
-26
2180-28
—30
-32
2175--
-34
-36
2170--
38
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-25
Sheet I of 3

(L
"'U
z
MONITORING VWL NO. MW-25
ROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-M
N Andrex Industries 5TART: 4-1"T-END: 4-1-4-97
INELL-ILMMONS
ENGINEERING6 INC.
Lo Tiol
OCATION: ELEVATION: 2208.04
GEOTECHWCALANDENVROMMOM
DRILLER: Lee and Simms LOGGED BY- JAC
commamum
DRILLING METHOD: Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFTER 24 HOURS: -T 49.93 CAVING>3W—
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(Fr)
TYPE
DETAILS
-42
2165--
44
Neat Cement, 0 to 89.5 feet
-46
2160-48
-50
-52
2155--
-54
56
2150-58
-60
-62
2145--
-64
-66
2140-68
-70
-72
2135--
-74
-76
21301711
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-25
Sheet 2 of 3

MONITORING 1- 'I'LL NO. MW-25
Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-101]22-01
EMINEEmr.� INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2208.04
GE0TECHMcuANDEwiw&wmmfaL DRILLER: Lee and Simms LOGGED BY. JAC
CONBUUANT3 DRILLING METHOD: Air hammer
DEPTH TO -WATER> INITIAL . AFTER 24 HOURS: X 49.93 CAVING>3M
ELEVATION/
DEPTH(FT)
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
-82
Nyl
-84
86
2120--88
—90
-92
94
-96
2110--98
—100
Filter Pack, 94 to 106 feet
-102
2-Inch diameter, 0.010-inch slotted
-106
Boring terminated at 106 feet
-
Borehole diameter, 6-inches
—110
112
2095
114
-116
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-25
Sheet 3 of 3

MONITORING I,- ";LL NO. MW-26
IBLIBINC.
r�kOJECT: —Andrex Corrective Action PROJECT NO.: J98-1022-05
BUNNELL-LAMMONS -CLIENT�-- --Andrex1ndustrIes---- - -- --- S7ART.---VlSI98--MD.----4/20198—
EMINEEM%INQ LOCATION: Asheville, North Carolina ELEVATION: 2207.62 (GS)
GEOTEmnacALANDENVIRDINIMOML DRILLER: Lee and Sims, J. Sims LOGGED BY: AWA
CONSMMUIM DRILLING METHOD: 6-inch air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 38 AFrER 24 HOURS: 25.2 - CAVING>3W_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(Fr)
TYPE
DETAILS
GRAVEL off Asphalt lot
r\0
SURFACE COMPLETION
flush mounted, steel cover and
locking cap
-2
4
-6
-8
-10
J..
-12
14
Neat cement, 0 to 34 feet
-16
Light brown, micaceous, sandy SILT - (residuum)
-20
-22
-24
IF
-26
28
-30
32
-34
36
Bentonite seal, 34 to 38 feet
N7
-38
Dark brown, PARTIALLY WEATHERED ROCK
Highly productive water bearing zone at 38 to 42 feet
MONITORING WELL NO. MW-26
Sheet 1 of 2

MONITORING *L NO. MW-26
tROJECT: Andrex Corrective Action PROJECT NO.: J98-1022-05
L
BtMNELLALAMMONS LtElWr,--- Andrex industne-s- -STfiRKTr-.- U�--412=8-
ENGINEERINCv, INC. LOCATION: Asheville, North Carolina ELEVATION: _2207.62 (GS)
GEOTECHNnALANDENVIR0111118CIRL DRILLER: Lee and Sims, J. Sims LOGGED BY: AWA
COMWUANTS DRILLING METHOD: 6-inch air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 38 AFTER 24 HOURS: 25.2 CAVING>3M
ELEVATION/ DESCRIPTION SOIL � MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH (FT) I I TYPE DETAILS
42 Black MICA GNEISS component rock with water bearing
fracture at 48 feet
44
46
48
50
52 Boring terminated at 51X feet. Ground water encountered
at 38 feet at time of boring and at 25.2 feet after 24 hours
54
56
58
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
Filter pack, sand 38 to 51.5 feet
.010-Inch slotted Schedule 40 PVC
well screen, 41 to 51 feet
Pipe cap, 51 to 51.5 feet
Boring diameter, 6-inches
�-1 MONITORING WELL NO. MW-2]6
0
W 2
'I Sheet 2 of 2

RECOVERY T-11L NO. RW-1
PROJECT: —Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
----MEN'F- - ----START-.--5--17--93--END--S447T-VnT-
BUNNELL-LAWOM
LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2211.22
EMINEEMIGo. INQ
DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
GE0TECHxnALANDENvRomffiN1AL
DRILLING METHOD: 10" Air hammer
COKMAXANT3
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFIFER 24 HOURS: CAVING>3W_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
DEPTH (M
Residual soils
SURFACE COMPLETION 2X2foot
2210--
lockable steel well vault with gripper
-2
plug well cap
4
2205--6
-8
-10
2200--
-12
-14
Neat Cement (3% Bentonite), 0 to 3(
2195--16
feet
-18
-20
2190-
-22
-24
2185--26
-28
-30
2180--
Bentonite Seal, 30 to 32 feet
-32
-34
L 2175--36
RECOVERY WELL NO. RWA
Sheet I of 2

MILMINC, RECOVERY -k-L NO. RW-1
1PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
CLIENT: Andrex Indu es 5-17-93 END-54T-93—
BUNNELL-LAMMONS
ENGINEEMIG19 INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2211.22
GEOTECHNICALANDIEwwwwam DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
COKSULVXTS DRILLING METHOD: 10" Air hammer -
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFTER 24 HOURS: CAVING>3W
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
Filter Pack, sand 32 to 77 feet
2170--
-42
-44
2165--46
-48
-50
6-inch diameter, 0.010-Inch slotted
2160--
Sch. 40 PVC screen, 35 to 75 feet
-52
-54
2155--56
-58
-60
2150--
62
-64
Bedrock
2145 -
66
-68
-70
2140-
-72
-74
2135--76
Total well depth, 77 feet
78
Borehole diarnter, 10-inches
RECOVERY WELL NO. RW-1
Sheet 2 of 2

RECOVERY%/ ------ �-"-L NO. RW-2
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
ZLIENT— Andrex Industnes --- START.*--ra-
BtMNELL-LAMMONS
EMINEEmrx, iNc. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2183.62
GE0TECHwc&LANDEmvrAmuaML DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
COKTULVRM DRILLING METHOD: 12"Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFTER 24 HOURS: CAVING>3W
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
Dry to moist brown micaceous silty fine to medium SAND -
-
(residuum)
SURFACE COMPLETION 2 X 2 foot
steel well vault with PVC lockable
-2
well cap
2180-
4
-6
-8
7
2175-
10
-12
2170-
Neat Cement (3% Bentonite), 0 to
14
26.5 feet
-16
-18
2165-
-20
22
2160-
24
-26
-28
Bentonite Seal, 26.5 to 28.9 feet
2155-
-30
Gray fine to medium grained blotite, quartz, feldspar
32
GNEISS
2150-
34
-36
-38
21451
RECOVERY WELL NO. RW-2
Sheet 1 of 2

RECOVERY V�" �1 NO. RW-2
-PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
-CUENT.-- -----Arxdr—ex I-nd-ustf ie—s 6-2-94 END: __6;2_-9AF---
BUNNELL-LAMCM
ENIGANEEmr., INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION: 2183.62
DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
GEOTECIDWALANDENMAMMISML
CONSUMMS DRILLING METHOD: 12" Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL:
ELEVATION/ DESCRIPTION
DEPTH(FT)
-42
2140 - 44
46
-48
2135-
-50
-52
2130 - 54
Minor fractures at 55-58 feet. Water production about 0.5
56 gpM
58
2125-
-62
2120- 64
66
-68
2115 -
-70
-72
2110- 74
-76
- 78
2105- Boring terminated at 78 feet
AFTER 24 HOURS: IT CAVING>3W_
SOIL I MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
TYPE DETAJLS
Filter Pack, sand 28.9 to 78 feet
6-inch diameter, 0.020-inch slotted
Sch. 40 PVC screen, 35 to 75 feet
Borehole diameter, 12-inches
RECOVERY WELL NO. RW-2
Sheet 2 of 2

RECOVERYT It NO. RW-3
PROJECT: Andrex Corrective Action PROJECT NO.: J98-1022-05
-WENT.___-_Ahdre­x Industries ____7STAITT-._ 4/15/98 _EN 17198
BUNNELL-LAMMONS
ENGINEERINC% INQ LOCATION: Asheville, North Carolina ELEVATION: 2218.06 (GS)
ENvrAmmBmwL DRILLER: Lee and Sims, J. Sims LOGGED BY: AWA
CONSULMUM DRILLING METHOD: 10-inch air rotary and 64nch air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 56 AFrER 24 HOURS: T 45.6 _ CAVING>3W_
ELEVATIONI I SOIL MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(Fr) DESCRIPTION TYPE I DETAILS
flush mounted, 2'x 2' steel well vault
Reddish -brown, slightly clayey, micaceous, fine, sandy SILT Wth butterfly valve and locking cap
A.
-2 (residuum)
-4
Rocklens
-6
-8
Brown, micaceous, fine, sandy SILT
—10 .....j..
-12
-14
-16
-18 j I.
—20
-22
-24
Neat cement, 0 to 49 feet
-26
28
I J.'T.1
-32
Ri
-34
(L
36
Competent rock, MICA GNEISS
38
RECOVERY WELL NO. RW-3
Sheet 1 of 2

IL-l" RECOVERY V,'-',.L NO. RW-3
PROJECT: Andrex Corrective Action PROJECT NO.: J98-1022-05
-CLIENT�--- An—drex IndCMffe—s-- ---START--V15M--END�---411M8—
BUNNELL-LAWOM
ENGINEERWG� mQ LOCATION: Asheville, North Carolina ELEVATION: 2218.06 (GS)
QMTEWMCALANDENvrAmm0ML DRILLER: Lee and Sims, J. Sims LOGGED BY: AWA
DRILLING METHOD: 1 0-Inch air rotary and 6-Inch air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 56 AFTER 24 HOURS: T 45.6 _ CAVING>3M—
ELEVATION/ SOIL MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT) DESCRIPTION TYPE � DETAILS
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
56 T Water bearing fracture at 56 feet
58
62 1 Water bearing fracture at 62 feet
64
66 Very hard, competent rock from 64 to 76 feet. No fractures
observed.
68
72
74
76 Boring tenninated at 76 feet. Ground water encountered at
56 feet at time of boring and at 45.6 feet after 24 hours.
78
Bentonite seal, 49 to 51 feet
-*-.�z4.-*..j Filter pack, #4 DSI sand 51 to 64 feet
.020-inch slotted Schedule 40 PVC
well screen, 54 to 64 feet
Backfilled With native cuttings (rock
chips), 64 to 76 feet
Boring diameter, 104nches (0-64 ft.),
6-inches (64 to 76 ft.)
Total boring depth, 76 feet
RECOVERY WELL NO. RW-3
Sheet 2 of 2

RECOVERY T' 1 NO. RW-4
11LEINC.
I;- ,
PROJECT: Andrex Industries Rernediation PROJECT NO.: J99-1022-07
---CLIENT--.-- --AM-dre—xtn-clu-s-tne—s-------- -START-:---tt--t"9--.END--"--10*9- -
BWNEL
LOCATION: Asheville, North Carolina ELEVATION: 2161.74msi
ENGINEEMIGilt INC.
DRILLER: Lee &Sims, Larry Williams LOGGED BY: KAL
QW1rECHIQCALANDEwimoWfiNM
CONSWANTS DRILLING METHOD: Ingersoll-Rand T3W, 1 0-inch Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: �7- 33 AFTER 24 HOURS: T 18 - CAVING>3W_
ELEVATION/
DEPTH(FT)
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
Light brown SILT
SURFACE COMPLETION
-
2'x 2' steel well vault
-2
Top of casing elevation = 2160.78-
rnsl
4
6
8
5% bentonitelcement, 0 to IS feet
10
PARTIALLY WEATHERED ROCK which sampled as gray
-
and black, coarse SAND
-12
14
16
Bentonite seal, 3/8-inch hole plug 15
to 17 feet
IF
18
-20
amphibolite gneiss BEDROCK
22
-24
-26
6-inch ID,.020-inch slotted Schedule
40 PVC well screen, 19.6 to 59.6 feet
-28
-30
Filter pack, (DSI #4) sand 17 to 60
feet
-32
7 Fractured rock from 32 to 43 feet
Returns are angular cobbles of amphibolite gneiss
-34
36
-38
RECOVERY WELL NO. RW-4
Sheet I of 2

cc
ELEVATION/
DEPTH (FT)
42
44
Hard drilling at 45 feet
46
48
50
52
54
Fracture at 55 feet, copious water
56
58
60
Boring terminated at 60 feet. Ground water encountered at
62 33 feet at time of drilling and at 17.9 feet after 24 hours.
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
40 PVC well screen, 19.6 to 59.6 feet
Filter pack, (DSI #4) sand 17 to 60
feet
Pipe cap, 59.6to 60 feet
Total well depth, 60.0 feet
Total borehole depth, 60.0 feet
RECOVERY WELL NO. RW-41
I Sheet 2 of 21

RECOVERY NO. RW-5
11LEINC.
--,'!-:OJECT: Andrex Industries Remediation PROJECT NO.: J99-1022-07
-CLtE-NT--------Mdrex-industdez-------- —START-�-41-9--W-END�-4t-"9—
BUNNELL-LAMMONS
EMINEEmrs, INQ LOCATION: Asheville, North Carolina ELEVATION: 2160.60 msi
DRILLER: Lee &Sims, Larry Williams LOGGED BY: AWA
GE0TEMWCALANDENvwmmmffirRL
comemmWIM DRILLING METHOD: Ingersoll-Rand T3W, 10-Inch Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: -7 38 AFTER24HOURS:-Y 19.5 _ CAVING>3M_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(Fr)
TYPE
DETAILS
-\6-inches of GRAVEL
SURFACE COMPLETION
flush mount. Xx 3'steel well vault
Brown, micaceous, fine sandy SILT
-2
Top of casing elevation 2159.48'
msl
4
-6
8
5% bentonite/cement, 0 to 15 feet
10
-12
14
-16
Bentonite seal (3/8-inch hole plug),
Gneiss BEDROCK
15 to 17 feet
18
-20
-22
Fracture at 23 feet below ground surface, no water
-24
6 -inch ID, .020-inch slotted Schedule
-26
40 PVC well screen, 20.2 to 60.2 feet
28
-30
Filter pack, (DSI #4) sand 17 to 60.6
feet
32
-34
-36
38�'
Fracture at 38 feet below ground surface with water, 10 to
12 gpm (driller estimate)
RECOVERY WELL NO. RW-5
Sheet I of 2

RECOVERY Vi' L NO. RW-5
11LEINC,
PROJECT: —Andrex Industries Remediation PROJECT NO.: J99-1022-07
BUNNELL-LAMCM
-CLIENT.-- -- --Mdrex Industfies START: 11--"g--END�- �-­
ENGINEMUNGONQ
LOCATION: Asheville, North Carolina ELEVATION: 2160.60 msl
GEOTEMOaCALANDENVRONMOM
DRILLER: Lee &Sims, Larry Williams LOGGED BY- AWA
CONSULTANTS
DRILLING METHOD: Ingersoll-Rand T3W, 1 0-inch Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 38 AFTER 24 HOURS: 19.5 _ CAVING>3M_
ELEVATION/
DEPTH(FT)
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
Gneiss BEDROCK
6 -inch ID,.020-inch slotted Schedule
40 PVC well screen, 20.2 to 60.2 feet
-42
44
Fracture, water minor 44 to 46 feet
-46
Filter pack, (DSI #4) sand 17 to 60.6
48*
feet
-50
-52
Fracture, water minor 53 to 55 feet
-54
56
58
-60
Pipe cap, 60.2 to 60.6 feet
62
Minor fracture, 62 to 64 feet
Slough, 60.6 to 66 feet
-64
66
Boring terminated at 66 feet. Ground water encountered at
Total well depth, 60.6 feet
63
38 feet at time of drilling and at 19.5 feet after 24 hours.
Total borehole depth, 66.0 feet
-70
-72
-74
76
-78
RECOVERY WELL NO. RW-5
Sheet 2 of 2,

RECOVERY1, -LNO. RW-6
-OkOJECT: —Andre-x Industries Rernedlation PROJECT NO.: J99-1022-07
-CUENT.---. -- AndrexinduMes 11-9-99 END: 11 --949—
BUNNELL-LAMMONS
ENGINEERINCIN INQ LOCATION: Asheville, North Carolina ELEVATION: 2161.57 rnsi
GEOTECHICCALANDIENVEONWWRL DRILLER: Lee &Sims, Larry Williams LOGGED BY: AWA
COMURMUIM DRILLING METHOD: Ingersoll-Rand T3W, I 0-Inch Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 30 AFTER 24 HOURS: 20.5 'CAVING>W__�0.4
ELEVATION/
DEPTH(FT)
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
-\6-inches of GRAVEL
SURFACE COMPLETION
Brown, fine to medium sandy SILT
2'x 2'steel well vault
Top of casing elevation 2160.44!
-2
rnsl
-4
-6
A.
5% bentonite/cement, 0 to 14.5 feet
-8
-10
-12
14
-16
Bentonite seal (3/8-inch hole plug),�
14.5 to 17 feet
-20 IF
-22
-24
A..
6-Inch ID, .020-inch slotted Schedule
-26
40 PVC well screen, 20 to 60 feet
28
-30
Soil zone with water (high productivity), 30 to 36 feet
Filter pack, (DSI #4) sand 17 to 60.4
feet
-32
34
-36
BEDROCK
-38
RECOVERY WELL NO. RW-6
Sheet I of 2

' 01
RECOVERY L NO. RW-6
PROJECT: Andrex Industries Rernediation PROJECT NO.: J99-1022-07
-CLIEN 1: Andrex I—ndustnes 11-4; 9--ENDr--11--"9
BUNNELWAMMONS
LOCATION: Asheville, North Carolina ELEVATION: 2161.57rnsl
EMINEEMIGlINQ
DRILLER: Lee &Sims, Larry Williams LOGGED BY. AWA
GE0TECNMCALAwEkvraNm9raL
CoMWLVxM DRILLING METHOD: Ingersoll-Rand T3W, 1 0-inch Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 30 AFTER 24 HOURS: T 20.5 _ CAVING>=_10.4
ELEVATIONI DESCRIPTION SOIL MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT) TYPE DETAILS
MQ I-
42 minor fractures throughout
44
46
48
52
54
56
58
Hard ROCK, no fractures at 60 feet
62
64
66
68 Boring terminated at 67 feet. Ground water encountered at
30 feet at time of drilling and at 20.5 feet after 24 hours.
70
72
74
76
78
64nch ID, .020-inch slotted Schedule
40 PVC well screen, 20 to 60 feet
Filter pack, (DSI #4) sand 17 to 60.4
feet
Mr.P5i Pipe cap
Total well depth, 60.4 feet
Cave-in
Total borehole depth, 67.0 feet
�-1 RECOVERY WELL NO. RW-6
0
W Sheet 2 of 2
01 1

MILMINC. RECOVERY 1-1--1,-L NO. RW-7
r-i-OJECT: —Andrex Industries Rernediation PROJECT NO.: J99-1022-07
-CUENT:-----Andrexlndustdos------- ------'---STAlZr.--11-11-99-ENu: 11--TT-99—
BUNNELUAMMOM
ENGNEERINCONC. LOCATION: Asheville, North Carolina ELEVATION: 2165.60 rnsi
G8nECI*WAL"EWR0NMMKL DRILLER: Lee & Sims, Larry Williams LOGGED BY: AWA
CONSULDNIM DRILLING METHOD: Ingersoll-Rand T3W, 1 0-inch Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 23 AFTER 24 HOURS: 27.5 _ CAVING>3W_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH (FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
6-inches of GRAVEL
SURFACE COMPLETION
2'x 2'steel well vault
Top of casing elevation 2164.5r
Brown, fine to medium grained sandy SILT (dry)
-2
rnsl
5% bentonite/cernent, 0 to 6 feet
4
6
-8
Bentonite seal 3/8-inch hole plug, 6
to 10 feet
-10
-12
j
14
-16
-18
-20
Filter pack, (DSI #4) sand 10 to 53.4
feet
-22
N7
-24
Wet soil at 24 feet
26
-28
-30
6-Inch ID,.020-inch slotted Schedule
40 PVC well screen, 13 to 53 feet
-32
-34
-36
J..
J.
RECOVERY WELL NO. RW-7
Sheet 1 of 2

MILIGINC. RECOVERYV NO. RW-7
��--�OUECT: Andrex Industries Rernediation PROJECT NO.: J99-1022-07
UE-Mr------findrex-tndushies---------
BUNNELL-LAMONS
ENGINEEMNG, INQ LOCATION: Asheville, North Carolina ELEVATION: 2165.60 rnsl
GEOTECHReALANDENVROININDfOkI. DRILLER: Lee &Sims, Larry Williams LOGGED BY: AWA
CONSULTMTS DRILLING METHOD: Ingersoll-Rand T3W, I 0-inch Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: 23 - AFTER 24 HOURS: 27.5_ CAVING>3w—
ELEVATION/ SOIL MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT) DESCRIPTION TYPE I DETAILS
zone
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
BEDROCK, (hard, no fractures)
56
58
62
-64
66
68 Boring terminated at 67 feet. Ground water encountered at
23 feet at time of drilling and at 27.5 feet after 24 hours.
—70
-72
-74
76
78
6-inch ID, .020-inch slotted Schei
40 PVC well screen, 13 to 53 feet
Filter pack, (DSI #4) sand 10 to 53.4
feet
Pipe cap
Slough, 53.4 to 67 feet
Total well depth, 53.4 feet
Total borehole depth, 67.0 feet
5 1 RECOVERY WELL NO. RW-71
31 Sheet 2 of 21

AIR-SPARGINI-1 "ELL NO. AS-1
PROJECT: —Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BILINNELUAMMONS -CUENT—.--- Mdrexindustrie—s--
ENGINEEMNIGONQ LOCATION: ELEVATION:
GEOTECINCALAmEwRommem DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
Commmmm DRILLING METHOD: Air -rotary
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFrER 24 HOURS: T CAVING>3W
ELEVATION/
DEPTH(FT)
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
LU
-j
IL
2
so
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
-\Gravel
W
7-
SURFACE COMPLETION
Dark brown, micaceous, moist fine sandy SILT with
-2
construction debris - (fill)
steel well cover with lockable
j
cap
-4
-6
-8
-10
ND
-12
14
-16
18
Light brown, micaceous, fine, sandy SILT - (residual)
-20
ND
-22
Neat Cement (3% Bentonite), 0
to 44 feet
-24
26
-28
30
N D
-32
34
-36
-38
AIR-SPARGING WELL NO. AS-1
Sheet I of 2

x
w
z
AIR-SPARGINI -ELL NO. AS-1
PROJECT: Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
ULIENT.�---fiffidrex ffinduan—es ---­-ZTXM.- -MMS­END�.7121195
BUNNELL-LAW010
LOCATION: ELEVATION:
FMWAEERIN% INC.
DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
GWTIWHmcmAwEwRomw0kL
CoNsmMWIM DRILLING METHOD: Air -rotary
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: �_z AFTER 24 HOURS: T CAVING>3M
0
Lu
-go
06 z
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
.50
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
g
DETAILS
L w
-42
44
-46
Bentonite Sea[, to 50.5 feet
-48
so
ND
-52
-54
-56
Filter Pack, sand 50.5 to 64 feet
58
0.010 inch slotted PVC Screen,
-60
54 to 64 feet
-62
-64
Lad.
Total well depth, 64 feet
66
Borehole diameter 6 inches
-68
-70
72
74
-76
AIR-SPARGING WELL NO. AS-1
Sheet 2 of 2

'—\
EMINEEM% INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION:
GEOTECIVOCALANDEWFAMMOCIRL DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
Comumzwm DRILLING METHOD: 12" Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFTER 24 HOURS: T CAVING>M
ELEVATION/
DEPTH (FT)
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
SURFACE COMPLETION Steel
well cover with lockable cap
4
feet
—10
-12
Filter Pack, sand 8 to 21 feet
-14
-16
0.020 inch slotted PVC pipe, 10 to 20
18
feet
—20
22
-24
26
-28
30
-32
34
-36
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION NO. SVE-1

EMINEEIMIG, WQ LOCATION: ELEVATION:
GEOTECHWCALANDIENvwmammL DRILLER: LOGGED BY-
CONSIJURNTS DRILLING METHOD: 12"Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFTER 24 HOURS: CAVING>3w—
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
KXJ SURFACE COMPLETION Steel
well cover with lockable cap
feet
10
-12
Filter Pack, sand 6 to 20 feet
14
0.020 inch slotted PVC pipe, 10 to 20
-16
feet
—20
-22
-24
26
-28
30
32
-34
36
38
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION NO. SVE-2
Sheet I of I

NILMINO. SOIL VAPOR EXr,,-'-,- TION NO. SVE-3
-PROJECT: —Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
-CLIEN1T­.*---- ___ Andrex Industries ------ START: 7-2G:95__ENIY-___7-'20�W—
BUNNELL-ILAIMMKIINS
ENGINEERENCog INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION:
C'WTVN9aCALAwEwimomwmL DRILLER. LOGGED BY:
CoNuumurm DRILLING METHOD: 12" Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: AFTER 24 HOURS: T CAVING>=—
ELEVATIONI
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
SURFACE COMPLETION Steel
well cover with lockable cap
-2
Neat Cement (3% Bentonite), 0 to 3.3
feet
4
—
Bentonite Seal, 3.3 to 6 feet
-6
-8
10
Filter Pack, sand 6 to 20 feet
-12
-14
0.020 inch slotted PVC pipe, 10 to 20
-16
feet
20
22
-24
26
28
—30
32
34
-36
38
SOIL VAPOR MRACTION NO. SVE-3]
Sheet 1 of I

SOIL VAPOR EXT�, '-',"'F'TION NO. SVE-4
PROJECT: —Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
-CLIENT�-- ---Mdrex -n-d-u-stn—es START"--'7--2"5 E D�-7;20;W
BMNELL-LMMOM
EMINEEMIGgINC. LOCATION: ELEVATION:
GE0TECWUCALAmENVIR0NUBnRL DRILLER: LOGGED BY:
CONSWANTS DRILLING METHOD: 12" Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL. AIFTER 24 HOURS: T CAVING>3M
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(Fr)
TYPE
DETAILS
SURFACE COMPLETION Steel
well cover with lockable cap
4
6
10
12
-14
Neat Cement (3% Bentonite), 0 to 36
16
feet
18
-20
22
24
-26
28
30
-32
34
-36
Bentonite Seal, 36 to 38 feet
38
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION NO. SVE-4
Sheet I of 2

SOIL VAPOR EXTI
BUNNELUAMMONS
ENGINEEIMING� INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION:
GEOTECINCALANDEwiswomcaL DRILLER: LOGGED BY-
CONSUUN103 DRILLING METHOD: 12"Air hammer
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH(FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
-42
Filter Pack, sand 38 to 50.5 feet
44
0.020 inch slotted PVC Screen, 40 to
-48
—50
Total well depth, 50.5 feet
-52
Borehole diameter, 12 inches
54
56
58
60
-62
64
66
68
70
72
-74
76
78
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION NO. SVE-4
Sheet 2 of 2

SOIL VAPOR EXT"---"-"#'TION NO. SVE-5
IBLMINC.
PROJECT: —Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
BUNNELL-LAMONS- -CLIENT'- --- Andrex Inclugisn—es ---START-- -7--2045--END7-7-2M--
EMI[NEEIMING, INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION:
GE0TECW1ICALANDENVRDNnN1RL DRILLER. LOGGED BY:
CoNstlimWIM DRILLING METHOD: 12" Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: �z AFTER 24 HOURS: T CAVING>3M_
ELEVATION/
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DEPTH (FT)
TYPE
DETAILS
SURFACE COMPLETION Steel
well cover with lockable cap
4
-6
8
-10
-12
-14
Neat Cement (3% Bentonite), 0 to
-16
34.5 feet
18
-20
22
-24
-26
28
30
-32
34
-36
Bentonite Seal, 34.5 to 38.3 feet
38
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION NO. SVE-5
Sheet I of 2

SOIL VAPOR EXTj----":CTION NO. SVE-5
.�AOJECT: —Andrex Industries PROJECT NO.: J96-1022-01
Btl1NNELL-ILAMMONS ----AndreicIndustrlw--- S IART:
ENGINEEMNG, INC. LOCATION: ELEVATION:
GEOTECHNIC-MANDEWAROMMOML DRILLER: LOGGED BY-
cokmamorm DRILLING METHOD: 12"Air hammer
DEPTH TO - WATER> INITIAL: �7- AFTER 24 HOURS: T CAVING>3M
ELEVATION/
DEPTH(FT)
DESCRIPTION
SOIL
TYPE
MONITOR WELL INSTALLATION
DETAILS
-42
-44
Filter Pack, sand 38.3 to 50.5 feet
-46
0.020 inch slotted PVC Screen, 40 to
-48
50 feet
-50
52
-54
-56
-58
-60
-62
.64
66
68
-70
-72
-74
Ln
-76
2;
_j
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION NO. SVE-d
0
w
0 Sheet 2 of 21

APPENDIX E
TOC LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS
NOVEMBER 2009 SAWLING EVENT

110A
November 17, 2009
Mr. Andy Alexander
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering
6004 Ponders Court
Greenville, SC 29615
RE: Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Dear Mr. Alexander:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on November 06, 2009.
The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current NELAC standards, where applicable, unless otherwise narrated in the body of the
report.
Inorganic Wet Chemistry and Metals analyses were performed at our Pace Asheville laboratory and
Organic testing was performed at our Pace Huntersville laboratory unless otherwise footnoted. All
Microbiological analyses were performed at the laboratory where the samples were received.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Godwin
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
�0
Page 1 of 21

CoAnaljd�
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Asheville Certification lDs
West Virginia Certification M 356
Virginia Certification M 00072
Tennessee Certification #: 2980
South Carolina Certification M 99030001
South Carolina Bioassay Certification #: 99030002
Pennsylvania Certification M 68-03578
Connecticut Certification M PH-01 06
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
CERTIFICATIONS
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37712
North Carolina Bioassay Certification M 9
New Jersey Certification M NC01 I
Massachusetts Certification M M-NC030
Louisiana/LELAP Certification M 03095
Florida/NELAP Certification M E87648
North Carolina Wastewater Certification M 40
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
!LCOR.
Pace Analytical Services. Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 2 of 21

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2:
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Lab ID
Sample ID
Matrix
Date Collected
Date Received
9256946001
MW-5
Water
11/04/09 16:25
11/06/09 08:45
9256946002
MW-6
Water
11/04/09 15:45
11/06/09 08:45
9256946003
MW-7
Water
11/03/0915:35
11/06/09 08:45
9256946004
MW-9
Water
11/04/09 14:30
11/06/09 08:45
9256946005
MW-10
Water
11/04/09 12:00
11/06/09 08:45
9256946006
MW-111
Water
11/04/0913:35
11/06/09 08:45
9256946007
MW-12
Water
11/04/09 16:30
11/06/09 08:45
9256946008
MW-13
Water
11/04/09 11:10
11/06/09 08:45
9256946009
MW-14
Water
11/04/09 10:40
11/06/09 08:45
9256946010
RW-1
Water
11/05/09 14:35
11/06/09 08:45
9256946011
RW-3
Water
11/05/09 13:10
11/06/09 08:45
9256946012
RW-5
Water
11/04/09 10:50
11/06/09 08:45
9256946013
RW-6
Water
11/04/09 14:00
11/06/09 08:45
9256946014
RW-7
Water
11/05/09 10:50
11/06/09 08:45
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the wTitten consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 3 of 21

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
ceftlyt�cal 2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Lab ID Sample ID
9256946001
MW-5
9256946002
MW-6
9256946003
MW-7
9256946004
MW-9
9256946005
MW-10
9256946006
MW-111
9256946007
MW-12
9256946008
MW-13
9256946009
MW-14
9256946010
RW-1
9256946011
RW-3
9256946012
RW-5
9256946013
RW-6
9256946014
RW-7
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Method
SM 5310B
SM 5310B
SM 5310B
SM 5310B
SM 5310B
SM 5310B
SM 5310B
SM 5310B
SM 5310B
SM 5310B
SM 5310B
SM 5310B
SM 5310B
SM 5310B
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
lcco�'
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Analytes
Analysts Reported Laboratory
SAJ
1
PASI-A
SAJ
1
PASI-A
SAJ
1
PASI-A
SAJ
1
PASI-A
SAJ
1
PASI-A
SAJ
1
PASI-A
SAJ
1
PASI-A
SAJ
1
PASI-A
SAJ
1
PASI-A
SAJ
1
PASI-A
SAJ
1
PASI-A
SAJ
1
PASI-A
SAJ
1
PASI-A
SAJ
1
PASI-A
Page 4 of 21

.. . . . Z
aw-wpacdabicom
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: MW-5 LablD: 9256946001 Collected: 11/04/0916:25 Received: 11/06/0908:45 Matrix:Water
Report
Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DIF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
531 OB TOC Analytical Method: SM 5310B
Total Organic Carbon 2.1 mg/L 1.0 1.0 1 11/10/09 19:24 7440-44-0
Date: 11/17/200905:45PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 5 of 21

- 2 CeAnalyAcal
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville, NG 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Sample: MW-6 LabID: 9256946002 Collected: 11/04/09 15:45 Received: 11/06/09 08:45 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
531 OB TOC Analytical Method: SM 5310B
Total Organic Carbon 5.9 mg/L 1.0 1.0 1 11/10/09 19:33 7440-44-0
Date: 11/17/2009 05:45 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
�-Ccov'
Page 6 of 21

CeAnalXj
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078,
[phone]
Sample: MW-7 LablD: 9256946003 Collected: 11/03/09 15:35 Received: 11/06/09 08:45 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
531 OB TOC Analytical Method: SM 5310B
Total Organic Carbon ND mg/L 1.0 1.0 1 11/10/0920:41 7440-44-0
Date: 11/17/2009 05:45 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 7 of 21

z CoAnalj4i
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
H untersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: MW-9 LabID: 9256946004 Collected: 11/04/09 14:30 Received: 11/06/09 08:45 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
5310B TOC Analytical Method: SM 5310B
Total Organic Carbon 4.7 mg/L 1.0 1.0 1 11/10/0921:00 7440-44-0
Date: 11/17/200905:45PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
ACCo,'
Page 8 of 21

Analyti
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800KInceyAve. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Sample: MW-10 LabID: 9256946005 Collected: 11/04/0912:00 Received: 11/06/0908:45 Mat6x:Water
Report
Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DIF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
531 OB TOC Analytical Method: SM 5310B
Total Organic Carbon 5.8 mg/L 1.0 1.0 1 11/10/0921:25 7440-44-0
Date: 11/17/200905:45PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Wthout the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
,'o leco,
Page 9 of 21

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Sample: MW-11 LabID: 9256946006 Collected: 11/04/0913:35 Received: 11/06/0908:45 Matrix:Water
Report
Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
531 OB TOC Analytical Method: SM 5310B
Total Organic Carbon 4.0 mg/L 1.0 1.0 1 11/10/0921:35 7440-44-0
Date: 11/17/2009 05:45 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 10 of 21

I
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: MW-12 LablID: 9256946007 Collected: 11/04/09 16:30 Received: 11/06/09 08:45 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
531 OB TOC Analytical Method: S M 531 OB
Total Organic Carbon 1.3 mg/L 1.0 1.0 1 11/10/09 21:48 7440-44-0
Date: 11/17/200905:45PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the mitten consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
1cco'*
Page 11 of 21

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Analjd
2225 Riverside Dr.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804
Huntersville. NC 28078
[phone]
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Sample: MW-13
LabID: 9256946008 Collected: 11/04/0911:10
Received: 11/06/0908:45
Matrix:Water
Report
Parameters
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
5310B TOC
Analytical Method: SM 5310B
Total Organic Carbon
3.8 rng/L 1.0 1.0 1
11/10/0921:58 7440-44-0
Date: 11/171200905:45PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 12 of 21

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Sample: MW-14 LabID: 9256946009 Collected: 11/04/0910:40 Received: 11/06/0908:45 Matrix:Water
Report
Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
531013 TOC Analytical Method: SM 5310B
Total Organic Carbon 2.2 mg/L 1.0 1.0 1 11/10/09 22:09 7440-44-0
Date: 11/17/2009 05:45 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 13 of 21

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
MalY 2225 Riverside Dr.
y-w.ppce)abicom Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078-
[phone]
Sample: IRWA LabID: 9256946010 Collected: 11/05/09 14:35 Received: 11/06/09 08:45 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
531 OB TOC Analytical Method: SM 5310B
Total Organic Carbon 6.4 mg/L 1.0 1.0 1 11/10/0922:19 7440-44-0
Date: 11/17/200905:45PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, I nc..
Page 14 of 21

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: RW-3 Lab ID: 9256946011 Collected: 11/05/0913:10 Received: 11/06/0908:45 Matrix:Water
Report
Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
531 OB TOC Analytical Method: SM 5310B
Total Organic Carbon 3.4 mg/L 1.0 1.0 1 11/10/09 22:32 7440-44-0
Date: 11 /17/2009 05:45 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
LCCO#.
Page 15 of 21

J
�,�=AnalW�cal
Ww.PPce)db1qqT
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 980OKinceyAve. Suite 100,
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Sample: RW-5 LabID: 9256946012 Collected: 11/04/09 10:50 Received: 11/06/09 08:45 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
5310B TOC Analytical Method: SM 5310B
Total Organic Carbon 5.4 mg/L 1.0 1.0 1 1111010922:46 7440-44-0
Date: 11 /17/2009 05:45 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 16 of 21

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 I(incey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersvilie, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: RW-6 LabID: 9256946013 Collected: 11/04/09 14:00 Received: 11/06/09 08:45 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
531 OB TOC Analytical Method: SM 5310B
Total Organic Carbon 4.3 mg/L 1.0 1.0 1 11/10/0923:32 7440-44-0
Date: 11/17/2009 05:45 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 17 of 21

Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
CoAnalXtcal" 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Sample: RW-7 LabID: 9256946014 Collected: 11/05/09 10:50 Received: 11/06/09 08:45 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters Results Units Limit MDL DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua[
531 OB TOC Analytical Method: SM 5310B
Total Organic Carbon 4.3 mg/L 1.0 1.0 1 11/10/0923:51 7440-44-0
Date: 11 /17/2009 05:45 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 18 of 21

. Rol ..
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
QC Batch: WETA/6227
QC Batch Method: SM 5310B
Associated Lab Samples: 9256946001,9256946002
METHOD BLANK: 364011
Associated Lab Samples: 9256946001,9256946002
Parameter Units
Total Organic Carbon mg/L
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
364012
Parameter
Units
Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
364013
Parameter
Units
Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
364015
Parameter
Units
Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 364014
Parameter
Total Organic Carbon
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 364016
Parameter
Total Organic Carbon
Date: 11/17/200905:45PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2226 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Analysis Method: SM 5310B
Analysis Description: 531 OB TOC
Matrix: Water
Blank Reporting
Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
ND 1.0 11/10/09 14:57
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Spike LCS LCS % Rec
Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
25 24.0 96 90-110
9256703008 Spike IVIS IVIS % Rec
Result Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
ND 25 27.3 108 75-125
9256907003 Spike IVIS IVIS % Rec
Result Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
1.8 25 25.9 97 75-125
9256880001 Dup
Units Result Result
mg1L 25.7 25.4
9256937001 Dup
Units Result Result
mg/L 13.5 13.5
Max
RPD RPD Qualifiers
1 20
Max
RPD RPD Qualifiers
0 20
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 19 of 21

Mnalytjc
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
QC Batch: WETA/6228 Analysis Method: SM 5310B
QC Batch Method: SM 5310B Analysis Description: 531 OB TOC
Associated Lab Samples: 9256946003,9256946004,9256946005,9256946006,9256946007,9256946008,9256946009,9256946010,
9256946011,9256946012,9256946013,9256946014
METHOD BLANK: 364017 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 9256946003,9256946004,9256946005,9256946006,9256946007,9256946008,9256946009,9256946010,
9256946011,9256946012,9256946013,9256946014
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units - Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Total Organic Carbon mg/L ND 1.0 11/10/09 20:16
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
364018
Spike LCS
LGS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc. Result
% Rec
Limits
Qualiflers;
Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
25 23.2
93
9G-110
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
364019
9256946003 Spike
IVIS
IVIS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
ND 25
26.0
102
75-125
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
364021
9256946013
Spike
IVIS
IVIS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result
Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
4.3
25
28.2
96
75-125
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 364020
9256946004
Dup
Max
Parameter
Units
Result
Result
RPD
RPD
Qualifiers
Total Organic Carbon
mg1L
4.7
4.7
0
20
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 364022
9256946014
Dup
Max
Parameter
Units
Result
Result
RPD
RPD
Qualifiers
Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
4.3
4.3
0
20
Date: 11/17/2009 05:45 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
ACCo# *
Page 20 of 21

QUALIFIERS
Project: ANDREX 2009 GROUNDWATER
Pace Project No.: 9256946
DEFINITIONS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 WinceyAve. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of
the sample aliquot, or moisture content.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL -Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
S - Surroga te
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (8270 listed analyte) decomposes to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicatei
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
Pace Analytical is NELAP accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
LABORATORIES
PASI-A Pace Analytical Services - Asheville
Date: 11/17/2009 05:45 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 21 of 21
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the wdften consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Acco"

11A�2
aceAna1j4icaJ*
www.paculabs.com
Section A
Required Client Information:
Companylt
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY /Analytical Request Document
The Chain -of -Custody Is a LEGAL DOCUMENT. All relevant fields must be completed accurately.
Section B
Required Project Information: Section C Page: of
R.— T-- Invoice Information: if 2—
r%rill,ol-!E —blCAQrp- C4,n
r-urcnase Order No,,,
rurcnase Order No.;
P Pa
P
i�2_,_L- JFa
2%
P 11 rol I so , I " N
.t N.mag
R
'a
Requested Due DatefrAT-
;Eroje,l
In
a
i -r
Ji).l_
aw I
02? LJ
lozz L41
.
a
Secilon D
RequirediClient Inform.U.n
Matrix Codes
MATRIx/ coDE
COLLECTED
Drinking Water
DW
Water
Waste IN ter
Product
WT
WW
co COMPOSITE COMPOSITE
z
0
SAMPLE ID
Soillsolld
oil
P
SL
OL
START
0
ENDIGRAB
w
-1
(A-Z, 0-9
Wipe
Air
WP
LU
0
w
SamPle IDS MUST BE UNIQUE
Tissue
AR
TS
a w
0 IL
Other
OT
0
I
u
J
ui 0
" L)
a-
DATE
TIME DATE TIME
,
(R 0M
wr (7
3
YAW-
wr
2.
A
A& mAe. i d
12
2
7 VAw- kJ�
Mw - 15
ftAj-- 14
10 w— I
11 VJ - -3
12 KO-15
ADDMONAL COMMENTS
RELINQUISHED BY
Islo
kvii,tv 1331358
lame: 4REG--
4imATORY AGENCY
U' T
r NPDES I- GROUNDWATER r- DRINKING WATER
r- UST RCRA OTHER
Site Location
S TA
TE.
ReqUpst 31YSis Filtered
ed Am
(YIN)
Preservatives
7(.0
Pace Project No./ Lab I.D.
COMMON
1300000
109NEEN OMEN
r"JOEMN
mom
10000 MEN
ORIGINAL SAMPLERNAMEANMSIGNA�,bkg'
PRINT Name Of SAMPLER-
4 is I.
SIGNATURE of BAMPLER:
;Y signing this form you are accepting Paces NET 30 tc 'g.s.fls.
In. �to 'a �h. per
d 7ar.
day Payment terms and agreeing to late charges Of 1.5% per
I not Id within 30 days.
2
E
[J
E
fMfDSD'::��� w
Oo

CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY /Analytical Request Document
,/�!;Zcqnalytical
The Chain -of -Custody Is
a LEGAL DOCUMENT. All relevant fields must be completed accurately.
www.pacelabs.com
Section A
Requilred Client Information:
Section IS
Required Project Information:
Section C Page:
Of
Company. 0
Company'
itimmg --I,
IAVIMW�45K�.
Address.
res�
'Report To: I
A
r
Invoice Information:
Attention:
MIA
1331359
I It
�,,Ays
L'upy, 10:
Company Name.
krumvl& it,
itEG,ULATORY AGENCY
E JIT
mail To:
Cov
Purchase irder No.:
NPDES f— GROUND WATER DRINKING WATER
n
4 FU
Requested
re"Ce.*
R.M­ LIST RCRA
Pace Pro ec'
OTHER
u.st. Due DalerrAT:
ProjeCT NUITIDer.
3'*,(- 107-2. 1�q
�t
Manager. Site Location
Pro,
iTA -E
T]E.*
.
17—
Section 0
40steld! Analysis F.Iltered (YIN)
Matrix Codes
RequiredClient Information CODE
COLLECTED
Preservatives I I H
Drinking Water Dw
Water WT
z
0
Waste Water
Product
WW
P
COMPOSITE COMPOSITE
START ENDIGRAB w
fie
Soil/Solid
SAMPLE ID Oil
SL
OL a
:1
0
Co
z
(A-Z, 0-9 Wipe
Air
Sample IDS MUST BE UNIQUE Tissue
WP
AR EJ
w
0.
w
z
Other
TS 0
OT 5
(L
z a)
0
X
Lu
r
0
U M
CO
grao
2-
I
DATE
<
TIME DATE TIME W
0 co Z, 0 16
X z z N
Ri
�-:
Ur
1400
% I
Pace Project No./ Lab I.D.
Kw - 1-
KK w:
wr �E
— :;, ,
I 06_� 1054
lXI
i
2 5-�, 03
3
. . . . .
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
By��FFILIATION'r
0?
SAMPLER NAME AND ilGNAT'
ORIGINAL URE
PRINT Name of SAMPLER:
C4%
SIGNATURE of SAMPLER: A
*Irnp By signing this form you are accepting Pace's NET 30 day Payment terms a t.c a of Z, _aF6rJ lm�
nd agreeing to late charges of 1.5% per th �ic.. n I paid �within 30 do..
DATE I TIME SAMPLE CONDITIONS
0—
o L)
JE
E

N
I. WELL CONTRACTOR:
WELL ABANDONMENT RECO"
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERUFICATIONv 3 y8r
Z1W e-zoRMA
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
1A1JR&i:f
Well Contfactor Company Name
STREET ADDRESS f(() 0 y 1001J� e&
je- A V&
City or Town State Zip Code
COO -"-) - a "-I d-.f-
Area code - Phone number
WELL INFORMATION:
SITE WELL 11) # (ifapplicable) &I-1
STATE WELL PERMIT # (ifapplicable)
COUNTY WELL PERMIT # (ifapplicable)
DWQ or OTHER PERMIT N (ifapplicabi.),
WELL USE (Circle applicable use): (]!��
Municipal/Public Industrial/Commercial
Recovery Injection Irrigation
Other Uist use)
Residential
Agricultural
3.WELLLOCATION:
COUNTY AU*V-d QUADRANGLENAMEJUeate
NEARESTTOWN: A90 A-amyery-AeLi Apq,(
ArAe-'-ile r N!C APR&
(Street/Road Name, Number, Conununity. Subdivision. Lot No.. Parcel, Zip Code)
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING.
Slope Valley 930) Ridge Other
(Circle appropriate setting)
LA=JDE May be in degrees,
minutes, seconds, or in
t
LONGITUDE Edm—imal format
Latitude/longitude source: (V Topographic map
Pcadon ofi Oell must h e shoft—on a USGS topo map and
aitached to thisform iftot!aing GP&)
4a. FACILITY- The name of the business where the well is located. Complete 4a and4b.
(1fa residential well, skip 4a; complete 4b, well owner h*rmatiou only.)
FACILITY ED #(if applicable) AA2A= 0 of) I X-41
NAME OF FACI
STREET ADDRESS 180 p4g�4CMW R.oj
ks�y� - 0 C- ?-$go(,-
CityorTown State Zip Code
4b. CONTACT PERSdN/WELL OWNER:
NAME /?I A- C 0 � x" ..
STRMADDRESS 2JO 1&?&Z
ACICIVAIC - XAC -q4W
City or Town State Zip Code -
h-q ) - 3--st—It —
Area code - Phone number
5. WELL DETAILS:
a. Total Depth:_ - � � r k it Diamc(cr:----Jn,.in.
b- Water Level (Below Measuring Point): 3 �', of it
Measuring point is 0,19 & above land surface.
6. CASING:
a. Casing Depth (ifknowny
b. Casing Removed: -
Length Diameter
W-A fL ;L in.
& in.
7. DISINFECTION: N-4
(Amount &65V�75% calcium hypochlorite used)
S. SEALING MATERIAL -
Neat Cemen
Cement-300 ib.
Water� I C2 gal.
Bentoulte
.A�ntonite — lb.
T�pc: Shiny_ Pellets_
Watoil.. gal.
Other
Type material
Amount
Sand Cemen
Cement b.
Water gal.
9. EXPLAIN METHOD OF EMPLACEMENT OF MATERIAL-
PRUSVITI Ift'Y'd t,;A I" fqe-k
Agg 14 V- a. o te. 1/ 4, g&,,o
S 'r-4-C f -
10. WELL DIAGRAM: Draw a detailed sketch of the well on the back ofthis
form showing total depth;- depth and diameter ofsoreens (ifany) remaining
in the well, gravel interval, intervals of casing perforations, and depths and
types offfil underials used.
11. DATE WELL ABANDONED_ -7-AV-09
I DO EEREBY CERTIFY THAT TM WELL WAS ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ISA NCAC 2C� WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF
THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
'7-ot 9 -0,?
Polli'URE OFIbERTIMI) WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
SIGNATUREOF PRIVATE WELL OWNER ABANDONING THE WELL DTTE
(The private well ownermust be an individual who versonall abandons his/her residential wall
in aceordance with 15ANCAC 2C.01 13.)
X-.X. 4C0PAkr1A
PRINTED NAME OFPERSON ABANDONING THE WELL
Submit a copy to the owner and the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Form GW-30
Attn: Information Managemen4 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC27699-1617, Phone No. [phone] ext 568. Rev. 5106

WE, LL ABANDONMENT RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 314 6'5-
I. WELL CONTRACTOR:
'r
% 01bu
Wel I Contractor (Individual) Name
14"A0q&0ke
Well Con&actor Company Name
snEErADDREss �ooq Acjudc4f Ci.
6 /Z r-ev L., ; th S6 16 Ir
City or Town State Zip Code
we v - a-'Lpoo - /A K5,
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION -
SITE WELLED# (ifapplicable) /44
STATE WELL rERMIT # (ifapplicable)
COUNTY WELL PERAffr # (ifapplicablc)_
DWQor OTHER PE RMT # (ifapplicable) Tot CiA'- A 4 5ryl
WELL USE (Circle applicable use): qzig� Residential
Municipal/Public Industrial/Commerci2l Agricultural
Recovery Nection Irrigation
Other (list use)
3. WELL LOCATION.
COUNTY -ACsP%4 QUADRANGLE NAME
NEARESTTOWN: ZOO dedwAcoo . eL, A"r'j
(Strect/Road Name. Number, Community, Subdivision. 1:� No., Parcel. Zip Code)
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SEMNG:
Slope Valley (JER Ridge Other
(Circle appropriate sitting)
May be in degrees,
LATITUDE 24 " CO. 10 j A( t_.
minutes, seconds� or in a
ima
decimal
LONGITUDE -71? Eformat
Latitudetlongitude source: W TopographicInap
(Locafion ofivell must he shown on a USGS topo map and
amached to thisform ifnot --g GPS)
4a. FACILITY- The name oftha business where the well is located. Complete 4a and4b.
(Ifa residential well, ddp 4a; complete 4b, well owner information only.)
FACILITY ID 0(ifapplicable) A42NCOOOPI 2-0-H -
NAMEOFFACiLrry_& �Pk AAdaex 1,dellIggs
SnZEETADDRESS /80 l2envedo'et"., Rd
&I—lekll Z-le 11C �.Epo
City or Town state Zip Code
4b. CONTACT FERSrLL OWNEF-
NAME _Me'/ - a . T
STREETADDRESS A-PA'd—
Ade 0-11c Ale- —c-P Otto q/
City -or Town state Zip Code -
Area code - Phone number
WELL DETAILS:
5
a. Total Depth: V J 0 ft. Diameter- 01,- in.
b. Water Level (Below Measuring Point): 143.!j ft.
Measuringpoint is 6, 0 ft, above land surface.
6. CASING: Length Diameter
a. Casing Depth (if known): ft- 2� in.
b. Casing Removed: & in.
7. D][S]NFECTION: AM
(Amount of65%-75% calcium hypochlorite used)
S. SEALING MXTERL41:
Neat Cement Sand Cement
Cement Q 0 lb. Cerneut�_Ib.
Water 0 gal. Water gal.
Bcntonit
Bentonitc_lb.
Type. Slurry- Pellets_
Water: gal.
Other
Type material
Amount
9. EXI?LAIN METHOD Or, EWLACEMNT OF MATERIAL.-
V1 I
OX 44c wc/t 7�5 �4e
10. WELL DIAGRAM: Draw a detailed sketch of the well on the back ofthis
form showing total depth, depth and diameter of screens (if any) remaining
in the well, gravel interval, intervals of 6asing perforations, and depths and
types of fill materials used.
11. DATE WELL ABANDomiD7-dLY-00111
I DO HEREBY CERTIFYTHATMiTS WELL WAS ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ISANCAC2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THATA COPY OF
THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
,a 71-OW-0)?
OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
SIGNATURE OF PRIVATE NVELL OWNERABAKDONING THE WELL DATE
(The private well ownermnst bean individual who personall abandons hiAerresidential well
in accordance with ISANCAC2C.DI13.)
J-01A
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON ABANDONING THE WFLL
Submit a copy to the owner and The original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 day& Form GW-30
Attn: Information Management, 1617 Mail Service Center - Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. (919) 733-7ol5 ext 568. Rev. 5106

WE, LL ABANDONMENT RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 3 q 9.f
I. WELL CONTRACTOR:
- I c t4,-J 6c)gA4m
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
IAIJ 42/ZoA
Well Contiactor Company Name
STREETADDRESS 00(4 Pe4io(M-9
6/zete"L'I'lle 5<� JA 61�-
City or Town state Zip Code
&0 - j. oOo'7- /), K.<
Area code - Phone number
WELL INFORMATION:
srrE WELL ED # (ifapplicable) /11
STATE WELL PERMIT N (ifapplicable)
COUNTY WELL P.ERMIT # (ifapplicable)
D W Q o r OTH ER P E RMIT 9 (i f app! i.bie)-!J1! C I V&f
WELL USE (Circle applicable use): d�� Residential
Municipal/Public IndustrIA/Commercial Agricultural
Recovery Injection Irrigation
Other (list use)
3. WELL LOCATION:
COUNTY&COA�&.QUADRAN . NAME XfOlefe
GLE -1 Yle
NEAREST TOWN. 4d
Ade,4114, IVC ' J leg M
(Sueet/Rnad Name. Number, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
TOPOGRAP111C / LAND SETTING:
Slope Valley 4310 Ridge Other
(Circle appropriate setting)
LATTI-UDE '3 May be in degr=-
minutes, seconds, or in a
LONGITUDEW_11f 'y?, A 9 decimal format
Latitude/longitude source: 16P) Topographic map
(Location ofteff must be show)pvlTa USGS topo map and
attached to &sform ifizot using GPS.)
4a. FACILITY -The name oftho busirmswhere the well is 1()catod. Complete 4aand4b.
(1fa residential well. sldp 4a; complete 4b. well ownerinfor"nat'On only.)
FACILITY 11D #(ifapplicable) AlONCO o 0.6 /:L?- f
NAME OF FACILITY PeAmelf 4Ndfie)( lAidus-lVa
sTREETADDpms /Ro De.4,ent/leu, 4J.
k4ewe A/ C J19&6
City or Town state Zip Code
4b. CONTACT PERSON/WELL OWNER;
NAME /4,//, c" 91 T..4 -
STREETADDRESS A" vor. 11"e
4cXe 416 6k,0041
tc Zip Code
M - 31-tf-7flo
Area code - Phone number
S. WELL-DETAULS:
a. Total Depth: 5's- 0 & Diamctel—a�=--irl
b. Water Level (Below Measuring Point): - fL
Measuring point is 0 - 0 ft above land surface.
6. CASING: Length Diameter
a. Casing Depth (ificnown): ft. in.
b. Casing Removed: & in.
7. DISINFECTION: N#
(Amount of 655.'�75% calcium hypochlorite used)
8. SEALING MATERIAL:
Neat Cement S2nd Cement
Cement —)00 lb-. Cement lb.
Water J-0 gal. Water gal.
Bentimite
Bentonite — lb.
Type- Sluny_ Pellets_
Water —gal.
21ha
Type material
9. EXPLAIN METIIOD OF EMPLACEMENT OF MATERIAL:
Afle-gruRf qRdVYeJ t/;)4 I" MeAir 10W-f
E&AI JAC '0130ffd^ OF Ae L."ell -to Me
10. WELL DIAGRAM: Draw a detailed sketch of the well on the back of this
form showing total depth, depth and diameter of screens (if any) remaining
in the well, gravel interval, intervals of casing perforations, and depths and
types of fill materials used.
11. DATE WELL ABANDONED
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH 15A NCAC 2C� WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF
Tam R`70 HAS BEEN "O'DED To THE WELL OWNER-
eu /Yell --
UBE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR
SIGNAVIRE OF PRIVATE WELL OWNER ABANDONING THE WELL DATE
(The private well ownermust bean individual who rersonall abandons histherresidentialw4l
in accordance with ISA NCAC 2C.0 113.)
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON ABANDONING THE WELL
Submit a copy to the owner and the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Form GW-30
All n: Information Management, 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, rhoncNo.(919)733-70I5ext568. Rev. 5106

J-
WELL ABANDONMENT RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 3 � 9 3'
I. WELL CONTRACTOR.
-09,*J (-r6Rm4,AJ
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
1AAM(,R1?01?1e
Well Contrictor Company Name
STREETADDRESS (00ki A0,JbC C�,
(1,�t'W./Nle 5 C J1461r
City or Town State Zip Code
('?'0 -4(yy-
Area code - Phone nurnber
2. WELL INFORMATION:
SITE WEILL M 0 (ifapplicablej�_M W
STATE WELL FERMIT# (if applicable)
COUNTY WELL PERMIT # (ifapplicable).
DWQ or OTHER PERMIT N (ifappI1cable)..x1n4 41# ifrA'�
WELL USE (Circle applicable use): (M[E� Residential
MunicipaLIPubfic Industrial[Commercial Agricultural
Recovery Injection Irrigation
Other (list use)
3. WELL LOCATION-
COUNTY-& " QUADRANGLE NAME A/gral. Ile -
NEAREST TOWN: -ttW
toe,
(StrectlRoad Name. Ntunbcn Community; Subdivision. Lot No., Aareel, Zip Code)
TOPOGRAPIRC/ LAND SE1-[TNG-
Slope valley (M) Ridge Other
(Circle appropriate setting)
LATITUDE
May be in degrees'
minutM seconds. or in a
iaut
LONGITUDE 9A 'I .37LV decimal format
4"q7 E
Latitudellongitude source: M—PO Topographic map
(Location oftell must be show-&tlFa VSGS topo map and
attached to thisform iftot using OPS.)
4a. FACELITY-Thenamooftho business wherethe well islocateA Complete4a and4b.
(Ifa residential well, sldp 4a; complete 4b, well owner information only.)
FACILITY IOD N(ifapplicable) AIM LIM Oaq I A W
NAME OF FAcnxr�_Eg�t?-elf Avolgex —TMW�Aies
STRUETADDRESS AF0 VeAddview KeA.
Arlle-,,'Ile MC -�'aO 9 ,
City or Town State Zip Code
4b. CONTA& PERSON/WELL OWNER:
NAMIE. MoSca. 7,.,-
STREETrDR1 'SS "59 10101RA6WA6�fIn' 411
'e -'
ee, I& , A&
Citi or Town (state Zip Code
9)4-)- - 131�0
Area code - Phone number
S. WELL DETAILS:
a. Total Depth: S6, I ft. Diameter. in.
b. Water Level (Below Measuring Point):
Measuring point is & above land surface.
6. CASING: Length Diameter
a- Casing Depth (if known): 84� .7- fL —.?,— in.
b. Casing Removed; —fL in.
7. DISINFECTION: AJ4�: —
(Amount of6SW75% calcium hypochlorite used)
8. SEALING MATERIAL -
Neat Cement Sand Cemen
Cement qOO lb. Cement b.
water al I gal. Water gal.
Bentenite
Bentonite — lb.
Type: Slurry_ Pellets_
Water- gal.
Rther
Type material
9. EXPLAIN METHOD OF EYFLACEMENT OF MATERIAL-
17f?eS5-,#?C j,1a0v1f1A ut)q 1,,,
ARO,&' -fAe Raff-'A '0A 144
,�A(>uAjol 3vRF4ce--
10. WELL DIAGRAM. Draw a detailed sketch ofthe well on the back ofthis
form showing total depth, depth and diameter of screens (if any) remaining
in the well, gravel interval, intervals of casing perforations, and depths and
types offill materials used.
11. DATE' VEIL ABANDONED
I DO DEREBY CERTIFY THAT TMS WELL WAS ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH 15A NCAC 2C� WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF
THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
-1-Aq-0'7
DATE
SIGNATURE OF PRIVATE WELL OWNER ABANDONING TBE WELL DATE
(The private well ownermustbe an individual wbo personally abandons his/her residential well
7 in accordan *th ISANCAC2C.OI13.)
HZ
PRINTED NAME OFFERSON ABANDONING THE WELL
Submit a copy tothe owner and the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 d2y5. Form OW-30
Attn: Information Management, 1617 Mail Service Center— Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. [phone] ext568. Rev. 5106

WELL ABANDONMENT RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION#
LIVELL CONTRACTOR:
I T a A V - (7 oR A 4* J
Well Conft-dctor (Individual) Name
&UAQA&
Well Coffiractor
Company Name
STREETADDRESS
n/
e
CityorTown State
Zip Code
('?� - a ?F'P— Y Yj o
Area code - Phone number -
2. WELL IW- ORTVIATION.
S=WELLIDff(ifapplicabIq) /ilu/4
STATE WELL PERMIT ff (ifapplicablo)_
COUNTY WELL PERMIT # (ifapplicable)
DWQ or OTJRERPERM[T # (ifapp1i-ab1q)_'&
��fQ
WELL USE (Check applicable use): 0 Monitoring El Residential
0 MunicipaMblic [j Industrial/Commercial [I Agricultural-
0 Recovery El Talection El Irrigation
[I Other (list use)
3. WELL LOCATION:
COUNW&Acy;k QUADRANGLENAME/kiel"et/t
NEARESTTO ;ew Ap"d
J'e Al
/ %.
(StreeMoidName, Number, Commuo ty, Subdivisim�,;' No, Parcel, Zip Code)
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING:
E]Slope ElValley 'WFlat EIRIdgeElOther
(Check appropriate setting)
Maybe in degrees,
1AT=E 3VA" Y8. cr minutcssccondsorina
0 j* decimal format
LONGITUDEM M iql—.10—tv
Latitudellongitude source: MCPS ElTopogrnpiacmap
(Location OfWefl MUSt be ShOWn On 4 USGS topo map and
attached to th isform iftot ushig GPS.)
4a. FACILITY-Thc mame ofthe business where thewell is located. Complete 4a and4b.
(1faxesidential well, sk� 4a; complete 4b, well ownerinformatloaordy.)
FACILM ID #�ifapplicablq.)AIOA�C'0 0 0 0 I.L 04- f
14AME OF FACMJTY_jjr,-L-
ge An
STIMET'ADDRESS
Ackewille Vz 12
CityarTown State Zip Code
4b. CONTACT PERSONAVELL OWNER-
NAhM fAq I'AD
STR.EETADDRESS_jj,�
S. WELL DETAILS:
a.ToWDepth: J, L2 ft. Diameter: C�_ in.
b. Water Level (Below Measuring Point): it.
Measuring point is (L above land surface.
6. CASING -
a. Casing Depth (iftnown):
b. Casing RemovetE
Length Diameter
ft. in.
ft in.
7. DIS11,07CTIOM. AM
(Amount ol`65Y�75% calcium hypochlorito used)
8. SEALING MATERIAL:
Neat Cement Sand cement
Cement �Az_ lb. Cement —lb.
Water____J'_� gAl. Water gal.
Bentonite
Bentonite lb.
T�pe: 0 Slurry Opellets
Water. gaI4
Q!Let
Type material.
Amount
9. WMLAINBMTHODOFEMPLACEMEENTOrMATEPJAL:
&fff.94 qRAC1' (1,*A 1"7Aek;f' P,;�-e
10. VIELL DIAGRAM: Draw a detailed sketch ofthe well on the back ofthis
in the well, gravel interval, Intervals ofeasing perfbradons� and depths and
Vjpcs offill materialsused.
11. DATEVVELLARANDONED 7_� q -0 CP
I DO HEREBY CERTIFYTHATTHIS WELL WAS ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH 15A NCAC2C, WEIL CONSIRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF
THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELLOWNER.
NP11"M OF CERTIFIED IVELL CONTRAC70R DATE
SIGNATEME OF PRIVATE WELL O"ERABANDONING THE WELL DATE
Ube private well ownermust bean individual who Mrsonally abandons hL4herresideathl well
in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.01 13.1
j dA
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON ABANDONING THE WELL
Subralt a copy to the owner and the original to the Division Of Water Qtiality within 30 days. Form, GW-30
Attn: Information Managemen4 1617 Mail Service Center —Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No.[phone] ext568. Rev. 5106

WELLABANDONMXNTRECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Naftni Resources- Division of Water Quality
V WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION it
I. WELL CONTRACTOR: 5. WELL DETAILS:
Tel &Z ('164141AIL) a. Total Depth: 3,5.0 tL Diameter: in.
Well Contractor (Individual) Name b. Water Level (Below Measuring Point): _ iL
Measuring point is 1 above Ind surface.
Well Contractor Company Name.
STREET ADDRESS.& 0Y.12640kW 6. CASING: Length Diameter
.5� (- Mdlrr a. Casing Depth (iflatown): Ar&2 fL in -
City or Town State Zip Code b. Casing Removed: fl. in.
(flffj - JAFI- 1499t
Area code - Phone munber 7. DISINFECTION:
2. ViMLL INFORMATION: (Amount of 65505% calcium hypochlorite used)
SITE WELL 1D # (if appricable)_ tj t.,, -,?,4 SEALING MATERML:
STATE WELL PERMIT # (ifapplicable) Neat Cement
Cement 4jPk lb. Cement —ib.
COUNTY WELL PERMIT # (if applicable)_ Water---'Lj— gaL Water gal.
DWQ o r OTE I ER PE RM IT # (if appli cable) tA C- 1 174 10-641 Bentanite
WELL USE (Check applicable use)*"A Monitoring El Residential Rentonite lb.
[I Municipal/Public El Industrial/Commercial [I Agricultural Type: El Slurry [3ftllcts
El Recover7 foldeflon El Irrigation Water. gal,
Other
[I Other Oist use) Type material
3. WELL LOCATION: Amount
COUNTY-&&"- QUADRANGLE NAME k
NEAREST SO 9. FMLAIN METHOD OF EhlPLACEMENT OF MATERIAL;
A/6 jantz, V11,14 7OA;e A"-*f ic'e-041
(StrectRoad Nanoc, Nurcbm, &...rdty. Subdividn, EtNo,, Parcel, Zip Cade) 4.p B.,v.A -X-4e .,,ell & yAe
TOPOGRAPIUCI LAND SETT1NG-
[]Slope []Valley 5flFlat []Ridge. El Other
(Check appropriate selling)
b Maybeia 10. WELL DIAGRAM: Draw a detailed sketch of the well on the back offt
oriag form showing total depth, depth and diameter ofscmens (1fany) remaining
t
LAT=E IF rainutes, ;;zl in the well, gravel interval, intervals ofcasing perforations, and depths and
V decirnalforma
LONGITUDE JW ff types offill materialsused.
Latitudellongitude source: WS [I Topographic map 7-4 9?-047
(Loca rion oftell must be shoi m on a USGS topo map and ii. DATEwELLABANDoNED
attached to thisform ifirot using OPS.) IDO HEREBY CERTIFYTHATnUS WEM WAS ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE
4a. FACILITY- The name ofthe business where the well is located. Complete 4a and4b. wriH 15A NCAC 2C, WFEL coNsrRucrioN srANDARDs, AND THAT A COPY OF
(1fa residendal well, skip 4a; complete 4b, well owner lafarmation only.) TIUS RECORD HAS BEEN FROVEDED TO THE WEIL OWNER.
FACILrrY ED #(ifapplicable) AIA 44C h 0 0,9 1 Z -2� f I I
NAME OF FAC= &Ae& (2/ &— CF.1 6
-&,nrwe OFCERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
ST7 DRESS /&P eamen�l—" 4.z
Alr- Z
Citi or -rown Stale Zip Code SIGNATURE OF PRIVATE 'WELL OWNERABANDONING THE Y&LL DATE
Obe pdntc well owner raust bean klWual who Personally abandons hisberresideatial well
4b. CONTACT PERSONIWELL OWNER- in accordance with ISA NCAC 2C.01 13.)
NAME 1h 'Jeo' J-00/1 -
STREETADDRESS 2:Lo PRIN7ED NAME OF PERSON ABANDONING TIM WELL
Submit a copy to the owner and the original to the Division ofWater Quality within 30 days. Form GW-30
Attn: 14ormation Managemen416ITMail Service Center —Raleigh, NC X7699-1617, Phone No. [phone] ext568. Rev. 5106

lot
WELL ABANDONMENT RECOWD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
J'17AA—J 4721TPAV
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
14'Vd8&A--9
Well Contractor Company Name
STREBTADDRESS ()00f*( i%syde&
4
City or Town State zip Code
a—&—) - A PIP- 14 4'r-
Area code - Phone number
2. VVELL INFORI�XATION-
SITE WELL ID # Cif applicable)/? cv d-,,
_L�LA-'- —
STATE WELL PERMIT 9 (ifapplicable).
COUNTY WELL PERAW 9 (ifapplicable).
DWQorOTEEER.PEPZdrr#(ifoppHcabl-li�c.-#(, �'f4o-xl(
WELL USE (check applicable use): D Monitoring [I Residential
MunicipaLTublic El Iudustrial/Commerei2l Ej Agricultural -
Recovery [I Injection D Irrigation
[10ther(listuse)
3. V#`ELL LOCATION;
NAME
QUADRANGLF
NEARESTTOV;N. �00
. .4 14910.740 , AIC 4410d
(Street/Road Name, Nurnber, Community, Subdivision6 Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
TOPOGRAPHIC I LAND SErrJNG-
08101le [3valley �9171at E]Ridge[3
(Check appropriate setting)
,..B I'Maybeindegrtes,
LoNr,=)E 1 minutes, seconds, or In a
le - 10. 74' A/ I " I
Latitudellongitude source: WWS ElTop.grphi..p
(Lowdon oftell must be shmm on a USGS topo map card
arlac*ed to thisform Jfnot using GPS.)
4a. FACTLM- The name ofthc business where the well is located. Complete 4a and4b.
(Ira xesiderfial wall, sirip 4a; corplete 4b, well owner infomation only.)
FACILITY 13) #(ifapplicable)
NAME ox, mcuxy-&&o!�g� r
snaisr-pDyms I J?a &.
Atr4ecare �,mle oteope
City or Town S&te Vp Code
4b. CONTACT PERSONAVELL OWNER:
NAME /"A C�& .
STREHrADDRESS
5. WELL DETAILS:
a. Total Depth: 1 Diam.tr.- in.
b. Water Level (Below Measuring Point): ft.
Measuring point is ft above land surface.
6. CASING- Lzngth Diameter
a. Casing Depth (ifknown): R. 6 in.
b. Casing Removed: & in.
7. DISINFECTION: AIA
(Amount of651/,75*/. calcium hypoeblorite used)
& SEALINGMATERIAL-
Cement j wolb. Cement lb.
Water ly
__ a gal. water gal,
Bentanite
Bentonite lb.
Type: E) Slurry ElPellets
Water. _pL
Other
Type material
Amount
9. EXPLAIN METHOD OF EMYLACEMENT OF MATERIAL:
plZmAe qA.,'A yr'�4 I" meA.'t P'r?
!(A/ 'Yaw 40ic, -/4e .'ey -/0
10. WELL DIAGRAM. Dxaw a detailed sketch of the well on the back of this
form sbowingtotal depth, depth and diameter ofsercens ffaqy) remainkil
in the well, gravel interval, intervals ofcasing perforations, and depths and
types offill materialsused.
11. DATE WELL "ANDONED 7- 4 q- 0(y
I DO MMY CERWVMTTM WEM WAS ABANDONM IN ACCORDANCE
WIT11 ISANCAC2C, WEM CONSMUCIION STANDA[WS, AM TUATA COPY OF
nffS UCOM HAS BEM PROVIDED TO 7M WEM OWM&
0. // we?'
DAIS
SIGNATUREOFPRIVATE WEM OWNERABANDONINGnffi WELL DATE
gbeFi"tewcUowmmastbeanMMdualwbapemmilyabandi)nshL%&crresldcwWwaH
imaccordantewithISANCAC2C.0113.)
—jazA 40rA--dC^
PRINTED NAME OPPERSON ABANDONING THE WELL
Submit a copy to the owner and the original to the Dividon of Water Quality within 30 days. Form GW-30
Atta.- Information Management, 1617 Mail Service Center— Rdelgh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. [phone] ext568. Rev. 5106

WELL ABANDONMENT RECO"
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
,76PA.' (71-ofl?-"
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
Well Confractor Company Name
smur.ADDREss 6'00Y
665wole .5*C
City or Town State Zip Code
(Lk�j - J'Ay - Q &
Area code - Phone number
Z WELL INFORMATION:
SITE WELLED# (ifapplicable)
STATE WEIX PERAUT ff (if applicable)
COUNTY WELL PERMIT # (ifapplicablc)_
DWQorOTEEERP,ERb=#(ifappHeabl-174ei,c("I 0dred
.WELL USE (Check applicable use): D Monitoring [I Residential
0 Municipal/.Pub]lc El IndustriaIlCormnercial El Agricultural.
�,'Recovery El Injection 13 Irrigation
[I Other (list use)
5. WELL DETAILS:
a. Total Depth: SA ft. Diameter 6 in.
b. Water Level (Below Measuring Point): ft.
Measuring point is & above land surfam
6. CASING;
a. Casing Depth (iflmown):
b. Casing Removed:
Length Diameter
11-6 ft. in.
-1 in.
7. DISINIPECTION;
(Amount of 6551&75Yo calcium hypoeblorite used)
8. SEALING MATERIAL:
3. WELL LOCATION:
COUNTY, QUADRANGLE NAMA49V
I Ile
NEARESTTOWN.- A.Egejff~�"
� 'r - 11 9.
(StredMoadName, Number, Community, Subdivision, WNo, Pare:1, Zip Code)
TOPOGRAPHIC/ LAND SEI'IING:
EISIope [3Valley "aFlat [1,Ridge[]Other
(Check appropriate setting)
LATJTWE Zr 0 1 in degrees,
V =sccondsoriaa
LONGIIUDE Eel & _W I docimalfonuat
Latitudeilongitudesaurce: WS [1T0P0grUPblCM2P
(Location ofteUmustbeshown on a USGStopo map and
attached to thisform iftof using GPS.)
4a. FACIIATY- Ile name afthebusiness where the wall is locate& Complete4a and4b.
(Ha zesi&mialwell, skip 4a; completaft, well owner information only.)
FACEL1TY1D#(ifapplicab1-) A1041C,0000
NAzaoFFAc=Y—jjt,-t,,P
STREET ADDRPSS ( 9
)qM&Ot.e. Vc-
City or Town State Zip Code
4b. CONTACT PERSONS"LL OWNER:
NAM M Ir /h a � tA 'C
sTREETADDREss jt16 vAroi kw A.Pa.
N, nt Comprit
cement 3000 ib.
Water (00*gaL'
Bentorilte
Ilentonite lb.
Type: 0 Slurry []Pellets
Water- ---- gal-
Oth-
Type material
Amount
Cement lb.
Water gal.
EXPLAIN NXITIOD OF EIVIPLACEMENT OF MATERIAL:
f-M-f-Ke 141AJ -;A fze.-,'g P,,pe xle.,,--,
A A A&M 6F �Wf
r.dkke
10. WELL DIAGRAM: Draw a detailed sketch of(ho well on the back ofthis
form showing total depth, depth and diameter ofscreens (if any) Temaininj
in the well, gravel interval, intervals ofcasing perforations, and depths and
Wes offitl materials used.
11. DATE WELL "ANDONED 7. 4CF. (2cy
I DO BFREBY CEP71FY THAT TMS WEM WAS ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE
WMI 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSMUMION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF
TH[S RECORD,11AS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
DATE
SIGNATURE OF PRIVATE VVELL OWNERA13ANWNING Tfm WELL DATE
9he private well ownwraust bean individual who pm2nallvabandow hWhcr residential well
inacconkocewiffil5ANCAC2C.01l3J
PREMD NAME OF PERSON ABANDONING THE WELL
Submit a copy to the owner and the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Form GW-30
Adn: Information Mauagement� 1617 Mail Service Center — Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. [phone] ext 568. Rev. 5106

WELL A13ANDONMENT RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION# 3 qh'
I. WELL CONTRACTOR:
RN Alol?MAA-)
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
&j6fj4R06e
Well Co6tractor Company Name
STREET ADDRESS o'00y
41496vuxe " �;e-
City or Town State Zip Code
OdY i - A91? - /ot Kr
Area code - Phone number
WELL INFORMATION:
SITE WELL ID # (ifapplicable) S VS
STATE WELL PERMIT # (ifapplicablcl_
COUNTY WELL PERMIT N (if applicable)
DWQorOTEERPERNM#(ifapplicabl.)-7,m-ci&/e.-I 4g ak-e
WELL USE (Circle applicable use): Monitoring Residential
Municipal/Public Industrial/Commercial Agricultural
Recovery Injection rrri
545;1 ization
Other (list use) &�IWA*OJ
3. WELL LOCATION.
COUNTYA1C-*n--00-f--'/0C— QUADRANGLE NAME
too Veayervfev
(Street/Ro2d Name. Number. Commun ty, Subdivision, Lot No.. ParceL Zip Code)
TOPOGRAPHIC/ LAND SETTING -
Slope Valley <M Ridge Other
(Circle appropriate setting)
0 f May be in d
LATITUDE c"ec"
1k) decimal Iurcmoant ds� or in a
LONGITUDEM-u S-1-al I
Latitude/longitude source: & Topographic map
(Location oftell must beshown an a USGS topo map and
attached to thisfonn i�nof using G.M.)
49. FACILITY -The name fth. business h. the well is locata Complete 4a and4b.
(1fa residential well, sIdp 4a; complete4b. well owncrinformation only.)
FACILITY 11) N(ifapplicable) N011coo9P1x;x,1
NAME OF FACILITYjd&ejfd
STREETADDRESS /80 &gffV,'fw fid,
Af,4ey;1le &C a. PoOo 6
City or Town State Zip Code
4b. CONTACT PERSONIWELL OWNER -
NAME :&-- 7;.<.
STREETADDRESS J,2-6� AO V �/
"t-4/f/Z — AIC AIRM
City or Town staW Zip Code
V1 - �- J-Zt - 41
Area code - Phone number
S. WELL DETAILS:
a.TotaiDepth: 1Y.Q ft Diameter. J-- n.
b. Water Level (Below Measuring Point): nRLI &
Measuring point is 6 - 0 fL above laA surface.
6. CASING:
a- Casing Depth (if knowny
b. Casing Removed:
Length Diameter
ft Z in.
& in.
7. DISINFECTION: Alk
(Amount of 65%-75*/e calcium hypochlorite used)
S. SEALING MATERIAL. -
Neat Cement Sand Cement
Cement /00 lb. Cement —lb.
Water 7 gat. Water gal.
Benlorite
Bentonite _ lb.
Type: Slurry_ Pellets_
Water gal.
Other
Type material
Amount
9. EXPLAIN METHOD OF EMPLACEMENT OF MATERIAL:
PRaftige j;A jf(eft'c P,)qt
AM^ Y%P 11, 4 6A 44f 4well 4,
5ROW,JA slifirAce!
10. WELL DIAGRAM. Drawa detailed sketch of the well on the �ac'k of this
farm showing total depth, depth and diameter of screens (if any) remaining
in the well. gravel interval, intervals of casing perforations, and depft and
types offill materials used-
11. DATE WELL ABANDONED IN/
09
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF
TEES REC HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
711�'TURE RTIVIEWIVELLCONTRACTOR DATE
SIGNATUREOFPRrVATE AVELLOWNER A13ANDONING THE WELL DATE.
(The private well ownermustboan individual who prrsanall abandons hisIbir,,idential well
dance w7i 15A NCAC 2C.01 13.)
PRINTED NAME OFPERSON ABANDONING THE WELL
Submit a copy to The Wirer and the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days, Form OW-30
Attn.- Information Managemen4 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. [phone] ext568. Rev. 5106

-WELL ABANDONMENT RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION#_3 q 095
I -WELL CONTRACrOR.
TAA) 6o1Z/hAA/
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
1AA&RO&
Well Cofitractor Company Name
STREET ADDRESS �OO� ew--U,
ell tz e#w V 0// 5(- 44eW
City or Town state Zip Code
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION:
SITE WELL ED 11 (if applicable,. S VLC -
STATE WELL PERMIT # (if applicable)
COUNTY WELL PERMIT # (if applicable)
DWQ or OTHER PERMIT 0 ffapplicabl-)��d/ea if P-11
WELL USE (Circle applicable use): Monitoring Residential
MUHiCip2l/Public Industrial/Commercial Agricultural
Recovery Injection Irrigation
Other(listuse) SQ;/ 11AP61? J5X11?ACj,'*V
3. WELL LOCATION:
C6UNTY-&9&CJ^4
e- -QUADRANGLENAME
NEARESTJOV; 1,00 #e-t&rjZLeLyXW
41e .14.9,94
(Strect/Road'Name, Number, community. subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Coda)
TOPOGRAPHIC I LAND SETTING:
Slope Valley M Ridge
(Circle appropriate setting)
I hby be in degree,
LATITUDE 3.S-.Iq ftef Al minutm scconds� or in a
�v —'r decimal format
LONGITUDE 91 LC V- 7A 4/
Latitude/longitude source: Of Topographic map
(Location oftell must be shown on a USGS lopo map and
attached to thisform iftot using GPS.;
4a. FACILITY- no name ofthe business where the well is located. Complete 4a and4b.
ff� residential well, sldp 4a; complete 4b, well owner information only.)
FACILITY ID w(if applicable) Aj6A1Cj000V(.L,;!j
NAmEoFFAcILrrYr69m�?
STREETADDRESS 190 DeAykview ROL
AAEV"Ile &C - JS,?06 .
City or Town State Zip Code
4b. tONTACT PERSONIWELL OWNER:
NAI& IkIrikeo .09 -T'n e
STREETADDRESS UQ 49plyerm,'et.,
V, Me , A14C P .8 P?,*
CityorTown. Stite Zip Code
du - Xd(-'qS-;/0
Area code - Phone number
S. WELL DETAILS:
a. Total Depth: 13�, 0 ft. Diameter in.
b. Water Level (Below Measuring Point): 09 V ft.
Measuring point is 0,0 ft. above fang surface.
6. CASING -
a. Casing Depth (if known):
b. Casing Removed:
7. DISINFECTION:
Lcngth Diameter
fL .2 a
fL in.
(Amount of650/*-75% calcium hypochlorite used)
8. SEALING MATERIAL:
Neat Cemen Sand Cement
Cement /040 lb. Cement lb.
wate� "7 gal. Water — gal.
Bellftnift
Bentonfte — lb.
Type: Sluuy_ Pellets_
Water�_ gal.
atber
Type material
Amount
9. EXPLAIN METHOD OF EMPLACEMENT OF MATERIAL:
82-enra,ge o2aaeA vig j"jtze,-,;v iO;P,-
F—AgAi I 13,46m OF-Mewett lo 44e
10. WELL DIAGRAM: Draw a detailed sketch ofthe well.on the back ofthis
form showing total depth, depth and diameter ofscreens (ifany) remaining
in the well, gravel interval, intervals ofcasing perforatio6s, and de�ths and
types offill materials used.
Ii. DATE WELL ABANDONED I-ay-ocy
I D6 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TIUS WELL WAS ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH 15A NCAC 2C; WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF
INS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO TBE WELL OWNER.
. 4y -I-jq-0j, —
Sr'"M OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
SIGNATURE OF PRIVATE WELL OWNER ABANDONING THE WELL DATE
(The private well owner must bean individual who versonall abandons hisiherresidential well
i3jaC00rd&oCCZI5ANCAC2C.0113.)
jo— 4t5"
or'J'4401
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON ABANDONING THE WELL
Submit a copy to the owner and the original to the Division ofWaterQuatity within 30 days. Form GW-30
Attn: Information Management; 1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC27699-1617, Phone No.[phone] ext568. Rev. 5106

WELL ABANDONMENT RECORD
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of 13nviromnent and Natural Resources
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 3qo
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
,YoAAj e-to&nAA)
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
JA,y.
4pl?gh e
Well Contrictor Company Name
STREET ADDMS K06!J PdAW
&ALMAiLdAT ;<- alUir
City or Town state Zip Code
wdy
Area code - Phone number
2- WELL INFORMATION:
SITE WELL ID # (ifapplicable)--� V C-3
STATE WELL PEMT # (ifapplicable)
COUNTY WELL PERMIT 0 (ifapplicable).
DWQ or OTHER PERMIT # ffapplicablevA—�dV4�
WELL USE (Circle applicable use): Monitoring Residential
Municipal(Public Industrial/Commercial Agricultural
Recovery Injection Irrigation
Other(listuse) S-Oil VA "d. F211RAd,40AV
3. WELL LOCATION:
COUNTY94- _ QUADRANGLE NAMEA/e V. e(- r
NEARESTTO : ego loeailleemk 124aw
(Street/Road Name, Number. Community, Subdivision. Lot No, Parcel. Zip Code)
TOPOGRAPHIC I LAND SETTING.
Slope Valley <P Ridge Other
(Circle appropriate setting)
LATITUDE If' 4',#a 4 May be in degrees,
niiau(M scconds� or in a
LONGITUDE decimal format
Latitude/longitude source: 40 Topographic map
(Location oftell must beshown on a USGS topo map and
attached to thisform iftot using GPS.)
4a. FACILITY. The nam oftbe business where the well is located. Complete 4& and4b.
(1fa residential well, skip 4a; complete 4b, well owner information only.)
FACILITY ID 0(ifapplicable) 1VcPAr—,ovoP1,)- 91(
NAME OF FACILITY Fag�!jed Axw(ac% s&es
STREET ADDREssIA00 DeA Vieuj Ad.
AfAevilte Al 6 'Iepo K
City or Town State ZipCode
4b. CONTACT PERSO
,7/WELL OWNER:-
r, " -
NAME -7.4-
STREM�jkDQRESS g2c�Ci .40Wg &�4f be,f t.—
Adrolelld-le - '41�� 49-91 -0��
City or Town Ttate Zip Code
P4 - 9'Y -Ir-410
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. Total Depth: 15. 0 fl. Diameter: dl�,— n.
b- Water Level (Below Measuring Point): 13/?1/ ft.
Measuring point is 0 , Q & above fim6 surface.
6. CASING- Length Diameter
a. Casing Depth (ifknown): 1 ft in.
b. Casing Removed: —ft. in.
7. DISINFECTION:
(Amount of65Yo-75% calcium hypochlorite used)
S. SEALING MATERL4L-
Neat Cement
Cement 10 0 lb.
Watcr---'l gal.
Bentonite
Bentonitc ib.
Type: Slurry_ Pellets ­
Water gal.
Other
Type material
Amount
Sand Cement
Cement lb.
Water gal-
9. EXPLAIN METHOD OF EMPLACEMENT OF MATERIAL:
PAESSafit I—R-avl ui*A JAe^-'f f2rpt
F/Zo^ Ue'fta& &P 4�e L-el) 4p itf
10. WELL DIAGRAM, Draw a detailed sketch ofthe well on the back ofthis
form showing total depth, depth and diameter ofsereens (ifany) remaining
in the well, gravel interval, intervals ofcasing perforations, and depths and
types of fill materials used.
11. DATE WELL ABANDONED—]� �GWQ�4?..
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 7HIS WELL WAS ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ISA NCAC = WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF
THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
S?WURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
SIGNATUREOF PRIVATE WELL OWNERABANDONING THE WELL DATE
(Ile private wall ownermust bean individual who versonall 2b2ndonshis/heriesidentialwell
in2ccord4�ccwu ISANCAC2C.OL13J
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON A13ANDONING THE WELL
Submit a copy to the owner and the original to the Division of Water Quality Within 30 days. Form GW-30
Attn: Information Management, 1617 Mail Service Center— Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No.[phone]ext568. Rev. 5106

c ince Lah.com
ie
Chemicals & Laboratory Equipment
Material Safety Data Sheet
Water MSDS
Section 1: Chemical Product and Company Identification
Product Name: Water
Contact Information:
Catalog Codes: SLW1063
Sciencelab.com, Inc.
14025 Smith Rd.
CAS#: 7732-18-5
Houston, Texas 77396
RTECS: ZC01 10000
US Sales: 1-800-901-7247
International Sales: 1-281-441-4400
TSCA: TSCA 8(b) inventory: Water
Order Online: Sciencel-ab.corn
CI#: Not available.
CHEMTREC (24HR Emergency Telephone), call:
1-800-424-9300
Synonym: Dihydrogen oxide
International CHEMTREC, call: 1-703-527-3887
Chemical Name: Water
For non -emergency assistance, call: 1-281-441-4400
Chemical Formula: H20
Section 2: Composition and Information on Ingredients
Composition:
Name AS # % by Weight
Water 7732-18-5 100
Toxicological Data on Ingredients: Not applicable.
I Section 3: Hazards Identification I
Potential Acute Health Effects:
Non -corrosive for skin. Non-irritant for skin. Non -sensitizer for skin. Non-permeator by skin. Non -irritating to the
eyes. Non -hazardous in case of ingestion. Non -hazardous in case of inhalation. Non-irritant for lungs.
Non -sensitizer for lungs. Non -corrosive to the eyes. Non -corrosive for lungs.
Potential Chronic Health Effects:
Non -corrosive for skin. Non-irritant for skin. Non -sensitizer for skin. Non-permeator by skin. Non -irritating to the
eyes. Non -hazardous in case of ingestion. Non -hazardous in case of inhalation. Non-irritant for lungs.
Non -sensitizer for lungs.
CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available.
MUTAGENIC EFFECTS: Not available.
TERATOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available.
DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY: Not available.
P. 1
Potential Acute Health Effects:
Non -corrosive for skin. Non-irritant for skin. Non -sensitizer for skin. Non-permeator by skin. Non -irritating to the
eyes. Non -hazardous in case of ingestion. Non -hazardous in case of inhalation. Non-irritant for lungs.
Non -sensitizer for lungs. Non -corrosive to the eyes. Non -corrosive for lungs.
Potential Chronic Health Effects:
Non -corrosive for skin. Non-irritant for skin. Non -sensitizer for skin. Non-permeator by skin. Non -irritating to the
eyes. Non -hazardous in case of ingestion. Non -hazardous in case of inhalation. Non-irritant for lungs.
Non -sensitizer for lungs.
CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available.
MUTAGENIC EFFECTS: Not available.
TERATOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available.
DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY: Not available.
P. 1

Eye Contact: Not applicable.
Skin Contact: Not applicable.
Serious Skin Contact: Not available.
Inhalation: Not applicable.
Serious Inhalation: Not available.
Ingestion: Not Applicable
Serious Ingestion: Not available.
Flammability of the Product: Non-flammable.
Auto -Ignition Temperature: Not applicable.
Flash Points: Not applicable.
Flammable Limits: Not applicable.
Products of Combustion: Not available.
Fire Fighting Media and Instructions: Not applicable.
Special Remarks on Fire Hazards: Not available.
Special Remarks on Explosion Hazards: Not available.
ease Measures,
t
pip ton 6: ApoidentaVR I'
Small Spill: Mop up, or absorb with an inert dry material and place in an appropriate waste disposal container.
Large Spill: Absorb with an inert material and put the spilled material in an appropriate waste disposal.
"S -HAndlin'g and St
ddion 7.,,,
prage
Precautions: No specific safety phrase has been found applicable for this product.
Storage: Not applicable.
Engineering Controls: Not Applicable
Personal Protection: Safety glasses. Lab coat.
Personal Protection in Case of a Large Spill: Not Applicable
p. 2

r --,\
Exposure Limits: Not available.
Physical state and appearance: Liquid.
Odor: Odorless.
Taste: Not available.
Molecular Weight: 18.02 g/mole
Color: Colorless.
pH (11% soln/water): 7 [Neutral.]
Boiling Point: 100*C (212'F)
Melting Point: Not available.
Critical Temperature: Not available.
Specific Gravity: 1 (Water = 1)
Vapor Pressure: 2.3 kPa (@ 20oC)
Vapor Density: 0.62 (Air = 1)
Volatility: Not available.
Odor Threshold: Not available.
Water/Oil Dist. Coeff.: Not available.
Ionicity (in Water): Not available.
Dispersion Properties: Not applicable
Solubility: Not Applicable
Stability: The product is stable.
Instability Temperature: Not available.
Conditions of Instability: Not available.
Incompatibility with various substances: Not available.
Corrosivity: Not available.
Special Remarks on Reactivity: Not available.
Special Remarks on Corrosivity: Not available.
Polymerization: Will not occur.
p. 3

Toxicity to Animals:
LD50: [Rat] - Route: oral; Dose: > 90 ml/kg
LC50: Not available.
Chronic Effects on Humans: Not available.
Other Toxic Effects on Humans:
Non -corrosive for skin. Non-irritant for skin. Non -sensitizer for skin. Non-permeator by skin. Non -hazardous in
case of ingestion. Non -hazardous in case of inhalation. Non-irritant for lungs. Non -sensitizer for lungs.
Non-Gorrosive to the eyes. Non -corrosive for lungs.
Special Remarks on Toxicity to Animals: Not available.
Special Remarks on Chronic Effects on Humans: Not available.
Special Remarks on other Toxic Effects on Humans: Not available.
Ecotoxicity: Not available.
BOD5 and COD: Not available.
Products of Biodegradation:
Possibly hazardous short term degradation products are not likely. However, long term degradation products may
arise.
Toxicity of the Products of Biodegradation: The product itself and its products of degradation are not toxic.
Special Remarks on the Products of Biodegradation: Not available.
��:Sect
�,Dls 3 �,,qnsi eftition
loli,13i.
Waste Disposal:
Waste must be disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local environmental
control regulations.
DOT Classification: Not a DOT controlled material (United States).
Identification: Not applicable.
Special Provisions for Transport: Not applicable.
Federal and State Regulations: TSCA 8(b) inventory: Water
Other Regulations: EINECS: This product is on the European Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical Substances.
Other Classifications:
WHIVIIS (Canada): Not controlled under WHMIS (Canada).
p. 4

I rus proauct is not classitiecl accoraing
to the EU regulations.
Not applicable.
Health Hazard: 0
Personal Protection: a
National Fire Protection Association (U.S.A.):
Flammability: 0
Specific hazard:
Protective Equipment:
Not applicable.
Lab coat.
Not applicable.
Safety glasses.
References: Not available.
Other Special Considerations: Not available.
Created: 10/10/2005 08:33 PM
Last Updated: 11/06/2008 12:00 PM
The information above is believed to be accurate and represents the best information currently available to us. However, we
make no warranty of merchantability or any other warranty, express or implied, with respect to such information, and we
assume no liability resulting from its use. Users should make their own investigations to determine the suitability of the
information for their particular purposes. In no event shall ScienceLab.com be liable for any claims, losses, or damages of any
third party or for lost profits or any special, indirect, incidental, consequential or exemplary damages, howsoever arising, even
if ScienceLab.com has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
p. 5

APPENDIX C
MILK -SOLUTION BENCH -SCALE STUDY LABORATORY RESULTS
SUMMARY TABLES AND DATA PLOTS

Table C1
Initial Groundwater and Soil Analytical Results
Bulk Samples -- Bench -Scale Study
Andrex Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
NCDENR Groundwater Incident Number 6586
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
Bulk les
Groundwater
Soil
Analyte
Unit,;
Result
Units
Result
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
g/L
�tg/l_
�t"//J_
�t­/L
11.0
< 1.00
< 1.00
2.02
1.00
1.00
K
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
gg/Kg
�t K­
�tglKg
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1 -Dichloroethane
I -D-'-ich.11oroethene
YJ-Dichl-oropropene
'm/l,
ILg/Kg
< 4.00
............ < 4.00
_a#_/L_<
_2&/L
jt�JL_
[ig/L
'ug/L
p L
1.00
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1 -00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
_E&�Ng_
< 4.00
<'�.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
1,2,3-Tri�blp�qppopane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropr2pane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-,Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
T'�-'D'ic'blorobenzene
1,3-Dichloropropane
ggd�
< 1.00
1.22
-R&LKg
_&/KE
'k
Ag/L
�Lg/L
< 1.00
< 4.00
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
_E&/L
__:�_1.00
< 1.00
_22�NE
gg/Kg
< 4.00
2,2-D�sh�ropane
2-Chlorotoluene
_p_&/L
-gg/L
j!�
< 1.00
1.99
< I.Do
0.770
< 1.00
< 1.00
3.42
1.4
< 1.00
< 1.00
_�9_4
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
3,510
2.58
:�_1_00
203
0.890
2.53
gg/Kg
< 4 00
< 4-00
4-Chlorotoluene
-EWL
__EWL
'-a-IL
jig/L
pg/L
�tg 1�
�t­/L
�t�­/L
[t (Y�f_
�t­/L
�tg/L
�tg/L
�tg/L
�tg/l_
�tg/l_
�tg/l_
Ag/L
ag
pg/Kg
< 4.00
Bromochloromethane
gg�Ng
< 4.00
Bromodichloromethane
Carbon tetrachloride
j4Kg'.
[tg/Kg
�t�/Kg
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
[tgfq_
�tg/Kg
�tg/Kg
�tg/Kg
�tg/l��'
p K
�tg/Kg
�to/Kg
lig/Kg
1ijLKk_
�%�NE
< 4.00
Chloromethane
< 4.00
cis- 1,2-Dichloroctliene
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropeiie
Dibrornochlorornethane
5ichlorodifluoromethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Metl�ylene chloride
Tetrachloroethene
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
trans- 1,3-Dichl oropropene
Trichloroethene,
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
� 4-60
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00
< 4.00 I
Trichlorofluoromethane
1
�tg/l�a_
I �tg/Kg
Vinyl chloride LE
Analyses by EPA Method 8260B
Groundwater sample from RW-1
Soil sample from Macrocore near RW- I (refusal depth)

Table C2
Day 1 Groundwater Analytical Results
Microcosms -- Bench -Scale Study
Andrex Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
NCDENR Groundwater Incident Number 6586
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
Microcosm
0_ 1
100-1
1000-1
1 2000-1
Malyte
�'tits
Result
Result
Result
Result
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroetliatie_
gg/L
10.1
10.1
9.73
9.58
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
gg(L
1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Ag/L
1.12
1.02
< 1.00
1.99
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
IJ-Dichloroethene
lig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1, 1 -Dichloropropene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
�Lg/]L
2.95
1.65
1.63
< 1.00
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
lig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
gg/L
0.970
< 1.00
0.800
< 1.00
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropan
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dichloroethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dichloropropane
Ag/L
1.10
0.940
< 1.001
1.01
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,3-Dichloropropane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
2,2-Dichloropropane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
2-Chlorotoluene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
4-Chlorotoluene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
< 1.00
Bromochloromethane
gg/L
0.840
0.770
0.950
0.950
Bromodichloromethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Carbon tetrachloride
lig/L
I < 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Chlorobenzene
lig/L
3.15
3.16
3.06
2.%
Chloroethane
gg/L
< 1.00
1.14
1.08
0.950
Chloroform
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
0.780
0.990
Chloromethane
lig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
lLg/L
568
530
540
526
cis- 1,3-Dichloroprovene
4g/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Dibromochloromethane
lig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Dichlorodifluoromethane
lig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Hexachlorobutadiene
lig/L
1.35
1.12
< 1.00
< 1.00
Methylene chloride
gg/L
< 1.00
0.760
< 1.00
< 1.00
Tetrachloroethene
ILg/L
4,1101
3,400
3,731)
3440
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
gg/L
2.46
2.30
2.27
2.10,
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Trichloroethene
gg/L
191
159
157
167
Trichlorofluoromediane
[Lg/L
0.840
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
lVinyl chloride
I gg/L
1 2.421
1.94
2.17
1.88
Analyses by EPA Method 8260B
Microcosm 0-1 = Zero Spike (control) Sample at Day I
Microcosm 100-1 = 100 V1 Spike Sample at Day I
Microcosm 1000- 1 = 1000 pl Spike Sample at Day I
Microcosm 2000-1 = 2000 ld Spike Sample at Day I

Table C3
Day 15 Groundwater Analytical Results
Microcosms -- Bench -Scale Study
Andrex Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
NCDENR Groundwater Incident Number 6586
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
Microcosm
0-15
100-15
1000-15
2000-15
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
�tg/L
9.73
9.57
9.51
8.69
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
ltg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
4g/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
gg/L
3.87
3.841
< 1.00
3.4
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
gg/L
< 1.00
0.91
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,1-Dichloroethene
gg/L
< 1.00
3.46
< 1.00
< 1.00
1, 1 -Dichloropropene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
�tg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
< 1.00
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
�tg/l,
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropan
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dichloroethane
lig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dichloropropane
gg/L
1 0.99
0.970
< 1.001
< 1.00
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,3-Dichloropropane
lig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
2,2-Dichloropropane
�tg/l_
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
2-Chlorotoluene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
4-Chlorotoluene
ltg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Bromochloromethane
gg/L
I < 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Bromodichloromethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Carbon tetrachloride
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Chlorobenzene
gg/L
2.2
2.01
2.93
2.91
Chloroethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
< 1.00
Chloroform
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1.300
Chloromethane
gg/L
I < 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
gg/L
400
284
329
364
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
�ig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Dibromochloromethane
�ig/l_
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
Dichlorodifluoromethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Hexachlorobutadiene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Methylene chloride
gg/L
I < 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Tetrachloroethene
gg/L
3,490
3,250
3,430
3,220
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
[ig/L
4.15
3.46
3.75
4.78
ans- , - ichloropropene
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.
Trichloroethene
�ig/l_
163
146
148
154
Trichlorofluoromethane
�ig/l_
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Vinyl chloride
I gg/L
1 2.431
2.05
2.18
2.291
Analyses by EPA Method 8260B
Microcosm 0- 15 = Zero Spike (control) Sample at Day 15
Microcosm 100-15 = 100 �tl Spike Sample at Day 15
Microcosm 1000- 15 = 1000 pl Spike Sample at Day 15
Microcosm 2000-15 = 2000 �tl Spike Sample at Day 15

Table C4
Day 30 Groundwater Analytical Results
Microcosms -- Bench -Scale Study
Andrex Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
NCDENR Groundwater Incident Number 6586
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
Microcosm
0-30
100-30
1000-30
2000-30
Aiid�
n kk
1� ft��'
"-,1 "'Y
I "I R
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
gg/L
7.61
9.48
6.76
7.46
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
[tg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
pg/L
1.56
1.82
2.01
1.7
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
],I-Dichloroethene
lig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
3.01
3.57
1,1-Dichloropropene
[ig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
�Lg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
�ig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropan
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
�ig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dichloroethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
< 1.00
1,2-Dichloropropane
lig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
jig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,3-Dichloropropane
�Lg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
pg/L
I < 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
2,2-Dichloropropane
lAg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
2-Chlorotoluene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
4-Chlorotoluene
�Lg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Bromochloromethane
pg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Bromodichloromethane
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Carbon tetrachloride
_�g/L
gg/L
I < 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Chlorobenzene
lig/L
< 1.00
1.26
2.53
2.59
Chloroethane
[tg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
Chloroform
[tg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
0.850
1.150
Chloromethane
ltg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
ltg/L
384
266
716
1470
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
gg/L
I < 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Dibromochloromethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00,
< 1.00
Dichlorodifluoromethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
Hexachlorobutadiene
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Methylene chloride
__±g/L
ltg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Tetrachloroethene
gg/L
2,930
3,230
2,290.
1,420
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
Vg/L
1.21
1 * 51
1.52
1.81
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene-
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< .
< 1.00
Trichloroethene
ltg/L
136
58
256
5601
-
[Trichlorofluoromethane
lig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
JVinyl chloride
gg/L
1.371
1.67
2.02
2.39
Analyses by EPA Method 8260B
Microcosm 0-30 = Zero Spike (control) Sample at Day 30
Microcosm 100-30 = 100 �d Spike Sample at Day 30
Microcosm 1000-30 = 1000 pl Spike Sample at Day 30
Microcosm 2000-30 = 2000 pl Spike Sample at Day 30

Table C5
Day 45 Groundwater Analytical Results
Microcosms -- Bench -Scale Study
Andrex Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
NCDENR Groundwater Incident Number 6586
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
Microcosm
0-45
100-45
1000-45
2000-45
Aualvte
Units
Result
Result
Result
ReSUlt
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroetliane
�tg/l_
8.7
8.89
7.28
5.2
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
gg/L
I < 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
gg/L
< 1-oo
3.4
3.171
1.75
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
gg/L
< l.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
< 1.00
1, 1 -Dichloroethene
gg/L
< im
< 1.00
2.441
3.48
1, 1 -Dichloropropene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00,
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dibroino-3-chloropropan,
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dichloroediane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dichloropropane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
< 1.00
1,3-Dichloropropane
1g/L
I < 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Pg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
2,2-Dichloropropane
Ag/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
2-Chlorotolliene
Ag/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
4-Chlorotoluene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
Bromochloromethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Bromodichloromethane
gg/L
I < 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Carbon tetrachloride
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Chlorobenzene
gg/L
< 1.00
0."
231
2.19
Chloroethane
lig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Chloroform
lLg(L
< 1.00
< 1.00
0.8201
< 1.00
Chloromethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
gg/L
354
268
928
1360
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.5-0
< 1.00
Dibromochloromethane
gg/L
I < 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Dichlorodifluoromethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Hexachlorobutadiene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Methylene chloride
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Tetrachloroethene
gg/L
2,220
2,450
19640
832
trans- 1,2-Dichloroediene
gg/L
1.54
1.55
2.03
1.78
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene-
gg/L
I < 1.00
< 1.
< 1.00
< 1.
Trichloroethene
lig/L
134
139
1691
237
TTichlorofluoromethane
AggIL
< 1.00
< 1.55
< TOO
I < TOO
,Vinyl chloride
< 1.00,
< 1.00
1.141
1.741
Analyses by EPA Method 8260B
Microcosm 0-45 = Zero Spike (control) Sample at Day 45
Microcosm 100-45 = 100 W Spike Sample at Day 45
Microcosm 1000-45 = 1000 jil Spike Sample at Day 45
Microcosm 2000-45 = 2000 jil Spike Sample at Day 45

Table C6
Day 59 Groundwater Analytical Results
Microcosms -- Bench -Scale Study
Andrex Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
NCDENR Groundwater Incident Number 6586
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
Microcosm
0-59
100-59
1000-59
2000-59
jkn
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
[ig/L
7.95
9.08
4.95
4.03
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
[tg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
[tg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Itg/L
< 1.00
3.73
2.93
1.47
IJ-Dichloroethane
[tg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
],I-Dichloroethene
�ig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
4.11
6.59
1, 1 -Dichloropropene
�tg/l,
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
�Lg/l,
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2,3-Tr-ichloropropane
�tg/l,
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
[tg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropan
[tg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
[tg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dichloroethane
�ig/l,
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,2-Dichloropropane
pg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
uWL
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,3-Dichloropropane
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
�tg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
2,2-Dichloropropane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
2-Chlorotoluene
�tg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
4-Chlorotoluene
[tg/L
I < 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Bromochloromethane
�Lg/l_
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Bromodichloromethane
�Lg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Carbon tetrachloride
�ig/l,
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Chlorobenzene
gg/L
0.85
0.94
1.74
2.63
Chloroethane
�ig/l_
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Chloroform
gg/L
I < 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Chloromethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
lAg/L
345
261
1270
1880
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Dibromochloromethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
Dichlorodifluoromethane
g/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Hexachlorobutadiene
[ig/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Methylene chloride
�tg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Tetrachloroethene
�tg/L
1,750
2,010
578
335
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
VgIL
1.39
1.41
2.63
3.49
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
�tg/l_
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.001
Trichloroethene
�ig/l_
97.4
110
191
89.2
Trichlorofluoromethane
gg/L
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
< 1.00
Vinyl chloride
I �tg/l_
I < 1.001
< 1.00
1.2
1.821
Analyses by EPA Method 8260B
Microcosm 0-59 = Zero Spike (control) Sample at Day 59
Microcosm 100-59 = 100 �d Spike Sample at Day 59
Microcosm 1000-59 = 1000 gl Spike Sample at Day 59
Microcosm 2000-59 = 2000 pl Spike Sample at Day 59

Table C7
Experiment End Mcrocosm Soil Analytical Results
Microcosms - Bench -Scale Study
Andrex Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
NCDENR Groundwater Incident Nwnber 6586
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
Wet Weight oncentrations
Dry Weight oncentrations
0-59 Soil
100-59 Soil
1000-59 Soil
2000-59 Soil
0-59 Soil
100-59 Soil
1000-59 Soil
2000-59 Soil
Aiiakte
IT'llit';
Result
Rcsult
Result
Re�'Ult
Result
Result
Result
Result
1, 1, 1,2-TetracWoroethane
gg/Kg
2.18
2.48
< 3.92
< 3.84
2.39
2.85
< 3.92
< 3.84
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
gglKg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaDe
gg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
1,1,2-Trichloroediane
gg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3:92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
IJ-Dichloroethane
gg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
IJ-Dichloroethene
ji&Xg
.< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
IJ-Dichloropropene
�Lg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
pg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
gg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
gg(Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
1,2-Dibromo-3-chl ropropane
gg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
_<
< 3.92
< 3.94
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Itg(Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
1,2-Dichloroethane
gg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
1,2-Dichloropropane
Itg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ktg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
3.92
< 3.94
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
1,3-Dichloropropane
gg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
_<
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ggtKg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
2,2-Dichloropropane
[tg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.94
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
2-Chlorotoluene
Itg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
4-Chlorotoluene
Rg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
Bromochloromethane
itgLK&
1.10
1.05
< 3.92
1.08
1.20
1.21
< 3.92
1.18
Bromodichloromethane
pg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
Bromoform
pg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
Bromomethane
pg/Kg
3.64
< 3.96
< 3.92
1.72
3."
< 3.96
< 3.92
1.98
Carbon tetrachloride
Itg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
Chlorobenzene
[Lg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
Chloroethane
�Lg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
Chloroform
�Lg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
Chloromethane
[tgtKg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
cis- 1,2-Dichloroedicne
pg/Kg
52.4
37.1
204
324
57.4
42.6
232
355
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
gg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
Dibromochloromethane
pg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
1.77
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
1.94
Dichlorodifluoromethane
pg(Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
Hexachlorobutadiene
ltg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
Methylene chloride
pg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
Tetrachloroethene
pg/Kg
236
296
42.7
1.88
258
340
48.5
2.06
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
mIa-
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
pg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
Trichloroethene _
pg/Kg
15.7
17.3
20.6
< 3.84
17.2
19.9
23.4
< 3.84
Trichlorofluoromethane
pg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
Vinyl chloride
pg/Kg
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
< 4.20
< 3.96
< 3.92
< 3.84
Percent Moisture
%
8.7
13
12
8.7
Analyses by EPA Method 8260B
Microcosm Soil 0-59 = Zero Spike (control) Sample at Day 59
Microcosm Soil 100-59 = 100 pl Spike Sample at Day 59
Microcosm Soil 1000-59 = 1000 pl Spike Sample at Day 59
Microcosm Soil 2000-59 = 2000 pl Spike Sample at Day 59
Dry weight concentration = Wet weight concentration divided by (I minus moisture ratio)

Control (Zero Spike) Microcosm
Groundwater Contaminant Concentration vs. Time
Andrex Industries Asheville, North Carolina
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
4,500
MILf
3,500
t
=L 3,000
2,500
2,000
E 1,500
500
0 -0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Days
—0— Tetrachloroethene
--M— Trichloroethene
—Ar- cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
--W-1,1-Dichloroethene

100 gL Spike Microcosm
Groundwater Contaminant Concentration vs. Time
Andrex Industries Asheville, North Carolina
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
EM
Um
3,500
t
=L 3,000
2,500
2,000
E 1,500
500
0-0 0 7- 0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Days
--$-- Tetrachloroethene
--W- Trichloroethene
--*— cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
--W-1,1-Dichloroethene

4,500
EM
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
M
1,000 gL Spike Microcosm
Groundwater Contaminant Concentration vs. Time
Andrex Industries Asheville, North Carolina
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
0 1 () 20 30 40 50 60 70
Days
--*-- Tetrachloroethene
--W- Trichloroethene
--Ar- cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
--W- 1, 1 -Dichloroethene

2,000 gL Spike Microcosm
Groundwater Contaminant Concentration vs. Time
Andrex Industries Asheville, North Carolina
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
4,500
- ft-ir"
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Days
36
32
28
24
20
Tetrachloroethene
At— Trichloroethene
16
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
1, 1 -Dichloroethene
12
8
4
40
70

4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
0
2000
r
0
1500
1000
500
PCE Concentrations vs. Time
Milk -Solution Microcosms
Andrex Industries Asheville, North Carolina
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Days
Spike
Volume
(uL)
0
__0_100
A 1000
9 2000

zo
500
400
300
0
0
U
OR
W91
im
20
TCE Concentrations vs. Time
Milk -Solution Microcosms
Andrex Industries Asheville, North Carolina
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
30
Days
40
50
60
Spike
Volume
(uL)
$ 0
__Gl­_ 100
__&_ 1000
0 2000

2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
0
1000
0
L) 800
600
400
200
0
0
IN
20
cis-1,2-DCE Concentrations vs. Time
Milk -Solution Microcosms
Andrex Industries Asheville, North Carolina
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
30
Days
40
50
60
Spike
Volume
(uL)
4 0
100

3
0
0 -
trans-1,2-DCE Concentrations vs. Time
Milk -Solution Microcosms
Andrex Industries Asheville, North Carolina
BILE Project No. J09-1022-28
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Days
Spike
Volume
(uL)
0 0
__1F___ 100
A 1000

7
2 1
5
4
C
0
3
0
C.)
J1
DI
10
20
1,1-DCE Concentrations vs. Time
Milk -Solution Microcosms
Andrex Industries Asheville, North Carolina
BILE Project No. J09-1022-28
30
Days
40
50
60
Spike
Volume
(uL)
4 0
__11F__ 100
A 1000
--0-2000

2.5
1.5
0
(U
0
L)
0.5
Vinyl Chloride Concentrations vs. Time
Milk -Solution Microcosms
Andrex Industries Asheville, North Carolina
BLE Project No. J09-1022-28
10 20 30 40 50 60
Days
Spike
Volume
(uL)
A 1000
­411— 2000

IN

Rogers, Michael
From: Andre I �nder [ancly(��blecorp.com]
wW r �'
�v. Octo r
Sent: WE�( nes y, October 17,2012 0:01 AM
To: 'Andrew Michael-, Davidson, Landon
Cc: Wahl, Tracy; 'Nisbeth, Ben (blecorp)', Collins, Keith (Milkco)
Subject: Injection Event Record 2012-1 for Andrex UIC Permit W1 0100106
Attachments: 1022-35 Andrex Injection NCDENR Event Record 2012.pdf
Hello Everyone,
I have attached the Injection Event Record form for the third injection event (designated
2012-1) at the subject site. If the DWQ needs a hard copy of the form, please contact
me.
The next sampling event is scheduled for November 12, 2012 with subsequent events in
January and March 2013.
Annual groundwater sampling was conducted in Mid -September prior to the third
injection. The report is in progress.
A Project Interim Evaluation Report [IER] is also in progress. The report will include the
data and a summary of results from the 1st and 2 nd injection events.
We plan to submit an addendum to the IER after the March 2013 is available.
We anticipate that a Permit Renewal Application and Full -Scale Injection Plan will be
prepared and submitted prior to July 30, 2013 (deadline).
Please contact me if you have any questions. --Andy
From: Andrew W. Alexander [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25,,/:�0_1 1,3': 19 PM
To: 'Rogers, Michael'; 'David Landon'
Cc: 'Wahl, Tracy (NCDWM)'; 'Nisbeth, Ben (blecorp)'; Collins, Keith (Milkco)
Subject: Injection Event Record 2011-2 for Andrex UIC Permit W10100106
Hello Everyone,
I have attached the Injection Event Record form for the second injection event (designated
2011-2) at the subject site. If the DWQ needs a hard copy of the form, please contact
me.
The 30-day sampling event is scheduled for November 9, 2011 with 60- and 90-day
sampling thereafter.
We will determine the need for subsequent injections in 2012 based on our 2011 analysis
results. I anticipate issuing an interim report in the first quarter of 2012.

FYI, Buddy Gaither has retired and Keith Collins has taken his position at Milkco, Inc.
Please contact me if you have any questions. --Andy
From: Andrew W. Alexander [ma flto: a ndyftlecorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 20112:07 PM
To: Rogers, Michael; Davidson, Landon
Cc: Wahl, Tracy (NCDWM); Gaither, Buddy (Milkco); Nisbeth, Ben (blecorp)
Subject: Injection Event Record 2011-1 for Andrex UIC Permit W10100106
Hello Everyone,
I have attached the Injection Event Record form for the first injection event (designated
2011 -1 ) at the subject site. If the DWQ needs a hard copy of the form, please contact
me.
The 30-day sampling event is scheduled for July 21, 2011 with 60- and- 90-day sampling
thereafter. We anticipate performing the second injection event in October 2011. Please
contact me if you have any questions. --Andy
Hello Michael and Landon,
Per Michael's request, this email serves as documentation of notice via telephone (on
May 26, 2011 ) of intent to begin injection activities at the Former Andrex property (U IC
Permit No. W10100106) on or about Tuesday, May 31, 2011 at 9:00 AM.
Please contact either Ben Nisbeth (828-545-3414) or me (info below), if you have any
questions. --Andy
cc: Project File
Andrew W. Alexander, P.G., RSM
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc. (BLE)
6004 Ponders Court
Greenville, South Carolina 29615
[phone] (voice)
[phone] (fax)
[phone] (cell)
andyCcD-blecorp.com
wvAlv.blecorp.corn

This electronic transmission contains informati& Trufn the consulting firm of Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc., that may be confidential or privileged. The
information is intended solely for the recipient. Use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone
(864-288-1265) or by email (InfoOblecorp.com). Thank you for your cooperation.

INJECTION EVENT RECORD,
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources — Division of Water Quality
Permit Number— (4,rc) 100 1 o(p
1. Permit Information
M Akilp '10C I
Perifiiftee
Facility Name
(go ii,.1wiew U 1, A-66AG- 4c Ifto(o
Facility Address
2. Injection Contractor Information
&VIftq ' �AMW%OAS -CV4&; j4 tfr) A&
Injection Contractor / CompaAy Name
Street Address Wo+ ?0'taa� Cowf
(1f9tAViUt e, (, _7 q(g 16'
city State Zip Code
(g�tD z%g - 12'rol'
Area code — Phone number
3. Well Information
Number of wells used for injection 3
Wellnames 'RW-S'
Were any new wells installed during this inj ection
event?
El Yes No
If yes, please provide the following information:
Number of Monitoring Wells
Number of Injection Wells
Type of Well Installed (Check applicable type):
F-1 Bored 0 Drilled El Direct -Push
D Hand -Augured El Other (specify)
Please include tivo copies offorin GW-1bfor each
ivell installed.
Were any wells abandoned during this injection
event?
El Yes No
If yes, please provide the following information:
Number of Monitoring Wells
Number of hijection Wells
Please inchide hio copies ofthe GW-30foy- each
well abandoned.
4. Injectant Information
I. Vik
Inj ectant Type
Concentration
If the hijectant is diluted please indicate the source
dilution fluid. -��w
Total Volume Injected :35- 9�0 !n4#1111f
I-)
Volume Injected per well 741 271-2,17 j 441,Ms
5. Injection History
Injection date(s) 4-u to-104612.
Injection number (e.g. 3 of 5)---:�k —3
Is this the last injection at this site?
El Yes 9 No
1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL THE
INFORMATION ON THIS FORM IS CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND THAT THE
INJECTION WAS PERFORMED WITHIN THE
STANDARDS LAID OUT IN THE PERMIT.
/0.
F INJECTION CONTRACTOR DATE
PRINT NAME OF PERSON PERFORMING THE INJECTION
Submit the original of this form to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days of il�lection.
Attn: UIC Program, 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636, Phone No. 919-733-3221
Form UIC-IER,
Rev. 07/09

Rogers, Michael
From: Andrew W. Alexander [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 9:35 AM
To: Rogers, Michael
Subject: RE: Andrex 2011 Groundwater Report (11 MB)
Attachments: Trend Plots MW-5 MW-12 and MW-10.pdf; Injection Monitoring Matrix 2012.pdf
Michael,
Thanks for the phone call. I'll send you a CD of the annual report.
As we discussed, I have attached my sampling matrix for the 1st half of 2012 (additional monitoring)
and plots of the historical data from'some of the best example wells. Several plots have been re -
scaled so you better can see the daughter product.
Thanks again for your help. Call or email me if you want to talk about anything. --Andy
From: Rogers, Michael rmailto:michael.rogers(�ncdenr.gov1
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 5:29 PIVI
To: Andrew W. Alexander; Davidson, Landon
Subject: RE: Andrex 2011 Groundwater Report (11 MB)
Would you please send a bound hard copy w/the injection permit number. Thanks
th
NOTE: On January 6 , the Aquifer Protection Section (APS) is scheduled to move to
the 6th floor of the Archdale Building located at 512 N. Salisbury Street in
Raleigh. Our mailing address will remain the same (1636 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636). If you need to visit APS staff or review files, please
call or email in advance to ensure availability. Please check the-APS website
for updates on office numbers and phone numbers as they become available.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line 919-807-6406
I
hftp://portal.ncdenr.oLg/web/Wci/ai)s/��wpro/permit-api)iications#qeothermApps
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third patties
From: Andrew W. Alexander I'mailto:andy(ftlecorp.corn]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 10:57 AM
To: Rogers, Michael; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Andrex 2011 Groundwater Report (11 MB)
Hello Michael and Landon,
I have attached the subject report as requested. I hope it goes through. Please contact me if you
have any questions. --Andy
1

Andrew W. Alexander, P.G., RSIVI
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc. (BLE)
6004 Ponders Court
Greenville, South Carolina 29615
[phone] (voice)
[phone] (fax)
[phone] (cell)
andy(cb-blecorp.com
www.blecorp.com
MILE
This electronic transmission contains information from the consulting firm of Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc., that may be confidential or privileged.
The information is intended solely for the recipient. Use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone [phone]) or by email (info(dblecorp-com). Thank you for your cooperation.
2

Table 1
Injection Monitoring Plan 2012 Matrix
Andrex Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
NCDENR Groundwater Incident Number 6586
BLE Project No. J12-1022-33
a
0
0
U
0
0
>
>
0
E-
0
0
-c�
:3
M
:3
Id
r
0
U
0
>
N
C14
r
a.
Cq
0
RW-1
RW-1
x
x
x
x
NM-6
x
x
x
x
Nff-7
x
NM-9
x
RW-3
RW-3
X
x
x
x
AIW-5
x
x
x
x
NM-12
x
x
x
x
MW-24
X
X
RW-5
RW-5
x
x
x
x
MW-10
x
x
x
x
RW-6
X
x
x
x
MW-13
x
x
MW-14
X
x
RW-7
kW-7
x
x
AM-11
x
x
None
NM-15
x
NM-16
x
MW-17
x
NM-18
x
MW-20
x
NM-21
x
MW-22
x
MW-23
X
MW-26
x
Notes:
VOC analyses performed by EPA Method 8260 MSV Low Level.
TOC analyses performed by SM Method 53 1 OB.
It may not be possible to obtain samples at exact milestones
due to weekends, holidays, inclement weather, or other delays beyond our control.
Samples will be collected as near the milestone dates as the schedule allows.
Prepared by: AWA
Table I Monitoring Plan of Injection Monitoring Matrix 2012.xls Checked by: TJB

11,11111111911
50,006
40,000
,;B
=L
r-
41
m
.w
u
r-
0
u
0
30 000
20,000
10,000
Monitoring Well MW-S
PCE, TCE, cis-1,2 DCE,, Vinyl Chloride, and TOC
so
45
40
35
30 E
25
0
20
is
10
5
0 0'
0 0 C> 0 n n 0 C) 0 0 0
H H H H vi H H H N N N N N N N N rq N N N " N
—C— Perch loroethene
--*—Trichloroethene
—0—cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
—%—Vinyl Chloride
—AP—Total Organic Carbon

61000
51000
4,000
=L
C 31000
0
2,000
1,000
0
0)
C�
0
Monitoring Well MW-5,
PCE, TCE, ds-1,2, DC . E. Vinyl Chloride, and TOC
so
45
40
315
30 E
Perch loroethene
--*--Trichloroethene
25
--�>-.cis-1,2-Dithloroethene
R
--X—Vinyl Chloride
20 u
-wArmTotal Organic Carbon
10
R
m

mm
7,000
6,000
5,000
40
=L
C
0
4,000
0
0 3,000
OEM
1,000
Monitoring Well MW-1 2
PCE., TCE,. ds-1,,2 DCE,, V.inyl Chloride, and.TOC
oo
0)
m
"
m
C)
m
ri
o
(D
0
"
-i
0
0
N
0
0
IN
m
0
(D
IN
-:T
0
0
N
Ln
C)
0
IN
..... -----
.....
0
1-4
0
IN
r-I
1-1
0
rq
tD
C)
0
IN
r�
0
0
IN
00
C)
0
CN
CA
C)
C)
IN
CIj m
�q 1-4
0 0
N IN
M CD
00 a)
0 m
r-I r-(
�i
ai
m
H
rj
a)
m
r-q
m
0)
m
­4
;t
a)
0
1-1
Ln
a)
m
1-1
;�o
0)
m
1-1
j-
0)
0
r-I
1400
1200
1000
E
800
2
4�
C
d)
600
0
I--
400
VIRLI
IN
—ff— Perch loroethene
--*—Trichloroethene
—0--cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
—W—Vinyl Chloride
—A—Total Organic Carbon

8,000
7,000
mm
5,000
=L
C
0
4,000
ID
C
0
0
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
Monitoring Well MW-12
PCE, TCE, cis-1,2. DCE, Vinyl Chloride, and TOC
�q
1400
1200
1000
E
--R-- Perchl oroethene
800
—9—Trichloroethene
--0— cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
600 0
—N—Vinyl Chloride
u
400
200
WIJ
r4
s-�Total Organic Carbon

1,000
900
800
700
600
500
0
400
300
200
100
0
CI
Monitoring Well MW-12
PCE., TCE,, cis-1.,2 DCE, Vinyl Chloride., and TOC
0
I-q
0
(14
1400
1200
1000
—93�- Perch loroethene
800 —r_
2
—6—Trichloroethene
--O—cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
600 0
—U—Vinyl Chloride
Q
u
2
—*—Total Organic Carbon
400
200
mull
r4
r-i
0
rIj

10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
=L
5,000
u 4,000
0
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
Monitoring Well MW-10
PCE, TCE, cis-1,2 �DCE, Vinyl Chloride, and TOC
w
m
0
-1
N
en
-�t
Ln
----
%D
Jim-
t-
owo
ami
m co
-4
(-4
m
-'t
LO
1�0
r-I
r-4 m
oo G)
0)
m
0)
(7)
0)
CY)
0)
0)
0)
C�
0
0
CD
0
(D
0
0
0
0
'1
'q
-I "-I
a) CF)
0)
m
0)
m
C)
0)
.0)
(3)
0)
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
a
C)
0 0
14 rq
Iq
r-i
r-I
H
r-I
H
I-q
Ii
�-i
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
CN
N N
450
350
300
250
.2
200 t
0
u
u
0
150
HIM
50
us]
—M—Perchloroethene
—0—Trichloroethen6
.--O--cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
--N—Vinyl Chloride
--A—Total Organic Carbon

3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
.2
41
41
1,500
0
1,000
500
0 A.
Monitoring Well MW-10
PCEY TCE, cis-1,2 DCE, Vinyl Chloride., and TOC
450
0
0
H
Ii
r-I
�,-i
71
a)
a)
Gi
-0
E
E
ca
E E
aj
a)
Qj a)
u
CD
u
CL W
(V
v)
V)
400
350
.300
E
250 c
.2
-0—Perchloroeth ene
41
--*--�Trichloroethene
200
—,O—cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
0
0
--X=-wVInyl Chloride
150
--*—Total Organic Carbon
100
50
I
0
u

t'-J;j� V 10 0 / � �
Rogers, Michael
From: Andrew W. Alexander [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 10:57 AM
To: Rogers, Michael-, Davidson, Landon
Subject: Andrex 2011 Groundwater Report (11 MB)
Attachments: Andrex Report of 2011 Groundwater 1022-32 FINAL.pdf
Hello Michael and Landon,
I have attached the subject report as requested
have any questions. --Andy
Andrew W. Alexander, P.G., RSM
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc. (BLE)
6004 Ponders Court
Greenville, South Carolina 29615
I hope it goes through. Please contact me if you
[phone] (voice)
[phone] (fax)
[phone] (cell)
andvCcD.blecorp.com
www.blecorp.com
LThis electronic transmission contains information from the consulting firm of Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc., that may be confidential or privileged.
T!he information is intended solely for the recipient. Use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
Is (6, Copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone [phone]) or by email (info(cDblecorp.com). Thank you for your cooperation.

MJECTION EVENT RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources — Division of Water Quality
Permit Numb*e"RWM,-'
1. Permit Information
WiLy
Permittee
fa(ma AiAA(6X lyt-AM�ies Corp. 'Facjf
Facility Name
190
Facility Address
2. Injection Contractor Information
".VLOAI, EM IA
Injection Contractor / Compaiiy Name
Street Address (9004 ?D-",A 6r's
64ree,,ALe !�C- 'zol (V 15
city State Zip Code
(8�A 2-85 — lzw�
Area code — Phone number
3. Well Information
Number of wells used for injection I -
Well niim6s & - t . 9Lj - 3 KW - 6- . R 0
Were any new wells installed during this injection
event?
El Yes No
If yes, please provide the following information:
Number of Monitoring Wells
Number of Injection Wells
Type of Well Installed (Check applicable type):
E] Bored El Drilled El Direct -Push
El Hand -Augured [I Other (specify)
Please include two copies offonn GW-Ibfor each
well installed.
Were any wells abandoned during this injection
event?
El Yes [K No
If yes, please provide the following information:
Number of Monitoring Wells
Number of Injection Wells
Please include two copies of the GW-30for each
well abandoned.
4. Injectant Information
It PKA
Injectant Type
Concentration
If the injectant is diluted please indicate the source
dilution fluid. M-cr
Total Volume Injected !9"71 02.0
Volume Injected per well '7, 7(,(, - 20, S
5. Injection History
hijectiondate(s) 6--3(-?vq
Injection number (e.g. 3 of 5) &A
Is this the last injection at this site?
El Yes 0 No
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL THE
INFORMATION ON THIS FORM IS CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND THAT THE
INJECTION WAS PERFORMED WITHIN THE
STANDARDS LAID 0
IN THE PERMIT.
7 Z 6 -2--z
,5AIPRE OF WECTf09 CONTRACTOR DATE
PRINT XAME OF PERSON PERFORM[NG THE INJECTION
Submit the original of this form to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days of injection. Form UIC-IER
Xttn: UIC Program, 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-J636, Phone No. 919-733-3221 Rev. 07/09

HCDEN-R
North CaroHna Department of Environment and Natural, Resources
Division of Water Qualiti.,
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governo, Director
December 22, 2010
Mr. Charles L. Gaither
Milkco, Inc.
P.O. Box 16160
Asheville, NC 28816
Ref: Issuance of Injection Permit W10100106
Former Andrex Industries Corp. Facility
Asheville, Buncombe County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Gaither:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
In accordance with the application received on June 30, 2010, and the supporting data received August 17, 2010, and
Z�
December 3, 2010, we are forwarding permit number WIO 100 106. This permit is to inj ect I % milk solution to remediate
CY
L r
oundwater contaminated with volatile oroanic compounds at the Former Andrex Industries Corp. Facility located 180
Deaverview Road, Asheville, Buncombe County, NC 28806. This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until
November 30, 2013, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations stated therein, including the requirement to
submit a final project evaluation as stated in PART VII — MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. Please
read the entire permit to ensure that you are aware of all compliance requirements of the permit.
Please pay special attention to Part VII.1 in the permit. The proposed monitoring plan included in the application
has been modified.
You will need to notify this office and the Asheville Regional Office by telephone 48 hours prior to initiation of operation
of the facility. In order to continue uninterrupted legal use of the injection facility for the stated purpose, you must submit
an application to renew the permit 120 days prior to its expiration date. Please contact me at -919-715-6166 or
Michael.RogersAncdenngo if you have any questions about your permit.
Best Regards,
/9
�Iichael Rogers, P.G. (N6 & FL)
Environmental Specialist
Underground Injection Control Program
cc: Landon Davidson, Asheville Regional Office
Andrew W. Alexander, Bunnell-Lammons; Engineering, Inc.
WIO 100 106 Permit File
Tracy Wahl, Brownfields Project Manager, NCDENR-DWM, 339 New Leicester Highway, Suite 140, Asheville,
NC 28806
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1536
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh. North Carolina 27604 011C
Phone: [phone] k FAX 1: 919-715-0588; FAX 2: 919-715-604EI'k Customer Sqer�vjce: 1-877-623-6748 No----thCarolma
Internet: www.nmaterouality.org
An Eaqual Opporlunity N Afflimative Action Employer

Rogers, Michael
From: Andrew W. Alexander [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 11:33 AM
To: Rogers, Michael
Subject: Andrex UIC Application Info
Attachments: Andrex Table 8 for Risk Assessment.pdf
Hello Michael,
Thanks for your phone call. Per your request I have attached Table 8 from the CSA. This
table includes groundwater flow velocity information for the site.
Also as we discussed the following information/tasks will be part of our injection plan:
1) The most recent annual sampling event (October 2010 -- report in progress) will serve
as the baseline sampling event for the injection.
2) BLE will collect standard field sampling parameters (temp., conductivity, pH, etc.) from
each well during each groundwater sampling event.
3) We will continue to collect and analyze surface water samples (for 8260) during each
annual sampling event but will add total organic carbon (TOC) to each surface water
analysis. I
Thanks and if you need any other information, please contact me. --Andy
Andrew W. Alexander, P.G., RSM
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc. (BLE)
6004 Ponders Court
Greenville, South Carolina 29615
[phone] (voice)
[phone] (fax)
[phone] (cell)
andv(a-)-blecorp.com
www.blecorp.com
This electronic transmission contains information from the consulting firm of Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc., that may be confidential or privileged. The
information is intended solely for the recipient. Use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone
(864-288-1265) or by email (info(a)blecorp.com). Thank you for your cooperation.
1

Rogers, Michael
From: Andrew W. Alexander [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 3:37 PM
To: Rogers, Michael; Davidson, Landon; Slusser, Thomas
Cc: Nisbeth, Ben (blecorp)
Subject: Re: Well Survey Update: Andrex UIC Permit Status W101 00106
Hello Guys,
FYI, the tables are formatted for 11x17-inch paper. If printed on paper sizes smaller than
11 x1 7 the text will be unreadable.
I'll fire off one hard copy to Michael in Tuesday's mail. Does anybody else want a hard
copy? I can make more, no problem. --Andy
----- Original- Message
'From.�RbOerg-,__.Michaell I .... ... .. . ­
- ----------
To: Andrew W. Alexande Davidson, Landon; Slusser, Thomas
Cc: Nisbeth, Ben (blecorp)
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 3:17 PM
Subject: RE: Well Survey Update: Andrex UIC Permit Status W10100106
Would you please send hard copy via mail with tables in a sufficient font size to read.
" IT- no 11r,
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 -
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter
hftp://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/Wq/aps`/"�wpro/permit-ai)plications#aeothermApps
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Andrew W. -Alexander rmailto:andy(ftlecorp.coml
Sent: Tuesday, November'23, 2010 9:16 AM
To: Davidson, Landon; Slusser, Thomas; Rogers, Michael
Cc: Nisbeth, Ben (blecorp)
Subject: Well Survey Update: Andrex UIC Permit Status
Hello Guys,
I have attached the water supply well survey update for the Andrex Milkco site and U IC
permit application. I believe that with the submittal of this document we have met the
requirements of your request for additional information.
Hard copies of this document are available upon request. Please contact me if you need
anything else. Have a great Thanksgiving. --Andy

------ Original Message -----
------- ------- -
-From:- Rogers, Michael - -
To: Andrew W. Alexander; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 1:38 PM
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Andrew -
After review by staff, there are a few items that need further clarification and/or additional information. Please find
attached an Additional Information request letter, which was sent out Thursday, October 7. Please provide this
additional information as soon as possible in order for us to issue permit.
Please send 2nd copy of written response to Landon Davidson with the Asheville Regional Office to expedite process.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
http://Portal.ncdenr.oi�g/web/wq/aps/qwpro/permit-ai)plications
E-mail correspondence to and./rom this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
Andrew W. Alexander, P.G., RSIVI
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc. (BLE)
6004 Ponders Court
Greenville, South Carolina.29615
[phone] (voice)
[phone] (fax)
[phone] (cell)
andy(@-blecorp.com
www.blecorp.com
This electronic transmission contains information from the consulting firm of Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc., that may be confidential or privileged. The
information is intended solely for the recipient. Use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately bytelephone
(864-288-1265) or by email (info(ftlecorp.com). Thank you for your cooperation.

Rogers, Michael
From: Andrew W. Alexander [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 3:59 PM
To: Rogers, Michael; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Approval Letters: Item One for
Attachments: NCDENR and FDA Approval Letters.pdf
Hello Gents,
Those Milkco folks are fast. I have attached one PDF document which contains both
the NCDENR and the FDA approval letters for the use of the product. Please let me know
if this is what you need, etc. Thanks, --Andy
----- Original Mes s age
-From-:-Ro
gers; Michael:
To: Andrew W. Alexande Slusser� Thomas ;'-Davidson, Landon
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: Item One forAndrex UIC PermitWI0100106
Andrew -
Please provide the documentation indicating that the FDA has approved the referenced product.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
hftp://Portal.ncdenr.om/web/wq/aps/qwpro/permit-applications
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Andrew W. Alexander [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 7:29 AM
To: Rogers, Michael; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Item One for Andrex UIC Permit
Hello Guys,
Take a look at this letter from Milkco that addresses Item 1 on yoOr letter. Buddy Gaither
saying that we are proposing to inject material which has been approved (by the FDA) for
use as food product. This is very different from waste product which is handled differently
and contains cleaners, etc.
Please let me know if this letter is a satisfactory response for Item 1. Thanks, --Andy
------ Original Message ----- ----------
.From: Rogers, Michael
To: Andrew W. Alexander; Sluss6r, thom-a s- ; Davidson, Landon
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
1

Andrew -
After review by staff, there are a few items that need further clarification and/or additional information. Please find
attached an Additional Information request letter, which was sent out Thursday, October 7. Please provide this
additional information as soon as possible in order for us to issue permit.
Please send 2nd copy of written response to Landon Davidson with the Asheville Regional Office to expedite process,
Thank you for your cooperation.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC. & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/apslgwpro/permit-applications
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Andrew W. Alexander [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 8:04 AM
To: Rogers, Michael; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Re- Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Hello Guys,
The end of this week will mark about 90 days of review time for the Andrex UIC Perm.it
Application (dated June 25, 2010). The client is supposed to authorize me to conduct
annual sampling later this week. Their next question will be "when do we start the
injection?"
Please let me know what I should tell them. Thanks, --Andy
----- Original Messagei
--------- - ------- — — ------- ---
;From: -R6
-qbrs,- Michael -
To: Slusser, Thomas; Andrew-W. Al - e - xand er Davi clson, Landon
Sent:. Friday, July 23, 2010 9:23 AM
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
I just received the application last week. As the acknowledgment letter indicated, processing permit applications can
take as long as 60 to 90 days after receipt of completed application.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax 715-05,88 (put to my attn on cover letter)
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/aps/��wpro/permit-applications
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties

North Camlina
DcPartment of Environment and NaftuW Resources
Division ofEnvironmental Health
hfichael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretay
Linda C. Sewall, Director
March 1, 2001
Mr. Charles L. Gaither
MIJECO, 130C.
220 Deaverview Road
P.O. Box 16160
Asheville, NC 28816
VRi7qznUVr_Mn
This letter is in response to your request for writtein approval to use the recovered product as an ingredient
in specified Gra& "N' dairy products.
I have reviewed the copy ofthe November 29, 2000 letter from Mr. Jdm Foret� Director, Office of
Nutritional. Products, Labeling and Dairy Supplements, Center fi)r Food Safety and AppliedWitrition. In
his letter, Mr. Foret agrees that the milk ingredient produced through the milk conservation ("recovery")
system is ameptable for use as an "offier ingredienf 'in cultured bufterm�k and egg ncg (21 CFR
131.112(d)andl.31.170(e)). In understanding that the ingredient produced through the milk conservation
C'recc�ver)r) system is a combination ofmilk and water to which non& dry milk is added, he agrees that
the resultant product has a milk component which may be declared in the list ofingredieots as "MW as
stated in 21 CFR 10 1.4(bX4).'He further agrpes that the combination of water and dry Sidra milk may be
declared in the list of ingredients as "sicim rniW', as long as the amount ofwater is not in excess ofthe
amount ofwater needed to reconstitute the dry skim milk to sh4e strength (21 CFR 10 1.4(c)).
I have warted your processing plant and mewed the milk conservation Crecinvery") system It does appear
that the system was installed and is operating in accordance with the plans approved by Mr. Tom
Wffiamscn, former Head of the North Carolina Milk Sanitation Branch.
Mwefore, the North Carolina Dairy and Food Protection Branch has approved the use of the recovered
prodwl according to the November 29, 2000 letter from Mr. Join Ford.
1632 MzU Semm Cadw, RidelSk NO& CKUHM 27699.1632

1W. Chadw L. Gaidier
Page 2
Match 1, 2001
ff I may be offinther assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
N),? "i
Kay Spain Sigmon, R. S., Assistant Branch Head
North Carolina Daffy and Food Rvtection Branch
8297 Hagers Ferry Road
Denver, NC 28037 -
[phone]
kay.simon@nanailmet
Mr,
cc: Roger Maney
Susan C. Grayson
Bruce Williams
Lezette EaTh rt
Roy Carawan
Grant Smith

4'
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES.
Public Health Smice
FbW wx1 Drug AdminWra*m
NOV 2 9 MM WashinOw DC 2MO4
Ms. Cary Frye
Vice President� Regulatory Affairs M I,,,- C
International Dairy Foods Association J'X it. E E
f25O H St., NW, Suite 9 1 00 ET
Washington, DC 20005
Dear Ms. Frye� EAJJ� FjEAj 7H
&—=_U�8EM)rr -_cCT
As "' _
00 pRor - 'ECT
This is in reply to your letter OfOctober 12, 2000, concerning e Ik ingredients
produced through milk conservation ("recovery") systems in cultured milk and eggnog.
We reviewed your description of the conditions under which the wastirig Food and Drug
Administration's (FDA) standards of identity for cultured milk and eggnog authorize the
use of optional milk ingredients obtained through milk conservation ("recovery")
systems -
Based on our review of your letter and the information that was received during our
meeting with you on August 10, 2000, we agree that the milk ingredient produced
through milk conservation ("recovery") system is acceptable for use as an "other
optional ingredient"n culturcd milk and eggnog (21 CFR 131.112(d)and 131-170(e)).
As you are aware, th6 September 21, 1982 Federal Register (47 FR 41519), stayed the
kinds of safe and suitable milk -derived ingredients that may be used as "Other optional
ingredients." Therefore, we cannot restrict the use of this ingredient produced through
milk conservation ("recovery) systems in cultured milk and eggnogg.
We understand that the ingredient produced by the milk conservation ("recovery") system
is a combination of milk and water to which nonfat dry milk is added. We agree that the
resultant product has a milk component, which may be declared in the list of ingredients
as "Milk" as stated in 21 CFR 101.4(b)(4). We also agree that the combination of the
water and dry skim milk may be declared in the list of ingredients as ',sldm milk- as
stated in 21 CFR 101.4(b)(3), as long as the amount of water is not in excess of the
amount Of water needed to reconstitute the dry skim milk to single strxm
101.4(c)). A (21 CFR
We trust that tins information will be helpful to you and your members in preparing
labels for their cultured milk and eggnog containing milk ingredients produced through
milk conservation ("recovery") systems. However, we point out that these comments
represent our current thinking and that your clients' labels may need to be revised in the
future if new regulations are promulgated.

Page 2 — Ms. Cary Frye
IfYOu have any further questions, ple'ase do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely yours,
12. ; Z�
B. Foret
Irector
Office of Nutritional Products, Labeling
and Dietary Supplements
Center for Food Safety
and -Applied Nutrition
cc:
Charles L. Gaither
President
Milkeo, Inc.
220 Deavaview Road
Post Office Box 16160
Asheville, North Carolina 28816
Ron Harris
Operations Manager
Superstore Industries
Fairfield Dairy Division
199 Red Top Road
Fairfield, California 94:533
Thomas Williamson
Head, AM Sanitation Branch
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Enviromm ental Health
-Environmental Health Services Section
1632 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1632

Rogers, Michael
From: Andrew W. Alexander [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 11:24 AM
To: Rogers, Michael; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Page 9: Andrex UIC Permit
Attachments: Page 9 Attachments Section V Injection Plan and Permit App Andrex 1022-28.pdf
Hello Guys,
I have attached a PIDF of Page 9 which now includes PG stamps. A hard copy will not be
mailed unless requested. Please print and replace the original Page 9.
Please let me know if this does not meet the requirement for Item 3 in your letter.
Thanks, --Andy
------ Original Message -----
-FromilRo
qdrs� Michael
To: Andrew W. Alexander Slus_ser,__Tharnas Day -i d s' -on-,-- L an- d-o-n-----
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Andrew -
After review by staff, there are a few items that need further clarification and/or additional information. Please find
attached an Additional Information request letter, which was sent out Thursday, October 7. Please provide this
additional information as soon as possible in order fo�r us to issue permit.
Please send 2nd copy of written response to Landon Davidson with t.he Asheville Regional Office to expedite process.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
-http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/aps/gwpro/permit-appiications
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Andrew W. Alexander [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 8:04 AM
To: Rogers, Michael; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Re: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Hello Guys,
The end of this week will mark about 90 days of review time for the Andrex UIC Permit
Application (dated June 25, 2010). The client is supposed to authorize me to conduct

annual sampling later this ",.ek. Their next question will be vv�hen do we start the
injection?"
Please let me know what I should tell them. Thanks, --Andy
7 Original Message -----
From: Ropers, -Michael
To: Slusser, Thonas; '%ndrew W Alexander Davidson, Land on
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:23 AM
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permif Status?
I
I just received the application last week. As the acknowledgment letter indicated, processing permit applications can
take as long as 60 to 90 days after receipt of completed application.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
http://Portal.ncdenr.orig/web/wq/aps/-qwpro/permit-applications
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Slusser, Thomas
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 4:01 PM
To: Andrew W. Alexander; Davidson, Landon
Cc: Rogers, Michael
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Greetings Andrew,
Michael Rogers is the reviewer for that project and he can give you the best update. He is copied on this email and his
telephone number is 919-715-6166.
Take care Andrew,
—Thomas.
T-M,311C01T9S,q017d8flC6 rV gnd�rVM ta ME 11arthl6m,"i,78 PURN Pi5A9rdSZXV617d1r78Yh8 91'SC1,9S5dtV thlrdpgrtiES
From: Andrew W. Alexander Imailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:04 PM
To: Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
-Hey Guys,
I know that the Milkco guys are going to be asking me soon about the status of the
Andrex UIC Permit Application so I figured I'd ask you first. Any news for me to relay?
Thanks, --Andy
Andrew W. Alexander, P.G., RSIVI
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc. (BLE)
0J

Rogers., Michael
From: Rogers, Michael
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 2:38 PM
To: 'Andrew W. Alexander'; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Attachments: Andrex- Milkco.pdf
Andrew -
After review by staff, there are a few items that need further clarification and/or additional information. Please find
attached an Additional Information request letter, which was sent out Thursday, October 7. Please provide this
additional information as soon as possible in order for us to issue permit.
Please send 2nd copy of written response to Landon Davidson with the Asheville Regional Office to expedite process.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
hfti)://Portal.ncdenr.om/web/wq/aps/qwpro/permit-applications
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law andmay be disclosed to third parties
From: Andrew W. Alexander [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 8:04 AM
To: Rogers, Michael; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Re: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Hello Guys,
The end of this week will mark about 90 days of review time for the Andrex UIC Permit
Application (dated June 25,'2010). The client is supposed to authorize me to conduct
annual sampling later this week. Their next question will be "when do we start the
injection?"
Please let me know what I should tell them. Thanks, --Andy
------ qriginal Message ----- ----- --------------
;From:
TO: Slusser, Thomas ; Andrew W. Alexander; Davidson, Landon
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:23 AM
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
I just received the application last week. As the acknowledgment letter indicated, processing permit applications can
take as long as 60 to 90 days after -receipt of completed application.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist

NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Prote( -, Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
hftp://Portal.ncdenr.or_q/web/Wq/aps/qwpro/permit-applications
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Slusser, Thomas
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 4:01 PM
To: Andrew W. Alexander; Davidson, Landon
Cc: Rogers, Michael
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Greetings Andrew,
Michael Rogers is the reviewer for that project and he can give you the best update. He is copied on this email and his
telephone number is 919-715-6166.
Take care Andrew,
—Thomas.
tfl 311dirum thisaddPass Irtak bE subject ta thg Ilurth faivlllw Public Rkgrds laiv3ndmaY b,- dis-rIkEdto thlrdpa-ti'-s.
From: Andrew W. Alexander [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:04 PM
To: Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Hey Guys,
I know that the Milkco guys are going to be asking me soon about the status of the
Andrex UIC Permit Application so I figured I'd ask you first. Any news for me to relay?
Thanks, --Andy
Andrew W. Alexander, P.G., RSIVI
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc. (BLE)
6004 Ponders Court
Greenville, South Carolina 29615
[phone] (voice)
[phone] (fax)
[phone] (c6ll)
andyCa�_blecorp.com
www.blecorp.com
This electronic transmission contains information from the consulting firm of Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc., that may be confidential or privileged. The
information is intended solely foe the recipient. Use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately bytelephone
(864-288-1265) or by email (infoCcDblecorp.com). Thank you for your cooperation.

Rogers, Michael
From: Andrew W. Alexander [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 3:18 PM
To: Rogers, Michael; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Re: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Thanks Michael,
Those are all easy to do. We will get right on it.
Only one question so far ... should the revised well survey radius be 1,500 feet per the old
CSA requirements or 2,640 feet (1/2 mile) or some other distance? --Andy
----- Original Message ---------
�t__ r :.kogers- ae
prn JMi6h - _F__
To: Andrew W. Alexander; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Andrew -
After review by staff, there are a few items that need further clarification and/or additional information. Please find
attached an Additional information request letter, which was sent out Thursday, October 7. Please provide this
additional information as soon as possible in order for us to issue permit.
I
Please send 2nd copy of written response to Landon Davidson with the Asheville Regional Office to expedite process.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/aps/gwpro/permit-applications
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Andrew W. Alexander [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 8:04 AM
To: Rogers, Michael; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Re: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Hello Guys,
The end of this week will mark about 90 days of review time for the Andrex UIC Permit
Application (dated June 25, 2010). The client is supposed to authorize me to conduct
annual sampling later this week. Their next question will be "when do we start the
injection?"

Please let me know what I DUld tell them. Thanks, --And"y-
----- Original Message
Fro -nu Ro ---- - ------- - ---------
gers, Michael
To: Slusser, Thomas; Andrew W. Alexander; Davidson, Landon
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:23 AM -
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
I just received the application last week. As the acknowledgment letter indicated, processing permit applications can
take as long as 60 to 90 days after receipt of completed application.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct �ine [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
htti)://Portal.ncdenr.or�g/web/wq/aps/qwpro/permit-6i)i)lications
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Slusser, Thomas
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 4:01 PM
To: Andrew W. Alexander; Davidson, Landon
Cc: Rogers, Michael
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
I Greetings Andrew,
Michael Rogers is the reviewer for that project and he can give you the best update. He is copied on this email and his
telephone number is 919-715-6166.
Take care Andrew,
—Thomas.
ta &7d fir.170 thl's ?ddpgss msy he subiect tv the &rth fanglw,7 Pablic Prkards Zatv 3fldruay bE dsclased to thlrdpartles,
From: Andrew W. Alexander [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:04 PM
To: Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Hey Guys,
I know that the Milkco guys are going to be asking me soon� about the status of the
.Andrex UIC Permit Application so I figured I'd ask you first. Any news for me to relay?
Thanks, --Andy
Andrew W. Alexander, P.G., RSIVI .
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc. (BLE)
6004 Ponders Court
Greenville, South Carolina 29615
[phone] (voice)
2

[phone] (fax)
[phone] (cell),
andV(d1blecorp.com
www.blecorp.com
This electronic transmission contains information from the consulting firm of Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc., that may be confidential or privileged. The
information is intended solely for the recipient. Use by any other party is not authorized, If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone
(864-288-1265) or by email (info(a-)blecorp.com). Thank you for your cooperation.

ok
CDEHR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water ouaiity
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
October 7, 2010
Andrew W. Alexander, P.G.
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc.
6004 Ponders Court
Greenville, SC 29615
Re: Additional Information Request
Injection Well Permit Application
Permit No. WIOIOO106
Milkeo. Inc. - Former Andrex Industries Corp. Facility
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Alexander:
Natural Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
While reviewing the referenced permit application our staff identified some items that need clarification and/or
additional information. Please address the following items:
In the Injection Fluid Composition section of the application on page 6 it states, 'The injection fluid
is a 1 % milk solution, which is a byproduct of the dairy manufacturing processes at Milko'. As
written, this meets the definition of an industrial waste given in G.S. 143-213 (18b) and, therefore,
cannot be injected into the aquifer. If however, it can be demonstrated that this I% milk solution is
being adapted and formulated to be specifically used as a groundwater remediation additive, it may
not be classified as an industrial waste. Please clarify how the I% milk solution is to be formulated
or otherwise prepared for use specifically as a groundwater remediation injectant. Otherwise, an
alternative injectant needs to be submitted as an addendum to the permit application.
0 The well survey and reconnaissance of other private or potable wells in the area of the Site was
based upon a survey completed in 1997 and is out of date. Please submit a new well survey
incorporating a regulatory file search and field reconnaissance.
0 We did not see where the application was sealed by a North Carolina registered licensed geologist
according to 15A NCAC 2C .0211. We saw some included maps sealed but not the application.
Please submit a revised page 9 or cover letter signed and sealed.
Page I of 2 Pages

Please slibmit your responses with any corrected text pages/figures for insertion into the previously submitted
UIC Application within 30 calendar dUs of receipt of this letter. If you have any questions regarding your
permit please call me at [phone] or email me at Michael.Rogers@,ncdenr.gov.
Thank you for your'cooperation.
Best Regards,
Michael Rogers, P.G. C & FL)
Environmental Specialist
cc: Landon Davidson — Asheville Rea
gional Office
Central Office File — WIO 100 106
Tracy Wahl — NCDENR Brownfields Prograin
Charles Gaither — Milkeo Inc.
Page 2 of 2 pages
C,

HCDEHR
North Caroiinca Department of E-nvironrnent and
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
July 14, 2010
Charles L. Gaither
Milkco, Inc.
PO Box 16160
Asheville, NC 28816
Subject: Acknowledgement of Application No. WIOIOO106
Injection In situ Groundwater Remediation Well (51)
Surface Irrigation System - SFR
Buncombe
Dear Mr. Gaither:
Natural Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality (Division) acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting materials on June 30, 2010. This application package has been assigned the number listed above and will be reviewed by
Michael Rogers.
The reviewer will perform a detailed review and contact you with a request for additional information if necessary. To ensure the
maximum efficiency in processing permit applications, the Division requests your assistance in providing a timely and complete
response to any additional information requests. I
Please be aware that the Division's Regional Office, copied below, must provide recommendations prior to final action by the
Division. Please also note at this time, processing permit applications can take as long as 60 - 90 days after receipt of a complete
application.
If you have any questions, please contact Michael Rogers at 919-715-6166, or via e-mail at [e-mail]. If the
reviewer is unavailable, you may leave a message, and they will respond promptly. Also note that the Division has reorganized. To
review our new organizational chart, go to h!M://h2o.enr.state.tic.us/documentl,/dwq—orgehart.pdf.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRIES ON THIS PROJECT.
Sincerely,
Ouj&�,
for Debra J. Watts
Supervisor
cc: Asheville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Andrew W. Alexander, PG, RSM (Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc - 6004 Ponders Court, Greenville, SC 29615)
Permit Application File WIO 100 106
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh. North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] \ FAX 1: 919-715-0588; FAX 2: 919-715-6048 \ Customer Service: 1-1377-623-6748 One
Internet www.rimatenquality.om NorthCarohna
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer Naturally

IBLEINC.
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc.
6004 Ponders Court
Greenville, South Carolina 29615
Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
RECENED I DENR I DM
AqWfer Prdecfion Sedion
JUN.3 0 20io
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO: Underground Injection Control Program
DWQ - Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 276"-1636
ATTENTION: Mr. Thomas Slusser, L.G. - NCDENR Raleigh -
2 copies with 2009 GW Report
CC: Mr. Buddy Gaither - Milkco, Inc. - 1 copy without 2009 GW Report
Ms. Tracy Wahl - NCDENR - 1 copy without 2009 GW Report
DATE: June 25,2010
RE: Andrex Industries Corp.
UIC Permit Application (UIC-5It5T)
and Risk Assessment (GW/UIC-3)
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
[0 Attached [I Under separate cover via: U.S. MAIL
Pennit Application El Prints [-] Change order El Letter [I Copy of report
Other [—] W.A.S. [1 Plans El Samples [I Specifications
El Proposal E] Preliminary Data:
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
For approval For your records 0 As requested Other For review and conmient
REMARKS: Tom,
I have enclosed two copies of the subject document and have transmitted copies to others on behalf of
Milkco as shown above. Please contact me with any questions or concerns. We look forward to
receiving the approved UIC permit.
Atl a4oal�
Andrew W. Alelm"nder, P.G.
Senior Hydrogeologist
c:\awa\active projects\andrex nfflkco\phase28 andrex injection plan\uic pennit application and section v attachmentsVimsrnittal uic
pernAt andrex slusser nedenr.doc

1 % Milk Solution Health Risk Evaluation
From: Rudo,Ken
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 9:41 AM
To: Slusser, Thomas
Subject: 1 % Milk Solution Health Risk Evaluation
Mr.Slusser, I have evaluated the information of the use of the 1 % milk solution for enhanced
bioremediation at the former Andrex Industries Corp Site in Asheville, NC. I have reviewed the
composition analysis and the statements regarding the absence of private wells and public water
use of the groundwater in the area based on the information provided for me in the 7/7/10 memo.
Based on this information, there should not be any significantly increased human health risks
upon the use,of this remediation product. If you have any further questions regarding this matter,
please feel free to contact me at 919-707-5911. Sincerely Kenneth Rudo, Ph.D, Toxicologist,
OEEB
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to
third parties by an authorized State official. Unauthorized disclosure of juvenile, health, legally privileged, or
otherwise
confidential information, including confidential information relating to an ongoing State procurement effort, is
prohibited by
law. If you'have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all records of this
e-mail.
Page 1

Rogers, Michael
From: Davidson, Landon
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 4:51 PM
To: Slusser, Thomas; Rogers, Michael
Subject: RE: Approval Letters: Item One for Andrex UIC Permit W10100106
Attachments: image004.png; imageOO1.png
No doubt adjustments to the mix will be made.
G. Landan Davidson, P.G.
Nc[)EKIP� - mvi�ian Mv.,ater Quzlit%�,
web page: http.*Ilh2o.enr.state.nc.uslogw.htmI
This e-mail contains a public record which is subject to disclosure to third
parties and the public pursuant North Carolina's Public Records Law. N. C.
Gen. Stat. §132-1, et seq. This e-mail may contain materials prepared
during or in anticipation ofa legal proceeding as part ofpreparation for that
legal proceeding, in which case third party or public access to it is subject to
N.C. Gen. Stat. §132-1.9 and may be denied until the conclusion of the legal
proceeding, including the completion of all appeals and post -judgment
proceedings, or, in the case where no legal proceeding has been commenced,
upon the expiration of all applicable statutes of limitations and periods of
repose.
From: Slusser, Thomas
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 4:49 PM
To: Davidson, Landon; Rogers, Michael
Subject: RE: Approval Letters: Item One for Andrex UIC Permit WIOIOOI06
A splash of rum or bourdon should help with that!
1-mallcorrespoadeflce to aflolrom this address maybe sabject to the North targhaa Pub& R.-corosiawandmaybe d1sclosedto thirdpartles
From: Davidson, Landon
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 4:49 PM
To: Rogers, Michael; Slusser, Thomas
Subject: RE: Approval Letters: Item One for Andrex UIC Permit WI0100106
Good to go with the injection here, but I must say my appetite for eggnog may have been diminished during this
endeavor.

G. Landon Davidson, P.G.
t.CDENP Divi.Man ot V., mcr Ou:- lit�,
'% q uif:
­r r1rotection Sc:ficon e
RegianFl APS Sup�-vii"ig
00
Ashavilk, Regi�),_
2093 U_f� Hwy�
ph, S 2-q 294; 500F
web page: h ttp:11h2o. enr. state. nc. u5logw. html
This e-mail contains a public record which is subject to disclosure to third
parties and the public pursuant North Carolina's Public Records Low. N. C.
Gen. Stat. §132-1, et seq. This e-mail may contain materials prepared
during or in anticipation ofa legalproceeding as part of preparation for that
legal proceeding, in which case third party or public access to it is subject to
N. C. Gen. Stat. §132-1.9 and may be denied until the conclusion of the legal
proceeding, including the completion of a// appeals and post -judgment
proceedings, or, in the case where no legal proceeding has been commenced
upon the expiration of all applicable statutes of limitations and periods of
repose.
From: Rogers, Michael
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 4:35 PM
To: Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: RE: Approval Letters: Item One for Andrex UIC Permit WI0100106
Do the attached documents give you guys a warm, fuzzy, and comfy feeling enough to proceed?
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Sectior� (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone], Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/aps/gwpro/permit-applications
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Andrew W. Alexander [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 3:59 PM
To: Rogers, Michael; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Approval Letters: Item One for Andrex UIC Permit WI0100106
Hello Gents,
Those Milkco folks are fast. I have attached one PDF document which contains both
the NCDENR and the FDA approval letters for the use of the product. Please let me know
if this is what you need, etc. Thanks, --Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: Rogers, Michael
To: Andre w W. Alexander; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: Item One for Andrex UIC Permit W10100106
2

Andrew -
Please provide the documentation indicating that the FDA has approved the referenced product.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
http://portal.ncdenr.or-q/web/wq/aps/qwpro/permit-applications
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Andrew W. Alexander [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 7:29 AM
To: Rogers, Michael; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Item One for Andrex UIC Permit
Hello Guys,
Take a look at this letter from Milkco that addresses Item I on your letter. Buddy Gaither
saying that we are proposing to inject material which has been approved (by the FDA) for
use as food product. This is very different from waste product which is handled differently
and contains cleaners, etc.
Please let me know if this letter is a satisfactory response for Item 1. Thanks, --Andy
----- Oriqinal Messag e
;Fr_0____.__Ro4ers,-MichaeI
To: Andrew W. Alexander; SI'usser, T�omas Da I v - idson, Landon
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Andrew -
After review by staff, there are a few items that need further clarification and/or additional information. Please find
attached an Additional Information request letter, which was sent out Thursday, October 7. Please provide this
additional information as soon as possible in order for us to issue permit.
Please send 2nd copy of written response to Landon Davidson with the Asheville Regional Office to expedite process.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/Wq/aps/gwpro/permit-applications
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties

From: Andrew W. Alexander [mailtc�[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 8:04 AM
To: Rogers, Michael; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Re: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Hello Guys,
The end of this week will mark about 90 days of review time for the Andrex UIC Permit
Application (dated June 25, 2010). The client is supposed to authorize me to conduct
annual sampling later this week. Their next question will be "when do we start the
injection?"
Please let me know what I should tell them. Thanks, --Andy
----- Original Messagq�­-_
'Frdfn: Rociers, Michael --
To: Slusser, Thomas; Andrew W. Alexander; Davidson, Landon
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:23 AM
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
I just received the application last week. As the acknowledgment letter indicated, processing permit applications can
take as long as 60 to 90 days after receipt of completed application.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my aftn on cover letter)
http://i)ortal.ncdenr.org/web/wci/aps/q-wpro/permit-applications
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Slusser, Thomas
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 4:01 PM
To: Andrew W. Alexander; Davidson, Landon
Cc: Rogers, Michael
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Greetings Andrew,
Michael Rogers is the reviewer for that project and he can give you the best update, He is copied on this email and his
telephone number is 919-715-6166.
Take care Andrew,
—Thomas.
E-i77N11V91`r.-SP0fld517C8 to Hfld.'�M Ih1s3dd)-essm3ybe subject to the North farglil7a PvbAu1?acordsI3wa17dmay0'E &5TIasedto
From: Andrew W. Alexander [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:04 PM
To: Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Andrex UIC Permit Status?

Hey Guys,
I know that the Milkco guys are going to be asking me soon about the status of the
Andrex UIC Permit Application so I figured I'd ask you first. Any news for me to relay?
Thanks, --Andy
Andrew W. Alexander, P.G., RSM -
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc. (BLE)
6004 Ponders Court
Greenville, South Carolina 29615
[phone] (voice)
[phone] (fax)
[phone] (cell)
andy(cD-blecorp.com
www.blecorp.com
This electronic transmission contains information from the consulting firm of Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc., that may be confidential or privileged. The
information is intended solely for the recipient. Use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone
(864-288-1265) or by email (info(cDblecorp.com). Thank you for your cooperation.
5

Rogers, Michael
From: Davidson, Landon
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 3:23 PM
To: Andrew W. Alexander; Rogers, Michael; Slusser, Thomas
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Attachments: image003.png
I'd go with 1,500 ft unless central office staff feel differently.
Landon
G. UndDn Davidson, P.G.
NCEIENP CliviMun otWaterQuafit,�
Aquiter Protection Section
Re:,ion�l APS Supefviwr
4�_
A shevi I R eggium, I MID-.
2090 U_5�
Swannimuz. KC. Z8776 %
ph.: 829 29645W_­
tax: 828-Zq-S-
web page: http.,Ilh2o.enr.stote.nc.uslcigw.htmi
This e-mail contains a public record which is subject to disclosure to third
parties and the public pursuant North Carolina's Public Records Low. N.0
Gen. Stat. §132-1, et seq. This e-mail may contain materials prepared
during or in anticipation of a legal proceeding as part ofpreporotion for that
legal proceeding, in which case third party or public access to it is subject to
N. C Gen. Stat. §132-1.9 and may be denied until the conclusion of the legal
proceeding, including the completion of a// appeals and post -judgment
proceedings, or, in the case where no legal proceeding has been commenced
upon the expiration of all applicable statutes of limitations and periods of
repose.
From: Andrew W. Alexander [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 3:18 PM
To: Rogers, Michael; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Re: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Thanks Michael,
Those are all easy to do. We will get right on it.
Only one question so far ... should the revised well survey radius be 1,500 feet per the old
CSA requirements or 2,640 feet (1/2 mile) or some other distance? --Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: Rogers, Michael
To: Andrew W. Alexander; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Andrew-

After review by staff, there are a fe -,-2ms that need further clarification and/( -.-Iditional information. Please find
attached an Additional Information request letter, which was sent out Thursday, October 7. Please provide this
additional information as soon as possible in order for us to issue permit.
Please send 2nd copy of written response to Landon Davidson with the Asheville Regional Office to expedite process.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/aps/gwpro/permit-applications
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
I
From: Andrew W. Alexander [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 8:04 AM
To: Rogers, Michael; Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Re: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Hello Guys,
The end of this week will mark about 90 days of review time for the Andrex UIC Permit
Application (dated June 25, 2010). The client is supposed to authorize me to conduct
annual sampling later this week. Their next question will be " -when do we start the
injection?"
Please let me know what I should tell them. Thanks, --Andy
...... Original Message -----
;From: RoQers,. M icheiel
To: 2usser, Thomas ; Andrew W. Alexander Davidson, Landon
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:23 AM
Subject: RE: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
I just received the application last week. As the acknowledgment lette ' r indicated, processing permit applications can
take as long as 60 to 90 days after receipt of completed application.
Michael Rogers, P.G. (NC & FL)
Environmental Specialist
NC Div of Water Quality- Aquifer Protection Section (APS)
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Direct Line [phone]; Fax [phone] (put to my attn on cover letter)
http://portal.ncdenr.or�g/web/wg/aPs/qwpro/permit-applications
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Slusser, Thomas
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 4:0X-PM
To: Andrew W. Alexander; Davidson, Landon

Cc: Rogers, Michael
Subjeat: RE: 6ndrex UIC Permit Status?
Greetings Andrew, .
Michael Rogers is the reviewer for that project and he can give you the best update. He is copied on this email and his
telephone number is 919-715-6166.
Take care Andrew,
—Thomas.
f-Md11C171-r8SP,9F1d5X5 tV317dfr9fl7 this addr-uss ma� �5 subjgct to the #Lrth E,7rahaa PublIc qm7rds Z a wY17dmsvh_P disclasedto thfro'PgrtiEs
From: Andrew W. Alexander [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:04 PM
To: Slusser, Thomas; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Andrex UIC Permit Status?
Hey Guys,
I know that the Miikco guys are going to be asking me soon about the status of the
Andrex ' UIC Permit Application so I figured I'd ask you first. Any news for me to relay?
Thanks, --Andy
Andrew W. Alexander, P.G., RSM
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc. (BLE)
6004 Ponders Court
Greenville, South'Carolina 29615
[phone] (voice)
[phone] (fax)
[phone] (cell)
andy(d)-blecorp.com
www.blecorp.com
This electronic transmission contains information from the consulting firm of Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc., that may be confidential or privileged, The
information is intended solely for the recipient. Use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone
(864-288-1265) or by email (info(a)blecorp.com). Thank you for your cooperation.

Rogers, Michael
From:
Wahl, Tracy
Sent:
Thursday, October 07, 2010 12:19 PM
To:
Rogers, Michael
Subject:
Andrex-Milkco Site
Hi Michael,
I received your voice mail regarding the UIC application for the Andrex/Milkco site. I am a DWMer in the Brownfields
Program, but I'm housed in the Land of Sky Regional Councils' office in Asheville. My address is:
Tracy Wahl
NC DENR - LOSRC
339 New Leicester Hwy Suite 140
Asheville, NC 28806
Thanks - Tracy
'1'racy L.\Valil
Brownfields Pro ject Manager
NC DENR - DWM
Dircct 1�nc: 828-251-7465
The North Carolina Brownfields Program - Come Clean Up With Us Redevelopment and Land Recycling
for a Sustainable Future www.ncbrownfields.org
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
Date: August 2,2010
To: Aquifer Protection Central Office
Central Office Reviewer: Brett Lavert-V
Regional Login No:
County: Polk
Permittee: Tffilkco Inc.
Project Name: Former Andrex Industries
Application No.: VVIO100106
L GEAERAL IATORKATION
1, This application is (check all that apply): E] New 0 Renewal
0 Minor Modification 7 Major Modification
F1 Surface Irrigation 0 ReuseE] Recycle [:] High Rate Infiltration Evaporation/Infiltration Lagoon
F] Land Application of Residuals Attachment B included E] 503 regulated E] 503 exempt
F1 Distribution of Residuals F-1 Surface Disposal
F� Closed -loop Groundwater Remediation E Other Injection Wells (including in situ remediation)
Was a site visit conducted in order to prepare this report? Z Yes or 0 No.
a. Date of site visit: July30,2010
b. Person contacted and contact information: Andrew Alexander [phone]
c. Site visit conducted by: Brett Laverty
d. Inspection Report Attached: Z Yes or F� No.
2. Is the following information entered into the BIMS record for this application correct?
Z Yes orE:] No. If no, please complete the following or indicate that it is correct on the current application.
For Treatment Facilities:
a. Location:
.b. Driving Directions:
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number:
d.' Latitude: Longitude:
e. Regulated Activities / Type of Wastes (e.g., subdivision, food processing, municipal wastewater):
For DisRosal and In! ection Sites:
(If multiple sites either indicate which sites the information Uplies to, copy and paste a new section into the
document for each site, or attach additional pages for each site)
a. Location(s): 180 Deaverview Road Asheville, NC
b. Driving Directions: I-26JE to Patton Ave, turn right on Denverview Road. Site located next to Milkeo,
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number: Asheviller Quad/ 35082-135-TE-024,
_7
d. Latitude: 35.580469 N Longitude: -82.613983 W
not
Desc.-d don Of V'Vaste(s) And Facilities
1. Please attach completed rathig sheet. Facility Classification-
2. Are the new tre�ltrnont facililios adc.-quet -,oi 0: y*,"i".'... (11IG t"h!'-
RECEIVED DENR I DWQ
FORM: Andrex Industries.docx Aquifer Protection Section
2010

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
FlYes F-1 No F� N/A. If no., please explain:
n . I i I -
Are. the new site conditions (soils. topography. ,at(-!.r -table-, etc) consistent 1%-'i h w .i -Niac f. U".2
depth to 13,9 rePoT11.'
tile soil scientist �i.-cidjoi-Pr(yCessioji.a,I,Eiigin.ceil? FlYes F3 No [_]T,�/A.
4. Does the application (niaps, pJans. etc,) represent the actual site (properMy lines, wells. surface drainage)?
Yes F-1 No E] NIA, If no, please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals nianagernent plan adequate and./or acceptable to the Division. Yes M No F-1
N/A. If no, please explain:
6. Are the proposed application rates for new sites (hydraulic oi- nutrient) accoptable?
F] Yes D No D NVA. If no, please explain: _ ___
7
Are tlietievvti-�-atiiientf�icilitiesoriiiviiewdi-,,posi-I siteslocatedin a
F1 YesE] N E:1 N/A. li'ves, please attach a map showing areas of I 00-year floodplain and r1casQ.
and recommend any mitigative ineasures/speoial conditions in Part LV:
Are there anv buff-er conflicts (new treatnient facilities or new disposal Ates)? El Yes or F] No. If ves. pktase
attach a inap showing conflict areas or attach any new. inaps you have receiied from tile applicant to be
incorporated ilato the permit:
-requency af� inoj,iirpririg�
9. Is proposed andlor oxisting groundwater nionito-ring prOM-11111 (Miniber of wells, f
1110111[oflng paranieters, etc;.) adequate? [] Yes 0 No El N/A. Attach map of e-x'isting vv�oniii.00ng y1* el i
network if applicable.. Indicate th.e' reNiew and compliance boundaries. If No, explain al -id. recotnTnend an,';
changes to the groundwater nionitoring prograin-
10. For residivals. will seasonal or other restrictions"be required'? El Yes 0 No D N/A If ves, attach list of sites
with restrictions (Certification W.)
ITT 2T�11
I . REJVFWAL AND MODIMCATMAIAPPLICATIONS Orseprevioussection fi)r new orm, ' ryno(Iffleadon
LLvf_e11_1S)_
p1tLivi:v 0
�)ti.on f Waste(S) And facill ties N/A
1. Are there appropriately certified OR.Cs [br the faci I iticS9 F-1 Yes or 0 N o.
Operator in Charge: Certificateh,:
Backup- Operator in Charge: Certificate #:
2. Is the desiali, maintenance and operation (e.g. adequate aeration., sludge wasting, sludge StOl-M),'e, efflUC-11t
storage, etc) of the treatnient facilities adequate for the ty e ofwagte and. disposal system? 0 Yes ar El No.
P
If no,, please explain:
Are the site conditions (soils. topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriawly and adequanely
assimilating tile waste? [:]Yes or [I No. if ilo, please explain:
FORM: Andrex Industries.docx 2

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
4. Has the site. change'd in any wa-y that may affect pernait (drainqge added, ne\iv wells Inside dv�,, cornpilance,
boundary, new de-v-elopment. etc.)? If yi��s, pleas-, o%plainls itie rcsidu.-ills niariagcine.-A
ate and/or acceptable to the Division?
F-1 Yes or F-1 No. If no, please explain:
application rates -(kydraufic or nutrient) still accoptable? [] Y s or E] No. if no, -please
Are the. exist-.L e
explain:
6. Is the existing grouridwxior monitoring program (HUmber of wells, frequency ol' monitorin 111011itortno
'M
parameters, etc.) adequate? [] Yes El No E] N/A. Attach niap of ffxisting Monitoringi-
applicable. Indicate. the review and compliance boundaries. If No. explaiii and reconmiiend mr, k-,yh&ug,-,s u.� rlh,�
groundv,!awr monitorin(y program:
7. Will sea,somil or other restrictions be required fibrad-ded sites? [I Yes 1-1 No F-1 N/A If ves., atta.ch list of sites
with -restrictions (Certification B?)
8. Are there any buffer confl icts (treatment facilities or disposal sites)9 F Yes or F No. If' yes, please attach a
inap showing conflict areas or attach any new, maps you have receiv,ed. fi-om the applicant to be intoij.)orited
into the pernfit:
9. Is the descripti.01i of the facilitics, type and/or volliluie ol as in thf-.,
Yes or F_� No. If no, please explain:
10. �Vere monitoring we -Us properly constructed arid locatod? F� YC5 01J7 NO E-11, i i n, p 1 - �x r i
ID I ,
Has a review ofall sol-f-monitoring dati been t)onducted (GW, NDMR.. and 11N,113AR as applicable)?El Yes or
No F N/A. Please simirnarize any -Findings resulting from this review:
121. Check all that appty: El No compliance issues., F Notice(s) of violatiort within the last pernift cycle; El
CUITellt ClIfOrCen)(NIt aCti0n(�',) F] Currently under SOC; F Currently under JOC, F CLO-1-tNAIV Under
moratorium. If ariv iterns. checked. I 1 1. . .-
please explain and atUch any document" t! ;Ii-
answer/coniments (such as NOV., NOD etc): Have all compliance dates/conditions in -die e-,xisi:ing pr�nm-c�
(SOC, JOC., etc.) been complied mr.-ith? 7 Yes 7 No 7 Not Deten.-nmed El N/,k.. If no, please. mplain:
13. Are there any issim related to tompliance-lenforeement that should be resolved before. issuing this permV
Yes or []-No 7 N/A. If yes.. please explain: ---
FORM: Androx Industries.doex 3

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
IV _VVECTION WTLL PERA17TAPPLICATIONS (Complete these two sections for all systems that use injection
w - ells, including closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent in ection wells, in situ remediation injection wells, and heat
j
pump injection wells.)
DescriMion Of Well(S) And Facilities — New, Renewal, And Modification
I . Type of injection system:
Heating/cooling water return flow'(5A7)
O'Closed-loop heat pump system (5QM/5QW)
In situ rernediation (51)
Closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection (5L/"Non-Discharge")
E] Other (Specify:
2. Does system use same well for water source and injection? [] Yes No
3. Are there any potential pollution sources that may affect injection? EJ Yes Z No
0, What is/are the pollution source(s)?
a What is the distance of the injection well(s) from the pollution source(s)?
4. What is the minimum distance of proposed injection wells from the property boundary? Approximately 50 ft
5. Quality of drainage at site: []Good Z Adequate El Poor
6. Flooding potential of site: Z Low E] Moderate El High (for injection site itself)
7. For groundwater remediation systems, is the proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring program
(number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring parameters, ete.) adequate? El Yes Z No. Attach
map of existing monitoring well network if applicable, If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program: See VA below.
S. Does the map presented represent the actual site (property lines, wells, gurface drainage)? Z Yes orF� No. If
no or no map, please attach a sketch of the.site. Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution
sources, roads, approximate scale, and north arrow.
9. Iniection Well Permit Renewal And Modification Only;
1. For beal pump systems, are there any abnormalities in heat pump or ii1jection vv-ell operation (e.g. t�rbid -vvater�
filitUre -to assimilate. hijected fluld., poor heating/cooling)?
Yes LINo. Ifyes..c.xplain:
For closed-loopleat pump systems, has systein lost pressure orrequired inake-ul) fluid, si�
or,last inspection?E] Yes 0 NP, 117 ves, explain;
3. For renewal or modification. of groundwater remeAhation -germits (of any type), will
coiitiiiued/addit:ional/rnoLiifie-d injections have'aii adverse impact on migration of the plume or management of
the contamination ineidelif?F� Yes n No. If )Le.& e\plafil
FORM. Andrex Industries.doex 4

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
4, Drillin- contractor: Name:
0
Address:
Certification number:
5. Complete and attach Well Construction Data. Sheet.
FORM: Andrex Industries.docx 5

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
V EVALUATIONAADRECOMMEADATIONS
.1. Provide any additional narrative regarding your review of the application.: On the day of the -site visit, BLE
was repairing many of the injection/recovery and monitoring wells. Some had been paved over while
others had cracked pads as a result of the Milkco expansion and the razing of the Andrex facilities. I
asked Mr. Alexander to inspect each well- thoroughly to insure the casings were still intact. Many of the
monitoring wells in the original network have been abandoned. This should be noted on the UIC
application site maps.
2. Attach Well Construction Data Sheet - if needed information is available:
3. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? 0 Yes Z No. If yes, please explain
briefly.
4. List any items that you would like APS Central Office to obtain through an additional information request.
Make sure that you provide a reason for each item:
I Item I Reason I
I Revised water supply well survey I The existing well survey is essentially an updated version of �
the 1997 survey performed as part of the site assessment
work. That original survey was based on GW-1 records
review and miquiries made to DENR APS and PWS; it was
not a door-to-door survey. A water supply well located at Sky
Lane Bowling, 1477 Patton Ave, Asheville was found to be
impacted with PCE and is located within 1/4radius of Andrex.
Although the PCE source in the well has yet to be
I
determined, that supply well was not found during the initial
1997 survey.
Surface water impacts from more Three different water bodies (Cecil's Spring, Smith Mill
toxic (hazardous) PCE degradation Creek and Bear Creek) contain detectable levels of PCE from
compounds produced by the subject site. Thr, application should include some
dechlorination comments/approach addressing the potential of more
toxic/hazardous PCE-degradation compounds (e.g., vinyl
chloride) entering these surface water bodies as a result of the
injection plan. -
5. List specific Permit conditions that you recommend to be removed from the permit when issued. Make sure
that you provide a reason for each condition:
Condition Reason
6. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules that you recommend to be included in the permit when
issued. Make sure that you provide a reason for each special condition:
FORM: Andrex Industries.docx 6

7.
AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
Condition Reason
Recommendation: Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office; El Hold,
pending review of draft permit by regional office; 0 Issue upon receipt of needed additional infbrination; E]
Issue; L] Deny. If deny, please stqex�ns:
8. Signature of report prepare
Signature of APS regional
Date: August 3, 20 10
ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFFREVIEWITEMS
***It appears that the injectant may meet the definition of an industrial wastewater according to 15A NCAC 2T
.0103(20). ARO recommends that CO obtain an opinion from the Non -Discharge group on whether this injectant can
actually be permitted solely under UIC rules or whether additional review under 2T may be necessary. The applicant
referes to the injectant as a by-producL This issue is more based on rule process than actual toxicological concerns of using,
the injectant. This issue should be addressed prior to issuance of the permit"
FORM: Andrex Industries.docx 7

Rogers, Michael
From: Laverty, Brett
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 9:46 AM
To: Rogers, Michael
Subject: UIC Application W 10100106
Attachments: U IC W 10100106 Regional Staff Report.pdf
Michael,
Here is the UIC staff report for the Andrex facility in Buncombe County.
Brett Laverty
Brett Laverty - brett. lave rty(a--) n cde n r.q ov
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Aquifer Protection Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Notice: E-mail correspondence to and from this address may.be subject to the North Carolina Public Records
Law and therefore may be disclosed to third parties. I
1

Rogers, Michael
N�
From:
Davidson, Landon
Sent:
Wednesday, August 11, 2010 9:47 AM
To:
Risgaard, Jon
Cc:
Rogers, Michael
Subject:
industrial wastewater ?
Attachments:
image002.png
Mornin'Jon-
W1 0100106 is a UIC permit application for groundwater remediation at a site contaminated with PCE in Buncombe Co.
The permit application proposes to inject a 1% milk solution into groundwater to enhance degradation of the PCE. The
milk solution provides a carbon source for existing subsurface microprobes to consume and thus beginning a co -
metabolic reaction to clechlorinate the PCE. Supposedly they did a bench study using site soils and injected the milk
solution causing PCE clechlorination.
So, what is my point? The milk solution is essentially an industrial wastewater and this permit would allow injection of
an industrial wastewater (they refer to it as "by-product"). The solution is essentially untreated tank rinse water from an
adjacent milk processing plant. Seems like they may need another permit or we may need to discuss at a minimum all
together. Thoughts on this?
Landon
G. Landon David lon, P.G.
N C DENP - D iv im o n of Wat er 0 us H t�,
A quite r Pmtc-,tio n Secfj an
Regional APS, Supervisot
A sh evi I 1�, Regi o n:� I Oth C'�
20913 U.S. Hw-i. 7,
Swannanoa, N.C. �--S77_
ph.;
web page: http://h`2� �11.ltate.nc. uslaqw.htm
This e-mail contains a public record which is subject to disclosure to third
parties and the public pursuant North Carolina's Public Records Law. N.C.
Gen. Stat. §132-1, et seg. This e-mail may contain materials prepared
during or in anticipation of a legal proceeding as part of preparation for that
legal proceeding, in which case third party or public access to it is subject to
N. C Gen. Stat. §132-1.9 and may be denied until the conclusion of the legal
proceeding, including the completion of all appeals and post -judgment
proceedings, or, in the case where no legal proceeding has been commenced,
upon the expiration ofall applicable statutes oflimitations and periods of
repose.
1

AOUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
APPLICATION REVIEW REOUEST FORM
Date: July 19, 2010
To':
Landon Davidson, ARO-APS
Art Barnhardt, FRO-APS
Andrew Pitner, MRO-APS
Jay Zimmerman, RRO-APS
From: Michael Rogers Groundwater Protection Unit
Telephone: [phone]
E-Mail. Michael.Roizers(ibncinailm
A. Permit Number: W1 0100106
B. Owner: Former Andrex Industries Facility
0 David May, WaRO-APS .
El Charlie Stehman, WiRO-APS
F� Sherri Knight, W-SRO-APS
r
Fax. [phone]
- ----- ------------- -
F - ----ilityi6p�atan::
'C
Proposed Existing [:1 Facility El Operation
D. Application:
1. Animal F� SFR-SurfaceIrrigationE] Reuse El H-R Infiltration
y
El Recycle El I/E Lagoon El GW Remediation (ND)
For Residuals: - El Land App. El D&M El Surface Disposal
El 503 Ej 503 Exempt F-1 Animal.
2. New [:1 Major Mod. Minor Mod. F1 Renewal El Renewal w/ Mod.
E. Comments/Other Information: Fl. I would like to accompany you on a site visit.
NOTE: - The Permittee is requesting to use of an additive that has not been approved by DENR and is under review.
Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your
review, comment, and/or action. Within, please take the following actions:
Return a Completed APSARR Form and attach laboratory analytical results, if applicable.
F� Attach Well Construction Data.Sheet.
F Attach Attachment B for Certification by the LAPCU.
F Issue an Attachment B Certification from the RO.*
Remember that you will be responsible for coordinating site visits and reviews, as well as additional
information requests with other RO-APS representatives in order to prepare a complete Attachment B for
certification. Refer to the RPP SOP for additional detail.
When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy
of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office -Aquifer Protection Section contact person
listed above.
RO-APS Reviewer: Date:
FORM: APSARR 07/06 Page I of I

IRLE
BUNNELL-LAMMONS ENGINEERING, INC.
GEOTECHNIcAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS CONSULTANTS
VIA EMAIL (PDF)
September 12, 2012
Underground Injection Control Program
DWQ - Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Attention: Mr. Thomas Slusser, L.G.
Program Manager - ,
Subject: Notice of Intent for Milk Solution Injection & Monitoring
[3'd Injection Event and 3 Monitoring Events (2012-2013)]
Former Andrex Industries Facility
180 Deaverview Road
Asheville, North Carolina
Groundwater Incident Number 6586
VMMZ—Tt_MXW W___NWWRX�
Brownfields; Project Number 07022-03-11
BLE Project No. Jl 2-1022-35
Dear Mr. Slusser:
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc. (BLE) is pleased to submit this notice on behalf of Milkco, Inc.
(1\4ilkco) for services associated with the former Andrex Industries Corp. (Andrex) site. This notice
is prepared in compliance with the injection permit issued and requirements specified by the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Water Quality
(DWQ), Aquifer Protection Section (APS), Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program.
Included herein is the background project information, scope of services, and schedule.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
In June 2010, BLE submitted a permit application to the NCDENR UIC program for remediation of the
site's groundwater using milk solution. Subsequent information was requested by the DWQ and that
information was prepared and/or collected, and submitted by BLE in August 2010 and December 2010.
On December 22, 2010, the DWQ­.issued Injection Permit W10100106 to Milkco. The permit requires
special conditions and limitations -including n-dnor modifications to the injection monitoring plan. The
permit effective dates are December 22, 2010 through November 20, 2013 with a renewal option if
subn-dtted 120 days prior to expiration of the permit.
6004 PONDERS COURT PHONE [phone]
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROUNA29615 FAx [phone]

13LIB
Notice of Yd Injection Event & Monitoring — 2012-2013
Former Andrex Industries, Asheville, North Carolina
September 12, 2012
BLE Project Number J12-1022-35
The permit was part of a green/sustainable enhanced bioremediation approach utilizing milk solution. The
injection plan included an injection schedule over 5 years with semi-amual injections planned for the first
two years. BLE proposed to conduct the project in phases with the first phase including two injection
events (and monitoring) within a 12-month period (designated "Year One" in the plan). BLE was retained
by Mi1kco to perform the injection and monitoring services for year one in 2011.
Subsurface injections of milk solution into four former groundwater recovery wells were performed in
June 2011 and September 2011 and monitoring was conducted as plarina The results show that
daughter products of PCE are being created as anticipated. Based on these data, injections during the first
half of 2012 were suspended and monitoring was conducted to determine the results of the 2011 injections
at a 60-day monitoring frequency through July 2012 with annual sampling scheduled for September 2012.
The three most recent monitoring events were performed in March, May, and July 2012. Annual
groundwater and surface water sampling for 2012 is being conducted during the week of September 10,
2012
We received the July monitoring data on July 27a. Based on the results, we recommend the performance
of a third injection event in late September 2012 with a 60-day monitoring frequency through March 2013.
This notice outlines the tasks necessary to conduct the injection and subsequent groundwater monitoring
as required in the approved Brownfields redevelopment plan (et seq.) and the approved UIC permit.
Please note that if the results of the proposed P injection event are similar to that already observed, we
anticipate submitting a permit renewal application and full-scale injection plan by July 30, 2013.
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
Injection
Milk solution will be injected into recovery wells RW-1, -3, and -5. Proposed injectant volumes are
shown on the table below. Injection rates are unknown and will be measured in ' the field. Please
note that it may be necessary to adjust injectant volumes based on observed injection rates.�
Well-
Volume'.
RW-1-'
16'.66b gallon . 9'.—�
RW-�
27,000 gallons
RW-5
24,000 gallons
2

MILE
Notice of 3d Injection Event & Monitoring — 2012-2013
FormerAndrex Industries, Asheville, North Carolina
September 12, 2012
BLE Project Number J12-1022-35
We understand that Milkco will provide a 4,000 gallon capacity tanker (and driver) for this project.
The tanker will be filled with 1% milk solution by Milkco. The volume of milk solution loaded in
the tanker will be metered at the milk recovery system and not measured at the injection well head.
A total of 67,000 gallons of milk solution is required for this injection event. Based on a tanker with
a capacity of 4,000 gallons, a minimum of 17 trips will be required to achieve the specified injection
volume for this event.
Based on the target injection volumes and on our prior work we estimate that a minimum of 2 weeks
will be required to complete the injection event. However, our estimates are based on maximum
injection rates observed during prior event. Clogging of wells by milk solids from prior events may
slow the injection process or require a reduction in total volume injected.
Sampling of the milk solution will be performed three times for quality control purposes. Each
sample will be a three-point composite collected over a single day of injection. The three total
samples will be analyzed for total organic carbon (TOC) by Standard Method SM 53 1 OB.
Monitoring
-Groundwater monitoring will be performed 3 times in injection areas as specified on Table 1. In
general, monitoring will be performed bimonthly at 60-day milestones (November 2012, January
2013, and March 2013). Monitoring frequencies may be adjusted based on results obtained. It may
not be possible to obtai n samples at exact 60-day milestones due to weekends, holidays, inclement
weather, or other delays beyond our control. Samples will be collected as near the milestone dates as
the schedule allows. Sampling will be performed in general accordance with the procedures in
Appendix A.
Groundwater samples will be analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260 MSV Low Level and for
TOC by Standard Method SM 53 1 OB (Table 1). Each sampling event will also include collection
and analysis of a trip blank for quality assurance purposes.
Reporting & Data Evaluation
We will perforin an evaluation of each dataset after receipt from the laboratory. Based on the results
of the monitoring we may recommend additional injection events in 2013, adjust the monitoring
schedule as needed, or more likely, move toward permit renewal and full-scale injection.

Notice of 3d Injection Event & Monitoring — 2012-2013
Former 4ndrex Industries, 4sheville, North Carolina
SCHEDULE
We anticipate the following calendar schedule for feld services:
September 12, 2012
BLE Project Number J12-1022-35
Task Starting Date
Injection Event 3 ................................. Sept. 24, 2012 (concludes by Oct. 5, 2012)
Monitoring Event I .................................................................. November 5, 2012
Monitoring Event 2 ...................................................................... Januar y 7, 2013
Monitoring Event 3 ...................................................................... March 11, 2013
CLOSING
We request that NCDENR provide comments on this notice, if any, prior to initiation of the
proposed injection event scheduled for September 24, 2012. We appreciate the opportunity to work
with the NCDENR on this project. 'If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate
contacting us at [phone].
Sincerely,
BUNNELL-LAmmONs ENGINEERING, INC.
Andrew W. Alex nder, P.G., RSM
Senior Hydrogeologist
CC: Mr. G. Landon Davidson, L.G. — DWQ Asheville
Ms. Tracy Wahl — Brownfields Program Asheville
Mr. Keith Collins, President — Milkoo, Inc.
Attachments: Table I —Injection and Monitoring Matrix
Appendix A — Sampling Procedures
---a
Senior Hydrogeologist
c. Uivalactive projectsUndrex milkco�phase35 3.rd injection and monitoringWotice of 3rd injection & monitoring andrex j12-1022-
35.doc
4

Table 1
Injection & Monitoring Matrix 2012-2013
Andres: Industries
Asheville, North Carolina
NCDENR Groundwater Incident Number 6586
BLE Project No. J12-1022-35
C
C
C
t5
C
>
0
>
0
>
F3
E
N
>
r
RW-1
RW-1
I
x
x
x
MW-6
x
x
x
MW-7
MW_9
x
RW-3
RW-3
I
x
x
x
MW_5
x
x
x
MW-12
x
x
x
MW-24
x
RW-5
RW-5
I
x
x
x
MW-10
x
x
X
RW-6
x
x
x
MW-13
x
AM-14
x
RW-7
RW-7
x
MW-11
x
MW-15
—None
MW-16
MW-17
MW-18
MW-20
MW-21
M -22
MW-23
MW-26
Notes:
I = Injection during the last week ofSeptember 2012.
X = Well sampled for paramaters as shown.
VOC analyses performed by EPA Method 8260 MSV Low Level.
TOC analyses performed by SM Method 53 1013.
It may not be possible to obtain samples at exact milestones
due to weekends, holidays, inclement weather, or other delays beyond our control.
Samples will be collected as near the milestone dates as the schedule allows.
Prepared by: AWA
Table I Monitoring Plan of Injection Monitoring Matrix 2012-2013.xls Checked by: TJB

APPENDIX A
MONITORING WELL PURGING AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES
The monitoring wells will be purged prior to sample collection to remove any stagnant water from
the well so that the samples collected are representative of the groundwater quality in the vicinity of
each well. For wells that recover quickly, a minimum of three volumes of water will be evacuated.
Specific. conductance, pH, and water temperature will be measured periodically during well
evacuation using calibrated instruments. Wells that are evacuated to dryness with less than three
well volumes being removed will be sampled as soon as the well has recovered enough to yield
sufficient volume for a sample.
The monitoring wells will be purged and sampled using a bailer constructed of a 3-foot long, 1.6-
inch diameter bailer attached to an unused polypropylene cord or by peristaltic pump. The recovery
wells and large diameter monitoring wells may be sampled via submersible pump or grab samples
may be collected by bailer without purging. Recovery wells used as injection points will not be
purged. To minimize the potential for cross -contamination between wells, disposable bailers will be
used for purging and sampling. All reusable sampling equipment such as non -disposable bailers and
pumps will be cleaned before use with either laboratory soap and distilled water rinse or by steam
cleaner, or both.
In order to verify the quality of the sample collection, transportation and analyses, quality control
(QC) samples will be collected. QC samples will be collected for VOC analysis. The QC samples
collected may include a sampler rinsate and a trip blank.
A sampler rinsate sample may be collected during sampling. This sample will be collected
following the rinsing of the sampling bailer by pouring deionized or distilled water over and inside
the sampler. A portion of this water will be collected and tested to verify the adequacy of the field
cleaning procedures.
Trip blanks are defined as containers filled with deionized or distilled water which
accompany the field samples during storage and transportation to the laboratory. One trip blank
sample will be analyzed to determine if the storage or handling of the field samples has jeopardized
their integrity. The results of the bailer rinsate and/or trip blank samples will be used for final data
validation purposes.
Field pH, specific conductance and temperature measurements will be made on water samples collected
from the monitoring wells. The samples will be placed in 407ml VOA vials with Teflon lids.
Groundwater samples will be marked with identifying numbers, immediately placed in the sample coolers,
secured, and maintained at less than 4'C. These samples will be shipped in a cooled container by
overnight courier to a North Carolina certified laboratory for analysis. Appropriate chain -of -custody
records will be maintained.

INJECTION EVENT RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality
Permit Number I J 7- 0 100 10 (o
1. Permit Information
WALD
Permittee
'Famcr AAJfe_� -7-V6,A�;t6 Lfa. — 5_41 C 1�
Facility Name
tj (),DWaftz 4L 'MOV
Facility Address
2. Injection Contractor Information
StAAA,z� - UA, wtyLom 1�"ne�Aee_dnd
Injection Contractor / Company Name -J
Street Address IF
__(D� �Wam� �t
6� G(_ zq('gL5-
city State Zip Code
C&t) 2_9i - 17-4,15
Area code - Phone number
3. Well Information
Number of wells used for injection
Well names Fv) - �, 9u) - 31 RL4) - 'Y , RW - T
Were any new wells installed during this injection
event?
El Yes No
If yes, please provide the following information:
Number of Monitoring Wells
Number of Injection Wells
Type of Well Installed (Check applicable type):
R Bored El Drilled 0 Direct -Push
0 Hand -Augured E] Other (specify)
Please include two copies offorin GW-1bJbr each
well installed.
Were any wells abandoned during this injection
event?
F-1 Yes EL No
if yes, please provide the following information:
Number of Monitoring Wells
Number of Injection Wells
Please include two copies of the GW-30for each
well abandoned.
4. Injectant Information
rt. mjt(�
injectant Type
Concentration
If the injectant is diluted please indicate the source
dilution fluid. LA)4,�-o-
Total Volume Injected 39 45-0
Volume Injected per well 3,100 —
5. Injection History
Injection date(s) 9- Zol 1 4�" to - zo t(
Injection number (e.g. 3 of 5 4-7,
Is this the last injection at this site?
El Yes 9 No
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL THE
INFORMATION ON THIS FORM IS CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF My KNOWLEDGE AND THAT THE
INJECTION WAS PERFORMED WITHIN THE
SiANDARDS LAID OUT IN THE PERMIT.
OF INJECTION CONTRACTOR DATE
PRINT NAME OF PERSON PERFORMING TRE INJECTION
Submit the original of this form to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days of injection.
Attn: UIC Program, 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636, Phone No. 919-733-3221
Form UIC-IER
Rev. 07/09

Rogers, Michael
From: Andrew W. Alexander [[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 3:19 PM
To: Rogers, Michael; Davidson, Landon
Cc: Wahl, Tracy; 'Nisbeth, Ben (blecorp)'; Collins, Keith (Milkco)
Subject: Injection Event Record 2011-2 for Andrex UIC Permit W1 0100106
Attachments: 1022-31 Andrex Injection NCDENR Event Record 2011-2.pdf
Hello Everyone,
I have attached the Injection Event Record form for the second injection event (designated
2011-2) at the subject site. If the DWQ needs a hard copy of the form, please contact
me.
The 30-day sampling event is schedule d for November 9, 2011 with 60- and 90-day
sampling thereafter.
We will determine the need for subsequent injections in 2012 based on our 2011 analysis
results. I anticipate issuing an interim report in the first quarter of 2012.
FYI, Buddy Gaither has retired and Keith Collins has taken his position at Milkco, Inc.
Please contact me if you have any questions. --Andy
From: Andrew W. Alexander rmailto:andy(ftlecorp.coml
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 20112:07 PIVI
To: Rogers, Michael; Davidson, Landon
Cc: Wahl, Tracy (NCDWM); Gaither, Buddy (Milkco); Nisbeth, Ben (blecorp)
Subject: Injection Event Record 2011-1 for Andrex UIC Permit WIOIOO106
Hello Everyone,
I have attached the Injection Event Record form for the first injection event (designated
2011 -1) at the subject site. If the IDWQ needs a hard copy of the form, please contact
me.
The 30-day sampling event is scheduled for July 21, 2011 with 60- and 90-day sampling
thereafter. We anticipate performing the second injection event in October 2011. Please
contact me if you have any questions. --Andy
Origin_ "Iessagei_­
rom- Andrew-W. Alexander
- - - --------- --- --- ------ -- ------- -
To: Rogers, Michael ; Davidson, Landon
Cc: Wahl, Tracy (NCDWM) ; Gaither, Buddy (Milkco) ; Nisbeth, Ben (bleco
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 10:23 AM
Subject: Injection Notice for Andrex UIC Permit W1 0100106
Hello Michael and Landon,

Per Michael's request, this email serves as documentation of 6otice via telephone (on
May 26, 2011) of intent to begin injection activities at the Former Andrex property (UIC
.Permit No. W10100106) on or about Tuesday, May 31, 2011 at 9:00 AM.
Please contact either Ben Nisbeth (828-545-3414) or me (info below), if you have any
questions. --Andy
cc: Project File
Andrew W. Alexander, P.G., RSM
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc. (BLE)
6004 Ponders Court
Greenville, South Carolina 29615
[phone] (voice)
[phone] (fax)
[phone] (cell)
andy(a-)-blecorp.com
www.blecorp.com
This electronic transmission con * tains information from the consulting firm of Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc., that may be confidential or privileged. The
information is intended solely for the recipient. Use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone
(864-288-1265) or by email (infoP-blecorp.com). Thank you for your cooperation.
2

IRL13
Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc.
r-1
6004 Ponders Court
Greenville, South Carolina 29615
Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO: Underground Injection Control Program
NC Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Rogers, PG — CD only
CC: Mr. Keith Collins — Milkeo, Inc. — No Copies
Ms. Tracy Wahl — NCDENR--Brownfields - No Copies
Mr. Ben Nisbeth — BLE Asheville - No Copies
Mr. Landon Davidson — NCDENR--DWQ — No Copies
Mr. Mark Pinkston — Van Winkle — No Copies
DATE: July 17,2012
RE: Andrex Industries Corp.
2012 Groundwater and Surface Water Report
.0
UIC Permit?*o. WIOIOO106
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
I
N Attached El Under separate cover via: U.S. MAIL
* Report on CD El Prints 0 Change order El Letter
* Other El W.A.S. [--] Plans El Samples
El Proposal El Preliminary Data:
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
El For approval 0 For your use 0 As requested El Other
Number of copies: As specified above.
REMARKS: Michael,
El Copy of report
El Specifications
El For review and comment
As in prior years, I have enclosed one CD of the subject report. Hard copies of the Interim
Evaluation Report and Permit Renewal for the injection will I submitted to your office when
DR
published.
RECEIVERENR/M
JUL 2 2 2011-3
Andrew W. AleAnder, P.G.
Senior Hydrogeologist
c:\awa\active projects\64444plAwrWo �%4"01 2\transmittal 2012 gw report rogers.doc

IBLEINC.
Bunnell-Larnmons Engineering, Inc.
6004 Ponders Court
Greenville, South Carolina 29615
Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO: Underground Injection Control Program
NC Division of Water Quality,'
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 276"-1636
ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Rogers, PG — CD only
K)IDIOD10(2
CC: Mr. Keith Collins — Milkco, Inc. — No Copies
Ms. Tracy Wahl — NCDENR--Brownfields - No Copies
Mr. Ben Nisbeth — BLE Asheville - No Copies
Mr. Landon Davidson — NCDENR--DWQ — No Copies
Mr. Mark Pinkston — Van Winkle — No Copies
DATE: March 5,2012
RE: Andrex Industries Corp.
2011 Groundwater and Surface Water Report
UIC Permit No. W10100106
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
0 Attached E] Under separate cover via: U.S. MAIL
0 Report on CD 0 Prints Change order 0 Letter
El other El W.A.S. Plans El Samples
El Proposal El Preliminary Data:
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
El For approval 0 For your use 0 As requested El Other
Number of copies: As specified above.
REMARKS: Michael,
El Copy of report
El Specifications
El For review and comment
As we discussed on the phone today, I have enclosed one CD of the subject reporL Hard copies of the
Interim Evaluation Report for the injection will be submitted to your office when published. .
RECEIVERENR/M At/
MAR 0 7 2012 Andrew W. AleAnder, P.G.
Senior Hydrogeologist
Aquifer Protection Section
c:\awa\active projects%andr�x niilkco\phase32 gw samp 201 1\transmittal 2011 gw report rogers.doc

C3