WI0100089_Complete File - Historical_20120113

5r0- \ j
r_____—_- ----
._._..__.__--_ RM
-
E NGINEERING 8c H YDROGEOLOGY
231 HAYWOOD STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
WWW.ALTAMONTENVIRONM[NTAL.COM
January 13, 2012''`.'
Mr. Thomas Slusser x1ft r
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality E
Underground Injection Program
r
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Subject: Application for Renewal of Existing Injection Permit
Tyco Electronics Corporation, Fairview, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Slusser:
Altamont Environmental, Inc. (Altamont) on behalf of Tyco Electronics Corporation (TEC) is requesting the
renewal of the injection permit obtained on June 21, 2010, permit number W10100089. The appropriate
sections of the renewal application are included. This letter serves as the status report.
Altamont conducted a sodium permanganate injection pilot test at the TEC facility located at 1396 Charlotte
Highway in Fairview, North Carolina in the summer of 2010.
The following summarizes all of the injection activity reports to date. The reports were prepared for TEC by
Altamont and submitted to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). Please refer to
these documents for further detail including the monitoring results for all injection activities.
• Pilot Test Work Plan submitted on December 23, 2009
• Underground Injection Control (UIC) Permit Application submitted on March 24, 2010
• Issuance of Injection Permit W10100089 received on June 21, 2010
• Sodium Permanganate Injection Pilot Test Report submitted on February, 28, 2011
Based on the results of the injection pilot test, sodium permanganate remains in the water column of the
injection well, RW-07. In order to address the potential excess permanganate Altamont contacted Mr.
Landon Davidson, DENR Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Asheville Regional Office Aquifer Protection Section
Supervisor. The first step is to extract and temporarily store the excess sodium permanganate and agitate
the water column within RW-07. Mr. Davidson stated that only a permit renewal would need to be obtained
for this first step. After the first step is completed, we will assess the injection well and surrounding
observation, monitoring, and recovery wells to determine if a permit modification will need to be obtained for
future injection activities.
A building with a secondary containment curb is currently being constructed in order to temporarily store the
excess sodium permanganate. Upon completion of the building, the first step described above will be
conducted.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test_2010\UIC Application\NCDENR-Permit Renewal Status Report.Doc

r_-
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
• Do not use this form for remediation systems that extract contaminated groundwater, treat it, and reinject the treated groundwater.
• Submit TWO copies of the completed application and all attachments to the address on the last page of this form.
• Any changes made to this form will result in the application package being returned.. =-
Application Number (to be completed by DWQ):
I. GENERAL INFORMATION: Q0
1. Applicant's Name (generally the responsible party): Tyco Electronics Corporation
2. Signing Official's Name*: Richard J. Suminski Title:_ Vice President & Deputy GenerabCounsel_Y
* Signing Official must be in accordance with instructions in part VI on page 7.
3. Mailing address of applicant: Glen Foster, Tyco Electronics Corporation, P.O. Box 3608, M/S 038-34
II.
City: Harrisburg State: Pennsylvania Zip: 17105-3608
Telephone number: 717-986-7916 Fax number: 717-985-2683
4. Property Owner's Name (if different from Applicant): Same as Applicant
5. Property Owner's mailing address:_ Same as Applicant
City: Same as Applicant State: Same as Applicant Zip: Same as Applicant
6. Name and address of contact person who can answer questions about the proposed injection project:
Name: Christopher Gilbert Title: Project Engineer
Company:_ Altamont Environmental, Inc.
Address: 231 Haywood Street
City: Asheville State: NC Zip: 28801
Telephone number: 828-281-3350 Fax number: 828-281-3351
Email Address: [e-mail]
PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Project is: ( New ( Modification of existing permit X Renewal of existmgapermitwithout°modifcat o
( Renewal of existing permit with modification
2. If this application is being submitted for renewal or modification to an existing permit, provide:
existing permit number WI0100089 and the issuance date June 21, 2010
For renewal without modifications, fill out sections I & H only, sign the certification on the last page of this
form, and obtain the property owner's signature to indicate consent (if the applicant is not the owner).
For all renewals, submit a status report including monitoring results of all injection activities to date.
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 1 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PEK""ai—AT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A W ELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
VI. CERTIFICATION (to be signed as required below or by that person's authorized agent)
NCAC 15A 2C .0211(b) requires that all permit applications shall be signed as follows:
1. for a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer
2. for a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively
3. for a municipality or a state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or
ranking publicly elected official
4. for all others: by the well owner.
If an authorized agent is signing on behalf of the applicant, then supply a letter signed by the applicant that
names and authorizes their agent.
I hereby certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information
submitted in this document and all attachments therein, and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals
immediately responsible for obtaining said information, I believe that the information is true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are penalties, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment, for submitting
false information. I agree to construct, operate, maintain, repair, and if applicable, abandon the injection well(s)
and all related appurtenances in accordance with the approved specifications and conditions of the Permit.
Printed Name and
Signature:
Date: t -
VH. CONSENT OF PROPERTY OWNER (if the property is not owned by the applicant)
("Owner" means any person who holds the fee or other property rights in the well being constructed. A well is
real property and its construction on land shall be deemed to vest ownership in the land owner, in the absence of
contrary agreement in writing.)
As owner of the property on which the injection well(s) are to be constructed and operated, I hereby consent to
allow the applicant to construct each injection well as outlined in this application and agree that it shall be the
responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the injection well(s) conform to the Well Construction Standards
(Title 15A NCAC 2C .0200).
Printed Name and Title: Not applicable; Property is owned by applicant
Signature:
Submit TWO copies of the completed application package, including all attachments, to:
UIC Program
Aquifer Protection Section
North Carolina DENR-DWQ _
1636 Mail Service Center 0 ' E [IV G 1 $'°��r � 1
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Telephone [phone]- , -7; o
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 7 of 7

INFORMATION
FROM
ORIGINAL,
PERMIT
APPLICATION

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
• Do not use this form for remediation systems that extract contaminated groundwater, treat it, and reinject the treated groundwater.
• Submit TWO copies of the completed application and all attachments to the address on the last page of this form.
• Any changes made to this form will result in the application package being returned.
Application Number (to be completed by DWQ): J-of
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's Name (generally the responsible party): Tyco Electronics Corporation (TEC)
2. Signing Official's Name*: Richard J. Suminski Title: VP Deputy General Counsel, CCO, TEC
* Signing Official must be in accordance with instructions in part VI on page 7.
3. Mailing address of applicant: P.O. Box 3608, M/S 140-42
City: Harrisburg State: Pennsylvania Zip: 17105-3608
Telephone number: 717-986-7916 Fax number: 717-985-2683
4. Property Owner's Name (if different from Applicant): Same as Applicant
5. Property Owner's mailing address: Same as At)ylicant
City: Same as Applicant State: Same as Applicant Zip: Same as Applicant
6. Name and address of contact person who can answer questions about the proposed injection project:
Name: Alec Macbeth Title: Project Geologist
Company: Altamont Environmental, Inc.
Address: 231 Haywood Street
City: Asheville State: NC Zip: 28801
Telephone number: 828-281-3350 Fax number: 828-281-3351
Email Address: amacbethAaltamontenvironmental.com
II. PERMIT INFORMATION: RpR �0
M nTFrrF�R���Q
1. Project is: X New El Modification of existing permit ©$ ew, (o g permit without modification
❑ Renewal of existing permit with modification �U
2. If this application is being submitted for renewal or modification to an existing permit, provide:
existing permit number N/A and the issuance date N/A
For renewal without modifications, fill out sections I & II only, sign the certification on the last page of this
form, and obtain the property owner's signature to indicate consent (if the applicant is not the owner).
For all renewals, submit a status report including monitoring results of all injection activities to date.
RECEIVED / DENR / DWQ
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T AQUIFFR PRnTFCTinN gPCTION Page 1 of 7
MAY 2 5 1010

AQUA RECEIVED / DENR / DWQ
State of North Carolina
�FCTIOIy
Department of Environment and Natural Resources MAN y 4 CUB(/
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(SY FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
• Do not use this form for rem diation systems that extract contaminated groundwater, treat it, and reinjq6t the treated groundwater.
• Submit TWO copies of the co leted application and all attachments to the address on the last page f this form.
• Any changes made to this form 11 result in the application package being returned.
Application Numbel,(to be completed by DWQ):
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's Name (generally the ressible party): Tvco
2. Signing Official's Name*: Glens ster Title: Director,
* Signing Official ust be in accordance with
3. Mailing address of applicant: P.O. Box 3 08 MIS 140-42
City: Harrisburg State:
Telephone number: 717-986-7916
4. Property Owner's Name (if different from Appli
5. Property Owner's mailing
City: Same as Applicant State: Same alApplicant
6. Name and address of contact person who/canswer questions
Name: Alec Macbeth
Company: Altamont Environme 1 Inc.
Address: 231 Havwood Stree
in part VI on page 7.
Zip: 17105-3608
Fax number: 717-985-2683
Zip: Same as Applicant
proposed injection project:
_ Title: Project Geologist
City: Asheville StatV28
Telephone number: 828-28 -3350 Fax number:-
Email Address: amack/ethQaltamontenvironmental.com
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
Zip: 28801
1. Project is: X New ❑ Modification of existing permit ❑ Renewal of existing permit without modification
❑ Renewal of existing permit with modification
2. If this application is being submitted for renewal or modification to an existing permit, provide:
existing permit number N/A and the issuance date N/A
For renewal without modifications, fill out sections I & H only, sign the certification on the last page of this
form, and obtain the property owner's signature to indicate consent (if the applicant is not the owner).
For all renewals, submit a status report including monitoring results of all injection activities to date.
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 1 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PL,, °IIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE n -:VELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells — In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
III. INCIDENT & FACILITY DATA
A. FACILITY INFORMATION
1. Facility name: Tyco Electronics Corporation
2. Complete physical address of the facility: 1396 Charlotte Highway
City: Fairview County: Buncombe State: NC Zip: 28730
B. INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
1. Describe the source of the contamination: The groundwater contamination is in result to a former solvent
disposal area in the northwest corner of the manufacturing building. Primary contaminants are chlorinated
solvents and degradation by-products (for example, tetrachloroethene (PCE), trichloroethene (TCE), and cis-1,2-
dichloroethene (1,2-DCE)). Additional discussion on site history and impacted groundwater is included in
Attachment A.
2. List all contaminants present in soils or groundwater at the site (contaminants may be listed in groups, e.g.,
gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, fuel oil, chlorinated ethenes, chlorinated ethanes, metals, pesticides/herbicides, etc):
Chlorinated volatile organic compounds, including PCE, TCE, and cis-1,2-DCE; also 1,1,2-
trichlorotrifluoroethane, and dichlorodifluoromethane,
3. Has LNAPL or DNAPL ever been observed at the site (even if outside the injection zone)?
❑ Yes If yes, list maximum measured separate phase thickness feet
X No If no, list maximum concentration of total VOCs observed at site: approximately 15,000 ppb
4. Agency managing the contamination incident:
❑ UST Section ❑ Superfund Section (including REC Program and DSCA sites)
❑ DWQ Aquifer Protection Section ❑ Solid Waste Section
❑ Hazardous Waste Section X Other: Division of Waste Management; Super -fund,
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
5. Incident managers name Robert Ludy and phone number 919-508-8400
6. Incident number or other site number assigned by the agency managing the contamination incident:
NCDO03163730
C. PERMITS
List all permits or construction approvals that have been issued for the facility or incident, including those not
directly related to the proposed injection operation:
1. Hazardous Waste Management program permits under RCRA: NCD099216798
2. DWQ Non -Discharge or NPDES permits: NCO033227
3. County or DEH subsurface wastewater disposal permits: None
4. Other environmental permits required by state or federal law: NCGNE0244
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 2 of 7

APPLICATION FOR Ply,, IIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE H -vJELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
IV. INJECTION DATA
A. INJECTION FLUID DATA
1. List all proposed injectants.
NOTE: Any substance to be injected as a tracer or to promote in situ remediation must be reviewed by the
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section (GEES) of the Division of Public Health, Department of
Health and Human Services. Review the list of approved injectants or contact the UIC Program to determine if
the injectants you are proposing have been reviewed by OEES.
Injectant: RemOx® L ISCO Reagent (Sodium Permanganate; manufactured and supplied by Carus
CorporationL_
Concentration at point of injection: approximately 10%
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants: N/A
Ini
Concentration at point of injection: N/A
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants: N/A
Concentration at point of injection: N/A
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants: N/A
Injectant: N/A
Concentration at point of injection: N/A
Percent if in a mixture with other injectants: N/A
2. Source of fluids used to dilute or chase the injectants listed above:
❑ None
X Municipal water'supply
❑ Groundwater from private well or any well within 'Amile of injection site
❑ Air
❑ Other:
3. If any well within 'Amile of injection site, a private well, or surface water is to be used as the fluid source, supply
the following information:
a. Location/ID number of
b. Depth of source: N/A
c. Formation: 1
d. Rock/Sediment type:
e. In Attachment C, provide a current, complete chemical analysis of the water from the source well, including
analyses for all contaminants suspected or historically recognized in soil or groundwater on the site.
NOTE: If contaminated groundwater is to be used as the dilution or chase fluid, this is not the proper permit
application form. You must apply for a closed -loop groundwater remediation permit using application form
GWRS.
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 3 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PL-_°°IIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
B. PROPOSED OPERATING PARAMETERS
1. Duration of Injection: up to 2 days
a. Maximum number of separate injection events: 1
b. Expected duration of each injection event: 2 days
c. Expected duration between events (if more than one event): N/A
2. Injection rate per well: approximately 1 to 2 gallons per minute (gpm)
3. Total Injection volume: approximately 1,000 gallons per day (gpd); N/A gallons per event (if
separate events)
4. Injection pressure: to be determined pounds/square inch (psi)
5. Temperature at point of injection: room temperature OF
6. Briefly describe how the above parameters will be measured and controlled: The discharge volume will be
metered to ensure that the required volume is injected. A pressure valve will be installed at the wellhead to
monitor pressure.
7. Estimated hydraulic capacity of the well: 2 gpm
C. INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA
1. Injection will be via:
X Existing well(s) proposed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through (6) below to the best of
your knowledge.
❑ Proposed well(s) to be constructed for use as an injection well. Provide the data in (2) through (6) below as
proposed construction specifications.
2. Well Drilling Contractor's Name: Miller Drilling Company
NC Well Contractor Certification number: Ron Garrish (driller)
3. Date to be constructed: April 2001 Number of borings: 1
Approximate depth of each boring (feet):50
4. Screened interval/Injection interval of injection wells:
Depth: _30_ to _50_ feet below ground surface (if multiple intervals, indicate shallowest and deepest depth).
5. Well casing (N/A if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: X PVC ❑ Stainless steel ❑ Other:
Casing depth: _0 to 30 ft.
6. Grout (N/A if injection is through direct push rods):
Type: X Cement X Bentonite ❑ Other:
Grout depth: 0 to 28 ft.
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 4 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PLC 112,111IT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE h .VELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
V. ATTACHMENTS
Provide the following items as separate attachments with the given headings:
A. SITE HISTORY
Provide a brief description of the site history including:
(1) site usage historically and present,
(2) origin of the contamination,
(3) previous remedial action(s).
NOTE: G.S. 89E-18 requires that any geologic plans, reports, or documents in which the performance is related to the
public welfare or safeguarding of the environment be prepared by a licensed geologist or subordinate under their
direction. G.S. 89E-13 requires that all drawings, reports, or documents involving geologic work prepared or approved
by a licensed geologist, or a subordinate under their direction, be signed and sealed by the licensed geologist.
B. HYDROGEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
Provide a hydrogeologic description, soils description, and cross section of the subsurface to a depth that includes the
known or projected depth of contamination. The hydrogeologic description shall include:
(1) the regional geologic setting;
(2) significant changes in lithology;
(3) the hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity, and specific yield of the aquifer to be.used for injection, including a
description of the test(s) used to determine these parameters; and
(4) the depth to the mean seasonal high water table.
C. INJECTION FLUID COMPOSITION
Describe the chemical, physical, biological and radiological characteristics of each injectant. Attach the Material Safety
Data Sheet (MSDS) for each injectant. If a private well or a well within'/4 mile of the injection site is used as the source
well, include chemical analysis of source fluid here.
D. INJECTION RATIONALE
Attach a brief description of the rationale for selecting the injectants and concentrations proposed for injection, including:
(1) goals of the injection project;
(2) explanation and/or calculations of how the proposed injectant volume and concentration were determined;
(3) a description of the reactions between the injectants and the contaminants present including specific breakdown
products or intermediate compounds that may be formed by the injection; and
(4) summary results of modeling or testing performed to investigate the injectant's potential or susceptibility to change
(biological, chemical or physical) in,the subsurface.
E. INJECTION PROCEDURE AND EQUIPMENT
Provide a detailed description of all planned activities related to the proposed injection including but not limited to:
(1) construction plans and materials;
(2) operation procedures;
(3) a detailed diagram of the surface and subsurface portions of the system; and
(4) a planned injection schedule.
Revised 6/09 UIC-5I/5T Page 5 of 7

APPLICATION FOR P _MT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE -,dELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
F. MONITORING PLAN
Provide a plan for monitoring the results of the injection, including:
(1) a list of existing and proposed monitoring wells to be used;
(2) a list of monitoring parameters and analytical methods to be used; and
(3) a schedule for sampling to monitor the proposed injection.
NOTE: The selected monitoring wells must be located so as to detect any movement of injection fluids, process by-
products, or formation fluids outside the injection area or zone. The monitoring parameters should include the target
contaminants as well as secondary or intermediate contaminants which may result from the injection and other
parameters which may serve to indicate the progress of the intended reactions, such as pH, ORP, dissolved oxygen, and
other electron acceptors and donors. The monitoring schedule should be consistent with the pace of the anticipated
reactions and rate of transport of the injectants and contaminants.
G. WELL DATA
Provide a tabulation of data on all existing or abandoned wells within 1/4 mile of the injection well(s) which penetrate the
proposed injection zone, including, but not limited to, monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection wells.
Such data shall include a description of each well's use (water supply, monitoring, etc), total depth, screened or open
borehole depth interval, and well construction or abandonment record, if available.
H. MAPS
Attach the following scaled, site -specific maps:
(1) Area map based on the most recent USGS 7.5' topographic map of the area, at a scale of 1:24,000 and
showing the location of the proposed injection site.
(2) Site map including:
a. all property boundaries;
b. all buildings within the property boundary;
c. existing and proposed injection wells or well field(s)
d. any existing sources of potential or known groundwater contamination, including waste storage,
treatment or disposal systems within 1/4 mile of the injection well or well system;
e. all surface water bodies within'/4 mile of the injection well or well system; and
f. all existing or abandoned wells within 1/4 mile of the injection well(s) which penetrate the proposed
injection zone, including, but not limited to, monitoring wells and wells proposed for use as injection
wells.
(3) Potentiometric surface map(s) including:
a. direction of groundwater movement
b. existing and proposed monitoring wells
c. existing and proposed injection wells
(4) Contaminant plume map(s) including:
a. the horizontal extent of the contaminant plume, including isoconcentration lines
b. existing and proposed monitoring wells
c. existing and proposed injection wells
(5) Cross-section(s) to the known or projected depth of contamination, including:
a. horizontal -and vertical extent of the contaminant plume, including isoconcentration lines
b. major changes in lithology
c. existing and proposed monitoring wells
d. existing and proposed injection wells
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 6 of 7

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL(S) FOR INJECTION
Type 5I Wells —In Situ Groundwater Remediation / Type 5T Wells — Tracer Injection
VI. CERTIFICATION (to be signed as required below or by that person's authorized agent)
NCAC 15A 2C .0211(b) requires that all permit applications shall be signed as follows:
I . for a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer
2. for a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively
3. for a municipality or a state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or
ranking publicly elected official
4. for all others: by the well owner.
If an authorized agent is signing on behalf of the applicant, then supply a letter signed by the applicant that
names and authorizes their agent.
I hereby certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information
submitted in this document and all attachments therein, and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals
immediately responsible for obtaining said information, I believe that the information is true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware that there are penalties, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment, for submitting
false information. I agree to construct, operate, maintain, repair, and if applicable, abandon the injection well(s)
and all related appurtenances in accordance with the approved specifications and conditions of the Permit.
Printed Name and Title: Richard J . Suminsky' ,, VP Deputy General Counsel
Signature:( 4y` -� H 9 e I Date: 3/ 19/ 10
VII. CONSENT OF PROPERTY OWNER (if the property is not owned by the applicant)
"Owner" means any person who holds the fee or other property rights in the well being constructed A well is
rea erty and its construction on land shall be deemed to vest ownership in the land owner, in the absence of
contrary agrewwnt in writing.)
As owner of the property on h the injection well(s) are to be constructed and operated, I hereby consent to
allow the applicant to construct eac tion well as outlined in this application and agree that it shall be the
responsibility of the applicant to ensure that ection we11(s) conform to the Well Construction Standards
(Title 15A NCAC 2C .0200).
Printed Name and Tit]
Signature:
Submit TWO copies of the completed application package, including all attachments, to:
UIC Program RECEIVED !DENR /DWQ
Aquifer Protection Section
North Carolina DENR-DWQ AMIF;:R PP0 TFr'T10hi cFCTION
1636 Mail Service Center MAR 9 4 Z lU
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Telephone [phone]
Revised 6/09 UIC-51/5T Page 7 of 7

Application for Permit to a Well for Injection (Form UIC-5�, ,-) March 22, 2010
on Behalf of Tyco Electronics Corporation in Fairview, NC
Application for Permit to Use a Well
for Injection (Form UIC-515T)
on Behalf of
Tyco Electronics
in Fairview, NC
March 22, 2010
Corporation
�7
Christopher F. Gilbert, PE
Alec Macbeth, PG
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test 2009\UIC Application\UIC Report Cover And TOC.Docx

E N G IN E E R ING & HYDROGEOLOGY
231 HAYWOOD STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
WWW.ALTA MONTENVI RON M ENTAL.COM
ATTACHMENTS FOR THE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONTRUCT AND/OR USE A WELL FOR
INJECTION
TYCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION (TEC)
FAIRVIEW, NORTH CAROLINA
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test_2009\UIC Application\Attachments Narrative.Docx

Attachments for UIC App' B a"don
TEC Fairview, NC
Attachment A —Site History
Tyco Electronics Corporation (TEC) wishes to perform a pilot test injection of sodium
permanganate to evaluate the potential of utilizing the technology to design a full-scale
source area treatment system. TEC has contracted Altamont Environmental, Inc.
(Altamont), based in Asheville, North Carolina, as their consultant. The TEC site (formerly
known as Communications Instruments, Inc.) is located at 1396 Charlotte Highway (US
Route 74), in Fairview, North Carolina (Figure 1; all referenced figures in this attachment
are presented in Attachment H). TEC formerly manufactured relays (electronic and
electromechanical switches). Currently, the facility is used for assembly of electronic
components. A Site Plan showing all monitoring wells and recovery wells on -site is shown
on Figure 2. A pilot test site plan, showing the proposed injection location, pre-existing
groundwater monitoring locations, detected groundwater -quality data from recent
sampling, and other site features in the area of the proposed pilot test, is included as
Figure 3.
Environmental assessment activities have been performed at the facility since the early
1990s. Altamont currently collects groundwater samples from selected monitoring wells
at the site as part of a semiannual groundwater and surface water monitoring program.
The most recent sampling event was in November 2009 (as documented in Altamont's Fall
2009 Semi Annual Progress Report, dated February 8, 2010). These data are considered
the most representative of current site conditions; they are referenced frequently in this
UIC Application.
The environmental work indicates that chlorinated solvents and associated breakdown
products are present in the groundwater under much of the site at concentrations above
associated North Carolina groundwater standards, as promulgated in 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC) 2L.0202 (2L Standards). In addition to the semiannual
monitoring, there is also active groundwater pump -and -treat remediation occurring at the
site. Five recovery wells are located onsite and are shown on Figure 2. Two clustered
extraction wells, RW-06 and RW-07, are located in the northwest corner of the
manufacturing building in the area of a former solvent disposal area. These wells contain
the highest concentrations of chlorinated volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Recovery
wells RW-01, RW-02, and RW-04 are located downgradient of RW-06 and RW-07 and
provide mass recovery and aid in reducing movement of contamination off -site.
Historically RW-03 has contained the lowest concentrations of chlorinated solvents and is
mostly used for groundwater hydraulic control. The impacted groundwater is treated on -
site using air stripping and carbon adsorption techniques. Important aspects of the
environmental conditions and activities at the site are described in the following bullets.
• The major sources of groundwater contamination are 1) a former solvent disposal
area, located in the northwest corner of the TEC facility; 2) former burn and acid
pits located in the northern parking lot; and 3) a former septic system leach field
adjacent to Cane Creek, in the eastern part of the site, near the current
groundwater remediation building.
Groundwater has been categorized into three hydrogeologic zones: (1) the
unconsolidated regolith, (2) the partially weathered bedrock, and (3) the bedrock.
The zones are hydraulically connected. At most parts of the site, the hydraulic
gradient between these zones is upward. Groundwater flow in all three zones is
approximately southeast. (The hydrogeology at the site is discussed further in
Attachment B.)
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test 2009\UIC Application\Attachments Narrative.Docx

Attachments for UIC AppV._.�Lion
TEC Fairview, NC
Site -wide, there are 44 monitoring wells/piezometers in the groundwater -quality
monitoring network. There are seven recovery wells. These wells are screened in
all three of the water -bearing zones. Figure 3 shows the wells near the proposed
injection/pilot test area, RW-06, RW-07, MW-03, MW-17, MW-25, and MW-26. Table
1 (all tables are included in Attachment G) summarizes construction information for
the wells.
• The groundwater (in all three hydrogeologic zones) shows relatively high
concentrations of chlorinated solvents near RW-06 and RW-07. Table 2 summarizes
the analytical results from pertinent wells from the fall 2009 sampling event. Table
3 summarizes field parameters from that sampling event.
The -following summary shows the maximum detected concentrations of the constituents
that exceeded the 2L Standards during the November 2009 sampling event. The
maximum concentrations of two of the five constituents exceeding the 2L Standards were
detected in RW-07. Altamont proposes using this well as the injection well for the pilot
test (as described further below).
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results Exceeding 2L Standards
Sampling
NCAC 2L
Results
Location of
Standard
Concentrations
Maximum
Constituent
(µg/L)
(µg/L)
Concentration
1,1-Dichloroethene
7
23.9 - 133
RW-01
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
70
77.8 - 216
PZ-D4
Tetrachloroethene
0.7
1.0 - 971
RW-04
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
200
234 - 577
RW-07
Trichloroethene
2.8
5 - 7,810
RW-07
Figure 4 shows the distribution of the volatile organic compound (VOC) contaminants in
the groundwater as interpreted from the November 2009 sampling.
On the basis of these conditions, TEC wishes to evaluate remediation technologies that will
complement the operating pump -and -treat system and more aggressively address the
groundwater contamination. Altamont, on behalf of TEC, will perform a pilot test and
apply an in -situ chemical oxidation technology near the first source area described above
(near RW-6 and RW-7; Figure 3) to reduce the source area contamination. ISCO uses non-
specific oxidizers that react rapidly with (naturally occurring) organic substrates and
contaminants in the aquifer environment. The oxidation reactions involve breaking
chemical bonds and removing electrons. Several oxidants have been effectively used to
degrade contaminants in groundwater remediation projects, including sodium
permanganate, potassium permanganate, fenton's reagent (hydrogen peroxide with ferric
iron), ozone, peroxone, and persulfate.
These oxidants vary in stability, efficacy in degrading specific compounds or groups of
compounds, handling requirements, and safety concerns.
For this pilot test, sodium permanganate will be used as the ISCO agent. This oxidizer has
been demonstrated to be effective in oxidizing chlorinated ethenes, such as the primary
contaminants detected in the groundwater at the site. Its effectiveness in oxidizing non-
ethene compounds that have been identified in the groundwater, such as
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test 2009\UIC Application\Attachments Narrative.Docx

Attachments for UIC App�:".-.:'tion
TEC Fairview, NC
dichlorodifluoromethane and 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane, are less well documented. The
pilot test should provide data on the efficacy of sodium permanganate in oxidizing these
compounds at the site. Sodium permanganate is relatively stable, so it can persist in the
aquifer. Unlike a related compound, potassium permanganate, sodium permanganate can
be shipped to the site in a liquid form, which facilitates adequate mixing. It has a higher
solubility and can be applied in a more concentrated solution. And, the material is
relatively easy to handle, in contrast to potassium permanganate.
The pilot test will be performed to evaluate the efficacy of the sodium permanganate in
reducing groundwater contamination at the site. In addition to indicating whether the
ISCO will be effective, the pilot study will provide the following information for full-scale
design, as follows:
• Appropriate injection -well point spacing
• Injection parameters, such as oxidant concentrations, injection rates, temperatures,
pressures, zones of influence, and injection volumes
• Potential negative influences of the sodium permanganate (such as increased
metals mobility and incomplete degradation of contaminants)
The existing recovery well, RW-07, will be used as the injection well for the pilot test. This
well is an active recovery well at the site and has consistently showed relatively high
concentrations of chlorinated ethenes. Its common pumping rate is one to three gallons
per minute (gpm) and it operates continuously. The well is constructed of six-inch
diameter PVC and is screened in the unconsolidated regolith from 30 to 50 feet below
ground surface (bgs) (Table 2). The top of bedrock in the area of the pilot test is
approximately 60 feet bgs. A second recovery well, RW-06, is clustered with RW-07
(located about 15 feet away) and is screened from approximately 60 to 120 feet bgs (into
bedrock). This recovery well, in addition to four nearby existing monitoring wells (MW-17,
MW-03, MW-25, and MW-26) located at distances ranging from 50 to 100 feet of RW-07,
and three new monitoring wells will be used as monitoring points to evaluate the ISCO
effectiveness (Figure 3; Attachment F). These nearby existing monitoring wells are
screened in saprolite and in bedrock. During this pilot test (including the post -injection
monitoring), which is anticipated to last approximately six weeks, groundwater will not be
pumped out of either RW-06 or RW-07.
We are establishing the area of the pilot test to encompass an approximately 20-foot
radius extending from RW-07. The vertical section of the pilot test is 20 feet thick, from
30 to 50 feet bgs. This is within the saturated unconsolidated regolith described above.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test 2009\UIC Application\Attachments Narrative.Docx

1
Attachments for UIC App!,1.'._tion -
TEC Fairview, NC
Regionally, the site is located in the Blue Ridge Physiographic Province. Topographically,
the site lies just west of Cane Creek near the southern base of the Swannanoa Mountains.
The ground surface at the site slopes gently to the southeast toward the creek. According
to the Bedrock Geologic Map of the Oteen 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, North Carolina
(Cattanach and Merschat, 2008), the bedrock underlying the site is characterized as a
schistose greywacke, part of the Ashe Metamorphic Suite . The Brevard fault zone, a major
structure which includes mylonitic and cataclastic rocks, is located just east of the site.
As introduced in Attachment A, groundwater underlying the site is present in three media,
(1) unconsolidated regolith, (2) partially weathered bedrock, and (3) bedrock. The zones
are hydraulically connected. The depth to bedrock at the site ranges from approximately
6 to 85 feet bgs (Table 1). At the location of the pilot test, the depth to bedrock is
approximately 60 feet bgs (Figure 5). The unconsolidated soils are commonly silty clayey
fine sands to sandy silts with clay. Generally, the permeability and grain size increases in
the saprolite and partially weathered rock with depth. The bedrock is variably fractured.
The frequency of the fractures tends to decrease with depth below the top of bedrock.
Figure 5 shows a generalized cross-section of the pilot test area.
On the basis of aquifer tests (pumping and step drawdown tests) performed in 1994,
hydraulic conductivities are estimated to range from 2 to 4 feet per day (feet/day) for the
saprolite, 6 to 10 feet/day for the partially weathered rock (transition zone), and 0.001 to
10 feet/day in the bedrock (Aquifer Pumping Test Report, General Instrument Corporation
Hatboro, Pennsylvania and Communication Instruments, Inc. Fairview, North Carolina,
RETEC, January 1995).
The water table at the site was measured in November 2009 to range from just a few feet
below grade to 31 feet bgs. In general, groundwater flows southeasterly toward Cane
Creek (Figures 6 through 8).
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test 2009\UIC Application\Attachments Narrative.Docx

Attachments for UIC App::,_.-Rion
TEC Fairview, NC
We plan to utilize a sodium permanganate oxidant that is manufactured as a liquid
solution by Carus Corporation under the trade name of RemOx® L ISCO Reagent. The
solution is comprised of approximately 40% sodium permanganate (NaMnO4). It is
designed to degrade a variety of contaminants, including chlorinated solvents. A fact
sheet and a material data safety sheet (MSDS) are attached on the following pages.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test 2009\UIC Application\Attachments Narrative.Docx

Attachments for UIC App[,, ,.-rion
TEC Fairview, NC
The objective of the pilot test is to evaluate the efficacy of the sodium permanganate ISCO
treatment to reduce source area contaminant mass so that concentrations in the
groundwater at the site are at acceptable levels (that demonstrate source control). If the
pilot test results demonstrate that the ISCO treatment will be effective, the data from the
pilot test may be used to design a full-scale source area treatment system.
The pilot test is also expected to provide the.following additional information:
• Ability of the oxidant solution to dissipate into the aquifer formation from the
injection point (radius of influence)
• Monitoring data that is useful
• Negative effects (if any) of the injection of sodium permanganate solution into the
subsurface, such as increased mobility of metals, displacing contaminants into
previously unimpacted groundwater, and incomplete degradation of site
contaminants that may result in constituents not previously identified at the site
• Oasis for developing design and costs for full-scale implementation of ISCO at the
site
The target depth zone of the pilot test is 30 to 50 feet bgs, which encompasses the lower
unconsolidated regolith. The area of the pilot test is anticipated to extend an
approximately 20-foot radius from the injection well, RW-7 (Figure 3).
The proposed injectant volume and concentration is based on the hydraulic properties of
the aquifer and the permanganate natural oxidant demand (PNOD; average 1.4 grams per
kilogram [ g/kg]) of the soils in the areas from the target depth interval. These values
were incorporated into a reagent estimation spreadsheet provided by Carus Corporation
which is intended to aid in design of the injection program. A hardcopy of this
spreadsheet is attached at the end of.this Attachment D.
As described in Principles and Practices of In Situ Chemical Oxidation Using Permanganate
(Siegrist and others, 2001), permanganate oxidizes chlorinated solvents through a
hydroxylation process. Site contaminants, such as chlorinated solvents, break down
ultimately to carbon dioxide, chlorine, hydroxides, water, and metals. Permanganate
reactions can reduce pH, increase reduction potential (Eh), reduce natural oxygen demand,
and increase ion concentrations..
The results from the PNOD analyses performed by Carus Corporation showed a low PNOD
(1.4 g/kg), which supports the use of permanganate as an oxidizer. The results indicate
that the amount of excess NaMnO4 needed to satisfy the PNOD is relatively low.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test 2009\UIC Application\Attachments Narrative.Docx

RemOx® S and L ISCO Reagents Estimation Spreadsheet
Altamont, Chlorinated Solvent Pilot Study, Fairview, NC
Input data into boxes with blue font.
Estimates Units
Treatment Area Volume
Length
36 ft
Width
36 Ift
Area
1296 sq ft
Thickness
20 7ft
Total Volume
960 cu yd
Soil Characteristics/Analysis
Porosity 1 25
Total Plume Pore Volume
48474 gal
Avg Contaminant Conc
2.3 7ppm
Mass of Contaminant
0.93 lb
PNOD
1.4 g/kg
Effective PNOD
10 %
Effective PNOD Calculated
0.14
PNOD Oxidant Demand
399.168 lb
Avg Stoichiometric Demand
2.4 lb/lb
Contaminant Oxidant Demand
2.23 lb
Theoretical Oxidant Demand
401.40 lb
Confidence Factor
2.5
Calculated Oxidant Demand
1003.502541
Injection Volumes for RemOx S
RemOx S Injection Concentration 3.0% %
Total Volume of Injection Fluid
4,008 gal
Pore Volume Replaced
8.27 %
ed 1 A Pam
Injection Volumes for RemOx L
RemOx L Injection Concentration
10.0%
Calculated Specific Gravity
1.091623 g/ml
Total Volume of Injection Fluid
989 gal
Pore Volume Replaced
2.04 %
jkmountf RemOx L ISCO Wagent Estimated 2,253 pounds
197 gallons

Attachments for UIC Appl�..i�tion
TEC Fairview, INIC
Attachment E—Injection Procedure and Equipment
Carus Corporation will ship the oxidant reagent, RemOx L, to the job site in 550-pound
drums (total of approximately 2,250 pounds of solution). The shipped concentration of
approximately 40% will be diluted to 10% via an approximately 500-gallon in -line
mixer/tank constructed of HDPE. Dilution water will be obtained from the municipal water
system. The total volume of the 10% solution that we anticipate pumping into the
subsurface is approximately 1,000 gallons. A manifold and release valve will be installed
downstream of the tank to allow for release of the solution if the pressure becomes too
great. A pressure gauge and sampling port will be installed at the well head and used to
monitor and control the injection pressure of the solution. A packer connected to an
approximately 2-inch galvanized steel pipe extending to the ground surface will be
lowered to just above the screened interval of the injection well (RW-7). The diluted
solution will be pumped under pressure into RW-7 into the eductor pipe and forced out
through the screened interval into the formation material. A diagram of the surface and
subsurface portions of the system is shown in Figure 9.
The total volume of solution that we plan to inject in the subsurface is approximately
1,000 gallons. At an injection rate of just over approximately 1 gpm, we anticipate it
taking one to two days to complete the injection process.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test 2009\UIC Application\Attachments Narrative.Docx

Attachments for UIC AppU:,__ition -
TEC Fairview, NC
Attachmentor g Plan
The monitoring program entails installing approximately three new monitoring wells (MW-
39 through MW-41) within the anticipated extent of the sodium permanganate injection
zone of influence, to evaluate the effectiveness of the sodium permanganate to degrade
the contaminants. These wells will be located northeast, northwest, and southwest of the
injection well (RW-07). Site conditions preclude installing a monitoring well southeast
(downgradient) of RW-07. It is estimated that the monitoring wells will be installed within
approximately 20 feet of RW-07. Their proposed approximate locations are shown on
Figure 3.
These monitoring wells will be screened from 30 to 50 feet bgs. They will be constructed
of two-inch diameter Schedule 40 PVC with approximately 10 feet of 0.010-inch slotted
screen. Appropriately sized filter pack, bentonite seal, and grout will be installed within
the annulus of the monitoring well, in accordance with Subtitle 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC) Subchapter 2C. The surface completion of each monitoring
well will be with a flush mount six-inch manhole. Alternatively, these wells may be
constructed as temporary wells and subsequently abandoned after completion of the pilot
test.
After the monitoring wells have been properly installed and developed and within
approximately one week ahead of the sodium permanganate solution injection event,
Altamont will collect baseline groundwater samples from each monitoring well and submit
them to Pace Analytical Services in Asheville, North Carolina (Pace). Altamont will collect
the field measurements. The analyses will include the following parameters:
• Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using EPA Method 8260
• Select total metals (lead, chromium, arsenic, zinc, cadmium, copper, and mercury)
using EPA Method 6010/7000
• Nitrate, sulfate, and chloride using EPA Method 300 (ion chromatography)
• Alkalinity using EPA Method 310.1, SM 23208 .
• Dissolved oxygen (field measurement)
•. phi (field measurement)
• Specific conductivity (field measurement)
• Temperature (field measurement)
• ORP (field measurement)
• Turbidity (field measurement)
For approximately eight hours following the injection, water levels in monitoring wells that
are part of the pilot test (MW-17, MW-03, RW-06, MW-25, MW-26, and the three newly
installed monitoring wells MW-39 through MW-41) will be measured hourly to identify
mounding effects. In the days that follow (for approximately one week), water levels will
be measured daily.
Approximately one week after injection, groundwater samples will be collected from RW-
06 and RW-07, as well as the three newly installed monitoring wells (MW-39 through MW-
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test 2009\UIC Application\Attachments Narrative.Docx

Attachments for UIC App[�:'__'lion
TEC Fairview, NC
41). These samples will be submitted to Pace for analyses. Altamont will collect the field
parameters. The analyses will include the following parameters:
• Sodium permanganate using a field spectrophotometer
• Select metals (lead, chromium, arsenic, zinc, cadmium, copper, and mercury) using
EPA Method 6010/7000
• Nitrate, sulfate, and chloride using EPA Method 300 (ion chromatography)
• Alkalinity using EPA Method 310.1, SM 2320B
• Dissolved oxygen (field measurement)
• pH (field measurement)
• Specific conductivity (field measurement)
• Temperature (field measurement)
• ORP (field measurement)
• Turbidity (field measurement)
Field sampling personnel will. also observe and note the color of the groundwater extracted
from these monitoring wells. Any excess sodium permanganate should be indicated by
discoloration (for example, pink, red, or brown) of the groundwater. Sodium
permanganate will also be indicated by the field spectrophotometer noted above. The
presence of excess sodium permanganate may indicate the absence of VOCs. Therefore,
if no discoloration or sodium permanganate is observed, then the samples may be
submitted to the laboratory for VOCs using Method 8240. If discoloration is observed, then
samples will be submitted for VOCs less frequently than indicated below. Samples will be
collected from the same wells biweekly for the first month after the initial post -injection
sampling event. The groundwater sampling schedule is summarized as follows:
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test 2009\UIC Application\Attachments Narrative.Docx

Attachments for UIC Appl.--'lion
TEC Fairview, NC
Sampling
Event Timing Wells Analyses
1 Within one RW-06, RW-07, Full scan as
week of MW-39, MW- described
injection event 40, MW-41 above
2 One week after RW-06, RW-07, Full scan as
injection event MW-39, MW- described
40, MW-41 above
3 Three weeks RW-06, RW-07, Full scan as
after injection MW-39, MW- described
event 40, MW-41 above
4 Five weeks RW-06, RW-07, Full scan as
after injection MW-39, MW- described
event 40, MW-41 above
Please note that the timing, wells, and analyses may be modified based on site conditions
and data associated with the pilot test.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test 2009\UIC Application\Attachments Narrative.Docx

Attachments for UIC Appa.,_-lion
TEC Fairview, NC
-
Table 1 provides information on well construction details for all of the existing wells onsite.
Wells whose Well Identification Labels (IDs) start with "MW" are monitoring wells. Those
that have an "RW" are the recovery wells. Tables 2 and 3 summarize November 2009
analytical and field screening results.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test 2009\UIC Application\Attachments Narrative.Docx

Table 2
Current Groundwater Analytical Results
TEC-Fairview
Buncombe County, North Carolina
November 16 - 20, 2009
O
.O
f0
O
O
C
N
O
C
L
a�
L
+L+
r-
fa
C
O
a)O
a)
o
L
W
L
a)
a)
O
`o
a
O
_ N
L
+L
C
W
O
'O
a .
O
Date
o
`
o
`
O
°rWellID
U
I?N
L
:
p
UO
OO
C
L
U
O
1?`
rI
L
U
O
u
ri
r i
c
�
F-
p
'�
U
�
y
rl
MW-3
11/17/2009
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
22.9
<1.0
2.7
13.2
<1.0
RW-6
11/16/2009
<20.0
<20.0
<20.0
<20.0
<20.0
20.1
<20.0
<20.0
129
<20.0
1,030
1,850
<20.0
RW-7
11/16/2009
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
<100
114
577
7,810
12,100
<100
2L Standards
0.269
70
NL
70
7
70
100
0.51
0.7
200
2.8
NL
0.015
Notes:
1. This table only includes compounds that were recently and historically detected above method detection limits.
2. The complete suite of compounds can be found in the individual analytical reports.
3. Concentrations are in micrograms per liter (µg/L).
4. "<" means the result is less than the indicated value.
5. 2L Standards from North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) Title 15A, Subchapter 2L.
6. Bold indicates exceedance of the 2L Standard.
7. NL indicates a 2L Standard is not listed.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test_2009\UIC Application\Tables 2 & 3 Page 1 of 1

Table 3
c-urrent Water Quality Parameters
TEC-Fairview
Buncombe County, North Carolina
November 16 - 20 2009
Dissolved
Oxygen
Specific
Well ID
Date
Oxygen
Y9
Reduction
pH
Conductance
Temperature
Turbidity
(m9/L)
Potential
(µS)
VC)
(NTU)
(mV)
MW-3
11/17/09
5.70
260.3
5.62
25
18.1
0.00
RW-6
11/16/09
4.95
11.4
5.97
85
15.37
5.22
RW-7
11/16/09
5.56
135.9
5.77
43
15.16
0.00
Notes:
1. pH measured in standard units
2. °C denotes degrees Celsius
3. µ5 denotes microsiemens
4. mV denotes millivolts
5. mg/L denotes milligrams per liter
6. NTU denotes nephelometric turbidity units
7. Parameters are those measured following stabilization.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test_2009\UIC Application\Tables 2 & 3 Page 1 of 1

Table 1
Well Construction Data
TEC-Fairview
Buncombe County, North Carolina
Well
Screened
Total Well
Outer Casing
Depth of
TOC
Ground
Depth To
Well ID
Date Installed
Diameter
Well Riser
Screen
Interval
Depth
Diameter
Outer
Outer Casing
Elevation
Surface
Well Type
Bedrock
(mm/dd/yy)
(inches)
Material
Material
(ft-bgs)
(ft-bgs)
(inches)
Casing
Material
(ft-MSL)
Elevation
(ft-bgs)
(ft-bgs)
(ft-MSL)
MW-3
04/10/93
2
PVC
PVC
5. to 15
15.28
NA
NA
NA
2265..16
2265.5
Water Table
MW-17
02/01/94
2
Galvanized
Stainless
38 to 48
48.0
NA
NA
NA
2264.23
2264.8
Deep Regolith
Steel
Steel
MW-25
07/20/94
2
PVC
Stainless
50 to 60
59.5
NA
NA
NA
2280.19
2280.3
Deep Regolith
60
Steel
MW-26
07/19/94
6
Open Boring
65 to 85
85.0
6.25
65.0
PVC
2280.22
2280.3
Bedrock
60
RW-6
04/12/01
6
PVC
PVC
60 to 120
120.0
NA
NA
NA
2267.48 .
2267.8
Deep Regolith
60
RW-7
04/13/01
6
- PVC
Steel
30 to 50
50.0
NA
NA
NA
2267.30
226,8.E
Water Table
Notes:
1. TOC - Top of Casing
2. ft-bgs - feet below ground surface
3. ft-MSL - feet above Mean Sea Level
4. NA indicates that the information was Not Available or is Not Applicable.
5.-PVC - Poly Vinyl Chloride.
6. Ground surface and TOC elevations obtained from well construction logs, well surveys, and summary tables from prior site assessment reports.
7. Water Table - This well type consists of.wells completed with screens entirely in regolith and that bracket the water table.
8. Deep Regolith - This.well.type consists of wells- in which the measured groundwater level is above the top of screen, but are completed above the top of bedrock and wells completed with the top of screen in
regolith and bottom of the screen in weathered rock.
9. Bedrock - This well type consists of wells completed with screens or open boreholes entirely in competent bedrock.
10. All wells are considered flushmount unless noted otherwise.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test_2009\UIC Application\Tablel Page 1 of 1

RemOx6 L ISCO Reagent
CAS Registry No. 10 10 1 -50-5
EINECS No. 233-251-1
RemOx® L ISCO Reagent has been specifically manufactured for
environmental applications such as remediation of soils and
associated groundwater. This product can be used to degrade a
variety of contaminants including chlorinated solvents,
polyaromatic hydrocarbons, phenolics, organo-pesticides, and
substituted aromatics. RemOx L ISCO Reagent is shipped with a
Certificate of Analysis (COA).
PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS
Assay
39.5-41.0% as NaMnO
PH
5.0-8.0
Trace Metals
(see Table 1)
CHEMICAL/PHYSICAL DATA
Formula NaMnO4
Formula Weight 141.93 g/mol
Appearance Dark Purple Solution
Specific Gravity 1.365-1.385
Shelf Life 18 months
Freezing Point 4° F
Solubility in Water Miscible with water in all proportions.
Material will pass through a 10 micron filter.
APPLICATIONS
RemOx L is used for soil and groundwater remediation by In -situ
or ex -situ chemical oxidation and as an active agent in subsurface
reactive barriers for treatment of:
Chlorinated Ethenes - PCE, TCE, Vinyl Chloride, etc.
Phenolics, PCP, p-Cresol, 2,3 dichlorophenol, etc.
Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons, - Naphthalene, Phenanthrene, Benzo
(a) Pyrene, etc.
TNT, RDX, HMX, etc.
FACT SHEET
SHIPPING CONTAINERS
5-gallon (20-L) HDPE jerrican
(UN Specification: UN3H1/Y1.8/100) Made of high -density
polyethylene (HDPE). Weighs 3.5 lb (1.6 kg). The net weight is
57 Ibs (25.7 kg). The jerrican stands approximately 13.4 in. tall, 9.4
in. wide, and 13.0 in. deep (33.9 cm high, 23.8 cm wide, and 33.0 cm
deep).
55-gallon (208 L) HDPE Tighthead Drum
(UN Specification: UNIHI/YI/150) Made of high -density
polyethylene (HDPE). Weighs 22 Ibs (10kg). The net weight is
550 Ibs (250kg). The drum stands approximately 34.5 in. tall, has an
outside diameter of 23.4 in. (89.1 cm tall, OD 59.4 cm).
275-gallon (104L) IBC (Intermediate Bulk Container)
(UN Specification: UN3 I HA I /Y 1.9/ 100) They are also marked
"MX" for multi -trip. IBC weighs 139 Ibs (65 kg). The net weight is
3000 Ibs (1161 kg). The IBC contains 263 gallons (995 L) of
product. The IBC dimensions are 45.4 in. high, 48 in. long, and
40 in. wide. The IBC has a 2" butterfly valve with NPT threads in
bottom sump. (Domestic)
Bulk Shipping - Quantities up to 4000 gallons are available
HANDLING, STORAGE, AND INCOMPATIBILITY
Like any strong oxidizer RemOx L should be handled with card.
Protective equipment during handling should include face shields
and/or goggles, rubber or plastic gloves, and rubber or plastic
apron. If clothing becomes spotted, wash off immediately;
spontaneous ignition can occur with cloth or paper. In cases where
significant exposure exists use the appropriate NIOSH-MSHA dust
or mist respirator.
Store in accordance with NFPA (National Fire Protection
Association) Code 430 requirements for Class II oxidizers. The
product should be stored in a cool, dry area in closed containers.
Concrete floors are preferred. Avoid wooden decks. Spillage
should be collected and disposed of properly. To clean up spills
and leaks follow the steps recommended in our MSDS.
Avoid contact with acids, peroxides, and all combustible organic or
readily oxidizable materials including inorganic oxidizable materials
and metal powders. With hydrochloric acid, chlorine gas is
liberated. RemOx L ISCO Reagent is not combustible, but will
support combustion. It may decompose if exposed to intense heat.
Fires may be controlled and extinguished by using large quantities
of water. Refer to the MSDS for more information
ONE •MPANY, ENDLESS SOLUTIONS• • •
The Wormation conolnad heroin is artisan to the beat of our knowledge Htaever, data, safety standards and joverrmaant reauladons art subject to change; and the condtions of handling,
use or misuse of the product are beyond our control. ol. GChemical Company nano warranty. alther expressed or Y pit" indudlK" warranties of merchantability and Omess for a
pardcuhr purpose. Gros aho dschims atl babdity for reliance, on the completeness or confirming accuracy of any bdormatlon bxhrded herein. Users should sadsy themsehes that day are
of all de,
awaro arrrent re, relevant to their paroodar --*a).
14 00-43S-6tS6 RemOx is a registered trademark
Carus Corporation Tel. IIS) 223-IS00 of Carus Corporation. (Carus and Design) is
Copyright 2005 3 1 S Fifth Street Fax IBIS) 224-6697 a registered service mans of Carus Corporation.
rev. 1 /07 P.0 Box S99 Web: www.canmhem.corn Responsible Care is a registered service mark �Responalbk Clare*
RX 1603 C A /2 GJ 5 e Peru IL 613S4 E sa
lesn*t@�mrtischem.com [e-mail] of the American Chemistry Council. Goodchcmrst yof wort

SHIPPING
RemOxO L ISCO Reagent is classified as an oxidizer for both
domestic and international transportation. Liquid permanganate is
shipped domestically as Freight Class 70.
Proper Shipping Name: Permanganates, inorganic, aqueous
solution n.o.s. (contains sodium permanganate).
Hazard Class: 5.1
Identification Number: UN 3214
Label Requirements: Oxidizer, 5.1
Packaging Group: II
Packaging Requirements: 49 CFR Parts 171 to 180
Sections: 173.152, 173.202, 173.242
Quantity Limitations:
I liter net for passenger aircraft or railcar:
5 liters net for cargo aircraft.
Vessel Stowage:
D-material must be stowed " on -deck" on a cargo vessel, but is
prohibited on a passenger vessel. Other provisions: stow
separately from ammonium compounds, hydrogen peroxide,
peroxides, super -oxides, cyanide compounds, and powdered metal.
i
FACT SHEET
CORROSIVE PROPERTIES
RemOx L ISCO Reagent is compatible with many metals and
synthetic materials. Natural rubbers and fibers are often
incompatible. Solution pH and temperature are also important
factors. The material selected for use with liquid permanganate
must be compatible with any kind of acid or alkali being used.
In neutral and alkaline solutions, RemOx L ISCO Reagent is not
corrosive to carbon steel and 316 stainless steel. However,
chloride corrosion of metals may be accelerated when an oxidant
such as liquid permanganate is present in solution. Plastics such as
Teflon, polypropylene, and HDPE are also compatible with liquid
permanganate.
Aluminum, zinc, copper, lead, and alloys containing these metals
may be (slightly) affected by RemOx L ISCO Reagent. Actual
corrosion or compatibility studies should be made under the
conditions in which RemOx L will be used.
Table 1: Typical Trace Metal Content and Specifications
Element
Typical
Analysis
(mg/kg)
Specifications
(mg/kg)
DL"
(mg/kg)
Element
Typical
Analysis
(mg/kg)
Specifications
(mg/kg)
DL`
(mg/kg)
Ag
0.04
0.15
0.034
Fe
BDL
2.00
0.053
Al
0.3
2.00
0.24
Hg
BDL
0.03
0.003
As
BDL
4.00
0.006
Ni
BDL
0.1
0.03
Ba
2.247
5.00
0.016
Pb
BDL
0.70
0.16
Be
BDL
0.50
0.08
Sb
BDL
0.70
0.16
Cd
BDL
0.10
0.016
Se
0.007
0.50
0.0003
Cr
2.159
5.00
0.031
TI
BDL
3.S0
0.80
Cu
0.024
0.10
0.022
Zn
0.047
0A0
0.011
ONE
•MPANY, ENDLESS SOLUTIONS•
•
•
The Information contained herein is accurate to the best of our kno viedge.1-lon er, dam, safety standards and government regulators an wbiea m change; and
the conditions of handling,
use or misuse of the p,odua an beyond our control. Carus chemical Company makes no
warranty, either expressed or implied, including any w nties of me<hantabibty and fitness for a
parucular purpose Carus also disclaims all liabiliry for reliance on the completeness or confirming
accuracy of any information included herein. Users should satisfy themselves that they are
aware of all current data relevant to their parucular use(s).
1-800-435-6856
RemOx is a registered trademark
Carus Corporation Tel. [phone]
315 Fifth Street Fax [phone]
of Carus Corporation. (Carus and Design) is
a registered service mark of Carus Corporation.
Copyright 2005
P.O Box 599 Web: www.caruschem.com
Responsible Care is a registered service mark
�Responslble Care
rev. 001/07
G A /2 5 " e
Peru IL 61354 E-Mail: [e-mail]
of the American Chemistry Council.
Good[hemistyot wort
form RX 1603

RemOx®L
ISCO Reagent
EC- SAFETY DATA SHEET according to EC directive 2001/58/EC
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Page 1 of 8
Section 1 Clhemical Product and Company Identification
PRODUCT NAME: RemOx® L ISCO Reagent Revision Date: January 2006
TRADE NAME: RemOx® L ISCO Reagent
USES OF SUBSTANCE: RemOx® L ISCO Reagent is a liquid oxidant recommended for in -situ and ex -situ
remediation of sites that require a strong oxidant.
COMPANY NAME (Europe):
CARUS NALON S.L.
COMPANY NAME (US):
CARUS CHEMICAL COMPANY
Section 2 Hazardous Ingredients
COMPANY ADDRESS:
INFORMATION:
EMERGENCY TELEPHONE:
COMPANY ADDRESS:
INFORMATION:
EMERGENCY TELEPHONE:
Carus Nalon S.L.
Barrio Nalon, s/n
33100 Trubia-Oviedo
Espana, Spain
(34)985-785-513
(34)985-785-513
www.caruseurope.com (Web)
carusng.carusnalon.com (Email)
(34)985-785-513
315 Fifth Street
Peru, IL 61354, USA
(815)-223-1500
www.caruschem.com (Web)
salesmkg@_caruschem.com (Email)
(800) 435 —6856 (USA)
[phone] (CHEMTREC, USA)
(815-223-1500 (Other countries)
Material or Component CAS No. % Hazard Data
Sodium Permanganate 10101-50-5 40 PEL/C 5 mg Mn per cubic meter of air
TLV-TWA 0.2 mg Mn per cubic meter of air
HAZARD SYMBOLS:
O Ite N
RISK PHRASES:
8 Contact with combustibles may case fire.
22 Harmful if swallowed.
50/53 Very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term effects in the aquatic environment.
SAFETY PHRASES:
17 Keep away from combustible materials.
24/25 Avoid contact with skin and eyes.
26 In case of contact with eyes, rinse immediately with plenty of water and seek medical advice

Section 4 .:First Aid Measures
Section 5 : Firefighting Measures

C4`RUS®
EG .SAFET.Y DATA SHEET according to EC directive 2001/58/EC
MATERIAL'SAF ETY:DATA SHEET
:Page i-ot 25
FLASHPOINT .
None
FLAMMABLE OR EXPLOSIVE LIMITS:.
Lower: Nonflammable- Upper:. Nonflammable :
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA
Use large quantities of water:
Water- will turn pink to purple if in contact with
RemOx® L ISCO Reagent. Dike to contain.
Do not use dry chemicals, CO21-1alon® or foams..
SPECIAL FIREFIGHTING PROCEDURES
If material is involved in fire, flood with water.
Cool all affected containers with large: quantities -
of water. _ :Apply water from as far: as a distance
as:possible. Wear self-contained breathing
apparatus and full protective clothing.
.UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION
Powerful: oxidizing material. May decompose
spontaneously if exposed to heat (1351C/275°F).
May be explosive in contact with certain other
chemicals (Section 10). May react violently with .
fnely divided and readily oxidizable: substances.
.'Increases burning rate of combustible material.
May ignite wood and cloth.
Section 6 Accidental Release Mea
sures
PERSONAL PRECAUTIONS
Personnel should wear. protective clothing suitable for the task: - Remove all ignition sources and incompatible
.
materials before attempting clean up...
ENVIRONMENTAL PRECAUTIONS:
:Do not flush into sanitary sewer system or surface water. If accidental release into the environment occurs, .
inform the responsible authorities: Keep the product away from drains, sewers, surface and ground water and
soil:
STEPS TO BE TAKEN IF MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED
Contain spill by collecting the liquid in a pit or holding behind a dam (sand or soil). Dilute.to approximately 6%
with water, and then reduce with -sodium thiosulfate, a bisulfite or ferrous salt solution..The bisulfite or ferrous. -
salt may require some dilute sulfuric acid (10% w/w) to promote reduction. Neutralize With sodium carbonate to.
neutral.pH, if acid was used.. Decant or filter. and deposit. sludge in approved landfill. Where _permitted, the sludge.
may be drained into sewer with large quantities of water. To clean.contaminated floors, flush with abundant
quantities of water into sewer, if permitted by federal, state, and. d local regulations. If not,•.collect water and treat, .
as above.

Section 8 Exposure Controls and Personal Protection
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION .
In cases where overexposure to. mist may occur, the use.of 'an approved NIOSH-MSHA mist respirator or an air
supplied. resirator is advised.. Engineering or administrative controls should -be im lemented to control mist.
EYE
Faceshield;goggles, or safety glasses with side shields should be worn: Provide eyewash in working area.
GLOVES
Rubber or plastic gloves should be worn: .
OTHER PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Normal work clothing covering arms and legs, and .rubber, or plastic apron should be. worn. Caution.: If clothing
becomes contaminated, wash off immediately, S ontaneous i nition may occur with cloth or paper.:

STABILITY
Under normal conditions, the material is stable.
CONDTTIONS.TO -AVOID .:
Contact with incompatible materials or heat (13PC I275°F) .
could
result, in violent exothermic chemical reaction::
INCOMPATIBLE -MATERIALS
Acids, peroxides, formaldehyde, antifreeze,
hydraulic fluids, and all combustible organic .
or readily, oxidizable.materials; including metal powders.
With hydrochloric acid; toxic chlorine gas is liberated.
HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION
PRODUCTS.-
When involved in a fire, liquid permanganate. -°
may form corrosive fumes.
CONDITIONS CONTRIBUTING TO . Material is not known to polymerize.
HAZARDOUS -POLYMERIZATION
Section 11 . Toxicological Information
SODIUM PERMANGANATE:: Acute oral_ LDso 'not known.
1. Acute toxicity

rage o.oi a:
chronic manganese poisoning, chiefly involving the central nervous. system. .
3. Carcinogenicity .: .
Sodium permanganate has not been. classified as a carcinogen by ACGIH, NIOSH; OSHA, NTP; or IARC.
4 Medical Conditions Generally A—avatedl Ex osure
Y P
Sodium permanganate solution will cause further. irritation of.tissue, openwounds, burns. or mucous
membranes:
Section 12 Ecological Information
Section 13 Disposal Considerations
-Section 14 . Transport- Information
USA (land, D.O.T:); :
Proper Shipping Name:
49 CFR172.101 Permanganates, inorganic;
aqueous.:
solution, n.o.s .(contains sodium permanganate.:°
Hazard Class:
49 CFR172.101.... Oxidizer
ID Number:
49 C17.R172.101....LJN 3214 . .
Packing Group:
49 CFR172.101.... II
ivi§ion:.
.49 CFR172.101.... 5.1 .. .
European'Labeling in.
-ID Number:
UN 3214.
Accordance oad/Rail
ADR/RID'Class.
. 5.1 ;
Transport (ADRBID)
Description of Goods:
Permanganates,: inorganic, aqueous
:''sol ution, n:o.s (contains sodium permanganate):
Hazard Identification No. 50
European Labeling in
Proper.Shipping Name:
Permanganates, inorganic, aqueous -
accordance with EC
solution, n.o.s (contains sodium permanganate)
directive (Water, I.M.O.) : '
Hazard Class:.
Oxidizer
ID Number:
UN 3214

Packing Group: II
Division:: 5.1
Marine Pollutant:.: No
EuropeanLabelingin
Proper Shipping Name: Permanganates, inorganic, aqueous .
accordance with EC .
solution; n:o.s (contains sodium permanganate)
directive: (Air, LC:Ao.)
Hazard Class: Oxidizer
ID Number: UN 3214
Packing Group: II
Division:.1
Section 15 Regulatory Information (Sodium Permanganate)
Section 16 Other Information
Chithambarathanu?illai (S.O.F.)
January 2006
The information. contained herein is accurate to the. best of our. knowledge. However, data; 'safety standards and.govemmegt regulations are
subject to change and, therefore, holders and users should satisfy'themselves tha6they are aware of all current data and regulations relevant to
their particular use of product. CARUS CHEMICAL. COMPANY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY FOR RELIANCE ON THE
COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY.OR THE INFORMATION INCLUDED HEREIN.: CARUS CHEMICAL COMPANY MAKES:NO
WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIABILITY
OR FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE OF THE PRODUCT. DESCRIBED HEREIN. All conditions relating to storage,

I A
41 Q� I F
Chu
X.
N v
or
"N
4
Qz)
Kvle
'24
-M
Y, j 61Y
N
Site Location
L
ZJ4 ,It'A
aLr". k
-1 I'D Cw
29
Tariryj" Sch
6
, f't
J
A
7>
Fftir
t �q
f
•
7f
Pa
X�
N- -----
Z
_j
171 X 2285.
Z, 0'
M AKW
4
6
USGS Topo Map: Oteen Quadran I
Created: 1962 Revised: 1990
1:24,000 Scale
ALTAMONT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE
I E m q I N E E
231 HAYWOOD STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
Tel. [phone] Fac. 828.2813351 TEC-FAIRVIEW
-m.alt=ontenviromental.com 1596 CHARLOTTE HIGHWAY
BUNCOMBE
-- COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWN BY: EVAN YURKOVICH SCALE (FEET)
PROJECT MANAGER: CHRIS GILBERT
CLIENT: TEC 1,000 0 1,000 2,000
DATE: 1/13/2010 1 - I P:\TEC\Fairview\FiguresNGIS\Site Location Map

MUNICIPAL
APPROXIMATELY FOUR 50-GALLON WATER 500-GALLON
DRUMS CONTAINING 40% NaMnO, SUPPLY HDPE TANK
���� (10% NaMn0')
NaWo, II NMI II NaMnO, II NaMO, I 4 I I it
NOTE:
SOLUTION OF 40% NaMnO, WILL BE MIXED WITH
MUNICIPAL WATER IN THE 500-GALLON HDPE
TANK TO ESTABLISH A 10 % NaMnO: SOLUTION.
SAPROLITE
50
ESTIMATED TOP OF BEDROCK
BEDROCK
RECEIVED I DENR I DWQ
AQUIPR'PPnTFr..TI0N SECTION
MAR 9 4 2010.
RELEASE VALVE
RETURN TO
HDPETANK FLOW METER PRESSURE
GAUGE AND SAMPLING PORT
RW-7
I--� (INJECTION RW-6
—1 GPM
INFLATED
PACKER
20 FEET
PERFORATI
DROP PI
60
FEET
ALTAMONT ENVIRONMENTAL,
GENERALIZED SCHEMATIC OF THE FIGURE
NOTES: -- - --1 ABOVE GROUND AND SUBSURFACE
ENGINEERING & HYDROGEOLOGY INJECTIONSYSTEM
1. HORIZONTAL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 231 HAYWOOD STREET, ASHEwuE, NC 28801
TEL.828.28FAC.828.281.3351
www.>LT—�rnnoi+TeNnua+Henr- mn TYCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
9
DRAWN BY: LISA MANNING VERTICAL SCALE (FEET) 1396 CHARLOTTE HIGHWAY
PROJECT MANAGER: ALEC MACBETH FAIRVIEW, NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: 2281 TEC 15' 0 15' 30'
DATE: 03/01/2010 1
FILE PATH: P:\TEC\Fairview\Figures\CAD\Pilot Test Plan\INJECTION SYS SCHEMATIC.DWG

11 /17/2009
PCE - 22.9 Ng/L
TCE - 2.7 pg/L
cis-1,2 DCE - <1.0 pgl
1,1,2-TCTFA- 13.2 pg
November 2009
Wells Not Sampled
l
' RECOVERY WELL
l` PIPE TRENCH
(TYPICAL)
Notes:
ug/L = micrograms per liter
1,1,2—TCTFA = 1,1,2—Trichlorotrifluoroethone
PCE = Tetrachloroethene
TCE = Trichloroethene
cis-1,2—DCE = cis-1,2—Dichloroethene
13J
! November 2009
Wells Not Sampled
IM W — 2 6 11 /16/2009
PCE - 114 ug/L
MW-25 TCE- 7,810Ng/L
cis-1,2 DCE - <1.0 pg/L
1,1,1-TCA - 577 Ng/L
1, 1,2-TCTFA -. 12,100 pg/L
----_Inn
-17
/I
I
I
I
I
0
11 /16/2009
IVI W — PCE - 129 Ng/L
TCE - -1,030 Ng/L
cis-1,2 DCE - 20.1 pg/L
1,1,1-TCA <20.0 pg/L
1,1,2-TCTFA 1,850 pg/L
Approximate Area
of Pilot Test
7/7
MW-2, , (*
'LEGEND
MW-2 WATER TABLE MONITORING WELL
MW-1 DEEP REGOLITH MONITORING WELL
OMW-19 BEDROCK MONITORING WELL
i
RW-1 GROUNDWATER RECOVERY WELL
MW-4 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL
® RW-7 GROUNDWATER RECOVERY WELL
! l TO BE USED AS AN INJECTION WELL
UTRACE OF CROSS SECTION SHOWN
ON FIGURE 5
m' PILOT TEST SITE PLAN FIGURE
E N G I N E E R I N G & H Y D R 0 G E 0 L 0 G Y
231 HAYWOOD STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TE L.828. 281.3350 FAC.828.281C H TEC - FAIRVIEW
WWWALTANU NT EN VIRONN ENTAL.GfI 1396 CHARLOTTE HIGHWAY
DRAWN BY: EVAN YURKOVICH SCALE (FEET) BUNCOMBE COUNTY,
PROJECT MANAGER: CHRIS GILBERT NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: TEC-FAIRVIEW 25 0 25 50
DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHK AFV DATE: 2/I7/I0 P:\TEC\FAIRVIEW\FIGURES\CAD\PILOTTEST\PILOTTESTSITEPLAN

•
•
Z300
Z 250
a N
w.
Z N
O
Fay
> U
J IN
W J
DO
a K 2,200
uj
W
v
2,150
w
MW-17
MW-3
MANUFACTURING BUILDING
a
RW-6 RW-7
REGOLITH
N
MW-25 MW-26
r iiir r-rr i' rirr /r
Al
- i'r,i ''r iiiir r ir',iiir r•' r rr
'-iir'' i'r•i '' ' '-iii -- -irir' iir�i riii %iir i''-' �i'r�:
:i��iiiiiiiiiiirii''-iiir�iriii`riiiiriii'•iiiiiiiiiii iii f'ri %�ii iiii- iii �%�%�i �i�%�����iii %�ir.=ii �ir
r iii r• � r ,.. i t BEDROCK
r--
�iiii
• •�i.i%i, r i'-r% r r'r iiii iii%:=i'''- iii ii'''r iir iii iiiii'% iiir� i% 'ram-r'r
NOTES:
1) TRACE OF THIS CROSS-SECTION IS SHOWN ON FIGURE 3.
2) A ZONE OF PARTIALLY WEATHERED ROCK (TRANSITION ZONE) MAY LIE
BETWEEN THE REGOLITH AND BEDROCK.
3) RW-7 WILL BE THE PILOT TEST INJECTION WELL.
4) ? ? INDICATES THAT THE INTERFACE WAS INFERRED.
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1' - 30'
ENGINEERING & HYDR0GEOLOGY
231 HAYWOOD STREET, ASHEVILLE. NC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAC. 828. 281. 3351
W W W. A L T A M O N T E N V I R O N M E N T A L. C OM
DRAWN BY: EVAN YURKOVICH
PROJECT MANAGER: CHRIS GILBERT SCALE AS SHOWN (FEET)
CLIENT: TEC-FAIRVIEW
DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHK APV DATE: 2/17/10
RECEIVED /DENR/DWO
A0UIFFP'P4rTc'7lnk' cFCTION
kIHit 4 LU iU
I FGFNn:
Q ELEVATION OF POTENTIOMETRIC
SURFACE MEASURED 11/16/09 (RW-6
AND RW-7 NOT REPORTED BECAUSE
THEY WERE PUMPING AT TIME OF
MEASUREMENTS)
GENERALIZED GEOLOGIC FIGURE
CROSS-SECTION
TEC - FAIRVIEW
1396 CHARLOTTE HIGHWAY 5
BUNCOMBE COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
P:\TEC\FAIRVIEW\FIGURES\CAD\PILOTTEST

AJ
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E.
Governor Director
March 14, 2012
Richard Suminski
Tyco Electronics Corporation
P.O. Box 3608, M/S 140-42
Harrisburg, PA 17105-3608
Ref: Issuance of Injection Permit WIOI00089
Tyco Electronics Corp. Facility
Fairview, Buncombe County, North Carolina.
Dear Mr.-Suminski:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
In accordance with the application received on January 19, 2012, and the supporting data received March 5, 2012, we are
forwarding renewed permit number WI0100089. This permit is to inject sodium permanganate to remediate groundwater
contaminated with chlorinated solvents at the facility referenced above. This permit shall be effective from the date of
issuance until May 31, 2012, shall void Permit WI0100089 issued June 21, 2010, and shall be subject to the conditions
and limitations stated therein, including the requirement to submit a final project evaluation as stated in PART VII —
MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. Please read the entire permit to ensure that you are aware of all
compliance requirements of the permit.
You will need to notify this office by telephone 48 hours prior to initiation of operation of the facility. In order to
continue uninterrupted legal use of the injection facility for the stated purpose, you must submit an application to renew
the permit 120 days prior to its expiration date. Please contact me at 919-807-6352 or at [e-mail] if
you have any questions about your permit.
Best Regards,
David Goodrich, L.G.
Hydrogeologist
cc: Landon Davidson, Asheville Regional Office
Christopher Gilbert, Altamont Environmental, 231 Haywood St., Asheville, NC 28801
Robert Lutfy, DWM Saperfund Section
W10100089 Permit File,
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1636
Location:.-512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Naturally

E NGINEERING & H Y D R O G E O L O G Y
231 HAYWOOD STREET. ASHEVILLE. NC 28801
TEL.828.281 _3350 FAC.828.281.3351
W W W .A LTA NONTK N V I RON N <NTA L.CON
March 5, 2012
Mr. David Goodrich
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Subject: Responses to Additional Information Request
W10100089 Permit Application
Tyco Electronics Corporation Facility
Groundwater Injection Well (51) System
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
Altamont Environmental, Inc. (Altamont), on behalf of Tyco Electronics Corporation (TEC), submitted a permit
renewal application package to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(DENR) on January 13, 2012. In order to continue your review, please find listed below and on the following
page responses to the additional information request submitted to TEC on February 16, 2012.
The ultimate fate of the recovered sodium permanganate is not clear. Please indicate whether it will be
reinjected or discarded.
The sodium permanganate will be agitated and removed from well RW-07 to determine if the well filter pack
is occluded. Once this is determined, a final decision will be made on the fate of the recovered sodium
permanganate. The eventual fate of the sodium permanganate may be as follows:
• If agitation and removal proves difficult, then the filter pack may be heavily occluded and well
redevelopment may be necessary. Little if any permanganate will be recovered in this scenario. In
this scenario, any recovered permanganate will be discarded (disposed of off -site).
• If the agitation and removal can be completed without much difficulty and the purple color does not
persist, then the remaining sodium permanganate was likely due to temporary filter pack occlusion.
Little if any permanganate will be recovered in this scenario. In this scenario, any recovered
permanganate will be discarded (disposed of off -site).
• If the agitation and removal can be completed without much difficulty and the purple color persists
following removal of at least three well volumes, which would likely indicate that the sodium
permanganate is present within the surrounding aquifer and that the excess permanganate is most
probably due to a lower -than -measured permanganate natural oxidant demand (PNOD), then the
PNOD was underestimated and the remaining sodium permanganate will be re -injected.
RECEIVEDIDENRIM
MAR 0 7 2012
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test_2010\UIC Application\Ltr-DENR-Additional 1�5f�Pii it n esp tion C Mnion esponses_ ev ocx

Mr. David Goodrich -
March 5,-2012 .,.
i
Page-2 of 3.:
The.storage of the injectant substance is a concern. Please indicate if there: is any likelihood of the stored
injectant coming into contact with sulfuric
J acid peroxide, or an otheroxidizable Substances.
g , P y .
A new building with secondary: containment was constructed:for thesole purpose of storing the sodium
permanganate..:°The building is:located northeast of the:°recoverywells and.is separate from the:TEC facility.
Only.a container(s) of permanganate will be stored in the building: Adequate space between: the container(s)
and the interior building wa[Is-wilI be maintained to' allow site workers .to safely inspect the:sealed
container(s) for possible leaks. See attached photos of the-riew permanganate storage building'
The only sulfuric acid on -site is contained -within vehicle batteries and quality assurance (QA): test, batteries
storedinside the main building: The: only peroxide is Benzoyl peroxide, and is stored inside.the main building.
The stored'sodium permanganate will. not come: in: contact with sulfuric acid and: eroxide. and it is extremely
y
unlikely to come in contact with any:'other: oxidizable substances:.:'
It is not clear how long the sodium permanganate will be. stored. Please indicate: how long:it will be stored;.
whether the secondary containment is an open or a closed -containment system, and whether the
containment system is appropriate for the safe storage of the -recovered injectant.
The sodium permanganate will: initially be stored while we determine the condition of RW-Q7 for injection
purposes. As soon as the initial steps are completed, we will have a better time frame on the storage of the
sodium permanganate long-term.. Long-term plans may: include injection into other wells. Altamont -
..anticipates 60 days to complete the.initiai investigation steps, and. if injection into other wells is proposed,-
i80 days to modify the current underground injection control permit. The permanganate may IJ6 stored for.
as long as about 24O:days. As can -be seen.inthe attached photographs, the secondary containment is.a.
closed containment system (a curbed concrete floor, four walls, and a roof): and will be locked and secured.
The building contains no floor drains. In. our opinion, the system is appropriate for thesafestorage of the
recovered :injectant.
Aatorm drain .is located. approximately 25 feet from the injection: site. Please indicate if a
contingency/response plan is in place to address the possible accidental spillage of the injectant.
The storm drainwill be bermed:and`protectedfrom:a►i accidentalrelease when transferring -permanganate
solution from wells to containers and from containers to wells and when moving containers: -Contingency/
response plans and containment procedures, as described in the permanganate supplier Carus
Corporation's presentation on The Safe Use.and Handling of Permanganate:Products, will be in.effect when
transferring permanganate solution from wells to containers and .from containers -to wells and when moving
. containers:- The appropriate pages from the document areincluded as an attachment. Additionally,:
Altamont will adh.ere.to its September: 2010 Underground: Injection Control Site -Specific Health and Safety_:
..
Planduring:work activities.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot ,Test _2010\UICApplication\Ltr-DENR-Additional Information ResponsesRev2.Docx:

Mr. David Goodrich
March 5, 2012
Page 3 of 3
Thank you for your time and consideration on this project. Please feel free to call or respond with any
questions or comments.
Sincerely,
ALTAMONT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
4
Christopher F. Gilbert, P.E.
Enclosures: Photographs of Secondary Containment Building
Appropriate Pages from Carus "The Safe Use and Handling of Permanganate Products"
cc: Mr. Glen Foster Tyco Electronics Corporation, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Mr. John Frazier Tyco Electronics Corporation, Fairview, North Carolina
Mr. Landon Davidson DENR, Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection Section,
Asheville Regional Office
RECEIVEDIDENR/M
MAR 0 7 2012
Aquifer Protection Section
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test_2010\UIC Application\Ltr-DENR-Additional Information Responses_Rev2.Docx

Sodium Permanganate Storage Duilding Photographs
TEC-Fairview, Fairview, North Carolina
1-11uLos taken January 27, 2012
Page 1
Photograph 1: Sodium permanganate storage building with lockable roll -up door.
Photograph 2: Inside of sodium permanganate building with secondary containment.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test_2010\UIC Application\Permanganate Building Photos_Glfoster.Doc

Permanganate. Storage
Requirements
CARCJS�
• Stable .under normal conditions
• Keep dry and away from heat
• Do not store next to acids, peroxides, combustible
organics, such as brake fluid or antifreeze, metal
powders, or other materials identified in the MSDS
• Take care to protect the containers from physical
damage

Liquid Permanganate
Spill. Clean-up.
• Contain and isolate the liquid, collecting in a pit or holding area**
• Dilute the solution with water until the permanganate concentration is
less than 6%. (Mn04_)
• Neutralize the permanganate using a solution of sodium thiosulfate,
bisulfite, or ferrous salt
** Carus tested the following materials and found them to be -compatible
with 40% sodium permanganate:
PIG® Haz Mat Adsorbent Sock
Spill-tek Adsorbent Pad
United Sorbents Polypropylene Adsorbent Pad
r- I

Additional Safety Considerations
for Liquid Permanganate
CARUS�
WATER .... WATER .....WATER!
NEVER. neutralize a concentrated solution
Always dilute the permanganate to less than 6%
v before attempting any type of chemical neutralization
*May ignite wood, cloth, or paper.
If clothing becomes contaminated wash with water
immediately
Spontaneous ignition may occur with wood or paper
Store on a. concrete floor
DILUTE ... DILUTE .. DILUTE!

Goodrich, David
From: Goodrich, David
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 11:04 AM
To: Laverty, Brett
Subject: RE: Additional Information Requested for the renewal of Permit W10100089
Brett,
Thank you for transmitting their response to me. I think that we have all that we need to proceed.
Regards,
David Goodrich
Aquifer Protection Section Central Office
Office Telphone Number: [phone] -
Aquifer Protection Section Main Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
From: Laverty, Brett
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 10:23 AM
To: Goodrich, David
Subject: RE: Additional Information Requested for the renewal of Permit WI0100089
David,
The letter was addressed to you so I am sure it still en route. Altamont is here in Asheville ... I believe our copy arrived
first. Let me know if you need anything else from me.
Brett Laverty
Brett Laverty - brett.laverty(a ncdenr.gov
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Aquifer Protection Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Notice: E-mail correspondence to and -from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records
Law and therefore may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Goodrich, David
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:30 AM
To: Davidson, Landon; Laverty, Brett
Subject: FW: Additional Information Requested for the renewal of Permit WI0100089
Office Telphone Number: [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section Main Number: [phone]
1

Goodrich, David
From: Laverty, Brett
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 9:22 AM
To: Goodrich, David
Subject: RE: Additional Information Requested for the renewal of Permit W10100089
David,
I reviewed the information request from Altamont Environmental. I am satisfied with their response and have no further
questions.
Brett Laverty
Brett Laverty - brett.laverty(�D_ncdenr.gov
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Aquifer Protection Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa; NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Notice: E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records
Law and therefore may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Goodrich, David.
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:30 AM
To: Davidson, Landon; Laverty, Brett
Subject: FW: Additional Information Requested for the renewal of Permit WI0100089
Office Telphone Number: [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section Main Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
From: Goodrich, David
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:29 AM
To:'[e-mail]'
Subject: Additional Information Requested for the renewal of Permit WI0100089
Mr. Gilbert:
The Aquifer Protection Section is reviewing the application for permit renewal. In order to continue, we need additional
information regarding the injectant recovery actions described in your letter to Thomas Slusser of January 13, 2012. 1 am
including our request for additional information as an attachment to this email.
Thank you for your assistance.
Regards,
David Goodrich
Aquifer Protection Section Central Office

Office Telphone Number: [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section Main Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]

231 HAVI"6OOD STREET, ASHEVELLE. HC 28801
>;EL-829-258-3350 EAC.828-28D-33511
�+4Y�.'.�FLSfi, �mSi!'D'EL��@ taeS+E� k� ELC'G'� C.GaoDB
i
March 5, 2012
Mr. David Goodrich
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Subject: Responses to Additional Information Request
W10100089 Permit Application
Tyco Electronics Corporation Facility
Groundwater Injection Well (51) System .
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
Altamont Environmental, Inc.-(Altamont), on behalf of Tyco Electronics Corporation (TEC), submitted a permit
renewal application package to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(DENR) on January 13, 2012. In order to continue. your review, please find listed below and on thefollowing
page responses to the additional information request submitted to TEC on February 16, 2012.
The ultimate fate of the recovered sodium permanganate is not clear. Please indicate whether it will be
reinjected or discarded.
The sodium permanganate will be agitated and removed from well RW-07 to determine if the well filter pack
is occluded. Once this is determined, a final decision will be made on the fate of the recovered sodium
permanganate. The eventual fate of the sodium permanganate may be as follows:
If agitation and removal proves difficult, then the filter pack may be heavily occluded and well
redevelopment may be necessary. Little if any permanganate will be recovered in this scenario. In
this scenario, any. recovered permanganate will be discarded (disposed of off -site).
® If the agitation and removal can be completed without much difficulty and the purple color does not
persist, then the remaining sodium permanganate was likely due to temporary filter pack occlusion.
Little if any permanganate will be recovered in this scenario. In this scenario, any recovered
permanganate will be discarded (disposed of off -site).
If the agitation and removal can be completed without much difficulty and the purple color persists
following removal of at least three well volumes; which would likely indicate that the sodium
permanganate is present within the surrounding aquifer and that the excess permanganate is most
probably clue to a lower -than -measured permanganate natural oxidant demand (PNOD), then the
PNOD was underestimated and the remaining sodium permanganate will be re -injected.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\PilotTest 2010\UICApplication\Ur-DEN13-Additional Information Responses_Rev2.Docx

Mr. David Goodrich
March 5, 2012
Page 2 of 3
The storage of the injectant substance is a concern. Please indicate if there is any likelihood of the stored
injectant coming into contact with sulfuric acid, peroxide, or any other oxidizable substances.
A new building with secondary containment was constructed for the sole purpose of storing the sodium
permanganate: The building is located northeast of the recovery wells and is separate from the TEC facility.
Only a container(s) of permanganate will be stored in the building. Adequate space between the container(s)
and the interior building walls will be maintained to allow site workers to safely inspect the sealed
container(s) for possible leaks. See attached photos of the new permanganate storage building.
The only sulfuric acid on -site is contained within vehicle batteries and quality assurance (QA) test batteries
stored inside the main building. The only peroxide is Benzoyl peroxide and is stored inside the main building.
The stored sodium permanganate will not come in contact with sulfuric acid and peroxide and it is extremely
unlikely to come in contact with any other oxidizable. substances.
It is not clear how long the sodium permanganate will be stored. Please indicate how long it will be stored,
whether the secondary containment is an open or a closed containment system, and whether the
containment system is appropriate for the safe storage of the recovered injectant.
The sodium permanganate will initially rbe stored while we determine the condition of RW-07 for injection
purposes. As soon as the initial steps are completed, we will'have a better time frame on the storage of the
sodium permanganate long-term. Long-term plans may include injection into other wells. Altamont
anticipates 60 days to complete the. initial investigation steps, and if injection into other wells is proposed,
180 days to modify the current underground injection control permit. The permanganate may be stored for
as long as about 240 days. As can be seen in the attached photographs, the secondary containment is a
closed containment system (a curbed concrete floor, four walls, and a roof) and will be locked and secured.
The building contains no floor drains. In our opinion, the.system is appropriate for the safe storage of the
recovered injectant.
A storm drain is located approximately 25 feet from the injection site. Please indicate if a
contingency/response plan is in place to address the possible accidental spillage of the injectant.
The storm drain will be bermed and protected from an accidental release when transferring permanganate
solution from wells to containers and from containers to wells and when moving containers. Contingency/
response plans and containment procedures, as described in the permanganate supplier Carus
Corporation's presentation on The Safe Use and Handling of Permanganate Products, will be in effect when
transferring permanganate solution from wells to containers and from containers to wells and when moving
containers. The appropriate pages from the document are included as an attachment. Additionally,
Altamont will adhere to its September 2010 Underground Injection Control Site -Specific Health and Safety
Plain during work activities.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\PilotTest_2010\UICApplication\Ltr-DENR-Additional Information Responses_Rev2.Docx

;Mr. David Goodrich
March 5, 2012
Page 3 of 3
Thank you for your time and consideration on this project. Please feel free to call or respond with any
questions or comments.
Sincerely,
ALTAMONT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC,
Christopher F. Gilbert, P.E.
Enclosures: Photographs of Secondary Containment Building
Appropriate Pages froni Carus "The Safe Use and Handling of Permanganaie Products"
cc: Mr. Glen Foster Tyco Electronics Corporation, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Mr. John Frazier Tyco.Electronics Corporation, Fairview, North Carolina
Mr. Landon Davidson DENR, Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection Section,
Asheville Regional Office,
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test_2010\UIC Application\Ltr-DENR-Additional Information Responses_Rev2_.Docx

Sodium Permanganate Storage Building Photographs
TEC-Fairview, Fairview, North Carolina
Photos taken January 27, 2012
Page 1
Photograph 1: Sodium permanganate storage building with lockable roll -up door.
Photograph 2: Inside of sodium permanganate building with secondary containment.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test_2010\UIC Application\Permanganate Building Photos_Glfoster.Doc

a Stable under normal conditions
,D Keep dry and away from heat
Do not store next. to acids, peroxides, combustible
organics, such as brake fluid or antifreeze, metal'
oother material identified in the MSDS
pov,vders, 1. r ate
,-- Take care to protect the containers from physical
damage

Cdontain anisoiatthe liquid, coilecting in a pit ®r holding area**
, %�e
Dilute the solution with eater until the permanganate concentration is
less than 6% (MnC4
Neutralize the perrnanganate using a solution of sodium thiosulfate,
bisuif-ite, or ferrous scallt
Carus tested the following materials and found them to be compatible
with 40% sodium permanganate:
Pg1G OP Haz Mat Adsorbent SoCk
Spill-tek Adsorbent Pad
United Sorbents Polypropylene Adsorbent Pad

!,F%JA7ER,, - ., VVA7ER .... IiFIATERl'
oNEVER neutralize a concentrated solution
Always dilute the permanganate to less than 6%
before attempting any type of chemical neutralization
,vMay ignite wood, cloth, or paper
if clothing becomes contaminated wash with water
irnmediate�Y
.Spontaneous ignition May occur with wood or paper
Store on a concrete floor
MLUTE .... DILFUTE -

Goodrich, David
From: Chris Gilbert [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 1:29 PM
To: Goodrich, David
Subject: RE: Additional Information Requested for the renewal of Permit W10100089
David,
We recently built a secondary containment building specifically for this project and I will describe this in a formal
response to you letter. Just FYI, I am about to leave on a vacation and will be out of touch next week (no email no cell
phone), but I will respond on behalf of Tyco as soon as I get back.
Thanks for sending me the email.
-Chris Gilbert
From: Goodrich, David[mailto:david.goodrichCa)ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:29 AM
To: Chris Gilbert
Subject: Additional Information Requested for the renewal of Permit WI0100089
Mr. Gilbert:
The Aquifer Protection Section is reviewing the application for permit renewal. In order to continue, we need additional
information regarding the injectant recovery actions described in your letter to Thomas Slusser of January 13, 2012. 1 am
including our request for additional information as an attachment to this email.
Thank you for your assistance.
Regards,
David Goodrich
Aquifer Protection Section Central Office
Office Telphone Number: [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section Main Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
1

Goodrich, David
From: Goodrich, David
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 3:16 PM
To: 'Foster, Glen L'
Subject: RE: Additional Information Requested for the renewal of Permit,W10100089
Attachments: W10100089AddinfoGF.docx
Glen,
Please see the attached additional information request. I am also sending a hard copy, and will send you future
correspondence.
Regards,
David Goodrich
Office Telphone Number: [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section Main Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
From: Foster, Glen L [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 1:38 PM
To: Goodrich, David
Subject: FW: Additional Information Requested for the renewal of Permit WI0100089
David,
Not sure what the department's procedures are, but could you direct correspondence to me instead of Mr. Suminski? He
.signed the application as the corporate officer, but I am the one directly involved with the application.
Thanks, Glen
From: Chris Gilbert [mailto:cgilbertaltamontenvironmental.coml
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 1:30 PM
To: Foster, Glen L
Cc: Evan Yurkovich
.Subject: FW: Additional Information Requested for the renewal of Permit WI0100089
From: Goodrich, David jmailto:david.goodrich Cab ncdenr.govl
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:29 AM
To: Chris Gilbert
Subject: Additional Information Requested for the renewal of Permit WI0100089
Mr. Gilbert:
The Aquifer Protection Section is reviewing the application for permit renewal. In order to continue, we need additional
information regarding the injectant recovery actions described in your letter to Thomas Slusser of January 13, 2012. 1 am
including our request for additional information as an attachment to this email.
Thank you for your assistance.
Regards,

David Goodrich
Aquifer Protection Section Central Office
Office Telphone Number: [phone]
Aquifer Protection Section Main Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]

AN -94
NCDEN
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
February 16, 2012
Mr. Glen Foster, Director, Global Environmental
Tyco Electronics Corporation
PO Box 3608, M/S 038-34
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105-3608
Subject: Additional Information Request
WI0100089 Permit Application
Tyco Electronics Corporation Facility
Groundwater Injection Well (5I) System
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Foster:
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit is reviewing the subject permit renewal application packages dated
January 13, 2012. Additional information is required before we may continue our review. Please address
the following items no later than March 16, 2012:
1) The ultimate fate of the recovered sodium permanganate is not clear. Please indicate whether it will
be reinjected or discarded.
2) The storage of the injectant substance is a concern. Please indicate if there is any likelihood of the
stored injectant coming into contact with sulfuric acid, peroxide, or any other oxidizable substances.
3) It is not clear how long the sodium permanganate will be stored. Please indicate how long it will be
stored, whether the secondary containment is an open or a closed containment system, and whether
the containment system is appropriate for the safe storage of the recovered injectant.
4) A storm drain is located approximately 25 feet from the injection site. Please indicate if a
contingency/response plan is in place to address the possible accidental spillage of the injectant.
Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules
and regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the
responsibility of the applicant.
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. Three copies
of all revised and/or additional documentation should be signed, sealed, dated, and submitted to my
attention at the address at the bottom of the cover page of this letter.
Please note that failure to provide this additional information on or before the above requested date
may result in your application being returned as incomplete. If additional time is necessary, the
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 tte
Phone: 919�07-64641 FAX: [phone] Orie thCal olina
Internet: www.ncuvateraualitv.om Nor�lrtlll'�t��f
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Glen Foster
February 16, 2012
Page 2 of 2
application may be withdrawn to avoid being returned as incomplete. Either the applicant or the
applicant's consultant may request withdrawal by email message or letter if this is desired.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] or
at [e-mail]. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
David Goodrich
Aquifer Protection Section
cc: Christopher Gilbert, Altamont Environmental, Inc., 231 Haywood Street, Asheville, NC 28801
Landon Davidson, Asheville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
APS Central Files WI0100089

J
N1CDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E.
Governor t , Director
�oYJ4r, P��S
o
February 16, 2012
Mr. Richard J. Suminski, Vice President & Deputy General Council
Tyco Electronics Corporation
PO Box 3608, M/S 038-34
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105-3608
Subject: Additional Information Request
WI0100089 Permit Application
Tyco Electronics Corporation Facility
Groundwater Injection Well (5I) System
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Suminski:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The Non -Discharge Permitting Unit is reviewing the subject permit renewal application packages dated
January 13, 2012. Additional information is required before we may continue our review. Please address
the following items no later than March 16, 2012:
1) The ultimate fate of the recovered sodium permanganate is not clear. Please indicate whether it will
be reinjected or discarded.
2) The storage of the injectant substance is a concern. Please indicate if there is any likelihood of the
stored injectant coming into contact with sulfuric acid, peroxide, or any other oxidizable substances.
3) It is not clear how long the sodium permanganate will be stored. Please indicate how long it will be
stored, whether the secondary containment is an open or a closed containment system, and whether
the containment system is appropriate for the safe storage of the recovered injectant.
4) A storm drain is located approximately 25 feet from the injection site. Please indicate if a
contingency/response plan is in place to address the possible accidental spillage of the injectant.
Please be aware that you are responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules
and regulations. Any oversights that occurred in the review of the subject application package are still the
responsibility of the applicant.
Please reference the subject application number when providing the requested information. Three copies
of all revised and/or additional documentation should be signed, sealed, dated, and submitted to my
attention at the address at the bottom of the cover page of this letter.
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Noi thCarolina
Internet: wuuw.ncwatemualiri.org �aturall�
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

_Richard A. Suminski
February 16, 2012 t
Page 2 of 2
application may be withdrawn to avoid being returned as incomplete. Either the applicant or the
applicant's consultant may request withdrawal by email message or letter if this is desired.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] or
at [e-mail]. Thank you for your, cooperation.
Sincerely,
David Goodrich
Aquifer Protection Section
cc: Christopher Gilbert, Altamont Environmental, Inc., 231 Haywood Street, Asheville, NC 28801
Landon Davidson, Asheville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
APS Central' Files WI0100089

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E.
Governor Director
January 30, 2012
Richard J. Suminski — Vice President & Deputy General Counsel
Tyco Electronics Corporation
PO Box 3608
MIS 038-34
Harrisburg, PA 1.7105-3608
Dear Mr. Suminski:
Natural Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Acknowledgement of
Application No. WI0100089
Tyco Electronics Corporation
Injection In situ Groundwater
Remediation Well (51) System
Buncombe County
The Aquifer Protection Section acknowledges receipt of your permit application and supporting
documentation received on 1/19/2012. Your application package has been assigned the number listed
above, and the primary reviewer is David Goodrich.
Central and Asheville Regional Office staff will perform a detailed review of the provided
application, and may contact you with a request for additional information. To ensure maximum
efficiency in processing permit applications, the Aquifer Protection Section requests your assistance in
providing a timely and complete response to any additional information requests._
Please note that processing standard review permit applications may take as long as 60 to 90 days
after receipt of a complete application. If you have any questions, please contact
David Goodrich at [phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
for Debra J. Watts
Groundwater Protection Unit Supervisor
cc: Asheville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Christopher Gilbert — Altamont Environmental, Inc.
I;ermitlMilW�IUi©fl0$9
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] ;FAY.: 919-807-6496
Internet: wvvw.ncwaterguality.org
One
N6fthCar()1i_na
An Equal Opportunity ! Affirmative Action Employer

INFORMATION
FROM
ORIGINAL
PERMIT
APPLICATION

E N G I N E E R I N G & HYDROGEOL O G Y
231 HAYWOOD STREET, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351
WWW.ALTAMONTKNVIRONMENTAL.COM
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
.o: Mr. Thomas Slusser, UIC Proarafp-Aciuifer
From: Mr. Evan Yurkovich
Date: October 15, 2010
Enclosed, please find the Sodium Permanganate Injection Summary for the TEC facility in Fairview,
North Carolina.
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test_2010\Field Work\Trans-DENR-Injection Event Summary.Doc

Table 1
Sodium Permanganate Injection Event Summary
Tyco Electronics Corporation
Fairview, North Carolina
Time
Approximate
NaMnOa
concentration
Approximate
Injection Flow
Rate Igpm)
Calculated
Injection Flow
Rate Iepm 1
Pressure
Reading at
Wellhead
(psig)
Approximate
Incremental
Volumes
Injected
Approximate
Cumulative
Volume
Injected
Depth to water (feet below TOC)
MW-07
MW-061
-
MW-39
MW-40
MW-41
MW-03
MW-17
MW-26
MW-25
Notes/Observations
9/14/1010
8:15 AM
3.11
8.99
US
3.08
3.36
6.25
1.40
14.02
14.03
Mix Batch 01 consisting of approximately 100
gallons water and 25 gallons 40-A NaMn04.
9:35 AM
101A
0.9 to 1.2
1.8
4
Be in In ection #1.
3.12
6.53 1
3.16
2.60
2.91
6.25
1.32
NMT
NMT
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
125
125
Stop Injection K. Mix Batch 02 consisting of
approximately 100 gallons water and 25 gallons
40-A NaMn04'
11:00 AM
10%
0.95 to L4
1.3
2
Be in In ection #2.
3.10
6.50
3.30
2.63
2.99
6.22
1.32
13.90
13.60
11:40 AM
12:15 PM
3.10
6.46
3.10
2.50
2.90
1.23
1.21
NMT
NMT
-
12:30 PM
120
245
Stop Injection #2. Mix Batch #3 consisting of
approximately 100 gallons water and 25 gallons
4016 NaMn0,
1:00 PM
10%
0.99 to 1.6
L2
2
Be in In'ection #3.
3.03
6.45
3.30
2.61
2.98
6.21 1
1.32
1 13.90
1 13.85
1:30 PM
2:40 PM
120
365
Stop Injection 03. Mix Batch 114 consisting of
approximately 100 gallons water and 25 gallons
40%NaMnO,.
2:55 PM
10",6
1.95
2.3
4
Be in In ection 94.
3:00 PM
3.10
6.44
3.25
2.61
2.96
6.21
1.31
NMT
NMr
3:35 PM
2.07
3.10
6.43
2.71
2.30
2.75
6.19
1.30
NMT
NNIT
3:50 PM
125
490
Stop Injection #4. Mix Batch #5 consisting of
approximately 120 gallons water and 25 gallons
40-A NaMn04.
4:20 PM
<10%
1.76 to 2.05
1.9
4
Begin In ection #5.
4:35 AM
5:30 PM
NMT
6.45
2.95
2.42
1 2.85
6.20
1.34
13.87
13.65
130
620
Stop Injection #5, Stand down for the evening.
9/15/30 -
7:00 AM
Mix Batch #6 consisting of approximately 100
gallons water and 25 gallons 40-A NaMnO4.
103A
2to 2.3
2.3
2
NMT
6.60
3.50
2.91
2.95
6.29
1.42
13.99
13.95
Begin Injection 96.
115735approximately
Stop Injection #6. Mix Batch #7 consisting of
100 gallons waterand 25 gallons
4WANaMn04.
1.9 to 2.3
2.1
2
Be inIneRion#7.
E7A
NNR
6.52
3.10
2.58
2.82
6.29
1.38
NMr
NMTS0--
115
850
Stop Injection #7. Mix Batch #8 consisting of
approximately 140 gallons water and 35 gallons
40%NaMn04'
10%
1.76 to 2.01
1.9
2
Be h. In ection #8.
10:20 AM
11:10 AM
NMT
6.50E2.52
2.47
2.79
6.28
1.32
13.90
13.87
NMT
6.50
2.20
2.62
6.25
1.32
NMT
NMT
11:45 AM
170
1020
Stop Injection #8. Mix Batch (ro consisting of
approximately 140 gallons water and 35 gallons
40%NaMn04.
30°/
1.8 to 2.7
1.9
2
Begin In ection #9.
120 PM
PEE
2;()0 PM
NMT
6.49
1.411
1.15
2.56
6.26
NMT
NMi
NMT
175
1 1195
Sto In'ection #9.
Notes:
1=flow rate measured at the gauge at the well head.
2 = pump in well was pulled at about 7:50 AM 9/13/10
NMT = No measurement taken.
3= Volume measured based on graduated 225 gallon square poly tank.
4 = Calculated flow rate based on volume Injected over time.
P:\TEC\FaWlew\Correspondence\Pilot Test_2010\Field Work\Injectlon Event Rerord.xlsx

A e�
w— —
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleeb H. Sullins
Governor Director
June 21, 2010
Richard Suminski
Tyco Electronics Corporation
P.O: Box 3608, M/S 140-42
Harrisburg, PA 17105
Ref: Issuance of Injection Permit WI0100089
Tyco Electronics Corp. Facility
Fairview, Buncombe County, North Carolina.
Dear Mr. Suminski:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
In accordance with the application received on March 24, 2010, and the supporting data received May 25, 2010, and June
9, 2010, we are forwarding permit number WI0100089. This permit is to inject sodium permanganate to remediate
groundwater contaminated with chlorinated solvents at the, facility referenced above. This permit shall be effective from
the date of issuance until May 31, 2012, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations stated therein, including the
requirement to submit a fmal project evaluation as stated in PART VII — MONITORING AND REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS. Please read the entire permit to ensure that you are aware of all compliance requirements of the
permit.
You will need to notify this office by telephone 48 hours prior to initiation of operation of the facility. In order to
continue uninterrupted legal use of the injection facility for the. stated purpose, you must submit an application to renew
the permit 120 days prior to its expiration date. Please contact me at 919-715-6164 or Thomas.Slusser(a),nedenr.gov if you
have any questions about your permit.
Best Regards,
Thomas Slusser, L.G.
Program Manager
Underground Injection Control Program
cc: Landon Davidson, Asheville Regional Office
Alec MacBeth, Altamont Environmental, 231 Haywood St., Asheville, NC 28801
Robert Luftly, DWM Superfund Section
WI0100089 Permit File
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX 1: 919-715-0588; FAX 2: 919-715-60481 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterQuality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative .Action Employer
Nor thCarolina
ati(rall

Slusser, Thomas
From: Alec Macbeth[amacbeth@altamontenvironrri'ental.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 10:13 AM
To: Slusser, Thomas
Cc: Chris Gilbert
Subject: gw velocity calculation
Attachments: backup for velocity calc..pdf
Thomas --
Good morning. Per your request, the following is a calculation of average linear velocities of groundwater near RW-07
to support the UIC permit for the sodium permanganate ISCO pilot test at TEC-Fairview, NC. I know this is kind of on the
informal side. If you need more documentation or have questions, please feel free to call me.
Average linear velocity equation (Fetter, 1987) is as follows:
V = (K/ne)ih, where
V = average linear velocity
K = hydraulic conductivity
ne = effective porosity
ih= horizontal hydraulic gradient
In November 2009, we advanced a soil boring approximately 15 feet north of RW-07 to collect soil samples for NOD
information. The boring log is attached. On the basis of the spilt spoon samples we defined the soil lithology as clayey
silts (CL) from 0 to 15 feet below ground surface (bgs) and 30 to 44 feet bgs. We identified silty sands (SM) from 15 to
30 feet bgs and 44 to 46 feet bgs, where we encountered HSA refusal. Soils were noted as saturated at 15 feet bgs.
Saprolite was identified from 0 to 44 bgs and PWR/Saprolite was noted�from 44 to 46 feet bgs.
On the basis of Maidment's Handbook of Hydrology (1993) (see attached file), we assigned the following effective
porosity values to the soils:
Clayey silt ne = 0.01
Silty sand ne = 0.1
On the basis of Freeze and Cherry (1979) (see attached file) we assigned the following K values:
Clayey silt K =10-6 cm/s
Silty sand K = 10-3 CM/S.
We calculated the horizontal gradient by performing a three point problem for the calculated water level elevations
(measured 5/18/10) at MW-04, MW-16R, PZ-S4 (see Figure 6 from UIC Permit application). We picked these monitoring
wells to make sure we were away from the influences of pumping by the recovery wells (see attached file).
ih = 0.032 ft/ft
So! The average linear velocity for the clayey silt (VCL) and for silty sand (VSM) is as follows:
VCR _ (10-6 cm%s/0.01)(0.032 ft/ft) = 3.2 x 10-6 cm/s = 0.01 ft/day
VSM = (10-3 cm/s/0.1)(0.032 ft/ft) = 3.2 x 10-4 cm/s = 0.91 ft/day
Thanks.
Alec Macbeth, PG

2-21
common definition of effective porosity. We see then that effective porosity is equal to or less
than specific yield. Bear and Verruijt (1987) call this interconnected porosity, the effective
porosity for flow through the medium, neff, rather than just effective porosity, ne..In this way,
the important connection with flow is established. We will see later that the true velocity of a
contaminant is inversely proportional to the value of ne,r (in this chapter the subscript is
simplified to: nef), so its distinction from ne is more than just semantics. Other names have been
given to the effective porosity for flow, including dynamic porosity, kinematic . porosity and
transport porosity. Mercer and Waddell (Chapter 16 in Maidment's Handbook of Hydrology
:[1993]) suggest using -nef = :0.01 for clays, silty clays- and sandy clays; nef = 0.1 for- silts, silt
loams and silty clay`loams; and nej = 0.2 for,all -other rock types.
In the case of sand and gravel aquifers or other geologic materials with no appreciable
immobile water, a reasonable :assumption is to ignore the low specific retention and assume:
n = ne = Sy nef (2-5)
For soils which have a high degree of soil aggregates, however, this is a poor -assumption.
Unfortunately, there are few data published on the effective porosity for flow. It can only be
reliably determined experimentally using tracers in soil cores or in field piezometers.
Storage In Confined And Unconfined Aquifers
The volume of water released or absorbed by an aquifer when the head is decreased or
increased can be quantified with the storativity coefficient of the aquifer. In water table aquifers;
the unconfined storativity is called the specific yield, s,.. In confined aquifers, one uses the
specific storage coefficient, Ss, when the head varies in three dimensions; and the storage
coefficient, S, when the two-dimensional, hydraulic approach is used.
THE PRINCETON REMEDIATIONT COURSE R.W. CLEARY

in
p
—Karst limestone----
Permeable basalt —
h�
Fractured igneous and
t
metamorphic rocks —
tD
Limestone and
dolomite —
Sandstone
Unfractured
M
(D
—metamorphic ond—
°n
iD
igneous rocks
-- Shale.
_
Unweathered
C
marine clay
—
`i0
0Glacial
fill
—
Sill, loess -- -
0 0
—Silly sand
'"
CZ
— Clean sand—
^ o
Gravel
Ia
a
r4
C1 0 0 0l
o
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
N
W A. In
v
\3
lO
O Oi OI O
O
O O O O OI O
O O O
N
O1 O O O
1 1
O
1
O O O O O O
1 1
O O
3>
V
OI IT A W N
3
0 0 0 o
a
o 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1
0 0
'
W N 0
tD.
W V T N A W
1 �
N
C
O OI O O O
O
O Q O O 0
0 O
o
�I Qi N .N W
N L. A
N N
N
n

BORING NUMBER SB-01
` • 1110, PAGE 1 OF 2
CLIENT TEC PROJECT NAME Pilot Test Boring
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT LOCATION Fairview, NC
DATE STARTED-1 1/13/09 COMPLETED 11/13/09 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE 6-inch
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Metro Drilling GROUND WATER LEVELS:
DRILLING METHOD AT TIME OF DRILLING --
LOGGED BY Alec Macbeth CHECKED BY AT END OF DRILLING —
NOTES AFTER DRILLING --
a
_
W>
���
Q
SAMPLE ID
_
O
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Q
0
Q
mOVZ
j
0
ASPHALT, gravel sub -base
1.0
CLAYEY SILT, medium stiff, moist, red -brown, mostly silt, some clay,
trace fine sand.
5
CL
10
—
15.0
--------------------------------
SILTY SAND, medium dense, wet, red -brown, mostly fine sand, some
15
silt, trace medium sand, relict fabric, SAPROLITE.
i 20
SM
i
i
i
i
i
25
i
i
i
c
: 30
30.0_________
'-
SS
2-2-4-6
Collected sample for
_
_____________________
CLAYEY SILT, medium stiff, wet, yellowish orange, mostly silt, some
SS-01
100
(6)
NOD.
clay, relict fabric, SAPROLITE.
CL
i
35
(Continued Next Page)

BORING NUMBER SB-01
PAGE 2 OF 2
CLIENT TEC PROJECT NAME Pilot Test Boring
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT LOCATION Fairview, NC
a-y
=
ov
I=
a
�
o
H�
SAMPLE ID
U
¢ O
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
m>
WUZ
CD
40
D
CL
SS 100 -10-28-50 Collected sample for SM
S-01 (38) NOD.
CLAYEY SILT, medium stiff, wet, yellowish orange, mostly silt, some
clay, relict fabric, SAPROLITE. (continued)
SILTY SAND, very dense, wet, red -brown, mostly fine sand, some silt,
few medium sand, trace weathered schistose (dark gray, platy) rock
fragments at bottom of spilt spoon, well -developed relict fabric,
SAPROLITE/PWR.
Boring terminated at 46.0 feet.
=L

V
MW-22
17P 14 Miller Road 1�
\ t
'-4� Miller Road
Z-5
�� USED r3�
M —21J
r;
—4
PZ—DI
RVJ-2 j n
lPZ—S1r
6 Miller Road
15
I(2226.91) �� JPZ S4-.
— — _ _ _ SED-2
4 Miller. ge�-
Zr
�I
� a

Slusser, Thomas
From: Alec Macbeth[[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 5:14 PM
To: Slusser, Thomas
Cc: Laverty, Brett; Davidson, Landon; Chris Gilbert; [e-mail]
Subject: RE: Tyco Electronics injection well project
Thomas --
Thanks for your attention to our UIC application. Our answers to your questions are provided below. Please feel free to
call me to discuss further if you need more information. I'll be out of town next week, but. in the work mode, so call me
cell,phone.
Thanks.
Alec Macbeth
From: Slusser, Thomas [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 12:58 PM
To: Alec Macbeth
Cc: Laverty, Brett; Davidson, Landon
Subject: Tyco Electronics injection well project
Greetings Alec,
We have some questions/comments about the Tyco injection project in Fairview:
• Will the recovery wells be running during the pilot test? We need this information to determine
groundwater flow rates for the injection zone and to be able to evaluate the proposed monitoring
plan. The two local recovery wells, RW-6 and RW-7, will not be running. However, we plan to continue
running the downgradient recovery wells RW-1 through RW-4.
• How were the metals parameters chosen? I noticed that some are the same as the RCRA-8 list but
others are not. Is this based on site data? If so, what are the historical values and trends for the site?
Most of these metals (lead, chromium, arsenic, cadmium, and copper) were chosen based on ITRC's
Guidance for In -situ Chemical Oxidation of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater (2005). Basically,
these metals may become more soluble with an increasing oxidation state and we want to be able to
track any increased concentrations. This may affect our decision on whether to apply the
permanganate on a larger site scale. Carus particularly recommended that we keep our eye on
chromium.
• We need the well driller's certification number. AE Drilling, #2201.
• We need a revised Page 1 of the application form to match the signature page; or, a new signature
page to match the signing official listed on Page 1 of the application form. OK. When you say
"signature page", do you mean page 7 of the application (Richard J. Suminski) or the overall signature
page with Chris Gilbert and my signature? Let us know and we'll square it away.
• ARO staff inspecting the site noticed a storm drain near the chemical mixing area. What steps will be
taken to prevent the injectant from entering the storm drain in the event of an accidental spill? We'll
make sure and stage the mixing equipment on heavy duty plastic and berm the plastic with hay bales.
We'll also heavy absorbent material (socks, powder) onsite in case any releases occur.

Please provide the requested information within 30 days or the application will be returned as incomplete.
Thanks Alec,
—Thomas Slusser, L.G.
Program Manager
Underground Injection Control Program
ph# 919-715-6164
fax# [phone]
DWQ- Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Division of Water ouality
Beverly 'aves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director .
April 1, 2010
Glen Foster- Director, Global Environmental
Tyco Electronics Corporation
PO Box 3608
M/S 140-42
Harrisburg, PA 1.7105-3608
Subject: Acknowledgement of Application No. WI0100089
Tyco Electronics Corporation
Injection In situ Groundwater Remediation Well (5I)
Buncombe
Dear Mr. Foster:
Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality (Division) acknowledges receipt of your permit application' and
supporting materials on March 24, 2010. This application package has been assigned the number listed above and will be reviewed by
Thomas Slusser.
The reviewer will perform a detailed review and contact you with a request for additional information if necessary. To ensure the
maximum efficiency in processing permit applications, the Division requests your assistance in providing a timely and complete
response to any additional information requests.
Please be aware that the Division's Regional Office, copied below, must provide recommendations prior to final action by the
Division. Please also note at this time, processing permit applications can take as long as 60 - 90 days after receipt of a complete
application.
If you have any questions, please contact Thomas Slusser at 919-715-6629, or via e-mail at [e-mail]. If the
reviewer is unavailable, you may leave a message, and they will respond promptly. Also note that.the Division has reorganized. To
review our new organizational chart, go to http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/documents/dwq orachart.pdf.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRIES ON THIS PROJECT.
Sincerely,
for Debra J. Watts
Supervisor
cc: Asheville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Alec Macbeth (Altamont Environmental, Inc) 231 Haywood Street, Asheville, NC 28801
t�Permit�►fit�licatiat�F�i�le�W�I0�rQ0089
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh. North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone]?1 1 FAX 1: 919-715-0588: FAX 2: 919-715-60481 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwatemualitv.org
One
NorthiCarolina
An Equal Opportunity, AfrimativE Action Employer

E N G IN EER ING & HYDROGEOLOG Y ,171EIVED / DENR I DWq
231 HAYWOOD STREET, ASHEVILLE. NC 28801 gUIR:0 oRnrFrTinnl qFCTION
TEL.[phone] FAC.828.281.3351 MAN 2 4 MV
W W W.ALTAMONTURV IRONMENTAL.COM
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
To: Mr. Thomas Slusser, UIC Program, Aquifer Protection Section
From: Mr. Christopher F. Gilbert, PE and Mr. Alec Macbeth, PG
Date: March 22, 2010
cc: Mr. Bobby Lutfy, DENR
Mr. Glen Foster, Tyco Electronics Corporation
Subject: Application for Permit to Use a Well for Injection,
Type 51 Wells, In Situ Groundwater Remediation
Tyco Electronics Corporation (TEC) Facility
Fairview. NC
Enclosed, please find two copies of the Application for Permit to Use a Well for Injection
(Form UIC-515T), completed by Altamont Environmental, Inc. (Altamont) on behalf of Tyco
Electronic Corporation in Fairview, North Carolina (TEC). The permit addresses a proposed
pilot test at the facility to evaluate the effectiveness of adding sodium permanganate to
the saturated formation to degrade chlorinated solvents and other detected groundwater
constituents. A work plan for the project was submitted to Mr. Bobby Lutfy of the Inactive
Hazardous Sites Branch on December 23, 2009. Mr. Lutfy approved the document in a
letter dated February 1, 2010.
We appreciate your timely review and feedback for this application. Please feel free to
contact Mr. Chris Gilbert at Altamont or Mr. Glen Foster, the Director, Global
Environmental, TEC if you have any questions or need more information.
Enclosure: Application for Permit to Use a Well for Injection
P:\TEC\Fairview\Correspondence\Pilot Test 2009\UIC Application\UIC Transmittal Letter.Docx

r
L_
_4
AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
Date: February 15, 2012
To: Aquifer Protection Central Office
Central Office Reviewer: B. Laverty
Regional Login No:
County: Buncombe
Permittee: Tyco Electronics Corporation
Project Name: Fairview Facility
Application No.: WI0100089
L GENERAL INFORMATION
1. This application is (check all that appiy): ❑ New ® Renewal
❑ Minor Modification ❑ Major Modification
❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ Recycle ❑ High Rate Infiltration ❑ Evaporation/Infiltration Lagoon
❑ Land Application of Residuals ❑ Attachment B included ❑ 503 regulated
g ❑ 503 exempt
❑ Distribution of Residuals ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ Closed -loop Groundwater Remediation ® Other Injection Wells (including in situ remediation)
Was a site visit conducted in order to prepare this report? ❑ Yes or ® No.
a. Date of site visit:
b. Person contacted and contact information:
c. Site visit conducted by:
d. Inspection Report Attached: ❑ Yes or ❑ No.
2. Is the following information entered into the BIMS record for this application correct?
❑ Yes or ❑ No. If no, please complete the following or indicate that it is correct on the current application.
For Treatment Facilities:
a. Location:
b. Driving Directions:
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number:
d. Latitude: Longitude:
e. Regulated Activities / Type of Wastes (e.g., subdivision, food processing, municipal wastewater):
For Disposal and Infection Sites:
(If multiple sites either indicate which sites the information applies to cony and paste a new section into the
document for each site, or attach additional pages for each site)
a. Location(s): 1396 Charlotte Highway Fairview, NC
b. Driving Directions: Interstate 40 to US 74 Alt-E. Stay on US 74 Alt-E for 6.1 miles, Facility entrance is
on left just past Food Lion and Fox Run Drive.
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number: Oteen 35082-E4-TF-024
d. Latitude: 350 31' 31.18" Longitude: 820 24' 25"
II: IVEW AND MAJOR IVIODIFICATIONAPPLICA.TION.4 (this section luot uee(lec! [)r renewals or miner
moclifeations, ship to next section
Description Of Waste(S) And Facilities
1. Please attach. completed rating sheet. Facility Classification:
FORM: WI0100089 renewal (2).docx . 1

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If'no, please explain:
3. Are the new site conditions (soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) consistent with what was reported by -
the soil scientist and/or Professional Engineer? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain:
4. Does the application (maps, plans, etc.). represent the actual site (property lines, swells, surface drainage)`? ❑
Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain:
5. is the proposed residuals management plan adequate and/or acceptable to the Division. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑
N/A. if no; please explain:
6. Are the proposed application rates for:new sites (hydraulic or nutrient) acceptable?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. 1 f no, please explain:
7. Are the new treatment facilities or any new disposal sites located in a. I00,year floodplain`?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If yes, please attach a niap showing areas of 100-year floodplain and please explain
and recommend any mitigative measures/specia.l conditions in Part IV: _
8. Are there any buffer conflicts (new treatment facilities or new disposal sites)? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. If yes, please
attach a map showing conflict areas or attach any, new maps you have received from the applicant to be
incorporated :utto the permit:
9. is proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring program (number of wells, frequency of monitoring,
monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. Attach map of existing monitoring well
network if applicable. Indicate the review and compliance boundaries. If No, explain and recommend any
changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
10. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required`? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If yes, attach list of sites
with restrictions (Certification.13?)
III. RI_�'NL'I1h.AL ANI) ilIODI11C9TIONAPPLICATIONS (rrse Areidoris section for ne►n or 1xrr r nlociificalian
s vslems
Dcscription Of Waste(S) And facilities N/A
1. Are there appropriately certified ORCs for the facilities? ❑ Yes or ❑ No.
Operator in Charge: Certificate #:
Backup- Operator in Charge: Certificate #:
2. is the design, maintenance and operation (e.g. adequate aeration, sludge wasting, sludge storage. effluent
storage, etc) of the treatment facilities adequate fot• the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes or ❑ No.
If no, please explain:
3. Are t:he site conditions (soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste`? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. if no, please explain:
FORM: WI0100089 renewal (2).docx 2

1
AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect permit (drainage added, new wells inside. the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? If yes, please explainls the residuals management plan for the facility
adequate and/or acceptable to the Division?
❑ Yes or ❑ No. if no, please explain: _
>. Are the existing application rates (hydraulic or nutrient) still acceptable? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. If no, please
explain:
G. Is the existing groundwater nuonit.oring program (number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring
parameters, etc.) adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. Attach map of existing monitoring well network if
applicable. Indicate the review and compliance boundaries. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program: _
7. Will seasonal or other restrictions be required for added sites'? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If yes, attach list of sites
with restrictions (Certification B?)
8. Are there any buffer conflicts (treatrrient facilities or disposal sites)? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. if yes, please attach a
map showing conflict areas or attach any new maps you have received from the applicant to be incorporated
into the permit:
9. Is the description of the .facilities.. type and/or volume of waste(s) as written inthe existing permit correct? ❑
Yes or ❑'No. If no, please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes or ❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain:
11. Has a review of all self -monitoring. data been conducted (GW' NDMR, and NDAR as applicable)" ❑ Yes or
❑ No ❑ N/A. Please summarize any findings resulting from this review:
J2. Check all -that apply: ❑ No compliance issues; ❑ Notice(s) of violation within. the last permit cycle; ❑
Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under SOC; ❑ Currently under JOC; ❑ Currently under
moratorium. If any items checked, please explain and attach any documents that may help , clarify
answer/comments (such. as NOV, NOD etc): Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit,
(SOC, TOC: etc.) been complied with? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Determined. ❑ N/A.. If no; please explain:
13. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit? ❑
Yes or ❑ No ❑ N/A. If yes, please explain:
FORM: WI0100089 renewal (2).docx 3 .

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
IV. INJECTION WELL PERMITAPPLICATIONS (Complete these two sections for all systems that use injection
wells, including closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection wells, in situ remediation injection wells, and heat
pump injection wells.) .
Description Of Well(S) And Facilities — New, Renewal, And Modification
1. Type of injection system:
❑ Heating/cooling water return flow (5A7)
❑ Closed -loop heat pump system (5QM/5QW)
® In situ remediation (H)
❑ Closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection (5L/"Non-Discharge")
❑ Other (Specify:
2. Does system use same well for water source and injection? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Are there any potential pollution sources that may affect injection? ® Yes ❑ No
• What is/are the pollution source(s)? Liquid nitrogen and compressed gas cylinders
• What is the distance of the injection well(s) from the pollution source(s)? The liquid nitrogen and
compressed gas cylinders are approximately 25 ft from the injection site but separated by an
exterior cinder block wall.
4. What is the minimum distance of proposed injection wells from the property boundary? 125 ft.
5. Quality of drainage at site: ❑ Good ® Adequate ❑ Poor
6. Flooding potential of site: ® Low ❑ Moderate ❑ High (for injection site itself)
7. For groundwater remediation systems, is the proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring program
(number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? ® Yes ❑ No:,, Attach
map of existing monitoring well network if applicable. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program: see application report field verified monitoring well locations.
8.. Does the map presented represent the.actual site (property lines, wells, surface drainage)? ® Yes or ❑ No. If
no or no map, please attach a sketch of the site. Show property boundaries, buildings, wells,_ potential pollution
sources, roads, approximate scale, and north arrow. There appears to be an additional monitoring well not
shown on the map in the area halfway between MW-6S and the UT.
Injection Well Permit Renewal And Modification Only:
For heat pump systems, are there any abnormalities in heat pump or injection well operation (e.g. turbid water,
failure to assimilate injected. fluid. poor Ilea jing/cooling)'?
❑ Yes El -No. If v-es. ex .lain _!
2. For closed -loop heat pump systems, has system lost pressure or required .iiiake-up fluid since permit issuance
or last inspection' [] Yes ❑ No. It'ves. explain:
FORM: WI0100089 renewal (2).docx 4.

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
3. For renewal or modification of groundwater remediation permits (of any type) will
continued/additional/modified injections have an adverse impact on migration of the plume or management of
the contamination incident? ® Yes ❑ No. If yes, explain:
An injection event was conducted in the summer 2010 at monitoring well RW-07. The injected sodium
permanganate failed to leave the well bore. As a result, and unknown quantity of injectant currently
remains in the well bore.
^. Drilling, contractor: Nance:
Address:
Certification number:
5. Complete and attach Well Construction Data. Sheet.
FORM: WI0100089 renewal (2).doex 5

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
V EVALUATIONAND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Provide any additional narrative regarding your review of the application.:
2. Attach Well Construction Data Sheet - if needed information is available:
3. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes ® No. If yes, please explain
briefly.
4. List any items that you would like APS Central Office to obtain through an additional information request.
Make sure that you provide a reason for each item:
Item
Reason
What will be the ultimate fate of the recovered
Recovered injectant
sodium permanganate? Will it be reinjected
or discarded?
Is there any likeyhood that the stored
injectant will come in contact with sulfuric
Recovered injectant
acid, peroxide, or any other oxidizable
substances?
How long will the sodium permanganate be
stored? Is the secondary containment curb an
Secondary containment
open or closed containment system? Is the
containment system appropriate for the
recovered injectant?
5. List specific Permit conditions that you recommend to be removed from the permit when issued. Make sure
that you provide a reason for each condition:
Condition Reason
6. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules that you recommend to be included in the permit when
issued. Make sure that you provide a reason for each special condition:
Condition
Reason
A storm drain is located approximately 25 ft
from the injection site. Determine if a
Spill response plan
contingency plan is in place in case of
accidental spillage.
7. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office; ❑ Hold,
pending review of draft permit by regional office; ® Issue upon receipt of needed additional information; ❑
Issue; ❑ Deny. If deny, please state reasons:
FORM: WI0100089 renewal (2).docx 6

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
8. Signature of report preparer(s):
Signature of APS regional super
Date: 2/15/2012
ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
FORM: WI0100089 renewal (2).docx 7

AQUIFER PROTECTION: SECTION .
APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM
Date: January 30, 2012
To: X Landon Davidson, ARO-APS ❑ David May, WaRO-APS
❑ Art Barnhardt, FRO-APS ❑ Charlie Stehman, WiRO-APS
❑ Andrew Pitner, MRO-APS ❑ Sherri Knight, WSRO-APS
❑ Jay Zimmerman, RRO-APS
From: David Goodrich, Land Application Unit -----
Telephone: [phone] Fax. [phone]
E Mail. david.jzoodrich@—ncdenr.gov
A. Permit Number: WI0100089
B. Owner: Tyco Electronics Corporation
C. Facility/Operation: Tyco Electronics Corporation Facility in Fairview
X Proposed 9 Existing X Facility - X Operation
D. Application:
1. Permit Type: ❑ Animal ❑ Surface Irrigation ❑
❑ Recycle ❑ I/E Lagoon X
❑ UIC - (5A7) open loop geothermal
For Residuals: ❑ Land App. ❑ D&M
❑ 503 ❑ 503 Exempt
Reuse ❑ H-R Infiltration
GW Remediation (ND) 5I Inj. wells
❑ Surface Disposal
❑ Animal
2. Project Type: ❑ New ❑ Major Mod. ❑ Minor Mod. X Renewal ❑ Renewal w/ Mod.
E. Comments/Other Information: ❑ I would like to accompany you on a site visit.
Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your
review, comment, and/or action. Within 30 calendar days, please take the following actions:
X Return a Completed APSARR Form. - Please comment
❑ Attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
❑ Attach Attachment B for Certification by the LAPCU.
❑ Issue an Attachment B Certification -from the RO.*
* Remember that you will be responsible for coordinating site visits and reviews, as well as additional
information requests with other RO-APS representatives in order to prepare a complete Attachment B for
certification. Refer to the RPP SOP for additional detail.
When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy
of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office -Aquifer Protection Section contact person
listed above.
RO-APS Reviewer:
Date:
FORM: APSARR 07/06 Page 1 of 1

Central Files: APS SWP
01/30/12
Permit Number W10100089 Permit Tracking 'Slip
Program Category
Ground Water
Permit Type
Injection In situ Groundwater Remediation Well (51)
Primary Reviewer
david.goodrich .
Coastal SW Rule
Permitted Flow
Facilit
Status
Project Type
In review
Renewal
Version
Permit Classification
Individual
Permit Contact Affiliation
Alec Macbeth
231: Haywood St
Asheville NC 28801
Facility Name Major/Minor Region
Tyco. Electronics Corporation Minor Asheville
Location Address County
1396 Charlotte Hwy Buncombe
Fairview NC 287308544 Facility Contact Affiliation
Owner Name
Owner Type
Tyco Electronics Corporation
Non -Government
Owner Affiliation
Richard J. Suminski
Counsel Deputy General VP
PO Box 3608
Dates/Events
Harrisburg PA 171053608
Scheduled
Orig Issue App Received Draft Initiated Issuance
Public Notice Issue Effective Expiration-
06/21/10 01/19/12
Regulated Activities
Requested/Received Eventsr
Groundwater remediation
RO staff report requested
RO staff report received
Outfall NULL
Waterbody Name
Stream Index Number
Current Class Subbasin

INFORMATION
FROM
ORIGINAL
PERMIT
APPLICATION

i
AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
Date: May 13, 2010
To: Aquifer Protection Central Office
Central Office Reviewer: Thomas Slusser
Regional Login No:
County: Buncombe
Permittee: Tyco Electronics Corp.
Project Name: Fairview Facility
Application No.:WI0100089
L GENERAL INFORMATION
1. This application is (check all that apply): ® New ❑ Renewal
❑ Minor Modification ❑Major Modification
Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ Recycle ❑ High Rate Infiltration ❑ Evaporation/Infiltration Lagoon
❑ Land Application of Residuals ❑ Attachment B included ❑ 503 regulated ❑ 503 exempt
❑ Distribution of Residuals ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ Closed -loop Groundwater Remediation ® Other Injection Wells (including in situ remediation)
Was a site visit conducted in order to prepare this report? ® Yes or ❑ No.
a. Date of site visit: May 13, 2010
b. Person contacted and contact information: Alec Macbeth (Altamont Environmental) [phone]
c. Site visit conducted by: Brett Laverty
d. Inspection Report Attached: ® Yes or ❑ No.
2. Is the following information entered into the BIMS record for this application correct?
® Yes or ❑ No. If no, _please complete the following or indicate that it is correct on the current application.
For Treatment Facilities:
a. Location:
b. Driving Directions:-
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number:
d. Latitude: Longitude:
RECEIVED / DENR / DWd
AWftr Protection Section
MAY 14 2010
e. Regulated Activities / Type of Wastes (e.g., subdivision, food processing, municipal wastewater):
For Disposal and Iniection Sites:
(If multiple sites either indicate which sites the information applies to, copy and paste a new section into the
document for each site or attach additional pages for each site)
a. Location(s): 1396 Charlotte.Highway Fairview, NC 28730
b. Driving Directions: Interstate 40 to U.S. 74 Alt-E. Stay on U.S. 74 Alt-E for 6.1 miles. Facility entrance
on left just past the Food Lion and Fox Run Drive.
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number: Oteen 35082-E4-TF-024
d. Latitude: 82*24125.0011 Longitude: 35' 31131.1811
II NEWAND MAJOR MODIFICATIONAPPLICATIONS (thissection not needed for renewals or minor
modifications, skip to next section)
Description Of Waste(S) And Facilities
1. Please attach completed rating sheet. Facility Classification:
FORM: Tyco Electronics UIC Permit.doc 1

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system?
❑-Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain:
3. Are the new site conditions (soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) consistent with what was reported by
the soil scientist and/or Professional Engineer? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain:
4. Does the application (maps, plans, etc.) represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface drainage)? ❑
Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate and/or acceptable to the Division. . ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑
N/A. If rib, please explain:
6. Are the proposed application rates for new sites (hydraulic or nutrient) acceptable?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain:
7. Are the new treatment facilities or any new disposal sites located in a 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If yes, please attach a map showing areas of 100-year floodplain and please explain
and recommend any mitigative measures/special conditions in Part IV:
8. Are there any buffer conflicts (new treatment facilities or new disposal sites)? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. If yes, please
attach a map showing conflict areas or attach any new maps you have received from the applicant to be
incorporated into the permit:
9. Is' proposed and/or .existing groundwater monitoring program (number of wells, frequency of monitoring,
-monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. Attach map of existing monitoring well
network if applicable. Indicate the review and compliance boundaries. If No, explain and recommend any
changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
10. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If yes, attach list of sites
with restrictions (Certification B?)
III RENEWAL AND MODIFICATIONAPPLICATIONS (use previous section for new or maior modification
system"
Description Of Waste(S) And Facilities N/A
1. Are there appropriately certified ORCs for the facilities? ❑ Yes or ❑ No.
Operator in Charge: Certificate #:
Backup- Operator in Charge: Certificate #:
2. Is the design, maintenance and operation (e.g. adequate aeration, sludge wasting, sludge storage, effluent
storage, etc) of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes or ❑ No.
If no, please explain:
3. Are the site conditions (soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. If no, please explain:
FORM: Tyco Electronics UIC Permit.doc 2

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect permit (drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? If yes, please explainIs the residuals management plan for the facility
adequate and/or acceptable to the Division?
❑ Yes or ❑ No. If no, please explain:
5. Are the existing application rates (hydraulic or nutrient) still acceptable? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. If no, please
explain:
6. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program (number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring
parameters, etc.) adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. Attach map of existing monitoring well network if
applicable. Indicate the review and compliance boundaries. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program:
7. Will seasonal or other restrictions be required for added sites? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If yes, attach list of sites
with restrictions (Certification B?)
8. Are there any buffer conflicts (treatment facilities or disposal sites)? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. If yes, please attach a
map showing conflict areas or attach any new maps you have received from the applicant to be incorporated
into the permit:
9. Is the description of the facilities, type and/or volume of waste(s) as written in the existing permit correct? ❑
Yes or ❑ No. If no, please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes or ❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain:
11. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (GW, NDMR, and NDAR as applicable)? ❑ Yes or
❑ No ❑ N/A. Please summarize any findings resulting from this review:
12. Check all that apply: ❑ No compliance issues; ❑ Notice(s) of violation within the last permit cycle; ❑
Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under SOC; ❑ Currently under JOC; ❑ Currently under
moratorium. If any items checked, please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify
answer/comments (such as NOV, NOD etc): Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit,
(SOC, JOC, etc.) been complied with? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Determined ❑ N/A.. If no, please explain:
13. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this. permit? ❑
Yes or ❑ No ❑ N/A. If yes, please explain:
FORM: Tyco Electronics UIC Permit.doc 3

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
IV INJECTION WELL PE"ITAPPLICATIONS (Complete these two sections for all systems that use injection
wells, including closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection wells, in situ remediation injection wells, and heat
pump injection wells.)
Descriation Of Well(S) And Facilities — New, Renewal, And Modification
Type of injection system:
❑ Heating/cooling water return flow (5A7)
❑ Closed -loop heat pump system (SQM/5QW)
® In situ remediation (51)
❑ Closed -loop groundwater remediation effluent injection (5L/"Non-Discharge")
❑ Other (Specify:
2. Does system use. same well for water source and injection? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Are there any potential pollution sources that may affect injection? ® Yes ❑ No
• What is/are the pollution source(s)? Liquid nitrogen and compressed gas cylinders
• What is -the distance of the injection well(s) from the pollution source(s)? The liquid nitrogen and
compressed gas cylinders are approximately 25 ft from injection site but separated by an exterior
cinder block wall.
4. What is the minimum distance of proposed injection wells from the property boundary? 125 ft.
5. .Quality of drainage at site: ❑ Good ® Adequate- ❑ Poor
6. Flooding potential of site: ® Low ❑ Moderate ❑ High
7. For groundwater remediation systems, is the proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring program
(number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? ® Yes ❑ No. Attach
map of existing monitoring well network if applicable. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program:
8. Does the map presented represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface drainage)? ® Yes or ❑ No. If
no or no map, please attach a sketch of the site. Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution
sources, roads, approximate scale, and north arrow.
Iniection Well Permit Renewal And Modification Only:
1. For heat pump systems, are there any abnormalities in heat pump or injection well operation (e.g. turbid water,
failure to assimilate injected fluid, poor heating/cooling)?
❑ Yes ❑ No. If yes, explain.
2. For closed -loop heat pump systems, has system lost pressure or required make-up fluid since permit issuance
or last inspection? ❑ Yes ❑ No. If yes, explain:
3. For renewal or modification of groundwater remediation permits (of any_type),will
continued/additional/modified injections have an adverse impact on migration of the plume or management of
the contamination incident? ❑ Yes ❑ No. If yes, explain:
FORM: Tyco Electronics UIC Permit.doc 4

i
f
AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
4. Drilling contractor: Name:
Address:
Certification number:
5. Complete and attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
FORM: Tyco Electronics UIC Permit.doc

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT.
Y. EVALUATIONAND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Provide any additional narrative regarding your review of the application.:
• There is no contingency plan for accidental spillage or potential daylighting of the injection fluid.
A storm drain is located approximately 25 ft from the injection fluid mixing area.
• Altamont Environmental will be diluting the sodium permanganate with municipal water. Are
there any potential unfavorable reactions between chlorine and the injection fluid?
2. Attach Well Construction Data Sheet - if needed information is available
3. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes ® No. If yes, please explain
briefly.
4. List any items that you would like APS Central Office to obtain through an additional information request.
Make sure that you provide a reason for each item:
Item Reason
5. List specific Permit conditions that you recommend to be removed from the permit when issued. Make sure
that you provide a reason for each condition:
Condition Reason
6. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules that you recommend to be included in the permit when
issued. Make sure that you provide a reason for each special condition:
Condition Reason
7. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office; ❑ Hold,
pending review of draft permit by regional office; ❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information;
Issue: I -I Denv. If deny, please state reasons:
8. Signature of report preparer(s):
Signature of APS regional super
FORM: Tyco Electronics UIC Permit.doc 6

AQUIFER PROTECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
Date:
ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
FORM: Tyco Electronics UIC Permit.doc

Slusser, Thomas.
From: Laverty, Brett
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 11:15 AM
To: Slusser, Thomas
Subject: RE: injection well application W 10100089
Attachments: Tyco Electronics UIC Regional Staff Report.pdf; image001.png
Thomas,
Here is the regional staff report for the Tyco Electronics UIC permit.
Brett Laverty
Brett Laverty - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Aquifer Protection Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone] -
Fax: [phone]
Notice: This e-mail contains a public record which is subject to disclosure to third
parties and the public pursuant North Carolina's Public Records Law. N.G.
Gen. Stat. §132-1, et seq. This e-mail may contain materials prepared
during or in anticipation of a legal proceeding as part of preparation for that
legal proceeding, in which case third party or public access to it is subject to
N.C. Gen. Stat. §132-1.9 and may be denied until the conclusion of the legal
proceeding, including the completion of all appeals and post -judgment
proceedings, or, in the case where no legal proceeding has been commenced,
upon the expiration of all applicable statutes of limitations and periods of
repose.
From: Slusser, Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 9:19 AM
To: Laverty, Brett; Davidson, Landon
Subject: RE: injection well application WI0100089
Thanks guys for the sanity check! I really wasn't sure I sent one over. I just completed my•review last night. The only
technical issues I found to ask about are as follows:
Will the recovery wells be running during the pilot test? We need this information to determine groundwater
flow rates for the injection zone and to be able to evaluate the proposed monitoring plan.
How were the metals parameters chosen? I noticed that some are the same as the RCRA-8 list but others are
not. Is this based on site data? If so, what are the historical values and trends for the site?
I'll wait for your input before I send them an Add. Info. Request in case y'ins have something for me to include.
Thanks again,
—Thomas.
f-mall orrespondeoe to and Pram this address maybe subiect to the IIarlh Carahlu pUbhc�scords law 317d,773,V he dlsclosad to thlyd partles.
From: Laverty, Brett
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 8:43 AM

To: Davidson, Landon; Slusser, Thomas
Subject: RE: injection well application WI0100089
Thomas,
I am scheduled to make a site visit this Thursday.
Brett Laverty
Brett Laverty - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Aquifer Protection Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Notice: This e-mail contains a public record which is subject to disclosure to third
parties and the public pursuant North Carolina's Public Records Law. N.C.
Gen. Stat. §132-1. et seq. This e-mail may contain materials prepared
during or in anticipation of a legal proceeding as part of preparation for that
legal proceeding, in which case third party or public access to it is subject to
N.C. Gen. Stat. §132-1.9 and may be denied until the conclusion of the legal
proceeding, including the completion of all appeals and post -judgment
proceedings, or, in the case where no legal proceeding has been commenced,
upon the expiration of all applicable statutes of limitations and periods of
repose.
From: Davidson, Landon
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 8:22 AM
To: Slusser, Thomas
Cc: Laverty, Brett
Subject: RE: injection well application WI0100089
Thomas -
Received by the RO on April 6`h. We did not return the cover letter upon our receipt and the RO comments are past due
at this stage. We will get it out this week. Thanks.
Landon
O. Landoin Davidson, P.C.
KCDEN'R - Division otW titer Quality
Aquiter Protection 4ection �
Regional APS fup rvisor — —
_ at
,Ashevil le Regianal offi,
2040 tt 4. Hwy. 70
Swannanoa, NX. 28778
ph.:822,2
rex:8pa-299-2
web page: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/agw.html
This e-mail contains a public record which is subject to disclosure to third
parties and the public pursuant North Carolina's Public Records Low. N.C.
Gen. Stat. §132-1, et seq. This e-mail may contain materials prepared
during or in anticipation of a legal proceeding as part of preparation for that
legal proceeding, in which case third party or public access to it is subject to
N.C. Gen. Stot. §132-1.9 and may be denied until the conclusion of the legal
proceeding, including the completion of all appeals and post judgment
proceedings, or, in the case where no legal proceeding has been commenced,

upon the expiration of all applicable statutes of ,_ I-itions and periods of
repose.
From: Slusser, Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 4:59 PM
To: Davidson, Landon
Subject: injection well application WI0100089
Heyo Landon,
Did you receive a copy of the subject application for Tyco Electronics in Fairview, Buncombe County? I cannot
remember if I sent one to you.
Hope all's well,
—Thomas.
— Thomas Slusser, L.G.
Program Manager
Underground Injection Control Program
DWQ - Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
please note nezv einail address: [e-mail]
ph# 919-715-6164
fax# [phone]
E-mau ca; respo,rdence tD acd from tbrs address may be .:abject to the firth Carolina Ptlblic 17eccpds 13vl and msy be disclDsed tD thLrd parties.

a
Page 1 of 1
2� 2
Evan Kane
From: Luanne Williams [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:59 AM
To: evan kane
Subject: potassium permanganate
The precautions listed in the June 11, 1999 letter to Sherri Knight for sodium permanganate can be
followed for potassium permanganate. There are many potential chemical interactions that could result
in an explosion. This chemical is quite lethal to small children. I have attached the health effects and
possible reactions for this chemical. Please share with those that will be applying or may come into
contact with this chemical at the application site.
4/4/02

North Carolina
DepartrnctU o: Fi ,d 1 :r; .:u: Scr. t.es
I: g Division i':�;: ;c : ::lt : - -
1330 St. Mary's Street • Post Office Box 29597 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0597 • Courier 56-20-11
- r .
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor • H. David Bruton, M.D., Secretary • Ann F. Wolfe, M.D., M.P.H., Director
Ms. Sherri Knight
Winston-Salem Regional Office
8025 North Point Boulevard, Suite 100
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27106
Dear Ms. Knight:
t..,...
uI am writing in
June 11, 1999
jA,
IT Corporation
health risk evaluation regarding the use of oxidizing
Chemical Company in an in -situ soil and groundwater i
of North Carolina, Inc., a
tufactured by the Carus �-
n project at the W. P. Ballard &
Company site in Greensboro, North Carolina. Based upon my review of the information
submitted, I offer the following health risk evaluation: _
WORKER PRECAUTIONS DURING APPLICATION
1. Some effects reported to be associated with the product proposed to be used are as
follows: eye, skin, nose, throat, and lung i:Yitation. If the product is released into the
environment in a way that could result in suspension of fine solid or liquid particles
(e.g., grinding, blending, vigorous shakii.,;, or mixing), then proper personal protective
equipment should be used. The application process should be reviewed by an industrial
hygienist to ensure that the most appropriate personal protective equipment is used.
2. Persons working with these products should wear goggles or a face shield, gloves, and
protective clothing. Face and body protection should be used for anticipated splashes or
sprays.
3. This product may cause spontaneous ignition with cloth or paper. Caution should be
taken to prevent spills on clothes. Also, this product could react violently with most
metal powders, ammonia, ammonia. salts, phosphorus, finely divided organic compounds,
flammable'liquids acids, and sulfur. In addition, this product may become explosive if
mixed with sulfuric acid, acetic acid, or acetic anhydride if not kept cold.
4. Eating, drinking, smoking, handling contact lenses, and applying cosmetics should not be
permitted in the application area during or immediately following application.
5. Safety controls should be in place to ensure that the check valve and the pressure delivery
systems are working properly.
6. It is imperative that the Material Safety Data Sheets be followed to prevent incompatible
or adverse reactions and injuries.
.flip
rrrr.�
.. 1r1...
�'urtJ, C:rrolur.r: (lust u%thr /999 SPecu/ Olympics It —U S11rune, C.rmes

T
Sherri Knight
June 11, 1999
Page Two
OTHER PRECAUTIONS
1. Access to the area of application should be limited to the workers applying the product.
In order to minimize exposure to unprotected individuals, measures should be taken to
prevent access to the area of application.
2. According to the information submitted with the letter dated May 14, 1999, "A sensitive
receptor survey was conducted by IT Corporation of North Carolina, Inc. in November
1998. Results of the survey indicate that neither private nor public potable water wells
are present within a 1,500 foot radius of the subject site. The survey also confirmed that
water from the City of Greensboro Water Resources is available within a 1,500 foot
radius of the subject site.... Water accounts were confirmed for all properties adjacent to
both the W.P. Ballard and former Sears Greensboro Distribution Center Properties. The
exception being 2820 Lawndale Avenue, which was verified as being currently
unoccupied. A current water account is not in place.... The approximate travel distance
for the ...solution in groundwater from each application point is expected to be no
greater than 20 feet. " According to the information submitted, the concentration in
groundwater after injectionis estimated to approach 0% after several days to a week.
Based on this information, it is unlikely that this solution would contaminate an existing
water supply, however, measures should be taken to prevent contamination of existing or
future wells that may be located near the application area.
3. According to the information submitted, the product is not expected to discharge to
nearby surface water. The distance to the nearest surface water body was not provided.
Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions at [phone].
Sincerely,
Luanne K. Williams, Pharm.D., Toxicologist
Medical Evaluation and Risk Assessment Unit
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch
LKW:lp
cc: Mr. Mark Pritzl, Groundwater Section
Ms. Melanie Wells, Guilford County Department of Health
Ms. Linda Blalock, Groundwater Section
Mr. Bob Cheek, Groundwater Section
LW. Keith Ogden, P.E., IT Corporation of North Carolina, Inc.

U P&D 3 9
Goodrich, David
From: Evan Yurkovich [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 10:13 AM
To: Goodrich, David
Cc: Davidson, Landon; Parris, Bruce; Chris Gilbert; [e-mail]
Subject: TEC-Fairview (NCD 003 163 730) - Sodium Permanganate Removal
I would like to inform you that we will be conducting the sodium permanganate removal activities at the TEC-Fairview
site beginning this Wednesday March 215t according to Injection Permit W10100089.
Thanks,
Evan Yurkovich
Altamont Environmental Inc.
231 Haywood Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Phone: [phone] ext. 217
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
www.altamontenvironmental.com
1