SW8060103_COMPLIANCE_20090116

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO. SW�C
DOC TYPE ❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
❑ HISTORICAL FILE
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE JgO�I%
YYYYMMDD

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor James H. Gregson, Director Dee Freeman, Secretary
.[anuary 16, 2009
MEMORANDUM:
TO
FROM
SUBJECT
Applicant:
Project .Location:
Kelly Johnson
Division of Water Quality— Stortnwater
Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
101,3 0(A
1111 �UC�U 12.
"n I5
6°"'
0,
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Morgan Creek Landings, Inc.
E XE
1. p
The project site located at 233 Old Causeway Road, Morehead City, Carteret.
County
Proposed Project: The applicant is proposing to expand an existin �28slip�mari�nato �35slips
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by
02/06/2009. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
Heather Styron at [phone]. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are
requested.
REPLY:
SIGNED
This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project
�E�IPT
S71NJL f,��Q&kk�
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
C
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.nccoastaimanagement.net
An Equal Opporlunity I Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

morgan creek landing
Subject: morgan creek landing
From: Heather Styron <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:11:33 -0500
To: [e-mail]
Good morning Kelly, They are not adding any impervious with this project. All the
structures will be water dependent and drip through design. I hope this helps and
if you have anymore questions feel free to contact me. Thanks, Heather
1 of' 1 1/28/2009 9:49 AM

Major Permit Fee Schedule
Circle One
ACM %
DWO %
Development Type
Fee
(14300160143510009316256253)
(2430016024351000952341)
t. Private, non-commercial
development that does not involve
the filling or excavation of any
wetlands or open water areas:
$250
100% ($250)
0% ($0)
II. Public or commercial
development that does not invoive
the filling or excavation of any
wetlands or open water areas:
$400
100% ($400)
0% ($0)
II€. For development that involves
the filling andlor excavation of up
to 1 acre of wetlands and/or open
water areas, determine if AA C,
or D below applies:
III(A). Private, non-commercial
development, if General Water
Quality Certification No. 3490
(See attached) can be applied.,
$250
100% ($250)
0% ($0)
tii(B). Public or commercial
development, if General Water
Quality Certification No. 3490
(See attached) can be applied:
$400
100% ($400)
0% ($0)
I€I(C)• If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3490 (see
attached) could be applied, but
DCM staff determined that
additional review and written
DWQ concurrence is needed
because of concerns related to
water quality or aquatic life:
$400
60% ($240)
40% ($160)
III(D). If General Water Quality
Certification No. 3490 (see
attached) cannot be applied:
$400
60% ($240)
40% ($160)
IV. Development that involves the
filling andlor excavation of more
than one acre of wetlands andlor
open water areas:
$475
60% ($285)
40% ($190)
Check #y b d q
Amount zD, 0
Project
Name V�'Lc��.��tY��� l E'c

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICA\T'S NANIE: Morgan Creek Landings, Inc. CIO Jones Coastal Consulting, Inc.
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: 233 Old Causeway Road in Morehead City adjacent
to Morgan Creek.
Photo Index • 2000: 41-527 grid (R-7&8),(S-6&7),(T-5&6)
1006. 41-8035 grid (E-19),(F-18&19),(G-17,18&19) (H-17)
State Plane C, irdinates - X: 2696525.048 Y: 361417.035 Rover: J120411A
Longitude: 76°40'54.63164 Latitude: 34°43' 14.52406
3. INVESTIGA l ON TYPE: CAMA/D&F
t. INVESTIGAI 4'E PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit — 11/21/08, 12/4/2008
Was Applicant Present — Yes, No
5. PROCESSINC
'ROCEDURE: Application Received — 12/22/2008
Office -- Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRj
1'ION:
(A)
Local Lai
Use Plan — Morehead City dated 2007
Land Clay
•ication from LUP — Port Mixed Use/Conservation
(B)
AEC(s) Ia
)tved: ES, CW, EW, PTA
(C)
Water De
-ident: pier, dock, slips, finger piers (yes)
(D)
Intended
: Private/Community
(E)
Wastewat
Treatment: Existing —Municipal sewer
Planned - None
(F)
Type of S.
fctures: Existing — Condos, boat slips and other amenities
Planned - finger piers, docks, tie pilings, pedestrian pier,
and new slips
(G)
Estimated
annual Rate of Erosion: NIA
Source — ,
A
7. HABITAT DE` 'RIPTION:
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Open Water
(pier, platform an(- 'inger piers)
NIA
NIA
4,170ft2 Incorp.
1,350ft2 Shaded
(B) Shallow Bottom
1,232 ftz
N/A
NIA
(C) Coastal Wetlands
N/A
NIA
2,586ft2 Incorp.
2,586ft2 Shaded
(D) High Ground
NIA
NIA
1,674ft2 Incorp.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 9,662ft2
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: SC Open: No
8. .PROJECT SUMNIARY: This project is being proposed as a major modification to Major

Field Investigation Report:
Morgan Creek Landings, Inc.
Page 42
Permit # 89-06. The applicant proposes to expand an existing 28 slip marina to 35 slips.
9. Narrative Description:
The Morgan Creek Landings, Inc. project is located at 233 Old Causeway Road. The property
lies adjacent to Morgan Creek Turning Basin and Beaufort Harbor in 1vlorehead City, Carteret
County. The northern part of the tract is bordered by individual lots to the east and mixed use
lots to the west while the southern portion of the tract is bounded by Morgan Creek to the west
and Beaufort Harbor to the east.
Morgan Creek Landing Inc. is 444,539 square feet in its entirety and is an average of F-8'
above NHW. Presently there are condominiums units with existing boat slips and other
amenities on this tract. Small fringes of coastal marsh mostly Spartina alterniflora are located
within the vicinity of the proposed work. They are landward of slips 6-8, east of slip 15 and
south of slip 19. The southern boundary of this property includes an oak hammock which is
bordered by coastal marsh comprised predominately of Juncus roemerianus, S_.partina
alterniflora, and Spartina patens. The undeveloped portion of remaining high ground is
comprised mostly of cedars and scrub bushes. The developed high ground has been landscaped
previously.
The Morehead City Land Use Plan classifies this property as fort Mixed Use, with all AEC's
classified Conservation. Morgan Creek Turning Basin and Beaufort harbor are not designated
as Primary Nursery Areas. Both are closed to the taking of Shellfish, and both carry water
classifications of SC. The adjoining waters of Newport River are classified as SA-HQW. The
substrate in Morgan Creek Turning Basin and Beaufort Harbor is mostly silt and sand.
10. Proiect Description:
The existing major permit # 89-06, which was issued on June 9, 2006, authorized only the
land disturbing activities associated with the establishment•of the Morgan's Creek landing
residential condominium complex, as well as the construction of the parking areas, driveways,
utilities and storm water collection system. A transfer/minor modification was issued on
December 3, 2007 for further upland development not permitted through the original permit. It
authorized the grading and other land disturbing activities associated with the construction of a
wooden deck, wooden access ramp, the bathroom and pool equipment storage building,
outdoor shower, concrete deck and spa -type pool which is located on the peninsula located
south of the existing condominiums.
The applicant's current proposal is to add seven new slip~ to the existing 28 slip marina for
a total of 35 slips. They would be numbered 2-15 on the east side and 1-19 on the west
side. The two temporary slips at the proposed floating dock area, which is located at the
north side of the basin, would not be numbered. Slips 1-18 on the west side are existing
with,P,as the new slip area. Slip area 19 would have a 6' x 30' dock extension from the
existing dock and one 4' x 35'finger pier for access with four tie pilings. The new slip

Field Investigation Report:
Morgan Creek Landings Inc.
Page 03
areas located on the east side of the basin would be numbered 6,,7, 8° and .15There would
„Y
be two 4' x 40' finger piers for access at slips 6-8 and one 4' x 35' finger pier for slip 15. The
proposal also includes four boatlifts within slips 6-8 and 15. A floating dock with gangway
would be placed along the head of the existing boat basin directly south of the condominiums.
This Iocation would account for the final two new slip areas. Five slips would be permanent
and two would be used on a temporary basis. The typical boats to be served would be open
runabouts with a typical boat length of 25'.
The applicants are requesting to construct a pedestrian pier across the marsh located south of
the peninsula. This span of marsh contains a high ground oak hammock in the middle. The
pedestrian access pier would be 6' x 790' and is proposed to be elevated a minimum of 6'
above the coastal wetland substrate and 8' above the creek bed. It would cross a tidal ditch
which is dry at nlw. The purpose for the pedestrian pier is for residents to gain access to the
oak hammock and enjoy scenic vistas.
They are also proposing excavation within the areas of proposed slip 15 and slip 19 locations.
The marina basin has previously been excavated to a depth of —6' at nlw. The average existing
depths are at -4to 5" to -6' nlw. The final project depth would be-6'nlw. This excavation
would remove 170 cubic yards of material. The applicants are also proposing removal of a
sunken barge currently located along the east side of Morgan Creek with a crane mounted
barge .with chains and a tooth bucket to snag the visible remains.
11. Anticipated Impacts:
The proposed slip additions which include the pier, dock and finger piers would shade
,1,350ft2 and incorporate 4,170 ft2 of open waters. The number of slips would increase to 35.
The barge removal would be performed with a grab method from a crane mounted barge with
minimal bottom disturbance. The removal of this should improve navigation and water quality
conditions. A total of 1,232 ft2 of shallow bottom would be disturbed during excavation of slips
# 15 and # 19. All excavation is proposed a minimum of 5' from existing coastal wetlands and
bulkheads with spoil material hauled off site. The setting of pilings for the new slips would
cause temporary increases in turbidity. A total of 2,586 ft2 of coastal wetlands would be
incorporated and shaded by construction of the pedestrian pier. A total of 1,674 ft2 of high
ground would be incorporated by the pedestrian pier. No new impervious areas proposed. All
proposed work would meet the required COE setback of 58' from the Morgan Creek turning
basin.
Name: Heather Styron Date: 1./13/09 Morehead City

APPLICHION for
mmiev
Nevelsoment
1 3 c
(last revised 12127/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Morgan Creek Landings, Inc.
Project Name (if applicable)
Applicant 1: First Name
Jim
MI
Last Name
Bailey
Applicant 2: First Name
frill
Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names fisted.
Mailing Address
5113-B Arendell Street
PO Box
City
Morehead City
State
NC
ZIP
28557
Country
Carteret
Phone No.
252- - 241 - 1200 ext.
FAX No.
-
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Jones Coastal Consulting, Inc
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Charles
Jones
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
296 Bay Drive
Smyrna
NC
ZIP
Phone No. t
Phone No. 2
28579
252 - 729 - 9711 ext.
- ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
Street Address (if different from above)
City
StateEmail
ZjF� T
A {�"
�
[e-mail]
DEC 13 1i ?.003
<Form continues on backs oreneaa City DCM
5-Ii].i?-31)1-588-41l YJ9hSN' �n',,t�vv,ra_-,��kd;� u'n�sricrnk,n a9

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Carteret
233 Old Causeway Road
Subdivision Name City
State
Zip
Morehead City
NC
23557 -
Phone No.
Lot No,(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
- - ext.
I , ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
White Oak
Morgan Creek- Beaufort Harbor
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
Newport RiverlBogue Sound/Back Sound
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
®Yes ❑No
work falls within.
Morehead City
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
approx. 1600'
approx. 651340 sq.ft.
c. Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
NWL (normal water level)
(if many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
.1' to 8' ®NHW or ❑NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
lawn grasses, coastal and 404 wetlands, cedar, bay, myrtle and other maritime vegetation
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
Condominimums, boat slips and other amenities
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacent to the proposed project site.
Residential, commercial and undeveloped/open space
h. How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
Residential, Multi -family
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
j, Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, by whom?
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a Oyes
National Register listed or eligible property?
ON OW,•.-
Alm
<Form continues on next page>
0EC' c ' UM
. 1 .
2:52-8ig 5-:28 .1; ,. 1 ,3Sg?,. lVI,,G : S T imwfit.11v.^oaBtnItri�:.lnn9amyn-n'I,net

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 3 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site?
®Yes
[]No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site?
®Yes
[]No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted?
❑Yes
®No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
Municipal sewar
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
L L r L
Municipal water
r ;
D 1,G
p. Describe existing storm water management or treat t systems.
t,)
rr�
Stormwater management approved by DWQ per it # SW8 060103
O P
a
, All
! iV" ti v
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ❑Public/Government
®Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The purpose of the project is to provide condominium homeowners with: 1) additional boat slips; 2) a temporary loading and
unloading dock in front of the condominium units; 3) a scenic walkway for the homeowners. A derelick dredge/barge is also
proposed to be removed from the waters of Morgan Creek
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Crane, barge, excavator, pumps, pile driving/vibrating equirpment, chains and tooth bucket for removing derelick dredge
d. List all development activities you propose.
The project will create: 1) 5 permanent slips with associated access docks and boat lifts; 2) a floating dock at the at the head
of the boat basin which will be used for temporary loading and unloading (2 boat capablitiy); 3) a scenic pedestrian walkway
and 4) the removal of a derelick dredge platform which is located in the waters of Morgan Creek.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? new
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? na ❑Sq.Ft or ❑Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
None proposed
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j. is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes '®N NA " " ft fl.
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal)
<Form continues on back>
M, 0 To t I e ad C'ICY 1"J' a
?y� 13- �3i�8 1-89 -�liii i dST wwoi ncco�.q-%-n1 maParg rnant.not

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 4)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
C. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name Carol Adams Phone No.
Address 6001 Shallow Moss Circle, Raleigh, NC 27603
Name Celia Eudy Phone No.
Address 519 Front Street, New Bern, NC 28560
Name Radio Island Dev, Co., LLC Phone No.
Address 5113-B, Hwy 70 West, Morehead City, NC 28557
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
CAMA Permit # 51089C CAMA Permit #4850C
CAMA Permit #89-06
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N,C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
1 7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date. December 22, 2008 Print Name Charles J t
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project. 0 Wtf.
®DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culy riS
❑DCM MP-3 Upland Development
®DCM MP-4 Structures Information �ji� 4 ?.t 0
��(ypjha City 1)(AI
252-803.2ff08 1 - 3 S 2 - 4.R C 0A 6 Tvsn w.rm� c4�� a]m �xa�ge �52ni.net

Form DCM MP-2
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
Access
Other
Channel
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
(NLW or
Breakwater
shoreline
NWL)
stabilization
A-1 area:: 28'
Length
B-2 area:: 28'
A-1 area:: 22'
Width
B-2 area:: 22'
Avg. Existing
Depth
-.4' to -6'
NA
NA
Final Project
6'
NA
NA
Depth
9..EXCAVATION ❑This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards, sand and some silt
approx. 170
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
To provide adequate water depths for two proposed boat slips
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
na
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL ❑This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
Contractor will haul away from site
c. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
(i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
Unkown
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
[]Yes ®No []NA
(ii) If yes, where?
(an on -site disposal area will not be used)
f. (€) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
[]Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
wig VA

3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION ®This section not applicable
(If development is a wood groin, use MP-4 — Structures)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization:
❑Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑BreakwaterlSill 00ther:
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
e. Type of stabilization material:
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
Breakwater/Sill Other
i. Source of fill material.
b. Length:
Width:
d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL:
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
❑Yes ❑No El NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
h. Type of fill material.
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ®This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA b. (i) Will fill material be olaced in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW).
If yes,
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water
(iii) Dimensions of fill area
(iv) Purpose of fill
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAv _. ❑SB
OWL ❑None
(d) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
Contractor will be responsible for removing all excavated material Crane, barge, excavator, pile drving equipment
offsite in accordance with applicable local, state and federal
requirementslapprovals
C. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
December 22, 2008
Date
Morgan Creek Landings, Inc
Project Name
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ❑Yes ®No []NA
(ii) if yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
Charles .!ones 4 I� � �, � q Rtob
App c me �.
Applicant Signature
�SZ-$�3$-yeti:.. 9•f3S�-�lR��.�,�"f : kin:r_;r.rr�ra.�s.�i�tar���r.-s�rrt.r�# sev9:;�c:: -i2r�bt�?`�

Form DCM MP-4
00"Tufflum CTU RES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1, Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information are
9. DOCKING FACILITY/MARINA CHARACTERISTICS
a. (i) is the docking facility/marina:
❑Commercial ❑Public/Government ®Private/Community
c. (i) Dock(s) and/or pier(s)
(ii) Number
2
(iii) Length
35',50'
(iv) Width
4,6
(v)_Floating
®Yes ®No ^
e. (i) Are Platforms included? [_-]Yes ®No
If yes:
(ii) Number
(iii) Length
(iv) Width
(v) Floating []Yes ❑No
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from dripline dimensions.
g. (i) Number of slips proposed
7
(ii) Number of slips existing
28
i. Check the proposed type of siting;
❑ Land cut and access channel
®Open water; dredging for basin and/or channel
®Open water; no dredging required
❑Other; please describe:
k. Typical boat length: 25'
m. (i) Will the facility have tie pilings?
®Yes ❑No
(ii) If yes number of tie pilings?
4 pilings (for slip 19, A -dock)
❑This section not applicable
b. (i) Will the facility be open to the general public?
❑Yes ®No
d. (i) Are Finger Piers included? ®Yes ❑No
If yes:
(5) Number 4
(iii) Length 35' to 42'
(iv) Width 4'
(v) Floating ❑Yes ®No
f. (i) Are Boatlifts included? ®Yes []No
If yes:
(ii) Number 4
(iii) Length 14'
(iv) Width 12'
h. Check all the types of services to be provided.
❑ Full service, including travel lift and/or rail, repair or
maintenance service
❑ Dockage, fuel, and marine supplies
® Dockage ("wet slips") only, number of slips: 35
❑ Dry storage; number of boats:
❑ Boat ramp(s); number of boat ramps:
❑ Other, please describe:
j. Describe the typical boats to be served (e.g., open runabout,
charter boats, sail boats, mixed types).
primarily often runabouts with a few_ larger -boat
I. (i) Will the facility be open to the general public?
❑Yes ®No

" i:a•i �i �'.,�:�1i ��,� •-'"i �.7;: +�#i E'ab' ate; 'a-='=! = 3 `%{ °�1
12. DOCKING FACILITY/MARINA OPERATIONS ❑This section not applicable -I
a. Check each of the following sanitary facilities that will be included in the proposed project.
❑ Office Toilets
❑ Toilets for patrons; Number: _-_; t ocation: M)7 TOD T?I > 's
❑ Showers
❑ Boatholding tank pumpout; G a type and location:
i ji N.j t; R ),,nn
b. Describe treatment type and disc
aal location for all sanitary wastewater.
None proposed for marina. a
nicipal sewar is provided to all boat owners via their condoqnit'+!'t,ic.j
c. Describe the disposal of solid w,,
fish offal' and trash.
Solid waste .a!sposal is prop,
:1 by the Town of Morehead City
a. How will ove. ;!ischarge of
rage from boats be controlled?
Prohibited
e. (i) Give the location and number
do Sewage Discharge" signs proposed.
None proposed
(ii) Give the location and number
"umpout Available" signs proposed.
None proposed
f. Describe the special design, if ap,
-)ble, for containing industrial type pollutants, such as paint, sandblasting waste and petroleum products.
na
g. Where will residue from vessel rn.
inance be disposed of?
na
h- Give the number of channel mart•:
and "No Wake' signs proposed. na
i. Give the location of fuel -handling -
+ties, and describe the safety measures planned to protect area water quality.
na
j. What will be the marina policy on t
-might and live -aboard dockage?
None at present time -
k. Describe design measures that pr(
,ote boat basin flushing?
Open water marina in an area
ath strong tidal conditions
I. If this project is an expansion of an )xisting marina, what types of services are currently provided?
None
m. Is the marinaidocking facility proposed within a primary or secondary nursery area?
❑Yes ®No
252-808-.28013 :: 1-9884RCOAST :_ wr+rimr ncP_oasta3rnn.nv:t revised: 12i2 106

`r�'a.�'";�`� �4+;r� i`r��•='r 5�:�w=!�.r-=^, fl:,�ga j rJ:l .�
n. Is the marinaldocking facility proposed within or adjacent to any shellfish harvesting area?
ElYes " ®No
o. Is the marinaldocking facility proposed within or adjacent to coastal wetlandslmarsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom
(SB), or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑5Av ❑SB
OWL ®None 4'
p. is the proposed marina/docking facility located within or within close proximity to any shellfish leases? ❑Yes ®No
If yes, give the name and address of the leaseholder(s), and give the proximity to the lease. A,%1
3. BOATHOUSE (including covered lifts) ® This section not applicable
a. (i) Is the boathouse structure(s):
❑Commercial ❑Public/Govemment ❑PrivatelCommunity
(ii) Number
(iri) Length
(iv) Width
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from dripline dimensions.
4. GROIN (e.g., wood, sheetpile, etc. If a rock groin, use MP-2, Excavation and Fill.) ®This section not applicable
a- (i) Number
(U) Length
(iii) Width
5. BREAKWATER (e.g., wood, sheetpile, etc.) E This section not applicable
a• Length b. Average distance from NHW, NWL, or wetlands
c. Maximum distance beyond NHW, NWL or wetlands
6. MOORING PILINGS and BUOYS ® This section not applicable
a. Is the structure(s)_
❑Commercial ❑PublidGovernment ❑PrivatelCommunity
C. Distance to be placed beyond shoreline
Note: This should be measured from marsh edge, if present.
e. Arc of the swing
7. GENERAL
b. Number
d. Description of buoy (color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
���•Ed�dL". cii��1 .. ?-51S.�t.C�:�:�'�" .: tihvi_enr_a�.�.1�_.L� 3�„rx;-asi- °:rszt�r,_#".»�# �c.:a�:�,.�: �:�12l11;8

a. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent riparian property lines
approximately 50', 110' and 670'
Note: For buoy or mooring piling, use arc of swing including length
of vessel.
c. Width of water body
approx. 213' in Morgan Creek
approx. 200' in Beaufort Harbor
e: (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) if yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
b. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent docking facilities.
immedately adjacent to existing docking areas
ri i j
d. Water depth at waterward en f st Gure;at NLW or NW 6a
,',
8. OTHER [:]This section not applicable
a. Give complete description:
Construction of an approximately 780' long x 6' wide x 6' high (minimum) pedestrian walkway
January 8, 2009
Date
Morgan Creek Landing, Inc.
Project Name
Charles ,!ones
Ap rca me
Applicant Signature
maw»kS�%�•���$ .. 'f-KSa%�tiT.<_>17�5'?' 9n1L•Iy�t:"Z:C�i�_.�',.Ss3d`a_�id?� ��'a1C3i3i.i'1%, ; a'�J{ s�.!F�: 't'�1� i rt7+;i

Jones Coastal Consulting, Inc,
296 Bay Drive
Smyrna, NC 28579
Telephone: [phone]
January 8, 2009
Ms. Heather Styron
NC Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Dear Ms. Styron:
M10roamri cq '
Please find enclosed a CAMA permit application submitted by Morgan Creek Landing, Inc. to
undertake development activities at and adjacent to their property located at 233 Old Causeway Road,
in the Town of Morehead City, Carteref County. Morgan Creek Landing is a 30 unit condominium with
a 28 slip marina, swimming pool and other amenities. The property borders Morgan Creek and
"Beaufort Harbor" on its south side and Old Causeway Road on its north.
The application is seeking permission to:
1) add three finger piers off an existing dock which is located in the water body locally known as
Beaufort Harbor. These docks will range in length from 35' to 42' x 4' in width and will
accommodate four additional boat lifts/slips. One small area of creek bottom, approximately
22'x 28', is proposed to be excavated to -6' normal low water (nlw) deep;
2) extend the existing main dock in Morgan Creek by an additional length of 30' x Win width and
construct an approx. 35' long x 4' wide finger pier (with adjacent tie-up pilings). The dock
extension would be immediately south of slip 4 18 and would provide for an additional `in -the -
water' boat slip. A small area, approx. 22' x 28', would also be excavated to a depth of -6' nlw
within the boat slip. The dock, finger pier and all associated tie-up pilings will be located
outside of the US Corps of Engineers' setback policy which has been established for federal
navigation projects. (This dock is adjacent to the federally authorized Morgan Creek turning
basin);
3) place an approx. 50' long x 6' wide floating dock at the head of the existing boat basin to
provide a convenient loading and unloading area for condominium owners. An articulated
walkway/ramp, up to 30' in length x 6' wide, will provide access from existing high ground to
the floating dock. The floating dock could accommodate two boats;
4) construct an approx. 790' long x 6' wide pedestrian pier which will be elevated above coastal
wetlands and through a high ground hammock. The purpose of this pier is to provide pedestrian
users with a scenic vista and to gain access to the hammock of the surrounding area. The pier
will cross a small tidal creek which is dry at low tide. The pier decking will be elevated at least
8' above the creek bed and at least 6' above the substrate of all coastal wetlands, There will be
no mechanical land clearing of the hammock. Only hand clearing will occur;
5) remove an old derelict dredge/barge which is rusting away in Morgan Creek. A crane mounted
barge will be used in the removal effort. Chains and a tooth bucket will be used to snag the
visible remains of vessel with all removed material being disposed in accordance with
applicable local, state and federal regulations. Actual bottom disturbance of Morgan Creek
should be de minimis.

This project will increase the number of slips for this marina by 7, bring the total to 35. Five will be
permanent slips and two will primarily be used on a temporary basis. Excavation of the creek bottom
will involve a total area of just over 1200 sq. ft.. A clear benefit of this project will be the removal of a
derelict and rusty structure from the waters of Morgan Creek. This should improve water quality in the
area, eliminate an eye -sore and a navigational hazard. The proposed pedestrian pier will not impact
navigation and will be significantly elevated in height over coastal wetlands. Shading impacts from
this structure should be minimized.
If you have any questions concerning this project or need additional information, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Sincerely,
Charles Jones
JCC, Inc. .
Cc: Jim Bailey
lo
JAN
Moreheac C i Do

EDP
SKETCH PLAN I❑R
OLD U. S• HWY. 70 N.C.S,R. I205
� Riw
c r�)
EDP (Old CnuseGrnyRond) paved
CU
MORGAN
CREEK LANDINGS, INC,
N 89.00'00'E 225.00' N 88.56'44'E 145,tT
Cli
M❑REHEAD CITY
CARTERET COUNTY, NC
yhPaFfA H
_
DECEMBER 18, 2008
SCALE: 1° = 60'
(
©
o ma
a
W. D. DANIELS JR.
g y I I
a
PLS C L-2673 )
MGRGAN CREEK LANDINGS, INC. � !
P. ❑, BOX 163
Ile�
L3W I
DAVIS, NC 28524
a 0ef j I
a �Qoa = I
Z
PH. [phone]
(voice/fax) e-Dail: jocierb,danielsl@grnail,com
SIM
I rI fto Ui ®Ulf
UIJkI03
lead City j)M jjZ x.
an aExsmr 3
+cwoeT V
xc nth aym SITE
FORT TMMQW�
a�
a�vm
�r tiri,�a<
a�
VICINITY SKETCH
C NUT M SCAM
a S i.0 26 40 0 40 80 120
N 1.00, 00'W 6yQ a A a B GRAPHIC SCALE - FEET FILE. D0809 B,GDWG 1 7 EnlO r ement ❑ c
1.00' /y ��-0.7
3, eo- 9
- S 69.00'00' W 0p i'` -0 3 + A -1 DOCK
b �' C `l+ � T ^'1+ `�•+h (EXISTING) 1 �t�i �• r `y SCALE; 1" = 30'
tq'�' \© s• x sn Q o �4 I] AREA TO BE �� • + 47
FLMTIIC ➢aCK 1 ; D __ •
»; O }0 O Pro Proposed
0 EXCAVATED
t
m's Q .y B-1 DOCK BEAUF❑RT HARBOR +` •. f�
O `oo� • ,5 (See Enlargement) z 8.5 `'��+ 4 ' h 1L11�1
4 1 s
(PROPOSED) 1 .2
+-3. a. '�: A-1 DOCK �O
+-5.7 + -1 . 9. .
1 0 I 0 1.2 O 7 (Slip 91 19'XX335) ,y�" +C1
g Proposed !/ V
a d B-2 DOCK $ z4'56• -2 . 0.
0 rt' 10 Z (See Enlargement) h C 2.1 41.74 -8 • 9 +
AREA TO BE N rs o 6 + . "s,\ +
-12.3 h
OO „ EXCAVATED N ate" �,. • a+ `p,\
O 1 O 3 �95+.-°ova + ti 0 fl, -� -2 1 - +• (approximate seperation
ID 10 1 , 2 +w ry t < a ,� � ..�`4 �^ �r� � O• y ' _ - of marsh and uplands)11 7-10„ 7- 13 � 9,�� �1 a ?sg•
0,..9
_
3 ln�
[79 x 12 No �� 0 8 4rF •'' fb.- '�W x:-D:3 + -1 0 . 4
ALL
.� N .••} f ti --�•
13 30' 'IP•5O�`#. F �4 �+ 4 ... �q . ti 2 . • .y / 1 . - - .. ti j
ID ` 14 ss4 ti NL::._ a.s + -1 3 . 5 s
I paved \f�
is s pace �1dg. � �• °i S1, 1
N 0' �` • 1 . B o �4t' ° 1b of Marsh O 4 A8&
13 °
N
�a ? Width Of Creek 17 ,+ _ +A• ,T 4) d9ao ` °
10
H 213' +/- to bulkhead S 69-00'00"W «-a �!
1 �m
3- 203.19' to Property Line is S 78' +ro `V- slilx �a 6
18•
.* °� �I°' ox
1
Y _ Proposed • Na -ff
� •+` � .� •- 1• ,1, R
O W s I A-1 DOCK -a.s+. + �� + '. � + -1 3 .'
/ °'
1 7 (See Enlargement) ` 0 . v +
ion
AREA TO BE �9+ ri
s° aarsh nrroximate d uplands)
EXCAVATED °' `(P /L'
-- + e+ ALL
+ 1�� ti . 1MSH
4._0 Enlargement ❑f
1 8 19 ' h+ d) 2.5 Avg
.Q .� •••. -� A � B-1 DOCK
+ti��Aas .----. scaLE. 1" = 30'
_ + o \ 1q ,
} 1 s u+ + (EXISTING)
19 z °+
1a OCb I ----; (PR❑P❑SED) 166
a
,
mo �p�• oa �` i O l $.-1 DOCK
1 + m °+ CStips 6, 7,
45
�� ot A +�ti CFO' b / Z3'
�F O• ° may• Typical: 12' X 14' Lift
o° 1 1 `" o� ��. - O' 8 PROPOSED
5 +` b ,rn3 ., �j + + \1 : o BOAT LIFTS y
+``, CREEK ° s f'"o� • + 9
O ' + �U s+ +
` io
A(o � a Q
MQRGAN CREEK LANDINGS, INC.
1 2 �e a d' C ARSH x p 7 •+ -3.4 v -
-5 k. a2 O D H ff- e + 5.7
B DOCK
O S c� °�` ` - r (EXISTING)
181A `
,s
\ ` O ti iliLu •-'�
I) s ry
lu
Reference;
PID:6396,19.60.8966
Map Book 1, Page 237 \
Map Book 1, Page 214
Deed Book 1183, rage 342 16.2+
\ ry^ AAU
LEGEND: \ ,
.......
EIP = existing iron pipe
EIS. = existing iron stake \ 1
o = point, nothing found or set 1 0
R/W = right-of-way , t ro+ N�/y MMSH
C/L = centerline \ 1 i, ` X - A81A
EDP = edge of pavement ' � a APPROXIMATE
NCSR = North Carolina Secondary Road 1. �� BOUNDARY OF
FEMA = Federal Emergency Management Agenc N COASTAL WETLANDS
NAVD = North American Vertical Datum +� 1 r
NGVD = National Geodetic Vertical Datum
CAMA = Coastal Area Management Agency \ BIG HAMMOCK
AEC = CAMA Area of Environmental Concern 1 ' 6$'S. Area = 66,654 square feet - Ilk'
• =existing piling = 1,53 acres �
j1A = marsh 1 NO LAND DISTURBANCE
�-
MHW = Mean High Water 114 ` ' ° v
n' r ONLY HAND CLEARING -
NLW = Normal Low WaterOF VEGETATION
NLW = Normal Low Water �. o d 1_;ne
+ 0.0 = spot elevation or water depth q 3 ? �LUu `66> 15, colic 333.,N
r
NOTES; 1. Z � � � �° '.• _-
Broken lines not surveyed, calculated or taken from referenced materials. 1 r1 1 `' o /yL'•. -1�
Property lies within the zoning jurisdiction of Morehead City, NC. o,wo� 7�
Property lies within the corporate limits Morehead City, NC. ' VA 's. °� •.•••..........•
Property falls in special flood hazard zone `AE', base flood elevation
7.0' NAVD according to FEMA map, Community Panel Number 370043 ^ °� ""
-6396-J, map effective date 07-16-03, map index 07-02-114. ` o 1 a AW
Bulkhead represents property line along Morgan Creek and Beaufort Harbor. �s
Additional easements are reserved as provided for In the Declaration of Unit
Ownership for Morgan Creek Landing Condominiums. p
Docks and walkways to be constructed in accordance with the NC Uniform
Building Code,
The Morgan Creek Channel Is platted from Information provided by the US t
Corps Of Engineers. CROSS-SECTION OF
�- WALKWAY OVER CREEK
' SCALE: 1" = 6'
DATUM CONVERSION
The Mean High Water CMHW) elevation of 2.2' NGVD for Morgan Creek was provided by
NC Geodetic Survey in July, 1997 and approved by CAMA agent.
The Normal Low Water (NLW) elevation of -1,7' NAVD for Morgan Creek was determined
from observations of tide ranges over a 30 day period of 2.9' NHW to NLW and
converted from NGVD Datum to NAVD Datum as shown hereon,
Top of Deci
MHW Elevation = 2201 NGVD + (-1.041) = 1.16' NAVD
Bottom of Dec
-2.90' Tide Range
NLW Elevation = -1.74, NAVD ( approximately = -1.7' NAVD)
NLW DATUM
Difference in elevation of 1,7' between NAVD and NLW1 Spot elevations shown hereon
are NLW Datum relative to NLW being equal to 0.0'.
NF
MGRGAN CREEK LANDING property
Bottom of Stream of
AREA: 444,539 square feet = 10.2 acres +/-
+ Face Of Bulkhead
CROSS -SEC ION OF
FLOATING DOCK AND RAMP
SCALE: 1" = 10'
s 0'
N '6
v Q:
Ang = 9.1'
rn
:ing = 8.9'
v
v c
c
oin
W = 2.9'
Creek = 0.4'
u
r
C
0-
1
G
Z
PROPOSED 6' X 50' FLOATING DOCK (Overhead View)
Floating Dock
O� (6' X 501)
6' Walkway
ro
i
SIDE VIEW (WALKWAY OVER CREEK)
C
r
Lateral Stringer
a•
C
n_
NHW = 2.9'
Bottom of Stream of Creek = 0.4'
u
where walkway crosses
RAMP
n
h
+ `
Top Of Bulkhead and Walkway-4
Top of Decking = 7.2'
t
NHW = 2.9' a
Pi l,no Coll 1.25" Decking 3" Bracing
Apron Surround
NLW = 0.0'
i
O Existing Depth ad latent to Bulkhead � 45'x22"x, 5" Flotation ,�j• _
ti` LxwxH-Flotation / --` - - - - -
------- --`~
-----�•------•----------------------------
_
° Existing Depth S' from Bulkhead �0+--------~--------------------+~
Top of Decking = 9.1'
_ Bottom of Decking = 8.9'
(PROPOSED)
B-2 I ❑
(Slips6
15 8 1) BEAUF❑RT HARBOR s+
..
Typical= 12' X 14' Lift
B - DOCK +
(EXISTING) �3
�O •f�'. PROPOSED
_ 1 3 BOAT LIFT
AREA TO BE
�4 EXCAVATED
14
L
= + `0 8 P J L
�4
1 -
' 2 + � " 1+1AR51'' sL11�I
_13.44
Enlargement Of
B-2 DOCK
1 SCALEi 1' = 30'
181, 1
1
CROSS-SECTION OF
WALKWAY OVER MARSH
SCALE: 1" = 6'
SIDE VIEW (WALKWAY OVER MARSH)
C
r
Lateral Stringer
i
of
Top of Marsh Vegetation
NHW = 2.9'
NLW = 0.0'
c
a.
,
CROSS-SECTION OF
PROPOSED EXCAVATION
SCALE: 1" = 10'
(PROPOSED)
a_ti nnry
Top of Decking = 7.0'
Bottom of Decking = 6.8'
NHW = 2.9
NLW = 0.0
Excavation Def
i
J Top of Decking = 7.2'
_ Bottom of Decking = 7.0'
Top of Decking = 7.0'
Bottom of Decking = 6.8'
NHW = 2.9'
NLW = 0.0'
Excavation Depth = -6.0'
CROSS-SECTION OF
PROPOSED EXCAVATION
SCALE: 1" = 10'
Io, v 1,41% (PROPOSED)
2 DOCK
6' X 35')
ip: 15)

SAND FILTER DESIGN
FILENAME: G:IDATAIWPDATAIWQSISFILTER1060103-1.apr06.WK1
DATE: 04-Apr-06 PROJECT# SW8 060103-1.apr06
PROJECT NAME: Morgan's Creek (Replaces SW8 051124- appl. returned)
DRAINAGE BASIN: White Oak REVIEWER: P,Bartlett
RECEIVING STREAM: Newport River CLASS: SA; HQW
Index No.: 21-(17) If ORW, is site within the 575' AEC?
SITE AREA: 10.2 acres DRAINAGE AREA: '$27Ei: SF
(DA#2 = Sand Filter #1) i1C{ r
IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATION SAND FILTER #1
BUILDINGS
PARKI NGIWALKS
CONCRETE
OTHER
% IMPERVIOUS, 1= €€100iQ%
BOTTOM OF FILTER
TOP OF SAND
OVERFLOW WEIR
SQUARE FEET
8270 SQUARE FEET
SQUARE FEET
SQUARE FEET
TOTAL €€':`87© SQUARE FEET
RV= .05+.009 (I ) _ [095
SURFACE AREA (Used 540 sq ft/ac for 1.5" runoff)
REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
FILTER WIDTH PROVIDED
FILTER LENGTH PROVIDED
PROVIDED SURFACE AREA
VOLUME (Used 810 cu fth
REQUIRED MIN. VOLUME
TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED
DESIGN STORM
DEPTH, 18" MINIMUM
VOLUME
TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED
ORIFICE DESIGN
Sediment Chamber
................
117.5>102.5
33 FEET MSL
48 FEET MSL
53 FEET MSL
SF
FEET
FEET
SF
Sand Chamber
302.52
SF
FEET
FEET
SF
235
€€5
.175
for 1.5" runoff
€€€153;7:8s CF 153:78� CF
............ .
i 30756 CIF
PROPOSED ORIFICE DIAMETER
AVERAGE HEAD
NUMBER OF ORIFICES
FLOWRATE FOR 24 HOURS
FLOWRATE PROVIDED
Sediment Chamber Sand Chamber
=1i5 IN €15 IN
.2.0' FEET 1'5 FEET
CIF € € '76:25 CF
235>154 €41125' CF 176>154
.......................
6
€1 sQ
`0©048
INCHES
FEET
EACH
CFS
CFS
COMMENTS
Volume, surface area and drawdown are within Design Requirements.

SAND FILTER DESIGN .
FILENAME: G:\DATA\VVPDAT/WVVQS\SF|LTER0/60103-2.oprO8.WK1
DATE: 04-\pr-06 P0OJECT#SW8 060103'2.mpd0$
PROJECT NAME: 88organ'mCnoek (Replaces SVV80S1124-oppireturned)
DRAINAGE BASIN: White Oak REVIEWER: P,Bart|ett
RECEIVING STREAM: Newport River CLASS: SA; HOW
Index No.� 21-(17) If ORW, is site within the 575'AEC?
SITE AREA: 10,2 acres DRAINAGE AREA: SF
IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATION SAND FILTER #2
BU|U]|N88
PARK|NG8WALKS
CONCRETE
OTHER
96IMPERVIOUS, |=
BOTTOM OF FILTER
TOP OFSAND
OVERFLOW WEIR
SQUARE FEET
BD0OSQUARE FEET
SQUARE FEET
SQUARE FEET
TOTAL SQUARE FEET
RV=.05+009(|)=
SURFACE AREA (used 54Onqft/anfor 1.5rrunoff)
REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
FILTER WIDTH PROVIDED
FILTER LENGTH PROVIDED
PROVIDED SURFACE AREA
Sediment Chamber
117>99
FEETM8L
FEETM8L
FEETM8L
Sand Chamber
SF
SF
FEET
FEET
FEET
FEET
�SF
8F
117>99
VOLUME 01 ou fUeofor 1 5^
REOU|REDK8|N,VOLUyNE CF
TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED CF
Sediment Chamber Sand Chamber
DESIGN STORM IN
DEPTH, 18^MINIMUM 2 F E E T FEET
VOLUME CIF CF
TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED 236p149 CF 176»149
ORIFICE DESIGN
PROPOSED ORIFICE DIAMETER
AVERAGE HEAD
NUMBER OFORIFICES
FLOVVRATEFOR 24HC}URS
FL{)VVRATEPROV|DED
COMMENTS
INCHES
FEET
EACH
CFS
CFS

SAND FILTER DESIGN
FILENAME: G:\OAJAVWPQATA6VVQS\SF|LTER\060103-3.mprO6.VVN1
DATE: 04-Apr-06 PROJECT#8VV8 080103'3.aprO6
PROJECT NAME: KXongon1sCreek (Replaces SVVOO51124-appireturned)
DRAINAGE BASIN: White Oak REVIEWER: P.Bmrt|e#
RECEIVING STREAM: Newport River CLA8& OA;HOVV
Index No.: 21-(17) If ORW, is site within the 575'AEC?
SITE AREA: 10.2 acres DRAINAGE AREA: SF
IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATION
BUILDINGS
PARKING/WALKS
CONCRETE
OTHER
BOTTOM DFFILTER
TOP OFSAND
OVERFLOW WEIR
SAND FILTER #3
TOTAL
RV=.05+�008(|)=
SURFACE AREA (used 540 sq ft/ac for 1.5" runoff)
REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
FILTER WIDTH PROVIDED
FILTER LENGTH PROVIDED
PROVIDED SURFACE AREA
Sediment Chamber
11T»Q1
SQUARE FEET
732OSQUARE FEET
SQUARE FEET
SQUARE FEET
SQUARE FEET
FEET MSL
FEETk4SL
FEETK8SL
8F
FEET
FEET
SF
Sand Chamber
SF
FEET
FEET
SF
§5
117>91
VOLUME (used 81Oouftlac for 1.5" runoff)
REQUIRED MIN. VOLUME CF
TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED CIF
Sediment Chamber Sand Chamber
DESIGN STORM 1 NIN
DEPTH, 18^MINIMUM FEET
VOLUME CF
TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED 235>138 CIF17G>13G
ORIFICE DESIGN
PROPOSED ORIFICE DIAMETER
AVERAGE HEAD
NUMBER OFORIFICES
FL(]VVRAJEFOR 24HOURS
FLOVVRATEPROV|DEO
COMMENTS
INCHES
BET
�EACH
�CF8
�OF8

SAND FILTER DESIGN
FILENAME: S:1WQSISFILTER1060103-3.jan06.WK1
DATE: 04-Apr-06 PROJECT# SW8 060103-3.jan06
PROJECT NAME: M'g,rgafi's Creek (Replaces SW8 051124- appl. returned)
DRAINAGE BASIN: White Oak REVIEWER: P.Bartlett'
RECEIVING STREAM: Morgan Bay/Beafort Hrbr. CLASS: l8C—
Index No.: 1�1.8" If ORW, is site within the 575' AEC?
SITE AREA: 10.2 acres DRAINAGE AREA 7326 SF
(DA#4 = Sand Filter #3)
t
IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATION SAND FILTER #3 r I / � {� � .
S40)e,4.5 = b'f�CF
BUILDINGS
PARKING/WALKS
CONCRETE
OTHER
% IMPERVIOUS, 1= 1,0006/.
BOTTOM OF FILTER
TOP OF SAND
OVERFLOW WEIR
SURFACE AREA
,mod 54v-fP2 j2c' ,
REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
FILTER WIDTH PROVIDED
FILTER LENGTH PROVIDED
PROVIDED SURFACE AREA
SQUAREFEET
7326 SQUARE FEET
SQUAREFEET
SQUAREFEET
TOTAL <'<:<<'<< 7326 SQUAREFEET
RV= .05+.009 (1 ) =
Sediment Chamber
90 82:
23t5
<33' FEET MSL
`4$ FEET MSL
53 FEET MSL
VOLUME 3
Jruke - REQUIRED MIN. VOLUME 136 23 CF ...: li36 23 CF
pf 0C/e TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED '272:45 CF
rp
Sediment Chamber Sand Chamber
DESIGN STORM :'`T.5 IN <j',5 IN
DEPTH, 18" MINIMUM
200 FEET ;'<15 FEET
VOLUME >:235 CF 176r25 CF
TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED ..Is41:l.'. CF 47 Z r 2
ORIFICE DESIGN
PROPOSED ORIFICE DIAMETEF
AVERAGE HEAD
NUMBER OF ORIFICES
FLOWRATE FOR 24 HOURS
FLOWRATE PROVIDED
a s
;,...,...:...............:0:
INCHES
FEET
EACH
CFS
CFS
COMMENTS
Volume, surface area and drawdown are*) within Design Requirements.
vvoc�lcl hove W0-7C e 0-( IDsch - ��fa 2 Vey. Fi I�� hrsf

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 060103
The following design criteria have been provided in the three sand filters, and
must be maintained at design conditions:
a.
Q
C.
d.
m
n
0
p
g
Design Criteria
Drainage 2Area, acres:
Onsite, ft
Offsite, ft2:
Total BUA, ft2:
Design Storm, inches:
Sand Filter Depth, ft:
TSS efficiency:
Filter Bottom, FMSL:
Filter Area, ftz:
Sediment Area, ft2:
Storage Volume, ft3:
Top of sand, FMSL:
Weir Elevation, FMSL:
Grate Elevation, FMSL:
Controlling Orifice:
Number of Orifices:
Receiving Stream/River Basin
Stream Index Number:
Classification of Water Body:
II. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
Sand Filter Number
1
2
3
0.189
0.184
0.168
8,270
8,000
7,326
None
None
None
8,270
8,000
7,326
1.51,
1.51,
1.51,
1.5
1.5
1.5
85%
85%
85%
3.3
3.3
3.3
118
118
118
118
118
118
411
411
411
4.8
4.8
4.8
5.3
5.3
5.3
6.25
6.25
6.25
6"0
6"0
6"0
1
1
1
Newport River[White Oak
21-(17)
"SA; »QW"
1. The stormwater management system shall be constructed in its entirety,
vegetated and operational for its intended use prior to the construction of any
built -upon surface.
2. During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded areas of
the system will be repaired immediately.
3. The facilities shall be constructed as shown on the approved plans. This permit
shall become voidable unless the facilities are constructed in accordance with
the conditions of this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and other
supporting data.
4. If the stormwater system was used as an Erosion Control device, it must be
restored to design condition prior to operation as a stormwater treatment device,
and prior to occupancy of the facility.
Page 3 of 7