20031064 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20070411

Draft Stream Mitigation Site Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
February 1, 2007: Draft Version 2.%
Evaluator's name(s): a VU 17
Date of Office Review:
Other individuals/agencies pre nt:
1. Office Review Information:
Project Name: ?R'M TAP? Monitoring reports available? es No
DWQ Project Number: 63-0732. Problem areas identified in reports? es No
ation Project Type (Circle One) Problem areas addressed on site? es No
P Private Mit. Bank Date(s) of monitoring reports: d0
Project mitigation was constructed for (if

applicable): Year(s) of monitoring:
V!FA 9-
Location of project (narrative): of "die, V 2
Nearest named stream (WQ classification): -
County:
-
9 -PAM0 U)
River basin: IA
Approved Mitigation plan available? Yes
Goal of Mitigation (stream length): Buffer Mitigation? Yes No
Stream length required for mitigation:
Mitigated stream length present on site: Q L
Zone 1 Acreage
Type of Mitigation) (circle all applicable) Zone 2 Acreage
Restoration (priority level ,2) Creation
Enhancement Preservation
Dates of Activities(month/year):
Monitoring requirements and frequency: Start of Construction:
?? ?????,? ? U ?.L
?-6i Construction Completed: ? 2c OS
Corrective Measures `Taken:
Date
T?e
-
-
PMNG ?iu?SNfl? (f (15
Success Criteria:
).Physical: P /?? .STA
2. Vegetation: 269 1 ?z
3. Aquatic biota: VA
The space below may be used to provide any additional, important information that was found
during the office review of information, or to list any additional information that needs to be
obtained during the site visit:
IV 61E : PAN1SI?RV P f ?e r G4,i 6 '4449
?2 X26 ?srg? ws 4j,
IIV 5u?u?V?9 L to A?
6 x
C.oUll /? > -6"
s
Draft page I of 3
cSU.A JL ?semMa
qdJ3 104?
Evaluator's Agency: Nd
Date of Field Review:
?g
H. t)ata reported from site visit
Streambank Stability:
Are Streambanks Stable? Yes
If no, provide descript' n and notes regarding stability issues:
s??6N???,

Structures:
List all Types of structures present on site: OoUL?S 1L L
Are the structures stable (e.g. erosion, deposition, etc.)? Yes No
Provide description and notes regarding problematic structures: 1
3AR AAZ SILL IAA LOW )PW. N
11 -IV /00? W'-L WORT 1,00L if 5-I(TA
E2?j ION 5 '?1/k
Stream Features:
Are riffles and pools appropriately spaced? Ves_?' No
Is the final sinuosity and gradient designed approximately to plan speciifications? ? No
Any evidence of vegetation growing on the stream bed or in the f lweg? Yes No
Percentage of the restoration reach that has: Flowing water _=_ Ponded areas
Describe any stream features that provide evidence of unstable stream reaches (e.g. mid-channel
bars, downstream meander migration, chute cutoff formation, etc.):
Vegetation:
Approved Success Criteria: Dominant plant species TPA/% cover
L
2.
Vegetation planted on site?: No 3.
According to the approved plan? o 4.
Vegetation growing successfully? Yes 5.
Date of Latest planting: WC 06
Ave trees per acre (buffer)
General observations on condition of riparian/buffer areas (e.g. buffer width, overall health of
vegetation, etc.)
??A

0/1
AID q00?_ Sr flcm U0171 owAs?? t"),
pv?
Draft pag of 3
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no woody vegetation:
/ ?? 2` A -JO3fi ??? ?i? PI Q Z
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with large areas of bare ground:
5y
Site total % or estimated acreage of unvegetated areas:
V,
Observations on invasive species (type, % cover, etc.)
General comments on vegetation issues(e.g. plant survival, major concerns, etc):
IM w M) &&Wr Dp?
Aquatic Biota:
Is aquatic life present in the channel?
Y No
Description of taxa observed, incl. quantities of individuals and general distribution of biota.
S?N ?? W16 N4-15

Mitigation Success:
Compared to the mitigation plan, the site is: (circle one)
successful partially successful not ,successful
List specific reasons for any lack of success for this site:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Notes: Attach site maps showing problem areas and/or important stream features.
Attach digital photographs of representative sites with photo locations shown on site map.
1 Use the definitions in the joint stateJfederal stream mitigation guidelines to determine tthe
correct type of mitigation used for this project.
Draft page 3 of 3