NC0025445_PERMIT ISSUANCE_20070102

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNIN& COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit.
NC0025445
Randleman WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Inspection
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
January 2, 2007
This document im printed on reuse paper - isizore any
content on the reverse side

Michiel F Easley Governor
William G Ross Jr Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W Klimek P E D,recior
Drvis on of Watcr Quality
January 2, 2007
Mr Harold F Brewer
City of Randleman
101 Hilhary Street
Randleman, North Carolina 27317
Subject Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO025445
City of Randleman WWTP
Randolph County
Dear Mr Brewer
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject
permit Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit This permit is issued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between North Carolina and the U S Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994
(or as subsequently amended)
This final permit includes the following changes from your current permit
➢ Daily maximum limits for cadmium and mercury have been deleted from this permit because the
toxicants presented no reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards based on statistical
analysis of the effluent data
➢ Monitoring frequencies for cadmium nickel and silver have been deleted Monitoring of
cadmium and nickel shall continue in the LTMP
➢ Monitoring frequency for mercury has been reduced to 2/month because there is no limit for this
parameter in the permit
➢ The daily maximum limit for lead has been changed to 33 8 ug/l because the previous limit was
wrong
➢ To support nutrient -sensitive modeling for the Deep River Cape Fear watershed, the Division
now requires permit re -opener language for supplementary nutrient monitoring to be added to the
permit
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adludicatory hearing upon written request within thirty
(30) days following receipt of this letter This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714) Unless such
demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding
N��on��ennCarolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet w win nL WuLrguahty ore Location 512 N SalisburySt Raleigh NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Af nniaWe Action Employer-50%Recyded/10% Post Consumer Paper

Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division The Division
may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit This permit does not affect the
legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or
permits required by the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other
Federal or Local governmental permit that maybe required If you have any questions concerning this
permit, please contact Agyeman Adu-Poku at telephone number [phone], extension 508
Sincerely,
e6wAlan W Khmek, P E
cc Central Files
CNRDES'FilbZ�
Winston-Salem Regional Office / Surface Water Protection
EPA Region IV/Roosevelt Childress, Section Chief
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
PERCS

Pe=t NCO025445
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission,
and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, the
City of Randleman
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Randleman WWTP
3475 Applewood Road, Randleman
Randolph County
to receiving waters designated as the Deep River in the Cape Fear River Basin in accordance with effluent
limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II and III hereof
The permit shall become effective February 1, 2007
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on August 31, 2011
Signed this day January 2, 2007
Alan W Klimek, P E , Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Pe=t NC0025445
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
t�
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked As of this permit issuance, any previously issued permit hearing this number is no longer
effective Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the
permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein
The City of Randleman is hereby authorized to
Continue to operate an existing 1 745 MGD wastewater treatment facility located off Applewood
Road southeast of Randleman in Randolph County This facility discharges via outfall 001 and
includes the following wastewater treatment components
• Grit removal
• Mechanical bar screen
■ Four extended aeration basins
■ Four clanfiers
• Chlorine contact chamber
■ Cascade aerator
■ Dechlormation
• Traveling filter bridge
• Three aerobic digesters
2 Discharge from said treatment works into the Deep River, classified C waters in the Cape Fear River
Basin, at the location specified on the attached map

Permit NCO025445
A (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge
treated wastewater from outfall 001 Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permrttee as specified
below
F�,„g,. •. �j� � � �
s >rEFFLIIENT "'rt`
tits*
n,:CHARACTERI�STIC3,.xth 1
C+"YL iI
,EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
Morithl"%,t "Weekd'°;2
Y l Yx
.r SZa`u_�ra J Y+�PCfL.
` g c & g
Avera a
,,,�
w-
"JaDail` t
,. y �„
1 o..i x�i
a' _
Maximum
3�o-{ 1�, RE IREMT y i "'n
'$>, ` 4�MONITORING �D„C^/LIUIREMENT5, a ; +?'
5:
Y r
Meas`u`rement Sam lei Sam IeaLoca.tiorii�±ra
P! b s P
3`c nauw rr�Cta<iu? 3a ;1
�% (1
Fie uen sn Type
1 i ?� 1^•i'kdrR
I��.. F42,
,pL+
Flow
1 745 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5 day, 200C 2
(April 1- October 31
5 0 mg/L
7 5 mg/L
31 Week
Composite
Influent and Effluent
BOD, 5 day, 200C 2
November 1 — March 31
10 0 mg1L _
15 0 mglL
3Meek
Composite
Influent and Effluent
Total Suspended Solids2
30 0 mg/L
45 0 mglL
3/Week
Composite
Influent and Effluent
NH3 as N
(April 1 October 31
2 0 mg/L
6 0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N
November 1 March 31
4 0 mg/L
12 0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine
28 0 pg/L
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
2001100 ml
400/100 ml
3lweek
Grab
Effluent
pH3
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen4
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Conductivity
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
3lweek
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen NO2+NO3+TKN
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
nthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Lead
Composite
Effluent
Tota
onth
Gra
tal r
o
0
Effluent —
Total Cyanide
onth
Grab
Effluent
73V I
n
nt
Total Copper
4 n
Com osde
Effluent
Total Zinc
t
Com osite
Effluent
Chronic Toxin a
—duarterly
Composite
Effluent
Temperature?
3/week
Grab
U, D
Dissolved Oxygen7
3/week
Grab
U D
Conductive r
3/week
Grab
U D
Notes
I Sample locations Effluent Influent U — Upstream at Fox Street D — Downstream at Worthvdle Bridge
2 The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal)
3 The pH shall not be less than 6 0 standard units nor greater than 9 0 standard units
4 The daily effluent dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be less than 5 0 mg/L
5 EPA Method 1631 E shall be used in all mercury analyses
6 Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodap6ma) at 35% with testing in January, April, July and October (see A (3))
7 Asa participant in the Cape Fear River Basin Association, the mstream monitoring requirements as stated above are waived Should
your membership in the agreement be terminated, you shall notify the Division immediately and the mstream monitoring requirements
specified in your permit shall be reinstated
There shall be no discharge of floating sohds or visible foam in other than trace amounts

Pemnt NC0025445
A (2) PERMIT RE -OPENER SUPPLEMENTARY MONITORING
The Division may, upon wntten notification to the Permittee, require additional effluent momtonng that
it deems necessary to support its water quality protection and restoration efforts in the receiving stream
A (3) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or sigmficant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 35%
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the
"North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or
subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions The tests will be performed during the months of
January, April, July and October Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the
permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two
following months as descnbed in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometnc mean of the
highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest
concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival The definition of
"detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are
specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter
code TGP313 for the pass/fall results and THP313 for the Chronic Value Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3
(onginal) is to be sent to the following address
Attention NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later
than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentrationtresponse data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate
signature Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlonne
is employed for disinfection of the waste stream

Perri tNC0025445
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test
form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report
with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form The report shall be submitted to the
Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring
will be required during the following month
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division
of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits
NOTE Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall
constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the
last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring
A (4) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN
The permittee shall perform an annual Effluent Pollutant Scan for all parameters listed in the table below
(in accordance with 40 CFR Part 136) The annual effluent pollutant scan samples shall represent seasonal
(summer, winter, fall, spring) variations over the 5-year permit cycle Unless otherwise indicated, metals
shall be analyzed as "total recoverable " Additionally, the method detection level and the minimum level
shall be the most sensitive as provided by the appropriate analytical procedure
Ammonia (as N)
Chlorine (total residual,
Dissolved oxygen
Nitrate/Nitrite
Kleldahl nitrogen
Oil and grease
Phosphorus
Total dissolved solids
Hardness
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
TRC) 1,1-dichloroethylene
1,2-dichloropropane
1,3-dichloropropylene
Ethylbenzene
Methyl bromide
Methyl chloride
Methylene chloride
1,1, 2, 2-tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-trichloroethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Chromium
Trichloroethylene
Copper
Vinyl chloride
Lead
Acid -extractable compounds
Mercury
P-chloro-m-cresol
Nickel
2-chlorophenol
Selenium
2,4-dichlorophenol
Silver
2,4-dimethylphenol
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-chloronaphthalene
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Dibenzo(a, h)anth racene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
1,2-diphenylhydrazi ne

Pert NC0025445
Thallium
Zinc
Cyanide
Total phenolic compounds
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
2,4-dinitrophenol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
Acrylonitnle
2,4,6-tnchlorophenol
Benzene
Base -neutral compounds
Bromoform
Acenaphthene
Carbon tetrachloride
Acenaphthylene
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Dich lorobromometh an e
1,1-dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroethane
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-n itrosod i-n-propyla m i ne
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
Test results shall be reported to the Division in DWQ Form- DMR-PPAI or in a form approved by the
Director, within 90 days of sampling A copy of the report shall be submitted to each the NPDES Unit and
Central Files to the following address Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, , 1617 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

J��tEO Si�TF
s
� � W
n �
o �
Z;F'i'T G10r
�< PROtE
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4
ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
61FORSYTH STREET
ATLANTA GEORGIA 30303 8960
NON 29 2006
Mr Agyeman Adu-Poku
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
SUBJ Draft NPDES Permit
Randleman WWTP
Permit No NCO025445
Dear Mr Adu-Poku
In accordance with the EPA/NCDENR MOA, we have completed review of the draft
permit referenced above and have no comments on its conditions We request that we be
afforded an additional review opportunity only if significant changes are made to the permit prior
to issuance, or if significant comments objecting to the draft permit are received Otherwise,
please send us one copy of the final permit when issued
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone]
Sincerely,
Marshall Hyatt, Environmental Scientist
Permits, Grants, and Technical Assistance Branch
Water Management Division
Intemet Address (URL) • http Hv~ ape gov
Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnled with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)

NORTH CAROLINA
RANDOLPH COUNTY
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE .='
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA y
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said ENVIROMENTAL MANAGE i
MENTcOMMISION NPDES
County and State, duly commissioned qualified and U6 IT I, ISE, C CEN ER�r
authorized by law to administer oaths, personally RALEIGH NC7 6991617 N,xIi
I NOTIFICATION'OF INTENTfTDp
appeared ISSUE,A NPOE S,W AST EWlA^
TER PERMIT4� sf ti
Marla Shaw re the basis of Ihgr &n staHy
"�remew,arid Statute
lftJ1 321 of Ncy.
r General StaWte )14321"Pubbcy
who being first duly sworn, deposes and says, that taw 92 5ooaadyother lawful
( standards antlrregulahonssthe
he she Is NorOCarobna Environmental
(she) I1,',Management Comme,lon pro "
K pores to issue a No ad Pollut,i
Business Manager kept discharge elimination sys
tom'(NPOES),wastewater dtsl
'charge permit to the person (s)yy
Ilsied'below eNechve 45 daysl
of The Courier -Tribune, engaged in the publication fiem the pubtah tla,e w this no '
two C�'VS1'�lPI $gk)ljl'f.'}1df`IM
of a newspaper Known as I ne Louner I noune l'I�tt a n v t ill'' ix�60,
I Written Comments regarding theill
published, issued, and entered as second class eproposed1permit will be so
+ceptetl until 30 days after the')i
mad in the City of Asheboro in said County and ,)publish Eate of this notice' All
ycommentskreceived prior to that
State and the he (she) is authorized to make this a dale are consldered,nitho final'
Idelermmabons mg"ard,ng,the`
affidavit and sworn statement that the notice or proposed permit The D,rector of,
(the NC Oven of Water Oualhy)r
other legal advertisement, a true copy of which is may decme,,to hold,a pubic
•meetmg for the propesedjpei
attached hereto was published in the Courier r should the,Drvision raceme a
1'signifieiantidegreeelof pubha In
Tribune on the following dates ereei �,„� >I {{ may, t t
, _. 4% W j'4'"r yf 1 141\1f"'.s.i
Copies of the drat permit one l
November 9 2006 other suppoding Iniof a ion
file usetl to determine conda,ons}
,present r'the drelt,1 rmit In I,
available upon request antl pay 7RC ere,wstard Total dq,stay limited
menyof ilia costs
of repoduc �' The discharge may affect Iutureyr
bons Mail comments enNor re,t wasteioad allocations to, re
oasis forimfo,maia,i Io the NC ,)
and that the said newspaper In which such notice o,wam of Water,0uahty at Ina° emng sirYam ,j
above eddress,or cell Ms ,Caro- tt 11 fi
paper document, or legal advertisement was lyri Bryant (919)�7335063 ex„
tension 3'(919 Ms Frances}
published was at the time of each and every such tendon 20 at the Pint u x i
tension 52o et she Point e,thei,
publication, a newpaper meeting all of the BranchNPleaseilnclude+iheh
requirements and qualifications of Section 1 597 of Nctiedi any o nuairySaal (at ,j
tacFed)nn any4ommumcehon
the General Statutes of North Carolina 1943, as Inlarestedipereons may also
visit the Drvawnval Water Oual
ny at L512 11 12760ury 4B etrf
amended, and was a qualified newspaper within the Reletgh a C1276of 00 be a
meaning of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes and 5 theeAhoto of a 0o a m
and 5 psm�, rw`niosY
lion on rle ..r r, J
of North Carolina s , S ra,Krr-�.
aCliy o1�RantllemeIII n 1WWTP /
this 9ih dayof November, 20010 (34]5tApplewood Road Ran
dlaman its far stave 2]31 r
/J has�epplietl for renewal of per /
1 h A v �{ / �� inn NC0025445 for iThisb W W�rP It ✓ lv'(l,/` /V\\
W Wu/ 1�7o/OV,hI Randolph County treate
lad traler discher River
treated \
`wastewater to Deep Rrver in the' N
Cape Fear, RIvSr,Basm Curt
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 9th ontly Be ammoma,narogen I
day of November, 2006 facer forms
are end total In 'ft el
chlorine are Con t tal residual'
tied This tlIaeha,Be may I_ at
future allocetins in this portion
//�/�(� �� (T .t'{) //r/� of Me Deep Rrver"i}'(t' %7,T'
1—LL�.�----sue- I., ' )1-n M 2 %l 2 (Part
of Ramseur 26565WwTP
y
U Perm,l Number NC webs" 5),
Notary 'jbhc has apdiscpileh discharging
renewal,Ddepf
�`permrt tltschargmg Io lhe,Deep
River located within the Cape
Fear,Rrver Bli Facel'coidmmt
f' I _�mrri ssion Fx,3ires 6/19/11 1
-' -(-^'-� t

DENR / DWQ / NPDES Unit
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES Permit No NCO025445
INTRODUCTION
The City of Randleman Wastewater Treatment Plant (W WTP), herein called Randleman or
the pennittee, requires a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to
discharge treated wastewater to the waters of the state The pernittee's 5-year NPDES permit
expired at midnight on August 31, 2006 and have requested renewal from the Division of
Water Quality This Fact Sheet summanzes background information and rationale used by the
Division's NPDES Unit to determine permit limits and monitonng frequencies
FACILITY DESCRIPTION
Randleman is a publicly owned treatment works (POTW) utilizing a Grade III aeration units
and clarifiers to treat domestic and industrial wastewater The treatment system utilizes a
mechanical bar screen, grit removal device, four clarifiers, four extended aeration basins,
chlorine contact chamber, cascade aerator, dechlonnation, traveling filter bridge and three
aerobic digesters Table 1 Summarizes the receiving stream characteristics and facility
description The previous pennrt had incorrect 30Q2 stream flow value in the fact sheet
Table 1 City of Randleman W WTP
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name
City of Randleman / Randleman W WTP
Applicant Address
101 Hilliary St, Randleman, North Carolina
Facility Address
3475 Applewood Rd Randleman North Carolina
Permitted Flow
1 745 MGD
Type of Waste
Domestic 77 % / Industrial 23 %
Facility/Permit Status
Renewal
County
Randolph
Miscellaneous
Stream Classification C State Grid / USGS Quad D 19 SE/Randleman
303(d) Listed? No Permit Writer Agyeman Adu-Poku
Subbasin 03-06-08 Date 10/23/2006
Drainage Area (miz) 180
Summer 7Q10 cfs 50
Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 12 •
30Q2 cfs 23
Average Flow cfs 171
IWC(%) 35 Lat 35048 24 N Lonq 79047 00' W
Randleman is a major municipality in Randolph County, serves 1900 people, Commonwealth
Hosiery and Deep River Dyeing Co , Inc The facility has a permitted flow rate of 1 745
MGD discharging into the Deep River For the past two years monthly average flow varied
Fact Sheet
Renewal - NPDES Permit NCO025445
Page 1

within the range of 88 — 1 23 MGD as reported in the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)
The permittee is a member of the Cape Fear Monitoring Coalition, and all its in -stream
monitoring is conditionally waived for the duration of its membership in the Coalition The
stream flow characteristics will probably change due to the minimum release requirement of
the Randleman Lake dam Since this information is not yet available, the existing flow
characteristics will be used for this permit renewal When the dam is fully operational, the
permit limits may be adjusted during renewal
Randleman has two significant industrial users (23% of the total flow) and a full-scale
pretreatment program The permit will continue to require the City of Randleman to
implement its pretreatment program
BASINWIDE PLAN
Deep River [17-(10 5) b] from US 220 to Subbasm boundary (2 2 miles) is supporting
aquatic life because no criteria were exceeded at site BA301 (Cape Fear River Basmwide
Water Quality Plan, 2005) The Division added High Point Lake to the 2006 303(d) list due
to violations of the chlorophyll a standard, and we expect that the new Randleman Reservoir
will have similar violations soon after it is filled The Modeling Unit has not yet scheduled
stream studies in this part of the river basin, but it is possible that work could begin soon
(Supplement to NPDES Permitting Strategies Cape Fear River Basin, 2006)
Until stream studies are scheduled and prompt increased monitoring, existing nutrient
requirements in this sub -watershed will continue unchanged That is, dischargers will
monitor nutrients at the frequencies set in their existing permits, which should be consistent
with those in the 2B 0508 rule The permit will include a re -opener Special Condition
allowing the Division to incorporate monitoring requirements or other conditions during this
permit term if necessary to support water quality studies The language of the re -opener
clause will be "The Division may, upon written notification to the Permittee, require
additional effluent monitoring that it deems necessary to support its water quality protection
and restoration efforts in the receiving stream" (Supplement to NPDES Permitting Strategies
Cape Fear River Basin, 2006)
WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION (WLA)
The last waste load allocation was done in 1995 and developed effluent limits and monitoring
requirements for BOD, ammonia and TSS, considering an in -stream waste concentration (IWC)
of 35 % at 1 745 MGD The Division views these limits and monitoring requirements
appropriate for renewal
TOTAL RESIDUAL CHLORINE (TRC)
The permittee currently uses chlorine for disinfection The Division has implemented TRC
policy to protect aquatic life in the waters of the State and has adopted aquatic life standard for
Fact Sheet
Renewal -- NPDES NCO025445
Page 2

TRC A TRC limit of 28 ug/l will be continued in this permit to be consistent with the Division's
TRC policy
REASONABLE PO rENTIAL ANALYSIS (RPA)
To establish a list of pollutants of concern (POCs), the Division examined Randleman's permit
application, pretreatment data, two years of Discharge Monitoring Reports (January 2004 through
August 2006), and the basin plan The Division then applied the reasonable potential analysts to
calculate a maximum predicted concentration for each POC Each maximum predicted
concentration was then compared to the POC's freshwater standard/cntenon or allowable
concentration considering dilution If by this method, a POC showed reasonable potential to
exceed its standard or critenon, the Division included a limit in the permit as a weekly average to
protect the receiving stream against chronic toxicity impact, and as a daily maximum against acute
toxicity impact
Reasonable potential analysis was performed for cadmium, chromium, copper, cyanide, fluonde,
lead, mercury, nickel, silver and zinc
Cadmium -The maximum predicted concentration is less than the allowable concentration The
limit and monitoring are deleted from this permit Monitoring should continue in the LTMP
Chromium — The maximum predicted concentration is less than the allowable concentration
Continue with 2/month monitoring
Copper — The maximum predicted concentration is greater than the allowable concentration This
is an action level parameter, monitoring will continue 2/month
Cyanide - The maximum predicted concentration is less than the allowable concentration
Continue with 2/month monitonng
Fluoride - The maximum predicted concentration is less than the allowable concentration
Continue with 2/month monitoring
Lead - The maximum predicted concentration is greater than the allowable concentration Daily
maximum limit of 33 8 ug/i and weekly monitoring is recommended The previous permit had a
wrong limit for total lead
Mercury - The maximum predicted concentration is less than the allowable concentration The
limit is deleted from this permit Monitoring is reduced to 2/month
Nickel - The maximum predicted concentration is less than the allowable concentration
Momtonng is deleted from this permit Monitoring should continue in the LTMP
Silver - The maximum predicted concentration is greater than the allowable concentration
Monitoring is deleted from this permit because there is no detection in the sixty data set
Fact Sheet
Renewal - NPDES NC0025445
Page 3

Zinc - The maximum predicted concentration is greater than the allowable concentration This is
an action level parameter, monitoring will continue 2/month
WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY (WET) TEST AND AMMONIA
Type of Toxicity Test Chronic P/F (Quarterly)
Existing Limit 001 Chronic P/F @ 35%
Recommended Limit 001 Chronic P/F @ 35%
Monitoring Schedule January, April, July, and October
The permittee has passed all of the nineteen WET tests from January 2002 to July 2006 See
the attached WET testing summary
COMPLIANCE REVIEW
Winston-Salem Regional Office (WSRO) staff conducted an annual facility inspection and Jenny
Freeman prepared a staff report dated November 3, 2005 The WSRO staff found issues with the
presence of filamentous bacteria and has made several recommendations for improved
operations The facility is in satisfactory condition and in compliance with the permit The
WSRO recommended the permit be renewed in accordance with the Division policy
DMR records indicated the facility had numerous compliance issues during the May 2004
through May 2006 reporting period Randleman had violated BOD5 fecal cohform and TSS
limits In addition, the City of Randleman has commissioned several studies from consulting
companies and sought technical assistance from the Division of Water Quality over the past
three years in an effort to correct operational problems at the plant However, even with the
reports and recommendations generated by consultants, the violations of the effluent limits
have continued at the plant Due to these circumstances, the Division is considering placing
the City of Randleman on a sewer line moratorium
In a letter dated January 26, 2005, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 4,
requested information from Randleman in pursuant to Section 308 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA),33USC §1318
INSTREAM DATA REVIEW
Coalition mstream monitoring data was reviewed for the period beginning May 2004 through
January 2006 Instream monitoring was required for dissolved oxygen, conductivity,
temperature, total cadmium, lead, chromium, nickel and mercury The analysis of the
mstream data showed that the facility might not impact the stream negatively Thus, mstream
is required for only dissolved oxygen, temperature and conductivity Monitoring is
conditionally waived based on the participation in the Cape Fear River Basin Monitoring
Coalition
Fact Sheet
Renewal - NPDES NCO025445
Page 4

PROPOSED CHANGES
• Monitoring Frequencies
■ Weekly monitoring for cadmium and nickel has been deleted because these
pollutants presented no reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards
based on the statistical analysts of the effluent data
■ Weekly monitoring for mercury has been reduced to 2/month because the
pollutant presented no reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards
based on the statistical analysis of the effluent data
• Linuts
2/month monitoring for silver has been deleted because these pollutants
presented no reasonable potential to exceed water quality standards based on the
statistical analysis of the effluent data
Daily maximum limits for cadmium, and mercury have been deleted
because these toxicants presented no reasonable potential to exceed
water quality standards
■ Daily maximum limit for total lead has been changed from 25 0 ug/1 to
33 8 ug/l because the previous permit had a wrong limit
• Priority pollutant scan has been added to fulfill EPA's permit renewal application
requirement for major municipal wastewater treatment facilities
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public Notice November 8, 2006
Permit Scheduled to Issue January 2, 2007
NPDES UNIT CONTACT
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit,
please contact Agyeman Adu-Poku at [phone] ext 508
NAME iT'[4Pn'✓� N-4,k Tuw DATE ' p o
Fact Sheet
Renewal - NPDES NC0025445
Page 5

Table 1 Project Information
Facility Name
WWTP Grade
NPDES Permit
Outfall
Flow, Qw (MGD)
Receiving Stream
Stream Class
7Q10s (cfs)
7Q10w (cfs)
30Q2 (cfs)
CIA (cfs)
Time Period
Data Source(s)
City of Randleman WWTP
III
NC0025445
001
1 745
Deep River
C
50
120
230
171 0
January 2004 - August 2006
DMR, LTMP, APPLICATION
Par09
Par02
Par03
Par04
Par05
Par06
Par07
Par08
ParOg
Par10
Par11
Par12
Par13
Par14
Par15
Table 2 Parameters of Concern
Name Type Chronic Modifier Acute PQL Units
Cadmium
NC
2
15
ug/L
Chromium
NC
50
1022
ug/L
Copper
NC
7
AL
73
ug/L
Cyanide
NC
5
N
22
10
ug/L
Fluoride
NC
1 8
mg/L
Lead
NC
25
N
338
ug/L
Mercury
NC
12
20
ng/L
Nickel
NC
88
261
ug/L
Silver
NC
006
AL
1 23
ug/L
Zinc
NC
50
AL
67
ug/L
npdes rpa input
10/25/2006

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
City of Randleman WWTP
NCO025445
rime Period January 2004 -August 2006
Qw (MGD) 1 745
WWTP Class III
7Q10S (cls) 5
IWC (%) @ 7Q10S 35 105
7Q10W (c/s) 12
@ 7Q10W 18 394
3002 (c/s) 23
@ 3002 10 522
Avg Stream Flow CA (c(s) 171
@ CA 1 5571
Rec'vmg Stream Deep River
Stream Class C
Outfal 1001
Qw = 1 745 MGD
STANDARDS&
PARAMETER
TYPE
CRITERIA(2)
POL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NCWQS/ /FAV/
n gDet Max etl Cw, Allowable Lw,
Prod
(1)
Chinn¢ Acute
Acute 15
Cadmium
NC
2 15
ug/L
140 2
21
No_ limit or_ momtonng in this pertne.
_ _ _ _ _
Chronic 570
_ _ _ _ _
Monitoring shouklconhnue in the LTMP in pretreatment
Acute 1022
ce \
mtonngi
Chromium
NC
500 1022
ug/L
63 59
822
2/m_onth m should continue inmi the pert _
Chromc 142
Monitonng should continue in the LTMP in pretreatment
1.
Acute 730
an 1i i
Copper
NC
7 AL 73
ug/L
60 56
490
2/month monitoringshould continue in the permit
—
Chronic 1994
(Action level parameter)
Acute 22
Cyanide
NC
5 N 22
10
ug/L
64 6
50
2lmonth monrto rig should continue in the permit
Chronic 14
— — — — — —
Acute NIA
Fluoride
NC
1 8
mg/L
60 60
16
2/month monrtonng should continue in the mi _pert
Chronic 513
F
Acute 3380
Lead
NC
25 N 338
ug/L
63 38
406
Da,Tm_aximum limit of 33 8 ug/i is recommended—
_ _ _ _ _
Chronic 7121
_
Weekly monitoring is recommended
I
Acute NIA
i.
Mercury
INC
12
2
rig/L
62 62
229
_
21month moreto g' is recommended
Chronic 34 18
Monitonng"should continue in the LTMP in pretreatment
�1* t
Acute 261
+
i�
Nickel
NC
88 261
ug/L
60 6
840
No limit or, momtonng in this remn it
Chronic 2507
Monitoring should continue in the LTMP in pretreatment
n i— q
Acute 1 23
Silver
NC
006 AL 1 23
ug/L
60 0
250
No monitoring is recommended in this perm t
Chromc 0 17
_
(Action level parameter)
Acute 67
Zinc
NC
50 AL 67
ug/L
60 58
2192
2/month momtonng should continue in the pem it
Chronic 142
(Action level parameter)
Acute N/A
Legend
C = Carcinogenic
NC = Non -carcinogenic
A = Aeslhebc
Freshwater Discharge
npdes me me
11/7/2006

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Cadmium
Chromium
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
i
Jan 04
<
200
1 0
Sid Dev
0 1260
1
Jan-04
2000
200
Sid Dev 69117
2
Jan 04
<
200
10
Mean
10179
2
Jan-04
2100
210
Mean 119524
3
Jan 04
<
200
1 0
C V
0 1238
3
Feb 04
1
1200
120
C V 05783
4
Jan-04
<
200
1 0
n
140
4
Feb-04
1400
140
n 63
5
Feb 04
<
200
1 0
5
Mar-04
1000
100
6
Feb-04
<
200
10
Mult Factor =
10600
6
Mar-04
1200
120
Mult Factor = 15800
7
Feb-04
<
200
10
Max Value
20 ug/L
7
Apr-04
1000
100
Max Value 520 ug/L
8
Feb-04
<
200
1 0
Max Fred Cw
21 ug/L
8
Apr-04
1200
120
Max Fred Cw 82 2 ug/L
9
Mar-04
<
300
1 5
9
May-04
1600
160
10
Mar 04
<
200
10
10
Jun-04
1700
170
11
Mar 04
<
200
10
11
Jun 04
1700
170
12
Mar 04
<
200
10
12
Jul04
1200
120
13
Mar 04
<
200
10
13
Jul-04
1700
170
14
Apr-04
<
200
10
14
Aug-04
1900
190
15
Apr-04
<
200
10
15
Aug-04
1400
140
16
Apr-04
<
200
10
16
Sep-04
1400
140
17
Apr-04
<
200
10
17
Sep-04
800
80
18
May 04
<
200
1 0
18
Oct-04
1800
180
19
May 04
<
200
1 0
19
Oct 04
1600
160
20
May 04
<
200
1 0
20
Nov 04
2200
220
21
May 04
<
200
1 0
21
Nov 04
21 00
21 0
22
Jun-04
<
200
10
22
Dec-04
1200
120
23
Jun-04
<
200
10
23
Dec-04
800
80
24
Jun-04
<
200
10
24
Jan-05
1200
120
25
Jun 04
200
20
25
Jan-05
1200
120
26
Jun 04
<
200
10
26
Feb-05
5200
520
27
Jul 04
<
200
10
27
Feb-05
1100
110
28
Jul 04
<
200
10
28
Mar 05
<
500
25
29
Jul 04
<
200
10
29
Mar 05
700
70
30
Jul 04
<
200
1 0
30
Apr-05
1000
100
31
Aug-04
<
200
1 0
31
Apr-05
11 00
11 0
32
Aug-04
<
200
1 0
32
May-05
1700
170
33
Aug 04
<
200
10
33
May 05
1100
11 0
34
Aug 04
<
200
1 0
34
Jun-05
900
90
35
Sep 04
<
200
1 0
35
Jun 05
11 00
11 0
36
Sep 04
<
200
10
36
Jul 05
<
500
25
37
Sep 04
<
200
10
37
Jul 05
600
60
38
Sep 04
<
200
1 0
38
Aug 05
11 00
11 0
39
Sep 04
<
200
10
39
Aug 05
500
50
40
Sep-04
200
20
40
Sep-05
1100
110
41
Oct-04
<
200
1 0
41
Sep-05
1000
100
42
Oct-04
<
200
1 0
42
Oct-05
1700
170
43
Oct 04
<
200
1 0
43
Oct-05
1200
120
44
Oct 04
<
200
1 0
44
Nov 05
900
90
45
Nov 04
<
200
1 0
45
Nov 05
1400
140
46
Nov 04
<
200
1 0
46
Dec 05
800
80
47
Nov-04
<
200
10
47
Dec-05
1100
110
48
Nov-04
<
200
10
48
Jan-06
1000
100
49
Dec-04
<
200
10
49
Jan-06
1000
100
50
Dec-04
<
200
1 0
50
Feb-06
1500
150
51
Dec 04
<
200
1 0
51
Feb-06
1000
100
52
Dec 04
<
200
1 0
52
Mar-06
900
90
53
Dec 04
<
200
10
53
Mar-06
<
500
25
54
Jan 05
<
200
10
54
Apr 06
1000
100
55
Jan 05
<
200
10
55
Apr-06
800
80
56
Jan-05
<
200
10
56
May 06
1100
110
57
Jan-05
<
200
1 0
57
May-06
700
70
58
Feb-05
<
200
10
58
Jun-06
900
90
59
Feb-05
<
200
10
59
Jun-06
600
60
60
Feb-05
<
200
1 0
60
Jul-06
<
500
25
61
Feb 05
<
200
10
61
Jul 06
700
70
62
Mar 05
<
200
1 0
62
Aug 06
600
60
63
Mar 05
<
200
1 0
63
Aug 06
600
60
64
Mar 05
<
200
10
64
65
Mar-05
<
200
10
65
66
Mar-05
<
200
10
66
67
Apr 05
<
200
10
67
68
Apr 05
<
200
1 0
68
69
Apr 05
<
200
1 0
69
70
Apr 05
L<j
200
1 0
70
npdes rpa data
10/23/2006

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
71
May-05
< 200
10
71
72
May-05
< 200
1 0
72
73
May-05
< 200
10
73
74
May 05
< 200
10
74
75
Jun-05
< 200
10
75
76
Jun 05
< 200
10
76
77
Jun 05
< 200
1 0
77
78
Jun 05
< 200
10
78
79
Jun 05
< 200
1 0
79
80
Jul-05
< 200
10
80
81
Jul-05
< 200
10
81
82
Jul-05
< 200
10
82
83
Jul 05
< 200
10
83
84
Aug 05
< 200
1 0
84
85
Aug 05
< 200
1 0
85
86
Aug 05
< 200
1 0
86
87
Aug-05
< 200
1 0
87
88
Aug-05
< 200
1 0
88
89
Sep-05
< 200
10
89
90
Sep-05
< 200
10
90
91
Sep-05
< 200
10
91
92
Sep 05
< 200
10
92
93
Oct 05
< 200
1 0
93
94
Oct 05
< 200
1 0
94
95
Oct 05
< 200
1 0
95
96
Oct 05
¢ 200
1 0
96
97
Nov-05
< 200
1 0
97
98
Nov-05
< 200
1 0
98
99
Nov-05
< 200
1 0
99
100
Nov 05
< 200
1 0
100
101
Nov 05
< 200
1 0
101
102
Dec 05
< 200
1 0
102
103
Dec 05
< 200
1 0
103
104
Dec-05
< 200
1 0
104
105
Dec-05
< 200
1 0
105
106
Jan-06
< 200
10
106
107
Jan-06
< 200
10
107
108
Jan 06
< 200
1 0
108
109
Jan 06
< 200
10
109
110
Feb 06
< 200
1 0
110
111
Feb 06
< 200
1 0
111
112
Feb 06
< 200
10
112
113
Feb 06
< 200
1 0
113
114
Mar 06
,<� 200
1 0
114
115
Mar-06
< 200
1 0
115
116
Mar 06
< 200
1 0
116
117
Mar 06
< 200
1 0
117
118
Mar 06
< 200
10
118
119
Apr 06
< 200
1 0
119
120
Apr 06
< 200
1 0
120
121
Apr-06
< 200
1 0
121
122
Apr-06
< 200
10
122
123
May-06
< 200
10
123
124
May-06
< 200
10
124
125
May-06
< 200
10
125
126
May-06
< 200
1 0
126
127
May 06
< 200
1 0
127
128
Jun 06
< 200
10
128
129
Jun 06
< 200
10
129
130
Jun 06
< 200
1 0
130
131
Jun-06
< 200
10
131
132
Jul 06
< 200
1 0
132
133
Jul-06
< 200
10
133
134
Jul 06
< 200
10
134
135
Jul 06
< 200
10
135
136
Aug 06
< 200
10
136
137
Aug 06
< 200
10
137
138
Aug 06
< 200
10
138
139
Aug-06
a 200
10
139
140
Aug-06
< 200
10
140
npdes rpa data
10/23/2006

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Copper
Cyanide
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
Jan-04
1400
140
Std Day
68165
1
Jan-04
<
500
500
Std Dev 00000
2
Jan-04
500
50
Mean
134000
2
Jan-04
<
500
500
Mean 50000
3
Feb-04
900
90
C V
05087
3
Feb-04
<
500
500
C V 00000
4
Feb-04
800
80
n
60
4
Feb-04
<
500
500
n 64
5
Mar-04
600
60
5
Mar-04
<
500
500
6
Mar-04
900
90
Mult Factor =
15300
6
Mar-04
<
500
500
Mult Factor = 10000
7
Apr-04
1400
140
Max Value
320 ug/L
7
Apr-04
<
500
500
Max Value 50 ug/L
8
Apr-04
800
80
Max Fred Cw
490 ug/L
8
Apr-04
<
Soo
500
Max Fred Cw 5 0 ug/L
9
May 04
1100
11 00
9
May 04
<
500
500
10
Jun-04
1000
1000
10
Jun 04
<
500
500
11
Jun 04
1000
1000
11
JW 04
<
500
500
12
Jul-04
1200
1200
12
Jul-04
<
500
500
13
Jul-04
2000
2000
13
Aug 04
<
500
Soo
14
Aug-04
900
900
14
Aug 04
<
500
500
15
Aug 04
1400
1400
15
Sep-04
<
500
500
16
Sep-04
2800
2800
16
Sep-04
<
Soo
500
17
Sep-04
1700
1700
17
Sep-04
<
500
500
18
Sep-04
1700
1700
18
Oct-04
<
500
500
19
Oct-04
1800
1800
19
Oct-04
<
500
500
20
Oct-04
2000
2000
20
Nov 04
<
Soo
500
21
Nov 04
1100
1100
21
Nov 04
<
500
500
22
Nov 04
900
900
22
Dec 04
<
500
500
23
Dec 04
900
900
23
Dec 04
<
500
500
24
Dec 04
1200
1200
24
Jan 05
<
500
500
25
Jan 05
1600
1600
25
Jan-05
<
500
500
26
Jan-05
1600
1600
26
Feb-05
<
500
500
27
Feb-05
700
700
27
Feb-05
<
500
500
28
Feb-05
<
500
250
28
Mar-05
<
500
500
29
Mar-05
1100
1100
29
Mar-05
<
500
500
30
Mar-05
600
600
30
Apr-05
<
500
500
31
Apr-05
2600
2600
31
Apr-05
<
500
500
32
Apr 05
3200
3200
32
May 05
<
500
Soo
33
May 05
3200
3200
33
May 05
<
500
500
34
May 05
1200
1200
34
Jun 05
<
500
500
35
Jun 05
1000
1000
35
Jun 05
<
Soo
500
36
Jun 05
1400
1400
36
Jul 05
<
500
500
37
Jul-05
1300
1300
37
Jul 05
<
500
500
38
Jul-05
1100
1100
38
Aug-05
<
500
500
39
Aug-05
11 00
11 00
39
Aug-05
<
500
500
40
Aug-05
2200
2200
40
Sep-05
<
500
500
41
Sep-05
1700
1700
41
Sep-05
600
Soo
42
Sep-05
2800
2800
42
Oct-05
640
500
43
Oct-05
1400
1400
43
Oct 05
<
500
500
44
Oct-05
<
500
250
44
Nov-05
960
Soo
45
Nov-05
1600
1600
45
Nov 05
<
500
500
46
Nov-05
900
900
46
Dec 05
<
500
500
47
Dec 05
1500
1500
47
Dec 05
<
500
500
48
Dec-05
1700
1700
48
Jan 06
<
500
500
49
Jan-06
1500
1500
49
Jan 06
<
500
500
50
Jan-06
1200
1200
50
Feb 06
<
500
500
51
Feb-06
2200
2200
51
Feb-06
<
Soo
500
52
Feb-06
<
500
250
52
Mar-06
<
500
500
53
Mar-06
1300
1300
53
Mar-06
600
500
54
Apr-06
<
500
250
54
Apr-06
<
590
500
55
Apr-06
1200
1200
55
Apr 06
<
500
500
56
May 06
800
800
56
May 06
<
500
500
57
May 06
2400
2400
57
May 06
<
500
500
58
Jun 06
1400
1400
58
Jun 06
<
500
500
59
Jun-06
700
700
59
Jun 06
<
500
500
60
Jul-06
1200
1200
60
Jul 06
<
500
500
61
61
Jul 06
700
500
62
62
Jul 06
600
500
63
63
Aug-06
<
500
500
64
64
Aug-06
<
500
500
65
65
66
66
67
67
68
68
69
69
70
Li
70
Lj
npdes rpa data
10/23/2006

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
npdes rpa data
10/23/2006

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
I Fluoride I Lead I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Jan 04
0805
08
Jan 04
079
08
Feb-04
0 804
08
Feb-04
0 778
08
Mar-04
0 173
02
Mar-04
0908
09
Apr-04
0 713
0 7
Apr-04
0 743
07
May-04
0 838
08
Jun-04
0774
08
Jun 04
0826
08
Jul-04
1 28
13
Jul 04
0533
05
Aug 04
0 739
07
Aug 04
0 811
08
Sep-04
0 891
09
Sep-04
054
05
Oct-04
0 638
06
Oct-04
0 864
09
Nov-04
08
08
Nov-04
0745
07
Dec-04
0 578
06
Dec-04
0 657
07
Jan-05
0 545
05
Jan-05
0695
07
Feb-05
0 703
07
Feb 05
1 02
1 0
Mar 05
0469
05
Mar 05
0 638
06
Apr 05
0627
06
Apr-05
0 736
07
May-05
0665
07
May-05
0 942
09
Jun-05
0105
01
Jun-05
0636
06
Jul-05
084
08
Jul-05
0 637
06
Aug-05
0 519
05
Aug-05
0 579
06
Sep 05
0 902
09
Sep-05
0 888
09
Oct 05
0 976
1 0
Oct-05
0 683
07
Nov 05
0 896
09
Nov-05
109
1 1
Dec-05
0 551
06
Dec-05
0615
06
Jan-06
0503
05
Jan-06
0 691
07
Feb-06
0 583
06
Feb-06
077
08
Mar-06
0962
10
Mar-06
1 08
1 1
Apr 06
1 23
1 2
Apr 06
0921
09
May 06
078
08
May 06
0641
06
Jun 06
0869
09
Jun-06
0911
09
Jul-061
0978
10
Results
Std Day
02079
Mean
07517
C V
02766
n
60
Mult Factor = 12700
Max Value 1 3
Max Fred Cw 1 6
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
i
Jan 04
<
5 00
250
Sul Day
41524
2
Jan-04
800
800
Mean
60556
3
Jan-04
800
800
C V
06857
4
Jan-04
800
800
n
63
5
Feb-04
900
900
6
Feb-04
1400
1400
Mult Factor =
1 6900
7
Feb-04
800
800
Max Value
240
8
Feb-04
<
500
250
Max Fred Cy,
406
9
Mar-04
800
800
10
Mar-04
<
500
250
11
Mar-04
400
400
12
Mar 04
800
800
13
Mar 04
<
500
250
14
Apr 04
1000
1000
15
Apr 04
1400
1400
16
Apr-04
800
800
17
Apr 04
<
500
250
18
May-04
500
500
19
May-04
2400
2400
20
May-04
800
800
21
May-04
1300
1300
22
Jun-04
500
500
23
Jun 04
1600
1600
24
Jun 04
700
700
25
Jun 04
600
600
26
Jun 04
600
600
27
Jul 04
700
700
28
Jul 04
800
800
29
Jul 04
600
600
30
Jul-04
700
700
31
Aug 04
<
500
250
32
Aug-04
<
500
250
33
Aug-04
500
500
34
Aug 04
<
500
250
35
Sep-04
<
500
250
36
Sep-04
<
500
250
37
Sep-04
<
500
250
38
Sep 04
<
500
250
39
Sep-04
<
500
250
40
Sep 04
<
500
250
41
Oct 04
500
500
42
Oct 04
<
500
250
43
Oct 04
<
500
250
44
Oct 04
700
700
45
Nov-04
<
500
250
46
Nov 04
500
500
47
Nov-04
600
600
48
Nov-04
<
500
250
49
Dec-04
700
700
50
Dec-04
<
500
250
51
Dec-04
<
500
250
52
Dec 04
400
400
53
Dec 04
<
500
250
54
Jan 05
<
500
250
55
Jan 05
1300
1300
56
Jan 05
800
800
57
Jan 05
1000
1000
58
Feb 05
700
700
59
Feb-05
800
800
60
Feb-05
900
900
61
Jul-06
<
500
250
62
Aug-06
<
500
250
63
Aug-06
<
500
250
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
npdes rpa data
10/23/2006

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
npdes rpa data
10/23/2006

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Mercury
Nickel
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
Jan 04
602
6 020
Std Dev
30301
1
Jan 04
<
500
25
Std Dev,
55439
2
Jan 04
623
6 230
Mean
52913
2
Jan 04
<
500
25
Mean
40500
3
Jan 04
491
4 910
C V
05727
3
Feb 04
<
500
25
C V
1 3689
4
Jan 04
487
4 870
n
62
4
Feb 04
<
500
25
n
60
5
Feb 04
307
3 070
5
Mar 04
<
500
25
6
Feb 04
396
3 960
Mult Factor =
1 5800
6
Mar 04
<
500
25
Mult Factor =
24700
7
Feb 04
248
2 480
Max Value
145 ng/L
7
Apr-04
<
500
25
Max Value
340
8
Feb-04
542
5 420
Max Fred Cw
229 ng/L
8
Apr-04
<
500
25
Max Fred Cw
840
9
Mar 04
206
2060
9
May 04
<
500
25
10
Mar 04
316
3160
10
Jun 04
<
500
25
11
Mar 04
391
3910
11
Jun 04
<
500
25
12
Mar 04
131
13100
12
Jul 04
<
500
25
13
Mar 04
394
3940
13
Jul 04
<
500
25
14
Apr 04
404
4 040
14
Aug 04
<
500
25
15
Apr 04
583
5 830
15
Aug 04
<
500
25
16
Apr 04
674
6 740
16
Sep 04
2500
250
17
Apr 04
595
5 950
17
Sep 04
<
500
25
18
May 04
449
4 490
18
Sep 04
<
500
25
19
May 04
49
4 900
19
Oct 04
<
500
25
20
May 04
645
6 450
20
Oct 04
<
500
25
21
May 04
659
6590
21
Nov 04
1500
150
22
Jun 04
000668
000668
22
Nov 04
<
500
25
23
Jun 04
000786
000786
23
Dec 04
<
500
25
24
Jun 04
00126
00126
24
Dec 04
<
500
25
25
Jun 04
000622
000622
25
Jan 05
500
25
26
Jun 04
000711
000711
26
Jan 05
<
500
25
27
Jul 04
235
2 350
27
Feb 05
3400
340
28
Jul 04
412
4 120
28
Feb 05
1800
180
29
Jul 04
537
5370
29
Mar 05
<
500
25
30
Jul 04
754
7540
30
Mar 05
<
500
25
31
Aug 04
547
5 470
31
Apr 05
<
500
25
32
Aug 04
145
14 500
32
Apr 05
<
500
25
33
Aug 04
656
6 560
33
May 05
<
500
25
34
Aug 04
806
8 060
34
May 05
<
500
25
35
Sep 04
799
7 990
35
Jun 05
<
500
25
36
36
Jun 05
<
500
25
37
Sep 04
537
5370
37
Jul 05
<
500
25
38
Sep 04
654
6540
38
Jul 05
<
500
25
39
Sep 04
768
7 680
39
Aug 05
<
500
25
40
Sep 04
698
5 980
40
Aug 05
<
500
25
41
Oct 04
693
6 930
41
Sep 05
<
500
25
42
Oct 04
433
4 330
42
Sep 05
<
500
25
43
Oct-04
605
6 050
43
Oct 05
<
500
25
44
Oct-04
573
5 730
44
Oct 05
<
500
25
45
Nov 04
102
10 200
45
Nov 05
700
70
46
Nov 04
11 2
11 200
46
Nov 05
<
500
25
47
Nov 04
842
8 420
47
Dec 05
<
500
25
48
Nov 04
103
10 300
48
Dec 05
,<
500
25
49
Dec 04
595
5 950
49
Jan 06
<
500
25
50
Dec 04
465
4 650
50
Jan 06
<
500
25
51
Dec 04
389
3 890
51
Feb 06
<
500
25
52
Dec 04
359
3 590
52
Feb 06
<
500
25
53
Dec 04
362
3 620
53
Mar-06
900
90
54
Jan 05
707
7 070
54
Mar 06
<
500
25
55
Jan 05
38
3 800
55
Apr 06
<
500
25
56
Jan 05
588
5880
56
Apr 06
<
500
25
57
Jan 05
59
5 900
57
May 06
<
500
25
58
Feb 05
6 13
6 130
58
May 06
<
500
25
59
Feb 05
662
6 620
59
Jun 06
<
500
25
60
Feb 05
952
9 520
60
Jun 06
<
500
25
61
Jul 06
076
076
62
Aug 06
0 908
0 908
63
Aug 06
0 924
0 924
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
Li
nodes too data
10/23/2006

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
npdes rpa data
10/23/2006

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Silver
Zinc
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
Jan-04
<
500
25
Sid Dev
00000
1
Jan-04
4300
430
Sid Dev
2
Jan-04
<
500
25
Mean
25000
2
Jan-04
6400
640
Mean
3
Feb 04
<
500
25
C V
00000
3
Feb-04
6800
680
C V
4
Feb 04
<
500
25
n
60
4
Feb-04
61 00
61 0
n
5
Mar 04
<
500
25
5
Mar 04
71 00
71 0
6
Mar 04
<
500
25
Melt Factor =
1 00
6
Mar 04
4600
460
Mull Factor =
ug/L
7
Apr 04
<
500
25
Max Value
25 ug/L
7
Apr-04
6000
600
Max Value
ug/L
8
Apr 04
<
500
25
Max Fred Cw
25 ug/L
8
Apr 04
6200
62 0
Max Fred Cw
9
May 04
<
500
25
9
May-04
6400
640
10
Jun 04
<
500
25
10
Jun 04
7300
730
11
Jun-04
<
500
25
11
Jun-04
6000
600
12
Jul-04
<
500
25
12
Jul 04
<
1000
50
13
Jul-04
<
Soo
25
13
Jul-04
7200
720
14
Aug-04
<
500
25
14
Aug-04
5000
500
15
Aug-04
<
500
25
15
Aug-04
5400
540
16
Sep-04
<
500
25
16
Sep-04
6800
680
17
Sep-04
<
500
25
17
Sep-04
4700
470
18
Sep-04
<
500
25
18
Oct-04
5500
550
19
Oct 04
<
500
25
19
Oct-04
6000
600
20
Oct-04
<
500
25
20
Nov-04
6800
680
21
Nov-04
<
500
25
21
Nov-04
6700
670
22
Nov-04
<
500
25
22
Dec-04
7000
700
23
Dec-04
<
500
25
23
Dec-04
8500
850
24
De"4
<
500
25
24
Jan-05
71 00
71 0
25
Jan-05
<
500
25
25
Jan-05
6400
640
26
Jan-05
<
500
25
26
Feb-05
8700
870
27
Feb-05
<
500
25
27
Feb-05
8300
830
28
Feb 05
<
Soo
25
28
Mar-05
7300
730
29
Mar 05
<
500
25
29
Mar 05
7000
700
30
Mar 05
<
500
25
30
Apr-05
5400
540
31
Apr 05
<
500
25
31
Apr-05
5600
560
32
Apr 05
<
500
25
32
May 05
5200
520
33
May 05
<
500
25
33
May 05
78 00
780
34
May 05
<
500
25
34
Jun 05
51 00
51 0
35
Jun 05
<
500
25
35
Jun 05
7800
780
36
Jun 05
<
500
25
36
Jul 05
7400
740
37
Jul 05
<
500
25
37
Jul-05
5700
570
38
Jul-05
<
500
25
38
Aug 05
6200
620
39
Aug-05
<
500
25
39
Aug 05
4900
490
40
Aug-05
<
500
25
40
Sep 05
8000
800
41
Sep-05
<
500
25
41
Sep-05
7400
740
42
Sep-05
<
500
25
42
Oct-05
9200
920
43
Oct-05
<
500
25
43
Oct-05
5800
580
44
Oct-05
<
500
25
44
Nov-05
2600
260
45
Nov-05
<
500
25
45
Nov-05
8700
870
46
Nov-05
<
500
25
46
Dec-05
7200
720
47
Dec-05
<
500
25
47
Dec-05
10500
1050
48
Dec-05
<
Soo
25
48
Jan-06
46000
1600
49
Jan-06
<
500
25
49
Jan-06
9000
900
50
Jan-06
<
500
25
50
Feb-06
11600
1160
51
Feb-06
<
Soo
25
51
Feb-06
9800
980
52
Feb-06
<
500
25
52
Mar-06
8600
860
53
Mar 06
<
500
25
53
Mar 06
<
1000
50
54
Mar 06
<
500
25
54
Apr-06
11600
1160
55
Apr-06
<
500
25
55
Apr-06
7600
760
56
Apr 06
<
500
25
56
May 06
12900
1290
57
May 06
<
500
25
57
May 06
9500
950
58
May 06
<
500
25
58
Jun 06
8000
800
59
Jun 06
<
500
25
59
Jun 06
9400
940
60
Jun 06
<
500
25
60
Jul 06
13000
1300
61
61
62
62
63
63
64
64
65
65
fib
66
67
67
68
68
69
69
70
70
Li
npdes rpa data
10/23/2006

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
10
npdes rpa data
10/23/2006

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
2624
71 68
037
60
1 3700
1600
2192
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
npdes rpa data
10/23/2006

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
12
npdes rpa data
10/23/2006

IWC Calculations
City of Randleman
NC0025445
Prepared By Agyeman Adu-Poku NPDES Unit
Enter Design Flow (MGD) 1 745
Enter s7Q10(cfs) 5
Enter w7Q10 (cfs) 12
Residual Chlorine
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(summer)
7Q10(CFS)
5
7Q10(CFS)
5
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
1 745
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
1 745
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
270475
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
270475
STREAM STD (UG/L)
170
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1 0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (1
0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
022
IWC (%)
3510
IWC (%)
3510
Allowable Conc (ug/1)
48
Allowable Conc (mg/1)
24
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(winter)
7Q10(CFS)
12
Fecal Limit
200/100ml
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
1 745
(If DF >331 Monitor)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
270475
(If DF <331 Limit)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1 8
Dilution Factor (DF)
285
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
022
IWC (%)
1839
Allowable Conc (mg/1)
88
Rule of tumb never give small facility <2 ug/L of NH3
INPDES Servor/Current Versions/IWC
10/25/2006

Jan-Ub
0971
4438
0143
6925
6631
Feb-05
1 048
3 901
0 320
5 611
6 650
Mar-05
1 055
3 338
0 282
2 458
6 583
Apr-05
1 072
3 656
0 153
3 154
6 662
May-05
1 045
4 858
0 938
4 303
6 725
Jun-05
1115
4502
0168
2013
6723
Jul-05
0976
5074
0401
4217
6775
Aug-05
1017
1501
0100
0405
6700
Sep-05
0 884
2031
0 096
0 000
6 967
Oct-05
0 973
3202
0 234
4 564
6 877
NOV-05
0 974
5 560
0 694
4 139
6 875
Dec-05
0 990
6 864
0 369
20 264
6 717
Jan-06
1 015
6 533
0 238
16 958
6 858
Feb-06
0 932
4 514
1 171
4 431
6 883
Mar-06
0 930
6 191
2 963
6 878
6 857
Apr-06
1 001
4 819
0 404
1 472
6 883
May-06
0 995
2 584
0 838
0 000
6 938
Jun-06
1229
2973
0182
2002
6977
Jul-06
0905
1727
0259
3396
6817
Aim-06
0 955
2 251
0 141
1 119
6 879
Maximum 1 23 686 296 2026 f 698
Minimum 088 150 " 010 000 658

NPDES/Non-Discharge Permitting Unit Pretreatment Information Request Form
NPDES OR NONDISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT COMPLETES THIS PART
Date of Request 10/6/2006
Facility
Cit of Randleman WWTP
Permit#
NCO025445
Region
WSRO
Re uestor
Agyeman Adu-Poku
Pretreatment A F Towns Dana Folley (ext 523)
Contact G M Towns Jon Risgaard (ext 580)
N Z Towns Deborah Gore (ext 593)
r0 PRETREATMENT UNIT
PRETREATMENT UNIT COMPLETES THIS PART
Status of Pretreatment Program
3) the facility has (or is developing) a Pretreatment Program
3a) is Full Program with LTMP
Flow Permitted MGD Actual MGD STMP time frame
Industrial 065 0 237 most recent
Domestic next cycle
(S)
T
MP
Pollutant
Check List
POC due to
NPDESINon
Discharge Permit
Limit
Required
by EPA
Required by
503 Sludge
POC due to SW
Site specific POC Provide Explanation)
STMP
Frequency at
effluent
LTMP
Frequency at
effluent
BOD
X
Q
TSS
X
Q
NH3
X
Q
Arsenic
X
Q
,f
Cadmium
X
J
X
Q
,/
Chromium
X
Q
,/
Copper
X
Q
Cyanide
Q
/
Lead
X
/
X
Q
Mercury
X
X
Q
Molybdenum
X
Q
,(
Nickel
./
X
Q
Silver
0
Selemum
X
Q
,/
Zinc
x/
X
Q
COD
X
Q
Q
Always in the LTMP
Only in the LTMP if the POTW land applies sludge
Only in LTMP while the SIU is connected to the POTW
Only m LTMP when the pollutant is a specific concern to the POTW (ex Chlorides fora POTW who accepts Textile waste)
o=oaadedy
M=Manihly
Comments Next HWA is due 1/2007 so monthly sampling should have been
done The data is on the DMRs but I have also contacted the PT
all LTMP/STMP effluent data
on DM Rs7
Yes X
No (attach data)
available in spreadsheet?
Yes No
coordinator top request spreadsheet of data
version 1018l03
NPDES_Pretreatment request form
Revised August 4 2000

Flow Permitted Actual STMP
% Industrial time
% Domestic frame
Pollu
Poc
tant
due to
Site
CheC
NPDES/
specific
Non-
Require
POC
k
Dischar
d by
(Proved
STMP
LTMP
List
ge
Require
503
POC
a
Frequen
Freque
Permit
d by
Sludge'
due to
Explana
cy at
cy at
LTMP
Limit
EPA'
SIU"'
tion)""
effluent
effluent
BOD
4
Q M
TSS 1
1
4
Q M
NH3 1
4
Q M
Arsenic
4
Q M
Nf
Cadmium
N1
4
Q M
Chromium
j
4
Q M
�!
Copper
Nf
4
Q M
Cyanide
4
Q M
4
Q M
Mercury
1
4
Q M
Molybdemum
4
Q M
-\!
Nickel
4
Q M
Silver
4
Q M
Selenium
4
Q M
Zinc
4
Q M
4
Q M
4
Q M
4
Q M
4
Q M
4
Q M
4
Q M
`Always in the LTMP
"Only in the LTMP if the POTW land applies sludge
Only in LTMP while the SIU is connected to the POTW
Only in LTMP when the pollutant is a specific concern to the POTW (ie-Chloride t
Q= Quarterly
M=Monthly
Comments
o a POTW who accepts Textile waste)

Re EPA Show Cause Meetings- Randleman + Elizabeth City
Subject Re EPA Show Cause Meetings- Randleman + Elizabeth City
From Steve Tedder <Steve Tedder@ncmail net>
Date Thu, 22 Jun 2006 07 02 50 -0400
To Tom Belntck <Tom Belnlck@ncmatl net>
CC matt Matthews <Matt Matthews@ncmatl net>, Charles Weaver <Charles Weaver@ncmatl net>, Al
Hodge <Al Hodge@ncmatl net>, Karen Rust <Karen Rust@ncmatl net>, Susan A Wilson
<Susan A Wilson@ncmail net>, Gil Vmzam <Gil Vmzani@ncmatl net>, Paul Rawls
<Paul Rawls@ncmail net>, Jenny freeman@ncmail net, marc stokes@ncmail net
As far as Randleman, maybe some costly paperwork requirements by EPA may help get
the Town's attention We have been working with them for over a year and have had two
operator training staff visits and evaluations In addition the town has contracted
2-3 evaluations from private consultants For some reason the recommendations never
get implemented I know they have been through a period with only an interim Town
Manager but one was hired about 6 months ago we have been looking at their data and
attempting to get them to take actions but with no success to date We are actually
in the process of preparing a pre -moratorium letter that will go out this week It
will discuss our concerns and our intent to issue a moratorium letter and give them
15 days to try to convince us otherwise
Tedder
Steve Tedder
Steve Tedder@ncmail net
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107
(336)-771-4950
Fax [phone]
On 6/21/2006 3 25 PM, Tom Belnick wrote
Update from EPA Region 4 (Yvonne Martin) As an offspring from the EPA Watch
List/308/309 process, EPA has requested Show Cause meetings with Elizabeth City
(July 11) and Randleman (July 12) due to NPDES compliance issues Both facilities
provided partial submissions to the EPA 308 Information Requests that EPA sent
out previously, but EPA is still obviously concerned and has requested full
submissions along with the Show Cause meetings in Atlanta EPA will then decide
how to proceed It looks like compliance problems (BOD, fecal, TSS) at Randleman
have continued Elizabeth City had 60 pH violations in 2005, but it looks like
that issue has finally been resolved by chemical neutralization, they are also
listed for cyanide violations, though some listings were in error These meetings
do not generally involve DWQ
Steve Tedder <Steve TedderpNCnlatl net>
WSRO
NC DENR
1 of 1 6/22/2006 7 42 Anl

OF vvnlF9
Oy
r
Michael F Easley Governor
William Ross Jr Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W Klimek P E Director
Division of Water Quality
June 21 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL 7005 3110 0002 5067 8371
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr Tony Sears City Manager
City of Randleman
101 Hillary Street
Randleman, NC 27317
Subject Randleman WWTP — NPDES Permit No NCO025445
Randolph County
Dear Mr Sears
The Winston Salem Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality has reviewed the effluent data
from the Randleman Wastewater Treatment Plant s Discharge Monitoring Reports for the past two years
(May 2004 — April 2006) Our office noted during this review that the plant violated one or more of its
permit effluent limits in approximately 50% of the 24 months in question Biochemical Oxygen Demand
Fecal Cohform and Total Suspended Solids limits violations were most common
In addition, it has come to our attention that the City of Randleman has commissioned several
studies from consulting companies and sought technical assistance from the Division of Water Quality
over the past 3-5 years in an effort to correct operational problems at the plant that may be causing the
abovementioned limits violations However even with the reports and recommendations generated by
consultants, the violations of effluent limits have continued at the plant
Due to these circumstances, the Division of Water Quality is considering placing the City of
Randleman on a sewer line moratorium As stated in North Carolina General Statute 143-215 67(c), "the
(Environmental Management) Commission may impose a moratorium on the addition of waste to a
treatment works if the Commission determines that the treatment works is not capable of adequately
treating additional waste "
Our office requests a response from you, in writing, within 15 working days of receipt of
this letter In your response please address the following issues
• What is the long-term plan for City of Randleman's Wastewater Treatment Plant?
• How is the City addressing the repeated violations of effluent limits?
• Have the studies and reports commissioned by the City been implemented? If so, what were the
results? If not why?
Should you have any questions regarding this situation please contact me at [phone]
AN-23AN
cc WSRO—SWP
Central Files — SW P
Sincerely,
Steve W Tedder
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
rCarolina
urally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughto" Street Winston Salem NC 27107 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet h2o enr state nc us FAX [phone] t 877 623 6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for
4 5'h., ''; MRs Bet i
-, < <tP�rmil„"�nc0025445tµ � � F i' �rMRs Between h5-
Y
`Farahty Name /�=Z� �(,Param Name °-11
}s`"-
Me1or Mlrior.,.'
zor vnr 01-1 i1'_ay_ tV3i:.
Report Date 06/21/06 Page 1 of 3
4�-�2,006w,�Reg on-`Vlolabori Categoryr°��;h��„;f„ProgremCategory�k,��,!�-
'.I
ni,�^ou"n d__��y+£��^_tu?A£ ��=hz12v3i1�=.�.i4rNa�c�";a _4 ii 4�z.`�✓`_it r`9,:r W,�`r _
PERMIT NCO025445 FACILITY City of Randleman - Randleman WWTP COUNTY Randolph REGION Winston-Salem
Limit Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL
REPORT
/PPI
LOCATION
PARAMETER
05 - 2004
001
Effluent
BOD 5 Day (20 Deg C)
05 - 2004
001
Effluent
BOD 5 Day (20 Deg C)
05 - 2005
001
Effluent
BOD 5 Day (20 Deg C)
07 - 2005
001
Effluent
BOO 5 Day (20 Deg C)
07 _ 2005
001
Effluent
BOD 5 Day (20 Deg C)
12 - 2005
001
Effluent
BOD 5 Day (20 Deg C)
01 - 2006
001
Effluent
BOD 5 Day (20 Deg C)
06-2004
001
Effluent
Coliform Fecal MF M FC
Broth 44 5C
07-2004
001 r
Effluent
cal MF M FC
&olh
44 SC
e
n�
07 _ 2004
1
Effluent
Col dorm Fecal MF M FC
Col
S
44 5C
7 -i�
C
)rC-
08 - 2004
001,
Effluent
Coliform Fecal MF M FC
Broth445C
F
_j.,
09-2004
001
Effluent., Cohform Fecal MF M FC
Broth 44 5C
09-2004
001Effluent
Coliform Fecal MF MFC
Broth 44 5C
11 - 2004
001
Effluent
Coliform Fecal MF M FC
Broth 44 5C
11 - 2004
001
Effluent
Coliform Fecal MF M FC
Broth 44 5C
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT
VALUE
05/29/04
3 X week
mg/I
75
904
05/31/04
3 X week
mg/I
5
606
05/21/05
3 X week
mg/I
75
764
07/23/05
3 X week
mg/I
75
835
07/31/05
3 X week
mg/I
5
507
12/31/05
3 X week
mg/I
15
1515
01/07/06
3 X week
mg/I
15
16 55
06/12/04
3 X week
#1100ml
400
1 21464
07/17/04
3 X week
#/100ml
400
83625
07/31/04
3 X week
#/100ml
400
41565
08/07/04
3 X week
#/100ml
400
70349
09/11/04
3 X week
#/100ml
400
69587
09/30/04
3 X week
#1100ml
200
22807
11/20/04
3 X week
#/100ml
400
1 04097
11/27/04
3 X week
#/100ml
400
7746
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
Weekly Average Exceeded
Proceed to
Enforcement Case
Monthly Average Exceeded
Proceed to
Enforcement Case
Weekly Average Exceeded
No Action BPJ
Weekly Average Exceeded
Proceed to NOV
Monthly Average Exceeded
Proceed to NOV
Weekly Average Exceeded
Proceed to NOV
Weekly Average Exceeded
Proceed to NOV
Weekly Geometric Mean
None
Exceeded
Weekly Geometric Mean
No Action BIMS
Exceeded
Calculation Error
Weekly Geometric Mean
Proceed to NOV
Exceeded
Weekly Geometric Mean
Proceed to
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
Weekly Geometric Mean
Proceed to
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
Monthly Geometric Mean
Proceed to
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
Weekly Geometric Mean
Proceed to
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
Weekly Geometric Mean
Proceed to 1
Exceeded
Enforcement Case
r

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for Report Dale 06/21/06 Page 2 of 3
..,r ? 'v *.�.T„a� G r^>=+['y�Ti-C� rt�_Cx'si
�,elPermn nc0025445y`hY�f� ^f "=.,r .,> MRs Between 52004 *j�and';-�x-42006�s Region % »c",;,a tv�,<y;,4;; rVfolahon Category ^,6 _„P Program Category %�/;h"i�
}4 t i.L1 ?_>.
1'- .-'+'' a e3"' 4§ ✓ . '.1b*V.`'>4r"Y : r"Y''"
" r s' °Param Name % _ %..' Count %?.
Facility Name ,%x; ; 1- i r++� ;��� e < Y fir vy�
-$; ".i"- tr H u� y ,,,.TL'- G oC n.•''� abb:= a r:,.r ev_y +^+».` vc+.. �.z,c a"v. Rom✓
.:.; r`� ��.v^T 'y `f` .Y•`' � F`^`
rY- x f r a `,.s i!" rh
,,Ma or Mmor o�„yE=i'1>�c�- �m.�3>-��,rz ra, >w� i£ ,�� �,'�.,:an.�m-�--irt`$r,`.�-.��yz x*- x.� �t�'<�: ,a'�y.# �'F,��?`� �- � "^o '�,�• i '`z, c>� `„w<'
<: 'k.rk `v tr�h"�.l"�" �$M�ah``ia"r. 's' y.e x-+ -e y ax' '�..9?' a ,G�.�•P,- a'-`'"�"`wz='iT>".y.t..ri-,y, .I''�w
.0 ..x.s.s .. �. s<__.LavrYru.u. e3 _ •. ,..e`... 591..�33'�R.'e�� � r- w... _A`_u.. z.� " a-.�, vs>,ti%rv-. L,.1.•-,sn..�!. -'� .-._t+
PERMIT NCO025446 FACILITY City of Randleman - Randleman WWTP COUNTY Randolph REGION Winston-Salem
Limit Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED
REPORT /PPI LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
11 - 2004 001 Effluent Coliform Fecal ME M FC 11/30/04 3 X week #/100ml 200 44217 Monthly Geometric Mean Proceed to
Broth 44 5C Exceeded Enforcement Case
07 - 2005 001 Effluent Coliform Fecal ME M FC 07/23/05 3 X week #/I ooml 400 501 78 Weekly Geometric Mean Proceed to NOV
Broth 44 5C Exceeded
08 - 2005 001 Effluent Coliform Fecal ME M FC 08/27/05 3 X week #/loom1 400 55699 Weekly Geometric Mean Proceed to NOV
Broth 44 5C Exceeded
12 - 2005 001 Effluent Coliform Fecal ME M FC 12/31/05 3 X week #/100m1 400 1 897 37 Weekly Geometric Mean Proceed to NOV
Broth 44 5C Exceeded
12 - 2005 001 Effluent Solids Total Suspended 12/17/05 3 X week mg/I 45 4533 Weekly Average Exceeded Proceed to NOV
01 - 2006 001 Effluent Solids Total Suspended 01/07/06 3 X week mg/I 45 49 Weekly Average Exceeded Proceed to NOV
03 - 2005 001 Effluent pH 03/28/05 3 X week su 6 59 Daily Minimum Not Reached No Action BPJ
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL VIOLATION UNIT OF CALCULATED
REPORT / PPI LOCATION PARAMETER DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE LIMIT VALUE VIOLATION TYPE VIOLATION ACTION
04 - 2006 001 Effluent Cadmium Total (as Cd) 04/29/06 Weekly ug/I Frequency Violation None
05-2004 001 Effluent Chromium Total (as Cr) 05/31/04 2 X month ug/1 Frequency Violation None
05- 2004 001 Effluent Copper Total (as Cu) 05/31/04 2 X month ug/1 Frequency Violation None
03 - 2006 001 Effluent Copper Total (as Cu) 03/31/06 2 X month ug/I Frequency Violation None
05 - 2004 001 Effluent Cyanide Total (as Cn) 05/31/04 2 X month ug/I Frequency Violation None
06 - 2004 001 Effluent Cyanide Total (as Cn) 06/30/04 2 X month ugfl Frequency Violation None
05 - 2004 001 Effluent Fluoride Total (as F) 05/31/04 2 X month mg/I Frequency Violation None

MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for Report Date 06/21/06 Page 3 of 3
PERMIT NCO025445 FACILITY City of Randleman - Randleman WWTP COUNTY Randolph REGION Winston-Salem
Monitoring Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
REPORT / PPI
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT VALUE
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
04 - 2006 001
Effluent
Lead Total (as Ph)
04/29/06
Weekly
Ug/I
Frequency Violation
None
04 - 2006 001
Effluent
Mercury Total (as Hg)
04/29/06
Weekly
ug/I
Frequency Violation
None
05 - 2004 001
Effluent
Nickel Total (as Ni)
05/31/04
2 X month
ug/I
Frequency Violation
None
04 - 2006 001
Effluent
Nitrogen Ammonia Total (as N)
04/29/06
Weekly
mg/1
Frequency Violation
None
03 - 2006 001
Effluent
P/F STATRE 7Day Chr
03/31/06
Quarterly
pass/fail
Frequency Violation
None
Cenodaphma
05- 2004 001
Effluent
Silver Total (as Ag)
05/31/04
2 X month
ugh
Frequency Violation
None
05 - 2004 001
Effluent
Zinc Total (as Zn)
05/31/04
2 X month
ug/I
Frequency Violation
None
Reporting Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL
VIOLATION
UNIT OF
CALCULATED
REPORT /PPI
LOCATION
PARAMETER
DATE
FREQUENCY
MEASURE
LIMIT VALUE
VIOLATION TYPE
VIOLATION ACTION
10-2004
10/31/04
Signature Missing
None
a

October 2005 Watch List- NPDES ComphanLL
Subject October 2005 Watch List- NPDES Compliance
From Tom Belmck <Tom Belmck@ncmail net>
Date Tue, 01 Nov 2005 16 45 25 -0500
To "DENR WESTNPDES DWQ" <DENR WESTNPDES DWQ@ncmatl net>,
"DENR EASTNPDES DWQ" <DENR EASTNPDES DWQ@ncmatl net>, "DENR SUPVSWP"
<DENR SUPVSWP@ncmatl net>, Jeanne Phillips <Jeanne Phillips@ncmail net>, Dave Goodrich
<Dave Goodrich@ncmatl net>, Paul Rawls <Paul Rawls@ncmatl net>
I Just downloaded the EPA Quarterly Watch List for October 2005, which includes EPA's compliance
review through their latest quarter (April/May/June 2005) There are 35 NC wastewater treatment
facilities listed for exceeding various EPA compliance criteria, with changes since the last quarter listed
below Most of the new additions are primarily for "DMR Non -Receipt", which has generally ended up
being a BIMS/PCS data entry issue The applicable Central Office ROCs will look further into the
listings and may need to contact Regional staff ROCS will also need to add their responses to EPA on
the Oct05 Excel spreadsheet, which I'll add to the NPDES Servor/Watch List Let me know if you have
any questions
Facilities Added Since Last Quarter (n=15)
1 NC0027065- ADM (WIRO)- Effluent violation>200% (looks like an EPA error)
2 NC0086819- NE Brunswick WWTP(WIRO)- DMR non -receipt
3 NC0086550- Fairmont Regional WWTP(FRO)- DMR non -receipt
4 NC0063096- Holly Springs (RRO)- DMR non -receipt
5 NC0081736- New Hanover County Airport(WIRO)- DMR non -receipt
6 NC0085359- Union County Twelve Mile Creek(MRO)- 25+ effluent violations
7 NC0004375- Clariant Corp (MRO)- DMR non -receipt
8 NC0006190- Delta Apparel (MRO)- DMR non -receipt
9 NC0003468- Duke Energy Dan River (WSRO)- DMR non -receipt
10 NC0005088- Duke Energy Cliffside (ARO)- DMR non -receipt
11 NC0000078- Ecusta (ARO)- DMR non -receipt
12 NC0001643- Eden Real Estate aka Fieldcrest Cannon (WSRO)- DMR non -receipt
13 NC0066516- Fuquay Varina Terrible Creek (RRO)- 25+ effluent violations
14 NC0001627- National Spinning (WARD)- DMR non -receipt
15 NC000319I- Weyerhaeuser New Bern (WARO)- DMR non receipt
Facilities Deleted Since Last Quarter (n=5)
I NC0025496-
Lmcolnton (MRO)
2 NC0030210-
Charlotte Mecklenberg (MRO)
3 NC0079057-
Manteo (WARO)
4 NC0024112-
Thomasville Hamby Creek (WSRO)
5 NC0025445-
Randleman (WSRO)
Tom Belnick, Environ Specialist
N C Division of Water Quality
Point Source Branch
919-733-5083,ext 543
1 o1 2 4/20/2006 10 02 AM

Charles H Weaver, Jr
CITY OF RANDLEMAN
101 Hdliary Street
Randleman North Carolina 27317
[phone] / Fax [phone]A3
Nrn%N randl,man oru/
%nthom \ Lcnre MiNor
ALDERMEN
Melissa Blalock Mayor Pro -Tern
1 C Leonard
Bud Talley
Charles BSerly
Tony Sears City Manager
February 22, 2006
;I,� 3 2006
NC DENR / DWQ / Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
1
Dear Mr Weaver,
This cover letter is requesting renewal of the NPDES Permit # NC0025445-for the
Randleman Wastewater Treatment Plant
There have been no changes in the facility since the issuance of the last permit
The Sludge Management Plan is as follows
The sludge is pumped into digester 92 for thickening After dewatenng, the sludge is
mixed and limed to a pH of 12+ for two hours After 24 hours the pH must be 11 5 or
higher The sludge is then hauled by Synagro to the state approved fields
Sincerely,
b
H Frankie Brewer
Operator in Responsible Charge

Narrative Description of Diagram
Flow enters through the sphtter box and is evenly distributed by volume
to each aeration basin. The flow goes through the outside part or
"doughnut" of the tank, then enters the center clarifier where the sludge
settles, and is returned to the head of the plant via the RAS pump
station. The effluent from the clarifier enters the chlorine contact
basin, then into the traveling filter bridge. At the end of the filter the
water is dechlor►nated and then flows into Deep River. Each day sludge
is wasted to a sludge basin. When a basin is filled, it is then limed and
when ready, is hauled to the state approved fields.

STORAGE SHED
11
a
TRAVELLING FILTER
DRYING BEDS
BLOWERS
C�CONTACT
BASIN
cry
CHEMICAL FEED
BUILDING
SLUDGE BASIN / SLUDGE
/ BASIN
V //LIME SILO
WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
+return e 4 4511n/
E�
TREATMENT UNIT try
Ib7m C
III TREATMENT UNIT
l
II
/ 33
I �;D
TRE
El \I
I
SPUTTER BO%
SLUDGE BASIN
TREATMENT
N!
0
�m
ro fe
01
c
0
CONTROL BUILDING

cc Charles Weaver, NPDES Unit
Central Files
WSRO
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT Yes No X
If Yes, SOC No
To Permits and Engineering Unit
Surface Water Protection Section
Attention Dawn Jeffries
Date November 3, 2005
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Randolph County
Permit No NCO025445
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATIONI�� Niar�
1 Facility and Address��
City of Randleman WWTP
3475 Applewood Road
Randleman, NC 27317
2 Date of Investigation October 27, 2005
3 Report Prepared by Jenny Freeman
4 Persons Contacted and Telephone Number Frankie Brewer, ORC
Phone [phone]
5 Directions to Site From I-40, take US-220 South Take
Randleman exit to US-220 Business South Turn left onto
Presnell Street, veer right onto Academy Street Turn left
onto Fox Street Turn right onto Naomi Street Turn right
onto Creekridge Country Road Turn right onto Aoplewood
Road The plant is at the end of the gravel road
6 Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points
Latitude 35 48' 23" Longitude 79 47' 00"
U S G S Quad No D19SE U S G S Quad Name Randleman
7 Site size and expansion area consistent with application?
X Yes No If No, explain

a
8 Topograpny (relationship to flood plain included)
Located adjacent to Deep River
9 Location of nearest dwelling >1000 feet
10 Receiving stream or affected surface waters Deep River
a Classification C
b River Basin and Subbasin No 03-06-08
c Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses Residential/Commercial/Agricultural
Part II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1 a Volume of Wastewater to be permitted 1 745 MGD
b What is the current permitted capacity of the Waste
Water Treatment facility" 1 745 MGD
c Actual treatment capacity of the current facility's
1 745 MGD
d Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two
years N/A
e Please provide a description of existing or
substantially constructed wastewater treatment
facilities Bar screen, grit chamber, extended aeration
basins, clarifiers, Traveling Filter Bridge,
chlorination, cascade aerator, and aerobic sludge
digesters
f Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities N/A
g Possible toxic impacts to surface waters N/A
h Pretreatment Program (POTWs only) N/A
in development
should be required
approved X
not needed
2 Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme
a If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
Permit No WO0004825
Residuals Contractor SVnagro, Inc

NPDES Permit Staff Report
Telephone No [phone]
b Residuals stabilizatiop PSRP X PFRP
Other
c Landfill
d Other disposal/utilization scheme
3 Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating
sheet) Class III
4 SIC Code(s) 4952
Primary 01 (Domestic) Secondary 02 (Industry)
Main Treatment Unit Code 0 5 1 X 3
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1 Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds or are any public monies involved (municipals only))
2 Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity)
requests N/A
3 Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates (Please
indicate) N/A
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
4 Alternative Analysis Evaluation Has the facility evaluated
all of the non -discharge options available Please provide
regional perspective for each option evaluated
Spray Irrigation N/A
Connection to Regional Sewer System N/A
Subsurface
Other disposal options N/A
5 Other Special Items

n
NPDES Permit Staff Report
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Randleman WWTP continues to have some operational issues with the
presence of filamentous bacteria At the request of the
Randleman ORC, Mark Stokes, WSRO Technical Assistance, visited
the plant with Jenny Freeman on October 6, 2005 and made several
recommendations for improved operations The plant is generally
in compliance WSRO recommends reissuance of this permit in
accordance with Division policy
Regional staff
!� 3 AS
Date
Regional Supervisor Date

-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 UP, I °If "UM 4° I I I I I I I I` 1' 1 VI " N"I "P I I I I I I I I "('1 1" P" "i TV I I I I I I I I y' 9 7" 1" �'I °I° __
-
r r F,✓� ,r, f �a � l sue-^- ; - _ .� ,. � � ' : G.\ ' ,_ 1f Jt6! 4�,� : , �v,- _.�.-�� ,rp f�- _..-
�i1�il �\� hft ✓r�����-��.,-?+ � + `� t„ �'r'^ .i �/, iT' �-"'.�k �c.��� •'_"'^/ � f `.. .f'./ r �.v��
r f_ I ��9r✓ � .,.,,i ,+ .r~ -.... �` I t `"" .`f )xl C� \� r'f„ ^a+.
'� �
71;4 f 4
x
r ?'..• },;s%,�! 1 ettr�n�yll� �r)= �65 �La 'r `r !+' �'-_�Z .r/
r. � k I �d f i,{'� /� f � .«� .� ;u/`. \i�, •� ���t�.'rirt ��`�^r `�'-`-_-•
-
'.E t1A ",.,w.�`z'£ V'�ti `��e'•'+f =' r.r��j--� ,',�t``r � '
-
;,%%+ik'�\"✓'.w'�i�+it`���j
N i ` ,�•`,\���_'7 i!l-',;,r '/fVT
�a.�', v�V1lf%'l✓r1; �%, ho( r{v��'�.�' F,ly� ,�'�.. ;�'✓jf( j dim
'f-;f ad
z
i•; �a��' '�,�: ;� t�����y ;�,� ���,`av�?�� f- _
tp
i r , F
tl
,
�, /'
+• ! f : (j�.� ^" ..—,y. i�.`� i �l 1 r� ! V 1 i 'y + '....,^� ,�'+v`" t .._
���f�t-w_,>
• ' rf" �I� lrf^7 ".<tVAAti f is/5,j���j`xNj '4� , tl w o 1,! � �� ��`V
�iw`%/r/'•7r }� S��"fl.-
I
•
�Oo�,; `'t
� �;' � a � - _� �/.--"��� t , ', II i }�,;�, ,' eke\l 1} ``ttt, ; f.�✓> r C^ /��-^ . J�_ r.,
^ •J !..f<� -" , ��" 4• .=-v a !!(fhI % lk g.ti /� -� ! T l� � / {�. !�,; t ^ t
�� !i (`t/
—. ^-� •=`=� „ rl 15�=Atl �' ef �J " 1��:.," r �IL"^" , mot_ I 1f
{ • r � � rl + �+ e ' V'", � /' f.. / � = it i � _1 " t i i._�'�---^ '� fiJ , t,
-
-ti'1'
•��, 1'tiJrrf, rirn�hl}�jf(6�/f' y�,,���, �,�`�'`{{4t'�•`��--'�' r�"�7f(i%�`���`ti=.`���°h ��r��i�� 'L:�'W'r;,„�`;'��ti4.�.,�� �°j
o
o
"�.. ,✓' ( t! S'F yW f ,� i y'�....-. � �. �^-�^,�f 1 .�1 if a I � 1 3�•� "'' ' /-11 � ¢
Y'
�� 1L'i ♦ ' :
o
n
r I r it f ft i%�f` I �` 4 jJr 1 l \ ,_-• ! f V .��
i1 �, � v�,--�
0
.� �:l,• � , .t y , !,�, ram, o� ,�.r-tr,j1 Q'' c � ,,
lr`„,! t tarhv: �, I`'1 1 �1•,-..�„
Dlschar a �, t / rti—
t 9 1 l Y, t'
�7: ; • rx, `,` f �� t.�i`` fv/y point j�-
f 1 (� Ifflj///{//{ f�'i� . \.
(j1�r
J ,• �yf^ _itp �:r{F n� C- 7�- li i,/~ �' I
• „ / r-'{I r5 �1, 1 .�-- v"\� • /J/�• ' ram'' / +-� , ��.
V J� f 4.K�� 1%�F ( '...^t �.^✓�x..;.-^
�i w ^ti\..�1 �
/� I� th ".!/r t\`t / rr,. ..\� 'I r�J"'l, .+Y,..�ii
Y ♦! lv rJC U!'� j}, y
��) • It}. h4� sUtY`SM !+J/I (y )Ifrf
♦ j"tJ`t..� !"\-O�'tlli± j111 f+ �.=t Sl.)y�l!� +�'�J •� s.` \^ /""—
I�
.f "%t�, A' 1lJi
���i
z
.-}�
i ,yam ,�1, j.li�S"� .r^' p�, o/•S�e �r Tl�: ��k \� 1 }>�Y
.rt1 r ij� 11i` A`
-
.. ^, ` `ti.,, ,� � ! i ♦+ / t,,' � i r: �n '.�//, • �i Sty ^.
I �
rf'��;�;,1�� I ,'.._;.•..�' t �//r�\��i�.' T�--'' �;�'a�' ;� t(l.:if.."�%r� �� '4j� t•;_,i^'� is)�
k`'E C""r 9w,,,' 1 a +�w� � P �f`�.,n � /��L� F 1 �.e� ��'�l�f "�`�t �r � t{(s+ � •, .:1� �
u'
a
m
o
�,�. t I r � ._ �.., r , a, r• i
1',f+ �,�;L rh t ,�y�p7 k / I { t � -y� 1"�. i -., i�s, � �� ; yy���� ,� �� � v F//�Jr +r� .✓
1 ti J J f I �` ✓ t trv�t.� Il � < }1 '`L i y, y 1�,. i � 4i � i V_ .U-,j, v!� f 44f � t /h • t"
AV....�,���nr, �?.�i�^}"1� ��`'d�
!§ i<<.;.ti r-_r'��1���jj�i - . �l�t,��/ "�{zI
�{{ rY}Il
�°r<
Y5✓
y, J`%�,.
'` i�'� 1; .1 \ �
r {♦ "h �, fO�w i V'/M/ �/+"'�!(A fir! x�^;,\ � �C �-Y�i
�i l�•,ti, v ; ,",� yj."C_ f't r u -•
If s \"` i/ i('' =-•w',t-., 'D�±„it
_
,� s / f trr-
{ k��_"'-' �l �' 1 r i �;�.;,,4p,. t, 't\'+.4•,._w..l �1A411
✓��„�- `t;� ; (, ,`� ��
\'{I, ,/"'. .:t ftrl •^
,j' .�� A:� d�� ♦ ^}-��-. �..�^+P' .=.lf 1I,�"i r� i" �, �Y`i t
14 }
-
Z
✓may%�'j ,r-re?,,� s4 ' Rr^�Yi ti k tlr, t )
z
- 4
/ -' e t : ^ / •! + Yl. f J f i�'� t��` � '"" '4�� �.+� r Ylb 06 1,-
ij J, •� ' �-sl� '� k 'r
/: /,?"`; c"r •,,i"��,j( tti� t� i'9z �t' rZ112 l
"-^'j'�"'�h,!""
W �'71 JJ�J1 },k„i} y,'+•,, 6517 �,
8 .t,°l i("i` ,✓r^ Y tr,lir,r�.r'.}].rj- �'r?l
n
�
0 9 417
00 7 47
0 0 0 914
00 W 7 6
0 0
^
�
Name RANDLEMAN Location 035* 48 2662 N 079° 46 53 18 W
Date 10/28/2005 Caption NCO025445 Randleman WWTP Discharge
Scale 1 inch equals 1333 feet
copyright((;) 1998 Maptecn Inc

—PERMIT
OWNER
FACILITY
COUNTY
CASE#
Parameter_
AssessDate
PE ALT
AI
N 5
ity of Randleman
Randleman P
Randolph
-2001 1
-
0912 1
9 95
5
NC 025 5
ity of Ran eman
Randleman P
Rando ph
V-200 1
00
356 0
0
NCO 5 5
ity of Randleman
Randleman P
Randolph
LV- 001 00 6
O1I2001
611 0
00
NC00 5 5
City of Randleman
Randleman P
Randolph
LV-2 0354
2001
0
0
NCO025445
City of Randleman
Randleman WWTP
andolph
LV-20 8
5 001
3 4 00
T-7470-
NCO025445
City of Rand eman
Randleman WWTP
Randolph
LV-2001 5 4
12/17/2 1
7 00
4TUO
NC0025 5
City of Randleman
Randleman WTP
Randolph
LV-200 2
17 2
71 00
71 0
NC 5 5
ity of Randleman
Randleman P
Randolph
LV-2 0573
1 1 02
35550
0
NC 5
City of Randleman
Randleman WWTP
Randolph
LV- 002 066
1 2002
35550
0
N 5 5
City of Randleman
Randleman P
Randolph
LV- 00 00 4
FE
8/2004
3 89 0
0
NC0025 5
City of Rand eman
Randleman TP
Ran o ph
2004 0 9
FEC COLI
12 2004
5 0
5 00
N 25 5
City of Randleman
Randleman WWTP
Rando ph
LV 2004 Ot 1
FEC COLI
5 17/2004
58 00
56FOO
NCO 5 5
ity of Randleman
Randleman P
Randolph
1_7 0 0 0
B D
9/2004
337 0
7 00
NCO F25 5
CityofRandleman
Randleman P
Randolph
NOV-200 L 6
CADMIUM
NC00 5 5
ity of Randleman
Randleman P
Randolph
OV-2003 LV U1 bu
SOD
1T -
NCO025445
City of Randleman
Randleman WWTP
I Randolph
I NUV-21JU4 MV U002
CHROMIUM
-
The prob ems at this facility appear to be operation and maintenance
Training and Certification staff have recommendations and continue to provide TA and several consultant studies completed with 0& M
R needs to implement recommendations rather than convince town to do more studies
The permit is fine We need to elevate panalties to get the Board's undivided attention