NC0025445_INSTREAM ASSESSMENT_19830729

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNINS COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0025445
Randleman WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Report
Speculative Limits
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
July 29, 1983
This document is printed oa reuse paper - ignore May
coaterrt on the reverse side

z�C/r15� O,6�t0,q7
t /O, cn 0-7Cc/ = % l 8 `U
Mori �z �l '75'
CD 4o DS
-7O
// D
6yr fiLsz g �/ c�eri a %z �o uiJ� Bo ps N
LxevLa 513
Qw = 0,00 75
:jo!L— 6A3
--low
DO
3oD5 _ a/, 5
7}Zf1 = 1,3
timK
�n 4 A,o
/,O f716 aoaul-j
3 O De

5.
-I.
0, 005& 3 0%a
itl n? R .,SIsZ — 51,6 3
F/o w = O 100 3 --3
60 Do = //, 5 * . I rY? l "
ti jq3
D0 = %
3 0(00,56 nJ = 0. DO
loanylc.Q/! 774�d&5&5 �Xp /Z/31/8-�'
0, 3D . m�Ip = O, 465
30/- co
/M/cv
Aim
ley
$o D5 ; 31(P
lU H3 = 0, / q
m
" C@ P""Tta ��r �

0,�om-4, O.
6 -- -
4o l'�-,� .. _ .15/10 l5 .po
c Ck "T
.SuR n0 Fei-Hhrh 5
5.i'vari76T� .,t/XGlrn�/ _ - (f� . �►nd(�mG'.-, -

�64
1 -
Scu�
lewd
�P/o u
C-vb.
aa,
+
l�l(9
l�l$
0, oa
i i (p
Im
0,015,5
ooos�.
O o/5S
M
0�5
i?4L
8
// o
1 /0
90�o S�-
0., 25r3
O, &3
O t 9-3

Savona {� fig, &01)--
-- - - - --I_YIO6L) 1
632P 1 Nt/3 1
F<CAY I
4 I
I
I
I
I
N j
/0.5
�8e3
/!
io
--i-5/eL
/&Z ,Z)
22—
! .l9
I
(Q.S
I
I
r
__
J
-5
ZP3oc
7,g
A�
Oo---
��
9Z
rol z
003�
I 033
l 033
-!,3
1 oo33�L�3i
3
I—
I
8.
a5oI
I
I o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Tir
-*-.3,-
41
1=5
50-
41
12,
-7
q.5
1
2, 1
1
e2-
T
IlloLd I
1>0 13oD
/I
I-K
00
100 3e
31
T2-
—
13-1
OZ,
/Y 2-
01
no3 �4
q2,
O-L
3
FA)H3
IFcu P
I -r5y
(p
5,3

f
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Winston-Salem Regional Office
July 26, 1983
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Randy Williams, Modeling Branch
Technical Services Unit
FROM: Russell D. Radford
Regional Supervisor
M. Steven Mauney
Regional Engineer
SUBJECT: In -Stream Assessment
Randleman, N.C.
Randolph County
Due to a request by Mr. Phil Pendry, Town Manager, Randleman for
connection of two (2) projects under the authority of 143-215.67(b), a
steam assessment must be performed.
A. Present Conditions
Flow
BOD5
TKN
DO Avg.
DO (low mo.)
DO (min, day)
DO for mode].
(May 82 - May 83)
0.626 MGD
36.3 MG/L
3.26 MG/L
7.5 MG/L
6.7 MG/L
3.5 MG/L
4.0 MG/L
(See Part B)
It n n
The data given abcve for BOD5 is an average of data by Randleman
and our readings..
B. Future Additions
The connection of wastewater from proposed site of Nantucket Hosiery
Mills Corp. would eventually mean 125,000 gallons/day of flow. The pend-
ing connection of flow from Worthville Community would add another 10,000
gallons/day. The industrial flow will be a 20% increase of hydraulic
loading and likely a greater organic_ loading. It is expected that the ef-
fluent BOD5 & TKN could increase by 10% above their present level to, BOD5 =
40 MG/L + TKN = 3.6.
YKM
A composite sample of July 1977 showed 4.2 MG/L NHgand 6.9 MG/LAwhich
is a 61% ratio. This comparison with present TKN gives a final set of
values: BOD5 = 40 MG/L, NITS = 2.2 MG/L,

C. Stream Assessment :
The assessment is needed to determine if the flow increase will have a
detrimental effedt on the receiving stream. Call if you have any questions.
cc: L. P. Benton
WSRO

RANDLEMAN DATA
Self -Monitoring (sm) + DEM Sampling
Flow
BODS
TSS
DO
TKN
Oil 6
Grease
AVG.
S-M
DEM
S-M
DEM
S-M
S-M
S-M
DEM
AVG.
MIN.
May '82
.580
10.5
5
6.7
5.1
1.9
33.5
June
.638
16
18
5
400
7.1
6.4
6.2
24.2
22
July
.456
19
32
7.9
3.6
5.8
79.2
Aug.
.420
27
18
7.2
4.4
5.3
28
Sept.
.532
27.5
22
7.5
6.4
2.2
45.6
Oct.
.689
25.8
23
7.6
6.5
4.2
69
Nova
.590
20
26
7.1
3.5
1.1
61
Dec. '82
.555
19.5
24.5
7.9
4.2
1.4
50
Jan. '83
.689
21.5
6.5
7.4
5.3
1.1
75
Feb.
.786
26.5
26
7.9
5.4
4.4
65
March
.750
31
24
7.7
6.8
2.8
93
April
.757
30.6
47
7.5
5.2
5.9
133
May '83
.689
25.2
25.2
7.6
4.6
3.36
52
June '83
81*
96
140
Average
.626
23.1
49.5
21.7
248
7.5
5.2
3.26
62.2
81
*Split sample
and
city got
BOD5 of
34.8
GM/L

A!1 —. IIM c;11G0'IA:;I
1. Name of City: I�,_•iu�l -r, a.
2. Name of FUC1)it
m cT u
3. Effluent Limlrntiuns: w Ir\
80D5 I5 nn/j 3
Suspended SuL,.ic jp"'j?o/����.Q,
Phouphorus NA N/ig
Ammonia Nir.rul;nn U Iti ���� O" M3A
Total Nitrogen
Other Co�i{,,;ram 1000KPf j�IC) 0m
I
DO = 5,U "'�1/t ( for �o��_ pEr'►c�s
4. Proposed L:cotmeut. unit. pror.esae:: 1
5. Total ra::t:: f t),y• trent.:rnt I'.n:iIIty
C9p1t;:i
Yearly O&H
Present Unrth
6. lncremr.ntu'_ AST cost r. („hoer 81•r.undal y?
Capital
Yearly OSIt
Presen! W<u'Lh
7. Compar. ue of the t.:•tal -,n.mal homsehold .r,pr_nditure for all of the
propcsei [re:run:nt .,:rks with the median lu:;tl household income
annual
m.:dian
m

U. Have violations in 'water Quality sl.to ;: ly houn 'Inrumcurtrd for parameters
related to the need for .','.;T':
No
_Do not know
J/ Yes
1).0.
ar,nmu la
J)huu;phoIus
COMM haCLerlfl
MCI
C-F12.. a. A; 11 O71 W
n a, ti 01-1
9. What la the basin of the Atil' icquirnvnt?
If ;Justification is hatrrd upon Cled to protect,public health,
go to PIC
_�X --If -Justif 1rit Ion Is bus, d upon r, ied ro meet Water Quality,
Standards, go Lu hll.
If Justification
In baa,•d
upon n,ei to comply with
effluent
limltat.toan
rsLublished Ly
Inteinati-nal agreement
(e.g., Crest
Lakes Agreement),
stop.
If ,Justlrication Is banod upon need ro comply with State law
or rnEuLaLlun, gu to 012.
[f )ustl.fI, A !On 1s ha.mud upon need r" comply with an enforcement
-�-^--urdur or Curt. order, go to M.
If other, vxplaln, and g- to 014.
10.0 Which pollutants aunt be ronocrd to protnet public health?
10.0. What are the tper.NIP; unLor uver: whirl; mu>t be protected?
10.C. Is the specified level n1 Lr"Mmeur. neaesnary to prntect public health?
M
No
Go to 014 in

II.A. la the receiving Water an II1LP.roiltLttn Stc:wi?
Yes I IU = "7t C�S z� o�1sc�,rrq� tni'
II.B. Are water quality rrltetia, wC'ICIt A';; Jn nort:;:.uc L" protect, consistent
With Red Book lt;u:tl Itp (:k'Jt..:rl-1 for lout
X Yea
qu
11.C. Was the summer ;swan -day, tt n-;;.,ar I„w u:::d .0 L110 dp.alga condition?
—Yes
C rr,), give dc-4 •,:: "undI( toll
II.D. Is the effect ui nuupuinL 5;uji ,!, likely to be nk,gilgible and not interfere
with the nttalrtn:en' .,I dt::irr,i htnollILcl.al nr:, :titer' AST Is achieved?
—Yes SEF z1�I�ctl'.- I EXI�Ia1)z.i-lor)
llu
Do not. kn
I1.E, Is the AST requl:cmcuL L.,sct! upon a 1'.utdt:lli:a ur foror.rla considering factoro
such as dilution'.
Yes
a. Is the effluent rr-guirrnert Irrttteu into l4;ltol Quality Standards?
17.r
cu CO i11�.
I1.F. Is the AST( rcquiiilm:lt h.:,ci'. W.i t :l ..t.! ll,:,'it.tun utudyl
ir'O. Lxpl:,;n ULifvu l furl'•" j:e !'" C;PLIlr min hill, AST limits to
,n:hlt•:',• seta[. ru,t'itlt st.nr.,.iad:;, and gu to 014.
r.

a, Was the wasteload allotatlun documented and aro the results reproducible?
A_Yes
No
b. Was the water quality analyals conducted and hived upon adequate date
collected from the recolving water
Yes, Mu to 014 Cc c�cG��FGI toWhylc hour
No
c. Was data rrom like or similar rccoiving aaLcts used for the water quality
analysis?
Yes
No
Go to ?l4
12.A. Identify the law of rreKOaLi,n. Whrn did it h• v^. eirrctive?
120. Is the law/regular ion intvnQod zo proLPct an lut.7rmlttent stream?
Yes
No
12.C, Is the effect of nonpoinL aor•tC1s likely to hu n•gllglble and not interfere
with attainment of desircd b,•ne.ficlal uses after AST is achieved?
Yey
No
Du not hgow
12.D, Based upon the mu<,L roccU L inlormaK on avaJLnhln, chatacterUd the affluent
llm.itatlon us:
More sttinpent than nrccy:a y to :wet water quality criteria;
not :ulilr.ir.nL to m,et J,•sLgnav-A beneficial uses;
WHOM to alirw criteria and drsignatcd beneficial uses to
be met with reasonable certainty;
n,, I,;dt,o,n,ut p snihic wad upon • vol lnhlc lnfurmatlon. r.

A. Identify the enforcement order or c,irL nrdcr•
3.11. Based upon the most recent ntorrtatiou .w.;ll,;h.o.. characterize the
effluent limitation as:
more 5trinEent than necegsnt to moot water Quality Criteria;
not sufficient to meet jusIgnateJ WORM* uses;
sufilclrnt to allow criteria and designated benefiClal uses to
he met with reasonable cer.alnty:
no judgement posNible ba:jcd upon avnlllble information.
14. Should there be a further review of the proposed AST requirement?
Yes
0

iIc,diilon�Nl
'r[ N . C . U�
30c (f
Cccorct� ci u. U , of
o 416O'l
OfLLS
Jul,?, V-i
7a
Juij,
►cl7
Is,-_P} >
1978
Jun!
1977
197?
icl79
1977
�xl�lrn�•l ��,r G1" � S
C>1-1� Inv n4-urj
�y 77 S((h��ows II
�c�nc��cnlc'/� On 4kL
'�L IIUIIII f�C r
noon' ��r1r�c S-6,Ton
z�c m aX . min
G,ILI
a,3
7,
3
6,8
3.1
3.
&
-1. 7
0, 5
23

Ci.,3,t 1 Un �.I L,\() I c:'{-1(�, I I Gil `,V if II D .
I ;i Sf I-F" I L)f t rcCUI-J's -C". ih £ F2^S r.
li r c Ilo�� vlu�C��ionS Ivl 1h£ VI�S7i<z�V
,Ic2t� { Ij
VeI�FS /�ow�vcl� ,r v�j'c'tvl tt�ain'2C+F
IS �IEc�u1Yl�flc�llAIU1 Y�rI�I I hL�vYer_)
1 II II I
V1c�Ic i', 41�.5 �-I lh<:. VhST���(1'\ �atuJ If OlZ. V)
is 1lc I,c�n - hninA"
zs :)l ;,
1'(i,,i�n�� JamfS 1o�un CI r,c7p/
o� al��� 1121,�$ �;�- know►� -�-� ��
I\n-.)lI-S 2t �I1`IS
.arc' 1
r
f�',ovl� o�
Cretl=
�
Cr

III t= •b �, ly
�Fr�o11rrn`.
4Aofr�
v2i1 G Jam" 1 GIl
'T,f
ski rz c r l 11C s� Fr �m h� zY�
S I r\,' ei�o, IE.�I�r ��ow `` 01 7, a oII�S (7Q IG�
a� 46- ��cilll� �� �iSCl�zr�QI
1 1' zl�c' cid not- r� IFcra--l0
Colic I � 1 „S 1
ClS 001
60
Oh OUP �x 1
.,`c1 C%�
F rnc�. ' Ot� '1I'�c `�'OC�`�IC�+,
n

11
Sc> `I U�nT L;nl'1 S
Nor rF-c(u1,4
I 1
Cu IN (3l-)S.
i
ccj v l , l oll YJ C L� Yn�
C. 7c /,
bl��
IU - clFa� Io�v
U l 1 Q.i �. I `.`�--���-1' C5Q -� �",F l.0 i it T�i.•%
a9�9s`.0
I ocx7 on
•tl��� I]=r�ti 1'1�:�Y f�?�`IG:i l�i"1')�'V1 I �illS
CC
o�.UE\j'cr"� '���C re`�•Gr,. Y'vno
/r�VcS / `nd V� IUcS 4O"r 4 11�-�(0v1$
"� t"n� I C)�i'"L�U •� �;'�c`'t J. �;c�� C���fCJ �f-f•'CI
I �
za U )�f- ��4� I� 1 l„�I , �h(-S,
co�,Pc-i-C� IW
Yf'�flCi" uuiVQIC) <'Ut'��it16105, Sync I `
k,0%0A<� ao,-tIS-is sl,cwsj
Rc�r,c'lcl\lc�j1 "I'l jOJJIE O6umlllEr
I ti r,,ll1 V-o Ut,•1 c1 wi
Ilr,itiS)J �h �I,ZII�;is CU(,l'�Ic��1 (�4lbe��✓<
aur,A -kt1�,�

'S ulllll'1c
�h� n-�o�1>✓1 �l,o-I�-S -(ter
Z�)Irc
`s
L,vin-6(
Cuncl usl onS ur Q w m CTD
(� P r ! 1 ► -►-� Q c-R �b f �
�011u�T qq
U U f fly
�J✓In��r C
l V�11+
I nuts
NC) V
rch
130bUL-T - I I U
"-.,/1
tj �I � - N = ao
D7 ), W = 5 my /,
31)
3l
�Lu-I cS-
e-I0,:�. n E
0

II 1 � 1
S Fcood e- vs . rAc�\j �r-)c Fc� SF-Conclzf�l Y�ain,Fn�
A II cl�sl `yin st f�Cn, cUr�d t I on , tkE Y„cx�c
r,,calCT�d 1ha� ���,a D. U, woji Szj L.IC)LU
Pki- Sr sl ✓fir
cl; Prbn4 r�sc�,Fs, �rc,�uc y v1 v� o4*101,s cv�:.r-
I'J
S vfrc�� ���� ?��?r C'IYr}��n L'vFI IoWfc
St c•c:t,c'�>f `I �� n i1 ���� Ions �QUL�� = I Ip
I
Ihf Yy,II�IIIIUI}1 �n.�_�� I:�i�(:1C UJ -v �-5b 'mot/
I
r�7SS Z V 1 c 1 o,
A, U-)r , cI Cyr-1?ir� pf l }C)A .
0