310064_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20201014

Facility Number m - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: C�om/pHance Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: pyRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up O Referral 0 Emergency O Other � O Denied Access
Date of Visit: ., Arrival Time: G�.3 Departure Time:�(�County:l,L,.t/�,,, Region:Wt�
_t db
Farm Name: &L 8r:A Son Owner Email:
Owner Name: rdJ Q(i,Sn,\ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: 5J. M 1 LY [ Asbn
Certified Operator: .2L�4C�. &ifl 6 \
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
to I
to I
r to
v to
v to
v to
Other
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number: t"IW('
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
NNon--
La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacitv Pon.
La ers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify D WR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
[—]Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [—]No
[—]Yes 2rNo
❑ Yes E2"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
V] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: P1
Structure 5
Structure
6
I✓�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �. _ M
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
(4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[)o No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
50 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
50 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
I5. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
Ep No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
7
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[R) No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
P] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
p
§0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
m( No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number:31 - 0 d I Date of Inspection: 4�
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [:]Yes XNo
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes rV9 No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes P No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
N'tNA ❑NE
❑ Yes JK] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
V NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
X] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
SIU�` st kt( " aodD
ND U--'asfie cost 5 rS gor Ca e.,vLt sa a zo^k peg, a a5
l�l�lao >Idsr
j/'7IaO a/io/A
t`♦&OIAAAR d'U �trbw Gc.��d�A end c�v�- �o crP4,5 �d
�c�bA S. J r
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 9w—(0V_ 0_b
Date: to -1 - )-0
511212020