Bridge 58 on SR 1155

North Carolina
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
February 22, 2010
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
or
NC®ENR
Department of Environment and
Division of Coastal Management
James H. Gregson
Director
Natural Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
R.5-MENA
FEa Z 3 20ie
DERR • WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STTFLMWATER BRANCH
Division of Water Quality
Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: NC DOT - Bridge No. 58
Location: The project site is located on S/R 1155 over Pamlico Creek, Brunswick County.
Proposed Project: The applicant is proposing to replace the existing bridge with a new 100' long
concrete bridge and associated infrastructure on the existing alignment. An off-
site detour will be utilized during construction.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by
03/15/2010. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
Stephen Lane at [phone]. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data are requested.
REPLY: 1i,/ This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project. -
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED DATE 912,?) 0
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557-3421
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: vrm? nccoaslatmanaaement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer
N?arthCarolini
?atura!lr??'

Major Permit Fee Schedule
Circle One
uDevelopmentTYPe .i`Fee+
? D6M€%
? '
v_: . ,
1. Private, non-commercial $250 100%($250) 0%($0)
development that does not
involve the filling or
excavation of any wetlands
or open water areas
II Putilic or commercial $400 , x fi 100% ($400)' , :0% ($O)
developme t that does not Y 'a+ rr
involve the filhn "or ,
g s? sw s r:'r?x, t r3 r? U -ns as , ?.
excavation of a
y wetlands
or
o en water
areas,
,
;
III. For Development that
involves the filling and/or
excavation of up to 1 acre
of wetlands and/or open
water areas, determine if
A,B,C, or D below applies
III a Private non ;
( ) L , r'
u $250 s ?" s o
100% ($250) LT ?`0%a 0 a3t
($).
commercial develop em nt"4 ;r "s £
° xy `?-.
0"
'
` u
> xt
J General Water Qualdy
No 3490 (Se
Ce
rtitication x, _` r`
xs pv ?' w3
t ?
'
ai?K's?
v
;
s
?
,
i
e
attact ad can
beta lied T r is ' :c tr
r
-
r
w £
s
x
-.
; s
,
y
; s ,..
n
, :, . x.
. . , a
.
lll(b). Public or $400 100%($400) 0% ($0)
commercial development,
if General Water Quality _
Certification No. 3490 (See
attached can be applied
III(c)° If Genera(Water , f U $400 '' . s b x'60% ($240)t 40%'($16Q) ?
Quality Certification'No t s xf to as }£ zap, ` ' 1
Y l
(3490Y(See attached) could
ed but DGM staff
a
l 1 =fi£r 4
N
r ?, n X , f
be
pp
(
tideterminedthatddttional
-a? d,
L`,
z,? r's*i,i,?NX?,?z ? ,? ?? ?f:? T«v ar'? ? ?r,„
# Lc °S `k t? ? `s ?,i
eWDWQ °
eview and wntt c_
? a s
' 3, ?y t 1
,
"
concurrence i heeded
.av3-._z•0. v iK3ayt "'1-
5 ,'.h
mmr
?4? `*ea M2? r a
a
s?fi'>. L{-aL- -#b'rde`'? ?= x
R x v
?va.?i9 YT4$"%?a?B.R T,'i
s
-
because of concerns .
s
equality
or
elated to wat
?
?
'a a clife?,.. ?
III(d). If General Water $400 60% ($240) 40%($160)
Quality Certification N .
3490 (See attached)
cannot be applied
fV s,Dev?e^IopmentFthat ? ? ? ?" t '? , ,64$475 "`>t ? ?? t??f60% ($285)T x??,7 ' ?,'? ?x?,40% ($190)' u""
?
-'
,involves the filling and/or
t
" _.,?, * "' m-kc .ry 5 "....°'? „ ?
a 9 ?
' •,°?; ? h=,a ?"a, -? xr -t
°
?
T G
`
i
?
'' r?"?-??'-?"'?'
? +'?
?` r
t°'
5 'rT'
?
?-C
4 r a ?.
? .fi
excavation of more than 4
s'
n ?
^
???*- ?^` v4.o
.35 a f C C+ § , +
m `
u.=
?a I
?x
x
z^
i
9 ?z u U! }F
sv
t ts
.r
s,
a j y £ fi
fi;
r
t
s
one acre of wetla
d p .
1
,Y
ry s
a m
s

Check # a
Amount $ ?L
Project Name: n c_ c? ` Y`?
DIVISION OFCOASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD IN ,`ESTIGATION REPORT.
APPLICANT'S NAME-: North Carolina Department cf Transportation
2.
LOCATION OF PROJECT SIT, E: The project is located on SRI 115 over Pamlico Creels at Bridge No.
58 in Brunswick County.
Photo Index - N/A
State Plane Coordinates
Latitude: 35°58'06"
3.
- X: 2,222,476 Y: 80,347
Longitude: 78'15'35"
INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/Dredge and Fill
4.
INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Date of Site Visit- February 4, 2010
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received Complete: January 19, 2010
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plans - Brunswick County
Land Classification from LUP - Low Density Residential/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: EW, PTA, CS
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A'
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Bridge for public use
Planned - Bridge for public use
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
T7vr' A \7 A TFn FT1 T FT) OTHER
(A) Open Water Shading 1,296 sf
(B) Coastal Wetlands 146 sf 95 sf
(B) Section 404 Wetlands 509 sf
(C) High Ground Disturbed by project 18,290 sf
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 20,336 sq. ft.
(E) Primary Nursery Area: Yes
(F) Water Classification: SC; HQW Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to replace the existing 41' long bridge on SR1115 over
Pamlico Creek with a new 100' long concrete bridge and associated infrastructure within the existing
right-of-way. An off-site detour will be utilized during construction.
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTNIENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BRIDGE NO, 58 01,TR PANF ICO CREEK
PAGE #2
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION;
Project Setting
Bridge No. 58 is located on SRI 115 over Pamlico Creek, approximately four miles south of
Supply in Brunswick County. Elevations in the project area range from 0 to 5 feet above the normal
high water level of Pamlico Creek. The predominant land use in the project area is forestry with a
few residential dwellings located within the project vicinity, the closest being approximately 500'
north of the project. The sides of the causeway to the bridge are maintained and vegetated with sod
grasses. The floodplain and embankments of Pamlico Creek immediately adjacent to the bridge are
dominated by Spartina cynosuroides and Cladium jamaicense. The land rises quickly beyond the
coastal wetland areas to high ground dominated by pine trees.
The existing bridge is a two lane bridge and is 41' long and 25.3' wide. The bridge is a fixed
bridge consisting of two spans, with a maximum, of 19' horizontal distance between spans. The
bridge has a vertical clearance of 4.3' underneath the bridge. The bridge consists of a concrete deck
on steel I-beams. The bridge is supported with timber caps on timber piles. The bridge pilings have
been supplement with "crutch bents" to help support the bridge as the original support pilings have
deteriorated badly.
There are no stormwater runoff controls on the bridge. Aerial electric lines cross over the bridge
from the northeast quadrant to the southwest quadrant. A cable TV line and a water line parallel the
east side of the bridge crosses under Pamlico Creek.
Pamlico Creek is classified SC; HQW in the project vicinity of the bridge by the Environmental
Management Commission. Pamlico Creek is classified by the Division of Marine Fisheries as
Coastal Waters and the area is considered a Primary Nursery Area. The waters are closed to
shellfishing by the Shellfish Sanitation Section of the Division of Environmental Health. At the
project site Pamlico Creek is approximately 36' wide and has a maximum water depth of -3.5'
below NLW in the area of the bridge. There were no SAV's observed in the project area during the
site visit.
Project Proposal
NCDOT proposes to replace the existing Bridge No. 58 over Pamlico Creek. The project
involves replacement of the existing bridge and related approaches with a cored slab concrete bridge
and new approaches. To initiate the project, the existing bridge would be closed and traffic re-routed
to an off-site detour route along SRI 127, SRI 119, and SRI 125, which is approximately 4 miles in
length. The existing bridge would be completely demolished and removed from the project site
utilizing Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal, such that any component
of the bridge dropped into the water will be immediately removed.
The new bridge as proposed would be 100' in length and 36' in width, which would be
approximately 1 I' wider than the existing bridge. The new bridge would consist of three spans, with
two spans at 25' in length and one at 50' in length. The bridge would totally span Pamlico Creek,
which would eliminate the bridge bent currently in the center of the creek and provide the full width
of the creek for navigation. The new bridge is also designed to allow 4.5' of vertical clearance
FIELD IN ESTIGATION REPORT:
NORTTI C.yROLIN:`. DEPART` LENT OF TRAN'SPORTA'TION
BRIDGE 1ti0. r8 OVER PANILICO CREEK
PAGE #-)
underneatt? the bridge, which is an increase of 0.2' above the existing 4.3' clearance height. The
new bridge as proposed would have wu 1 t:av i lanes, will; a 4. effsct Git caeii side. The bridge
would also have a 1.5' wide concrete rail along each side for safety purposes. NCDOT has
committed to construct the bridge utilizing top down construction methods and to build the bridge
with no deck drains over surface waters. The commitments reduce potential impacts to the
surrounding environment and eliminate the need for a temporary work bridge.
The applicant has proposed to excavate a 30' long x 35' wide section of the existing roadway fill
from beneath the base of the bridge on each side of Pamlico Creek. This would partially restore
hydraulic capacity and floodplain area to the Lumber River Basin, which was displaced with the
construction of the existing bridge. Approximately 146 sq. ft. of Coastal Wetlands would be
excavated from the bases of the causeways to a slightly lower elevation than the existing elevation to
properly connect the restored causeway areas to the adjacent Coastal Wetlands.
To allow for the increased height of the new bridge, the applicant has requested to raise the
approach structures to the bridge. On the northern approach the causeway grade would be raised by
up to 1'. To reduce the amount of fill in the adjacent wetlands, the slopes would be armored with
riprap and sloped at a'2:1 ratio instead of the normal 3:1 slope. Approximately 195 linear feet of
Class II riprap would be placed along the west side of the causeway, it would wrap around the end of
the causeway for 50', then continue along the east. side of the causeway for an additional 145 linear
feet. The riprap and backfill for the causeway would fill in a 509 sq. ft. area of Section 404
Wetlands along the east side of the causeway.
On the southern end of the bridge, the grade would be raised by up to 1.5'. The side slopes would
be stabilized with riprap at a 2:1 ratio to minimize fill in Coastal Wetlands. Approximately 150
linear feet of riprap would be placed along the west side of the approach, continue 50' adjacent to
Pamlico Creek, and then extend along the east side of the causeway for 25'. The riprap would be
placed entirely above the normal high water level of Pamlico Creek. A 95 sq. ft. area of Coastal
Wetlands containing Spartina evnosuroides and Cladium jamaicense would be filled in between
STA. 14+36 to STA. 144-85 with the grade increase.
The asphalt on the east and west ends of the bridge would be paved over for 190' and 140',
respectively from the foot of the bridge and two 12' wide travel lanes with eight-foot shoulders, four
foot of which would be paved would be constructed. New guardrails would also be constructed
along SRI 115 for up to 175' from the east end of the bridge and 150' from the west end of the
bridge. The existing power lines that cross over the bridge will have to be relocated, however, final
design plans for their relocation are still pending.
Anticipated Impacts
The proposed bridge would permanently shade 1,296 sq. ft. of Estuarine Waters and the Public
Trust Area of Pamlico Creek, which would be an increase of 385 sq. ft. more than that which exists
with the current bridge. The navigable clearance under the bridge would increase by 0.2' from 4.3'
to 4.5'. The bridge would also allow an increase in the maximum navigational width from 18' to
36'.
The proposed riprap and associated backfill would permanently fill in 146 sq. ft. of Coastal
Wetlands dominated by Spartina cynosuroides and Cladium jamaicense on the west side of the
causeway. The riprap and causeway widening would also result in the permanent filling of 509 sq.
ft. of Section 404 Wetlands on the east side of the causeway.
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT;
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTYIENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BRIDGE NO, 58 OVER PANILICO CREEK
PAGE #4
The causeway removai would restore 2,100 sq. Eft. of previously filled Coastal Wetlands to
appropriate elevations. Approximately 146 sq. ft. of existing Coastal Wetlands would have to be
excavated to a slightly lower elevation to allow proper flushing of the excavated causeway area.
The project would result in a total of 18,290 sq. ft. of high ground disturbance, including the
grading, paving, and stabilization of the new approaches to the bridge and the removal of the
causeway areas under the existing bridge.
The applicant does not propose any mitigation for the impacts to the Coastal Wetlands or the
Section 404 Wetlands anticipated with this project. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a
Nationwide Permit 3 for this project under Action ID 2005 590.
A localized increase in turbidity can be expected during the removal of the existing bent and
excavation of the existing causeway. No additional closures of shellfishing waters are expected in
association with the proposed project. Impacts to anadromous fish in Pamlico Creek are expected to
be minimal due to the limited in water work portion of the project. Traffic along SRI 115 would be
re-routed during the construction period of the project which will result in increased travel distances
for some uses of the transportation system, however, the public is expected to benefit upon
completion of the project by the increase in the safety and efficiency of the new structure.
Submitted by: Stephen Lane -Morehead City District - February 17, 2010
(]not r iced 12127'08)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
9. Primary Ap ;olicantl Landowner Information
Business Name
N.C Department Of Transportation Project Name (if applicable)
Brunswick Bridge 56
Applicant 1: First Name
H tv!I
Allen Last Name
Pope
Applicant 2: First Name MI Last Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed
Mailing Address
123 Division Dr. PO Box City
Wilmington State
NC
ZIP
28401 Country
United States Phone No.
910 - 251 -
5724 ext. FAX No.
910 - 251 - 5727
Strect Address (if different from above) City State ZIP
Email
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
N.C Department Of Transportation
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
Mason MI Last Name
Hemdon
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name MI Last Name
Mailing Address
123 Division Dr PO Box City
Wilmington State
NC
ZIP
28401 Phone No.1
910-251-572
4 ext. Phone No. 2
910-620-4039 ext.
FAX No.
910 251 5727 Contractor #
Street Address (if different tram above) City State ZIP
Email
<Form continues on back>
252.808-2808 :: 1.888.4111COAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net
Form GCNI MP-1 (Page 2 of b)
APPLICATION for
Major Cevelcpment Permit
3. Project Location
County (car be multiple) I Street Address 1 3?ate ^.c. 4
1115
i SR
.
Brunswick NIA
Subdivision Name City j S:a;e Zic
/A NiA N!A NlA-
Phone No. Lot Na(s) (if many, attach additional page with Iisi)
N/A - - ext. N/A, ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located? b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
Lumber Pamlico Creek
c. Is the water body idenlifed in (b) above, natural or manmade? d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ?Manmade ?Unknown Lockwood Folly River
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction? I. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
?Yes NNo work falls within.
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.) b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
N/A N/A
c. Size of individual lot(s) d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
NWL (normal water level)
N/A
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list) 4.5 ®NHW or ?NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
N/A
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
NCDOT bridge and 2lane paved secondary roadway
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adlacent to the proposed project site.
residents/wooded lots/marsh
h. How does local government zone the tract? i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
N/A (Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
?Yes ?No NNA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? Yes No
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. Yes No NA
If yes, by whom?
1. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a Yes No NNA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes ?No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? NYes ?No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes ?No
(Attach documentation, if available)
252.808.2808 :: 1.888.41RCOAST :: www.necoastaimanagement.net
Form PCM! 'MP-1 (Page 3 of 5)
n. Descricae.?istinq wastewater treatment
N/A
APPLICATION for
%laicr Dsvelooment Permit
o. DescriC? exsting c-,nFlce ate; ?uppl? scum. ;
N/A
p. Describe existing storm water management or treacnent systems. ?
N/A
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ?Commercial ©Pubiic/Gcvernment
?Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
standard secondary road bridge infrastructure
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the num5er of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
NCDOT standard bridge construction equipment, backhoe, crane & trucks
J. List all development activities you propose.
Replace existing 41 ft long x 25.3 ft wide bridge with a 100 ft long x 36 If wide cored slab bridge.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work. or both? Replacement of existing
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 0.68 ?Sq.Ft or ZAcres
g. Will the proposed project encroach or. any public easement, public accessway or other area ®Yes ?No ?NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
Fill is required to widen and rebuild the approaches. Shoulders slopes were reduces to 2:1 to minimize impacts and therefore
will be armored with rip rap for bank stabilization.
I. Will wastewater or stom[water be discharged into a wetland? ?Ves ®NO ?NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ?Yes ?No ZNA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? Yes No NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) - (0 are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give e sent o the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
252-808.2808 .. 1.888.4RCOAST .. w w w. in c c o a s It a l m a n a g e m e, nt. n et
Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 5j
APPLICATION. for
Major -)ew!iqP,Tient Permit
i d. A: cpy of the deed (wdh state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the aftecfed properties,
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DEI
f A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent vraierfiont (dpanani landowner and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners nave received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowner must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the oroposed Protect, to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name See attached sheet
Phone No
Address
Name
Phone No.
Address
Name
Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, pernittee, and issuing dates.
Unknown
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i. Welland delineation, if necessary.
I. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Ad.
7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fad grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date _1/19/10 Print Name -Mason Herndon
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
?DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information ®DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
?DCM MP-3 Upland Development
?DCM MP-4 Structures Information
Form DCM 19P-5

BRIDGES and DDT
Attach this form to Jcin, Apclicatier, for CANIA Majcr Permit. Farm E)CM NIP-1. Be sure to compieta all other sections of the Joint
Application that reiate to this proposed Project. Pleasa include all supplemental information.
1, BRIDGES ? This section not applicable
a. Is the proposed bridge: "dam
?Commercial ®Publio'Government ?PrivateiCommunity
c. Type of bridge (construction motorist):
core slab
b. Xater body to be crossed oy m, ge.
Pamlico Creek
e. (1) Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? ®Yes ?No
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge: 41 ft
(iii) Width of existing bridge: 25.3 ft
(iv) Navigation clearance underneath existing bridge: 4.3 ft
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed?
(Explain) All
J. Water depth at the proposed crossing at I or NWL:
3.5 ft
f. (I) Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert? []Yes ENo
If yes,
(ii) Length of existing culvert:
(iii) Width of existing culvert:
(iv) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the NHW or
NWL'
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed?
(Explain)
9. Length of proposed bridge: 100 ft h. Width of proposed bridge: 36
I. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? ?Yes XNo j. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ?Yes ?No
If yes, explain:
If yes, explain:
'k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge: 4.5 ft I.. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their
approval? ?Yes ®No
If yes, explain:
m. Wilt the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable n. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands. N/A
waters? ?Yes ZNO
If yes, explain:
2. CULVERTS ZThis section not applicable
a. Number of culverts proposed: b. Water body m which the culvert is to be placed:
c. Type of culvert (construction material),
< Form continues on back>
252.808-2808 :: 1-888.4RCOAST :: www_nccoastalmanagementuri revised: IOi26106
Form DCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 2 of 4)
d. (i) Wlil proposed culvert reclaue an existing brcqe?
?Yes ?No
If Yes,
(ii) Length of existing bridge.
!iii) Width of existing bridge:
(iv) Na,,igatlcn clearance underneath existing bridge:
(v) Will all, or a part of, the existing ordge be removed-.
(Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
:
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the NHN/ or NWL.
j Will the proposed culvert affect navigation by reducing or
increasing the existing navigable opening? ?Yes ?No
If yes, explain:
3. EXCAVATION and FILL
a. (i) Will thevat placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excaion below the NHW or NWL? ?Yes NNo
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: _,
(iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated:
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: _
(i) Will proposed culvert replace an existing :;ulven?
?Yes ?No
if yes.
(ii) Length of existing culvert(s):
(iii)'Nidtn _` e.-.ist ng ='jverts):
(iv) Height o` the top of ice existing c-Ivert above the NHVV cr
NVVI _
(v) Will all, or a part c;, the axis,: g diver' be removetl?
(Explain)
g. Width of proposed culvert:
i. Depth of culvert to be buried below existing bottom contour.
k. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
?Yes ?No
If yes, explain:
[]This section not applicable
b. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
excavation within coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WI_)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
NCW 146sg ff?SAV ?SB _
?WL _ []None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Causeway & fill will be removed to match adj. wetland
elevations.
c. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any
high-ground excavation? NYes ?No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be excavated: 80 It
(iii) Avg. width of area to be excavated: 35 ft
(Iv) Avg. depth of area to be excavated: 5.3 It
(v) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards: 540
252.808.2808 :: 1.8884RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmg!lagement.net revised: 10126106
?u
FArm DCNi PAP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 3 of d)
d. If the placement of the bridge cr culvert involves any excavation, please complete the .`allowing:
NO I ocaiicn of fie spoil dispcsal area Some material will he used to rebuild shoulders, contractor will provide
(ii) Dimensions of the spoil disposal area Undetermined
(iii) no you claim title to the disposal area? ?Yes ZNO ('f1le attach a lettergrarhrg perrl;srcr'rom the owner.)
h v) Wit :he disposal area be available for future maintenance? ?Yes ?t rb
(-) Does he d spcsal area include any Coastal wedand_l.. nrnh (Cal) submerged aquatic vegenlion (SANS), other watla?ds WL), or ,hell ? ?
bottom (SB)2
?cw ?SAV ?V/L ?SB ®None
if any bcyas are checked, give dimensions if different from (ii) above. Undetermined
(vi) Does the disposal area include any area below the NHW or NWL? ? Dyes ENO
If yes, give dimensions if different from (ii) above.
e, (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed below NHW or NWL? ?Yes ENO
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled:
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled:
(iv) Purpose of fill
g. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed on high-ground? Eyes ?No
If yes,
(ii) Avg. length of area to be filled: 550
(iii) Avg. width of area to be filled: 5
(iv) Purpose of fill: Rip rap for shoulder stablization & end
bent protection
a. Will the proposed project require the relocation or any existing
utility lines? Eyes ?No
If yes, explain: Aerial powerline will need to be relocated,
no wetland impacts anticipated.
f. (i) Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any
fill (other than excavated material described in Item d above) to
be placed within coastal wetlands/marsh (CbV), submerged
aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or other wetlands
(WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square
feet affected.
®CW 95 ?SAV ?SB
OWL 509 ?None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Rip rap will be used for shoulder stabilization
detour structures',
If yes, explain:
any ten
Dyes
If this portion of the proposed project has already received
approval from local authorities, please attach a copy of the
approval or certification.
< Form continues on back>
c. Will the proposed project require any work channels? d. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion
?Yes- ONO controlled?
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2. silt fence will be placed at toe of fill
252.808-2808 :: 1.88"RCOAST :: www,ncconstalmanagement_net revised: 10126/06
Form IDCM MP-5 (Bridges and Culverts, Page 4 of 4)
e. `P/hat hype Of construction equipment will be used !for example,
dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic drecge?
backhoe, excavator, crane & trucks
f. Will wetlands be crossed in t2nsporting equipment to projeri site?
?Yes ENO
If yes. explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
g. Wiil the placement of the proposed bridge or cuNen require any
shoreline stabilization? ®Yes ?No
if yes, complete form PAP-2, Section 3 for Shoreline
Stabilization only.
1/19/10
Date
Brunswick BR 58
Project Name
Mason Herndon
Applicant Name
Applicant Signature
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-0RCOAST :: www_nccoastalmanagement_net revised: 10126106
."R e
NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT F'P,'OFERT'i O';v'VLR5: 3'0 fi 1
a,? r 13
I F!rthermore cc-, ify that the foiio`vm2 7erS,_?)S a*e n.xrrerg o_ prop'?"LS adiolnino his rr^pery.
of -n char I ha ;e provided notification to each o._ the canceming =7`i intent to complete these
. epa .rr..:.:p rv:ement$ a? u., apply .va .. ?. ...?_
(Name) (Address)
(1) Norma Je27: Maness 2003 Bin-ham Dr., Far _tteil!e, ETC 28304
(2) Briggs & Roberts Deve!ooment Co. 165 Aoole Blossom Ln.. Burnsville. NC 28714
(3) Pamlico Creek. LLC 522 S. L:;ingtou Ave.. burlington NC 27215
(4) Clam Bay Plantation, LLC 312 River Rd.. Souhmort, NC 28461
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)

A
1
p
I

y?na
#58

1LY
J / , 4
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
VICINITY BRUNSWICK COUNTY
PROJ ECT: B-5216
}? REPLACE BRIDGE X58
?V'j? ON SR 1115 OVER
(NOT TO SCALE) PAMLICO CREEK
SHEET I OF 1 12/7/09
??0 D?'?` ( l,R 01 iiV' n
r

?
i I? •? I(. is '>\ .., .. I ro o i.

.OR D
.

I y\
4
1
I ? C
1.,: i
e \/ 1 / ? % a.-
I ?
\$n0 IiA IAMf
I(
1l e, ? JCr r

ie-t

• _ _.
i p ,:
•
• ' b Uooipe .. ? 1 0 A ;
15 Il

? c-
- . ,. s,oe?n -

IJ \ \?/ 1
I

1V CD® LL
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
T(DPO MAP
lC'" PROJECT; B-5216
tt
58
REPLACE BRIDGE
ON SR 1115 OVER
SCALE: 1" = 2000' PAMLICO CREEK
SHEET Z OF -1 12/7/09
E
.1
?_ ? N? x U m ,??. ti V r
U
UNI'IPOlY14 X N O 9 p
III ?? QG ?I
?6
I \.
( i 1 y`
?? I I z
I ' ? Q
FQt.L C.
-jo
w-m I ?? 1 iiZ ww
i Z z
lij w
0
oLl-
ZC3
ZQcn "Q I I
J
JW?j o f,
It ?C? o f ?'t I lI
I
O° I
I
?°c
I
0
I
?? l? Ir Il . ? ? ?
°
-Ii AV
i C' .gi t4t7H
('-
s?c}v1
I ' zo a¢
ZQ(n W~ H7
C: JI-m w LLQ
ct Jw0 u)3 cn?
07'Y it I?? I) LL Lo LUZ WW
I - ' ,
3
` z z
Z Z
w w
w
51
° II
Ch' a II l L?
,
-i
ZCD
F-QW L---?--
QJC5 t
F-V) \
W
O?? , \ k-J 1'i9
'• X
II` o
i ? ® lq?d
t
a:?i?rx?avia I Q ?'

r?y??'

"I I
? i

F? r, i .CiI

l
EJ m ? L
t rc+
\
i
s

i
I(Y I ??- ?? 91 aV
Iql I
I?iLI I. M
II :I it ti, em y>
11 ? Av
z0 x I, ? ? _t
oz?
nF.
alp * I? ?_; V
Qua I, :?,? _; IIII zz°
X N? :? : `': llll, JH
\1 \ j
C;
O
OZI- _I
aJC7 ? '?
v" ? 17
X M
Ld co ' {jC) .?
zao
,. 11
JF-? S5, ?M
JW? S ? ?I
<L?O
Y.
ill a ? ;;l
II 4.
r
??!I rTj * nee' M ?
-?
! 1
n

u
c s C
(
p

d (JI
L)
O

A
Z
¢0 z
><r
QU J
XF HO
ww ?Q
LiJz LIJW
O 03
Z z
w LLL1
r? 0

w
Hmmi
o
ti
Z w
. ?
.,`
•c,.
.;

Z Li = ?,{ i i i
_ L _ i I i ? I ` I ? < If l v
n N J a

E
?
C ? ? ` i I i I ? i
r
F c .??
I j n
.
N
d
? I
I I _
V

a
iEr
wc
j j v

u1 n N '^ d
c c 2i ?„ I k7 z ?^
?? o 0
I

a a 1^
E
K r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- w
? --
c
N - - - - - - - - -
y m 3 ? m
to
E
Q a

?
w v
c -
_
r m ? _ ? m
d_d
U ?
W
p^ N
v
ZQO ? c c

L d
i
?
J

a
0 0
g 'm mu b o 0
Z o
v 0
v
v
z
5 3
6
N
9
d C C
p U
N
m
if d
I
S
C N
?
m _ ro m
?
1 L p °
O o
?
d V

Y?
N d N N
U?
2 O U 'O O
H
N m m m m

J
J r
K
th
¢l (7
O N
N (?1
O
O O r r `
?

O O O O

N r r- g r
v J J I ce
N + N m
t
O 4
Q
N
?.
S
1 1 1
L EE ?