20010404 Ver 1_2006 Monitoring Report_20080527

I C),4 C)
ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2006
SALT Mitigation Site
Moor County
Project No. 6.569005T
TIP No. R-021OWM

Natural Environment Unit & Roadside Environmental Unit
North Carolina Department of Transportation
December 2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY ...................................................................................................
1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................
1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................
1.2 PURPOSE ...........................................................................
1.3 PROJECT HISTORY ..........................................................
2.0 HYDROLOGY ..................................................................................
2.1 SUCCESS CRITERIA ........................................................
2.2 HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION .........................................
2.3 RESULTS OF HYDROLOGIC MONITORING ..................
2.3.1 Site Data ..................................................................
2.3.2 Climatic Data ...........................................................
2.4 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................
3.0 VEGETATION .................................................................................
3.1 SUCCESS CRITERIA ........................................................
3.2 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES ...........................................
3.3 RESULTS OF VEGETATION MONITORING ..................
3.4 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................
4.0 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS ................
................1
.1
................1
................1
................1
................3
................3
................3
................3
................3
................5
................7
................9
................9
................9
.............10
.............10
.............10
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Site Location Map ........................................................................................................2
Figure 2. Monitoring Gauge Location Map ................................................................................4
Figure 3. 2006 Hydrologic Monitoring Results ..........................................................................6
Figure 4. 30-70 Percentile Graph, New Bern, NC .....................................................................8
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Hydrologic Monitoring Results ......................................................................................5
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A GAUGE DATA GRAPHS
APPENDIX B PHOTO AND VEGETATIO PLOT LOCATIONS, SITE PHOTOS
SUMMARY
The following report summarizes the monitoring activities that have occurred in 2006 at the
Sandhills Area Land Trust (SALT) Mitigation Site. The 2006-year represents the first year
of hydrology and vegetation monitoring following construction. The site must demonstrate
hydrologic and vegetation success for a minimum of five years or until the site is deemed
successful. The site was constructed to serve as mitigation for impacts for R-0210 (US-1
Bypass).
Hydrologic success criteria are based on the approved mitigation plan and require that the
site show saturation or inundation within one foot of the soil surface for at least 12.5% of
the growing season. Alternatively, hydrology success criteria may be established through
comparison of well data between the wetland restoration area and the reference wetland
(i.e. depth to groundwater). The reference hydroperiod will be compared to the restoration
areas which must exceed 75 percent of the hydroperiod exhibited by the reference wells,
located within the same physiographic landscape area. The 2006-year represents the first
year of hydrologic monitoring for the Salt Mitigation Site. For the 2006-year, ten of the
eleven gauges recorded jurisdictional hydrology for greater than 12.5% of the growing
season.
Of the 24.5 acres of planting on this site, approximately 15.9 acres involved bottomland
hardwood tree planting. Approximately 8.6 acres of upland buffer were planted with
longleaf pine. There were 4 vegetation-monitoring plots established throughout the
bottomland hardwood planting area. The 2006 vegetation monitoring of the site revealed
an average tree density of 440 trees per acre. This average is above the minimum
success criteria of 320 trees per acre.
Per the letter from Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to NCDOT dated August 25,
2004 the EEP has accepted the transfer of all off-site mitigation projects. The EEP will be
responsible for fulfilling the remaining monitoring requirements and future remediation for
this project. The site will be transferred to EEP February 2007 for remaining monitoring.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Description
The Sandhills Area Land Trust (SALT) Mitigation Site serves (entirely) as mitigation for the
R-210 (US-Bypass). The 327-acre site is located is located in southern Moore County,
along the Little River, near the town of Lobelia. The 327-acre site includes restoration of
both riverine hardwood and swamp forest wetlands.
1.2 Purpose
In order to demonstrate successful mitigation, hydrologic and vegetation monitoring must
be conducted for a minimum of five years or until the site is deemed successful. Success
criteria are based on federal guidelines for wetland mitigation and as stipulated in the
approved mitigation plan. Criteria for hydrologic conditions and vegetation survival are
included in this document. Also included in this report are analyses of hydrologic and
vegetation-monitoring results, discussions of local climate conditions throughout the
growing season and site photographs.
1.3 Project History
December 2001
July 2002
February 2003
January 2006
January 2006
March-November 2006
February 2007
Site KG Sheared and Drum Chopped
Site Sprayed
Site Planted
Ditches Plugged
Monitoring Gauges reprogrammed
Hydrologic Monitoring (Year 1)
Vegetation Monitoring (Year 1)
•
333 /1( ' ?i 'rP
'1 j ??M1 i i ? '? Y P ( i• ?l
? t
? P
f'r a ?' ?? i mot)
.t5 r a C< e { 6l) ?- ?+ I
i ?_R.. a ?1 t iY? 4
', `•, ' `;? SALT Mil iC,6 .`wit '
?. ??. [_' is /' ? ••l '(,
F
t
5, W
,l! -.?..,."'- t ? dry, ? i•-: R
yy
J ?
'? i •?? , .:- ? °' i?x'?. 4?' Y4 ??? ?? =?? t-J ]431 i?. ,??'.?
PROJECT VICINITY - R-0210WM N
SALT Tract Wetland Mitigation Site
Moore County, North Carolina
? W E
0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000
Feet s
Figure 1. Site Location Map
2
2.0 HYDROLOGY
2.1 Success Criteria
The hydrologic success criteria established for the Salt Mitigation Site, as stipulated in the
approved mitigation plan and subsequent revisions, require that the site show saturation or
inundation within one foot of the soil surface for at least 12.5% of the growing season.
Alternatively, hydrology success criteria may be established through comparison of well
data between the wetland restoration area and the reference wetland (i.e. depth to
groundwater). The reference hydroperiod will be compared to the restoration areas which
must exceed 75 percent of the hydroperiod exhibited by the reference wells, located within
the same physiographic landscape area.
The growing season in Moore County begins on March 23 and ends November 7 The
dates correspond to a 50% probability that air temperature will drop to 280 after March 18
and before November 71; thus, the growing season is 228 days. Local climate must
represent normal conditions for the area.
2.2 Hydrologic Description
No rain gauge is located on the site, so rainfall data (supplied by the NC State Climate
Office) from an official weather station in Carthage is used to compare to the site data.
The groundwater gauges record water levels on a daily basis. Monitoring data for 2006
represents the first year of hydrologic monitoring for the site.
2.3 Results of Hydrologic Monitoring
2.3.1 Site Data
The maximum number of consecutive days that saturation occurred within 12" of the ground
surface was determined for each groundwater-monitoring gauge. This number was
converted into a percentage of the 228-day growing season (March 23 - November 7).
Table 1 provides the 2006 hydrologic results; Figure 3 is a graphical representation of
these results. Appendix A includes graphs of the data recorded at each groundwater and
surface water gauge. Daily rainfall events recorded at the official weather station in
Carthage are included on each of the groundwater gauge plots.
Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Moore County. North Carolina, 1989.
3
GROUNDWATER MONITORING GAUGE LOCATIONS N
R-0210WM SALT Mitigation Site Wetland Restoration
Moore County, North Carolina
0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000
Feet S
Figure 2. Monitoring Gauge Location Map
4
Table 1. 2006 Hydrologic Monitoring Results
Monitoring Gauge >12.5% Actual % Success Dates
STGW2* (**) X 94.3 (100) March 23-November 7
STGW3* (**) X 94.3 (100) March 23-November 7
STGW5* X 50.4 (100) March 23-November 7
STGW6* X 100.0 (100) March 23-November 7
STGW8* X 17.4 (100) April 18 - May 27
STGW9* 2.2 (100)
STGW10* X 29.1 (100) March 23-May 28
STGW11* X 30.0 (100) August 31-November 7
STGW12* X 30.0 (100) August 31-November 7
STGW13* x 33.5 (100) August 30-November 7
STGW14* x 30.0 (100) August 30-November 7
* Gauges were reprogrammed in February 2006.
(**)STGW2 & STGW3 calibration points have been raised 6" above ground level due to
standing water in excess of 6".
2.3.2 Climatic Data
Figure 4 is a comparison of the 2006 monthly rainfall to the historical precipitation
(collected between 1976 and 2006) for Carthage, North Carolina. This comparison gives
an indication of how 2006 relates to historical data in terms of climate conditions. The NC
State Climate Office provided all local rainfall information.
This graph is used to indicate the general precipitation conditions for the surrounding area.
Overall, the 2006-year exhibited below average rainfall. The data obtained for the 2006-
year indicates that rainfall going into the beginning of the 2006 growing season (January to
March) as well as August, September and October tended to be on the low side of normal.
The rainfall for the months of April, May and July were normal while the rainfall for June and
November were well above normal. Overall, 2006 was an average rainfall year.
HYDROLOGIC MONITORING GAUGE RESULTS N
R-0210WM SALT Mitigation Site Wetland Restoration
Moore County, North Carolina
0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 6,000
Feet g
Figure 3. 2006 Hydrologic Monitoring Results Map
6
2.4 Conclusions
The 2006-year represents the first year of hydrologic monitoring for the Salt Mitigation Site.
For the 2006-year, ten of the eleven gauges recorded jurisdictional hydrology for greater
than 12.5% of the growing season. Groundwater Monitoring Gauge 9 is the only monitoring
gauge that has not been successful in 2006. Due to the location in a localized area.
Hydrologic monitoring has indicated that the site has met the success criteria for 2006.
EEP will continue monitoring the hydrology at the SALT Mitigation Site for the 2007
monitoring year.
c
O
Q.
M V
CL (D
L 0..
Ca A
O ?
C
O O
r f
J Z
Q
m
t
.L
u
LO
O
0
Z
[9
O
;
O
CD
O
CL
m
U7
LO
O
Q
ID
O
5
a?
a
0
r?
c
a?
o i
y Q)
= Q d
0
O
0
O N
Q '
Co
O
(6
CD
O
a?
LL
Lo
O
C
co

U
Z
rn
cu
c6
U
a
0
N
c
a)
L
a
O
ti
O
M
L
LL
00
N O co Lo v N O
(seg3ui) uoiwgdl38Jd
3.0 VEGETATION: SALT MITIGATION SITE
(YEAR 1 MONITORING)
3.1 Success Criteria
NCDOT will monitor the site for five years or until success criteria is met. A 320 stems per
acre survival criterion for planted seedlings will be used to determine success for the first
three years. The required survival criterion will decrease by 10% per year after the third
year of vegetation monitoring (i.e., for an expected 290 stems per acre for year 4, and 260
stems per acre for year 5). The number of plants of one species will not exceed 20% of the
total number of plants of all species planted.
3.2 Description of Species
The following species were planted in the Wetland Restoration Area:
Chamaecyparis thyoides, Atlantic White Cedar
Taxodium distichum, Baldcypress
Quercus laurifolia, Laurel Oak
Nyssa sylvatica var. biflora, Swamp Blackgum
Quercus nigra, Water Oak
Quercus phellos, Willow Oak
The following specie was planted in the Upland Restoration Area:
Pinus palustris, Longleaf Pine
9
3.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring
E
3 I a

d Y
ev ? Y Y d Q. F-
O a. O Q v v
`
m
a 0 H H
1 7 7 8 22 27 554
2 6 2 3 11 39 192
3 5 4 2 6 7 4 28 46 414
4 17 7 5 4 6 5 44 50 598
AVERAGE DENSITY 440
Site Notes: Vegetation Plot #2 had a low density (trees/acre) due to the landowner
conducting some mowing in this area.
3.4 Conclusions
Of the 24.5 acres of planting on this site, approximately 15.9 acres involved bottomland
hardwood tree planting. Approximately 8.6 acres of upland were planted with longleaf
pine. There were 4 vegetation-monitoring plots established throughout the bottomland
hardwood planting area. The 2006 vegetation monitoring of the site revealed an average
tree density of 440 trees per acre. This average is above the minimum success criteria of
320 trees per acre.
EEP will continue monitoring the vegetation at the SALT Mitigation Site for the 2007
monitoring year.
4.0 Overall Conclusions/Recommendations
The 2006-year represents the first year of hydrologic monitoring for the Salt Mitigation Site.
Ten of the eleven reinstalled monitoring gauges recorded jurisdictional hydrology for
100% of the growing season. The ten-groundwater restoration gauges indicated that
jurisdictional hydrology was met for wetland hydrology.
This stem count yielded an average tree density of 440 trees per acre. This average is
above the minimum success criteria of 320 trees per acre.
Per the letter from Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to NCDOT dated August 25,
2004 the EEP has accepted the transfer of all off-site mitigation projects. The EEP will be
responsible for fulfilling the remaining monitoring requirements and future remediation for
this project. This site will be transferred to EEP in February, 2007 for the remaining
monitoring.
10
APPENDIX A
GAUGE DATA GRAPHS
APPENDIX B
PHOTO AND VEGETATIO PLOT LOCATIONS,
SITE PHOTOS
SALT
j
S Y `
r ! _ i
Photo 1
i

4
S ..i360i1?.
?Li?`i:>e?i*?`,', is J'' - r ?.L - ? ?i ..-
Photo 3
F? {
fF ?f
Via
Photo 5
Photo 4
r
1.-• ,.tom `? - ?,.?,; ;?
4 - ?S
Photo 2
APPENDIX A
GROUNDWATER GAUGES
(•ui) uoiwl!di38Jd
LP LP uD Ln
"tr m m ni CV - 0 0
N
H
J
a
N
j
i
7-------
i
i
i o 0
0
'm j
I-- S m
w o to
90-AGN-LZ
9O-AGN-1 L
90-AGN-LO
9O-1Do-9Z
90-1D0-9 L
90-1x0-90
9oAGS-9Z
90?a S-$ L
90-daS-90
90-Bny-6Z
90-Bny-6 L
9 o-Bny-60
9o-I of O£
90-I nrOZ
9O-I n!`0 L
90-u of 0£ d
90-u nf`OZ c
90-u of O 4
go -Alen- c
9o-AEW- LZ
9o -+EW- L L
9o-AEW- L0
9O adv-LZ
9O adv-L L
9O adv- LO
9O aEW-ZZ
9O aSW-ZL
9O aEW-ZO
9O{I a?-OZ
9O{l eA-OL
9O-UU L£
9Q-uE(l-LZ
90-UWrl L
9o-UeN
o u, o u, o m o N o m o
(•ui) J8WMpun019 01 41doo
t'I
m
0
a
a?
j
s
0
U
m
li
0
m
m
m
C9
?I
o=
'I
(•ui) uoP lidl38Jd
In
v co m o O

C9
F-
N
H
J
Q
N
90-AON-LZ
90-AaN-L6
90-AON-LO
901D0-9Z
90-100-i36
90-PO-90
9O-1aS-9Z
90-daS-9l
90-daS-9O
90-6ny-6Z
90-6ny-fi 6
90-6ny-BO
9O-I nf`O£
90-I n"Z
90-1 of 0 l
9O-u n1`0£
90-u of OZ c
90-u of O 6
90 aeW- L £
90 -+eW- 6 Z
90-AeW- L l
90-AeW- ?0
90 Ady-6Z
90 ady- 6 6
90 ady-
9O aeW-ZZ
9O aeW-ZL
90 aeW-ZO
90-uef l£
90-uef lZ
90-uerL l
90-ueN?
O
V
t
0
a,
a
o=
0
tD
in
cD
m
a?
C?
c
I
O ?fi O Ln m m m m (O fm
(•ui) jawmpunoig of y;daa
(•ui) uailelfdi36]d
LP ln LP LP
V m m N N - - O O

0
f'-
N
H
J
N
90-AGN-LZ
90-AON-L L
90-AON-LO
901oO-9Z
90-1oO-9 L
90-1UO-90
go-des-13Z
go-des-13L
go-des-go
90-5ny-SZ o

90-5ny-S L

90-Bny-fi0 a

90-I ?f 0£ m
90-I nf`OZ
90-I nf`0 L U-

90-u nf`0£ y m
U
90-u nf`OZ c o
m
90-u nf`0 L
90-Alen-L£
90-AuW-LZ a

90-+EW-L L cu
CD
90??W-LO u
90 JdV-LZ

90Jdy-LL '
90Jdv- LO
90 JeIN-Zz
90 JEW-ZL
90JEW-ZO
90-A a=]-OZ
90{la=]-O L
90-uef`L£
90-uuf`LZ
90-uef`L L
90-URN
Ln O LD O u7 O N O m O
(•ui) JalehnpunoJ9 01 yldafl
(•ui) uoilelidi38Jd
?n LP u? LP
v c?i m Cq rv o a

0
H
N
E-
N
90-AGN-LZ
90-AaN-L 6

90-AGN-L0

90 3DO-9Z

so-WO-j3[
90-100-$0
a g0-des-SZ
0
w a,
90?aS-86
so-des-go
90-Bny-fiZ
rr g0-Bny-fib

- 90-finb-fi0

? V7

u
90-1 of 0£
- --_ 0
,_ 90-1 of 0Z

u, o
90-I of 0 L
90-unr-0£

90-unf`0Z c
90-u of 0 6
90-Aun- 4£
90-AEW-6Z
90-AeW-LL
90-Aun- LO
7 90 adb-?Z
i 90adb-LL
90 adb-60
-___.-..__
I _- 90agW-zz
90 a?W-Z6
90 a?'W-Z0
??
L 90-Qa?-OZ

90-uef l£
go-ueNZ
90-UPM I

90-ue?[
LD O Ln O N O m O
(•ui) jalermpunoig 01 yldap
O
s
N
LO
N
w
m
m
a?
rn
CD
c
(•ui) uoiie;ldi38Jd
lrn Wn Ln m
lT] m N N ?-- O O

0
H
N
F-
d
rn
m
90-AON-LZ
9 o-AQN-L L
n- - - ... 90-AoN-L0
L) 90-100-2Z
C:D
o so ??o-eo
o
o so gas-$Z
90 dab-g L
_r ' 90?aS-80 s
y? Q
o go-Bny-6Z
o
a, ? g0-6ny-fiL
90-6ny-80 s
a?
7i 90-1 n(`0£
?`- 90-1 ri 0Z
?r 90-1 of o L pp
w
go-u nf`0£ d
{ 9o-u ni -0Z c m
rn
I 9o-u of o L
go?Ew- L£
I N 90-+tEw-LZ a?
0 90-Aun-LL
't 9o ??W LD c
90adV-LZ I
9oady-LL
g0 ady-L0
-?~ .. ?. 90 jen-ZZ
?'? 9o aEW-ZL
? _ 90 J2w-Z0
?.? ?, ?, 90{Ia??Z
1 c c
o ° 90{Iaj-L
m a m 90-uRNE
IT) o N
I s0-uE(,-LZ
90-ula L L
1 so-uu f-L
O Lfi O
U7 O N O I? O
IT C? C?
(•ui) JaWnpun019 04 Wdap
(•ui) uoiwlldl38Jd
u, LP LP LP
V M M N N - - O O

C7
F-
N
H
J
d
N
90-ACIN-LZ
90-AaN-L L
90-AGN-L0
90-1D0-8Z
90 ADO-9 L
9NDO-90
90-daS-$Z
go-des-q[
90-daS-$0
90-6ny-6Z
90-6ny-6 L
90-6ny-60
90-I nf 0£
90-1 of 0Z
90-1 nf`0 L
90-u nf`0£ m
90-u nf`OZ c
g0-u of 0 L
90-AEW- L£
90-+EW-LZ
90-AeW-L L
90-AeW-LO
90 add!-LZ
90ady-LL
90 ady-LO
90 JUVY-zz
90 JEA-ZL
90 aUW-ZO
90-90=1-oz
90-9a:j-U L
90-uef`L£
90-uEf`LZ
90-uef-L L
90-usl%-L
0
If
t
Q
0
a?
a
a)
of
m,
m
a)
ns
C9
o?
Ln o u, o u, o uD o m
N N M M
(•uJ J8WmPunoi9 01 41dap
(•ui) uoilelidiaaJd
LP In u? In
v m m N cN 0 0
O
r
C9
r
H
J
Q
N
90-AON-LZ
90-AaN-L L
90-AGN-LO
90--100-9Z
90-100-$ L
90-100-80
90-des-SZ
9O-da S-$ L
90-daS-$0
9O-Bny-6Z
90-6ny-6 6
9O-&nV-60
90-I nFO£
90-1 of OZ
90-1 of 0 6
90-u of 0£
9O-u nr-OZ
9O-u nNO L
go -hen- Lc
9O-ARW-LZ
90 -AeW- L L
90-Alen-LO
90 ady-LZ
9O adv- L L
90 ady-LO
9O JUA-ZZ
90 AUA-ZL
90 auW-ZO
90{I a?:Oz
9(){laA-o L
90-UEf-L£
90-uef LZ
go-URN L
90-uleN
0
v
L
a
m
0
a
m
s
au
a
CV
U
m `r
r ?
lC UJ
0 0
rn
m
m
c?
a?
Ln o u, co u, o N o m
(•ui) JaWm pu11019 of 41da0
(•u} uoiwt!d!30]d
LP LP LP LP
v c?i m ni ?v ? ? 0 0
H
H
J
90-+aN-LZ
90-AGN-L l
T - - - -
i - 90-AGN-LO
/ 90-1?0-SZ
/ 90-1?0-g L

,? ?, c
0 o 90 ??0-80
90?1aS-8Z
w a, u, 90 daS-$L
l ? 90?1aS-B0
- 90-Bny-SZ
90-Bny-6 6
r - - 90-Bny-60
90-1 nf`0£
- 90-1 nf`OZ

co 90-1 nf`o
a 90-u nf'--OE
y 90-u nf`OZ
90-u nf`0 L
--
r -?-' 90-?t2W- 6E
?,n 90-AeIN- l Z

90-ARA- L L

\ U cr, 90-A?A- 60

j 90 ady-6Z
90adv-LL
90 adv-60
+. 90 JEW-?
90 aEW-Z6
i 90 aEW-ZO
? c
L ? V7
90-Qa??l

QJ O .I
90-u?f`6Z
90-uef`ll

90-ueN?
o uD o in o m N N m m
(•ui) jawepunoig o; 44dap
d
v
C
t
o
a.
a
a,
r,r
d
m
m
a,
.s
I
(•ui) uoiwlidioaJd
LP Ln un Ln
V m m N N o O
tV
r
'S
C9
H
N
H
J
fA
90-AoN-LZ
90-AGN-L L
90-AON-L0
90 l;)0-BZ
90-1?0-8 L
90-1?0-g0
90-daS-ez
90-daS-g L
go-des-go
90-finy-6Z
90-finy-6 L
90-finy-80
90-1 of 0£
90-I n 0Z
90-I of 0 L
90-unf`0£
90-u nf`0z
90-u of 0 L
90-+EW-L£
90-+EW-Lz
sO-AEW-L L
90 ?+EW-L0
90Jdy-LZ
90 adV- L L
90Jdy- L0
90 JEW-ZZ
90 JEW-ZL
90JEW-Z0
90{la=l-oz
90-1 a=j-oL
90-uef`L£
90-UeNz
90-uEf`-L L
90-usf`L
0
v
Q
0
a?
a
a?
0
rn
w
LD
w
O O
m
Q]
M
m
C?
c
U7 O ?f1 O LD CD N O m
(•ui) jawmpunoig of 41da0
I+7
r
C9
N
F-
a
W
up
•- O O
90-AON-LZ
9O-AaN-L L
- AL
90-AGN-LO
90-1?0-9Z
9O-10-8 L
90 ??0-80
90-?a5-SZ
90-daS-S L
90?aS-80
9O-6ny-6Z
9O-6ny-6 L
9O-6ny-fi0
9O-I nt`O£
9O-I of OZ
9O-I n 0 L
90-u np-OZ o
9O-u of o L
?- ?- 90 SEW- L £
1 90Z
90-AEW-L L
a 9O?EW-LO
{ 9O ady-LZ
9O ady- L L
9O Jdv-LO
---------------
9o JEW-zZ
'9oJEW-ZL
??`, 90JEW-ZO
T zn 9"a=j-oZ
90-q O L
m O N 90-UEP`L£
go-UL TI-1Z
90-UE(?LL
90-uE?4
u? o ors o uD N N m
(•ui) jawampunoig of 4ldap
t
Q
a?
0
.j
a
a?
0
w
m
m
a)
rn
n=
C9
Gr
(•ui) uop IdPOM
LP LP LP
=Y m m N N
(•ui) uoiw;idiaa]d
Iq LP m Ln
v m m CV N - 0 CO
C)
N
H
J
N
90-AGN-LZ
90-AON-L L
90-AQN-LO
90-100-9z
90-1oO-9 L
9O-1DO-90
9O-daS-9z
90-daS-9 L
90-daS-90
90-Bny-6Z
9O-tiny-f3 L
90-6ny-BO
9O-I nrOE
90-1 nrOZ
9O-I nr0 L
90-u nr0£
90-u nrOZ
90-u nrO L
90-AEW-LE
90-AEW-Lz
go -Am- L L
90-AEW- L0
9O adt!-LZ
90 ady-L L
90 ady-LO
90 jen-zz
9O aeW-zL
90 jen-z0
9O-q a=l-Oz
90-Qa=,O L
90-UErL£
90-UErLz
90-URM L
90-UeM
0
v
m
M
C
t
Q
0
a
m
rn
m
m
w
m
m
a)
ns
c
cu
G=
u, o Ln o u, o N o m
(•ui) jawmpunoig of y;dap