20100176 Ver 1_401 Application_20100310

..
HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
P.O. Box 400, 266 Old Coats Road
Lillington, NC 27546-0400
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
www.halowensoil.com
1 March 2010
Mr. James Shearn 2 0 1 0 0 1 7 6
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers PAID
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 - /;Zk =
Reference: Pre-Construction Notification
For Bailey's Creek Subdivision (proposed) MAR 2 2010
Wake County, North Carolina
DENR • WATER QuAUTy
Dear Shearn VYETUWDS AND STOR?fWATFA KWU
,
A Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) has been prepared for the above referenced
property, located at the termination of Anita Way, Wake County, North Carolina. The
residential subdivision plan proposes to impact 0.03 acre of non-riparian wetland for
construction of a dry pond. It appears this impact is allowed under Nationwide Permit 18. In
addition, the plan proposes to impact protected riparian buffers located in the Neuse River basin,
for which approval is sought from the NC Division of Water Quality. In total, the plan would
impact 0.03 acre of the Zone 1 buffer and 0.06 acre of the Zone 2 buffer.
A jurisdictional determination (JD) has not yet been made by the US Army Corps of
Engineers for this project. A JD report is attached to the PCN that contains a map of the
delineated wetlands and streams and supporting documentation.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
Krissina B. Newcomb
Project Environmental Scientist I
CC: 401 /WetlandsUnit
1650 Mail Service Center _ 5 Gop; e 5 0 -? PC ?J
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 7 1 copy of 5-brMw Q+Lr P (q n
Mr. George Bailey I aPP ?' c4?on -re e
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting
r -•.

2010 f 6
o?oF wArF9o?
1 R . ( > =a
O C
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information IM AL 19
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the

Corps:
®Section 404 Permit F-1 Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number ?$ or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Bailey's Creek Subdivision (proposed)
2t. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Cary
2d. Subdivision name: Bailey's Creek Subdivision (Proposed)
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
MAR 2 201
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: CCR PROPERTIES INC VVETUM S
3b. Deed Book and Page No. '12457 1258
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Joseph Bailey, president
3d. Street address: 201 EVANS ESTATES DR
3e. City, state, zip: CARY NC 27513-9629
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page I of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
0

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: HAL OWEN
5b. Business name
(if applicable): HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
5c. Street address: PO BOX 400
5d. City, state, zip: LILLINGTON, NC 27546
5e. Telephone no.: 910-893-8743
5f. Fax no.: 910-893-3594
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): PIN 0764293252
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.80819 Longitude: - 78.78916
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 14.9 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Black Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C, NSW
2c. River basin: NEUSE (8-HUC 03020201)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is forested/undeveloped. Land use in the vicinity is residential
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.06
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
180
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a single-family residential subdivision serviced by a network of roads and
utilities (sewer and water). The proposed impacts are more specifically due to installation of a sewer line, stormwater
management devices, public hiking trails, and grading and revegetation of riparian buffers.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Equipment to be utilized includes bulldozers, pans, trackhoes, and other typical construction equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
? Yes ®No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: Concurrent approval for JD and PCN sought.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Hal Owen & Associates
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ? Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
or Temporary
W1 ®P ? T MECHANIZED LAND Floodplain pool or ® Yes ® Corps 0
03
CLEARING AND FILL seep ? No ® DWQ .
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.03
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
or Temporary (INT)? other) (feet) feet)

S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? PEI T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
- Permanent
(P) or
Temporary 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then com lete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID 5b.

Proposed use or purpose of 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
number pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5L Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason for Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) impact Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
or Temporary required?
B1 ®P ? T sewer line UT-1 to Black Creek ®Neos 1128.80 836.00
B2 ®P ? T greenway/hiking
trail UT-1 to Black Creek ® Nos 97.60
B3 ®P ? T grading and
revegetation UT-2 to Black Creek ? Yes
® No 54.75
B4 ®P ? T grading and
revegetation UT-2 to Black Creek ? Yes
® No 184.17
B5 ®P ? T grading and
revegetation UT-2 to Black Creek ? Yes
® No 689.65
B6 ®P ? T grading and
revegetation UT-2 to Black Creek ? Yes
® No 5.60
B7 ® P ? T grading and
revegetation UT-2 to Black Creek El Yes
® No 0.02
6h. Total buffer impacts 1128.80 2588.01
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed sewer line (impact 131) was sited perpendicular to Black Creek, and connects to the existing sewer line at a
point where it is close to the creek, therefore minimizing the buffer impact. An aerial crossing is proposed to avoid stream
impacts.
The hiking trail has been designed to meet the existing hiking trail at a point where it is close to the outer edge of the Zone 2
buffer, therefore minimizing buffer impacts.
Topography is steep and rolling, making grading and revegetation of the Zone 2 buffer necessary for installation of stormwater
devices and building pads for lots. This should provide added stability to the slope to reduce erosion.
Lots have been designed so as not to contain wetlands or riparian buffers to prevent impacts.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
A tree protection fence shall be installed at the lot clearance line and shall be maintained until all site work is completed.
Silt fence shall be installed around stormwater wetlands and dry detention ponds.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ? Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
® Yes ? No
Comments: BMPs (stormwater wetlands) utilized
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 32%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater management for this site is accomplished by routing as much of the stormwater through stormwater wetlands
and dry retention basins as possible. There are two pairs of such, one located on each side of the project. The
stormwater wetlands are used primarily to reduce the nitrogen and phosporus output of the project. The dry retention
basins are used primarily to reduce the peak flow rate of stormwater from the project to comply with local requirements.
They do, however, provide some minor reductions in the nitrogen and phosporus outputs from the site.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Cary
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ® NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ® Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply [:1 HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply): ® Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ® Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This proposed subdivision contains 30 lots and maximizes use of the land. No additional lots or phases may be added.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Town of Cary public sewer.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ® Yes ? No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act Yes
? No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. El Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
US Fish and Wildlife county list and NC Natural Heritage Program Quad list.
NC NHP lists the species Rhus michauxii as an Endangered Species occurring in the Cary Quadrangle.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
hftp://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coralfims/viewer.htm
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
hftp://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/nrlist.htm
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfioodmaps.com
Hal Owen a d S /O
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Table of Figures
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic map (Cary Quadrangle)
Figure 3. NRCS Soil Survey (Wake County, Sheets 46 and 47)
Figure 4. Overall Site Plan
Figure 5. Impact Map (Impacts W1, 131, and 132)
Figure 6. Impact Map (Impacts 133, 134, 135, 136, and 137)
Figure 7. Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan
Figure 8. Sanitary Sewer Outfall Plan and Profile (Impact 131)
List of Attachments
NC Natural Heritage Program search results for Endangered and Threatened Species
Agent Authorization Letter
Request for USACE Jurisdictional Determination
Approved Stormwater Management Plan (titled "Drainage Report")
Hal Owen & Associates Inc. Bailey's Creek Subdivision (proposed)
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546 Pre-Construction Notification
Ph. [phone] www.halowensoil.com February 2010
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Hal Owen & Associates Inc. Bailey's Creek Subdivision (proposc(l)
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546 Pre-Construction Notification
Ph. [phone] www.halowensoil.com February 2010
http://imaps.co.wake.nc.us/imaps
Scale 1:24000
N
Hal Owen & Associates Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546
Ph. [phone] www.halowensoil.com
Quadrangle: Cary, NC (1993)
Bailey's Creek Subdivision (proposed)
Pre-Construction Notification
February 2010
Figure 2 USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
-P k
Scale 1:15840
Soil Survey of Wake County, North Carolina. Sheets 46 and 47

Hal Owen & Associates Inc. Bailey's Creek Subdivision (proposed)
PO Box 400, Lillington, NC 27546 Pre-Construction Notification
Ph. [phone] www.halowensoil.com February 2010
Figure 3 NRCS Soil Survey Map
doh
m
3
cd
G
V
klL
U
V
I I II

1
V

?o
Q.. 0
V
?
No Qv.
? y
4J O H O)

Nm ... R]

? a

Y
o
. cr,

„
ff
?
o
W m
w
W -'
M
LL ?
m U
En
U " c

?
o
U N

t0 (0 m
m o '
F- M m J
W O
N O Y
= o 0 0 ° 3 <
m
o Q
U) w M- Ln
H to m
F- O N O N l9
co ro n
>- O
Q m
U)
N n

x c m CO -? m

cn I YI
CU m z 4d
U

x '
N N N 3 5 d
IL
O
m b
W ?
Q

? 0

0
0
o
W
f
an
d
c
Al 0
u
:.m
- o
V o
c?
0
7 ?
r?
z#
I 3
(V-31Al
MW??lS n
Z
aNod ?a
e so•o)
-1Jbdwl ?ofq 13M j
Nb?1-3M \
9NllSjX3
a-
0
Q
a.
W
W
U
J
m
I
I
I ,
1
n. cu
\ O N
\ \ N CV
0 oz
\
I \ u (1)
Q
I `?0
I H.
O \
I oN
NO .
I ? \
I
I U
U Q]
CL CU
I a
H
cu LSl
/ p N /
/ N Ln /
co
/
co
to
FI u
V N
Ho
/ ?# pNMW?? ?S cwu
/ N?
Qm
H0
H r+
/ NO
/ 0 W I
/ N r
lP / '`r I
T /
to
/ # oNo d ?
CS
/
4-0
d -
i
i
U
F- Q
W O
W
_ O
U) L)
to
H O U)
S O
F- ti
O Q
Q Q
Q V- ICl Q
f to to a N,
x
=1 o . z z
in I I I O
F- " N M Z
U Q
Q W W W J
H N N N 3
® 0
0 1<
U
0
O 0a O ? % (m0 0
a
V
® m

Q ? Z U
?

t 3v'3??vrn

d
? m
In U m o ..
® B
o tL
C L
m

_ fNd7NV8 _
- 6002/BZ 6 031V0 S1N3NYq? *M30 ANYO 10 401 e00LTUN f
_
rNd/HVS _
_ -Z LL t 031V0 S1N3hW3 M3038 AWO 30 W01 6002 17 _
L
0V e00Z ZI t Q V0 S1N3"MD M31A3H ANVO 30 WA01 600E 9Z f I
NH0 wa NOISN3N 31tl0 oN
w °
z
0 2a w?UU°
W ET ZmWZV
ft 15 np.g
0
Z j V j Q a V W 2 w
aZ°?p 2?WW W
2<J°? mU??VI z
Ul?.l y=j 1-? J??pJ U
z?0= =00??
m r 1n
`Fnw<?a WW33,3a°WOr I
XO °FU <
O0Zzw wNZF N° wW
r°www„' z?WNU wm
UQ KO W<? o< Z a oo?3 z'"
I> VI
2R --
Z ??N UH ODW- Q ?F
w N?a wcoo awoJl QIo Z WO
W<Iq
-O Q U ¢
? z'idow F5 isa:O0 J °0
2aWaa W?W Oam Q 12
Z 0lz I O SF Oir1 w 3 <N
LLJ rONO Z
Q O<
Fa
N o<
N
VNnOaVO H.WOL4N?''AiNnOO 3)IVM
Auvo 'z °wo° z
ss3uaaV logrodd a ° 11 °
=_
iv a3lvniis n
0?0 F / CLj
)133aO SeGllb8
w
ak m ?
HOl M U m a < _
N ? N
z w
Md_ld _10UNOO N0I8089 aMd '3!DVNIVU(I 'JNI(IVH!D
0 r W
1 O r m w =A m
(A In 'z
Z 2 Z N O
OaW N mm m cl In7 2z
11 wz J U-mo as n° ?Q JaJ= a~ zom?S o{
K Q Z °Zaro 29 Za I z 1<-Za F<-?°Umm VJ V O[
1 O F_ joFw2 00 a a D VI Ow W]
LLJ _j 2.
11 !. U< WZaN NN Fr WN W°UO O?Z <2
° ° a Nm > Fo Wm? Z mr< o<gz2
1 w? = mFU? JQ OaW J
-Un UWO d
.? <WWwacFi v C-) LIJ
aw Zk 5 Z wN 20 z?rc ak1?Ij
a > tz VI oEol J? O? ZWW f=/1<2J wx m O,
v?o 11 wz p NO =mi Z 1,3MK Z ?c?i0
w? I Za z OCjQmQ ?Ow W w °O2 LL z7WN<ZO Z <°2
D Z N -
j ?0 3z?ZW ?oJ ?i? zQ°?3 Ww N oo<ZU
- 2o?w0 omw s m ` mo Wrak °<QO o?
::I LJ
?avziz
Pwww°N w°? a=? 0Ja w
1 x Inm Mtn n XO rlnU N z
r r a \ <
LLI
m
z?
1\ ? ? N
3a ?i
1 \ tXo
\? ''ll a I. Il II ?)I II `I I ?\ wv J ?
0 WW .tl 11 II _
I? Zm0^ r llc:?17 'il m43 r
a-WzU 1111,1 •tl m?Z
€0mF rId 33 wmi ?w
am?a s 3lC Hl II
N o O
m to 2 ? \ ? -_ _? _
z
00
0 V
W 6
i '• ? J a O rc w 2W O a?1Ja - - .F. :tJ- -
A / / \wx(n 00'?+W ,g pa0z __ _
X02
?,? h ''- ,i III 1 i_ I I L? - ? Y \r`! m V J
_r 11 // /? /•? 1 .</ }•?B? _TWIV•13a ...?? -????? \ \\1! ??
-?-,HI-1 - .? /i/ /• xa/ t / ? 91 w' ; ? -.8?" •F - _ 1 ?5? 1
? 83MAS
_ ro0 wn%'. I z/, Q ,Z o e<, AdV11NVS _ _ `?? \ - •.
x •o / »? - - I ?' .g ` 3 lily Aavo !0
Ta
I
J aQJ h°
G.
I NMOl ,Of Q'??
d N
8b
ss-
2: V)
_ 55 _r3
1N 03Stl3 QQ?
Q.
9je?! I ava o?r?i441.0
?.z
-- WI I/ /F'? mU WV`^1 y 111
w } 00, I i I. \ ° L r - r, ;_. 1 W53. ?tl3 ate 11 p' !\
O
Zw 2 N / I' I _ f ?\
O°- OWN A 0 Z G? -
a?jmF ?wJ / l I ?.. ??wl - ??R N ? 6•??V^??I II/ i%.?h ?.?
a?mZz 0{E5V•
/
N w /.. ??? . .? I F J I - ._' - A1N pR1VP Coot, -
r 2 AN
N m o O
WS3 S?Pl - 8 _w M 1 Y coy. wt?- '/. •cwi; w -
• 1- z
-\ lna
----- ???..+ o 'Nr mb'?...?- " - NwLL. ?a3?dlt8- iN3N35d3 ts?'e $ '-r' .1 Z./.. pet `/
i NWi? w. .g+m, f .,V: ?dAl 5$3a0 V:91 'imp ... ;.....:N \ '.'
od -1 } IAA's \ fit'
r y rN \ _.
HO110 1lIS mac- ' / \ L'
Hallorl_IS \ _ - --?\ -C m d oo 4
u / ?m A
II i1 xv Tf aE Z" \ 1 .. i? /\4 n .. ne3'm I N 1
- elm ?
LI I I i xe - Ln v \\ ¢ n /
a
>a 41 / / << \ J C C / \<
nz
\n />
1 I I I1, 1 M r //'; .._ \< ! I I ?? \ zo 14
I m
I ? \ 1
f
t o < x I 1 c-
?, /
<
Nn)
83.33f1B I \ m tiP\????? 1 o I I\ ; ^ - ox ? -?7??S?b?33 , /? Jd Qo !/
,oz j-
rv m b'. / ?? 30VW3Sy3
00
'1WS3 ?? I1 ;b?yq, I\ ?m?- / a ???._ Qd,?• 1 --b _ l l (?J /// / ?\et
0'j .S I I, .1f %'lb
1SIX3 I
•`I ? by1? c???O NW / m< .. oy.' ? ° +S , .ice . ?: ?_- -?: ? ..,,// /? 1 ;// // , r-
?r, ??h(?d smwz_ _ CO / ?.Nr.
\ 3 00 ?op20r HLO ?i Vin: 1 ?---ol * r <\\ 0,0 /// /n Il
-I rn yr'., y+r lTb?/ // Ina / ° N x 1 I \ / /` 'pI I
a"
?I,\ - - -o ?s _ fef "' i '•?.ry '?0 -r ."•ro j - y? / % < a Y^?xU : 11? - -i
Ir :aa,?. _ - x F8b 8o I -1 I // 1' / v U 1 t,
i 1
0 -
Z _ U q u I
-__ - - \ \ ???•?.. y3o-Q?.4 ? ?j.. 1.02. :? I ? ' 1 /? o ? I .;,1 4 L
1
1
11.1
1 ,
z cy uu
m \ '
:b \
?.? - ?? -- \ Ot r ^ 00+6
°ao _ I aW Na °a?m I ,°,a °m `v
wxvl za•o._ ...? _ `. ?l 1 ,,... ormz? 0?? I _ a? Nw?
z- uo,<m
< Oz
W?roTmi F?zF W I uwz T
< ?4 `\\\ If lJNNd11? wao? L\ Q ww ?? 1 I
` LZ! I?yII w 22 ZZ? -
\ pjW O? °
\ I? N - ?v W W W
m OZ O
:2 1, ana °z c cYi z 3 ? -
Y z
W. 00
w WRI I
wozzm
/ VdUln
/ a
ZOPM
NnOO 3)IVM
'
_ ,U
VNrK)UVO HIWM
z w z
a g "
" 6
883HOOV logroNd o Z

)133HO SAYING
U
?
LOA m x i=
Q; N
' Z
0
- 3 3ll?Odd ONVd NVId
T
m U C d LL
y ql
m
fN Irv8
fx HIB
f ¢Y'
NHJ NMO
31Y0 Slx3°IOJ x3NJx xWJ !0 x.01
3IV0 S1x31•XOJ x3Y.3tl lWJ ]D IMOl
=LEI
L 1 031Y0 SlN31p°J M7Y1ltl 11nJ 10 xx01
600 NOISW3i1
600i )[ EI
!WL G [
6002 9 C
31V0
C
L
1
'?N
4N? ' N ?J
1 Y 1 -nV= O a3M38 AU Y SIN Y S
o
_
i5
w
0
U
a
o?
ww
w
wv=
z
"
to
z?
ZUZZ
UO
x
ZZ<"
O<
Fa
S<
U I 8
U)
_U
x
?d A
C7
4j li A
- -
r ? . u A
00
a
t-N
v o Jas
? 'lrls vd a _ '
dwAlaa D` dh
I ?B
I 0'I 0 A ?
I II ? E E MT.? ii
o? 20 iOVfN '',QP bAR?'
LL', i ? At1liARY R
, N RSE E T ,,'
EASE T.
- `1 1
36?: Tom
I 1 $$ _
of CARP 1 8 I .
SANITARY
8ElYER ' S? "? ?'"- ?
h
gSEGMENT L
- X E OVIN M' _
00
t- o 55 -??
S

Cam/
T
O
d d
W
LL l?
T
,^^a n?
(v JJ `_
T
I

\
-- ?
3 l '90'L4 l V S i V 133 S
Z4Z V S. 3 41 no a S ) no AN
9 H S Z IB NON NI ANI

Q
¢

I

I U
Z o
Z
o
w
A
3l
£ O1 ! I
SI

6
H S i n NI
a <
I I j J
? ? :n om
I
'I

? r
' ? r m °no6
o z £ n 3 1 y? i
0 S l'4 N I NI
'tli0 '.9 L H S I 8' f9£ n o ANI ,

i v
I
1 0 > ''.
.

k4 - E

lo loll

•
(
S
I NI
o
o +1 15
V 1
i
oi
- 4' S )10 1 A I' 3
- t 3 IIW S SIX3 ) N a
do, E D E (1 0 ) I A I' 3
1
as
V O DO 0 d- N O 00 c0 "t N O 00 W d' N O 00 W d N O 00 O't N O DO O d N O 00 O ? N O
O O O O O O) O) 06 0) O) 00 00 [O 00 0o M^., .?i .^i rn.. tO frOi O to cD ? In 1f1 In N d d ? ? dM M M M M M M M M M] M N] 17
ZI

1W'F T IJ;W-Lhti) - 3?,C 11'
? D D
a o?
v k
c c
<aw

D
0
N
?W
++ J o
0'
f
LAS/? ,
2
a
00
M
0
a
N
O
0
O CO O ? N O 00 60 ? N O 00 c0 ? N O 00 c0 d N O au LD ? N O [O O d' N O 00 07 d N Off'
0 0 0 0 o rn rn rn m rn ao co ao ao ro ? r ? r r co m m? o In In u3 In In a??? ar
? d' ? ? d t ? ? M ? M M M M r7 r7 f7 r7 M fo r7 M M f7 ? f7 r7 M M M M f7 M M M M
N
a
a
o ?N
o? F?
Ow w?
z
2 QF Z UQ
O
F ?w <u?i
Iwi) j a O ??it Z
f "? ? 7w
cT3 Qm w ?' Z u
O g? U Fy
w " a? J ww
N < ?m = 3coJ
Q <
z w" a zw
o z- 2
o wig a a<
0 a gw aw ??
a? ¢ Oz
N ?i a vi
u
a?
O?

=I J J J J J J A .J J JI -j J? J) JI J J J
N
7
p m m m m m m
O
p C C
N C
m C E C U U U U C C C U
" V
6 C
N C
N C
0 m m O O O O m m N O O m
7
U 7
U 7
U 7
U 7
U 3
U N
2 m
2 y
Z N
= 7
U 7
U 3
U N
= U
2 7
U 7
U 7
U

m m m m m to m m m m m m m m m m m m
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
I L C
z
U
U
a
z
U
z
Cl)
2t
U)
NN
I.L
U
L-
M
N
cu
C?
a
z
z
v
(a
'c
Q
N
cc
W
OD
C
(0
cc
3
U
to
w>
U CV)
'C
7
E
c o
'(n U
ca
N Z
C ch
N co
a 'C
W Q
N
N ?
c ?
L •?
L
N ?
c"nl ail z z z
N co 0 co
co - N ('7 to = N N N N as m m M
f` to
7
w m N 0 m m m m 0 0 m m 0 m m a)
U C C C C c c C C C C c c U C C C
(n O O O O O O O O O O O (n O O
U- z z z O z z z z z z z z w (L z z O
d to
0 m 0 a a a a a a a U
w F- F- z z z w w w w w w N w O F- (n co
J
a
Z y a r 3 v
tOA m m .? C U 2 m Y
E T m (9 ?6 m E L
p a t 7 L U c C O a M (n
O L? m c m? T N O (? y c v
U d J cu c > L ftm66 N C p) -0 m
m -x 'O a 7 O O O L a) (D
U a) v U C
'« a •` m r- co C m W N
N (n N C C c O O` m 12 •O V U 32
7 m
W, U zo :2 } Q C d = w 5 co
m (i
y
m
-O
c = E m m
?c CO o = Q co
z Z3
ca :3
N" O m m a m O ° U T G m co
O co
Z3 Z
co
E t`a
0 0 0 co
? Q ca m ca = Z
ca y C -? M U N O' t U to U j
U h
U Q to J--
Q , h t m G y C to O a
h E N tea) ?a U ?_ U_ "' U G c
(L (
J 7 Q m U U J ?? Q = = .
c c c C c c c c
p N N a) m m m m m m m fa
m m N Z' ?-l Z? n d M d a a m a? a? m m
? .n .n` > j 0 t`a `m `m t`a m `m t_`a m m m m m
$ m- o- a? m m m m >> 3 5>>? o m a m m ?-
f4 E t of vpi w a ai uvi uvi .E .E
'c m o m o m o m m m m m m m m a`) c c a`) 'c a? 'c
CQ sQ sQ z0 ZU z0 > > > > > > > > >Q >Q >Q >Q
w
N
O
N O
r
L ^`
N v
O
Mo
M N
O M
LL L
(Sf N
LL
v?
LL
c
O CU
.O
CL C: cn
OOa)
N -0 O
(?'a E U
M L o
O
M C:
-0 N O
a am
= U
z " a
z in w
'RT
0
o_
O
N
N
O
hAL UWtN
ry
2
Property Description
00 Proj ect Name:
Address:
0
z PIN
County:
Owner Information
Name:
Mailing Address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone #:
AGENT AIJT140RIZATION LETTER
Bailey's Creek Subdivision (proposed)
Anita Way, Cary NC
PIN 0764293252
Wake
CCR Properties, Inc.
201 Evans Estates Drive
Cary, NC 27513
Anulicant Information (if different from owner
Name:
Mailing Address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone #.:
The undeisigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do
hereby authorize Mr. Hal Owen of Vial Owen & Associates, Inc. to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance
of jurisdictional determinations, CWA Section 401 and 404 permits and
certifications, and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge,
G7
z
Q
t-
z
0
v
w
J
Q
Q
O
O
N
Authorized Signature
(Please print name:
Title
Date
Date
N
C11
QJ
LL
HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
P.O. Box 400, 266 Old Coats Road
Lillington, NC 27546-0400
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
www.halowensoil.com
24 February 2010
Mr. James Shearn
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Reference: Request for Jurisdictional Determination
Bailey's Creek Subdivision (proposed)
Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Shearn
A wetland and stream delineation has been conducted for the above referenced property,
which is located at the termination of Anita Way, -unship, Wake County, North Carolina. All
wetland determinations were made in accordance with the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual. The property perimeter was walked and several traverses were
conducted across the interior of the subject site. An area that meets the required criteria for
wetlands was observed and delineated, as shown in Figure 1, and two streams were identified. A
set of Wetland Determination Forms and a Jurisdictional Determination (JD) Form have been
completed and are enclosed for your use. Additional supporting documentation collected and
included in this report:
• Agent Authorization, signed by owner
• Vicinity Map (Figure 2)
• Wake County GIS map showing property boundaries and aerial photography (Figure 3)
• Map from NC Floodplain Mapping Information Systems (Figure 4)
• USGS 7.5 Minute topographic map, Cary Quadrangle (Figure 5)
• NRCS Soil Survey map (Figure 6)
• USFWS National Wetland Inventory map (Figure 7)
• Photographs taken at site (Figure 8)
I trust that this provides all the information that you require to approve the jurisdictional
determination. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to
contact me at your convenience.
CC: NC Division of Water Quality
Mr. George Bailey
Sincerely,
?'?/Lt00NAot ? • IVBW?D"??..
Krissina B. Newcomb
Project Environmental Scientist I
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting
HAL OWEN
N
a
Property Description
Project Name:
Address:
0
z PIN #:
County:
Owner Information
Name:
Mailing Address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone #:
AGrENT AUT1101UZATION LETTER
Bailey's Creek Subdivision (proposed)
Anita Way, Cary NC
PIN 0764293252
Wake
CCR Properties, Inc.
201 Evans Estates Drive
Cary, NC 27513
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
Name:
Mailing Address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone #.:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do
hereby authorize Mr. Hal Owen of Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the pro cessing, issuance. and acceptance
of jurisdictional determinations, CWA Section 401 and 404 permits and
certifications, and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge,
z
U
Q
Z
U
W
Q
0
0
ry
Authorized Signature
(Please print narne:
Title
Date
Date
N
a?
LL
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The site is located at 160 Anita Way, adjacent to Evans
Subdivision off of Evans Road, Cary NC. An unnamed tributary to Crabtree Creek crosses the southeastern corner of the property and
another unnamed tributary to Crabtree Creek crosses the northwestern corner.
State:NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Cary
Center coordinates of site (]at/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.80819° N. Long. 78.78916` W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Crabtree Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: Neuse
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Upper Neuse (03020201)
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
? Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
? Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There A re no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
? Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
? Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There?Are "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
? TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Z Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
? Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
? Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 1001inear feet: 10 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.06 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: 1987 Delineation Manual
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable) :3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
Z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F.
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section IILB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbodya is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 50 acres
Drainage area: 480 acres
Average annual rainfall: 46.07 inches
Average annual snowfall: 3.9 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
? Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 20-25 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are I (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 10-15 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5: Project waters flow to Black Creek to Crabtree Creek to the Neuse River..
Tributary stream order, if known:
' Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
? Artificial (man-made). Explain:
? Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 10 feet
Average depth: 2 feet
Average side slopes: Ztl.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
? Silts ® Sands ? Concrete
® Cobbles ® Gravel ? Muck
® Bedrock ? Vegetation. Type/% cover:
? Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: stable.
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: yes.
Tributary geometry: Meandering
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 2 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Pick List
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick List
Describe flow regime: flow is perennial.
Other information on duration and volume: perennial stream.
Surface flow is: Confined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWMe (check all indicators that apply):
? clear, natural line impressed on the bank ?
® changes in the character of soil
? shelving ?
? vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away ?
® sediment deposition
? water staining ?
? other (list):
F-1 Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
? High Tide Line indicated by:
? oil or scum line along shore objects
? fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
? physical markings/characteristics
? tidal gauges
? other (list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
? survey to available datum;
? physical markings;
? vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: Water is clear. Watershed is mostly forested and residential. A sewer line runs parallel to Black Creek.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): Hardwood forest, >100ft wide.
? Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size:0.06 acres
Wetland type. Explain: Floodplain pool.
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Ephemeral flow. Explain: Wetland does not exhibit characteristics of prolonged inundation. and hydric soils are
not present between wetland and ? rrek.
Surface flow is: Discrete
Characteristic ,
Subsurface flow: Pick List Explain findings:
? Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
? Directly abutting
® Not directly abutting
® Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: The wetland is separated from Black Creek by a paved
walkway with a pipe underneath to allow surface water to flow from wetland to creek..
? Ecological connection. Explain:
? Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are 20-25 river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 10-15 aerial (straiehtl miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Wetland to navigable waters.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the 100 - 500-year Foodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
® Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
? Habitat for:
? Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
? Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
? Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
? Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( ) acres in total arc being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
I. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D: Wetland is located on floodplain of perennial stream. A pipe under the walkway provides a hydrologic connection
between the wetland and stream and would allow the transfer of chemical and biological material..
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
? TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
? Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Visual observation of year round flow.
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 100 linear feet 10 width (ft).
Q Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
[ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
? Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
? Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
[] Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.06 acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters!
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
? Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):'s
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
? from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
? which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
? Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
? Other factors. Explain:
'See Footnote # 3.
To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Ad Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
? Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
? Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
? If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
? Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
? Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
? Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
? Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
? Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
? Lakes/ponds: acres.
? Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
? Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
? Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
? Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
? Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
? Corps navigable waters' study:
? U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
? USGS NHD data.
? USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
? U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:7.5 Minute Series, Cary Quadrangle.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:Wake Coutny, Sheets 46 and 47.
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
[j State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps:
? 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
? Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):2005 orthophoto Wake County.
or ® Other (Name & Date): photographs taken at site by investigator, Feb 2010.
? Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
? Applicable/supporting case law:
? Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, ANC.
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. Project Name: Figure 1
PO Box 400, Lillington NC 27546 Bailey's Creek Subdivision Wetland Delineation Sketch
PH [phone]/ FX 893-3594 (proposed
www.halowensoil.com
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting
b Locations of photographs (Figure 8)
* Locations of Wetland Determination Forms
HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Not to scale
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. Project Name: Fibure 2
PO Box 400, Lillington NC 275 16
PH [phone]/ FX 893-3594 Bailey's Creek Subdivision VicinityV 1>>
www.halowensoil.com (proposed
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting
HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington NC 27546
PH [phone]/ FX 893-3594
www.halowensoil.com
Project Mame:
Bailey's Creek Subdivision
(proposed)
2005 Color Orthos:
County-wide
Figure 3
Wake County GIS Nvi;i1
aerial photography
Into rstates/Highways
Major Roach
t Streets
F-I Parcels
_7
i
Soil Science lnvestit,Aions • Wetland Delineations, PernJaing, and C nsulting
Not to scale
http://imaDs.co.wake.nc.us
HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, iNC.
www.ncfloodmaps.com
DFIRM panel 0764
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington NC 27546
PH [phone]/ FX 893-3594
www.halowensoil.com
Project Name: 4
Bailey's Creek Subdivision NC Flood!, I? i? Mapp l.,
(proposed)
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consu;rng
HAL OWEN & ASSGC .RTES, INC.
Scale 1:24000
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington NC 27546
PH [phone]/ FX 893-3594
www.halowensoil.coni
Quadrangle: Cary, NC (1993)
Project Name:
Bailey's Creck Subdivision
(proposed)
.W
y
Figure
USGS 7.,- Iv' i nute
,opograpi:ic .nap
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Con_ !t
HAL OWEN & ASSOCATES.: NC.
>kG
CtH
Scale 1:15840
Soil Survey of Wake County, North Carolina. Sheets 46 and 47
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. Project Name: Figure
PO Box 400, Lillington NC 27546 Bailey's Creek Subdivision NRCS Soil S LL'\ ev Map
PH [phone]/ FX 893-3594
www.halowensoil.com (proposed)
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting
HAL OWEN & ASSOC,.'iTES, iNC.

?Y

Ali.
5
%
C(ti-re-^
i
Aid X
North
Carolina
X Cary

?^ 1747 _ ? `_

4-1U
_4 tf
C-i
US Fish and Wildlife National Wetland Inventory Map
http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html
not to scale
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington NC 27546
PH [phone]/ FX 893-3594
www.halowensoil.coin
Project Name:
Bailey's Creek Subdivision
(proposed)
Legend
Ohio_ Wet.,scan
r
Ow of range
N Interstate
Major Roads
Other Nora
IrlerStLte
s'-we nlanway
;i USnlg'.1way
Roads
N, C?t?ss
USGS Ctiad Inday 24K
Lower 48 Wetland! Pofyyurte
,. Eetuanre and Marne Goapwater
W EeWnrina no Marina wollard
F•va.walor Eme,yonl Worland
I resnwatr F areaMd'Shrub WetlarN
- F opiwata! mond
Lake
othor
N +rcn ne
I *war 48 Available Wetland Data
Nor-010,b1
n;ye.r,
No oa^.a
Scan
NH6 Streams
Counties 104K
O States 100K
South America
-- North Amence
Figure 7
USFWS National
Wetland Inventory Map
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting
HAL OWEN & ASSOC. `\,TES. INC.
Photograph
Photograph B. View of Wetland

inR west.

Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. Project Name: 1•i ,°
PO Box 400, Lillin- ton NC 27546 Bailey's Creek Subdivision
PH [phone]/ PX 893-3594 (proposed)
www.halowensoil.com
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and C1 1isU,ili,Z
HALO YEN & TES., NC.
Photograph C. e?? of pips un.ier ir.xing trail providing r???,r?
wetland and U l 131ack Creek-.
See Figure 1 for photograph locations

a
Hal Owen & Ay,?:)ciates, In,:. Project Name: j +'_zt Bb
PO Box 400, Lillin! Lon NC 27546 Bailey's Creek Subdivision Ph` tc
PH [phone] FX 893-3594
www.halowensoil.com (proposed)
_ I
Soil ience L,,,;t g.1tions * Wetland )L-lineations, i'e';