The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20160981 Ver 2_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20201012ID#* 20160981 Version* 2 Select Reviewer:* Katie Merritt Initial Review Completed Date 10/13/2020 Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/12/2020 Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No Type of Mitigation Project:* r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer r- Nutrient Offset (Select all that apply) Project Contact Information Contact Name:* Jamey McEachran Project Information .................................................................................................................................................................. ID#:* 20160981 Existing IDY Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank Project Name: Uale Buffer Mitigation Site County: Johnston Document Information Email Address:* jameyred@gmail.com Version: *2 Existing Version Mitigation Document Type:* Mitigation Monitoring Report File Upload: Uz7le Bank Parcel MY2 Report.pdf 6.18MB Rease upload only one RDFof the conplete file that needs to be subnitted... Signature Print Name:* Jamey McEachran Signature:* Bank Parcel Development Plan Year 2 Monitoring Report Uzzle Buffer Mitigation Site DWR Project # 2016-0981v2 Johnston County, North Carolina Neuse River Basin HUC 03020201 Prepared By: rtm- s Bank Sponsor: EBX-Neuse I, LLC, An entity of Resource Environmental Solutions 3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27612 919-829-9909 October 2020 Table of Contents 1.0 Project Summary..................................................................................... 1.1 Project Location and Description..................................................... 1.2 Project Success Criteria................................................................... 1.3 Project Components......................................................................... 1.4 Riparian Enhancement Approach .................................................... 1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions ............................................. 1.6 Year 1 Monitoring Performance...................................................... 2.0 Methods.................................................................................................. 3.0 Reference................................................................................................ Appendix A: Site Maps Figure 1: Site Location Map Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data Table 2: Plant Species Summary Table 3: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table Table 4: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets .............................................. 1 .............................................. 1 .............................................. 2 .............................................. 2 .............................................. 3 .............................................. 4 .............................................. 4 .............................................. 4 .............................................. 5 n 1.0 Project Summary 1.1 Project Location and Description EBX—Neuse I, LLC (EBX), an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide this Bank Parcel Development Monitoring Report for the Uzzle Riparian Buffer Mitigation Bank (Parcel). This Parcel was built to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to development within the Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC — 03020201) (Figure 1). This Parcel is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and the RES Poplar Creek Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI), made and entered into by EBX-Neuse I, LLC acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality -Division of Water Resources (DWR). The BPDP has also been constructed in concurrence with Uzzle Stream Mitigation Site in the Neu -Con Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank (SAW# 2016-01973). The mitigation plan for the Uzzle Stream Mitigation Bank was approved by Interagency Review Team (IRT) in February 2019. The Uzzle Parcel is located in Johnston County approximately six miles southeast of Clayton, North Carolina. The Parcel is located within Neuse River Basin USGS 14-digit HUC 03020201100040, a Targeted Local Watershed, and DWR Subbasin Number 03-04-02. To access the Parcel head West on NC 70 from the Town of Wilson Mills and turn left onto Meta Drive. The Parcel is accessible from the end of Meta Drive. The coordinates of the site are 35.585186 N,-78.393553 W. The easement is separated by an agricultural crossing, dividing the site into an upper and lower portion. The upper portion of the project includes reaches LP1, LP2, LP3, LP4, and LP5. The lower portion of the project includes reaches LP5, LP6, and LP7. The overall drainage area of the Parcel is approximately 2.05 miles squared. Little Poplar Creek (LP1, LP2, LP4, LP5, and LP7) is a perennial stream channel and the two unnamed tributaries (LP3 and LP6) have been classified as intermittent and confirmed by DWR staff Furthermore, it was confirmed, by DWR staff, that all riparian areas adjacent to streams associated with this proposed bank have active cattle grazing. Stream identifications and buffer viability assessments were performed by the DWR at the January 13, 2017 site visit. For purposes of the Uzzle Riparian Buffer Bank, the Parcel involved enhancing riparian buffers and other riparian areas adjacent to mitigated streams onsite. Of the 27.27 acres protected in the conservation easement, 13.45 acres are enhanced by the removal of cattle from the streams and riparian areas for Neuse riparian buffer credit only. The BPDP generates credit within the 20-30 foot range, 0-50 foot and 151-200 foot buffer from the proposed top of bank. Majority of the project streams have a riparian buffer of at least 50 feet, excluding crossings and a portion of LP5 and LP6 due to the parallel gas -line easement. Credit within the 51-150 foot buffer zone was claimed for additional stream credit in the Uzzle Stream Mitigation Bank. There is no overlap in the buffer bank credit areas and the buffer for stream credit areas. The stream credit area is solely used for the generation of stream mitigation credits and is not used for the generation of any other credit. Also, riparian buffer enhancement credits generated on this Bank Parcel are allowed pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6) but are not used to generate nutrient offset credits. Uzzle Buffer 1 Year 2 Monitoring Report Mitigation Site October 2020 1.2 Project .Success Criteria Annual vegetation monitoring is to occur each year for a minimum of five (5) years and is to be conducted during the fall season with the first year occurring at least 5 months from initial planting. As part of the stream mitigation plan 3.6 acres were planted and four monitoring plots were installed a minimum of 100 in in size. These plots cover at least two percent of the planted mitigation area for the Stream Mitigation Bank. All four plots are within the riparian buffer that are measuring success of both the stream mitigation and the buffer riparian area. Data for the plots is to be provided in the Monitoring reports, as a courtesy to the DWR. The following data is to be recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. All stems in plots are to be flagged with flagging tape. Photos are to be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports. Visual inspections and photos are to be taken to ensure that enhancement areas are being maintained and compliant. The measures of vegetative success for the parcel are based on the Uzzle Stream Mitigation Plan (Action ID #SAW-2016- 01973). Invasive and noxious species are to be monitored and controlled so that none become dominant or alter the desired community structure of the site. A visual assessment of the cattle exclusion areas within the conservation easement is to be performed each year with all observations provided in the annual monitoring reports, to confirm: • Fencing is in good condition throughout the site; • no cattle access within the conservation easement area; • no encroachment has occurred; • diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement area; and • there has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would negatively affect the functioning of the buffer. RES is to monitor the stream mitigation bank for a minimum of seven years, or until IRT approval. Therefore, all plots will be monitored in accordance with the monitoring protocol in the Uzzle Stream Mitigation Plan. 1.3 Project Components This Bank generates approximately 6.17 acres (268,834.036 fc) of buffer enhancement credits. The approximately 0.21 acre decrease in creditable area following the as -built was due to the removal of buffer areas less than 20 feet from the top of bank. The riparian buffer mitigation credits generated service Neuse buffer impacts within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin, excluding the Fall Lake Watershed. The Sponsor is to maintain one credit ledger. The one ledger shall account for buffer enhancement credits. All mitigation credit assets shall be shown on this credit ledger. The total potential mitigation credits that the Uzzle Bank generates are summarized below. Uzzle Buffer 2 Year 2 Monitoring Report Mitigation Site October 2020 Table 1. Riparian Buffer Credit Riparian Buffer Credit Credit Riparian Credit Mitigation Type Existing Used Per Ratio % Full Mitigation Assets Zone Type Acreage Acreage Acre Credit (ftZ) 20-29' Buanan Enhancement .09 .09 43,560 2:1 75% 1,407.750 ftZ (0.03 ac) 0-50' Buanan Enhancement 12.08 12.08 43,560 2:1 100% 255,773.500 ftZ (5.87 ac) 151-200' Buanan Enhancement 1.58 1.58 43,560 2:1 33% 11,652.795 ftZ (0.27 ac) 268,834.036 It' (6.172 ac) Total Enhancements 13.45 includes ratios & reductions 1.4 Riparian Enhancement Approach Preparation of the Parcel involved spraying exotic invasive species, contoured ripping, seeding, and planting. Livestock were completely removed from Parcel, in perpetuity by way of conservation easement and installation of fencing. After construction activities, the subsoil was scarified, and any compaction was deep tilled before the topsoil was placed back over the site. Any topsoil that was removed during construction was stockpiled and placed over the site during final soil preparation. This process provides favorable soil conditions for plant growth. Bare root plantings and live stakes were planted according to the planting plan. Enhancement occurred in areas of grazing adjacent to the stream in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6). Where livestock was present, RES installed cattle exclusion fencing to prohibit access to riparian areas and their associated streams. All fencing was installed to NRCS specifications. Riparian enhancement adjacent to streams was approved by the DWR in their Buffer Viability letter dated January 13, 2017. All enhancement activities began from the tops of the stream banks and extended outward a maximum of 200 feet perpendicular to the stream channel where possible pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015). It is important to note that areas along all reaches, between the 50- 150-foot buffer width zone, within the project was used to generate additional stream credit for the Uzzle Stream Mitigation Bank. This area is solely being used for the generation of stream mitigation credits and is not be used for the generation of any other credit. Buffer crediting is generated from the 0-50 foot and 151-200-foot buffer width zones, with a small area of credit being generated within the 20-30-foot buffer zone due to project limitation with a gas line easement. Buffer enhancement can only generate buffer mitigation credit and is not transferrable into nutrient offset credits. All riparian enhancement activities commenced in concurrence with the stream mitigation activities and not before. Stream restoration activities based on the design approach included meandering the proposed channel within the natural valley, backfilling the existing stream channel, and reconnecting a new channel to its floodplain. Diffuse flow is to be maintained throughout the mitigated riparian areas. Uzzle Buffer 3 Year 2 Monitoring Report Mitigation Site October 2020 1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions Revegetation of the site included treating invasive species and planting native hardwood bare root trees in areas where stream restoration occurred. Prior to planting, RES prepped the site by spraying and ripping that section of the easement. Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp is the target community type and was used for all areas within the project. The community is defined by Schafale (2012). The planting of bare root trees occurred in May 2019. Deviations from the initial planting plan were due to bare root availability. A list of the planted species can be found in Table 2. Stream construction activities were completed in May 2019. RES submitted a Stream As -Built Report in July 2019 to USACE and conducted a site visit in July 2019 with no comments. The site was constructed in accordance with the Approved Mitigation Plan and associated permits. RES acquired 404 (SAW-2016- 01973), 401(DWR # 2016-0981), and NPDES Erosion and Sediment Control Plan QC# 19-012-P) Permits. The conservation easement is marked every 150-200 feet with North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation signs attached to either fences or t-posts. A fence was installed around the entire easement as livestock were present throughout. 1.6 Year 2 Monitoring Performance The Uzzle Year 2 Monitoring (MY2) activities were completed in September 2020. All MY2 data is present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meet vegetation and stream interim success criteria. Monitoring of the four permanent vegetation plots was completed during September 2020. Vegetation tables and transect data are in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C. MY2 monitoring data indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 486 to 647 planted stems per acre with a mean of 567 planted stems per acre across all plots. A total of 16 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were noted in three plots, with an average of 30 species per acre. The average tree height observed was 2.7 feet. A few willow livestakes were added to Vegetation Plot 1 in the wet area in March 2020. Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is becoming well established throughout the project. All of the fencing was in good condition and there was no evidence of cattle in the easement. There was no encroachment observed or similar activities that would negatively affect the functioning of the buffer. Diffuse flow was also maintained throughout the conservation easement area. A few small areas of re -sprouted Chinese privet observed in 2019 in the lower section of the easement were treated in early 2020 and will continue to be treated as needed throughout the monitoring period. 2.0 Methods Vegetation success is being monitored at four permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year. Uzzle Buffer 4 Year 2 Monitoring Report Mitigation Site October 2020 3.0 Reference Environmental Banc & Exchange — Neuse I, LLC (2018). Uzzle Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site — Bank Parcel Development Plan Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2 NCDENR. 2009. "Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." Division of Water Quality. http:// http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (October 2013). NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers. Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC. Uzzle Buffer 5 Year 2 Monitoring Report Mitigation Site October 2020 Appendix A Site Maps �O o �Hv Legend Conservation Easement 9p 70 U,— D, tliuo Rd \ DayCo Manufacturing 0 A Raleigh Q Sadisco Rd _ - ' -77 uuieDr — Southern Accent Insurance Auto Auctions Q 70 �_ _ _—�� _ �_ Shutters and Blinds V D & J Cycle Center Q�-- 9U Amy 01 \ Fast Lane Auto Care Q Edgewood Q Q PI& J Contract Hauling Custom Cabinetry ■ Al Custom Meats Y Johnston County Sports Complex Vr Carolina Comfort a A Air - Clayton I HVAC... 0 o. LifeSpring Academy 0 70 Bailey's Automotive Repair MIDTOWN V MOTORS OF NC R 4 Pc MI 70 pJ� Pc Z a� Interstate Ministries 0 The Mortgage Bus@ 0 A rr�''io::iinlr+�►�►��til ♦fit I N w E 500 1,000 Warren Transport 0 United Forming9 ro Figure 1 - Site Location Map Uzzle Buffer/Nutrient Site Johnston County, North Carolina Date: 10/12/2020 Drawn by: RTM Checked by: BPB 1 inch = 1,000 feet Wilson Mills 0 Mini Storage fires Appendix B Vegetation Assessment Data Table 2. Planted Species Summary Common Name Scientific Name Total Stems Planted Water Oak Quercus nigra 1,800 Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii 1,100 Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 900 Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 800 Willow Oak Quercus phellos 700 Blackgum Nyssa sylvatica 700 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 600 Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum 600 River Birch Betula nigra 500 Overcup Oak Quercus lyrata 400 Tuliptree Driodendron adipifera 400 Flowering Dogwood Cornus florida 400 Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 300 Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 300 American Hazelnut Corylus americana 300 Totall 9,800 Table 3. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Success Average Planted Volunteer Total Plot # Criteria Stem Height Stems/Acre Stems/Acre Stems/Acre Met? (ft) 1 486 40 526 Yes 2.3 2 647 0 647 Yes 3.4 3 526 40 567 Yes 2.3 4 607 40 647 Yes 2.6 Project Avg 567 30 597 Yes 2.7 Table 4. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Current Plot Data (MY2 2020) Annual Means Scientific Name Common Name Species Type 05302019-01-0001 05302019-01-0002 05302019-01-0003 05302019-01-0004 MY2(2020) MY1(2019) MYO(2019) PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T Betula nigra river birch Tree 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 8 8 10 10 10 Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 Cornusamomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 8 8 8 5 5 5 Cornus florida flowering dogwood Tree 1 1 1 Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 Liquidambarstyraciflua sweetgum Tree 2 Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 5 4 41 8 8 8 8 Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 3 3 3 13 13 13 Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 9 9 9 12 12 12 18 18 18 Quercus oak Tree 3 3 3 35 35 35 Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 5 5 5 6 6 7 1 1 1 Quercus nigra water oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 4 4 4 8 8 8 SaIixnigra blackwillow Tree 3 3 3 3 3 3 Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 14 14 14 16 16 16 16 16 16 Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) Speciescount Stems per ACRE 121 12 13 16 161 16 131 131 14 151 151 16 561 561 59 781 781 85 127 127 127 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.10 7 7 8 6 6 6 8 8 9 5 5 6 11 11 11 14 14 15 15 15 486 485.E 526.1 647 647.5 647.5 526 526.1 566.6 607 607 647.5 567 566.6 596.9 789 789.1 860 1285 1285 12 J Appendix C Visual Assessment Data Uzzle MY2 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos (Taken 09/30/2020) Vegetation Plot 1 Vegetation Plot 3 Vegetation Plot 2 Vegetation Plot 4 Appendix D Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets Plot (continued): 05302019-01-0001 Sep 2020 Data o THIS YEARS DATA map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors. Plot 05302019-01-0001 Pa Role: Date last planted: VMD Year (1-5): Date: / / 7 New planting date m/yy? Check box if plot was not Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below Taxonomic Standard DATE: Latitude or UTM-N: 35.590498 Datum: NAD27 (dec.deg. or m) Longitude or UTM-E:-78.39564 UTM Zone: 17N Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 ',X-Axis bearing (deg): 195 Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of Sep 2020 Data z THIS YEARS DATA 0 Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vig or* * Dama e* Notes ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout g g 3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 1.4 2.4 42.0 ❑ 7 Quercus michauxii O R 4.9 1.9 15.0 ❑ 8 Quercus sp. O R 6.2 1.4 Missin g ❑ 11 Betula nigra (�) R 9.7 3.0 Missin g ❑ 12 Taxodium distichum O R 8.5 3.1 50.0 ❑ 13 Taxodium distichum R 7.2 3.4 Missin g ❑ 14 Taxodium distichum R 6.0 4.1 76.0 ❑ 15 Taxodium distichum O R 4.9 4.6 110.0 DBH? ❑ 16 Cornus amomum ® R 3.9 4.9 99.0 ❑ 17 Betula nigra O R 2.9 5.2 Missin g ❑ 20 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 0.3 7.1 Missing ❑ 22 Cephalanthus occidentalis ® R 2.1 7.3 50.0 ❑ 23 Quercus nigra (g) R 3.4 7.5 Missin g ❑ 25 Salix nigra O R 5.7 7.0 93.0 ❑ 26 Liriodendron tulipifera R 7.2 6.7 Missin g ❑ 27 Salix nigra R 8.2 6.0 92.0 ❑ 29 Quercus nigra O R 9.0 8.1 Missin g ❑ 30 Salix nigra O R 8.0 8.5 72.0 ❑ 31 Cornus amomum O R 6.5 9.0 Missin g ❑ 33 Quercus phellos O R 4.2 9.8 Missin g ❑ 34 Platanus occidentalis O R 3.2 9.8 90.0 ❑ 35 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 1.8 9.9 60.0 ❑ # stems: 22 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form: X Y Height DBH Species Name Source* (in) (in) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes *VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa 1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other. *HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1 Plot (continued): 05302019-01-0001 map source X Y ID Species char (m) (m) Sep 2020 Data ddh Height DBH (mm) (cm) (cm) o * (mm) THIS YEAR'S DATA ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes (cm) (cm) sprout Explanation of cutoff Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling—: Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ IOcm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm Species Name p c SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH Sol).- Seed 10 cm- 50 cm 50 cm 100 cm 100 cm- 137 cm Sol).- Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10 (write DBH) **Required ifcut-off >lOcmor subsample?100%. 101 •2 • 3 ♦ 04 N5 �6 �7 �8 } N10 Form WS2,ver9.1 Map of stems on plot 05302019-01-0001 Y:5m c f i 0 O a Ol ® O 0 0 L%i (0,0) X:5m X-axis: 195 ° # stems: 22 N � map size: small *VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa 1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other. *HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1 Vegetation Monitoring Data (VNID) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors. Plot 05302019-01-0002 Party: Role: Date last planted: VN1D Year (1-5): - Date: / / � 1 New planting date m/yy? Check box if plot was not Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below Taxonomic Standard DATE: Latitude or UTM-N: 35.590355 Datum: NAD27 (dec.deg. or m) Longitude or UTM-E:-78.39523 UTM Zone: 17N Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 ',X-Axis bearing (deg): 324 Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: F7710 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of Sep 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA Map Source* X Y Height DBH c Height DBH Re- Vi orDama e* Notes ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.lm lcm* 1 cm* lcm* 1 cm sprout g g 38 Platanus occidentalis ® R 0.7 0.4 142.0 0.3 ❑ 41 Quercus phellos O R 0.6 4.7 Missin g ❑ 44 Platanus occidentalis O R 0.5 8.8 123.0 DBH? ❑ 45 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 3.0 9.8 73.0 ❑ 46 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 2.8 8.6 72.0 ❑ 47 Quercus lyrata R 2.8 7.2 Missin g ❑ 48 Betula nigra O R 2.6 5.8 97.0 ❑ 49 Quercus phellos O R 2.4 4.7 Missin g ❑ 51 Comus amomum ® R 2.1 1.9 Missin g ❑ 53 Quercus sp. O R 4.5 1.1 Missin g ❑ 54 Cornus amomum O R 4.2 2.3 100.0 ❑ 56 Cornus amomum O R 4.4 5.1 Missing ❑ 60 Betula nigra O R 8.3 9.7 Missin g ❑ 61 Betula nigra @ R 7.9 8.4 87.0 ❑ 62 Betula nigra R 7.6 7.1 74.0 ❑ 63 Betula nigra O R 7.0 6.2 110.0 DBH? ❑ 66 Taxodium distichum O R 6.7 2.2 110.0 DBH? ❑ 67 Taxodium distichum R 6.7 1.1 118.0 DBH? ❑ 69 Quercus michauxii O R 8.3 2.1 Missing❑ 70 Taxodium distichum O R 8.3 2.9 143.0 0.2 ❑ 71 Cornus amomum O R 8.5 3.8 85.0 ❑ 72 Taxodium distichum O R 8.6 5.0 136.0 DBH? ❑ 73 Nyssa sylvatica O R 8.7 5.9 46.0 ❑ 74 Taxodium distichum O R 9.0 6.9 130.0 DBH? ❑ # stems: 24 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form: X Y Height DBH Species Name Source* (in) (in) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes *VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa 1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other. *HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1 Plot (continued): 05302019-01-0002 map source X Y ID Species char (m) (m) Sep 2020 Data ddh Height DBH (mm) (cm) (cm) o * (mm) THIS YEAR'S DATA ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes (cm) (cm) sprout Explanation of cutoff Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling—: Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ IOcm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm Species Name p e SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH Sol).- Seed 10 cm- 50 cm 50 cm 100 cm 100 cm- 137 cm Sol).- Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10 (write DBH) **Required ifciioff>lOcmor subsample?100%. 101 •2 • 3 ♦ 04 N5 �6 �7 �8 } N10 Form WS2,ver9.1 Map of stems on plot 05302019-01-0002 X-axis: 324° #stems: 24 0 map size: small N (0,0) X:5m *VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, Strangulation, DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIM1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing uman TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE UNKNown, specify other. *HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1 Vegetation Monitoring Data (VNID) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors. Plot 05302019-01-0003 Party: Role: Date last planted: VN1D Year (1-5): - Date: / / � 1 New planting date m/yy? Check box if plot was not Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below Taxonomic Standard DATE: Latitude or UTM-N: 35.589926 Datum: NAD27 (dec.deg. or m) Longitude or UTM-E:-78.39545 UTM Zone: 17N Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 ',X-Axis bearing (deg): 210 Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: F7710 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of Sep 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA Map Source* X Y Height DBH c Height DBH Re- Vi orDama e* Notes ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.lm lcm* 1 cm* lcm* 1 cm sprout g g 76 Cephalanthus occidentalis R 3.9 2.1 44.0 ❑ 77 Diospyros virginiana O R 5.2 2.3 23.0 ❑ 79 Comus amomum O R 8.1 2.1 30.0 ❑ 81 Taxodium distichum R 8.7 4.5 117.0 DBH? ❑ 83 Cornus amomum O R 6.0 5.3 90.0 ❑ 84 Taxodium distichum O R 4.7 5.3 145.0 0.1 ❑ 86 Taxodium distichum O R 2.4 5.0 153.0 0.2 ❑ 87 Taxodium distichum O R 1.4 4.3 Missin g ❑ 89 Quercus phellos ® R 0.7 2.0 Missin g ❑ 92 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 1.6 8.2 Missin g ❑ 95 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 5.3 7.9 35.0 ❑ 97 Nyssa sylvatica R 7.7 7.5 79.0 ❑ 99 Platanus occidentalis R 9.2 9.5 32.0 ❑ 100 Betula nigra R 8.1 9.6 Missin g ❑ 101 Nyssa sylvatica O R 7.0 9.8 80.0 ❑ 102 Platanus occidentalis O R 0.2 9.9 48.0 ❑ 263 Quercus michauxii O R 1.6 9.9 32.0 ❑ # stems: 17 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form: X Y Height DBH Species Name Source* (in) (in) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes *VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa 1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other. *HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1 Plot (continued): 05302019-01-0003 map source X Y ID Species char (m) (m) Sep 2020 Data ddh Height DBH (mm) (cm) (cm) o * (mm) THIS YEAR'S DATA ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes (cm) (cm) sprout Explanation of cutoff Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling—: Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ IOcm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm Species Name p c SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH Sol).- Seed 10 cm- 50 cm 50 cm 100 cm 100 cm- 137 cm Sol).- Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10 (write DBH) **Required ifcut-off >lOcmor subsample?100%. 101 •2 • 3 ♦ 04 N5 �6 �7 �8 } N10 Form WS2,ver9.1 Map of stems on plot 05302019-01-0003 x-axis: 210' #stems: ?' map size: small N (0,0) X:5m *VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, Strangulation, DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIM1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing uman TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE UNKNown, specify other. *HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1 Vegetation Monitoring Data (VNID) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors. Plot 05302019-01-0004 Party: Role: Date last planted: VN1D Year (1-5): - Date: / / � 1 New planting date m/yy? Check box if plot was not Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below Taxonomic Standard DATE: Latitude or UTM-N: 35.589301 Datum: NAD27 (dec.deg. or m) Longitude or UTM-E:-78.39560 UTM Zone: 17N Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 ',X-Axis bearing (deg): 250 Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: F7710 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of Sep 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA Map Source* X Y Height DBH c Height DBH Re- Vi orDama e* Notes ID Species Name char O.lm O.lm lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g 104 Quercus michauxii O R 4.2 0.3 38.0 ❑ 105 Cornus amomum O R 5.2 1.2 Missing ❑ 109 Platanus occidentalis O R 9.7 6.0 Missin g ❑ 110 Cephalanthus occidentalis R 8.4 5.5 Missin g ❑ III Platanus occidentalis O R 7.2 5.3 118.0 DBH? ❑ 114 Nyssa sylvatica R 3.6 3.2 80.0 ❑ 115 Platanus occidentalis ® R 2.5 2.1 130.0 DBH? ❑ 117 Quercus lyrata O R 0.5 0.3 Missin g ❑ 118 Quercus michauxii ® R 0.5 3.6 53.0 ❑ 119 Quercus michauxii O R 1.5 4.4 100.0 ❑ 120 Taxodium distichum R 2.6 5.2 123.0 DBH? ❑ 121 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 3.7 5.9 34.0 ❑ 122 Platanus occidentalis O R 5.0 6.5 123.0 DBH? ❑ 123 Taxodium distichum R 6.3 7.4 79.0 ❑ 124 Platanus occidentalis (p) R 7.3 8.4 32.0 ❑ 125 Taxodium distichum O R 8.4 8.5 68.0 ❑ 126 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 6.3 9.8 100.0 ❑ 128 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 4.1 8.6 10.0 ❑ 129 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 2.9 8.0 88.0 ❑ # stems: 19 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form: X Y Height DBH Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes *VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa 1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other. *HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1 Plot (continued): 05302019-01-0004 map source X Y ID Species char (m) (m) Sep 2020 Data ddh Height DBH (mm) (cm) (cm) o * (mm) THIS YEARS DATA ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes (cm) (cm) sprout Explanation of cutoff Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling—: Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ IOcm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm Species Name p c SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH Sol).- Seed 10 cm- 50 cm 50 cm 100 cm 100 cm- 137 cm Sol).- Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10 (write DBH) **Required ifcut-off >lOcmor subsample?100%. 101 •2 • 3 ♦ 04 N5 �6 �7 �8 } N10 Form WS2,ver9.1 Map of stems on plot 05302019-01-0004 Y (0,0) X:5m X-axis: 250 ° # stems: 19 0 map size: small N *VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa 1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M-missing Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other. *HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1