20171045 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2020_20201009

ID#* 20171045 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 10/09/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal-10/9/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
V Stream r Wetlands r- Buffer r- Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Matthew Reid
Project Information
...................................................................................
ID#:* 20171045
Existing IDI
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Key Mill Mitigation Site
Surry
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: KeyMill_100025_MY0_2020.pdf 17.27MB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Matthew Reid
Signature:*

AS-BUILT BASELINE
MONITORING REPORT

FINAL

KEY MILL MITIGATION SITE
Surry County, NC
NCDEQ Contract No. 7180
DMS Project No. 100025
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01504
Yadkin River Basin
HUC 03040101

Data Collection Period: September 2019 – July 2020
Submission Date: October 5, 2020

PREPARED FOR:

NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1652

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.  phone [phone]  fax [phone]  1430 S. Mint Street, # 104  Charlotte, NC 28203
October 5, 2020

Mr. Matthew Reid
Project Manager
NCDEQ – Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Dr., Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801

RE: Task 6 – Final As-built Baseline Monitoring Report
Key Mill Mitigation Site, Surry County
Yadkin River Basin – HUC 03040101
DMS Project ID No. 100025 / DEQ Contract #7180

Dear Mr. Reid:

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) has reviewed the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) comments
from the Draft As-built Baseline Monitoring report for the Key Mill Mitigation Site. The report has been
updated to reflect those comments. The Final As-built Baseline Monitoring Document and Record
Drawings are included. Wildlands’ responses to DMS’ report comments are noted below in italics.
DMS comment: There was considerable storm damage caused to the site during the winter/spring 2020.
Please include a brief discussion regarding the impact and changes to the timeline this had on
construction, repairs and asbuilt/MY0 data collection that followed.
Wildlands response: The site received approximately 4.2” of rain on February 6, 2020. This equated to an
event between a 25-yr and 50-yr recurrence interval based on NOAA precipitation frequency for Mount
Airy. Due to critical areas being graded just the day before, considerable damage was sustained
throughout the site. Repair efforts added approximately 4 weeks to the completion of earthwork, which
consequentially delayed planting and as-built survey. In addition, some monitoring features had to be re-
installed after the repairs were completed.
DMS comment: Bull Creek Reach 3: Section discusses BMP installed at Station 115+10. According to the
asbuilt sheets, this stationing may be a mistake. The correct station appears to be 155+10.
Wildlands response: The stationing text has been revised to 155+10 to correctly reflect the location of the
BMPs’ confluence with Bull Creek Reach 3.
DMS comment: There were several instances where cross-section locations were moved after the as-
built survey was completed. For clarification, do the cross-section plots shown in the report represent
the relocated cross-sections that will be used for the overlays in future monitoring years?
Wildlands response: Yes, the cross-section plots represented in the report are of the relocated cross-
sections that will be used for the overlays in subsequent monitoring years.
DMS comment: Thank you for identifying the 127 LF of fence inadvertently installed inside the
conservation easement and relocating this before MY1 is completed.
Wildlands response: You are welcome.

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.  phone [phone]  fax [phone]  1430 S. Mint Street, # 104  Charlotte, NC 28203
DMS comment: Numerous rock sills were replaced with logs sills due to local material availability.
Were there more trees removed during construction than originally anticipated? Or, was this design
decision based on other factors?
Wildlands response: We spec our sills to be interchangeable between boulders and logs. The
functionality does not change. We removed a small number of additional trees during construction,
which allowed us to use more logs and on-site materials as opposed to hauling in boulders.
DMS comment: Please modify existing photo point locations or add additional photo points to capture
crossings/CE breaks for MY1. Please include cattle crossing area under Key Rd.
Wildlands response: Photo point locations have been either modified or added, as needed, to capture both
an upstream and downstream representative photo of each culvert crossing/CE break, as well as both a
northern and southern view of the cattle crossing at Key Mill Rd. These photo locations have been updated
in the As-built Monitoring Plan View Maps (Figures 3.0 – 3.3), as well as in the Record Drawings. These
location changes are depicted in red on the Record Drawings where they differ from those collected during
the baseline survey. In addition, photos were collected in these locations during MY0, included in the MY0
photo log to serve as a baseline depiction of the revised location for comparison throughout the monitoring
period, and recorded as changes in Section 5.1 Record Drawings of the As-built Baseline Monitoring Report.
DMS comment: The planting list shown in the Record Drawing differs from the planting list shown on
the planting plan sheets provided in the approved Mitigation Plan. For the Record Drawing, please call
out in Red the species that were not in the approved mitigation plan. For example, Black Gum, Silver
Maple, Green Ash, Paw Paw, Southern Red Oak, Northern Red Oak, American Holly and American
Beech were planted, but not in the approved mitigation plan.
Wildlands response: The record drawing planting list has been updated to reference the approved
planting list from the Mitigation Plan. Species that were not listed on the approved planting list are
shown in red as are changes in the planted densities. In addition, these updates have been revised in
Section 5.1.17 Planting List of the As-built Baseline Monitoring Report.
DMS Comment: The IRT has requested that Green Ash not make up more than 5% of the planted
stems on site. The planting plan shows that Green Ash comprises 12.5% of the planted stems. If a
replant is required in the future, please exclude Green Ash from the list.
Wildlands response: Wildlands acknowledges that the planting density is higher than the IRT’s
recommended density for green ash and will refrain from using green ash if supplemental replanting is
needed in the future.
DMS Comment: Are the green hatched areas that were not planted shown on the planting plan
existing undisturbed forested areas? There is considerable area that was slated for planting that did
not occur. Likewise, there are numerous areas that were planted that was not planned. Briefly explain
this change to the planting plan.
Wildlands response: The green hatched areas that represent areas not planted per plan are mature
forested areas. It was determined during construction that the density of trees and understory species
were sufficient and met the stem count criteria. The red hatched areas represent areas that were planted
but were not planned or the planting area was altered. There are two primary sections where this occurs:
Bull Creek Reach 1A (Sheet 2.2) and near the confluence of Bull Creek and UT3 (Sheets 2.4 and 2.9). Bull
Creek Reach 1A was due to the realignment of the stream to avoid a bedrock outcropping. The area near

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.  phone [phone]  fax [phone]  1430 S. Mint Street, # 104  Charlotte, NC 28203
UT3 confluence was where construction staging was expanded and where dirt was harvested to backfill
the old channel. Planting in this area consisted of pasture seeding only.
Electronic Deliverables:
DMS Comment: Please include the zero credit connecting feature that spans the easement break.
Wildlands response: As requested the connecting feature has been included as a “Not for credit” polyline
as part of the Project Stream feature class in the electronic geodatabase submittal.
DMS Comment: Before resubmitting, please isolate the stream features contained in
“AlignmentDeviations_new.shp” and consolidate with “StreamPH_new.shp” for clarity. Please
remove any old or irrelevant features from “StreamsPH_new.shp.
Wildlands response: As requested the two stream feature classes have been consolidated into one
feature class, which is named “Project_Streams_AB”. Additionally, old and/or irrelevant data have been
removed.
Wildlands acknowledges that 180 days must separate MY0 versus MY1 data. Therefore, MY1 data
collection will commence in late fall and/or early winter, and delivery of the MY1 report will be delayed
until January 31st to account for this requirement.
As requested, Wildlands has included one hard copy of the Final Key Mill Mitigation Site As-built
Baseline Monitoring Report and Record Drawings, as well as a USB drive that includes the full final
electronic copy with the electronic support files of the report, and a PDF of our written responses to
comments. Additionally, a copy of our response letter has been included after the report cover page of
the revised report.

Sincerely,

Kristi Suggs
Senior Environmental Scientist
[e-mail]

AS-BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT

KEY MILL MITIGATION SITE
Surry County, NC

Yadkin River Basin
HUC 03040101

DMS Project No. 100025
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-01504

PREPARED BY:

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203

Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report-DRAFT i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) implemented a full-delivery stream mitigation project at the Key
Mill Mitigation Site (Site) for the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS). The project restored, enhanced, and preserved a total of 7,437 linear feet
(LF) of perennial and intermittent stream in Surry County, NC. The Site is located within the DMS
targeted watershed for the Yadkin River Basin Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03040101110040 and the NC
Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Sub-basin 03-07-03. The project is providing 6,107.300 cool
stream mitigation units (SMUs) for the Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040101 (Yadkin 01).
The Site has a long history of agricultural activity and most of the stressors to stream functions are
related to this historic and current land use practices. The major stream stressors for the Site were
concentrated agricultural runoff inputs, degraded instream habitat, active stream incision, lack of
stabilizing streamside vegetation, bank erosion and failure, and the lack of bedform diversity. The effects
of these stressors resulted in degraded water quality and habitat throughout the Site when compared to
reference conditions. The project approach for the Site focused on evaluating the Site’s existing
functional condition and evaluating its potential for recovery and need for intervention.
The project goals defined in the mitigation plan (Wildlands, 2019) were established with careful
consideration of 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) goals and
objectives to address stressors identified in the watershed. The established project goals include:
• Improve stream channel stability,
• Stabilize eroding stream banks,
• Exclude livestock from stream channels,
• Reconnect channels with historic floodplains,
• Improve instream habitat,
• Reduce sediment and nutrient input from adjacent farm fields,
• Restore and enhance native floodplain vegetation, and
• Permanently protect the project site from degradational impacts.
The Site construction and as-built surveys were completed between April and July 2020. Planting and
baseline vegetation data collection occurred during April 2020. Minimal adjustments were made during
construction and specific changes are detailed in Section 5.1. Baseline (MY0) profiles and cross-section
dimensions closely match the design parameters with little variation. A small section of fence line was
inadvertently installed inside the easement along the upper extent of UT1A. The fence will be relocated
and documented in the MY1 Report. The Site has been built as designed and is expected to meet the
upcoming monitoring year’s success criteria.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report ii
KEY MILL MITIGATION SITE
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1: PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES ........................................................ 1-1
Project Location and Setting ...................................................................................................... 1-1
Project Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................... 1-1
Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach ................................................................... 1-2
Project Structure ................................................................................................................ 1-2
Restoration Type and Approach ........................................................................................ 1-2
Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data ............................................................................ 1-6
Section 2: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS .......................................................................................... 2-1
Streams ...................................................................................................................................... 2-1
Dimension .......................................................................................................................... 2-1
Pattern and Profile ............................................................................................................. 2-1
Substrate ............................................................................................................................ 2-1
Photo Documentation ........................................................................................................ 2-2
Hydrology Documentation ................................................................................................. 2-2
Vegetation .................................................................................................................................. 2-2
Visual Assessments .................................................................................................................... 2-2
Schedule and Reporting ............................................................................................................. 2-2
Section 3: MONITORING PLAN & METHODOLOGY .......................................................................... 3-1
Streams ...................................................................................................................................... 3-1
Dimension .......................................................................................................................... 3-1
Pattern and Profile ............................................................................................................. 3-1
Substrate ............................................................................................................................ 3-2
Photo Reference Points ..................................................................................................... 3-2
Visual Assessment .............................................................................................................. 3-2
Hydrology Documentation ......................................................................................................... 3-2
Bankfull Events ................................................................................................................... 3-2
Baseflow Monitoring .......................................................................................................... 3-2
Vegetation .................................................................................................................................. 3-2
Section 4: ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT AND CONTINGENCY PLAN ..................................................... 4-1
Adaptive Management Plan....................................................................................................... 4-1
Section 5: AS-BUILT CONDITION (BASELINE) ................................................................................... 5-1

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report iii
Record Drawings........................................................................................................................ 5-1
Bull Creek Reach 1A ........................................................................................................... 5-1
Bull Creek Reach 1B ........................................................................................................... 5-1
Bull Creek Reach 2 .............................................................................................................. 5-1
Bull Creek Reach 3 .............................................................................................................. 5-2
Bull Creek Reach 4 .............................................................................................................. 5-3
UT1A ................................................................................................................................... 5-3
UT1B ................................................................................................................................... 5-3
UT1C ................................................................................................................................... 5-3
UT2 ..................................................................................................................................... 5-3
UT2A ................................................................................................................................... 5-3
UT2B ................................................................................................................................... 5-4
UT2C ................................................................................................................................... 5-4
UT3 ..................................................................................................................................... 5-4
UT3A ................................................................................................................................... 5-4
UT3B ................................................................................................................................... 5-4
UT3C ................................................................................................................................... 5-5
Planting Plan ...................................................................................................................... 5-5
Encroachment Areas .......................................................................................................... 5-6
Baseline Data Assessment ......................................................................................................... 5-6
Morphological State of the Channel .................................................................................. 5-6
Vegetation .......................................................................................................................... 5-6
Section 6: REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 6-1

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report iv
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 General Figures, Tables, and Documentation
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Project Component/Asset Map Figure
Figure 3.0 – 3.3 As-Built Monitoring Plan View
Table 1 Mitigation Assets and Components
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contact Table
Table 4 Project Information and Attributes
Table 5a – 5b Monitoring Component Summary
Post Contract IRT Site Walk Meeting Minutes (August 14, 2017)

Appendix 2 Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 6a – 6b Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 7 Reference Reach Data Summary
Table 8a – 8c Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters-Cross-Section)
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Cross-Section Plots
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
Stream Photographs

Appendix 3 Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 10 CVS Permanent Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 11a – 11c Planted and Total Stem Counts
Vegetation Photographs

Appendix 4 Record Drawings

LIST OF ACRONYMS
Best Management Practice (BMP)
Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS)
Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)
Interagency Review Team (IRT)
Monitoring Year (MY)
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR)
Stream Mitigation Unit (SMU)
Step Pool Stormwater Conveyance (SPSC)
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Unnamed Tributary (UT)
Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin Priorities (RBRP)

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 1-1
Section 1: PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES
Project Location and Setting
The Key Mill Mitigation Site (Site) is located in Surry County approximately 7.2 miles south of City of
Mount Airy, NC in the Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040101110040 and NCDWR Sub-basin 03-07-03 (Figure
1). Located in the Smith River Allochthon of the Piedmont physiographic province (NCGS, 1985), the
project watershed is predominately forested land with some areas of agriculture including the Site.
The Site is located on one parcel, bisected by Key Road creating a western side and an eastern side
(herein referenced as the West side and the East side) to the project. The Site is predominantly actively
grazed pasture with the downstream extent of the Site forested. Bull Creek is the primary stream, which
flows southeast through the center of the Site. There are five unnamed tributaries (UT1, UT2, UT2A-C,
UT3, and UT3A-C) that join Bull Creek within the Site limits (Figure 2). Valleys throughout the Site have
moderately steep walls with alluvial bottoms, whereas valleys along the upstream extents of the
project’s East side tributaries are narrow with colluvial bottoms.
The West side of the project contains the upstream portion of Bull Creek (Reaches 1A, 1B, and 2), as well
as, UT1A, UT1B, and UT1C. UT1C joins Bull Creek Reach 2 near the bottom of the West Side of the Site
and flows through a culvert under Key Road into the eastern side of the Site. The East Side of the site
contains the downstream portion of Bull Creek (Reach 3 and 4), as well as UT2, UT2A-C, UT3, UT3A-C.
The Site drains approximately 2.15 square miles of rural land. Downstream of the Site, Bull Creek
continues southeast to join the Ararat River near the Cedar Hill community.
Prior to construction, the Site had been primarily used for agriculture. Lands upstream and downstream
of the Site are predominantly forested though there are some areas of agricultural lands and small
residential areas within the watershed. Agricultural activities within the Site had led to streams in
various stages of impairment. Most of the streams on the Site were impaired from limited to non-
existent buffers, concentrated agricultural runoff inputs, degraded instream habitat, active stream
incision, bank erosion and failure, and the lack of bedform diversity. Pre-construction conditions are
outlined in Table 4 of Appendix 1 and Table 6 of Appendix 2.
Project Goals and Objectives
The Site is providing numerous ecological benefits within the Yadkin Valley Basin. The project goals were
established with careful consideration to address stressors that were identified in the RBRP (EEP, 2009).
Improvements to water quality and ecological processes are outlined below as project goals and
objectives.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 1-2
Goals Objectives
Improve stream channel stability.
Restore stream channels that will maintain a stable pattern and
profile considering the hydrologic and sediment inputs to the
system, the landscape setting, and the watershed conditions.
Create stable tie-ins for tributaries joining restored channels. Add
bank revetments and in-stream structures to protect restored
streams.
Stabilize eroding stream banks.
Reconstruct stream channels slated for restoration with stable
dimensions. Add bank revetments and in-stream structures to
reaches to protect restored/enhanced streams.
Exclude livestock from stream channels. Install livestock fencing and watering systems as needed to
exclude livestock from stream channels and riparian areas.
Reconnect channels with historic
floodplains.
Reconstruct stream channels with appropriate bankfull
dimensions and depth relative to the floodplain.
Improve instream habitat.
Remove man-made impoundments and culvert crossings within
easement. Install habitat features such as constructed riffles,
cover logs, and brush toes into restored/enhanced streams. Add
woody materials to channel beds. Construct pools of varying
depth.
Reduce sediment and nutrient input from
adjacent farm fields.
Restore the streams’ riparian buffers. Construct a BMP to slow
and treat runoff from farm fields before entering Site streams.
Restore and enhance native floodplain
vegetation.
Plant native tree species in riparian zone where currently
insufficient.
Permanently protect the project site from
degradational impacts.
Record a conservation easement on the Site and install livestock
exclusion fencing.
Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach
The final mitigation plan was submitted and accepted by DMS in October of 2018 and the IRT in January
of 2019. Construction activities were completed in April 2020 by Carolina Environmental Contracting,
Inc. Kee Mapping & Surveying, P.A. completed the as-built survey in June 2020. Planting was completed
following construction in April of 2020 by Bruton Natural Systems, Inc. Field adjustments made during
construction are described in further detail in section 5.1 and depicted in the record drawings in
Appendix 4. Please refer to Appendix 1 for detailed project activity, history, contact information, and
watershed/site background information.
1.3.1 Project Structure
The project will provide 6,107.300 cool stream mitigation units (SMUs) in the Yadkin 01 service
area. Project mitigation components are outlined in the Mitigation Assets and Components Table
(Table 1) and depicted in the As-built Monitoring Plan View Maps (Figures 3.0 - 3.2) that are located
in Appendix 1.
1.3.2 Restoration Type and Approach
The design approach for this Site was chosen based on the surrounding landscape, climate, natural
vegetation communities but also with thorough consideration to existing watershed conditions and
trajectory. The mitigation approaches for the streams on the Site were developed to achieve the
maximum potential for functional uplift relative to the existing conditions on the Site. The project
includes stream restoration, enhancement II, and preservation.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 1-3
When needed, the project streams were reconnected with an active flood bench or floodplain at the
bankfull stage, and the bankfull channels were constructed with stable dimension, pattern, and profile.
Instream structures were constructed in channel to help maintain stable channel morphology and
improve aquatic habitat. Reaches that were stable and functioning were preserved to protect them from
future impacts from cattle and agricultural production.
All the project reaches are protected in perpetuity with the implementation of a conservation easement.
Along restoration and enhancement reaches, streambanks and floodplains were planted with native
tree and shrub species as depicted in the planting plan of the record drawings located in Appendix 4.
Invasive species within the riparian buffers of restoration and enhancement reaches were treated at the
time of construction. The extent of invasive species coverage will be monitored, mapped, and controlled
as necessary throughout the required monitoring period.
Specific stream mitigation types are illustrated in Figure 2 and detailed below. The Site vegetative
planting plan is depicted on sheets 2.1 through 2.9 of the record drawings located in Appendix 4.
Bull Creek Reach 1 A
Reach 1A enters the Site at Station 100+95 from the west as a perennial stream. The valley at the
upstream extent is confined but gently sloping at 1.0%. To allow for a Priority 1 restoration approach to
begin at the property boundary, an agreement was made with the upstream landowner to allow for
hydraulic trespass.
The channel was constructed as a Rosgen C3-type stream with a slope of approximately 0.7%. Because
bedrock was exposed in the left floodplain during construction, the channel was realigned from the
head of the reach to the start of Reach 1B. Brush toe was incorporated along the outside meander
bends to increase shear resistance. Riffles, log sills, and log j-hooks were incorporated to provide grade
control.
Bull Creek Reach 1 B
Bull Creek Reach 1B begins at station 105+39. Here, the stream becomes confined along the right valley
toe, the left floodplain widens, and the slope steepens slightly to approximately 1.2%. The design
channel remains as a Rosgen C3-type stream, and a Priority 1 restoration approach continues for
approximately seven hundred feet to the start of Reach 2 at Station 112+61. Brush toe and lunker logs
were used to promote the beneficial re-use of woody debris in the channel. Constructed riffles and log
sills were incorporated to provide grade control. Constructed riffle types are more diverse along this
reach (as compared to Reach 1A) to promote bed form diversity.
Bull Creek Reach 2
Bull Creek Reach 2 begins at station 112+61 where the valley slope increases and the design transitions
to a Rosgen C3b-type stream. Near the downstream extent of Reach 2, UT1C joins Bull Creek at Station
116+79. Below the confluence with UT1C, the design approach transitions to Priority 2 to re-connect to
the existing channel bed elevation at an existing ford crossing. Structures (i.e., brush toe, rock sills, log
sills, boulder toe, log j-hooks and log-rock cascade riffles, etc.) were added along this reach to dissipate
shear stress along the bank and bed of the channel, as well as aid in grade control.
In order to avoid impacting remnants of an old mill dam, hand stacked by a Key family ancestor, no
restoration activities occurred along the channel just upstream of Key Road. However, the area was
fenced to exclude livestock from accessing the stream except during times in which cattle are moved
between pastures. The stream then flows under Key Road through two 60-inch corrugated metal pipes
into the East side of the Site.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 1-4
Bull Creek Reach 3
Bull Creek Reach 3 begins downstream of the Key Rd. and an internal cattle crossing at station 150+30.
The valley is wider and gently sloping at <1.0%. Reach 3 was designed as a Rosgen C3-type stream with
an average channel slope of 0.95% for approximately 1,700 feet.
UT2C and UT3C join Reach 3 at Station 151+20 and 156+00, respectively, before an internal farm road
crossing of dual arch pipe culverts at Station 158+63. Reach 3 continues past the culvert as a Priority 2
Rosgen C3-type stream for approximately 900 linear feet prior to tying into the downstream
preservation reach at Station 167+56. Throughout the reach the channel receives drainage from
multiple stabilized wetland seeps and drainage swales. Log vanes and brush toe were incorporated
along this reach to reduce bank erosion. Log sills and constructed riffles provide grade control.
Approximately 500 linear feet downstream of the Key Road crossing, a step-pool conveyance channel
(SPCC) best management practice (BMP) was implemented within the right floodplain and joins Reach 3
at Station 155+10. The SPCC was designed to capture pasture runoff from a gully with a drainage area
of approximately 20 acres. This BMP will provide initial stormwater run-off treatment before
discharging into the restored stream.
Bull Creek Reach 4
Bull Creek Reach 4 begins at station 167+56. This reach was identified for preservation and continues
from the downstream extent of Reach 3 to the property boundary. The reach is currently stable and
exhibits mature vegetation. Desirable aquatic habitat is present throughout the reach and includes
undercut banks, root mats, leaf packs, and small debris jams. Stabilizing the upstream reaches will allow
for this reach to remain stable and reduce the sediment load.
UT1A
UT1A originates as a perennial stream outside of the conservation easement and begins within the
project boundaries at station 200+21. Enhancement level II was incorporated along this reach to
promote long-term channel stability and included isolated pockets of bank grading, fence installation for
cattle exclusion, the removal of a collapsed culvert, profile adjustments, the installation of a new
appropriately sized culverted crossing, and riparian plantings. A cucumber magnolia tree, located along
the right bank of UT1A approximately 100 feet downstream of the existing culvert, was preserved at the
request of the landowner.
UT1B and UT1C
Downstream of the enhancement reach, reach UT1B begins at station 208+85. It has an average slope
of 3.2% and designed as Rosgen B4-type stream. A Priority 2 restoration approach was implemented due
to the narrow and steep valley and short valley length. Log and rock sills along with woody riffles were
utilized for grade control, while native and chunky riffles were implemented to promote bedform
diversity. UT1B terminates at an internal crossing, Station 210+97, and is succeeded by UT1C.
UT1C begins at station 211+36 where the valley and channel slopes steepen. The design transitions to a
Rosgen B4a-type stream. Due to a wider valley, the reach was constructed almost entirely offline,
within the left floodplain of the existing channel. Rock sills were incorporated for grade control and
brush toe for bank stability. A Priority 2 restoration continues along UT1C to tie into the confluence with
Bull Creek Reach 2 at Station 213+93.
UT2
UT2 originates from a spring head within the wooded area on an adjacent property. The reach enters
the site as an intermittent stream at Station 350+00 and remains intermittent to its confluence with
UT2A at Station 350+42. The valley is confined with a steep slope of approximately 6.4%. The channel

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 1-5
was designed as a Rosgen B4-type stream and was restored using a Priority 2 approach. Logs sills and
constructed riffles were implemented to provide grade control along this reach.
UT2A, UT2B, and UT2C
As UT2A originates off the property as a perennial stream and enters the project Site at Station 300+00.
The valley is moderately confined with a slope of 2.9% and conveys a 0.05 square mile drainage area.
This reach was restored as a B4-type stream using Priority 2 restoration with an average channel slope
of 2.5%. Chunky riffles were utilized to dissipate channel velocity, log sills to facilitate grade control, and
brush toe to protect and stabilize outside meander bends. UT2A ends at an internal culvert crossing at
Station 303+15 where the valley widens.
UT2B begins downstream of the internal culvert crossing at Station 303+50. This reach has a valley
slope of 3.1%, a channel slope of 2%, and was restored as a Rosgen C4b-type stream using Priority 2
restoration. UT2B continues to be confined by steep valley walls before opening up near its end at
Station 306+13. Like UT2A, structures were incorporated to dissipate channel velocity, stabilize stream
banks, and facilitate grade control.
UT2C begins at station 306+13. The valley widens as it transitions downstream towards Bull Creek and
the valley slope decreases to 1.9%. This reach was restored as a Rosgen C4-type stream with an average
channel slope of 1.4%. Priority 2 restoration was used along the reach to tie it into the lower bed
elevation of Bull Creek at Station 310+82. Brush toe was incorporated along outer meanders
throughout the reach to stabilize the stream banks. Constructed riffles were used to increase bedform
diversity, and log sills were used to provide grade control, when needed.
UT3
UT3 begins outside the project limits from one of the outlets of an existing farm pond. This reach enters
the project area at Station 450+38 flows downstream for 18 feet before the confluence with UT3A. UT3
is an Enhancement II reach.
UT3A, UT3B, and UT3C
UT3A originates from another outlet of the farm pond and enters the project area 400+57. An
Enhancement level II approach was implemented along this reach and included cattle exclusion, areas of
bank grading, profile manipulation to enhance the functionality of this stream. A small section of
channel realignment was implemented at Station 401+64 to 402+45 to improve bank stability and
meander pattern. The enhancement reach ends at Station 404+70 where it transitions to UT3B.
UT3B begins at station 404+70. With an average channel slope of 3.2%, UT3B was designed as a Rosgen
B4-type stream. Priority 2 restoration was implemented along the reach. Tall mature trees located on
both of banks of the reach were avoided when possible. Log sills were frequently incorporated into the
channel design to maintain grade control and flatten riffle slopes. Brush toe was incorporated to protect
the stream banks. UT3B ends at an internal crossing (Station 407+77) before transitioning to UT3C.
UT3C begins at station 408+12 after an internal arched corrugated metal pipe crossing and continues for
approximately 400 feet through a confined valley to an open floodplain upstream of its confluence with
Bull Creek at Station 412+24. The majority of this reach incorporated Priority 1 restoration before
transitioning to Priority 2 near its confluence with Bull Creek Reach 3. With a channel slope of 1.3%, the
reach was designed as a Rosgen C4-type stream. Brush toe, constructed riffles, and log sills were
incorporated to maintain the stream’s structural integrity.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 1-6
Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data
The Site was restored by Wildlands through a Full Delivery contract with DMS. Tables 2, 3, and 4 in
Appendix 1 provide detailed information regarding the project activity and reporting history, project
contacts, and project baseline information and attributes.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 2-1
Section 2: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The stream performance criteria for the Site follow approved performance criteria presented in the Key
Mill Site Mitigation Plan (2019) and is based on performance criteria presented in the DMS Mitigation
Plan Template (August 2016), and the Stream and Wetland Mitigation Guidance issued in October 2016
by the USACE. Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of
the finished project. Specific performance standard components are proposed for stream morphology,
hydrology, and vegetation. Performance criteria will be evaluated throughout the seven-year post-
construction monitoring period. The monitoring plan designed to verify that performance standards are
met is described in Section 3.
Streams
2.1.1 Dimension
Riffle cross-sections on the restoration reaches should be stable and should show little change in
bankfull area, bank height ratio, and width-to-depth ratio. All riffle cross-sections should fall within
the parameters defined for the designated stream type. Bank height ratios shall not exceed 1.2 and
entrenchment ratios shall be at least 1.4 for B-type channels and 2.2 for restored C-type channels. If
any changes do occur, these changes will be evaluated to assess whether the stream channel is
showing signs of instability. Indicators of instability include a vertically incising thalweg or eroding
channel banks. Changes in the channel that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced
habitat include a decrease in the width-to-depth ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool
depth. Remedial action will not be taken if channel changes indicate a movement toward stability.
2.1.2 Pattern and Profile
A longitudinal profile was conducted as part of the as-built survey to provide a baseline for
comparison should it become necessary to perform longitudinal profile surveys later during
monitoring and to insure accordance with design plans. Annual longitudinal profile surveys are not
required during the seven-year monitoring period unless other indicators during the annual
monitoring indicate a trend toward vertical and lateral instability. If a longitudinal profile is deemed
necessary, monitoring will follow standards as described in the 2016 USACE Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Guidance for the necessary reaches.
Restoration reaches must remain vertically stable throughout the monitoring period with little
indication of downcutting or significant aggradation. Deposition of sediments at certain locations
(such as the inside of meander bends) is expected and acceptable. Changes in pool depth are not an
indication of vertical instability. Restoration reaches must remain laterally stable and major changes
planform pattern dimensions and sinuosity should not occur. However, migration of meanders on
alluvial channels is not an indication of instability if cross sectional dimensions continue to meet the
requirements.
2.1.3 Substrate
A pebble count was conducted at each surveyed riffle to characterize the pavement during the
baseline monitoring only. A reach-wide pebble count will be performed in each restoration reach for
monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7. Reach-wide counts will be conducted for classification purposes.
Restoration reaches should show maintenance of coarser materials in the riffle features and finer
particles in the pool features. Riffles may fine over the course of monitoring due to the stabilization
of contributing watershed sediment sources. Successful substrate measurements show that the
restored stream meet the objective of maintaining stable banks through reduced shear stress.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 2-2
However, natural variations in pool and riffle substrate is expected as a result of sediment transport
processes in steeper sloped channels.
2.1.4 Photo Documentation
Photographs should illustrate the Site’s vegetation and morphological stability on an annual basis.
Cross- section photos should demonstrate no excessive erosion or degradation of the banks.
Longitudinal photos should indicate the absence of persistent of mid-channel bars or vertical incision.
Grade control structures should remain stable. Deposition of sediment on the bank side of vane arms
is preferable. Maintenance of scour pools on the channel side of vane arms is expected.
2.1.5 Hydrology Documentation
The occurrence of bankfull events will be documented throughout the monitoring period. Four
bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The four
bankfull events must occur in separate years. In addition, a stream gage pressure transducer was
installed on the restored intermittent channel (UT2) to document 30 consecutive days of baseflow.
Stream monitoring will continue until performance standards in the form of four bankfull events in
separate years have been documented.
Vegetation
The final vegetative performance standard will be the survival of 210 planted stems per acre in the
planted riparian areas at the end of the required seven-year monitoring period. The interim measure of
vegetative success for the Site will be the survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre at the end of
MY3 and at least 260 stems per acre at the end of MY5. In NC mountain counties, such as Surry County,
planted trees must average 6 feet in height in each plot at the end of MY5 and 8 feet in height at MY7.
The extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled as necessary throughout
the required monitoring period.
Visual Assessments
Visual assessments should support the specific performance standards for each metric as described
above.
Schedule and Reporting
Monitoring reports will be prepared in the fall of each year of monitoring and submitted to DMS.
Based on the DMS Annual Monitoring Template (April 2015), the monitoring reports will include the
following:
• Project background which includes project objectives, project structure, restoration type and
approach, location and setting, history and background,
• Project Asset Map of major project elements,
• Photographs showing views of the restored Site taken from fixed point stations,
• CCPV Map with monitoring features and current problem areas noted such as stability and
easement encroachment based on the cross-section surveys and annual visual assessments,
• Assessment of the stability of the stream based on the cross-sections,
• Vegetative data as described above including the identification of any invasion by undesirable
plant species,
• A description of damage by animals or vandalism,
• Maintenance issues and recommended remediation measures will be documented, and
• Wildlife observations.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 3-1
Section 3: MONITORING PLAN & METHODOLOGY
Annual monitoring will consist of collecting morphologic, vegetative, and hydrologic data to assess the
project success based on the restoration goals, as outlined in the Key Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
(2019). Monitoring requirements will follow guidelines outlined in the DMS Annual Monitoring and
Closeout Reporting Template (April 2015) and the USACE Stream and Wetland Mitigation Guidance
(October 2016). Installed monitoring device and plot locations closely mimic the locations of those
proposed in the Site’s Mitigation Plan. Deviations from these locations were made when professional
judgement deemed them necessary to better represent as-built field conditions or when installation of
the device in the proposed location was not physically feasible.
Project success will be assessed by measuring channel dimension, substrate composition, vegetation,
surface water hydrology, and by analyzing photographs and performing visual assessments. Any high
priority problem areas identified, such as unstable stream banks, bed instability,
aggradation/degradation, and/or poor vegetation establishment will be evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. The problem areas will be visually noted and reported to DMS staff in the annual report. Standard
DMS monitoring reports will be submitted in monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Monitoring
activities in years 4 and 6 will be documented in a memorandum to include a project summary update,
annual photos, and updated monitoring plan map. Closeout will occur seven years beyond completion of
construction or once performance standards are met. All survey data will be georeferenced to North
Carolina State Plane coordinates. Refer to Table 5 in Appendix 1 for the monitoring component
summary.
Streams
Geomorphic assessments follow guidelines outlined in the Stream Channel Reference Sites: An
Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994), methodologies utilized in the Rosgen
stream assessment and classification documents (Rosgen, 1994 and 1996), and in the Stream
Restoration: A Natural Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al., 2003). Please refer to Figures 3.0 through
3.3 in Appendix 1 for monitoring locations discussed below.
3.1.1 Dimension
To assess channel dimension performance, 15 permanent cross-sections were installed along stream
restoration reaches as defined in Table 20 and Table 21 of the Mitigation Plan. Cross-section locations
were chosen in the field to be representative of the typical dimensions for each project reach. Each
cross-section is permanently marked with rebar installed in concrete and ½ inch PVC pipes. Cross-
section surveys will include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, edge
of water, and thalweg. Cross-section surveys will be conducted in monitoring years one, two, three, five,
and seven. Photographs will be taken of the cross-sections looking downstream during the survey
assessment.
3.1.2 Pattern and Profile
Longitudinal profile surveys will not be conducted during the seven-year post-construction monitoring
period unless other indicators during the annual monitoring indicate a trend toward vertical and lateral
instability. If a longitudinal profile is deemed necessary, monitoring will follow standards as described in
the Stream Mitigation Guidelines issued in October 2016 by the USACE for the necessary reaches.
Stream pattern and profile will be assessed visually as described below in Section 3.1.6.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 3-2
3.1.3 Substrate
Reach-wide pebble count will be performed in each restoration reach for classification purposes and will
be conducted in monitoring years one, two, three, five, and seven. Riffle 100-count substrate sampling
were collected in each surveyed riffle cross-section during the baseline monitoring only to characterize
pavement at as-built.
3.1.4 Photo Reference Points
A total of 25 permanent photograph reference points were established along the stream reaches after
construction. Photographs will be taken once a year to visually document stability for the seven-year
monitoring period. Permanent markers were established and located with GPS equipment so that the
same locations and view directions on the site are photographed each year. Photos will be used to
monitor all restoration, enhancement II, and preservation stream reaches.
Longitudinal reference photos were established along the channel and will be documented by taking a
photo looking upstream and downstream. Cross-sectional photos will be taken of each permanent cross-
section looking upstream and downstream.
3.1.5 Visual Assessment
Visual assessments will be performed along stream reaches on a semi-annual basis during the seven-
year monitoring period. Areas of concern, such as channel instability (i.e. lateral and/or vertical
instability, in-stream structure failure/instability and/or piping, headcuts), vegetation health (i.e. low
stem density, mortality, invasive species, and/or encroachment), beaver activity, or livestock trespass;
will be mapped, photographed, and described in the annual monitoring reports. Problem areas will be
re-evaluated during each subsequent visual assessment. Should remedial actions be required,
recommendations will be provided in the annual monitoring report.
Hydrology Documentation
Automated pressure transducers will document stream hydrology and will be used on mitigation
reaches that implement restoration approaches throughout the seven-year monitoring period.
Henceforth, these devices will be referred to as “crest gages (CG)” for those recording bankfull events
and “stream gages (SG)” for those recording baseflow.
3.2.1 Bankfull Events
The occurrence of bankfull events will be documented with the use of automated CGs, photographs, and
visual assessments such as debris lines. CGs were set to record bankfull events every three hours and
were installed within the stream’s riffle. A total of 5 CGs were installed along restoration reaches (Bull
Creek Reach 2 and 3, UT1C, UT2C, and UT3C). The CGs will be downloaded quarterly to determine if a
bankfull event has occurred. Photographs will be used to document the occurrence of debris lines and
sediment deposition observed during field visits.
3.2.2 Baseflow Monitoring
Streamflow stage will be monitored to document 30 days of continuous flow using a continuous stage
recorder or SG. One automated SG was installed on UT2 and was set to record every 2 hours. Evidence
of channel flow will be documented with a photo when possible. Transducer data will be plotted and
included in the annual monitoring reports.
Vegetation
Vegetative plot monitoring will be conducted in post-construction monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7.
Permanent plots will be monitored in accordance with the guidelines and procedures developed by the

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 3-3
Carolina Vegetation Survey-EEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008) and the 2016 USACE Stream and
Wetland Mitigation Guidance to assess the vegetation success. For both permanent and random plots,
all woody stems, including exotic and invasive species, should be counted. Supplemental plantings and
volunteer plants must be present for at least two growing seasons before counting toward performance
standards for monitoring years five and seven. Exotic/invasive species will not count toward success of
performance standards.
A total of 8 permanent vegetation plots were established within the project easement area. Permanent
vegetation plots were randomly established within the planted stream riparian buffer areas to capture
the heterogeneity of the designed vegetative communities. The locations of permanent vegetation plots
were chosen in the field using the same distribution throughout the planting areas, as shown in the
Site’s Mitigation Plan, and to best represent the planted areas within the easement.
All of the permanent vegetative plots were established as either a standard 10-meter by 10-meter
square plot or a 5-meter by 20-meter plot. The vegetation plot corners have been marked and are
recoverable either through field identification or with the use of a GPS unit. Reference photographs at
the origin looking diagonally across the plot to the opposite corner were taken during the MY0 in April
2020. Subsequent assessments in monitoring years one, two, three, five, and seven following baseline
survey will capture the same reference photograph locations.
Beginning in MY1, individual permanent plot data will include diameter, height, density, vigor,
damage (if any), and percent survival. Planted woody stems were marked and mapped in MY0 and
will be re-marked, if needed, during subsequent monitoring year assessments using a known origin so
they can be found. Mortality will be determined from the difference between the baseline year’s
living planted stems and the current year’s living planted stems.
To evaluate random vegetation performance for the Site, 5 mobile vegetation plots were established
in MY0, for use in MY1, using a circular or 100 m2 square/rectangular plot. Mobile plots will be re-
established in different and random locations throughout the planted conservation easement in
monitoring years 2, 3, 5, and 7. These locations will be geographically recorded and depicted in the
CCPV maps for the corresponding monitoring assessment year. Mobile vegetation plot assessments
will document the number of stems, species type, and stem height within the plot.
Please refer to Figures 3.0 through 3.3 in Appendix 1 for the permanent and mobile MY0/1
vegetation monitoring plot locations.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 4-1
Section 4: ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT AND CONTINGENCY PLAN
Adaptive Management Plan
Wildlands will perform maintenance as needed on the mitigation project. A physical inspection of the
Site shall be conducted a minimum of once per year throughout the post-construction monitoring
period or until performance standards are met. These site inspections may identify site components and
features that require routine maintenance. Routine maintenance for stream features should be most
often expected in the first two years following site construction. The need for maintenance will be
evaluated annually during monitoring activities. Maintenance activities may include the following.
Component/
Feature Maintenance through project close-out
Stream
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of in-stream
structures to prevent piping, securing of loose coir matting, and supplemental installations
of live stakes and other target vegetation along the channel – these shall be conducted
where success criteria are threatened or at the discretion of the Designer. Areas where
storm water and floodplain flows intercept the channel may also require maintenance to
prevent bank failures and head-cutting. Beaver activity will be monitored and beaver dams
on project streams will typically be removed, at the discretion of the Designer, during the
monitoring period to allow for bank stabilization and stream development outside of this
type of influence.
Vegetation
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted community.
Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include supplemental planting,
pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species requiring treatment per the
Invasive Species Treatment Plan (Appendix 6) shall be treated in accordance with that plan
and with NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
BMP
Routine BMP maintenance may include removal of accumulated sediment from the bottom
of the BMP. Stone and boulders may require adjustment to prevent scour. Wildlands will
evaluate and determine whether sediment removal is necessary based on observations of
the constructed sediment storage volume and volume remaining in subsequent monitoring
years.
Stream Crossings
Stream crossings shall be maintained to ensure stability and functionality when livestock are
present. Routine maintenance and repair activities may include additional matting, gravel,
and seeding for ford crossings. Maintenance and repair for culvert crossings used for
livestock should be minimal but may require additional gravel and seeding to minimize
runoff to the adjacent waterbody. Cattle exclusion fencing and gates where applicable shall
be regularly inspected and maintained as needed.
Site Boundary
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the
mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker,
bollard, post, tree-blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or conservation
easement. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or
replaced on an as-needed basis.
Wildlands will develop necessary adaptive measures or implement appropriate remedial actions in the
event that the Site or a specific component of the Site fails to achieve the success criteria outlined
above. The project-specific monitoring plan developed during the design phase identifies an appropriate
threshold for maintenance intervention based on the monitored items. Any actions implemented will be
designed to achieve the success criteria specified previously and will include a work schedule and

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 4-2
updated monitoring criteria. If, during annual monitoring it is determined the Site’s ability to achieve
Site performance standards are jeopardized, Wildlands will notify DMS and the members of the IRT and
work to develop contingency plans and remedial actions.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 5-1
Section 5: AS-BUILT CONDITION (BASELINE)
The Site construction and as-built surveys were completed between April 2020 and June 2020. The
survey included developing an as-built topographic surface and locating the channel boundaries,
structures, and cross-sections. For comparison purposes, during the baseline assessments, reaches were
divided into assessment reaches in the same way that they were established for design parameters: Bull
Creek Reach 1A and 1B, Bull Creek Reach 2 – Reach 4, UT1A – UT1C, UT2, UT2A – UT2C, UT3, and UT3A –
UT3C. Monitoring location field adjustments were completed in July 2020, and planting and baseline
vegetation data collection was completed in April 2020.
Record Drawings
A sealed half-size record drawing is located in Appendix 4 that includes redlines for any significant field
adjustments made during construction that were different from the design plans. Specific changes by
each project area are detailed below:
5.1.1 Bull Creek Reach 1A
• Station 100+95 - 105+39: The channel design was altered and realigned due to bedrock that was
present in the left floodplain. Due to channel realignment the following structure adjustments
were made:
o A log vane was replaced with a log sill to improve stability within the altered alignment,
o Boulder toe was replaced with brush toe due to sufficient channel stability from bedrock
in the channel,
o A log sill was added to improve channel stability through the alignment deviation, and
o A log vane was replaced with a log j-hook to improve channel stability at the
downstream end of the alignment deviation.
5.1.2 Bull Creek Reach 1B
• Station 105+75: The vernal pool at depicted location was not installed because it was not
necessary to balance onsite earthwork volumes at this location.
• Station 107+40: A log sill and a log vane were omitted due to the presence of bedrock.
• Station 110+48: The location of cross-section 3 (XS3) was adjusted after the as-built survey was
collected so that the cross section would no longer share its left cross section pin with XS2.
5.1.3 Bull Creek Reach 2
• Station 113+80: A log sill was substituted for rock sill due to local material availability and site
conditions.
• Station 113+85: Brush toe was substituted for brush mattress due to sufficient bank stability
following the construction of the design channel.
• Station 114+32: Crest gage 1 (CG1) was moved upstream after the as-built survey was collected
to avoid the possibility of false bankfull readings in the event that water should back up at the
confluence.
• Station 115+45: Brush toe was substituted for boulder toe due to sufficient bank stability
following the construction of the design channel.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 5-2
• Station 115+88: The location of XS4 was adjusted after the as-built survey was collected
because the cross section was inadvertently disturbed from construction equipment during
channel repairs from a large storm event.
• Station 116+00: A log sill was substituted for rock sill due to local material availability and similar
functionality.
• Station 116+62: Photo point 4A was added after the survey was completed at the request of
DMS to capture a view of the conservation easement break.
• Station 118+30: Photo points 4B and 4C were added after the survey was completed at the
request of DMS to capture views across the cattle crossing.
5.1.4 Bull Creek Reach 3
• Station 150+XX: Photo point 4D was added after the survey was completed at the request of
DMS to capture a view of the conservation easement break.
• Station 150+62: Boulder toe was replaced with a brush toe due to local material availability and
to improve in-stream habitat.
• Station 157+72: Brush mattress was replaced with brush toe due to time of year or installation.
• Station 157+72: A log vane was removed due to bank stability and habitat enhancement
provided by brush toe.
• Station 158+22: Photo point 7 was moved after the survey was completed at the request of
DMS to capture a downstream view of the culvert crossing.
• Station 158+40: A rock sill was replaced with a log sill due to local material availability and
similar functionality.
• Station 159+50: Photo point 8 was moved after the survey was completed at the request of
DMS to capture an upstream view of the culvert crossing.
• Station 159+84: Brush toe was substituted for a boulder toe due to local material availability and
to provide habitat enhancement.
• Station 159+84: A log vane was removed due to the bank stability and habitat enhancement
provided by the brush toe.
• Station 161+14: XS7 and CG5 were moved after the as-built survey was collected because the
current riffle location better represents the conditions of the reach.
• Station 161+56: A log vane was removed, and a brush toe was added to outside bank to
improve stability for the entire outside bank.
• Station 163+30: A log vane was removed, and a brush toe was extended due to availability of
materials and to improve stream bank stability and habitat.
• Station 164+47: A log vane was removed, a log sill was added, and a brush toe was extended
due to local availability of materials and to improve channel stability and habitat.
• Station 165+75: A log vane was removed, and a brush toe was extended due to availability of
materials and the improved habitat provided by the brush toe.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 5-3
• Station 166+97: A log sill was substituted for rock sill due to local material availability and site
conditions.
• Station 167+00: A brush toe was added to improve bank stability.
5.1.5 Bull Creek Reach 4
• No changes.
5.1.6 UT1A
• Station 202+26: Pool was not excavated due to existing profile stability.
• Station 203+32: Photo point 12 was moved after the survey was completed at the request of
DMS to capture a downstream view of the culvert crossing.
• Station 203+90: Photo point 12A was added after the survey was completed at the request of
DMS to capture an upstream view of the culvert crossing.
• See Section 5.1.18 for easement encroachment areas.
5.1.7 UT1B
• Station 209+24: XS9 was relocated after the as-built survey was collected because the current
riffle location better represents the conditions of the reach.
• Station 209+65: During construction, a riffle, a pool, and a rock sill were omitted due to
sufficient stability and slope on the reach.
• Station 210+83: Photo point 14A was added after the survey was completed at the request of
DMS to capture a downstream view of the culvert crossing.
5.1.8 UT1C
• Station 211+57: Photo point 14B was added after the survey was completed at the request of
DMS to capture an upstream view of the culvert crossing.
• Station 212+35: During construction upstream rock and roll riffle and boulder sill were omitted
and riffle was extended to connect to downstream rock and roll riffle.
• Station 212+62: CG2 was moved upstream after as-built survey was collected to avoid the
possibility of false bankfull readings in the event that water should back up at the confluence.
5.1.9 UT2
• Station 350+08: Rock sill was replaced with log sill due to local material availability and similar
functionality.
• Station 350+27: Rock sill was replaced with log sill due to local material availability and similar
functionality.
5.1.10 UT2A
• Station 300+40: Rock sill was replaced with log sill due to local material availability and similar
functionality.
• Station 302+25: Rock sill was replaced with log sill due to local material availability and similar
functionality.
• Station 302+83: Rock sill was replaced with log sill due to local material availability and similar
functionality.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 5-4
• Station 302+95: Photo point 17 was moved after the survey was completed at the request of
DMS to capture a downstream view of the culvert crossing.
5.1.11 UT2B
• Station 303+59: Rock sill was replaced with log sill due to local material availability and similar
functionality.
• Station 303+90: Photo point 18 was moved after the survey was completed at the request of
DMS to capture an upstream view of the culvert crossing.
• Station 305+90: Rock sill was replaced with log sill due to local material availability and similar
functionality.
5.1.12 UT2C
• Station 310+33: Rock sill was replaced with log sill due to local material availability and similar
functionality.
5.1.13 UT3
• No changes
5.1.14 UT3A
• Station 401+64 – 402+45: The channel design was altered and realigned to improve bank
stability and meander pattern
• Station 401+71 - 402+29: Rock sills were replaced with log sills due to local material availability
and similar functionality.
5.1.15 UT3B
• Station 404+89 – 407+35: Riffle elevations adjusted due to the upstream tie in elevation being
changed due to field conditions.
• Station 402+82: Rock sills were replaced with log sills due to local material availability and
similar functionality.
• Station 405+06: Rock sills were replaced with log sills due to local material availability and
similar functionality.
• Station 405+32: Rock sills were replaced with log sills due to local material availability and
similar functionality.
• Station 405+58: Rock sills were replaced with log sills due to local material availability and
similar functionality.
• Station 405+82: Rock sills were replaced with log sills due to local material availability and
similar functionality.
• Station 406+59: Rock sills were replaced with log sills due to local material availability and
similar functionality.
• Station 406+85: Rock sills were replaced with log sills due to local material availability and
similar functionality.
• Station 407+09: Rock sills were replaced with log sills due to local material availability and
similar functionality.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 5-5
• Station 407+35: Rock sills were replaced with log sills due to local material availability and
similar functionality.
• Station 407+41: Photo point 22A was added after the survey was completed at the request of
DMS to capture a downstream view of the culvert crossing.
5.1.16 UT3C
• Station 408+22: Rock sills were replaced with log sills due to local material availability and
similar functionality.
• Station 408+33: Photo point 24 was moved after the survey was completed at the request of
DMS to capture an upstream view of the culvert crossing.
• Station 411+86: Rock sills were replaced with log sills due to local material availability and
similar functionality.
5.1.17 Planting Plan
Changes to the as-built planting list were made to account for the species availability at the time of
planting. Changes in the location of bare root plantings were adjusted as needed along the top of bank
in the areas where channel realignment was conducted. Planting contractor provided quantities for the
entire site. Total bare root plant quantities were not broken up between shaded and unshaded planting
areas. Total herbaceous plant quantities were not broken up between streambank, vernal pool, and
wetland area planting zones. Specific changes to the plant species lists are outlined below.
Buffer Planting Zone –
• The following bareroot species were removed from the planting list due to the lack of available
species at the time of planting: Tag alder (Alnus serrulata), Bigleaf magnolia (Magnolia
macrophylla), Willow oak (Quercus phellos), and Swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii).
• The following species were added to the bareroot planting list to increase species diversity at
the direction of the engineer: Northern red oak (Quercus rubra), Southern red oak (Quercus
falcata), Paw paw (Asimina triloba), Black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), Silver maple (Acer
saccharinum), Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), American holly (Ilex opaca), and American
Beech (Fagus gradifolia).
• The remaining species’ “Percent of Stems” within the Buffer Planting Zone planting area were
adjusted accordingly.
Streambank, Vernal Pool, and Wetland Planting Zone –
• The following herbaceous species were removed from the planting list due to the lack of
available species at the time of planting: Bluejoint grass (Calamagrostis canadensis) and
Broadwing sedge (Carex alata).
• The following species were added to the livestakes planting list to increase species diversity at
the direction of the engineer: Button bush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) and Elderberry
(Sambucus canadensis).
• The following species were added to the herbaceous planting list to increase species diversity at
the direction of the engineer: Green bulrush (Scrirpus altrovirens), Fringed sedge (Carex crinita),
Bushy beardgrass, (Andropogon glomeratus), Upright sedge (Carex stricta), and Softstem
bulrush (Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani).

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 5-6
• The remaining species’ “Percent of Stems” within the Streambank, Vernal Pool, and Wetland
planting zones were adjusted accordingly.
Permanent Riparian Seeding –
• The following species of live seed were removed from the permanent riparian seed list due to
the lack of available seed at the time of planting: Cardinal flower (Lobelia cardinalis L.) and
Dense blazing star (Liatris spicata).
• The following species of live seed were added to the permanent riparian seed planting list to
increase species diversity at the direction of the engineer: Bearded beggartick (Bidens aristosa).
5.1.18 Encroachment Areas
• Approximately 127 LF of fence line was inadvertently installed inside the easement along the
upper extent of UT1A. The fence will be relocated and documented in the MY1 Report.
• Station 203+47: On UT1A, less than one linear foot of pipe extends into the project area on the
upstream side of the internal easement crossing. A loss of one linear foot is reflected in the
total as-built linear footage for UT1A in Table 1 of Appendix 1.
Baseline Data Assessment
MY0 was conducted between September 2019 to July 2020 with the vegetation data collection occurring
during April 2020. The first annual monitoring assessment (MY1) will be completed in the late fall and/or
early winter of 2020 to ensure that at least 180 days separate the collection of MY0 data from MY1 data.
Subsequently, the MY1 monitoring report submittal will be delayed to account for this requirement.
The streams will be monitored for a total of seven years, with the final monitoring activities scheduled
for 2026.
5.2.1 Morphological State of the Channel
Please refer to Appendix 2 for summary data tables, morphological plots, and stream photographs.
Profile
The MY0 profiles generally match the profile design parameters. On-site as-built reviews showed no
visual indicators of vertically instability. Variations from the design profile often reflect field changes
during construction as a result of field conditions and do not constitute a problem or indicate a need
for remedial actions. Channels profiles will continue to be assessed visually during the semi-annual
Site walks.
Dimension
The MY0 dimension numbers closely match the design parameters with minor variations. Over time
as vegetation is established, the channels may narrow. This narrowing is normal and not an indicator
of instability.
Pattern
The MY0 pattern metrics fell within acceptable ranges of the design parameters.
Bankfull Events
Bankfull events recorded following completion of construction will be reported in the Year 1
monitoring report.
5.2.2 Vegetation
The overall MY0 planted density is 557 stems/acre, which exceeds the interim measure of vegetative
success of at least 320 planted stems per acre at the end of the third monitoring year. Summary data

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 5-7
and photographs of each plot can be found in Appendix 3.

Key Mill Mitigation Site
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report 6-1
Section 6: REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, Cheryl C; Rawlins, C.L.; Potyondy, John P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4.2. Retrieved from: http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-
2.pdf.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), February 2009. Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River
Basin Restoration Priorities.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS), October 2015. DMS Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Plan Template and Guidance.
North Carolina DMS, April 2015. DMS Annual Monitoring and Closeout Reporting Template.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR), 2015. Surface Water Classifications.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications.
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina: North Carolina Survey,
General Geologic Map, scale 1:500,000. https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-
resources/north-carolina-geological-survey/ncgs-maps/1985-geologic-map-of-nc4.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
Simon, A. 1989. A model of channel response in disturbed alluvial channels. Earth Surface Processes and
Landforms 14(1):11-26.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), October 2016. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE,
NCDENR-DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc (Wildlands), 2019. Key Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan. DMS, Raleigh, NC.

APPENDIX 1. General Figures and Tables

03040101110020
03040101090040
03040101090030
03040101110050
03040101090050
03040101110030
03040101100010
03040101110060
03040101110040
03040101110070
03040101090020
03040101110010
03040101090010
03040101100020
03010103170030
03040101080040
03040101080060
03040101080050
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
Surry County, NC
0 1 2 Mile
Project Location
Hydrologic Unit Code (14)
DMS Targeted Local Watershed
¹
Directions to Site:
From Charlotte, travel north on US-21 to exit 85. Turn right onto
NC-268 Bypass E for approximately 3.0 miles take a left onto NC- 268 E.
Travel 11.0 miles on NC-268 E then turn left onto Siloam Road.
Continue for approximately 4.0 miles then sharp right onto Ararat Road.
Stay on Ararat Road for 1.0 mile then turn left onto Key Road. Continue
approximately 0.5 miles on Key Road to the site.
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of
the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is encompassed
by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered
by land under private ownership. Accessing the site
may require traversing areas near or along the easement
boundary and therefore access by the general public is not
permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state and
federal agencies or their designees/contractors involved in
the development, oversight,and stewardship of the restoration
site is permitted within the terms and timeframes of their
defined roles. Any intended site visitation or activity by
any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles
and activites requires prior coordination with DMS.
Key Mill Project Location
Reach 1A
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
UT1A
UT3
UT2 UT2A UT2B
Reach 3
UT2C
UT3AUT3B
UT3C
UT1B
UT1C
Reach 1B Bul
l
Creek
B
u
l
l

C
r
e
e
k
Bull Creek0 250 500 Feet
Figure 2 Project Component/ Asset Map
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
Surry County, NC
Conservation Easement
Project Parcel
Internal Crossings
Existing Wetlands
Restoraton
Enhancement II
Preservation
Not for Credit
Alignment Deviation
Non Project Streams
!P Reach Breaks
¹
2018 Aerial Imagery
Reach 1A
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
UT1A
UT3
UT2 UT2A UT2B
Reach 3
UT2C
UT3AUT3B
UT3C
UT1B
UT1C
Reach 1B Bul
l
Creek
B
u
l
l

C
r
e
e
k
Bull CreekSheet 3.1
Sheet 3.2
Sheet 3.3
0 250 500 Feet
Figure 3.0 As-Built Monitoring Plan View (Key)
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
Surry County, NC
Conservation Easement
Project Parcel
Internal Crossings
Existing Wetlands
Vegetation Plots (Permanent)
Vegetation Plots (Mobile)
Restoraton
Enhancement II
Preservation
Not for Credit
Alignment Deviation
Non Project Streams
Bankfull
[ [Fence line
Structures
Cross-Sections
!A Barotroll
!A Crest Gage
!A Stream Gage
GF Photo Points
!P Reach Breaks
¹
2018 Aerial Imagery
Reach 1A
Reach 2
Reach 3
UT1A
UT3
UT2B UT2C
UT3AUT3B
UT3C
UT1B
UT1C
Reach 1B Bul
l
Creek
B
u
l
l

C
r
e
e
k
Sheet 3.2
XS5 XS15
X
S
6 XS14XS
1
0
XS4CG1
CG2
CG3
CG4
MP4
MP5
MP2
MP3
MP1
2
1
5
6
7
8
0 130 260 Feet
Figure 3.1 As-Built Monitoring Plan View
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
Surry County, NC
Conservation Easement
Project Parcel
Internal Crossings
Existing Wetlands
Vegetation Plots (Permanent)
Vegetation Plots (Mobile)
Restoraton
Enhancement II
Preservation
Not for Credit
Alignment Deviation
Non Project Streams
Bankfull
[ [Fence line
Structures
Cross-Sections
!A Barotroll
!A Crest Gage
!A Stream Gage
GF Photo Points
!P Reach Breaks
¹
2018 Aerial Imagery
1
2
3
4
4A
4B
4C
4D
20
5
6
25
23
24
22A 22
21
15
14B
14A
14
13
12A
12XS1
XS2
XS3X
S
9
XS13
[[
[
[
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
[
[
[[[[[
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
[
[
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
[
[
[
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
[
[[
[
[
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
[
[

[
[
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[300+00301+00 302+00
303+00 304+003
0
5
+
0
0
306+00 307+00308+0030
9
+
0
0
31
0
+
0
0
3
1
0
+
8
2
404+71405+00
40
6
+
0
0
407+00
408+00
409+00
410+00
411+00
412+00400+
0
0
4
0
1
+
0
0
402
+
0
0
403+00
404+00
3
5
0
+
4
2
350+00 116+79108+00109+00 110+00111+00 112+00113+00
114+00
115+00116
+
0
0
213+93209+00210+00211+00212+00213+00150+00151+00152+00153+00154+001
5
5
+
0
0
156+0015
7
+
0
0
15
8
+
0
0
15
9
+
0
0
16
0
+
0
0
161+001
62
+
0
0
1
6
3
+
0
0
164+001
6
5
+
0
0116+79117+00118+00118
+
4
0 204+00205+00206+00207+00208+004
5
0
+
5
7
450+00
SG1
XS15
XS
1
0
XS11XS9
XS4XS13X
S
1
2
XS14XS3XS2
XS7
XS5
X S8
X
S
6 !P!P!P!P!P!P!P!P!P!P!P!A!A!A!A!A!A!AGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFGFReach 2
Reach 3
UT1A
UT3
UT2 UT2A
UT2B
Reach 3
UT2C
UT3AUT3B
UT3C
UT1B
UT1C
Reach 1B Bull Creek
B
u
l
l

C
r
e
e
k
Bull CreekB a r o tro llCG215
4A
4C
4B
4D
20
19
CG3
CG4
5
6
24
22A 22
21
7 8
25
23
1817
16
MP4
MP2
MP3
MP1
2
3
7
8
0 125 250 Feet
Figure 3.2 As-Built Monitoring Plan View
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
Surry County, NC
Conservation Easement
Project Parcel
Internal Crossings
Existing Wetlands
Vegetation Plots (Permanent)
Vegetation Plots (Mobile)
Restoraton
Enhancement II
Preservation
Not for Credit
Alignment Deviation
Non Project Streams
Bankfull
[ [Fence line
Structures
Cross-Sections
!A Barotroll
!A Crest Gage
!A Stream Gage
GF Photo Points
!P Reach Breaks
¹
2018 Aerial Imagery
Reach 4
Reach 3
UT3AUT3BUT3C
B
u
l
l

C
r
e
e
k
Bull Creek7
8
9
10
11
MP2
3
4
0 100 200 Feet
Figure 3.3 As-Built Monitoring Plan View
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
Surry County, NC
Conservation Easement
Project Parcel
Internal Crossings
Existing Wetlands
Vegetation Plots (Permanent)
Vegetation Plots (Mobile)
Restoraton
Enhancement II
Preservation
Not for Credit
Alignment Deviation
Non Project Streams
Bankfull
[ [Fence line
Structures
Cross-Sections
!A Barotroll
!A Crest Gage
!A Stream Gage
GF Photo Points
!P Reach Breaks
¹
2018 Aerial Imagery
Table 1.  Mitigation Assets and ComponentsKey Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020435444 Cool RestorationP1 1.000 421N/A876722 Cool RestorationP1 1.000 722N/A403418 Cool RestorationP2 1.000 418N/A2,291 1,674 Cool RestorationP2 1.000 1,676N/A683683 Cool Preservation N/A 10.000 683N/A866829 Cool Enhancement II N/A 2.500 832N/A188212 Cool RestorationP2 1.000 212N/A332257 Cool RestorationP2 1.000 257N/A6142 Cool RestorationP2 1.000 42N/A349315 Cool RestorationP2 1.000 315N/A299263 Cool RestorationP2 1.000 263N/A223469 Cool RestorationP2 1.000 469N/A2118 Cool Enhancement II N/A 2.500 18N/A249413 Cool Enhancement II N/A 2.500 390N/A414307 Cool RestorationP2 1.000 307N/A296412 Cool Restoration P1, P2 1.000 412N/AWarm Cool ColdRiverine Non‐RivN/A 5,535.000 N/AN/AN/A N/A N/AN/AN/A N/A N/AN/AN/A N/A N/AN/AN/A N/A N/AN/AN/AN/A 504.000 N/AN/AN/A N/A N/AN/A 68.300 N/AN/AN/A N/AN/A 6,107.300 N/AN/AN/A N/A N/AEnhancement IEnhancement IICreationNon‐Riparian WetlandProject CreditsCoastal MarshEnhancementRestorationRe‐establishmentRehabilitationUT3CUT3BMitigation Ratio (X:1)As‐Built Footage/ AcreageMitigation CategoryProject Area/ReachExisting Footage (LF) or AcreageMitigation Plan Footage/ AcreageRestoration Level Priority LevelBull Creek Reach 1ABull Creek Reach 1BUT1AUT1CUT2PreservationTotalsProject ComponentsNotes/Comments Restoration LevelStream Riparian WetlandBull Creek Reach 2Bull Creek Reach 3Bull Creek Reach 4UT1BUT2AUT3UT3AUT2BUT2C
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020
Construction
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020
Bare Roots
Live Stakes
Herbaceous Plugs
Monitoring, POC Kristi Suggs
[phone] x.110
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Completion or Delivery
July 2020 October 2020
Designers
Stream SurveyYear 7 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Vegetation Survey
Year 4 Monitoring
1Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.  
Table 2.  Project Activity and Reporting History
May 2019 May 2019
April 2020 April 2020
May 2019 May 2019
June 2019 ‐ April 2020 April 2020
June 2019 ‐ April 2020 April 2020
April 2020 April 2020
January 2017 ‐ January 2019
404 Permit
January 2019Mitigation Plan
Final Design ‐ Construction Plans
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area1
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments1
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach/segments
Monitoring Performers Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Charlotte, NC 28203
Seed Mix Sources Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc.
Seeding Contractor
Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc.
150 Pine Ridge Rd
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc.
PO Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Construction Contractors 
Planting Contractor
704.332.7754
Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc.
150 Pine Ridge Rd
Mt Airy, NC 27030
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc.
Wetland Plants, Inc.
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)
Year 1 Monitoring
Mt Airy, NC 27030
Stream Survey
Stream Survey
Vegetation SurveyYear 2 Monitoring
Aaron Earley, PE, CFM
Vegetation Survey
Stream Survey
Year 3 Monitoring
Vegetation Survey
Stream Survey
Table 3.  Project Contact Table
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Vegetation Survey
Vegetation Survey
Stream SurveyYear 5 Monitoring
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020Bull Creek Reach 1ABull Creek Reach 1BBull Creek Reach 2Bull Creek Reach 3Bull Creek Reach 4UT1A UT1B UT1C421722418 1,676 683 832 212 257PPPPPPPPF3/G3c‐‐‐‐‐‐G4cG4C3bC3‐‐‐‐‐‐B4B4aVIUT2UT2A UT2B UT2C UT3 UT3A UT3B UT3C4231526346918390 307 4126IPPPII/PPPG4G5G5cG5‐‐‐‐‐‐G5G5cB4B4C4bC4‐‐‐‐‐‐B4C4Physiographic ProvinceRiver BasinUSGS Hydrologic Unit 8‐digit3040101Project Area (acres)Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)Planted Acreage (Acre of Woody Stems Planted)Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral9.8FEMA classificationEvolutionary trend (Simon's Model) ‐ Pre‐ Restoration36° 23' 57.4794"N     ‐80° 36' 11.88"WModeratley ConfinedConfinedRegulatory ConsiderationsEndangered Species ActWaters of the United States ‐ Section 401NCDWR Water Quality ClassificationEvolutionary trend (Simon's Model) ‐ Pre‐ RestorationWaters of the United States ‐ Section 404Drainage area (acres)RegulationMorphological Description (stream type) ‐ Pre‐RestorationFEMA classificationMorphological Description (stream type) ‐ Post‐RestorationFEMA Floodplain ComplianceEssential Fisheries HabitatYesNoCIII/IVN/ANot located in a Special Flood Hazard AreaN/ACategorical Exclusion Document in Mitigation PlanCategorical Exclusion Document in Mitigation PlanTable 4.  Project Information and AttributesPiedmont Physiographic ProvinceProject InformationYadkin RiverMorphological Description (stream type) ‐ Pre‐RestorationLength of reach (linear feet) ‐ Post‐RestorationProject Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area2011 NLCD Land Use ClassificationBull Creek‐ Forest (58%), Cultivated (33%), Urban (9%)UT1A‐C ‐ Forest (70%), Cultivated (21%), Urban (9%)UT2A‐C ‐ Forest (32%), Cultivated (49%), Urban (19%)                                                                                                                                             UT2 ‐ Forest (55%), Cultivated (45%), Urban (0%) UT3/UT3A‐C ‐ Forest (22%), Cultivated (74%), Urban (4%)Reach Summary InformationParameters1%Project Drainage Area (acres)Bull Creek Reach 1A, 1B, & 2: (1,146); Bull Creek Reach 3 & 4: (1,293); UT1A‐C: (102); UT2A‐C: (32); UT2: (6); UT3 & UT3‐C: (45)304010111004003‐07‐03Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)USGS Hydrologic Unit 14‐digitDWR Sub‐basinKey Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County20.8Project Watershed Summary InformationProject NameMorphological Description (stream type) ‐ Post‐RestorationPerennial, Intermittent, EphemeralNCDWR Water Quality ClassificationDrainage area (acres)Historic Preservation ActCoastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)Division of Land Quality (Erosion and Sediment Control)ParametersLength of reach (linear feet) ‐ Post‐RestorationValley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)ConfinedYesYesYesYesYesNoOutside SFHAModeratley Confined3245Outside SFHAIV/VC3F3C1,146 1,293 102Moderately ConfinedConfined to Moderately ConfinedConfinedIII/IVYesN/AN/AN/AApplicable?NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit NCG010000DWR# 17‐1045USACE Action ID# SAW‐2017‐01504Supporting DocumentationResolved?YesYesYesYes
Table 5a.  Monitoring Component SummaryKey Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020Bull Creek Reach 1ABull Creek Reach 1BBull Creek Reach 2Bull Creek Reach 3UT1B UT1CRiffle Cross‐Section11121 1Pool Cross‐Section‐‐‐1‐‐‐2‐‐‐ ‐‐‐PatternPatternN/AProfileLongitudinal ProfileN/ASubstrateReach Wide (RW) Pebble Count1 RW 1 RW 1 RW 1 RW 1 RW 1 RW Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 73HydrologyCrest Gage (CG) and/or Stream Flow Gage (SG)1 CGQuarterly4VegetationCVS Level 2Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 75Visual AssessmentSemi‐AnnuallyExotic and Nuisance VegetationSemi‐Annually6Project BoundaryAnnually7Reference PhotosPhotographsAnnuallyUT2 UT2A UT2B UT2C UT3B UT3CRiffle Cross‐Section‐‐‐11111Pool Cross‐Section‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐PatternPatternN/AProfileLongitudinal ProfileN/ASubstrateReach Wide (RW) Pebble Count‐‐‐1 RW 1 RW 1 RW 1 RW 1 RW Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 73HydrologyCrest Gage (CG) and/or Stream Flow Gage (SG)1 SGQuarterly 4VegetationCVS Level 2Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 75Visual AssessmentSemi‐AnnuallyExotic and Nuisance VegetationSemi‐Annually6Project BoundaryAnnually 7Reference PhotosPhotographsAnnuallyNotes:2. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi‐annual site visits. Longitudinal profile data was collected during as‐built baseline monitoring survey only, unless observations indicate widespread lack of vertical stability (greater than 10% of reach is affected) and profile survey is warranted in additional years to monitor adjustments or survey repair work.1. Cross‐sections have been permanently marked with rebar to establish location. Surveys include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and thalweg.3.  Reach wide pebble counts will be conducted each year a monitoring report is submitted. Riffle (100) pebble counts have been conducted during as‐built baseline monitoring only unless observations indicate otherwise during post‐construction monitoring.4. Crest gages and/or stream gages (pressure transducers) will be inspected quarterly or semi‐annually, evidence of bankfull events will be documented with a photo when possible. The stream gage (pressure transducer) has been set to record stage once every 2 hours.5. Both mobile and permanent vegetation plots will be utilized to evaluate the vegetation performance for the areas planted. Permanent vegetation monitoring plot assessments will follow CVS Level 2 protocols. Mobile vegetation monitoring plot assessments will document number of planted stems and species using a circular or 100 m2 square/rectangular plot.6.  Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.7.  Locations of vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.2Frequency Notes1DimensionYear 1, 2, 3, 5, and 712ParameterMonitoring Feature8 (5 permanent, 3 mobile)YesQuantity / Length by Reach1 CG1 CGN/AN/AParameterMonitoring FeatureQuantity / Length by ReachFrequency Notes1N/A21 CGN/A1 CG9DimensionYear 1, 2, 3, 5, and 73 (1 permanent, 2 mobile)Yes
Table 5b.  Monitoring Component SummaryKey Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020UT1A UT3 UT3ABull Creek Reach 4Riffle Cross‐Section‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐Pool Cross‐Section‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐PatternN/ALongitudinal ProfileN/AReach Wide (RW) Pebble Count‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7Crest Gage (CG) and/or Stream Flow Gage (SG)‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐QuarterlyCVS Level 2‐‐‐Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 71Semi‐AnnuallySemi‐Annually2Annually3PhotographsAnnuallyNotes:3.  Locations of vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.1. Both mobile and permanent vegetation plots will be utilized to evaluate the vegetation performance for the areas planted. Permanent vegetation monitoring plot assessments will follow CVS Level 2 protocols. Mobile vegetation monitoring plot assessments will document number of planted stems and species using a circular or 100 m2 square/rectangular plot.2.  Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.FrequencyNotesQuantity / Length by ReachYear 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7Yes2 (2 permanent)4ParameterDimensionN/AN/APatternExotic and Nuisance VegetationProject BoundaryReference PhotosMonitoring FeatureProfileSubstrateHydrologyVegetationVisual Assessment

MEETING NOTES

MEETING: Post-Contract IRT Site Walk
KEY MILL Mitigation Site
Yadkin 03040101; Surry County, NC
DEQ Contract No. 7180
DMS Project No. 100025
Wildlands Project No. 005-02165

DATE: Monday, August 14, 2017

LOCATION: 515 Key Road
Ararat, NC

Attendees
Todd Tugwell, USACE
Andrea Leslie, USFWS
Mac Haupt, DWR
Paul Wiesner, DMS
Matthew Reid, DMS
Shawn Wilkerson, Wildlands
Christine Blackwelder, Wildlands

Materials
 Wildlands Engineering Technical Proposal dated 2/15/2017 in response to DMS RFP 16-006993

Meeting Notes
The meeting began at 1 pm. Shawn presented an overview of the project at the parking location. From there,
the group proceeded to walk the entire site in the following order: Bull Creek Reach 2, Bull Creek Reach 3,
wetland BMP, UT2, UT3, Bull Creek Reach 1, UT1. The meeting concluded at 4:30 PM. For organizational
purposes, the meeting notes are arranged by stream reach, from upstream to downstream.
1. Bull Creek
 Reach 1
o Bull Creek Reach 1 will be primarily constructed offline, into the right floodplain on the upstream
half of the reach and into the left floodplain on the downstream half of the reach.
o IRT members expressed concern over legacy sediments that may exist behind the old mill dams.
They pointed to crack between soil layers in a cut bank and noted that the backwater from the old
dams may have extended far upstream. Wildlands will shoot survey grades on top of the old dams
and compare to soil layers during existing conditions analysis. Shawn also noted that the legacy
sediments seemed consolidated and have been in place for 80 years since the last mill dam
breach.

KEY MILL Mitigation Site – Meeting Notes

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 2
KEY MILL Mitigation Site
Post-Contract IRT Site Walk
 Reach 2/Wetland BMP
o Bull Creek Reach 2 will be restored and moved into the left floodplain, off the right valley wall.
Group agreed with this approach. The group noted that Bull Creek Reach 2 (downstream of Key
Road) has bank height ratios around 2 and is eroded.
o Wetland BMP – This wetland is designed to treat agricultural drainage from a defined valley that
does not have a flowing stream. Some discussion over whether a stream once ran here and had
been buried. Todd asked if there is a pipe which outlets into Bull Creek – there is not. No direct
credit has been requested for BMP.
 Reach 3
o Within the woods, Bull Creek Reach 3 has eroded, high banks, and privet dominates the
understory. Approximately halfway down the reach, the bank heights drop, invasive species are
small and sporadic, and the banks are more stable.
 IRT team members do not consider the first half of this reach to be preservation quality.
 Paul/Shawn remarked that, due to the restrictions set forth in the RFP, only 81 SMUs are
requested for the 1,460 LF stretch, which equates to an 18:1 ratio.
 Todd, Andrea, Mac agreed that they like the lower half of the project for preservation.
Discussion about potentially proposing the lower half at a 10:1 credit, and conserving the
upper half of Bull Creek Reach 3 at no credit.
 Discussion about potentially extending restoration into the woods for a distance. Wildlands is
agreeable to extending the P1 restoration a few hundred feet and tying into the preservation
section.
 Several solutions are possible here. If the IRT is agreeable we will select final approach after
survey and preliminary design.
2. UT1 -The group agreed with the approximate break between restoration and enhancement II on UT1.
3. UT2/UT2A - UT2 and UT2A approaches were reviewed and approved by the group. Discussion about UT2
where it hits the flat floodplain of Bull Creek and whether the creek would have naturally splayed into a
wetland. This area is heavily trampled by cattle and is growing over with aquatic vegetation, but has fast
flow. Wildlands will review the stream type during design.
4. UT3 - The group agreed on the approximate break between restoration and enhancement II on UT3.
Although incised, the stream in the enhancement II section is not eroding, and with the upstream pond
controlling peak watershed flows, the stream is unlikely to see flashy, eroding flows. Where restoration is
proposed, the banks are actively eroding and migrating, and restoration is appropriate.
5. Ratios - The group agreed upon the credit ratios presented in the Proposal and below
 Restoration, 1:1
 Enhancement II, 2.5:1
 Preservation, 10:1
6. Stream Crossings - All crossings are internal, which allows legal recourse if crossing restrictions are not
observed.
KEY MILL Mitigation Site – Meeting Notes

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 3
KEY MILL Mitigation Site
Post-Contract IRT Site Walk
 Bull Creek/Key Road Crossing (#1 on proposal figure 6): Todd asked for Wildlands to explain this
crossing in detail. The farmer currently rotates cattle between fields upstream and downstream of
Key Road. Cattle are moved through the Key Road culvert. This is the only way the farmer can move
cattle between fields, so Wildlands has proposed an internal crossing upstream and downstream of
the road, which allows the farmer to move the cattle through the stream. Andrea expressed concern
about cattle entering the easement during crossing events. Temporary fence will be strung during
crossing events to prevent cattle from entering the remainder of the easement.
 UT1 – upstream crossing (#3 on proposal figure 6): Todd asked if this crossing could move upstream
of the conservation easement. No - the farmer cannot gain access to his upper fields by crossing the
stream above the project because the right valley wall is too steep to traverse.
 UT1 - downstream crossing (#4 on proposal figure 6): Todd asked if this crossing could be eliminated.
No – the farmer needs this crossing to gain access to his lower fields.
7. General suggestions/recommendations of the IRT
 Overall, members of the IRT would like to see the proposed approach (restoration, enhancement,
preservation) presented in the Mitigation Plan in the context of evolutionary stage.

These meeting minutes were prepared by Christine Blackwelder and reviewed by Shawn Wilkerson on August 15, 2017, and
represent the authors’ interpretation of events. Please report and discrepancies or corrections within 5 business days of
receipt of these minutes.

APPENDIX 2. Morphological Summary Data and Plots

Table 6a. Baseline Stream Data SummaryKey Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020Parameter GageMin Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min MaxDimension and Substrate ‐ RiffleBankfull Width (ft)16.2 19.1 16.2 19.1 16.2 19.1 18.0 25.4 5.6 7.0 5.6 7.019.6 21.2Floodprone Width2 (ft)21 25 21 25 21 25 27 53 14 17 14 17 42.9 97.5 38.5 87.535.2 80.0 46.2 105.0 12.0 19.0 12.0 18.094.0 99.0Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.1 2.1 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.01.6 1.8Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.8 2.1 1.8 2.1 1.8 2.1 1.6 2.7 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.8 1.7 2.4 1.4 1.9 1.8 2.4 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.12.7 3.0Bankfull Cross‐sectional Area (ft2)18.7 21.6 18.7 21.6 18.7 21.6 26.2 39.5 3.9 6.8 3.9 6.833.5 36.0Width/Depth Ratio14.1 16.8 14.1 16.8 14.1 16.2 8.5 22.5 7.3 8.1 7.3 8.110.7 13.4Entrenchment Ratio21.3 2.9 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.2 4.66.3 7.82.8 3.3 2.7 2.94.3 4.7Bank Height Ratio 3.7 4.1 3.7 4.1 3.7 4.1 1.9 2.8 5.0 7.9 5.0 7.91.0 1.0D50 (mm)91.6 96.6 91.6 96.6 25.8 37.217.7 24.2 17.7 24.256.4 56.9ProfileRiffle Length (ft)Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.0100 0.0148 0.0162 0.0203 0.0172 0.0318 0.0103 0.0171 0.0314 0.0801 0.00800.0526 0.0050 0.0140 0.0133 0.0258 0.0274 0.0377 0.0037 0.0197 0.0285 0.0604 0.0108 0.0527Pool Length (ft)Pool Max Depth (ft)1.5 2.3 4.0 5.6 3.5 4.8 3.9 6.5 1.3 1.8 4.3 5.0 3.1 4.6 3.3 4.2 3.0 5.4 0.9 2.0 1.2 2.4Pool Spacing (ft)48.0 262.0 48.0 262.0 96.0 111.0 80.0 101.0 74.6 76.7 55.8 149.0 20.054.0 20.0 27.0 76.6 110.1 59.3 99.2 60.8 187.8 19.9 63.0 18.2 51.5Pool Volume (ft3)PatternChannel Beltwidth (ft)68.8 89.4 53.4 81.3 45.0 69.2 39.0 108.4N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A168.8 89.4 53.4 81.3 45.0 69.2 39.0 108.4N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A1Radius of Curvature (ft)35.0 50.0 32.0 50.0 30.0 50.5 36.0 85.6N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A135.0 50.0 32.0 50.0 30.0 50.5 36.0 85.6N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A1Rc/Bankfull Width 1.8 2.6 1.8 2.9 1.9 3.2 1.7 4.1N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A11.8 2.6 1.8 2.9 1.9 3.2 1.7 4.1N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A1Meander Length (ft)192.2 207.2 179.2 199.8 149.3 171.4 177.0 312.4N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A1192.2 207.2 179.2 199.8 149.3 171.4 177.0 312.4N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A1Meander Width Ratio3.5 4.6 3.1 4.6 2.8 4.3 1.9 5.2N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A13.5 4.6 3.1 4.6 2.8 4.3 1.9 5.2N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A1Substrate, Bed and Transport ParametersRi%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%D16/D35/D50/D84/D95/D100Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull42.0 47.0Stream Power (Capacity) W/m2Additional Reach ParametersDrainage Area (SM)Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)Rosgen ClassificationBankfull Velocity (fps)4.8 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.2 4.3 3.5 5.0 3.5 5.04.7 5.1Bankfull Discharge (cfs)157 184Q‐NFF regression (2‐yr)Q‐USGS extrapolation (1.2‐yr)Max Q‐ManningsValley Slope (ft/ft)Channel Thalweg Length (ft)SinuosityBankfull/Channel Slope (ft/ft)0.0076 0.01141. Pattern data is not applicable for A‐type and B‐type channels 2. ER is based on the width of the cross‐section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.SC: Silt/Clay <0.062 mm diameter particles(‐‐‐):  Data was not providedN/A:  Not Applicable0.920.03490.0092 0.0407‐‐‐2121,676 2571.11.31 2.03356.2B4‐‐‐4.42.176.61511.6353.01.6877 1401.6829.0166‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐0.0370‐‐‐‐‐‐111N/A 9220.02400.00863.81303.21.7C34.1C3bB4C35.6170.02951,15960.0B4a‐‐‐0.04580.015019.010719.090.0200.01181.1 1.1‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐4.90.3/2.8/34.3/167.3/287.3/>2048‐‐‐‐‐‐2.6UT1CBull Creek R1BBull Creek R2 Bull Creek R3Bull Creek R1B Bull Creek R2 Bull Creek R3UT1CUT1CBull Creek R31.03.41.030.21.31.213.213.313.819.3119801.32491.501.190.660.161%F3/G3cF31.632.021.792.02<1%<1%4353323.2116.099.01881,4843.91.761%3.90.3/8.0/13.5/33.6/75.9/180.0C3C30.641.020.9823.2Pre‐Restoration Condition0.16G4F3UT1B1.2202.6418‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐0.01240.00714211,6742574441.20.02421.11.32120.01300.04400.04250.00690.01237220.0090 0.01600.01400.03161.21.31.21.21.2403 2,2911191.21.30.01001.10.0335N/A1.6390.0116.019.003.80.1690.00.01901.1N/A0.1/5.6/20.7/ 113.8/171.4/ 362.0940.3/6.4/12.8/45.0/101.2/ 256.00.3/1.8/8.9/ 87.3/137.0/ 1024.00.1/5.6/28.5/ 151.8/256.0/ 362.0SC/0.3/11.0/ 222.4/346.7/ 512.0‐‐‐N/A‐‐‐‐‐‐N/A4.94.952.0 N/A‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐52.0 52.0‐‐‐135.933.956.282.21.3 1.3 1.3>2.264.0>2.2N/A1.14.810.113.42.828.23.631.114.58.5Bull Creek R1A19.51.61.58.30.617.516.00.6As‐Built/BaselineDesign2.967.61.070.121.03.9Bull Creek R2UT1BBull Creek R1ABull Creek R1BBull Creek R1A107.319.41.71.529.7UT1B1.0‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐0.0120 0.0270 0.00801.68 1.798760.5/9.2/13.7/100.0/180.0/362.00.5/3.4/13.3/109.5/166.9/256.090.0F30.02491.792.020.16C3bC3B4a0.1699.0‐‐‐4181.27221.21.11.3‐‐‐‐‐‐5.30.16G4c19.05.212.614.2‐‐‐C31.06.823.60.60.93.911.717.33.51.06.934.00.81.35.78.34.916.455.71.42.522.911.81%<1%94.00.2/0.5/19.0/ 96.0/146.7/  362.089.0230.4
Table 6b. Baseline Stream Data SummaryKey Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020ParameterGageMin Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min MaxDimension and Substrate ‐ RiffleBankfull Width (ft)3.9 5.7 3.9 5.7Floodprone Width2 (ft)84 112 84 112 84 112 84 112 9 14 9 14 5.0 8.0 8.0 13.0 13.0 30.0 15.0 34.0 10.0 15.0 16.5 37.5Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.4Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 0.8 1.2 0.8 1.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.0Bankfull Cross‐sectional Area (ft2)5.7 7.4 5.7 7.4 5.7 7.4 5.7 7.4 2.8 4.1 2.8 4.1Width/Depth Ratio 3.7 4.8 3.7 4.8 3.7 4.8 3.7 4.8 5.4 7.8 5.4 7.8Entrenchment Ratio216.0 21.2 16.0 21.2 16.0 21.2 16.0 21.2 1.6 3.5 1.6 3.5 1.4 2.2 2.8 5.7 5.0 7.5 5.1 6.6 3.1 6.0Bank Height Ratio 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.9 2.7 3.8 2.7 3.8D50 (mm)SC 0.1 SC 1.1 SC 2.1 SC 3.1 3.6 6.4 3.6 6.4ProfileRiffle Length (ft)Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.0457 0.0681 0.0287 0.0414 0.0135 0.0409 0.0135 0.0449 0.0385 0.0488 0.01980.02660.0046 0.0347 0.0054 0.0371 0.0132 0.0510 0.0113 0.0530 0.0081 0.0249Pool Length (ft)Pool Max Depth (ft)1.42.21.62.21.42.10.92.61.82.5Pool Spacing (ft)22.0 33.0 23.0 44.0 30.0 47.0 24.029.0 31.0 58.018.6 39.9 20.5 44.1 26.1 55.9 19.5 30.4 17.4 79.9Pool Volume (ft3)PatternChannel Beltwidth (ft)N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A119.0 26.0 23.0 34.0N/A1N/A117.2 44.8N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A119.0 26 23.0 34.0N/A1N/A117.2 44.8Radius of Curvature (ft)N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A112.0 15.0 13.0 17.0N/A1N/A112.0 22.0N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A112.0 15.0 13.0 17.0N/A1N/A112.0 22.0Rc/Bankfull Width N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A12.0 2.5 1.9 2.5N/A1N/A11.6 2.9N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A12.0 2.5 1.9 2.5N/A1N/A11.6 2.9Meander Length (ft)N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A156.0 76.0 73.0 90.0N/A1N/A165.2 118.0N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A156.0 76.0 73.0 90.0N/A1N/A165.2 118.0Meander Width RatioN/A1N/A1N/A1N/A13.2 4.3 3.3 4.9N/A1N/A12.2 6.0N/A1N/A1N/A1N/A13.2 4.3 3.3 4.9N/A1N/A12.2 6.0Substrate, Bed and Transport ParametersRi%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%D16/D35/D50/D84/D95/D100Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfullStream Power (Capacity) W/m2Additional Reach ParametersDrainage Area (SM)Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)Rosgen ClassificationBankfull Velocity (fps) 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.2 1.9 2.2 4.0 4.2 4.0 4.2Bankfull Discharge (cfs)Q‐NFF regression (2‐yr)Q‐USGS extrapolation (1.2‐yr)Max Q‐ManningsValley Slope (ft/ft)Channel Thalweg Length (ft)SinuosityBankfull/Channel Slope (ft/ft)0.0229 0.0387 0.0304 0.0363 0.0121 0.01461. Pattern data is not applicable for A‐type and B‐type channels 2. ER is based on the width of the cross‐section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.SC: Silt/Clay <0.062 mm diameter particles(‐‐‐):  Data was not providedN/A:  Not Applicable1.10.01340.69 0.59 0.99151.2 1.3<1%C40.660.0317 0.01323073.7 3.3 4.2 3.418 23G50.07‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐469<1%<1%G4 G519C4bG5c4140.0290Pre‐Restoration ConditionDesignAs‐Built/BaselineUT2 UT2A UT2B UT2C UT3B UT3CUT2UT2CUT3BUT3CN/A5.35.35.35.3UT2AUT2B7.0UT2AUT2BUT2CUT3BUT3C UT20.70.70.50.50.50.60.22.63.24.7N/A6.8N/A30.36.06.87.53.56.0N/AN/A0.50.5N/A0.83.613.7N/A3.412.0N/A13.9>2.24.42.713.321.00.914.2B41.61.3B412.913.3‐‐‐‐‐‐1.01.5‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐G5‐‐‐12.00.0360G5c0.0230‐‐‐‐‐‐N/AN/A‐‐‐1.01.0N/A58.61.049.0N/A1.5N/A‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐N/A1.61.9‐‐‐‐‐‐1.4N/A‐‐‐‐‐‐N/A‐‐‐‐‐‐SC/0.1/0.2/8.4/12.5/32.0‐‐‐N/A‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐SC/0.1/8.9/92.5/124.6/256.0N/ASC/0.1/0.8/ 64.0/ 85.4/128.0SC/0.1/1.3/ 85.4/137.0/256.00.8/4.2/9.4/ 64.0/165.3/362.00.1/0.3/4.0/73.4/148.1/256.01.060.380.52SC/0.5/5.9/21.0/100.0/256.0N/A1.131.050.550.74848340294289N/A36.035.028.028.00.050.0550.00.040.02720.01N/A0.01 0.05 0.05 0.050.07B4C4bC4B40.0310N/AN/A123.60.042.70.01900.052.40.050.073.02.40.01C4B4C43.07.07.07.012.03.07.07.07.012.012.039 110.01790.0153‐‐‐N/A0.03290.023462102‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐0.07310.01604121.23152630.0640613492992232960.0220 0.0170 0.02000.01703151.11.21.11.2421.10.0184B40.073.3N/AN/A420.04700.05800.02001.30.01351.24693071.14121.1N/A 0.02371.1‐‐‐32.00.61.14.811.77.848.20.71.15.8‐‐‐0.070.070.50.83.51.22633.569.32.28.821.128.210.56.28.11.03.16.955.80.81.36.811.36.313.41.021.4
Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020ParameterGageMin Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min MaxDimension and Substrate ‐ RiffleBankfull Width (ft)9.7 12.47.3 7.88.2 11.2Floodprone Width (ft)52.0 79.012.2 15.614.7 18.5Bankfull Mean Depth1.2 1.40.7 0.81.0 1.4Bankfull Max Depth1.1 1.41.5 1.6Bankfull Cross‐sectional Area (ft2)11.4 17.5 5.7 6.210.7 11.1Width/Depth Ratio 8.1 8.9 6.6 9.86.0 11.7 17.0 17.5Entrenchment Ratio 5.4 6.4 1.6 2.11.5 1.9Bank Height Ratio 0.9 1.4 0.8 1.3 1.7 2.61.8 2.1 1.0 2.4D50 (mm)ProfileRiffle Length (ft)Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0114 0.0605 0.0142 0.3451 0.0036 0.0420 0.0063 0.0770 0.0110 0.1400 0.0120 0.0320 0.0230 0.1700Pool Length (ft)Pool Max Depth (ft)1.3 1.5Pool Spacing (ft)31 60 19 46 9 55 29 8818 27 36 149 13 49Pool Volume (ft3)PatternChannel Beltwidth (ft)24 60 62 88 18 3425 56Radius of Curvature (ft)31 56 29 52 14 29 7 38 8 269 28Rc/Bankfull Width 2.8 5.1 2.4 4.2 1.9 3.8 0.3 1.60.9 2.9Meander Length (ft)Meander Width Ratio4.4 5.73.3 7.6 2.6 3.7 2.3 4.32.6 5.8Substrate, Bed and Transport ParametersRi%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2 Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfullStream Power (Capacity) W/m2Additional Reach ParametersDrainage Area (SM)Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)Rosgen ClassificationBankfull Velocity (fps)Bankfull Discharge (cfs)26 32Q‐NFF regression (2‐yr)Q‐USGS extrapolation (1.2‐yr)Q‐ManningsValley Length (ft)Channel Thalweg Length (ft)SinuosityWater Surface Slope (ft/ft)Bankfull/Channel Slope (ft/ft)0.0300 0.0650SC: Silt/Clay <0.062 mm diameter particles  (‐‐‐):  Data was not provided N/A:  Not Applicable0.00460.01502.51.00.711.510.910.14.31.23.419.18.99.11.10.70.60.520.93.3‐‐‐‐‐‐0.0067‐‐‐3.41.6‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐1.3N/AB4cB42.73.717N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A2.4N/A‐‐‐8.9/27/38/71/1500.49/3.5/6.5/48.0/83.0/128.0N/AN/A‐‐‐6.5‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐N/A‐‐‐‐‐‐UT to South Fork Timber Tributary‐‐‐‐‐‐N/A0.20.11.61.6N/A‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐Reference Reach Data13.64.61.538.00.0680‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐5.923‐‐‐‐‐‐0.0084‐‐‐1.2C4‐‐‐8019B4/ B4a‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐1.3‐‐‐‐‐‐5.0‐‐‐E4B4a or A43.4E50.027099‐‐‐1.1‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐1.16.15.5E3b/ C3b‐‐‐0.5/29.8/75.9/170.8/332.0/2048.0N/A0.22.120800.062/1/19/76/1500.3/0.4/1.8/12.8/25.2/90.0N/A‐‐‐N/A‐‐‐1.8N/A‐‐‐N/A‐‐‐‐‐‐2.5N/A4.1/11/22/50/78N/AN/A13.276.31.228.90.00.37/8/19.02/102.3/256/>20480.1Table 7. Reference Reach Data SummaryUT to Catawba R2 UT to Sandy Run Box CreekN/AN/AN/AN/AUT to Kelly Branch UT to Gap BranchUT to Catawba R153.0‐‐‐12.37.919.01.823.5‐‐‐4.419.0‐‐‐‐‐‐1.5‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐N/AN/A6.21.71.71.11.075.91.95.73.81.52255N/A‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐N/A‐‐‐23
Table 8a.  Morphology and Hydraulic  Summary (Dimensional Parameters ‐ Cross‐Section)Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020Dimension and SubstrateBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7Bankfull elevation 1106.411099.36Bankfull Width (ft) 19.417.3Floodprone Width (ft)170.167.6Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.51.7Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.82.9Bankfull Cross‐Sectional Area (ft2)28.229.7Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 13.410.1Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio23.63.9Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.01.0Dimension and SubstrateBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7Bankfull elevation 1098.701088.01Bankfull Width (ft) 24.416.4Floodprone Width (ft)1N/A55.7Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 2.31.4Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 5.32.5Bankfull Cross‐Sectional Area (ft2)56.822.9Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.511.8Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio2N/A3.4Bankfull Bank Height Ratio N/A1.0Dimension and SubstrateBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7Bankfull elevation 1079.641079.35Bankfull Width (ft) 27.021.2Floodprone Width (ft)1N/A99.0Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.81.6Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 3.72.7Bankfull Cross‐Sectional Area (ft2)49.033.5Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 14.913.4Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio2N/A4.7Bankfull Bank Height Ratio N/A1.01. Floodprone width is based on the width of the cross‐section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.2. ER is based on the width of the cross‐section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.N/A:  Not ApplicableBull Creek Reach 3 Cross‐Section 5, PoolBull Creek Reach 3 Cross‐Section 6, RiffleBull Creek Reach 1A Cross‐Section 1, RiffleBull Creek Reach 1B Cross‐Section 2, RiffleBull Creek Reach 1B Cross‐Section 3, PoolBull Creek Reach 2 Cross‐Section 4, Riffle
Table 8b.  Morphology and Hydraulic  Summary (Dimensional Parameters ‐ Cross‐Section)Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020Dimension and SubstrateBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7bankfull elevation 1073.271068.53Bankfull Width (ft) 19.629.3Floodprone Width (ft)184.0N/ABankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.81.9Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 3.04.3Bankfull Cross‐Sectional Area (ft2)36.055.1Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.715.6Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio24.3N/ABankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0N/ADimension and SubstrateBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7bankfull elevation 1101.941089.27Bankfull Width (ft) 6.86.9Floodprone Width (ft)123.634.0Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.60.8Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.91.3Bankfull Cross‐Sectional Area (ft2)3.9 5.7Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 11.78.3Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio23.54.9Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.01.0Dimension and SubstrateBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7bankfull elevation 1096.251088.43Bankfull Width (ft) 6.88.1Floodprone Width (ft)130.332.0Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.50.6Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.81.1Bankfull Cross‐Sectional Area (ft2)3.4 4.8Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 13.913.4Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio24.44.0Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.01.01. Floodprone width is based on the width of the cross‐section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.2. ER is based on the width of the cross‐section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.N/A:  Not ApplicableBull Creek Reach 3 Cross‐Section 7, RiffleBull Creek Reach 3 Cross‐Section 8, PoolUT1B Cross‐Section 9, RiffleUT1C Cross‐Section 10, RiffleUT2A Cross‐Section 11, RiffleUT2B Cross‐Section 12, Riffle
Table 8c.  Morphology and Hydraulic  Summary (Dimensional Parameters ‐ Cross‐Section)Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020Dimension and SubstrateBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7bankfull elevation 1081.591084.57Bankfull Width (ft) 7.86.9Floodprone Width (ft)148.221.4Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.70.5Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.10.8Bankfull Cross‐Sectional Area (ft2)5.8 3.5Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.513.4Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio26.23.1Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.01.0Dimension and SubstrateBase MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7bankfull elevation 1081.13Bankfull Width (ft) 8.8Floodprone Width (ft)155.8Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.3Bankfull Cross‐Sectional Area (ft2)6.8Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 11.3Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio26.3Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.01. Floodprone width is based on the width of the cross‐section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.2. ER is based on the width of the cross‐section, in lieu of assuming the width across the floodplain.N/A:  Not ApplicableUT2C Cross‐Section 13, RiffleUT3B Cross‐Section 14, RiffleUT3C Cross‐Section 15, Riffle
DMS Project No. 100025Longitudinal Profile PlotsKey Mill Mitigation SiteMonitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020Bull Creek Reach 1A (STA 100+95 to 105+39)XS1Start BC R1AEnd BC R1AStart BC R1B109811001102110411061108111010090 10140 10190 10240 10290 10340 10390 10440 10490 10540Elevation (feet)Station (feet)TWG (MY0‐10/2019)WSF (MY0‐10/2019)LTOB (MY0‐10/2019)RTOB (MY0‐10/2019)STRUCTURE (MY0‐10/2019)
DMS Project No. 100025Longitudinal Profile PlotsKey Mill Mitigation SiteMonitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020Bull Creek Reach 1B (STA 105+39 to 112+61)XS2XS3End BC R1AStart BC R1BEnd BC R1BStart BC R21088109010921094109610981100110211041106110810500 10550 10600 10650 10700 10750 10800 10850 10900 10950 11000 11050 11100 11150 11200 11250 11300Elevation (feet)Station (feet)TWG (MY0‐10/2019)WSF (MY0‐10/2019)LTOB (MY0‐10/2019)RTOB (MY0‐10/2019)STRUCTURE (MY0‐10/2019)
DMS Project No. 100025Longitudinal Profile PlotsKey Mill Mitigation SiteMonitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020Bull Creek Reach 2 (STA 112+61 to 116+79)XS4End BC R1BStart BC R2End BC R2108010821084108610881090109210941096109811240 11290 11340 11390 11440 11490 11540 11590 11640 11690Elevation (feet)Station (feet)TWG (MY0‐10/2019)WSF (MY0‐10/2019)LTOB (MY0‐10/2019)RTOB (MY0‐10/2019)STRUCTURE (MY0‐10/2019)
DMS Project No. 100025Longitudinal Profile PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020Bull Creek Reach 3 (STA 150+30 to 167+56)XS5XS6Start BCR31070107210741076107810801082108414990 15090 15190 15290 15390 15490 15590 15690 15790Elevation (feet)Station (feet)TWG (MY0‐6/2020)WSF (MY0‐6/2020)LTOB (MY0‐6/2020)RTOB (MY0‐6/2020)STRUCTURE (MY0‐6/2020)XS7XS8End BCR3Internal Crossing105910611063106510671069107110731075107715860 15960 16060 16160 16260 16360 16460 16560 16660 16760Elevation (feet)Station (feet)TWG (MY0‐6/2020)WSF (MY0‐6/2020)LTOB (MY0‐6/2020)RTOB (MY0‐6/2020)STRUCTURE (MY0‐6/2020)
DMS Project No. 100025Longitudinal Profile PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020UT1B (STA 208+85 to 210+97)XS9End UT1BStart UT1BInternal Crossing10901092109410961098110011021104110620880 20930 20980 21030 21080Elevation (feet)Station (feet)TWG (MY0‐10/2019)WSF (MY0‐10/2019)LTOB (MY0‐10/2019)RTOB (MY0‐10/2019)STRUCTURE (MY0‐10/2019)
DMS Project No. 100025Longitudinal Profile PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020UT1C (STA 211+36 to 213+93)XS10End UT1BEnd UT1CInternal CrossingStart UT1C108210841086108810901092109410961098110021090 21140 21190 21240 21290 21340 21390Elevation (feet)Station (feet)TWG (MY0‐10/2019)WSF (MY0‐10/2019)LTOB (MY0‐10/2019)RTOB (MY0‐10/2019)STRUCTURE (MY0‐10/2019)
DMS Project No. 100025Longitudinal Profile PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020UT2A (STA 300+00 to 303+15)XS11End UT2AStart UT2A108710891091109310951097109929990300403009030140301903024030290Elevation (feet)Station (feet)TWG (MY0‐6/2020)WSF (MY0‐6/2020)LTOB (MY0‐6/2020)RTOB (MY0‐6/2020)STRUCTURE (MY0‐6/2020)
DMS Project No. 100025Longitudinal Profile PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020UT2B (STA 303+50 to 306+13)XS12End UT2AEnd UT2BInternal CrossingStart UT2B108010821084108610881090109230310303603041030460305103056030610Elevation (feet)Station (feet)TWG (MY0‐6/2020)WSF (MY0‐6/2020)LTOB (MY0‐6/2020)RTOB (MY0‐6/2020)STRUCTURE (MY0‐6/2020)
DMS Project No. 100025Longitudinal Profile PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020UT2C (STA 306+13 to 310+82)XS13Start UT2CEnd UT2C1074107610781080108210841086108830610 30660 30710 30760 30810 30860 30910 30960 31010 31060Elevation (feet)Station (feet)TWG (MY0‐6/2020)WSF (MY0‐6/2020)LTOB (MY0‐6/2020)RTOB (MY0‐6/2020)STRUCTURE (MY0‐6/2020)
DMS Project No. 100025Longitudinal Profile PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020UT3B (STA 404+70 to 407+77)XS14End UT3BStart UT3B1077107910811083108510871089109140465405154056540615406654071540765Elevation (feet)Station (feet)TWG (MY0‐6/2020)WSF (MY0‐6/2020)LTOB (MY0‐6/2020)RTOB (MY0‐6/2020)STRUCTURE (MY0‐6/2020)
DMS Project No. 100025Longitudinal Profile PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020UT3C (STA 408+12 to 412+24)XS15Start UT3CEnd UT3CInternal CrossingEnd UT3B107210741076107810801082108440770 40820 40870 40920 40970 41020 41070 41120 41170 41220Elevation (feet)Station (feet)TWG (MY0‐6/2020)WSF (MY0‐6/2020)LTOB (MY0‐6/2020)RTOB (MY0‐6/2020)STRUCTURE (MY0‐6/2020)
Bankfull Dimensions28.2 x‐section area (ft.sq.)19.4 width (ft)1.5 mean depth (ft)2.8 max depth (ft) 20.5 wetted perimeter (ft)1.4 hydraulic radius (ft)13.4 width‐depth ratio70.1 W flood prone area (ft)3.6 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 10/2019Field Crew: Kee Mapping & SurveyingKey Mill Mitigation Site  DMS Project No. 100025Cross‐Section PlotsCross‐Section 1‐Bull Creek Reach 1AMonitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020View Downstream1102110411061108111010 20 30 40 50 60Elevation (ft)Width (ft)102+89 RiffleMY0 (10/2019)BankfullFloodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions29.7 x‐section area (ft.sq.)17.3 width (ft)1.7 mean depth (ft)2.9 max depth (ft) 18.6 wetted perimeter (ft)1.6 hydraulic radius (ft)10.1 width‐depth ratio67.6 W flood prone area (ft)3.9 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 07/2020Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringKey Mill Mitigation Site  DMS Project No. 100025Cross‐Section PlotsCross‐Section 2‐Bull Creek Reach 1BMonitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020View Downstream1096109811001102110410 20 30 40 50 60 70Elevation (ft)Width (ft)110+04 RiffleMY0 (07/2020)BankfullFloodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions56.8 x‐section area (ft.sq.)24.4 width (ft)2.3 mean depth (ft)5.3 max depth (ft) 28.6 wetted perimeter (ft)2.0 hydraulic radius (ft)10.5 width‐depth ratioSurvey Date: 07/2020Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringKey Mill Mitigation Site  DMS Project No. 100025Cross‐Section PlotsCross‐Section 3‐Bull Creek Reach 1BMonitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020View Downstream10931095109710991101110310 20 30 40 50 60 70Elevation (ft)Width (ft)110+37 PoolMY0 (07/2020)Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions22.9 x‐section area (ft.sq.)16.4 width (ft)1.4 mean depth (ft)2.5 max depth (ft) 17.8 wetted perimeter (ft)1.3 hydraulic radius (ft)11.8 width‐depth ratio55.7 W flood prone area (ft)3.4 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 07/2020Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringKey Mill Mitigation Site  DMS Project No. 100025Cross‐Section PlotsCross‐Section 4‐Bull Creek Reach 2Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020View Downstream108410861088109010920 1020304050Elevation (ft)Width (ft)115+72 RiffleMY0 (07/2020)BankfullFloodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions49.0 x‐section area (ft.sq.)27.0 width (ft)1.8 mean depth (ft)3.7 max depth (ft) 28.6 wetted perimeter (ft)1.7 hydraulic radius (ft)14.9 width‐depth ratioSurvey Date: 06/2020Field Crew: Kee Mapping & SurveyingKey Mill Mitigation Site  DMS Project No. 100025Cross‐Section PlotsCross‐Section 5‐Bull Creek Reach 3Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020View Downstream1074107610781080108210 20 30 40 50 60 70 80Elevation (ft)Width (ft)152+97 PoolMY0 (06/2020)Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions33.5 x‐section area (ft.sq.)21.2 width (ft)1.6 mean depth (ft)2.7 max depth (ft) 22.1 wetted perimeter (ft)1.5 hydraulic radius (ft)13.4 width‐depth ratio99.0 W flood prone area (ft)4.7 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 06/2020Field Crew: Kee Mapping & SurveyingKey Mill Mitigation Site  DMS Project No. 100025Cross‐Section PlotsCross‐Section 6‐Bull Creek Reach 3Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020View Downstream1076107810801082108410 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90Elevation (ft)Width (ft)153+52 RiffleMY0 (06/2020)BankfullFloodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions36.0 x‐section area (ft.sq.)19.6 width (ft)1.8 mean depth (ft)3.0 max depth (ft) 21.1 wetted perimeter (ft)1.7 hydraulic radius (ft)10.7 width‐depth ratio84.0 W flood prone area (ft)4.3 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 07/2020Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringCross‐Section 7‐Bull Creek Reach 3Cross‐Section PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site  DMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020View Downstream10681070107210741076107810 20 30 40 50 60 70 80Elevation (ft)Width (ft)164+14 RiffleMY0 (07/2020)BankfullFloodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions55.1 x‐section area (ft.sq.)29.3 width (ft)1.9 mean depth (ft)4.3 max depth (ft) 31.1 wetted perimeter (ft)1.8 hydraulic radius (ft)15.6 width‐depth ratioSurvey Date: 06/2020Field Crew: Kee Mapping & SurveyingCross‐Section 8‐Bull Creek Reach 3Cross‐Section PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site  DMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020View Downstream10621064106610681070107215 25 35 45 55 65 75 85Elevation (ft)Width (ft)164+78 PoolMY0 (06/2020)Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions3.9 x‐section area (ft.sq.)6.8 width (ft)0.6 mean depth (ft)0.9 max depth (ft) 7.4 wetted perimeter (ft)0.5 hydraulic radius (ft)11.7 width‐depth ratio23.6 W flood prone area (ft)3.5 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 07/2020Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringKey Mill Mitigation Site  DMS Project No. 100025Cross‐Section PlotsCross‐Section 9‐UT1BMonitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020View Downstream11001102110410 20 30 40Elevation (ft)Width (ft)210+31 RiffleMY0 (07/2020)BankfullFloodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions5.7 x‐section area (ft.sq.)6.9 width (ft)0.8 mean depth (ft)1.3 max depth (ft) 7.7 wetted perimeter (ft)0.7 hydraulic radius (ft)8.3 width‐depth ratio34.0 W flood prone area (ft)4.9 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 07/2020Field Crew: Wildlands EngineeringKey Mill Mitigation Site  DMS Project No. 100025Cross‐Section PlotsCross‐Section 10‐UT1CMonitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020View Downstream1087108910910 102030Elevation (ft)Width (ft)213+12 RiffleMY0 (07/2020)BankfullFloodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions3.4 x‐section area (ft.sq.)6.8 width (ft)0.5 mean depth (ft)0.8 max depth (ft) 7.1 wetted perimeter (ft)0.5 hydraulic radius (ft)13.9 width‐depth ratio30.3 W flood prone area (ft)4.4 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 06/2020Field Crew: Kee Mapping & SurveyingKey Mill Mitigation Site  DMS Project No. 100025Cross‐Section PlotsCross‐Section 11‐UT2AMonitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020View Downstream109510975 15253545Elevation (ft)Width (ft)300+77 RiffleMY0 (06/2020)BankfullFloodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions4.2 x‐section area (ft.sq.)7.3 width (ft)0.6 mean depth (ft)1.0 max depth (ft) 7.7 wetted perimeter (ft)0.5 hydraulic radius (ft)12.8 width‐depth ratio32.0 W flood prone area (ft)4.4 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 06/2020Field Crew: Kee Mapping & SurveyingKey Mill Mitigation Site  DMS Project No. 100025Cross‐Section PlotsCross‐Section 12‐UT2BMonitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020View Downstream1087108910918 1828384858Elevation (ft)Width (ft)304+78 RiffleMY0 (06/2020)BankfullFloodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions5.8 x‐section area (ft.sq.)7.8 width (ft)0.7 mean depth (ft)1.1 max depth (ft) 8.3 wetted perimeter (ft)0.7 hydraulic radius (ft)10.5 width‐depth ratio48.2 W flood prone area (ft)6.2 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 06/2020Field Crew: Kee Mapping & SurveyingKey Mill Mitigation Site  DMS Project No. 100025Cross‐Section PlotsCross‐Section 13‐UT2CMonitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020View Downstream1080108210840 1020304050Elevation (ft)Width (ft)309+26 RiffleMY0 (06/2020)BankfullFloodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions3.5 x‐section area (ft.sq.)6.9 width (ft)0.5 mean depth (ft)0.8 max depth (ft) 7.2 wetted perimeter (ft)0.5 hydraulic radius (ft)13.4 width‐depth ratio21.4 W flood prone area (ft)3.1 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 06/2020Field Crew: Kee Mapping & SurveyingKey Mill Mitigation Site  DMS Project No. 100025Cross‐Section PlotsCross‐Section 14‐UT3BMonitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020View Downstream10831085108715 25 35 45 55 65Elevation (ft)Width (ft)406+50 RiffleMY0 (06/2020)BankfullFloodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions6.8 x‐section area (ft.sq.)8.8 width (ft)0.8 mean depth (ft)1.3 max depth (ft) 9.3 wetted perimeter (ft)0.7 hydraulic radius (ft)11.3 width‐depth ratio55.8 W flood prone area (ft)6.3 entrenchment ratio1.0 low bank height ratioSurvey Date: 06/2020Field Crew: Kee Mapping & SurveyingCross‐Section 15‐UT3CCross‐Section PlotsKey Mill Mitigation Site  DMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020View Downstream1079108110830 1020304050Elevation (ft)Width (ft)408+51 RiffleMY0 (06/2020)BankfullFloodprone Area
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max Riffle Pool Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 6 6 6 6
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
Bull Creek Reach 1A, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)Reach SummaryParticle Count
Very fine 0.062 0.125 1 12 13 13 19
Fine 0.125 0.250 8 8 8 27
Medium 0.25 0.50 1 3 4 4 31
Coarse 0.5 1.0 1 1 1 32
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 32SAND
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 1 1 1 33
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 1 1 1 34
Fine 4.0 5.6 1 1 1 35
Fine 5.6 8.0 5 5 5 40
Medium 8.0 11.0 1 1 2 2 42
Medium 11.0 16.0 5 5 5 47
Coarse 16.0 22.6 1 3 4 4 51
Coarse 22.6 32 1 3 4 4 55
Very Coarse 32 45 4 1 5 5 60
Very Coarse 45 64 8 8 8 68GRAVEL
Small 64 90 6 6 6 74
Small 90 128 15 15 15 89
Large 128 180 7 7 7 96
Large 180 256 3 3 3 99COBBLE
Small 256 362 1 1 1 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
50 50 100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
ReachwideBOULDERTotal
362.0
Channel materials (mm)
0.1
5.6
20.7
113.8
171.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
Bull Creek Reach 1A, Reachwide
Bull Creek Reach 1A, Reachwide
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max Riffle Pool Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 1 12 13 13 13
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
Bull Creek Reach 1B, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)Reach SummaryParticle Count
Very fine 0.062 0.125 1 5 6 6 19
Fine 0.125 0.250 1 3 4 4 23
Medium 0.25 0.50 1 5 6 6 29
Coarse 0.5 1.0 29
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 4 4 4 33SAND
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 33
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 1 1 1 34
Fine 4.0 5.6 1 1 1 35
Fine 5.6 8.0 1 1 1 36
Medium 8.0 11.0 1 1 1 37
Medium 11.0 16.0 5 5 5 42
Coarse 16.0 22.6 3 1 4 4 46
Coarse 22.6 32 2 4 6 6 52
Very Coarse 32 45 5 3 8 8 60
Very Coarse 45 64 6 2 8 8 68GRAVEL
Small 64 90 6 2 8 8 76
Small 90 128 3 3 3 79
Large 128 180 10 10 10 89
Large 180 256 6 6 6 95COBBLE
Small 256 362 5 5 5 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
50 50 100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
ReachwideBOULDERTotal
362.0
Channel materials (mm)
0.1
5.6
28.5
151.8
256.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
Bull Creek Reach 1B, Reachwide
Bull Creek Reach 1B, Reachwide
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max Riffle Pool Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 1 26 27 27 27
Very fine 0.062 0.125 1 1 1 28
Fine 0.125 0.250 6 6 6 34
Medium 0.25 0.50 7 7 7 41
Coarse 0.5 1.0 1 3 4 4 45
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 1 1 1 46
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 46
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 1 1 1 47
Fine 4.0 5.6 47
Fine 5.6 8.0 1 1 1 48
Medium 8.0 11.0 1 1 2 2 50
Medium 11.0 16.0 1 1 1 51
Coarse 16.0 22.6 1 2 3 3 54
Coarse 22.6 32 54
Very Coarse 32 45 1 1 2 2 56
Very Coarse 45 64 6 6 6 62
Small 64 90 2 2 2 64
Small 90 128 7 7 7 71
Large 128 180 7 7 7 78
Large 180 256 10 10 10 88
Small 256 362 8 8 8 96
Small 362 512 4 4 4 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
50 50 100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
Bull Creek Reach 2, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Reachwide
Reach Summary
SANDGRAVELParticle Count
COBBLEBOULDERTotal
512.0
Channel materials (mm)
Silt/Clay
0.3
11.0
222.4
346.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
Bull Creek Reach 2, Reachwide
Bull Creek Reach 2, Reachwide
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max Riffle Pool Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 1 3 4 4 4
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
Bull Creek Reach 3, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)Reach SummaryParticle Count
Very fine 0.062 0.125 2 3 5 5 9
Fine 0.125 0.250 2 11 13 13 22
Medium 0.25 0.50 3 12 15 15 37
Coarse 0.5 1.0 1 1 1 38
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 38SAND
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 1 1 1 39
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 1 1 1 40
Fine 4.0 5.6 40
Fine 5.6 8.0 1 1 1 41
Medium 8.0 11.0 4 4 4 45
Medium 11.0 16.0 1 3 4 4 49
Coarse 16.0 22.6 2 2 2 51
Coarse 22.6 32 2 4 6 6 57
Very Coarse 32 45 5 4 9 9 66
Very Coarse 45 64 10 10 10 76GRAVEL
Small 64 90 5 1 6 6 82
Small 90 128 10 1 11 11 93
Large 128 180 5 5 5 98
Large 180 256 1 1 1 99COBBLE
Small 256 362 1 1 1 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
50 50 100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
ReachwideBOULDERTotal
362.0
Channel materials (mm)
0.2
0.5
19.0
96.0
146.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
Bull Creek Reach 3, Reachwide
Bull Creek Reach 3, Reachwide
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max Riffle Pool Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 1 7 8 8 8
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
UT1B, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)Reach SummaryParticle Count
Very fine 0.062 0.125 2 2 2 10
Fine 0.125 0.250 2 2 2 12
Medium 0.25 0.50 2 10 12 12 24
Coarse 0.5 1.0 2 2 2 26
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 5 5 5 31SAND
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 31
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 31
Fine 4.0 5.6 1 1 1 32
Fine 5.6 8.0 4 4 8 8 40
Medium 8.0 11.0 6 6 6 46
Medium 11.0 16.0 6 4 10 10 56
Coarse 16.0 22.6 3 1 4 4 60
Coarse 22.6 32 9 3 12 12 72
Very Coarse 32 45 9 3 12 12 84
Very Coarse 45 64 3 3 3 87GRAVEL
Small 64 90 6 1 7 7 94
Small 90 128 3 3 3 97
Large 128 180 2 2 2 99
Large 180 256 1 1 1 100COBBLE
Small 256 362 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
50 50 100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
ReachwideBOULDERTotal
256.0
Channel materials (mm)
0.3
6.4
12.8
45.0
101.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT1B, Reachwide
UT1B, Reachwide
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max Riffle Pool Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 6 6 6 6
Very fine 0.062 0.125 6
Fine 0.125 0.250 5 5 5 11
Medium 0.25 0.50 3 11 14 14 25
Coarse 0.5 1.0 2 3 5 5 30
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 6 6 6 36
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 1 1 1 37
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 4 4 4 41
Fine 4.0 5.6 2 1 3 3 44
Fine 5.6 8.0 5 5 5 49
Medium 8.0 11.0 3 3 3 52
Medium 11.0 16.0 2 3 5 5 57
Coarse 16.0 22.6 1 1 1 58
Coarse 22.6 32 3 3 3 61
Very Coarse 32 45 5 1 6 6 67
Very Coarse 45 64 7 7 7 74
Small 64 90 11 11 11 85
Small 90 128 9 9 9 94
Large 128 180 5 5 5 99
Large 180 256 99
Small 256 362 99
Small 362 512 99
Medium 512 1024 1 1 1 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
50 50 100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
UT1C, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Reachwide
Reach Summary
SANDGRAVELParticle Count
COBBLEBOULDERTotal
1024.0
Channel materials (mm)
0.3
1.8
8.9
87.3
137.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT1C, Reachwide
UT1C, Reachwide
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max Riffle Pool Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 4 12 16 16 16
Very fine 0.062 0.125 4 15 19 19 35
Fine 0.125 0.250 7 7 7 42
Medium 0.25 0.50 4 4 4 46
Coarse 0.5 1.0 6 6 6 52
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 1 2 3 3 55
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 55
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 55
Fine 4.0 5.6 55
Fine 5.6 8.0 3 3 3 58
Medium 8.0 11.0 1 1 1 59
Medium 11.0 16.0 1 1 1 60
Coarse 16.0 22.6 1 1 1 61
Coarse 22.6 32 1 1 2 2 63
Very Coarse 32 45 12 12 12 75
Very Coarse 45 64 9 9 9 84
Small 64 90 13 13 13 97
Small 90 128 3 3 3 100
Large 128 180 100
Large 180 256 100
Small 256 362 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
50 50 100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
UT2A, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Reachwide
Reach Summary
SANDGRAVELParticle Count
COBBLEBOULDERTotal
128.0
Channel materials (mm)
Silt/Clay
0.1
0.8
64.0
85.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT2A, Reachwide
UT2A, Reachwide
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max Riffle Pool Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 2 16 18 18 18
Very fine 0.062 0.125 5 24 29 29 47
Fine 0.125 0.250 1 1 1 48
Medium 0.25 0.50 1 1 1 49
Coarse 0.5 1.0 49
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 3 3 3 52
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 52
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 52
Fine 4.0 5.6 2 2 2 54
Fine 5.6 8.0 54
Medium 8.0 11.0 54
Medium 11.0 16.0 2 2 2 56
Coarse 16.0 22.6 1 2 3 3 59
Coarse 22.6 32 59
Very Coarse 32 45 3 3 3 62
Very Coarse 45 64 11 11 11 73
Small 64 90 13 13 13 86
Small 90 128 8 8 8 94
Large 128 180 5 5 5 99
Large 180 256 1 1 1 100
Small 256 362 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
50 50 100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
UT2B, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Reachwide
Reach Summary
SANDGRAVELParticle Count
COBBLEBOULDERTotal
256.0
Channel materials (mm)
Silt/Clay
0.1
1.3
85.4
137.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT2B, Reachwide
UT2B, Reachwide
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max Riffle Pool Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 2 19 21 21 21
Very fine 0.062 0.125 2 12 14 14 35
Fine 0.125 0.250 4 4 4 39
Medium 0.25 0.50 39
Coarse 0.5 1.0 39
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 3 3 6 6 45
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 45
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 2 2 2 47
Fine 4.0 5.6 1 1 1 48
Fine 5.6 8.0 1 1 1 49
Medium 8.0 11.0 3 3 3 52
Medium 11.0 16.0 1 1 1 53
Coarse 16.0 22.6 3 3 3 56
Coarse 22.6 32 56
Very Coarse 32 45 5 1 6 6 62
Very Coarse 45 64 4 4 4 66
Small 64 90 17 17 17 83
Small 90 128 13 13 13 96
Large 128 180 1 1 1 97
Large 180 256 3 3 3 100
Small 256 362 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
50 50 100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
UT2C, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Reachwide
Reach Summary
SANDGRAVELParticle Count
COBBLEBOULDERTotal
256.0
Channel materials (mm)
Silt/Clay
0.1
8.9
92.5
124.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT2C, Reachwide
UT2C, Reachwide
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max Riffle Pool Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 2 2 2 2
Very fine 0.062 0.125 2
Fine 0.125 0.250 1 5 6 6 8
Medium 0.25 0.50 1 5 6 6 14
Coarse 0.5 1.0 3 3 3 17
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 2 3 5 5 22
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 2 5 7 7 29
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 1 4 5 5 34
Fine 4.0 5.6 2 6 8 8 42
Fine 5.6 8.0 2 4 6 6 48
Medium 8.0 11.0 1 3 4 4 52
Medium 11.0 16.0 5 2 7 7 59
Coarse 16.0 22.6 4 2 6 6 65
Coarse 22.6 32 1 4 5 5 70
Very Coarse 32 45 7 1 8 8 78
Very Coarse 45 64 5 1 6 6 84
Small 64 90 6 6 6 90
Small 90 128 2 2 2 92
Large 128 180 4 4 4 96
Large 180 256 2 2 2 98
Small 256 362 2 2 2 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
50 50 100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
UT3B, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Reachwide
Reach Summary
SANDGRAVELParticle Count
COBBLEBOULDERTotal
362.0
Channel materials (mm)
0.8
4.2
9.4
64.0
165.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT3B, Reachwide
UT3B, Reachwide
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max Riffle Pool Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 3 3 3 3
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
UT3C, Reachwide
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)Reach SummaryParticle Count
Very fine 0.062 0.125 1 8 9 9 12
Fine 0.125 0.250 3 17 20 20 32
Medium 0.25 0.50 7 7 7 39
Coarse 0.5 1.0 3 3 3 42
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 1 2 3 3 45SAND
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 3 3 3 48
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 2 2 2 50
Fine 4.0 5.6 1 1 1 51
Fine 5.6 8.0 1 1 1 52
Medium 8.0 11.0 1 2 3 3 55
Medium 11.0 16.0 2 1 3 3 58
Coarse 16.0 22.6 4 4 4 62
Coarse 22.6 32 9 1 10 10 72
Very Coarse 32 45 5 5 5 77
Very Coarse 45 64 5 5 5 82GRAVEL
Small 64 90 5 5 5 87
Small 90 128 5 5 5 92
Large 128 180 7 7 7 99
Large 180 256 1 1 1 100COBBLE
Small 256 362 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
50 50 100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
ReachwideBOULDERTotal
256.0
Channel materials (mm)
0.1
0.3
4.0
73.4
148.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT3C, Reachwide
UT3C, Reachwide
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 4 4 4
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
Bull Creek Reach 1A, Cross-Section 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)SummaryRiffle 100-
Count
Very fine 0.062 0.125 2 2 6
Fine 0.125 0.250 6
Medium 0.25 0.50 1 1 7
Coarse 0.5 1.0 1 1 8
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 1 1 9SAND
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 9
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 9
Fine 4.0 5.6 9
Fine 5.6 8.0 9
Medium 8.0 11.0 1 1 10
Medium 11.0 16.0 10
Coarse 16.0 22.6 10
Coarse 22.6 32 10
Very Coarse 32 45 3 3 13
Very Coarse 45 64 3 3 16GRAVEL
Small 64 90 14 14 30
Small 90 128 40 40 70
Large 128 180 26 26 96
Large 180 256 4 4 100COBBLE
Small 256 362 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Cross-Section 1BOULDERTotal
256.0
Channel materials (mm)
64.0
94.1
107.3
153.8
177.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
Bull Creek Reach 1A, Cross-Section 1
Bull Creek Reach 1A, Cross-Section 1
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 1 1 1
Very fine 0.062 0.125 1
Fine 0.125 0.250 1
Medium 0.25 0.50 1 1 2
Coarse 0.5 1.0 2
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 2 2 4
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 4
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 4
Fine 4.0 5.6 4
Fine 5.6 8.0 3 3 7
Medium 8.0 11.0 1 1 8
Medium 11.0 16.0 1 1 9
Coarse 16.0 22.6 9
Coarse 22.6 32 7 7 16
Very Coarse 32 45 15 15 31
Very Coarse 45 64 8 8 39
Small 64 90 15 15 54
Small 90 128 10 10 64
Large 128 180 19 19 83
Large 180 256 14 14 97
Small 256 362 3 3 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
Bull Creek Reach 1B, Cross-Section 2
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Cross-Section 2
Summary
SANDGRAVELRiffle 100-
Count
COBBLEBOULDERTotal
362.0
Channel materials (mm)
32.0
53.7
82.2
184.6
243.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
Bull Creek Reach 1B, Cross-Section 2
Bull Creek Reach 1B, Cross-Section 2
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 3 3 3
Very fine 0.062 0.125 3
Fine 0.125 0.250 1 1 4
Medium 0.25 0.50 4
Coarse 0.5 1.0 4
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 2 2 6
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 6
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 3 3 9
Fine 4.0 5.6 9
Fine 5.6 8.0 2 2 11
Medium 8.0 11.0 3 3 14
Medium 11.0 16.0 4 4 18
Coarse 16.0 22.6 2 2 20
Coarse 22.6 32 1 1 21
Very Coarse 32 45 2 2 23
Very Coarse 45 64 4 4 27
Small 64 90 8 8 35
Small 90 128 12 12 47
Large 128 180 17 17 64
Large 180 256 17 17 81
Small 256 362 15 15 96
Small 362 512 4 4 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
Bull Creek Reach 2, Cross-Section 4
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Cross-Section 4
Summary
SANDGRAVELRiffle 100-
Count
COBBLEBOULDERTotal
512.0
Channel materials (mm)
13.3
90.0
135.9
274.4
353.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
Bull Creek Reach 2, Cross-Section 4
Bull Creek Reach 2, Cross-Section 4
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 4 4 4
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
Bull Creek Reach 3, Cross-Section 6
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)SummaryRiffle 100-
Count
Very fine 0.062 0.125 1 1 5
Fine 0.125 0.250 3 3 8
Medium 0.25 0.50 2 2 10
Coarse 0.5 1.0 10
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 10SAND
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 10
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 1 1 11
Fine 4.0 5.6 11
Fine 5.6 8.0 1 1 12
Medium 8.0 11.0 4 4 16
Medium 11.0 16.0 3 3 19
Coarse 16.0 22.6 3 3 22
Coarse 22.6 32 2 2 24
Very Coarse 32 45 10 10 34
Very Coarse 45 64 25 25 59GRAVEL
Small 64 90 23 23 82
Small 90 128 11 11 93
Large 128 180 7 7 100
Large 180 256 100COBBLE
Small 256 362 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Cross-Section 6BOULDERTotal
180.0
Channel materials (mm)
11.0
45.6
56.4
96.0
141.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
Bull Creek Reach 3, Cross-Section 6
Bull Creek Reach 3, Cross-Section 6
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 5 5 5
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
Bull Creek Reach 3, Cross-Section 7
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)SummaryRiffle 100-
Count
Very fine 0.062 0.125 5 5 10
Fine 0.125 0.250 2 2 12
Medium 0.25 0.50 12
Coarse 0.5 1.0 12
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 12SAND
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 12
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 12
Fine 4.0 5.6 12
Fine 5.6 8.0 4 4 16
Medium 8.0 11.0 1 1 17
Medium 11.0 16.0 17
Coarse 16.0 22.6 7 7 24
Coarse 22.6 32 6 6 30
Very Coarse 32 45 6 6 36
Very Coarse 45 64 21 21 57GRAVEL
Small 64 90 13 13 70
Small 90 128 14 14 84
Large 128 180 9 9 93
Large 180 256 3 3 96COBBLE
Small 256 362 2 2 98
Small 362 512 2 2 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Cross-Section 7BOULDERTotal
512.0
Channel materials (mm)
8.0
42.5
56.9
128.0
227.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
Bull Creek Reach 3, Cross-Section 7
Bull Creek Reach 3, Cross-Section 7
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 6 6 6
Very fine 0.062 0.125 1 1 7
Fine 0.125 0.250 7
Medium 0.25 0.50 7
Coarse 0.5 1.0 7
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 2 2 9
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 9
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 9
Fine 4.0 5.6 1 1 10
Fine 5.6 8.0 1 1 11
Medium 8.0 11.0 6 6 17
Medium 11.0 16.0 3 3 20
Coarse 16.0 22.6 10 10 30
Coarse 22.6 32 17 17 47
Very Coarse 32 45 18 18 65
Very Coarse 45 64 10 10 75
Small 64 90 5 5 80
Small 90 128 7 7 87
Large 128 180 9 9 96
Large 180 256 4 4 100
Small 256 362 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
UT1B, Cross-Section 9
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Cross-Section 9
Summary
SANDGRAVELRiffle 100-
Count
COBBLEBOULDERTotal
256.0
Channel materials (mm)
10.4
25.0
33.9
110.1
173.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT1B, Cross-Section 9
UT1B, Cross-Section 9
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 2 2 2
Very fine 0.062 0.125 2
Fine 0.125 0.250 2 2 4
Medium 0.25 0.50 5 5 9
Coarse 0.5 1.0 1 1 10
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 10
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 10
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 1 1 11
Fine 4.0 5.6 5 5 16
Fine 5.6 8.0 4 4 20
Medium 8.0 11.0 1 1 21
Medium 11.0 16.0 2 2 23
Coarse 16.0 22.6 1 1 24
Coarse 22.6 32 2 2 26
Very Coarse 32 45 5 5 31
Very Coarse 45 64 30 30 61
Small 64 90 25 25 86
Small 90 128 6 6 92
Large 128 180 4 4 96
Large 180 256 3 3 99
Small 256 362 1 1 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
UT1C, Cross-Section 10
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Cross-Section 10
Summary
SANDGRAVELRiffle 100-
Count
COBBLEBOULDERTotal
362.0
Channel materials (mm)
5.6
47.2
56.2
87.6
165.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT1C, Cross-Section 10
UT1C, Cross-Section 10
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 0
Very fine 0.062 0.125 5 5 5
Fine 0.125 0.250 5 5 10
Medium 0.25 0.50 2 2 12
Coarse 0.5 1.0 1 1 13
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 3 3 16
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 16
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 16
Fine 4.0 5.6 16
Fine 5.6 8.0 1 1 17
Medium 8.0 11.0 17
Medium 11.0 16.0 1 1 18
Coarse 16.0 22.6 18
Coarse 22.6 32 18
Very Coarse 32 45 14 14 32
Very Coarse 45 64 24 24 56
Small 64 90 26 26 82
Small 90 128 11 11 93
Large 128 180 6 6 99
Large 180 256 99
Small 256 362 1 1 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
UT2A, Cross-Section 11
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Cross-Section 11
Summary
SANDGRAVELRiffle 100-
Count
COBBLEBOULDERTotal
362.0
Channel materials (mm)
2.0
47.0
58.6
96.0
143.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT2A, Cross-Section 11
UT2A, Cross-Section 11
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 10 10 10
Very fine 0.062 0.125 2 2 12
Fine 0.125 0.250 12
Medium 0.25 0.50 1 1 13
Coarse 0.5 1.0 13
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 12 12 25
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 25
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 25
Fine 4.0 5.6 25
Fine 5.6 8.0 25
Medium 8.0 11.0 1 1 26
Medium 11.0 16.0 1 1 27
Coarse 16.0 22.6 27
Coarse 22.6 32 27
Very Coarse 32 45 2 2 29
Very Coarse 45 64 13 13 42
Small 64 90 34 34 76
Small 90 128 20 20 96
Large 128 180 4 4 100
Large 180 256 100
Small 256 362 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
UT2B, Cross-Section 12
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Cross-Section 12
Summary
SANDGRAVELRiffle 100-
Count
COBBLEBOULDERTotal
180.0
Channel materials (mm)
1.2
52.9
69.3
103.6
125.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT2B, Cross-Section 12
UT2B, Cross-Section 12
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 8 8 8
Very fine 0.062 0.125 2 2 10
Fine 0.125 0.250 10
Medium 0.25 0.50 10
Coarse 0.5 1.0 10
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 3 3 13
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 13
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 13
Fine 4.0 5.6 13
Fine 5.6 8.0 13
Medium 8.0 11.0 1 1 14
Medium 11.0 16.0 14
Coarse 16.0 22.6 3 3 17
Coarse 22.6 32 17
Very Coarse 32 45 27 27 44
Very Coarse 45 64 25 25 69
Small 64 90 20 20 89
Small 90 128 7 7 96
Large 128 180 96
Large 180 256 3 3 99
Small 256 362 1 1 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
UT2C, Cross-Section 13
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Cross-Section 13
Summary
SANDGRAVELRiffle 100-
Count
COBBLEBOULDERTotal
362.0
Channel materials (mm)
20.1
40.2
49.0
82.6
121.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT2C, Cross-Section 13
UT2C, Cross-Section 13
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 1 1 1
Very fine 0.062 0.125 1 1 2
Fine 0.125 0.250 2 2 4
Medium 0.25 0.50 4
Coarse 0.5 1.0 1 1 5
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 5 5 10
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 7 7 17
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 3 3 20
Fine 4.0 5.6 4 4 24
Fine 5.6 8.0 2 2 26
Medium 8.0 11.0 8 8 34
Medium 11.0 16.0 8 8 42
Coarse 16.0 22.6 10 10 52
Coarse 22.6 32 7 7 59
Very Coarse 32 45 12 12 71
Very Coarse 45 64 6 6 77
Small 64 90 12 12 89
Small 90 128 4 4 93
Large 128 180 4 4 97
Large 180 256 3 3 100
Small 256 362 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
UT3B, Cross-Section 14
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Cross-Section 14
Summary
SANDGRAVELRiffle 100-
Count
COBBLEBOULDERTotal
256.0
Channel materials (mm)
2.7
11.5
21.1
78.1
151.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT3B, Cross-Section 14
UT3B, Cross-Section 14
Reachwide and Cross-Section Pebble Count Plots
min max
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT/CLAY Silt/Clay 0.000 0.062 1 1 1
Key Mill Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100025
Monitoring Year 0 - 2020
UT3C, Cross-Section 15
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)SummaryRiffle 100-
Count
Very fine 0.062 0.125 1
Fine 0.125 0.250 2 2 3
Medium 0.25 0.50 3
Coarse 0.5 1.0 3
Very Coarse 1.0 2.0 8 8 11SAND
Very Fine 2.0 2.8 3 3 14
Very Fine 2.8 4.0 2 2 16
Fine 4.0 5.6 1 1 17
Fine 5.6 8.0 4 4 21
Medium 8.0 11.0 7 7 28
Medium 11.0 16.0 8 8 36
Coarse 16.0 22.6 7 7 43
Coarse 22.6 32 11 11 54
Very Coarse 32 45 9 9 63
Very Coarse 45 64 11 11 74GRAVEL
Small 64 90 12 12 86
Small 90 128 6 6 92
Large 128 180 4 4 96
Large 180 256 4 4 100COBBLE
Small 256 362 100
Small 362 512 100
Medium 512 1024 100
Large/Very Large 1024 2048 100
BEDROCK Bedrock 2048 >2048 100
100 100 100
D16 =
D35 =
D50 =
D84 =
D95 =
D100 =
Cross-Section 15BOULDERTotal
256.0
Channel materials (mm)
4.0
15.3
28.2
85.0
165.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Individual Class PercentParticle Class Size (mm)
Individual Class Percent
MY0-04/2020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
MY0-04/2020
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT3C, Cross-Section 15
UT3C, Cross-Section 15

Stream Photographs 
Bull Creek 
Monitoring Year 0 

Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs
Photo Point 1 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 1 – look downstream (04/14/2020) 
Photo Point 2 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 2 – looking downstream (04/14/2020) 
Photo Point 3 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 3 – looking downstream (04/14/2020) 
Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs
Photo Point 4 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 4 – looking downstream (04/14/2020) 

Photo Point 4A – looking upstream (09/28/2020) Photo Point 4A – looking downstream (09/28/2020) 

Photo Point 4B – looking north (09/28/2020) Photo Point 4C – looking south (09/28/2020) 
Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs

Photo Point 4D – looking upstream (09/28/2020) Photo Point 4D – looking downstream (09/28/2020) 
Photo Point 5 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 5 – looking downstream (04/14/2020) 
Photo Point 6 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 6 – looking downstream (04/14/2020) 
Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs
Photo Point 7 – looking upstream (09/28/2020) Photo Point 7 – looking downstream (09/28/2020) 
Photo Point 8 – looking upstream (09/28/2020) Photo Point 8 – looking downstream (09/28/2020) 
Photo Point 9 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 9 – looking downstream (04/14/2020) 
Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs
Photo Point 10 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 10 – looking downstream (04/14/2020) 
Photo Point 11 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 11 – looking downstream (04/14/2020) 

Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS 
UT1 
Monitoring Year 0 

Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs
Photo Point 12 – looking upstream (9/28/2020) Photo Point 12 – looking downstream (09/28/2020) 

Photo Point 12A – looking upstream (9/28/2020) Photo Point 12A – looking downstream (09/28/2020) 
Photo Point 13 – looking upstream (04/16/2020) Photo Point 13 – looking downstream (04/16/2020) 
Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs
Photo Point 14 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 14 – looking downstream (04/14/2020) 

Photo Point 14A – looking upstream (09/28/2020) Photo Point 14A – looking downstream (09/28/2020) 

Photo Point 14B – looking upstream (09/28/2020) Photo Point 14B – looking downstream (09/28/2020) 
Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs
Photo Point 15 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 15 – looking downstream (04/14/2020) 

Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS 
UT2 
Monitoring Year 0 

Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs
Photo Point 16 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 16 – looking downstream (04/14/2020) 
Photo Point 17 – looking upstream (09/28/2020) Photo Point 17 – looking downstream (09/28/2020) 
Photo Point 18 – looking upstream (09/28/2020) Photo Point 18 – looking downstream (09/28/2020) 
Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs
Photo Point 19 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 19 – looking downstream (04/14/2020) 
Photo Point 20 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 20 – looking downstream (04/14/2020) 
Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS 
UT3 
Monitoring Year 0 

Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs
Photo Point 21 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 21 – looking downstream (04/14/2020) 
Photo Point 22 – looking upstream (04/14/2020) Photo Point 22 – looking downstream (04/14/2020) 

Photo Point 22A – looking upstream (09/28/2020) Photo Point 22A – looking downstream (09/28/2020) 
Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs
Photo Point 23 – Wetland looking North (04/15/2020) Photo Point 23 – Wetland looking East (04/15/2020) 
Photo Point 23 – Wetland looking South (04/15/2020) Photo Point 23 – Wetland looking West (04/15/2020) 

Photo Point 24 – looking upstream (09/28/2020) Photo Point 24 – looking downstream (09/28/2020) 
Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 2:  Morphological Summary Data and Plots ‐ Stream Photographs
Photo Point 25 – looking upstream (04/15/2020) Photo Point 25 – looking downstream (04/15/2020) 

APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 9.  Vegetation Plot Criteria AttainmentKey Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020Permanent Vegetation Plot MY0 Success Criteria Met (Y/N)1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Y8YMobile Vegetation Plot MY0 Success Criteria Met (Y/N)1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y100%Tract Mean (MY0 ‐ 2020)100%100%
Table 10.  CVS Permanent Vegetation Plot MetadataKey Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020Report Prepared ByBrandon RomeoDate Prepared4/24/2020 12:17Database Namecvs‐eep‐entrytool‐v2.5.0.mdbDatabase LocationQ:\ActiveProjects\005‐02165 Key Mill\Monitoring\Baseline Monitoring\Vegetation AssessmentComputer NameJEFF‐PCFile Size72605696MetadataDescription of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.Proj, plantedEach project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year.  This excludes live stakes.Proj, total stemsEach project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year.  This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.PlotsList of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).VigorFrequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.Vigor by SppFrequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.DamageList of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.Damage by SppDamage values tallied by type for each species.Damage by PlotDamage values tallied by type for each plot.Planted Stems by Plot and SppA matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.ALL Stems by Plot and sppA matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.Project Code100025Project NameKey Mill Mitigation SiteDescriptionFull delivery mitigation project in Surry County, NC.Sampled Plots8DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐PROJECT SUMMARY‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020Scientific NameCommon NameSpecies TypePnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all TAcer saccharinumSilver Maple, Soft Maple TreeAsimina trilobaCommon Pawpaw, Indian‐banana Shrub Tree 111111111Betula nigraRiver Birch, Red Birch Tree 333333111111Carpinus carolinianaIronwood Shrub Tree 111Fagus grandifoliaAmerican Beech Tree 3 3 3Fraxinus pennsylvanicaGreen Ash, Red Ash Tree 111333 111Ilex opacaAmerican Holly, Christmas Holly Shrub Tree 111222222Nyssa sylvaticaSour Gum, Black Gum, Pepperidge Tree5 5 5Platanus occidentalisSycamore, Plane‐treeTree333444Quercus falcataSpanish Oak, Southern Red Oak Tree111222Quercus rubraNorthern Red OakTree 444222222222Viburnum dentatumArrow‐woodShrub Tree 11111155511115 15 15 12 12 12 18 18 18 13 13 13888666777777607 607 607 486 486 486 728 728 728 526 526 526Scientific NameCommon NameSpecies TypePnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all TAcer saccharinumSilver Maple, Soft MapleTree222Asimina trilobaCommon Pawpaw, Indian‐bananaShrub Tree111111Betula nigraRiver Birch, Red BirchTree333222333Carpinus carolinianaIronwoodShrub Tree333Fagus grandifoliaAmerican BeechTree111Fraxinus pennsylvanicaGreen Ash, Red AshTree222222333Ilex opacaAmerican Holly, Christmas HollyShrub Tree111Nyssa sylvaticaSour Gum, Black Gum, PepperidgeTree111Platanus occidentalisSycamore, Plane‐treeTree333444222Quercus falcataSpanish Oak, Southern Red OakTree111222111Quercus rubraNorthern Red OakTree111222111222Viburnum dentatumArrow‐woodShrub Tree33333311112 12 12 15 15 15 11 11 11 13 13 13666666888666486 486 486 607 607 607 445 445 445 526 526 526Color for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%PnoLS: Number of planted stems excluding live stakesExceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all: Number of planted stems including live stakesFails to meet requirements, by less than 10%T: Total stemsFails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteer species included in total10.02Stems per ACREsize (ACRES)0.020.020.02Species countsize (ACRES)size (ares)1Stem countPermanent Plot 5 Permanent Plot 60.020.020.02Species countStems per ACRE0.02Current Permanent Vegetation Plot Data (MY0 2020)Permanent Plot 7 Permanent Plot 8size (ares)Table 11a. Planted and Total Stem CountsStem countPermanent Plot 21Permanent Plot 1 Permanent Plot 4111Current Permanent Vegetation Plot Data (MY0 2020)Permanent Plot 311
Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020Scientific Name Common Name Species TypePnoLS P‐all TAcer saccharinumSilver Maple, Soft Maple Tree222Asimina trilobaCommon Pawpaw, Indian‐banana Shrub Tree555Betula nigraRiver Birch, Red BirchTree16 16 16Carpinus carolinianaIronwoodShrub Tree444Fagus grandifoliaAmerican BeechTree444Fraxinus pennsylvanicaGreen Ash, Red AshTree12 12 12Ilex opacaAmerican Holly, Christmas HollyShrub Tree666Nyssa sylvaticaSour Gum, Black Gum, PepperidgeTree666Platanus occidentalisSycamore, Plane‐treeTree16 16 16Quercus falcataSpanish Oak, Southern Red OakTree777Quercus rubraNorthern Red OakTree16 16 16Viburnum dentatumArrow‐woodShrub Tree15 15 15109 109 10912 12 12551 551 551Color for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%PnoLS: Number of planted stems excluding live stakesExceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all: Number of planted stems including live stakesFails to meet requirements, by less than 10%T: Total stemsFails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteer species included in totalTable 11b. Planted and Total Stem CountsSpecies countStems per ACRE8size (ACRES)0.20Permanent Vegetation Plot Annual MeanMY0 (2020)Stem countsize (ares)
Key Mill Mitigation SiteDMS Project No. 100025Monitoring Year 0 ‐ 2020Scientific NameCommon NameSpecies Type MP1 MP2 MP3 MP4 MVP5 MY0 (2020)PnoLS PnoLS PnoLS PnoLS PnoLS PnoLSAcer saccharinumSilver Maple, Soft MapleTree11Asimina trilobaCommon Pawpaw, Indian‐banana Shrub Tree44Betula nigraRiver Birch, Red Birch Tree 3236115Carpinus carolinianaIronwoodShrub Tree325Fagus grandifoliaAmerican BeechTree314Fraxinus pennsylvanicaGreen Ash, Red AshTree347Ilex opacaAmerican Holly, Christmas Holly Shrub Tree314Nyssa sylvaticaSour Gum, Black Gum, Pepperidge Tree2114Platanus occidentalisSycamore, Plane‐treeTree224Quercus falcataSpanish Oak, Southern Red Oak Tree11Quercus rubraNorthern Red Oak Tree 3272216Viburnum dentatumArrow‐woodShrub Tree1121511 14 18 16 117011111 50.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.125667612445 567 728 647 445 567Scientific NameCommon NameSpecies Type MY0 (2020)PnoLSAcer saccharinumSilver Maple, Soft MapleTree3Asimina trilobaCommon Pawpaw, Indian‐banana Shrub Tree 9Betula nigraRiver Birch, Red BirchTree31Carpinus carolinianaIronwoodShrub Tree 9Fagus grandifoliaAmerican BeechTree8Fraxinus pennsylvanicaGreen Ash, Red AshTree19Ilex opacaAmerican Holly, Christmas Holly Shrub Tree 10Nyssa sylvaticaSour Gum, Black Gum, Pepperidge Tree10Platanus occidentalisSycamore, Plane‐treeTree20Quercus falcataSpanish Oak, Southern Red Oak Tree8Quercus rubraNorthern Red OakTree32Viburnum dentatumArrow‐woodShrub Tree 20179130.3212557Color for DensityExceeds requirements by 10%PnoLS: Number of planted stems excluding live stakesExceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P‐all: Number of planted stems including live stakesFails to meet requirements, by less than 10%T: Total stemsFails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteer species included in totalTable 11c. Planted and Total Stem Countssize (ares)size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACREOverall Site Annual MeanStem countsize (ares)Species countsize (ACRES)Stems per ACREStem countCurrent Mobile Vegetation Plot (MP) Data (MY0 2020)

VEGETATION PHOTOGRAPHS 
Monitoring Year 0 

Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 3:  Vegetation Plot Data – Vegetation Photographs

Permanent Vegetation Plot 1 (04/21/2020) Permanent Vegetation Plot 2 (04/21/2020) 
Permanent Vegetation Plot 3 (04/21/2020) Permanent Vegetation Plot 4 (07/02/2020) 
Permanent Vegetation Plot 5 (04/21/2020) Permanent Vegetation Plot 6 (04/21/2020) 
Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 3:  Vegetation Plot Data – Vegetation Photographs

Permanent Vegetation Plot 7 (04/21/2020) Permanent Vegetation Plot 8 (04/21/2020) 

Key Mill Mitigation Site    
Appendix 3:  Vegetation Plot Data – Vegetation Photographs

Mobile Vegetation Plot 1 (North) (04/21/2020) Mobile Vegetation Plot 2 (North) (04/21/2020) 

Mobile Vegetation Plot 3 (North) (04/21/2020) Mobile Vegetation Plot 4 (North) (04/21/2020) 

         Mobile Vegetation Plot 5 (North) (04/21/2020)    

APPENDIX 4. Record Drawings and a Sealed As-built Survey

Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record Drawings
Surry County, North Carolina
Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040101
for
NCDEQ
Division of Mitigation Services
Title Sheet 0.1
General Notes and Legend 0.2
Project Overview 0.3
Stream Plan and Profile 1.1-1.23
Planting and Fencing Plan 2.1-2.9
Vicinity Map
Not to Scale
Sheet Index
Project Directory
Engineering:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc
License No. F-0831
1430 S. Mint St., Ste. 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Aaron Earley, PE, CFM
704-332-7754
Surveying:
Kee Mapping & Surveying
Box P.O. 2566
Asheville, NC 28802
Phillip B. Kee, PLS
828-575-9021
N
Owner:
NCDEQ
Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Drive, Ste 102
Asheville, NC 28801
Matthew Reid
919-707-8976
DMS Project no. 100025
Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040101
USACE Action ID: SAW-2017-01504
Record Drawings
August 27, 2020
T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AB-Cover and Notes.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaTitle Sheet005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE0.1August 27, 2020Surry County, NC
SITESiloam RoadKey RoadArarat Ro
a
d
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:10/06/2020
Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaGeneral Notes and Legend005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE0.2August 27, 2020T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AB-Cover and Notes.dwgOctober 6, 2020Pre-Construction Property Line
Pre-Construction Overhead Electric
Pre-Construction Power Pole
Pre-Construction Tree
Pre-Construction Pond
Design Thalweg Alignment
Design Major Contour
Design Minor Contour
Design Terracell 140
Cattle Crossing
Design Road over Culvert
Design Log Sill
Design Log J-Hook
Design Boulder J-Hook
Design Log Vane
Design Rock Sill
Design Cover Log
Design Rock Vane
Design Lunker Log
10+00
OHE
Existing Features Design Features
Design Various Constructed Riffles Per Plans
Design Brush Toe
Design Sod Mat
Design Brush Mattress
Design Boulder Toe
As-Built Features
CE CE CE
CE-XS CE-XS CE-XS
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:As-Built Thalweg Alignment
As-Built Bankfull
As-Built Major Contour
As-Built Minor Contour
As-Built Limits of Disturbance
As-Built Culvert
As-Built Fencing
Recorded Conservation Easement
Recorded Internal Crossing at Conservation Easement
As-Built Log Sill
As-Built Log Vane
As-Built Rock Sill
As-Built Log J-Hook
100
As-Built Various Constructed Riffles Per Plans
As-Built Brush Toe
As-Built Boulder Toe / Riprap
LOD LOD
X X
Monitoring Features
>>
VP#
Permanent Cross Section
Vegetation Plot
Photo Point
Crest Gage
Stream Gauge
Barotroll
PP#
CG#
100
Notes:
1. Deviations from Design will be shown in Red.
2. Both the As-Built surveyed thalweg alignment and Design Centerline are
depicted in this plan set.
3. The Design Centerline stationing is used for the profiles as well as project
credit stationing.
4. Pre-construction topography by Kee Mapping and Surveying March 16,2018.
5. Boundary survey by Kee Mapping and Surveying June 1, 2018.
6. As-built survey west of Key Road November 1, 2019.
7. As-built survey east of Key Road June 9, 2020.
CE
CS-XS CS-XS CS-XS
CE CE VEGVEGVEG
VEG
SG#
BT
0'150' 300' 450'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-West.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaProject Overview005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE0.3August 27, 2020N
Reach Reach Start End Station Type of MitigationNorthingEastingStation
Bull Creek R1A 967255.23 1526843.10 100+95 105+39 Restoration
Bull Creek R1B 966953.15 1527027.89 105+39 112+61 Restoration
Bull Creek R2 966864.77 1527613.64 112+61 116+79 Restoration
Bull Creek R3 966807.00 1528127.22 150+30 167+56 Restoration
Bull Creek R4 966185.55 1529301.19 167+56 174+39 Preservation
UT1A 968069.36 1527267.64 200+21 208+85 Enhancement II
UT1B 967430.25 1527721.40 208+85 210+97 Restoration
UT1C 967245.93 1527800.36 211+36 213+93 Restoration
UT2 965906.42 1527791.97 350+00 350+42 Restoration
UT2A 965925.08 1527767.27 300+00 303+15 Restoration
UT2B 966181.96 1527894.24 303+50 306+13 Restoration
UT2C 966402.88 1528032.86 306+13 310+82 Restoration
UT3 967436.62 1528615.63 450+38 450+56 Enhancement II
UT3A 967430.52 1528625.75 400+57 404+70 Enhancement II
UT3B 967094.08 1528563.75 404+70 407+77 Restoration
UT3C 966848.62 1528451.56 408+12 412+24 Restoration
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:09/29/2020UT3CECECECECECECECECECECE
CECECE
CE
CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE
CE
CE
CEC
E
C
E
C
E
CECECE CE CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
CECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
JASON ELLIOT SMITHAND MARCIA LYNNSMITHPIN: 5926-77-7725DB: 907 PG: 890PB: 19 PG: 146,TRACT 1
MARY L. HOLYFIELD HEIRSPIN: 5926-00-75-4818DB: 204 PG: 127REF.: DB: 167 PG: 581
ZACHARY NEIL HARDYAND SARAH SMITHHARDYPIN: 5926-66-6552DB: 1169 PG: 387
LINDA S. KEYPIN: 5926-00-77-7192DB: 302 PG: 610, DB: 385 PG: 465 &DB: 325 PG: 180REFERENCES FOR DB: 302 PG: 610 & DB: 385PG: 465TRACT 1 - DB: 124 PAGE 426TRACT 2 - DB: 149 PG: PG: 69TRACT 3 - DB: 117 PG: 278TRACT 4 - DB: 124 PG: 375, SECOND TRACT LINDA S. KEYPIN: 5926-00-77-7192DB: 302 PG: 610, DB: 385 PG: 465 &DB: 325 PG: 180REFERENCES FOR DB: 302 PG: 610 & DB: 385PG: 465TRACT 1 - DB: 124 PAGE 426TRACT 2 - DB: 149 PG: PG: 69TRACT 3 - DB: 117 PG: 278TRACT 4 - DB: 124 PG: 375, SECOND TRACT
DELANA SHINAULTPIN: 5936-00-07-5126DB: 1625 PG: 282REF.: PORTION OF DB: 239 PG: 676
HOMEPLACE RECREATIONAL PARK, INC.PIN: 5936-00-05-7889DB: 1025 PG: 756 TRACTS 1 & 2
& DB: 1201 PG: 1206PB: 19 PG: 29 & PB: 24 PG: 160405+00410+00SH
E
E
T

1
.
1
SHEET 1.2
SHEET 1.3
SHEET 1.4
SH
E
E
T

1
.
5
SHEET 1.7
SH
E
E
T

1
.
8
SH
E
E
T

1
.
9
SHEET 1.1
0 SHEET 1.11
S
H
E
E
T

1
.
1
2
SH
E
E
T

1
.
1
3
SH
E
E
T

1
.
1
4
SH
E
E
T

1
.
1
5 SHEET 1
.16SHEET 1.20SHEET 1.17SHEET 1.18SHEET 1.19SHEET 1.21SHEET 1.22SHEET 1.23BULL CREEK
U
T
1
BULL CREEK
UT220
0
+
0
0
2
0
5
+
0
0
168+00
170+00
STA. 408+12START UT3CXX
X
XXX X XXXXXX
X
X
XXMATCH LINE - STA 208+85XXXXXXXXX XXXSTA. 100+95START BULL CREEK REACH 1A
STA. 105+39END BULL CREEK REACH 1ASTART BULL CREEK REACH 1B
STA. 112+61END REACH 1BSTART REACH 2
STA. 213+93END UT1C
STA. 211+36START REACH UT1C
STA. 210+97END REACH UT1BSTA. 208+85END UT1ABEGIN UT1B
STA. 200+21START REACH UT1A
STA. 150+30BEGIN BULL CREEK REACH 3
STA. 116+79END BULL CREEK REACH 2
STA. 310+82END UT2C
STA. 412+24END UT3C
STA. 167+56END REACH 3START REACH 4
STA. 174+39END REACH 4
STA. 350+00START REACH UT2
STA. 300+00START REACH UT2A
STA. 350+42END REACH UT2
STA. 303+15END REACH UT2A STA. 303+50START REACH UT2B
STA. 306+13END REACH UT2BBEGIN REACH UT2C
STA. 407+77END REACH UT3B
STA. 404+70END REACH UT3ASTART REACH UT3B
STA. 400+57START UT3A
STA 450+56END UT3
STA 450+38START UT3
UT3AUT2A105+00
1
1
0
+
0
0
115
+
0
0
208+85
210+00400+00SHEET 1.6
15
0
+
0
0
155+00
160+00
165+00305+00
310+00KEY ROADXXXXXX
X
X XXXXX
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-West.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 1AStream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.1August 27, 2020Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
NOTES:1. STA.100+95-105+49: THE CHANNEL DESIGN WASALTERED AND REALIGNED DUE TO BEDROCK THAT WASPRESENT IN THE LEFT FLOODPLAIN WHICH RESULTED IN431 LF OF CONSTRUCTED CHANNEL, COMPARED TO THE454 LF IN ORIGINAL DESIGN.2. STA. 105+75: THE VERNAL POOL AT DEPICTED LOCATIONWAS NOT INSTALLED BECAUSE IT WAS NOT NECESSARYTO BALANCE ONSITE EARTHWORK VOLUMES AT THISLOCATION.
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:09/29/20201095
1100
1105
1110
1095
1100
1105
1110
100+95101+00 101+50 102+00 102+50 103+00 103+50 104+00 104+50 105+00 105+50 106+00100+95 101+00
DESIGN GRADE
AS-BUILT GRADE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECESHEET 1.1
XXXX X X X X X X X X X XX1
1
0
5
STA. 100+95START BULL CREEK REACH 1ARESTORATION
BULL CREEK REACH 1A BULL CREEK REACH 1B1110
11
0
7
1110
11061107
1108
PP1XS 1MATCH LINE - STA 106+00STA. 105+39END BULL CREEK REACH 1ARESTORATIONSTART BULL CREEK REACH 1BRESTORATION
>>>STA. 100+95BEGIN 431 LF DEVIATIONOF ALIGNMENT DUE TOBEDROCK IN LEFTFLOODPLAIN
STA. 105+49END 431 LF DEVIATION OFALIGNMENT DUE TO BEDROCK INLEFT FLOODPLAIN
111511101110
101+0010
2
+
0
0
103+0010
4
+
0
0
105+00106+00
SEE NOTE 2
LOG SILL ADDED TO IMPROVECHANNEL STABILITY THROUGH THEALIGNMENT DEVIATION.SEE NOTE 1.
BOULDER TOE REPLACED WITH BRUSHTOE DUE TO SUFFICIENT CHANNELSTABILITY FROM BEDROCK IN CHANNEL.SEE NOTE 1.
LOG VANE REPLACED WITH LOG SILLTO IMPROVE STABILITY WITH THEALTERED CHANNEL ALIGNMENT.SEE NOTE 1.
LOG VANE REPLACED WITH J-HOOK TO IMPROVECHANNEL STABILITY AT THE DOWNSTREAM ENDOF THE ALIGNMENT DEVIATION.SEE NOTE 1.1107
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-West.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 1BStream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.2August 27, 2020Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
NOTE:1. STA. 107+40: THE LOG SILL AND LOG VANE WEREOMITTED DUE TO PRESENCE OF BEDROCK.
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:09/29/20201090
1095
1100
1105
1090
1095
1100
1105
106+00 106+50 107+00 107+50 108+00 108+50 109+00 109+50
AS-BUILT GRADE
DESIGN GRADE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
X
X X X X X X X X X X
X
VEGVEGVEGVEG
VP1
11001105BULL CREEK REACH 1B
1105
1100
11001103
1101
110
2
11031106MATCH LINE - STA 109+50MATCH LINE - STA 106+001104
1105
1100105+00
1
0
6
+
0
0
107+00108+
0
0 109+00PP2
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-West.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 1BStream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.3August 27, 2020Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:09/29/20201085
1090
1095
1100
1085
1090
1095
1100
109+50 110+00 110+50 111+00 111+50 112+00 112+50 113+00 113+50
AS-BUILT GRADE
DESIGN GRADE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
STA 112+61END REACH 1BSTART REACH 2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
VEGVEGVEGVEG
1100 109511001095BULL CREEK REACH 1B
1095
1096
1099
1100
1
1
0
1
VP1
PP3XS2
MATCH LINE - STA 109+50>>>STA 112+61END BULL CREEK REACH 1BRESTORATIONSTART BULL CREEK REACH 2RESTORATION
11001100
1
0
9
5
1
0
9
5
109+00
1
1
0
+
0
0
111+00
112
+
0
0 113+00>>>XS3STA. 110+48: THE LOCATION OFXS3 WAS ADJUSTED AFTER THEAS-BUILT SURVEY WASCOLLECTED SO THAT IT NOLONGER SHARES A LEFT CROSSSECTION PIN WITH XS2.
1
1
0
+
0
0
MATCH LINE - STA 113+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-West.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 2Stream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.4August 27, 2020Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
NOTES:1. STA. 113+80: LOG SILL WAS SUBSTITUTED FOR ROCK SILLDUE TO LOCAL MATERIAL AVAILABILITY AND SITECONDITIONS.2. STA. 113+85: BRUSH TOE WAS SUBSTITUTED FOR BRUSHMATTRESS DUE TO SUFFICIENT BANK STABILITYFOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSEDCHANNEL.3. STA. 115+45: BRUSH TOE WAS SUBSTITUTED FORBOULDER TOE DUE TO SUFFICIENT BANK STABILITYFOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSEDCHANNEL.4. STA. 116+00: LOG SILL WAS SUBSTITUTED FOR ROCK SILLDUE TO LOCAL MATERIAL AVAILABILITY AND SIMILARFUNCTIONALITY.5. STA. 116+62: PHOTO POINT 4A WAS ADDED AFTER THESURVEY WAS COMPLETED AT THE REQUEST OF DMS TOCAPTURE THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT BREAK.
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:09/29/20201080
1085
1090
1095
1080
1085
1090
1095
113+50 114+00 114+50 115+00 115+50 116+00 116+50 116+79
AS-BUILT GRADE
DESIGN GRADE
CECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CECECEXXX
X
X XX
X
X XXXXX
X
VEGVEG VEGVEGVP2 10901095109010951
0
9
5
11
6
+
7
9
117+
0
0
118+00MATCH LINE - STA 113+501095 10921
0
9
0
1
0
9
2
1087PP4
PP15
XS10
2
1
3
+
9
3
2
1
3
+
0
0
>1
0
9
5
1
0
9
0
1095
10901
0
9
0
1
0
9
5
11
6
+
7
9114+0011
5
+
0
0
116+00>>XS4STA. 115+88: THE LOCATION OF XS4 WASADJUSTED AFTER THE AS-BUILT SURVEYWAS COLLECTED BECAUSE THE CROSSSECTION WAS INADVERTANTLYDISTURBED FROM CONSTRUCTIONEQUIPMENT DURING CHANNEL REPAIRSFROM A LARGE STORM EVENT.
STA. 114+32: CREST GAGEWAS MOVED UPSTREAMAFTER THE AS-BUILTSURVEY WAS COLLECTEDTO AVOID THE POSSIBILITYOF FALSE BANKFULLREADINGS IN THE EVENTTHAT WATER SHOULDBACK UP AT THECONFLUENCE.MATCH LINE - STA 113+50CG1
BULL CREEK REACH 2 CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSSTA 116+79END BULL CREEK REACH 2RESTORATION
PP4A
PP4C
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-East.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 3Stream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.5August 27, 2020Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:NOTE:1. STA. 150+50: PHOTO POINT 4D WAS ADDED AFTER THESURVEY WAS COMPLETED AT THE REQUEST OF DMS TOCAPTURE THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT BREAK.2. STA. 150+62: BOULDER TOE REPLACED WITH BRUSH TOEDUE TO LOCAL MATERIAL AVAILABILITY AND TO IMPROVEIN-STREAM HABITAT.09/29/20201072
1075
1080
1085
1072
1075
1080
1085
150+00 150+50 151+00 151+50 152+00 152+50 153+00 153+50 154+00 154+50
DESIGN GRADE
AS-BUILT GRADE
STA 150+30START BULL CREEK REACH 3RESTORATION
SHEET 1.5
BULL CREEK REACH 3
UT2CPP5
PP23
XS 5XS 6VEG>>>>>>>>>EXISTING 84" CMPINV IN: 1078.96INV OUT: 1078.30
PP61080
108010801085
108010801
0
8
0
1080
150+00
151
+
0
0
152+00
153+00
154+0
0 155+00CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
ECE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XS310+00310+824
1
1
+
0
0
X
X XXXXXXXXXXEXISTING 84" CMPINV IN: 1079.08INV OUT: 1077.99
PP4D
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

-

S
T
A

1
5
4
+
5
0
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-East.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 3Stream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.6August 27, 2020Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:09/29/20201070
1075
1080
1085
1070
1075
1080
1085
154+50 155+00 155+50 156+00 156+50 157+00 157+50
DESIGN GRADE
AS-BUILT GRADE
UT3CVP3
PP25
VEGVEGVEGVEG>>>>>XS 6
PP6
BULL CREEK REACH 3
10
8
0
1080
1075154+00155+00
156+00
157+00
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E 412+00X
X
X
X X
X
X
XXXXX
MATCH LINE - STA 154+50MATCH LINE - STA 157+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-East.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 3Stream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.7August 27, 2020Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:NOTE:1. STA. 157+72: BRUSH MATTRESS REPLACED WITH BRUSHTOE DUE TO TIME OF YEAR OF INSTALLATION. LOG VANEREMOVED DUE TO BANK STABILITY AND HABITATENHANCEMENT PROVIDED BY BRUSH TOE.2. STA. 158+22: PHOTO POINT 7 WAS MOVED AFTER THESURVEY WAS COMPLETED AT THE REQUEST OF DMS TOCAPTURE A DOWNSTREAM VIEW OF THE CULVERTCROSSING.3. STA. 158+40: ROCK SILL REPLACED WITH LOG SILL DUE TOLOCAL MATERIAL AVAILABILITY AND SIMILARFUNCTIONALITY.4. STA. 159+50: PHOTO POINT 8 WAS MOVED AFTER THESURVEY WAS COMPLETED AT THE REQUEST OF DMS TOCAPTURE AN UPSTREAM VIEW OF THE CULVERTCROSSING.5. STA. 159+84: BRUSH TOE WAS SUBSTITUTED FORBOULDER TOE AND LOG VANE REMOVED DUE TO LOCALMATERIAL AVAILABILITY AND THE BANK STABILITY ANDHABITAT ENHANCEMENT PROVIDED BY BRUSH TOE.09/29/20201068
1070
1075
1080
1085
1068
1070
1075
1080
1085
157+50 158+00 158+50 159+00 159+50 160+00 160+50
AS-BUILT GRADE
DESIGN GRADE DUAL 54" x 36"CMP ARCH PIPE
160+00XXXXX
XXXVEGVEGVEGVEG
VEG54" x 36" CMP ARCH PIPESTA. 158+71
U/S INV. :1072.68 (1072.80')
D/S INV.: 1072.42 (1072.47')
VP3 10751
0
7
5 10751075
1
0
7
5
>>>>XS 7
STA. 161+14: CROSS SECTION ANDCREST GAGE WERE MOVED AFTER THEAS-BUILT SURVEY WAS COLLECTEDBECAUSE THE CURRENT RIFFLELOCATION BETTER REPRESENTS THECONDITIONS OF THE REACH.
157+00
158+00
159+00
160+00
161+00CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECEBULL
C
R
E
E
K

R
E
A
C
H

3
STA 158+63BULL CREEK REACH 3START INTERNAL CROSSING
CG 5
X
X XXXXXXXXXXPP7
PP8
54" x 36" CMP ARCH PIPESTA. 158+71
U/S INV. :1072.68 (1072.75')
D/S INV.: 1072.42 (1072.59')
STA 159+13BULL CREEK REACH 3END INTERNAL CROSSING
MATCH LINE - STA 157+50MATCH LI
N
E - S
T
A
1
6
0
+
5
0
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-East.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 3Stream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.8August 27, 2020Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:NOTE:1. STA. 161+56: LOG VANE REMOVED AND BRUSH TOEADDED TO OUTSIDE BANK TO IMPROVE STABILITY FORTHE ENTIRE OUTSIDE BANK.2. STA. 163+30: LOG VANE REMOVED AND BRUSH TOEEXTENDED DUE TO AVAILABILITY OF MATERIALS AND TOIMPROVE STREAM BANK STABILITY AND HABITAT.3. STA. 164+47: LOG VANE REMOVED, LOG SILL ADDED ANDBRUSH TOE EXTENDED DUE TO LOCAL AVAILABILITY OFMATERIALS AND TO IMPROVE CHANNEL STABILITY ANDHABITAT.09/29/20201064
1065
1070
1075
1064
1065
1070
1075
160+50 161+00 161+50 162+00 162+50 163+00 163+50 164+00 164+50 165+00
AS-BUILT GRADE
DESIGN GRADE
165+00SHEET 1.8
VP4
PP9
PP10
VEG
VEGVEGVEG>>>>XS 810701
0
7
0
1
0
7
0
1070
>>>>XS 7STA. 161+14: CROSS SECTION ANDCREST GAGE WERE MOVED AFTER THEAS-BUILT SURVEY WAS COLLECTEDBECAUSE THE CURRENT RIFFLELOCATION BETTER REPRESENTS THECONDITIONS OF THE REACH.
161
+
0
0
162+00163+0016
4
+
0
0
165+00CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE CE CE
CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECG5
BULL CREEK REACH 3
MATCH LINE - STA 160+50MATCH LINE - STA 165+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-East.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 3Stream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.9August 27, 2020Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:NOTE:1. STA. 165+75: LOG VANE REMOVED AND BRUSH TOEEXTENDED DUE TO AVAILABILITY OF MATERIALS AND THEIMPROVED HABITAT PROVIDED BY BRUSH TOE.2. STA. 166+97: LOG SILL WAS SUBSTITUTED FOR ROCK SILLDUE TO LOCAL MATERIAL AVAILABILITY AND SITECONDITIONS.3. STA. 167+00: BRUSH TOE WAS ADDED TO IMPROVE BANKSTABILITY.09/29/20201060
1065
1070
1075
1060
1065
1070
1075
165+00 165+50 166+00 166+50 167+00 167+50 167+70
AS-BUILT GRADE
DESIGN GRADE
STA. 167+56END BULL CREEK REACH 3RESTORATIONSTART BULL CREEK REACH 4PRESERVATIONMATCH LINE - STA 167+70PP10
>>>>XS 810701
0
7
0
1
0
7
0
1070
167+56
16
4
+
0
0
165+00166+0
0
1
6
7
+
0
0
CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
BULL CREEK REACH 3
167+56
168+00
169+00
MATCH LINE - STA 165+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.10August 27, 2020T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-East.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 4Stream PlanSheet Index
N
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:09/29/2020STA 167+56END BULL CREEK REACH 3RESTORATIONSTART BULL CREEK REACH 4PRESERVATIONMATCH LINE - STA 167+70MATCH LINE - STA 172+00BULL CREEK REACH 4
PP11
167+
5
6
16
6
+
0
0
167+00CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEBULL
C
R
E
E
K

R
E
A
C
H

3
167+
5
6 168+00
169+00
170+00 171+00172+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.11August 27, 2020T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-East.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek Reach 4Stream PlanSheet Index
N
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:09/29/2020MATCH LINE - STA 172+00BULL CREEK REACH 4
STA. 174+39END BULL CREEK REACH 4PRESERVATION
PP11
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE171+00
172+00
173+00
174+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-West.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaUT1AStream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.12August 27, 2020Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:NOTES:1. STA. 202+26: POOL WAS NOT EXCAVATED DUE TOEXISTING PROFILE STABILITY.2. STA. 203+32: PHOTO POINT 12 WAS MOVED AFTER THESURVEY WAS COMPLETED AT THE REQUEST OF DMS TOCAPTURE A DOWNSTREAM VIEW OF THE CULVERTCROSSING.3. STA. 203+90: PHOTO POINT 12A WAS ADDED AFTER THESURVEY WAS COMPLETED AT THE REQUEST OF DMS TOCAPTURE AN UPSTREAM VIEW OF THE CULVERTCROSSING.09/29/20201105
1110
1115
1120
1105
1110
1115
1120
200+20 200+50 201+00 201+50 202+00 202+50 203+00 203+50 204+00
DESIGN GRADE
AS-BUILT GRADE
49'' x 33''CMP ARCH PIPE
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
200+00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X
XXXXX XVEGVEGVEGVEG1115
1115
1115
1115
1120
UT1A
1120
1123
1119
1120
1121
112
1
VP5
49" x 33" CMP ARCH PIPE (28 LF)STA. 203+47
U/S INV. :1110.6 (1111.05')
D/S INV.: 1110.3 (1110.65')
STA 200+21START UT1AENHANCEMENT II
STA 203+48UT1ASTART INTERNAL CROSSING
STA 203+79UT1AEND INTERNAL CROSSING
200+00
201+00 202+00
203+00
204+00
PP12A
PP12 MATCH LINE - STA 204+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-West.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaUT1AStream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.13August 27, 2020Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:09/29/20201100
1105
1110
1115
1100
1105
1110
1115
204+00 204+50 205+00 205+50 206+00 206+50 207+00
DESIGN GRADE
AS-BUILT GRADE
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
205+00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X
1115
UT1A
11201123
PP13
END INTERNAL CROSSIN
G 204+00205+00
206+00
207+00
PP12AMATCH LINE - STA 204+00MATCH LINE - STA 207+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-West.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaUT1AStream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.14August 27, 2020Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:09/29/2020CECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
XXXXXX X X X X X X XXMATCH LINE - STA 208+85VEG1105
209+00
STA 208+85END UT1AENHANCEMENT IISTART UT1BRESTORATION
208+85
207+00 208+00
UT1A
MATCH LINE - STA 207+00
1087
1090
1095
1100
1105
1087
1090
1095
1100
1105
208+85 209+00 209+50 210+00 210+50 211+00 211+50 212+00 212+50 213+00
DESIGN GRADE
AS-BUILT GRADE
57'' x 38'' CMPARCH PIPE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
END REACH UT1BSTA. 210+97 START REACH UT1CSTA. 211+36
SHEET 1.
1
4
SHEET 1.15 XXXXXXXX X X X X X
X
X
X
X
X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXVEGVEGVEGVEG
VP6
1090
109
5
10951100
1100
1105
1110
1115
MATCH LINE - STA 208+8557" x 38" CMP PIPE
ARCH (39LF)STA. 210+97
U/S INV. :1094.95 (1095.24')
D/S INV.: 1094.65 (1094.80')ROADWAY ELEV.: 1101
STA. 210+97END REACH UT1BRESTORATION
STA. 208+85END REACH UT1AENHANCEMENT IISTART REACH UT1BRESTORATION
UT1B
1
0
9
2
11041105
XS
10
209+00
210+0
0
211+00 212+00
213+00
>10
9
0
1095
1105
1110
1100
1100
110
0
1100
1
0
9
5
PP14
>>XS9STA. 212+62: CREST GAGEWAS MOVED UPSTREAMAFTER THE AS-BUILT SURVEYWAS COLLECTED TO AVOIDTHE POSSIBILITY OF FALSEBANKFULL READINGS IN THEEVENT THAT WATER SHOULDBACK UP AT THE CONFLUENCE.
STA. 211+36START REACH UT1CRESTORATION CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XS208+85210+0
0
STA. 209+24: CROSS SECTIONRELOCATED AFTER THE AS-BUILTSURVEY WAS COLLECTEDBECAUSE THE CURRENT RIFFLELOCATION BETTER REPRESENTSTHE CONDITIONS OF THE REACH.
UT1C
CG2
PP14B
PP14A PP15 MATCH LINE - STA 213+000'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-West.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaUT1BStream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.15August 27, 2020Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
NOTE:1. STA. 209+65: RIFFLE, ROCK SILL AND POOL WEREOMITTED DUE TO SUFFICIENT STABILITY AND SLOPE ONTHE REACH.2. STA. 210+83: PHOTO POINT 14A WAS ADDED AFTER THESURVEY WAS COMPLETED AT THE REQUEST OF DMS TOCAPTURE A DOWNSTREAM VIEW OF THE CULVERTCROSSING.3. STA. 211+57: PHOTO POINT 14B WAS ADDED AFTER THESURVEY WAS COMPLETED AT THE REQUEST OF DMS TOCAPTURE AN UPSTREAM VIEW OF THE CULVERTCROSSING.4. STA. 212+35: UPSTREAM ROCK AND ROLL RIFFLEBOULDER SILL WAS OMITTED AND RIFFLE WAS EXTENDEDTO CONNECT TO DOWNSTREAM ROCK AND ROLL RIFFLE.
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:09/29/2020
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-West.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT1CAs-Built Plan & Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.16August 27, 2020Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:09/29/2020NOTE:1. STA. 118+30: PHOTO POINT 4B AND 4C WERE ADDEDAFTER THE SURVEY WAS COMPLETE AT THE REQUEST OFDMS TO CAPTURE VIEWS ACROSS THE CATTLE CROSSING.
1082
1085
1090
1095
1082
1085
1090
1095
213+00 213+50 214+00
AS-BUILT GRADE
DESIGN GRADE
CECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECEXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
1090
1095
116+79117+00118+00 118+40STA. 213+93END UT1CRESTORATION
1
0
9
2 109010921087
213+93
213+00
>109
0
1090
1095 116+79116+00>>XS10C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
XS4
PP4B
PP4A
PP4C
MATCH LINE - STA 213+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-East.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaUT2AStream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.17August 27, 2020Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:NOTE:1. STA. 300+40, 302+25, & 302+83: ROCK SILLS REPLACEDWITH LOG SILLS DUE TO LOCAL MATERIAL AVAILABILITYAND SIMILAR FUNCTIONALITY.2. STA. 302+95: PHOTO POINT 17 WAS MOVED AFTER THESURVEY WAS COMPLETED AT THE REQUEST OF DMS TOCAPTURE A DOWNSTREAM VIEW OF THE CULVERTCROSSING.09/29/20201087
1090
1095
1100
1087
1090
1095
1100
300+00 300+50 301+00 301+50 302+00 302+50 303+00 303+50
AS-BUILT GRADE
DESIGN GRADE
42" x 29"CMP ARCH PIPE
1090
1090
1100
1100
STA. 350+00START REACH UT2RESTORATION
STA 303+15END REACH UT2ARESTORATION
42"x 29" CMP ARCH PIPE (34LF)STA. 303+15
U/S INV. :1089.48 (1089.85')
D/S INV.: 1089.22 (1089.13')
STA. 300+00START REACH UT2ARESTORATION
STA 303+50START REACH UT2BRESTORATION
PP16
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X XXXXXXXXXXX>>XS 11350+00
1100
1095
1095
1100
1105
1100
1095
UT2A CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
300+00
301+00
302+
0
0
303+00
304+00STA. 350+42END REACH UT2RESTORATION
SG1
BT
UT2
XXXXXX
X
PP18
PP17 MATCH LINE - STA 303+50
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-East.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaUT2BStream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.18August 27, 2020Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:NOTE:1. STA. 303+59 & 305+90: ROCK SILLS REPLACED WITH LOGSILLS DUE TO LOCAL MATERIAL AVAILABILITY ANDSIMILAR FUNCTIONALITY.2. STA. 303+90: PHOTO POINT 18 WAS MOVED AFTER THESURVEY WAS COMPLETED AT THE REQUEST OF DMS TOCAPTURE AN UPSTREAM VIEW OF THE CULVERTCROSSING.09/29/20201080
1085
1090
1095
1080
1085
1090
1095
303+50 304+00 304+50 305+00 305+50 306+00 306+50 307+00 307+50 308+00
AS-BUILT GRADE
DESIGN GRADE
1090
10
9
0
10901090
3
0
5
+
0
0
UT2B
X XXX>
>>X
S

1
2
PP19
STA 306+13END REACH UT2B
RESTORATIONBEGIN REACH UT2CRESTORATION
PP20
10
9
0
1090
1085
1085108510
8
5
1085UT2C
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CECE304+003
0
5
+
0
0
306+00 307+00308+00STA 303+50START REACH UT2B
RESTORATION XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XPP18MATCH LINE - STA 303+50MATCH LINE - STA 308+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-East.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaUT2CStream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.19August 27, 2020Sheet Index N0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:NOTE:1. STA. 310+33: ROCK SILL REPLACED WITH LOG SILL DUETO LOCAL MATERIAL AVAILABILITY AND SIMILARFUNCTIONALITY.09/29/20201075
1080
1085
1090
1075
1080
1085
1090
308+00 308+50 309+00 309+50 310+00 310+50 310+90
DESIGN GRADE
AS-BUILT GRADE
1084 UT2C
VEGVEGVEG
VEG>>>XS 13PP19
PP20
VP7
PP5 BULL CREEK REACH 31085
1085
1080 10851
0
8
0
10
8
0
10851085 1080150+00151+00152+00CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS
307+00308+0030
9
+
0
0
3
1
0
+
0
0
3
1
0
+
8
2
CG3
STA. 310+82END UT2CRESTORATION XXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
XXXXXXXPP4D
MATCH LINE - STA 308+00
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-East.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaUT2Stream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.20August 27, 2020Sheet Index
N
0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:NOTE:
1. STA. 350+08 & 350+27: ROCK SILLS REPLACED WITH LOGSILLS DUE TO LOCAL MATERIAL AVAILABILITY ANDSIMILAR FUNCTIONALITY.09/29/20201090
1095
1100
1105
1090
1095
1100
1105
350+00 350+50
AS-BUILT GRADE
DESIGN GRADE
RE
F
.
:

D
B
:

1
6
7

P
G
:

5
8
1
STA. 350+00START REACH UT2
RESTORATION
1100
1100
X
X
X
X
X
X XXXXXXXX>>350+00STA. 350+42
END REACH UT2RESTORATION
110010951100
11051100 1095UT2ASG1 CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECE300+00301+00302+00
UT2PP16 XS11BT
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-East.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaUT3 and UT3AStream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.21August 27, 2020Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:NOTE:1. STA. 401+64 - 402+45: THE CHANNEL DESIGN WASALTERED AND REALIGNED TO IMPROVE BANK STABILITYAND MEANDER PATTERN WHICH RESULTED IN 58 LF OFCONSTRUCTED CHANNEL, COMPARED TO 81 LF IN THEORIGINAL DESIGN.2. STA. 401+71 - 402+29: ROCK SILLS REPLACED WITH LOGSILLS DUE TO LOCAL MATERIAL AVAILABILITY ANDSIMILAR FUNCTIONALITY.09/29/20201089
1090
1095
1100
1105
1089
1090
1095
1100
1105
400+50 401+00 401+50 402+00 402+50 403+00 403+50 404+00 404+50 404+70
AS-BUILT GRADE
DESIGN GRADE
STA.400+57
START UT3A
ENHANCEMENT II
STA. 404+70
END REACH UT3AENHANCEMENT IISTART REACH UT3BRESTORATION
UT3A
PP21XX
XXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXVP8
40
0
+
0
0
401+00403+00
404+00
405+001105
1100
1100
STA. 401+64BEGIN 58 LF DEVIATIONOF ALIGNMENT TO
IMPROVE BANK STABILITYAND MENDER PATTERN
STA. 402+45END 58 LF DEVIATION OFALIGNMENT TO IMPROVE BANK
STABILITY AND MEANDER PATTERN
STA 450+38
START UT3
ENHANCEMENT II
STA 450+56
END UT3ENHANCEMENT II
450+00 CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
UT3
VEG VEGVEGVEG401+50
402+50
MATCH LINE - STA 404+70
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-East.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaUT3B and UT3CStream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.22August 27, 2020Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:NOTE:1. STA. 404+82, 405+06, 405+32, 405+58, 405+82, 406+59,406+85, 407+09 AND 407+35: ROCK SILLS REPLACEDWITH LOG SILLS DUE TO LOCAL MATERIAL AVAILABILITYAND SIMILAR FUNCTIONALITY.2. STA. 404+89 - 407+35: RIFFLE ELEVATIONS ADJUSTEDDUE TO THE UPSTREAM TIE IN ELEVATION BEINGCHANGED DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS.3. STA. 407+41: PHOTO POINT 22A WAS ADDED AFTER THESURVEY WAS COMPLETED AT THE REQUEST OF DMS TOCAPTURE A DOWNSTREAM VIEW OF THE CULVERTCROSSING.09/29/20201075
1080
1085
1090
1075
1080
1085
1090
404+60 405+00 405+50 406+00 406+50 407+00 407+50 408+00 408+20
DESIGN GRADE
49" x 33"CMP ARCH PIPE
AS-BUILT GRADE
49"x 33" CMP ARCH PIPE (32LF)STA. 407+77
U/S INV. :1080.12 (1080.17')
D/S INV.: 1079.85 (1079.89')
STA. 407+77END UT3BRESTORATION
1
0
8
5 10801085UT3B
PP22
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>>>>
>
XS
1
5
XS 14STA. 404+70END REACH UT3AENHANCEMENT IISTART REACH UT3BRESTORATION
STA 408+12START UT3CRESTORATION1090109
0 10851
0
8
5
1080
10
8
0
10901090
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CEMATCH LINE - STA 404+70CG4
405+00
4
0
6
+
0
0
407+00
408+00
409+0
0
410+00X
XXXXXX
X
X
X
X
PP24
PP22A
MATCH LINE - STA 408+20
0'20'40'60'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-East.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaUT3CStream Plan and Profile005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE1.23August 27, 2020Sheet IndexN0'2'4'6'
(VERTICAL)
1.1
1.2 1.3
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.8 1.9
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.5
1.10 1.11
UT1
BULL CREEK
UT3
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:NOTE:1. STA. 408+22: ROCK SILLS REPLACED WITH LOG SILLS DUETO LOCAL MATERIAL AVAILABILITY AND SIMILARFUNCTIONALITY.2. STA. 408+33: PHOTO POINT 24 WAS MOVED AFTER THESURVEY WAS COMPLETED AT THE REQUEST OF DMS TOCAPTURE AN UPSTREAM VIEW OF THE CULVERTCROSSING.3. STA. 411+86: ROCK SILL REPLACED WITH LOG SILL DUETO LOCAL MATERIAL AVAILABILITY AND SIMILARFUNCTIONALITY.09/29/20201070
1075
1080
1085
1070
1075
1080
1085
408+20 408+50 409+00 409+50 410+00 410+50 411+00 411+50 412+00 412+30
AS-BUILT GRADE
DESIGN GRADE
1085BULL CREEK REACH 310801085
155+00STA. 412+24
END UT3CRESTORATION
X X X XXXXXXXX>
>>49"x 33" CMP ARCH PIPE (32LF)STA. 407+77
U/S INV. :1080.12 (1080.17')
D/S INV.: 1079.85 (1079.89')
STA. 407+77END UT3BRESTORATION
PP23
PP25UT3C
1085108510
8
0
1
0
8
0
155+00156+00X
S

1
5
CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
C
E
C
E
C
E
407+00
408+00
40
9
+
0
0
410+
0
0
411+00 412+00
UT3B XXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
STA. 408+12START UT3CRESTORATION
CG4
PP24
PP22A
XS 6MATCH LINE - STA 408+20
T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaPlant ListPlanting Plan005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE2.1August 27, 2020Buffer Planting Zone
Bare Root
Species CommonName
MaxSpacing Indiv.Spacing
Min.
Caliper Size Stratum # of Stems
Alnus
serrulata Tag Alder 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 20% 0%
Quercus rubra Nothern Red
Oak 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 12.5%
Platanus
occidentalis Sycamore 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 20% 18%
Betula nigra River Birch 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 25% 18%
Quercus
falcata Southern Red
Oak 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 8%
Asimina
triloba Paw Paw 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 3%
Nyssa
sylvatica Black Gum 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 6%
Acer
saccharinum Silver Maple 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 3%
Fraxinus
pennsylvanica Green Ash 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 12.5%
Carpinus
caroliniana Ironwood 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 5% 4%
Viburnum
dentatum Arrowwood 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 5% 4%
Ilex opaca American
Holly 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 4%
Fagus
gradifolia American
Beech 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25”-1.0”Canopy 7%
Quercus
phellos Willow Oak 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25"-1.0"Canopy 20% 0%
Quercus
michauxii
Swamp
Chestnut Oak 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25"-1.0"Canopy 20% 0%
Magnolia
macrophylla
Bigleaf
Magnolia 12 ft. 6-12 ft.0.25-1.0"Canopy 5% 0%
100%
Permanent Riparian Seeding
Pure Live Seed (20 lbs/ acre)
ApprovedDate Species Name CommonName Stratum Density
(lbs/acre)
All Year Panicum
rigidulum RedtopPanicgrass Herb 1.0
All Year Agrostis
hyemalis
WinterBentgrass Herb 3.0
All Year Chasmanthium
latifolium
Indian
Woodoats Herb 0.4
All Year Rudbeckia hirta BlackeyedSusan Herb 1.0
All Year Coreopsis
lanceolata LanceleafCoreopsis Herb 1.0
All Year Carex
vulpinoidea Fox Sedge Herb 1.5
All Year Panicum
clandestinum Deertongue Herb 3.0
All Year Elymusvirginicus Virginia WildRye Herb 3.5
All Year Panicumvirgatum Switchgrass Herb
2.0
All Year Schizachyriumscoparium Little Bluestem Herb 2.0
All Year Asclepiassyrica
Common
Milkweed Herb 0.4
All Year Bidens aristosa Bearded
Beggartick Herb 1.0
All Year Eupatorium
perfoliatum Boneset Herb 0.2
Temporary Seeding
Pure Live Seed
ApprovedDate Species Name Common Name Stratum
Density
(lbs/acre)
Aug 15 - May1 Secale cereale Rye Grain Herb 140
May 1 - Aug15 Setaria italica German Millet Herb 50
Pasture Seeding
ApprovedDate SpeciesName Stratum CommonName
Density
(lbs/acre)
All Year Festuca
arundinacea Herb Tall Fescue 80
*All disturbed areas.
Pasture Areas Outside Easement
Streambank, Vernal Pool and Wetland Planting Zone
Herbaceous Plugs
Species Common Name MaxSpacing Indiv.Spacing Min. Size Stratum # of Stems
Scrirpusaltrovirens Green Bulrush 5 ft. 3-5 ft.
1.0"-2.0" plug Herb 8%
Juncus effusus Common Rush 5 ft. 3-5 ft.
1.0"-2.0" plug Herb 35% 40%
Calamagrostiscanadensis Bluejoint Grass 5 ft. 3-5 ft.
1.0"-2.0" plug Herb 30% 0%
Carex crinita Fringed Sedge 5 ft. 3-5 ft.
1.0"-2.0" plug Herb 13%
Andropogon
glomeratus
Bushy
Beardgrass 5 ft. 3-5 ft.
1.0"-2.0" plug Herb 4%
Caryx stricta Upright Sedge 5 ft. 3-5 ft.
1.0"-2.0" plug Herb 18%
Schoenoplectus
tabernaemontani
Softstem
Bulrush 5 ft. 3-5 ft.
1.0"-2.0" plug Herb 17%
Carex alata BroadwingSedge 5 ft. 3-5 ft.
1.0"-2.0" plug Herb 35% 0%
100%
Streambank Planting Zone
Live Stakes
Species CommonName Max
Spacing Indiv.Spacing Min. Size Stratum # ofStems
Physocarpus
opulifolius Ninebark 8 ft. 2-8 ft.0.5”-1.5” cal. Shrub 20% 10%
Cornusammomum Silky Dogwood 8 ft. 2-8 ft.0.5”-1.5” cal. Shrub 40% 30%
Salix sericea Silky Willow 8 ft. 2-8 ft.0.5”-1.5” cal. Shrub 40%
Cephalanthus
occidentalis Button Bush 8 ft. 2-8ft. 0.5" 1.5" cal. Shrub 10%
Sambucuscanadensis Elderberry 8 ft. 2-8 ft. 0.5”-1.5” cal. Shrub 10%
100%SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:Note:
·Planting contractor provided plant quantities
for entire site. Total plant quantities were not
broken up between shaded and unshadedareas.
Note:
·Planting Contractor provided plant
quantities for entire site. Total
plant quantities were not broken
up between streambank, vernal
pool and wetland area plantingzones.
·Herbaceous plugs shifted to
similar species due to quality of
materials available at nursery.
Buffer Planting Zone - Shaded
Buffer Planting Zone
Vernal Pool and Wetland Planting Zone
All Year Lobelia
cardinalis L.Cardinal
Flower Herb 0.4 0.0
All Year Liatris spicata Dense BlazingStar Herb 0.4 0.0
09-25-2020
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek WestPlanting Plan005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE2.2August 27, 2020N
Sheet Index
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:2.2
2.4
2.52.8
2.6
2.7
2.9
2.3
UT1
UT3
BULL CR
E
E
K
UT2
NOTES:1. DEVIATIONS TO THE DESIGN PLANTING PLAN THAT WEREINSIDE OF THE AS-BUILT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE ANDWERE PLANTED ARE SHOWN IN RED.2. DEVIATIONS TO THE DESIGN PLANTING PLAN THAT WEREOUTSIDE THE AS-BUILT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE ANDWERE NOT PLANTED ARE SHOWN IN GREEN.3. STA.100+95-105+39: PLANTING AREA ALTERED DUE TOBEDROCK THAT WAS PRESENT IN THE LEFT FLOODPLAIN.10-01-2020PLANTING ENDED AT LIMITSOF DISTURBANCE. EXISTINGFOREST TO REMAIN.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X XXXXXXLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
L
O
D
LO
D
L
O
D
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LODLOD
LOD
LOD
L
O
D
LODLOD LODLOD LODLOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECEBULL CREE
K

R
E
A
C
H

1
A
BULL CR
E
E
K
R
E
A
C
H
1
B
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek WestPlanting Plan005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE2.3August 27, 2020N
Sheet Index
2.2
2.4
2.52.8
2.6
2.7
2.9
2.3
UT1
UT3
BULL CR
E
E
K
UT2
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:NOTES:1. DEVIATIONS TO THE DESIGN PLANTING PLAN THAT WEREINSIDE OF THE AS-BUILT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE ANDWERE PLANTED ARE SHOWN IN RED.2. DEVIATIONS TO THE DESIGN PLANTING PLAN THAT WEREOUTSIDE THE AS-BUILT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE ANDWERE NOT PLANTED ARE SHOWN IN GREEN.10-01-2020BULL CREEK REACH 2
KEY ROADPLANTING ENDED AT LIMITSOF DISTURBANCE. EXISTINGFOREST TO REMAIN.XXXX
XXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X XX X
XXXXXX
LODLOD LOD LODL
O
D
L
O
DXLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LOD
LODLOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LOD LOD LOD
LOD LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LODLODLODLODLODCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-XS
CE-XS
CE-XS CE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSUT1CBUL
L

C
R
E
E
K

R
E
A
C
H

1
B
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek EastPlanting Plan005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE2.4August 27, 2020N
Sheet Index
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:2.2
2.4
2.52.8
2.6
2.7
2.9
2.3
UT1
UT3
BULL CR
E
E
K
UT2
NOTES:1. DEVIATIONS TO THE DESIGN PLANTING PLAN THAT WEREINSIDE OF THE AS-BUILT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE ANDWERE PLANTED ARE SHOWN IN RED.2. DEVIATIONS TO THE DESIGN PLANTING PLAN THAT WEREOUTSIDE THE AS-BUILT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE ANDWERE NOT PLANTED ARE SHOWN IN GREEN.10-01-2020BULL CREEK REACH 3KEY ROADXXXXXXX
XXXXX
LODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLOD LODLODLODLODLOD
LOD LODLODLOD LOD LOD
L
O
D
LO
D LODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LODL
O
D
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD
LOD LODLODLOD
XXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXCE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
-
X
S
CE
-
X
S
CE-XS
CE-XS
CE
-
X
S
CE
-
X
S
CE-XSCE-XSK
E
Y

R
O
A
D
BUL
L

C
R
E
E
K

R
E
A
C
H

3
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaBull Creek EastPlanting Plan005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE2.5August 27, 2020NSheet Index
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:2.2
2.4
2.52.8
2.6
2.7
2.9
2.3
UT1
UT3
BULL CR
E
E
K
UT2
NOTES:1. DEVIATIONS TO THE DESIGN PLANTING PLAN THAT WEREINSIDE OF THE AS-BUILT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE ANDWERE PLANTED ARE SHOWN IN RED.2. DEVIATIONS TO THE DESIGN PLANTING PLAN THAT WEREOUTSIDE THE AS-BUILT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE ANDWERE NOT PLANTED ARE SHOWN IN GREEN.10-01-2020BULL CREEK REACH 3
XXX
X
LOD
LOD
LODLODLODLOD
LOD LODLODLOD LOD LOD
LO
D
LOD LODLODLOD
LODLOD
LOD LOD LOD LOD
LOD
LO
D
LODLODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLO
D
LODLO
D
LODLODLODLODLODXXXXXXXXCECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-
X
S
CE-
X
S
CE-
X
S
CE-
X
S
BULL CREEK REACH 4
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaUT1Planting Plan005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE2.6August 27, 2020NSheet Index
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:2.2
2.4
2.52.8
2.6
2.7
2.9
2.3
UT1
UT3
BULL CR
E
E
K
UT2
NOTES:1. DEVIATIONS TO THE DESIGN PLANTING PLAN THAT WEREINSIDE OF THE AS-BUILT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE ANDWERE PLANTED ARE SHOWN IN RED.2. DEVIATIONS TO THE DESIGN PLANTING PLAN THAT WEREOUTSIDE THE AS-BUILT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE ANDWERE NOT PLANTED ARE SHOWN IN GREEN.10-01-2020S
A
F SAFX X
XXXXXXXXX X XXXXXXX X X X
X
X
X
X X
XXXXXXXXX X XXXXXXX X X X
X
X
X
LODLODLOD
LOD LODLODLODL
O
D
LOD
LOD
LODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LODCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CEUT1A
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaUT1Planting Plan005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE2.7August 27, 2020NSheet Index
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:2.2
2.4
2.52.8
2.6
2.7
2.9
2.3
UT1
UT3
BULL CR
E
E
K
UT2
NOTES:1. DEVIATIONS TO THE DESIGN PLANTING PLAN THAT WEREINSIDE OF THE AS-BUILT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE ANDWERE PLANTED ARE SHOWN IN RED.2. DEVIATIONS TO THE DESIGN PLANTING PLAN THAT WEREOUTSIDE THE AS-BUILT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE ANDWERE NOT PLANTED ARE SHOWN IN GREEN.10-01-2020BULL CREEK REACH 2UT1B XXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X XXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
XXXX
X
X
X
X
X XLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODX XXXLODLODLODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LODLOD
LOD LOD LODLODLOD
LOD
LODLODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSC
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
C
E
-
X
S
KEY ROAD
UT1C
UT1A
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaUT2Planting Plan005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE2.8August 27, 2020NSheet Index
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:2.2
2.4
2.52.8
2.6
2.7
2.9
2.3
UT1
UT3
BULL CR
E
E
K
UT2 10-01-2020UT2C
KEY ROAD
BULL CREEKX
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X XXXXXLODLOD
LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
LO
D
LOD LOD
LOD
LOD LOD
LOD
LOD LOD
LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
LODLODL
O
D
LOD
LODXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X X
X
X
X
XXXXXXXXXXXXLOD
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CECECECECECECECECECE-XS
CE-XS CE-XSCE-XSUT2A
UT2UT2B
0'40'80' 120'
(HORIZONTAL)T:\ACTIVE PROJECTS (NC)\005-02165 Key Mill\Cadd\As-Built\02165-AsBuilt-Planting Plan.dwgOctober 6, 2020Key Mill Mitigation Site - Record DrawingsSurry County, North CarolinaUT3Planting Plan005-02165ABP/JTCJCKAE2.9August 27, 2020NSheet Index
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:1430 S. Mint Street, Ste 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]Fax: [phone]Firm License No. F-0831Date:Revisions:2.2
2.4
2.52.8
2.6
2.7
2.9
2.3
UT1
UT3
BULL CR
E
E
K
UT2
NOTES:1. DEVIATIONS TO THE DESIGN PLANTING PLAN THAT WEREINSIDE OF THE AS-BUILT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE ANDWERE PLANTED ARE SHOWN IN RED.2. DEVIATIONS TO THE DESIGN PLANTING PLAN THAT WEREOUTSIDE THE AS-BUILT LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE ANDWERE NOT PLANTED ARE SHOWN IN GREEN.10-01-2020UT3A450+00 450+57
X
X
XXXX X X X X
X
X
X
X
X XXXXXXXXXXLOD
LODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LO
D
LO
D
LOD
LOD
LOD LODLODLODLODLODLOD
LO
D
LODLOD LODLODLODL
O
D
LOD
LODLO
D
L
O
D
LODLODLODLODLO
D
LOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
X
X
X
XXXCECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE
CE CE CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSCE-XSUT3
BULL CREEK REACH 3