20000874 Ver _Complete File_20100726

6. ,Y
NCDOT/P&E BRANCH Fax:[phone] Sep 1 '99 11:17
ss_`
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTNENT OF TRANSPORTAMN
P. 01
JANEs B. HuN'T JR. P.O. BOX 25701, RA1.1;1GK 14-C. 27611-5201 DAVID MCCOY
OOVEMMR SECUTARX
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & ,ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
FAX COVER SHEET'
DATE: ? l91
Please deliver thefololl-owing pages to:
Name:. I
Name: o
Name: LJ?u?d?
Name: oM / ?cr
7
Fax: -? ?D - 7-` 1-.L? 0215-
Pax: 9 19 -- r13,3 --' S
Fax:
Fax:
This Teleeopy is being sent by:
Name:
Phone Number: w? `i
Number of Pages (Including Cover Sheet): ?--? - -
If you do not receive all pages clearlyr call (919)%733-3141 as soon as possible.
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch Fax Number: [phone]
PHONE [phone] PAX(919)733-9150
NCDOT/P&E BRANCH Fax:[phone] Sep 1 '99 11:18 P.02
i?
10
looo?
SPECIAL Dl ,•? Q
? SEE PROFf.E
PE
.? ?
l i
/,2111 `,
0. 94#-00
D AM
>•2 ,
1 5. E
low
15 PjW
?' V ? AV ? ?
_NZ
nrrAL P.93
d , - «.f b.J v'?' X18 w 7
NCDOT/P&E BRANCH Fax:[phone] Sep 1 '99 1:18 P.03
1
? s • Vd.{,
rj n? .
a
/
?y.?,?•?
AW7V
,
7v 6w4rvok:
.00

? RIP -.:RAP
..
??? ` r
W (? Ls r??
? 1 ,

ram .,''..,J' F r I' o+'A
e
ir- s'7 e
• _? r
•

WED'' AkA
ROM
77171
-?
•?
,
W-. MdM,&,dGWff' W .
_ r?
Ul
TYPE '? ., ? `r
9bl rr ?-
`\
0 y • r
NCDOT/P&E BRANCH
s'? a
?J
P
Sep 1 '99 11:19 P.04
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTN ENT.OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HvNrT JR.
GOVERNOR
September 1, 1999
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Fax:[phone]
P.O. BOX 25201, RALI?1CK W.C. 27611-5201
Dave Timpy, USACE
John Hennessy, NCDWQ
David Car, NCWRC
Tom McCartney, USFWS
Jim Hauser :??A
Natural Systems Unit
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
Potential stream relocation for proposed Ellerbe bypass,
R-2231 BR, Richmond County.
Attached are the conceptual design plans for: a.potential: stream relocation which could be
implemented at station 92+20 to 93+90.4R-2231: B Please note that the potential
relocation would occur in an existing: wetland which.is, located on the west side of the
proposed alignment. The relocated channel would.be, approximately 150 meters in length
and could offset some of the expected impact at .this stream crossing. A new channel
would be excavated within the existing wetland. This wetland presently occurs as a
floodplain system along both sides of the existing stream. The plans, as presented, are
:only conceptual in nature and would be. €malized once detailed study of the relocated
stream is completed.
NCDOT would like to request a determination. from the resource agencies as to whether
this stream relocation is warranted and whether•it-could:be used as a mitigation measure
to offset projected stream impacts for R-2231 B.
cc: Charles Bruton
Hal Bain
Jay Twisdale
PHONE [phone] FAX[phone]

I
MAY-11-2000 10:06 NCDOT
919 250 4108 P.01i07
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HYDRAULICS UNIT
`?wrtrN FACSIMILIE TRANSMITT CO R SHEET
* * DAYE:
Please deliver the following pages to:
Name:
Of.
This facsimilie is being sent by:
Name:
Fax Number Called:
REMARKS:

is

IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES CLEARLY, CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
Our Telephone Number is: [phone] Our FAX No. is, (919) 250 - 4108
PLEASE COUNT PAGES, (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) TOTAL NUMBER
PAGES
MAY-11-2000 10:06 NCDOT
w
831
Q) t
r ?
l? 1
i SEE FALSE SUMP 1
919 250 4108 P.02i07
14_c6.__, c/t v
C C C
B DETAIL l

770;:1- 7 ` CABLE GUIDERAIL
? N 60 25'25.6" W
H '
3 SEE FALSE SUMP ORCHARD
? i
DETAIL

f? I

---t . r- F F F

i -SEE FALSE SUMP
DETAIL-
C C G -
? ? I
. r
c C C
I
I
!
1
i
i
MAY-11-2000 10:06 NCDOT
SEE FALSE SUMP
DETAIL
M C C
TYPE B ?.
/0N
0 EXTRA DEPT
^r_N 2,3I*00 2GI TYPE B
SEE FALSE SUMP
DETAIL
919 250 4108 P.03i07
j LATERAL V-D/TCH
SEE DITCH
1 DETAIL

la

N? ! o

r` - --I Nl

IgI /
M
N tT
< I
W
LL'
1
3:
Zu
?v
r
---?- __..?-_?_? - --- F 1
F ? F !
A c c
ORCHARD
c c
1
1
1

I w
T7C /RN c Ic I --a,
a
O W
O ?
U
1? •
Q ?
THOMPSON-ARTHUR PAVING CO.
I
"O/Tc ,
h
r
MAY-11-2000 10:06 NCDOT
r-
M
N
co
d r...
w
?z
1 cry
u1 LU
ua
u
W
919 250 4108 P.04/07
F F F
F?c
/6 ./

?l
Y/

F
O

Q LOG
co

W
w
?
N
1
MOME

v)
J e
? ? ? •00 -Y2-
15.000 (RT)
h 89.21 (RT)

a
GARY WELCH
D8.0273-0317
-YZ
P/ Sto 44}72.510
0 -15 08' 57.'
L = 938.640
T =472D73
R = 3,550.000
SE = NC
MAY-11-2000 10:06 NCDOT 919 250 4108 P.05/07
-F ` 18P 2? 5.? W F F F
N
Y '
N
1
O?
MA
EXTRA DEPTH CABLE GUIDERAlL l
2G! TYPE B 233'00 q-54 R c
SEE rALSE ( SUMP

GRAU Type 350
F F -
C ~1~ F F
c- C C C

c
L\ ?
-Y2- STA 48.60 RT - 46.85 4R-T_,_`?
f MAY-11-2000 10:06 NCDOT 919 250 4108 P.06i07
11 r ??
4- L;l
1 ? fI I l
1
CABLE GUIDERAIL
24 0
>`E SUMP i
GRAD Type 350
S?E? D M ?q fLBASL? DITCH
C
' -? -Y2-
"IN
C - C C C C
0.9m BASE TAIL DITCH
SEE DITCH DETAIL _
5m AT 5.0X
EST _... METRIC TONS --
CLASS B RIP RAP
3??8? EST - SM FILTER FABf
EST CM ODE
SEE DITCH L
EST - METI
CLASS B RIP
EST - SM f
MAY-11-2000 10:07 NCDOT
-`?
C N 70 51? 36.11 Vb -BL_
SPECIAL LATERAL V-DITCH /
SEE DITCH DETAIL 1.
v

Q1 Q Drm Al LAP P M7zM7

/ EXTRA DEPTH
/147,f / / 2G/ TYPE B
?,A+
w1 a
LATERAL 0.6m BASE_
SEE DITCH DETAIL _
F
C
EST
SEE FALSE SUMP
DETAIL
23?*00
57ell?#
CAT-1
SPECIAL CUT DITCH '
SEE DITCH DETAIL F 1 -
F ?-
r
r r
F ? .r
1,7 C
7 SPECIAL. U
_ ?..? r•- SEE DITCt
F C - C
C
/
'H
AIL
TONS / ?A''
?AP
.TER FARfa//e lice,
15.000 (RT) T
TOHS2r (RT)
ER FABRIC ?r 6j ?QF Q.
-00 -Y2-
!-v
?ye 32.000 (RT)
(RT)
•06 -Y2- 492P (RT
26.000 (RT)
85.30' (RT)
? Om BASE TAIL Dl
-4?- 2 m AT 1.
SEE DITCH DETAIL
TOTAL P.07
aM mA7g
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF "TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201,-RALEIGH, N.C. 2761 1-5201
GOVERNOR
2/16/00
Memorandum To: Jim Hauser
Natural Systems Unit
From: Abdul Rahmani
Hydraulics Project Engineer
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
Subject: Responses to Avoidance/Minimization Issues on US 220 in Richmond County;
TIP R-2231 B, CA, and CB
Section B (Design Plans)
Sheet 4 and 5
Station 93+40
Relocate stream along
east fill slope where possible
Response: Per email from David Timpy to Jim Hauser, offsite mitigation is preferred by Mr. Timpy
Sheet 8 Station 108+60 A larger perennial
channel occurs at 109+00
pipe as drawn appears
misplaced.
Response: Per discussion with Hydraulic consultant, the pipe is located correctly.
Sheet 15 and 16 Station 136+00 Include entire surface area of the
drained pond as a surface water
impact, not just that within the
fill slopes.
Response: A revised permit drawing and summary sheet reflecting the entire pond as an impact were
provided in August of 1999.
Sheet 17 Station 141+00 Include entire surface area of
drained pond as a surface water
impact, not just that within fill
slopes. Consider opportunties
for on-site wetland and stream
mitigation in drained pond.
Response: A revised permit drawing and summary sheet reflecting the entire pond as an impact were
provided in August of 1999. Per discussion with Jim Hauser concerning opportunties for
on site mitigation in the drained pond, he stated that due to the small size of the
remaining drained pond, mitigation would be pursued elsewhere.
Section CA (Design Plans)
?l Sheet 8
Station 190+80
Consider bridging to avoid
impacts.
Response: A bridge/culvert cost comparison produced the following cost difference: Dual Bridges
$3,633,000 vs. a double barrel culvert $441,000. (A difference of $3,192,000)
Dual Bridges would save 0.66 ha (1.6 ac.) of wetlands
Sheet 19 Station 234+50 Construct energy dissipator /
flow spreader at culvert outfall
to prevent blowing out stream
and wetland with stormwater.
Response: Per investigation by the design engineer, energy dissipation can be achieved with the
standard amount of rip rap at the outlet of the pipe and the additional rip rap lining of the
tail ditch that is reflected in the current design.
Section CB (Design Plans)
Sheet 6-11 Station 250-272 Shift road alignment more to the
West to reduce many small
stream crossings into one large
crossing.
Response: This concern was resolved in a separate meeting on 2/10/00.
Sheet 7 Station 255+20 Consider bridging to avoid
impacts.
Response: Alternate 1 would span all of the wetlands in this area and abridge/culvert cost
comparison produced the following cost difference: Dual Bridges $7,750,000 vs. a single
barrel culvert $220,300. (A difference of $7,529,700)
Dual bridges would span all of the wetlands and save 0.59 ha (1.5 ac.) of
wetlands.
Alternate 2 would span the majority of the wetlands in this area and a bridge/culvert cost
comparison produced the following cost difference: Dual Bridges $4,323,000 vs. a single
barrel culvert $220,300. (A difference of $4,102,700)
Dual bridges would span the majority of the wetlands and save 0.45 ha (1.1 ac.) of
wetlands.
If you need any additional information or have any questions, please give me a call.